CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Infant feeding methods are a major determinant of infant nutritional status, which in turn,

affects infant morbidity and mortality. Among feeding methods, breastfeeding is of

particular importance because this practice is fundamental for growth, development, health

and survival of infants. Diallo, Bell, Moutquine, & Garrant (2005) stated that about 5.6

million infants die annually because they do not receive adequate nutrition. Breastfeeding

therefore has been classified by scientists and health workers as the best natural food for

babies and breast milk contains all the necessary nutrients for the healthy growth of the

child. The benefits of breastfeeding are numerous ranging from providing the infant with

antibodies, to helping ward off risks of illnesses and providing the baby with all his/her

nutritional needs (Mundi, 2008). According to the World Health Organization (WHO)

(2004), breast milk provides all the energy and nutrients that the infant needs for the first six

months of life, and it provides about half or more of a child’s nutritional needs during the

second half of the first year, up to one third during the second year of life. Furthermore,

breast milk not only protects the infant against infectious and chronic diseases, but also

promotes sensory and cognitive development in addition to contributing to the health and

well-being of mothers, helping in birth spacing, reducing the risks of ovarian and breast

cancers as well as increasing family and national resources (WHO,2004).

Generally, breastfeeding is practiced all over the world, though with variation in duration.

Considering that the introduction of other food supplements at an early age often increase

the risks of infections to the infant which may at times lead to life-threatening conditions

such as diarrhea, the WHO and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
(2004), recommended that infants be exclusively breast fed for six months and, thereafter,

up to 24 months, introducing other supplements to support the infant’s growth and

development. In view of the many benefits afforded by mothers and infants in breast

feeding, governments have also set goals and rates for breast feeding practices. The

Nigerian government has earmarked six University Teaching Hospitals as Baby Friendly

Hospital Initiative (BFHI) centres, in Benin, Enugu, Maiduguri, Lagos, Jos, and Port-

Harcourt, with the objective of reducing infant malnutrition, morbidity and mortality, as

well as promoting the health of mothers. Since the inception of BFHI in 1991, a series of

programmes, seminars, workshops and conferences aimed at promoting breast feeding

practices have been organized. The BFHI itself has proved to be an effective method of

improving breast feeding practices worldwide (Salami, 2006). To further strengthen the

practice of exclusive breastfeeding, governmental so approved a breast feeding policy in

1998. The code on the marketing of substitutes of breast milk was reviewed and amended

in May, 1999, to further introduce stiffer fines and a clearer definition of breast milk

substitutes. These measures are aimed at increasing the rate of exclusive breastfeeding as

well as the early initiation of breastfeeding so as to achieve the World Summit on

Children1990 goal of universal exclusive breastfeeding for infants up to six months of

age (Mundi, 2008).

These measures notwithstanding, evidence showed that the practice of exclusive

breastfeeding (though fast improving) is still low in many parts of the world. In Nigeria,

the rate increased from 2% to 20% in infants 0-3 months and from 1% to 8% in infants 4-

6 months between 1990 and 1999 (National Planning Commission (NPC)/UNICEF,

2001). The Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) (2008), however, revealed

that 97% of Nigerian children under age five were breastfed at some point in their life. A

small proportion of infant (13%) were exclusively breastfed throughout the first six

months of life. More than seven in ten (76%) children of ages 6-9 months received
complementary foods. 16% of infants less than six months of age were fed with a bottle

with nipple, and the proportion bottle fed peaked at 17% among infant in the age ranges

of 2-3 and 4-5 months. However, less than half of infants (38%) were put to the breast

within one hour of birth and only 68% started breastfeeding within the first day.

Relatively, among children born in the five year preceding the survey in Anambra State,

showed that 97.8% of children ever breastfed. 64.1% started breastfeeding within one

hour of birth. 90.2% began breastfeeding within 1 day and 38.7% introduce pre-lacteal

feed. Only 0.5% children were exclusively breastfed. These proportions indicate a

marginal level of decline from the 1990, 1991, 1999, 2003 and the 2008 surveys (NDHS,

2008).

These dwindling attitudes regarding the practice of exclusive and non-exclusive

breastfeeding have been attributed to several socio-economic, cultural and socio-

demographic factors. Thus, this study purposed to examine the influence of demographic

determinants of exclusive and non-exclusive breastfeeding among nursing mothers in

Anambra State, Nigeria.

1.2 The Statement of the Problem

Breastfeeding practices have undergone tremendous medical, cultural and sometimes

religious challenges and debate. In an attempt to achieve successful breastfeeding

globally by the year 2000, the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s

Fund (1993), launched the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) in 1991. The BFHI is

a global effort involving 160 countries, of which 95 of them are in the developing world

where Nigeria is inclusive (Salami, 2006). This project is to support, protect, and promote

the practice of exclusive breastfeeding for six months and thereafter until 24 months of

age. Several medical literatures have also established the superiority of breast milk over

the other types of milk for the nourishment of the human infants, offering better health
benefits.

Although breastfeeding is universal in the country, the trend is towards giving other feeds

in addition to breast milk. Generally, the practices are more diversified and are

characterized by late initiation of breastfeeding, the administration of substances other

than maternal milk, and the introduction of weaning foods within one month following

the infant’s birth. The Nigerian Integrated Child Health Cluster Survey (ICHCS, 2003),

indicated that a major area of need in infant breastfeeding was early initiation. The survey

indicated a decline from 56% in 2000 to 34% in 2002. The Nigeria Demographic and

Health Survey (NDHS, 2008) reports, also revealed a 13% exclusive breastfeeding rate

which is a decline from 17% indicated in 2003 report. The 2008 report further revealed

that 34% of infants aged 0-5 months were given plain water in addition to breast milk,

while 10% were given milk other than breast milk. Only 32% of infants under 24 months

of age were still on breast milk.

Considering the percentage of mothers practicing breastfeeding, it should not be

surprising that Nigeria is still saddled with high incidence of malnutrition and its

associated infant mortality. Many factors have been adduced to influence these practices.

The decisions are very often influenced more by other factors than by health

considerations alone. According to Sika-Bright (2010), the factors which influence the

decision to exclusively or non-exclusively breastfeed include; mother’s marital status,

employment status, friends method of feeding their babies, social support and baby’s age.

Several other demographic studies conducted over the years (i.e National Demographic

Sample Survey (NDSS), 1966; Nigeria Fertility Survey (NFS), 1982; National Population

Policy (NPP), 1988; Integrated Child Health Cluster Survey (ICHCS) 2003; Nigeria

Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), 1990, 1999, 2003, & 2008; have also

identified similar factors to include; mother’s level of education, occupation, and income

level to influence mother’s choice of exclusive breastfeeding. While significantly

expanded in content, the primary objective of the previous surveys has been on emerging

issues such as awareness and behaviour regarding HIV/AIDS and other sexually

transmitted infection, poverty, gender inequality, fertility, mortality, nuptiality, awareness

and use of family planning methods, sexual activity, nutritional status of mothers and

infants, early childhood mortality and maternal mortality, maternal and child health and

of course breastfeeding practices. However, these factors are apparent in the studies

conducted over the years. The existence of a large scale of mothers practicing exclusive

and non-exclusive breastfeeding, and its associated causes remained elusive in the

studies. It is not definite or clear whether demographic factors significantly or

insignificantly influence the practice of exclusive and non-exclusive breastfeeding. It is

worthy of note that up till recently, the principal foci of attention has been demographic

factors and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding. None of the studies conducted over

the years concern itself much with demographic factors and the practice of exclusive and

non-exclusive breastfeeding of babies and Anambra State in particular. Therefore, the

study purposed to examine demographic determinants of exclusive and non-exclusive

breastfeeding among nursing mothers in Anambra State.

1.3 Research Questions

This study sought to provide answers to the following specific research questions:

1. Does mother’s age influence the practice of exclusive and non-exclusive

breastfeeding of her baby in Anambra State?

2. Does mother’s level of education influence the practice of exclusive and non-

exclusive breastfeeding of her baby in Anambra State?

3. Does mother’s occupation has any impact on the practice of exclusive and non-

exclusive breastfeeding of her baby in Anambra State?

1.4 Objectives of the Study

The main purpose of this study was to examine demographic determinants of exclusive

and non-exclusive breastfeeding among nursing mothers in Anambra State. The specific

purposes of the study are:

a) To assess whether mother’s age has influence on the practice of either exclusive or

non-exclusive breastfeeding of babies.

b) To assess whether mother’s level of education influence the practice of exclusive and

non-exclusive breastfeeding of babies.

c) To assess whether mother’s occupation has any impact on the practice of exclusive or

non-exclusive breastfeeding of babies.

1.5 Significance of the Study

The findings of this study would give an insight into areas where health education

campaigns are required to influence and promote the adoption of exclusive breastfeeding.

Specifically:

The findings of the study would benefit employers of labour to plan more appropriately

the period of time for lactating mothers in order that it may not interfere with their work

or working hours.

It would also make progress towards obtaining demographic data on exclusive and non-

exclusive breastfeeding among nursing mothers attending antenatal clinics in Anambra

State. This, in addition, will benefit nutritionists, health planners in Anambra State to

formulate policies and strategies that are geared towards the promotion of exclusive

breastfeeding on specific group of women and locations in which it is poorly practiced.

The findings of the study would benefit health workers to develop special intervention

measures on specific age ranges of mothers who poorly practice exclusive breastfeeding.

The findings of this study would help health educators, nurses, nutritionists and
curriculum planners to develop informed programmes for nursing mothers on the benefits

of breastfeeding. This in addition, would update the curriculum to educate students in

higher institutions of learning in preparing for future parenthood to adopt an effective

method of breastfeeding the infant.

1.6 Research Hypotheses

Based on the research questions, one major hypothesis and five sub-hypotheses were

formulated for the purpose of this study:

Major Hypothesis

Demographic determinants of nursing mothers do not influence the practice of exclusive

and non-exclusive breastfeeding of babies in Anambra State of Nigeria.

Sub-Hypotheses

1.6.1 Mother’s age will not significantly influence the practice of exclusive and non-

exclusive breastfeeding in AnambraState.

1.6.2 Mother’s level of education will not significantly influence the practice of

exclusive and non-exclusive breastfeeding in Anambra State.

1.6.3 Mother’s occupation will not significantly influence the practice of exclusive and

non- exclusive breastfeeding in Anambra State.

1.7 Basic Assumptions

On the basis of research evidence, the following basic assumptions are drawn for the

purpose of this study:

1. That low educational attainment of nursing mothers account for failure to exclusively

breastfeed the infant for up to 4-6 months.

2. That poor working conditions of nursing mothers caused the mother to discontinue

exclusive breastfeeding and introduce other feeds to complement breastfeeding.

3. That babies born to mothers in the highest level of income are less likely to receive a

pre-lacteal feed than babies born to mothers in the lowest level of income.

1.8 Delimitation of the Study

This study is delimited to the followings:

Demographic determinants of nursing mothers such as age, occupation, level of

education, level of income and family/friends views and the practice of exclusive and

non- exclusive breastfeeding of babies in Anambra State. Nursing mothers who attended

postnatal clinics in Anambra State.

1.9 Limitations of the Study

The findings of this research must be viewed in line of the limitations of the study. First,

the relationship between types of breastfeeding and the infant mortality and morbidity

were probably underestimated by some mothers as they did not attend post-natal care for

further assessment and possible advice by the health care providers. Such nursing mothers

were not included in the sample of the study. The study considered only nursing mothers

that attended postnatal clinics.

The study did not take into account the differences between the infants who were raised

by their biological mothers and those raised by significant others, and this could involve

some bias in the decision to exclusively or non-exclusively breastfeed the infant. Based

on this, the researcher convinced the nursing mothers to provide accurate information on

the method they feed their babies, as this was not to “witch hunt” them but was merely for

academic purpose.

Nursing mothers with astute traditional and religious beliefs were difficult to convince to

complete the questionnaire. However, with the help of the nurses on duty, they were

assured of the confidentiality of their responses, as the exercise was mainly for academic
purpose.

1.10 Operational definition of terms

Appropriate health seeking behavior- seeking prompt and appropriate care and

treatment for illnesses

Contextual factors - place of child delivery, type of child delivery, breastfeeding support

from family and breastfeeding support programmes/counseling.

Cultural factors – population beliefs, norms and local myths about breastfeeding and

infant feeding practices.

Exclusive breastfeeding-this means an infant is fed only on breast milk (including milk

expressed from a wet nurse) and allows for medicine, oral rehydration, drops or syrups

(vitamins and syrups) (WHO, 2008).

