Supplier Relationship Management
Supplier Relationship Management
105
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 28 2007
106
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 28 2007
to operate specific collaboration processes between can be hardly differentiated from their competitors in the
heterogeneous groups [13]. market.
In the case of supplier portals, they create the basis to This finding has been shown by the later studies from the
connect suppliers with their buyers, with the focus on most important research institutes of the area [16], [17], [18],
purchasing processes and the exchange of transactions data. [19], [20], [21]. Forrester research (2005) found that the
They offer a structured and customized gateway to improve average scores for goods procurement, settlement, and process
the business relations between two or more business partners. configuration are consistently strong across all vendors,
On the other side, e-marketplace is described as a virtual averaging close to 4 (on scale of 1 to 5) with a standard
online market where buyers, suppliers, distributors and sellers deviation of less than 1.
find and exchange information, conduct trade, and collaborate The same research institutes found that the most
with each other via an aggregation of information portals, competitive e-procurement providers are SAP, Oracle and
trading exchanges and collaboration tools [14]. Ariba, although none of them reached the highest
It is crucial for an efficient procurement strategy that these technological level/rate, suggesting that there are still areas,
channels are not isolated in the enterprise’s intranet, but rather which require further developments.
they should be integrated with companies’ front-end and back- One of those areas is the support of more complex material
end systems in order to integrate their inter-processes and groups and services, as the current protocols and standard
automate the data exchange. At the same time, it is formats e.g. BMEcat provide a solution just for a limited
recommend that their users have the possibility to access them number of material groups, and in the case of services,
anywhere, at any time, regardless of the distance and the sort because of its variety and differentiated data model, a new
of device there are using e.g. computer, laptop, Personal protocol based on configuration rules has to be developed to
Digital Assistant (PDA). allow the description and price formation of the service
In addition, supplier portals and e-marketplaces should purchased.
include in their functionality spectrum, a number of features to Furthermore, the compliance management is an issue that
facilitate and secure their use by company’s employees e.g. has not been properly addressed by the e-procurement
Navigation and search tools, reporting and notification vendors, and it is a top theme on the procurement executive
functions. Since the acceptance and success of those channels agenda. Therefore, a higher integration level has to be
depend on the willingness of these employees to use these achieved with other systems of the organization in order to
channels in their daily procurement activities converge the procurement data and even to eliminate
redundant systems across the enterprise.
III. THE SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT MARKET B. e-Sourcing Functionalities
The SRM market is in constant growth, most of the market In contrast to the e-procurement functionalities, most of the
researches in this area e.g. [15], [16], [17] shows a growth rate e-sourcing functionalities have still not achieved its maturity,
greater than 10% per year between the main vendors, who can and there is not a single provider that can be classified as a
be divided into two distinct classes: leader [22].
• The ERP vendors, who offer their SRM system as a The market is characterized by the presence of a number of
module of their product portfolio, which has as the best-of-breed vendors that are rated by the research institutes
main advantage the high integration capacity with the as specialist in their area e.g. FreeMarktes (auctions),
other modules of the same vendor, reducing the Emptoris (complex bid processes), I2 (Spend Management),
implementation cost and time. Contracto (Contract management).
• The best-of-breed providers, who are specialists on It is in this area of the supplier relationship management
SRM systems or part of the system e.g. e-Procurement, that most investments in research and development have been
e-Sourcing, Supplier Enablement, who offers their done in the last years and the consolidation process is more
products to the market as an alternative to the ERP present.
providers or concentrate their efforts in niche markets. For the next couple of years, it is expected that the new
The market is going through a consolidation process, which developments will still concentrate on this area, improving the
will continue during the next years. This is characterized by current functionalities as spend and contract management. At
the numerous merger and acquisition activities that have been the same time, a higher integration between the current
occurring e.g. Ariba-FreeMarkets (2004), Oracle-Peoplesoft technologies available is foreseen, especially as a result of the
(2005), SAP-Fricionless (2006). consolidation process through merger and acquisition as well
On the other side, a detailed analyses of the SRM as strategic partnerships.
