www.irregularbooks.

co
 All Your
Yesterdays
Extraordinary Visions of Extinct Life
from a New Generation of Palaeoartists

Written and Edited by C. M. Kosemen

Featuring Art by
Artists of the
All Your Yesterdays Contest

An Irregular Books Free Book

Introduction after John.) Sold both as an ebook and a “regular” book, it
surprised us with the attention it received and the positive
by C. M. Kosemen reviews it generated. It was even hailed as the “most im-
portant palaeoart book of the last 40 years.” Within days of
the launch we found ourselves giving interviews to radios
In a way, the book you are holding in your hands is a in Scotland and magazines in Brazil. With all this attention,
fans of the book soon began posting their own All Yester-
sequel of All Yesterdays, which was published in December
2012 by myself, John Conway and Darren Naish, with the days - themed artwork online.
valuable contributions of Scott Hartman. Therefore, it is
best to first consider the original All Yesterdays before talk- All in all, it seemed that we’d tapped into a “second renais-
ing about this volume. sance” of dinosaur art. It would be brash to assume that All
Yesterdays was the catalyst of this resurgence, although we
All Yesterdays was based on our misconceptions about are proud to be playing an important role in it. More than
dinosaurs and how they may have looked. For a long time, the result of a single work or author, this renaissance is the
me, John and Darren had been thinking about the mistakes product of a number of factors, all rooted in the growth
in popular dinosaur reconstructions. Artists were duplicat- of digital technology, and the increase of scientific literacy
ing each other’s work, sometimes without even realizing. through the internet.
Animals were typecast into a few predictable roles, mostly
as monster-like predators versus “peaceful” herbivores. To begin with, research and science news are far easier to
Most important of all, they weren’t reconstructed as regular disseminate. This specialist knowledge rests at the core of
animals, but as “shrink-wrapped” fantasy beasts, with palaeoart. Scientific journals, which were either too ex-
every bone and skull opening visible through their skin. pensive and difficult to procure, have now been ousted by
Most often, they were removed from any ecological setting peer-to-peer sharing of pdf files and new online publishing
and greeted the viewer as isolated, itemized monsters; a platforms such as PLOS ONE. Now, even the casual palaeo-
freak show of strange beings, parading for the shock factor. artist can have access to the newest discoveries, theories
The old narrative of dinosaurs as “alien” beings as opposed and data. Skeletal diagrams and other reference material
to “normal” everyday creatures was still alive and well in is on his or her fingertips, far easier to procure. Feeding
palaeoart. on this information, there are networks of palaeoartists,
palaeo-admirers and professional scientists, who regularly
With All Yesterdays, we wanted to go beyond these stereo- exchange views and comments on a number of websites.
types. We wanted to show dinosaurs and other prehistoric Their discussions frequently generate new and insightful
animals looking and acting like animals today. They would ideas for art and science alike. All Your Yesterdays was borne
have thick coverings of body fat. They would do things act out of the response generated by our first book on this
in ways that did not make sense. They would have strange cyber-culture of dinosaur art and science. Initially, we were
and fascinating mating rituals, soft-tissue fat deposits and simply going to hold the contest and announce the winners
skin integument. We knew that most such details were in two months. However, two things convinced us to turn
impossible to tell from fossils alone, but what we could All Your Yesterdays into book. The first and foremost was the
not deduce from bones, we speculated. To drive home the quality and quantity of the submissions that began arriving
message, we also had an “All Todays” section, where we from all corners of the world. From Russia to Brazil, The
knowingly reconstructed modern-day animals with the United States to Bulgaria, fellow paleontology enthusiasts
same mistakes we see in contemporary palaeoart. sent us top-notch artwork and unique concepts for the con-
test. Some works had the same level of craftmanship and
We launched All Yesterdays in December 2012, with a big attention to detail as the legendary masters of palaeoart. It
meeting at London’s Conway Hall (no, it wasn’t named would not do these submissions justice to simply announce
winners and move on.

4
The second reason for making this collection into a book
was the criticism we received for the original All Yesterdays.
It was found be too short by some reviewers. We felt that
we owed our fans a lengthier foray into the world of All
Yesterdays.

But what about copyrights, money issues? Although we are

confident that most of our contributors would not object to
us actually selling this book – we decided on publishing All
Your Yesterdays as a free e-book. This would also be resonate
well with the online renaissance of palaeoart explained
above. Anyone interested in dinosaurs and palaeoart will
able to download our book and read it on their computer,
tablet device or e-reader and share it with their friends.
Because we know that great art never views the same way
on a screen as it does on paper, we created a print-friendly
version as well. You can print this book at any local print
shop, bind it, and place it in your personal library.

We hope that this book inspires new artists as the original

All Yesterdays inspired the artists within it. A new gen-
eration is looking at the past with a new perspective, so
discard the tropes, sharpen your instruments and feel free
to speculate!

Istanbul, August 2013

Right,
The cover of the original All Yesterdays volume.

5
On All Your Yesterdays seeking financial gain. It’s probably best here that we don’t
get into the whole issue of how palaeoartists (and, indeed,
by Darren Naish artists in general) can make a living from their work (for
the record, the deal isn’t any different for writers and some
scientists, either). The point worth making here is that the
When C. M. “Memo” Kosemen told me and John of his internet has changed everything: long gone are the days
where an artist had to strive to get work published in a
plans to invite people to send in their own All Yesterdays
style illustrations for an All Yesterdays-themed competition, mainstream published outlet (like a magazine or book) be-
I thought it was a tremendously bad idea. I expected a few, fore their work was noticed or considered worthy. While –
poor to mediocre bits of art that would most likely be silly given the hardships – we wouldn’t necessarily recommend
and outlandishly speculative. How wrong and stupid I that anyone try to get into palaeoart or even writing as a
was. The actual results – included in the volume you have possible career path, we sincerely hope that our promotion
in front of you now – are nothing short of spectacular; I’m of the work included here helps its creators in some way.
blown away by the quantity and quality of the work the in-
vitation attracted. Those interested in palaeoart – wherever
they find themselves in the world of science and art – will,
I think, relish this book and the quality of its illustrations.
Already I can’t stop thinking about some of my favourite
images and I’m secretly afraid that some of them will stay
in my mind whenever I look at, or think about, the crea-
tures concerned. The project that Memo decided to title All
Your Yesterdays has, in short, been an outstanding success.
All Your Yesterdays is a thing of great beauty.

There are so many personal highlights in the volume that

it’s difficult to know which pieces to honourably mention
in a summary. The invitation attracted professionals and
semi-professionals as well as interested amateurs; it’s thrill-
ing to see several pieces by the brilliant and increasingly
well known Emily Willoughby, I love Jaime Headden’s
Dixon-inspired ‘Giraffapteryx’, and Raven Amos’s ‘Bower-
tyrants’ piece is wonderful. Other highlights that make the
book appear way more professional in appearance than I
ever expected include the contributions of All Yesterdays tri-
umvirate member John Conway, and the brilliantly innova-
tive and imaginative works of Joschua Knuppe and Oscar
Mendez. The invitation attracted contributions from several
household names in the palaeoart ubernerd community:
Mike Hanson, Mike Keesey, Julio Lacerda and Simon Roy
among them. Seriously: wow. Just… wow!
Above,
Remember also that the contributions included in All Your Darren Naish’s drawing of the flightless pterosaur Lank, which appears
Yesterdays were essentially done for fun, sent in by people in Dougal Dixon’s book about speculative dinosaur evolution, The New
purely because they wanted to, not because they were Dinosaurs. One of the artworks in this volume also referes to this specula-
tive critter - read on to find out!

6
Does the world need more speculation in palaeoart? about its living relatives; and we should try to incorporate
It’s complicated whatever data we have on environments, climates and the
local vegetation. The scientific palaeoart that I and many
Are we wise in encouraging people to speculate when it of my colleagues would consider ‘good’ ticks all of these
comes to palaeoart? This is a complex subject. Scientists boxes (though, at the risk of sounding like a stuck record, I
tend to think that palaeoart ‘belongs’ in some way to will repeat a point I often have; that some of the palaeontol-
Science, and that people who produce reconstructions of ogists who advise palaeoartists aren’t aware of the required
extinct animals can only do so when they portray ancient technical data, or honestly don’t care about the way ancient
animals and environments in rigorously accurate fashion, animals are depicted. These two problems explain the
paying attention to the most up-to-date knowledge. Scien- many terrible illustrations we still see in some mainstream
tifically rigorous art of this sort certainly has its place: we books).
would expect to see it, for example, accompanying a press
release on a newly announced fossil animal, or adjacent to However, when it comes to soft tissue anatomy and behav-
a fossil specimen in a museum (for palaeoart of this sort iour, many of the cherished ideas and themes of conven-
we very much recommend William Stout’s 2009 Prehistoric tional palaeoart are not always obviously less speculative
Life Murals and Steve White’s 2012 Dinosaur Art: the World’s than the sorts of images we explored in All Yesterdays: they
Greatest Paleoart). However, the fact that palaeoart combines frequently represent historical tropes that were arrived
an element of artistry and speculation – be honest, even the at by accident, they represent assumptions and conven-
most rigorous, most conservative piece of palaeoart still tions, and they are even, arguably, reflective of cultural
involves an amount of speculation – means that it is some- and societal expectations. Sure, there are some illustra-
times unclear where the ‘facts’ end and the speculations tions in All Yesterdays that might be a tad unlikely (exam-
begin. Remember that animals are often shown eating, ple: a stegosaur with a giant flexible penis, a plesiosaur
standing or resting in certain postures, frequenting specific that camouflages itself by lying on the seafloor), but they
environments, and are decorated in a given livery. Those aren’t any that are obviously more unlikely than many of
are speculations, and even when they appear conservative, the other illustrations that have been endorsed elsewhere
they aren’t necessarily correct or worthy. (for example, stegosaurs with hyper-mobile plates, skim-
feeding pterosaurs, ceratopsians that form defensive circles,
One of the criticisms levelled at All Yesterdays is that the theropods that roar at their prey, and so on).
entire project seemingly made it ok for people to speculate
away and do whatever the hell they liked, evidence, con- In short, speculation in palaeoart should be seen as a slid-
servatism and critical thinking be damned. By inviting peo- ing scale. At which point does a speculation render itself
ple to speculate away and produce even more artwork of too extreme? And is it even possible to reach said extreme
the same sort, maybe we’re exacerbating things, arguably given the ridiculous soft tissue structures and absurd
opening the floodgates to an endless torrent of evidence- behaviours present in the modern world? It is, in fact,
free arm-waving. surprisingly difficult to come up with a speculative piece
of palaeoart that is unconditionally ridiculous (at least, so
There are several responses that need to be made to this long as the basic rules of anatomy, biology and physics
claim. As we tried to make clear in All Yesterdays (look at p. are applied, as they are in science-based reconstructions).
10 in the Introduction), scientific reconstructions of fossil Critics and detractors would do well to remember this
animals should indeed incorporate whatever hard data we when criticising speculative palaeoart, especially when the
have on ancient animals and their environments (Conway art concerned is clearly labelled – as it is – as an exercise in
et al. 2012). We typically have detailed information on the speculation. Remember that, if we’ve learnt anything about
bony anatomy and thus the proportions and basic shape living animals and about palaeobiology, it’s that things are
of a given animal, for example; we can infer a lot about more complex, stranger, and more wonderful than we have
its musculature and integument based on what we know typically assumed.

7
It should also be accepted that depictions of ancient ani- References:
mals do not ‘belong’ wholly to science. Images of living
animals are frequently incorporated into abstract, fantasti- Conway, J., Kosemen, C. M. & Naish, D. 2012. All Yesterdays: Unique and
Speculative Views of Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals. Irregular
cal and surrealist works of art: nobody ever said that every Books. 
image of an animal, ever, has to be an anatomically correct
study that faithfully depicts the creature in its natural envi- Stout, W. 2009. Prehistoric Life Murals. Flesk, Santa Cruz.
ronment. Art depicting extinct animals can obviously play
White, S. 2012. Dinosaur Art: the World’s Greatest Paleoart. Titan Books,
the same game. Speculative, fun, and even deliberately London.
‘wrong’ depictions of extinct animals are therefore ‘al-
lowed’ in cases where the artist is not claiming to produce a
rigorous scientific reconstruction. Some of the art included
here can be seen in this vein. It is not necessarily offered
as a scientific bit of palaeoart, but as a stylized image that
features a fossil animal.

On that note, much of the palaeoart of the past is now

regarded as woefully wrong. The animals have the wrong
body shapes, the wrong postures, they are shown engag-
ing in unlikely or absurd behaviours, they are in the wrong
environments, the wrong climates, and so on. This does
not stop them being worthy, and even beautiful, pieces of
art. A few people that admire and love the style created by
Knight, Burian, Parker and many of the other great artists
of the past are depicting ‘retro’ palaeoart that does not pre-
tend to be scientifically accurate – rather, it is a homage to a
specific style. Again, this is ‘allowed’ as an artistic conven-
tion; it doesn’t mean that the artist is necessarily trying to
portray an imagined reality.

The human experience is rich. We should love what we do;

we are passionate, we enjoy thinking about and depicting
scenes from the world, from the past, from our lives and
from our minds. Art can be driven by science, but it can be
divorced from it entirely. Speculative art, ‘retro’ palaeoart,
and accurate, high-fidelity reconstructions all have their
place in the way we choose to portray the animals of the
past. We hope you enjoy the remarkable selection of images
we include here. And well done and thank you to everyone
that contributed.

Above and Right,

Obsolete but meaningful: These dinosaur paintings by Charles Knight
are now scientifically outdated, yet they remain impostant as artistically
beautiful and inspiring portrayals of prehistoric life.

8
9
 All Your
Yesterdays

“Leptoceratops,”
artwork by Vitaly Melnik
Alessio Arena
Displaying Prenocephale and
Compsognathus at Play
Alessio Arena’s deceptively simple artwork shows dino-
saurs as we rarely see them; as small, fuzzy animals one
might call “cute.” Beyond this, his dinosaurs also engage
in complicated behaviors and interactions that are usually
reserved for more “complicated” animals such as mammals
and birds.

Thus, Arena’s couple of Compsognathi are seen playing with

a feather they have found on the ground. “Some birds like
corvids and hawks engage in play behavior also using objects they
find (feathers, leaves and such), maybe Mesozoic dinosaurs did
the same, who knows?” says the artist when explaining this
depiction. The small, meat eating dinosaurs are depicted
with excessively “bushy” tails in reference to Sciurumimus,
a meat eating theropod dinosaur which may have been re-
lated to Compsognathus. Among the best-preserved fossils in
the world,1 Sciurumimus sports a similar, squirrel-like tail.

Arena’s Prenocephale, on the other hand, belongs to a dif-

ferent group of plant-eating dinosaurs, the pachycepha-
losaurs. These animals bore very thick, dome-like skulls,
which may have been used for defense, combat for social
dominance, or both. This male Prenocephale looks especially
flamboyant with its colorful skull dome, facial patches and
its thick coat of filamentous integument.

While feathered theropods, the bird-like, meat eating di-

nosaurs, have been more-or-less common in palaeoart for
the last decade, Alessio Arena is one of the few artists who
have been restoring the plant-eating ornithischian dino-
saurs with an equally extensive covering of filaments.

1 Rauhut, O. W. M.; Foth, C.; Tischlinger, H.; Norell, M. A. (2012). “Ex-

ceptionally preserved juvenile megalosauroid theropod dinosaur with filamentous
integument from the Late Jurassic of Germany”. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 109 (29): 11746. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203238109.

12
13
Alessio Ciaffi
Cancer
Disease, not predation, kills the majority of animals in real
life, but it is almost never represented in artwork, let alone
palaeoart. Italian artist Alessio Ciaffi highlights the grim
reality of disease with this poignant drawing of a female
Deinonychus infected with facial tumors.

