We Are Intechopen, The World'S Leading Publisher of Open Access Books Built by Scientists, For Scientists
We Are Intechopen, The World'S Leading Publisher of Open Access Books Built by Scientists, For Scientists
4,200
Open access books available
116,000
International authors and editors
125M
Downloads
154
Countries delivered to
TOP 1%
most cited scientists
12.2%
Contributors from top 500 universities
Abstract
The high performance evaporators are important for process industries such as
food, desalination and refineries. The falling film evaporators have many advan-
tages over flooded and vertical tubes that make them best candidate for processes
industries application. The heat transfer area is the key parameter in designing of an
evaporator and many correlations are available to estimate the size of tube bundle.
Unfortunately, most of the correlation is available only for pure water and above
322 K saturation temperatures. Out of these conditions, the areas are designed by
the extrapolation of existing correlations. We demonstrated that the actual heat
transfer values are 2–3-fold higher at lower temperature and hence simple extrapo-
lated estimation leads to inefficient and high capital cost design. We proposed an
accurate heat transfer correlation for falling film evaporators that can capture both,
low temperature evaporation and salt concentration effectively. It is also embedded
with unique bubble-assisted evaporation parameter that can be only observed at
low temperature and it enhances the heat transfer. The proposed correlation is
applicable from 280 to 305 K saturation temperatures and feed water concentration
ranges from 35,000 to 95,000 ppm. The uncertainty of measured data is less than
5% and RMS of regressed data is 3.5%. In this chapter, first part summarized the all
available correlations and their limitations. In second part, falling film evaporation
heat transfer coefficient (FFHTC) is proposed and model is developed. In the last
part, experimentation is conducted and FFHTC developed and compared with
conventional correlations.
1. Introduction
The falling film evaporators currently leading in the processes industries because
they have many advantages over submerged tubes evaporators. In the past, the
vertical tubes evaporators were considered as most efficient but now they have
been replaced by falling film evaporators due to its distinctive nature of operation.
The submerged and vertical tubes evaporators are normally not fast responsive to
many operational parameters. On the other hand, the falling film evaporators
respond fast to feed quality and heat source supplied. These properties make them
very efficient to operate across small temperature differences so that they can be
arranged in cascading manners for maximum efficiency. In addition, falling film
evaporators have many other advantages such as:
1
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
4.Fast operation and short contact time for working fluid, favourable for food
industry.
5. Falling film washed away the deposition on tubes that minimize the chances of
fouling on tube surfaces.
The falling film evaporators also have many advantages over vertical tubes
evaporators such as:
1. Smaller size as compared to vertical tubes for same capacity due to high heat
transfer coefficient.
3. Multi pass tube bundle design for required operation as compared to single
pass vertical tubes evaporators with limited operations.
5. The compact design reduces the overall piping work as compared to single pass
large size vertical design.
6. Due to vertical stacking arrangement, the overall footprint can be small in large
industries by using falling film evaporators.
It can be seen clearly that falling film evaporators have many advantages over
submerged and vertical tubes evaporators but there is lack of heat transfer data at
sub-atmospheric temperature. Particularly, below 323 K, there is no data available
in the literature. This was one of the main motivations for this work.
[2] Ribatski and Jacobi Heat transfer coefficient values development for water
and other refrigerants for horizontal evaporators fitted
with single and multi tubes
[10] Han and Fletcher Heat transfer coefficient correlation development for
falling film evaporators for boiling conditions above
322 K saturation temperatures.
[11, 14–17] Liu et al., Fujita et al., Yang Film Reynold number investigation on heat transfer
et al., Parken et al., Ribatski coefficient and main conclusions are:
et al.
a. Heat transfer increase with Reynold number
b. Heat transfer decrease to its minimum value and
then increase
c. Heat transfer increase to maximum and then drop
[18] Lorenz and Yung Investigation of single tube and multi tubes arrangement
on heat transfer. They also found that the critical
Reynold number is below 300 and single tube have good
heat transfer as compared to array of tubes
[19] Thome et al. Heat transfer study on different tube geometry such as
Gewa-B, plain surface, turbo-BII HP and high heat flux
tubes. They found a stark difference in heat transfer
values
[11] Fujita et al. Tubes array and feed header impact on heat transfer was
studied and showed that top row has low heat transfer
due to direct exposure of feed
[14] Liu et al. Tubes geometry impact was investigated and concluded
that roll worked tubes heat transfer is 3–4 fold higher
them smooth tubes
[20] Aly et al. Film thickness impact was studied and found that
thickness has negative impact on heat transfer
[21–23] Moeykens et al. and Chang et al Impact of different refrigerants such as R-141b, R22,
R123 and R-134a were studied and found enhanced heat
transfer by additional distribution plats
Table 1.
