Polyoxygenated Cyclohexene Derivatives From Ellipeiopsis Cherrevensis
Polyoxygenated Cyclohexene Derivatives From Ellipeiopsis Cherrevensis
www.elsevier.com/locate/phytochem
Abstract
Aerial parts of Ellipeiopsis cherrevensis contained the polyoxygenated cyclohexenes zeylenol, ferrudiol and three analogs,
ellipeiopsols A, B and C. The C-1 stereochemistry of ferrudiol has been revised. # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ellipeiopsis cherrevensis; Annonaceae; Polyoxygenated cyclohexenes; Zeylenol; Ferrudiol; Ellipeiopsols A, B, C
Ellipeiopsis cherrevensis (Pierre ex Finet et Gagn.) R. The MeOH extract of the aerial parts on concentra-
E. Fries (Annonaceae, subfamily Annonoideae, tribe tion, precipitation of polar material from an EtOH–
Uvarieae) is one of only two species in the genus H2O solution, extraction with CHCl3 followed by col-
and is limited to Thailand and Cambodia. It has not umn and thin layer chromatography of the nonpolar
been studied previously. The genus is closely related fraction afforded five polyoxygenated cyclohexene deri-
to the genus Uvaria species of which have furnished vatives. The least polar substance was identified as zey-
acetogenins (Cavé et al., 1997) and polyoxygenated lenol (1a, Jolad et al. 1981; Pan and Yu, 1995a) by 1H
cyclohexene derivatives (Thebtaranonth and Thebt- and 13C NMR spectrometry, HMBC, COSY and
aranonth, 1986; Nkunya et al., 1987; Parmar et al., NOESY. A second substance was the new 3-acetate
1994; Liao et al., 1996, 1997; Pan and Yu, 1995a,b, analog 1b of zeylenol which we have named ellipeiopsol
1996; Pan et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 1998, 1999). Our A. Chemical shifts and coupling constants, HMBC and
study of the aerial parts has led to the isolation of the NOESY data (Table 1) showed that the acetate was
zeylenol (1a, Jolad et al., 1981), its new 3-acetate on C-3, the benzoate on C-7 and that conformer A
analog 1b, the new C-1 epi-derivatives 2a and 3a and resembled the predominant conformer, with H-3 pre-
ferrudiol (Schulte and Ganem, 1982; Schulte et al., dominantly axial and H-6 predominantly equatorial.
1982a) whose stereochemistry has been revised to 5a. A third constituent ellipeiopsol B was assigned struc-
ture 2a, epimeric at C-1 and C-6 compared with 1a,b, on
the basis of the NMR spectral data (Table 2) and the
formation of di- and triacetates 2b and 2c (Table 3). The
locations of the acetate at C-3 and the benzoate at C-7
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-850-644-2774; fax: +1-850-644-
were clear from the chemical shifts of H-3 and H-7a,b
8281. and from HMBC, COSY and NOESY experiments
E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Herz). while the chemical shifts and coupling constants
0031-9422/02/$ - see front matter # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0031-9422(01)00465-4
544 A. Kijjoa et al. / Phytochemistry 59 (2002) 543–549
involving H-2 and H-4 indicated a stereochemistry at also clearly manifested in the chemical shifts of C-2, C-
these centers similar to that of 1a and 1b but with a free 6, both 1 ppm downfield from C-2 and C-6 in 1a,b, and
hydroxyl on C-2. On the other hand the coupling con- C-7, 3 ppm upfield from C-7 in 1a,b (see also Table 7).
stants involving H-5 and H-6 differed and the chemical The downfield shifts of C-2 and C-6 are negated in the
shift of H-6 indicated the absence of an esterifying case of the triacetate 2c because of the effect produced
function on the C-6 hydroxyl which was now alpha by acylation of a neighboring hydroxyl. The coupling
orientated. constants suggest that 2b exists entirely in conformation
The remaining problem was the stereochemistry at C- C ( R1=H, R2=Ac) while in 2c conformation C (
1. Chemical shifts of H-7a,b differed somewhat from R1=H, R2=Ac) merely predominates. In both 2b and
those reported for an isomer, ovarigranol G, which has 2c the NOESY spectrum exhibited a cross peak between
the C-7 stereochemistry of 1a and 1b (Pan et al., 1998). H-7 and H-3 as required by C.
