Scribd
Upload
323 views1 page

Good Scates

The document is a content validity form used to evaluate a research instrument. It contains 9 criteria for evaluating the instrument based on factors like length, appeal, ability to obtain depth of responses, suggestiveness of items, and ability to elicit definite but not forced responses. Respondents are asked to rate each criterion from 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total and average scores are calculated to assess the overall validity of the questionnaire.

Uploaded by

Salvador Lawrence Togores
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
323 views1 page

Good Scates

The document is a content validity form used to evaluate a research instrument. It contains 9 criteria for evaluating the instrument based on factors like length, appeal, ability to obtain depth of responses, suggestiveness of items, and ability to elicit definite but not forced responses. Respondents are asked to rate each criterion from 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total and average scores are calculated to assess the overall validity of the questionnaire.

Uploaded by

Salvador Lawrence Togores
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Content Validity Form

Direction: Kindly rate or evaluate the research instrument using the rating scale
according to the following criteria set forth by Calter V. Good and Douglas F.
Scates. Please encircle your rating using the scale below:

1 – Poor 2 – Fair 3 – Good 4 – Very Good 5 -- Excellent

Criteria for Evaluation


1. The questionnaire is short enough such that the
respondent will not reject it because it will not
drain much of his precious time. 1 2 3 4 5

2. The questionnaire has face appeal such that the


respondent will be inclined to accomplish it fully. 1 2 3 4 5

3. The questionnaire can obtain some depth to the


responses & avoid superficial answers or
information. 1 2 3 4 5

4. The items and their alternative responses are not too


suggestive. 1 2 3 4 5

5. The questionnaire can elicit response which are definite


but not mechanically forced. 1 2 3 4 5

6. The items are stated in such a way that the responses


will not be embarrassing to the person concerned. 1 2 3 4 5

7. Items are framed in such a manner as to allay suspicion


on the part of the respondent concerning hidden
purposes in the questionnaire. 1 2 3 4 5

8. The questionnaire is not too narrow, not restricted


or limited in its scope or philosophy. 1 2 3 4 5

9. The responses to the questionnaire, when taken as a


whole, could answer the basic purpose for which the
questionnaire is designed and therefore considered
valid. 1 2 3 4 5

Total Score: ____________________


Average Score : ________________

Name & Signature of Evaluator: ________________________

You might also like