Ciaffi has dedicated this artwork to his late grandfather,

who also succumbed to the dreaded disease in what he de-
scribes under “similar conditions.” Being a disease of organ-
ized tissues, cancer is present in all animals, even insects.
It seems rational to assume that dinosaurs would also suf-
fer from tumors in various locations.

14
15
Alessio Ciaffi
Collaborative Camouflage by The
Trilobite Palaeolenus
It seems that dinosaurs and other mesozoic reptiles are the
stars of palaeoart in the public mind. Prehistoric mammals
and amphibians are only slightly less-commonly represent-
ed in artwork, and invertebrates, barring some spectacular
forms such as gigantic sea scorpions, usually come the last
when it comes to artistic popularity. This is a pity, because
fossil invertebrates, such as the ancient trilobites shown
here, come in a great diversity of interesting forms.

Trilobites are a completely extinct group of arthropods that

lived in the primordial seas. At a centimeter long, Palaeo-
lenus is one of the most common fossil trilobites of the
Cambrian period. It is usually discovered in mass aggrega-
tions, which has led the artist to portray it as a camouflaged
bottom dweller. In this picture, two Palaeolenus sport pat-
terned carapaces that mimic the texture of the seafloor and
frond-like antennae that resemble sea plants. Artist Alessio
Ciaffi imagined that two or more individuals could come
together to form cryptically-shaped units that help disguise
them even more.

As a final note, we can see tiny, fish-like animals known as

Haikouichthys swimming around the trilobites. These crea-
tures are some of the earliest known free-swimming chor-
dates, members of the group which later gave rise to fish,
amphibians, reptiles, dinosaurs and ultimately ourselves.

16
17
Alvaro Rozalen
Archaeopteryx and Ctenochasma
Talented palaeoartist Alvaro Rozalen offers us a glimpse
of a time in Earth’s past when two different lineages, the
pterosaurs and the newly-evolved birds, co-existed in the
planet’s skies. This scene depicts an Archaeopteryx, famous-
ly known as the “first bird,” (actually just a pretty ordinary
feathered theropod dinosaur which just happened to be
discovered the first,) looking up at a flock of Ctenochasma
pterosaurs flying in a V formation, much like migrating
geese or other large birds today.

At this stage of their evolution, birds, while producing

volant forms, hadn’t fine-tuned their adaptations for fly-
ing and had not yet expanded into the extensively aerial
niches which they occupy today. Such roles were occupied
by pterosaurs. Eventually, however, birds increased in
diversity while only the largest flying pterosaurs remained
alive by the end of the Mesozoic era. Some theories on this
decline suggest a “battle for the skies,” with the evolution
of the birds actively contributing to the winged reptiles’
demise, but it is debatable if the decline of pterosaurs had
anything to do with the evolution of birds.1 In fact, the
so-called “decline” of the pterosaurs may not even have
happened, and the rarity of pterosaur fossils from the last
epochs of the Mesozoic can simply be an artifact of preser-
vation.

1 Butler, Richard J.; Barrett, Paul M.; Nowbath, Stephen and Upchurch,
Paul (2009). “Estimating the effects of sampling biases on pterosaur diversity
patterns: implications for hypotheses of bird/pterosaur competitive replacement”.
Paleobiology 35 (3): 432–446. doi:10.1666/0094-8373-35.3.432.

18
19
Alvaro Rozalen
Shellfish-Eating Citipati
Oviraptorosaurs were a group of extremely bird-like dino-
saurs known for their bizarre head crests and extraordinary
mouth structure. Most animals in this group had mouths
that were devoid of all teeth, except for two spike-like pro-
tuberances on the mouth roof.

Needless to say, this arrangement elicited a lot of hypoth-

eses about the oviraptorosaurian diet from the day these
animals were discovered. Initially, they were thought to be
egg-eaters from the way one skeleton was discovered next
to a nest of eggs, almost as if caught in the act. Later stud-
ies, however, revealed that the eggs belonged to the same
species as the “thief,” 1and the question become unresolved
again.

Here, Alvaro Rozalen is continuing the debate by illustrat-

ing Citipati, one of the largest oviraptorosaurs, in the act of
crushing a crab which it has caught from a freshwater lake.
The animals are using their sharp mouthparts to crack open
shellfish instead of eggs.

1 Norell, M.A., Clark, J.M., Chiappe, L.M., and Dashzeveg, D. (1995). “A

nesting dinosaur.” Nature 378:774-776.

20
21
Alvaro Rozalen
A Parrot-Like Oviraptorosaur
Continuing the speculation on oviraptorosaur skulls and
diet, Alvaro Rozalen here reconstructs an oviraptorosaur
as a fruit-eating animal after observing the similarities of
the their beaks and those of parrots. Shellfish, hard fruits,
bones have all been suggested as parts of the oviraptoro-
saur diet. Perhaps these strange animals ate a bit of every-
thing.

22
23
Alvaro Rozalen
Epidexipteryx
Preserved with elongated, ribbon-like structures adorning
its tail, Epidexipteryx is one of the most unusual feathered
dinosaur discoveries of the past decade. 1 It is also notewor-
thy in having very large eyes and apparently featherless
arms, whereas most dinosaur fossils preserved with integu-
ment bear long feathers on their forelimbs. This could be an
artifact of preservation, or it could be a specialized adapta-
tion, especially if one considers that related species such as
Scansoriopteryx and Epidendrosaurus both have extremely
long fingers, which may have been used in probing trees
for insect larvae and other food items.

Alvero Rozalen has noticed the similarity between these

mystifying anatomical features and the anatomy of a living
primate, the Aye-Aye. (Daubentonia madagascarensis) This
famous denizen of Madagascar also has long, grub-probing
digits and large eyes adapted for a nocturnal life. Inspired
by the Aye-Aye, Rozalen has rejected traditional recon-
structions of Epidexipteryx, which look like tiny birds with
fingers and no tails bimbling about on the forest floor.

He has drawn this animal as a nocturnal tree dweller with

bright eyes that reflect the moonlight. Adaptations for an
arboreal lifestyle can force animals to assume deceptively
scary forms with large eyes, long limbs, sharp, insect-
crunching teeth and cryptic body shapes. The living Aye-
Aye also looks terrifying, yet it, like Rozalen’s hypothetical
Epidexipteryx, is only harmful to tree-living insects.

1 Zhang, Fucheng; Zhou, Zhonghe; Xu, Xing; Wang, Xiaolin and

Sullivan, Corwin. “A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate
ribbon-like feathers”. <http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v455/n7216/full/
nature07447.html> Nature 455, 1105-1108 (23 October 2008) | doi:10.1038/na-
ture07447 PMID 18948955.

24
25
Alvaro Rozalen
Troodon: Young Hunters
If dinosaurs were as similar to birds as fossils show them to
be, this similarity may have extended to their development
and the care of their offspring too. 1 Certainly, the more
bird-like dinosaurs may have taken extensive care of their
young. This could have been especially true for bird-like
dinosaurs with large brains, such as Troodonts. Usually
hailed as the smartest dinosaurs, these animals may have
had complicated behaviors and elaborate social displays.
Such advanced cognitive skills would have necessitated a
relatively long period of infancy and learning.

This stunning portrait shows two hatchling Troodons, smart

and bird-like meat-eaters, in their tree burrow nest as they
wait for their parents to return from a foraging trip. Like
hatchlings of certain birds today, they have a mottled, cam-
ouflaging pattern of feathers. The developing remige, or
flight feathers, are clearly visible on the arm of the hatch-
ling which is shielding itself from the sun. When they grow,
these feathers will get longer, and their arms will resemble
wings. The hatchlings are scanning their surroundings with
wary, intelligent eyes, on the lookout for potential danger
or the return of their parents.

Many artworks depict Troodon, but Alvaro Rozalen has

done a truly masterful job at portraying them as real ani-
mals; not “reptiles,” not proper birds, but graceful, unique
beings of their own.

1 Varricchio, D. J.; Moore, J. R.; Erickson, G. M.; Norell, M. A.; Jackson,

F. D.; Borkowski, J. J. (2008). “Avian Paternal Care Had Dinosaur Origin”. Science
322 (5909): 1826–8. doi:10.1126/science.1163245. PMID 19095938.

26
27
Andrea Gassler
A Scansoriopterygid with Wings
Believe it or not, this bat-like creature is actually a specula-
tive reconstruction of a long-fingered scansoriopterygid
dinosaur, related to the owl-like Epidexipteryx shown in the
previous pages.

Swiss artist Andrea Gassler has come up with a novel

interpretation of these animals. He postulates that the long
finger, understood by many artists and researchers as an
adaptation to probe for grubs and insects under tree bark,
was actually the support for an extensive, wing-like mem-
brane. Bats and the flying reptiles known as pterosaurs
also have wings derived from similar adaptations.

As one can expect, portraying a dinosaur with membra-

nous protowings results in a truly bizarre beast, and this
pterosaur-mimic reconstruction has to be appreciated
as food for thought rather than a genuine hypothesis. A
similar idea has been proposed by the Italian palaeontolo-
gist Andrea Cau and illustrated by the palaeoartist Lukas
Panzarin in 2012. 1

1 Andrea Cau (2012-07-07).  “Il ritorno del paraviano pterosauro-mi-

mo?” Blogspot.com. Retrieved 2013-05-28.
http://theropoda.blogspot.com/2012/07/il-ritorno-del-paraviano-pterosauro.html

28
29
Andrew Dutt
Bones Away
One of the strangest flying reptiles, or pterosaurs, Dsun-
garipterus is famous for its extraordinary skull, which
combines an upturned, tweezer-like tip with tough, heavy
dentition. This odd morphology was possibly used for
consuming durable prey items, possibly shellfish. Here,
however, the New York-based palaeoartist Andrew Dutt
considers a different feeding strategy for this extraordinary
pterosaur;

“So what does a flying reptile with crushing jaws living in a ter-
restrial environment sustain itself with? Surely Dsungaripterus
wouldn’t pass on small terrestrial vertebrates if it came across
them, but it probably put those knobbly teeth and strong jaws (for
a pterosaur) to good use. Its beak could have probed into carcasses
and with its jaws it could have crushed bones to obtain nutritious
bone marrow. If its bite wasn’t strong enough to shatter larger
bones, it could have engaged in a behavior similar to the one
practiced by today’s bearded vulture: fly high up over cliffs and
outcrops and drop the bone in order to smash it against the rocks
below.”

This work is as interesting in its style as it is in its content.

Dutt’s use of flat colors and sharp contours differs mark-
edly from most other palaeoartists, who usually aim for
a more photorealistic approach. By using this visually-
appealing style, he has made Dsungaripterus’ extraordinary
anatomy more prominently visible.

30
31
Asher Elbein
Pterodactyl Mating Flight
As attested by their extraordinary crests and brain casts
showing enlarged optical lobes, Pterosaurs were visually-
oriented creatures. It is thus highly possible that their mat-
ing habits made use of visual signals as well. In fact, sexual
selection may have been the driving force in the evolution
of exaggerated crests on pterosaurs and dinosaurs. 1

Starting from this assumption, artist Asher Elbein has

portrayed two pterosaurs, a male and a female of the
same species, in an colorful aerial ballet of mating signs
and displays. As in birds and most reptiles, the male is the
more colorfully-ornamented member of the couple and
he is doing his best to impress the larger, drably-colored
female. Seeing that the males of many modern-day animals
sport colorful crests, sacs and wattles which would not be
preserved in the fossil record, Elbein has also adorned the
male pterosaur with bright, inflatable sacs on his face and
throat.

1 Hone, D. & Naish, D. & Cuthill, I. C. 2012. Does mutual sexual selec-
tion explain the evolution of head crests in pterosaurs and dinosaurs? Lethaia 45,
139-156.

32
33
Bethany Vargeson
Ambulocetus Couple
It’s a pity that fossil whales, being the spectacular, transi-
tional forms they are, do not get more attention from
palaeoartists. Their transformation from land-living
animals to gigantic swimmers is one of the most extraordi-
nary stories in the history of mammal evolution. 1

Whales started evolving 50 million years ago, in what

became Pakistan, India and Afghanistan today. The earli-
est whales resembled deer-like animals with short necks
and long, thick tails. Soon after, they diversified into more
aquatically-adapted forms, such as the large-headed, al-
most crocodile-like Ambulocetus seen here.

About the size of a person, Ambulocetus is usually illus-

trated as a naked, semiaquatic lurker in swamps or lakes.
Bethany Vargeson has broken this tradition, not only in
illustrating Ambulocatus as a furry, cute yet still believable
animal, but also depicting it like a gigantic sea otter, able to
venture into more open waters.

1 Carl Zimmer (2007-12-19). “The Loom : Whales: From So Humble A

Beginning”. ScienceBlogs. Retrieved 2007-12-21.

34
35
Brian Engh The true nature of sauropod integument may never be

Diamantinasaurus in Caves
known, but considering that other dinosaurs have been dis-
covered with protofeathers or spiky filaments, it won’t be
surprising if in real life, these animals bore structures that
Sauropods are the iconic “big plant eater” dinosaurs with would make this reconstruction tame in comparison.
their long necks and tails. In the past, most sauropods
were reconstructed as slow, swamp-dwelling titans which
could not even stand up properly on land. Later on, ad-
ditional discoveries and new theories of dinosaur evolution
revised our image of sauropods. No longer consigned to
the swamps, they were seen as fully-terrestrial animals.
Ultimately, however, this view also turned into a sort of
orthodoxy. Sauropods are now drawn as sleek, unadorned
land-dwellers with monotonous regularity.

With this one image of Diamantinasaurus, a sauropod

dinosaur that lived at the end of the Cretaceous, California-
based palaeoartist Brian Engh has challenged the conven-
tional wisdom of how these animals are represented, on
multiple fronts.To begin with, we see the animals in an
otherworldly cave, with strange geologic formations and
colonies of bioluminescent bacteria that light the ceiling
like stars. Engh does not suggest that these animals lived
in caves, but caves undoubtedly did exist in the world’s
past, and some animals, no matter how ungainly, may have
entered them to obtain salts or other necessary minerals. In
today’s Africa, elephants visit similar underground caves in
order to obtain salt. By picturing the large sauropods inside
a cave, Engh successfully draws attention to the fact that in
nature, animals often do extraordinary things and venture
into unlikely places.

A second extraordinary detail in this picture is the resto-

ration of Diamantinasaurus with keratinous “whiskers”
adorning their faces. This is a speculative feature never
before illustrated in such animals, yet it is not any more or
less-likely than a traditional, reptile-headed reconstruction.
Engh explains;

“My Diamantinasaurs exhibit keratinous defensive spines,

display spines along their back, and specialized elongated quill-
like scales on their faces, which serve as whiskers to help them
navigate caves and dark forests at night.”

36
37
Carlos de Miguel Chaves
A Melanistic Sabretooth
Smilodon, or the saber-toothed tiger, is one of the most
familiar prehistoric mammals in public knowledge. What
is less commonly known is that there was not one species
Smilodon, but three or possibly more, the largest of which
was markedly different from others with its heavy struc-
ture, long front legs and hyena-like sloping back. Here,
artist Carlos de Miguel Chaves has illustrated this largest
species of Smilodon, S. populator, in an extraordinary mela-
nistic form.

Melanism is a condition characterized by an overabun-

dance of dark pigments in an animal’s skin. Like albinism,
it affects many different species of animals, including deer,
lions, snakes, owls, salamanders and others. Thus, “black”
versions of familiar animals are not necessarily different
species, simply individuals afflicted with a melanistic con-
dition. In today’s world, “black panthers” are not a unique
species, but melanistic forms of jaguars, cougars and leop-
ards. In the past, similar individuals must have appeared
among Smilodon populations as well.

