Anti-Communism Bulletin 1955
Anti-Communism Bulletin 1955
---e---
APRll- MAY, 1955 - - News-Bulletin
--- .-- -
Based on Myron C . Fagan's address to th e Fello ws of the Ci nema
Ed ucat ional C uild at their met-ting on Ma)' 9. 1955,
at the Eb ell Club in Los Angeles, California.
---.---
CONTENTS:
11 "Guilt By Association"
21 San Francisco Hearing on U. N. Charter Revisions
31 " Cong ress of Freedom" Convention
41 Obvious Conclus ions
51 Grounds for Lawsu its against U. N.
61 The PETITION
71 The DOCUMENTATIONS
81 So. Africa gives UNESCO " Bum's Rush"
---.---
This News-Bulletin copyr ighted May. 1955
Price per copy . fift }· cen ts
A11 rights reserved
"GUILT BY ASSOCIATION "
- - - - .- ---
Back in 1933 Frn nklin Rooseve lt gave th e Red s in Amcr ie:t a
I alse cloak of rcsp ect nb illty by grn ntlng Reco gnl tlen to Moscow.
Afler th at he gave th em pot ent propaganda weapons eve ry tim e hr.
denounced or ridi cul ed pa tr iotic gro nps such ;15 "America First".
"Pr o-America" , "Minute Wo men ", th e DAn. et c. If you joined or
supported any orgnn lza u on tha t oppo sed Communism a nd Inter-
na tionalism you were loud I>' cha rge d w ith bein g a F asc ist, a Nazi.
a n Iso lati onist a nd. for final good meas ur e, a n ant l-Serni te, :\ ntl
even If )'OU were not :\11 netive member of such patriotic orgn nlza-
tiulls , but atten ded th eir meetings arul expressed a p prova l of th eir
objectlves, you were d ecla re..1 gu ilty by reason of as socta tion .
Thus, from 1933 unt il a year o r two afte r th e wa r, "Cuilt h )' As-
socia tio n" W :l S the Iavorite "smea r" techn iqu e of the Hed s and Inter-
nnrionnl tsts . They even stre tche d it 10 cover Indlviduals whn re-
ru ~ t'(l to join or contri bute money to Red Fron ts. M nn y ncrors-«
e ven top Stars- Wri te rs and D irectors wer e secre tly blackllstcd in
Hollywood a nd o n BrOlll!w n>' if th ey COli tin II ed to nssoc inte wilh
known foes of Com m unism :11111 Intem uttonallsm. Wbcn thn t "guilt
b y nssoclntion" techniq ue W II S d ecri ed by those wh o were thns d e-
p rived of livelihood ill their pro fessio ns, the Red s chortled mucous'
ly, lind tr ium ph nnt!>' poi nte..l tn the old adage that "n mllll 15 kno wn
by th e l'Ompany he keeps: '
BUI along in 19·17 the title begun tn turn, It became obvious th nt
~I os cow was never our all)'. Pro-Communism began to lose its
po pulnri ty. Co ngressiona l a nd Stnte com mi ttees bega n to in\'es ti!-:a tc
the nl:t! Fr on ts. They na med and expo sed memb ers nnd su ppo rter s.
T hen the "C inema Ed uca tio nal C u ild" exposed an d l\.... ~~ED th e
Heds in Hollywood-c-nnd th e Ame rica n peo ple bega n to ~ivc th ose
Red Stars, D irectors and Wri lers a taste of th eir own "blacklist"
med icine. And their screams ra ng to high heaven, They h itt e rly de-
nounces our use of their own "guilt by associat ion" techn iqu e. It
was vlcic us a nd unlnir. they cried out. No lon ge r d id th ey point to
tl.:,t old ndnge nhout bc iog known by th e company yo u keep , No w
tllcir ox wns he ill ~ gorL'<1-.,nd the y d idn 't like it.
----.- - - -
SAN FRANCISCO HEARING ON U. N. REVISION
All of the above is a propos of th e Sen a te F or eign Rela tions 5111>-
- 2-
Committee's Hearing on the matter of revi sing th e U. N. Ch art er ,
held in San Francisco on April 9, 1955.
TI le henrlng open ed promptly at 10 A. ~t. Senator Sparkman
a rrival went unn oticed . Sen ator Knowl and received a trem en dous
ovation , They Were the onl y mem be rs of th e Comm ittee present .
Sparkman expla ined th e ob ject ive of th e various hear ings : il was
10 gcr the reactions of th e pe ople to th e pr oposed revisions, if any.
of th e llnitt.-d Nations Chart er . He fu rth er sta ted that th er e wer e
about 90 people scheduled to speak . Eac h speaker was alloted five
m inutes in wh ich to pr esent a summary of th e written stat ements
th ey had alre ad y delivered. L..ater, Senator Sparkman assured that
all of the wri tten statements woul d be pr inted verba tim in an
offici al repo rt and mad e avail able 10 the public. Anybod y can get
a copy by writing for it to the Senate For eign Relations Comm ittee .
Senate Office Building, Washington. D. C" or to the C overnment
Print in g Office, W nshington, D. C.
The morn ing session had 5 speakers opposing the U. N. and 19
for "stre ngthening" it. In th e aft emoon 16 loyal American s staunchly
sp oke tip for the Con stitution and 34 spoke in favor of str engthen.
ing the U. 1'\. regardless of what it would d o to American Sovere ign -
ly. The a udie nce was about eve nly di vide d on the qnest ion. But
th ere was a hea lthy sign throughout the hearing tha t I feel should
he stressed. T hose who OPPOSl'<l the U. N.• both th e speakers an d
ill the au d tence, did so fearl essly and w ith assuran ce th llt their
came was righteo us. Thos e wh o spoke in favor of the U. . ' , were
[n rtive and defiant- th ey knew they were prop ounding treason
W hich brings ti S back to their own one-ti me "gu ilt by assocla tion''
tech niqu e,
111e first SPC:lKCr in favor of the U. 1\.. onc Luther Carr. pro-
cla imed that he was the re to spea k on behalf of the Kiwan is. I very
milch dou bt tha t he had been authorized by Int ern at ion al Kiwan is
to dn so. I stress that doub t becaus e I nm fam iliar w ith the tactics
of thnt gentleman. Back in 1949, wh en C.E.C . was leadi ng in th e
fight for the resc ission of the "United World Fed eralists" infnrnous
On e-World Resolution, I pu blicly d eb at ed th e q uesti on with him.
He was then :I top funct ionnry of the U.W ,F. He W:lS openly a
O nf:.\Vor!cler , nnd amo ng hts co-wor kers I recognized many Reds .
Mtl:r h is statement at the hearing on th e matt er of th e U. N. Chart er
revisio ns (on inil 9, 1955) . at wh ieh he claimed to rep resent K!-
wn nis, I cornm nted nbou t h is UW F relat ionship. a nd upon hIS
association w ith var tous Bed s and Int ernat ional ists. He p romptlv
wailed thnt 1 was "smearing" him via th · "gutlt hy nssociation"
-3-
technique. lie conve niently forgo t ( ? ) th at in 1949 he nnd his eo -
workers e ndeavored to discredit me nnd CEC, by pointing to my
purported nssocintmn with notorio us an tl-serni tes.
