2nutritionassmt Studay1819
2nutritionassmt Studay1819
Assessment
1
General Objectives
Assess the nutritional status of
individuals across the life span
using basic measurement tools.
2
Specific Objectives
• Define the terms: nutrition screening, nutrition assessment, nutritional
status.
• Describe the four methods used in nutrition assessment – (A, B, C, D), their
appropriate uses, advantages and limitations.
• Perform common anthropometry measurements using appropriate
equipment and following standard procedures:
• Estimate body fat composition using BIA.
• Explain the principles behind the anthropometry measurements and BIA.
• Differentiate between these terms: body fat composition and distribution,
overweight and obesity, subcutaneous and visceral fat,
• android/upper body/abdominal and gynoid/lower body obesity, fat-free and
lean body mass
• Interpret data from the anthropometry measurements and BIA by comparing
against age, gender and population-specific references.
• Describe sophisticated techniques for assessing body composition
3
Specific Objectives
• Interpret common biochemical indicators of nutritional status.
• Describe common clinical signs associated with poor nutritional status.
• Collect food intake data using common methods, the appropriate forms and
following standard procedures
• Analyze food intake data using food composition tables and nutrient
databases.
• Evaluate dietary intakes by comparing against appropriate references.
• Recommend the most appropriate methods of collecting nutrition
assessment data in a given scenario.
• Communicate intention and describe procedures clearly when obtaining
informed consent before performing nutrition assessment.
• Respect gender and cultural differences when performing data collection.
• Maintain confidentiality and safeguard data collected.
4
Nutrition/Health Status
Optimal Clinical/
?
health deficiency
disease
?
Clinical/
Optimal
deficiency
health
disease
Malnutrition
• undernutrition - underweight, poor protein status, vitamin deficiency
9
Why Assess Nutrition Status?
For the individual:
to establish the nature & cause of the problem
to provide appropriate treatment & prevent recurrence
BIOCHEMICAL &
DECREASED TISSUE LEVELS ANTHROPOMETRY
15
Anthropometry Assessment
16
Common Anthropometric
Measurements For Adults
Physical dimensions
Stature/Standing height
Weight
Body composition
Measurements of fat mass
skinfold thickness
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BIA
Measurements of fat-free mass (FFM)/muscle mass status
mid-arm muscle area MAMA
Assessing fat distribution
Waist circumference
17
Uses of Anthropometric
Measurements in Adults
The measurement of weight & stature allows the tracking of
weight changes & the calculation of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to
evaluate one’s nutritional status:
obesity due to overnutrition
emaciation due to undernutrition
Measurement of body fat mass/ fat-free mass allows us to
assess the health implications of depleted/excessive fat & protein
reserves.
Determining body fat distribution helps us to
assess risk for chronic health conditions related to excess abdominal
fat.
These measurements also allow us to monitor the effects of
nutritional intervention.
18
Weight Status & Standards
John lost 10 kg over the pastThese figures
3 months. Is his current alone don’t
weight status acceptable? make much
sense.
Jim gained 1 kg over the past How do we
2 months & is now 58 kg. Is assess one’s
his weight status acceptable? weight status
more
Standards & references are used as a basis objectively?
for comparison:
these should be validated for the
population
may be age, gender & population
specific
e.g. not correct to compare Jim’s weight
with Sally’s (female) or little Sue’s (child)
19
Overweight & Obese
Overweight
Body weight greater than some reference point of acceptable weight
in relation to height.
It is possible for very muscular people to be overweight because
of high muscle mass.
But in most cases people are overweight because their body has
excess amount of fat.
Obesity
Excess amount of body fat in relation to lean body mass
To determine the relative amounts of fat & lean tissue (body
composition analysis) requires certain difficult techniques. It
cannot be done by simply measuring weight & height to calculate
BMI.
But because it is easier to calculate BMI, we use/define BMI > 25 as
overweight & BMI > 30 as obese. 20
The Body Mass Index
Weight (in kg)
BMI =
Height2 (in m2)
For adults >18 yrs
but NOT for pregnant/lactating ♀
Has a high correlation with estimates of body fatness .
a convenient & reliable indicator of obesity
measurements are quick, noninvasive & precise
Does not distinguish between weight associated with muscle
or body fat elevated BMI may result from excessive
adiposity, muscularity or edema.
Does not give an indication about the distribution of body fat
abdominal fat is a risk factor for disease.
