Coccidiosis in Poultry Anticoccidial Products, Vaccines and Other Prevention Strategies
Coccidiosis in Poultry Anticoccidial Products, Vaccines and Other Prevention Strategies
Veterinary Quarterly
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tveq20
To cite this article: H.W. Peek & W.J.M. Landman (2011): Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and
other prevention strategies, Veterinary Quarterly, 31:3, 143-161
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to
anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions,
claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Veterinary Quarterly
Vol. 31, No. 3, September 2011, 143–161
REVIEW ARTICLE
Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies
H.W. Peeka* and W.J.M. Landmanab
a
Animal Health Service – GD, Deventer, The Netherlands; bDepartment of Farm Animal Health,
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(Received 27 June 2011; final version received 4 July 2011)
Coccidiosis in chickens is a parasitic disease with great economic significance, which has been controlled
successfully for decades using mainly anticoccidial products. However, large-scale and long-term use of
anticoccidial drugs has led to the worldwide development of resistance against all these drugs. In order to
minimize the occurrence of resistance, the rotation of various anticoccidial drugs in single and/or shuttle
programmes is used. Unfortunately, this has not solved the anticoccidial resistance problem. Recently, live
anticoccidial vaccines have been incorporated into rotation programmes, resulting in an increasing incidence of
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
anticoccidial drug-sensitive Eimeria spp. field isolates, which may ameliorate the efficacy of anticoccidial drugs.
Nevertheless, possible upcoming bans restricting the use of anticoccidials as feed additives, consumer concerns on
residues and increasing regulations have prompted the quest for alternative coccidiosis control strategies.
Although management and biosecurity measures could halt the introduction of Eimeria spp. to a farm, in practice
they do not suffice to prevent coccidiosis outbreaks. Phytotherapy, aromatherapy and pre- and probiotics either
show conflicting, non-consistent or non-convincing results, and have therefore not been applied at a large scale in
the field. So far, live attenuated and non-attenuated anticoccidial vaccines have proved to be the most solid and
successful coccidiosis prevention and control strategy. Despite the drawbacks associated with their production
and use, their popularity is increasing. If with time, the immunogenicity of subunit vaccines can be improved,
they could represent the next generation of highly efficient and low-cost anticoccidial strategies.
Keywords: poultry; chickens; coccidiosis; Eimeria; Isospora; anticoccidial drugs; anticoccidial sensitivity test;
vaccines
Table 1. Contemporary anticoccidial products and recom- Ethopabate, which is often used in combination
mended doses for prophylactic treatment of coccidiosis in with amprolium to improve the spectrum of efficacy, is
chickens (modified from Conway and McKenzie 2007).
a folate antagonist and blocks a step in the synthesis of
Poultry Concentration para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and prevents the
Chemical name category in feed (ppm) formation of nucleic acids of vitamins (Rogers et al.
1964). It is most active against Eimeria maxima and
Chemicals Eimeria brunetti.
Amprolium Broiler, rearing 125–250
Similar to ethopabate, sulphonamides prevent the
Amprolium þ Broiler, rearing 125–250 þ 4
ethopabate synthesis of dihydrofolate by interfering with the
Aprinocid Broiler 60 dihydropteroate synthetase reaction, blocking the con-
Clopidol Broiler, rearing 125 jugation of pteridine and PABA. Dihydropteroate
Decoquinate Broiler 30 synthetase is only present in the parasite. They are
Diclazuril Broiler, rearing 1
very effective against E. brunetti, E. maxima and
Dinitolmide (zoalene) Broiler, rearing 125
Halofuginone Broiler, rearing 3 Eimeria acervulina and to a much lower degree against
Nequinate Broiler, rearing 20 Eimeria tenella and Eimeria necatrix (Ryley and Betts
(methyl benzoquate) 1973). A major drawback of sulphonamides is their
Nicarbazin Broiler 125 small safety margin, which easily leads to intoxications
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Robenidine Broiler 33
especially if they are used as treatment for coccidiosis
Polyether ionophores outbreaks.
Lasalocid Broiler 75–125 A third product affecting the folate pathway of
Maduramicin Broiler 5–6
Monensin Broiler, rearing 100–120
coccidia is pyrimethamine. It prevents the reduction of
Narasin Broiler 60–80 dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate by inhibiting the
Narasin þ nicarbazin Broiler 54–90 enzyme dihydrofolate reductase. Pyrimethamine has a
(of both drugs) clear synergistic effect with sulphonamides (Kendall
Salinomycin Broiler, rearing 44–66 and Joyner 1956). Ethopabate, sulphonamides and
Semduramycin Broiler 25
pyrimethamine affect the second generation of schiz-
Notes: Products listed are known to be used more or less onts (Reid 1973, 1975).
frequently in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific region Thiamine analogues, like amprolium, block the
and/or North America. absorption of thiamine completely and have probably
an antagonistic effect on the vitamin B1 supply.
of important ions like sodium and potassium. Amprolium seems especially efficacious during
The following groups of ionophores exist: schizogony as then the demand of thiamine is at its
highest (James 1980). There is a difference in sensitivity
. Monovalent ionophores (monensin,
of the thiamine transport system of host and parasite
narasin and salinomycin).
(more sensitive) to amprolium. It affects the first
. Monovalent glycosidic ionophores
generation of schizonts and to a lesser extent the
(maduramicin and semduramycin).
gametogony (Reid 1973) allowing immune response to
. Divalent ionophores (lasalocid).
develop.
(3) Mixed products. A few drug mixtures, consist-
ing of either a synthetic compound and 2.2.2. Products affecting mitochondrial function
ionophore (nicarbazin/narasin (MaxibanÕ )) or
Quinolone drugs, amongst which buquinolate, deco-
two synthetic compounds (meticlorpindol/
quinate and nequinate (methyl benzoquate) are listed,
methylbenzoquate (LerbekÕ )), are also used
show anticoccidial activity at very low concentrations.
against coccidiosis.
These products inhibit the respiration of coccidia by
blocking the electron transport in their mitochondria
(Wang 1975). Quinolones arrest the development of
2.2. Mode of action sporozoites (Yvoré 1968; Reid 1973).
Although detailed knowledge on the selective action of Meticlorpindol is the most important compound of
anticoccidial compounds against specific stages of the the pyridone group. Similar to the quinolones, it
parasite is often lacking (Wang 1982), a broad inhibits electron transport in mitochondria, but
categorization of the mode of action of anticoccidials possibly at another level as cross-resistance with
on the parasite metabolism has been undertaken quinolones does not occur. A synergistic effect between
(Chapman 1997). meticlorpindol and 4-hydroxiquinolones has been
described (Challey and Jeffers 1973). A widely used
pyridone–quinolone combination drug is LerbekÕ ,
2.2.1. Products affecting cofactor synthesis consisting of meticlorpindol and methyl benzoquate.
Several anticoccidial products influence essential The true mode of action of nicarbazin (4,40 -
biochemical pathways of the parasitic cell by affecting dinitrocarbanilide) is unknown. The product has been
an important cofactor (Greif et al. 2001). shown to inhibit both the succinate-linked NAD
Veterinary Quarterly 145
reduction in mitochondria of beef hearts and the 2.3. Antimicrobial and growth-promoting properties
energy dependent transhydrogenase and accumulation Ionophores have been found to inhibit Gram-positive
of Ca2þ ions by rat liver mitochondria (Dougherty organisms and mycoplasmas (Shumard and Callender
1974). It is not suitable for layers as it negatively affects 1967; Dutta and Devriese 1984; Stipkovits et al. 1987).
the egg production and quality. Monensin and narasin were shown to inhibit
The exact anticoccidial mechanism of robenidine (a Clostridium perfringens (types A and C) in chickens
guanidine derivative) is still unknown. However, from and turkeys (Elwinger et al. 1992; Vissiennon et al.
studies in mammals, it is assumed that it inhibits the 2000). Ionophores may therefore have contributed in
oxidative phosphorylation of mitochondria (Wong some cases to the control of necrotizing enteritis
et al. 1972). (Martel et al. 2004).
