0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 34K views9 pagesExecutive Summary - Sexual Extortion Case
Executive Summary - sexual extortion case
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Utah Department of Public Safety
Independent Investigation of Allegations of
Misconduct by UUPD Officers
Executive Summary
Allegations:
In May of 2020, The Salt Lake Tribune published a story regarding the University of Utah Police
Department (UUPD), alleging that one of its former officers was involved in downloading, sharing, and
bragging about having explicit photos of Lauren McCluskey, the victim of a highly publicized homicide
in 2018. The article alleges that former UUPD Officer Miguel Deras saved the images of Lauren
McCluskey to his cell phone. However, this investigation did not find any physical evidence to suggest
that Officer Deras ever downloaded the pictures in question to his phone. Also, there is no evidenee that
Officer Deras forwarded the images in question to anyone other than to Detective Kayla Dallof (who
was the detective assigned to this case), and to the records officer/executive sic
August 16, 2019), who was processing the GRAMA requests related to this case on behalf of UUPD.
Independent Administrative Investigation:
At the request of the University's Chief of Police (Chief Rodney Chatman), the Office of Professional
Standards (IA) for the Utah Department of Public Safety (DPS) conducted an independent
administrative investigation regarding these allegations,
During this independent administrative investigation, DPS IA investigators interviewed 20 current
officers and employees, and 17 former employees. All interviews conducted with current UUPD officers
‘were conducted under Garrity. Only two individuals DPS IA attempted to contact were not interviewe:
onc of which was Officer Deras. Due to the faet that Officer Deras is no longer a UUPD employee, this
investigation did not have the authority to compel him to submit to an interview. The second individual
who declined to be interviewed was a non-sworn UUPD employee at the time of the McCluskey
Investigation, but is no longer employed there: this person was also under no obligation to respond to
requests to be interviewed. Additionally, DPS IA scheduled appointments to interview any current
police department employee wanting to speak to investigators confidentially about this matter.
‘This investigation determined that on October 13, 2018, Lauren McCluskey emailed copies of explicit
images, which were part of an extortion case, to UUPD Officer Miguel Deras” work email address.
Officer Deras then forwarded the same photos to the Detectives Division (Detective Kayla Dallof)
within the same hour that he received them from Lauren McCluskey.
On October 13, 2018, UUPD cr I was with Officer Deras when Lauren
McCluskey reported the extortion incident to the UUPD, also saw the images. After Lauren McCluskey
left the police department, Officer Deras showed the photos to Ofice, ll the Officer in Charge
(OIC), and asked [for supervisory guidance regarding the elements of the crime of extortion as wellas how to handle the pictures, specifically, how to attach them, or even if he should attach them to his
police report
On October 15, 2018, Officer Deras showed the images to a Sergeant (reportedly to Set
; juring a shift-briefing. Deras again asked for guidance on how to proceed with handling the
pictures. Officer —: Officer said they were in this shift-briefing when
Deras showed Sgt pictures. Sgt Jdcnies being there or that Officer Deras
asked him for his advice on how to handle the digital evidenee.
Although the date cannot be confirmed, at some point after the afore-mentioned briefing, Officer Deras
showed the images to three officers (who had already seen the photos). The officers who are believed to
have been ther when this happened oe Ofc} <- ah
told DPS IA they remember this —_ the hallway outside of the conference room where
bricfings take place. Officers| remember hearing some unprofessional comments being
made when the pictures were displayed. Officer [lenis having any knowledge about this event.
Garrity Interview of Officer Miguel Dera:
On September 16, 2019, Officer Deras left employment with UUPD and began working for the Logan
Police Department. On May 18, 2020, after The Tribune published their story, IA investigators from
Logan PD interviewed Officer Deras under Garrity about these allegations.
During the Garrity interview, Officer Deras explained which officers saw the photos on the day that
Lauren McCluskey emailed the pictures to him. He also explained the circumstances surrounding when
he showed the images to Sgt.. a. asking for help regarding how to handle the digital
evidence. Officer Deras did not tel Lo; whether he showed the images in a setting outside of the
afore-mentioned shift-briefing. DPS IA investigators attempted to contact Officer Deras and interview
him. Ultimately, Officer Deras was not interviewed as part of this investigation.
Download of Officer Deras’ Phone:
As reported by The Tribune and later confirmed by the University of Utah Police Department, on
August 15,2019, the West Valley Police Department (at the request of UUPD) conducted a download of
Officer Deras' phone. The download in question occurred months before The Tribune raised allegations
of downloading and sharing Lauren MeCluskey's pictures. UUPD copied Deras' cell phone to try to
answer questions about the number of phone calls and length of calls that occurred between Officer
Deras and Lauren McCluskey, between when she reported the extortion incident and her murder. DPS
1A eventually searched a copy of the download but did not find any of the explicit photos in question on
his phone.
Allegations of Boasting:
‘The Tribune reported that Officer Deras boasted about having explicit images of Lauren McCluskey.