Besides BMI, include other measures of adiposity like skinfold thickness or
waist circumference as a surrogate estimate of abdominal fat.
21
BMI & Disease Risk
BMI has been used to
assess disease risk among
RISK INCREASES AS BMI
EXTREMELY
adults.
HIGH RISK
It has a U-curve relationship
HIGH RISK
with cardiovascular
disease risk
MORTALITY
Increasing BMI is
associated with increased
risk of cardiovascular
BODY MASS complications, including
15 20 25 30 35 40 INDEX
hypertension, type 2
diabetes, stroke. 22
BMI & Disease Risk
Classification BMI (WHO cut-off values, BMI (Asian cut Disease risk
international classification) off values)
Underweight <18.5 <18.5
24
http://altmed.creighton.edu Apr08
BODY COMPOSITION
• To measure the amount and distribution of fat and lean body mass
Cadaveric Studies
25
Body Composition - Models
Two-compartment model
The body consists of two chemically distinct Fat mass
compartments:
Adipose tissue
fat mass
fat-free mass (muscle, water, bone & other Fat-free mass
tissues devoid of fat) Skeletal muscle
+
Body composition is defined as the ratio of fat
Non-skeletal
to fat-free mass. muscle
Assumes constant lean mass characteristics +
for a given age & gender (problematic in Soft lean tissue
individuals with deranged body composition +
or hydration). Skeleton
These measurements – skinfold thickness, +
limb (i.e mid arm circumference) Water
circumferences, underwater weighing are
based on this model.
26
Body Composition - Models
2 compartment 3 compartment 4 compartment
Fat mass Fat mass Fat mass
Adipose tissue Adipose tissue Adipose tissue
Measurements by
Bioelectrical impedance analysis BIA
Computed tomography CT
Dual energy X–ray absorptiometry DEXA
Magnetic resonance imaging MRI
are based on this model.
29
http://www.harpenden-skinfold.com Mar14
Skinfold Measurements
Thickness of subcutaneous adipose
tissue varies at different sites – thus,
it is best to measure at multiple
sites.
Several prediction equations have
been developed to calculate % body
fat using sum of skinfold
measurements.
Durnin & Womersley Equations
Mitchell. (2003). Nutrition across the life span
use the sum of four skinfold sites –
biceps, triceps, subscapular &
suprailiac
The % body fat is then compared
30
with normal body fat ranges.
Body Fat Ranges
Classification Males (> 18 yr) Females (> 18 yr)
Unhealthy range – too low < 5% < 8%
BOD POD
33
http://ybefit.byu.edu, https://en.Wikipedia.org May16
Air Displacement
Plethysmography
Same principle as underwater
weighing: when subject enters a
chamber with a known volume,
the subject’s body volume = the
reduction in chamber volume.
Calculations of % body fat & fat-
free mass.
Fairly quick & easy, even suitable
for elderly & infirm
Need specialized equipment,
trained personnel
Assumes constant density of fat
BOD POD commercialized by Life
Measurement Inc ~$37,000. & fat-free mass
34
http://calorielab.com Mar14
Bioelectrical Impedance
Analysis (BIA)
When an electrical current is passed through the body,
electrolytes dissolved in water (largely found in fat-free
tissues) conduct electricity
fat tissues oppose the current impedance
The body’s resistance to the current is measured by the
instrument .
Analysis yields values for total body water (TBW)
Fat-free mass & % body fat estimated from the value of TBW
using regression equations – recent equations are more
accurate.
Assumes subject is normally hydrated – dehydration will result in
overestimation of fat mass.
Safe, convenient, portable, rapid & noninvasive; cost of
instrument varies. 35
Body Fat in Reference ♂ & ♀
Fat location Reference Male (kg) Reference Female (kg) Body fat
Essential fat (bone marrow, 2.1 4.9 content is the
CNS, mammary glands, etc) most variable
Storage fat 8.2 10.4 component of
• Subcutaneous • 3.1 • 5.1 the body.
• Intermuscular • 3.3 • 3.5 Sensitive to
• Intramuscular • 0.8 • 0.6
acute
malnutrition,
• Fat of thoracic & abdominal
cavity
• 1.0 • 1.2 can be used as
indirect
Total fat 10.5 15.3
estimate of
Body weight 70.0 56.8 energy
% fat 14.7 26.9 balance.