Another anticoccidial drug possibly affecting mito- Salinomycin has been shown to reduce the number
chondrial function is the triazinetrione compound of resistant coliforms (sulphadiazine) and Streptococci
toltrazuril, which is applied in drinking water for (erythromycin and lincomycin; George et al. 1982). It
preventive and therapeutic treatment. Harder and also seemed to reduce the number of resistant
Haberkorn (1989) showed that activities of some Salmonella typhimurium bacteria (Ford et al. 1981).
enzymes of the respiratory chain, such as succinate-
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
maximum tolerated by the host is ineffective A more recent development in managing antic-
(i.e. diclazuril and nicarbazin). In contrast, relative occidial drug resistance is the rotation of anticoccidial
resistance to anticoccidial drugs is characterized by the drugs with live Eimeria spp. vaccines. Several studies
fact that increasing doses tolerated by the host still will have documented a higher incidence of sensitive
show efficacy (i.e. ionophores). Eimeria spp. field isolates when live anticoccidial
The worldwide intensive use of anticoccidial drugs vaccines and anticoccidial products are rotated. The
to prevent coccidiosis has inevitably led to the devel- exact mechanism resulting in an increase of sensitivity
opment of resistance to all anticoccidial drugs as long- of Eimeria spp. field isolates is currently unknown, but
term exposure to any drug will result in loss of it is explained by the fact that chicken houses are
sensitivity. The widespread occurrence of resistance seeded with drug-sensitive vaccine oocysts (Jeffers
has been described in the United States of America, 1976; Mathis and McDougald 1989; Chapman 1994,
South America, Europe and China (Jeffers 1974a, 1996; Newman and Danforth 2000; Mathis and
1974b, 1989; Chapman 1978, 1982, 1984, 1997; Ryley Broussard 2006; Peek and Landman 2006). This may
1980; Hamet 1986; Litjens 1986; McDougald et al. lead to the outgrowth of resistant strains by reproduc-
1986, 1987; Zeng and Hu 1996; Zhou et al. 2000; Peek tively more advantageous drug-sensitive coccidia,
and Landman 2003; Peek and Landman 2004). In interbreeding between field and vaccine parasites
some cases resistance is induced very quickly, as in the resulting in (more) sensitive interbreeds or a combina-
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
case of quinolones and pyridinols, which led to a tion of both. Moreover, in case live attenuated
decline in their use, while in other instances it may take coccidiosis vaccines are used, less virulent interbreed
several years as in the case of the ionophores. field isolates may be produced (Shimura and Isobe
Despite the widespread occurrence of resistance, at 1994; Williams 2002a).
least in Europe, coccidiosis outbreaks seem to have had
limited impact so far. This is explained by the fact that
resistance in many cases will have allowed the occur- 3. Vaccines
rence of trickle infections, which are essential in the
Immunity to coccidiosis, which can be induced by
building up of immunity (Jeffers 1989; Chapman 1998;
passive or active immune responses, is generally
Peek and Landman 2003; McDougald and Shirley
defined as the occurrence of ‘resistance’ to a challenge
2009).
infection with an Eimeria spp. and can be determined
by a reduction of the pathogenic effects of coccidiosis:
2.6.1. Management of resistance less macroscopically visible lesions and/or a decrease in
oocyst production, and increased performance of
To minimize the occurrence of resistance, rotation (a
birds.
given anticoccidial product is used during a maximum
The first study showing that chickens infected with
of 2 months or two fattening periods) of various
E. tenella were resistant to homologous challenge was
anticoccidial drugs or shuttle programmes (two or
reported by Beach and Corl (1925) and formed the
more anticoccidial drugs are used within a fattening
basis of modern coccidiosis vaccinology. However, it
period) is used. The rationale behind this is the fact
took another 27 years before the first commercial live
that, as said previously, the loss of sensitivity is
coccidiosis vaccine CocciVacÕ was registered in the
correlated to the length of drug exposure, which
USA (Edgar and King 1952).
should be kept short if possible. Due to the occurrence
During the past 20 years, various reports describing
of cross-resistance between anticoccidial drugs, antic-
coccidiosis vaccines and their use in poultry have been
occidial drugs with distinct mode of action should be
published (Shirley 1988; Williams 1992, 1996, 1998,
used within rotation and shuttle programmes.
1999, 2000; 2002a, 2002b; Dalloul and Lillehoj 2006;
In order to optimize the use of prophylactic
Shirley et al. 2007). In Table 2, an overview showing
medication in the field, scientific information on the
drug-sensitivity profiles of Eimeria spp. concerning most available coccidiosis vaccines and their usage is
field isolates is vital. This information can only be given (Williams 2002a; Shirley et al. 2005).
obtained by performing an in vivo Anticoccidial Vaccination can be alternated with anticoccidial
drugs in feed within rotation programmes and in
Sensitivity Test (AST) in battery cages. Despite the
fact that the AST is the only accurate tool to detect combination with biosecurity.
anticoccidial drug resistance, the procedure is slow and
expensive; isolates frequently originate from disease
outbreaks (and may not always be representative for 3.1. Subunit vaccines
the field) and need to be propagated first in specified Subunit vaccines are composed of a purified antigenic
pathogen-free chickens for multiplication (which may determinant that is separated from the virulent organ-
result in the selection of non-relevant coccidia). ism. Such vaccines can be obtained by different
Nevertheless, it is generally accepted by the scientific technologies and may consist of native antigens or of
community that ASTs provide valuable information recombinant proteins expressed from DNA of various
and should be given more attention in coccidiosis developmental stages (sporozoites, merozoites and
prevention programmes. gametes) of the Eimeria parasite.
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Table 2. Overview of anticoccidial vaccines that are being used or being registered for use in chickens (modified from Williams 2002a; Shirley et al. 2005; manufacturer’s technical
information bulletins and websites).
Vaccine (manufacturer) Eimeria speciesa Attenuation Bird type Administration route First registration
Õb
ADVENT (Novus Eac, Emax, Eten Non-attenuated Broilers Hatchery spray, water or 2002 (USA)
International) feed spray
CocciVacÕ -B (Schering Eac, Emax, Emiv, Eten Non-attenuated Broilers Ocular, hatchery spray, 1952 (USA)
Plough Animal Health) water or feed spray
CocciVacÕ -D (Schering Eac, Ebr, Eha, Emax, Emiv, Non-attenuated Breeders/layers Ocular, hatchery spray, 1951 (USA)
Plough Animal Health) Enec, Epra, Eten water or feed spray
CoxAbicÕ (Abic Biological Killed antigen of Emax Breeders (to protect Killed antigen, one species, 2002 (Israel)
Laboratories) gametocytes hatchlings) intramuscular
EimerivacÕ Plus Eac, Emax, Eten Attenuated Breeders/layers/broilers Oral Expected (China)
(Guangdong Academy of
Agricultural Sciences)
EimeriavaxÕ 4 m Eac, Emax, Enec, Eten Attenuated (precocious) Breeders/layers/broilers Eye-drop application 2003 (Australia)
(Bioproperties Pty)
HipracoxÕ Broilers Eac, Emax, Emit, Epra, Attenuated Broilers Drinking water 2007 (Spain)
(Laboratorios Hipra, Eten
SA)
ImmucoxÕ C1 (Vetech Eac, Emax, Enec, Eten Non-attenuated Broilers Water or gel 1985 (Canada)
Laboratories)
ImmucoxÕ C2 (Vetech Eac, Ebr, Emax, Enec, Eten Non-attenuated Breeders/layers Water or gel 1985 (Canada)
Laboratories)
InmunerÕ Gel-Coc Eac, Ebr, Emax, Eten Attenuated Breeders/layers/broilers Oral 2005 (Argentina)
Veterinary Quarterly
(Vacunas Inmuner)
InovocoxÕ (Embrex Inc. Eac, Emax 2, Eten Non-attenuated Broilers In ovo injection with the 2006 (USA)
and Pfizer) InovojectÕ system
LivacoxÕ Q (BioPharm) Eac, Emax, Enec, Eten Attenuated (precocious, Breeders/layers Hatchery spray, water or 1992 (Czech Republic)
except Eten (embryo- feed spray
adapted))
LivacoxÕ T (BioPharm) Eac, Emax, Eten Attenuated (precocious, Broilers Hatchery spray, water or 1992 (Czech Republic)
except Eten (embryo- feed spray
adapted))
ParacoxÕ -8 (Schering Eac, Ebr, Emax 2, Emit, Attenuated (precocious) Breeders/layers Water or feed spray 1989 (UK)
Plough Animal Health) Enec, Epra, Eten
ParacoxÕ -5 (Schering Eac, Emax 2, Emit, Eten Attenuated (precocious) Broilers Hatchery spray, water or 1989 (UK)
Plough Animal Health) feed spray
SupercoxÕ (Qilu Animal Eac, Emax, Eten Attenuated (precocious: Broilers Oral 2005 (China)
Pharmaceutical Eten) non-attenuated (Eac
Company) and Emax)
Notes: aEac, E. acervulina; Ebr, E. brunetti; Eha, E. hagani; Emax, E. maxima; Emit, E. mitis; Emiv, E. mivati; Enec, E. necatrix; Epra, E. praecox; Eten, E. tenella; and Emax 2, two
antigenically different lines of E. maxima.
