Herpertz Et Al-2004-Obesity Research
Herpertz Et Al-2004-Obesity Research
* One study (43) does not indicate the mean follow-up period.
† Three studies (20,42,43) using a postdesign do not indicate drop-out rates.
‡ The study of Powers et al. (34) had a drop-out rate of 57% (see text).
§ Weight loss was indicated in BMI units on kilograms.
Barrash et al. (58), 138 (151); women, 138; ma, 12 Standardized questionnaire 37.5 ⫾ 15.5 kg Severe psychological problems presurgery
VBG 35.6 ⫾ 10 years; dor, 8.6% predicted lower absolute weight loss postsurgery
Brolin et al. (52), 42 (56); women, 30; men, 12; 18 Semistructured interview, 30.3 kg Positive predictor of weight loss: lower initial
horizontal ma, 36.6 to 47.0 years, dor, standardized questionnaires, percentage above ideal weight, younger age, low
gastroplasty 25% clinical interview number of preoperative food contacts, higher
levels of psychological stress; no predictor:
socioeconomic status
Busetto et al. (30), 80; women, 57; men, 23; ma, 12 Clinical interview, 24 hour BMI, 12.4 BED was a predictor of higher vomiting frequency
ASGB 36 ⫾ 11 years, dor, 0% dietary recall, vomiting and higher rate of neostoma stenosis; vomiting
diary frequency determined the rate of medical
complications; no predictor of weight loss: BED
Busetto et al. (53), 250 (women, 260; men, 188; 36 Clinical interview BMI, 9.8 Positive predictor of weight loss: age ⬍ 40 years,
LAGB ma, 72; 37.6 ⫹ 10.8 BMI ⬍50 kg/m2; negative predictor: male sex,
Psychosocial Predictors of Obesity Surgery, Herpertz et al.
1557
1558
Table 3. continued
Study, authors, Mean
type of surgical follow-up Assessment methods
procedure Sample period and measures Weight loss Predictors
Gentry et al. (44), 33 (33); women, 32; men, 1; 24 Standardized interview, 83% lost ⬎50% of Positive predictor of weight loss: eating in
gastric bypass ma, 32 years; dor, 0% standardized questionnaires excess weight response to pleasant feelings or a sense of
accomplishment, realizing preoperatively that
overeating was the cause of obesity; high levels
of optimism were not associated with weight
loss
Hafner et al. (45), 71 (118); (women, 83; men, 12 Standardized questionnaires 35.4 kg; BMI, 13.1 Positive predictor of weight loss: marital
gastric bypass 35); ma, not indicated; dor, dissatisfaction, increase in phobia scores;
39.8% negative predictor: generalized anxiety, increase
in extrapunitiveness
Kopec-Schrader et al. 45 (60); women, 41; men, 4; 108 Structured interview, self-made BMI, 9.4 No predictor of weight: demographic features, age
(50), VBG ma, 37 years; dor, 25% questionnaire at surgery, family and patient history of obesity,
patient weight at the time of marriage, patient
history of significant life events, emotional
Powers et al. (34), 43 (100; women, 85; men, 12 Clinical interview, 43.8 kg No difference in weight loss between hospitalized
VBG comparison of 15; two deaths); ma, 38.8 standardized questionnaires psychiatric group and matched controls;
the group requiring years; dor, 57% predictor of postoperative psychiatric
psychiatric hospitalization: presurgical psychiatric
hospitalization (17%) hospitalization, presence of multiple axis I
with 16 matched diagnosis, untreated axis I diagnosis
patients of the
sample
Powers et al. (17), 81 关131; women, 111; men, 68.4 Clinical interview, 41 kg; BMI, 14.0 No predictor of weight loss: age, gender, presence,
gastric restrictive 20; five deaths (one standardized questionnaires, or absence of a presurgical psychiatric
surgery suicide); ma, 39.4 years兴; self-made questionnaire diagnosis; no relationship between the presence
dor: 38.2% or absence of a presurgical psychiatric diagnosis
and various mental health parameters
Powers et al. (55), 77 (116; five deaths, one 66 Clinical interview, BMI, 13.8 kg/m2 No relationship between presurgical eating
gastric restrictive suicide); women, 64; men, standardized questionnaire, pathology and weight loss or presence of
Psychosocial Predictors of Obesity Surgery, Herpertz et al.