There is a tendency for increased fat deposition & a reduction in
muscle mass with aging. Such changes in body composition
are not evident in weight measurements alone but can be
assessed by determining body fat or fat-free mass. 36
Subcutaneous vs
Visceral Fat
Subcutaneous fat cells
main function is energy
storage
Visceral fat cells
are metabolically active
impact fasting glucose, serum
triglyceride & cholesterol
levels
are dangerous because they
contribute to inflammation,
atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia
& hypertension
is considered a pathogenic fat
depot
37
http://www.precisionnutrition.com Mar14
Assessment Of Fat Distribution
The site of fat storage (fat distribution) is a more
important risk factor for morbidity & mortality than is
obesity per se.
Especially excessive fat in the abdominal
area
Made up of subcutaneous & visceral fats
Total abdominal fat can be accurately
measured using MRI/CT scan but these are
expensive & not readily available.
2 simple measurements are waist-to-hip ratio
(WHR) & waist circumference (WC).
38
http://www.mohrresults.com Mar14
http://www.medicaldude.com Mar14
WHR
Waist -to-hip ratio (WHR)
= waist circumference
hip circumference
In ♀ WHR > 0.8 or in ♂ WHR >
1.0 indicates
upper body/abdominal/
android/central obesity
‘apple shape’
increased risk of type 2
diabetes, CVD
With weight loss, & fat loss from both waist & hip
regions, WHR is not a good index for tracking beneficial
39
reductions in abdominal fat.
WC
Waist circumference is the recommended
measurement to assess abdominal obesity.
42
http://www.icts.uiowa.edu, http://www.nutritionalassessment.english.azm.nl Mar14
MAMA – Percentile Charts, ♂
Age Mean n Mean SD Percentiles
Group Age
5th 10th 15th 25th 50th 75th 85th 90th 95th
20.0 – 24.96 1564 64.5 13.4 45.2 48.8 51.4 55.4 63.8 73.4 79.1 83.2 89.6
29.9
30.0 – 34.72 1405 66.6 13.5 48.7 52.4 55.2 59.4 68.1 78.1 84.0 88.3 95.0
39.9
40.0 – 44.35 1158 69.9 12.8 49.8 53.5 56.2 60.5 69.1 79.0 84.8 89.0 95.6
49.9
50.0 – 54.89 815 67.4 12.6 49.7 53.3 55.8 59.7 67.8 76.9 82.3 86.1 92.1
59.9
60.0 – 64.83 1122 64.8 12.4 45.8 50.2 52.7 56.5 64.4 73.3 78.6 82.4 88.3
69.9
Frisancho, A.R. (2008)
Percentiles
The set of data is divided into 100 equal parts & arranged in
rank order from lowest to highest
There is no zero percentile rank – the lowest score is
at the first percentile
There is no 100th percentile – the highest score is at
the 99th percentile
Used to determine the relative standing/position of an 43
individual in a population
Evaluating Anthropometry Data & Indices
Reference population
β α
Do Not Reject Ho 44
Reject Ho critical value
Evaluating Anthropometry Data & Indices
Cut-off points
are decided based on the relationship
between nutritional assessment indices & low
body stores, functional impairment or clinical
signs of deficiency.
may vary depending on conditions e.g. for
pregnancy or elderly
sometimes more than 1 cut-off point is
available e.g. different cut-offs for BMI
45
Sophisticated Methodologies
Computed Tomography (CT Scan)
Due to differing density, there are differences in the transmission
of an X-Ray beam through body tissues
A computer reconstructs a subject’s cross-sectional anatomy
based on mathematical equations
Provides a highly detailed cross-sectional images of the body
can differentiate between different types of lean tissue –
skeletal muscle, visceral mass, organ mass
can differentiate subcutaneous & visceral fat
Limitations
Problems of radiation exposure – repeat scans, pregnant ♀
High cost
Limited availability
Use limited to research applications
46
Sophisticated Methodologies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
The subject is placed in a strong magnetic field
Some of the nuclei in the body attempt to align themselves relative to
the applied field
When the field is turned off, the nuclei return to their original state,
emitting a signal which can be picked up by the system
The data are then processed by a computer to generate an image
Can give accurate & precise measurements of muscle & adipose
tissue – differentiate between visceral & subcutaneous fat
MRI is the method of choice for calibration of field methods
designed to measure body fat & skeletal muscle in vivo
Advantages - non invasive, uses no ionizing radiation, produces high
quality images, allows amount & distribution of body fat to be studied,
can be used to study the metabolic activity of tissues or organs
Drawback - restricted availability & high cost 47
Sophisticated Methodologies
Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
Originally developed to assess bone mineral density
Can be used to assess body composition
Dual-energy X-Ray source passes X-rays through the body
relative absorption of the two energies is measured
the data are then processed by a computer to generate an
image