functionalities shows that the market has different maturity At the moment, the e-Sourcing market has a huge growth
grades and potential growth rates while comparing different potential, which can be explained by the high company’s
features i.e. e-Procurement functions are in average much expectations on these solutions. A study from the BME &
more mature than the e-Sourcing functions. Siemens [23] showed that the majority of the enterprises
expect a 10-25% process costs reduction and a 5-10% material
A. e-Procurement Functionalities costs reduction through the application of SRM solutions. And
The e-procurement applications of the main providers have according to ARM Research (2005) and IDC Research (2005)
achieved already their technical maturity and their functions there is an evidence to suggest that this growth of the SRM
107
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 28 2007
market is leaded by the e-Sourcing applications rather than the Enterprise are also starting to enhance the integration
relative mature e-Procurement solutions. between contract management solutions and other sell-side
and buy-side systems, such as pricing, order management, and
IV. THE SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT TRENDS invoicing in order to gain visibility and to prevent revenue
The universal trend in the area of supplier relationship leakage and lengthy processes [17].
management goes towards the process cost reduction and C. Services Procurement
compliance. Nowadays, the interest of the organizations is to Service procurement processes are still a source of high
build flexible electronic processes that support and customize costs to companies, and due to its complex and heterogeneous
their business processes, at the same time that they are able to purchasing processes, few companies up to now have tried to
adapt the enterprise to the constant market changes. support those processes via the application of web-based
Therefore, for the next couple of years it is unlikely that information systems.
SRM moves outside its current basis: e-Procurement, e- Nonetheless, this scenario is changing, the survey
Sourcing and Supplier Enablement. Instead, what is expected “eBusiness-Barometer 2006/2007” have shown that around
is the consolidation of the current functionalities and 70% of the industrial enterprises in Germany rated services
practices, especially the ones that have still not achieved its procurement as a high or very high relevant aspect of their
maturity: business process outsourcing, contract management, SRM activities.
service procurement, spend and supplier intelligence, process Different from the MRO (Maintenance, Repair and
integration, among others. Operations) materials, services procurement processes have
A. Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) hardly data transfer standards, and few IT vendors provide
During the last years there was a wave towards the specialized tools to support this business process.
application of service providers in the supplier relationship Hence, there is a need to develop electronic data transfer
management market. Although earlier utilization of those models and standards to foster the development and
services leaded to a reduction in process improvement application of web-based information systems during the
benefits, because of workflow and integration issues. services negotiation and buying process between companies
Currently, a research from Gartner [24] showed that 42% of and their suppliers.
the European respondent and 36% of the American Some initiatives in this direction have already taken place in
respondents are already using some form of procurement Germany with the research projects Services Standardization
BPO. The delegation of IT-intensive purchasing processes to and AIR-CRAFT. Nevertheless, further developments have to
an external provider that, in turn, owns, administers and be done by the IT vendors in order to build appropriate tools
manages selected processes, based on defined and measurable and interfaces to facilitate the management of service
performance metrics. procurement, since companies are seen this area as the next
The factors in favor of business process outsourcing e.g. frontier in their e-procurement projects.
rapid deployment, lack of IT resources, access to new D. Spend and Supplier Intelligence
technology/skills and cost, are convincing supply chain The transparence of the purchase processes and data is a
managers to invest on these services and their respective key factor for an e-procurement program success. However,
integration projects rather than massive implementation and currently only one in every five companies applies spend
enterprise-wide deployments [17]. management tools to control their procurement activities [27].
B. Contract Management On the other hand, the selection of suppliers based just on
The benefits of contract management is gaining more and product price has leaded to numerous disadvantages to
more attention from companies, given the amount of manual suppliers and buyers. These disadvantages have made
processes currently involved in contract negotiation and purchasing departments to change from a price based supplier
compliance procedures, there is no reason that contract selection to a broader selection model, in which suppliers are
management applications vendors cannot double or triple their no longer selected based solely on prices, but also in aspects
installations over the next few years [25]. such as product quality and warranty [28].