It is int eresting to note wh at kind of nrganiz:\tions :lIId indivi-
clnals espoused the ca use of the U. N. The most zealous were the
~ U n ilcd W orld Fed eralists", "At lnntie Un ion" , "'\lIlI'rie:ln ssocin-
t ion for th e U. N.', " Leag ue Ilf \\' omen Vote rs", ":'I1a tiona l Conncil
of jewish \\'om en ", "Ame rica ns Ior Democratic Act ion", "Wnmens'
Iutem ntionnl I.,·agn e for Peace nnd Fr eed om", cte., etc .. together
wi th others wh o appear d as individuals, wh om I recogn ized as
members of nrious Hed Fronts and On e-World gf/ln ps, No doubt,
however , that nmong them the re wer e a few naiv e nnd misled sin-
ce re men and wom en ,
Thuse who spu k,' lor America lind the COllst illlJ iulI wi-n - n'JlI'I'-
w nt:,t ivl's III "Cilll'Ill,1 Etlm:alillllal Cui ld", OAII, SA l\' "Calilornl«
~lilitM)' Order o f World W ilts ", "Pro-America ". "Cnlifnrnians for
the Bricker Am en dment", togethe r with lnwyers, do ct ors, wr iters,
hou sew ives, etc., wlto ap pea red as Ind ivid ua ls,
The most i n terl'sti n~ Iout u re of th e h earinlt wa s in tl", reaction s
ell Il<ltlt .
cnu torx Knowl.nul a m! ' pa rkm an . ;'I:at " IOIlI y, th ey hn, l th e
pr ivilel(e 01 que stmmng e very speaker after he ( or she ) spo ke . The
witness es wh o spok e on behull 01 Ameri can ism a ml tlu- Constitu-
tion were not 'l 1l('stion",I , hilt those' who :ll!"lll'al ('d for ,!rl'n ~lllt'n '
ill~ Ihe U, N. carn e ill for couskleruble e i llestinnin~ b y Senator
Knowlnnd . He pointed ou t that th e U. N. is no t pr es('nll )' l\Sin~
nil rhe power it has at its di sposal. so how cou ld gi\'inl-: it more
x)w,'r solve th e probl em . In shor t, he t'jllidly hilt eff ectively Ilil!h -
l
,ightL't1 the !:T1I\'e menace or he U, N, to Ih,~ U. S. TI le Wil Il L'S S""
Im,l no answe rs for his qu est ion s.
---.-- -
THE "CONGRESS OF FREEDOM"
----.----
In Octobe r W53 [ a tte nded th e first nat ional co nve ntion of the
"C on gres s of Freedom" in Omah a , Nebraska .
~ I ~' int er est ill tl uu th en new org:llliza tion was nTOllsl,tI b)' a ( "0 11\-
municnriou in th e Iorm of a pr ospectus wh ich I received fr om till'
01'l;'lnizcr s, It p romised mna z ing ac t ion, It named us S PO IIS HTS ant i
O ;I'('ctOI'S men a....1 wom en (If "rcat re p u ta tio ns, noted law -crs,
-1-
pol ltk-a J nnel m ilita ry figurl'S, cou rageo us je u mn lists-e-a nd wh en
C ol. ..\ rc:h ibah l B. Roosevelt (Teddy's son) told m e th at he hnd ne-
cept ed the ehni rmnns h ip of th e convention I becalm' convinced
t hat this urg anizntlon of true a nd grea t Amer icans was th e ans wer
10 ...ve ry tru e American's prayer.
W eIJ-1 he ard ~reat speeches . del ivered by b rilli an t spea ke rs, But
th 'y told me noth ing th'll I elid no t al ready kn ow -or tbat the vas t
ma jorit" of those assembled there d id not al rea d y kno w. TIley ca me
lip w itfl s ple ndid "lt esolutlon s", hut Resolution s w itho ut ac tion a rc
merely scraps of p nper-s-nnd th ere w ns no actio n, In short. that
convent ion W ' I5 all tal k a nd no action . ) lef t Om aha com plete ly d e-
f!:lll'el :lOll elislIppointl'(I-:m d dl srnissed the "Cong ress or
Freedom"
05 i\ possibl e instrumen t for th c awakening and welding of th e
l\ l1Il' rit~ 1I 1 peop le.
In )f)5.; the)' hel d anot her co nve ntio n. nlso in O maha . I did not
a ttend. Xor d iu CuI. Roosevelt. Nor d id mnn v of th e oth ers w ho
ha d l'ntll1lsinst iC:llly flock ed to Om a ha Ior the i953 COli" 'n lion . But
shOltlv ,lfl er th e 1954 eon ve utio n I rece ived a le tte r from Hobert
I", F\:vre. the newly elect ed Executi ve D irect or of the "Cong res s o f
F"'I'(ICllU- , ill w h ich he inf ortll L'l.1 me th 'lt a ne w Boanl of Direct ors
hall be en elected, an d that the new Boar d w as composed of m en
uml wo men of ACTIO N, not of tal k. He outlined th e ir plans fo r :I
H1;''5 conve ntion to be held in San F ran c isco-i- un d stresse d thn t th c
('III in." l..nvention was to he devoted to "u n np p misal of th e -Un itcd
I atlom- and ho w to des troy its menace 10 th e so vereignly of th e
United Sta tes.
Despitl' m>' p re vious co nvict ion th at the "Con gr ess of F reedom
was jlls a nother hr illia nt ide a that had some ho w gone awry, th nt
1.'I IN. :\IId the communica tions thur followed , re vived 10" be ltef
tha t ~n'at good cou ld co me out of it. ;"Ir. Le F ev rc diu no t stress
tl u- ~re:l t speeches tha I wou ld he hea rd-he stressed th e ACTION
Ibat would be ta ken. I accepted his nssu ru nces lit face valu e a nd
thr e w myself wh ole-h eart ed ly illto the suppo rt of the project, I
urg c'el all me mbrs (If C.E.G. to co-opera te. Man y of th em did . For
lhat rea son I fed th at it is my ob liga tion 10 issue a rep ort of the
rc~~ull, of the San Fra ncisco convention .
- -- e- - -
OBVIOUS CONCLUSIONS
- - -e----
Those two San F ra ncisco eve nts revealed Far more th nn is visible
to the naked eye.
Taking First the hl'nriug on the revisio n of the U. N, Ch ar ter .
the lIn-ay of sp ea kers iu favor or the U, ' , rew nled that the
"U nited Nations" is th e great hope of th e subversives, Int er-
nationa lists nnd outright tra itors in our land. That es rnb lishes
beyond a ny doub t th at the " United ntlo ns" is ;1 dinbolic-.Il1y eon -
cei ved Instrument for the des tr uct ion of th e United States :I.~ a
sovl'rci~n na tion. That hcnring also revealed th at the " United Nn-
tions" is. to lise n poli tical expression , run ning sca red , Th er e is
evidence that nt long last the American people nre com ing awake.
I spent most of the mon th of ;"1;\Tch in Ind ian a, M ich i~1 n and
Illi nois. I spoke be fore many nnd vnried gro u[ls of peop le, includ-
ing ga therings of high sch ool students, 1 foun d a gro wing awa re-
ness of the men nce of the U. N. I toured the same nre ns in l!)Sl
and 1952. At thnt time the One-Wo rklers wer e riding a very high
h orse. They jee red nt pa triotism, scoffed at th e Cons titu tion, sne er-
ed at the Star s and Str ipes - they idolized Milton Mayer for his
pub lic de ma nd to ""alll clow n th« I\ mcrican flag ancl stam p ancl 'T,it
01 1 it: And th e tru e Ame rfcan s were bew ilder ed- timid, • nd almost
fearful to express th e ir loya lty.
It WM diff erent th is year. The O ne-Worl ders w ere b y no m eans
ns vocifernnr. :-':ow they whine about the need of the U. N. to pre-
se rve PEACE . •. they do n't j('er, or sneer. or scoff . , .they don't
quote ~Hlto n Mayer. And today th ere nrc many tru e Ame ricans
who a rc 110 longer hcw ildenxl, no longer delud ed . no longer t imid-
th ey 1I0 W sp eak with courage arul nssurnnee.
But th e hcst evidence thut the On c-Worlders ar e "runnln g scared "
is fo und ill n state ment issued hv Eleanor Roosevelt : "Nou: is not
tile t;III C" , mOllnlflllly cautioned ihe high pries tess (If the U. No "t»
talk of rCllisin:; the Chaner • • ," Thn t was :I warning in so mnny
-6-
words that attempts to trnnsform the U. N. inlo a One-World gov-
ernm ent lit this time might well boomerang nnd completely torped o
thnt monstrosity.