surgery 13; ma, 39.6 ⫾ 9.3 years, self-made questionnaire vomiting at follow-up
dor, 33.6%
Schrader et al. (46), 39 (72; women, 66; men, 6, 36 Semistructured interview 33 kg No predictor of weight loss: age, gender, marital
gastroplasty, ma, 41 years); dor, 45.8% status, socioeconomic status, past psychiatric
gastric, bypass, history, parental/spouse support for surgery,
gastrogastrostomy violent parents/spouse
Sugerman et al. (41), A, 16 (20; women, 18; men, 36 Clinical interview, 24-hour A, 41.3 ⫾ 12.7 kg; B, VBGP: “sweets eaters” lost significantly less
VBG (A) and 2); ma, 38 ⫾ 9 years (one recall, 2-day diary food 27.2 ⫾ 14.5 kg excess weight than “nonsweets eaters”; RYGBP:
RYGB (B) death); dor, 20%; B, 18 frequency check no significant difference between sweets and
randomized (20; women, 18; men, 2; nonsweets eaters
prospective trial ma, 38 ⫾ 11 years; two
deaths); dor, 10%
Sugerman et al. (64), 222 (age and gender not 36 Dietary history (24-hour recall, Weight loss, A, Sweets eating is a negative predictor for weight
sweet eaters (A) indicated); A, 182 (82%); 2-day food diary, food 35 ⫾ 11%; B, loss in the frame of restrictive surgery but not in
3 gastric bypass B, 40 (18%); dor, 15% frequency checklist) 27 ⫾ 13% the frame of bypass surgery procedures
nonsweet eaters
(B) 3 VBG
Valley and Grace 49 (57; women, 51; men, 6; 12.7 Clinical interview, 43 kg No predictor of weight loss but of significant
(56), horizontal ma, 38 years); dor, 14.3% standardized questionnaire, medical complications: prior inpatient (but not
gastroplasty self-made questionnaire outpatient) psychiatric history, elevated scores of
the personality questionnaire, negative life events,
1559
no predictor at all: sociodemographic factors
1560
Table 3. continued
Study, authors, Mean
type of surgical follow-up Assessment methods
procedure Sample period and measures Weight loss Predictors
van Gemert et al. 62 (68); women, 44; men, 18; 85.9 ⫾ 4.8 Standardized questionnaire 45 kg Positive predictor of weight loss: self-esteem; no
(47), gastric ma, 33.1 ⫹ 9.4 years; dor, predictor: intelligence, personality features,
bypass, VBG 10% interpersonal behavior
Yale and Weiler (28) 195 (200), F: 150, M: 45; A: 12 Clinical interview, self-made A: 34.0 ⫾ 13.61 Negative predictor of weight loss: consumption of
VBG A: 4.5 cm F: 79, M: 19; ma: questionnaire B: 34.9 ⫾ 10.89 caloried liquid and/or soft foods; no predictor:
circumference B: 38.6 ⫾ 9.1 year B: F: 71, age, gender, unemployment, preoperative mental
5.0 cm M: 26; ma: 35.6 ⫾ 9.2 health problems
circumference years, dor (total sample):
2.5%
Postsurgery assessment only (months after operation)
Cook and Edwards 100 (selection criteria, 0 84 (Phone) interview, self-made 42.2 kg Positive predictor of weight loss: eating three well-
(42), gastric indicated); women, 95; questionnaire balanced meals and two snacks daily, drinking
bypass men, 5; ma, not indicated water, avoiding carbonated beverages, taking
ASGB, adjustable silicone gastric banding; dor, drop out rate; LASGB, laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding; ma, mean age; NES, night eating syndrome.
the score of personality traits and degree of weight change.
Valley and Grace (56) examined the predictive utility of
several classes of variables including psychiatric history and
Predictors
weight.
Psychiatric Status
As was shown in our previous review (14), presurgery
prevalence of axis I psychiatric disorders according to the
criteria of the DSM (23), DSM-R (62), varies between
27.3% (44) and 41.8% (63) and of axis II between 22% and
follow-up
period
Mean
postoperative
Cross-sectional
only four studies suggested an impact of psychiatric comor- psychiatric symptoms and required hospitalization (34). The
bidity and symptoms on postsurgery weight loss (45,48, hospitalized group was compared with a matched group
49,52), whereas the other 10 studies failed to find any drawn from the original 100 patients. The two groups were
association. The two retrospective studies (18,36) demon- similar in terms of presurgical weights and weight lost 3 and
strated an association between psychiatric variables and 12 months after surgery. However, the hospitalized group
course of weight. However, a considerable number of stud- was more likely to have had previous psychiatric hospital-
ies found a significant association between presurgery di- izations, multiple axis I diagnoses, and untreated axis I
agnoses of psychiatric symptoms and disorders and various diagnoses at the time of the presurgical assessment. Similar
mental health parameters at follow-up (20,24,30,31,34, findings were obtained by Davidson et al. (57), who were
48,56). also not able to demonstrate any effect of major psychiatric
Dubovsky et al. (49) observed a statistically significant symptoms on the postoperative course of weight; however,
positive correlation between the degree of clinically esti- the occurrence of postoperative psychiatric problems corre-
mated preoperative depression and the percentage of body lated closely with preoperative psychological assessment.
weight loss after surgery, speculating that patients who do Hafner et al. (45), assessing 71 patients undergoing gastric
not express as much distress before surgery may be less bypass, identified generalized anxiety and phobia to be
dissatisfied with their weights and less willing to extend negatively associated with weight loss after a follow-up
themselves in the service of postoperative weight loss than period of 1 year. In contrast, Delin et al. (20), in their
patients who are more upset by their obesity and more retrospective study of 20 gastric bypass patients with a
motivated to diet once barriers to weight loss are reduced by 2-year follow-up, could not find anxiety to be associated
surgery. However, psychiatric disturbances such as depres- with weight loss.
sion, anxiety, psychosocial crisis, and suicidal ideation that In a qualitative comparison of the criteria of the individ-
did not seem to be an imminent result of obesity were ual studies (prospective study design, adequate sample size,
associated with less weight loss; this was also confirmed by and low drop-out rate), the study of Larsen (48) must be
Hafner et al. (45). Brolin et al. (52) found a level of emphasized. Because of the large sample of 103 patients
psychological stress to be positively related to weight loss. undergoing horizontal gastric banding surgery and a small
Valley and Grace (56) tried to isolate psychological predic- drop-out rate of only 7% after 3 years, the Norwegian study
tors of outcome in 57 patients with horizontally reinforced is of major importance with regard to possible psychiatric
gastric surgery 1 year after surgery. Prior inpatient psychi- predictors of postsurgery weight loss. All 103 patients were
atric history (but not outpatient history), negative life interviewed and rated on DSM (23). Larsen (48) identified
events, and low social support related significantly to med- a group with insufficient weight loss that had a significantly
ical complications. Prior inpatient psychiatric history and higher frequency of personality disorder diagnoses with no
low social support also predicted psychological complica- predominance of any distinct personality disorder compared
tions postoperatively. However, there were no significant with the rest of the patients. Moreover, a group of patients
relationships between weight loss and psychopathology. with negative psychosocial outcome was found. This group
Dixon et al. (54), Kopec-Schrader et al. (50), Schrader et al. was characterized by a higher frequency of preoperative
(46), and Yale and Weiler (28) investigated prospectively psychiatric help-seeking than the rest of the patients. Inter-
samples of obesity surgery patients ranging from 60 to 440 estingly, this pattern was most evident in a subgroup of
patients for a period of at least 1 year; however, they were these patients who had a negative psychosocial reaction
not able to identify a history of mental illness or measures despite sufficient weight loss. Preoperative psychopathol-
of mental health to be predictive of weight loss. Davidson et ogy, defined as contact with health services for psychiatric
al. (57) reviewed patients undergoing VBG with regard to problems or manifest personality disorder, was associated
preoperative psychological assessment and postoperative with negative outcome results. However, the degree of
outcome, grouping them into three broad categories (no
contact with health services for psychiatric reasons before
psychiatric abnormality, minor psychiatric disorders, major
the operation was highly correlated to the score on the same
psychiatric disturbance). Psychiatric morbidity had no ad-
variable in the follow-up period and not associated with the
verse effect in terms of postoperative weight loss or post-
degree of weight loss.