The contract management providers can offer their systems The utilization of business intelligence technology to
in two ways: As a part of their Sourcing-Suite or as a extract and analyze possible cost savings and support the
Standalone solution. Since companies have different design of supplier selection/evaluation and spend saving
requirements and processes regarding contract management, programs in a company is a major goal of modern purchase
there are opportunities for both business models. departments.
Technically speaking, contract management system has Since most researches suggest that those systems still in its
started its deployment on the buy-side with the management infancy and most companies have still not deployed this
of supplier contracts. Nonetheless, the market should start a technology, the market of spend and supplier intelligence
convergence between sell-side and buy-side contract applications should continue its high growth rate in the next
management solutions, that should provide to companies a years.
central document management, reports, analysis and The near future developments in this area should focus on
compliance rules, based on an unique master data [26]. reporting and analytical features as well as Key Performance
108
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 28 2007
Indication (KPI) definition models. In the long run reporting ERP vendors have to catch up this technological disadvantage,
tools with automatic commutation with end-user are expected. or their integration capabilities will no longer secure their
place in the SRM market.
E. Process Integration
All the trends listed above and any other development in the REFERENCES
area of supplier relationship management should have as the
[1] Nahar, N., It-enabled Effective and Efficient International Technology
main goal the complete integration of company’s business Transfer for SME’s, Proceedings of the Evolution and Challenges in
processes. System Development, September, Bled, 85-98, 1998a.
It has to be noted that during the development of any suite, [2] Nahar, N., It-enabled International Promotion of Technology Transfer
for High-Tech Enterprises, Proceedings of the UIC/AMA Research
module or a standalone solution, the main focus should not
Symposium on Marketing and Enterpreneurship, August, Boston, 1998b.
rely on the features conception, but rather on the entire [3] Hammel, M., and Prahalad, C.K., Competing for the Future, Harvard
business process. Business School Press, Boston, 1994.
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is an option to [4] Christopher, M., Logística e Gerenciamento da Cadeia de Suprimentos.
facilitate this approach by providing an environment in which São Paulo: Ed. Pioneira, 240, 1997.
[5] Eyholzer, K., W. Kuhlmann, and T. Münger, Wirtschaftlichkeitsaspekte
different information systems can be provided and integrated eines partnerschaftlichen Lieferantenmanagements. HMD - Praxis der
as services, increasing systems functionalities and process Wirtschafts-informatik, 39(228): p. 66-76, 2002
compliance. [6] Beil, D., and Wein, L., An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction
Mr. Shai Agassi, the CEO from SAP, goes even further, Mechanism to Support a Multi-Atribute RFQ Process, Management
Science, 49, 1529-1545, 2003.
and related as his and SAP’s vision, the deployment of an [7] Nenninger, M., and Lawrenz, O., B2B-Erfolg durch eMarkets und
unique and integrated business process platform in which the eProcurement. Strategien und Konzepte, Systeme und Architekturen,
entire supply chain, from the purchase to sales, will take place. Erfahrungen und Best Practice, Verlag Vieweg, 2002.
“The days of buying point products are long behind us. [8] ComputerWire: Executive Briefing: Supplier Relationship Management
– A Relationship Too Far? 2002, http://bpem.fzi.de, download
Five years from now, customers will only buy suites. You 19.01.2007.
won’t purchase individual point products such as ERP, CRM, [9] Pepels, W., e-Business-Anwendungen in der Betriebswirtchaft, Verlag
Supply Chain Management or HR applications that will ship Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe GmbH, Herne/Berlin, 2002.
to you as separate entities and that will end up as a collection [10] Gronau, N.: Enterprise Resource Planning und Supply Chain
Management – Architektur und Funktionen. Oldenburg Verlag,
of services that you need to manage. Customers are looking to München, 2004.
drive a higher level of value out of their industry flavored [11] Maier, K., Pützfeld, K., Der e-Business Spezialist Planung und
enterprise software solutions and they are doing this through Praktische Umsetzung von e-Business-Anwendungen, Addison-Wesley
deploying application suites.” [29]. Verlag, 2002
[12] Holland, C.P. and Light, B. A critical success factors model for ERP
implementation. IEEE Software, 16, 3, pp. 30−36, 1999.