Informal settlement / slum- Living conditions in which a household lacks one or more

of these conditions; access to improved water, access to improved sanitation facilities,

sufficient living area-not overcrowded, structural quality/durability of dwellings and

security of tenure (World Bank, 2008).

Maternal factors - education, knowledge on breastfeeding, morbidity and breast health.

Socio-economic factors - defined by income, occupation and proxy indicators such as

ownership of items.

Partial breastfeeding- an infant receives breast milk and any food or liquids including

non-human milk and formula (WHO, 2008).

Predominant breastfeeding – an infant receives breast milk (including milk expressed

from a wet nurse) as the predominant source of nourishment and allows water and water-

based drinks, fruit juice, ritual fluids, oral rehydration salts, drops or syrups (vitamins,

minerals and medicine) (WHO, 2008).

Pre-lacteal foods – non-breast milk feeds given before breastfeeding is initiated (WHO,
2008). Post –lacteal feeds- non-breast milk fluids and foods given after breastfeeding has

been initiated
 CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Available research evidences related to demographic determinants of exclusive and non

exclusive breastfeeding among nursing mothers are reviewed in this chapter under the

following subtitles:

Concept of Breast and Production of Breast Milk

Exclusive Breastfeeding

Benefits of Exclusive Breastfeeding

Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Benefits of Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Challenges of Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Demographic Determinants of Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding and Mother’s Age

Breastfeeding and Mother’s Level of Education

Breastfeeding and Mother’s occupation

Breastfeeding and Mother’s Level of Income

Breastfeeding and the Cultures of the Nursing Mother’s

Stages of Breast Milk

Importance of Breast Milk in the Growth and Development of Infants

Basic Nutritional needs of Infants

Summary
2.1 Concept of Breast and Production of Breast Milk

Breasts are mammary secreting glands composed mainly of glandular tissue, which is

arranged in lobes, approximately 20 in number. Each lobe is divided into lobules that

consist of alveoli and ducts. The aveoli contain acini cells, which produce milk and are

surrounded by myoepithelial cells, which contract and propel the milk out. Small

lactiferous ducts, carrying milk from the alveoli, unite to form larger ducts. Several large

ducts (lactiferous tubules) conveying milk from one or more lobe emerge on the surface

of the nipple. The lactiferous tubules are distensible. Myoepithelial cells are oriented

longitudinally along the ducts and, under the influence of oxytocin, these smooth muscle

cells contract and the tubule becomes shorter and wider (Vorherr, 1974; Woolridge,

1986). As the tubule distends during active milk flow, it may provide a temporary

reservoir for milk (while the myoepithelial cells are maintained in a state of contraction

by circulating oxytocin). This is often shown diagrammatically and described as

lactiferous sinuses (or ampullae). These researchers (Fraser & Cooper, 2003), further

explained that the nipple is composed of erectile tissue which is covered with epithelium

cells and contains plain muscle fibres, which have a sphincter - like action (milk ejection

reflexes or let down) in controlling the flow of milk. Surrounding the nipple is an area of

pigmented skin called the areola, which contains Montgomery's glands. These produce a

substance which acts as a lubricant during pregnancy and throughout breastfeeding

(Fraser & Cooper, 2003).

Breast, nipple and areola vary considerably in size from one woman to another. The

breast is supplied with blood from the internal and external mammary arteries and

branches from the inter-costal arteries. The veins are arranged in a circular fashion around

the nipple. Lymph drains freely between the two breasts and into lymph nodes in the

axillae and the mediastinum. During pregnancy, oestrogen and progesterone (“mothering

hormones” responsible for milk ejection reflexes (MER)) induce alveolar and ductal
growth as well as stimulating the secretion of colostrums. Although colostrums is present

from the 16 week of pregnancy, the production of milk is held in abeyance until after

delivery, when the levels of placental hormones fall. This allows the already high levels

of prolactin (hormone responsible for suckling and milk removal) to initiate milk

production. Continued production of prolactin is caused by the baby feeding at the breast

with concentrations highest during night feeds. Prolactin is involved in the suppression of

ovulation, and some women may remain anovular until lactation ceases, although for

others this effect is not as prolonged (Kennedy, et al, 1989; Romos, et al, 1996). If

breastfeeding has to be delayed for a few days, lactation can still be initiated because

prolactin levels remain high, even in the absence of breast use, for at least the 1 st week

(Kochenour, 1980). Prolactin seems to be much more important to the initiation of

lactation than to its continuation. As lactation progresses, the prolactin response to

suckling diminishes and milk removal becomes the driving force behind milk production

(Applebaum, 1970). This protein accumulates in the breast as the milk accumulates and it

exerts negative feedback control on the continued production of milk. Removal of this

autocrine inhibitory factor (sometimes referred to as FIL - feedback inhibitor of lactation)

by removing the milk allows milk production to be stepped up again. It is because this

mechanism acts locally (i.e within the breast) that each breast can function independently

of the other. It is also the reason that milk production slows as the baby is gradually

weaned from the breast. If necessary, it can be stepped up again if the baby is put back to

the breast more often (e.g because of illness) (Fraser, et al,2003).

Milk release is under neuroendocrine control. According to Wong et al (2002), the nipple

is stimulated by the suckling infant and the posterior pituitary is prompted by the

hypothalamus to produce oxytocin. This oxytocin is the hormone responsible for the milk

ejection reflex (MER), or let - down reflex. This milk ejection reflex can be triggered by

thoughts, sights, sounds, or odours that the mother associates with her baby such as
hearing the baby cry. Many women reported a tingling "pins and needles" sensation in the

breasts as let down occurs, although some mothers can detect milk ejection only by

observing the sucking and swallowing of the infant. Let down may also occur during

sexual activity, since oxytocin is released during orgasm. Wong, et al, (2002), further

explained that oxytocin is the same hormone that stimulates uterine contractions during

labour. It contracts the mother's uterus after birth to control postpartum bleeding and to

promote uterine involution. Thus, mothers who breastfeed are at decreased risk for

postpartum hemorrhage. These uterine contractions that occur with breastfeeding can be

painful during and after the feeding, particularly in multiparas (more than one baby), for 3

to 5 days after giving birth. Prolactin and oxytocin have been referred to as the

"mothering hormones" since they are known to affect the postpartum woman's emotions

as well as her physical state. Many women have reported feeling thirsty or very relaxed

during breastfeeding, which may be due to these hormones (Wong, et al; 2002).

2.2 Exclusive Breastfeeding

In an effort to promote breastfeeding, the 54th World Health Assembly which met in

Geneva, May, 2001 affirmed the importance of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months. The

new resolution (Ref: Agenda item 13:1, infant and young child nutrition, A) 54/45 in

Paragraph 2(4) urged member states to (Baby Milk Action, 2001): support exclusive

breast feeding for six months as a global public health recommendation taking into

account the findings of the WHO Expert Technical Consultation on optimal breast

feeding and to provide safe and appropriate complementary foods, with continued breast

feeding for up to two years or beyond (Fraser, et al; 2003). Since then researches have

therefore shown that EBF for up to six months is associated with increased weight and

length gains.

The WHO/UNICEF (2007), defines exclusive breastfeeding as an infant’s consumption

of human milk with no supplementation of any type (no water, no juice, no non-human

milk, and no foods) except for drops or syrups consisting of vitamins, minerals, and

medications (nothing else) for six months and thereafter up to 24 months with timely

introduction of other supplements to support the infant’s growth and development.

According to Ekele & Hamidu (1997), EBF means no other drink or food is given to the

infant, and the infant is fed exclusively on breast milk from birth to 4-6 months of age.

This is also one of the cardinal components of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative

(BFHI) which is aimed at protecting, promoting and supporting breast feeding for optimal

maternal and child health. It has been shown for some time that exclusively breast fed

babies who consume enough breast milk to satisfy their energy needs will easily meet

their fluid requirements even in hot dry climates (Ashraf, et al; 1998, Sachder, et al;

2000). Extra water will do nothing to speed the resolution of physiological jaundice

should it occur (Nicolle, et al; 2002; Carvahlo, et al; 2001). The only constituents effect

of giving additional fluids to breast fed infants is to reduce the time for which they are

breast fed (de Chateau, et al; 1999, Fenstain et al; 1998, Herrera, 2000; White,2002).

In an effort to increase global breastfeeding rates, the WHO and UNICEF launched the

Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) in 1991. This initiative is comprised of ten steps

to successful breastfeeding with the aim of providing a health care environment for

infants where breastfeeding is the norm (Martens, et al; 2000). Maternity care facilities

must implement each of the ten steps to earn the designation of “baby-friendly” hospital.

Some of the steps of the BFHI include: “train all health care staff in skills necessary to

implement the baby friendly policy; help mothers initiate breastfeeding within 30 minutes

of delivery; give newborn infants no food or drink other than breast milk, unless

medically indicated; practice rooming-in by allowing mothers and infants to remain

together 24-hours-a-day; have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely

communicated to all health care staff; inform all pregnant women about the benefits and
management of breastfeeding; show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain

lactation even if they should be separated from their infants; encourage breastfeeding on

demand; give no artificial teats or dummies to breastfeeding infants; foster the

establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to them on discharge

from hospital or clinic’’, (DiGirolamo, 2001; Fraser et al, 2003). Studies have reported

that, as of October 2000, only 27 hospitals had actually completed the process of

becoming designated as baby friendly (DiGirolamo, 2001). In order to assess the effects

of the BFHI on breastfeeding rates and infant growth, 17 infants were followed for 12

months, and their weights and heights were measured at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Infants in the experimental group weighed more than the control group at one and three

months, and a similar trend was observed for gain in length. The authors concluded that

EBF accelerates weight and length gain in the first few months (Kramer et al., 2002).

However, this acceleration was not seen at 12 months (Cahill and Wagner, 2002b;

Kramer et al., 2002). A positive relationship was observed between infant growth rate and

fat, lactose, protein, and energy content of breast milk during the first six months of life in

a separate study (Mitoulas et al., 2002). Breastfed infants have slower rates of gastric

filling and faster rates of gastric emptying, which may contribute to growth rate (Heinig

& Dewey, 1996). Results of two randomized studies showed that EBF for 4 months

resulted in earlier development of certain milestones by the infants (Dewey et al, 2001).

Infants exclusively breastfed for six months crawled and walked sooner, compared to

infants who were exclusively breastfed for only four months. Similar results were

reported in another study conducted to explore the relationship between breastfeeding and

growth. One hundred and eighty-five children were followed from birth to 20 months.

Exclusively or predominantly breastfed infants, for at least four months, had significantly

(P=0.04) larger ponderal index increments compared to children who were not. Among

infants in a lower socioeconomic status (SES) group, those who were fully breastfed for
at least four months had larger length increments (0.59 cm) compared to children who

were not. However, these differences in ponderal index and length were not significant in

infants between six and 20 months of age. Investigators concluded that EBF may have

more benefits to the infant, particularly during the early months of infancy (Eckhardt, et

al; 2001). In another study by Onyango, et al; (1999), continued breastfeeding during the

second year of life was positively associated with growth in a cohort of 264 children, but

it was also seen that linear growth of these children was hindered by poor sanitation. A

study showed that prolonged breastfeeding (>24months) was positively associated with

linear growth during the second and third year of life in 443 African toddlers (Simondon

et al., 2001). Several observational studies have also found that breast milk keeps the

infant adequately hydrated, even in tropical settings, such that additional fluids, including

water, tea, and other liquids are not required by the infant when breastfed (Black and

Victora, 2002).

In addition to physiological benefits, a number of studies have shown that breastfeeding is

associated with positive effects on neurodevelopment. These advantageous effects have

been attributed to the presence of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human milk.

The fatty acids, ecosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), present in

human milk may be responsible for advanced neurodevelopment (ADA Reports, 2001).

Higher erythrocyte DHA concentration and better visual function was observed in full

term breastfed infants compared to formula-fed infants (Heinig & Dewey, 1996). A meta

analysis of 20 studies suggested that breastfeeding, compared to human milk substitute

feeding, was associated with significantly higher cognitive development scores in infants

(Anderson et al., 1999). In order to examine the association between breastfeeding and

developmental milestones, 1,656 infants were followed for eight months. Milestones

included fine motor skills, general motor skills, and language development. Results

showed that increased duration of breastfeeding was associated with increased mastery of
the milestones, and the authors concluded that breastfeeding benefited neurodevelopment

(Vestergaard et al, 1999). In a separate study, infants who were exclusively breastfed for

at least three weeks had fewer neurological abnormalities at nine years of age compared

to infants who were not breastfed (Heinig & Dewey, 1996).