operative complications such as vomiting. Similar results
were obtained by Powers et al. (17), who found neither a
relationship between the presence or absence of a presurgi- Eating Patterns and Eating Pathology
cal psychiatric diagnosis and weight loss nor an influence of Ten studies (28 –30,32,41,44,52,53,55,64) evaluating eat-
various mental health parameters on weight loss in a sample ing patterns and eating pathology as possible predictors of
of 131 patients after a follow-up period of more than 5 weight loss had a prospective design, whereas six studies
years. In another study, they assessed psychiatric status of (20,25,31,42,43) had a retrospective design or compared
100 patients before surgery; of these, 17% developed severe different subsamples pre- and postsurgery (24). Four studies
investigated postsurgery eating patterns as a possible pre- showed that no association was observed between intake of
dictor for postoperative course of weight (28,29,31,32). sugar and sweet foods before surgery and weight loss at 2
Not only patients suffering from eating disorders, espe- years after surgery. Similar findings were obtained by
cially BED, but also sweets eaters, and here especially those Busetto et al. (30) studying 260 patients prospectively over
who undergo gastric restrictive surgery, are believed to have a period of 36 months and Hudson et al. (43) studying 200
poor outcomes. Sugerman et al. carried out two studies patients within the scope of a retrospective evaluation. All
(41,64): VBG was compared with RYGB in a randomized these authors challenged the hypothesis that sweets eating is
prospective trial that included preoperative dietary separa- predictive of the outcome after gastric restrictive surgery.
tion of sweets eaters vs. nonsweets eaters (41). The patient They found that sweets eaters were just as likely to be
was classified as a sweets eater if he or she consumed ⬎300 successful as nonsweets eaters.
calories of sweet foods or beverages more than three times Apart from the evaluation of the foods preferred, e.g.,
per average week. Greater weight loss was demonstrated foods high in simple sugars and calorie-containing bever-
with gastric bypass, supposedly due to the development of ages, three studies (20,32,44) investigated eating behavior
dumping syndrome symptoms in sweets eaters after gastric as a possible predictor of postsurgery weight loss. Gentry et
bypass. It was noted that sweets eaters lost significantly less al. (44) showed that the patients who ate in response to
weight than nonsweets eaters with VBG 1 year after sur- pleasant feelings or a sense of accomplishment lost more
gery. In the second study (64), Sugerman classified “sweets weight after operation than did those who ate in response to
eaters” as subjects consuming ⬎15% of total caloric intake stress, suggesting the institution of new reward systems not
in the form of sweet foods such as candy, cake, ice cream, based on food. Delin et al. (20) found a negative relation-
or caloric beverages. Nonsweets eaters were assigned to ship between the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire sub-
VBG and sweets eaters to gastric bypass. Weight loss after scale “disinhibition” and percentage weight lost, i.e., sub-
VBG was significantly improved 2 years postoperatively, jects who tend not to respond to emotional disinhibitors
with selective assignment of all sweets eaters to gastric such as anxiety or loneliness by eating lost a greater per-
bypass without any loss of efficacy in the gastric bypass centage of excess weight after surgery.
group. Although gastric bypass was statistically more effec- Examining pre- and postsurgery predictors, Lang et al.
tive with regard to percentage excess weight lost than VBG, (32) assessed the eating behavior of 66 obese patients before
it was associated with a greater incidence of considerable and 1 year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
side effects such as stomal stenosis, marginal ulcer, and (LAGB) by means of standardized questionnaires such as
vitamin B12 deficiency. Yale and Weiler (28) assessed the German version of the Three-Factor Eating Question-
eating behavior by means of a four-part scale (volume of naire (66). Results indicated significant changes after sur-
solid food, amount of liquid calories consumed per day, gery, with dramatically increased levels of “cognitive re-
frequency of eating large amounts of soft food, and snack- straint” and “flexible control” and simultaneous decreases
ing between meals). Postoperative eating behavior dramat- of disinhibition and “hunger”; however, the change in the
ically affected weight loss, although the food consumed did eating behavior as a postoperative predictor did not seem to
not exclusively have a sweet taste but also consisted of be directly associated with the observed weight loss.
