Chapter VIII

RES!tSTM.IC MOVEMENT
AND
ITS VIOLENT END
 219

CIIAI"I'ER VIII

RESISTANCE MOVEMENT AND ITS VIOLENT END

Through military operations and political settlements the English East

India Company reduced the Tamil Country to unity. With the annexation of Kongu

Nadu, Thanjavur and the Carnatic the imperial order replaced the dual system o

control. In 1 799 the company, despite the dual authority shared with the Nawab,

waged military operation against the poligars. But it was of limited scope, for its

rights came into conflict with those of the sovereign and it was confinced to parts

of Ramnad and Tirunelveli. However, in consequence of the settlement of the

Carnatic Tready of 1 801 the British gained complet jurisdiction over the poligars

and found themselves free to deal with these powers as they wanted.

The Campany's administration looked upon the poligari system as essentially

feudal and opposed to the central authority and its existence as detrimental to its

interests. Still, such a view was not shared by all the administrators. For instance,

B.Hurdis, Collector of Salem, in his report to the Board of Revenue dated 4th May

1797 observed: "..the character of the poligars, I do not conceive to be fairly

understood. The Europeans have received their impression from the amuls of the

Nawab of the Carnatic and have enquired no further. As they have been plundered

by the administration, they have deemed it essential to plunder others; this does not

show their character but their act. The poligars are called refractory and

detachments moved against them to overcome their resistance by terror and when
 220

it is satisfied in its full extent, the i ns ui nunt by Which it. was ell fOFcCd WaS

withdrawn. However, no attempt was made to win their confidence; we understand

from the official papers that demands were made for tribute, we hear the demands

were refused and we hear that fire and sword exacted, what was refused".' In

comparison with the British system many of the inhabitants found the poligari

system more beneficial .2 In 1799 the inhabitants of Rajapalayam in Tininelveli

represented to the Madras Council that when the poligars exercised their

jurisdiction over them, they treated them with respect and extended assistance and

protection. They helped in the settlement of disputes between the inhabitants and

public servants and obtained for the ryots the circar's permission for the cultivation

of public lands. If the administration in its demand exceeded the terms of the

revenue settlement, the poligars intervened on behalf of the inhabitants and forced

the circar to do justice.3

In fact many of the inhabitants considered the poligars as guardians of

public welfare. This was because these chieftains enforced police authority,

1. Board of Revenue, proceedings, 7 June 1797, vol.178, pp.2924.

2. After the acquisition of territories, the Company greatly increased the taxes in
Dindigul by 25 percent Gudalur 96 percent, Kambum 11 percent to 933/'4
percent over Tipu's assessments.Nowonder the people considered these
revisions as oppressive. (general Report to the Board of Revenue, 1 October
1797, Vol.2, p.13).

3. Board of Revenue, proceedings, 14 January 1799, vol.217, p.374.

 221

undertook protection of private property against robbery, paid compensation for

losses through thefi, administered justice, founded villages, conducted religious

festivals, maintained temples, promoted cultivation and contributed to charities.

These factors created and promoted a bond of local affinity between the poligars

and the inhabitants. Inspite of this and in disregard their status in traditional

society, the British forces engaged them in a long series of campaigns for more

than half a century, executed many of them and annexed their estates . 4 In 1799 the

British administration asserted that the power of the poligars was annihilated to

such an extent that they were deprived of the power of resistance. 5 This was

because their forts were dismantled, their armed establishments were disbanded

and their resources were taken over. Yet the Company found it not possible to curb

resistance against its authority.

y.

subsequent periods headmen of the villages, the broken ranks of the rebel

powers and the emissaries of the French Directory joined together in organising

opposition to British imperialism. 6 At different places the opposing forces

organised regional leagues to apearhead astruggle agaisnt the British. Marudu

4.K.Rajayyan, Administration and Society in the Carnatic, pp.93-94.

5 .Madras council, Revenue consultations, 29 November 1799, Vol.99, pp.3249.

6.K.Rajayyan in his work South Indian Rebellian the first War of Independence
(chapter 4) has discussed the details, which appear relevant for reference.
 222

Pandyan, a minister in the service of Sivaganga, seni his emissaries on missions to

Ramnad, Kallar Nadu and Tirunelvcli, won the suppoort of discontented headmen

and chiefs. This led to the formation of a Ramnad League. Mean while the alliance

system of the poligars, that was formed by the rebels of Tirunelveli, maintained its

association with different rebel groups to work out the escape of the chiefs who

were imprisoned at PaIayimkottai. Wide Gopala Nayak of Virupakshi in Palani

organised a rebel group in Dindigu!, Kerala Varma in Malabar, Krishnappa Nayak

in Karnataka and Dhondia Wang in Shimoga created their own alliance systems.