However, let there be no de lusion- the One-W orld ers are not
surrend erin g. T hey arc merely changing their strntegy-the U. N. is
to lie doggo nncl let the termit es "carry on" • . • the term ites being
th e "Atlantic Union", piloted or Dulle s, Milton Eisenhower , John
Marshall Harla n, etc; the "United World Fed erali sts", piloted by
Stassen. Justice Douglass, Earl Warren, etc, the "Anti·Defamation
Lea gue" piloted by . Lehman. Frankfurter , Morganthau and
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWEH-plus oth er such organizatlons. They
will "carry on" th e job of spread ing FEAR nnd urging the surrender
of natlona l sovereignty to insure PEACE. .....nd the>' will have the
controll ed press. rndlo, TV, stage and screen- lind unlimited funds
from the Ford , Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations ami our own
mx money provided by our elected tra itors In Washington,
Nevertheless, despite that arra y of power to destroy America,
wh:1l I have seen in mv travels and in San Francisco, mnkes me
more IlOpC£ul-in fact, sanglline--than I have ever been . Th e one
th in~ that the "Unitl..d N:ltions" nnd th e One-Worlders nnd the
hetr.lycrs in Washington nrc deathly afra id of is :\0 awakened and
arou sed merican people ••. and the American people ARE
awnkening!
Th e paramount job now is to keep awakening them more and
more-in every nook and cranny In our land . . . and to keep them
Irorn being lulled back into slumbe r by phon y assurances and
promi ses. Th e surest way to do that is b y complet ely unmaskin g-
with DOC UMENTARY evidence-s-th e "United Nations," 'Eisen-
hower, the Intemntionnlists and the betrayers we have elected into
office. We enn not rely on our press to do It~r any other of our
means of publ ic communications-we must do it by going di rect
to the people with ACTION that will pe rform the expositions.
In the days when we hnd nn honest, ethi cal and self-respecti ng
judiciary, a lawsu it W IIS the surest mea ns of getting justice. In
those clays n mnn could look to the courts for protection ng.1inst
libel. agai nst "smear", against pe rsecu tion- It was the su rest W:lY
to s;l fl'~uard your !itanding nnd repu tation In your community . ..
hecnuse in those dnys we had a free press that repo rted the facts
and the fjnd illg.~ of n court with out fear or Iavor, Without distortion.
In those dnys we who love our country did not have to search for
ways and means to snfc~u a rd our American way of liCe and our
Frcedoms-s-w . had a nitcd States Supreme Court that stood like
- 7-
n Rock of Glb rnlt ur h -twecn our Constitution nml thos e wh o would
d estroy it-we hnd Pres idents who loved the A:\IEHICAN nnl:.
not International On e-World rugs . But it I. different toda~" T oda y
we hnve no fre e pr ess . .. we have no loyal judicln~' . . . we hnve
no White House integ rity. Tod ny we hav e only th e Voice and the
Will of the American people with wh ich to save America-if IC C
ClIn rcacl: them .
Seve ral months ag o, rcnllz ing that lim e is ru nni ng o ut, wi th
Charter re visions planned 10 transform th e U. N. into n Onc-Worhl
Go vernment , we ( C EG) decided nn n drastic step which we he-
lieved would alert nil of the Amer ienn people-e-we decided 10 stnrt
a law suit to require the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 10
rescind the original rat ifienlion Ilf the Cha rte r. on wounds that tho
U. N. had employed Imud , deceit . misreprcsentntion , mlsinformn-
tion and conecnlment of secret ag ree me nts to delude the Committee
into ra tiFying th e Chart er. We commissioned five lawyers, in dif -
ferent pnrts of th e co un try . to make the necessary researches and
pr epare the d ocument ati ons to ha ck up our lawsuit. Ve ry qu ickly
It became a p pare nt thnt we lnul g ro unds for se verer/lawsn its.
- - - -.- - - -
GROUNDS FOR LAWSU ITS
----e----
Suit"No . I : ) The matt er of the territory in New York now oceu-
pied by th e United Nntion s and proclaimed 10 be "for eign te rrit ory",
Und l..r Olll Con st ilution on I)" the buildings and grounds of an
Embassy of :I Sover eign Nntion can he set asid e as "Iorelgn terri-
tory ". The Un ited Nation s is not :I sove reign nnt ion- it is mer el y
an assoclntion of agents of vurious nat ion s. Nevertheless. a large
plot of ground in the heart of New York has been ceded to the
United lI::ltions and declared to be "fore ign territory" outside of
United Stat es jurisdi ct ion. That e na bled the U. N . to mllke those
pr emis es n sacrosanct sanc tua ry for spie s and tra ito rs, where they
ha ve been plolting and schem ing to destroy the soverc ign tv of till'
United States, :\ lawsuit, tri ed before nn unblns ed I\ M E RICAN
Judge. should speed ily cstahlish that th e relinquishment of nnt ion -
al iurisdiction over thnt lem itor>' is illegal and inv alid.
Su it No. 2 : ) Th at in 1945 th e "U nited Nat ions" pr cm cditntedly
emp loyed fraud . deceit . misrepresentntion, misinformntion and th e
-8-
concea lment of secre t ag reem ents. not !Critlc lI into the Char ter , to
deceive an d del ude th e Senate Foreign Relations Comm nt ee into
mlilyinl: the Charter, thereb y gra vely endangering th e sovere ignty
ell the United Stat es nnd the Freedoms of the American peop le ns
gllllm ntecd 1>y our Constitu tfon a nd Bill 01 !lights . Tried before n
Iny,11 :\ mericnn [ ud ge, th is suit, bac ked by the DO C U:\IENTED
evi dence we will submi t, should au tomn ticallv brin~ about the
rescission ond revoca tio n of the ra tification of ihe . N. Chnrter.
Th ere me nddi tional grounds for legal nction , such as the iIIc~fl l
xecrer l,:Tilllts of tnx-payers' money to various agencies of the U. N.,
su ch as Unesco, th e Econom ic nnd Socia l Coun cil, etc; ete ., bu t
th e abo ve two lawsui ts arc the most vital nnd impo rtan t ones.
....t 01 con ference 01 our lawyers it was unanimously agr eed that
both su its, bac ked by our overw he lming DO C U~IENTED eviden ce,
:1Tt: sure' fire-if tried bclorc fin im partial line/ ethica! Jue/ge. I stress
that "if' because today most of our Feciern] and Supreme Co urt
J IltI l!t~S are more politica l thnn jurid ical. We know how a Young-
dahl or a Ynnkwich would view an)' .case that wou ld menace th e
U. N.. ur the Red s. And even after we fina lly get II Invorab le verdic t,
there will he appeals and long delays. We have a concr ete example
of th at ill the suit brought by "Defenders of the Amer icnn Con st itu-
tion- , hea ded br. Genera l Del Valle, to rescind and revoke the "Task
Forces Treaties" under wh ich 11 11 America n OO)'S d rait ed to serve in
Inre i~n cou ntries are depriv d of their Constitut ional rights and
protection.
So we must not plnce all of our reliance on the lawsu its. Becau se
wh ile we would be wai ting the enemj would he wo rklng-e-uml
time might n m out for us. Th ere is one course of nctlo n th nt can
solve this matt er of lime, and which is be yond interf erence bv the
U. N., by the cour ts-e-and even b)' the mnn in the Wh ile I-Iollse.
Th is course is a Peop le's Petition. 111e right of Pelition is still un-
touched a nd untouch able, A Pet ition 10 the Sena te Fo reign Bela-
lions Com mittee, embodying nil charges and DOC U:\JENT ED evi -
d cnee, might well be even more effective tha n the suits-even if
si~nl.,J by only two mill ion IOY:lI Amer icans. Alld we /'ol' e to get
T EN M1I.L10N signntllres! It surely will cut through 0111 th e Red
tape and "legal" opposi tions that will he mnbiliaed to stym ie th e
suits.