2.3 Benefits of Exclusive Breastfeeding

In a scientific research such as the studies conducted by the US Agency for Healthcare

Research and Quality (AHRQ), (2007) and WHO, (2007) revealed quite a number of

benefits to exclusive breastfeeding for both the infant and the mother asfollows:

Greater immune health

During breastfeeding, antibodies pass to the baby. This is one of the most important

features of colostrums (the breast milk created for newborns). Breast milk contains

several anti-infective factors such as bile salt stimulated lipase (protecting against

amoebic infections, lactoferrin (which binds to iron and inhibits the growth of intestinal

bacteria and immunoglobulin A (IgA) protecting against microorganisms (AHRQ, 2007;

WHO, 2007) breast milk also enhances maturation of the gastro intestinal (GI) tract and

contains immune factors that contribute to a lower incidence of diarrheal illness, and

celiac diseases (Barnad, 1997; Lopez-Alarcon, Villapando, and Fajardo, 1997; Scariah;

Grummer-Strawn, and Fein, 1997).

Lesser infections

Breastfed infants receive specific antibodies and cell-mediated immunologic factors that

help protect against Otitis media, respiratory illness such as respiratory syncytial virus

and pneumonia, urinary tract infections, bacteria and bacterial meningitis (Cushing, et al;

1998; Lopez, 1997). Among other studies showing that breast fed infants have a lower

risk of infection than non-breastfed infants are:

 • In a 1993 university of Texas Medical Branch Study, a longer period of

breastfeeding was associated with a shorter duration of some middle ear infections

(Otitis media) in the first two years of life.

• A 1995 study of 87 infants found that breastfed babies had half the incidence of

diarrheal illness, 19% fewer cases of any otitis media infection, and 80% fewer

prolonged cases of otitis media than formula fed babies in the first twelve months

of life.

• Breastfeeding appear to reduce symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in

premature infants up to seven months after release from hospital in 2002 study of

39 infants.

• A 2004 case-control study found that breastfeeding reduced the risk of acquiring

urinary tract infections in infants up to seven months of age, with the protection

strongest immediately after birth.

• Breastfeeding reduces the risk of acute otitis media, non-specific gastro enteritis,

and severe lower respiratory tract infections.

Reduced sudden infant death syndrome

Breastfed infants are less likely to die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) (Ford &

Kelsey, 1993). Breastfed babies have better arousal from sleep at 2-3 months. This

coincides with the peak incidence of sudden infant death syndrome. A study conducted at

the university of Munster found that breastfeeding halved the risk of sudden infant death

syndrome in children up to the age of two.

Less diabetes

Infants exclusively breastfed have less chance of developing diabetes mellitus type 1 than

peers with a shorter duration of breastfeeding and an earlier exposure to cow milk and

solid foods. Breastfeeding also appears to protect against diabetes mellitus type 2, at least

in part due to its effects on the child’s weight (AHRQ, 2007; WHO, 2007). Ricci (2007)
stated that breastfeeding exclusively is associated with avoidance of type 2 diabetes and

heart disease. Breastfeeding may also have a protective effect against childhood

lymphoma and insulin-dependent diabetes (Davis, 1998; Gerstein, 1994).

Less child obesity

Breastfeeding appears to reduce the risk of extreme obesity in children aged 39 to 42

months. The protective effect of breastfeeding against obesity is consistent, though small,

across many studies and appears to increase with the duration of breastfeeding (AHRQ,

2007; WHO, 2007). According to a report of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

(2006a, 2006b) exclusive breastfeeding is less likely to result in overfeeding, leading to

obesity. A study has also shown that infants who are bottle fed in early infancy are more

likely to empty the bottle or cup in late infancy than those who are breastfed. Bottle

feeding, regardless of the type of milk is distinct from feeding at the breast in its effect on

infants self-regulation of milk intake. According to the study, this may be due to one of

three possible factors, including that when bottle feeding, parents may encourage an

infant to finish the contents of the bottle whereas when breastfeeding, an infant naturally

develops self-regulation of milk intake. A study in today’s pediatrics associates solid

foods given too early to formula-fed babies before 4 months old will make them 6 times

as likely to become obese by age three. It does not happen if the babies were given solid

foods with breastfeeding (AHRQ, 2007; WHO, 2007).

Less tendency to develop allergic disease (atopy)

There is a lower incidence of allergy among breastfed infants from families at high risk.

Allergic manifestations occur at a greater rate and are more severe in formula fed infants

(Halken and Host, 1996). In children who are at risk for developing allergic diseases

(defined as at least one parent or sibling having atopy), atopic syndrome can be prevented

or delayed through exclusive breastfeeding for four months, though these benefits may

not be present after four months of age. However, the key factor may be the age which
non-breast milk is introduced rather than duration of breastfeeding. Atopic dermatitis, the

most common form of eczema can be reduced through exclusive breastfeeding beyond 12

weeks in individuals with a family history of atopy, but when breastfeeding beyond 12

weeks is combined with other foods incidents of eczema rise irrespective of family

history.

Less necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an acute inflammatory disease in the intestines of

infants. Necrosis or death of intestinal tissue may follow. It is mainly found in premature

births. In one study of 926 preterm infants, NEC developed in 51 infants (55%). The

death rate from necrotizing enterocolitis was 26% NEC was found to be six to ten times

more common in infants fed formula exclusively, and three times more common in

infants fed a mixture of breast milk and formula, compared with exclusive breastfeeding.

In infants born at more than 30 weeks, NEC was twenty times more common in infants

exclusively on formula. A 2007 meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials found

a marginally statistically significant association between breastfeeding and a reduction in

the risk of NEC.

Other long term health effects

Breastfeeding may decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in later life, as indicated

by lower cholesterol and C-reactive protein levels in adult women who has been breastfed

as infants. Although a 2001 study suggested that adults who had been breastfed as infants

had lower arterial dispensability than adults who had not been breastfed as infants, the

report concluded that breastfed infants “experienced lower mean blood pressure” later in

life. It further stated that there is an association between a history of breastfeeding during

infancy and a small reduction in adult blood pressure, but the clinical or public health

implication of this finding is unclear. A 2006 study found that breastfed babies are better

able to cope with stress later in life (AHRQ, 2007, WHO, 2007).
Intelligence

Studies have examined whether breastfeeding in infants is associated with higher

intelligence later in life. Possible association between breastfeeding and intelligence is not

clear. The 2007 review for the AHRQ found no relationship between breastfeeding in

term infants and cognitive performance. However, the 2007 review for the WHO suggests

that breastfeeding is associated with increased cognitive development in childhood. The

review also states that the issue remains of whether the association is related to the

properties of breast milk itself, or whether breastfeeding enhances the bonding between

mothers and thus contributes to intellectual development.

Horwood, Darlow and Mogridge (2001), tested the intelligence quotient (IQ) scores of

280 low birth weight children at seven or eight years of age. Those who were breastfed

for more than eight months had verbal IQ score 6 points higher (which was significantly

higher) than comparable children breastfed for less time. They concluded “These findings

add to a growing body of evidence to suggest that breast milk feeding may have small

long term benefits for child cognitive development.

In 2006, Der and others, having performed a prospective cohort study, sibling pairs

analysis and meta-analysis, concluded that breastfeeding has little or no effect on

intelligence that breastfeeding has little or no effect on intelligence in children. The

researchers found that most of the observed association between breast feeding and

cognitive development is the result of confounding by maternal intelligence (AHRQ,

2007; WHO, 2007).

Breastfeeding is a cost effective way of feeding an infant, providing nourishment for the

infant at a less cost to the mother. Frequent and exclusive breastfeeding can delay the

return of fertility through lactational amenorrhea, though breastfeeding is an imperfect

means of birth control (AHRQ, 2007).

Bonding

Breastfeeding provides a unique bonding experience and increase maternal role

attainment (Lawrence, 1999). During breastfeeding, hormones are released to help

strengthen the maternal bond. Support for a mother while breastfeeding can assist in

familiar bonds and help build a paternal bond between father and child.

Hormone release

Breastfeeding releases oxytocin and prolactin hormones that relax the mother and make

her feel more nurturing toward her baby. Breastfeeding soon after giving birth increases

the mother’s oxytocin levels, making her uterus contract more quickly and reducing

bleeding. (AHRQ, 2007; WHO, 2007). Breastfeeding also decreases risk of postpartum

hemorrhage (Lawrence 1999; Ricci, 2007).

Weight loss

Mothers who are breastfeeding tend to return to the pre-pregnancy weight more quickly

(Dewey, Heining & Nommsen, 1993). As the fat accumulated during pregnancy, is used

to produce milk, extend breastfeeding for at least 6 months can help mothers’ lose their

weight. However, weight loss is highly variable among lactating women; monitoring the

diet and increasing the amount/intensity of exercise are more reliable ways of losing

weight. The 2007 review for the AHRQ found the effect of breastfeeding in mothers on

returning to pre- pregnancy weight was negligible, and the effect of breastfeeding on

postpartum weight loss was unclear”.

Natural postpartum infertility

Breastfeeding may delay the return to fertility for some women by suppressing ovulation.

A breastfeeding woman may not ovulate or have regular periods, during the entire

lactation period. Though the period in which ovulation is absent differs in each woman.

This lactation amenorrhea has been used as an imperfect form of natural contraception

with greater than 98% effectiveness during the first six month after birth if specific
nursing behaviours are followed. It is possible for women to ovulate within two months

after birth while fully breastfeeding and get pregnant again (AHRQ & WHO, 2007).

According to Pryor & Huggins (2007), breastfeeding can afford some protection against

conception, although it is not a reliable contraception method.

Other long term heath effects

Women who have breastfed have a decrease risk of ovarian, uterine and breast cancer

(Enger 1998; Rosenblett & Thomas, 1995). A 2007 study indicated that lactation for at

least 24 months is associated with 23% lower risk of coronary heart diseases (AHRQ &

WHO, 2007). Although the review found no relationship between history of lactation and

the risk of osteoporosis, mothers who breastfeed longer than eight months benefit from

bone re- mineralization. Also breastfeeding diabetic mothers require less insulin.

According to Malmo University study published in 2009, women who breastfed for a

longer duration have a lower risk for contracting rheumatoid arthritis than women who

breastfed for a shorter duration or who had never breastfed.

2.4 Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Commercial formulas are produced to replace or supplement breast milk. Formulas are

sometimes called “breast milk substitutes” or „artificial breast milk’ because

manufacturers must adapt them to correspond to the components in breast milk as much

as possible. According to Fraser et al (2003), it is an offence under law to sell any infant

formula as being suitable for the newborn unless it meets the compositional and other

criteria set out in the infant formula and follow-on formula regulations. The researchers,

further stress that despite the claims made by formula manufacturers, there is no obvious

scientific basis on which to recommend one brand over another. There is no necessity for

the mother to stick to one brand, especially if she finds that one brand seems to disagree

with her baby, she should try switching brands. This has been made easier by the
availability of ready-to-feed sachets and cartons, as with these, mothers can experiment

without having to buy large quantities. Babies with underlying metabolic disorders, such

as galactasoemia or phenylketonia will need the appropriate prescribed breast milk

substitute. Nevertheless, though artificial milk may be highly processed, factory produced

product, inevitably there will from time to time be inadvertent errors. Recorded errors in

the past include too much or too little of an ingredient, accidental contamination,

incorrect labeling and foreign bodies (Fraser, et al, 2003). Therefore, according to Bobak,

et al (1989), mothers should be advised to inspect the contents of the tin or packet before

using it and if it looks or smells strange, return it to the place it was purchased.

Nevertheless, physicians who recommend formula’s for infant feeding should provide

written instructions as to the amount of formula to be fed the infant over 24 hours and

when to increase the amount to ensure meeting the growing infant nutrition needs.

Ricci (2009), however, opined that formula feeding requires more than just opening,

pouring, and feeding. Parents need information about the types of formula available,

preparation and storage of formula, equipment, feeding positions and the amount to feed

their new born. The mother also needs to know how to prevent lactation.

Non-exclusive breastfeeding therefore means breast milk along with infant formula, baby

food and even water, depending on the age of the child. The decision to feed a baby infant

formula may be the result of the mother’s or partner’s personal preference, the influence

of other significant factors such as maternal age, mother’s level of education,

employment, income level, family members, or simply a lack of familiarity with breast

feeding. Occasionally, there is no other option, the mother may have extensive breast

scarring or may have a bilateral mastectomy; the mother may be taking medications that

prelude breastfeeding; or the baby may be adopted (some mothers are able to include

lactation for an adopted baby). Rarely an infant may have galactosemia and must be fed

lactose-free formula (Wong, et al; 2002). According to McKinney, et al; (2009), some
women are simply embarrassed by breastfeeding, seeing the breasts only in a sexual

context. Many mothers have little experience with family or friends who have breast fed

infants. The woman’s partner or mother may not be supportive of breastfeeding.