“chips and dips.” Among the patients who lost ⬍20% of Especially with regard to the controversial discussion as
their original weight, 25% drank large volumes of calories to whether sweets eating has a predictive function for the
as liquids, whereas 75% ate large amounts of soft foods. course of weight, three carefully designed studies must once
Cook and Edwards (42) studied the eating behavior of a more be emphasized (29,41,64): The results of the study of
sample of 100 patients 1 year after gastric bypass. Success- Lindroos et al. (29) may be contrasted with two studies by
ful patients, defined as those who maintained at least 74% of Sugerman et al. (41,64). One fundamental difference be-
the initial weight loss, ate three well-balanced meals and tween the Swedish study (29) and Sugerman’s studies
two snacks daily, drank water, and avoided carbonated (41,64) was the difference in design: Sugermans’s patients
beverage of any kind. Apart from the issue of sweets or were randomized (41) or selected (64) for type of operation
nonsweets eaters, Brolin et al. (52) demonstrated that the based on dietary preferences, whereas the surgical part of
number of preoperative food contacts in the sense of fre- the SOS study (29,65) was observational in the context of
quent snacking per day was likely to be associated with diet. Furthermore, Sugerman et al. (41,64) reported primar-
inadequate weight loss. In an extensive study, Lindroos et ily on intake of sweet foods before surgery, whereas the
al. (29) used data from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) SOS study (29,65) also monitored changes in intake pat-
study (65) to test the hypothesis that a diet containing many terns after surgery. Another potential difference is of con-
sweet foods is associated with poor weight loss after gas- cern when considering the three studies: Sugerman et al.
troplasty. A total of 375 subjects were followed for 2 years (64) classified sweets eaters as subjects consuming ⬎15%
after VBG or gastric banding, and questionnaires were used of total caloric intake in the form of sweet foods. Lindroos
to evaluate diet both before and after surgery. Results et al. (29) pointed out that in the SOS study, 62% of the
women consumed ⬎15% of their calories in form of sweet which was consistent with the recurring theme during the
foods. By this definition, differences between sweets eating interviews that patients purposely overate knowing that it
patterns in obese and nonobese women were fairly small, might result in vomiting. The study of Mitchell et al. (31),
and, more important, nonsweets eaters were a minority in although reporting retrospectively, has several strengths in-
both groups. Therefore, other important selection criteria for cluding a standardized questionnaire, a sample size of 100
the Sugerman studies must be discussed; for example, pa- patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery, and a long-term
tients who were unusually health-conscious or cooperative (13- to 15-year) follow-up with a relatively small drop-out
might have been selected for VGB by applying the criteria rate of 12%. With regard to BED, the majority of individ-
of ⬍15% sweet foods as a cut-off point. uals who met criteria for BED did not meet such criteria at
long-term follow-up, even when the criterion for eating a
Binge Eating large amount of food was excluded. With regard to post-
A substantial percentage of bariatric surgery patients suf- surgery predictors, it is relevant that those who developed
fer from BED as a newly defined provisional eating disorder BED symptoms after the procedure tended to regain more
category included in the DSM (67) or BE symptoms in the weight. Furthermore, de Zwaan et al. (24), using a cross-
sense of overeating episodes that are accompanied by both sectional design, compared the Mitchell et al. (31) sample of
a subjective loss of control and significant emotional dis- 78 patients with a preoperative control group of 110 pa-
tress. Prevalence rates range from 7.3% (68) to 49% tients. They showed that patients suffering from BED had a
(31,69), respectively. Of the six studies explicitly evaluating significantly higher BMI at follow-up, and their weight loss
BED as a possible predictor of weight loss and mental since surgery was significantly less than that of non-BED
health, three studies used a prospective design (30,53,55), patients. Similar results were obtained by Pekkarinen et al.
two a retrospective design (25,31), and one study compared (25) in their retrospective but questionnaire-based study
different subsamples pre- and postsurgery (24). Busetto et assessing a smaller sample of 25 patients who had under-
al. (30,53) performed two studies analyzing the relation- gone VBG more than 5 years previously. BE behavior
ships among BED, eating pattern, vomiting frequency, emerged as the main predictive factor for poor weight loss.
weight loss, and the rate of band-related complications in It is striking that with regard to BED and the postopera-
patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric band- tive course of weight, the three prospective studies
ing. In the earlier study (30), patients with BED had a (30,53,55) were not able to demonstrate any connection;
significantly higher vomiting frequency and a 5-fold higher however, the two retrospective studies (25,31) demonstrated
frequency of neostoma stenosis than patients without BED. BED to be a negative predictor. Only Mitchell et al. (31)
However, the percentage of overweight lost did not differ investigated patients with gastric bypass, whereas the four
between patients with or without BE. Vomiting was a major other studies (25,30,53,55) were concerned exclusively with
determinant of global outcome after adjustable silicone gas- restrictive surgery procedures. Concerning the question of
tric banding. Interestingly, in the later study (53), prior BED whether BE represents a negative predictor for the postop-
did not significantly affect the 3-year outcome. The authors erative course of weight, the follow-up period and the
assumed that the preoperative psychological treatment of differentiation between pre- or postsurgery predictors are
patients in the second study with postoperative reinforce- relevant. Thus, Pekkarinen’s patients (25) did not differ in
ment affected the prognosis favorably. Powers et al. (55) body weight 1 year after surgery; this corresponds to the
assessed the relationship of presurgical eating pathology follow-up period of the Busseto (30,53) studies. However,
and weight outcome in 116 patients before bariatric surgery more than 5 years later, weight regain was significantly
(gastric restrictive procedures). The prevalence of BE was higher in the BE compared with the non-BE patients. Fi-
52% presurgery. After an average follow-up period of 5 nally, it is important to point out that in the Mitchell et al.
years, there was no reported BE among any of the patients, study (31), only those who redeveloped BE symptoms post-
probably related to the fact that the gastric restrictive pro- surgery regained weight. However, in the Powers et al. (55)
cedures make it physiologically very difficult to binge eat. study, not a single case of binging could be detected at
Psychopathology was greater in the BE group compared follow-up.
with the non-BE group. There was evidence of more cog-
nitive distortions, greater body image disturbance, and an Other Psychosocial Variables
increased level of depression for this group. Although no The predictive value of other psychosocial variables has
relationship between presurgical eating pathology and been examined. Marital dissatisfaction (45), high levels of
weight outcome or presence of vomiting could be observed life stress (52), and low self-esteem (20,47) have been
at follow-up, the authors described a new eating pathology. shown to be positive predictors of weight loss at follow-up.
