Vol. II - Design Report PDF
Vol. II - Design Report PDF
1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-02
Section 3
Km 65+923 to Km 80+930
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part-I
3.PAVEMENT DESIGN
3.1 GENERAL
3.2 METHODOLOGY OF PAVEMENT DESIGN
3.3 DESIGN OF NEW FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
3.4 OVERLAY DESIGN
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Part-I
Annexure 2.1 : Extra widening details
Annexure 2.2A to 2.2B : Horizontal Report
Annexure 2.3A to 2.3D : Vertical Report
Annexure 2.4A to 2.4B : Widening schedule
Part-II
4 DESIGN OF STRUCTURES
Part-III
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
1.0 METHODOLOGY
The project involves a series of inter related activities, both in the field and in the design
office. Methodology for carrying out these activities is described in the following paragraphs.
Road Inventory
Inventory of the existing road shall cover all existing physical features such as terrain, land
use, roadway, carriageway, type of cross section (cut or fill), utility lines passing along or
crossing the highway, roadside facilities and all other features that may have influence on
the project preparation.
Inventory of the existing road shall cover all existing physical features such as terrain, land
use, roadway, carriageway, type of cross section (cut or fill), utility lines passing along or
crossing the highway, roadside facilities and all other features that may have influence on
the project preparation.
Detailed field study shall be carried out for road and pavement surface conditions covering
the following:
The process ensures that complete information on condition of existing pavement and
shoulder is collected so that design parameters related to pavement can be established.
The information collected shall consist of the details of cracking (narrow and wide), rut
depth, raveling, potholing, patching in the form of percentage area as well as edge break in
terms of length and rut depth in mm. affected of the existing pavement; and paved shoulder
material loss, rut depth, corrugation, edge etc. in the case of unpaved shoulders.
The study shall identify defects and road section with similar characteristics i.e.
homogeneous sections.
According to the TOR, detailed topographic survey is required to be carried out for capturing
the essential ground features along the alignment and for working out improvements,
rehabilitation and upgrading costs.
Hence, the Consultants propose to carry out detailed topographic survey for the project
road. Briefly the survey work would include:
• Topographic survey true to ground realities using high precision instruments like mobile
Lidar, Total Stations and Auto Levels, and bringing out data in digital form (X,Y,Z format)
for developing digital terrain model (DTM)
• Capturing all existing physical features, including utility poles, trees of girth greater than
0.3 m, oil and gas lines, hills, valley etc. within the survey corridor which should be
compatible with the widening requirements subject to a minimum of 25 m on either side
of the center line of the road or road land boundary, whichever is more.
• Additional surveys at bridge sites for hydraulic calculations and for all arms of crossing
roads at intersections. Also, detailed topographic surveys along approved alignment of
proposed bypasses approved by NHIDCL, if required.
• Where existing road crosses the alignments, the survey will extend a minimum of 100m
on either side of the road center line to allow improvements, including at-grade
intersections.
• Longitudinal sections shall be taken at 25 m interval and at the locations of curve points,
small streams, and intersections and at change in elevation. Cross-sections, in general
covering the full width of survey corridor at 50 m interval shall be taken and should
show levels at every 2-5 m intervals also at all breaks in the profile. Cross sections shall
be taken at closer interval (15-25 m depending on radius of curve) on curves.
Fixing horizontal and vertical control points with concrete pillars. The Reference
Pillars/BMs with levels drawn from GTS bench marks shall be of size 15cmX15cmX45cm,
cast in RCC grade M15 with a nail fixed in the center of the top surface. The reference
pillar shall be embedded in concrete up to a depth of 30 cm with CC M 10 (5 CM wide all
around). The balance 15 cm above ground shall be painted yellow. The spacing shall be
250m apart.
Improvement of the intersections has been thought off with minimum of land acquisition.
However, merging lanes have been considered with proper traffic signage. In general,
standard codal provisions have been followed for design of these intersections. There are
no major intersections have been proposed. Besides, there are 18 nos. of minor
Detailed Project Report Page 2 of 23
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
(Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930) Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-02
Design Report
intersections along the project road are studied at site for the purpose of improving them.
Improvement proposals of the intersections are provided in Chapter-6, Volume-I,
Development Proposal.
vi) Preparation of mass haul diagram and quarry charts indicating the location of
selected borrow areas, quarries and the respective estimated quantities.
vii) Recommend on how to make good this borrow and quarry areas after the
exploitation of materials for construction of works.
viii) Preparation and testing of bituminous mixes for various layers and concrete mixes of
different grades using suitable materials (binders, aggregates, sand fillers etc.) as
identified during material investigation to conform with latest MORT&H
specifications.
Traffic survey stations have been selected by the Consultant on the basis of understanding of
the road network as well as consideration of the following aspects:
To capture the traffic flow characteristics and the travel pattern of the users passing through the
project road and other characteristics related to miscellaneous requirements as per TOR following
primary surveys were conducted.
Period of
Sl No. Type of Survey Date of Survey Location
Survey
27.07.18 to 02.08.18 7 days x
Km 62 of NH-29
(8:00 AM) (8:00 AM) 24 hrs
Period of
Sl No. Type of Survey Date of Survey Location
Survey
(8:00 AM) (8:00 AM) hrs 128+300 of NH-29)
2.1 General
The salient proposals for up-gradation and improvement of the project road are classified
into the following engineering aspects:
The design criteria / method applied for important components of the project are as follows:
Geometric Design : IRC: SP: 84-2019 Manual of Specification & Standards for
Four Laning of Highways with Paved Shoulder
IRC: 73-1980 Geometric design standard for rural highways
IRC and other relevant IRC Codes and guidelines on
geometric design.
The basis of preliminary design of various components of the project road is provided in
Table 2.1.
Table 2.1
Sl Project
Basis Outcome
No. Component
1 Road alignment • Geometric design standards • Location of widening
and profile • Road Inventory carriageway
• Type of area, rural or urban including • Improvement to sub-standard
available ROW and roadside curves and steep grade
developments sections
• Suitability of location for new bridges
2 Intersections/ • Peak-hour traffic intensities and • Design of at-grade
Junctions turning movement data intersections
• Installation of traffic control
measures
3 Pavement • Traffic loading in terms of cumulative Strengthening overlays for
design standard axles for design lane applicable stretches
strengthening • Falling weight deflection data
of existing • CBR of existing subgrade
pavement • Laboratory soaked CBR of subgrade
material
• Thickness and composition of
existing pavement layers
4 Pavement • Traffic loading in terms of cumulative • Thickness and composition of
design new standard axles for design lane various pavement courses
pavement • Soaked laboratory CBR of soil
Sl Project
Basis Outcome
No. Component
samples from prospective borrow • Design life determination
areas
• Initial design life and stage
development strategy
5 Road furniture • Road inventory • Identification of different
and safety • Alignment plans types of signs on linear plans
measures • Locations of intersections on urban • Identification of locations for
areas installation of crash barriers
and pedestrian guard rails
• Pavement marking details
6 Roadside Drains Results from drainage study • Location, type and size of
roadside drains to be
provided
7 Wayside Inventory of existing wayside amenities • Evaluation of need and
Amenities by location, type and quality grade additional amenities
• Locations and laybye design
for bus stops
This project is essentially involves widening the existing standard/sub-standard 2-lane road to 4-lane
road with paved shoulder along with construction of a new standard 4-lane road with paved
shoulder at realignment section. The geometric designs are as per recommendations of IRC: SP: 84-
2019. The general design standards for improvement are enumerated in Table 2.1a
The existing design of both horizontal and vertical alignments are not sound with few sharp curves
and insufficient sight distance. The proposed design is emphasized in adhering to the IRC codes and
manual. The design is carried out with MX-road software on the basis of design standards as
mentioned in Table 2.1a. The design methodology is also supported by various directives received
from Project coordinating consultants and as well as NHIDCL at various occasions.
Horizontal and Vertical reports are attached as an Annexure 2.2 and Annexure 2.3
The design proposed is mostly eccentric widening with overlay or reconstruction depending on the
condition of the existing road. Efforts have been made to follow the existing road in most of the
places in order to minimizing the land acquisition and project cost.
Proposed ROW of 42m is considered for the road sections in rural area. In built-up area 47m PROW
is considered. In forest area, to minimize the land acquisition, 35.5m PROW and at the approach of
elephant underpasses, 42.5m PROW are considered. 60 m PROW is also considered for approaches
of grade separator.