Literature summary on heat transfer coefficient investigation and operational parameters impact.
3
4
Xu et al. [25]
Heat source 50°C, deionized liquid, evaporator with copper tubes horizontally arranged
Pure water, 49–127°C, electrically heated single horizontal tube, OD—50.8 mm, thickness—1.7 mm,
length—254 mm
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
References Correlation
0:333
μ2l 0:22
hfilm ¼ 0:821: g:ρ2 :k3 ðReΓ Þ
l l
Pure water, 46–118°C, vertical single tube evaporator with electrical heater, tube 28 mm diameter
and 292 mm long
0:158
Alhusseini et al. [27] Laminar regime: hlaminar ¼ 2:65:ðReÞ ðKaÞ0:0563
1=5
Mixed regime: h ¼ h5laminar þ h5turbulent
Pure water and Propylene glycol
Table 2.
Review of heat transfer coefficient correlations for different evaporator design and operation conditions.
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
The heat transfer correlations available in the literature are based on different
parameters and they have some limitations. Table 2 showed most famous and
widely accepted heat transfer coefficient correlations and their limitations.
The most commonly used correlation is proposed by Han and Fletcher for
horizontal tube falling film evaporators. They developed this correlation for pure
water at saturation temperature ranges from 322 to 393 K. It can be noticed that
there are two major gaps in available literature; firstly, no data is available for
evaporation heat transfer for below 322 K and secondly, there is lack of data for salt
solution as boiling point elevation changes with salt concentration. These two fac-
tors are important for processes industries falling film evaporators design as most of
processes are performed below 322 K such as in food and desalination industries
[30–42]. This was the main motivation of this study, to provide detailed parameters
for falling film evaporators design for process industries. We developed falling film
heat transfer coefficient (FFHTC) correlation for saline water evaporation from 280
to 305 K saturation temperatures. We also demonstrated the effect of salt concen-
tration on heat transfer and LMTD. This will help to design efficient falling film
evaporators for processes industries.
The idea was to modify the famous and well accepted Han and Fletcher’s corre-
lation to incorporate the different salt concentration effect and expanded to low
range temperature evaporation. This will help to fill two major gaps as mentioned
earlier in processes industries evaporators design.
The dimensionless terms such as Nusselt, Reynolds and Prandtl numbers in the
Han and Fletcher’s correlation are adequate to incorporate the liquid film thermal
effect in heat transfer. As per steam properties table, the specific volume of steam is
rapidly changes at low temperature and it might have significant effect on heat
transfer. At low temperature, the generation of microbubbles at tubes surfaces
rapidly detach due to low density and it agitate the thermal barrier formed by liquid
film. The conventional heat transfer correlations are not able to capture this effect.
The heat transfer enhancement due to micro-bubble generation and detaching is an
important phenomenon at low temperature and need to be captured in heat transfer
correlation for efficient evaporator design.
The basic form of Han and Fletcher’s correlation is shown in Eq. (1).
2 1=3
μl
hevap gρ2l
¼ Nu ¼ 0:0028ðReΓ Þ0:5 ðPrÞ0:85 (1)
kl
The constants and indices can be found from the boundary conditions of falling
film evaporators. The heat supplied to the evaporator can be calculated by the
energy balance of hot water circulation through the tubes as presented in Eq. (2).
The overall heat transfer coefficient (Uoverall) can be calculated by using the
saturation temperatures of evaporator and log mean temperature difference
(LMTD) parameters as shown in Eq. (3).
6
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
T out T sat
> >
ch, w
>
> >
>
>
>
> ln >
>
>
T in
: T
;
ch, w sat
The Dittus-Boelter correlation can be applied to investigate the local heat trans-
fer coefficient for falling film evaporators as shown in Eq. (4).
Now, falling film heat transfer coefficient for evaporation can be calculated by
applying Eqs. (1)–(4). The material resistance is neglected due to very thin tube
wall (less than 0.7 mm). Eq. (5) presents the calculation process for falling film heat
transfer coefficient.
1 1 1
¼ þ Rwall þ (5)
UA hA tubeside hA outside
The unknown parameters in Eq. (5) are calculated by the planned experiments
as discussed in the following sections.
Figure 1.
Adsorption cycle pilot installed at NUS, Singapore (published with PI permission [43, 44]).
7
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
Figure 2.
Adsorption cycle flow schematic with detailed components (published with author’s permission [43, 44]).
Number of tubes 52
No of passes 2
Table 3.
Adsorption cycle evaporator design parameters.
fabricated with special outside and inside profile to enhance heat transfer. The
design parameters of evaporator are given in Table 3.