In the NOESY spectrum the absence of a cross peak A fourth substance, ellipeiopsol C (3a), was obviously
between H-7 and H-2, the latter clearly b-orientated in closely related to 2a with the same stereochemistry at C-
2a and triacetate 2c, indicated that the stereochemistry 1, C-2, C-3 and C-6 but with the benzoate at C-6 instead
at C-7 was inverted with a preference for conformation of at C-7 as shown by the 1H and 13C NMR data in
C (R1, R2=H) because of the magnitude of J2,3 (7.5 Hz) Table 4. The signals of H-7a,b were now at considerably
in 2a. The difference in the stereochemistry at C-1 was higher field while H-6 had moved downfield. The
A. Kijjoa et al. / Phytochemistry 59 (2002) 543–549 545
Table 1
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compound 1b (CDCl3)
1 75.70 s
2 4.09 d (6) 70.47 d H-3 H-3, 6,7a, b (5) 3
3 5.44 m (6, 2.5, 1.5) 73.33 d H-2, 4 H-2, 4,7a, b (5) 2, 4, 5, AcCO
4 5.68 dt (10, 2.5) 126.66 d H-3, 5 2, 3, 5, 6
5 5.91 ddd (10, 4, 2) 129.73 d H-4, 6 H-4, 6,(3, 3, 7a, b) 1, 4
6 4.30 brd (4) 68.68 d H-5, 7a, b H-2, 5, 7a, b 1.4, 5
7a 4.74 d (12.2) 66.55 t H-2 H-2, 3, 6, 7b (5) 1, 2, 6 fCO
7b 4.67 d (12.2) H-2
C=O 167.51 s
10 129.57 s
20 , 60 8.10 dd (8, 1) 129.73 d H-2, 6,30 , 50 H-30 , 50 20 , 40 , 60 , fCO
30 , 50 7.40 dd (8, 8) 128.46 d 10 , 30 , 50 , fCO
40 7.55 dd (8, 1) 133.44 d H-30 , 50 H-30 , 50
3-Ac 1.99 s (3p) 171.77 s
21.03 q AcCO
a
Assignments by HETCOR.
b
Weak interactions in parentheses.
Table 2
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compound 2a (CDCl3)a
1 76.32 s
2 4.13 d (7.5) 74.72 d H-3 and/or H-5, H-6 1, 3,4, 7
3 5.80–5.83 m 73.98 d H-2 H-2 1, 4,5, 3-CO
4 5.66 dt (10.3, 2.5) 124.89 d
5 5.81 dd (10.3, 2.2) 132.25 d H-2, 6 H-4 1, 4,5, 3-CO
6 4.46 d (2.2) 72.73 d H-2, H-3 and/or H-5 H-5 4, 5
7a 4.77 d (12) 63.37 t H-3 and/or H-5 H-7b 1, 2,6, fCO
7b 4.67 d (12) H-2
3-CO 166.58 s
7-CO 167.67 s
10 , 10 129.47 s H-2, 6,30 , 50 H-30 , 50 20 , 40 , 60 , fCO
20 , 60 200 , 60 8.00 dt (8, 1.4) 129.75, 129.67d H-2, 3,30 , 50 , 300 , 500 H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 70 , 60 , 2,6, 40 , 4,3-CO, 7-CO
30 , 50 , 300 , 500 7.36 td (8, 1.4) 128.39, 128.27 d 10 , 1, 30 , 3, 5, 3-CO, 7-CO
40 , 400 7.49 tt (8, 1.4) 133.24, 133.13 d H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 AcCO
a
Assignments by HETCOR.
chemical shifts of C-1, C-2 and C-6 in 3a exhibited the the hydroxyls on C-1 and C-2. Our own measurements,
expected changes produced by acylation at C-6 and including the previously unrecorded 13C NMR spectra,
deacylation at C-7 while conversion to a diacetate 3b for ferrudiol and its new diacetate are listed in Table 6.
and a triacetate 3c mirrored the shifts observed in the Although interpretation of the NOESY spectra was
conversion of 2a to 2b and 2c (Tables 5 and 7). The ring difficult due to superposition of signals the existence of a
coupling constants in the case of 3b and 3c indicate that cross peak between the H-3 and H-7 signals was evi-
the predominant if not exclusive conformations are C dent, an observation which could only be explained by
(R1=H, R2, R3=Ac resp. R1, R2, R3=Ac with Ac on reversing the stereochemistry at C-1 as in formulas 5a
C-7) as also shown by strong cross peaks between H-3 and 5b, with conformation C (R1, R2 on C-2=Ac, R2
and H-7 in the NOESY spectra. on C-6=Bz) predominant. Moreover the chemical shifts
The remaining substance was identical with ferrudiol of C-1, C-2, C-6 and C-7 were similar to those of 2a and
based on the 1H and 13C NMR spectra (Table 5), mp the shift changes on conversion of 5a to 5b closely par-
and rotation for which structure 4 including the abso- allel the shift changes which accompany the conversion
lute configuration was derived twenty years ago on the of 2a to 2c as is evident from the compilation in Table 7;
basis of the 1H NMR spectrum, formation of a tetra- in fact the chemical shifts in the 13C NMR spectra of 2c
and a pentabenzoate and CD measurements (Schulte et and ferrudiol diacetate are very similar.