Of the patients, 79% were occasionally vomiting, and one- Valley and Grace (56) and Delin et al. (20) could not
third were vomiting at least weekly. Powers et al. (55) identify social support to be of predictive value for weight
postulated that some patients would binge eat if they could, loss postsurgery.
Age and Presurgery Body Weight reduction defined as ⬍20% to 30% (15–17,19,20) com-
Ten studies (33,46,48,50,52–54,56 –58), all with a pro- pared with these weight loss results, the question as to
spective design, have evaluated age as a possible predictor possible predictors of postoperative weight loss is of sub-
of weight loss after bariatric surgery, yielding inconsistent stantial interest. Besides weight reduction and the associ-
data. Six studies (33,48,52–54,58) reported age to be sig- ated decrease in medical risk factors, one further goal of
nificantly correlated with absolute weight loss. Younger obesity surgery is the improvement of QoL where medical,
patients tended to lose more weight postsurgery. Four stud- psychological, and psychosocial variables merge.
ies (46,50,56,57), however, found age not to be predictive of All reviewed studies reported substantial weight loss after
postsurgery weight loss. With regard to the predictive value, surgery. In terms of predicting the course of weight, post-
the studies did not differ considerably in the mean age of the surgery data are inconsistent. However, some conclusions
single samples. Presurgery body weight is highly correlated can be drawn.
with weight loss; however, the absolute weight at follow-up Either personality traits do not predict postoperative
is of major importance. Therefore, only studies indicating course of weight (20,44,51,56,58) or the definition of per-
the absolute weight at follow-up were considered (45,52– sonality used in the respective studies was too broad (20) for
54,57,58). All six studies measuring absolute weight at application in daily clinical routine. Evidence of the rela-
follow-up found that patients who were more overweight tionship of psychiatric disorders or psychopathologic symp-
preoperatively had less successful weight loss. toms and the course of postsurgery weight is meager. Con-
trary to clinical assumptions, the majority of studies could
Predictors of QoL not identify psychiatric comorbidity as a negative predictor
Dixon et al. performed two studies (33,54) assessing QoL for weight loss. In single studies, increased psychological
as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire in 218 and 383 distress as assessed through higher levels of depression
patients, respectively, before and 1 year after Lap-Band (20,49) and anxiety (20,45,49), elevated SCL-90 profiles
placement. Poor physical ability as a major aspect of QoL (52), elevated phobia scores (45), and low self-esteem
before surgery was a clear predictor for a lower rate of (20,47) before surgery even appeared to be positively asso-
weight loss on the postoperative course of weight (54). ciated with weight loss after surgery. If at all, poor weight
Conversely, the percentage excess weight loss (EWL) at 1 loss after surgery can be observed in patients suffering from
year follow-up was not a major (postsurgery) predictor in serious and chronic psychiatric disorders requiring inpatient
improved QoL (33). In contrast, de Zwaan et al. (24) com- psychiatric treatment (56) and personality disorders (48),
pared the Mitchell et al. (31) sample of 78 patients with a which are distinguished by a lack of introspection. A cau-
preoperative control group of 110 patients with regard to tious interpretation of the partly conflicting results could be
QoL, also using the SF-36 questionnaire. They showed that that, contrary to distress independent of or only reinforced
reduction in BMI between baseline and a ⬎13-year fol- by obesity, obesity-associated psychological distress such
low-up accounted for a significant proportion of variance in as low self-esteem, depression and anxiety, and social pho-
physical well-being. Patients with preoperative arthritis/ bia resulting in social isolation probably predicts more
joint pain had greater improvement in most aspects of QoL postsurgical weight loss. Patients suffering from serious and
than did other patients with measures close to those of chronic psychiatric diseases such as personality disorders
community normal values. Patients reporting a history of might have more difficulties in adapting to the major de-
depression preoperatively also improved in QoL; further- mands of controlled eating behavior imposed on them by
more, they demonstrated that BED after surgery negatively the operation. Apart from the question of whether psycho-
influenced mental well-being as measured by the mental logical distress results from obesity or vice versa, i.e.,
composite scores of the SF-36 (24). whether obesity results from a dysfunctional regulation of
negative affects or is more an independent variable, the
severity of the emotional problems and not the presence or
Discussion absence of emotional problems might be predictive of
The superiority of obesity surgery, as opposed to conser- weight loss. As Vallis and Ross (71) pointed out almost a
vative weight reduction measures, with regard to improving decade ago, distress based on serious psychiatric distur-
the medical (8 –12) and psychosocial outcome variables bance is probably an impediment to obesity surgery,
(14) in subjects with obesity grade III is undisputed. Weight whereas distress based on the experience of being morbidly
loss is characteristically on the order of one-third of preop- obese is probably a positive predictor of outcome. Even if
erative weight, which corresponds to 55% to 65% of excess prevalence of psychiatric disorders except personality dis-
weight (70). EWL is greater after gastric bypass than after orders is decisively less after surgery (14,44,48,63), there
simple gastroplasty, and more malabsorptive operations, seems to be a significant association between at least serious
such as biliopancreatic bypass, occasionally result in losses presurgery psychiatric symptoms and various mental health
of 80% of excess weight. In view of an inadequate weight parameters (20,24,31,34,48,53,56) or medical complica-
tions (56) at follow-up. According to Larsen (48) and Valley attempts to binge eat, as Powers et al. (55) have hypothe-
and Grace (56), personality disorders or a prior inpatient sized, has yet to be investigated in further studies.