There are three liquid circuits in the system those are important to control and
maintain for a successful experiment. Firstly, the chilled water circulation through
the tubes of evaporator to maintain required saturation temperature. An accurate
thyristor controlled heater is installed to control chilled water temperature within
0.15 K. A vacuum rated feed pump help to spray water from pool of evaporator
below tubes bundle to the tubes surface. To maintain the liquid level in the evapo-
rator, the evaporated quantity refluxed back from condenser as a close loop.
Secondly, the cold water supply to the adsorption bed to remove the heat of
adsorption. The adsorber bed directly communicates to evaporator to adsorb the
vapors and release the heat of adsorption. This heat must be removed to maintain
the vapor uptake otherwise it can be drooped to very low quantity. The cooled
water flow through the cooling tower on the rooftop to reject heat to the ambient.
Lastly, the heat source to the desorber bed to regenerate the adsorbent. Once the
adsorber bed fully saturated, it cannot take more vapor and it has to be regenerated
for next adsorption process. The hot water is circulated through the tubes of the bed
to supply heat of desorption to the adsorbent. The hot water temperature is
maintained either by heater or solar thermal collectors.
8
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
Table 4.
Experimental operational parameters of adsorption pilot.
Figure 3.
Micro-bubbles agitation of liquid film on evaporator tube surfaces captured by camera (published with
author’s permission [43, 44]).
Figure 4.
Conventional thermal barrier braking phenomenon due to bubble agitation (published with author’s
permission [43, 44]).
9
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
The overall heat transfer coefficient (U) was calculated at assorted heat source
and salt concentrations. The evaporator chilled water temperature was varies from
10 to 40°C and salt concentration from 35,000 to 95,000 ppm. The typical trend is
presented in Figure 5 at 90,000 ppm salt concentration. The similar trend was
observed at other concentration values.
The two important results can be concluded, firstly, the U values drop over 25%
due to salt concentration at lower temperature but this impact is not very significant
at higher temperature. This might be due to propertied change at higher tempera-
ture. Secondly, The U values are higher at lower temperature and this is due to
micro-bubble generation and detaching phenomenon as described earlier. The same
trend of U values at all concentrations strengthens the argument of micro-bubble
enhanced heat transfer phenomenon.
Figure 5.
Overall heat transfer coefficient profiles at 90,000 ppm salt concentration and different chilled water
temperatures (with author’s permission [43, 44]).
10
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
The falling film heat transfer coefficient (FFHTC) values are then calculated by
using the methodology presented in the earlier section and presented in Figure 6. It
can be noticed that FFHTC follows the same trend as U values at assorted heat
source and salt concentrations.
The noticeable point in the plot is the heat transfer coefficient values drop
initially with drop in evaporator vapor space temperature and achieve minimum
values at 300 K. Once the vapor space temperature dropped further down, the heat
transfer values start increasing. The increasing trend is even sharper below 295 K
vapor space temperature and this is because of rapid change in vapor specific
volume. The vapor specific volume change can divide the evaporation processes
into three categories; namely, film surface evaporation, transition and micro-bubble
assisted evaporation. The sharp change in specific volume below 295 K help to
generate micro-bubble that detach from tube surface immediately due to low den-
sity and agitate the thermal barrier resulting increase in heat transfer rates. This
phenomenon is observed and captured for the first time and named as “micro-
bubble assisted film evaporation”.
It can be clearly noticed that micro-bubbles play an important role at low
temperature to enhance the heat transfer. The traditional heat transfer coefficient
correlations are not able to capture this unique phenomenon. All correlations avail-
able in the literature can only work in film surface evaporation zone. Their extrap-
olation to capture transition and micro-bubble assisted zone also cannot predict an
accurate value and heat exchanger designed based on these values cannot perform
up to the level. Hence there is an urgent need for the development of an accurate
heat transfer coefficient correlation to capture these two zones for efficient heat
exchanger design.
A new correlation is proposed for falling film heat transfer coefficient that can
efficiently capture transition and micro-bubble assisted evaporation at assorted salt
concentration. The proposed model was written in FORTRAN and fitted with
experimental data conditions. All important parameters such as heat flux, flow
velocity and vapor properties were also included. Most importantly, the salt con-
centration and vapor specific volume parameters those were missing in conven-
tional correlations are also embedded in the proposed correlation as shown in
Eq. (6) [48, 49].
Figure 6.
Experimental film evaporation heat transfer coefficient profiles at different saturation temperature and
different salt concentrations (with author’s permission [43, 44]).
11
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
( 0:333 0:45
μl 2 S
2:18 4:0
hfallingfilm ¼ 0:279 ð Re Þ ðP r Þ 2: exp 1
g:ρl 2 K l 3 30000
T evap q V
evap
: g þ 0:875 : (6)
322 DT 52:65
Figure 7.