38
39
Christian Masnaghetti
Miragaia and the Opportunists
In nature, smaller animals occasionally take shelter besides
larger, well-defended ones, usually herbivores, for protec-
tion, easier access to food, or both.

Palaeoartist Christian Masnaghetti has thus depicted Mira-

gaia, the extraordinary armored stegosaurian dinosaur with
a long neck, with an associated pack of smaller, opportun-
istic herbivorous dinosaurs known as hypsilophodonts.
Looking like a gigantic porcupine with dangerous spines on
its flexible tail, Miragaia was certainly a tough adversary for
any predator. The hypsilophodonts would not only find the
larger beast useful for safety, but would also help them-
selves to the small prey it stirs up, or even find sustenance in
its parasites or droppings.

Besides suggesting a plausible behavior, Masnaghetti has

also distinguished this work by illustrating both Miragaia
and the opportunistic hypsilophodonts (actually distant
relatives,) with bodily integument. In Miragaia, this takes
the shape of dense, protective quills, whereas in the smaller
hypsilophodonts the same structures have evolved into a
dense, bushy covering of fur-like fibers.

40
41
Christian Masnaghetti
Symbiosis
Christian Masnaghetti returns here with a more specula-
tive suggestion of symbiosis between a large herbivorous
dinosaur and an arachnid.

Here, a gigantic spider purposefully spins a web in be-

tween the horns of a Diaboloceratops, a large, horn-faced
plant eating dinosaur, to feed on insects buzzing around its
head. According to Masnaghetti’s words, however, “it won’t
refuse an occasional gargantuan feast” of a tick bird, another
commensal, if the opportunity presents itself.

While this arrangement seems unlikely, a very similar situ-

ation was observed with an impala in 2010 by the wildlife
photographer Frank Solomon.

42
43
Christian Masnaghetti
Two-Headed Zupaysaurus
Bordering on the surreal, a small meat-eating dinosaur
known as Zupaysaurus surveys its lakeside territory with
two heads. While this looks like a complete work of fantasy,
it might be surprising to know that polycephaly, or the
presence of more than one head in a single organism, is a
very real phenomenon in nature.

Polycephaly is a birth defect that occurs when two embryos

fail to separate properly and end up as a single fetus with
two heads or two front halves of the body. This condition
is almost always fatal, but certain individuals can man-
age to survive for long periods under captive care or other
favorable conditions. There are records of polycephalic fish,
turtles and snakes, but also of “higher” animals such as
cows, pigs and cats. There are even people with this condi-
tion: Abigail and Brittany Hensel of Minnesota, USA, have
been sharing a single body since they were born. Polyceph-
aly is also known from past eras; there exists a 120-million
year-old fossil of a juvennile aquatic reptile named Hyphalo-
saurus with two heads.

All this being said, it would have been extremely unlikely

for any dinosaur or other prehistoric animal to remain alive
for long if born with polycephaly. Predators, exposure or
other environmental factors would limit the life of any
polycephalous hatchling. Even the basic task of walking
would be immensely difficult, if not impossible, with two
different heads controlling the two separate halves of the
animal’s body. Considering all these disadvantages, this
(these?) Zupaysaurus must have been very lucky to have
survived into maturity.

44
45
Darren Naish
Therizinosaurs Old and New
Throughout paleontological history, certain fossil lineages have been interpreted in a variety of different ways.
Either due to scrappy fossils or poorly-formulated theories, a wide variety of identities have been suggested for certain
“problematic” lineages. Famous zoologist Darren Naish contributes to this collection with a parade of unusual forms, all
representing one such lineage, the therizinosaurids. Since their discovery, this lineage of long-clawed dinosaurs were as-
signed a succession of different identities.
A reconstruction of Alxasaurus, an early therizino-
saur species. Discovered in the 1990s with a reason-
ably complete skeleton, this animal revealed a lot of
anatomical details about the group. It also established
therizinosaurs as aberrant theropods and not a dis-
tinct lineage as suggested before. It is restored here as
a reptilian dinosaur, as the fashion was in the 1990s.
We now know that therizinosaurs were covered
extensively in feather-like integument.

A “late surviving prosauro-

pod,” proposed by paleon-
tologist Greg Paul as the
true identity of therizinosaur
lineage. 1 Prosauropods were
cousins of the long-necked,
herbivorous sauropod dino-
saurs. They lived earlier on
in the age of the dinosaurs,
whereas therizinosaurs ap-
peared later on.

1 Paul., G. S. 1984.
The segnosaurian dinosaurs:
relics of the prosauropod-or-
nithischian transition? Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology 4,
507-515.

A “segnosaur,” thought to belong to a group of

plant-eating dinosaurs distinct from anything else
that lived in the Mesozoic. Known from scrappy
remains, these animals were ascribed a lot of unusual
characteristics such as a toothless beak, webbed feet
and fish-eating habits. Later on, “segnosaurs” and
therizinosaurs were discovered to be the same thing,
and their appearance was understood to be nothing
like the form depicted here.

46
A “gumby” early reconstruction, based on the work
of artist Ely Kish, of a segnosaur/therizinosaur, with
long claws, an awkward, penguin-like body stance, a
long, stiff neck, no tail and no feathers. This was the
view of these animals during the later half of the 90’s.
They were believed by some researchers to be dig-
gers, and their long claws were seen as adaptations to
tear open insect nests.

A more modern, but featherless view of therizino-

saurs, namely the giant species Therizinosaurus,
known only from its seventy-centimeter-long claws.
Our current view of this animal is more-or-less close
to this version, except that it possibly had a covering
of protofeathers, and its claws were folded against
the animal’s body in a more wing-like posture.

47
Elia Smaniotto
A Violent Male Caviramus
Not knowing much about the way animals compete and
reproduce, one may falsely assume that nature is fairly
idyllic when it comes to relationships. Nothing could be
further from the truth. Without going too much into details,
suffice it to say that nature is full of acts and practices that
one might call depraved. It would be wrong to assume that
similar acts did not take place in the age of dinosaurs.

Here, a male pterosaur of the species Caviramus is seen bru-

tally raping the corpse of a rival which it has killed in an
aerial duel of dominance. Before assuming that the artist,
Elia Smaniotto, has a particularly disturbing imagination,
however, you must realize that the exact same act has been
documented by scientists among ducks, 1 and this work is
merely an adaptation of that behavior.

1 C.W. Moeliker (2001). “The first case of homosexual necrophilia in the

Anas platyrhynchos (Aves:Anatidae)”. Deinsea - Annual of the Natural History
Museum Rotterdam 8: 243–247.

48
49
Emily Willoughby
Microraptor
Palaeoartist Emily Willoughby is well known for her
beautifully detailed renditions of dromaeosaurs, or “rap-
tor” dinosaurs. Her animals are exceptional for looking first
and foremost like birds, creating an unexpected surprise
for viewers who are used to outdated reptile or dragon-like
representations.

Here, Willoughby has depicted Microraptor, the famous

“four-winged,” possibly flying dromaeosaur species from
China, with two spectacular artworks. In the overleaf
picture, a Microraptor is seen feeding on fruit - a definite
surprise in palaeoart. Perhaps because it is still a “raptor”
in people’s eyes, many previous artworks show Microraptor
in a predatory role, relentlessly chasing down small reptil-
ian or avian quarry. Willoughby considers the animal an
omnivore, and comments that like many birds in today’s
world, it too would have fed on fruit if the opportunity
presented itself.

The second Microraptor shows a very angry or scared

individual, puffing up its feathers to look bigger to poten-
tial aggressors. Advanced birds possess what amounts to
a “smart suit” in their covering of feathers. 1 By raising or
lowering individual feathers, they can change their body
contours and engage in a variety of social displays, or as-
sume cryptic body shapes for camouflage. Being so similar
to modern birds, Microraptor may have possessed such a
“smart suit” as well.

1 Kaiser, Gary W. (2007). The Inner Bird: Anatomy and Evolution.

Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. p. 19. ISBN 0-7748-1343-1.

50
51
Emily Willoughby
Utahraptors on the Beach
Moving from one of the smallest to one of the larg-
est dromaeosaurs, Emily Willoughby has here depicted
Utahraptor, a veritable giant of the dromaeosaur lineage at
up to six, or even eleven meters long. 1 This was the ani-
mal whose distorted version became popular in the movie
Jurassic Park, although it was called a “Velociraptor” in the
film.

Here, a decidedly non-Hollywoodian Utahraptor is seen on

a beach, with members of its pack in the background. Wil-
loughby has resisted a popular trend and avoided drawing
these gigantic “raptors” as exaggerated movie monsters.
Instead, her animals are calm, reserved and at peace with
their surroundings, much like a lion or tiger today. They
look less like reptiles and more like the birds they were
related to.

A similar scene, with a Utahraptor pack exploring the vast

expanse of a prehistoric beach, also takes place in palaeon-
tologist Robert Bakker’s fictional novel Raptor Red, 2 which
chronicles the life and fortunes of a female Utahraptor and
her relatives.

1 Britt; Chure; Stadtman; Madsen; Scheetz; Burge (2001). “New osteo-

logical data and the affinities of Utahraptor from the Cedar Mountain Fm. (Early
Cretaceous) of Utah”. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21 (3): 36A. doi:10.1080/
02724634.2001.10010852.
2 Bakker, Robert (September 1996). Raptor Red.Bantam Books. p. 4.
ISBN 0-553-57561-9.

52
53
Ethan Schmunk
A Test of Strength
In this lovely, concise pen-and-ink image, artist Ethan Sch-
munk has portrayed a full-grown Tyrannosaurus rex in the
act of felling a tree with the help of his thick, muscular tail
- but why exactly is he doing it?

The answer, Schmunk speculates, is that males of many

species engage in seemingly pointless acts designed to
show off their strength - to potential rivals as well as the
members of the opposite sex. From dueling reindeer to hu-
man males working out in gymnasiums, males rely on such
exercises of power to establish their social dominance and
mark themselves as suitable mating partners.

Schmunk continues his line of speculation by imagining the

male pushing the fallen tree to a location where a poten-
tial mate can easily find it. The uprooted tree serves as a
potential hunting blind and a “bait” for passing herbivores,
making it an impressive gift for any female Tyrannosaurus.

These details, of course, are all speculative. However, nupi-

tal gifts feature strongly in the behaviors of many animals,
ranging from spiders, (Pisaura mirabilis,) 1 to shrikes, (Lanuis
excubitor,). 2 Even people have such traditions. Is any mar-
riage proposal, no matter how much from the heart, ever
complete without a wedding ring?

1 Stålhandske, Pia (2001). “Nuptial gift in the spider Pisaura mirabilis

maintained by sexual selection”. Behavioral Ecology 12 (6): 691–697. doi:10.1093/
beheco/12.6.691.
2 Tryjanowski, Piotr and Hromada, Martin (2005). “Do males of the
great grey shrike, Lanius excubitor, trade food for extrapair copulations?”. Animal
Behaviour 69 (3): 529–533. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.009.

54
55
Fabio Manucci
Lazy Dimetrodons
Dimetrodon is everyone’s favorite “sail-backed reptile,”
mistakenly thought to be a dinosaur and frequently in-
cluded in toy sets and second-rate dinosaur books as one.
In fact, one might be surprised to know that this animal
actually lived before dinosaurs and is a distant cousin of us
mammals. It belongs to a lineage called synapsids, which
exhibit the first skull and teeth morphologies that would
later come to characterize mammals. More familiar mam-
malian characteristics such as a erect limbs, a covering of
fur, lactation, etc. evolved later on.

Italian palaeoartist Fabio Manucci has here illustrated

Dimetrodon as a lazy, sleepy predator, lounging in a pond
in-between bouts of hunting. Like many predators liv-
ing today, the sail-backed protomammal must have taken
plenty of hours to rest in order to conserve energy and
digest its food.

56
57
Gareth Monger
Bioluminescent Nyctosaurus
This painting by UK-based palaeoartist Gareth Monger, de-
picting a flock of flying reptiles from the genus Nyctoasau-
rus, can be considered fairly speculative with the surreal,
spear-like crests of these animals lighting up the night with
bioluminescence. It might surprise you, however, to learn
that the bioluminescence of their crests is the only specula-
tive detail about the animals in this picture. The compara-
tively gigantic, antler-like growths on the heads of these
Nyctosauri are all too real 1 - to the endless puzzlement of
palaeontologists and palaeoartists alike.

Just what function this crest served is a topic of debate. At

one time, it was believed that the two branches of Nycto-
saurus’ prong-like horn supported a sail of skin in between,
and this somehow helped helped the animal in its flight.
But factors such as the presence of crests only in certain
individuals weigh heavily in favor of it being a feature for
mating displays. Nyctosaurus’ perplexing crest might thus
be one of those exaggerated structures that evolve as a re-
sult of sexual competition. It confuses us only in hindsight,
and whether it glowed in the dark or not, was actually
about as ordinary as deer antlers, or the tails of peacocks.

1 Bennett, S.C. (2003). “New crested specimens of the Late Cretaceous

pterosaur Nyctosaurus.” Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 77: 61-75.

58
59
Geunhong Pius Park
Clidastes velox
This breathtakingly subtle composition was one of the best
works we received for the All Your Yesterdays contest. It
shows a mosasaur known as Clidastes, a large prehistoric
marine lizard related to today’s monitor lizards, swim-
ming about in its daily foray in the warm, shallow seas that
covered the North American continent at the end of the
Mesozoic era. It is a pretty ordinary scene, but it offers a
sublime new look at these extraordinary marine reptiles.

Because they were reptiles, mosasaurs were assumed to

have a “shrink-wrapped” covering of muscles and skin that
closely followed the contours of their bones. As a result,
many illustrations of these animals resemble overgrown
sea lizards with fins instead of legs. In fact, such depictions
still dominate the realm of palaeoart. However, the recent
discovery 1 of a mosasaur named Platecarpus shows that
at least some mosasaurs had fish-like flukes on their tails.
This discovery led to a revision of the way we looked at
mosasaurs.

The pressure of living in specialized environments such as

the open sea seem to drive the development of similar fea-
tures in unrelated organisms. This phenomenon is known
as convergent evolution. Much like mosasaurs, sea reptiles
known as ichthyosaurs have also evolved similar, fish-like
body plans. Among mammals, whales and sirenians (the
group which includes dugongs and manatees,) and pin-
nipeds; seals, sea lions and their kin, have independently
evolved streamlined, torpedo-like bodies and stabilizing
fins. Even birds have produced similar forms with pen-
guins. With this many independent groups evolving such
convergent body plans, it was perhaps naive to think that
mosasaurs alone remained as finned lizards in their marine
environment. Park’s artwork is one of the few that depict
mosasaurs in this new, lifelike interpretation.

1 Lindgren, J.; Caldwell, M.W.; Konishi, T.; and Chiappe, L.M. (2010).
“Convergent Evolution in Aquatic Tetrapods: Insights from an Exceptional Fossil
Mosasaur”. In Farke, Andrew Allen. PLoS ONE 5 (8): e11998. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0011998. PMC 2918493. PMID 20711249.

60
61
62
63
H. Esdaile
Tool Use in Jinfengopteryx
This spectacular artwork addresses one of the most inter-
esting debates about dinosaurs: How intelligent were these
animals? Intelligence and tool-making were once seen as
exclusive gifts to mankind. Other animals were regarded as
little more than instinct-driven automata. As time passed,
however, signs of self-awareness and complex emotions 1
were observed in animals and this embarrassing stereotype
slowly began to be discarded.