Occasionally a woman requires medications that would harm the infant. A frequent

reason that mothers choose formula feeding instead of breastfeeding is lack of adequate

understanding and education about the two methods.

The decline in the practice of breastfeeding, such as in developed countries like the U.S.,

has been observed in developing countries as well including Nigeria (Galler et al., 1998).

Sub-optimal breastfeeding practices still prevail in many countries, especially in rural

communities. A study that examined infant feeding practices in 12 rural communities

revealed that delayed initiation of breastfeeding, prelacteal feeding, and failure to practice

EBF were widespread. Moreover, colostrums was considered “hot milk” causing diarrhea

and stomach pain, and thus was not given to infants (Semega-Janneh, et al; 2001). In a

study conducted with 136 women, it was observed that stress during labour and delivery

was associated with delayed onset of lactation (Grajeda & Perez-Escamilla, 2002).

A study conducted to assess breastfeeding knowledge and beliefs among adults revealed

that in addition to having inadequate knowledge about the benefits of EBF, employment

was one of the primary factors affecting breastfeeding (Bovell-Benjamin, et al; 2001). A

study conducted with 222 mothers to assess their attitudes about and barriers to

breastfeeding showed that mothers perceived breastfeeding to be time consuming. They

also thought that breast milk was insufficient for the infant (Cohen, et al; 1999). This

decrease in 0breastfeeding rates around the world has led to serious implications for

infant health in developing countries (Amador, et al; 1994). This decline in EBF has led

to an increase in the prevalence of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) (Scarlett, et al;

1996). Lack of support from a significant other and negative attitude of the significant

other toward breastfeeding have been observed as major predictors of bottle feeding.
Fathers who support bottle feeding are more likely to believe that “breastfeeding is bad

for the breasts and interferes with sex” (Losch, et al; 1995).

2.5 Benefits of Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding is considered the best nutritional option for babies by the major medical

organizations, but it is not right for every mother. Commercially prepared infant formulas

are a nutritious alternative to breast milk, and even contain some vitamins and nutrients

that breastfed babies, need to get from supplements. Manufacturers under sterile

conditions, commercial formulas attempt to duplicate mother’s milk using a complex

combination of proteins, sugars, fat and vitamins that would be virtually impossible to

create at home. So if you do not breastfeed your baby, it is important that you see only a

commercially prepared formula and that you do not try to create your own (Hirsh, 2008c).

In addition to medical concerns that may prevent breastfeeding, for some women,

breastfeeding may be too difficult, stressful or demanding. In a review by Hirsh (2008)

found the following benefits of formula feeding.

Convenience: Either parents (or another Caregiver) can feed the baby a bottle at anytime

(although this is true for women who pump their breast milk). This allows the mother to

feel more involved in the crucial feeding process and the bonding that often comes with

it.

Flexibility: Once the bottles are made a formula feeding mother can leave her baby with

a partner or caregiver and know that her little ones’ feedings are taken care of. There is no

need to pump or to schedule work or other obligations and activities around the baby’s

feeding schedule. And formula feeding mothers do not need to find a private place to

nurse in public. However, if mother is out and about with baby, she will need to bring

supplies for making bottles.

Time and frequency of feeding: Because formula digests slower than breast milk,
formula fed babies usually need to eat less often than do breastfed babies.

Diet: Women who opt for formula feed do not have to worry about the things they eat or

drink that could affect their babies.

2.6 Challenges of Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

As with breastfeeding, there are some challenges to consider when deciding whether to

formula feed.

Organization and preparation: Enough formula must be on hand at all times and bottles

must be prepared. The powdered and condensed formulas must be prepared with sterile

water (which needs to be boiled until the baby is at least 6 months old). Ready to feed

formulas that can be poured directly into a bottle without any mixing of water tend to be

expensive. Bottles and nipples need to be sterilized before the first use and then washed

after every use (this is also true for the breast feeding women who give their babies

bottles of pumped breast milk). Bottles and nipples can transmit bacteria if they are not

cleaned properly. Bottles left out of the refrigerator longer than 1 hour and any formula

that a baby does not finish must be thrown out. And prepared bottles of formula should be

stored in the refrigerator for longer than 24 to 48 hours (check the formula label for

complete information). Some parents warm bottles up before feeding the baby, although

this often is not necessary. The microwave should never be used to warm a baby’s bottle

because it can create a dangerous „hot spots’. Instead, run refrigerator bottles under warm

water for a few months if the baby prefers a warm bottle to a cold one. Or the baby’s

bottles can be put in a pan of hot water (away from the heat of the stove) with the

temperature tested by squirting a drop or two of formula on the inside of the wrist

(Hirsch, 2008).

Lack of antibodies: None of the important antibodies found in breast milk are found in

manufactured formula, which means that formula does not provide the baby with the
added protection against infection and illness that breast milk does (Hirsh, 2008).

Expense: formula can be costly. Powdered formula is the least expensive, followed by

concentrated, with ready-to-feed being the most expensive and specially formulas (i.e.

soy and hypoallergic) cost more, sometimes far more than the basic formulas (Hirsch,

2008).

Possibility of producing gas constipation: Formula fed babies may have more gas and

firmer bowel movements than breastfed babies (Hirsch, 2008).

Cannot match the complexity of breast milk: Manufactured formulas have yet to

duplicate the complexity of breast milk, which changes as the baby’s needs changes

(Hirsch, 2008).

2.7 Demographic Determinants of Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Breastfeeding

Studies have been conducted to identify variables that influence infant feeding decisions.

Many demographic factors such as maternal age, education, employment, socioeconomic

and cultural factors, have been shown to influence women’s decision to either exclusively

or non-exclusively breastfeed their infants (Bass & Groer, 1997; Goksen, 2002; Scott &

Binns, 1999).

2.8 Breastfeeding and Mother’s Age

Age is an important demographic variable and the primary basis of demographic

classification. The age structure of the practice of exclusive and non exclusive

breastfeeding is however not found in the earlier conducted Nigeria Demographic and

Health Survey (NDHS’). However, other studies have found significant influence of age

in the practice of exclusive and non exclusive breastfeeding.

Research have shown that women who are older (>25 years) are more likely to initiate

and continue breastfeeding compared to younger women (Dennis, 2002b; Ertem, et al;
2001; Scott & Binns, 1999; Wagner & Wagner, 1999). Research published between 1980

and 1999 indicated that only 9.1% of mothers younger than 20 years of age continued to

breastfeed to six months, whereas women who were older were more likely (15-34%) to

have breastfed for six months. A feeling of embarrassment and regard for breastfeeding as

a private behaviour has been associated with maternal age (Wambach & Cole, 2000).

Adolescent girls who had positive attitudes toward and more knowledge about

breastfeeding were more likely to consider breastfeeding (Losch, et al; 1995; Wambach

& Cole, 2000). Mothers who were young, single, from low income and ethnic minority

groups, and who had negative attitudes toward breastfeeding were reported as the least

likely to breastfeed (Dennis, 2002b; Wagner & Wagner, 1999). A study was conducted in

1995 with teenage mothers in the Michigan WIC program. Breastfeeding initiation rate

and predictors of breastfeeding initiation in these teenage mothers were evaluated. Data

from the 1995 Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System were used for this study, and a

total of 3,534 teenagers between the ages of 12 and 19 years were included. Only 35.1%

of mothers initiated breastfeeding (Park, et al; 2003). There was a significant difference

(P<0.001) in the prevalence of breastfeeding between white (40.4%) and black (19.5%)

teenage mothers. Further analyses revealed that level of education, marital status, anemia

status, and smoking during pregnancy influenced the initiation rate among white teenage

mothers, whereas household size, parity and level of education influenced the initiation

rate among black teenage mothers. Black teenage mothers were 2.38 times less likely to

initiate breastfeeding compared to white teenage mothers. The authors concluded that all

teenage mothers were less likely to initiate breastfeeding. Moreover, women with these

characteristics should be targeted for breastfeeding support and education (Park, et al;

2003). A survey of 100 teenage females in sub-urban showed that although 79% of them

intended to have children, only 52% planned to breastfeed. Embarrassment and increased

fatigue were perceived as barriers to breastfeeding among these teenage girls (Leffler,
2000). These teenagers were also not certain whether breastfeeding was beneficial to the

nursing mother. The authors concluded that teenage girls should be targeted for

breastfeeding education (Leffler, 2000). A similar but separate study was conducted to

evaluate adolescents’ attitudes and subjective norms toward breastfeeding. In this study,

203 males and 236 females from high schools were surveyed. Although adolescents had

positive attitudes regarding the advantages of breastfeeding, they had negative subjective

norms about breastfeeding, especially among males. Fewer males versus females had

seen a mother breastfeeding her infant (P=0.001), and overall, males had more incorrect

beliefs about breastfeeding compared to females. Compared to females, males more

strongly believed that supply of breast milk was related to breast size (P=0.004), people

compared the breastfeeding mother to a cow (P=0.0001), breastfed infants were less

“self- sufficient” later in life (P=0.0002), and that when breastfeeding, a mother exposes

her breasts to the public (P=0.0002). The authors concluded that because subjective

norms for fathers are important determinants of breastfeeding, education of adolescent

males about breastfeeding is also necessary (Goulet, et al; 2003). A study conducted was

designed to examine the effect of a breastfeeding campaign for adolescent females on

scores of attitudes, norms, and intentions regarding breastfeeding. The intervention group

included 207 adolescent females exposed to the breastfeeding campaign compared to a

control group (n=205). The mean score for intention to breastfeed was significantly

higher (P<0.05) in the intervention group (4.07) compared to the control group (2.55).

Females exposed to the campaign had more positive attitudes, subjective norms and

intentions toward breastfeeding than the control group (Kim, 1998). These investigators

concluded that educating adolescents about breastfeeding was effective and positively

promoted breastfeeding (Kim, 1998). Results of a study that assessed students’ attitudes

toward breastfeeding revealed that although respondents had generally positive attitudes

about breastfeeding, a significant number of college students considered breastfeeding to

be unattractive for a woman (Forrester, et al; 1997). Of 346 high school and 244 college

students, only 135 individuals acknowledged having been breastfed.

Embarrassment was perceived as a major barrier to breastfeeding, and breastfeeding in

public was not considered acceptable by many of the students (Forrester, et al; 1997). A

study conducted to assess attitudes toward breastfeeding in the north-central region

involving students, faculty, and staff showed that although students perceived

breastfeeding as healthy, they considered bottle-feeding more convenient and less

embarrassing than breastfeeding. Although all participants (n=107) agreed that

breastfeeding is better than bottle-feeding, they believed that breastfeeding is a private

affair and should not be done in public (O’Keefe, et al; 1998). Thus, age has an important

impact on intent to breastfeed.

Mundi (2008), found positive influence of maternal age in the practice of exclusive

breastfeeding, which shows that the practice of exclusive breastfeeding is highest among

mothers between the ages of 20-24 (84.4%), compared with mothers in other categories.