V. CONCLUSION [13] Fraunhofer IAO, Marktübersicht Portalsoftware 2005, Fraunhofer IRB
Verlag, Stuttgart, 2005.
The SRM market is constantly growing. The ERP providers
[14] European Commission Electronic Commerce Team, B2B e-
e.g. SAP and Oracle, but also the "Best-of-Breed" vendors e.g. Marketplaces, June, 2002.
Ariba, are strongly developing their functionalities in order to [15] Gartner: B2B Buy-Side E-Procurement (Application Components)
be able to survive in this competitive market. Internet Commerce. Gartner Research, 2004.
Especially in the area of strategic sourcing much investment [16] Bartels, A.: Forrester WaveTM: eProcurement Solutions. Forrester
Research, 2005.
has been done with the purpose to improve or reinforce the [17] AberdeenGroup, The Procurement Benchmark Report: e-Procurement
current developments in the area of contract management, 2.0, August, 2006.
service procurement, spend and supplier intelligence and [18] Abery, J.; van Bokhost, G.; Giling, N.; Glindemann, C.; van der Kolk,
process integration, among others. R.; Noorlander, R.; Odijk, M.; Osborne, A.; Putters, M.; Schoultz, K.;
van Wilgen, P.: Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) 2005-2006 –
On the other side, in the area of e-Procurement, the growth A report for senior management in procurement optimization. Capgemini
potential seems to be exhausted, and the growth expectations Niederland B.V., 2005.
relatively low, when compared with the booming e-Sourcing [19] Minahan, T. A.: Center-Led Procurement – Organizing Resources and
segment of the market. Technology for Sustained Supply Value. AberdeenGroup, 2005.
[20] Van Vliet, M., Supplier Relationship Management Soluctions: Expected
Other important trend in the SRM market is the application Value, Capgemini Consulting, September, 2006.
of business process outsourcing and SRM On Demand, which [21] Aberdeen Group, The Advanced Sourcing & Negotiation Benchmark
gives software vendors the possibility to offer their systems as Report: The art & science of the deal, January, 2007
services. First to middle size enterprises, who cannot afford [22] Kyte, A.; Eschinger, C.; White, A.: Magic Quadrant for Strategic
Sourcing Applications, 2004. Gartner Research, 2005.
the acquisition of license software, and second to big [23] BME Verband - Bundesverband Materialwirtschaft, Einkauf und
organizations, who are looking for innovative products and Logistik e. V. : BMEcat – Entstehung und Ziele. 2006,
skills without the need to invest huge amount of capital in http://portal.bme.de, download 10.12.2006.
implementation and roll out projects. [24] Gartner, User Survey Analysis: Procurement BPO, North America and
Western Europe, November, 2006.
The ERP vendors have still the advantage of their vast [25] Pang, A.: Worldwide SRM Applications 2005-2009 Forecast and 2002-
customer base, and the facility to integrate their SRM modules 2004 Vendor Shares: Contract Management, Core Purchasing, Strategic
with their other systems. However, the "Best-of-Breed" Sourcing, and Supplier Collaboration Segments. IDC Research, 2005.
providers showed better performance in specific [26] Cecere, L.; D’Aquila, M.; Carter, K.: The Procurement and Sourcing
Applications Report, 2004-2009. AMR Research, 2005.
functionalities, according to most market researches. Thus, the
109
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 28 2007
[27] Hornung, J.; Neumann, K.: SRM: Den Einkauf strategisch betrachten –
Systeme für das Supplier-Relationship-Management können weit mehr,
als operative Prozesse zu automatisieren. Computerwoche, Heftnummer
1/2006, S. 24, 2006.
[28] Campelo, E., Stucky, W., New Use Scenarios For e-Catalog Systems: A
Cross-Company Approach, In Proceedings of the 6th International
Business Information Management Association (IBIMA) Conference,
pp. 207-212. Bonn, Germany, June 2006.
[29] SAP AG – Press Release: SAP Executive Shai Agassi Identifies Five
Key Software Trends for Companies to Watch. 2006,
http://www.sap.com, download 12.03.07.
110