Selection of cross-section has been governed by the widening scheme adopted and by other
Detailed Project Report Page 8 of 23
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
(Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930) Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-02
Design Report
considerations like land-use, drainage condition, traffic characteristics etc. The following typical cross
sections are proposed for the widening/new construction of project highway. These depict
generalized or critical/important features only within the related stretches.
Typical cross sections adopted for development of the project highway are attached as Figure 2.1 to
2.9.
Design Report
Fig 2.1
Design Report
Fig 2.2
Design Report
Fig 2.3
Design Report
Fig 2.4
Design Report
Fig 2.5
Design Report
Fig 2.6
Design Report
Fig 2.7
Design Report
Fig 2.8
Design Report
Fig 2.9
In all the cases the shoulders have to be rebuilt and all sections are required to be widened
to four lane carriageway. The details of widening schedule are given in Annexure-2.4.
Details of realignments proposed in the project road has been presented below.
Due consideration has been given to drainage while preparing the design. The cross-sections
incorporating roadside drains have been proposed at various stretches of the highway taking into
account the existing and natural conditions as well as anticipated situation. In general, unlined
trapezoidal drains have been considered on either side of road. Lined rectangular uncovered RCC
drains have been considered for cut. Covered rectangular drain sections have been proposed in
urban stretches. At super elevated sections with raised median, rectangular median drains have
been considered. All the drains shall discharge into the nearest outfall. Summary of proposed drains
is given in Table 2.3.
The proposed project road will form no major intersections with existing roads.
Improvement of these intersections has been thought off with minimum of land acquisition.
However, proper acceleration and deceleration lanes have been considered with proper
traffic signage. In general, standard codal provisions have been followed for design of these
intersections. Detail layouts are provided in Drawing Volume. There is no major intersections
have been proposed. Besides, there are 18nos. of minor intersections along the project road
which shall be operated as normal left-in and left-out principle. Improvement proposals of
major and minor intersections are provided in Table 2.4.
Design
Road Type of Improvemen
Sl No. Chainage Type Side Remarks
Segment Intersection t Proposals
(km)
Section-3
NIL
Design
Type of Improvement
Sl. No. Chainage Type Side
Intersection Proposals
(km)
Section 3
1 68+030 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
2 68+135 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
3 70+620 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
4 71+030 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
5 71+410 Minor 4 legged Both At Grade
6 71+835 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
7 72+550 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
8 72+790 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
9 73+020 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
10 74+950 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
11 75+125 Minor 4 legged Both At Grade
12 75+200 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
13 75+750 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
14 76+140 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
15 77+160 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
Design
Type of Improvement
Sl. No. Chainage Type Side
Intersection Proposals
(km)
16 77+660 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
17 78+850 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
18 78+880 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
Several towns, villages and settlements are abutting the project corridor and buses shall be
one of the major mode of passenger traffic movement along the corridor. It is imperative to
provide bus bays in order to eliminate the conflict between buses and other moving vehicles
as well as to ensure safety of passengers boarding and alighting. Proposed bus bays have
been kept sufficiently away from the intersections to avoid traffic congestion. Total 7 nos. of
bus bays have been considered for this section.
Span
Design Total
Type of Arrangement Overall Structure
Sl No. Chainage Length
Underpasses (Nos. x Length Width (m) Type
(km) (m)
in m)
Section 1
Nil
In bus bays and major junction, schools, RE wall section, service road.
Has been provided at built up sections, major intersections, near school, bus bay location as
per requirement.
Following road furniture and miscellaneous items have been designed keeping safety aspect
in mind.
• Road markings
• Road Signs & Delineators
• Crash Barriers
• Parapet Wall
• Noise Barriers
• Hard Topping
Road Markings on the carriageway and on the objects within and adjacent to the roadway
are used as a means of guiding and controlling the traffic. They promote road safety and
ensure smooth flow of traffic in the required paths of travel.
The location and type of marking lines, material and colour is followed using IRC: 35-2015 –
“Code of Practice for Road Markings”.
The road markings were carefully planned on carriageways, intersections, toll plazas and
bridge locations.
Road signs were planned to supply information, to regulate traffic by imparting messages to
the drivers. The type, locations, sizes were planned using IRC: 67-2012 “Code of Practice for
Road Sign”.
The role of delineators is to provide visual assistance to driver about alignment of the road
ahead, especially at night. Reflectors are used on the delineators for better night visibility.
IRC: 79-1981 “Recommended Practice for Road Delineators” was followed to plan locations
details. Two types of road delineators were planned i.e. hazard markers and object markers.
Hazard markers are to define obstructions like guardrails, and abutments adjacent to the
carriageway, for instance at culverts and bridges. Object markers are used to indicate
hazards and obstructions within the vehicle flow path, at channeling islands close to
intersections.
Metal Beam Crash Barriers are proposed/ provided for safety of the traffic on approaches of
bridges, on the stretches where embankment height is more than 3m. It is also proposed on
the curves for safety of traffic irrespective of embankment height as per NHAI Circular
(NHAI/PH-II/NHDP/ADB/GM (NS)-I dated May 19, 2004).
3.1.1 General
The pavement existing on the project stretch is flexible in nature. The project envisages new
Two Lane with Paved Shoulder as well as Four Lanes with Paved Shoulder configuration. The
general design Procedure for the flexible pavement for the proposed road as new
construction of whole stretch as per the guidelines of IRC: 37-2018 – “Guidelines for the
design of Flexible Pavements”.
New pavement design is based on the design traffic (MSA) and the subgrade strength
(soaked CBR).
Introduction
The flexible pavements are usually referred as a layered structure comprising generally
bituminous surface like Bituminous Concrete (BC) and Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM),
Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) base and Granular Sub-Base (GSB) course of finite thickness,
resting on subgrade of minimum thickness of 500 mm. The thickness design of these layers
principally depends on the subgrade CBR and the traffic loads that the pavement has to
carry during its design life. Ideally, the flexible pavement is built to such a depth that
stresses on any given layer should not cause unwarranted rutting, fatigue, shoving, or other
differential movements which may result in an uneven wearing surface. The chief function
of the surfacing course is to provide a smooth wearing surface, resistant to traffic. However,
the wearing course can provide some shearing resistance to the base structure and some
added resistance to deformation.
Base courses are usually layers of aggregates that must possess high resistance to
deformation in order to withstand the higher pressures imposed by wheel loads. High –
quality processed aggregates are usually required, which also provide good internal
drainage sub bases and generally made up of locally available aggregates, satisfying codal
specification/requirements.
The design methodologies widely used for the flexible pavement design are Indian Road
Congress (IRC) method, AASHTO methods and Asphalt Institute Method. For this project
latest IRC (IRC:37-2018) method is used for designing the flexible pavement. The brief about
the method is given below.
It gives pavement design catalogue for subgrade CBR values ranging from 5% to 15 % and
eight levels of design traffic ranging from 5 to 50 MSA. The pavement compositions given in
the design catalogues are relevant to Indian conditions, materials and specifications. For
higher traffic values, the pavement layer thicknesses are worked out using IITPAVE
software.
IRC: 58-2015 “Guidelines for the design of plain jointed rigid pavements for highways” gives
the design of rigid pavements and adopted for designing the rigid pavement for
carriageway.
IRC: 37-2018 method is adopted for the design which is based on the empirical – analytical
approach, and provides catalogues for design of flexible pavements. The design inputs
required for pavement design are explained as follows.
Design Theory
The pavement design method is based on elastic response of the pavement to traffic
stresses (i.e. each of the materials in the pavement structure behaves in an elastic manner).
The materials in the pavement are characterized by parameters whose values are
determined from field and laboratory testing. The method assumes that failure will not
occur as a result of permanent deformation of granular or bound materials (and this
assumption will be valid as long as good construction procedures are followed, and the
pavement is not subjected to very high wheel loads such as can be caused by a very heavily
overloaded vehicle). The method also assumes that loss of pavement serviceability can occur
due to:
• fatigue of bitumen bound or cemented layers due to repetitions of tensile strains at the
bottom of such layers; and/or
• Permanent deformation of the sub-grade due to repeated vertical compressive strains
induced in the sub-grade
The critical locations for pavement failure are therefore the bottom of bitumen bound layers
(where tensile strains occur) and the top of the sub-grade (where compressive strains
occur).