New breakthroughs allow measurement of visceral fat
Advantages - fast,
safe, low dose
radiation exposure
Drawback -
restricted
availability & high
48
http://www.bodycompositioncenter.com Mar14 cost
Common Anthropometry Measurements:
Advantages
Referring to simple field methods, not sophisticated ones
Procedure
Simple & quick to do, data easily obtained
Safe, non-invasive
Low respondent burden
Suitable for large sample sizes
Equipment – portable, inexpensive, easily obtainable
Minimal training for personnel
Data can be precise & accurate if trained personnel & standardized
techniques are used
Can identify mild to moderate states of malnutrition (as well as
severe)
Can evaluate changes in nutritional status over time – retrospective
information is generated on past long term nutritional history 49
Common Anthropometry Measurements:
Limitations
Referring to simple field methods, not sophisticated ones
Poor accuracy & precision – measurement errors, did not adhere
to proper techniques, no proper calibration of equipment,
between-examiner differences
Based on many assumptions – may not always hold true, source
of error
Insensitive – cannot detect small changes/over short periods of
time
Unable to distinguish between specific nutrient deficiencies,
specific body composition components
Lack of appropriate standards/population references to compare
results – error magnified by use of prediction equations not
derived from comparable population
50
Biochemical Assessment
51
Biochemical Assessment
Laboratory measurements
Done on body tissues, usually blood or urine, cells, breast milk,
saliva, sweat, hair, amniotic fluid.
Clinical laboratories use automated analyzers capable of
performing thousands of tests/hr, print out the test results
including reference ranges & flag abnormal results.
Measures
Level of nutrients or their metabolites
Substances that contain the nutrient (e.g. Hb for iron)
Enzymes that require the nutrient
Substances that result from abnormal metabolism from a
deficiency of the nutrient
52
Biochemical Assessment: Advantages
Provide the objective & quantitative data on nutritional
status.
Can detect sub-clinical deficiency (early signs of
malnutrition) before anthropometric measures are changed
or clinical signs/symptoms of a deficiency disease appear.
Sufficiently accurate to be use as a validation method in
dietary surveys – to determine if respondents are
over/underreporting what they eat e.g. compare reported
protein intake with 24hr urinary nitrogen excretion; compare
reported sodium intake with 24hr urinary sodium excretion.
53
Biochemical Assessment: Limitations
54
Biochemical Assessment: Limitations -
Explanation
Acute Phase Response = systemic & metabolic changes due to
release of acute phase proteins e.g. C-reactive protein (CRP) in
response to inflammation
CRP albumin (production by the liver drops, in part to allow
synthesis of acute phase proteins)
Activation of vitamin
D
Kidneys reabsorb
Ca
Parathyroid hormone
SERUM CALCIUM
Ca level rises Ca level falls
8.5 – 10.2 mg/dL 56
Biochemical Assessment – Iron Status
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Iron depletion Iron deficiency Iron deficiency anemia
Iron stores
Erythrocyte
protoporphyrin
Hb level
Serum ferritin
(main storage form of iron)
Transferrin
(iron transport protein)
59
Clinical Assessment
60
Clinical Assesment
Consists of a routine medical history & a
nutrition-focused physical examination done
by a qualified medical examiner
to detect signs & symptoms associated
with malnutrition.
Most useful during advanced stages of
nutritional depletion, usually when overt
signs already present.
Medical history can be obtained from medical
records or interview with patients/family
members/caregivers.
61
Clinical Signs Associated With Malnutrition
- Examples
Body system/normal Clinical Finding Possible
appearance deficiency
Hair – shiny, firm in the Lack of natural shine, dull & dry, PEM
scalp sparse, loss of color, pluckable
Tongue – deep reddish Swelling, scarlet & raw, purplish B6, niacin,
in appearance, surface color, smooth, swollen sores iron, B12,
papillae present folate,
riboflavin
62
Clinical Assessment:
ADVANTAGES
Quick to perform (i.e blood pressure taking)
Relatively inexpensive, especially for large sample sizes
Noninvasive
LIMITATIONS
Non-specificity of the physical signs
some may be produced by > 1 nutrient deficiency or by non-nutritional
factors (e.g. cheilosis from B2, B3, B6, iron; glossitis from B2, B3, B12,
folate)
Multiple physical signs exhibited
may exhibit multiple physical signs due to co-existing nutrient
deficiencies confusing
Examiner inconsistencies adequate training
Unable to detect deficiencies at early stages
63
Subjective Global Assessment
A clinical technique of nutrition assessment based
exclusively on a carefully performed medical history &
physical examination.