b
ADVENTÕ enables in vitro assessment of parasite viability using ViacystSM (non-viable sporocysts stain with ethidium bromide).
147
148 H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Despite an increasing number of manuscripts on feed in case chicken flocks are vaccinated with drug-
exploring the feasibility of subunit vaccines against sensitive live vaccine parasites in order to avoid
coccidiosis, no commercial products, except vaccination failures.
CoxAbicÕ , have been marketed to date (Brother
et al. 1988; Jenkins et al. 1989; Miller et al. 1989;
Jenkins et al. 1990; Crane et al. 1991; Bhogal et al. 3.2.1. Non-attenuated (or wild-type strains of
1992; Jenkins 1998; Vermeulen 1998; Jenkins 2001; Eimeria spp.) vaccines
Vermeulen et al. 2001; Dalloul and Lillehoj 2006). A Non-attenuated vaccines consist of Eimeria parasites,
major limiting factor has been that until now no which have not been modified in any way to change
antigens able to induce potent protective immune their pathogenicity and originate from laboratory or
response against Eimeria have been isolated. field strains. Examples of such vaccines are:
Systematic and detailed analysis of host–parasite CocciVacÕ , ImmucoxÕ , InovocoxÕ and ADVENTÕ .
interactions at the molecular and cellular levels includ- Some of these vaccines (CocciVacÕ and
ing studies of basic immunology need to be completed ImmucoxÕ ) are available as two different products
before successful subunit vaccine products will be and the choice of products depends on the poultry to
made available. In this regard, the E. tenella genome be vaccinated, e.g. broilers versus breeders and layers.
project may help to further understand how protective During the usage of non-attenuated coccidiosis
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
immune responses against Eimeria spp. are developed vaccines, it is crucial that all birds are given the
and help to identify antigens of vital importance in required dose and the occurrence of clinical coccidiosis
coccidial immunology (Shirley et al. 2007). is avoided. Therefore, application protocols should be
followed strictly (Chapman et al. 2002). In order to
diminish the risk of coccidiosis outbreaks following
3.1.1. Maternal immunization, transmission blocking
vaccination, attenuated vaccines have been developed.
immunity
CoxAbicÕ is a vaccine against coccidiosis, which
induces maternally derived antibodies to protect 3.2.2. Attenuated vaccines
broiler chickens (Michael 2003, 2007; Finger and Attenuated vaccines consist of Eimeria spp. strains,
Michael 2005; Ziomko et al. 2005). It is an inactivated, which have been manipulated in the laboratory in
subunit vaccine (oil emulsion) containing affinity- order to decrease their virulence. Reduced virulence
purified proteins (56, 82 and 230 kDa) from the has been performed by serial passages of the parasite in
oocyst wall-forming bodies of E. maxima gametocytes. chicken embryos; e.g. E. tenella in LivacoxÕ vaccines.
Cross-protection resulting in lower oocyst shedding of Selection for precocity is the second described method
E. maxima, E. acervulina and E. tenella has been for attenuation; e.g. remaining Eimeria spp. in
described after the administration of low-dose LivacoxÕ and all lines in ParacoxÕ vaccines
challenge inocula using the aforementioned Eimeria (McDonald and Shirley 1984; Shirley and Millard
spp. (Wallach et al. 1995; Wallach 1997). This is 1986; Shirley et al. 1995; Shirley and Bedrnik 1997).
remarkable because after natural Eimeria infections, Precocity is characterized by a shortened endogenous
cross-immunity has not been described (Rose and life-cycle due to the fact that the number of generations
Long 1962). However, Crane and co-workers (1991) of schizogony is decreased because last generations of
found cross-protection against four Eimeria spp. schizogony disappear by selecting early oocysts. As a
(E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. necatrix and E. tenella) consequence, the number of oocysts produced during
after administration of a single recombinant antigen. infection is reduced. However, the immunizing poten-
Offspring originating from vaccinated parent birds tial is maintained (Jeffers 1975, 1986; McDonald et al.
are fed an anticoccidial drug-free diet in order to 1986; Shirley and Millard 1986).
ensure natural exposure to the parasites and subse- A major drawback of live coccidiosis vaccines is
quent development of active immunity after maternal their loss of infectivity with time affecting their expiry
antibodies have disappeared. (Jeston et al. 2002). Other concerns are their high
production costs and management shortcomings
during their application such as dosage errors that
3.2. Live vaccines may result in insufficient immune response or clinical
Live Eimeria vaccines consist of sporulated oocysts coccidiosis in case non-attenuated vaccines are used,
and are either non-attenuated (wild-type strains of the erroneous addition of anticoccidial drugs to the
Eimeria spp.) or attenuated. Further differentiation is feed frustrating effective vaccination of drug-sensitive
based on the Eimeria spp. included, their anticoccidial strains and vaccination of sick birds. Furthermore,
drug sensitivity profile and application. Protective reversal of virulence of live vaccines may be another
immunity can be achieved if chickens are infected point of concern. Subunit vaccines offer possibilities to
with either a single high dose or multiple low doses circumvent mentioned drawbacks and could provide a
(trickle infections) of Eimeria (vaccine) parasites sustainable solution for the coccidiosis problem in
(Joyner and Norton 1973, 1976; Long et al. 1986). It commercial poultry if with the help of new technolo-
is crucial that anticoccidial drugs are withdrawn from gies their immunogenicity can be increased.
Veterinary Quarterly 149
A full list of anticoccidial vaccines, including, of ways. On the other hand, oocysts may already be
amongst others, their composition and route of present in the farm house if cleaning and disinfection
administration, has been given in Table 2. was not adequate.
Biosecurity measures aiming to prevent the intro-
duction of Eimeria parasites to the farm are similar to
4. Other preventive strategies against coccidiosis those applied for the prevention of other infectious
The prevention and control of coccidiosis in commer- poultry diseases and should focus on:
cial poultry and mainly broilers is largely based on the (1) Isolation. Birds should be separated from the
administration of anticoccidial drugs in feed, although environment by fencing and other animals
in some cases an anticoccidial drug administered including rodents and insects should be kept
shortly via drinking water is applied (Mathis et al. out.