In fact only 25% of mothers above 45 years have practice exclusive breastfeeding. This

may be because women within this age bracket are more full time housewife and may

have more time to breastfeed. According to McKinney, et al; (2009), women who are

most likely to breastfeed are Asian or White, ages 25 to 34 years. This is because they

have a college education and live in the mountain or pacific regions of the United States

and receive special supplemental nutrition programmme for Women, Infants and Children

(WIC) benefits. The study further revealed that African-American still have the lowest

rates of breastfeeding than other groups in recent years. A study by Ekele & Hamidu

(1997), observed that majority of mothers who practice exclusive breastfeeding were

between 20-29 years. Out of the 120 respondents sampled in the practice of exclusive

breastfeeding, 17.5% were between 18 - 24 years of age, 42.5% fall between 25-31 years,

23.4% were 32-38 years, while those aged 39- 45 years had 13.3%. 45 years and above
had 3.3%. By implication, exclusive breastfeeding was highest among women between 25

to 31years of age. The researchers concluded that older mothers were more likely to

exclusively breastfeed than the younger ones. Exclusive breastfeeding was significantly

associated with maternal age in an assessment of breastfeeding practices of 228 nursing

mothers. Most mothers that practice exclusive breastfeeding, 190 (83.3%) were aged

between 20 and 34 years (Ukegbu, et al, 2011). A prospective cohort study of 240 nursing

mothers carried out in three comprehensive health centers of Nnamdi Azikwe University

Teaching Hospital (NAUTH) found that EBF was significantly associated with maternal

age (p<0.05). Focus group discussion showed that mothers believed that adequate

nutrition and physical strength, financial and emotional support to them would increase

EBF practice. A 26 year old participant in one of the focus group discussion (FGD)

sessions said that “while waiting for the breast milk to flow, it is good to give baby water

or glucose water, after all water is the life of a fish, it is good to give water so as to

sustain the baby before breast milk starts to flow”. Although all the participants in the

FGDs agreed that colostrums was good for the baby. A 29 year old mother in the FGD

said that “colostrums is good because it helps the child to know the taste of breast milk

and will make the baby to always demand for it”. Exclusive breastfeeding was therefore

practiced more frequently by mothers aged 35-39 years compared with those less than 20

years old (x2=9.89, p=0.0042). Oche, Umar and Ahmed (2011), found that a total of 84

(47%) of the respondents’ were between the ages of 23-32 years, while only29 (16%)

were above 38 years of age with a mean age of 29.8+10.3years. According to them age

was found not to have influenced the practice of exclusive breastfeeding. They concluded

that young mothers below the age of 20 were more likely to non-exclusively breastfeed

their infants. Similarly, Ogunlesi, (2010), opined that maternal age does not confer any

advantage on breastfeeding practices. In their study, Piper and Parks (2001), analyzed

data from 1,863 cases from the NMIHS to examine the relationship between
breastfeeding intensity ratio and breastfeeding exclusivity. According to the Interagency

Group for Action for Breastfeeding (IGAB), breastfeeding intensity is defined as “the

continuum of partial breastfeeding, with an end point of exclusive breastfeeding” (Piper

and Parks, 2001). The investigators calculated a breastfeeding intensity ratio (range=0-1),

with full (exclusive) breastfeeding having an intensity ratio of 1.0 and partial

breastfeeding with values less than 1.0. Results showed that 61% of mothers reported

EBF during the first month, 31% during 2-3 months postpartum, and13% during 4-6

months postpartum. Higher breastfeeding intensity during the first six months postpartum

was significantly (P<0.01) associated with prolonged breastfeeding. Also, breastfeeding

intensity ratio was significantly and positively associated with higher maternal

age(P<0.01).

2.8 Breastfeeding and Mother’s Level of Education

Female education has severally been described as one of the strongest determinants of the

practice of exclusive breastfeeding. Many studies have found significant influence on the

practice of exclusive and non-exclusive breastfeeding.

According to Shealy, Li, Benton & Grummer (2005), mothers who are college graduates

were more likely to breastfeed their infants than are mothers with lower levels of

educational attainment. For infants born in 2007, 60% of mothers with a college

education breastfed their infant at six months, compared with 41% with some college

education, 31% with a high school degree, and 37% with less than a high school degree.

Mothers with some college were more likely to ever breastfeed than were women with

lower levels of education, and mothers who were college graduates were the most likely

to breastfeed: 67 and 66% of women with no high school diploma, or a high school

diploma only, respectively, ever breastfed, compared with 77% of women with some

college, and 88% of women with at least a bachelor’s degree. At twelve months, women
with a high school diploma only were the least likely (15%) to still be breastfeeding,

followed by women without a high school diploma, and those with some college, at 22

and 21%, respectively. College graduates were also the most likely to breastfeed at twelve

months, at 31%. A sample of 758 mothers were drawn for study to determine the reasons

behind cessation of breastfeeding during the first year postpartum. Analysis of these data

showed that women who were older, with higher education and more children, breastfed

for longer duration. During the early postpartum months, the mother encountered a

greater number of problems with breastfeeding, and many women chose to wean their

infants before six months because they thought that “the infant was old enough” or stated

that the “infant weaned itself” (Kirkland and Fein, 2003). The authors concluded that

breastfeeding promotion programs should educate the mothers that the infant is not too

old to be breastfed at six months (Kirkland and Fein, 2003). In an effort to determine if

psychological and biomedical factors, independent of demographic factors, influenced

duration of breastfeeding during the first six postpartum months, researchers conducted

an observational and longitudinal study with 539 mothers. At hospital discharge, 97% of

mothers were exclusively breastfeeding their infants, but this rate dropped to 83% at one

month, 56% at four months, and 19% at six months. Mothers with secondary school or

college education exclusively breastfed for longer duration than mothers with primary

education (P<0.01). Mothers who breastfed their previous infants for more than six

months were 14 times more likely to exclusively breastfeed their current infants for six

months compared to women who breastfed their previous infants for less than one month

(Cernadas et al., 2003). The duration of breastfeeding and percentage of EBF at six

months was significantly (P<0.001) more in mothers with higher education than those

with lower education. Feelings of embarrassment have been shown to be a major

hindrance to breastfeeding, (Perez-Escamilla, et al; 1998).

A prospective cohort study of 1,059 women was conducted to identify factors associated

with breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding. Results showed that only 46.9% of the

women were still breastfeeding at six months postpartum and intended duration of

breastfeeding was strongly associated with prolonged breastfeeding. Also, lower maternal

education, were negatively associated with breastfeeding at discharge (Scott et al.,

2001a).

A study revealed that although the majority of mothers (both formula and breastfeeding)

agreed that “breast is best,” they still considered breastfeeding embarrassing, disgusting

and inconvenient (Earle, 2002). However, through promotional and educational strategies

a woman’s intentions can be positively affected, thus increasing her duration of lactation

(Kramer, et al; 2002; Wright, et al; 1998).

In a study of 179 mother child pairs, conducted in NAUTH, education of the respondents

had no influence on the practice of exclusive breastfeeding as there was no statistically

significant difference (p=0.986) between those with formal education and informal with

regards to the practice of exclusive breastfeeding (Oche, et al 2011). Mundi (2008),

however, found mother’s level of education to be positively correlated with the act of

exclusive breastfeeding. In their study, the practice of EBF increases with increasing

educational attainment, ranging from 52.9% among women with no formal education to

75.8% among women with post secondary education. A closer observation of the data

however, showed that more than half (61.4%) of those educated had not gone beyond post

primary level. Mundi concluded that formal education had a positive influence on the

practice of EBF. In a study by Ojofeitmi et al (2000), indicated that higher education of

nursing mothers were associated with higher EBF rates. In statistically establishing the

relationship between education and the practice of EBF, the Chi-square test showed a

computed value of 92.70, the critical Chi-square value with 4 degrees of freedom at 0.05

and 0.01 levels of significance are 9.49 and 13.28 respectively. Since the computed value
is much larger than the critical values, the hypotheses that there is no relationship

between women’s education and the practice of EBF was rejected, meaning the practice

of EBF varies with educational attainment. Further analysis of the study however

revealed that the duration of EBF decreases with increasing educational attainment. Oche,

et al (2011), however opined that education of nursing mothers had no significant

influence on the practice of EBF as there was no statistically significant difference

between those with formal education and informal education with regards to the practice

of EBF (p=0.986). Significantly higher proportions of mothers with at least secondary

education, clinic based antenatal care and delivery in health facilities initiated

breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth, avoided pre-lacteal feeding and practice exclusive

breast feeding for the first six months of life. The researcher concluded that maternal

education below secondary level strongly contributed to pre-lacteal feeding (p=0.004) and

failure to practice exclusive breastfeeding (p= 0.008). (Scott, et al; 2001). Sobo, et al

(2008), stated that 5(4.2%) of nursing mothers who practice exclusive breastfeeding heard

from school. This might probably be due to the reason that a tertiary institution is located

around the areas of those villages. Mundi (2008), in a focus group discussion with the

women found that most of the respondents aged 15-19 and above 45 years had no formal

education. Those of them who were educated did not go beyond primary/Qur’anic level.

The work indicates that formal education has positive influence on the practice of

exclusive breastfeeding. In addition, those above 45 years appear to be more traditional in

their behaviour which explains why they view the practice of exclusive breastfeeding as

“strange and foreign aimed at killing the baby, for no human being can survive without

water”. The regression analysis of the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (2008)

also found significant influence of education on the practice of exclusive and non

exclusive breastfeeding. Infants born to mothers with at least primary education are more

likelytobebreastfedwithinonehourofbirththanthoseborntomotherswithnoeducation.
Also Infants whose mothers have more than secondary education (33%) are less likely to

receive pre-lacteal feeds than infants whose mothers have no education (68%).

2.9 Breastfeeding and Mother’s Occupation

Many studies have shown that one of the barriers to breastfeeding is work status. With

increased urbanization and industrialization, more and more women have joined the work

force. An estimated 50% of women employed in the workplace are of reproductive age

and return to work within one year of their infants’ births (Wyatt, 2002). The Bureau of

Labour Statistics reported that in 2002, 51% of women with children under 1 year of age

were employed outside the home (Libbus and Bullock, 2002), and according to the Ross

Mother’s Survey, only 22% of women employed full-time breastfed their infants

compared to 35.4% of mothers who were not employed (Libbus & Bullock, 2002).

Researchers examined the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) to

explore the association between employment factors associated with breastfeeding

initiation and duration. Of the 26,355 mothers sampled in the NMIHS, only 1,506 cases

of employed breast-feeding women were used. Results showed that maternal employment

was not responsible for low rates of breastfeeding initiation. However, it was observed

that breastfeeding women who returned to work weaned their infants earlier compared to

breastfeeding women who did not work. The negative association between employment

and duration of breastfeeding was strongest in developed countries, and duration of

maternity leave was significantly (P<0.01) associated with duration of breastfeeding

(Visness & Kennedy, 1997). Survey data from 10,530 women were analyzed to determine

the association between breastfeeding and employment. Results showed that 79%

(n=8,316) of the women initiated breastfeeding, and of the 4,837 mothers who planned to

work postpartum, 83.5% of them initiated breastfeeding compared to 75.2% of the 5,693

mothers who did not plan to work postpartum (P=0.001). However, mothers who planned
to return to work before six weeks postpartum were significantly (P<0.05) less likely to

initiate breastfeeding compared to mothers who were not planning to return to work

(Noble, 2001). Other studies have also shown a competition between breastfeeding and

work. In general, if a mother decides to return to work within six weeks postpartum, she

is less likely to initiate breastfeeding (Meek, 2001; Roe, et al., 1999; Scott & Binns,

1999). Similar findings were reported in studies conducted overseas. It was observed that

women working outside the home in Thailand were less likely to breastfeed after they

resumed their work. At six months postpartum, 80% of those women working at home

were still breastfeeding, whereas less than 40% of those women employed outside of the

home continued to breastfeed (Yimyam, et al; 1999). Some studies have shown that

intention to return to paid employment is associated only with breastfeeding duration but

not with breastfeeding initiation (Dennis, 2002b; Meek, 2001; Wright, 2001; Wright, et

al; 1998). To determine the effect of part-time employment on breastfeeding initiation

and duration, researchers surveyed 2,615 mothers during the first month postpartum and

then during months 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 12. Data from 1,488 surveys were analyzed and

results showed that 76% of the mothers initiated breastfeeding. No differences in

initiation rates were found between mothers who expected to work part-time and those

who did not expect to return to work. However, mothers working full-time breastfed 8.6

weeks less than nonworking mothers (P<0.05), and part-time work of more than four

hours per day decreased the duration of breastfeeding (Fein & Roe, 1998). Evidence

suggests that there is little support for breastfeeding mothers in the workplace (Bridges, et

al; 1997; Corbett-Dick, & Bezek, 1997). Attitudes of 69 employers toward breastfeeding

revealed that 41% believed that formula-fed infants are as healthy as breastfed infants.

Employers who had been exposed to breastfeeding women or women who expressed

breast milk at work were more supportive of breastfeeding than those who were not

exposed (Bridges, et al; 1997). A project that developed an information ki tabout

breastfeeding to inform employers about the benefits of breastfeeding revealed that the

response of employers toward breastfeeding was quite favourable. However, employers

were not very willing to initiate policy changes in their companies to promote

breastfeeding (McIntyre, et al; 2002). As studies have shown, breastfed infants have

fewer and less severe attacks of common illnesses. This has proven responsible for less

maternal absenteeism (Cohen, et al; 1995). Focus groups with large employers and small

employers revealed that although employers were knowledgeable about the benefits of

breastfeeding, they nonetheless believed that breastfeeding would not be profitable to

their organizations and would not recommend providing facilities and benefits to

breastfeeding mothers in the workplace (Brown, et al; 2001; Moore & Jansa, 1987). In

order to assess the effects of employer attitudes and knowledge on the breastfeeding

behaviour of employed mothers, the researchers developed a survey and distributed it to

156 participants at a business meeting that included employers and personnel managers.