The records of the Company indicate that the headmen of the villages in Kongu

Nadu and the emissaries of the French Directory went on missions to the centres of

disaffection and kept the rebJ groups in contact with each other. 7 Much because of

their effort, representatives of the rehal leagues held a conspiracy, presided over by

Gopala Nayak, Poligar olVirupakshi, in his fort by the end of April 1800. In this

conspiracy the rebel powers decided to launch a general offensive against the

British with the storming oF Coimbatore. The possession of Coimbatore appeared

as a strategic necessity so as to provide a vital link to the rebels operating in the

Tamil country and those in the Karnataka region. June 3, 1 800 was decided upon
for capturing Coimbatore, for the Mohammadan sepoys

7.Madras Council, Military Consultations, 17 August 1798, Letter from

Manaparai, Vol.24 1, p.5088.
 223

stationed by the Company to guard this fort, were expected to be busy with

Muharram Feast. The rebels decided to destroy the exhausted regiment late in that

night, when it would go an a procession around the town and occupy the fort.8

Accordingly, armed columns on June 3, 1 800 took up their positions in the vicinity

of Coimbatore. However, the Tahsildar of the area received information about the

rebel design and passed it on to Lieutenant Colonel Macalister, stationed in the

fort. Thereupon, parties went in search of the hiding rebels. Among the suspects

who were brought to trial, forty two insurgents were executed publicity at different

centers of disaffection. This marked a serious blow to rebel strategy. 9 Despite the

failure of the projected assault on Coimbatore, the rebel parties worked out the

escape of the rebels, who were imprisoned at Palayarnkottai and waged a

determined struggle against the British forces.

Escape of Poligar Prisoners

The relatives of Kattabomman, seventeen in number, condemned for perpetual

imprisonment, were confined in a small enclosure in the Fort of Palayamkottai.

Rebels of consequence, they were kept iii iron, rigidly guarded. Three of them died

in ordeal, while the rest languished in prison. However on the 2nd of February

1801 by a clever strategem they made their escape. Among the escaped prisoners

8.K.Rajayyan in his work South_Tndkin Rebellion pp.129-130.

9.Ibid., pp. 134-142.

 224

were Sevatish and Kumaraswaini Nayak, also Called Oornathurai, the brothers of

Kattabomman. After the failure of an attempt made by Marudu Pandyan to work

out the release of the prisoners, Oomathurai entered into a correspondence with the

rebels of Panjalamkurachi. Potti Pakada, a servant employed for the collection of

firewood for the prisoners, carried his letters wriitcn on palmyra leaves to the

rebels, who met him in the nearby jungles. Through the excalmge of letters the

strategy was worked out. Accordingly, in January 1801 a party of rebels

numbering about 200 disguised as pilgrims going to Tiruchendur Temple started

from Panjalamkurichi. Playing 'Kavadi' 10 blowing the conch shell, distributing

holy ashes, receiving offerings and chanting spells, all reached Palayamkottai. On

hearing the chanting of spells, the prisoners to their relief understood that the

relieving party had arrived. As sellers of plantain leaves, fruits and firewood, the

party now approched the gate of the fort. Oomathurai in the mean time won the

sympathy of the wife of the superintendent of the fort and secured permission to

perform the ceremonies for the dead. He offered to purchase the fruits, leaves and

firewood for the same. The prices were setteled and all the people were permitted

to carry the loads into the fort. They excised no suspicion but they kept arms

concealed inside the loads.

l0.Kavadi_is a wooden frame carrying the image or the weapon of Lord

Subramania and taken on the devotee's shoulders to the shrine of the deity.
 225

At the right moment the prisoners privately sent away their women, who were

allowed to stay at liberty within the fort. Large parties of insurgents, armed with

country weapons lay in wait. They brought a few horses to provide quick means of

escape to their imprisoned leaders. At the appointed hour soon after sun set on the

2nd of February 180 1 , the l)r1;ote1s sprung forward. They disarmed the sentinels,

overpowered the guard and got safely off The quickness of the assault and the

war cry raised by them took the troops by complet surprise. Jointed by more

columns of armed men on their way, the fugitives moved rapidly to the Vallanad

1-li11s, near Panjalamkurchi. The rebels annihilated the authority of the English,

reoccupied Panjalamkurichi and proclaimed Sevathiah as the poligar.

With the escape of rebels, pillaging parties surprised and subdued British

military posts and released the prisoners. Before the end of February they

occupied all the territories extending from Panajlamkurichi to Srivaikuntam and

Aiwar Tirunagiri. They converted the palayams of Kulattoor, Kadalkudi,

Nagalapuram, Kolarpatti and Yezhayirampannai into their strongholds and

reconstructed the demolished forts.' In March the insurgents marched to

Tutukudi, upon which the garrison surrendered. They permitted Edward Ormsley,

the English commander of the fort, to take away his properties and to go away in

safety. They imprisoned I3aggot, the Master Attendent but as the prisoner's wife

11. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 15 March 1801, Vol.280,p.1644.