Based on the features, physicians assign a rank
Well nourished
Moderate or suspected malnutrition
Severe malnutrition
Limitations:
Subjective, reproducibility depends on training &
experience of examiner.
Nevertheless, regarded as a reliable & efficient method to
assess nutritional status at the bedside.
64
HISTORY
1. WEIGHT CHANGES
Maximum body weight _____ Weight 6 months ago _____ Current weight _____
Overall weight loss in past 6 months ______
% weight loss in past 6 months ______
Change in 2 past weeks: ___increase ___no change ___decrease
2. DIETARY HABITS (relative to normal)
___No change
___Change Duration ___weeks
Type ___increased intake ___suboptimal solid diet ___full liquid diet
___IV or hypocaloric liquids ___starvation
3. GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS (lasting > 2 weeks)
___None
___Nausea ___Vomiting ___Diarrhea ___Anorexia
4. FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY
___No dysfunction
___Dysfunction Duration ___weeks
Type ___works suboptimally ___ambulatory ___bedridden
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION (for each trait specify 0=normal, 1+=mild, 2+=moderate, 3+=severe)
___Loss of subcutaneous fat (shoulders, triceps, chest, hands)
___Muscle wasting (quadriceps, deltoids)
___Ankle edema
___Ascites
SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RATING
___A = well-nourished
___B = moderately (or suspected of being) malnourished
___C = severely malnourished
65
Dietary Assessment
66
Dietary Assessment - Reasons
Determining an individual or a population’s usual
dietary intake is important
to identify potential dietary inadequacies/excesses
to provide data on intake of nutrients or specific
classes of food
to investigate the relationship between diet &
diseases
to formulate policies for disease reduction & health
promotion
67
Methods Of Dietary Assessment
24-hour recall
Food record or diary
Estimated food records
Weighed food records
Food Frequency
Questionnaire (FFQ)
Diet history
68
http://gadgether.com Mar14
24-hour Recall
Conducted in 4 steps using a standardised protocol.
1. Obtain list of of foods & drinks consumed in the previous
24 hr/preceding day.
2. Obtain detailed description of foods &
drinks consumed – cooking methods, brand names, details of
mixed dishes
3. Estimation of amounts of foods &
drinks consumed in household measures – food models,
calibrated utensils, photographs
4. Review of interview data
Nutrient intakes is then calculated using food
composition data.
69
24-hour Recall
A single 24hr recall may not be sufficient to describe
an individual’s food intake.
Multiple 24hr recalls can be obtained –
nonconsecutive days, include weekdays & weekends.
Nevertheless, single 24hr recalls on different
individuals is more feasible & can give a valid
measure of the intake of a large group or population.
70
24-hour Recall
Success depends on:
respondent’s memory
ability of the respondent to
convey accurate estimates
of portion size consumed
degree of motivation of the
respondent
persistence of the
interviewer
71
http://www.precisionnutrition.com Mar14
24-hour Recall: Advantages
Quick & easy to use
Low respondent burden, high compliance
Requires only short term memory
Low cost to administer
Its administration does not alter the usual diet
Ideal for illiterate respondents
Can provide detailed information on types of food consumed
Can be used for large groups
72
24-hour Recall: Limitations
Reliance on memory difficult for the elderly & young
children.
Estimation errors of food portion sizes occur (can be reduced by
using graduated food models).
One recall is seldom representative of a person’s usual intake.
Over-report intakes at low levels, foods considered to be
healthful & under-report intakes at high levels, binge eating,
foods considered to be unhealthful. Drinks, sauces, dressings
often not reported.
Withold/alter information because of embarrassment/want to
impress interviewer.
73
Food Record / Diary
The respondent records, at the time of consumption, the
identity & details of all foods & liquids consumed in
household measures.
Period of time usually 3 - 7 days, include weekdays &
weekends. Includes information on time, place & situation
of eating.
Respondent estimates/weighs the amount of food &
liquids consumed.
Nutrient intakes is then calculated using food composition
data.