Tool-making also proved to be much more common than

thought before. Crows, bears, elephants and numerous
species of birds and primates, not to mention “primitive”
animals like octopi were observed using and even manu-
facturing tools. Based on this growing body of evidence,
palaeoartist H. Esdaile has speculated about tool use in
dinosaurs. In his words:

“New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) fashion sticks

into harpoons and use them to snag tasty grubs out of holes and
rotting wood. I wanted to draw a dinosaur using tools the same
way, and I figured if any dinosaur was clever enough to figure it
out, it would be a troodontid. So here is Jinfengopteryx elegans,
a small troodontid from China that lived around 122 million
years ago.”

1 Bekoff, M.; Jane Goodall (2007). The Emotional Lives of Animals. ISBN
1-57731-502-2.

64
65
Jaime Headden
“Giraffapteryx”
The extraordinary lineage of pterosaurs known as
azhdarchids have been the subject of much debate in recent
years. These flying reptiles were among the largest species
of their group, with certain species such as Quetzalcoatlus
and Hatzegopteryx growing as tall as giraffes and sporting
wingspans up to 12 meters wide. Their anatomies are also
unusual: azhdarchids have comparatively huge heads and
very long, stiff necks made up of elongated vertebrae.

With such features, it is no wonder that much speculation

has been made on these animals’ lifestyles and behavior.
How could such beasts move, feed and live? The debate
has been long and complex, but suffice it to say that the
most plausible suggestion so far has been that azhdarchids
lived and fed like gigantic, quadrupedal storks. 1

Here, the well-known palaeoartist Jaime Headden takes

things one step further and proposes that the stork-like
azhdarchids may have been selectively fed on fruit and
vegetation, emulating giraffes as they used their extraordi-
nary long necks to browse in trees.

This work is also a homage to the 1980s book, The New

Dinosaurs.2 Portraying animals from a world where dino-
saurs did not become extinct, The New Dinosaurs featured a
flightless, giraffe-mimicking pterosaur known as the Lank.
While most animals in the book seem severely outdated or
erroneous in the light of our contemporary understanding,
the Lank has stood the test of time surprisingly well.

1 Witton, M.P., and Naish, D. (2008). “A Reappraisal of Azhdarchid

Pterosaur Functional Morphology and Paleoecology.” PLoS ONE, 3(5): e2271.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002271
2 Dixon, D. 1988. The New Dinosaurs: An Alternative Evolution. Salem
House Publishers, Topsfield, MA.

66
67
Jessica Pilhede
Whiskered Albertonykus
Even the average person knows that dinosaurs came in
a variety of different lineages. There are the long necked
sauropods, the terrifying tyrannosaurs, the horn-faced cera-
topsians and so on. But there are also numerous groups of
little-known dinosaurs that are just as intriguing as their
larger, more popular relatives.

Albertonykus belongs to one such group, a clade of dino-

saurs known as the alvarezsaurs, characterized by their
long legs and extraordinarily thick, short arms which sport-
ed only one finger each. Just how these limbs functioned
has been a matter of debate. One recent theory suggests
that they lived like dinosaurian anteaters, digging out ant
or termite nests with their strong arms and eating the in-
sects with their toothless beaks. However this conclusion is
not certain and the possibility remains that their arms were
used for a completely different purpose.

In this image, palaeoartist Jessica Pilhede approaches the

riddle of alvarezsaur lifestyles with a novel approach. She
imagines them much like kiwi birds, (Apteryx sp.) forest-
floor dwellers with thick, fur-like protofeathers and whisk-
er-like filaments on their faces. They don’t use their arms
for any specialized purpose. Instead, these organs have
been maintained much like the stunted wings of flightless
birds, bearing no specific advantage or detriment to their
owners.

68
69
John Conway
Balloon-Headed Allosaurus
Celebrated palaeoartist and Irregular Books co-founder
John Conway also participates in this collection with a
selection of works that were created after the origial All
Yesterdays volume.

Here, two Allosaurus males are gesturing to each other

with, balloon-like air bladders emerging from the top of
their heads. Conway has observed Allosaurus skulls and
was intrigued by the presence of holes on the top surface.
Taking into account the levels of pneumaticity, the spread
of air sacs inside the body, in large theropods, he has inter-
preted them as the basis of inflatable display sacs.

70
71
John Conway
Giraffatitan brancai
at the Mudbaths
In a spectacular, never-before-seen rendition of what he
calls “the best dinosaur,” Conway shows the long-necked,
giant herbivore Giraffatitan, also known as Brachiosaurus,
enjoying a fine day with a group of friends. There are litar-
ally thousands of renditions of this animal, but Conway has
made this particular one more interesting and more memo-
rable than most.

These mud-bathing Giraffatitan look nothing like the

stock image of the sideways-viewed, thin necked, shrink
wrapped versions we have been used to! Their necks are
sleeved with giant, inflatable sacs that help them keep cool
and the male has a highly-conspicious orange sac, complete
with a much deeper neck. A ring of thorn-like spines, de-
rived from the protofeathers of their earliest ancestors, tops
its head like a mighty, surreal crown.

John Conway also uses this artwork to showcase his

thoughts on a particular debate about dinosaurian rest-
ing postures. Recently, debates over how large dinosaurs
rested took place between different palaeontologists and
palaeoartists, mostly on online forums. One side suggested
that dinosaurs could lay down on their sides like large
mammals today, while another school suggested that they
adopted a crouching posture like birds. Here, Conway
points out the artificial nature of this debate by showing his
Giraffatitan in both postures, crouching and lying down.

Although seemingly trivial, Conway’s subtle commentary

is a hint that many other such “debates” in palaeontol-
ogy have unnecessarily become black-or-white pictures
due to scientists supporting different views as unshakable
cornerstones of their careers. In nature, things rarely exist
in black- or-white: usually both answers, or something
completely different may be correct.

72
73
John Meszaros extraordinary species such as Anomalocaris were not one-off
“experiments,” but parts of distinct and consistent lineages.
Therefore, John Meszaros imagines that the anomalocarid
“Ceticaris” famil tree may have included filter-feeding representatives
as well.
In this extraordinary artwork, artist John Meszaros tackles
one of the most interesting epochs in the evolution of life, This artwork is also distinct in that it depicts the imaginary
the Cambrian period. Taking place long before the age of (but completely plausible) Ceticaris with a host of commen-
the dinosaurs, approximately from 541 to 485 million years sal organisms. Primitive fluke-like vertebrates swim after it
ago, the Cambrian was the first time when reasonably for morsels of food, and derived echinoderms, very distant
large, hard-bodied organisms diversified in the planet’s cousins of today’s starfish, cover its body like red barnacles.
oceans. Animals that evolved in this period included the Less familiar organisms are also tagging along with Ceti-
first ancestors of vertebrates and the great arthropod line- caris for the ride. The animal’s underside is colonized by
ages, but also certain forms which seem very different from orange, frond-like vendozoans and tiny, five-eyed, shrimp-
anything living today. like opabinids dwell among them. Small, tadpole-like ani-
mals from a group called vetulicolians attach to Ceticaris’
One such example was Anomalocaris, 1 a gigantic predator carapace like prehistoric remoras. All in all, Meszaros has
for its time. About as big as a cat, this animal bore large, depicted a colorful, congruent riot of life instead of a pro-
well-developed eyes, a series of frond-like fins, two crush- cession of Lovecraftian “freaks.” Just because it was ancient
ing, jaw-like appanages that lined the front section of its did not mean that the Cambrian period had to be devoid of
body and a mouth composed of serrated plates arranged sophisticated ecosystems.
in an overlapping, circular pattern. These unusual organs
were first discovered as disarticulated fossils, and each
was mistaken to be a separate creature. The jaw-like limbs
were thought to be crayfish-like arthropods, the body was
thought to be a big, sea-cucumber-like organism and the
circular mouth was mistaken for a jellyfish. Only later did
researchers realize the error, and correctly identified Anom-
alocaris as a large swimming predator.

This artwork does not depict Anomalocaris, but instead

a speculative, filter-feeding relative which the artist has
dubbed “Ceticaris.” In the past, there was a trend of por-
traying the Cambrian as too much of an alien period,
full of unique and freakish “new phylums.” 2 While it is
true that many Cambrian animals were quite different
from the forms alive today, they now seem to be distantly
related, not alien to, the major groups of animals such
as arthropods, echinoderms, etc. today. The discovery of
Cambrian-era fossils in China have revealed that even
1 Whittington, H.B.; Briggs, D.E.G. (1985). “The largest Cambrian
animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia”. Philosophical Trans-
actions of the Royal Society of London B. 309 (1141): 569–609. doi:10.1098/
rstb.1985.0096.
2 Gould, Stephen Jay (1989). Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the
nature of history. New York: W.W. Norton. pp. 194–206. ISBN 0-393-02705-8.

74
75
The Art of Dueling Cotylorhynchus
Joschua Knuppe
Growing over six meters long with enormous bodies,
massive limbs and tiny heads, the mammal-like reptiles
known as caseids were doubtless some of the most comi-
cal animals to ever walk the Earth. Here, two of the largest
German palaeoartist Joschua Knuppe is one of the most
caseids, of a species known as Cotylorhynchus, engage in a
accomplished young palaeo-artists of the decade. His art-
clumsy, sumo-like wrestling match for social dominance
work, executed with color pencils and gouache over brown
while a female watches them with interest. Cotylorhynchus
paper, depicts such vivid and believable creatures that one
and relatives lived in the Permian period, long before the
wonders if Knuppe’s visions come from actual glimpses of
appearance of the first dinosaurs.
the fossil past. Beyond pure artistry, Knuppe also stands
out in showing the animals’ behavior as realistically as
their forms, which deviate refreshingly from the tropes Protoceratops in Snow
we’ve grown accustomed to as a generation. Needless to
say, we migwht expect to see more of this young artist’s The horn-faced dinosaurs known as ceratopsians had a
work in the future. remarkable image revision after the recent discovery of
hair-like integument on the tail of an ancestral form. 1
Knuppe has participated in All Your Yesterdays with a di- Knuppe has extrapolated from this discovery and has illus-
verse selection of scenes, each depicting a different species trated Protoceratops, one of the most familiar ceratopsians,
from the past, in a new perspective. entirely covered with fur-like body hairs. On top of this, he
has also shown it walking bipedally across a cold, snow-
covered landscape. The result looks strikingly alien, yet it is
no less plausible than the traditional image of Protoceratops
as a naked, quadrupedal reptile in a desert.

1 Mayr, Gerald, Peters, D. Stephan, Plodowski, Gerhard & Vogel, Olaf.

(2002). Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur
Psittacosaurus. Naturwissenschaften 89: 361–365.

76
77
Masiakasaurus knopfleri Nanshiungosaurus:
Masiakasaurus is an extraordinary meat-eating dinosaur A Mesozoic Moose
from the Late Cretaceous period of Madagascar. This ani-
mal is famous for its jaws, which are lined at the tips with Here, the large therizinosaur known as Nanshiungosaurus is
long teeth that project outwards. Many reconstructions of seen having a perfectly ordinary day as it wades through
this animal exaggerate these features, but in real life teeth a swamp, browsing for food and keeping its young safe
as long as Masiakasaurus’ would be protected by oral tis- on its back. Therizinosaurs were bird-like members of the
sues and consequently be less prominently visible. Thus, meat-eating dinosaur lineage known as theropods. Unlike
Knuppe has restored Masiakasaurus as a more convention- many theropods, they had adapted to a herbivorous diet.
al, bird-like dinosaur instead of a snaggle-toothed monster. Portraying dinosaurs as “ordinary” animals is one of the
hardest tasks in palaeoart, and Joschua Knuppe has done a
masterful job with this portrait of Nanshiungosaurus.

78
79
 Can You Recognize Hesperonchus?
Able to form a myriad different crests, patterns and colors,
feathers are a very versatile form of body covering. Most
dinosaur artists thoroughly underestimate the visual po-
tential offered by feathers. Even bird-like reconstructions
of dinosaurs shy away from extreme crests, wings or tail
feathers, opting mostly for a contour-hugging outline that
immediately gives away the skeletal details of the animal.
Epidexipteryx Burrows In real life, things may not have been so easy to tell. Can
We know from previous pages that the long-fingered, bird- you recognize this portrait as Hesperonyhus, a smaller rela-
like dinosaurs known as scansoriopterygids might have tive of Velociraptor? Possibly not. The animal’s characteristic
been specialized for a climbing life. Conventional wisdom muzzle is almost completely obscured by a circular crest
assumes these animals were tree-climbers, but what if they of feathers. Many animals in the past possibly had such
lived in a different environment? Here, a few Epidexipteryx striking integument, and Joschua Knuppe thinks that pal-
are seen nesting in burrows constructed in a rocky canyon aeoartists can afford to be more daring in their portrayal of
wall. feathered dinosaurs.
80
Tasty Soil
A bird-like dinosaur known as Incisivosaurus is engaging in what at first seems to be an unusual act - it’s using its chisel-
like teeth to eat soil from a hillside. The act of eating soil, clay, rocks or other minerals is known as geophagy and is not as
uncommon as one might believe. In today’s world many animals, especially birds, ingest earthy substances to obtain vital
minerals such as calcium and sodium.

Dinosaurs would not have been much different in their need of mineral supplements.

81
Shuuvia deserti
Current reconstructions of bird-like dinosaurs dress them up with bird-like feathers, but for some reason the avian attire
abruptly stops at the animals’ heads, which are still drawn in a reptilian manner. It’s as if the illustrators, no matter how
modern, are still stuck to the old template of dinosaurs as reptiles, at least when it comes to their faces. Here, Joschua
Knuppe breaks this tradition by portraying Shuuvia deserti, a one-fingered alvarezsaur, in a complete covering of bird-like
feathers. It looks like an ordinary bird, but then again, perhaps most dinosaurs did so as well.

82
Dust Bath
A lot of animals, especially birds, like to roll around in
sun-baked dust in order to clean themselves and get rid of
parasites. This Struthiomimus is following suit by cleansing
its feathers in a similar manner.  

Projectile Defence
No matter how complete, fossils almost never preserve the
behaviors of extinct animals. Even “ordinary” dinosaurs
could have had extraordinary defense mechanisms. Here,
Joschua Knuppe speculates on Heterodontosaurus, one of the
early plant-eating dinosaurs, defending itself from preda-
tors with a jet of foul-smelling feces.

83
Beipiaosaurus
A wary Beipiaosaurus is here seen scanning its
surroundings as it feeds on plants. Beipiaosaurus
was one of the earliest therizinosaurs, a lineage
of feathered, bird-like dinosaurs famously known
from gigantic, long-clawed species like Therizino-
saurus. At slightly less than two meters long,
Beipiaosaurus was nowhere as large. Nevertheless,
it caused quite a stir in palaeontological circles
because at the time of its discovery, Beipiaosaurus
was one of the largest dinosaurs preserved with a
feathery integument. 1

1 Xu, X., Tang, Z-L., and Wang, X-L. (1999). “A therizino-

sauroid dinosaur with integumentary structures from China.” Nature,
399(6734): 350-354.

A Violent Game
Play behavior is an important part of many ani-
mals’ lives. Here, Joschua Knuppe illustrates a dino-
saur at play to challenge conventional ideas about
dinosaurian predators and prey. In this painting, a
herbivorous Edmontosaurus is playing with a dead
juvenile Albertosaurus, (a relative of the famous
Tyrannosaurus,) tossing its body about.

The Edmontosaurus may even eat the little preda-

tor’s corpse after it has had its fun. Occasional
animal prey might have featured in the giant
herbivore’s menu for extra helpings of mineral and
protein. In today’s world, there are similar cases
of cows and deer eating chickens, bird nestlings,
dead squirrels and other animals. Once again, our
familiar concepts of predator, prey, hunter and the
hunted are not as clearly defined in nature.