psychiatric history had a predictive value for the postoper- This systematic review has several limitations: Compar-
ative psychiatric course. The study of Larsen (48) not only ison of the individual studies entails several problems based
showed that personality disorders were associated with in- on the study designs, methods of operation, investigation
sufficient weight loss but also demonstrated that patients instruments, and observation periods. Even if according to
with negative psychosocial reaction despite a sufficient our exclusion criteria, studies except one (34) with a drop-
weight loss were characterized mainly by a high frequency out rate of ⬎50% were not included in our study, the
of preoperative psychiatric help-seeking. One explanation average drop-out rate was 20%. Nevertheless, there was a
may be that these patients suffer from two different dis- wide range from 0% to 50%, so that for many studies the
eases, strictly speaking, that psychopathology might be un- question arises as to how representative they are.
related to body weight or obesity. Another explanation may Gastric bypass is superior to purely restrictive types of
be that although patients with personality disorders do not surgery for weight reduction; however, because few studies
manage to restrict their eating behavior after the operation are, at present, available that have investigated gastric by-
and, therefore, do not lose weight adequately, the group pass and restrictive surgery in subgroups of obese patients,
with major mental disorders complies with the required it is yet too early to discuss a possible specificity of predic-
eating behavior after surgery and loses weight but develops tors for different surgical procedures. Finally, it must be
an increase in psychiatric symptoms or a decrease in general understood that patients in the vast majority of studies
well-being instead (34). Also with regard to eating patterns survived a number of selection biases and cannot be re-
and eating pathology, it seems to be less the specificity, e.g., garded as representative of all morbidly obese patients
the question as to the extent of the consumption of sweets seeking obesity surgery. They have actively pursued weight
(18), but rather the extent of inadequate or disturbed eating reduction, were selected for referral to a surgeon by their
general practitioner, and, finally, were frequently inter-
behavior that influences the postoperative weight loss. Al-
viewed by a psychiatrist or psychologist before acceptance
though in the majority of the studies, sweets eaters were not
for surgery. Therefore, most results presented here are based
regarded to be a risk group for the postoperative course of
not on random but on highly selected samples, making it
weight (29,43,53), patients with a generally hypercaloric
difficult to draw general conclusions for clinical practice.
presurgery intake of foods such as sweets, chips, soft drinks
Because of these selection biases, we can assume that the
etc., which may be regarded as inadequate compliance,
outcome results from which possible predictors have been
might have an increased risk for a negative course of weight
derived, for example with regard to psychiatric comorbidity,
postsurgery (28,42,52). One important predictor may also
rather represent false positive than negative results. Never-
be the motivation on which the eating behavior is based.
theless, it seems that apart from serious psychiatric disor-
Eating as a way and means of reducing stress may be ders, including personality disorders, the predictive value of
regarded as a negative predictor for the postoperative course a psychiatric diagnosis according to DSM or ICD criteria
of weight as opposed to a controlled enjoyable eating be- with regard to weight loss postoperatively has been overes-
havior (44). However, an excessive energy intake in both timated in the past. Body weight is regulated by more-or-
quantity and quality may not only be an expression of less unknown complex cybernetic mechanisms that are af-
inadequate compliance but may also be determined biolog- fected by both psychological and biological-genetic factors
ically. For example, intake of large quantities of food may (75,76) Psychiatric comorbidity is only one aspect in this
be genetically determined. Recently, mutations in the mela- multidimensional cybernetic system. Furthermore, psychi-
nocortin receptor-4 gene have been implicated in BE (72) atric comorbidity may be a completely independent disor-
and a poor prognosis (73). Although these findings are der. On the other hand, it may have a decisive influence on
viewed controversially (26,74), they nevertheless point to body weight in the sense that eating has regulatory functions
the possibility that the aberrant eating behavior associated for unbearable emotions. Considering possible predictors
with a poor prognosis after bariatric surgery might, in part, for weight loss postsurgery, the sole diagnosis of a psychi-
have a genetic basis. atric disorder may be insufficient. What is additionally
With regard to BED being a negative predictor on the required is the assessment of the effect of a given psychi-
postoperative course of weight, the discrepancy between atric diagnosis on quantity and quality of the patient’s eating
prospective and retrospective studies may be resolved in behavior. Psychiatric comorbidity may also serve as an
that the redevelopment of BED postsurgery rather than BED important tool to estimate mental and physical well-being,
before surgery is of predictive value. Furthermore, restric- which are both essential aspects of QoL. There is an in-
tive surgery procedures are ineffective if pureed or hyper- creasing demand for obesity surgery to be performed only
caloric liquid food (e.g., chocolate or soft drinks) are con- by specialists in specialized centers. It seems appropriate
sumed. Whether vomiting is the consequence of failed that these centers cooperate with mental health profession-
als who are familiar with obesity in general and obesity multidisciplinary management of severe obesity. Am J Surg.
surgery-related problems in particular. 1995;169:361–7.
Future research should focus less on psychiatric comor- 16. Hsu LK, Benotti PN, Dwyer J, et al. Nonsurgical factors that
bidity and general psychological constructs such as person- influence the outcome of bariatric surgery: a review. Psycho-
som Med. 1998;60:338 – 46.
ality disorders as possible predictors of postsurgery weight.
17. Powers PS, Rosemurgy A, Boyd F, Perez A. Outcome of
Instead, specific aspects of the eating behavior with special gastric restriction procedures: weight, psychiatric diagnoses,
consideration of both motivation systems and the relation- and satisfaction. Obes Surg. 1997;7:471–7.
ship of energy intake and consumption should be evaluated. 18. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM, et al. Gastric bypass
for treating severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:560 – 6S.
19. Pessina A, Andreoli M, Vassallo C. Adaptability and com-
Acknowledgments pliance of the obese patient to restrictive gastric surgery in
This work was supported by The Deutsche Forschungs- short term. Obes Surg. 2001;11:459 – 63.
gemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) Grants HE 20. Delin CR, Watts JM, Bassett DL. An exploration of the
2665/2-1 and HE 2665/2-2. outcomes of gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: patient
characteristics and indices of success. Obes Surg. 1995;5:
References 159 –70.