The base course and sub-grade are structural elements of the pavement. In conjunction with
the overlying bituminous surface, their purpose is to distribute traffic wheel loads over the
whole foundation. To perform this function, we build the base course and sub-grade with
the necessary internal strength properties.
Bituminous pavement layers have both tensile and compressive strength to resist internal
stresses. For example, Figure 3.1 shows how wheel load (W) slightly deflects the pavement
structure, causing both tensile and compressive stresses within the pavement.
Figure 3.1 : Pavement Deflection Results in Tensile and Compressive Stresses in Pavement
Structure
• Traffic to be served initially and over the design service life of the pavement
• Strength and other pertinent properties of the prepared sub-grade
• Strength and other influencing characteristics of the materials available or chosen for
the layers (or courses) in the total pavement structure
• Special factors such free swelling property of existing soil
Design of new pavement has been carried out based on IRC 37-2018 “Guidelines for the
Design of Flexible Pavements” for design life of 15 years. Procedure for the same is given
below:
Step 1: To find out initial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of the
number of the number of commercial vehicles per day (CVPD)
Step 2: To determine traffic growth rate factor by studying the past trends of traffic growth
Step 3: Design life of Pavement
Step 4: To find out Vehicle Damage Factor to convert the number of commercial vehicles of
different axle loads and axle configuration to the number of standard axle load
repetition. It may be obtained by conducting axle load survey at site.
Step 5: To find out lane distribution factor of traffic over the carriageway
Step6: To determine design traffic in cumulative number of standard axles (msa) by the
following formula mentioned below:
N= [365 x {(1+r)n-1]/r}] x A x D x F
Where,
N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa
A = Initial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of number of
commercial vehicles per day
D = Lane Distribution Factor
n = Design life in years
r = Annual growth rate of commercial vehicles
F = Vehicle damage factor
Step 7: To determine total pavement thickness and crust composition by charts/graphs with
respect to CBR and cumulative number of standard axles.
Methodology flow chart for the design of new Flexible pavement has been shown in Figure
3.2 below.
Figure 3.2 : Methodology Flow Chart for Design of New Flexible Pavement
MSA Calculation
MSA calculation has been presented in Annexure 6.4 of main report (Volume-I)
Adopted design life for pavement design has been considered for 15 years period.
The lane distribution factor adopted for the project road is as given under:
Design CBR
The subgrade CBR for design has been considered as 8.0%. Subgrade of 500 mm thickness is
required as an integral part of the pavement structure. Details of msa calculated for flexible
pavement design are provided in Table 3.2 for Daboka-Lahorijan Section.
Axle Load Survey conducted for the road stretch reveals that the Axle Load patterns differ
significantly. Hence the pavement design is done considering different VDF values for the
two carriageways as per Clause 4.5.2 of IRC:37-2018.
VDF values for LHS of the Daboka – Lahorijan stretch for 2-Axle Trucks, 3-Axle Trucks, MAVs,
LCVs and Buses are 6.93, 9.46, 13.07, 2.40 and 1.92 respectively.
VDF values for RHS of the Daboka – Lahorijan stretch for 2-Axle Trucks, 3-Axle Trucks, MAVs,
LCVs and Buses are 2.59, 3.52, 5.97, 1.17 and 1.07 respectively.
Traffic Surveys were conducted at Km. 62, Km. 127 and Km. 138.45 of the Daboka –
Lahorijan road (NH-29) and the total stretch is to be developed as 4-Lane Dual Carriageway
road. The details of the msa calculated are presented below:
Table 3.2A: msa for 4-Lane Dual Carriageway on LHS from Daboka to Lahorijan (NH-29)
Location msa Adopted msa
Km 62 17.21
Km 127 18.95 20 msa
Km 138.45 14.34
As all the calculated msas are below 20, the Design msa is considered as 20.
Table 3.2B: msa for 4-Lane Dual Carriageway on RHS from Daboka to Lahorijan (NH-29)
Location msa Adopted msa
Km 62 7.59
Km 127 8.34 20 msa
Km 138.45 6.32
As all the calculated msas are below 20, the Design msa is considered as 20.
Pavement layer thicknesses based on inputs mentioned above is given in Table 6.15. The
GSB-II layer will be extended till earthen shoulder to facilitate of proper drainage in the
pavement structure. The design has been carried out as per Plate-6 of IRC:37-2018.
Overlay design has been carried out based on the results of the FWD Tests. The Summary of
the Analysis and selection of the 15th percentile moduli of in-service layers are presented in
Annexure 4.1 under Chapter 4 of Vol. I.
The Analysis is carried out for the stretch. The 15th Percentile Moduli of the in-service layers
and the average existing pavement thicknesses are presented in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4: 15th Percentile Moduli of the In-Service Layers and Average Existing Pavement
Thicknesses
Considering the above data, the remaining fatigue life and rutting life of the pavement are
obtained from equation 16 and 17 respectively from IRC:115-2014 as presented in Table 3.5.
From the above results it is evident that the existing pavement crust is not sufficient to carry
the corresponding design traffic. Hence considering the bituminous overlay the results
obtained are presented in Table 3.6.
Total Curve
Length (m)
Length (m)
Radius (m)
Horizontal
Curve (m)
Widening
Extra Widths of Pavement (m)
Circular
Type of
Side of
Curve
Curve
Spiral
Design Chainage (km)
Extra
Sl No.
On Spiral Curve On Circular Curve
From To Max Min Max Min
Section-3
1 68450.766 68478.149 177 75 27 S-C-S 300 0.6 0 0.6 0.6 BOTH
2 69105.931 69122.395 106 45 16 S-C-S 300 0.6 0 0.6 0.6 BOTH
3 72842.302 72857.934 126 55 16 S-C-S 200 0.6 0 0.6 0.6 BOTH
4 76326.726 76572.226 396 75 246 S-C-S 300 0.6 0 0.6 0.6 BOTH
Annexure to Main Report Annexure 2.2_Hor. Report_S3
DAB-MAN 1 VSPL
Annexure-2.3A: Vertical Alignment Report (LME)
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
Section-3
1 65+971.466 82.315 60 -0.501 0.323 0.824 65+941.466 66+001.466 82.465 82.412 Sag 72.8
2 66+129.723 82.826 125 0.323 -0.305 -0.628 66+067.223 66+192.223 82.624 82.635 Hog 198.927
3 66+337.266 82.192 120 -0.305 0.33 0.635 66+277.266 66+397.266 82.375 82.39 Sag 188.823
4 66+537.547 82.853 150 0.33 -0.296 -0.626 66+462.547 66+612.547 82.605 82.631 Hog 239.628
5 66+722.385 82.306 120 -0.296 0.301 0.597 66+662.385 66+782.385 82.484 82.487 Sag 201.059
6 66+931.754 82.936 120 0.301 -0.3 -0.601 66+871.754 66+991.754 82.755 82.756 Hog 199.849
7 67+041.252 82.608 90 -0.3 0.315 0.615 66+996.252 67+086.252 82.743 82.75 Sag 146.44