During this investigation, Officer reported hearing Deras say, "He could look at them whenever
he wanted." Officer said he remembers Officer Deras making this statement outside of the
previously-reported briefing. Officers EEE oth confirmed hearing a couple of
unprofessional or crass comments made by those who were there, Officer ililadts that he made a
crass comment, and said the other two officers made similarly improper comments. Officer aid
he could have said something off-color but doesn’t remember anything specific. Officer| fsaid heremembers hearing other officers making some unprofessional remarks but doesn't remember anything
specific, or who said what.
IA Investigation by UUPD:
In the fall of 2019, UUPD received a GRAMA request regarding the download of Officer Deras' phone.
In December of 2019, UUPD Lt. Brian Wahlin began an IA investigation to answer the GRAMA_
request. The GRAMA request did not include specific allegations of officer misconduct and was not,
handled by Lt. Wahlin with that end in mind, However, during his investigation, Lt. Wahlin learned that
Deras showed at least one image to Officer [EEE during a shift-briefing (possibly held on
October 15, 2018). In May of 2020, during this investigation, it was leamed that one a
‘was also in this briefing and also saw the images.
In February of 2020, Lt. Wahlin conducted follow-up interviews as part of his IA investigation and it
‘was at this time he discovered that Officer [Ell§had witnessed the photos while acting as the OIC on
October 13, 2018. When interviewed about this, Officer fold Wahlin it was for business purposes
only.
Lt. Wahlin did not interview Officer Deras or any other former UPD officers who were potential
witnesses to these events, Ultimately, Lt. Wahlin completed his investigation and verbally reported the
results of his investigation up the chain of command, but did not physically give his report to the Acting
Chief of Police Rick MeLenon to review it. Acting Chief Rick McLenon said Lt. Wahlin told him there
fas “nothing there". Acting Chief MeLenon, in turn, reported those same findings to Robert Payne of
the Office of General Counsel for the University.
‘On May 29, 2020, MeLenon told investigators he didn't read the IA report until after The Tribune
published their article on May 17. In hindsight, he said it became apparent that the initial investigation
had fallen short of answering the eventual allegations raised by The Tribune.
Conclusions:
In conclusion, the following details of this investigation can be confirmed:
On Saturday, October 13, 2020, Lauren McCluskey contacted UUPD to report Melvin Rowland (as later
confirmed) was extorting her by threatening to release sexually explicit images of her to her friends and
family. Former UUPD Officer Miguel Deras handled this call with the help of Onrcer tT
and later that same day, Lauren McCluskey sent copies of the extortion photos to Officer Deras at his
‘work email address.
‘After Lauren McCluskey reported the extortion, Officer Deras went to the on-duty supervisor, Officer
and asked him for supervisory guidance on how to handle the digital evidence Lauren
icCluskey sent to Officer Deras. Due to their involvement in this call, all three of these officers
(Devs RBBB tee or sw the photo in question
‘On October 15, 2020, the photos in question were shown to UUPD Set. EEE Curing a shift-
briefing. Office gain asked for supervisory guidance regarding the handling of these images.
UUPD Officers ind Officer ave confirmed that they were at this briefing
and reported seeing the photos when Officer Deras showed them (o St. J.
‘At some point in time after the afore-mentioned briefing, Officer Deras reportedly showed the images
again to Officers IE Officer filiremembers seeing the pictures for a second
Page |3images. Officer]
Officer
Deras showed the picture:
‘no memory of this taking place or being there. As reported by
they remember hearing some unprofessional comments being made when
Set EEE cries that he was in the afore-mentioned and denies that Officer Deras
asked for his supervisory guidance regarding these images. Sgt. tates that Officer Deras
showed him one of the photos in question on the night that Lauren McCluskey was murdered by Melvin
Rowland,
In August of 2019, a download of Officer Deras’ personally-owned cell phone was conducted by the
West Valley Police Department, at the request of UPD. The searches that have been conducted of the
download of Officer Deras’ phone found no evidence of the images in question being on his device.
In December of 2019, and again in February of 2020, UUPD conducted Internal Affairs interviews
regarding the allegations that Officer Deras shared the extortion photos with Officer UUPD Lt.