 226

followed the rebels and appealed to their chief for his safety, they released him

from custody and restored to him his properties. After the fall of Tutukudi, the

rebels made irruption into Ranmad and made preparations in Vallanad hills to

capture Tirunelveli.'2

Cohn Mecaulay, the Company's commandiing officer at Palayamkottai,

issued . a proclamation warning the people of exemplary punishment if they were

found in arms of rendering aid to the rebels. He sent express directions to the

pohigars of amicable disposition like those of Sivagiri and .Ettayapuam to remain

on their guard and to convey information about the rebel movements. 13 In February

1801 Macaulay launched operations against the rebels. Mobilishing the whole

disposable force of the province, he marched to Sankaranainarkoil, then to

Kayattar and reached Kadayanallur, six miles short of Panjalamkurichi. As the

troops pitched their camp and prepared for a hearty meal after a tedious march,

they found their camp suddenly attacked on all sides. Advancing under cover of a

deep ravine, the armed men made a simultaneous attack from different directions.

The British troops killed forty of the rebels and then formed into a square with

guns at angles and baggage in the centre remaining in their position the whole

night, subjected to repeated alarms. The next day, the forces encamped near

12.Ibid., 17 February 1801, Vol.279, pp.880 and 1616.

13. Ibid., 7 February 1801, Vol.280, pp.281-282.

 227

Panjalamkurichi. To their astonishment they found the demolished fort"raised as it

were by magic in six days" and every part of it was well manned by thousands of

armed men. 14 The rebels foiled an attempt to capture the Pagoda of Ottapidaram

and boldly appeared on the rear and flank of the forces. Macaulay for fear that his

column would be cut off by rebels both from Panjalamkurichi and Vallanad hills,

retreated under the guise of preparing for an attack. As soon as the rebels

understood their mistake, they overtook the troops with shouts and screams. In the

clash that ensued the rebels lost 110 men. Still followed by them, after a severe

march that lasted all the night the forces reached Palayamkottai on 10th February,

Mean while Captain Hazard reinforced by a detail from Madurai attacked

Kadalkudi, but was defeated. On 19th March the rebels directed all their effort for

the reduction of the Company's post at Srivaikuntam, overwhlemed a body of

troops led by Major Sheppard and took the post.15

While the Company's forces were suffering reverses in different quarters,

fresh troops poured into Tirunelveli under the direction of General Brathwaite, the

Commander-in-chief of the forces of Fort St.George. Macaulay assembled these

forces at Kayattar. Assuming the command of the forces, he reached

14. Ibid., 17 February 1801, Vol.279, pp.886-887.

15. Madras Council, Secret Consultations, 14 April 1801, Vol.2, pp.231-232.

 228

Pusuvanthanai situated near Panjalamkurichi on the 30th of March. At this place

the troops of Ettayapuram joined the English forces. Soon afterwards, the forces

found themselves surrounded by a formidable phalanx of insurgents. Macaulay

charged them and killed ninety six of these "brave but unskilful pedestrians".'6

The rest of them effected their escape through a nearby wood. On the 31st March

Macaulay concentrated his forces on the north west angle of the Fort, throwing out

the cavalry to the south and the troops of Ettayapuram to the east. When the

preparations were completed, the heavy guns commenced a sharp fire. At 3 p.m.the

breach seemed perfectly practicable. The European details, supported by native

infantry, moved forward to the breach "under the heaviest fire imaginable". But the

gallant assault of the assailants did not dissuade the insurgents from their

determination to resist. With intrepid firmness they engaged the assailants in a

fierce encounter. They either picked or shot dead all the soldiers, who pressed their

way to the breach. Repeated attempts were made to surmount the breach, but all

ended in fiasco. The troops of Ettayapuram who attacked the east wall of the rebel

stronghold sheered the fate of their allies. 17 Thus, the British troops, as

16.James Welsh. op.cit., Vol., p.61.

17. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 7 April 1801, Vol.281,pp.2007-2008.