8 67+173.935 83.026 120 0.315 -0.299 -0.614 67+113.935 67+233.935 82.837 82.846 Hog 195.306
9 67+284.830 82.694 90 -0.299 0.677 0.976 67+239.830 67+329.830 82.829 82.999 Sag 92.182
10 67+454.119 83.84 65 0.677 0 -0.677 67+421.619 67+486.619 83.62 83.84 Hog 96.019
11 67+567.646 83.84 65 0 -0.826 -0.826 67+535.146 67+600.146 83.84 83.571 Hog 78.658
12 67+713.708 82.633 105 -0.826 0.3 1.126 67+661.208 67+766.208 83.067 82.791 Sag 93.211
13 68+004.598 83.506 80 0.3 -0.297 -0.597 67+964.598 68+044.598 83.386 83.387 Hog 133.999
14 68+086.442 83.263 80 -0.297 0.302 0.599 68+046.442 68+126.442 83.382 83.384 Sag 133.647
15 68+224.003 83.678 60 0.302 0.377 0.075 68+194.003 68+254.003 83.587 83.791 Sag 801.065
16 68+390.765 84.306 150 0.377 -0.38 -0.757 68+315.765 68+465.765 84.024 84.021 Hog 198.178
17 68+551.686 83.694 80 -0.38 0.83 1.210 68+511.686 68+591.686 83.846 84.026 Sag 66.091
18 68+645.165 84.47 100 0.83 -0.505 -1.335 68+595.165 68+695.165 84.055 84.217 Hog 74.878
19 68+735.000 84.016 70 -0.505 0.872 1.377 68+700.000 68+770.000 84.193 84.321 Sag 50.829
20 68+822.634 84.78 95 0.872 -0.403 -1.275 68+775.134 68+870.134 84.366 84.588 Hog 74.508
21 68+945.145 84.286 60 -0.403 0.314 0.717 68+915.145 68+975.145 84.407 84.38 Sag 83.599
22 69+041.617 84.589 65 0.314 2.05 1.736 69+009.117 69+074.117 84.487 85.256 Sag 37.456
23 69+126.044 86.32 90 2.05 0 -2.050 69+081.044 69+171.044 85.398 86.32 Hog 43.906
24 69+275.313 86.32 75 0 -0.95 -0.950 69+237.813 69+312.813 86.32 85.964 Hog 78.922
25 69+430.000 84.85 95 -0.95 -0.058 0.892 69+382.500 69+477.500 85.301 84.822 Sag 106.502
26 69+588.487 84.758 60 -0.058 0.252 0.310 69+558.487 69+618.487 84.775 84.833 Sag 193.548
27 69+677.292 84.981 60 0.252 0.029 -0.223 69+647.292 69+707.292 84.906 84.99 Hog 269.325
28 69+853.260 85.032 60 0.029 0.106 0.077 69+823.260 69+883.260 85.023 85.064 Sag 773.888
29 70+006.386 85.195 60 0.106 -0.086 -0.192 69+976.386 70+036.386 85.163 85.169 Hog 312.164
30 70+117.162 85.1 60 -0.086 0.323 0.409 70+087.162 70+147.162 85.126 85.197 Sag 146.743
31 70+200.413 85.369 60 0.323 -0.032 -0.355 70+170.413 70+230.413 85.272 85.359 Hog 168.79
32 70+382.778 85.31 60 -0.032 0.233 0.265 70+352.778 70+412.778 85.32 85.38 Sag 226.235
33 70+454.925 85.478 60 0.233 -0.198 -0.431 70+424.925 70+484.925 85.408 85.419 Hog 139.259
34 70+518.392 85.352 60 -0.198 0.4 0.598 70+488.392 70+548.392 85.412 85.472 Sag 100.337
35 70+580.324 85.6 60 0.4 -0.118 -0.518 70+550.324 70+610.324 85.48 85.565 Hog 115.764
36 70+644.633 85.524 60 -0.118 0.108 0.226 70+614.633 70+674.633 85.559 85.556 Sag 264.687
37 70+807.045 85.7 60 0.108 0.267 0.159 70+777.045 70+837.045 85.667 85.78 Sag 378.42
38 70+907.445 85.968 60 0.267 -0.389 -0.656 70+877.445 70+937.445 85.888 85.851 Hog 91.436
39 71+000.184 85.607 60 -0.389 0.032 0.421 70+970.184 71+030.184 85.724 85.616 Sag 142.551
40 71+433.230 85.744 60 0.032 0.524 0.492 71+403.230 71+463.230 85.735 85.901 Sag 121.786
41 71+515.434 86.175 60 0.524 -0.122 -0.646 71+485.434 71+545.434 86.018 86.138 Hog 92.862
42 71+590.136 86.084 60 -0.122 0.425 0.547 71+560.136 71+620.136 86.121 86.211 Sag 109.798
43 71+657.016 86.368 60 0.425 0.262 -0.163 71+627.016 71+687.016 86.241 86.447 Hog 368.933
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
44 71+897.083 86.997 60 0.262 0.559 0.297 71+867.083 71+927.083 86.918 87.165 Sag 202.165
45 71+978.329 87.451 60 0.559 0.348 -0.211 71+948.329 72+008.329 87.283 87.555 Hog 284.526
46 72+314.039 88.619 120 0.348 -0.201 -0.549 72+254.039 72+374.039 88.41 88.498 Hog 218.422
47 72+459.465 88.326 125 -0.201 0.241 0.442 72+396.965 72+521.965 88.452 88.476 Sag 282.756
48 72+786.149 89.112 60 0.241 0.4 0.159 72+756.149 72+816.149 89.04 89.232 Sag 377.269
49 72+888.242 89.52 60 0.4 0 -0.400 72+858.242 72+918.242 89.4 89.52 Hog 150.136
50 73+024.533 89.52 95 0 -0.481 -0.481 72+977.033 73+072.033 89.52 89.292 Hog 197.594
51 73+119.193 89.065 60 -0.481 -0.36 0.121 73+089.193 73+149.193 89.209 88.957 Sag 497.568
52 73+282.961 88.475 70 -0.36 0.302 0.662 73+247.961 73+317.961 88.601 88.581 Sag 105.646
53 73+385.476 88.785 120 0.302 -0.483 -0.785 73+325.476 73+445.476 88.604 88.495 Hog 152.852
54 73+561.163 87.937 60 -0.483 -0.013 0.470 73+531.163 73+591.163 88.082 87.933 Sag 127.833
55 73+831.585 87.901 60 -0.013 -0.241 -0.228 73+801.585 73+861.585 87.905 87.829 Hog 263.903
56 73+931.307 87.661 60 -0.241 0.06 0.301 73+901.307 73+961.307 87.733 87.679 Sag 199.603
57 74+039.772 87.726 60 0.06 -0.266 -0.326 74+009.772 74+069.772 87.708 87.646 Hog 184.347
58 74+174.212 87.369 60 -0.266 0.186 0.452 74+144.212 74+204.212 87.449 87.425 Sag 132.777
59 74+262.760 87.534 60 0.186 -0.027 -0.213 74+232.760 74+292.760 87.478 87.526 Hog 280.646
60 74+885.654 87.363 60 -0.027 0.29 0.317 74+855.654 74+915.654 87.371 87.45 Sag 188.905
61 75+005.585 87.711 60 0.29 -0.048 -0.338 74+975.585 75+035.585 87.624 87.697 Hog 177.439
62 75+120.223 87.656 60 -0.048 0.073 0.121 75+090.223 75+150.223 87.67 87.678 Sag 497.317
63 75+292.233 87.781 60 0.073 0.186 0.113 75+262.233 75+322.233 87.759 87.837 Sag 529.846
64 75+402.501 87.986 60 0.186 0.049 -0.137 75+372.501 75+432.501 87.93 88.001 Hog 438.855
65 75+510.244 88.039 60 0.049 0.254 0.205 75+480.244 75+540.244 88.024 88.115 Sag 292.476
66 75+629.771 88.343 60 0.254 0.641 0.387 75+599.771 75+659.771 88.267 88.535 Sag 155.007
67 75+728.615 88.977 60 0.641 0.302 -0.339 75+698.615 75+758.615 88.785 89.068 Hog 176.743
68 75+794.191 89.175 60 0.302 1.024 0.722 75+764.191 75+824.191 89.084 89.482 Sag 83.055
69 75+924.029 90.505 105 1.024 -0.379 -1.403 75+871.529 75+976.529 89.967 90.306 Hog 74.813
70 76+095.464 89.855 90 -0.379 0.558 0.937 76+050.464 76+140.464 90.026 90.106 Sag 96.003
71 76+207.766 90.482 60 0.558 0 -0.558 76+177.766 76+237.766 90.315 90.482 Hog 107.466
72 76+306.370 90.482 65 0 -0.45 -0.450 76+273.870 76+338.870 90.482 90.336 Hog 144.458
73 76+427.270 89.938 85 -0.45 0.434 0.884 76+384.770 76+469.770 90.129 90.122 Sag 96.165
74 76+543.186 90.441 60 0.434 0.098 -0.336 76+513.186 76+573.186 90.311 90.47 Hog 178.524
75 76+610.639 90.507 60 0.098 0.47 0.372 76+580.639 76+640.639 90.478 90.648 Sag 161.239
76 76+848.631 91.624 40 0.466 0.784 0.318 76+828.631 76+868.631 91.531 91.781 Sag 125.671
77 76+906.474 92.078 60 0.784 -0.418 -1.202 76+876.474 76+936.474 91.843 91.953 Hog 49.922
78 76+970.436 91.811 60 -0.418 0.516 0.934 76+940.436 77+000.436 91.936 91.966 Sag 64.288
79 77+084.289 92.398 100 0.516 0.97 0.454 77+034.289 77+134.289 92.14 92.883 Sag 220.172
80 77+167.454 93.204 60 0.97 0.229 -0.741 77+137.454 77+197.454 92.914 93.273 Hog 80.943
81 77+287.586 93.479 80 0.229 1.009 0.780 77+247.586 77+327.586 93.388 93.883 Sag 102.464
82 77+365.858 94.269 60 1.009 0.403 -0.606 77+335.858 77+395.858 93.966 94.39 Hog 98.986