al. 1982a,b). The stereochemistry assigned to C-1 was Structure 4 for ferrudiol was apparently based on the
based on the facile formation of a carbonate involving assumption that formation of a carbonate between the
546 A. Kijjoa et al. / Phytochemistry 59 (2002) 543–549
Table 3
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compounds 2b and 2c (CDCl3)a
2b 2c
1 75.37 s 82.14 s
2 5.67 d (8.8) 74.19 d 6.49 d (7.5) 70.14 d
3 5.91 ddd (8.8, 5.8, 2.2) 71.28 d 5.90 ddd (7.5, 4.7, 2.4) 71.13 d H-2,7a, b, 2́, 2, 6́, 6
4 6.00 dt (10.4, 2.2) 127.45 d 6.03 dt (10.5, 2.4) 126.76 d
5 5.76 dt (10.4, 2.2) 128.39 d 6.03 dt (10.5, 2.4) 128.16 d
6 5.70 dd (5.0, 2.4) 76.25 d 6.56 dd (5, 2.5) 68.88 d
7a 4.70 d (12.3) 64.23 t 4.90 d (11.9) 60.97 t H-2,3
7b 4.63 d (17.3) 4.71 d (11.9) H-3
3-CO 165.96 s 165.91 s165.71 s
7-CO 167.11 s
10 ,100 129.38 s, 129.28 s 129.43 s, 129.29 s
20 ,60 ,200 ,600 8.09 d, 8.07 d (8.2, 1.5) 129.79 d 8.00–8.07 m 129.79 d, 129.72 d
30 ,50 ,300 ,500 7.42–7.49 m 128.59 d, 128.55 d 7.42–7.51 m 128.57 d, 128.29 d
40 ,400 7.55–7.60 m 133.50 d, 133.46 d 7.55–7.62 m 128.57 d, 128.29 d
2-Ac 1.90 s (3p) 20.61 q, 170.30s 2.01 s corresponds to 20.62 q
6-Ac 2.08 s (3p) 20.92 q, 171.53 s 2.02 s corresponds to 21.98 q
7-Ac 2.06 s corresponds to 20.79 q
a
Assignments by HETCOR and HMBC.
Table 4
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compound 3a (CDCl3)a
1 75.54 s
2 4.19 d (8) 76.62 d H-3 H-3 C-7
3 5.78 m 73.98 d C1C2
4 5.82 dt (10, 5, 2.4) 127.18 d H-5
5 5.72 dd (10.5, 2.4) 128.47 d H-4 C-1, 3,6
6 5.82 m 75.64 d C-2.7
7a 4.17 d (12) 62.80 t H-7 C-1, 2,6
7b 4.09 d (12) C-1, 2,6
3-CO 166.17 s
6-CO 166.61 s
10 129.49 s
20 , 60 8.02 dd (8, 1.4) 129.78 s H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 7-CO, C-20 , 60 , C-40
30 , 50 7.39 tt (8, 1.4) 128.44 d H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 C-10 , C-100 , C-30 , 50 , C-300 , 500
40 7.53 td (8, 1.4) 133.28 d
100 129.36 s
200 , 600 8.00 dd (8) 129.72 d H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 , H-3 H-30 , 50 , 300 , 500 3-CO, C-200 , 600 , C-400
300 , 500 7.39 tt (8, 1.4) 128.34 d C-10 , C-100 , C-30 , 50 , C-300 , 500
400 7.53 td (8, 1.4) 133.39 d
a
Assignments by HETCOR.