84
A Sleeping Trinisaura
There is a recursive pattern to certain hypotheses in the world of palaeontology. A case to the point is arboreality, tree-
living, in small dinosaurian herbivores. In the beginning of the century, a tree-living way of life was proposed for small,
plant eating dinosaurs known as hypsilophodonts. 1 This idea was based on the structure of their feet, which was seen
more or less like that of perching birds. Indeed, the entire group that included hypsilophodonts was named ornithopoda,
or bird-feet. Later on, however, this idea was discredited and ornithopod feet were understood to be adapted for walking
and running over firm ground.

As we look more into nature, however, it becomes apparent that not all animal behavior can be discerned from the anato-
my of their bones. Even if their feet were not adapted for perching, it is not implausible that some ornithopods may have
sought refuge in trees. To illustrate this point, Joschua Knuppe has painted the small ornithopod known as Trinisaura,
sleeping in a tree. Trinisaura is also one of the few dinosaur species known from Antarctica. 2

1 Abel, O., 1912, Grundzüge der Palaeobiologie der Wirbeltiere, E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Nägele und Dr Sproesser, Stuttgart
2 Coria, R. A.; Moly, J. J.; Reguero, M.; Santillana, S.; Marenssi, S. (2013). “A new ornithopod (Dinosauria; Ornithischia) from Antarctica”. Cretaceous Research.
doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2012.12.004.

85
 Live-Birthing Drepanasaur
With lizard-like bodies, very muscular arms and fragile,
bird-like heads, the reptiles known as drepanosaurs were
among the strangest animals in history. It is thought that
their lives may have been convergent with those of chame-
leons; drepanosaurs may have lived by clinging to branch-
es and snapping up small insect prey with their long necks
and delicate heads.

Here, artist Joschua Knuppe adds another twist into the

drepanosaur lifestyle mystery, and speculatively portrays
one giving live birth as it dangles from a branch with its
prehensile tail.

Live-Birthing Hesperornis
In this picture, we see the prehistoric marine bird known
as Hesperornis in a rather unlikely act; it’s giving live birth!
The possibility of dinosaurs and kin bearing live ofspring
has been considered before, for dome-headed dinosaurs
known as pachycephalosaurs, sea-going crocodiles, large,
herbivorous sauropod dinosaurs and the Hesperornis
shown here. So far, however, there are no confirmed fossils
that suggest dinosaurs or their relatives may have given
birth rather than laying eggs. This may be so because dino-
saur and bird embryos depend on their eggshells as a vital
calcium reservoir during development. 1

Live-bearing or not, Hesperornis was one of the most ex-

traordinary animals in the Mesozoic seas. With practically
no front limbs, it relied on its powerful legs for swimming.
Its mouth contained teeth alongside a keratinous beak.
Hesperornis and relatives all became extinct at the end of
the age of dinosaurs.
1 Packard, G. C., Tracy, C. R. & Roth, J. J. 1977. The physiological ecol-
ogy of reptilian eggs and embryos, and the evolution of viviparity within the class
Reptilia. Biology Review 52, 71-105.

86
87
 Caviramus and the Frog
This splendidly naturalistic illustration depicts Caviramus, a
primitive pterosaur known from the late Triassic period of
Switzerland, impaling its amphibian prey onto branches,
much like shrikes (Laniidae,) living today.

Pterosaurs, having no modern relatives, are often portrayed

as outlandish organisms. One particular trope is the desire
Nemicolopterus Nests to show every bone, joint and digit in the pterosaurs’ long,
finger-derived wings. In this artwork, the wings present a
Here, we see a Nemicolopterus, one of the smallest known smooth outline and their structure is not easy to discern at
pterosaurs, nesting in an extraordinary location - the back first glance. Joschua Knuppe’s illustration is thus a wel-
of an armored sauropod dinosaur known as Saltasaurus. come departure in its subtle, un-exaggerated depiction.

Artist Joschua Knuppe speculates that the nest would be

cemented on top of one of the bony nodules covering the
back of the animal, and would be strengthened with a mix-
ture of mud and saliva. The constant movement of the large
animal could have made this arrangement unlikely, but
it could work if the pterosaurs only occupied this “nest”
temporarily.

88
89
A Climbing Mosasaur
Pannoniasaurus is a mosasaur, from a lineage of large,
prehistoric marine lizards that also includes the Clidastes il-
lustrated on the previous pages. Pannoniasaurus was unique
among its relatives because so far, it is the only mosasaur
known to have lived in freshwater. 1

Artist Joshua Knuppe has seized this point to raise another

speculation. He suggests that the young of Pannoniasaurus
may have retained their clawed hands and feet, and used
them to exit water, be it in order to escape from predators
or to disperse to other rivers, lakes and lagoons. As they
grew, the animals’ digits would disappear and their clawed
limbs would slowly turn into streamlined paddles.

This idea, of course, is entirely speculative but similar phe-

nomena exist among animals living today. The hatchlings
of Hoatzin birds (Opisthocomus hoatzin) still retain claws on
their hands, and use them to climb branches. As they grow
the claws disappear and the hands gradually change into
wings.

1 Makádi, L. S.; Caldwell, M. W.; Ősi, A. (2012). “The First Freshwater

Mosasauroid (Upper Cretaceous, Hungary) and a New Clade of Basal Mosasau-
roids”. In Butler, Richard J. PLoS ONE 7 (12): e51781.

90
Umoonasaurus
Dinosaurs shared their world with a diverse host of marine reptiles. We picture all these animals as sea-dwellers, but cer-
tainly some must have adapted to estuarine, if not freshwater habitats in the 186 million-year-span of the Mesozoic era. In
today’s world, dolphins, marine mammals, have given rise to different freshwater species in the rivers of Asia and South
America. Artist Joshchua Knuppe has here decided to portray a species of marine reptile, Umoonasaurus, as a freshwater-
living form. Unlike its sleek, streamlined marine relatives, Knuppe’s Umoonasaurus has a cryptic body shape evolved to
hide in riverbeds and marshlands. Fast pursuit in open waters is no longer its forte. It has another adaptation for freshwa-
ter life in its tongue; the organ shaped like a worm in order to lure in inquisitive prey animals.

Umoonasaurus belonged to a group of marine reptiles called leptocleididae, some members of of which seem to be special-
ized for a freshwater lifestyle. 1 As a result, the portrayal of Umoonasaurus as a river-dweller may not be entirely specula-
tive.

1 Kear, B. P. & Barrett, P. M. 2011. Reassessment of the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) pliosauroid Leptocleidus superstes Andrews, 1922 and other plesiosaur
remains from the nonmarine Wealden succession of southern England. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 663-691.

91
Julio Lacerda
Taboo
Talented palaeoartist Julio Lacerda, known for his photore-
alistic compositions of birdlike dinosaurs, presents us here
with a thought-provoking picture that is only “taboo” for
people, and only certain people at that. His artwork depicts
a homosexual couple of bird-like dinosaurs known as
caenagnathids.

Lacerda explains; “Same-sex copulation, bonding and parent-

ing is well-documented in many animals, especially birds and
mammals. The exact reason why these behaviour exists... is not
really known. But it is much more common in nature than most
people would think, with unusually high rates of homosexual
pairing in species like giraffes, bonobos, ducks and penguins. In
certain cases it even leads to the adoption and successful raising
of surrogate offspring by such couples. 1

In my work, a male pair of caenagnathid oviraptorosaurs are

engaging in mutual courtship - something that would definitely
not be preserved in the fossil record. Their colouration is inspired
by black swans, 25% of whose pairings are male to male. 2”

1 Eric Silver (2 August 1999). “Gay vulture couple raise surrogate chicks”.
London: The Independent News. Retrieved 2009-09-21.
2 Braithwaite, L. W., ‘Ecological studies of the Black Swan III – Behaviour
and social organization’, Australian Wildlife Research 8, 1981: 134-146.

92
93
Lew Lashmit
“Georgosaurus”
In the history of palaeontology, there are certain fos-
sils which, through their sheer strangeness, have led to
wildly different theories about their origin and the way
they looked in life. A classic case is that of Therizinosaurus,
known only from a set of forearms with claws that were
almost a meter long.

Many theories have been proposed to explain the true iden-

tity of these animals. They were seen as turtle-like reptiles, 1
enormous predatory dinosaurs that tore plant eaters’
bellies open, late-surviving cousins of the earliest, long-
necked prosauropod dinosaurs, or to a lineage of dinosaurs
completely unique unto themselves. In the end, however,
more fossils and discoveries of related species led to a
picture of Therizinosaurus as a large, bird-like theropod
dinosaur with extraordinarily long claws. It was most pos-
sibly a herbivore with a long neck and a small head.

This “retro” illustration by Lew Lashmit, however, is not

about our current interpretation of Therizinosaurus.
Purposefully executed in a cold-blooded 1950s - 60s style, it
is a delightful, tongue-in-cheek speculation about Therizino-
saurus as a farming dinosaur that used its claws to plough
the soil, and plant and harvest root-like tubers.

Clearly, this interpretation has nothing to do with reality,

but it does not stop Lasmhit’s artwork from being thought-
provoking. Therizinosaurus was surrounded by over-the-top
theories from the day it was discovered. Clearly, a farming
dinosaur is no less ridiculous than a giant turtle-beast, or
a Freddy Kruger-like slasher as was proposed back in the
day.

1 Maleev, E.A. (1954). “New turtle−like reptile in Mongolia [in Russian].”

Priroda, 1954(3): 106–108.

94
95
Michael Hanson
A Diving Rhamphorhynchus
With its rudder-tipped tail, short beak and needle-like
teeth, Rhamphorhynchus is one of the most familiar ptero-
saurs, second only to the crested Pteranodon in the public
eye. This animal is mostly portrayed as a bat-like flyer,
clinging to branches and rocks and soaring around seaside
landscapes. Here, however, Michael Hanson has specula-
tively illustrated it in an unfamiliar ecological role - this
Rhamphorhynchus is adapted for aquatic life as a diver.

The idea of pterosaurs as aquatic, as opposed to aerial,

animals is not a new one. In the 1830s, German scientist
Johann Wagler interpreted them as marine animals, and al-
lied them together with a mismatched crew of marine rep-
tiles and monotremes, the group that includes echidnas the
duckbilled platypus, in a unique class of animals known as
Gryphi! 1 To Wagler, this group occupied a unique position
between mammals and birds.

As funny as aquatic pterosaurs seem to us now, there might

be reasons to think things twice, at least about Rhampho-
rhynchus. In today’s ecosystems, birds such as penguins,
cormorants, auks, or diving-petrels have adapted numer-
ous times for aquatic life. Many fossils of Rhamphorynchus
were found in marine deposits. There are even instances
of Rhamphoryncus preserved together with large, gar-like
fish that were trying to eat them. 2 Conventional theories
suggest the flying reptiles fell into the sea after dying, but
perhaps the Rhamphorhynchi were actually swimming in the
Jurassic seas when they perished.

1 Wagler, J. (1830). Natürliches System der Amphibien Munich, 1830:

1–354.
2 Frey, E.; and Tischlinger, H. (2012). “The Late Jurassic pterosaur Rham-
phorhynchus, a frequent victim of the ganoid fish Aspidorhynchus?”. PLoS ONE 7
(3): e31945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031945.

96
97
Mike Keesey
Texan Mama: Dimetrodon
Dimetrodon, the familiar, sail-backed cousin of mammals,
is usually portrayed as a lizard-like beast. The fact that it is
related to mammals is overshadowed by its more “reptil-
ian” features such as the sprawling limbs and the unusual
sail of skin. But what if mammalian characteristics such
as a moist skin full of sweat glands, appeared earlier on in
mammal evolution than we think? If this was indeed the
case, then Dimetrodon would not have looked like a reptile
at all. Artist Mike Keesey explains:

“In this piece, I have pushed the origin of fur and milk back to an
extremely early time - Dimetrodon is one of the furthest stem-
mammals from mammalia proper. While we know that a later
stem-mammal, Estemmenosuchus, had glandular skin without
any sign of fur, (1) it is possible that fur evolved earlier and was
simply lost or reduced in some lineages, as it has been in many
placental mammals today.

I have also posited parental feeding, but not, strictly speaking,

lactation. Other animal groups, including caecilians and pigeons,
have evolved ways of feeding the young from foodstuffs produced
by the mother. This mother Dimetrodon’s sides are swollen with
nutritious substances which seep out as her pups gobble it up. Is
it milk? Sort of and sort of not.”

98
99
Mike Keesey
A Siberian Denisovan
The Denisova hominin, or “the Denisovan,” is one of the
most enigmatic chapters in the story of human evolution.
Known from a few fragmentary bones from the Denisova
caves in Siberia, it preserves a DNA trace that is distinct
both from modern people, Homo sapiens, and the closely-
related neanderthals, Homo neanderthalensis. 1 Before the
Denisova discovery, us and the neanderthals were thought
to be the only major groups of humans in the ice-age world.
Now, it seems that a distinct third sub-species also existed.

It is a pity that only finger and toe bones are left from this
puzzling lineage of human beings. This lack of remains is
frustrating, but it also opens up room for speculation. Mike
Keesey elaborates on what our distant cousin might have
looked like, and their attitudes towards Homo sapiens.

“Here I’ve imagined a Siberian Denisovan as a sort of “polar

Neandertal”. As with polar bears, his skin is dark, trapping
heat, but his pelage is light, allowing for camouflage against the
taiga and tundra. He is the last of his kind - his southern kin
mixed with the strange, baby-faced people who keep invading
from the west. But he does not welcome them. He will fight to his
death.”

1 Krause, Johannes; Fu, Qiaomei; Good, Jeffrey M.; Viola, Bence; Shun-
kov, Michael V.; Derevianko, Anatoli P. & Pääbo, Svante (2010), “The complete
mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia”,
Nature 464 (7290): 894–897, doi:10.1038/nature08976, PMID 20336068.

100
101
Mitchell Seymour
Diplocaulus, an Amphibian Stingray
Mitchell Seymour’s naive and vivid, cartoon-like artwork
was a great addition to this book. Combining reasonable
speculation with a sense that prehistoric animals don’t
need to be portrayed as photorealistic figures or “gritty”
monsters, they encourage the viewer to look at extinct life
in a new perspective.

Here, the boomerang-headed prehistoric amphibian known

as Diplocaulus is seen hiding at the bottom of a lagoon,
inconspicuous and safe. Most reconstructions of Diplocau-
lus aim to highlight its strangely-shaped head for a bizarre
“wow” factor. In doing so, however, they negate any details
about how it lived and how these organs were used in life.
The organism is disconnected from its ecological and evo-
lutionary setting, and is reduced to a freak-show specimen.

This artwork doesn’t show Diplocaulus’ wing-like head

flanges, but it does give the viewer an idea about how its
strange anatomy may have helped it in life. For Seymour,
the skull flages help the animal burrow into the seafloor
sediment. If one was able to travel to the past, chances
are they would be more likely to see Diplocaulus this way,
rather than with its skull plainly visible for everyone to see.

102
103
Miyess Mitri
A Feathered Spinosaurus
Out of all the meat-eating dinosaurs, the superficially
crocodile-like spinosaurs proved to be the most resistant,
in the mind’s eye, to the “feathering” brought about by
new discoveries of dinosaurian integument. One can easily
imagine bird-like Velociraptors and even the famous Tyran-
nosaurus rex covered in feathers, but it is difficult to men-
tally picture the extraordinary spinosaurs with plumage.

Here, artist Miyess Mitri has attempted to visualize feath-

ers on a spinosaur. Instead of contour-inflating plumage, it
is covered with a dense layer of short, bristle-like feathers,
much like the ones we see in penguins today.

Why is this so? Because there is a distinct possibility that

spinosaurs may have spent most of their time in aquatic
environments. A recent comparison of oxygen isotopes
from spinosaur bones has revealed that these animals’ iso-
tope ratios are closer to habitually aquatic organisms such
as sea turtles and crocodiles. 1 If they spent a lot of time
swimming, it would make sense for the enigmatic spino-
saurs to have supported a coat of hydrodynamic, insulating
fibers.