We concluded our conferen ce with n decision to go ahea d with
the suits, but to conce ntra te on the Peti tion for d irect and immed iate
results.
-9-
THE PETITION
- ---.----
-PETITION-by the American People
"To the U. S. Senate Foreign Rela tions Committee :-To get the
U. S. out of tilt: U. N. lind tlu: U. N. 0111 of till' U. S.
"Attention of Sen at ors C:C'Or~e . Holland. Sparkman . Man sfield ,
Wiley, Smilh (N.J.) lind Knowland:
"We. the unders igned , citizens of the U n i t ~'tl Sta tes and regist ered
voters in ou r rcsp cliv e sta tes, respectfully sub mit th nt in the rl":"
1945 the United N:ltions pr em ed itatedly employed dec eit, frnud nnd
misrepresentation to delude and sed uce th e Sen ate Foreign Hl'Ia-
lions Committee into rnlifying the U. ~ . Charter . nnd th Jr ch y gra ve-
Iy endangering th e sove reign ly of the United Sta ll'S and th e F ree-
doms of the Amer icnn people as g uara ntee d hy our Cons tilul inn
and Bill of Rights. to-w it:
"T he ' nitt'd Nations Ch arter. Section 7 of Article 2. suys :
" 'No tllin!!- cDn/ /lin ed in 1111: /lTC.fCII/ Chart er shall III1ITw ri=c the
UIlIt Cl/ Nil/ion, to in/crocrrc in Illo// ar$ t~ ll ic11 nre r'sscn /ill lly lI;i/I,in
IIIl! d om cs/ic iurisdiato« of li lly state,
"Ha d it not be en for thi s provision th e Ch art er would not hav e
been mt ified by th e Senat e in 19-15.
" lIut immed iat ely afte r the rntif icnt inn th e U. N. d ill wilfull y nntl
del iberat ely proceed 10 plot to transf orm itself into a supe r-O ne
World Government tha t would a bsor b the United Stal es. tlcstroy
our sove reig nty and vo id nnd nullify our Con st itutlon, T o nchieve
th ose objectives th e U. No set u p special Agen cies. such as ILO.
till' Econom ic and Socii. I Co uncil. U ~ ESCO. etc.. etc.. th rou ~h
whi ch th ey null ified vnrio ns of ou r Sture and Federal Jaw s. They
further Wilfull y emp loyed Irnud and deceit in an endeavor 10 de-
lud e the ena te Foreign Ilelatlons Committee into rat ify i n~ udrli-
tinnlll 'Treaties", sud, .I S till: "Genocide Pact ". the "Covenu nt of
Human night s" a nd TWO II UNDUED siml lnr "trea ties". nny nne
01 wh ich would have forever de stroyed the fre ed oms of th e Arncri-
l"'" people. Th ey further wilfully nnd dcllh emt ely conceal ed th e
existence of . ecret a~rl·,mll' n t< . NOT WIHTI' El\ I NTO Til E
CH ,\H TEH. o ne of which ll ro\' itll·,1 th nl th ' lllililnry heml of the
'. :-i. is nlways to II<' II :-'I OSCOW nED-and we pro vide DOC U-
:-'I ENTAIIY " \·;,l«-lIl·(' that 1·13.00001 nur Illl)'S who fU IIl-:ht in Korea
-10-
were ambushed and trapped, murdered and maimed , as a result
of the Red Chinese receiving advance infonnation through tha t
U. N. military head.
(:--:OTE: Ten pages of docum ented ccidcnce will be auached to
th e Petition uihe» it is submitted to the Commi/tee. )
"Had the Senate foreseen these develop ments the Chart er would
have been overwh elmingly rejectd in 1945.
"Therefore we do earnestly lind p rayerfully beseech and implore
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to weigh nnd nppraisc the
documented and prima fncic evidences submitted with this PETI ·
T IO!': lind to move to rescind and revoke the original ratification
Oil the ground thai it was obtained by fraud . deceit and misrepre-
sentation, with intent aforethough t to destr oy the sovereignty oE
th e 'niteel Stales and the freedoms of the American people as
gnnmnteed 10 us by our Constitution and Bill of Rights.-
- - -e---
THE DOCUMENTATIONS;
To all of wh ich Ihe pro pon ents 01 lhe U. N. , e plled by po int ing 10 Ihe
above quot"d Section 7 01 Article 2 in the Ch." e r w hich explic;,h' . ta''''
tha r Ihe U. N. would no ' and could nol in eny manne' wha rso" ve r in' e r.
fet e w ith our domestic 14 Wi . 0' encroach on our n.tionel sov o, eionfy, By
IIre"ino rhar w, illen pl"dge Ihey succ" eded in oellino Ihe Ch.rte' reti fied.
Bu' immedl alel y elle, Ih" ,eliflcelion the U. N. d id w illully end de libe , e' ~
Iy p'oc""d ro .cheme and plot 10 Irensfor m i"ell lnte e ~upe, .O n" Worl d
GOvernmenl the' wou ld o' adually a bsorb the Unile d SI" tes and translorm
i' In lo on Impo te n: unlt 01 tha I One Wo,ld Gov e rnm e nl. The key te the ir
c:IOf roy in our own Con stiluriOn wh ich prov id e. thel e Tr" ety becom,,~ It><!
~ ..preme law 01 ou r land. Thus Ih" plOI was-and " ill Is-to oraduelly vo id
a nd nullify ell of Ollr dome.llc and Fede,ol rews b V , ..on 01 Iheir be inll
in conflier wilh 'he provi.ions of lhe Chart er an d ou r tre a ry w ith the United
Nellon•• unt il ,II of o u' le ws wou ld be en tirely superseded by the 'aws o f
' he U. N.. end our Consl itut ion end Bill 01 Rig h I. wou ld be entire ly . upe r-
.eded by ' he U. N. Chl" er .
" "hi"v e Ihot ob i" ct;ve ' h" U. N, .el up spec ia l age ncies, such as Il O,
I'oe Econom ic end Social Cour.<i1; Ihe Humen Right s Comm in1on; UNESCO.
ele et c.. thro ugh wh ich the y hav " elr"edy Mou tlew" d " va,i o us 01 our St.t.
end Fede r.' lews and supersened th"m wilh the ir " laws". So now we have
.he .\Ionh.hino procedCJre in our AmC/ ican co urls w"ere the U. N. Charter
Is ·ted Oi dOmtUIiC law . • . 'h'e he ,~ifh cite tw o hh.ro r;c cases fro m 'he
SIO' " o f Cel ilor nia:
-12-
I I '" ,I>e case of Pe,e: "I a' vs Lippold. 0 wh i'e we man wo" ted ' 0 mo"y
a n"o, o ond 0 mondomu. oCllon wos flied ' 0 requ i,e 'h" Cou"ry Cle, k of
l os Anl/e /es 10 issue . marriaoe license , ove" 'l\o uOh Ca lifornia had. " . Iule
lo,bidd ing Iho In'e , mo" ioge of rhese Iwo reces, Tl>e Supreme Court of
c " mo," io he ld Ihol 'he C.lifo,,, i. slo'u'e wos U" Co".' ilu, lo" ol. "0 lo,,; e '
volid by '"oso" of 01.0' T,. olv wlrh 'h e Unlled NOlio" s-o"d w" ", 0 " to
t i'e the Cherrer; w hich. among ofher thing s p ,oy ides-·~ • • • to promo ••
so cial proO'." and belle, slandard. 01 lile in lo, g ", lre"dom; and 10' Ihe. o
end. to practice tolerance in promollng .nd . ncouu g ing ros pe ct 'or human
righ ts and 10, lunda menIa l I,,, odoms 10, all w ithoul dislinction .. to roee.
sex, 1,"gu.JIge or relig Ion . . ..ft
In e ther wo,ds, the Courls 01 Colllo ,"I. au umed Ihol the Charl e' sup e',
sed e<! our do me SlIc low ond ciled the prov isions of lhe U. N. CharIer 10
suppe r, ' he r;ohl of the w hile woman 10 morr y a negro i" ' hoI slale . Thl,
ease lI on Ille In Ihe los Ange les Holl 01 Reco,ds.