2004). Moreover, biosecurity measures aiming at (2) Traffic control should not only be performed at
preventing the introduction of the parasite to the the farm, but also the traffic between farms
farm can be of additional strategic value against should be restricted.
clinical coccidiosis. During the past decade, live (3) Sanitation includes disinfection of materials,
coccidiosis vaccination has become increasingly people and equipment entering the farm and
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
4.1.3. Cleaning and disinfection body’s natural defenses. Homeopathy is often confused
Cleaning and disinfection between flocks and maxi- with herbalism also known as botanical medicine,
mizing the downtime period is important in order to medicinal botany, medical herbalism, herbal medicine,
significantly reduce the number of parasites in herbology and phytotherapy. It is based on the use of
contaminated chicken houses. However, there are plant and plant extracts for the treatment and preven-
mixed points of view regarding the use of cleaning tion of disease. Its scope is sometimes extended to
and disinfection for the control of coccidiosis. Some include fungi, bee products, minerals, shells and certain
consider that the presence of oocysts in the poultry animal parts. Aromatherapy, which is closely related to
environment enabling early establishment of immunity phytotherapy, is the treatment or prevention of disease
in order to avoid outbreaks at later age is beneficial. In by means of essential oils, and other scented
case coccidiosis vaccines are used to repopulate the compounds from plants. It involves the use of distilled
houses with drug-sensitive strains, survival of vaccine plant volatiles, a twentieth century innovation.
parasites between vaccinated and non-vaccinated Essential oils differ in chemical composition from
flocks is desired and therefore cleaning and disinfection other herbal products because the distillation process
should be skipped. Nevertheless, in case of severe only recovers lighter phytomolecules.
clinical coccidiosis outbreaks especially due to Although many papers have been published on the
efficacy of homeopathic treatment in humans, its
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Table 3. Overview of the influence of alternative feed additives, including the active compound, dose per kg feed and mode of action, on a coccidiosis infection in poultry.
152
Coccidiosis model
Alternative Active compound Mode of Infection dose (no. Effect on clinical
feed additive and dose action Eimeria spp. of oocysts) parameters Global effecta References
Artemisia Artemisinin extracts Induction oxidative Eimeria tenella Unknown BWGb " – Oh et al. (1995)
annua stress (free radicals) FCEb "
LSb #
Artemisia Dried leaves at 5, 10 Induction oxidative Eimeria acervulina 105 OPGb # Eimeria tenella Allen et al. (1997)
annua and 50 g/kg 3 weeks stress (free radicals) Eimeria tenella 5 104 LS # Eimeria acervulina
Pure artemisinin Eimeria maxima 5 103 No effect Eimeria maxima ¼
0.002, 0.0085 and
0.017 g/kg 4 weeks
Mushrooms Polysaccharide Immune stimulation Eimeria tenella 6 104 BWG " – Guo et al. (2004,
extracts extracts (1 g/kg) 9 104 2005)
Mushrooms Lectin (FFrL) Immune stimulation Eimeria acervulina 104 BWG " – Dalloul et al.
extracts injected into amniotic OPG # (2006)
cavity (100 mg in
100 mL/egg)
Oregano Essential oil, Stimulation mucosal Eimeria tenella 5 104 BWG " – Giannenas et al.
carvacrol and thymol immunity (antimicro- (2003)
(0.3 g/kg) bial effect)
Oregano Essential oil, thymol, Stimulation mucosal ADVENTÕ No beneficial effect ¼ Oviedo-Rondón
eugenol, curcumin immunity (antimicro- (day 1) on vaccination et al. (2006)
and piperin (0.1 g/kg) bial effect) Challenged
(day 19)
Eimeria acervulina 2 102
Eimeria maxima 102
Eimeria tenella 5 103
H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Herb(s) Various Indian herb Unknown Eimeria necatrix Unknown LS # – Mandal et al.
extracts extracts (6 g/kg) (1994)
Herb(s) Preparation of Unknown Mixed infection 5 104 BWG " – Hayat et al. (1996)
extracts Persian lilac (Melia Eimeria spp. OPG #
azedarach) 0.3 g/kg
and bitter melon
(Momordica
charantia) 30 g/kg
Herb(s) Fifteen Asian herb(s) Unknown Eimeria tenella 105 Variable results dif- þ/ Youn and Noh
extracts extracts (6–30 g/L ferent herbs (2001)
drinking water)
Herb extract Neem fruit Unknown Eimeria tenella 3 104 (3 g/kg) – Tipu et al. (2002)
(Azadirachta indica) Mort #
(1, 2 and 3 g/kg) OPG #
Herb(s) Complex of eight Unknown Eimeria tenella 105 LS # – Du and Hu (2004)
extracts herbs (2 g/mL and BWG "
10 g/kg)
Herb(s) Complex of four Unknown Eimeria tenella 6 104 BWG " – Christaki et al.
extracts herbs (Apacox) (0.5 FCE " (2004)
and 1.0 g/kg) OPG #
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Herb extract Green tea (5 and Unknown Eimeria maxima 104 BWG ¼ – Jang et al. (2007)
20 g/kg) OPG #
Betaine (sugar Trymethylglycine Stabilization cell Mixed infection Various BWG " – Augustine et al.
beet solids) (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and membranes and Eimeria acervulina OPG ¼ (1997)
5 g/kg) immune stimulation Eimeria tenella LS ¼ Mathews et al.
(osmoprotectant) Eimeria maxima (1997)
Waldenstedt et al.
(1999)
Klasing et al.
(2002)
Citric fruits Extracts and organic ? Mixed infection 4.5 104 LS # Mixed infection Tamasaukas et al.
acids (2, 3 and 4 mL/ Eimeria acervulina OPG # (1996, 1997)
10 L drinking water) Eimeria maxima
Eimeria tenella (E. tenella 5 103) Except for E. tenella Eimeria tenella ¼
Eimeria brunetti
Eimeria mivati
Echinacea Dried ground root Immune stimulation, ImmucoxÕ C1 115 (0.5 dose) BWG " – Allen (2003)
purpurea preparation including enhancement macro- (day 1) LS #
glycoproteins, chiro- phage activity Challenged 2.3 105
ric acid and alka- (day 28) (1000 vaccine
mides (1–5 g/kg first 2 dose)
weeks)
Turmeric Diferuleolymethane Immune stimulation Eimeria maxima Unknown BWG " – Allen et al. (1998)
(Curcuma (phenolic compound, by inactivation of LS #
longa) curcumin 10 g/kg) reactive nitrogen rad- OPG #
icals (
-tocopherol Eimeria tenella Unknown No effect ¼
like)
Prebiotics MOS 1, 0.5 and Immune stimulation Eimeria acervulina Various Variable results þ/ Elmusharaf et al.
10 g/kg (Bio-MosÕ ) and blocking binding Eimeria tenella (2006, 2007)
Veterinary Quarterly
Notes: a‘’ indicates that the substrate has an inhibiting effect on coccidiosis, ‘þ’ indicates that the substrate promotes coccidiosis and ‘¼’ indicates no effect on coccidiosis.
b
BWG, body weight gain; FCE, feed conversion efficiency (g weight gain/g food intake); LS, lesion scores; Mort, mortality; OPG, oocysts per gram faeces.
153
154 H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Figure 1. Artemisinin extracts, citric fruits and different herb extracts seem to have an inhibitory effect on the development of
Eimeria spp. Prebiotics and oregano have an indirect inhibitory effect on the development of Eimeria parasite. Betaine has an
indirect effect on the development of the parasite through its osmoprotective properties on the intestinal mucosa and stimulation
of the intraepithelial lymphocytes. Echinacea purpurea, mushrooms extracts, turmeric and probiotics have an indirect inhibitory
effect on the development of Eimeria spp. through stimulation of the immune system.