1. World Health Organization. Obesity Epidemic Puts Mil- 21. Black DW, Yates WR, Reich RH, Bell S, Goldstein RB.
lions at Risk from Related Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: DSM-III personality disorder in bariatric clinic patients. Ann
Clin Psych. 1989;1:33–7.
World Health Organization; 1997.
22. Black DW, Goldstein RB, Mason EE. Prevalence of mental
2. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the
disorder in 88 morbidly obese bariatric clinic patients. Am J
identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and
Psychiatry. 1992;149:227–34.
obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl
23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statisti-
2):51–209S.
cal Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-III. 3rd ed. Washing-
3. Seidell JC, Deerenberg I. Obesity in Europe: prevalence and
ton, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.
consequences for use of medical care. Pharmacoeconomics.
24. de Zwaan M, Lancaster KL, Mitchell JE, et al. Health
1994;5:38 – 44.
related quality of life in morbidly obese patients: effect of
4. Ayyad C, Andersen T. Long-term efficacy of dietary treat-
gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12:773– 80.
ment of obesity: a systematic review of studies published
25. Pekkarinen T, Koskela K, Huikuri K, Mustajoki P. Long-
between 1931 and 1999. Obes Rev. 2000;1:113–9.
term results of gastroplasty for morbid obesity: binge-eating as
5. NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel. Obes
a predictor of poor outcome. Obes Surg. 1994;4:248 –55.
Res. 1998;6:96 –9.
26. Herpertz S, Siffert W, Hebebrand J. Lack of association of
6. Wadden TA. The treatment of obesity: an overview. In: melanocortin-4 receptor gene mutations and binge eating dis-
Stunkard AJ, Wadden TA, eds. Obesity: Theory and Therapy. order. N Engl J Med 2003;349:6.
2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1993, pp. 197–217. 27. Herpertz S, Saller B. Psychosomatic aspects of obesity.
7. Monteforte MJ, Turkelson CM. Bariatric surgery for morbid Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2001;51:336 – 49.
obesity. Obes Surg. 2000;10:391– 401. 28. Yale CE, Weiler SJ. Weight control after vertical banded
8. Greenway FL. Surgery for obesity. Endocr Metab Clin North gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Am J Surg. 1991;162:13– 8.
Am. 1996;25:1005–27. 29. Lindroos AK, Lissner L, Sjöstrom L. Weight change in
9. Pories WJ, MacDonald KG. The surgical treatment of mor- relation to intake of sugar and sweet foods before and after
bid obesity. Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1993; 195–205. weight reducing gastric surgery. Int J Obes. 1996;20:634 – 43.
10. Herbst CA, Hughes TA, Gwynne JT, Buckwalter JA. Gas- 30. Busetto L, Valente P, Pisent C, et al. Eating pattern in the
tric bariatric operation in insulin-treated adults. Surgery. 1984; first year following adjustable silicone gastric banding
95:209 –14. (ASGB) for morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.
11. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who 1996;20:539 – 46.
would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most 31. Mitchell JE, Lancaster KL, Burgard MA, et al. Long-term
effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. follow-up of patients’ status after gastric bypass. Obes Surg.
1995;222:339 –50. 2001;11:464 – 8.
12. Gleysteen JJ. Results of surgery: long-term effects on hyper- 32. Lang T, Hauser R, Buddeberg C, Klagehofer R. Impact of
lipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:591–3S. gastric banding on eating behavior and weight. Obes Surg.
13. Mason EE, Renquist KE, Jiang D. Perioperative risks and 2002;12:100 –7.
safety of surgery for severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55: 33. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O‘Brien PE. Quality of life after
573– 6. Lap-Band placement: influence of time, weight loss, and co-
14. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, Langkafel M, Senf W, morbidities. Obes Res. 2001;9:713–21.
Hebebrand J. Does obesity surgery improve psychosocial 34. Powers PS, Boyd F, Blair CR, Stevens B, Rosemurgy A.
functioning? Int J Obes. 2003;27:1300 –14. Psychiatric issues in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 1992;2:
15. Benotti PN, Forse RA. The role of gastric surgery in the 315–25.
35. Brolin RE. Critical analysis of results: weight loss and quality 52. Brolin RE, Clemow LP, Kasnetz KA, Fynan TM, Silva
of data. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:577– 81S. EM, Greenfield DP. Outcome predictors after gastroplasty
36. Hsu LK, Betancourt S, Sullivan SP. Eating disturbances for morbid obesity. Nutr Int. 1986;2:322– 6.
before and after vertical banded gastroplasty: a pilot study. Int 53. Busetto L, Segato G, De Marchi F, et al. Outcome predictors
J Eat Disord. 1996;19:23–34. in morbidly obese recipients of an adjustable gastric band.
37. Hsu LK, Sullivan SP, Benotti PN. Eating disturbances and Obes Surg. 2002;12:83–92.
outcome of gastric bypass surgery: a pilot study. Int J Eat 54. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O‘Brien PE. Pre-operative predictors
Disord. 1997;21:385–90. of weight loss at 1-year after Lap-Band Surgery. Obes Surg.
38. Rowston W, McCluskey S, Gazet JC, Lacey JH, Franks G, 2001;11:200 –7.
Lynch D. Eating behavior, physical symptoms and psycho- 55. Powers PS, Perez A, Boyd F, Rosemurgy A. Eating pathol-
logical factors associated with weight reduction following the ogy before and after bariatric surgery: a prospective study. Int
Scopinaro Operation as modified by Gazet. Obes Surg. 1992; J Eat Disord. 1999;25:293–300.