1 Amiot, R.; Buffetaut, E.; Lécuyer, C.; Wang, X.; Boudad, L.; Ding, Z.;
Fourel, F.; Hutt, S.; Martineau, F.; Medeiros, A.; Mo, J.; Simon, L.; Suteethorn, V.;
Sweetman, S.; Tong, H.; Zhang, F.; and Zhou, Z. (2010). “Oxygen isotope evidence
for semi-aquatic habits among spinosaurid theropods”. Geology 38 (2): 139–142.
doi:10.1130/G30402.1.

104
105
Peter Buchholz
Parksosaurus Dreaming
Palaeoartist Peter Buchholz has created this whimsical-but-
plausible scene of an adult Parkosaurus, a plant-eating dino-
saur, in an inebriated state after eating some mushrooms
with psychoactive ingredients.

Consumption of plants and fungi for their narcotic proper-

ties is not uncommon in nature. In today’s world, elephants
regularly get drunk on fermented fruit, and reindeer have
been observed consuming Amanita muscaria mushrooms, 1
apparently for their psychoactive properties.

As animals with well-developed nervous systems and

social instincts, dinosaurs were certainly advanced enough
to have enjoyed an occasional natural “high” every now
and then.

1 Wasson, R. Gordon (1968). Soma: Divine Mushroom of Immortality, p

238. Harcourt Brace Jovanovick. ISBN 0-88316-517-1.

106
107
Rachel Lowrie
Vanquished
In this colorful piece, palaeoartist Rachel Lowrie has depict-
ed two male Fruitadens, plant-eating dinosaurs, in a duel
for social dominance. Although nature can be host to a va-
riety of unfortunate and violent interactions, same-species
duels for social dominance rarely end in death. Usually,
animals have a surrender signal that lets their conspecifics
know that they have given up.

For these Fruitadens, the signal is lying flat down on the

ground in a submissive posture. The victor plucks the
loser’s quills to further assert its power.

Although this behavior is entirely speculative, it is not un-

likely given the diverse contests for social dominance seen
in birds today. The Mesozoic must have been host to count-
less similar displays, duels, struggles and competitions for
social and sexual supremacy.

108
109
Rachel Lowrie
Wrestling Plateosaurus
Once more, Rachel Lowrie focuses her art on the theme of
social dominance. On this occasion, the combatants are of
the genus Plateosaurus - the forerunners of the long-necked
sauropods.

Unlike their quadrupedal descendants, Plateosaurus still

walked on two legs and their front limbs bore sharp claws
which may have been used for defence, or for duels as
shown here. Rachel Lowrie has also adorned her Plateosauri
with brightly-colored necks and inflatable throat sacs,
which makes them stranger, but also more believable than
the bare, snake-necked portrayals we have gotten used to.

110
111
“Ramul”
Tastes Like Chicken
As told before, palaeoart has developed its own unques-
tioned conventions and typecast roles when it comes to
certain scenes. The almost classical scene of a mid-sized,
herbivorous ornithischian being viciously torn apart by a
pack of predatory Deinonychi is one such trope.

Such acts of predation are not impossible. In fact, there are

Deinonychus fossils preserved alongside the bones of Ten-
ontosaurus, a mid-sized ornithischian herbivore.1 However,
the outcome of these encounters may not always have been
in the predators’ favor. With this artwork, German palaeo-
artist Ramul shows a stark reversal of the commonly-held
stereotype. This time, a plant-eating dinosaur has killed a
sub-adult Deinonychus by simply stomping on it.

Many people fail to understand just how strong a moder-

ately-sized herbivore can be, even if it has no sharp claws
or teeth. For example, even a present-day horse can be an
extremely intimidating and dangerous opponent if in an
aggressive mood. Growing almost as big as elephants, with
powerful, muscular legs, arms and tails, herbivorous dino-
saurs could certainly hold out on their own against small
to mid-sized predators. As a final detail, the herbivore is
eating the remains of its would-be assailant. Such behavior
has also been observed in nature, with herbivorous mam-
mals occasionally consuming small animals or bird hatch-
lings they come across.

1 Maxwell, W. D.; Ostrom, J.H. (1995). “Taphonomy and paleobiological

implications of Tenontosaurus–Deinonychus associations”. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 15 (4): 707–712. doi:10.1080/02724634.1995.10011256.

112
113
Raven Amos
Swamp Dragon - Ichthyovenator
With this gorgeously stylized painting, talented palaeoartist
Raven Amos addresses the unusual sail-like ridges found
in spinosaurid dinosaurs. As seen before in this book,
spinosaurs were a group of meat-eating dinosaurs with
possible adaptations for an aquatic lifestyle. Some members
of this group bore very tall vertebral ridges on their backs.
While these structures were conventionally assumed to
have been “skin sails,” Raven Amos interprets them as an
adaptation for an exitence spent in water.

“I have depicted Ichthyovenator as living a semi-aquatic life-

style like a crocodile or alligator. Rather than an ornamental bony
sail, its large neural spines serve an armor-encrusted anchor
point for enormous tail muscles that propel it through reed and
duckweed-infested swamplands.”

This work also stands out in this collection in the balance it

strikes between stylization and attention to detail.
Ichthyovenator and the surrounding scenery is rendered in
flat blacks and greens as opposed to “realistic” color.
This makes certain details, like the cleft in the animal’s back
and even the genus of the fish it is eating, far more visible
and interesting to the casual viewer. Locked in what seems
to be a cycle of realism, prehistoric art could certainly
benefit from daring techniques such as those used in this
artwork.

114
115
Raven Amos
Bowertyrants
In today’s world, bowerbirds (family Ptilorhynchidae,) are
well-known for their extraordinary mating habits, in which
males carefully curate and arrange a selection of brightly-
colored objects with hopes of getting the females’ attention.
With this piece, Raven Amos has speculated on a similar
behavior for the famous tyrannosaurs. For her, the tyranno-
saur species known as Gorgosaurus has become the “lesser
bowertyrant.”

Instead of colorful stones, flowers and bits of plastic, these

bower-builders are using carefully-arranged logs, bones
and the skulls of their victims to woo their mates. The drab-
ly-colored female looks impressed by her suitor’s carefully-
arranged aisle of driftwood and whitish stones, his bright
skin patches and the exquisite selection of a Lambeosaurus
skull as a focal display object. Will this be his lucky day?

Perhaps this scenario looks a bit too tongue-in-cheek, yet

it still leads to new ideas about dinosaurian social life and
mating habits. Co-incidentally, this is one of the first new
illustrations that depict tyrannosaurs with an extensive
covering of feathers. Even when feathers were known for
smaller dinosaurs, artists were reluctant to draw large
tyrannosaurs with feathers, assuming they were too large
to need insulation. However, the recent discovery of a large
tyrannosaur, Yutyrannus, 1 preserved with feather-like in-
tegument, has led artists to revise their depictions of these
majestic predators.

1 Xu, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, K.; Ma, Q.; Xing, L.; Sullivan, C.; Hu, D.;
Cheng, S. et al. (2012). “A gigantic feathered dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous
of China” (PDF). Nature 484: 92–95. doi:10.1038/nature10906. PMID 22481363.

116
117
Robinson Kunz
Guardpost
Not many dinosaur-themed artworks show mutually ben-
eficial interactions between animals. Done mostly for “awe-
some” value, mainstream palaeoart focuses on predator-
prey scenes with almost predictable repetition. Couldn’t
these animals have done something other than attacking,
killing and eating each other all the time?

Thus, this piece by Robinson Kunz is a welcome deviation

from the norm. A large, plant eating dinosaur and a small-
er, bird-like species are seen in a symbiotic relationship,
where the small dinosaur cleans the larger one of parasites,
and stands on lookout for larger predators which may
endanger both individuals. This relationship is similar to
the one that exists today between large, savannah-dwelling
herbivores and small birds in Africa.

118
119
Robinson Kunz
Darwinopterus as a Nest Parasite
Nest parasitism is an unusual phenomenon where an
animal, usually a bird, lays its eggs in the nest of a differ-
ent species. The unsuspecting hosts will accept the parasite
hatchling as their own and raise it at expense of their own
offspring. The parasite hatchling may even kill its nest-
mates in order to ensure its survival.

In today’s world, various cuckoo species and even certain

ducks practice nest parasitism. Who knows what the nest
parasites of the past may have looked like? Robinson Kunz
has come up with this depiction of the long-tailed Darwin-
opterus as a pterosaurian nest parasite. A desperate An-
urognathus, another kind of pterosaur, is also visible, trying
futilely to sate the ever-growing appetite of its “offspring.”

While this is a speculative scenario, it should be noted that

a lot of factors remain frustratingly unknown about the
nesting and reproductive habits of pterosaurs. Current
fossil discoveries indicate that pterosaurs, unlike birds,
were able to fend for themselves at a very early stage of
their lives, perhaps even right after hatching. 1 If this was
indeed the case, nest parasitism may have been unfeasi-
ble for these animals. But pterosaurs were a very diverse
group, an as it is often the case in nature, there could have
been exceptions to the rule.

1 Unwin, David M. (2006). The Pterosaurs: From Deep Time. New York:
Pi Press. p. 246. ISBN 0-13-146308-X.

120
121
Rodrigo Vega Put together, these small, speculative tweakings create a
fantastically different picture of Spinosaurus than the run-
ning, sail-backed crocodile we have gotten used to. Artist
A Speculative Spinosaurus Rodrigo Vega admits that his interpretation is possibly too
extreme, but it serves a very important purpose for people
As seen before, the predatory dinosaur Spinosaurus has interested in dinosaurs and palaeontology - it gets us think-
been the center of much palaeontological speculation with ing about the relation between fossils and the features they
its possible lifestyle and the soft-tissues covering of its supported in real life.
extraordinary bony sail. With this spectacular work, con-
ceptual artist Rodrigo Vega purposefully delivers the most
outlandish interpretation of Spinosaurus he can conceive.
Every detail of the animal’s anatomy, from the skull to the
sail-like bones on its back, has been interpreted as a basis of
an unconventional anatomical feature.

Take, for example, the strange, tapir-like trunk on the

animal’s face. Spinosaurus has a long, almost crocodile-like
snout. Traditional reconstructions leave the animal’s face
bare, but Vega has speculated that the small crest and the
rear-placed nostrils could have formed the basis of a mus-
cular, soft-tissue trunk. He speculates that this organ could
have been used like a snorkel when the animal was diving,
and would also help it snatch prey items. In today’s world,
brown bears dexterously use their upper lips to catch
salmon in mid-leap. Perhaps, Vega muses, Spinosaurus had
a similar adaptation. The presence of trunks, or trunk-like
organs in dinosaurian faces, by the way, is not a new idea.
Proboscis-like facial organs were proposed for the plant
eating sauropod dinosaurs as far back as 1975. 1 It is not
certain if such organs were present on any dinosaur, but
even if inaccurate, Vega’s trunked Spinosaurus gets viewers
thinking; perhaps there was something more to dinosau-
rian faces than bare, grinning teeth?

Another novelty of Vega’s Spinosaurus is on its back. The

tall neural spines, so often thought as supports for a thin,
reptilian sail, have been re-interpreted as the basis for an
enormous, bison-like hump. To support the weight of this
structure, the animal has reverted to a semi-quadrupedal
stance, using its muscular arms to carry itself. Vega specu-
lates that Spinosaurus may have used this fatty hump as a
food reservoir for lean seasons.

1 Coombs, W. P. 1975. Sauropod habits and habitats. Palaeogeography,

Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 17, 1-33.

122
123
124
125
Santa Mazzei
Austroraptor Chicks
At first glance, this artwork seems to depict a tiny duckling
about to be snatched by a vicious, long-jawed predator.
Look closer, however, and details hint that this is not the
case. To begin with, the “duckling” is not a duck. It has tiny
claws where its wings should be, and small, nascent teeth
gleam in its beak. Its tail is also longer than one would
expect a duck’s to be. This chick is a dinosaur chick, of
a species known as Austroraptor. The toothy maw in the
picture it is not that of a menacing predator, but of one of
its protective parents.

Austroraptor is a dromaeosaur, a relative of “raptor”

dinosaurs such as Deinonychus and the famous Velocirap-
tor. Unusually for its group, it had very short arms and an
elongated snout lined with conical teeth. 1 It was also one of
the largest of the dromaeosaurs, growing up to five meters
long. Austroraptor’s snout and teeth have been interpreted
as adaptations for a fish-eating diet, which is why artist
Sante Mazzei has restored it like a waterfowl.

Perhaps, Mazzei speculates, Austroraptors started out as

more-or-less aquatic juveniles, and graduated to a more ter-
restrial existence as they grew. For a present-day analogy,
imagine a mammal that would live like a mouse at infancy,
like a jackal in adolescence, and like a tiger in adult-
hood. Such “niche shifts” would enable a single species of
dinosaur to occupy the roles of different small, medium
and large sized-animals simultaneously. Some researchers
think that this model of growth occurred in most, if not all
dinosaur species. 2

1 Novas, Fernando E.; Diego Pol, Juan I. Canale, Juan D. Porfiri and Jorge
O. Calvo (2008-12-16). “A bizarre Cretaceous theropod dinosaur from Patagonia
and the evolution of Gondwanan dromaeosaurids”. Proceedings of the Royal So-
ciety B (The Royal Society) 276 (1659): 1101–7. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1554. PMC
2679073. PMID 19129109.

2 Codron, D. et al., ‘Ontogenetic niche shifts in dinosaurs influenced

size, diversity and extinction in terrestrial vertebrates’, Biology Letters, 2012.
doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0240.

126
127
Sarah Goss
Mating Dance - Tapejara
Tapejara was one of the most elaborately crested pterosaurs.
In this evocative digital painting by Sarah Goss, a Tapejara
couple is seen “sky dancing,” holding each other’s feet
and nuzzling while in a downward plunge. We have no
evidence of such a ritual in the fossil record, and pterosaur
wing membranes likely did not leave their legs free for
such activities, but nevertheless this piece leaves a momen-
tous impact.

The sight of two creatures in loving courtship leads us to

think about what feelings, affections and emotions prehis-
toric animals may have experienced in their lives. After all,
animals share homologous structures such as skeletal parts,
limbs and sense organs. Perhaps we have homologous
emotions too.

128
129
Sarah Goss
A Flamboyant Therizinosaurus
The strange, long-clawed dinosaur Therizinosaurus is
rendered even stranger, but also more lifelike with this
portrayal, featuring an attention-gathering suite of display
markings, long feathers and bulging throat sac.

Therizinosaurus, as strange as it was, belonged to a dinosaur

group that was not too far removed from the ancestry of
birds, yet it is mostly portrayed as a hulking, bare-skinned
beast in popular books and websites. Sarah Goss’s bird-
like interpretation re-casts it as a much more “ordinary”
animal, one whose relations to the rest of the dinosaurian
lineage are far clearer.

130
131
Simon Roy
Cyclops
Comic artist and illustrator Simon Roy is famous for his
subtly detailed, down-to-earth portrayals of alien cultures,
people and animals. Aided with a vast reservoir of knowl-
edge on anatomy, evolutionary biology and anthropology,
he adds layers of details to his concepts and characters,
resulting in an engrossing, world-building experience.
Here, Roy has produced a “what if” speculation on the
cyclops, one of the oldest palaeontological misconceptions.