4.2.1.7. Oregano. The essential oils of Origanum found for both Eimeria spp. (Allen et al. 1998). A
vulgare are known for their antibacterial activity similar effect on lesion scores, oocyst shedding,
(Hammer et al. 1999) and effect against some parasites growth, and plasma NO
2 and NO3 concentrations
(Milhau et al. 1997). Furthermore, some essential oils was found for
-tocopherol. The antioxidative prop-
of oregano, mainly carvacrol and thymol, have an erties of curcumin by inhibiting NOS induction by
anticoccidial effect against E. tenella although lower macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide and
than lasalocid (Giannenas et al. 2003). However, in interferon-
has been shown previously (Brouet and
subsequently performed studies with diets supple- Ohshima 1995). Although NO is an important defence
mented with a mixture of the essential oils, oregano, mechanism against the invasion of different
thymol, eugenol, curcumin and piperin, a beneficial Apicomplexa parasites (Adams et al. 1990; Mellouk
effect of these oils on a coccidiosis vaccination was not et al. 1991), it was suggested more recently that NO
found (Oviedo-Rondón et al. 2006). might itself promote the development of coccidial
lesions (Allen 1997a, 1997b).
thus improves the host’s health. The positive influence combination did not reduce the severity of a mixed
of prebiotics on the intestinal flora has been confirmed coccidiosis infection of E. acervulina, E. maxima and
by a number of studies (Van Loo et al. 1999). Recently, E. tenella given orally at clinical doses of 50,000, 15,000
the definition of the prebiotics was narrowed with the and 15,000 sporulated oocysts, respectively. These
introduction of a prebiotic index by Roberfroid (2005), contradictory results are possibly explained by the
who stated that a preparation might be called prebiotic differences in MOS concentrations in feed and the
if it is capable to produce at least 4 108 colony- magnitude of Eimeria spp. inoculation doses.
forming units of Bifidobacteria/gram faeces per daily
dose (gram) ingested. Only three large groups meet this
criterion: inulin and oliogofructose, galactose 4.2.2.2. Probiotics. Lower intestinal invasion, devel-
oligosaccharides and xylooligosaccharides. opment of coccidia and oocyst production, explained
Probiotics consist of beneficial live bacteria or by enhanced local cell-mediated immunity, were
yeasts supplemented to the diet. According to the Food observed with a Lactobacillus-based probiotic supple-
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and WHO pro- mented diet in E. acervulina-infected broilers (Dalloul
biotics are ‘live microorganisms, which when adminis- et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2005).
trated in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on More recently, in a study performed with a
the host’ (FAO/WHO 2002). The most frequently used Pediococcus-based commercial probiotic
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
probiotics in humans are species of the genera (MitoGrowÕ ) given to birds infected with either
Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria, whereas species of E. acervulina or E. tenella, increased resistance of
Bacillus, Enterococcus and Saccharomyces yeasts have birds against coccidiosis and a partial protection
been the most commonly used organisms in livestock. against growth retardation were demonstrated (Lee
In poultry production, probiotics are known for their et al. 2007a). In another study, performed with a
capacity to restore the intestinal microflora after being Pediococcus- and Saccharomyces-based probiotic
disrupted by antibiotic treatment or enteric infections (MitoMaxÕ ), less E. acervulina and E. tenella oocyst
(Rada and Rychly 1995; Line et al. 1998; Pascual et al. shedding and a better antibody response were found
1999). They are also known for their ability to boost (Lee et al. 2007b).
the immune system and used against allergies and
other immune diseases (Zulkifli et al. 2000; Dalloul
et al. 2003b; Kabir et al. 2004; Koenen et al. 2004). 5. Conclusions and perspectives
A treatment with prebiotics can be easily combined To date, coccidiosis control has relied mainly on
with a probiotic in a so-called ‘synbiotic’ approach chemoprophylaxis. However, the occurrence of resis-
(Gibson and Roberfroid 1995). An advantage of this tance, consumer concerns and the increasing regula-
combination is the improved survival of probiotics tions as well as possible upcoming bans on the use of
when given in a medium of prebiotics. The use of pre- anticoccidial drugs as feed additives, have prompted
and probiotics in poultry has been reviewed by the quest for alternative control strategies, amongst
Patterson and Burkholder (2003). which vaccines, phytotherapy, aromatherapy, pre- and
probiotics have been quite extensively studied. So far,
4.2.2.1. Prebiotics. Mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) live vaccines have proved to be the most solid and
are derived from the cell wall of the yeast successful anticoccidiosis alternative approach.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and are widely used in Although a number of drawbacks are associated with
animal feed to promote gastrointestinal health and the production and use of live coccidiosis vaccines,
performance. MOS have been described as a prebiotic, their efficacy and ability to increase the sensitivity of
but are thought to block the binding of pathogens to Eimeria spp. isolates to anticoccidial drugs, have
mannan receptors on the mucosal surface and stimu- further stimulated their use. If the immunogenicity of
late the immune response (Spring et al. 2000). subunit vaccines can be improved, they could represent
In an experiment performed with coccidia, dietary the next generation of highly efficient and low-cost
MOS (1 g/kg feed) were able to reduce the severity of a anticoccidial strategies.
single E. tenella infection with 3500 or 5000 sporulated
oocysts (Elmusharaf et al. 2006). In another
experiment, a dietary supplementation of MOS at a References
concentration of 10 g/kg feed reduced the oocyst
excretion and diminished the severity of E. acervulina Adams LB, Hibbs JB, Taintor RR, Krahenbuhl JL. 1990.
Microbiostatic effect of murine-activated macrophages for
lesions in birds infected orally with a mixture of
Toxoplasma gondii: role for synthesis of inorganic nitrogen
E. acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella at subclinical
oxides from L-arginine. J Immunol. 14:2725–2729.
doses of 900, 570 and 170 sporulated oocysts, Allen PC. 1997a. Nitric oxide production during Eimeria
respectively (Elmusharaf et al. 2007). tenella infections in chickens. Poult Sci. 76:810–813.
In contrast, in a study performed by McCann et al. Allen PC. 1997b. Production of free radical species during
(2006) supplementation of MOS (0.5 g/kg feed) or Eimeria maxima infections in chickens. Poult Sci.
tannin (0.5 g/kg feed) either individually or in 78:1506–1509.
156 H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Allen PC. 2003. Dietary supplementation with Echinacea and Proceedings of the 13th Poultry Science Symposium;
development of immunity to challenge infection with Edinburgh, UK, p. 387–412.
coccidia. Parasitol Res. 91:74–78. Chapman HD. 1982. Anticoccidial drug resistance.
Allen PC, Danforth HD, Augustine PC. 1998. Dietary In: Long PL, editor. The biology of the coccidia.
modulation of avian coccidiosis. Int J Parasitol. Baltimore (MD): Baltimore University Park Press.
28:1121–1140. p. 430–451, Chapter 2.
Allen PC, Fetterer RH. 2002. Recent advances in biology Chapman HD. 1984. Drug resistance in avian coccidia
and immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis (review). Vet Parasitol. 15:11–27.
and control of infection with these coccidian parasites in Chapman HD. 1994. Sensitivity of field isolates of Eimeria to
poultry. Clin Microbiol Rev. 15:58–65. monensin following the use of a coccidiosis vaccine in
Allen PC, Lydin J, Danforth HD. 1997. Effects of compo- broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 73:476–478.
nents of Artemisia annua on coccidia infections in chickens. Chapman HD. 1996. Restoration of drug sensitivity follow-
Poult Sci. 76:1156–1163. ing the use of live coccidiosis vaccines. In: World Poultry,
Ammon HPT, Safayhi H, Mack T, Sabieraj J. 1993. Special Supplement Coccidiosis 2. Amsterdam (The
Mechanism of anti-inflammatory of curcumine and Netherlands): Elsevier. p. 20–21.
boswellic acids. J Ethnopharmacol. 38:113–119. Chapman HD. 1997. Biochemical, genetic and applied
Arab HA, Rahbari S, Rassouli A, Moslemi MH, aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the
Khosravirad F. 2006. Determination of artemisinin in fowl. Avian Pathol. 26:221–244.
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Artemisia sieberi and anticoccidial effects of the plant Chapman HD. 1998. Evaluation of the efficacy of antic-
extracts in broiler chickens. Trop Anim Health Prod. occidial drugs against Eimeria species in the fowl. Int J
38:497–503. Parasitol. 28:1141–1144.
Augustine PC, Danforth HD. 1999. Influence of betaine and Chapman HD. 1999a. The development of immunity to
salinomycin on intestinal absorption of methionine and Eimeria species in broilers given anticoccidial drugs. Avian
glucose and on the ultrastructure of intestinal cells Pathol. 28:155–162.
and parasite development stages in chicks infected with Chapman HD. 1999b. Anticoccidial drugs and their effects
E. acervulina. Avian Dis. 43:89–97. upon the development of immunity to Eimeria infections in
Augustine PC, McNaughton JL, Virtanen E, Rosi L. 1997. poultry. Avian Pathol. 28:521–535.