2 ) The ea" , 01 Sel Fujii vs Ihe Slo'e of Colllorn lo: Sei Fu jii, a Jopanese
al ien purchosed properlV. bUI found Iho' und er rhe Colifomlo Allen land
l " w he could nol ho ld ' ille 10 the land occup ied by ' hoI properly. Aft"r
the U. N. Cho, ter w45 , olified Sei Fujii's lawyer se lzC'dupon a pro~ ision w i,h.
I" Ihe CharIer 10 " nle r a su it ag oinu the Sla'e of Ca lifornlo 10 ... ,ob lish Iha'
the Alien l.nd low b in con flicl wilh Ihe Chorter and Ihe re fore no longe r
va lid. Thus Iho' suiI become a lesl cese lor the Unlred Nallonl -and Ihe
Californio COu" held Ih., by virt ue of the CI.orter's Article 17 of the
'"Oeela'o lion of Humon Rlohts," which proc laim. the ri;hl of " ~e ryo,,e '0
ow n pro pe rty, Ihls alien had Iilte 10 hi. ptoperry. The courl wen l on 10 s.y
"Clol , ly lue h a d lscrimlnllion aoa in.1 I people 01 one ,ace I, conlrary balk
10 Ihe lello, Ind 10 Ihe .plrll of Ihe Chal1er wh lth. .. I l",alY. I. paramaunl
10 oyery law of every , Iale in conflict w ilh it. The alien land law m"sl the,...
lo,e yield 10 th. lrealy .. Ihe ."per/or oUlhorlly."
The Slole of Ca lilo rnia app ealed the cue. 10uOhl it bille rly. and finally
succeeded in ge ll ing the decision reversed. BUl Ihe Sei Fujii an orn~, . up-
po rled by the Unit d Nolions. is plann ing 10 lake the in ue to the United
Slates Su prem e Courr. This ent ire case Is on file In the Son Francisco Holl
of Records .
Ther e ore mony moro equa llv b'oz en ,,;o lol;on. of Ihal Cha , ter st ;pula-
tion o f no I" fer'~'en(c with our dome stic law s; bur the most po1l:ive evidence
tha ' rhe U. N. wa . de libe rale lv .el·up o"d .n rend ed 10 destrov Ih" . over e;gn ·
Iy of the Unlr"d Stares wos mad e oby iou. whe n T,uman onempled :0 seize
the Sleel I ndu.I~V. Thre e U. S. Sup reme Courl Justices ruled Ihol rhe U. N.
Cttorl r, by \/Irlue 0 1 Ihal - " eoly". supe rsede. ' he Cons lilution. Had five
J ushce . ruled Ihot wov ,h ., wo uld haye been the e nd of American sover eign.
- 13-
IV-WITHOUT RECOURSE TO. OR CONSENT O F, THE PEOPLE. Can we be sure
Ih. , we d o no t have FIVE such J ustices ' oday?-wlth Jo hn Ma rshall Harl.n,
off ida l of "Atla ntic Union" and o' lle ' One .Wo rid orQ.niza, lons, and Earl
Warr en , an equal ly no toriou s One·Worid Internationali st, now on thaI Bench?
Anot her less p ublici zed case is even mote sign ificant -wherein our Con.
s.fitutiorJ was saved by a tie vote. The point at issue in thi" case w~s wh e ther
ou r membership in the U. N. had subordi nated our Constitution to 'he
Uniled Nal ion s Cherrer. In Ihe in le rpre t. 'io n of wh.t we h.d done when
our Se nate r.tified 'h e U. N. Charier. four Sup reme Courl Juslices ruled Ih.'
we h.d subord in.ted the Constil u' ;on to the Ch.rler-fou r ruled Ih. t we
had not , The Constitufion was saved by • lie vole I Th.,'s g e lling prelly
dose to the end for our Constitut ion .
Th., Case cerne belore the Supreme Courl on • req ues t fo r a rulin9 as
10 wh e.her a con treer made under 'h e aUlhorlz.tion of a SIa'e law, leg al
under ou r Con stitu tlcn, wa s valid if il vlolsted a prov ision o f the U. N.
CharIer. The re was no claim ., .11 Ihal the law viola led the Constit ution of
the Uniled Stales. So 11 w as. clean cut c.se: our Const itution vs the U. N.
Charte rf iI!"d our ConsTifulion won o u t on ly because the vote was.., tie-
which srill loaves rhe malle, defi nitely undecide dl
And there wa s an oppo,'unily lor a tie on ly bec euse the d eath of Just ice
Jac kson le ft bu t eig hl Justices on the Court ,
It is im po rtant, at thi s pol nt, to stre ss th d' th e Supre m~ Cov rt does no'
pe .. on ' he m"r lts of a law Ih. t is bel o re It for eens ld e rat ion . II decides
only if rhe I.w is Con slilU'ional . And In Ihis case ha lf of 'h e Sup reme
Court ru 'ed Ihat wh en we ra' ified the Cha,'er 01 'he Uniled Nalions en d
'h e'eby be. ame a me mbe r'" 'h at o rg anizalion WE AUTOMATICAl l Y MADE
THE u. N. CHARTER SUPERIO R TO OUR CO NSTITUTIO NI
That's how close we camB 10 lQ1.ing o ur Const ltut ion , Wi,h JOHN MAR·
SHAU HARLAN and EARL WARR EN now on the Supr e me Court we ma y
nOl be so lucky neXI limo. " behoo ves Ihe U. S. Sena te 10 me ke sor e ,ha'
.he re wo n', be • NEXT TIMEI
_ _ _ a· _
-14-
haye for.ver des lroy.d the fre.doms of Ihe Amerlcan people. We cite the
"GENOCIDE" I,ea ly to .mphaslze Ihal cha rge :
On Decembe r I I , 1946, the U. N. p..... d a Reso lution (No. 96) calling
for a "Genee lde Conve ntion" . The full tllle is "Conn ntlon on 'h. P,.v....
elen ,nd Punishment of the Crime of GenocIde,' · and w e quote :
"Th. Conl'.c,lng P.rtie, (Ih. n"ion, Ihot , atlfy) h.vlng consld",,,d Ih.
ded.r.li"" m.d. by Ih. G.n.r.' " ....mbly of Ihe United N.lions In it,
Resolulion 96 (I I d.ted Decembe, 11, 1946, ,h.1 g.nocld. I, . . .Ime vnd"r
in' . m . lio" .l I.w, conlrory 10 Ih. splrll .nd .Ims of 'h. Unlt.d Ni llons Ind
cond.mned by Ih. civilized world; recOllnlzlng Ih.1 .1 .11 per iods of hl,lory
gonocide hOI 'nflictod g",.1 lo...s on humlnily; .nd,
"B@ing convlncltd 'hilt, In order '0 liber••• man1cind from such An odious
s.coufge , internationa l co.-oper.Uon is required, hereby agree A' here inlfter
provided:
" Any of Iho follow ing lei' committed wi'h inlont 10 de'troy, In wholo
or In p.rt, • n.llon.I, .'hnl... I, ..ei.1 or rollg'ou, group, .s such ; A) Killing
m.mbers of Ih. group; B) C.uslng ser ious bodily OR MENTAL HARM 10 me",.
be ... of ,h. group; C) D.l iber.,. ly inflicting on Ih. group condilions of life
..'cu,.t.d '0 bring .boul ils phy,i... l destruction in whol. or in p.rt; D) lm-
pos ing menures in'e " d. d 10 pr• .,e"1 births w ilhin Ihe gloup; El Forcibly
lI.nsfarrlnv children of Ihe 9rouP 10 ."olh.r IlrouP ,"
Arllcle III of the some Resolut ion lisls Ihe followin g among et he r ~"
w hich are pun isha ble : I ) Direcl and public inci' emenl 10 comm il Genocide;
2) Alle mpl 10 commit Gonoclde: 3) Co mp licily in Ge nocide .