Eighty-five participants completed and returned surveys. Sixty-nine percent (n=59) were

women and 30% (n=26) men. A gender preferential response (Libbus & Bullock, 2002),

to the questionnaire was observed, and only 53% of participants reported breastfeeding

initiation in self or spouse compared to the national rate of 64%. These results were

contrary to previous findings that showed that higher education was positively associated

with breastfeeding initiation as these participants had at least secondary level or college

level educations. Only a small percentage (18-25%) recognized the importance of

promoting breastfeeding in the workplace and few (35%) believed that the workplace

should be changed to allow women to breastfeed (Libbus and Bullock,2002).

Type of work and hours of work have also been shown to influence breastfeeding

(Visness & Kennedy, 1997). For example, African-American women and white women

returning to professional jobs breastfed longer compared to breastfeeding mothers in

clerical jobs (Kurinij, et al; 1989; Meek, 2001). Findings from a separate study of 1,179
(668 black and 511 white) women showed that women who intended to return to work

did so by the fourth month after delivery. Women who intended to return to full-time

employment (63%) had the lowest rate of breastfeeding, and those women who did not

return to work until seven months postpartum breastfed their infants longer compared to

those women who returned to work earlier. Moreover, among black women, those who

intended to return to part time employment were twice as likely to initiate breastfeeding

in the hospital compared to those women returning to full-time employment (Kurinij, et

al; 1989). Contrary to these findings, Visness & Kennedy (1997), found that women in

service occupations breastfed for a significantly longer duration compared to women in

professional jobs, even after controlling for duration of maternity leave. Planning to be

employed postpartum or being employed full- time decreased breastfeeding initiation and

duration (Frank, 1998), while women working part-time increased breastfeeding initiation

and duration as compared to women working full- time (Auerbach & Guss, 1984; Fein &

Roe, 1998). An intervention study showed that working mothers who received clinical

support by the pediatrician and the nurse-midwife on a monthly basis for the first six

months were more likely to practice EBF compared to women who did not receive any

clinical follow-up. Results showed that 78 of 146 working mothers who received

counseling and support from pediatricians and hospital staff were exclusively

breastfeeding their infants at six months postpartum compared to 7 of 116 working

mothers who did not receive any clinical support. The authors concluded that promotion

and support of breastfeeding by knowledgeable health professionals enabled working

mothers to exclusively breastfeed their infants (Auerbach, 1984; Corbett-Dick & Bezek,

1997; Valdes, et al; 2000).

Some mothers remain at home for 6 months or more after birth, while others must return

to work earlier. Women who work part-time, have a supportive work environment, and

likely to breastfeed longer than other women (Esposti, 2007). According to McKinney, et
al (2009), breastfeeding can be combined very well with working if the woman does

some advance planning. Most working mothers use a pump two or three times a day

during lunch and coffee breaks. Breastfeeding just before she goes to work and when she

returns home decreases the time between feedings. Frequent breastfeeding during the

evening and weekends will help her maintain her milk supply. In a study by Mundi

(2008), showed high (78.4%) practice of exclusive breastfeeding among civil servants

than women in other occupations. This could be because most of those in the civil service

are more educated in addition to living in an urban area where BFHI exist. They are

therefore more likely to be aware of and practice exclusive breastfeeding than their less

educated and rural counterparts. This means the practice of exclusive breastfeeding varies

with the women’s occupation. However, further analyses of the study indicate that most

(60.9%) women in the civil service breastfeed for shorter duration (not more than four

months) compared with women in other occupations. Gielen, et al; (1991), Ryan &

Martinez (1989) have identified maternal employment as obstacle to initiation and

continuation of breastfeeding especially where there are no facilities in the work place

and support for breastfeeding. Interestingly, 63.6% of housewives and 59.3% of traders

breastfed exclusively for more than four months. The longer duration among housewives

and traders could be attributed to the fact that women in such occupations are either

always at home or they have flexible working hours and so they can easily attend to the

infants needs without necessarily having any clash between their work in the house or

market and attending to the infant. Al-Shoshan (2005), in a study, found the percentage of

mothers who breastfeed was higher among those not working. The result showed that out

of the 120 respondents, 11(26.8%) did not practice exclusive breastfeeding due to the

type of job they do. In a study of 179 mother-child pairs, 109(61%) were full time house

wives while only 21(12%) of the respondents were civil servants who practice exclusive

breastfeeding (Oche, et al, 2011). In a separate study in the same zone as the study
area, Oche (2011), obtained an exclusive breastfeeding rate of 79%. The high rate

obtained in his study may not be unconnected with the fact that all his subjects were full

time house wives and therefore had enough time to carry on breastfeeding for longer

periods. Although, 39 housewives compared to 19 civil servants practiced exclusive

breastfeeding. This is in agreement with another study in the same study area where the

authors Oche, et al (2011), opined that the high rate of exclusive breastfeeding by the

mothers could be attributed to their being full time house wives and therefore had enough

time to practice exclusive breastfeeding. Out of the 120 respondents, about 41(34%) did

not practice exclusive breastfeeding. For those who were able to practice it, it may be

inferred that they were readily available to breastfeed their babies and probably because

majority of them have low educational status. Haider, et al (2000), in a study observed

that as long as maternity leave remains less than six months, working class women will

cut short the duration of EBF to enable them return to work as indicated by 21.9% of

women, especially in institutions where there are no daycare centres where mothers can

keep and breastfeed their infants. A study conducted to assess breastfeeding knowledge

and beliefs among adults revealed that in addition to having inadequate knowledge about

the benefits of EBF, employment was one of the primary factors affecting breastfeeding

(Bovell-Benjamin, et al;2001).

2.10 Breastfeeding and Mother’s Level of Income

Income level can also contribute to women continuing or discontinuing breastfeeding

early. Women in higher status jobs are more likely to have access to a lactation room and

suffer less social stigma from having to breastfeed or express breast milk at work. Low

income women are more likely to have unintended pregnancies, and women who’s

pregnancies are unintended are less likely to breastfeed their babies (Dee’s, 2007). It is

well documented that, women who are of high-income status and are college-educated
tend to have the highest breastfeeding rate, while young mothers from low socio-

economic backgrounds with low educational levels have the lowest breastfeeding rate.

However, in developing countries, breastfeeding is inversely related to socioeconomic

status (SES) (Beaudry, et al; 1995; Dennis, 2002b). Data collected from 1,001 low-

income pregnant women were used to study the relationship between breastfeeding

intention and maternal demographics, previous breastfeeding experience, and social

support. Respondents were predominantly African-American (80.2%) or Hispanic

(14.2%), and of these women only 50.6% planned to breastfeed. More women with

previous breastfeeding experience (n=205, 77.1%) intended to breastfeed compared to

women who had no breastfeeding experience (n=652, 41.9%). Irrespective of previous

breastfeeding experiences, advice from health professionals was not associated with

intention to breastfeed, implying that health care providers may not be effective in

influencing infant feeding choices. Although 56.1% of the women received information

about breastfeeding from the WIC program, this knowledge was not associated with the

intention to breastfeed. Among women with no previous breastfeeding experience, it was

observed that learning about the benefits of breastfeeding from different and multiple

sources positively correlated (r=0.13, P<0.01) with intention to breastfeed. Male partners

of pregnant women, older women from the community who were experienced in

breastfeeding, family members, and peer educators were found to be influential factors

for breastfeeding intentions (Humphreys, et al; 1998). A study was conducted with

school-aged girls (n=346) to assess the effect of socioeconomic class on perception and

knowledge about breastfeeding. Girls, in fourth to eighth grades, representing a high

social class school (HS, n=149) and a low social class school (LS, n=197) were asked to

complete questionnaires regarding breastfeeding. More girls from LS witnessed

breastfeeding at home (P=0.001) or in public (P=0.02) compared to girls from the HS.

More girls from the HS (46%) reported that they would be embarrassed to breastfeed in
public compared to girls from the LS (32%)(P=0.01) (Nakamura,etal;2003).Al-Shoshan

(2005), observed that the percentage of mothers who breastfed was higher among lower

family income. Agho, et al (2011) opined that the average EBF rate among infants

younger than 6 months of age was 16.4% (95%CI: 12.6%-21.1%) but was only 7.1% in

infants in their fifth month of age. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariate

analyses revealed that the odds of exclusive breastfeeding were higher in rich (Adjusted

Odds Ratio (AOR)=1.15, CI=0.28-6.69) and middle level (AOR=2.45, CI=1.06-5.68)

households than poor households. Children in household in the highest wealth quintile are

breastfed for the shortest duration (4-6 months) while other children are breastfed for 17-

21 months (Al Shoshan, 2005). Among infants born in the five years preceding the

survey, the percentage who started breastfeeding within one hour of birth was highest

(47%) in the highest quintile compare to the lowest quintile (32.7%) (NDHS, 2008). Also

infants born to mothers in the highest wealth quintile (39%) are less likely to receive a

pre-lacteal feed than infants born to mothers in the lowest wealth quintile (71%). A good

number of women may continue to regard EBF as being “too demanding” and may not

have “enough breast milk” because they are not able to afford the food needed to

replenish the source (breast milk) from which the infant derives its nourishment as a

consequence of their low educational status which results in placements in low paying

occupations. Thus, about 11.5% of them could not continue EBF because they felt they

did not have „enough breast milk’ and therefore introduced other supplements.

2.11 Breastfeeding and the Cultures of Nursing Mothers

Cultural beliefs and practices are significant influence on infant feeding methods. Cultural

influences may dictate decisions about how a mother feeds her infant (McKinney, et al

2009; Wong, et al 2002). Lack of support from significant others towards breastfeeding

have been observed as major predictors of bottle feeding. Fathers who support bottle
feeding are more likely to believe that “breastfeeding is bad for the breasts and interferes

with sex” (Losch, et al; 1995). Similar findings were reported in other studies (Scott, et

al; 2001b; Wambach & Cole, 2000). Research shows that fathers have less knowledge

about and positive attitudes toward breastfeeding compared to mothers (Sharma & Petosa,

1997). A study that evaluated a corporate lactation program that provided breastfeeding

education and services for male employees and their partners showed that fathers who

participated in breastfeeding education programs were more supportive of their partners

and their female colleagues who breastfed. The average duration of breastfeeding in

infants whose fathers (n=128) participated in the study was eight months, and 69% of the

infants were still breastfeeding at 6 months, even though 66% of the mothers were

employed (full-time or part- time). This study showed that breastfeeding education of

fathers can be effective in increasing breastfeeding duration, even in working mothers

(Cohen, et al; 2002). A survey of 123 women regarding factors influencing infant feeding

decisions revealed that 78% (n=96) of respondents made the decision regarding infant

feeding method before they became pregnant or during the first trimester of pregnancy.

The main reason given for choosing bottle feeding over breastfeeding was the “mother’s

perception of father’s preference” (Arora, et al; 2000). Family was a major source of

breastfeeding information for the mother, followed by friends. However, the majority of

mothers wanted more information on breastfeeding from different sources (Arora, et al;

2000). In a clinical trial where intervention, including breastfeeding education, was

provided to mothers (n=197) and fathers (n=196) after the birth of their children, parents

with higher breastfeeding knowledge scores were more likely to breastfeed than parents

who had lower knowledge scores. Father’s breastfeeding knowledge was significantly

associated with EBF during the first month and the frequency of breastfeeding during the

third and sixth months. Mothers who had higher knowledge scores were 6.5 times more

likely to practice EBF at the end of the third month and 1.97 times more likely to continue
to breastfeed to the end of the sixth month. Infants whose fathers had higher knowledge

scores were 1.76 times more likely to be exclusively breastfed at the end of the first

month and 1.64 times more likely to be breastfeeding at the end of the sixth month (Susin,

et al; 1999).As many as 50 of 120 cultures studied typically do not give colostrums to

newborns and only begin breastfeeding after the milk has “come in”. Some Fillipinos,

Mexican-American, Vietnamese Hmong, Koreans and Nigerians are among these groups.

(Morse, Jehle & Gamble, 1990). In India, infants may be fed liquid such as honey, tea,

water, or sugar water before the initiation of breastfeeding under the belief of the family

(Choudhry 1997).