Effect of betaine on the growth performance of chicks Chapman HD. 2000. Practical use of vaccines for the control
inoculated with mixed cultures of Avian Eimeria species of coccidiosis in the chicken. World’s Poult Sci J. 56:7–20.
and on invasion and development of Eimeria tenella and Chapman HD. 2003. Origins of coccidiosis research in the
Eimeria acervulina in vivo and in vitro. Poult Sci. fowl – the first fifty years. Avian Dis. 47:1–20.
79:802–809. Chapman HD, Cherry TE, Danforth HD, Richards G,
Beach JR, Corl JC. 1925. Studies in the control of avian Shirley MW, Williams RB. 2002. Sustainable coccidiosis
coccidiosis. Poult Sci. IV:83–93. control in poultry production: the role of live vaccines. Int
Berger J, Rachlin AI, Scott EE, Sternbach LH, J Parasitol. 32:617–629.
Goldberg MW. 1951. The isolation of three new crystalline Chapman HD, Hacker AB. 1993. The effects of shuttle
antibiotics from Streptomyces. J Am Chem Soc. programs upon the growth of broilers and the develop-
73:5295–5298. ment of immunity to Eimeria species. Poult Sci.
Bhogal BS, Miller GA, Anderson AC, Jessee SJ, 72:658–663.
Strausberg S, McCandliss R. 1992. Potential of a recom- Christaki E, Florou-Paneri P, Giannenas I,
binant antigen as a prophylactic vaccine for day-old Papazahariadou M, Botsoglou NA, Spais AB. 2004.
broiler chickens against Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria Effect of a mixture of herbal extracts on broiler chickens
tenella infections. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. with Eimeria tenella. Anim Res. 53:137–144.
31:323–335. Chroustova E, Pinka K. 1987. The efficacy of disinfectants
Borchers AT, Keen CL, Gershwin ME. 2004. Mushroom, on the oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Acta Vet BRNO.
tumors, and immunity: an update. Exp Biol Med. 56:141–149.
229:393–406. COM 2008. COM/2008/0233. Report from the Commission
Brother VM, Kuhn I, Paul LS, Gabe JD, Andrew WH, to the Council and the European Parliament on the use of
Sias SR, McCaman MT, Dragon EA, Files JG. 1988. coccidiostats and histomonostats as feed additives, sub-
Characterisation of a surface antigen of Eimeria tenella mitted pursuant to article 11 of regulation (EC) no 1831/
sporozoites and synthesis from a cloned cDNA in 2003 of the European parliament and the Council of 22
Escherichia coli. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 28:235–247. September 2003 on additives for the use in animal
Brouet I, Ohshima H. 1995. Curcumin, an anti-tumour nutrition. Available from: http://www.ipex.eu/ipex/cms/
promoter and anti-inflammatory agent, inhibits induction home/Ducuments/dossier_COM20080233 (accessed 23
of nitric oxide synthase in activated macrophages. December 2009).
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 206:533–540. Conney AH, Lysz T, Ferraro T, Abidi TF, Manchand PS,
Burger RA, Torres AR, Warren RP, Caldwell VD, Laskin JD, Huang MT. 1991. Inhibitory effect of
Highs BG. 1997. Echinacea-induced cytokine production curcumin and some related dietary compounds on
by human macrophages. Int J Immunopharmacol. tumour promotion and arachidonic metabolism in mouse
19:371–379. skin. Adv Enzyme Regul. 31:385–396.
Challey JR, Jeffers TK. 1973. Synergism between 4-hydro- Conway DP, Mckenzie ME. 2007. Poultry coccidiosis:
xyquinoline and pyridone coccidiostats. J Parasitol. diagnostic and testing procedures. 3rd ed. Ames (IA):
59:502–504. Blackwell Publishing Professional.
Chapman HD. 1978. Drug resistance in coccidia. Paper Crane MSJ, Goggin B, Pellegrino RM, Ravino OJ, Lange C,
presented at: 13th Poultry Science Symposium. Karkhanis YD, Kirk KE, Chakraborty PR. 1991.
Veterinary Quarterly 157
Crossprotection against four species of chicken coccidia Fetterer RH, Augustine PC, Allen PC, Barfield RC. 2003.
with a single recombinant antigen. Infect Immun. The effect of dietary betaine on intestinal and plasma levels
59:1271–1277. of betaine in uninfected and coccidia-infected broiler
Currier NL, Miller SC. 2001. Echinacea purpurea and chicks. Parasitol Res. 90:343–348.
melatonin augment natural-killer cells in leukemic mice Finger A, Michael A. 2005. Maternal protection against
and prolong life span. J Altern Complement Med. Eimeria challenge of CoxAbicÕ vaccinated chickens.
7:241–251. Proceedings of the IXth International Coccidiosis
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS. 2006. Poultry coccidiosis: recent Conference; 2005 Sep 19–23; Foz do Iguassu, Brasil.
advancements in control measures and vaccine develop- p. 146.
ment. Expert Rev Vaccines. 5:143–163. Ford AM, Fagerberg DJ, Quarles CL, George BA,
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS, Lee JS, Lee SH, Chung KS. 2006. McKinley GA. 1981. Influence of salinomycin on inci-
Immunopotentiating effect of a Formitella fraxinea- dence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of
derived lectin on chicken immunity and resistance to Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler
coccidiosis. Poult Sci. 85:446–451. chicks. Poult Sci. 60:2442–2453.
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS, Shellum TA, Doerr JA. 2003a. George BA, Ford AM, Fagerberg DJ, Quarles CL. 1982.
Intestinal immunomodulation by vitamin A deficiency and Influence of salinomycin on antimicrobial resistance of
lactobacillus-based probiotic in Eimeria acervulina infected coliforms and streptococci from broiler chickens. Poult
broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 47:1313–1320. Sci. 61:1842–1852.
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS, Shellum TA, Doerr JA. 2003b. Giannenas I, Florou-Paneri P, Papazahariadou M,
Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in Christaki E, Botsoglou A, Spais AB. 2003. Effect of
broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poult Sci. dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on
82:62–66. performance of broilers after experimental infection with
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS, Shellum TA, Doerr JA. 2005. E. tenella. Arch Anim Nutr. 57:99–106.
Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervu- Gibson GR, Roberfroid M. 1995. Dietary modulation of the
lina by Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Comp Immunol human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of
Microbiol Infect Dis. 28:351–361. prebiotics. J Nutr. 125:1401–1412.
Daugschies A, Böse R, Marx J, Teich K, Freidhoff KT. 2002. Goel V, Chang C, Slama JV, Barton R, Bauer R, Gahler R,
Development and application of a standardized assay for Basu TK. 2002. Alkylimides of Echinacea purpurea
chemical disinfection of coccidia oocysts. Vet Parasitol. stimulate alveolar macrophage function in normal rats.
103:299–308. Int Immunopharmacol. 2–3:381–387.
Dougherty HW. 1974. Inhibition of mitochondrial energy Graat EAM, Henken AM, Ploeger HW,
transduction of carbanilides. Fed Proc. 33:1657. Noordhuizen JPTM, Vertommen MH. 1994. Rate and
Dowling L. 1992. Ionophore toxicity in chickens: a review of course of sporulation of oocysts of Eimeria acervulina
pathology and diagnosis. Avian Pathol. 21:355–368. under different environmental conditions. Parasitology.
Du A, Hu S. 2004. Effects of a herbal complex against 108:497–502.
Eimeria tenella infection in chickens. J Vet Med B Infect Greif G. 2000. Immunity to coccidiosis after treatment with
Dis Vet Public Health. 51: 194–197. toltrazuril. Parasitol Res. 86:787–790.