74
Food Record / Diary: Estimated
Estimating food portion sizes can be done via
standard household measuring cups, spoons, ruler
colour photographs
for some food items e.g. eggs, apples – simply
counted
76
Food Record / Diary:
Advantages
Does not depend on memory
Provides detailed intake data
Provides data about eating
habits
Multiple-day data is more
representative of usual
intake
77
Food Record / Diary:
Limitations
Requires a high degree of co-operation
High respondent burden low response
rates/compliance
Subject must be literate
Time-consuming to obtain data
Analysis is labor-intensive & expensive
Act of recording may alter diet – respondents
change their usual eating pattern to simplify the
process/impress interviewer.
78
FFQ
Assesses energy/nutrient intake by determining how
frequently a person consumes a limited number of foods that
are major sources of the nutrient in question.
Questionnaires consist of a list of ~ 150 individual foods or
food groups that are important contributors to the
population’s intake of energy & nutrients.
Respondents indicate how many times a
day/week/month/year they consume the foods.
May be non-quantitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative
A computer program converts portion sizes & frequency of
intakes of a particular food to derive energy/nutrient intake
values.
79
Food Items Average use during the past year
< 1x/month 1-3 x/month 1-4 x/week 5-7x/week 2-4x/day > 5x/day
Coffee
Dark bread
Ice cream
Coffee 1 cup
½ cup 80
Ice cream
Estimate the amount of food / drink taken
fro FFQ
Food item (Milk as a Portion
Drink)
How often do you Per day Per week Per month Rarely /
have the never
following
Full cream milk 250 ml 1
(fresh, UHT, powder) (1 glass)
Low fat milk (fresh, 250 ml 4
UHT, powder) (1 glass)
Skimmmed milk 250 ml X
(fresh, UHT, powder) (1 glass)
81
FFQ
FFQs known as screeners have been developed to
assess intake of calcium, dietary fiber, fruits &
vegetable & % energy from fat.
Useful in situations that do not require assessment of
the total diet or quantitative accuracy in dietary
estimates or when financial resources are limited.
Commonly used in epidemiologic research
investigating the relationship between diet &
conditions such as cancer or CVD.
NOT considered a substitute for more definitive
approaches to measure dietary intakes such as
multiple 24 hr recalls/weighed food records.
82
FFQ: Advantages
Can be self-administered
Machine readable/optically scanned & directly downloaded into a
computer for analysis saves time & money
Modest demand on respondents
Inexpensive for large sample sizes
More representative of usual intake than a few days of diet records
provides data on a respondent’s intake of foods,
including those infrequently consumed, over a longer period
of time, usually over the course of a year
Considered by some to be the method of choice for research on diet-
disease relationships, especially in large scale studies.
83
FFQ: Limitations
May not represent usual foods or portion sizes chosen by
respondents
Must include foods commonly consumed by a particular group e.g.
ethnic foods
Need to update food list with new products entering the market
Does not provide good data about how much food or
beverage a person consumes
Intake data can be compromised when multiple foods are
grouped with single listings
Depends on ability of subject to describe diet
Short questionnaires easy to administer but lack
comprehensiveness; long questionnaires are tedious to
complete
84
Diet History
A detailed dietary assessment conducted by a trained
nutritionist.
Burke’s original method involved these steps:
24 hr recall - actual intake & general information on the
overall eating pattern over an extended period e.g. past
month or year. Collect related info about health habits –
smoking, exercise, appetite, use of supplements, food
dislikes, intolerances, weight history, etc
Cross check on data with specific questions about
preferences/habits with a FFQ
Respondent is required to complete a 3-day food record
(many omit this step)
85
Diet History: Advantages
Can assess usual nutrient intake
Can detect seasonal changes
Data on all nutrients can be obtained
Correlates well with biochemical
measures
Can be used with subjects who are
not literate
Its administration does not alter the
usual diet
86
http://www.techsavvyassistant.com Mar14
Diet History: Limitations
Lengthy interview ~ 1-2 hr
Requires trained interviewers
Difficult & expensive to
analyse, not applicable in large
scale population studies
Tends to over-estimate nutrient intake
Requires respondent’s co-operation, with the ability
to recall usual diet (not suitable for those < 14 or >
80)
This method is difficult for those who highly
variable food habits 87
http://www.ojsoftware.com Mar14
Plate wastage
• Commonly used in hospital caterings / childcare settings
• Can be used among groups that are illiterate / loss of hearing / elderly
where other means of diet assessment is less feasible
• Interviewer must know what food is served and how much
• Must be present before and after each meal consumed, for the whole
day
• Food is weighed before and after consumed
• Can be used to improvise menu
• Assess if portion served is enough / too much
88
Nutrient Analysis
To calculate nutrient intakes of individuals or population groups if
quantitative methods were used to collect data.
