Institutional Aspirations….

 Better Image/No 1 in district/ top ten in the state etc..

 Better admissions/higher fees with lowest costs
 Improved R and D funding
 Affiliated to autonomous status
 Autonomous to Deemed to be university status
 Vertical growth
 More liaison /collaboration with Industrial houses
 More rewards and awards for the employees/institute
 National recognition
 Compliance of all statutory regulatory authorities norms and
regulations
 Means ….accreditations

NBA and NAAC

accreditations specifically
for self funding affiliated
engineering institutes
ABET accreditation
 NBA Vs NAAC

NBA NAAC
 Program Specific  Institute wide

 Stringent pre-  No stringent pre-

qualifiers qualifiers
 Duration : 3 to 6  Duration: five years
years
 Only certain  All departments
departments
 Advantages of accreditation
• Facilitates information sharing

• Recognitions for the achievements of the

Institute

• Institutions get a new sense of direction and identity

• Provides society with reliable information on quality of

education

• Promotes intra and inter institutional interaction

 Advantages of accreditation

 Demonstrates accountability and commitment

to excellence

 Facilities continuous quality improvement

 Inculcate the culture of R&D in the institution

 BENEFITS
 Helps the institution to know its strengths, weaknesses,

opportunities through an informed review.

 To identify internal areas of planning and resource

allocation.

 Enhances collegiality on the campus

 The outcome of the process provides the funding agencies with objective and

systematic database for performance

funding.

 Initiates institution into innovative and modern methods of

pedagogy.

 Gives the institution a new sense of direction and identity.

 Provides the society with reliable information on the quality

of education offered by the institution.

 Myths (fallacies)about NAAC
 Permanent affiliation is NOT mandatory
 2f and 12 b are NOT mandatory
 NAAC work is NOT one time activity
 Data can NOT be manufactured
 All faculty members need NOT have Phd qualification

Eligibility:
 Any affiliated institute with either 6 years completed or
two batches should have passed out
 All India Survey on Higher education Survey
certificate(AISHE)
 Experience of 25 years – Success Story
 NAAC is promoting the establishment of Internal Quality Assurance
Cells (IQACs) and best practices – more than 7000 HEIs have
established IQACs. Series of activities are initiated and done by
HEIs.

 NAAC’s Process is based on global Quality Assurance Practices

and norms as well as good practices (guidelines) of APQN (Asia
Pacific Quality Network).

 International network for Quality in Higher education

Agencies(INQAAHE).
 Nomenclature/Glossary/Abbreviations

• HEI: Higher Education Institute

• Course: subject /paper offered in a program
• (Ex: Engineering mechanics)
• Program: Qualification offered
• ( Ex: B Tech , M. Tech, B.A, BBA etc)
• IQAC: Internal Quality Assurance Cell
• IIQA: Institute Information for Quality Assessment
• QIF: Quality Indicator Framework
 Nomenclature/Glossary/Abbreviations

• SSR: Self Study Report

• SSS: Student Satisfaction Survey
• AQAR: Annual Quality Assessment Report
• RAF: Revised Accreditation Framework
• DVV: Data Validation and Verification
• PTV: Peer team visit
 Revised Assessment and Accreditation Framework(RAF)

• Revised Assessment and Accreditation (A&A)

Framework launched in July 2017.

• Paradigm shift from qualitative to data based

quantitative indicator evaluation peer judgement
with increased objectivity and transparency.

• Towards extensive use of ICT and its

integration on evaluation.
 Revised Assessment and Accreditation
Framework

• Simplification of the process drastic reduction

in number of questions, size of the report,
visit days, and so on.

• Pre-qualifier for peer team visit, as 30% of

system generated score.
 Other Highlights- Meeting
Management
• Executive Committee

• Standing Committee

• Appeal Mechanism

• Automated Selection of Peer team visits

• User friendly Dashboards for all admin users

like process manager, coordinator and HEIs,
INFLBNET and DVV partner
 Revised Accreditation Framework (RAF)
• Introducing System Generated Scores (SGS) with combination
of online evaluation (about 65.2%) and peer judgement (about
34.8%)

• Introducing the element of third party validation Data

Validation and Verification (DVV) of data and the
involvement of multiple agencies

• Providing appropriate differences in the metrics,

weightages and benchmarks to Universities,
Autonomous Colleges and Affiliated/constituent
Colleges

• Participation of students and alumni in the assessment process

 Grading System adopted in the RAF
Range of Institutional Letter Grade Status
Cumulative Grade Point Average
(CGPA)
3.51-4.00 A++ Accredited

3.26-3.50 A+ Accredited

3.01-3.25 A Accredited

2.76-3.00 B++ Accredited

2.51-2.75 B+ Accredited

2.01-2.50 B Accredited

1.51-2.00 C Accredited

<= 1.50 D Not Accredited

 Pre requisites
 Creation of Internal Quality Assurance
cell (IQAC)
 IQAC Coordinator(s)
 Department wise Coordinators
 Criteria wise coordinators from each
department
 A dynamic website of the institute
 Preparation before during and
after A & A process: Stages
1. Registration of HEI
2. Institution information for quality
assessment (IIQA)
3. SSR submission (metric data and
optional metric selection)
4. Data validation and verification DVV
5. Prequalification
6. Peer teamVisit
7. Assessment outcome
 IIQA Application Process

HEI
Basic HEI
Affiliation / Application* Document
Institution Academic
SRA Fees Verification
Eligibility Data Inputs
Compliance Payment by
Coordinator

Accepted

No Yes
Supported by
Fees applicable for 3 attempts Resubmit SSR
uploading essential
within one year
documents IIQA Application
THE FEE STRUCTURE AND OTHER FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
New Fee Structure (w.e.f. Nov 27, 2019)
1. IIQA Fee
For Registration – applicable to all institutions i.e., irrespective of their status of
recognition under 12B of UGC Act, 1956( i.e., recognized / not recognized)
Process Total amount of Application fee for Assessment and
Accreditation (A&A) to be paid by the Institution

Institutional Information for

Rs. 25,000/- + G S T 18%
Quality Assessment (IIQA) (Non-refundable) *

* In case of rejection of IIQA application, HEIs may

resubmit IIQA applications for maximum of three
attempts without IIQA fees, including the rejection
attempt, within the period of a year.
1. Assessment and Accreditation (A&A) Fee
For Universities and Professional Institutions

Type Total amount of Amount to be Paid by the Institution

A&A Fee

1 to 10 Rs. 3,75,000/- Rs.1,87,500/-** + GST18%

departments **+ (50% of Total fee along with the online
GST18% submission of SSR) (Non-refundable)

More than 10 Rs.3,75,000/-** + GST18%

departments Rs. 7,50,000/-
** + (50% of Total fee along with the online
GST18% submission of SSR) (Non-refundable)

The accreditation fee will be limited to a maximum amount of Rs. 7,50, 000/-+
GST18%, per institution.
** Balance 50% of total fees along with 18% GST before 15 days from the date
of on site visit.
Balance amount 50%
i. 50% of the stipulated fee+ applicable taxes along with on line submission
of Self-study Report (SSR) (Non-refundable).

ii. The pre-qualified HEIs will be asked to pay balance 50% of the
stipulated fees+ applicable taxes as shown in column 2 & 3 above before
15 days from the visit date. If the institution does not pay the fee within 15
days, the SSR will not be processed. They have to apply again / afresh
with IIQA and its fees.
 Mandatory Taxes/GST will not be refunded.
iii. If the Institution does not take up the accreditation process, the
fees will not be returned to the institution. However, the same will
be adjusted when accreditation process is taken up. (The
Maximum time limit up to which it can be carried forward shall
be one year from the date of submission of SSR).
Logistics Fee: Institution has to pay an advance, towards logistic
expenses for the arrangement of Peer Team Visit, after clearing
Pre-qualifier, which is as follows:-
a. All General colleges, Professional colleges and Teacher
education institutions will have 2 day visit for which the fee
structure will be Rs.1,50,000 + GST.
b. In case of exceptional case of Professional colleges with proper
justifications and approval from the competent authority the Peer
Team Visit can be extended to 3 days & the fee structure will be
3,00,000 + GST.
c. For University the Fee structure of logistics will be 3,00,000 +
GST for 3 or more days of visit.
d. If the University has UGC recognized off-shore campus/centers,
then the University has to pay an additional fees of Rs. 2,00,000/-
+ GST or actual per off-shore campus to be visited.
Appeals Mechanism and Fee:
Review of Accreditation (grievance) Rs. 1,00,000/- + GST 18% as
applicable from time to time.