 229

Governor Clive himself admitted: "after sustaining an unequal conflicts, against a

superior force, with unshakable bravery and discipline, were repulsed with heavy

loss.18

Reaction in Dindigul and Coimbatore:

In Dindigul and Coimbatore the poligars took the lead in organising the

rebellion. Allied with the rebels of Malabar, Mysore, Sivaganga and Tirunelveli

the resistance movements in this region formed link between the rebels of the north

and of the south. The rebel chieftains assembled not only their peons but also all

the inhabitants to take arms against the English.19

When the forces that were encamped in Dindigul were withdrawn for the

suppression of a rebellion in Malabar, the armed men of Virupakshi under the

leadership of Gopala Nayak rose in rebellion. The escapee of the rebels who were

imprisoned at Palayamkottai and the subsequent rising in Tirunelveli in February

1801, gave encouragement to the rebels of Dindigul and Coimbatore. 2° The

poligars of Dhili, Mangalarn, Periapally, Chenchode, Julipatty, Tondamattoor and

18. Madras Council, Secret Despatches to England, 2 May 1801, Vol.2,p.81.

19. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 23 May 1801, Vol.283, p.3500.

20. Madras Council, Secret Consultations, 14 April 1801, Vol.2, pp.230-231.

 230

Somandory soon joined the insurrection. All threw of their allegiance to the
21
English and made incursions into the territoies of the company.

The administration took speedy measures to isolate the rebels from those of

northern and southern powersand to suppress them. The success of British arms in

Malabar and Wynaad enabled the Company to expedite the military operations.

Lietutentant Colonel Innes, assuming the command of a detachment from

Malabar, attacked the rebels' posts fiom the north. On 21st March, 1801, he

defeated Gopala Nayak and occupied Virupakshi. After posting a body of troops

for the defence of Virupakshi, the British troops, took Dhili without much

opposition. Theses reverses forced the rebels to flee to the jungles. Descending

from the hills, they made incursions into the territories of the Company. 2' But

Innes marching through a close jungle west of Anamalaikottai attacked the rebel

strongholds. The insurgents pulled down huge stones on the advancing troops and

inflicted losses. Yet on 13th April, Innes won a signal success over the united

forces of Virupakshi and Delhi. 23 The rebels, determined as they were made a

second attempt to establish themselves and raised barriers on the hills. On the 20th

April limes moved against them through a thick forced for about eight miles and

21. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 22 May 1801, Vol.283,

pp.3500-3504.

22. Madras Council, Secret Despatches to England,1 April 1801, Vol.2, pp.78-80.

23. Madras Council, Revenue Consultations,23 April 1801, Vol. 109, pp.851-855.
 231

arrived at Attoor. He captured the barriers that were held by the rebels and

dispersed them. Thereupon the fugitives led by Muthu Vella Nayak, son of Gopala

Nayak, evacuated the terrain and joined the rebel camps in Sivaganga and

Ramnad. 24 While the Poligar of Dhili escaped to the western hills, where he died,

Gopala Nayak of Virupakshi fell into the custody of advancing troops. The

rebellion in Dindigul was suppressed and fifteen rebels of note including the

25
poligars of Virupakshi and Jellipatti were hanged to death.

Capture of Panjalamkurichi

After the failure of a determined attempt on Panjalamkurichi, the attacking

forces instituted a blockade. There followed skirmishes day after day. While the

blockade was on, the Madras Council rushed reinforcements from fort St.George,

St. Thomas Mount, Arcot,Malabar and Tiruchirapalli to the south. He entrusted the

command of the grand army with Lieutenant Colonel Agnew, the Adjutant General

and an officer well qualified by his gallantly, integrity and experience, for the

task. 26

On 23rd May Agnew commanded the army from Kovilpatti to

Panajalamkurichi. The 53 day blockkade ended and a regular siege began. The

24. Madras Council, Military Despatches to England, 17 February 1802, Vol.2,

pp.269-270.

25. Madras Council, Secret Despatches to England, 3 June 1801, Vol.2,p.89.

26. Madras Council, Secret Despatches to England, 15 October 1801, Vol.31,

p.1 57.
 2.52

troops opened fire at the bastion of the south west angle of the citadel. On 24th a

breach being effected, an attack was ordered. Coloumns moved forward, supported

by the field pieces, while the big batteries by a heavy fire covered the advance.

Notwithstanding the formidable array, the rebels did not shrink back, but received

the enemy with renewed vigour. Armed with musquctry and pikes, the rebels kept

up a heavy fire on parties, while others sallying forth from the broken bastions

engaged the approching troops. An the storming arduoud contest ensued, in which

both the parties suffered heavy loss. Their herioc resistance continued till all of

them who gathered on the breach fell dead or wounded. The British troops

emerged triumphant. Shortly after the decisive hour, th rest of the rebels

numbering about 3000 assembled on the eastern sector of the fort. They rushed

rapidly in an eastern and northern direction; soon forming into two columns and

retreated, 'beset but not dismayed'. The English cavalry supported by the troops of

Ettayapuram attacked the rebel columns in flank and rear and killed about 600.