Dutta GN, Devriese LA. 1984. Observations on the in vitro Greif G, Haberkorn A. 1997. Enhancement of immunity and
sensitivity of Gram-positive intestinal bacteria of farm protection against coccidiosis during therapeutic medica-
animals to growth promoting antibacterials. J Appl tion with toltrazuril. Paper presented at: Control of
Bacteriol. 56:117–123. Coccidiosis into the Next Millennium. Proceedings of the
Edgar SA. 1955. Sporulation of oocysts at specific tempera- VIIth International Coccidiosis Conference; 1997 Sep 1–5;
tures and notes on the prepatent period of several species Oxford (UK): Keble, p. 42.
of avian coccidia. J Parasitol. 41:214–216. Greif G, Harder A, Haberkorn A. 2001. Chemotherapeutic
Edgar SA, King DE. 1952. Breeding and immunizing approaches to protozoa: coccidiae – current level of
chickens for resistance to coccidiosis. 62nd and 63rd knowledge and outlook. Parasitol Res. 87:973–975.
Annu rep Alabama Agr Exp Stat. p. 36–37. Gumarães Jr JS, Bogado ALG, da Cunha TCB, Garcia JL.
Elmusharaf MA, Bautista V, Nollet L, Beynen AC. 2006. 2007. In vitro evaluation of the disinfection efficacy on
Effect of a mannaoligosaccharide preparation on Eimeria Eimeria tenella unsporulated oocysts isolated from broi-
tenella infection in broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci. lers. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 16:67–71.
5:583–588. Guo FC, Kwakkel RP, Williams BA, Paramentier HK,
Elmusharaf MA, Peek HW, Nollet L, Beynen AC. 2007. The Li WK, Yang ZQ, Verstegen MW. 2004. Effects of
effect of and in-feed mannaoligosaccharide preparation mushroom and herb polysaccharides on cellular and
(MOS) on a coccidiosis infection in broilers. Anim Feed humoral immune responses of E. tenella-infected chickens.
Sci Technol. 134:347–354. Poult Sci. 83:1124–1132.
Elwinger K, Schneitz C, Berndtson E, Fossum O, Teglöf B, Guo FC, Kwakkel RP, Williams BA, Suo X, Li WK,
Engström B. 1992. Factors affecting the incidence of Verstegen MW. 2005. Coccidiosis immunization: effects
necrotic enteritis, ceacal carriage of Clostridium perfringes of mushroom and herb polysaccharides on immune
and bird performance in broiler chickens. Acta Vet Scand. responses of chickens with Eimeria tenella. Avian Dis.
33:369–378. 4:70–73.
FAO/WHO. 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probio- Hackstein JHP, Mackenstedt U, Mehlhorn H,
tics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group Meijerink JPP, Schubert H, Leunissen JAM. 1995.
on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in Parasitic apicomplexans harbor a chlorophyll a-D1
food. Available from: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/ complex, the potential target for therapeutic triazines.
fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf Parasitol Res. 81:207–216.
158 H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Hamet N. 1986. Resistance to anticoccidial drugs in poultry Joyner LP, Norton CC. 1973. The immunity arising from
farms in France from 1975 to 1984. Paper presented at: continuous low-level infections with Eimeria tenella.
Research in Avian Coccidiosis. Proceedings of the Georgia Parasitology. 67:907–913.
Coccidiosis Conference; 1985 Nov 18–20; Athens, Joyner LP, Norton CC. 1976. The immunity arising from
GA, USA. continuous low-level infections with Eimeria maxima and
Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. 1999. Antimicrobial Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology. 72:271–278.
activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Kabir SML, Rahman MM, Rahman MB, Rahman MM,
Microbiol. 86:985–990. Ahmed SU. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth
Harder A, Haberkorn A. 1989. Possible mode of action performance and immune response in broilers. Int J Poult
of toltrazuril: studies on two Eimeria species and Sci. 3:361–364.
mammalian and Ascaris suum enzymes. Parasitol Res. Kendall SB, Joyner LP. 1956. The potentiation of coccidio-
76:8–12. static drugs by Pyrimethamine. Vet. Rec. 68:119–121.
Hayat B, Jabeen F, Hayat CS, Akhtar M. 1996. Comparative Kheysin YM. 1972. Life cycles of coccidia of domestic
prophylactic effects of salinomycin and some indigenous animals. London: William Heinerman Medical Books Ltd.
preparations against coccidiosis in broiler chicks. Pakistan Klasing KC, Adler KL, Remus JC, Calvert CC. 2002.
Vet J. 16:164–167. Dietary betaine increases intraepithelial lymphocytes in the
Houdek Z, Hortvikova M, Cernik F. 2002. Efficacy of duodenum of coccidial-infected chicks and increases
NeopredisanÕ 135-1 on the viability of chicken coccidian functional properties of phagocytes. J Nutr.
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
Mathis GF, Broussard C. 2006. Increased level of Eimeria Mukhopadhyay A, Basu N, Ghatak N, Gujral PK. 1982.
sensitivity to diclazuril after using a live coccidial vaccine. Anti-inflammatory and irritant activities of curcumin
Avian Dis. 50:321–326. analogues in rats. Agents Actions. 12:508–515.
Mathis GF, Froyman R, Kennedy T. 2004. Coccidiosis Newman LJ, Danforth HD. 2000. Improved sensitivity of
control by administrating toltrazuril in the drinking water field oocyst populations to coccidiostat following vaccina-
for a 2-day period. Vet Parasitol. 121:1–9. tion with live oocyst vaccine. Poult Sci. 79(Suppl. 1):4.
Mathis GF, McDougald LR. 1989. Restoration of drug Oh HG, Youn HG, Noh HJ, Jang JW, Kang YB. 1995.
sensitivity on turkey farms after introduction of sensitive Anticoccidial effects of artemisin on the Eimeria tenella.
coccidia during controlled exposure immunization. Paper Korean J Vet Res. 35:123–130.
presented at: Coccidia and Intestinal Coccidiomorphs. Oviedo-Rondón EO, Clemente-Hernández S, Salvador F,
Proceedings of the Vth International Coccidiosis Williams P, Losa R, Stephan F. 2006. Essential oils on
Conference; 1989 Oct 17–20; Tours, France, p. 17–20. mixed coccidia vaccination and infection in broilers. Int J
Matthews JO, Ward TL, Southern LL. 1997. Interactive Poult Sci. 5:723–730.
effects of betaine and monensin in uninfected and Eimeria Pascual M, Hugas M, Badiola JI, Monfort JM, Garriga M.
acervulina-infected chicks. Poult Sci. 76:1014–1019. 1999. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents
McCann MEE, Newell E, Preston C, Forbes K. 2006. The Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl
use of Mannan-oligosaccharides and/or Tannin in broiler Environ Microbiol. 65:4981–4986.
diets. Int J Poult Sci. 5:873–879. Patterson JA, Burkholder KM. 2003. Application of
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
McDonald V, Shirley MW. 1984. Eimeria mitis: a compar- prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult
ison of the endogenous development stages of a line Sci. 82:627–631.
selected by early maturation of the parent strain. Peek HW, Landman WJM. 2003. Resistance to
Parasitology. 88:37–44. anticoccidial drugs of Dutch avian Eimeria spp. field
McDonald V, Shirley M, Millard B. 1986. A comparative isolates originating from 1996, 1999 and 2001. Avian
study of two lines of Eimeria tenella attenuated either by Pathol. 32:391–401.
selection for precocious development in the chicken or by Peek HW, Landman WJM. 2004. Gevoeligheidsprofielen van
growth in chicken embryos. Avian Pathol. 15:323–335. Spaanse, Duitse en Nederlandse Eimeria spp. veldisolaten
McDougald LR. 2003. Coccidiosis. In: Diseases of Poultry. voor anticoccidiose middelen. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd.
12th ed. Chapter 28, Ames (IA): Iowa State University 129:210–214.