For subsequent cycles of Accreditation:

The fee structure proposed for Assessment and Accreditation and towards
logistics as above applies for all the cycles of Accreditation and Re-assessment
for all Institutions
 Institutional Information for Quality Assessment(IIQA)

AISHE ID :
Tnungn56668
Institution Track ID :
1 Application For Accreditation
Cycle of Accreditation Cycle2

Cycle Date Grade

1 06/07/2011 B
2 Name of the College
Test
3 Date of establishment of the Institution
01/01/2000
4 Name of the Head of the Institution

Designation

5 Does the college function from Own Campus

6 Address of the College

State/UT

City

Pin

Phone No

Fax No

Mobile No

Registered Email

Alternate Email

7 Alternate Faculty Contact Details

Address

State/UT

City

Pin

Phone No

Fax No

Mobile No
Email
27 / 3
 Alternate Email

8 Website

9 Has the Institution completed 6 years of existence / Years of graduation of last two batches
Yes

10 Nature of the college

11 College Affiliation

12 Name of the affiliating University(ies) and the state(s) in which the University(ies) is located

State University Name Documents

No contents
13 Is the Institution recognized under section 2(f) of the UGC Act?
No

14 Is the Institution recognized under section 12B of the UGC Act?

No
If yes, date of recognition by UGC under section 12B along with latest Plan General Development
Grant release letter

15 Is the institution recognised as an Autonomous College by the UGC?

16 Is the institution recognised as a ‘College with Potential for Excellence (CPE)’ by the UGC?

17 Is the institution recognised as a ‘College of Excellence’ by the UGC?

18 Is the College offering any programmes recognised by any Statutory Regulatory Authority (SRA)

Statutory Regulatory Authorities

SRA program Document

No Content
19 If the institution is not affiliated to a university and is offering programmes recognized by any Statutory
Regulatory Authorities (SRA), are the programmes recognized by Association of Indian Universities(AIU)
Not Applicable
or other appropriate Government authorities as equivalent to UG / PG Programmes of a University

20 Number of programmes offered

Programmes Number

No contents
21 Programme Details

Program Department University Affiliation SRA Recognition Affiliation Status

No contents
28 / 3
 22 Number of Teaching Staff by employment status (permanent / temporary) and by gender

Male Female Transgender Total

No contents
23 Number of Non-Teaching Staff by employment status (permanent / temporary) and by gender

Male Female Transgender Total

No contents
24 Number of Students on roll by gender

Male Female Transgender Total

No contents
25 Does the institution have statutory cells / committees

26 Date of establishment of IQAC

The minutes of IQAC meeting and Action Taken Report should be uploaded on the institutional
website. Date View Document

No contents
27 Date of submission of AQARs of last 4 years to NAAC
Date View Document

No contents
28 Has the institution made statutory declaration on the institution website under Section 4 (1) (b) of the RTI
Act 2005 as issued and amended from time totime.

29 Does the college have an academic MoU with any foreign institution

30 Date of uploading data on MHRD website for All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE).

31 Attach Certification by the Head of the Institution for having complied with Rules & Regulations of Central
Government, UGC and other Statutory Bodies, State Government and Affiliating University in the
prescribed format enclosed herewith.

32 Registration Fee paid details.

 IIQA

Institution will be
informed within 15
days

Accepted Rejected

Two more
consecutive
times with the
same fees in a
year
After acceptance of IIQA

Executive
Summary

Profile of
the
Institution

With in
Extended 45 days
profile

SSR (QlM +
QnM
SSR : Components
•Executive summary

•Profile
•Extended profile

•QIF

•Conclusion
Total points : 1000

•SSR:640
•SSS:060
•PTV:300
 Executive Summary
Executive Summary : main features of the Institution
including
• Introductory Note on the Institution: location, vision,
mission, type of the institution etc.
• Criterion-wise Summary on the Institution’s
functioning in not more than 250 words for each
criterion.
• Brief write up on Strength Weaknesses
Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) in
respect of the Institution.
• Any additional information about the Institution other
than ones already stated.
• Over all conclusive explanation about the institution’s
•functioning – (The Executive summary shall not be be
more than 5000 words.)
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

2. Profile of the Institution

1.Name
Basic Information
and Address of the College:

Name :
Address :
City : Pin : State :

Website :

2. For Communication:
Designation Name Telephone Mobile Fax Email

with STD code

Principal O:
R:
Vice Principal O:
R:
IQAC Co- O:
3. Status of the
ordinator R:
Institution:
Affiliated College
Constituent College Any
other (specify)
4. Type of Institution:
a. By Gender
i. For Men
ii. For Women
iii. Co-education
b. By Shift
Yesi. Regular No
ii. Day
iii. Evening

5. It is a recognized minority institution?

 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

6. Sources of funding: Government Grant-in-aid Self- financing Any other

7. a. Date of establishment of the college: …………………… (dd/mm/yyyy)

b. University
Under Section to which the college is affiliated
Date, Month & Year /or which governs the collegeRemarks(If
(If it isany)a constituent
college) (dd-mm-yyyy)
i. 2 (f)
c. Details of UGC recognition:
ii. 12 (B)

(Enclose the Certificate of recognition u/s 2 (f) and 12 (B) of the UGC Act)

d. Details of recognition/approval by statutory/regulatory bodies like AICTE, NCTE, MCI, DCI,

PCI, RCI etc (other than UGC).
Statutory Recognition/Approval Day, Month
Validity Remarks
Regulatory details and Year
Authority Institution/Department (dd-mm-yyyy)
Programme
i.
ii.
iii.

iv.
(Enclose the recognition/approval letter)

8. Does the affiliating university Act provide for conferment of autonomy (as recognized by the UGC), on its
affiliated Yes
colleges? No

Yes No

If yes, has the College applied for availing the autonomous status?
9. Is the college recognized
a. by UGC as a College with Potential for Excellence (CPE)? Yes
No
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

If yes, date of recognition: …………………… (dd/mm/yyyy)

b. For its performance by any other governmental agency? Yes No

If yes, Name of the agency …………………… and

Date of recognition: …………………… (dd/mm/yyyy)
sq.mts: Location *
Campus area in sq. mts.
10. Location of the campus and area in
Built up area in sq. mts.
(* Urban, Semi-urban, Rural, Tribal, Hilly Area, Any others specify)

11. Details of programmes offered by the college (Give data for current academic year)
Name of the Sanctioned/ No. of
SI. Programme Programme/ Duration Entry Medium of approved
students
No. Level Course Qualification instruction Student admitted
strength
Under-Graduate

Post-Graduate

Integrated
Programmes
PG

Ph.D.

M.Phil.

Ph.D

Certificate
courses

UG Diploma

PG Diploma

Any Other
(specify and
provide details)
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

12. Please fill in the following details if applicable:

Self-financed programmes offered New Programmes introduced
during the last five years
Number of programs

13. List the departments: (respond if applicable only and do not list facilities like Library, Physical
Education as departments, unless they are also offering academic degree awarding programmes.
Similarly, do not list the departments offering common compulsory subjects for all the programmes

like English,
Faculty regional languages etc.)
Departments UG PG Research
(eg. Physics, Botany, History etc.)

Science
Arts
Commerce
Any Other
(Specify)

14. Number of teaching and non-teaching positions in the Institution

Teaching faculty
Positions Non-teaching Technical
Professor Associate Assistant
staff staff
Professor Professor

*M*F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F

Sanctioned by the UGC / University /

State Government
Recruited

Yet to recruit
Sanctioned by the
Management/ society or other
authorized
bodies

Yet to recruit Recruited

*M-Male *F-Female
2
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

15. Qualifications of the teaching staff:

Highest Professor Associate Assistant
Total
qualification Professor Professor
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Permanent teachers
D.Sc./D.Litt.
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Temporary teachers
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Part-time teachers
16. Ph.D.
Number of Visiting Faculty /Guest Faculty engaged with the College.
M.Phil.

17. PG
Furnish the number of theYear
students
1 admittedYear
to the
2 college during
Yearthe
3 last four academic
Year 4 years.
Categories
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
SC
ST
OBC
General

Others

18. Details on students enrollment in the college during the current academic year:
Type of students UG PG M. Phil. Ph.D. Total

Students from the same

state where the college is located
Students from other states of India
NRI students
Foreign students

Total
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

19. Please fill in the following details if applicable:

Unit Cost of Education
Excluding Salary Component
Including Salary Component

* (Unit cost = total annual recurring expenditure (actual) divided by total number of students enrolled
)

20. Date of accreditation* (applicable for Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4 and re- assessment only)
Cycle 1: ……………… (dd/mm/yyyy) Accreditation Outcome/Result….….... Cycle 2:
……………… (dd/mm/yyyy) Accreditation Outcome/Result….…....
Cycle3: ……………… (dd/mm/yyyy) Accreditation Outcome/Result……..... Cycle
4:………………. (dd/mm/yyyy) Accreditation Outcome/Result…….....