Immigrants to the United States often would breastfeed infants if they were still in their

own countries. In Russia, women are expected to breastfeed and formula is not available

in birth houses (Callister, et al; 2007). However immigrants from countries where

breastfeeding is the norm may breastfeed for shorter durations or not at all because they

lack the support system they had in their own country. Some of these women may think

that because formula is available in the hospital and they see American women using

formula, it is the preferred method of feeding. They may believe breastfeeding is inferior

to formula feeding and that formula will make their infants big and healthy (Hernandez,

2007). In a study by Oche, et al; (2011), more than half 94(53%) initiated breastfeeding in

less than 30 minutes after delivery while 85(47%) did so long after 30minutes. Reasons

adduced for delayed initiation of breastfeeding among eighty five mothers, included;

colostrums being dirty and thought to be harmful to the child, lack of breast milk and

mother or child illness. For the women who considered colostrums dirty, while awaiting

the coming of the clean milk, they gave boiled water, honey, animal milk and washouts

from writings of the Quran slates. The major reason for late initiation of breastfeeding in

most (47%) of the respondents was colostrums not pure thus supporting the general

perception in the family that in the first three days, the mother’s milk is not pure therefore
could harm the infant. This finding is in consonance with that of Onayande, (2007) in

Ille-Ife, even though the study areas have varying socio-cultural characteristics. While

starving the child for the period of not giving colostrums, the child is also denied the

benefits of the immunological constituents of colostrums and subsequently delays the

proper establishment of lactation later. While awaiting the establishment of the “clean

milk” the mothers gave pre-lacteal in form of boiled water, honey and animal milk under

the instruction of grandmothers and or mother in-laws. A study in Kano indicated that

only 1(2%) subject stopped breastfeeding before six months which is in consonance with

the study from Kano, where 24% of the respondents stopped breastfeeding before the age

of six months. The mothers that stopped breastfeeding before six months did so because

of the consent of a new pregnancy. In the study area, the widely held cultural belief that

the new pregnancy produced milk that is contaminated and thus harmful to the child

hence the need to put the child off the breast became necessary. This practice has far

reaching implications for the growing infants as they are exposed to malnutrition and

denied all the benefits of breastfeeding. The commonest reason for stoppage of

breastfeeding in this study was that the child was old enough and could eat solid foods

(Ogunlesi, 2011).

The findings by Hamidu & Ekele (1997), in Sokoto showed that some mothers (especially

the Hausa/Fulani primiparae) that practiced exclusive breastfeeding in the postpartum

period later succumbed to pressures from grandmothers and or mother-in-laws because

these “grannies” were really the custodians of the infants at home. A granny was quoted

as having said “it is ungodly not to allow a baby to taste water in the Sokoto weather”.

Majority (71%) gave water either at the end of a feed or in between feeds as opposed to a

pre- lacteal feed.

The decline in the practice of breastfeeding, such as in developed countries like the U.S.,

has been observed in developing countries as well (Galler, et al; 1998). Sub-optimal
breastfeeding practices still prevail in many countries, especially in rural communities. A

study that examined infant feeding practices in 12 rural communities in Gambia revealed

that delayed initiation of breastfeeding, pre-lacteal feeding, and failure to practice EBF

were widespread. Moreover, colostrums were considered “hot milk” causing diarrhea and

stomach pain, and thus was not given to infants (Semega-Janneh, et al; 2001). In a study

conducted with 136 women, it was observed that stress during labour and delivery was

associated with delayed onset of lactation (Grajeda & Perez-Escamilla, 2002). A study

conducted with 222 mothers to assess their attitudes about and barriers to breastfeeding

showed that mothers perceived breastfeeding to be time consuming. They also thought

that breast milk was insufficient for the infant (Cohen, et al; 1999). This decrease in

breastfeeding rates around the world has led to serious implications for infant health in

developing countries including infants in Nigeria (Amador, et al; 1994). This decline in

EBF has led to an increase in the prevalence of protein energy malnutrition (PEM)

(Scarlett, et al; 1996).

Data derived from a 1995 convenience sample of low-income, primarily minority women

receiving services in a public hospital were analyzed to determine the impact of attitudes,

norms, parity, and experience on the intent to breastfeed. Data were collected using a 70-

item breastfeeding questionnaire completed by 367 primiparous (one) and 596

multiparous (more than one) women. Among primiparous women, social norms and

breastfeeding attitudes of the mother predicted breastfeeding intention. The woman’s

mother, baby’s father, and the woman’s doctor strongly influenced the mother in making

her infant- feeding decisions (Kloeblen-Tarver, et al; 2002). Similar findings were

reported in a separate study (Wagner & Wagner, 1999). To explore reasons for early

termination of breastfeeding, 220 mothers were interviewed. The main reason given for

termination of breastfeeding was that the child did not want it (McLennan, 2001).

Breastfeeding practices of close family members and subjective norms influenced

mother’s breastfeeding practices. Perception of “insufficient milk” by others in the

community was also one of the reasons for mothers to discontinue breastfeeding

(McLennan, 2001).

During the first five months, the major reason given by mothers to discontinue

breastfeeding was “insufficient milk supply” (Kirkland & Fein, 2003). The mothers

thought that they were not producing enough milk or that the breast milk did not satisfy

the infant. Factors related to nutrition and lifestyle patterns were most predominantly

chosen as reasons for cessation of breastfeeding during first two months and 3-5 months.

2.12 Stages of Breast Milk

Human milk is a highly complex species specific fluid uniquely designed to meet the

needs of the human infant. Human milk contains antibodies that provide some protection

against a broad spectrum of bacteria, viral and protozoan infections. According to Fraser,

et al; (2003), the human milk varies in its composition as follows:

With the time of day (for example, the fat and protein content is lowest in the morning

and highest in the afternoon). With the stage of the lactation (for example, the fat and

protein content of colostrums is higher than in mature milk). In response to maternal

nutrition (for example, although the total amount of fat is not influenced by diet, the type

of fat that appears in the milk will be influenced by what the mother eats). McKinney, et

al; (2009), however, explained that the composition of breast milk changes in three

phases viz: colostrums, transitional milk, and mature milk.

The major secretion of the breast during pregnancy and the first 7 to 10 days after giving

birth is colostrums. Colostrums is a thick, yellowish fluid and is more concentrated than

the mature milk (foremilk and hind milk) and is extremely rich in immunoglobulin’s,

especially secretory IgA (immunoglobulin A) which helps to protect the infant’s gastro

intestinal tract from infection. Concentration of protein and minerals, but less fat than
mature milk, colostrums help establish the normal flora in the intestines and its laxative

effect speeds the passage of meconium (McKinney, et al; 2009).

McKinney, et al; (2009), further states that transitional milk appears, as the milk changes

from colostrums to mature milk. Immunoglobulin’s and proteins decrease and lactose, fat

and calories increase. The vitamin content is approximately the same as that of mature

milk.

After approximately 2 weeks of delivery, mature milk (foremilk and hind milk) replaces

transitional milk. Initially there is a release of bluish white foremilk that is part skim milk

(about 60% of the volume) and part whole milk (about 35% of the volume). It provides

primarily lactose, protein and water-soluble vitamins. The hind milk or cream (about 5%)

is usually let-down to 20 minutes into the feeding, although it may occur sooner. It

contains the denser calories from fat necessary for optimal growth and contentment

between feedings. Because of this changing composition of human milk during each

feeding, it is important to breast feed the infant long enough to supply a balanced feeding.

Milk production gradually increases, so that by the time the infant is 2 weeks old, the

mother produces 720 to 900ml of milk every 24 hours. (Wong, et al; 2002).

The most dramatic change in the composition of milk usually occurs during the course of

a feed. At the beginning of the feed the baby receives a high volume of relatively low fat

milk (this has come to be known as the foremilk). As the feeding progresses, the volume

of milk decreases but the proportion of fat in the milk increases, sometimes to as much as

five times the initial value (Hall, 1999; Jackson, et al; 1987). This has come to be known

as the hindmilk).

2.13 Importance of Breast Milk in the Growth and Development of Infant

Human milk is species specific having evolved overtime to optimize the growth and

development of the infant and young child. It has been classified by scientists and health
workers as the best natural food for babies. According to Mundi (2008), breast milk

contains all the necessary nutrients for the healthy growth of the child. The benefits are

numerous ranging from providing the infant with antibodies, helping ward off risks of

illness and providing the baby with all his nutritional needs. Accordingly, WHO (2004),

stated that breast milk provides all the energy and nutrients that the infant needs for the

first six months of life, and it provides about half or more of a child’s nutritional needs

during the second half of the first year up to one-third during the second year of life.

Furthermore, breast milk not only protects the infant against infectious and chronic

diseases, but also promotes sensory and cognitive development in addition to contributing

to the health and well-being of mothers, helping in birth spacing reducing the risks of

ovarian and breast cancers as well as increasing family and national resources. The

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (2005a) and American Dietetic Association

(ADA) (2005) recommended that only breast milk be given for the first 6 months after

birth. Breastfeeding should continue until the infant is at least 12 months old with the

addition of solids beginning at 6 months of age. WHO and UNICEF (2006), further

strengthened the recommendation that infants be exclusively breastfed during the first six

months of life and that infants be given solid or semi-solid complementary foods in

addition to continued breastfeeding from age 6 months to 24 months or more when the

baby is fully weaned.

Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended because breast milk is uncontaminated and

contains all the nutrients necessary for infants in the first few months of life. In addition,

the mother’s antibodies in breast milk provide immunity to disease. Early

supplementation is discouraged for several reasons. First, it exposes infants to risk of

infection. Second, it decreases infant’s intake of breast milk and therefore the frequency

of breastfeeding, which reduces breast milk production. Third, in low resource settings,

supplementary food is often nutritionally inferior.

AAP (2007), further states that the breastfed infant is the reference or normative model

against which all alternative feeding methods must be measured with regard to growth,

health, development and all other short and long term outcomes.

Human milk is ideal for infant growth and development. The composition of breast milk

changes throughout the lactation period according to each infant’s requirement and has an

appropriate balance of nutrients that are easily digested and bioavailable (Dewey, 2000).

Studies have shown that breast milk has low concentrations of the amino acids,

methionine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine, and high levels of cystine and taurine. This

composition of breast milk prevents central nervous system damage in infants and aids in

neurodevelopment (Picciano, 2001). According to ADA (2005), breast milk not only

provides energy but also contains enzymes such as lipoprotein lipase, pancreatic lipase,

and amylase, which aid in the digestion of nutrients. Breast milk also provides fat and

water-soluble vitamins, and minerals contained in breast milk are more bio available

compared to infant formula and are present in required quantities for the infant. On an

average, breast milk has been shown to provide 375 and 500 kcal/d at 6 and 11months

respectively (Dewey, 2000). While others consider complementary feeding of breastfed

infants necessary to promote optimal growth and development during the first few years

of life, studies have shown that EBF for six months provides adequate nutrition for

normal growth of the infant up to six months of age (Dewey, 2001b). The relatively low

content of protein and sodium in human milk places less load on the immature kidney of

the infant (ADA Reports, 2001). With respect to protein, human milk contains a high

ratio of whey to casein, which is easily digestible. Non-lactose carbohydrate has been

shown to play a role in an infant’s ability to resist infections, and fatty acids are essential

for brain development. A number of studies have shown that breastfed infants gain weight

rapidly during the first 2-3 months of life, followed by a relatively slower growth rate

compared to formula-fed infants. Studies showed that breastfed infants self regulatetheir
energy requirement (Dewey, 2001a) by maintaining a lower body temperature and

metabolic rate than formula-fed infants (Dewey, 2001a; Eckhardt et al, 2001).

Studies have also shown that breast milk promote immunogical benefits and reduced

infant morbidity. A dose-response relationship appears to exist between breastfeeding and

infant immune function. For example, the more breast milk that an infant receives during

the first six months of infancy, the less likely the infant is to develop health problems

including diarrhea and ear infections (Scariati, et al; 1997). Breastfeeding is superior to

infant formula feeding because breast milk not only meets the nutritional requirements of

the infant but also protects against infections through its defense factors such as secretory

immunoglobulin A (IgA), lactoferrin, lysozyme, anti-inflammatory factors, cytokines,

nucleotides, macrophages, and lymphocytes (Oddy, 2001). Hence, human milk enhances

the infant’s immune system (Heinig & Dewey, 1996). Studies have shown that infants

who are exclusively breastfed have fewer gastrointestinal infections due to the

“bifidogenic activity” of the human milk protein (Liepke, et al; 2002; Wright, et al;

1998). When rates of respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses were compared in 776

breastfed and bottle-fed infants, it was observed that infants who were fed human milk

substitutes had “five-fold more gastrointestinal illnesses, three-fold more respiratory

illnesses and double the episodes of otitis media” (Beaudry, et al; 1995). Infants who

were breastfed for 13 weeks or more had significantly fewer gastrointestinal illnesses

during the first year of life compared to bottle-fed infants. In addition, there was a

decreased incidence, severity, and duration of diarrhea in breastfed infants (Bocar, 1997).