83 77+495.811 94.793 60 0.403 0.079 -0.324 77+465.811 77+525.811 94.672 94.817 Hog 185.026
84 77+622.563 94.893 70 0.079 0.496 0.417 77+587.563 77+657.563 94.865 95.067 Sag 167.83
85 77+750.691 95.528 80 0.496 -0.032 -0.528 77+710.691 77+790.691 95.33 95.516 Hog 151.498
86 77+860.000 95.493 75 -0.032 0.891 0.923 77+822.562 77+897.438 95.505 95.827 Sag 81.078
87 77+943.152 96.235 85 0.891 0.353 -0.538 77+900.552 77+985.752 95.855 96.385 Hog 158.197
88 78+123.785 96.872 60 0.353 0.739 0.386 78+093.785 78+153.785 96.766 97.094 Sag 155.479
89 78+195.791 97.404 80 0.739 0.366 -0.373 78+155.791 78+235.791 97.108 97.55 Hog 214.458
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
90 78+268.423 97.67 60 0.366 0.704 0.338 78+238.423 78+298.423 97.56 97.881 Sag 177.307
91 78+335.366 98.141 60 0.704 1.075 0.371 78+305.366 78+365.366 97.93 98.463 Sag 161.924
92 78+401.619 98.853 60 1.075 0.607 -0.468 78+371.619 78+431.619 98.531 99.035 Hog 128.167
93 78+514.062 99.535 110 0.607 0.119 -0.488 78+459.109 78+569.015 99.202 99.6 Hog 225.205
94 78+617.856 99.658 70 0.119 0.483 0.364 78+582.856 78+652.856 99.617 99.827 Sag 192.16
95 78+740.064 100.248 70 0.483 0.013 -0.470 78+705.064 78+775.064 100.079 100.253 Hog 149.085
96 78+906.078 100.27 60 0.013 -0.297 -0.310 78+876.078 78+936.078 100.266 100.181 Hog 193.482
97 79+018.190 99.937 80 -0.297 0.156 0.453 78+978.190 79+058.190 100.056 100 Sag 176.743
98 79+328.760 100.421 60 0.156 -0.082 -0.238 79+298.760 79+358.760 100.374 100.396 Hog 251.813
99 79+571.969 100.22 60 -0.082 -0.299 -0.217 79+541.969 79+601.969 100.245 100.131 Hog 277.713
100 79+885.617 99.284 60 -0.299 -0.36 -0.061 79+855.617 79+915.617 99.374 99.176 Hog 969.685
101 80+076.229 98.597 60 -0.36 0.311 0.671 80+046.229 80+106.229 98.705 98.69 Sag 89.363
102 80+254.958 99.153 150 0.311 -0.316 -0.627 80+179.958 80+329.958 98.92 98.916 Hog 239.281
103 80+534.445 98.27 100 -0.316 0.104 0.420 80+484.445 80+584.445 98.428 98.322 Sag 238.191
Annexure-2.3B:-Vertical Alignment Report (RME)
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
Section-3
1 65+971.466 82.315 60 -0.501 0.152 0.653 65+941.466 66+001.466 82.465 82.361 Sag 91.886
2 66+115.831 82.534 60 0.152 -0.364 -0.516 66+085.831 66+145.831 82.488 82.425 Hog 116.238
3 66+185.244 82.281 60 -0.364 0.132 0.496 66+155.244 66+215.244 82.39 82.321 Sag 120.757
4 66+260.029 82.38 60 0.132 -0.141 -0.273 66+230.029 66+290.029 82.34 82.338 Hog 219.607
5 66+374.346 82.219 60 -0.141 0.403 0.544 66+344.346 66+404.346 82.261 82.34 Sag 110.27
6 66+504.775 82.745 60 0.403 -0.202 -0.605 66+474.775 66+534.775 82.624 82.684 Hog 99.17
7 66+722.385 82.306 60 -0.202 0.185 0.387 66+692.385 66+752.385 82.367 82.362 Sag 154.99
8 66+960.713 82.748 60 0.185 -0.085 -0.270 66+930.713 66+990.713 82.692 82.722 Hog 221.769
9 67+060.316 82.663 60 -0.085 0.289 0.374 67+030.316 67+090.316 82.689 82.75 Sag 160.558
10 67+147.308 82.914 60 0.289 -0.133 -0.422 67+117.308 67+177.308 82.827 82.874 Hog 142.349
11 67+262.375 82.761 60 -0.133 0.265 0.398 67+232.375 67+292.375 82.801 82.841 Sag 150.764
12 67+374.447 83.058 70 0.265 0.982 0.717 67+339.447 67+409.447 82.965 83.402 Sag 97.695
13 67+454.119 83.84 65 0.982 0 -0.982 67+421.619 67+486.619 83.521 83.84 Hog 66.224
14 67+567.646 83.84 65 0 -0.826 -0.826 67+535.146 67+600.146 83.84 83.571 Hog 78.658
15 67+713.708 82.633 105 -0.826 0.3 1.126 67+661.208 67+766.208 83.067 82.791 Sag 93.209
16 67+849.976 83.042 60 0.3 0.122 -0.178 67+819.976 67+879.976 82.952 83.079 Hog 336.374
17 68+041.319 83.275 60 0.122 0.221 0.099 68+011.319 68+071.319 83.238 83.341 Sag 607.111
18 68+224.003 83.678 60 0.221 0.377 0.156 68+194.003 68+254.003 83.612 83.791 Sag 384.652
19 68+390.765 84.306 105 0.377 -0.38 -0.757 68+338.265 68+443.265 84.108 84.106 Hog 138.725
20 68+551.686 83.694 60 -0.38 0.83 1.210 68+521.686 68+581.686 83.808 83.943 Sag 49.569
21 68+645.165 84.47 100 0.83 -0.505 -1.335 68+595.165 68+695.165 84.055 84.217 Hog 74.878
22 68+735.000 84.016 60 -0.505 0.872 1.377 68+705.000 68+765.000 84.168 84.278 Sag 43.567
23 68+822.634 84.78 95 0.872 -0.403 -1.275 68+775.134 68+870.134 84.366 84.588 Hog 74.508
24 68+945.145 84.286 60 -0.403 0.085 0.488 68+915.145 68+975.145 84.407 84.311 Sag 122.975
25 69+041.985 84.368 65 0.085 2.322 2.237 69+009.485 69+074.485 84.34 85.123 Sag 29.05
26 69+126.044 86.32 90 2.322 0 -2.322 69+081.044 69+171.044 85.275 86.32 Hog 38.757
27 69+275.313 86.32 75 0 -0.95 -0.950 69+237.813 69+312.813 86.32 85.964 Hog 78.922
28 69+430.000 84.85 95 -0.95 -0.058 0.892 69+382.500 69+477.500 85.301 84.822 Sag 106.502
29 69+588.487 84.758 60 -0.058 0.252 0.310 69+558.487 69+618.487 84.775 84.833 Sag 193.548
30 69+677.292 84.981 60 0.252 0.029 -0.223 69+647.292 69+707.292 84.906 84.99 Hog 269.325
31 69+853.260 85.032 60 0.029 0.106 0.077 69+823.260 69+883.260 85.023 85.064 Sag 773.888
32 70+006.386 85.195 60 0.106 -0.086 -0.192 69+976.386 70+036.386 85.163 85.169 Hog 312.164
33 70+117.162 85.1 60 -0.086 0.323 0.409 70+087.162 70+147.162 85.126 85.197 Sag 146.743
34 70+200.413 85.369 60 0.323 -0.032 -0.355 70+170.413 70+230.413 85.272 85.359 Hog 168.79
35 70+382.778 85.31 60 -0.032 0.233 0.265 70+352.778 70+412.778 85.32 85.38 Sag 226.235
36 70+454.925 85.478 60 0.233 -0.198 -0.431 70+424.925 70+484.925 85.408 85.419 Hog 139.259
37 70+518.392 85.352 60 -0.198 0.4 0.598 70+488.392 70+548.392 85.412 85.472 Sag 100.337
38 70+580.324 85.6 60 0.4 -0.118 -0.518 70+550.324 70+610.324 85.48 85.565 Hog 115.764
39 70+644.633 85.524 60 -0.118 0.108 0.226 70+614.633 70+674.633 85.559 85.556 Sag 264.687
40 70+807.045 85.7 60 0.108 0.267 0.159 70+777.045 70+837.045 85.667 85.78 Sag 378.42
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
41 70+907.445 85.968 60 0.267 -0.389 -0.656 70+877.445 70+937.445 85.888 85.851 Hog 91.436
42 71+000.184 85.607 60 -0.389 0.032 0.421 70+970.184 71+030.184 85.724 85.616 Sag 142.551
43 71+433.230 85.744 60 0.032 0.524 0.492 71+403.230 71+463.230 85.735 85.901 Sag 121.786
44 71+515.434 86.175 60 0.524 -0.122 -0.646 71+485.434 71+545.434 86.018 86.138 Hog 92.862
45 71+590.136 86.084 60 -0.122 0.425 0.547 71+560.136 71+620.136 86.121 86.211 Sag 109.798
46 71+657.016 86.368 60 0.425 0.262 -0.163 71+627.016 71+687.016 86.241 86.447 Hog 368.933
47 71+897.083 86.997 60 0.262 0.559 0.297 71+867.083 71+927.083 86.918 87.165 Sag 202.165
48 71+978.329 87.451 60 0.559 0.089 -0.470 71+948.329 72+008.329 87.283 87.478 Hog 127.605
49 72+057.340 87.521 60 0.089 0.521 0.432 72+027.340 72+087.340 87.494 87.677 Sag 138.904
50 72+196.040 88.243 75 0.521 -0.029 -0.550 72+158.540 72+233.540 88.048 88.232 Hog 136.446
51 72+302.489 88.212 60 -0.029 0.426 0.455 72+272.489 72+332.489 88.221 88.34 Sag 131.848
52 72+371.042 88.504 60 0.426 -0.201 -0.627 72+341.042 72+401.042 88.376 88.444 Hog 95.655
53 72+459.465 88.326 60 -0.201 0.241 0.442 72+429.465 72+489.465 88.386 88.398 Sag 135.776