Four hundred and fifty of the dead insurgents were found inside the fort. Those

who were killed in former occasions were found deposed outside the east face. The

rebels, whom Agnew took prisoners, were executed on the 24th May, near the

fallen fort.27

As a result of this victory, British forces took the fort of Panajalamkurichi for

27. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 2 June 1801, Vol.284, pp.4220-4229.

 the first time by storm. Therupon the rebels evacuated theri centres at Vallanad,

Tutukudi and Kadalkudi. The mass of the insurgents fled to the north, while the

rest of them scattered themselves in various parts of Tirunelveli. Dalaway Pillai, a

chief associate of the rebels of Panajalamkurichi, fled to Nanguneri where he

•28
organised a rebellion but Liisington suppressed it in October 1801

Spread of the Rebellion to Sivaganga

The rebels of Tirunelveli were allied with the disaffected inhabitants of the

region northward. As the fugitives escaped to Sivaganga, the rebel forces joined

-them in strength. In may 1801 the Marudu brothers, Vella Marudu and his more

influential brother Chinna Marudu, who served as ministers of the estate uniting

themselves with the disaffected chieftains, assembled a formidable force. They

equipped their armed mcii with all available weapons and trusted themselves on

the jungle recesses .29 The pagodas of Kalayarkoil located in the heart of the

Sivaganga forest become the rallying point of the insurgents, obviously because

they attached a religious significance to their struggle. From the sheltered posts in

the jungles, the rebel forces laid waste the neighbouring districts in defiance of

British authority. 30

28. K. Rajayyan, South Indian Rebellian, pp. 80-89.

29. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 26 May 1801, Vol. 26,

pp. 3820-3821.

30. Ibid., 12 June 1801, vol.284, pp.4840-497 1.

 From Sivaganga the rebellion spread to the adjoining territories. In May 1801 the

rebels seized the fort of Tirupatore and occupied Natham and Melur held by the

Company's forces. 31 They proclaimed Muthu Karuppa Tevar as the Rajah of

Ramnad. Led by the Rajah, the armed inhabitants occupied the Company's post at

Kamudi. At this place the fugitives from 'I'ininelvcli, led by Oomathural, joined

the rebels of Ramnad. Reinforced by these rebels, armed men took Palarnanerrj

and captured Company's garrison at Tiruchuzhi on 16th July. Melappan, leading

the rebels souhtward, freed the southern parts of Ramnad from British control

while Puttur, another rebel chief, occupied thenorthern territories of Ramnad.32

The success of the rebels in Ramnad greatly contributed to the strength of the

struggle. The country being famine striken, the people joined the rising in large

bodies. Besides, it secured for the rebels the command of the sea coast.

They employed boats in the Bay of Tondy and obtained supplies of grain,

arms and ammunition. 33 Oomathurai, after his recovery, led the rebels to Palaynad,

where he established himself. In July the Kallar tribes of Annoor rose in revolt,

31. Ibid., 1 June 1801,p.2820.

32. Ibid., 21 June 1801, Vol.285, p.4603.

33. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol.288, p.6934.

taking possession of the western part of Madurai. A large body of the rebels

marched to the Fort of' Maclurai, but finding it well defended, retreated to

Kadaracoil.34

In the mean time rebel forces under the command of Shevata Tambi, the son

of Chinna Marudu, marched to Thanjavur where the inhabitants rallied to the

standard of revolt. The rebels occupied the subah of Pattukottai. Establishing their

posts at Arandangy and Audiarkudi, they advanced as far as Mangudy. They

remained in force in the Kaveri delta till the British operations in other quarters put

them on the defensive. 35

The renewed struggle on such a widespread and violent proportion took the

Company's administration by surprise. The outbreaks were connected with the

36 Though it was
Political designs of the rebels in different areas of South India.

feudal in content, the common people of different areas swelled the rebel ranks.

The unity of purpose rendered their resistance determined. The guerrilla tactics

employed by the rebels were calculated to harass the attacking forces.

34. Ibid., 7 July 1801, Vol.281, pp.5051-5053.

35. Ibid., 4 August 1801, Vol.281, pp.5352-5370.

36.K.Rajayyan in his work South Indian Rebellion, The first War of

Independence, 1800-1801 has established that this rebellion in the Tamil
Country was not an isolated developments. On the other han it was the
outcome of a concerted move, made by the rebel powers of different regions
of the peninsula.
 236