A two-fold increase in illnesses including diarrhea was observed among formula-fed

infants compared to infants who were breastfed for at least 12 months (Heinig & Dewey,

1996). In a study of 430 breastfed infants, there was only one hospital admission due to

respiratory illness compared to 51 admissions in 346 bottle-fed infants; authors of this

study concluded that breastfeeding prevented hospitalizations for respiratory illnesses

(Beaudry, etal; 1995).

Research showed that infants who were breastfed and given pre-lacteal feedings

(colostrums) had fewer episodes of diarrhea (Ziyane, 1999). Studies confirming the

relationship between breastfeeding and other childhood illnesses indicate that

breastfeeding protects infants against infectious diseases including bacteraemia,

meningitis, infant botulism, and urinary tract infections (Heinig & Dewey,1996).

Breastfeeding has also been shown to protect against chronic illnesses including insulin-

dependent diabetes mellitus, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, childhood cancers such as

lymphoma (Heinig & Dewey, 1996), and sudden infant death syndrome (Dennis,2002b).

In a study conducted with 582 caregivers, it was observed that 45.9% of the infants were

breastfed for at least one year; further examination showed that a decrease in

breastfeeding was associated with increased episodes of diarrhea (McLennan, 2000).

2.14 Basic Nutritional needs of Infants

The full-term newborn needs approximately 100 to 110 Kcal (45 to 50 Kcal/kg) of body

weight each day. Breast and formulas used for the normal newborn contain 20 kcal

(Blackburn, 2007; Rosenberg, 2007). During the early days after birth, infants may lose

up to 10% of their birth weight because of normal loss of extracellular water and the

consumption of fewer calories than needed (Green, 2008). Newborns may fall asleep

before feeding adequately and have a small stomach capacity at birth. Capacity increases

rapidly so that many infants take 60 to 90ml by the end of the first week. Infants usually

regain the lost weight by 2 weeks of age (Feigelman, 2007). Infants should be evaluated

for feeding problems if weight loss exceeds 7% to 8%, if loss continues beyond 3 days of

age, or if the birth weight is not regained by 2 weeks of age in the full term infant, AAP

and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG), 2007; Stellwagen &

Bois, 2006). The calories needed by the newborn are provided by carbohydrates, proteins
and fat in breast milk or formula. Full term neonates digest simple carbohydrates and

proteins well. Fats are less well digested because the lack of pancreatic lipase in the breast

milk and formula (Mckinney et al; 2009). Because newborns lose water easily from the

skin, kidneys and intestines, they must have adequate fluid intake each day. The normal

newborn needs approximately 40 to 60ml/kg (18 to 27ml/kg) a day by the end of the first

week (DeMarini & Roth, 2007). Breast milk or formula supplies the infants fluid needs.

Additional water is unnecessary (Mckinney, et al; 2009).

Protein

The concentrations of amino acids in breast milk are suited to the infant's needs and

ability to metabolize them. Breast milk is high in taurine, which is important for bile

conjugation and brain development. Breast milk is low in tyrosine and phynlalanine,

corresponding to the infant's low levels of enzymes to digest them. The protein produced

a low solute load for the infant’s immature kidneys (Franklin & Figueroa, 2006). Casein

(a by- product of butter manufactured) and whey (a by-product of cheese manufactured)

are the proteins in milk. Casein forms a large insoluble curd that is harder to digest than

the curd from whey, which is very soft. Breast milk is easily digested because it has a

high ratio of whey to casein. Commercial formulas must be adapted to increase the

amount of whey so that the curd is more digestible (Mckinney, el al; 2009). Many infants

fed cow's milk-based formulas develop allergies to the protein in the milk. Because breast

milk is made for the human infant, it is unlikely to cause allergies. Infants with a family

history of allergies are less likely to develop them if they are breastfed (Lawrence &

Lawrence, 2005). Although breast milk does not cause allergies, allergenic foods the

mother has eaten may pass to her milk. If the infant reacts to the mother's diet, the

offending food should be identified and eliminated (Mckinney, et al; 2009).

Carbohydrate

Lactose is the major carbohydrate in breast milk. It improves absorption of calcium and

provides energy from brain growth. Other carbohydrates in breast milk increase intestinal

acidity and impede growth of pathogens (Rioden, 2005).

Fat

For infants to acquire adequate calories from the limited amount of human milk or

formula they are able to consume, at least 15% of the calories provided must come from

fat (tryglycerides). The fat must be easily digestible. Fat in human milk is easier to digest

and absorb than that in cow milk because of the arrangement of the fatty acids on the

glycerol molecule and because of the presence of the enzyme lipase (Wong, et al; 2002).

The researchers, further stated that cow milk is used in most infant formulas, but the milk

fat is removed and replaced by another fat source, such as corn oil that can be digested

and absorbed by the infant. If whole milk or evaporated milk without added carbohydrate

is fed to infants, the resulting fecal loss of fat (and therefore loss of energy) may be

excessive because the milk moves through the infant's intestines too quickly for adequate

absorption to take place. This can lead to poor weight gain. In addition to its energy

contributions, fat also furnishes essential fatty acids (EFA) which are required for growth

and tissue maintenance. EFAs are components of cell membranes and precursors of some

hormones. Inadequate intake of EFAs results in eczema and growth failure. The lack of

EFAs in skin and low fat milk is another reason infants should not be fed these products

(Wong, et al; 2002).

Vitamins

Human milk contains all the vitamins required for infant nutrition, with individual

variations based on maternal diet and genetic differences vitamins are added to cow's

milk formulas to approximate the levels in breast milk. While cow's milk contains

adequate amounts of vitamin A and vitamin B complex, vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and
vitamin E must be added (Wong, et al; 2002). Vitamin A, E and C are high in breast milk.

The vitamin D content of breast milk is low, and supplementation is recommended by 2

weeks of age (APP, 2005a; Kleinman, 2004). According to Wong, et al; (2002), human

milk may be somewhat deficient in vitamin D, supplementation may not be necessary,

provided that the infant is exposed to sunlight for 30 minutes per week wearing only a

diaper or for 2 hours per week fully clothed but without a hat. To prevent rickets,

supplementation may be recommended for preterm infants and for dark-skinned infants

whose mothers eat vegetarian diets that exclude meat, fish and dairy products. Vitamin K

is also essential, for the synthesis of blood clotting factors. It is present in human milk and

absorbed efficiently. Because it is fat soluble, it is present in greater concentrations in

colostrums and in the high fat hind milk (Kries, et al; 1987), although the increased

volume of milk as lactation progresses means that the infant obtains twice as much

vitamin K from mature milk as he does from colostrums (Canfield, et al; 1991). Water-

soluble vitamins, unless the mother's diet is seriously deficient, breast milk will contain

adequate levels of all the vitamins. Since most vitamins are fairly widely distributed in

foods, a diet significantly deficient in one vitamin will be deficient in others as well. Thus

an improved diet will be more beneficial than artificial supplements. With some vitamins,

particularly vitamin C, a plateau may be reached where increased maternal intake has no

further impact on breast milk composition (Fraser & Cooper, 2003)

Minerals

The casein-protein in cow's milk interferes with iron absorption. Although iron in breast

milk is lower than in formula, it is absorbed five times as well and breastfed infants are

rarely deficient in iron (Riordan, 2005). The full term infant who is breastfed exclusively

maintain iron stores for the first 6 months of life (Lawrence & Lawrence, 2005).

Generally, iron is added when the infant begins solids at 6 months. Preterm infants need

iron supplements earlier. All formula-fed infants should receive formula fortified with
iron (APP & ACOG, 2007). Sodium, calcium and phosphorus are higher in cow's milk

than in human milk. This difference could cause an excessively high renal solute load if

formula is not diluted properly (Mckinney, et al; 2009). According to AAP (1997), the

fluoride levels in human milk and in commercial formulas are low. This mineral which is

important in the prevention of dental caries, may cause spotting of the permanent teeth

(Fluorosis) in excess amounts. It is recommended that a fluoride supplement be given

only to those infants not receiving fluoridated water after 6 months of age.

Fluids

The fluid requirement for normal infants is about 80 to 100ml of water per kilogram of

body weight per 24 hours (Behrman, Kliegman, & Arvin, 1996). In general, neither

breastfed nor formula fed infants need to be fed water, not even those living in very hot

climates. Breast milk contains 87% water, which easily meets fluid requirements Feeding

water to infants may only decrease caloric consumption at a time when infants are

growing rapidly (Wong, el al; 2002). Furthermore infants have room for little fluctuation

in fluid balance and should be monitored closely for fluid intake and water loss. Infants

lose water through excretion of urine and through insensible losses such as respiration.

Under normal circumstances, infants are born with some fluid reserve, and some of the

weight loss during the first few days is related to loss of this fluid.

Enzymes

Breast milk contains enzymes that aid in digestion. Pancreatic amylase, necessary to

digest carbohydrates is low in the newborn, but present in breast milk. Breast milk also

contains lipase to increase fat digestion (Mckmney, et al; 2009).

Anti-infection factors

Leucocytes: During the first 10 days there are more white cells per milliliter in breast

milk than there are in blood. Macrophages and neutrophils are amongst the most common

leucocytes in human milk and they surround and destroy harmful bacteria by their
phagocytic activity (Fraser & Cooper, 2003).

Immunoglobulin's: Five types of immunoglobulin have been identified in human milk:

IgA, IgG, IgE, IgM and IgD. Of these, the most important is IgA which appears to be both

synthesized and stored in the breast. Although some IgA is absorbed by the infant, much

of it is not. Instead it 'paints' the intestinal epithelium and protects the mucosal surfaces

against entry of pathogenic bacteria and enteroviruses. It affords protection against

Escherichia coli, pneumococci, poliovirus and the rotaviruses (Fraser & Cooper,2003).

Lysozyme: this binds to enteric iron, thus preventing potentially pathogenic E coli from

obtaining the iron they need for survival. It also has antiviral activity (against HIV, CMV

and HSV), by interfering with virus absorption or penetration or both (Fraser & Cooper,

2003).

Bifidus factor: The bifidus factor in human milk promotes the growth of Gram bacilli in

the gut flora, particularly lactobacillus bifidus, which discourages the multiplication of

pathogens (Babies who are fed on cow's milk - based formulae have more potentially

pathogenic bacilli in their gut flora) (Fraser & Cooper, 2003)

Hormones and growth factor: Epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor

are among the most fully studied of the growth factors and regularly peptides found in

breast milk and colostrums. They stimulate the baby's digestive tract to mature more

quickly and strengthen the barrier properties of the gastro intestinal epithelium. Once the

initially leaky membrane living in the gut matures, it is less likely to allow the passage of

large molecules, and becomes less vulnerable to microorganisms. The timing of the first

feed also has a significant effect on gut permeability, which drops markedly if the first

feed takes place soon after birth (Fraser & Cooper, 2003).
2.15 Summary

The benefits of breastfeeding for mothers and infants have been widely recognized and

researched. Studies have shown that breastfeeding is superior to infant formula feeding because

of its protective properties against illness, in addition to its nutritional advantages. Considering

the extensive benefits of breastfeeding, the World Health Organization, United Nations Children

Fund and the American Dietetic Association recommend exclusive breastfeeding of infants for

the first six months and continued breastfeeding with complementary foods up to 24 months of

age. Despite widespread efforts to encourage breastfeeding, the rates in Nigeria have remained

low. Many demographic factors such as maternal age, education, socioeconomic status, cultural

factors, and social support have been shown to potentially influence a woman’s decision to

breastfeed. Along with a number of demographic factors, poor or negative attitudes toward

breastfeeding have been shown to be barriers to initiating and sustaining breastfeeding. Previous

studies have shown that mothers who do not breastfeed or individuals who do not support

breastfeeding have negative attitudes towards breastfeeding. Because the decision to breastfeed

is often made long before a woman becomes pregnant, breastfeeding promotion programs should

focus on educating women during their antenatal classes. In order to facilitate positive attitudinal

changes in individuals, health care professionals with adequate knowledge and positive attitudes

about breastfeeding are critical. Health Educators who received nutrition education, including

optimum infant feeding methods, are considered advocates of breastfeeding.