54 72+786.149 89.112 60 0.241 0.4 0.159 72+756.149 72+816.149 89.04 89.232 Sag 377.269
55 72+888.242 89.52 60 0.4 0 -0.400 72+858.242 72+918.242 89.4 89.52 Hog 150.136
56 73+024.533 89.52 95 0 -0.679 -0.679 72+977.033 73+072.033 89.52 89.198 Hog 139.994
57 73+124.592 88.841 60 -0.679 -0.084 0.595 73+094.592 73+154.592 89.045 88.816 Sag 100.915
58 73+203.125 88.775 60 -0.084 -0.377 -0.293 73+173.125 73+233.125 88.8 88.662 Hog 205.021
59 73+276.394 88.499 60 -0.377 0.045 0.422 73+246.394 73+306.394 88.612 88.512 Sag 142.351
60 73+430.413 88.568 60 0.045 -0.482 -0.527 73+400.413 73+460.413 88.555 88.423 Hog 113.789
61 73+570.311 87.893 90 -0.482 0.303 0.785 73+525.311 73+615.311 88.11 88.029 Sag 114.644
62 73+795.731 88.575 250 0.303 -0.319 -0.622 73+670.731 73+920.731 88.197 88.177 Hog 402.404
63 74+184.474 87.336 140 -0.319 0.306 0.625 74+114.474 74+254.474 87.559 87.55 Sag 224.134
64 74+436.512 88.107 150 0.306 -0.349 -0.655 74+361.512 74+511.512 87.878 87.845 Hog 229.03
65 74+626.181 87.445 150 -0.349 0.296 0.645 74+551.181 74+701.181 87.707 87.667 Sag 232.5
66 74+864.926 88.152 150 0.296 -0.194 -0.490 74+789.926 74+939.926 87.93 88.006 Hog 305.863
67 75+120.223 87.656 120 -0.194 0.306 0.500 75+060.223 75+180.223 87.773 87.84 Sag 239.736
68 75+418.981 88.571 140 0.306 -0.304 -0.610 75+348.981 75+488.981 88.357 88.358 Hog 229.434
69 75+579.544 88.083 120 -0.304 0.588 0.892 75+519.544 75+639.544 88.265 88.436 Sag 134.499
70 75+734.573 88.995 60 0.588 0.797 0.209 75+704.573 75+764.573 88.819 89.234 Sag 287.418
71 75+924.029 90.505 105 0.797 -0.379 -1.176 75+871.529 75+976.529 90.087 90.306 Hog 89.272
72 76+095.464 89.855 90 -0.379 0.558 0.937 76+050.464 76+140.464 90.026 90.106 Sag 96.003
73 76+207.766 90.482 60 0.558 0 -0.558 76+177.766 76+237.766 90.315 90.482 Hog 107.466
74 76+306.370 90.482 65 0 -0.45 -0.450 76+273.870 76+338.870 90.482 90.336 Hog 144.458
75 76+427.270 89.938 85 -0.45 0.434 0.884 76+384.770 76+469.770 90.129 90.122 Sag 96.165
76 76+531.786 90.392 60 0.434 0.3 -0.134 76+501.786 76+561.786 90.261 90.482 Hog 447.611
77 76+681.787 90.841 60 0.3 0.47 0.170 76+651.787 76+711.787 90.751 90.982 Sag 352.79
78 76+848.631 91.624 40 0.466 0.784 0.318 76+828.631 76+868.631 91.531 91.781 Sag 125.671
79 76+906.474 92.078 60 0.784 -0.418 -1.202 76+876.474 76+936.474 91.843 91.953 Hog 49.922
80 76+970.436 91.811 60 -0.418 0.516 0.934 76+940.436 77+000.436 91.936 91.966 Sag 64.288
81 77+084.289 92.398 100 0.516 0.97 0.454 77+034.289 77+134.289 92.14 92.883 Sag 220.172
82 77+167.454 93.204 60 0.97 0.302 -0.668 77+137.454 77+197.454 92.914 93.295 Hog 89.901
83 77+300.139 93.606 80 0.302 1.009 0.707 77+260.139 77+340.139 93.485 94.009 Sag 113.171
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
84 77+383.043 94.443 60 1.009 0.344 -0.665 77+353.043 77+413.043 94.14 94.546 Hog 90.179
85 77+754.349 95.72 80 0.344 -0.303 -0.647 77+714.349 77+794.349 95.582 95.599 Hog 123.666
86 77+852.151 95.423 75 -0.303 0.891 1.194 77+814.714 77+889.589 95.537 95.757 Sag 62.691
87 77+943.152 96.235 85 0.891 0.353 -0.538 77+900.552 77+985.752 95.855 96.385 Hog 158.197
88 78+123.785 96.872 60 0.353 0.739 0.386 78+093.785 78+153.785 96.766 97.094 Sag 155.479
89 78+195.791 97.404 80 0.739 0.366 -0.373 78+155.791 78+235.791 97.108 97.55 Hog 214.458
90 78+268.423 97.67 60 0.366 0.704 0.338 78+238.423 78+298.423 97.56 97.881 Sag 177.307
91 78+335.366 98.141 60 0.704 1.075 0.371 78+305.366 78+365.366 97.93 98.463 Sag 161.924
92 78+401.619 98.853 60 1.075 0.607 -0.468 78+371.619 78+431.619 98.531 99.035 Hog 128.167
93 78+514.062 99.535 110 0.607 0.299 -0.308 78+459.109 78+569.015 99.202 99.699 Hog 357.626
94 78+832.568 100.488 100 0.299 -0.297 -0.596 78+782.568 78+882.568 100.338 100.34 Hog 167.8
95 79+018.190 99.937 80 -0.297 0.3 0.597 78+978.190 79+058.190 100.056 100.057 Sag 134.036
96 79+341.667 100.908 250 0.3 -0.299 -0.599 79+216.667 79+466.667 100.533 100.535 Hog 417.59
97 79+885.617 99.284 60 -0.299 -0.36 -0.061 79+855.617 79+915.617 99.374 99.176 Hog 969.912
98 80+068.525 98.625 60 -0.36 -0.07 0.290 80+038.525 80+098.525 98.733 98.604 Sag 206.807
99 80+320.000 98.448 90 -0.07 0.159 0.229 80+275.000 80+365.000 98.48 98.519 Sag 392.821
100 80+450.131 98.655 100 0.159 -0.047 -0.206 80+400.131 80+500.131 98.575 98.631 Hog 485.731
101 80+749.086 98.514 80 -0.047 0.096 0.143 80+709.086 80+789.086 98.533 98.553 Sag 557.727
Annexure-6.2
0.150 m
0.250 m
0.625 m 0.625 m
2.750 m 2.750 m
0.230 m 0.230 m
0.150 m 0.075 m
0.300 m 0.150 m
0.150 m
0.250 m
0.625 m 0.625 m
1. Rectangular top Flange Cantilever 0.25000 1.70000 0.42500 0.72250 0.000833 0.72333 1.45000
2. Rectangular top Flange Inner 0.31625 1.68500 0.53288 0.89790 0.001394 0.89930 2.51750
3. Triangular top Flange Cantilever 0.09788 1.54000 0.15073 0.23212 0.000203 0.23232 1.10230
4. Triangular top Flange Haunch 0.02250 1.52000 0.03420 0.05198 0.000028 0.05201 0.33541
5. Web 0.42900 0.91000 0.39039 0.35525 0.062291 0.41755 2.04000
5. Bottom Bulb, Triangle 0.02250 0.30000 0.00675 0.00203 0.000028 0.00205 0.42426
6. Bottom Bulb, Rectangle 0.15625 0.12500 0.01953 0.00244 0.000814 0.00326 1.12500
1.250 m 1.375 m
0.200 m 0.230 m
0.075 m
0.150 m
1.800 m
0.625 m
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
1. Rectangular top Flange Cantilever 0.25000 1.70000 0.42500 0.72250 0.000833 0.72333 1.45000
2. Rectangular top Flange Inner 0.31625 1.68500 0.53288 0.89790 0.001394 0.89930 2.51750
3. Triangular top Flange Cantilever 0.04922 1.56500 0.07703 0.12055 0.000040 0.12059 0.94336
4. Triangular top Flange Haunch 0.00563 1.54500 0.00869 0.01343 0.000002 0.01343 0.16771
5. Web 0.98125 0.78500 0.77028 0.60467 0.201557 0.80623 3.61500
1. Rectangular top Flange 0.63250 1.68500 1.06576 1.79581 0.002788 1.79860 5.03500
2. Triangular top Flange 0.04500 1.52000 0.06840 0.10397 0.000056 0.10402 0.67082
3. Web 0.42900 0.91000 0.39039 0.35525 0.062291 0.41755 2.04000
4. Bottom Bulb, Triangle 0.02250 0.30000 0.00675 0.00203 0.000028 0.00205 0.42426
5. Bottom Bulb, Rectangle 0.15625 0.12500 0.01953 0.00244 0.000814 0.00326 1.12500
2.750 m
0.230 m
0.075 m
0.150 m
1.800 m
0.625 m
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
1. Rectangular top Flange 0.63250 1.68500 1.06576 1.79581 0.002788 1.79860 5.03500
2. Triangular top Flange 0.01125 1.54500 0.01738 0.02685 0.000004 0.02686 0.33541
3. Web 0.98125 0.78500 0.77028 0.60467 0.201557 0.80623 3.61500
0.000 m
0.400
N A
Area = 0.0000 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0000 m4
4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0000 m
4.4 Cantilever Slab (End of End Cross Girder)
Member no: _T-SLAB1
1.038 m
0.400
N A
2
Area = 0.4150 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0055 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0087 m4