2:355– 60. 56. Valley V, Grace DM. Psychosocial risk factors in gastric
39. Olsson SA, Ryden O, Danielsson A, Nilsson-Ehle P. Weight surgery for obesity: identifying guidelines for screening. Int J
reduction after gastroplasty: the predictive value of surgical, Obes. 1987;11:105–13.
metabolic, and psychological variables. Int J Obes. 1984;8: 57. Davidson T, Rohde P, Wastell C. Psychological profile and
245–58. outcome in patients undergoing gastroplasty for morbid obe-
40. Ryden O, Olsson SA, Danielsson A, Nilsson-Ehle P. Weight sity. Obes Surg. 1991;1:177– 80.
loss after gastroplasty: psychological sequelae in relation to 58. Barrash J, Rodriguez EM, Scott DH, Mason EE, Sines JO.
clinical and metabolic observations. J Am Coll Nutr. 1989;8: The utility of MMPI subtypes for the prediction of weight loss
15–23. after bariatric surgery: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality In-
41. Sugerman HJ, Starkey JV, Birkenhauer R. A randomized ventory. Int J Obes. 1987;11:115–28.
prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gas- 59. Hathaway SR, McKinley FC. Minnesota Multiphasic Per-
troplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus sonality Inventory: Manual. New York: The Psychological
non-sweets eaters. Ann Surg. 1987;205:613–24. Corporation; 1967.
42. Cook CM, Edwards C. Success habits of long-term gastric 60. Lazare A, Klerman GL, Armor DJ. Oral, obsessive and
bypass patients. Obes Surg. 1999;9:80 –2. hysterical personality patterns. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1966;14:
43. Hudson SM, Dixon JB, O‘Brien PE. Sweet eating is not a 624 –30.
predictor of outcome after Lap-Band placement: can we fi- 61. Gough HG, Heilbrun AB. The Adjective Checklist Manual.
nally bury the myth? Obes Surg. 2002;12:789 –94. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.; 1983.
44. Gentry K, Halverson JD, Heisler S. Psychologic assessment 62. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statisti-
of morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass: a com- cal Manual of Mental Disorders: Revision, DSM-III-R. 3rd ed.
parison of preoperative and post-operative adjustment. Sur- Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.
gery. 1984;95:215–20. 63. Gertler R, Ramsey-Stewart G. Pre-operative psychiatric as-
45. Hafner RJ, Watts JM, Rogers J. Quality of life after gastric sessment of patients presenting for gastric bariatric surgery
bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Obes. 1991;15:555– 60. (surgical control of morbid obesity). Aust N Z J Surg. 1986;
46. Schrader G, Stefanovic S, Gibbs A, Elmslie R, Higgins B, 56:157– 61.
Slavotinek A. Do psychosocial factors predict weight loss 64. Sugerman HJ, Londrey Gl, Kellum JM, et al. Weight loss
following gastric surgery for obesity? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. with vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-Y gastric bypass
1990;24:496 –9. for morbid obesity with selective versus random assignment.
47. van Gemert WG, Severeijns RM, Greve JW, Groenman N, Am J Surg. 1989;157:93–102.
Soeters PB. Psychological functioning of morbidly obese 65. Karlsson J, Sjöström L, Sullivan M. Swedish obese subjects
patients after surgical treatment. Int J Obes Relat Metab (SOS): an intervention study of obesity: two-year follow-up of
Disord. 1998;22:393– 8. health-related quality of life (HRQL) and eating behavior after
48. Larsen F. Psychosocial function before and after gastric gastric surgery for severe obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab
banding surgery for morbid obesity: a prospective psychiatric Disord. 1998;22:113–26.
study. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;359:1–57. 66. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating question-
49. Dubovsky SL, Haddenhorst A, Murphy J, Liechty RD, naire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.
Coyle DA. A preliminary study of the relationship between J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71– 83.
preoperative depression and weight loss following surgery for 67. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statisti-
morbid obesity. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1985;15:185–96. cal Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washing-
50. Kopec-Schrader EM, Gertler R, Ramsey-Stewart G, Beu- ton, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
mont PJ. Psychosocial outcome and long-term weight loss 68. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Siffert W, Stang A, Jöckel K-H,
after gastric restrictive surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. Senf W. Predictor variables of the course of weight: a multi-
1994;4:336 –9. center, prospective, controlled trial. Int J Obes. 2002;26:S74.
51. Larsen F, Torgersen S. Personality changes after gastric 69. Adami GF, Gandolfo P, Bauer B, Scopinaro N. Binge
banding surgery for morbid obesity: a prospective study. eating in massively obese patients undergoing bariatric sur-
J Psychosom Res. 1989;33:323–34. gery. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;17:45–50.
70. Kral JG. Surgical treatment of obesity. In: Bray GA, Bou- O‘Rahilly S. Clinical spectrum of obesity and mutations in
chard C, James WPT, eds. Handbook of Obesity. New York: the melanocortin 4 receptor gene. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:
Marcel Dekker; 1998, pp. 977–993. 1085–95.
71. Vallis MT, Ross MA. The role of psychological factors in 75. Blundell JE, Hill AJ. Serotonin, eating disorders and
bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: identification of psycho- the satiety cascade. In: Cassano GB, Akiskal HS, eds.
logical predictors of success. Obes Surg. 1993;3:346 –59. Serotonin-System-Related Syndromes (SRS): Psychopatho-
72. Branson R, Potoczna N, Kral JG, Lentes K-U, Hoehe MR, logical and Therapeutic Links. Royal Society of Medicine;
Horber FF. Binge eating as a major phenotype of melano- 1991.
cortin 4 receptor gene mutations. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 76. Blundell JE, Hill AJ. The psychobiological control of appe-
1096 –103. tite. In: Ferrari E, Brambilla F, Solerte SB, eds. Primary and
73. Kral J. Selection of patients for anti-obesity surgery. Int J Secondary Eating Disorders: A Psychoneuroendocrine and
Obes. 2001;25:107–12. Metabolic Approach: Advances in the Biosciences 90. Perga-
74. Farooqi IS, Keogh JM, Yeo GS, Lank EJ, Cheetham T, mon Press; 1993.