Use food composition tables or databases.
Issues:
food names & descriptions may not correspond to the actual food
being analysed, recipe variations
a food name is ambiguous or spelling hinders a food search e.g.
ketchup vs. catsup; donut vs. doughnut
fruits & vegetables have variable composition due to differences in
maturity, length & method of storage, variety, etc but typically only one
value is provided in a database
some databases have a limited range of food or do not have complete
data for a specified nutrient
Users must recognize limitations of the data & use judgment when
reporting estimated nutrient intakes.
89
Nutrient Analysis – Converting
Food to Nutrients
90
Nutrient Analysis – Converting
Food to Nutrients
Meal /Item Amount Calories Prot, g CHO, g Fat, g Sat fat, Cholesterol, Sodium, Dietary
g mg mg fiber, g
Breakfast
Toast 2 pc 64 1.98 11.97 0.88 0.13 0 130 0.6
Butter 1 tsp 34 0.04 0 3.8 2.4 10 33 0
Jam 1 tsp
Coffee 1c
Sugar 1 tsp
Lunch
V linguine ½ plate
Fruits 1c
Coffee 1c
Sugar 1 tsp
Milk, fresh 1 tbsp
Dinner
Roll 1
TOTAL
91
http://food.thefuntimesguide.com, http://www.amazon.com Apr12
Nutrient Analysis – Converting
Food to Nutrients
Meal /Item Calories Prot, g CHO, Fat, g Sat fat, Cholesterol, Sodium, Dietary Calcium,
g g mg mg fiber, g mg
TOTAL 1900 72 246 70 28 250 1955 12 768
Requirements, 2035 58 800
female 40 yr
% requirement 93.4 124.1 96.0
92
Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs)
94
MY HEALTHY PLATE
Meal /Item Amount Wholegrain Fruits Vegetables Meat & others, of which
dairy or calcium rich foods
Breakfast
Wholemeal 2 pc 1
bread
Butter 1 tsp
Coffee 1c
Sugar 1 tsp
Lunch
Brown rice 1 bowl 2
Grilled fish 95 grams 1
Papaya 1 wedge 1
Wholegrain Fruits Vegetables
Meal /Item Meat & others, of which
dairy or calcium rich foods
TOTAL 3 1 0 1
RECOMMENDED 5-7 2 2 3
DAILY SERVINGS
DIFFERENCE (SVG) (4) (-1) (-2) (-2)
Evaluating Dietary Intakes
Besides the RDAs, dietary intakes can be compared with dietary
guidelines & food guides:
Singapore Dietary Guidelines
Singapore My Healthy Plate
96
Summary
Anthropometric, biochemical,
clinical & dietary investigations
together provide a better picture of
one’s health & nutritional status &
risks.
97
Nutrition Ethics
98
Nutrition Ethics
Some common values that apply to healthcare ethics
are:
Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best
interest of the patient.
Non-maleficence - "first, do no harm"
Autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or
choose their treatment.
Dignity - the patient (& the person treating the
patient) have the right to dignity.
Truthfulness & honesty - the concept of informed
consent has increased in importance.
99
Nutrition Ethics
Patient Confidentiality
Healthcare practitioners have a duty to keep their patients'
confidences.
This allows the patient to feel free to make a full & frank
disclosure of information to the practitioner to enable
proper diagnosis &treatment.
The practitioner should not reveal confidential
communications or information without the patient's
express consent unless required to disclose the
information by law (other exceptions to the rule: such as
where a patient threatens bodily harm to himself or to
another person).
100
NUTRITION RESEARCH IN TP
• http://www.xn--
48sx1dz2x13fyo0ceubx4l.edu.sg/schools/asc/industry/institutional-review-
board
• All studies to be approved by the TP Institution Review Board.
• TP IRB B is a constituted group that has been formally designated to review
and monitor biomedical research involving human subjects. In accordance
with FDA regulations, an IRB has the authority to approve, require
modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove research. This group
review serves an important role in the protection of the rights and welfare of
human research subjects.
101