Marie Curie
Marie Curie
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Columbia University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Four Revolutions in the Earth Sciences
Strange Rays
Serendipity
The decade of the 1890s was a time of great progress in science. No year
in that decade was more eventful than 1895. In Sweden, Svante Arrhe-
nius was calculating the effect of atmospheric CO2 on global tempera-
ture, while in Britain John Perry was exposing the fallacy of Kelvin’s
assumptions. The Scottish chemist William Ramsay discovered helium,
previously known only from the Sun’s spectrum, in an earthly mineral.
Helium would not only help explain what had eluded Kelvin—the true
source of the Sun’s energy—but help refute his claims about the age of
the Earth. In the town hall at Sceaux, France, a young Polish chemist
named Marie Sklodowska married her sweetheart, Pierre Curie.
That same year, at the University of Wurzburg in Germany, Wilhelm
Röntgen (1845–1923) was investigating the properties of cathode rays.
These mysterious beams, discovered in 1876, appeared when scien-
tists applied a voltage across the electrodes in an evacuated tube. As
sometimes happens in science, Röntgen made a serendipitous discov-
ery. After enclosing the cathode-ray tube in a black box to exclude all
light, then turning off the lights in the laboratory, Röntgen switched
on the current in the vacuum tube. To his surprise, a spectral shimmer
appeared on his benchtop a few meters away. He lit a match and saw
that the glow had come from a paper plate that he had coated with a
barium compound. When he switched off the current, the glow disap-
peared. He recognized that the cathode-ray tube must give off invis-
ible rays that had somehow excited the barium. Röntgen named them
X-rays, X for unknown. He found that when he placed a solid object
between the cathode-ray tube and a photographic plate, a ghostly im-
age of the object appeared on the plate. Röntgen used X-rays to make
a famous image of his wife’s hand, her bones and ring clearly visible.
FIGURE Ϥ.ഩMarie Curie (ϣϪϨϩ–ϣϫϥϦ). Nobel Portrait, c. ϣϫϢϥ. Source: Photograph by Gene-
ralstabens LitograĮska Anstalt, courtesy AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives.
In 1903, Marie Curie, her husband, and Becquerel each received the
Nobel Prize in Physics for these discoveries. In 1911, she won the No-
bel Prize in Chemistry, making her the only person to win the prize in
two different sciences.
Having no idea of the dangers of radiation, Marie Curie conducted
her work without the safety measures that we take for granted today.
This was a time when workers would lick the tip of a paint brush, dip it
into a pot containing radium, and use it to coat the hands on a watch
so that they would glow in the dark. Then they would repeat the pro-
cess. Just as Kelvin had carried around a specimen of a radioactive min-
eral, so too did Madame Curie carry test tubes of radioactive material,
storing them in her desk drawer. In 1934, she died from leukemia, one
year before her daughter Irene Joliot-Curie and Irene’s husband Fredric
Joliot themselves won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Half Lives
Physicists and chemists leapt on the exciting new discoveries and be-
gan feverishly to explore the strange new rays. The most productive
was a young New Zealander named Ernest Rutherford (1871–1937).1
If any career personifies the benefits to society of providing educa-
tional scholarships to deserving students, it is Rutherford’s. How else
would this young man have made the journey from a small family
farm to the Nobel Prize? His first scholarship award allowed Ruth-
erford to attend Nelson College, close to the family farm on the
South Island. Having excelled there, he next received a scholarship
to Canterbury College of the University of New Zealand. Excelling
once again, in 1895 he won a scholarship to Cambridge University,
where his intellect and gifts as an experimentalist again made him
stand out. Rutherford went from Cambridge to the chair of physics
at McGill University in Montreal. In 1918 he became director of the
famous Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge, where he had done his
postgraduate work.
Ernest Rutherford ranks not only as one of the greatest experimen-
talists in the history of science but as one of the most inspiring men-
tors. Not only did he win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908 for his
work on radioactivity, under his direction four scientists at the Cav-
endish Laboratory themselves became Nobelists. Some of his students
would go on to lead the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s. Just
as the emissions from radioactive atoms induced radioactivity in other
nearby atoms, so proximity to Rutherford inspired his students and
colleagues to reach beyond themselves.
he named isotopes. For this discovery Soddy won the 1921 Nobel Prize
in Chemistry. In his remarks at the ceremony, Soddy gave a succinct
description of isotopes: “Put colloquially, their atoms have identical
outsides but different insides.”3
Rutherford and Soddy had found a strange new world: substances
decay so as to lose exactly half their original activity in a fixed amount
of time, but in so doing they transmute themselves into other sub-
stances, which also die away but with a different half-life. Atoms, far
from being eternal, immutable, and the smallest subdivision of mat-
ter, may spontaneously split into pieces and vanish while atoms of an
entirely different element arise in their place. In a sense, the ancient
alchemists were right: one element can be transformed into another.
But although lead cannot be changed into gold, as the ancients had
hoped, lead did turn out to be the most important element in discover-
ing the age of the Earth.
In a series of classic papers, Rutherford and Soddy explained that
radioactive decay obeys the law of probability.4 If we could observe
a particular atom, say of radon-220, we could not predict when that
atom would decay. It might happen within the first millisecond of
observation, or take hours, days, weeks, or years. We can speak only of
the probability that the atom will decay. But if the number of atoms
observed is large enough, the laws of probability dictate that in one
half-life, exactly one-half that number will decay.
A law of probability also governs the outcome of tossing a coin,
with its 50-50 chance of landing on heads. Toss an honest coin only a
few times, and you might get several heads in a row, or several tails, or
any combination: the exact outcome is unpredictable. But as you toss
the coin over and over, the percentage of heads approaches and finally
reaches 50 percent to whatever number of significant figures you have
the patience to achieve. Toss the coin 1023 times, for example, and the
number of heads will be 50 percent to a mind-numbing number of sig-
nificant figures. Ten raised to the twenty-third power is approximately
the number of molecules in only a single gram-mole of any chemical
element (Avogadro’s Number: 6.02 x 1023). Even minute traces of a
radioactive element contain so many atoms that they obey the law of
radioactive decay with complete fealty.