Brian Wahlin conducted the IA investigation and determined, "there is no evidence that any pictures
were electronically transferred from Miguel Deras to Officer [EEE during the dates in que:
nm”
There is no evidence from this investigation to support that Officer Deras' electronically transferred or
shared any of the extortion photos with fice
Investigation and Report By:
‘The Utah Department of Public Safety
Office of Professional Standards
Date: 07/29/2020yoirea pue seiaq Aq pamain
"39 04 papuenuo} ave aia so8eu! uoruorxs
u-9 4. Noy aU UILIM ay. ‘sesaq 04 speura
-souapine jeyip aus ajpuey or mou aauapine eusip ajpuey or spues pue wauares e
Uo ad|Ape 10) Bunjse “18s ayy 0 AjayeuyN moy uo aoinpe 10/510 4No pay ays “Gd aur
Due s1301yo 1240 0} saflew uoRoWxe 03 saew! uonioxe smoys ve pve sevoq
smoys sesag Suyaliq aB8ueyd Yylus IV peated senee] Meine) teu "240 sjaaw uasNey
S48941O AdNN Aq npuoas|W Jo suo|esay|y — AaysnigoW UasNe7
quawyedag aa!jog yein Jo AysuaAluQ‘wST
4340390 UO Ajayl] Jsow WOO BuyaLq ayy apis;no
Aemyjey aun ul ade|d uayer aney 03 panaliag
“sagel 40}Ka 440] 313Ng MouyuN s} Buymoys siyy Jo alep eX BY
ayy Jo auo Wy pamoys ed uuop 194 “apeus azam squauiwsos
seveg 12u EE 35 4c ur pareso| ‘4e9 134 ayelidosddeu) aiaym siaayjo 48430 un0y
pareys 5131 aua9s AULD ay wy uy papi sj uauney Jo aay) 0} saBew!! UOOIXe al paMoys sea
#
# ¢ €
Fe ‘
¢
§
§ “
> S
= &
SJ8914O GdNN Aq Npuods!W Jo suonesally - AayxsnjgoW vane}
quawiyedag a!jog Yyein Jo Ayssaaiun,“uolyesiysaau!
siug 03 2yI2ads ase aauyy asayy Ing aseo Aaysn|QIW,
‘uadne] pue Wiy uaamzaq
ay} Bulpie8ou ysanbau YWYD AUeW diam alayL, “dd ue807 Aq aouapuodsaiios Jo uo}jeunp
pauiy sem pue pue soguinu au3 Sulprega
ann au yum suojeBa||e aAosdsip djay |jIM
“8LOZ/T/ZT pue 8t0Z/T/OT quausAo|dwa a yeuy uonepadxe ayy UUM
uaamjaq saSessou. “peojumop auoyd sly papua papeojumop auoud S|Y @aey 07
3x9} Se1aq JO} BUNqUIL sesaq JO} aunqi| aye] sueag jangiw, soau8e sesag ‘uojess}uWpe
aye1 aes ay Woy sanbay yes ayy Woy ysanbay adnn Jo yanbai ay ty
%
oe.
Pe,
%
2
£
&
s
=
oe
&
g
e
S1991HO GdNN Aq npuoosi| Jo suoiesaljy - Aaysnjgo~ uaine7
quawyedag aa!jog yeqn jo Aysuantup)mee “paquem ay sanauaym >: “6T02/61/6
Way} Je YOO} 0} Bund omy JayjO By “AjUO — 6102/ZT/6 10 8L07¢/S/TT —
SAReastuuIpe qnoge paageiq pue suoseas ayeusi} 89] 810Z/OT/OT Bulaq uonsanb u
uo JaxJJOM-09 2 0} sadeu! 40y sem Suimoys yey salep a) Sun
and aie ujyem, BY} JO BuO sea] pazeoipul si 3} ‘aBew! 4BO1YJO 03 Se4dq [ANSI Woy
uevig 31 ye pamoys pue ‘auoyd uojoyxa ue uaas pey paueysued Aljeo1U01399|9 919M
arene sty 0} seBeul! uoOyxo OYM selag Woy apise saunyid Aue ey} aouay
fandaa aan ayl pares sesaq S1dD1JJO 1340 OMY OU S| B1aYI, SAIeIS GTOZ/ET/ZT
Jey apew suonesally parep uodas parajduioa
SU2ILYO AdNN Aq Npuods!| JO suoesal|y - Aaysn|goW uaune]
quawyedag an1jog Yyein Jo Aqissanlup“uewyey9
Jaly9 0} Yodas
“ysanbau “suoneBaije au BujpieBas ‘gg ue80]
ayy sywigns ‘yako|duia quauino sty Aq A
, syueuneyg dw a 1y Aq AqUIED
pue uonesisanut ‘aann cuones a Japun pamayuaiut sem sesag “240
ayn sersjeues | | wou suaisos uoneSasonuy sey
seaoidde
spaepuey uouaTaW aul sels :
oissojors oly Jo! spuepueis uosiapuy ssar UNGUL 47 Hes aut Aq 1y8n01q
leuo|ssayoug ypty $2149 pearseajens fil] souoyssauren suonegajje 343 oul uoRes);sonu)
40 201440 sda quapuadapu ue yonpuos
Jo 20440 sda sda 01 sda sisanbai uewneyp Jalyy
‘S8A01
ia nor
= =
© < =
s e Ss
£ S &
é & §
SUBIIYO GdNN Aq Npuoosip| Jo suo|esaly - Aaysn|g9|\) usune]
quawedag aoljog YyeIn jo Aysuanjun,