21. Date of establishment of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) IQAC

…………………… (dd/mm/yyyy)

22. Details regarding submission of Annual Quality Assurance Reports (AQAR) to NAAC

AQAR (i) ……………… (dd/mm/yyyy) AQAR (ii)

……………… (dd/mm/yyyy) AQAR (iii) ………………
(dd/mm/yyyy) AQAR (iv) ……………… (dd/mm/yyyy)
 Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

3. Extended Profile of the Institution

1 Programme:
Year
1.
Number Number of courses offered by the Institution across all programs during the last five years
2 Student:

Year
1. Number of students year wise during the last five years
Number
2.2 Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State Govt rule year wise during the last five years
Year
Number
2.3 Number of outgoing/ final year students year wise during the last five years
Year
Number

3 Academic:

Year
3.2 Number of full time teachers year wise during the last five years
Number
3.3 Number of Sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
Year
Number

4. Institution:

1. Total number of Classrooms and Seminar halls

Year
Number
2. Total expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs)
4.3 Number of Computers
 SSR SUBMISSION READINESS

• Go through NAAC manual and guidelines

• Understanding of metrics
• Data submission both Quantitative and
Qualitative metrics
• Upload relevant documents
• Selection of Non-applicable(optional) metrics
• Refer Standard operating procedure
(SOP) helpful in SSR submission and DVV
clarification
The seven Criteria to serve as basis for
assessment of HEIs
1.Curricular Aspects(100)
2.Teaching-Learning and Evaluation(350)
3. Research, Innovations and Extension(110)
4.Infrastructure and Learning Resources(100)
5.Student Support and Progression(140)
6.Governance, Leadership and
Management(100)
7. Institutional Values and Best Practices(100)
 Distribution of Metrics and Key Indicators
across Criteria

Type of HEIs Universities Autonomous Affiliated/

Colleges Constituent
Colleges
Criteria 7 7 7
Key Indicators
34 34 32
(KIs)

Qualitative
38 38 41
Metrics (QlM

Quantitative
99 98 80
Metrics (QnM)

Total Metrics
137 136 121
(QlM + QnM)
 About Quantitative Metric (Qnm)
Criteria cont..
University Autonomous Affiliated

CurricularAspects 7 Qnm + 2 Qlm 9 Qnm + 2 Qlm 9 Qnm +

3Qlm

Teaching, Learning and 18 Qnm + 5 Qlm 18 Qnm + 6 Qlm 14 Qnm + 9

Evaluation Qlm

Research, innovation and 29 Qnm + 7 Qlm 28 Qnm + 2 Qlm 14 Qnm + 2

Extension Qlm
Infrastructure and Learning 11 Qnm + 7 Qlm 10 Qnm + 6 Qlm 10 Qnm + 6
Resource Qlm

Student Support and 12 Qnm + 3 Qlm 13 Qnm + 2 Qlm 13 Qnm + 2

Progression Qlm

Governance, Leadership and 7 Qnm + 12 Qlm 7 Qnm + 12 Qlm 8 Qnm + 10

Management Qlm
InstitutionalValues and Best 12 Qnm + 8 Qlm 13 Qnm + 8 Qlm 13 Qnm + 8
Practices Qlm
 Quantitative
Metrics(QnM)
• Last five years data

• Average percentage of last five years data

• Multiple choice questions

• Current year data

• Current year data (RATIO)

• YES/NO Questions
Average percentage of last five year data
1.3.3. Percentage of students undertaking field projects/
QnM internships (current year data) 5
1.3.3.1. Number of students undertaking field projects or internships
Data Requirement : ( As per Data Template in Section B)
 Name of the programme
No. of students undertaking field projects/ internships
Formula:
X100

File Description:(Upload)
 Any additional information
 List of programmes and number of students
undertaking field projects/internships (Data
Template)
Multiple choice question
Current year data
Current year data (RATIO)
YES/NO Question
Multiple choice question
Qualitative Metrics
2.2.1. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students,
QlM after admission and organises special Programmes for 30
advanced learners and slow learners
Upload a description in maximum of 500 words
File Description:
 Past link for additional Information
 Upload any additional information QlM

2.2.2. Student- Full time teacher ratio (current year data)

QnM Data requirement: 10
 Total number of Students enrolled in the Institution
Total number of full time teachers in the Institution
Formula: Students: teachers
File Description (Upload)
 Institutional data in prescribed format QnM
 Any additional information
 Criterion-I
CurricularAspects 100

1. Curriculum Planning and

Implementation 20
2. Academic Flexibility 30

3. Curriculum Enrichment 30

4. Feedback System 20

29
Metric No. Weightage

The
1. Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well planned and documented process 10
1.1.1 Write description of initiatives in not more than 500 words
File Description
QlM  Upload Additional information
 Link for Additional information
The
1. institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE 5
1.1.2 Write description in maximum of 500 words
QlM File Description
 Upload Additional information
 Link for Additional information
Teachers
1. of the Institution participate in following activities related to curriculum development and assessment of 5
1.1.3 the affiliating University and/are represented on the following academic bodies during the last five years
1. Academic council/BoS of Affiliating university
QnM 2. Setting of question papers for UG/PG programs
3. Design and Development of Curriculum for Add on/ certificate/ Diploma Courses
4. Assessment /evaluation process of the affiliating University
Options
1. All of the above
2. Any 3 of the above
3. Any 2 of the above
4. Any 1 of the above
5. None of the above
Data requirement: (As per Data Template)
 Number of teachers participated
 Name of the body in which full time teacher participated
 Total number of teachers

Documents: Upload the scanned copies of the letters issued by the affiliating university / institutions w.r.t the activity
in which the teachers are involved.

File Description:
 Details of participation of teachers in various bodies/activities provided as a response to the metric
 Any additional information
 Metric Weightage
No.
1.2.1. Percentage of Programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/ elective course system has been
implemented 10

QnM 1.2.1.1. Number of Programmes in which CBCS/ Elective course system implemented.

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Name of all Programmes adopting CBCS
 Name of all Programmes adopting elective course system

Formula: X 100

File Description (Upload)

 Any additional information
 Minutes of relevant Academic Council/ BOS meetings
 Institutional data in prescribed format (Data Template)
1.2.2. Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years 10
1.2.2.1: How many Add on /Certificate programs are added within the last 5 years
QnM Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
The template is combined with 1.2.3
 Names of the Add on /Certificate programs with 30 or more contact hours
 No. of times offered during the same year
 Total no. of students completing the course in the year
File Description (Upload)
 Any additional information
 Brochure or any other document relating to Add on /Certificate programs
 List of Add on /Certificate programs (Data Template )
1.2.3 Average percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on programs as against the total number of students
during the last five years 10
1.2.3.1. Number of students enrolled in subject related Certificate or
QnM Add-on programs year wise during last five years

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Total number of students enrolled in certificate / Add –on programs
 Total number of students across all the programs
Formula:
 Metric Weightage
No.

1.2.3 Average percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on programs as against the total number
of students during the last five years 10
1.2.3.1. Number of students enrolled in subject related Certificate or
QnM Add-on programs year wise during last five years

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Total number of students enrolled in certificate / Add –on programs
 Total number of students across all the programs
Formula:

Percentage per year =

File Description(Upload)
 Any additional information
 Details of the students enrolled in Subjects related to certificate/Add-on programs
Metric Weightage
No.
1.3.1. Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum
10
Upload a description in maximum of 500 words
QlM File Description (Upload)
 Any additional information
 Upload the list and description of courses which address the Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the
Curriculum.

1.3.2. Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship during last five years 10

QnM 1.3.2.1: Number of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship year wise during last five years

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the Course
 Details of experiential learning through project work/field work/internship
 Name of the Programme
Formula:
Average percentage =
File Description: (Upload)
 Any additional information
 Programme / Curriculum/ Syllabus of the courses
 Minutes of the Boards of Studies/ Academic Council meetings with approvals for these courses
 MoU's with relevant organizations for these courses, if any
 Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship (Data Template)

1.3.3. Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year) 10

1.3.3.1. Number of students undertaking project work/field work / internships

QnM
Data Requirement : ( As per Data Template)
 Name of the programme
 No. of students undertaking project work/field work / internships
Formula:

File Description:(Upload)
 Any additional information
 List of programmes and number of students undertaking project work/field work/ /internships (Data Template)
 Metric Weightage
No.
1.4.1. Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the following 10
stakeholders
1) Students 2)Teachers 3)Employers 4)Alumni
QnM
Options:
A. All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Data Requirement:
Report of analysis of feedback received from different stakeholders year wise

File Description
 URL for stakeholder feedback report
 Action taken report of the Institution on feedback report as stated in the minutes of the Governing Council,
Syndicate, Board of Management (Upload)
 Any additional information (Upload)

1.4.2 Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows:

QnM Options: 10
A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website
B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected

Documents:
Upload Stakeholders feedback report, Action taken report of the institute on it as stated in the minutes of the
Governing Council, Syndicate, Board of Management

File Description
 Upload any additional information
 URL for feedback report
 Criterion-II

Teaching-Learning and Evaluation 350

1. Student Enrolment and Profile 40

2. Catering to Student Diversity 50

3. Teaching -Learning Process 50

4. Teacher Profile and Quality 60

5. Evaluation Process and Reforms 30

6. Student Performance and learning outcome 60

7. Student Satisfaction Survey 60

  Total number of Students admitted
 Total number of Sanctioned seats

X100

File Description:
 Any additional information
 Institutional data in prescribed format
2.1.2. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various 20
categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable
QnM reservation policy during the last five years
( exclusive of supernumerary seats)

