Scribd
Upload
56 views

Pore-Water Pressures Defined Using A Finite Element Analysis

1) The document compares using a piezometric line versus a finite element analysis to define pore-water pressures in a slope stability analysis. 2) The finite element analysis more accurately captures the spatial variability in pore-water pressures compared to a piezometric line, which assumes vertical flow. 3) In the example problem, the piezometric line yielded higher pore-water pressures than the finite element analysis, particularly where there was a greater downward component to groundwater flow.

Uploaded by

Puspa Chand
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views

Pore-Water Pressures Defined Using A Finite Element Analysis

1) The document compares using a piezometric line versus a finite element analysis to define pore-water pressures in a slope stability analysis. 2) The finite element analysis more accurately captures the spatial variability in pore-water pressures compared to a piezometric line, which assumes vertical flow. 3) In the example problem, the piezometric line yielded higher pore-water pressures than the finite element analysis, particularly where there was a greater downward component to groundwater flow.

Uploaded by

Puspa Chand
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Pore-Water Pressures Defined using a

Finite Element Analysis


GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. | www.geo-slope.com
1200, 700 - 6th Ave SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 0T8
Main: +1 403 269 2002 | Fax: +1 888 463 2239

Introduction
Pore-water pressures impose one of the greatest controls on the stability of slopes. The pore-water
pressure can be defined in a SLOPE/W analysis using a variety of approaches including a piezometric
line, spatial pressure head function, or a finite element analysis. This example illustrates how to set-
up and interpret the results of a SLOPE/W analysis that uses pore-water pressures defined using
SEEP/W.

Numerical Simulation
Figure 1 presents the problem configuration. The analysis comprises a simple homogeneous dam
with a toe under-drain. The GeoStudio Project includes a steady-state SEEP/W analysis and two slope
stability analyses, both of which reference the seepage analysis as the Parent. The first stability
analysis uses the pore-water pressures from the ‘Parent’ (Figure 2), while the second analysis uses a
piezometric line. The reader should review the file for material inputs and boundary conditions. The
search technique in the stability analyses is defined using entry-exit.

1
12
10
Elevation (m)

8
6
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Distance (m)
Figure 1. Problem configuration.

Figure 2. Selecting the parent as the source for the pore-water pressures.

Results and Discussion


The steady-state seepage results are shown in Figure 3, including the total head contours
(equipotential lines), two flow paths and the zero-pressure contour representing the phreatic
surface. The blue painting on the reservoir side is a visual indicator of positive pore-water pressure
along the face of the dam.

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Distance (m)

Figure 3. SEEP/W results.

Figure 4 presents the critical slip surface and factor of safety from the first stability analysis. The
location of Slice #13 is shown in Figure 5 along with element numbers from the seepage analysis. This
slice will be used to highlight the calculation procedure.

2
1.307

12
10
Elevation (m)

8
6
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Distance (m)

Figure 4. Stability analysis with SEEP/W pore-water pressures.

Figure 5. Slice 13 of the critical slip surface.

The base of Slice 13 is located in the upper-right corner Element 301. The local coordinates r and s can
be found which represent the local position of the slice base inside the element. The finite element
formulation is based on an equation that describes the pore-water pressure distribution inside the
element in terms of nodal values. The equation is given by:

𝑢̃ = [𝑁]{𝑈} Equation 1

where u is the pore-water pressure at any point inside the element, [N] is a matrix of interpolating
functions, and {U} is a vector of pore-water pressures at the nodes. The matrix [N] is a function of
the local r and s coordinates. The pore-water pressures at the nodes {U} are known from SEEP/W. As
such, the exact pore-water pressures can be computed at the slice base using the above
interpolating equation.

The finite element pore-water pressure distribution along the slip surface is compared to the
piezometric line result in Figure 6. The piezometric line yielded higher pore-water pressures,
particularly when there was a greater downwards component to groundwater flow. The main
reason for the discrepancy is that SLOPE/W takes the vertical distance from the slice base up to the
piezometric line (left distance in Figure 7). In actual fact the pore-water pressure would rise up to
the height of the piezometric line (right distance in Figure 7). As such, a piezometric line and finite

3
element analysis will produce the same result in areas where the equipotential lines are vertical (i.e.
horizontal flow) and will deviate as the equipotential lines are non-vertical.

40

30

20
pore pressure - kPa

10

0
25 30 35 40 45 50 55

-10
With FE pwp
With piezo lin
-20

-30
x-cordinate

Figure 6 Comparison of pore pressure distributions

Figure 7. Pore-water pressures from an equipotential line.

Summary and Conclusions


This example compared the pore-water pressures in a SLOPE/w analysis defined using a piezometric
line and a finite element SEEP/W analysis. The piezometric line approach assumes that the pore-
water pressure at the base of a slice is based on the depth below the phreatic surface. This is
assumption is incorrect if there is lateral flow. In this example, the piezometric line pore-water
pressures were higher that the finite element pressures. Although it was not very dramatic in this

4
case, there are examples where the difference is significant. There are also cases in which a
piezometric line simply cannot be used to capture the spatial variability in pore-water pressure.

You might also like