Press. p. 1076–1085. Peek HW, Landman WJM. 2006. Higher incidence of
McDougald LR, Da Silva JM, Solis J, Braga M. 1987. A Eimeria spp. field isolates sensitive for diclazuril and
survey of sensitivity to anticoccidial drugs in 60 isolates of monensin associated with the use of live coccidiosis
coccidia from broiler chickens in Brazil and Argentina. vaccinating with ParacoxTM-5 in broiler farms. Avian
Avian Dis. 31:287–292. Dis. 50:434–439.
McDougald LR, Fuller AL, Solis J. 1986. Drug sensitivity of Pittler MH, Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Ernst E. 2000.
99 isolates of coccidia from broiler farms. Avian Dis. Location bias in controlled trials of complementary/
30:690–694. alternative therapies. J Clin Epidemiol. 53:485–489.
McDougald LR, Shirley MW. 2009. Past and Rada V, Rychly I. 1995. The effect of Lactobacillus
future: vaccination against Eimeria. Parasitology. salivarius administration on coliforms and enterococci in
136:1477–1489. the crop and ceca of chicken broilers. Vet Med (Praha).
Mehlhorn H, Ortmann-Falkenstein A, Haberkorn A. 1984. 40:311–315.
The effects of symmetrical triazinetrione on developmental Reid WM. 1973. Anticoccidials: differences in day of peak
stages of Eimeria tenella and E. acervulina: a light and against Eimeria tenella. Paper presented at: Symposium
electron microscopical study. Z Parasitenkd. 70:173–182. Coccidia and Related Organisms. Proceedings of the
Mehlhorn H, Schmahl G, Haberkorn A. 1988. Toltrazuril Symposium Coccidia and related Organism; 1973;
effective against a broad spectrum of protozoan parasites. Guelph, Ontario, Canada, p. 119–134.
Parasitol Res. 75:64–66. Reid WM. 1975. Progress in the control of coccidiosis with
Mellouk S, Green SJ, Nacy CA, Hoffmann SL. 1991. IFN- anticoccidials and planned immunization. Am J Vet Res.
gamma inhibits development of Plasmodium berghei 36:593–596.
exoerythrocytic stages in hepatocytes by an L-arginine Roberfroid MR. 2005. Introducing inulin-type fructans. Br J
dependent effector mechanism. J Immunol. Nutr. 93(Suppl. 1):513–525.
146:3971–1976. Rogers EF, Clark RL, Becker HJ, Pessolano AA,
Michael A. 2003. The practical use of a maternal vaccine Leanza WJ, McManus EC, Andriuli FL, Cuckler AC.
against coccidiosis. In: World Poultry 19. Amsterdam (The 1964. Antiparasitic drugs V. Anticoccidial activity of
Netherlands): Elsevier. p. 24–26. 4-amino-2-theoxybenzoic acid and related compounds.
Michael A. 2007. Maternal vaccination against coccidiosis is Proc. Soc Exp Biol Med. 117:488–492.
an option. In: World Poultry 23. Amsterdam (The Rose M, Long P. 1962. Immunity to four species of Eimeria
Netherlands): Elsevier. p. 36–37. in fowls. Immunology. 5:79–92.
Milhau G, Valentin A, Benoit F, Mallie M, Bastide JM, Rudolph AS, Crowe JH, Crowe LM. 1986. Effects of three
Pelissier Y, Bessiere JN. 1997. In vitro antimalarial activity stabilizing agents – praline, betaine and trehalose – on
of eight essential oils. J Essent Oil Res. 9:329–333. membrane phospholipids. Arch Biochem Biophys.
Miller GA, Bhogal BS, McCandliss R, Strausberg RL, 245:134–143.
Jessee EJ, Anderson AC, Fuchs CK, Nagle J, Likel MH, Ryley JF. 1980. Drug resistance in coccidia. Adv Vet Sci
Strasser JM. 1989. Characterization and vaccine potential Comp Med. 24:99–120.
of a novel recombinant coccidial antigen. Infect Immunol. Ryley JF, Betts MJ. 1973. Chemotherapy of chicken
57:2014–2020. coccidiosis. Adv Pharmacol Chemother. II:221–293.
160 H.W. Peek and W.J.M. Landman
Saine A. 2000. Seminar homeopathy, the method: lectures on (Citrate C): products derived from the seeds of citrus fruits
pure classical homeopathy II, part II: case handling. for the control of avian coccidiosis: floor pen studies.
Eindhoven (The Netherlands): Lutra Services B.V. p. 52. (Esp.). Parasitologı́a al dı́a. 20:118–124.
Schneider D, Ayeni AO, Dürr U. 1979. Sammelreferat: Zur Tamasaukas R, Ruiz H, Theis W, De Basillio V. 1997.
physikalischen Resistenz der Kokzidienoocysten. Dtsch Efficacy of a disinfectant composed by citric extracts in a
Tierärztl Wochenschr. 79:561–569. floor-pen trail with broilers in Venezuela. Arch Latinoam
See DM, Broumand N, Sahl L, Tilles JG. 1997. In vitro Prod Anim. 5(Suppl. 1):612–615.
effects of Echinacea and ginseng on natural killer and Tipu MA, Pasha TN, Ali Z. 2002. Comparative efficacy of
antibody-dependent cell cytoxicity in healthy subjects and salinomycin sodium and neem fruit (Azadirachta indica) as
chronic fatigue synchrome or acquired immunodeficiency feed additive anticoccidials in broilers. Int J Poult Sci.
patients. Immunopharmacology. 35:229–235. 1:91–93.
Sharkey DL. 1978. Evaluation of coccidiosis in the presence Umemura T, Nakamura H, Goryo M, Itakura EA. 1984.
of a mold inhibitor. Dissert Abstr Int. 39B:2032. Histopathology of monensin-tiamulin myopathy in broiler
Shimura K, Isobe T. 1994. Pathogenicity and drug resistance chickens. Avian Pathol. 13:459–468.
of a recombinant line between a precocious line and a drug Van Loo J, Cummings J, Delzenne N, Englyst H, Franck A,
resistant field isolate of E. tenella. Paper presented at: Hopkins M, Kok N, Macfarlane G, Newton D,
Asian Conference on Coccidiosis. Proceedings of the 2nd Quigley M, et al. 1999. Functional food properties of
Asian Conference on Coccidiosis; 1994; Guangzhou, non-digestible oligosaccharides: a consensus report from
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012
quinolone coccidiostats. Biochim Biophys Acta. litter and the development of protective immunity. Vet Res
396:210–219. Commun. 24:309–325.
Wang CC. 1982. Biochemistry and physiology of coccidia. Wong DT, Horng JS, Wilkinson JR. 1972. Robenidine, an
In: Long PL, editor. The biology of the coccidia. inhibitor of phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res
Baltimore (MD): Baltimore University Park Press. Commun. 46:621–627.
p. 167–228. World Health Organization. 1965. Resistance of malaria
Williams RB. 1992. The development, efficacy and parasites to drugs. WHO Technical Report.
epidemiological aspects of ParacoxÕ , a new coccidiosis Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Vol.
vaccine for chickens. Harefield (Europe): Pittman-Moore. 296, p. 1–65.
Williams RB. 1995. Epidemiological studies of coccidiosis Youn HJ, Noh JW. 2001. Screening of the anticoccidial
in the domesticated fowl (Gallus gallus): II. Physical effects of herb extracts against Eimeria tenella. Vet
condition and survival of Eimeria acervulina oocysts in Parasitol. 96:257–263.
poultry-house litter. Appl Parasitol. 36:90–96. Yvoré P. 1968. Chimioprévention des coccidiosis aviaries.
Williams RB. 1996. The epidemiology of coccidiosis of Rec Med Vet. 144:485–503.
chickens. World Poultry, Special Supplement Coccidiosis Zeng M, Hu Z. 1996. The sensitivities of Eimeria tenella to
2: 9–11. three polyether ionophores antibiotics. Chin J Vet Sci.
Williams RB. 1998. Epidemiological aspects of the use of live 16:390–393.
anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Int J Parasitol. Zhou R, Nie K, Wang J. 2000. The sensitivity test of Eimeria
Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 08:36 29 September 2012