2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories

year wise during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of Students admitted from the reserved category
 Total number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per
GOI or State government rule

Formula:

File Description: (Upload)

 Any additional information
 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved (Data
Metric Weightage
No.
2.4.1. Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts 20
during the last five years

QnM Data Requirement for last five years (As per Data Template)
 Number of full time teachers
 Number of sanctioned posts

Formula:
Percentage per year =

File Description (Upload)

 Year wise full time teachers and sanctioned posts for 5years(Data
Template)
 Any additional information
 List of the faculty members authenticated by the Head of HEI

2.4.2. Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / 20
D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
(consider only highest degree for count)
QnM

2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /

D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five
years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of full time teachers with PhD./ D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B
Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt.
 Total number of full time teachers

Formula:

File Description (Upload)

Metric Weighta
No. ge
2.5.1. Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of 15
frequency and mode

QlM Upload a description not more than 500 words

File Description:
 Any additional information
 Link for additional information

2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is 15

transparent, time- bound and efficient

Upload a description not more than 500 words

QlM
File Description:
 Any additional information
 Link for additional information
Metric Weight
No. age
2.6.1. Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course 15
outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.

Describe Course Outcomes (COs) for all courses and mechanism of

Ql M communication within a minimum of 500 characters and maximum of
500 words

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Past link for Additional information
 Upload COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary)

2.6.2. Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are 15

evaluated by the institution.

Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs , PSOs

Ql M and COs in not more than 500
File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for Additional information
2.6.3. Average pass percentage of Students during last five years
2.6.3.1. Total number of final year students who passed the university 30
examination year wise during the last five years

QnM 2.6.3.2. Total number of final year students who appeared for the
university examination year wise during the last five years

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Number
of
students
appeare
d
Number
of
students
passes

Data Requirement (As per Data Template)

 Programme code
 Name of the Programme
 Number of Student appeared
 Number of Students passed
 Pass percentage
Formula:
Metric Weighta
No. ge
2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning 60
process.
QnM (online survey to be conducted )

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Name/Class/Gender
 Student Id Number/Adhar Id number
 Mobile number
 Email Id
 Degree Programme
(Database of all currently enrolled students need to be prepared and
shared with NAAC along with the online submission of QIF)

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Upload database of all currently enrolled students (Data
Template)
 Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) :

 Institutions will have to submit the entire database.

 The SSS questionnaire will be mailed to all students.

 Responses should be received from at least 10% of

the student population or 100.

 If the response rate is lower than the limits, the metric

will not be taken up for evaluation.

 Criterion III
Research, Innovation and Extension 110

1. Resource Mobilization for Research 15

2. Research Publications andAwards 15
3. Extension Activities 60
4. Collaborations 20
Metric Weight
No. age
3.1.1. Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for 5
research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five
QnM years (INR in Lakhs)
3.1.1.1: Total Grants from Government and non-governmental agencies
for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five
years (INR in Lakhs)

Year
INR in
Lakhs
Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the Project/ Endowments
 Name of the Principal Investigator
 Department of Principal Investigator
 Year of Award
 Funds provided
 Duration of the project
 Name of the Project/ Endowments
File Description(Upload)
 Any additional information
 e-copies of the grant award letters for sponsored research
projects / endowments
 List of endowments / projects with details of grants (Data
Template)
3.1.2 Percentage of departments having Research projects funded by 5
government and non government agencies during the last five years
3.1.2.1: Number of departments having Research projects funded by
QnM
government and non-government agencies during the last five years

Year
Number

Data requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of Principal Investigator
 Duration of project
 Name of the research project
 Amount / Fund received
 Name of funding agency
 Year of sanction
 Department of recipient
Formula:
Metric Weight
No. age
3.2.1. Number of papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on 5
UGC website during the last five years
QnM 3.2.1.1. Number of research papers in the Journals notified on UGC
website during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Title of paper
 Name of the author/s
 Department of the teacher
 Name of journal
 Year of publication
 ISBN/ISSN number

Formula:

File Description (Upload)

 Any additional information

 List of research papers by title, author, department, name and
year of publication (Data Template)
3.2.2. Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and 10
papers published in national/ international conference proceedings
QnM per teacher during last five years
3.2.2.1. Total number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books
published and papers in national/ international conference proceedings
year wise during last five years

Year
Number
Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the teacher: Title of the paper
 Title of the book published: Name of the author/s : Title of the
proceedings of the conference
 Name of the publisher: National/International
 National/international : ISBN/ISSN number of the proceedings
 Year of publication:

Formula:
Metric Weight
No. age
3.3.1. Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, 10
sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and
Ql M impact thereof during the last five years
Describe the impact of extension activities in sensitising students to
social issues and holistic development within a maximum of 500 words.

File Description:
 Paste link for additional information
Upload any additional information

3.3.2. Number of awards and recognitions received for extension activities 10

from government / government recognised bodies during the last five
QnM years
3.3.2.1. Total number of awards and recognition received for extension
activities from Government/ government recognised bodies year wise
during the last five years.

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the activity
 Name of the Award/recognition
 Name of the Awarding government/ government recognized
bodies
 Year of the Award

File Description: (Upload)

 Any additional information
 Number of awards for extension activities in last 5 year (Data
Template)
e-copy of the award letters
3.3.3. Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the 20
institution through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., ( including the
QnM programmes such as Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues
etc. and/or those organised in collaboration with industry, community
and NGOs ) during the last five years

3.3.3.1. Number of extension and outreach Programs conducted in

collaboration with industry, community and Non- Government
Organizations through NSS/ NCC/ Red Cross/ YRC etc., year wise
during the last five years
Year
Number

Data Requirements for last five years (As per Data Template)
Metric Weight
No. age
3.4.1. The Institution has several collaborations/linkages for Faculty 10
exchange, Student exchange, Internship, Field trip, On-the- job
QnM training, research etc during the last five years

 Number of linkages for faculty exchange, student exchange,

internship, field trip, on-the- job training, research etc year wise
during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirements for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Title of the linkage
 Name of the partnering institution /industry/research lab with
contact details
 Year of commencement
 Duration (From-To)
 Nature of linkage

File Description: (Upload)

 e-copies of linkage related Document
 Any additional information
 Details of linkages with institutions/industries for internship
(Data Template)

3.4.2. Number of functional MoUs with national and international 10

institutions, universities, industries, corporate houses etc. during the
QnM last five years
3.4.2.1. Number of functional MoUs with Institutions of national,
international importance, other universities, industries, corporate houses
etc. year wise during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years : (As per Data Template)
 Organization with which MoU is signed
 Name of the institution/industry/corporate house
 Year of signing MoU
 Duration
 List the actual activities under each MoU
 Number of students/teachers participating under MoUs
 Criteria-IV
Infrastructure and Learning Resources 100

1. Physical facilities 30
2. Library as a Learning Resource 20
3. IT Infrastructure 30
4. Maintenance of Campus
Infrastructure 20
Metric Weight
No. age
4.1.1. The Institution has adequate infrastructure and physical facilities for
teaching- learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing 5
Ql M equipment etc.

Describe the adequacy of infrastructure and physical facilities for

teaching –learning as per the minimum specified requirement by
statutory bodies within a maximum 500 words

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for additional information
4.1.2. The Institution has adequate facilities for cultural activities, sports,
games (indoor, outdoor), gymnasium, yoga centre etc. 5
Ql M
Describe the adequacy of facilities for sports, games and cultural
activities which include specification about area/size, year of
establishment and user rate within a maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for additional information
4.1.3. Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT- enabled
facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc. 10
QnM
4.1.3.1: Number of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT facilities
Data Requirements: (As per Data Template)
 Number of classrooms with LCD facilities
 Number of classrooms with Wi-Fi/LAN facilities
 Number of smart classrooms
 Number of classrooms with LMS facilities
 Number of seminar halls with ICT facilities
Formula:

File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload Number of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT
enabled facilities (Data Template)

4.1.4. Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure

augmentation during last five years(INR in Lakhs) 10
QnM
4.1.4.1. Expenditure for infrastructure augmentation, excluding salary
year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
Metric Weight
No. age
4.2.1. Library is automated using Integrated Library Management
System (ILMS)
Ql M Data Requirement for last five years: Upload a description of library 4
with,
 Name of ILMS software
 Nature of automation (fully or partially)
 Version
 Year of Automation

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for Additional Information
4.2.2. The institution has subscription for the following e-resources 6
1. e-journals
QnM 2. e-ShodhSindhu
3. Shodhganga Membership
4. e-books
5. Databases
6. Remote access to e-resources

Options:
A. Any 4 or more of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Details of membership:
 Details of subscription:

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Details of subscriptions like e-journals, e-ShodhSindhu,
Shodhganga Membership etc (Data Template)
4.2.3 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and
subscription to journals/e- journals during the last five years (INR in 5
QnM Lakhs)

4.2.3.1 Annual expenditure of purchase of books/e-books and

subscription to journals/e- journals year wise during last five years (INR
in Lakhs)

Year
INR in
Lakhs
 Metric Weightage
No.
4.3.1. Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi 05

QlM Describe IT facilities including Wi-Fi with date and nature of updation within a maximum of 500
words
File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for additional information

4.3.2. Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
10
Q nM
Number of students : Number of Computers
Data Requirements:
 Number of computers in working condition
 Total Number of students
File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Student – computer ratio

4.3.3. Bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution 15

Q nM Options:
A. ≥ 50 MBPS
B. 30 - 50 MBPS
C. 10 - 30 MBPS
D. 10 - 5 MBPS
E. < 5 MBPS

Data Requirement:
 Available internet bandwidth

File Description
 Upload any additional Information
 Details of available bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution
Metric Weight
No. age
4.4.1 Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of
infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities) excluding 10
salary component during the last five years(INR in Lakhs)

QnM 4.4.1.1. Expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical

facilities and academic support facilities) excluding salary component
year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs)

Year
INR in
Lakhs

Data Requirement year wise: (As per Data Template in Section B)

 Non salary expenditure incurred
 Expenditure incurred on maintenance of campus infrastructure

Formula:

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Audited statements of accounts.
 Details about assigned budget and expenditure on physical
facilities and academic support facilities (Data Templates)
4.4.2. There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and
utilizing physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory, library, 10
Ql M sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.

Describe policy details of systems and procedures for maintaining and

utilizing physical, academic and support facilities on the website within
a maximum of 1000 words

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for additional information
 Criterion V
Student Support and Progression 140

1. Student Support 50
2. Student Progression 30

3. Student Participation and

activities
50
4. Alumni Engagement 10
Metric Weight
No. age
5.1.1 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and
freeships provided by the Government during last five years 20

5.1.1.1. Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships

QnM provided by the Government year wise during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement year wise: (As per Data Template)

 Name of the Scheme
 Number of students benefiting

Formula:

Percentage per year =

File Description:
 upload self attested letter with the list of students sanctioned
scholarship
 Upload any additional information
Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and
freeships provided by the Government during the last five years
(Data Template)

5.1.2. Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships, freeships 05

etc. provided by the institution / non- government agencies during the
last five years
QnM
5.1.2.1 Total number of students benefited by scholarships, freeships, etc
provided by the institution / non- government agencies year wise during
last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the Scheme with contact information
5.1.2. Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships, freeships
etc. provided by the institution / non- government agencies during the
last five years
QnM
5.1.2.1 Total number of students benefited by scholarships, freeships, etc
provided by the institution / non- government agencies year wise during
last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the Scheme with contact information
 Number of students benefiting

Formula:

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships
institution / non- government agencies in last 5 years (Date
Template)

5.1.3. Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the

institution include the following
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene)
4. ICT/computing skills
QnM
Options:
A. All of the above
B. 3 of the above
C. 2 of the above
D. 1 of the above
E. none of the above

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

 Name of the capability building and skills enhancement
initiatives
5.1.4. Average percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive
examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution during
QnM the last five years

5.1.4.1. Number of students benefitted by guidance for competitive

examinations and career counselling offered by the institution year wise
during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years:(As per Data Template)

 Name of the scheme
 Number of students who have passed in the competitive exam
 Number of students placed

Formula

Percentage per year =

File Description (Upload)

 Any additional information
 Number of students benefited by guidance for competitive
examinations and career counselling during the last five years
(Data Template)
5.1.5. The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of
student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
QnM 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies
with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’
grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate
committees

Options:

A. All of the above

B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above
Metric Weight
No. age
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last 10
five years
QnM
5.2.1.1: Number of outgoing students placed year wise during the last
five years

Year
Number

Data requirement for last five years (As per Data Template)
 Name of the employer with contact details
 Number of students placed

Formula:

Percentage per year =

File Description (Upload)

 Self attested list of students placed
 Upload any additional information
 Details of student placement during the last five years (Data
Template)

5.2.2. Average percentage of students progressing to higher education 15

during the last five years
QnM
5.2.2.1. Number of outgoing student progression to higher education

Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)

Number of students proceeding from
 UG to PG:
 PG to MPhil:
 PG to PhD:
 MPhil to PhD:
 PhD to Post doctoral:

Formula:

File Description (Upload)

5.2.3. Average percentage of students qualifying in state/national/
international level examinations during the last five years (eg:
JAM/CLAT/GATE/ GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/State
government examinations)
QnM
5.2.3.1. Number of students qualifying in state/ national/ international
level examinations (eg: JAM/CLAT/NET/ SLET/ GATE/
GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/ State government
examinations) year wise during last five years

Year
Number

5.2.3.2. Number of students appearing in state/ national/ international

level examinations (eg: JAM/CLAT/NET/ SLET/ GATE/
GMAT/CAT,GRE/ TOFEL/ Civil Services/ State government
examinations) year wise during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
Number of students selected to
 JAM
 CLAT
 NET
 SLET
 GATE
 GMAT
 CAT
 GRE
 TOEFL
 Civil Services
 State government examinations

Formula:
Percentage per year =

File Description (Upload)

 Upload supporting data for the same
Metric Weight
No. age
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in
sports/cultural activities at university/state/national / international
QnM level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last 20
five years.

5.3.1.1: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in

sports/cultural activities at university/state/ national / international level
(award for a team event should be counted as one) year wise during the
last five years.

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the award/ medal
 University /State/National/ International
 Sports/ Culture

File Description (Upload)

 e-copies of award letters and certificates
 Any additional information
 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in
sports/cultural activities at university/state/national/international
level during the last five year (Data Template)
5.3.2 Institution facilitates students’ representation and engagement in
various administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities 10
Ql M (student council/ students representation on various bodies as per
established processes and norms )

Describe the students’ representation and engagement in various

administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities within a
maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
5.3.3. Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which
students of the Institution participated during last five years 20
(organised by the institution/other institutions)
QnM

5.3.3.1. Number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which

students of the Institution participated year wise during last five years

Year
Number
5.3.3. Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which
students of the Institution participated during last five years 20
(organised by the institution/other institutions)
QnM

5.3.3.1. Number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which

students of the Institution participated year wise during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 List of events/competitions

Formula:

File Description
 Report of the event
 Upload any additional information
 Number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which
students of the Institution participated during last five years
(organised by the institution/other institutions (Data Template)
Metric Weight
No. age
5.4.1 There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly 5
to the development of the institution through financial and/or other
support services.

Ql M Describe contribution of alumni association to the institution within a

maximum of 500 words

File Description:
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
5.4.2 Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) 5

Options:
QnM A. ≥ 5 Lakhs
B. 4 Lakhs - 5 Lakhs
C. 3 Lakhs - 4 Lakhs
D. 1 Lakhs - 3 Lakhs
E. <1 Lakhs

Data Requirement for last five years (year wise):

 Alumni association / Name of the alumnus
 Quantum of contribution
 Audited Statement of account of the institution reflecting the
receipts.

File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Criterion VI
Governance Leadership and Management 100

1. Institutional Vision and Leadership 10

2. Strategy Development and Deployment 10

3. Faculty Empowerment Strategies 30

4. Financial Management and Resource

Mobilization 20
5. Internal Quality Assurance Systems 30
Metric Weight
No. age
6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the
vision and mission of the institution 5
Describe the vision and mission statement of the institution on the
Ql M nature of governance, perspective plans and participation of the teachers
in the decision making bodies of the institution within a maximum of
500 words
File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.1.2 The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices 5
such as decentralization and participative management.

Ql M Describe a case study showing decentralization and participative

management in the institution in practice within a maximum of 500
words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
Metric Weight
No. age
6.2.1 The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
2
Describe one activity successfully implemented based on the strategic
plan within a maximum of 500 words
Ql M
File Description
 Strategic Plan and deployment documents on the website
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.2.2 The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as 4
visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service
rules, procedures, etc.