The proposed falling film heat transfer coefficient correlation with experimental results (with author’s
permission [43, 44]).
12
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
Figure 8.
Proposed falling film heat transfer coefficient compared with conventional Han & Fletcher’s extrapolated
values (with author’s permission [43, 44]).
The proposed correlation is timely and important for efficient design of falling film
evaporator for process industries.
5. Summary
The horizontal falling film evaporators have many advantages over submerged
and vertical tubes evaporators. Currently, there is no heat transfer correlation that
can capture evaporation at low temperature especially below 295 K with different
salt concentration. This is very important for efficient design of process evapora-
tors. A horizontal tube falling film heat transfer coefficient correlation is proposed
to capture effect, low temperature and salt concentration. It is demonstrated that
the actual heat transfer values at low temperature can be 2–3 fold higher than the
estimated values due to unique bubble-assisted evaporation phenomenon. The pro-
posed correlation is applicable from 280 to 305 K saturation temperatures and feed
water concentration ranges from 35,000 to 95,000 ppm. The uncertainty of mea-
sured data is less than 5% and RMS of regressed data is 3.5%.
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thanks to KAUT and NUS for this study. The data is
reproduced by the author’s permission [44].
Nomenclature
13
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
Abbreviations
Author details
© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
14
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
References
15
Heat and Mass Transfer - Advances in Science and Technology Applications
[18] Lorenz JJ, Yung D. Film breakdown [27] Alhusseini AA, Tuzla K, Chen JC.
and bundle-depth effects in horizontal Falling film evaporation of single
tube, falling-film evaporators. Journal of component liquids. International
Heat Transfer—Transfer The American Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.
Society of mechanical Engineers. 1982; 1998;41(12):1623-1632
104(3):569-571
[28] Shmerler JA, Mudawwar I. Local
[19] Roques JF, Thome JR. Falling films evaporative heat transfer coefficient in
on arrays of horizontal tubes with R- turbulent free-falling liquid films.
134a. Part II: Flow visualization, onset of International Journal of Heat and Mass
dry out, and heat transfer predictions. Transfer. 1988;31(4):731-742
Heat Transfer Engineering. 2007;28(5):
415-434 [29] Chien LH, Tsai YL. An experimental
study of pool boiling and falling film
[20] Aly G, Al-Hadda A, Abdel-Jawad M. evaporation on horizontal tubes in R-
Parametric study on falling film 245fa. Applied Thermal Engineering.
seawater desalination. Desalination. 2011;31:4044-4054
1897;65:43-55
[30] Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Ng KC.
[21] Moeykens S, Pate MB. Spray The fallacy of energy efficiency for
evaporation heat transfer performance comparing desalination plants: A
of R-134a on plain tubes. ASHRAE standard primary energy approach.
Transactions. 1994;100(2):173-184 Nature Clean Water. DOI: 10.1038/
s41545-018-0028-4
[22] Moeykens S, Kelly JE, Pate MB.
Spray evaporation heat transfer [31] Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Ghaffour
performance of R-123 in tube bundles. N, Ng KC. A multi evaporator
ASHRAE Transactions. 1996;102(2): desalination system operated with
259-272 thermocline energy for future
sustainability. Desalination. 2018;435:
[23] Chang TB, Chiou JS. Spray
268-277
evaporation heat transfer of R-141b on a
[32] Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Son HS,
horizontal tube bundle. International
Seung Jin O, Ng KC. Desalination
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.
processes evaluation at common
1998;42:1467-1478
platform: A universal performance ratio
(UPR) method. Applied Thermal
[24] Bourouni K, Martin R, Tadrist L,
Engineering. 2018;134:62-67
Tadrist H. Modelling of heat and mass
transfer in a horizontal tube falling film
[33] Ng KC, Shahzad MW. Sustainable
evaporators for water desalination.
desalination using ocean thermocline
Desalination. 1998;116:165-184
energy. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews. 2018;82:240-246
[25] Xu L, Ge M, Wang S, Wang Y. Heat
transfer film coefficients of falling film
[34] Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Ng KC.
horizontal tube evaporators.
Pushing desalination recovery to the
Desalination. 2004;166:223-230
maximum limit: Membrane and thermal
processes integration. Desalination.
[26] Chun KR, Seban RA. Heat transfer 2017;416:54-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.
to evaporating liquid films. The desal.2017.04.024
American Society of mechanical
Engineers Journal of heat transfer. 1971; [35] Ng KC, Shahzad MW, Son HS,
11:391-396 Hamed OA. An exergy approach to
16
Design of Industrial Falling Film Evaporators
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84230
17