Scribd
Upload
434 views1 page

Planters Products Vs Fertiphil GR 166006

Letter of Instruction (LOI) No. 1465 imposed a P10 charge per bag of fertilizer to fund debts of Philippine Planters, Inc. (PPI). Fertiphil Corporation challenged the constitutionality of LOI 1465, arguing it was an invalid exercise of taxation or police powers. The court ruled LOI 1465 was invalid because the charge was imposed solely to benefit PPI, a private corporation, rather than for public purpose. Even if considered under police powers, LOI 1465 failed the tests of promoting the general public interest and using reasonably necessary means that were not unduly oppressive on individuals.

Uploaded by

Christian Balabat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
434 views1 page

Planters Products Vs Fertiphil GR 166006

Letter of Instruction (LOI) No. 1465 imposed a P10 charge per bag of fertilizer to fund debts of Philippine Planters, Inc. (PPI). Fertiphil Corporation challenged the constitutionality of LOI 1465, arguing it was an invalid exercise of taxation or police powers. The court ruled LOI 1465 was invalid because the charge was imposed solely to benefit PPI, a private corporation, rather than for public purpose. Even if considered under police powers, LOI 1465 failed the tests of promoting the general public interest and using reasonably necessary means that were not unduly oppressive on individuals.

Uploaded by

Christian Balabat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Planters Products vs Fertiphil GR 166006, 14 March 2008

FACTS:

On June 3, 1985, for the purpose of rehabilitating Philippine Planters, Inc., the then President Ferdinand
E. Marcos issued Letter of Instruction (LOI) No. 1465 which imposed a charge of P10.00 per bag of
fertilizer on all domestic sales of fertilizer in the Philippines. Respondent Fertiphil Corporation, a
domestic entity engaged in the fertilizer business, questioned the constitutionality of LOI NO. 1465 and
brought an action to recover its accumulated payment thereunder in the amount of P6,698,144.00, the
case docketed as Civil Case No. 17835 before Branch 147 of the Regional Trial Court of Makati.

ISSUE:

Whether or not, LOI 1465 constitutes valid legislation pursuant to the exercise of the power of taxation
and police power of the state

RULING:

No. Court said, "It is clear from the Letter of Understanding that the levy was imposed precisely to pay
the corporate debts of PPI. We cannot agree with PPI that the levy was imposed to ensure the stability
of the fertilizer industry in the country. The letter of understanding and the plain text of the LOI clearly
indicate that the levy was exacted for the benefit of a private corporation, therefore not for public
purpose. Also, even if We consider LOI No. 1465 enacted under the police power of the State, it would
still be invalid for failing to comply with the test of ―lawful subjects‖ and ―lawful means.‖
Jurisprudence states the test as follows: (1) the interest of the public generally, as distinguished from
those of particular class, requires its exercise; and (2) the means employed are reasonably necessary for
the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. For the same reasons
as discussed, LOI No. 1465 is invalid because it did not promote public interest. The law was enacted to
give undue advantage to a private corporation."

You might also like