However, the Company found it possible to combat the hostile combination. This

was because it controlled the c ommunication system, received the support of local

rulers and possessed well equipped forces.37

In a bid to overcome the odds, the English gained the support of the princes,

particularly the Tondaiman of Pudukkottaj and the Rajab of Thanjavur and rushed
in r
einforcements, brought from Bengal and Malaya. They resumed operations on

a large scale in May 1801. Agnew in consequence of his Success in capturing a

number of rebel strongholds, checked the rising tempo of rebellion in Ran-mad and

relieved Madurai Fort from threat of assault. A force under the command of Major

James Graham marched from Tiruppuvanam to Madurai. The rebels in

considerable strength attacked Graham, but another detachment under Major

Sheppard reached to his rescue. 38 On the I ith of June the detachment of Agnew

marching through Manamaduraj and Parthibanur, reoccupied Paramagudi. The

armed bodies hovered round the English troops throughout their march. They cut a
party to pieces at T
iruppachetty and pressed vigorously on British lines; but

withdrew after a clash in which seventy of them died. On the 10th near

Manamaduraj columns of rebels lined behind high banks, water-courses and

jungles on the Opposite bank of river Palamaneri. They made a dash across the

37. Madras Council, Military Despatches to England, 15 October 1801, Vol.31,

pp. 152-157

38. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 9 June 1801, Vol.284, pp.4339-434 1.

 Li I

river and charged the British troops with pikes. In the clashes that followed both

sides suffered considerable losses Still the forces continued their advance and
39
reaced Ramnad on the 14th of June.

Leaving Ramnad, Agnew reached Madurai on the 9th of July. On the 24th

he stormed the rebel stronghold of Tirupatore and waited for the arrival of a

detachment, led by Colonel Innes from Malabar. After suppressing the rebels of

Dindigul, Innes advanced towards Madurai. Reinforced, he attached Piranmalai on

the 18th of June, but was defeated. Retreating to Natham, he marched to

Manapacherry on the 4th of July. But the Columns led by the Mardu brothers

pressed vigorously on his troops, again forcing his retreat to Natharn. Subsequently

taking the route through Piranmalai, Innes on the 25th arrived at

Satturusamharakkottai. The next day, while he was marching to Tirupatore through

a thick wood, the rebels again attacked him using rockets, but was rescued by

Agnew. 40 The combined forces of Agnew and Jnnes now reduced Okkur and

attacked Siruwayal, the headquarters of the rebels of Sivaganga. After a futile

resistance, the insurgents retired to the jungles. 41 Marching from Siruwayal, the

39. Ibid., 21 June 1801, Vol.285, pp.4603-4604.

40. Ibid., 4 August 1801, Vol. 286, p.5367.

41. Ibid., 4 August 1801, Vol.286, pp.5348-5349, 5367-5370.

 4M

forces of Kalayarkoil. Driven to dcsperation,the rebels fought for every inch of

land. Though the English succeeded in beating off the crowds every hour, they

found themselves completely and constantly surrounded by hordes. As no

alternative presented itself, Agnew retreated to Siruwayal and abandoned his

project of advancing to Kalayarkoil from that direction.42

However the Company's troops gained more victories in Ramnad and

Thanjavur. Captain Blackburne, with the assistance of the Rajah of Thanjaur,

reoccupied the southern bank of the Kaveri. A detachment commanded by

Lieutenant Maclean routed the rebels led by Puttur at Worior. In September

Blackburne drove the insurgents from Arandangy and desolated the villages of

Terboinad. He proceeded within twenty miles of Sirwayal, then advancing

eastward, detached the forces to join Maclean in Ramnad. The rebels about 3000

strong, led by Oomaithurai, marched to attack Maclean's troops, but finding the

task risky, retreated. Blackburne reached Karaikudi in October and captured the

rebels strongholds in the jungles of Singampinary.43 Mean while Macaulay

directed his operations against the armed men the southern region of Ramnad.

Lieutenant Miller, whom he detached to Kamudi, won a victory over the rebels on

42. James Welsh, op.cit., Vol.1, pp.89-92.

43. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol. 288, pp.6925-6973.

 239

13th August. 44 On 27th August Macaulay, supported by the troops of Ettayapuram

routed the rebels led by Melappan at Abiramam. The forces under Martins and

Miller dispersed a body of insurgents, who assembled near the fort of Rarnnad. In

September Macaulay marched to the west to assist Agnew for suppressing of the

rebels of Sivaganga.45

The Madras council had long been contemplating upon the tactics to divide

the united force of the rebels into opposite camps. Failing to turn the Marudu

brothers against eaach other, it found Padamattur Woya Tevar, a member of the

royal house, as its candiate to the rajahship of Sivaganga. Agnew proclaimed him

as the Rajah of Sivaganga at Cholapuram with the display of every mark of respect

and splendour. 46 This had the decisive effect on the rebels. The inhabitants of

Nalukottai, Okkur, Erekur, Pattimangalm and Paghenery soon paid homage to the

new ruler. Thus the Company's administration divided the insurgents into two

camps of opposing interests - that of Vengum Peria Wodia Tevar and Padmattu

Woya Tevar. 47 This development weakened the resistance movement.