Table 5
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compounds 3b and 3c
3b 3c
1 75.10 s 81.13 s
2 5.69 d (8.5) 73.74 d 6.47 d (6.5) 69.70 d H-7a,H-7b
3 5.78 ddd (8.5, 4.5, 2.2) 70.84 d 5.79 ddd (6.5, 4.5, 1.8) 70.71 d H-2,H-6,H-7a,H-7b,2.01,2.02 s
4 6.02 ddt (10.5, 2.2) 127.64 d 6.04 ddt (10.3, 3, 1.8) 126.83 d
5 5.78 dt (10.5, 2.2) 128.10 d 5.95 ddd (10.3, 1.8) 127.75 d
6 5.88 dd (4.5, 2.2) 76.27 d 6.70 dd (3.2, 2) 68.50 d
7a 4.60 d (11.8) 63.16 t 4.91 d (11.8) 60.42 t H-2́,6́,2,6
7b 4.40 d (11.8) 4.40 d (11.8) H-2́,6́,2,6
3-CO 165.91 s 165.86 s
6-CO 166.92 s 165.71 s
10 ,100 129.03 s, 129.22 s 129.31 s, 129.28 s
20 ,60 ,200 ,600 8.07 dd, 8.03 dd (8.4, 1.1) 129.19 d, 129.80 d 8.01–8.07 m 129.80 d, 129.72 d
30 ,50 ,300 ,500 7.43–7.51 m 128.59 d, 128.56 d 7.43–7.501 m 128.56 d, 128.52 d
40 ,400 7.57–7.65 m 133.77 d, 133.49 d 7.57–7.61 m 135.53 d, 133.45 d
2-OAc 2.09 s 20.79 q, 170.17 s 2.11 s 20.72 q, 169.23 s
7-OAc 1.93 s 20.67 q, 171.19 s 2.02 s 20.79 q, 170.00 s
1-OAc 2.01 s 22.03 q, 169.68 s
a
Assignments by HETCOR and HMBC.
Table 6
1
H (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) data for compounds 5a and 5b
5a 5b
a
Position H C COSY dH dCa NOESY
1 76.04 s 82.10 s
2 4.31 d (8.5) 75.43 d H-6 6.59 d (7) 70.08 d
3 5.82–5.85 m 76.77 d H-2 5.93 dt (10.3, 2.4) 71.13 d H-2, 7a, b,2, 6,2, 6,2, 6
4 6.01 dt (10.2, 1.6) 127.91 d H-5, 6 6.09 dt (10.3, 2.4) 126.93 d
5 5.88 dt (10.2, 1.6) 128.30 d 5.97 dt (10.3, 2.4) 128.14 d H-6
6 5.82–5.85 m 72.80 d 6.86 dd (5, 2.4) 69.10 d
7a 4.83 d (12) 62.68 t H-7b 5.06 d (11.8) 61.23 t H-3
7b 4.75 d (12) 4.77 d (11.8) H-3
3-CO 167.28 s 165.83 s
6-CO 166.52 s 165.42 s
7-CO 166.59 s 165.91 s
10 129.51 s 129.35 d
20 , 60 7.99 dd (8.5, 1.5) 129.85 d 7.99–8.05 m 129.82 d
30 , 50 7.47 tt (8, 1.5) 128.46 d H-20 , H0 , 60 , 2000 , 3000 , 5000 , 6000 7.38–7.53 m 128.51 d
4 7.60 tt (7.5, 1.5) 133.43 d H-30 , 50 7.53–7.61 m 133.49 d
100 129.34 s 129.32 s
200 , 600 8.10 dd (8.5, 1.5) 129.95 d H-300 , 500 7.99–8.05 m 129.73 d
300 , 500 7.34 tt (7.5, 1.5) 128.43 d 7.38–7.53 m 128.51 d
400 7.52 tt (7.5, 1.5) 133.13 d H-300 , 500 , 3000 , 5000 7.53–7.61 m 133.44 d
1000 128.88 s 129.16 s
2000 , 6000 7.91 dd (8.5, 1.5) 129.63 d H-3000 , 5000 7.99–8.05 m 129.73 d
3000 , 5000 7.32 tt (7.5, 1.5) 128.33 d 7.38–7.53 m 128.51 d
4000 7.47 tt (8, 1.5) 183.12 d 7.53–7.61 m
133.32 d
2:06 s 169:70; 22:07 q
1-OAc
2:03 s 169:32; 20:72 q
2-OAc
a
Assignments by HETCOR and HMBC.