Arlide IV "ales : · Persons cha,ved wilh G.nocide 0'
.ny of Ihe othe,
uts enumer.leU in Article III (induding MENTAL HARM) sh.II be 'ried by a
eempetent tribunal of 'he 51.,. in Ihe lorrilory in wh ich Ihe act WIS com-
milled, or (al the discrellon of Ih. U. N.) BY SUCH INTERNATIONAL PENAL
TRIBUNAL AS MAY HAVE JURISDICTION WITH RESPECT TO THOSE CON-
TRACTING PARTIES (me.ning nalions) WHICH SHAll HAVE ACCEPTED ITS
JURISDICTION ,"
II Is ob vlous lnal the inlent o f the United Nalio n. wa s 10 secure inte r.
nalion.1 lurisdl Cllo n In .very signolory counr,y over 1~'inQ Ihe Ille of, 01
causing MENTAL HAIlM 10, even a sinll ie member of any po,t iculor group.
Fa , a mem be r o f any such g roup In 'he Unlled S,.tes covld an.ge tha I J oh"
Doe-. by his convent. iot'l , or hi, commUl"licotions te the new,papefS. or by
his p ub hc sP<'ClChes, we s cau, ing him ser aus "MENTAL HARM" Md a sk thaI
a world body , whel he r the U. N., or Ine Intern otionol Cour t of J ustice ,
o r some ,rib unol ('specially sel up by Ihe U. N. for Ihp pvrpose, bring th e
accused person 10 trial,
-15-
If the Uniled SI.' e. ,hould ever r.'ify Ihi. "Co nve ntion" a. a Irea'y. an
Americ.n ClIizen could be forcibly tra nsported beyond .eO' 10 wh atever
ele ce the U. N. would deaiqnete, and ther e be tried . And from ,h .1
dec ision '0 10 "ansporl ond Iry him, and from .ny convlellon th.t m ight
result 'here would be no appea l-al 1..., to 'n Arnerlcen Courl. The luris.
d iclion of h i, lcc el, his s'ele end hi. fe d er el governmenl would be supplenl.
ed . He would lo se .11 prolection of hi. Americ.n cll izen.hip and of the
Amerieen Bill of Righ,..
Al Ihis po int we w ish 10 uress ,hal . derogator y remark . even If mad. in
jest, abo ut a m inor ity gro up indl vld ua l's race . colo r, or cre ed co uld be con -
. idered gre.' MENTAL HARM.
A. proof of the de libe ra te fr. ud . nd de cep tion employed by the U. N.
10 ind uce Ihe Senate Fore ign Relati ons Comm illee fo r. til y the Gt<nodde
t'<taly w« submit the fo llow ing ,
The Senete foreig n Rel. tion s Comm ln.... , alerted by an arous<!d clliz<!r.ry•
sho wed hesil'lion In 'h<!ir deUberallon, in conn"clIon w i,h the " trU ly",
Thereupon , in or c " r 10 dolude the Sen.te foreign R<!lalion. Commin." and
the Amer ic. n peop le, Ihe U. N. decided ,h., if Russia w o uld .I g n 'he "Pect"
it w o uld have a gre df mo ral efft"c. on 'he "humanitaria nism " of thp. Ameri-
cen people-and ",h. me " u, lnto do ing no less . Bur the men in Ihe Kremlin
"re no " ~uckersn_no rig id "Genocide Law" for them- urd ol.l if hold no "tee th"
a. f.r a. THEY w e re con ce rn ed . So th e U. N. made a desl w ith Moscow, .nd
on M. y 21 , 1951 , Ihe tntern etlon e l Cou rt of Ju.tice.1 the H.g ue SECRETLY
ru led th . r Moscow . nd her se ven Satelilie s cou ld "SIGN THE GENOCIDE
PACT WITH RESERVA nONS" . Ibose " Ie se rva lions " included the righl of
REFUSAL ON THE PART O f All THE IRON CURTAIN COUNTRIES TO AC-
CF.PT THE AUTOMATIC J URISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIO NAL COURT ON
GENOCIDE DISPUTES.
Thu. Ihe U. N. !ri<td b v , tea llh and dece it to indu ce ou r Se nate Forei g n
R<JG'lion!t Comm itte e '0 rafif y a " treer y" whoreby any Am erican w ho wou ld
be ch arged - m ere ly charged, if vou p lene-wllh "Ge nocid e" cou ld be se ized
by the U. N., tr.nsporle d 10 . nv p .rl of the World rhev would des lgn.te,
. nd p laced on trial before a U. N. lIi bu nal w ithout pro tect ion of Amer ic.n
law s., o r de fe~ n~ e by a" Am er ican 'aw ye r o f his cbe tee . . . w he rel1s a Ns -
,i" na l of Russi••nd he r S.te llite , would be immune .
Had o ur Senat e rarifie d Ih a' vicio u' " 'r ".ry'· It . u lom. tic. lly wo uld have
depr;ve d e Vftfy Am e u can cit il en o f the freedom of speech as g Udr ,,:-.te e d
by ou r Bill of R;gh 's-and It wo u lo have rendered o ul Con Slilu ,ion n. 11 and
voi d .
The f.act tha t tlU ' Sena te Fo reign R.elalion s. Cc m m trt ee w as m ade aware-
i u~t in lh. nick of time-of the vile tre eche rv e mbod ied in Ihal "tre e tv", and
-16-
re iecled it, doe' no ' minimize 'he de libe rale inten t of the U. N. 10 destr oy
' he , o.ereig nly of 'he Unitl'd Sla'e, and 01 'h e Amer ican peo ple.
To furlher emp has ize Ihaf Juch is 'he w illing and deliberate ;n lenf of It>e
U. N., II is a maile r of realrd fhol 'hlf o rganizalion has ready and on hand
TWO HUNDRED Jimilor "Irea ties", e ach one confoining pro vil lon. 10 de.troy
ou r dome";c laws and o ur freedom••nd '0e""ove Ihe Ame rican people.
All Ihey are wa illng lor is an unguerded momenf in wh ich 10 slip lhole
"t reol ies" ove r on us. w hich mean. Iha' as long as fhe Uni'e d S'a'es eon-
tinuM membership In fhe U, N. we will have re be on con"anf ou ard-
e nd ,h.re will ~lw'YI b. the p"niblliry of jull one sueh "t,..ly" .,upiftg
scrutiny.
SliII ano the r phase of 'he de libe ra'e Uniled Notions plol 10 d..troy ,t-e
sovereignly o f ,t-e Uniled Siale . Is embodied in Iheir "UNESCO" Agency,
There are a num ~ r of d evious schemes b eing de signed by "UNESCO", bUY
in ,hi. docu ment we will deal only w i'h Iheir invasion o f our schools w ith
e craflil y dev e loped plan 10 bra ln·we sh eur children InfO haIred of Ame rl.
can ism and le v.. of One·World ism. We will esl ab lilh it by quo ting from
'heir own books , in one of which 'h ey Jfoled ,
'1'r equenllv, ' he flmily (p . renls) Infect. Ihe thUd wilh nl 'ion llilm • ••
As long .. ,h. child bre.'h... .he poisoned I lr of nillon ilism, edu Cillon for
wo rld mlndedn"SI un produu only preurious rel ulll •• • Klnd erg.rton cl n
<orre<1 Ihe .rron of homo ' r.lnlng , .nd can . 110 prep.re Ih. <hlld for memo
bwnhip, It .bout le ven, In • group, ,h. fin' on hll w.y to membe "hip in
Iho wo rld socle ly • • , Hlslory shou ld be fll>9ht •• I unlversel hil lory • • • Ih.
s'u dy of il h. d b."er be pOS1ponod until Ihe pupil I. f......d from Ihe na-
lion.ll. t projudicol which now surro und the f..chlng of hislory, "
As we know , lenin's chief formule for Commun il t conquest of the wor ld
I: 10 capture Ihe mind of yourh . The schoo l, beg inning wllh kindergarlen,
ho•• Iwoys been Communism's prime fergel. J UII so. and emp loying tbe
ve ry same 'ec hnlqu"s , has "UNESCO' been dr iving to conlro l tho feaching
In our schooll -end '0destroy all parenlll influenc" ove r our Amer ican
y<> u,h. One of 'h eir book., known as the "E In Unesco ", Is re ple le w ilh
d orection. how to achieve 11'101 ob lective. From all ind ications, the ope ra ' ionl
Of "UNESCO", althouoh a U. N. age ncy, or" d irected from Moscow .