Ql M Describe the Organogram of the Institution within a maximum 500

words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Link to Organogram of the Institution webpage
 Upload any additional information

6.2.3. Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 4

1. Administration
QnM 2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination
Options:
A. All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Data Requirements: (As per Data Template)

 Areas of e-governance
Administration
Finance and Accounts
Student Admission and Support
Examination
 Name of the Vendor with contact details
 Year of implementation

File Description (Upload)

 ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Document
 Screen shots of user interfaces
Metric Weight
No. age
6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-
teaching staff 05

Provide the list of existing welfare measures for teaching and non-
Ql M teaching staff within a maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.3.2 Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to 10
attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of
professional bodies during the last five years
QnM
6.3.2.1. Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional
bodies year wise during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Name of the teacher
 Name of conference/ workshop attended for which financial
support provided
 Name of the professional body for which membership fee is
provided

Formula:
Percentage per year =

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Details of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conference, workshops etc during the last five years (Data
Template)
6.3.3 Average number of professional development /administrative training 5
programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching
staff during the last five years
6.3.3.1. Total number of professional development /administrative
training Programmes organized by the institution for teaching and non
QnM teaching staff year wise during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Title of the professional development Programme organised for
teaching staff
 Title of the administrative raining Programme organised for non-
teaching staff
 Dates (From- to)

Formula:

File Description (Upload):

 Reports of the Human Resource Development Centres (UGC
ASC or other relevant centres).
 Reports of Academic Staff College or similar centers
 Upload any additional information
 Details of professional development / administrative training
Programmes organized by the University for teaching and non
teaching staff (Data Template)
6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face 5
Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years

QnM (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction

Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course etc.)

6.3.4.1. Total number of teachers attending professional development

Programmes viz., Orientation / Induction Programme, Refresher Course,
Short Term Course year wise during the last five years

Years
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of teachers
 Title of the Programme
 Duration (From –to)
6.3.3 Average number of professional development /administrative training 5
programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching
staff during the last five years
6.3.3.1. Total number of professional development /administrative
training Programmes organized by the institution for teaching and non
QnM teaching staff year wise during the last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Title of the professional development Programme organised for
teaching staff
 Title of the administrative raining Programme organised for non-
teaching staff
 Dates (From- to)

Formula:

File Description (Upload):

 Reports of the Human Resource Development Centres (UGC
ASC or other relevant centres).
 Reports of Academic Staff College or similar centers
 Upload any additional information
 Details of professional development / administrative training
Programmes organized by the University for teaching and non
teaching staff (Data Template)
6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face 5
Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years

QnM (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction

Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course etc.)

6.3.4.1. Total number of teachers attending professional development

Programmes viz., Orientation / Induction Programme, Refresher Course,
Short Term Course year wise during the last five years

Years
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of teachers
 Title of the Programme
 Duration (From –to)
Metric Weight
No. age
6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
6
Enumerate the various internal and external financial audits carried out
during the last five years with the mechanism for settling audit
Ql M objections within a maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, 8
philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)
QnM 6.4.2.1: Total Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals,
Philanthropers year wise during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)

Year
INR in
Lakhs

Data Requirement for last five years (As per Data Template)
 Name of the non-government bodies, individuals, Philanthropers
 Funds / Grants received

File Description
 Annual statements of accounts
 Any additional information
 Details of Funds / Grants received from of the non-government
bodies, individuals, Philanthropers during the last five years
(Data Template)
6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal 6
utilisation of resources
Ql M
Describe the resource mobilisation policy and procedures of the
Institution within a maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
Metric Weight
No. age
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly 10
for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes
Ql M
Describe two practices institutionalized as a result of IQAC initiatives
within a maximum of 500 words

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & 10
methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic
intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the
Ql M incremental improvement in various activities
( For first cycle - Incremental improvements made for the preceding
five years with regard to quality

For second and subsequent cycles - Incremental improvements made

for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post
accreditation quality initiatives )

Describe any two examples of institutional reviews and implementation

of teaching learning reforms facilitated by the IQAC within a maximum
of 500 words each

File Description
 Paste link for additional information
 Upload any additional information
6.5.3 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 10

1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC);

QnM Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements
2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s)
3. Participation in NIRF
4. any other quality audit recognized by state, national or
international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA)
Options:
A. All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template
Quality initiatives
 AQARs prepared/ submitted
 Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
 Participation in NIRF
 Criterion- VII
Institutional Values and Best Practices 100
1. InstitutionalValues and Social Responsibilities 50
1. Gender Equity 10
2. Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability 10
3. Differently abled (Divyangjan) Friendliness
Resources available in the 10
institution 10
7.1.4. Inclusion and Situatedness 10
7.1.5 Human Values and Professional
Ethics

7.2 Best Practices 30

7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness 20
 Weightage

Gender Equity

7.1.1 Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity 5
during the last five years.
Q lM
Describe gender equity & sensitization in curricular and co-curricular activities,
facilities for women on campus etc., within 500 words

Provide Web link to:

 Annual gender sensitization action plan
 Specific facilities provided for women in terms of:
a. Safety and security
b. Counselling
c. Common Rooms
d. Day care center for young children
e. Any other relevant information

Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability

7.1.2 The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy 5
QnM conservation measures
1. Solar energy
2. Biogas plant
3. Wheeling to the Grid
4. Sensor-based energy conservation
5. Use of LED bulbs/ power efficient equipment

Options:
A. 4 or All of the above
B. 3 of the above
C. 2 of the above
D.1of the above
E. None of the above

Upload:
 Geotagged Photographs
 Any other relevant information
7.1.3 Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following 4
Ql M types of degradable and non-degradable waste (within 500 words)
 Solid waste management
 Liquid waste management
 Biomedical waste management
 E-waste management
 Waste recycling system
 Hazardous chemicals and radioactive waste management

Provide web link to

 Relevant documents like agreements/MoUs with Government and other
approved agencies
 Geotagged photographs of the facilities
 Any other relevant information

7.1.4 Water conservation facilities available in the Institution: 4

1. Rain water harvesting
QnM
2. Borewell /Open well recharge
3. Construction of tanks and bunds
4. Waste water recycling
5. Maintenance of water bodies and distribution system in the campus

Options:
A. Any 4 or all of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Upload :

 Geotagged photographs / videos of the facilities

 Any other relevant information
7.1.5 Green campus initiatives include: 4
7.1.5.1. The institutional initiatives for greening the campus are as follows:
QnM
1. Restricted entry of automobiles
2. Battery-powered vehicles
3. Pedestrian-friendly pathways
4. Ban on the use of Plastics
5. Landscaping with trees and plants

Options:
A. Any 4 or All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Upload
 Geotagged photos / videos of the facilities
 Any other relevant documents

7.1.6 Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the 5

Institution.
QnM
7.1.6.1. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed
through the following
 Green audit
 Energy audit
 Environment audit
 Clean and green campus recognitions / awards
 Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities

Options:
A. Any 4 or all of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Upload:
 Reports on environment and energy audits submitted by the auditing
agency
 Certification by the auditing agency
 Certificates of the awards received
 Any other relevant information
7.1.7 The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free environment 4
 Built environment with ramps/lifts for easy access to classrooms.
QnM  Disabled-friendly washrooms
 Signage including tactile path, lights, display boards and signposts
 Assistive technology and facilities for persons with disabilities
(Divyangjan) accessible website, screen-reading software, mechanized
equipment
 Provision for enquiry and information : Human assistance, reader,
scribe, soft copies of reading material, screen reading

Options:
A. Any 4 or all of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Upload:
 Geotagged photographs / videos of the facilities
 Policy documents and information brochures on the support to be
provided
 Details of the Software procured for providing the assistance
 Any other relevant information

Inclusion and Situatedness

7.1.8 Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive 5
environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional,
Ql M linguistic, communal socioeconomic and other diversities (within 500 words).

Provide Web link to:

 Supporting documents on the information provided (as reflected in the
administrative and academic activities of the Institution)
 Any other relevant information.
 Human Values and Professional Ethics

7.1.9 Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional 4

obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens
Ql M
Describe the various activities in the Institution for inculcating values for being
responsible citizens as reflected in the Constitution of India within 500 words.
Provide weblink to :
 Details of activities that inculcate values; necessary to render students
in to responsible citizens
 Any other relevant information

7.1.10 The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, 5
QnM administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this
regard.

1. The Code of Conduct is displayed on the website

2. There is a committee to monitor adherence to the Code of Conduct
3. Institution organizes professional ethics programmes for students,
teachers, administrators and other staff
4. Annual awareness programmes on Code of Conduct are organized

Options:
A. All of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above

Upload:
 Code of ethics policy document
 Details of the monitoring committee composition and minutes of the
committee meeting, number of programmes organized, reports on the
various programs etc., in support of the claims.
 Any other relevant information
7.1.11 Institution celebrates / organizes national and international commemorative 5
Ql M days, events and festivals

Describe the efforts of the Institution in celebrating /organizing national and

international commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five
years within 500 words
Provide weblink to :
 Annual report of the celebrations and commemorative events for the
last five years
 Geotagged photographs of some of the events
 Any other relevant information
 Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices (30)
Metric Weightage
No.
7.2.1 Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as 30
Ql M per NAAC format provided in the Manual.