4.5 Intermediate Slab Next to End Cross Girder
Member no: _T-SLAB2
0.631 m
N 0.230 A
Area = 0.1452 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
4
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0006 m
4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0010 m
4.6 Slab at Tapered portion
Member no: _T-SLAB3
0.400 m
N 0.230 A
Area = 0.0920 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0004 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0005 m4
4.7 Slab at Depth away from support
Member no: _T-SLAB4
1.825 m 3,5
0.230
N A
Area = 0.4198 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0019 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0033 m4
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
3.188 m 3,5
0.230
N A
2
Area = 0.7331 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0032 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0058 m4
4.9 Cantilever Slab Between Intermediate Cross Girders
Member no: _T-SLAB6
3.403 m 3,5
0.230
N A
Area = 0.7826 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
4
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0034 m
4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0062 m
4.10 Cantilever Slab (End of Central Intermediate Cross Girder
Member no: _T-SLAB7
1.070 m
0.230
N A
2
Area = 0.2461 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.1150 m
4
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0011 m
4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0019 m
4.11 ICG / Slab (Side Intermediate Cross Girder )
Member no: _T-SLAB8 { same as _T-SLAB5 (for 3 No's Cross Girder) & _INT-CG (for 5 No's Cross Girder)}
2
Area = 0.733 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.115 m
4
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.003 m
4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.006 m
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
2.750 m
0.400
N A
Area = 1.1000 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0147 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.02585 m4
5.2 Slab at the end of Outer Girder
Member no: _L-SLAB2
2.625 m
0.400
N A
Area = 1.0500 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0140 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.02463 m4
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
Wind Speed & design wind pressure for Basic Wind speed & design wind pressure for Basic wind
wind speed of 33 m/s speed of 39m/s
H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions
2 2
(m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m ) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m ) (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10 27.8 463.7 17.8 190.5 < 10 32.9 647.6 21.0 266.1
15 29.2 512.5 19.6 230.5 15 34.5 715.8 23.2 321.9
20 30.3 550.6 21 265.3 20 35.8 769.0 24.8 370.5
30 31.4 590.2 22.8 312.2 30 37.1 824.3 26.9 436.0
50 33.1 659.2 24.9 370.4 50 39.1 920.7 29.4 517.3
60 33.6 676.3 25.6 392.9 60 39.7 944.6 30.3 548.8
70 34.0 693.6 26.2 412.8 70 40.2 968.7 31.0 576.6
80 34.4 711.2 26.9 433.3 80 40.7 993.3 31.8 605.2
90 34.9 729.0 27.5 454.2 90 41.2 1018.2 32.5 634.4
100 35.3 747.0 28.2 475.6 100 41.7 1043.3 33.3 664.3
Average Height of superstructure = 10.0 m
2
Lower bound Height = 10.0 m Pz = 647.6 N/m
2
Upper Bound Height = 10.0 m Pz = 647.6 N/m
2
Pz = Design wind pressure at bridge for h = 10.0 m = 647.6 N/m
0
Maximum Air Shade temperature = 47.5 C
0
Minimum Air Shade temperature = 2.5 C
0
Difference between Max. & Min. of Air Shade temperature = 45.0 C
0
Maximum Effective Bridge temperature = 32.50 C
0
Minimum Effective Bridge temperature = 12.50 C
0
For Expansion, temperature Rise = 35.00 C
0
For Contraction, temperature Fall = 35.00 C
Class A = 110.8 KN
70 R Wheel = 200 KN
227.7 KN
57 KN
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
Reinforcing Steel:-
Environmental Parameters:-
Relative Humidity RH = 80 %
Exposure condition considered = Moderate
Coefficient of thermal expansion a = 1.2E-05 /oC
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
9.0 ULS CHECK OF RCC T-GIRDER SECTIONS FOR BENDING MOMENT & SHEAR FORCE ( OUTER GIRDER )
BY LIMIT STATE METHOD OF IRC : 112 - 2011
Design Parameters:-
Characteristic yield strength of Reinforcement fyk = 500 MPa
Design yield of strength of Reinforcement fyd = 434.8 MPa
Design yield of strength of shear Reinforcement fywd = 400.0 MPa
Characteristic compressive cube strength of Concrete at 28 days fck = 35 MPa
Design compressive strength of concrete fcd = 15.6 MPa
Mean value of axial tensile strength of Concrete fctm = 2.77 MPa
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete at time of cracks fct.eff = 2.90 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecm = 32308 MPa
Using Rectangular Stress block,
Effective height factor l = 0.8
Compression zone factor h = 1
h * fcd = 15.63 MPa
Limiting value of Depth of N.A to effective depth, d xumax / d = 0.464
200 230 x1
150 Cu
300 l * xu
xu
1800 325
N.A z
150
250 Tu Tu
625
Min. Reinforcement percentage for beam section As,min = max [ 0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d , 0.0013*bt*d]
Max. Reinforcement percentage for beam section As,max = 0.025*Ac Clause 16.5.1.1
Section At Unit c/L Brg. Tappered End Deff L/4 3L/8 L/2
Dist. from c/L brg. m 0.000 1.600 1.500 5.250 7.875 10.500
Bending Moment M ED KN-m 480 1808 1808 2416 3100 3254 *ULS Factored Moment
Check if shear force V ED ' calculated with out reduction factor b Clause10.3.2 (5)
n 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532
0.5 * bw * d * n *fcd KN 4363 2269 2269 2255 2255 2255
Check Section, OK / REVISE OK OK OK OK OK OK
Section At Unit c/L Brg. Tappered End Deff L/4 3L/8 L/2
Dist. from c/L brg. m 0.000 1.600 1.500 5.250 7.875 10.500
Dia. Of Rebar mm 32 32 32 32 32 32
lb mm 1159 1159 1159 1159 1159 1159
lb.min mm 348 348 348 348 348 348
As.req / As.pro 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
lb.net mm 812 812 812 812 812 812
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
10.0 SLS CHECK OF RCC T-GIRDER SECTIONS FOR BENDING MOMENT (OUTER GIRDER )
BY LIMIT STATE METHOD OF IRC : 112 - 2011
Design Parameters:-
Characteristic yield strength of Reinforcement fyk = 500 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 200000 MPa
Characteristic compressive cube strength of Concrete at 28 days fck = 35 MPa
Mean value of axial tensile strength of Concrete fctm = 2.77 MPa
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete at time of cracks fct.eff = 2.90 MPa
Creep factor f = 1.76 Refer:- Creep coefficient calculation
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete,
for Short term loading Ecm = 32308 MPa
for long term loading Ec.eff = Ecm / (1 + f) = 11691 MPa
Modular ratio,
for Short term loading m = Es / Ecm = 6.19
for long term loading m' = Es / Ec.eff = 17.11 14.0
Rare Com. Q-P Com.