A race of terrifying, one-eyed giants, the cyclopes were

mentioned primarily in the epic poetry of Homer and He-
siod. In 1914, Othenio Abel proposed 1 that the myth may
have been started by the skulls of dwarf elephants (Pal-
aeoloxodon sp.) which lived on Crete, Cyprus and isolated
Aegean islands before the arrival of humans in the Neo-
lithic era. Elephant skulls have a large hole in the center
that anchors the powerful muscles of their trunks. When
the animal’s body decomposes, this hole resembles a big,
empty eye socket on a hauntingly large, humanoid skull.
Having no knowledge of extinction, fossils, evolution or
anatomy, it is easy to understand how the ancient Greeks
may have mistaken these for remains of one-eyed giants.

Simon Roy’s sketch is based on this premise - what if the

ancient Greeks had been right, and there really was a race
of giant, anthropoid beings with singular eyes and skulls
roughly like those of elephants? This mad brute is the re-
sult of his speculation.

1 Mayor, Adrienne. The First Fossil Hunters: Paleontology in Greek and

Roman Times (Princeton University Press) 2000 ISBN 1400838444.

132
133
Simon Roy
Retro-Dinosauroid Tribesmen
Simon Roy here addresses one of the most interesting spec-
ulations about dinosaurs: If they hadn’t died out, would
some dinosaurs evolve into an intelligent species? Differ-
ent models have been proposed for intelligent dinosaurs
in recent decades. The most famous of these is Dale Rus-
sel’s “dinosauroid,” 1 which was hypothetically derived
from small, smart, meat-eating dinosaurs such as Troodon.
Published in 1978, when dinosaurs were thought to be
reptile-like creatures, Dale Russel’s dinosauroid looked
like a green, scaly humanoid with large eyes, an upright
stance and only the vestige of a tail. This model was later
criticized because it looked too much like a human being.
Would there really be an evolutionary pressure for all intel-
ligent animals to develop a humanoid body plan? Indeed,
the main theme of Russel’s 1978 hypothesis seems to be the
suggestion of a common, humanoid body form for intel-
ligent animals rather than a detailed speculation on intel-
ligent dinosaurs. More recently, in 2006, zoologist Darren
Naish suggested that due to their bird-like anatomy,
intelligent dinosaurs would look more like birds. Their
bodies would be horizontally aligned, and their tails would
not need to disappear. Like parrots and crows today, they
would use their beaks to manipulate objects.They wouldn’t
need to evolve a humanoid body plan. 2

In order to honor this debate, Simon Roy has here drawn

a tribe of purposefully inaccurate, “retro” dinosauroids,
complete with a reptilian steed and a featherless Velocirap-
tor “watchdog” straight out of a 1970’s palaeontology book.
With deep knowledge of his subject, Simon Roy makes
even these obsolete dinosauroids seem vividly real.

1 Russell, D. A.; Séguin, R. (1982). “Reconstruction of the small Cre-

taceous theropod Stenonychosaurus inequalis and a hypothetical dinosauroid”.
Syllogeus 37: 1–43.
2 Naish, D. (2006). Dinosauroids Revisited Darren Naish: Tetrapod Zool-
ogy, April 23, 2011.

134
135
Smyslov Alexander
Seasonal Feathers
The presence of feathers in dinosaurs is almost universally
accepted now, but the debate on the extent of feather-
ing still goes on. Russian palaeoartist Smyslov Alexander
brings in a suggestion a few have considered - what if cer-
tain dinosaurs only had seasonal feathering? In his hypo-
thetical scenario, the early plant-eating dinosaur
Heterodontosaurus has two distinct morphs for different
times of the year. The animals lose their hair-like body
covering during the warm season, and re-gain their plum-
age with the arrival of colder weather and rains. The green
color of the autumnal feathering also helps the animal
disguise itself from predators.

Of course, this scenario is fictitious, but animals with very

similar habits really do exist in today’s world. Just take a
look at the arctic fox, Vulpes lagopus. These animals adopt
a snow-white, insulating coat with the onset of winter and
revert to a shorter, darker covering of fur in the warmer
summer months. Closer to dinosaurs, polar birds known as
rock ptarmigans, Lagopus muta, also have sets of brown and
white plumage for camouflage in different seasons.

136
137
Smyslov Alexander
A Skin-Clad Stegosaurus
The plate-backed Stegosaurus is one of the most readily
recognizable dinosaurs of all time. Discovered back in 1877,
1
this bus-sized dinosaur soon became a palaeontological
enigma. No one could make sense of its bizarre plates, nor
could guess exactly how they were attached to the ani-
mal’s body in real life. At first, the plates were thought to
be fused to its skin, like the scales of a gigantic pangolin.
Later on, other interpretations were proposed with the
plates standing erect in a single row, a side-by-side double
row and so on. Some researchers though the plates were
independently movable, while others disagreed. An eccen-
tric writer even reconstructed them as tiny wings, which
helped the immense animal glide from cliffs! 2 In the end,
Stegosaurus’ plates were understood to lie in a staggered
double row across its back. There is still some debate over
what function they performed, but it is certain that this did
not extend to aeronautical capabilities.

It is over this historical puzzle that artist Smyslov Al-

exander brings a new interpretation. He maintains the
plate arrangement in its orthodox fashion, but proposes a
covering layer of skin, muscle and subcutaneous fat on top
of them. The resulting animal looks utterly different from
the Stegosaurus we’ve been used to. Alexander thinks that
this arrangement could have helped the animal store extra
nutrients and also strengthened the tissues of the animal’s
tail and back, adding power to the spine-studded “thago-
mizer” organ with which it warded off predators.

1 Marsh OC (1877). “A new order of extinct Reptilia (Stegosauria)

from the Jurassic of the Rocky Mountains”. American Journal of Science 3 (14):
513–514.
2 Ballou, W. H. (1920, August 15). The Aeroplane Dinosaur of a Million
Years Ago. The Ogden Standard-Examiner, pp. 8. Retrieved from
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85058393/1920-08-15/ed-1/seq-32/

138
139
Oscar Mendez
Rumbling Ichthyovenator
Palaeoartist Oscar Mendez is well-known online with his concise, colorful and sharp lineart of dinosaurs,
mostly meat-eating theropods.

In this image, he shows a male Ichthyovenator, a possibly aquatic spinosaur, conducting a “rumble” display
in the water for females of his kind. He has immersed himself in a calm river and is causing the water around
him to vibrate and bubble with sound waves. The extensive system of air sacs 1 in his lungs and chest is help-
ing him better transmit vibrations from his body to the water. We obviously don’t have direct evidence for this
kind of display in Ichthyovenator, but it is not unlikely. In today’s world, crocodiles perform a similar ritual,
causing the water on their backs to “boil” with sonorous vocalizations.

1 Wedel MJ. Evidence for bird-like air sacs in saurischian dinosaurs. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiol-
ogy. 2009 Oct 1;311(8): 611-28. doi: 10.1002/jez.513.

140
141
Oscar Mendez
Saurolophus and alvarezsaurs
Interactions between different animal species are thought
to fall into one of two categories. They can either be symbi-
otic, beneficial for both parties, or parasitic, in which one
animal benefits at the expense of another. But real life is not
so clear-cut. Nature is full of opportunistic relationships
that can change back and forth between symbiosis and par-
asitism. Indeed, this is how distinctly parasitic or symbiotic
relations evolve in the first place. An animal might initially
approach another as a parasite, but may inadvertently
cause beneficial side-effects. In due time, such relationships
may evolve into symbiosis - and vice versa.

Artist Oscar Mendez has here imagined a similarly am-

biguous relationship in dinosaurs. The small, bird-like,
one-clawed alvarezsaurs are approaching the tired Saurolo-
phus with intent to pick at its skin and lick the blood that
issues from the wounds. But one of them is also feeding on
ticks and other insects near the larger animal’s head. How
would one classify such an interaction? The smaller dino-
saurs are costing the Saurolophus a few drops of its blood,
but they are also cleaning it of insects that might spread
potentially lethal diseases. Perhaps, from the larger beast’s
perspective, the blood-letting could seem like an afford-
able “price” to pay for the insect-cleaning operation. In
due time, the alvarezsaurs could start feeding more on the
insects and less on Saurolophus blood, and this could be the
beginning of a truly symbiotic partnership.

142
143
Oscar Mendez a maw of sharp teeth on the predator, and a stubby beak
on Oryctodromeus. Perhaps Troodon would have sported a

Passive Defense - Oryctodromeus

token covering of hair-like “feathers” on its neck. If drawn
a few years ago, Troodon would have feathers, but would
retain a dragon-like head. Its fingers would be visible from
This stylized drawing is an excellent summary the great among a few long, feathers emerging awkwardly from its
image revision that dinosaurs underwent in the last mis-aligned hands. Oryctodromeus would still be a quasi-
decade or so. It shows a plant-eating ornithischian dino- reptilian kangaroo.
saur known as Oryctodromeus, being harassed by Troodon,
everyone’s favorite small predatory dinosaur. To protect In contrast, artist Oscar Mendez has drawn these animals
itself, Oryctodromeus is hiding in its burrow, and brandish- in the light of our latest knowledge, and in a wider un-
ing its spiny tail to ward off the attacker. It’s fascinating to derstanding of how real animals look, move and function.
realize that a decade ago, both animals would have been Oryctodromeus is now sporting a heavy coat of spines, in-
portrayed as lizard-like bipeds, distinguishable only by ferred from patches of similar structures discovered with a

144
related species. 1 Almost all prior illustrations showed these strides. Accurate representations not only make dinosaurs
animals with specifically and only those patches present. In more interesting, they also help convey the evolutionary
reality, the patchy preservation is a by-product of fossiliza- relationship they have with birds. They make us realize
tion, and these animals must have sported a more extensive how much of conventional palaeoart is based on repetitions
integument that even covered their faces. of patterns and tropes. Perhaps one day, new discoveries
will make this artwork seem as dated as the reptile-like
Likewise, Oscar Mendez has illustrated Troodon as a proper, dinosaurs of the past.
bird-like animal - instead of a reptile with a token covering
of feathers. Based on careful observations of real-life birds,
Mendez has given it subtle nuances of movement such
as its folded wings and the flexing posture of its feet as it
1 Zheng, Xiao-Ting; You, Hai-Lu; Xu, Xing; Dong, Zhi-Ming (19 March
2009). “An Early Cretaceous heterodontosaurid dinosaur with filamentous integu-
mentary structures”. Nature 458 (7236): 333–336. doi:10.1038/nature07856. PMID
19295609.

145
Oscar Mendez
A Tangent Bird
Eosinopteryx was a tiny, bird-like dinosaur, known from a
well-preserved fossil from China, complete with a full suite
of feathers. 1 Eosinopteryx had an unusual set of character-
istics; its head had an extremely short snout and very large
eyes. Unlike most related species, its legs and tail were not
extensively feathered. Despite its small size, it did not seem
to have the ability to fly. Artist Oscar Mendez has here
interpreted this puzzling animal as a nocturnal, gruond-
scurrying hunter of insects and other small animals, a dino-
saur converging with shrews and other small mammals.

Whether this interpretation is true or not, this enigmatic lit-

tle dinosaur has shown us that the evolution of birds from
dinosaurs was not as straightforward as once believed.
Instead of a straight progression from small, meat eating
dinosaurs to avians, the natural history of birds seems
to have included myriads of side-paths, dead ends and
tangent forms. Who knows what other strange quasi-birds
may have shared the world with dinosaurs and their flying
descendants?

1 Godefroit, P.; Demuynck, H.; Dyke, G.; Hu, D.; Escuillié, F. O.; Claeys,
P. (2013). “Reduced plumage and flight ability of a new Jurassic paravian theropod
from China”. Nature Communications 4: 1394. doi:10.1038/ncomms2389. PMID
23340434.

146
147
Thomas Duffy Using a method which no one else can replicate, he has
claimed to have seen features that nobody else can see,
such as a long finger supporting a small wing, a very long
Longisquama tail and extra fronds on the animal’s back, head and tail.

Thomas Duffy is well-known among today’s fantasy and Thomas Duffy has based his fantastic drawing on this
palaeo-artists with his outlandish, cheerfully irreverent improbable view. Instead of trying to argue the errors of
hybrids of different fossil animals and even machines. For Peters’ Longisquama, (which many people have tried,) he
this collection, he has chosen to tackle the enigmatic fossil has accepted it as a fantasy and added onto it.
known as Longisquama, whose extraordinary anatomy 1 is He has made this improbable being into a photosynthetic
almost as strange as one of Duffy’s fantastic creations. animal - one that can feed on sunlight, much like plants.
Its fronds are full of symbiotic algae colonies that convert
Longisquama is known mainly from one fossil, which only sunlight into energy and it spends most of its life hanging
preserves its front half. It is a small, lightly-built animal upside down like a sun-powered reptilian sloth,
with very long, feather-like projections emerging from its “grazing” on sunlight that dapples the jungle canopy.
back. A variety of purposes have been suggested for these Although certain invertebrates have recently been discov-
fronds, from camouflaging the animal in trees to display ered to integrate photosynthesis into their metabolisms, 5
devices for mating, or as winglets to help it glide from no evidence exists for similar phenomena in vertebrates. As
branch to branch. The fronds have also been discovered fantastic as it might be, Duffy’s Longisquama in tongue-in
in isolated fossils, which led some researchers to interpret cheek warning against unsupported speculations in palae-
them as vegetative remains unrelated to the animal. 2 ontology.

Lonigsquama’s exact position in the tree of life is also a bit

of a mystery. Because the fossil is indistinct, it is difficult
to interpret diagnostic details such as the parts of the skull
and the forelimbs. It was thought that Longisquama was
somehow related to the base of the family tree that includes
crocodiles and dinosaurs. However, a recent assessment
placed it closer to today’s lizards and snakes. 3

The mystery of Longisquama has also attracted unortho-

dox views. A researcher by the name of David Peters has
claimed he was able to see the missing rear half of the skel-
eton by enhancing the images of the fossil in a computer,
and proposed that it was an ancestor of pterosaurs, flying
reptiles of the past. 4

1 Sharov, A.G. (1970). “A peculiar reptile from the lower Triassic of

Fergana”. Paleontologiceskii Zhurnal (1): 127–130.
2 Fraser, N. (2006). Dawn of The Dinosaurs: Life in the Triassic. Bloom-
ington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-025-334-3.
3 Prum, R. O./Unwin, D.M., Benton, M.J./Response; Jones, T.D.,
Ruben, J.A., Maderson, P.F.A., Martin, L.D. (9 March 2001). “Longisquama
Fossil and Feather Morphology”. Science 291 (5510): 1899–1902. doi:10.1126/
science.291.5510.1899c. PMID 11245191.
4 Peters, D. (2006). “The Other Half of Longisquama”. Prehistoric Times 5 Solar-powered Sea Slug Harnesses Stolen Plant Genes, New Scientist,
75: 10–11. 2008-11-24.

148
149
Tom Parker
Uncommon Scenes
It can be safe to say that most of today’s novel ideas about
palaeontology are not generated in universities, labs or dig
sites, but on online discussions. Countless forums, blogs,
blogs’ comment sections and even art sites host a lively and
constant discussion about ancient animals and new theo-
ries about how they might have lived and looked like.

One such site is the Hell Creek Forums page, from which
artist Tom Parker has gathered this nice selection of
uncommon scenes people would like to see represented
more in palaeoart. It must be noted that these ideas were
coined and drawn before this book, and even the first All
Yesterdays was published - suggesting that today’s new
dinosaur renaissance was already brewing in a lot of inde-
pendent minds before its current blossoming.

A pterosaur is burying its eggs,

much like a sea turtle.

150
 An attack by a mosasaur, a
large, predatory marine lizard,
on a terrestrial dinosaur.

151
An ornithischian dinosaur is
drinking water, acting like a
bird rather than a mammal.

Birds employ scoop drink-

ing, while mammals drink
water with a lapping action
generated with their mobile
lips, cheeks and tongue.

A cool-climate theropod, an adorable

Sinosauropteryx prima, is licking
moisture off an icicle.