44. Madras Council, Revenue Consultations, 4 September 1801, Vol. 110,

pp. 1692-1693.

45. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 20 October 1801, Vol.288,

pp.6850-6861.

46. Ibid., 7 July 1801, Vol. 285, p.4975.

47. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol. 288, p. 6845 and 6908

 240

Battle of Kalayarkoil

Supported by the rival ruler of Sivaganga, Agnew began a second offensive

against Kalayarkoil. A detachment occupied Piranmalai on 18th of September;48

while another reduced Nandikkottai to submission. By the end of September

Agnew, marching through Vanimkudi and Collumbum took Muthur situated on the

western side of Kalayarkoil. In the midnight of 30th September he sent a

detachment under Lieutenent Colonel Spray, another under Sheppard and a thrid

under Innes against Kalayarkoil. In the mean time, Blackburne pressed the rebels

from the south. The dawn of 1 st October witnessed the simultaneous approach of

the British forces from different directions against the pagoda of Kalayarkoil. The

insurgents, though taked by surprise, fought with determination; but were routed.

Spray took possession of the pagoda of Kalayarkoil a handsome buliding

surrounded by a stone wall, 1 8feet in height. This marked the end of the revolt in

Sivaganga. Soon after this decisive event, a body of rebels led by Sevathiah,

Oomaithurai and Muthuvail Nayak, son of the Poligar of Virupakshi, marched in a

northern direction through Tirupatore. The Marudu brothers with their selected

followers took shelter in the jungles of Singampunari.49

48. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol. 288, p6865 and 6936.

49. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol. 288, pp.6844-6895

 241

Rebel Reverses in Dindigul

However, in October 1801 wiith the arrival of rebels from the south rebellion

broke out again. Soon after the fall of Kalayarkoil, a body of their armed men

nurnering about 600 led by Oomaithurai, Sevathiah and Muhtu Vella Nayak fled to

Dindigul. A force was despatched to intercept their march, but did not succeed.50

The fugitives carried with them neither ammunition nor provisions, After a long

march, they made good their way to the hills of Virupakshi.51

Soon after the arrival of the fugitives, the people of the neighbouring

country flocked together and rose in arms. The inhabitants of Chetrampatty and the

adjoining territory joined the rebels in large number. Alarming reports reached the

English camps that the strength of the insurgents was becoming more and more

formidable. The inhabitants reconstructed barnes especially the Great Stone

Carmon Dhilli Barrier and embarked upon depredations into the Company's

territories. 52 They attaked the troops stationed at Chetrampatty and forced them to

retreat to lagoody. A force under the command of Jones marched against the rebels
53
but it was also forced to retreat.

50. Ibid., 20 October 1801, Vol.2888, pp.6891-6895

51. Ibid., 1 December 1801, Vol.289, p.7212.

52. Ibid., 27 October 1801, Vol. 288, pp.6896-6905

53. Ibid., 1 December 1801, Vol. 288, p.1708

 'f2

On 12th October Innes recommenced military operations on a large scale.

The rebels under the leadership of Oomaithurai engaged the English army on the

plain of Virupakshi but were defeated and dispersed. They made another stand at

Chetrampatty but again suffered reverse. The Company's detachment followed up

their victories by a close pursuit of the rebels. Innes, marching through a thick

wood, occupied Cowdhilli, a rock commanding the view of Cormen Dhili Barriers

and moved ahead. 54 A body of the insurgents led by Oomaithurai after descending

from the hills again moved to the valley of Dindigul. Major Burrows, whom Jnnes

sent against them, drove the rebels upto Vettilagundu for about fifty one miles. As

the country seemed unfavourable for charging the insurgents, Burrows sent parties

in pursuit. After a fierce encounter, Oomaithurai with sixty five of his followers,

fell under the custody of the English. 55 Doraiswamy, who was at large, was taken

a prisoner from a place near Madurai. 56 Sevethiah and Oomaithurai were brought

to Panjalanikurichi, where they were beheaded. 57 The fall of Oomaithurai marked

the end of the Rebellion which began with the revolt of his brother Kattabomnian.

54. Ibid., 22 December 1801, Vol.290, p.8080.

55. Ibid., 27 October 1801, Vol. 288, p.7116.

56. Ibid., 1 December 1801, Vol.289, p.7615

57. Ibid., 1 December 1801, Vol. 289, p.7726.

 243

Muthu Vella Nayak also graced gallows. 58 The handsome youth of Doraiswamy

evoked the compassion of Agnew and Governor Clive; hence his life was spared.

However seventy three principal rebels including Doraiswamy were banished to

the Prince of Wales Island, Penang.