Provide web link to:

 Best practices in the Institutional web site
 Any other relevant information
 Templates

• MS Excel based tables seeking details of Qnm

• It is essential to fill up (only in the format

provided)(do not change the templates)

• Upload the filled in template in its

appropriate metrics in SSR

• Only when the template is complete it

facilitates in easy DVV
 Optional Metrics
Optional Metrics: In these diversified
education system, there can be few metrics
which may not be applicable to the HEI’s.
Thus in order to facilitate the HEI’s NAAC
has come out with this concept of Non
Applicable Metrics.
Terms for the non applicable(optional) metrics:

a) Maximum weightage of metrics that can be opted

out shouldn’t exceed 30 weightage (up to 3%).

b) Metrics with maximum of total 10 weightage per

criteria can be opted out.

c) Criteria 1, 2 and 7 are essential. No metrics can be

opted out.

d) Metrics identified as optional can only be opted out

e) Qualitative metrics cannot be opted out.

Optional metrics …..

• The optional metrics across 4 criteria have been

identified for Affiliated/constituent colleges which
can only be opted out.

• The calculation of Cumulative Grade Point Average

(CGPA) of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) will be
done excluding the 3% metrics as opted out by the
HEIs.

• This decision is aimed at helping HEIs as they will not

be assessed on metrics not applicable to them.
Metric No. Metric
3.1.2 Percentage of departments having Research projects funded by
government and non government agencies during the last five
QnM
years
(5)
3.1.3 Number of Seminars/conferences/workshops conducted by the
institution during the last five years (5)
QnM
3.3.2 Number of awards and recognitions received for extension
activities from government / government recognised bodies
QnM
during the last five years (10)
3.4.2 Number of functional MoUs with national and international
institutions, universities, industries, corporate houses etc. during
QnM
the last five years (10)
4.1.4 Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for
infrastructure augmentation during last five years (INR in
QnM
Lakhs) (10)
4.4.1 Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance
of infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities)
QnM
excluding salary component during the last five years (INR
in lakhs) (10)
5.1.2 Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships,
freeships, etc. provided by the institution besides government
QnM
during the last five years
(05)
Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships,
freeships etc. provided by the institution / non- government
agencies during the last five years
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during
the last five years
QnM
(10)
5.2.2 Average percentage of students progressing to higher
education during the last five years (15)
QnM
5.2.3 Average percentage of students qualifying in state/national/
international level examinations during the last five years
QnM
(eg: JAM/GATE/ CLAT/GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil
Services/State government examinations, etc.) (05)

5.4.2 Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in lakhs)
QnM Options:
A. A. ≥ 5 Lakhs

B. B. 4 Lakhs – 5 Lakhs

C. 3 Lakhs - 4 Lakhs Opt One

D. 1 Lakhs - 3 Lakhs

E. <1 Lakhs
(5)
6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
QnM 1. Administration

2. Finance and Accounts

3. Student Admission and Support

4. Examination
Options:
A. All of the above

B. Any 3 of the above

C. Any 2 of the above

D. Any 1 of the above

E. None of the above(4)

6.3.3 Average number of professional development /administrative
training programs organized by the institution for teaching and
QnM
non teaching staff during the last five years (5)
6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies,
individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not
QnM
covered in Criterion III) (8)
Screenshots of QIF Metric (QnM)
Screenshots of QIF Metric (QnM)
Screenshots of QIF Metric (QlM)
Screenshots of QIF Metric (QlM)
Calculation of Institutional CGPA
The CGPA will be calculated based on the scores
obtained from the three sources, viz.,

•The System Generated Scores (SGS) of the

quantitative metrics.

•The scores from the qualitative metrics includes

critical appraisal by the Peer Team through on site
visit.

•The scores obtained on the Student Satisfaction

Survey.

These will be collated through an automated

procedure based on benchmarks and assessed on a
five point scale, viz., (0, 1, 2, 3 & 4).
 Score Calculation

PR – Peer Review
 In case of Passed
Deviation
DVV clarification Pre qualifier

process will be
sorted from
30% SGS

HEIs
Failed

Apply again
with IIQA fresh
and payment of
all fees

**SSS will happen simultaneously with DVV process

SGS – System Generated Score
 Passed Failed

Within 30 days
PTV Will have to apply
afresh with IIQA & its
(QlM) fees after Six months
Example: Qualitative Metric (QlM) and Quantitative Metric (QnM)
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30)
Qualitative/ 1.3. Curriculum Enrichment Benchmark Values
Quantitative
(30)
Metrics 4 3 2 1 0

1.3.1 Institution integrates cross cutting issues relevant

QlM to Gender, Environment and Sustainability,
Human Values and Professional Ethics into the
Curriculum
(10)

1.3.2 Number of value-added courses imparting

Qn M transferable and life skills offered during the last ≥AA AA-BB BB-CC DD-CC <DD
five years
(10)

1.3.3 Percentage of students enrolled in the courses

Qn M under 1.3.2 above ≥AA AA--BB BB-CC DD-CC <DD
(5)

1.3.4 Percentage of students undertaking field projects /

Qn M internships ≥AA AA–BB BB–CC DD–CC <DD
(5)
 PEER TEAMVISIT

• After prequalification institution ready for

Peer Team Visit.

• Preparation of Peer Team Visit PTV.

• On-site visit & Assessment outcome

 Peer Team Visit
• NAAC will not pre-disclose the details of the visiting teams

• HEIs will not be responsible for Logistics for the Visiting Teams.
• NAAC will directly take care of all the
logistics regarding the Peer Teams visiting the
institutions.

• All payment towards TA, DA, Honorarium, etc., will be directly paid by
NAAC to the nominated members.
• There would be no financial transactions between the Institution and
the visiting NAAC team.
 System Generated Grade of HEIs:
INPUT FROM
INPUT FROM QUANTITATIVE
QUALITATIVE METRICS METRICS USING
USING PEER COMPUTER
JUDGEMENT GENERATED SCORE
INCLUDING STUDENT
(25% to 35%) SATISFCATION
SURVEY (65% to 75%)

GRADE
OF
HEIs
Accreditation Outcome NAAC Document
1 Peer Team Report

2 Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Metrics (QnM)

3 Institutional Grade Sheet

Above three (3) parts would be combined together to form

“NAAC Accreditaiton Outcome” document.
 ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
PART I (Peer Team Report):
Section 1: Gives the General Information of the institution
and its context.
Section 2: Gives Criterion wise analysis based on peer
evaluation of qualitative indicators. Instead of reporting with
bullet points, this will be a qualitative, descriptive
assessment report based on the Peer Team’s critical analysis
presenting strengths and weaknesses of HEI under each Criterion
Section 3: Presents an Overall Analysis which includes
Institutional Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and
Challenges.
Section 4: Records Recommendations for Quality
Enhancement of the Institution (not more than 10 major
ones).
 ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
PART II : This part will be a System Generated Quality
Profile of the HEI based on statistical analysis of quantitative
indicators in the NAAC’s QIF (quality indicator framework).
Graphical presentation of institutional features would be
reflected through synthesis of quantifiable indicators.

PART III : Contains the Institutional Grade Sheet which is

based on qualitative indicators, quantitative indicators and
student satisfaction survey using existing calculation methods
but it will be generated by a software.
Institutional Grades And Accreditation
Status
 NAAC
Institutional Assessment and
Accreditation (Effective from
July 2017) Accreditation - (Cycle:
1)

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission
P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA
No Criteria Weightage Criterion-wise Criterion-
(Wi) weighted Grade wise Grade
Point Point
(CrWGPi) Averages
(CrWGPi
/Wi)
1 Curricular Aspects 100 300 3

2 Teaching-learning and 335 921 2.75

Evaluation
3 Research, Innovations 119 357 3
and Extension
4 Infrastructure and 99 307 3.1
Learning Resources
5 Student Support and 110 321 2.92
Progression
6 Governance, Leadership 88 184 2.09
and Management
7 Institutional Values and 100 279 2.79
Best Practices

Total = 951 = 2669 2.81

Institut = = 2669 /951

ional =
CGPA 2.81
No Criteria and Key Indicators Key Indicator Key Indicator Wise Weighted
Weightage (Wi) Grade Points
(KIWGP)i

Criterion 1: Curricular Aspects

1.1 Curricular Planning and

20 70

Implementation
1.2 Academic Flexibility 30 90

1.3 Curriculum Enrichment 30 70

1.4 Feedback System 20 70

Total W1=100 (KIWGP)1 =300

Calculated CrGPA1 = (KIWGP)1 / W1 = 300 /100 = 3

 Criterion 2: Teaching-learning and Evaluation

2.1 Student Enrollment and Profile 30 110

2.2 Catering to Student Diversity 50 130

2.3 Teaching- Learning Process 50 140

2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality 65 190

2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms 50 120

2.6 Student Performance and Learning

40 90

Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey 50 141

Total
W2=335 (KIWGP)2 =921

Calculated CrGPA2 = (KIWGP)2 / W2 = 921 /335 = 2.75

 Criterion 3: Research, Innovations and Extension

3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research 10 18

3.2 Innovation Ecosystem 10 25

3.3 Research Publications and Awards 19 14

3.4 Extension Activities 60 220

3.5 Collaboration 20 80

Total W3=119 (KIWGP)3 =357

Calculated CrGPA3 = (KIWGP)3 / W3 = 357 /119 = 3

 Criterion 4: Infrastructure and Learning Resources

4.1 Physical Facilities 30 90

4.2 Library as a Learning Resource 20 60

4.3 IT Infrastructure 29 97

4.4 Maintenance of Campus 20 60

No Criteria and Key Indicators Key Indicator Key Indicator Wise Weighted
Weightage (Wi) Grade Points
(KIWGP)i