We now submi' fur'her evidence Ihat in lis very incep'ion the U. N, wos
aCl Internaliona l CommuniS! plol for ' he dMl ruclion of Ihe United Stales
tt • • froe nalion -,h., it was planted within our horders os a Troj. "
Horse 10 serv e 0 1 a IIl1eni"9 posl fo r the pIOlfo' , and as a sanc luory fo r
A,ner ican ' raltors and Red Ip ie. who." movement. are sh ielded by diplo-
matic immunilV and proledlon-and wh ICh onab les fhom 10 smuggl" In Ind
. ",",uggle oul whatev er Ihey w ish in Ihe ir diplomaticallv SlcroSl ne, b099a go ,
- 17-
For conf irmation of 'h is charge we u'ge you '0
s'udy Ihe repor' of lhe Mc-
Carra" Sena'.. Commit,..e issued in 1952, wh ich publicly charged the U. N.
wi,h ha,boring and shielding Red Spies and Ameriu n "allors.
There is still anolher pha", of ,he dec..l' and fraud ,ha' wos practiced
bv lhe U. N. '0 delude and deceive the Senate Foreign Relalion. Comm illee
in 1945-ond tho' is ,he conce alment of sec'e' agreem..n".
Omission from ,h.. Chart ..r of s~re' agreemen" affee'ing and menacing
rh" f' eedoms and Ihe liven of Ihe American people is even morr. reprehen.
Jible than mlsrep,esentalion . We submit Ih., such om issions lurlher ind uced
the ,allfiealion of 'he U. N. Charter by a de luded Se nate . The r~ently
publ ished '1'01'0 papers reveo led several s"ere' aoreement. wh ich, h.d they
been includ ed In Ihe wr i".n Chor'er, would have prevenled ratif ication .
Howev er, in ,h i. p,lpe r we w ill deal w ilh onlv One sec ret 6Qreemenl w hich
wu deleled from ,he publ ished '1'0110 papers, or , perhaps never put in
writ ino . Th., i. the seer ..' ooreement made between Alger Hiss and Moll>
lov-and .pproved by Rooseve lt, H. rry Hop~in. and 5,.lin- whe re bv ,he
U. N• •ecr,,'orlol in charoe of all mill'ary oellvllie. wa s '0
be h...ded per-
ma".,n,lv by 0 Moscow Communis' . Th.. nome of Ihe fi,s ' such head was
A,k.dy A. $obe lov. now Mos<ow'. deleoo'e 10 the U. N. When he wos ex .
posed he was .uce"eded bv lConstanlin Zynchenk o . World War II Censor of
lh., R" d Army . When 'h.. Red was exposed by the F.B.I. he wa. succeeded
by 11'1'0 Che rnv. he v, ano,her Moscow Red.
We fu, the r sub mil the follow ing 10 es'abllsh Ih.. ,he "Unl' ed Narions "
i• • rnor,ol enernv o f the Uni'ed StOles and IhGt all of lIS func tion. are
f..hlC:/IOd. d"vls" d Gnd d lrecled by Inle,n atlo nali" and Comm unis' pfolle ...
• nd Ihat if would be d is. , ' rous lo r u. In ~nv war berween the Unl.ed S'b .es
and I" e Commun i"s . whelh"r it be ~ussio o r Red Chino, If " be co nd ucted
und", ,he authority of Ihe "Uniled N.rion s", For rhe U. N. Chart"r read.
IArtiele 47 . para .. rap h 1): "Ther e sholl be e.,.bll.hed • Millt.ry 5'a ff Com-
millee 10 ad vise and a..i. t .he 5"cu, i'y Council on .11 .uch qu e.'ion. ,e lat ing
'0 the- Se curity Cou" ci l '~ mili •.,y requi,~m.nts 'or the m.inl en anco of if\oo.
'e",.';on.1 peo,ce .nd security, the e mployment .nd comm.nd of fote"
pllcl'd a l ii, dit pou l, .he ,cgul.tion of -" m amlnt, . nd po u ible diu,m..
men'."
-18-
The 'lex ' par ag raph rea ds: "Th. Milil.ry SI.ff Comml"o. oholl b. ...
opon.ibl. '0'
Ih. olr.l.g;c dlrectiono of .ny .rm.d forcft p'.ced .1 Ih. dl..
POOl' of Iho Security Council •• ." o" d Ihe Ihlrd paragra ph , ' ipula'e, : "Th.
MlIit.ry SI.ff Commi" •• •h.1I con.i., of Ih. Chlon of SI.ff of Ih. perm.nont
m.mlM.. of 'h o SecurilY Coundl or Ih.lr ropr. ..nl.llve... •
And 'ha l i. In add ilion to ' he head of Ih" Secre 'a riat In conlr ol of War.
Communications and Information o f the "Unite d Na' lom".
w. shall now establish Iha' 'h is plo' hu alwavs be'''' known bv var lou.
Ame rica'" 10 whom w" have en'rusted 'he secur l'v of our nallon- kld iv;.
dua ls who for vea ,s have kepI Ihe ir knowledgo seere from Ihe American
people . nd Ihu, oc'uo llv comm itted K is of Ireason .
"On April 30 . 1947. lieut. n. n! Gener.1 A. ph. Vuill. v. of the Red Army.
Ch. lrm.n of the ,,:\ili,.ry SI.ff Committ." of Iha Uniled N. tions. forwlld.d
10 Trygv ia L'e . Secr.lt1ry Ge n. r.a', fo r transmissi o n to tho Secur ity Coun cil, •
topo r' of the Military St. ff Comm i'loo , containin9 recomm endat io ns of the
ge ne r.' principle, '4Iovarning 'he orgin iza'ion or Ih. ~ ,med forcol m.d•
• va ll.ble ro the Securl,y Council by Member N.tions of Ih. United N. lions."
- 19-
The se .. ene,ol p, incip les 90ve,ninQ Ihe o,,,,a nlzal;on of the ARMED
FORCES mode ava ilab le 10 the Securily Council by Membe, Na' io n, of 'h e
U. N. a,e ou, lIned complere in Dep~rlmen l of SIa' e Bullelln Sup plemenl.
Volume XVII, No. 042 2 A. Augu, t 3. 194 7: ond Depo rlm,,"1 of Slole Pub lico.
lion No. 289 2, Uniled Slares-Uniled Nallon' Info, malion So, ie. No. 23. The
abo ve quotalion Is from tho' Bullet in. (Thl' Bulletin. a, In 'he ease of sec ret
ag, eem enl s in Ihe Yal'a p apers, is nOw TOP SECRET. bu ' il should be found
''Iany lib, a,y whe' e the ",gul o, sub sc,i pl lon . Oepo"men l of 51," 0 Bulle lins.
is o n file.)