152
 Dust bathing by a Velociraptor.
This is a common feather-cleaning (and
possibly fun,) activity undertaken by
many birds living today.

153
 A reversal of the “raptor” trope, with
a large herbivorous dinosaur success-
fully defeating an attack by a predatory
Deinonychus.

154
 An act of prehistoric river combing,
where an animal ranges across a stream
for food. Featuring a Gorgosaurus,
prowling a slow river for frogs and
turtles.

155
Tuomas Koivurinne
An Accidental Death
Most of us assume that animals are immune to accidental
death. In the popular, idealized and false vision of nature
there are no accidents; animals always move and act in
harmony with their surroundings, and death is brought
about only by the “natural” act of predation, or through the
“unnatural” transgressions of man.

Believers in such romanticism might be surprised to know

that accidents happen in nature, more often than we think.
There are countless cases of unlucky animals breaking their
limbs and simply starving to death. Cattle get struck by
lightning, walruses plummet off cliffs, and duelling rein-
deer get tangled in horn-locks and perish. Perhaps one of
the strangest cases of animal death on record is the case
of a giraffe dying after getting its head stuck in a cleft tree
branch.

Inspired by this incident, Finnish palaeoartist Tuomas

Koivurinne has come up with this scene of an unfortunate
Giraffatitan perishing in an arboreal accident. The ten-
meter-tall giant has been dead for quite some time, and
opportunistic scavengers are beginning to converge on his
remains.

156
157
Vitaly Melnik
Prehistoric Portraits
Ukrainian palaeoartist Vitaly Melnik has participated in
this collection with artwork that lets us look at dinosaurs in
a new perspective - as portraits.

Too many of us are used to seeing dinosaurs and other

prehistoric animals in full-body, sideways perspectives. An
artifact of skeletal diagrams, this viewpoint helps us visual-
ize the animals’ forms, but it also itemizes them; makes
them seem like different models of vehicles or weapons.
The scale of such representations also fails to connect the
viewers to the subtle, intimate anatomical details that exist
in real animals.

To break from this unconscious tradition, Melnik has

created vivid, speculative portraits of dinosaurs and other
prehistoric animals.

158
Portrait of Tyrannosaurus rex, everyone’s favorite meat-eating dinosaur. This time, however, T-rex is
feeding on plants, perhaps in order to relieve itself of a digestive ailment.  
159
 Portrait of Cryolophosaurus, a crested predatory dinosaur whose remains were discovered in
Antarctica. Vitaly Melnik has speculated that its crest could have sported flexible, leathery folds
that mimicked palm fronds. This would help conceal the animal from its quarry.
160
Portrait of Anurognathus, a tiny flying pterosaur with no tail and a wide, frog-like mouth.
These animals possibly occupied the ecological niches taken up by bats today.
In real life, this beast would be as small as a mouse.
161
 Portrait of a baby ornithischian dinosaur with a drool of “crop milk,” a nutritious substance regurgitated
by its caring mother. In today’s world, certain birds also use crop milk to feed their offspring.
162
 Portrait of two Pachycephalosaurs, locked in combat for social dominance. Pachycephalosaurs are famous for
their sturdy, dome-shaped skulls. Vitaly Melnik has interpreted the domes as the foundations of even larger
horns, much like the ones found in rhinoceroses today. Based on fiber-like fossils found in related animals, he
has also restored them with shaggy, ox-like pelts.
163
 Portrait of Estemmenosuchus, a very large, bear-like cousin of the early mammals that lived before the age of
dinosaurs. It possibly fed on meat as well as plants. Estemmenosuchus had numerous horn-like protrusions on
its face. Artist Vitaly Melnik has interpreted some of them as the bases of keratinous, reindeer-like horns.
164
Portrait of Majungasaurus, a predatory dinosaur from Madagascar. Since many dinosaur fossils
have been discovered with feather impressions, artist Vitaly Melnik has dressed out
Majungasaurus with an extremely-bird-like coat of feathers.
165
Vitor Silva
A Shedding Mosasaur
Sharing the seas with the last dinosaurs, mosasaurs were
ancient marine reptiles descended from lizards. While new
discoveries are showing them to be more fish-like than
shown here, Italian palaeoartist Vitor Silva has produced
his artwork with emphasis on the animals’ skin rather than
their bodies.

Like their relatives, mosasaurs skins were covered with

scales. Fossil impressions show these to be very small,
tightly packed and diamond-shaped. Mosasaur scales
varied from larger, keeled scales in the upper parts of their
bodies to smaller, smoother ones found lower down. 1 2 In
a way, this arrangement was similar to the scale patterns
found in snakes.

Inspired by this parallel, Vitor Silva has elaborated on

mosasaurian moulting. Lizards and snakes living today
need to moult; they shed their skin every once often to ac-
commodate their growing bodies. Almost certainly, mosa-
saurs would have shed their skin too. Would this take place
as a single-piece moult, as in snakes? If this were the case,
one could expect to find enormous moults of mosasaurs
regularly washing up on Mesozoic beaches like monstrous,
discarded veils. Or, would it take place in piecemeal fash-
ion, like lizards, as Silva has illustrated here? Having only
a limited number of soft-tissue mosasaur fossils, we cannot
yet tell the answer.

1 Snow, F. H. (1878). “On the dermal covering of a mosasauroid reptile”.

Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 6: 54–58.
2 Kaddumi, H.F. (2009). “On the latest scale coverings of mosasaurs
(Squamata: Mosasauridae) from the Harrana Fauna in addition to the description
of s new species of Mosasaurus”. Fossils of the Harrana Fauna and the Adjacent
Areas. Amman: Eternal River Museum of Natural History. pp. 80–94.

166
167
Vitor Silva
Drop-Kill Triceratops
As we know from today’s natural world, a herbivorous
diet does not always translate to strict vegetarianism. As
surprising as it might seem, many herbivores will try to eat
carrion or even live flesh if the opportunity becomes avail-
able. For example, animals like deer and cows have been
observed feeding on bird nestlings, possibly in order to
gain additional vitamins and minerals.

Artist Vitor Silva has here illustrated a similar case with the
familiar herbivorous dinosaur Triceratops. In his specula-
tive scenario, the heavyweight dinosaur allows commensal
birds to approach it as they look for parasites on its skin.
Seeking a suitable moment, the larger dinosaur unexpect-
edly drops all of its weight onto the bird, instantly crushing
it. The Triceratops then eats the bird for a helpful boost of
minerals. The larger herbivore might even be doing this
fun, as play behavior.

This might seem preposterous, but the artist has merely

adapted this behavior from present-day animals. Giant
tortoises have been observed “drop killing” small birds and
eating them in exactly the same manner.

168
169
Vladmir Nikolov
An Albino Eosinopteryx
From the common pet white rabbit to extraordinary white
whales, many animals exhibit albinism in nature. Albinism
is characterized by an absence of melanin and other skin
pigments, and is found in most animal groups, from birds
to reptiles, fish and even mollusks. Doubtlessly, the phe-
nomenon must have existed in dinosaurs as well.

Here, Bulgarian artist Vladmir Nikolov has illustrated an

albino Eosinopteryx, an unusual, small bird-like dinosaur.
Animals born with albinism face numerous obstacles in
life, including an increased sensitivity to light, higher risk
of skin cancer and extra visibility to predators. This little
Eosinopteryx has made it to adolescence without much trou-
ble, but now it faces a new threat: harassment and ostraci-
zation by its own kin.

170
171
Vladmir Nikolov
Damaged Feathers
Now that feathers in small dinosaurs have become popu-
larly accepted in palaeoart, the challenge is to produce art-
work that will get people to think about the implications
of feathers in the animals’ daily lives. For example, disease
and damage to feathers is a rarely tackled subject. In this
picture, artist Vladmir Nikolov has illustrated a Microrap-
tor, the famous “four winged” predatory dinosaur, 1 with
half of its plumage lost in a forest fire. Fortunately the small
hunter is not seriously hurt and the feathers will grow back
in due time. Until then, however, this Microraptor won’t be
able to glide from branches like it used to do.

Nikolov has also used the fire-burned Microraptor to show-

case his knowledge of bird anatomy. He has drawn the
animal with a propatagium, a membranous flap between
its upper and lower arms. Also, note that the second and
third digits of its hand have been fused, for better anchor-
age of its long feathers. Both these features are present in
modern-day birds, and by drawing his Microraptor with
them, Nikolov hints that such “bird-like” traits may have
preceded birds as we know them.

1 Xu, X., Z. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Kuang, F. Zhang, X. Du. 2003. Four-

winged dinosaur from China.- Nature, 421, 335-340.

172
173
Vladmir Nikolov
Bone-Headed Dinosaur Hiding
Most people think that pachycephalosaurs, the famous
bone-headed dinosaurs, used their extremely thick skulls
for dominance duels and also as weapons against preda-
tors. With this meticulously-detailed work in pencil, how-
ever, artist Vladmir Nikolov suggests another alternative:

“It’s known that at least some herbivorous dinosaurs had adapta-

tions for digging and were able to live in dens. 1 Similar adapta-
tions are not known for pachycephalosaurs (as far as my knowl-
edge goes), but many digging/denning animals have no obvious
adaptations for such behavior either. Here, the pachycephalosaur
Prenocephale is using a den to hide from a predator. I’m not
sure burrow was made by this dinosaur, it may just be using a
the den of another species. But denning is not its only protection.
If some pachycephalosaurs really were able hide underground
from time to time, then they could have gone even further by
using mimicry. Because of the specific shape of their heads – the
dome structure, some of them could have mimicked rocks, increas-
ing their chances of avoiding predators.”

1 Varricchio, D. J., A. J. Martin, Y. Katsura. 2007. First trace and body

fossil evidence of a burrowing, denning dinosaur.- Proceedings of Royal Society
Biological Sciences, 274, 1361-1368.

174
175
Vladmir Nikolov
Moonlight Attack
Current reconstructions of dinosaurs are unnaturally stark.
Perhaps because of a desire to represent skeletons accu-
rately, contemporary palaeoartists leave as much soft tissue
out as possible, resulting in “shrink wrapped” depictions.
We can never tell all the fat, muscle mass, meat, hair, feath-
ers and display features each dinosaur bore in real life,
but after comparing existing animals and their skeletons,
we can be certain that “shrink wrapped” dinosaurs are all
wrong. Some parts of the animals have been lost, forever
unknown.

Perhaps, instead of draping layers of skin over skeletal re-

constructions, contemporary palaeoartists can create more
thought-provoking images by engaging in healthy, plausi-
ble speculation. With this stunning scene from the Zimba-
bwe of 190 million years ago, palaeoartist Vladmir Nikolov
has ventured on one such exercise. He has depicted the
early long necked, herbivorous dinosaur Massospondylus
fending off an attack by predatory Megapnosaurs. Most
reconstructions of any long-necked dinosaur leave the neck
bare like a hose, but perhaps these impressive structures
bore soft tissue attachments as well. Nikolov has imagined
Massospondylus’ long neck as the support for a gigantic
inflatable sac. He imagines it bellowing thunderously and
expanding its dazzling sac to scare off its pursuers. There
is no evidence of such a structure in Massospondylus or its
relatives, but then again absence of evidence is not the
evidence of absence.

176
177
Afterword and Credits
We at Irregular Books would like to thank everyone who participated in our contest. What you saw in
this book was but a sliver of the new ideas, artwork and ways of thinking that will revolutionize not
only palaeoart, but possibly the scientific process itself. We could not include all of the art we received
for this volume, but your support, enthusiasm and creativity were the greatest driving forces for this
book, and our other, upcoming projects. Palaeoartists are unique in carrying the torches of art and
science tohether. Only a few people can do this. Whatever the future holds for your lives or careers, we
hope that your passion in palaeoart never fades away.
- C. M. Kosemen

Rafael Albo Michael Hanson Vladmir Nikolov

Smyslov Alexander Jaime Headden Tyler Norton
Yul Altolaguirre Dean Hester Ben Oliver
Raven Amos Mark W Johnston Geunhong Pius Park
Alessio Arena Maija Karala Tom Parker
Patricia Arnold Robert Katz Luis Perez
Carlos Bernardo Mike Keesey Jessica Pilhede
Peter Buchholz Pjotr Klaver Vladmir Pribylskiy
Camila Alli Chair Joschua Knuppe Connor Ross
Rick Charles Kristina Kovacs Hayley Rowland
Alessio Ciaffi Robinson Kunz Simon Roy
Bo Clark Julio Lacerda Alvaro Rozalen
Carlos De Miguel Romulo Lacerda Ethan Schmunk
Cristopher Dipiazza Lew Lashmit Mitchell Seymour
James Donaldson Tommy Leung Vitor Silva
Adam Dreifus Warren Lewis Elia Smaniotto
Thomas Duffy Rachel Lowrie Gray Stanback
Durbed Fabio Manucci Petr Stuchly
Andrew Dutt Christian Masnaghetti Dodd D Sutton
Asher Elbein Sante Mazzei Andrew Tempest
Scott Elyard Vitaly Melnik Vasika Udurawane
Brian Engh Oscar Mendez Bethany Vargeson
Cale Esau John Meszaros Rodrigo Vega
H Esdaile Miyess Mitri Fabian Wiggers
Andrea Gassler Gareth Monger Emily Willoughby
Sarah Goss Tim Morris
Dominik Hammelsbruch Kacy Nielsen

178
“Austroraptor”
artwork by Vitaly Melnik

179
 “A cheeky Psittacosaurus”
artwork by Chris di Piazza

180
 www.irregularbooks.co

Please visit our website

for information on previous titles
and upcoming projects.

181
The Irregular Books Crew
C. M. Kosemen John Conway
Author and Artist C. M. Kosemen holds a Media and Com- John Conway is a palaeontological and fine artist, who’s
munications Masters’ degree from Goldsmiths College, work has been used for National Geographic, Discovery
and has worked as an editor in Benetton Company’s Colors Channel and the American Museum of Natural History,
magazine. He has had several exhibitons of his evolution- among others. His work has most recently appeared in
themed fine art at galleries and science festivals interna- Dinosaur Art: the World’s Greatest Paleoart. John’s interest in
tionally. Kosemen’s areas of specialization are speculative the methodology and culture of reconstructing of palaeon-
& real zoology, history and unusual things in general. His tological subjects was the genesis of the original All
previous work includes Snaiad, a self-initiated web project Yesterdays project.
about life on an alien planet. Kosemen wrote and illustrat-
ed sections of the original All Yesterdays and initiated the Website: johnconway.co
contest behind this book. Twitter: @nyctopterus
Facebook: facebook.com/nyctopterus
Website: cmkosemen.com
Facebook: facebook.com/memo.kosemen
Email: [email protected]

Darren Naish
Author Darren Naish is a science writer, technical editor
and a palaeozoologist. Darren works mostly on theropod
and sauropod dinosaurs, but also on pterosaurs, marine
reptiles and other tetrapods. With colleagues, he named the
dinosaurs Eotyrannus, Mirischia and Xenoposeidon. Darren
has written several books, including Walking With Dino-
saurs: The Evidence (co- authored with David M. Martill),
Great Dinosaur Discoveries, and more recently Tetrapod Zool-
ogy Book One. He is also the co-author of All Yesterdays.
His blog, Tetrapod Zoology, is widely considered the world’s
foremost zoology blog.

When not writing about tetrapods, Darren can be found

pursuing his interest in modern wildlife and conservation
and resulting adventures in liz- ard-chasing, bird-watching
and litter-collecting.

Website: blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/
Twitter: @TetZoo Oveleaf,
John Conway, C. M. Kosemen and Darren Naish during
the All Yesterdays book launch event in London.

182
183
 Coming Soon: A new title from
Irregular Books authors
John Conway, Darren Naish
and C. M. Kosemen!

184
185
186
187