548 A. Kijjoa et al. / Phytochemistry 59 (2002) 543–549
Yellowish gum, []b +22.8 (CHCl3, c=1.27 g/100 White crystals, mp 192–195 , (CHCl3, petrol), [a]b
ml); HRMS: +FAB 323.11305, C16H19O7 requires 156.9 (CHCl3, 0.217 g/100 mg) (lit Schulte et al., 1982,
323.11308; 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra in Table 1. mp 191–192, []-141 ) +FAB 489.15488, C281H25O8
A. Kijjoa et al. / Phytochemistry 59 (2002) 543–549 549
requires 489.15494, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra in Liao, Y.-H., Xu, L.-Z., Yang, S.-L., Sun, N.-S., 1996. Studies on the
Table 6. Acetylation of 25 mg with Ac2O-pyridine chemical constituents of Uvaria grandiflora. Zhongcaoyao 27, 824
(Chemical Abstracts 1996–125, 323022c).
overnight and work-up in the usual manner followed by
Liao, Y.-H., Xu, L.-Z., Yang, S.-L., Dal, J., Zhen, Y.-S., Zhu, M.,
purification of the crude product by TLC (CHCl3–pet- Sun, N.J., 1997. Three cyclohexene oxides from Uvaria grandiflora.
rol-HCO2H, 7525:0.1) afforded 19 mg of diacetate 5b as Phytochemistry 45, 729.
a gum whose 1H and 13C NMR spectra are also listed in Nkunya, M.H.H., Weenen, H., Koyl, N.J., Thijs, L., Zwanenburg, B.,
Table 6; ; EI–MS of 3b, m/z calc. for C32H28O10, 572; 1987. Cyclohexene epoxides, (+)-pandoxide, (+)-b-senepoxide and
found 572 (M+,7) 513 (12), 467 (10), 452 (7), 408 (5), ()-pipoxide from Uvaria pandensis. Phytochemistry 26, 2563.
Pan, X.P., Yu, D.-Q., 1995a. Two new oxygenated cyclohexenes from
390 (7), 348 (15), 331 (15), 285 (21), 269 (17), 244 (16), Uvaria grandiflora. Chinese Chemical Letters 6, 309 (Chemical
226 (32), 164 (21), 122 (35), 105 (100), 77 (30). Abstracts 1995–123, 29641d).
Pan, X.P., Chen, R.-Y., Yu, D.-Q., 1998. Polyoxygenated cyclohex-
enes from Uvaria grandiflora. Phytochemistry 47, 1063.
Pan, X.P., Yu, D.-Q., 1995b. Two new oxygenated cyclohexenes from
Uvaria grandiflora. Phytochemistry 40, 1709.
Parmar, V.S., Tyagi, O.D., Malhotra, A., Singh, S.K., Bisht, K.S.,
Acknowledgements Jain, R., 1994. Novel constituents of Uvaria species. Natural Pro-
ducts Reports 11, 219.
We want to thank Fundação para Ciência e Tecnolo- Schulte, G.R., Ganem, B., 1982. Studies on highly oxidized cyclohex-
gia (Unidade de I&D No. 226/94), POCTI (QCA III) enes. Structure and absolute configuration assignments. Tetra-
hedron Letters 23, 4299.
and FEDER for support. Schulte, G.R., Ganem, B., Chantrapromna, K., Kodpinid, M., Suds-
vansri, K., 1982a. The structure of ferrudiol, a highly oxidized con-
stituent of Uvaria ferruginea. Tetrahedron Letters 23, 284.
Schulte, G.R., Kodpinid, M., Thebtaranonth, C., Thebtaranonth, Y.,
References 1982b. Studies on highly oxidized cyclohexenes. Constitution of a
new key metabolic intermediate. Tetrahedron Letters 23, 4303.
Thebtaranonth, C., Thebtaranonth, Y., 1986. Naturally occurring
Cavé, A., Figadère, B., Laurens, A., Cortes, D., 1997. Acetogenins cyclohexene oxides. Accounts of Chemical Research 19, 84.
from Annonaceae. In: Herz, W., Kirby, G.W., Moore, R.E., Ste- Zhou, G.-X., Chen, R.-Y., Yu, D.Q., 1998. Two new polyoxygenated
glich, W., Tamm, Ch. (Eds.), Progress in the Chemistry of Organic cyclohexenes from Uvaria calamistrata uvacolol A, uvacolol B.
Natural Products. Vol. 70. Springer Verlag, Wien, New York, p. 82. Chinese Chemical Letters 6, 309 (Chemical Abstracts 1999, 131,
Jolad, S.D., Hoffmann, J.J., Schram, K.H., Cole, J.R., Tempesta, 308830v).
M.S., Bates, R.B., 1981. Structure of zeylenol and zeylene, con- Zhou, G.-X., Chen, R.-Y., Yu, D.Q., 1999. New polyoxygenated
stituents of Uvaria zeylanica (Annonaceae). J. Org. Chem. 46, cyclohexenes from Uvaria calanistrata. Journal of Asian Natural
4267. Products Research 1, 227 (Chemical Abstracts 1999, 131, 167690k).