Infrastructure
Total W4=99 (KIWGP)4 =307

Calculated CrGPA4 = (KIWGP)4 / W4 = 307 /99 = 3.1

Criterion 5: Student Support and Progression

5.1 Student Support 50 154
5.2 Student Progression 25 90
5.3 Student Participation and Activities 25 65

5.4 Alumni Engagement 10 12

Total W5=110 (KIWGP)5 =321

Calculated CrGPA5 = (KIWGP)5 / W5 = 321 /110 = 2.92

 Criterion 6: Governance, Leadership and Management

6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership 10 20

6.2 Strategy Development and 6 16

Deployment

6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies 30 85

6.4 Financial Management and 12 28

Resource Mobilization

6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System 30 35

Total W6=88 (KIWGP)6 =184

Calculated CrGPA6 = (KIWGP)6 / W6 = 184 /88 = 2.09

 Criterion 7: Institutional Values and Best Practices

7.1 Institutional Values and Social 50 129

Responsibilities

7.2 Best Practices 30 90

7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness 20 60

Total W7=100 (KIWGP)7 =279

Calculated CrGPA7 = (KIWGP)7 / W7 = 279 /100 = 2.79

Grand Total 951 2669

Institut =
ional
CGPA
 Data Template

1. CurricularAspects (100)
1.1 Curriculum planning and implementation (20)
1.1.2 Number of certificate/diploma program introduced during last five years (5)

Name of the Certificate/

diploma introduced in Year of
Program code Program name Course code last 5 years introduction
Data Template
 Mandatory Disclosure On HEI’s
Website
It is suggested to create a separate NAAC tab/link on Higher Educational
Institution’s (HEI’s) website and upload following documents till the validity
period of Accreditation is over:
a) SSR submitted online, to be uploaded after DVV process only (.pdf
format).

b) Data templates which are uploaded along with SSR (in password protected
mode, if needed).
c) Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR – Year wise)

d) Accreditation outcome document viz., Certificate, Grade sheet, etc.

e) The Higher Educational Institution’s (HEI’s) may suitably design their NAAC
tab/link to accommodate all relevant documents.
 “NAAC Accreditation Outcome”
It is mandatory for the HEIs to display it on their institutional
website apart from NAAC hosting it on its website.

1 Peer Team Report (QlM)

2 Statistical Analysis of Quantitative

Metrics (QnM)

3 Institutional Grade Sheet

 Section - II
CRITERION WISE ANALYSIS
Observations (Strengths and/or Weaknesses) on each qualitative metrics of the key indicator under the respective
criterion (This will be a qualitative analysis of descriptive nature aimed at critical analysis presenting strength and
weakness of HEI under each criteria)

Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects

(Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrics (QlM) in Criterion I)
1.1. Curriculum Design andDevelopment:
1.1.1 Curricula developed /adopted have relevance to the local/ national / regional/global developmental needs
Ql M with learning objectives including program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes
of all the program offered by the University

1.2 Academic Flexibility:

1.3 CurriculumEnrichment:
1.3.1 Institution integrates cross cutting issues relevant to Gender, Environment and Sustainability, Human
Ql M Values and Professional Ethics into the Curriculum

1.4 Feedback System:

Qualitative analysis of Criterion I (300 to 500words)

...........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
.
 Quality Profile of Higher Education
Institution
Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Metrics

 Quality Profile of Higher Education Institution - outcome of

the statistical analysis of quantitative score of an institution
on the Quality Indicator Framework (QIF).
 System generated score carried out after data validation
process.
 Graphs are proposed on the basis of quantitative metrics for
an institution
 Student enrolment…
Catering to Student…
Student Satisfaction…
Promotion of…
Extension Activities
Collaborations
Physical Facilities
Library as a learning…
IT Infrastructure
Maintenance of Campus

across the Key Indicators.

Student progression
Alumni Engagement

High Performance Key Indicators

Strategy…
Financial…
IQAC System
Curriculum Design…
Academic Flexibility
Feedback System

80%) and Low performance Key Indicator (≤50%).

Teaching- Learning…
Teacher Profile Quality
Evaluation Process…
Student perform and…
on performance (percentage)

Research publication…
Consultancy
Student Participation…
Faculty…
Institutional Values…
Curriculum…
Resource Mobilisation…
Innovations
QnM Weighted score of the Institution across Key Indicators based

Student Support
• Based on the performance of Qn metrics, across key Indicators can be categorised
into high performance Key Indicator (≥80%),average performance Key Indicator (51-
• The scatter chart depicts the performance of QnM weighted score of an institution
Average Performance Key ILnodwicaPteorfsormanceKey In
 Graphical Representation of Strengths (4) and weakness
(0) of the institution based on QnM
Graphical representation of Strengths and weakness of the institution based on
QnM ( Criterion I,II and III)

Score 4 4
Strengths 1.1.3 4
Weakness 3.5.1 4 Strengths 4 1.2.1
Weakness 3.4.7 Strengths 1.4.1
Weakness 3.3.4 3.5 Strength4s 2.1.2
Weakness 3.2.1 3 Strengths 2.1.3
4
Weakness 2.5.5 2.5 Strengths 2.2.2
4
Weakness 1.3.4 2 2.2.3
Strengths
1.5
4
Weakness 1.3.3 Strengths 2.3.2
1
0
00
0
0.5 Stren4gths 2.4.2
Weakness 1.3.2 00
0 0
Weakness 1.2.2 Stren4gths 2.4.3

Strengths 3.7.3 Strengths 2.4.4

4 4
Strengths 3.7.2 Strengths 2.5.2
4 4
Strengths 3.7.1 Strengths 3.1.1
4 4
Strengths 3.6.3 Strengths 3.1.4
Strengt4hs 3.5.2 Strength4s 3.1.8
Strengths 3.4.6 Strengths 3.4.1
S4trengths 3.4.5 Strengths 3.44.2
Strengths 3.4.3
4 4
4 4 4

Note: The radar chart depicts the performance of QnM weighted score of an institution across the Qn metrics.
Based on the performance of the institution on quantitative metrics, the performance is categorised into High Performance metrics (strengths - the
metric score of an institution is maximum i.e 4 ) and Low Performing Metrics(weakness- the metric score of an institution is low i.e 0).
 Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the
Institution based on QnM ( Criterion IV,V,VI andVII)
4
Score 4
Strengths 4.1.4 4
Weakness 7.1.5.2 4 Strengths 4.2.3
Weakness 7.1.3 Strengths 4.42.5
3.5
Weakness 7.1.2.1.2 Strengths 4.2.6
4
3
Weakness 7.1.2.1.1 Strengths 4.2.7
2.5
4
Weakness 6.3.4 2 Strengths 4.3.2

1.5
4
Weakness 5.3.3 Strengths 4.3.4
1
0 0
0
00.5
0
Weakness 5.1.3 0 Streng4ths 4.4.1
0 0

Strengths47.1.5.2 Streng4ths 5.1.1

Strengths 7.1.4.1 Strengths 5.1.6

4 4

Strengths 7.1.2.1.6 Strengths 5.2.2

4 4
Strengths 7.1.1.1 Strengths 5.3.1

Str4engths 6.5.4 Strengths 5.4.2

Strengths 6.5.3 Strengths 5.4.3
4 Strengths 6.3.3 Strengths 6.2.3 4
4 4 4 4
 Process of Assessment and Accreditation

Two more Apply again

attempts in with IIQA fresh
Rejected
a year with and payment of
the same all fees QlM
fees PTV 30%
(QlM)
60 days
DVV Failed
SSR process Pre-
IIQA
Any time Q nM & Q l M (QnM) 30 qualifier QnM 70%
during the Accepted (Online 30% SGS Passed
GRADE
Submissio
days
year from
June 2018 n)
onwards 45 days

SSS
(QnM) 10%
or 100

F1
F2
 A BIG THANK YOU
•NAAC , BENGALURU and HOST OF UNKNOWN RESOURCE
PERSONS

•MANAGEMENT of GATES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

•IQAC CORODINATORS : DR KULLAYAPAA, DR ACHARI

•MY COLLEGUES:
DR SUNIL, DR PRASAD, DR SRINIVASULU,
O BHASKAR , NAGENDRA, RITESH, SANDILYA, RAJASHEKAR
AND RAMESH BABU (THE FLYER MAN)

LAST BUT NOT LEAST and THE MOST IMPORTANT

ALL THE PARTICIPANTS

 Be Safe …learn better

Before Covid 19 Because of Covid 19

[email protected]
and
[email protected]
Mobile No:
8374030055/9490082001