Reconstruction of British A iith only

With the suppression of the insurrection the Madras Council concentrated his

attention on measures aimed at the consolidation of British authority on a stable

foundtion. By his proclamation of 1st December 1801, the Governor dive

expressed his deep regret that the. Desperate resistance offered to British troops

was attended with so much loss of life and material He announced a general

annesty to the people and their chieftains in order to relieve them from any further

solicitude and apprehension. 59 Lord Clive assured the people that the British

Government would honour the rights of property and life, religious usages and

customs of the people. He announced his intention of reorgainsing the

administration of the country on a permanent basis; but respecting the traditions of

the people. The Governor declared his decision that a permanent assessment of

revenue would be instituted on principles of zarnindari tenure by which hereditary

rights would be granted to the poligars on their estates. He explained that the

58. Ibid., 1 December 1801, Vol. 289, p.7740

59. Madras Council, Military Despatches to England, 17 February 1802, Vol.31

p.272.
 244

permanent assessment would secure to the chieftains the possession of land under

the operation of limited and definite laws, which would restrain the servants of the

Company from unnecessary interference. 60 By this proclamation, Lord Clive

sought to concilate the chieftains and the people. in 1799 he confiscated the estates

of the rebel chieftains, but by his proclamation of 1801 he assured them that they

would be granted hereditary rights on their lands. The British offer that the

Company would respect the rights and customs of the people and that it would free

them from unnecessary interference by the English servants, was indeed an

inducement to the rebels to return to the cultivation of the arts of peace.

The same time Lord Clive rewarded the allies for their sevice and restored

the possessions to the chiefs. He conveyed his feelings of pride and satisfaction to

the friendly cheiftains in their strady attachment with the Company and guaranteed

to them of augmented security, favour and wealth. True to his promise, he ceded a

strip of territory called Kelanelly from Tanjore to the Tondaiman of Pudukkottai.6'

The Governor also conciliated the rebel chieftains. In 1802 he restored the estate of
62 In 1803 he
Ramagiri to Vengiri Nayak, who appeared as the rightful claimant.

restored the zamindary of Sapatore to Warra Kannaiah Nayak, the son of the rebel

60. Madras Council, Military Consultations, 17 February 1802, Vol.3 1, p.272.

61. Madras Council, Political Consultations, 5 July 1803, Vol.10, pp.833-834.

62. Madras Council, Revenue Despatches to England, 19 March 1802, Vol.7,

p.262.
poligar Kannaiah Nayak. Besides, he ordered the restoration of the zamindary of

Ramnad to Mungul Eshwar Nauchayar, the sister of the deceased Rajah. However,

Lord Clive did not restore the palayams which were sequestered in 1799 to the

families of the rebel cheiftains. On the other hand he declared them as havelly or

public lands and in a spirit of vengeance ordered the name of Panjalamkurichi to

be expunged from all public records. The name 'Panjalarnkurichi' being associated

wiht the humiliating reverses of the English, the Governor abliterated the very

name of that rebel stronghold.63

Further, Lord Clive sought to improve the government of the southern

provinces by cradicating the system of rapine and oppression that crept into the

adminstration. He understood that one of the sources of the misery of the people

was a system of exaction, practised by the European adventurers who claimed

protection from the Company. The Governor withdrew by a proclamation the

protection which they claimed. He placed under restraint those who were engaged

in coercion of the inhabitants. These measures removed a form of oppression

which endangered the foundations of public security. 64

In addition, Lord Clive disarmed the chieftains and their armed

inhanbitants. By a proclamation he directed the people to surrender their fire-arms.

63. Ibid., 9 May 1803, Vol. 7, pp.528-530 and 538-540.

64. Madras Council, Secret Despatches to England, 14 April 1800, Vol.2,

pp. 12-14.
 246

This resolution for disarming the inhabitatnts was tempered with every practicable

degree of attention to the hereditary customs of the chieftains. Thus the Governor

allowed the chieftains to retain a certain number of peons carrying pikes in order to

enable them to maintain those ceremonies of state, to which they had been

accustomed. Besides, he ordered the payment of compensation for the loss of fire-

arms surrendered by the inhabitants. On a comparison with the situation in 1799

these measures appeared conciliatory; for in 1799 Lord Clive refused

compensation for the loss of the personaiproperty of the people. He also ordered

the destruction of hte forts of the poligars and institued periodical inspection of the
65
palayams to prevent the reconstruction of demolished forts.

The company carried out these measures successfully taking advantage of

the favourable circumstances. In 1 799 similar measures did not meet with success

on account of the divided system of control of the country by the Nawab and the

Company and the inadequacy of military strength to coerce the powerful poligars.

But in 1801 these obstacles no more existed and hence it could effevtively disarm

the country and reconstruct the administration.

65. Madras Council, Military Despatches to England, 29 May 1802, Vol.32,

pp.454-456.