Scribd
Upload
83 views1 page

Drive and Automation Lab Rubrics

This document provides a rubric for assessing student performance in the Drives and Automation Laboratory course. The rubric outlines 5 criteria being assessed: background theory and aim, procedure, design/testing/simulation, conclusion, and viva voce. For each criteria, performance is scored on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with assigned point values ranging from 10-15 points per criteria and a total of 100 points. Faculty will use this rubric to evaluate student understanding, execution of experiments, ability to draw conclusions, and overall performance in the lab course.

Uploaded by

Deepak Venkatesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
83 views1 page

Drive and Automation Lab Rubrics

This document provides a rubric for assessing student performance in the Drives and Automation Laboratory course. The rubric outlines 5 criteria being assessed: background theory and aim, procedure, design/testing/simulation, conclusion, and viva voce. For each criteria, performance is scored on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with assigned point values ranging from 10-15 points per criteria and a total of 100 points. Faculty will use this rubric to evaluate student understanding, execution of experiments, ability to draw conclusions, and overall performance in the lab course.

Uploaded by

Deepak Venkatesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY

KOVAIPUDUR, COIMBATORE-641 042


DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING DRIVES AND AUTOMATION LABORATORY
NAME OF THE LABORATORY: 17ME323 DRIVES AND AUTOMATION LABORATORY
NAME OF THE STUDENT:
YEAR, BRANCH AND SEMESTER: III YEAR MECHANICAL VI SEMESTER
NAME OF THE FACULTY MEMBER: Mr. S.SANTHOSH KUMAR, Mr. K.S. RAGHUL

Sl. Criteria Marks Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No. Ex.No.
Improvement
No. 91% - 100% 71% - 90% 50% - 70% <50% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14.1 14.2 14.3

Clear Clear Moderate


understanding of
the objectives, understanding of understanding of Not clear about
1 10 theory with all the objectives, the objectives, the objectives and
Background details and explain theory but not able theory with less explanation
Theory & Aim (Pre Lab) to give clear details and unable (<2)
very well. (8- explantion (5-8) to explain (3-5)
10)

Able to explian the Able to explain Able to explain


procedure but not
procedure and list able to list few procedure partially Not able to list any
2 15 all components and components and and list only few Equipments and
give relevant give explanation to components and no explanation
Procedure explanation to them explain partially (<5)
(Execution) (12-15) some extend (5-8)
(8-12)

Able to construct,
design, simulate Able to complete Not able to design Not able to
Design, Testing & circuit and involves recognize the
Simulation and test the circuit the circuit with few
4 60 correctly and mistakes many mistakes circuit connection
(Execution) (25 -
Completely (40 - 50) 40) (<25)
(50 - 60)

Conclusions
All important regarding major
conclusions have All important points are drawn, Conclusions
been clearly made, conclusions have but many are missing or missing
5 Conclusion & 15 been drawn, could the important
student shows good be better stated misstated,indicatin points
VivaVoce (Post Understanding g a lack of
(12 - 15) (12 - 8) understanding (<5)
Lab) (8- 5)

TOTAL

Signature of the faculty member

You might also like