Thus, t" e mililery olga nizolio n (such IS contro lled the Ko' ean "police"
aClion and woul d cont, ol all fu'u,e milita,y " police" fo'cesl o f Ihe Unlled
NOlion' w as or .. onized end contro lled by tho Sovier Union wllhln the United
N.lion, . These fortes ere com posed , 0' he, e q uoled from the sama Slole
Deparlmen' Bullelin No. 422 A. Arlic!e 04 : "The•• Arm.d Forces sholl b. m.de
ov.ilobl. 10 the Securily Council 'rom the b••, Ir.ined and equipped units
of Momber Nation' of the Uni'ed NII,ions ."
Now we q uote f,om rhe Uniled Stoles offici. I docume nt, one issued by
the Uniled S'. ' e, Dofe nse Depertrnent (a "While Paper "], w hich ""'de Ihe
ch ar:~e. and named the Soviet lieu tenant G.nlffr.r Va.iliev, as. the Sov .et
Gene r.1 wh o launched the Ko, ean wa r over Ihe 38 th pa ralle l. We q uo te ..
follows:
"Oaputment of Defe ~se, Office of Public Informat ion , Wuhington 25,
D. C., pr~ss n,Je.~e May'S, 19S~ . "
This pr~ss re le ase is cap' ioned : "The Truth About Sov iet Involvement in
tho Korean War".
Tn~ Que 'a rlon: " tn.h. interest of throwing further light on the f.1c.ts of
Sov ie.t participation in .hiP Kor,,~n wu• .and on tho Chinole record In Kore.,
'he D.-partmen' of Defense h,J~ rale.sed two Ipeel.1 studies on the~. IUb-
Je cts. These documenb repre-sent conclus ions wh ich .re bue-d on Intelligence
Rese.,ch .. nd e.~mjna.ion of many seu rees of info rmiltion over .I considee-
able period of tim~ . Thl! docum~nts establish bftyond .any ro.sonabl. doubt
the tnJ~ ""tu'e of Communil' ~99reS5ion aga inst the Republic of Korea, the
Soviet ~"d Chi"e~e Communist suppor' of , and participat ion In that aggres-
s ion, ~nd the blunt truth ~bout th e internilll and external m.anifeltations. of
Communist control in North Kar•• . . . M<lny Ruula" '~ dvis or$' were .ttOJched
10 Ihe Norlh Korean Army advance headqulr1en e. tab lished in June, 19S0.
They wore clvllion c1olhing , and it was forb idden to add,ess them by rank.
-20-
They we.. Inl, od uced •• 'newsp. pe, ,.po,te,.', bUI 'hey h. d lupreme
,ulholily. They look Ihe 'e. d in comm.ndin9 .nd m.nipul.tin9 I,oops, They
I"••'ed Ih. No,th Kor.ln office,., who we'e nomini lly 'heir chiefs like
Ihe i, servinIs, or children. A No"h Korun Ml jor idenlified '..,0
of ,h...
Runiln '. d" ilO'" u LIEUTENANT GENERAL VASILIEV .nd Colonel Dolilin.
Vumev , ho Slid, w.. In ch.rgo of . 11 movemenl••cron 'he 38th plr.lle l.~
Thu. , II i. obv ious f,om our own O"'ens" Oep.rlm"n'·. olf icie' rMOrd .
,hel Ihi. R<>d Gene re l Va. iliev firs. o Ullined ho w ' he U. N. was 10 figh ' 'h e
Kor".n W.,-end . imil.r . ueh "wars" • . • ,he n promptly wen I over '0 Ko'e e
10 dirKI 'he Reds how '0 fight the U, N forces . HE WAS DIRECTING 80 TH
SIOESI Cen there now be .ny doubl e' 10 why Generals MacAr'hu' . nd V. n
Fleel were nol pe'ml"ed 10 win thet wer?-and who betreyed Ihe U. N.
fo'"",s in'o 'rA PS .nd ambu.hmenl' whe,ein 143,000 of ou, AMERICAN boy .
we". melmed and murd ered?
00 we da, e ever egain '0 ri.k ou r mon in ba" le w hile enemy offlcers-
end a liCliliou, PEACE org. nlle rion- di, ec' ou' wa' Slrategy?
-21-
H.d Ihe Sen o' e for e,een ,h e.e d e velo pment, the Charte r w oul d hav e been
ove rw he lming ly re lec led in 1945.
In conclu.ion , i, .hould be re membere d Ihal Ihi. U. N . Ch.rler wa. con-
eoc ted and prepared and w riuen by ALGER HISS-I n coll. bor., ion with Mo..
cow' s Moloto v. II Is sofe '0 a" ume Ih.. eVelr y wo rd In II wa. carefully
we ig hed and we ig h,od w llh . e ed . of destruct ion fo r the United Stales.
Ther efo re, we do e arn e ' llv and prayerfullv b es e ech and implo re the
Senale Fore ign Relal ions Comm lll"" '0 we igh and app rai.e the d ocumen'ed
and pr ima facie e viden ce . ubm iued w llh the PETI TION and 10 move to
t ...clnd and re voke the ori ginal ra ' ifiC41ion on the gr o und th ai II was ob-
rained bv frau d, d ece lr and misrepreson lal ion , w llh In' elnt arore.hough' 10
destro y .he sovereig nl y o f ,he Uniled Stale. and .he fre edo m s o f th e Amerl.
con people as g uoran le e d 10 u. b y our Consritu, ion and Bill o f Righ ..,
- ---e- ---
FOR ADDITIONAL "DOCUM ENTATION S"
- - -e---
"hl'~e - D OCli ;\IENT,\ TIONS· will be further fOdified w ith
d lrect citati ons From Cou rt reco rds so ns to m ore read ily ide ntify
.h ' (.,\~(.":\ men tioned therein . Also, Inusrnuc h us th e - D OCU M E N·
T ,\TI O NS" ar e not to he: submi tted until our Co mmi llcc will npJlcn r
be fore th e Se na te For e ign Ilcl nl ions Comm itt ee, il remains oJlcn
10 J;,w yl'rs ;tnd other indtvld un ls in th c various s ta tes who ma y he
nh le tn p rov id e p rooF of othe r d omest ic IO\w5 Ihal h nve he'll "o ut-
luwcd ' hy the i, N. C hO\TIl!r in th e ir sta tes, W e urge all suc h in-
d ivichmls to promptly Iorwunl :111 such proofs to us,
----e----
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS
---e---
Snlllh AFriC:1 j. I:IVI1lI:. UN ESCO the "b um's rush." No t nn lv is
UZl: ESC O or nn vulu e, slntc,1 Prime ;\Iinish :r 5 tryrlrun , but it I~
uctuall y d nngerous to Smith AFriC:l. No r is South M riC:1 th e only
member co untry fell lip w lth UN ESC O. At UN ESC O 's Montevideo
e llufl'rence, Mr . • tryd om stnk d. a lar ge number of importnnl co nn-
t r ie ~ expressed I Ii~sa t i srn cl i (lu with Ihat . N . lll;eucr-imlcl:d,
- 22-
th ey were so critical th at UNESCO's Director Gen eral resizned
his po st, -
The " United Nations" VOTED that th e taxpayers (If the United
Slntes should pay 35.12 per cent of the costs of opernting that
monstrosity. And we nrc doin g nl Wh y? Th ere is not one word in
our const itution that authorizes Con gr ess to dc1cgllte to nnv foreign
hod y the right to tax American ci tizen s. Th e riltht to tao includes the
right to confiscate ... TELL THAT TO THE REPRESE:-iTATIVE
YOU ELECTED TO REPRESENT YOU,
-23-
Bulletins ilia}' be had a t th e (ollowin ~ ra tes:
5 Copies _.. S 2.00
10 Copies _. 3..50
100 Co pies _._ _.._ _............... 30.00
S ll~l's tio ll : Ge t 1\ copy of th is News -Bullet in int o th e
hands of every d l'llIdl'd AlIwr iC'AIl so th at he mal' learn
III<" trut h about the UlIitc,d Nat ions.
PLACE YOUR OHDER AT ONC E . .. .
SPHE..m THE WORD! I !
-24-