Max. Permissible Concrete Compressive Stress = 16.8 12.6 MPa
Max. Permissible Tensile Stress in Steel = -400 -400 MPa
1250 1375
200 230 ec
150
300
x
1800 325
N.A
d-x
150
250 es
625
Bending Moment MED KN-m 425 790 790 1850 2280 2309
Depth of N.A, x mm 415 415 415 440 440 440 378
INA mm4 3.07E+11 3.03E+11 3.03E+11 3.31E+11 3.31E+11 3.31E+11
Stresses at 3.41E+11
Deck top Dtop N/mm2 0.57 1.08 1.08 2.46 3.03 3.07 OK 0.34
Deck top Dbottom N/mm2 0.32 0.60 0.60 1.29 1.58 1.60
Girder Top Gtop N/mm3 0.32 0.60 0.60 1.29 1.58 1.60
Girder Steel c.g Gst_cg N/mm2 -29.87 -56.27 -56.27 -117.49 -144.79 -146.64
Girder Steel Outer Gst_o N/mm2 -31.05 -58.50 -58.50 -123.22 -151.87 -153.80 OK
Bending Moment MED KN-m 500 1242 1242 1968 2144 2203
Depth of N.A, x mm 415 415 415 440 440 440
INA mm4 3.07E+11 3.03E+11 3.03E+11 3.31E+11 3.31E+11 3.31E+11
Stresses at
Deck top Dtop N/mm2 0.67 1.70 1.70 2.61 2.85 2.93 OK
Deck top Dbottom N/mm2 0.37 0.94 0.94 1.37 1.49 1.53
Girder Top Gtop N/mm2 0.37 0.94 0.94 1.37 1.49 1.53
Girder Steel c.g Gst_cg N/mm2 -35.14 -88.46 -88.46 -124.98 -136.16 -139.90
Girder Steel Outer Gst_o N/mm2 -36.53 -91.97 -91.97 -131.08 -142.81 -146.74 OK
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
Minimum area of reinforcement required to Crack control As,min = (kc * k * fct,eff * Act ) / sc , where
Coefficient kc = 0.40 for Bending member
Coefficient k = 0.65 for Web with h>800 mm
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete fct,eff = fctm = 2.77 MPa
Max. Stress permitted in reinforcement after crack sc = fyk = 500 MPa
Permissible Crack width (for Moderate Exposure) wk.max = 0.3 mm Table 12.1 of IRC
112:2011
Check for Min. Reinforcement for Crack control:-
At Span At Support
Total height of T-girder h = 1.800 1.800 m
Center of gravity (c.g) of T-girder from bottom y = 1.205 1.132 m
Moment of Inertia of girder section I = 0.451 0.510 m4
Area of girder section A = 1.294 1.602 m2
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecm = 3.23E+07 KN/m2
o
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete a = 0.000012 C
o
T1 = 17.8 C h1 = 0.150 m
o
T2 = 4.0 C h2 = 0.250 m
o
T3 = 2.1 C h3 = 0.150 m
0.150
3 0.150 814.2 0.250
2.1 0.625 0.625
Section of Girder at Span Section of Girder at Support
o
T1 = 10.6 C h1 = 0.250 m
o
T2 = 0.7 C h2 = 0.250 m
o
0.800 T3 = 0.8 C h3 = 0.250 m
o
T4 = 6.6 C h4 = 0.250 m
3
0.8 0.250 -310.2
4 6.6 0.250 -2558.8
11.0 ULS CHECK OF RCC T-GIRDER SECTIONS FOR BENDING MOMENT & SHEAR FORCE ( INNER GIRDER )
BY LIMIT STATE METHOD OF IRC : 112 - 2011
Design Parameters:-
Characteristic yield strength of Reinforcement fyk = 500 MPa
Design yield of strength of Reinforcement fyd = 434.8 MPa
Design yield of strength of shear Reinforcement fywd = 400.0 MPa
Characteristic compressive cube strength of Concrete at 28 days fck = 35 MPa
Design compressive strength of concrete fcd = 15.6 MPa
Mean value of axial tensile strength of Concrete fctm = 2.77 MPa
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete at time of cracks fct.eff = 2.90 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecm = 32308 MPa
Using Rectangular Stress block,
Effective height factor l = 0.8
Compression zone factor h = 1
h * fcd = 15.63 MPa
Limiting value of Depth of N.A to effective depth, d xumax / d = 0.464
230 x1
150 Cu
300 l * xu
xu
1800 325
N.A z
150
250 Tu Tu
625
Min. Reinforcement percentage for beam section As,min = max [ 0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d , 0.0013*bt*d]
Max. Reinforcement percentage for beam section As,max = 0.025*Ac Clause 16.5.1.1
Section At Unit c/L Brg. Tappered End Deff L/4 3L/8 L/2
Dist. from c/L brg. m 0.000 1.600 1.500 5.250 7.875 10.500
Bending Moment M ED KN-m 480 1710 1710 2750 3010 3121 *ULS Factored Moment
Check if shear force V ED ' calculated with out reduction factor b Clause10.3.2 (5)
n 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532
0.5 * bw * d * n *fcd KN 4363 2269 2269 2255 2255 2255
Check Section, OK / REVISE OK OK OK OK OK OK
Section At Unit c/L Brg. Tappered End Deff L/4 3L/8 L/2
Dist. from c/L brg. m 0.000 1.600 1.500 5.250 7.875 10.500
Dia. Of Rebar mm 32 32 32 32 32 32
lb mm 1159 1159 1159 1159 1159 1159
lb.min mm 348 348 348 348 348 348
As.req / As.pro 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
lb.net mm 812 812 812 812 812 812
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
12.0 SLS CHECK OF RCC T-GIRDER SECTIONS FOR BENDING MOMENT (INNER GIRDER )
BY LIMIT STATE METHOD OF IRC : 112 - 2011
Design Parameters:-
Characteristic yield strength of Reinforcement fyk = 500 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 200000 MPa
Characteristic compressive cube strength of Concrete at 28 days fck = 35 MPa
Mean value of axial tensile strength of Concrete fctm = 2.77 MPa
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete at time of cracks fct.eff = 2.90 MPa
Creep factor f = 1.76 Refer:- Creep coefficient calculation
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete,
for Short term loading Ecm = 32308 MPa
for long term loading Ec.eff = Ecm / (1 + f) = 11691 MPa
Modular ratio,
for Short term loading m = Es / Ecm = 6.19
for long term loading m' = Es / Ec.eff = 17.11
Rare Com. Q-P Com.
Max. Permissible Concrete Compressive Stress = 16.8 12.6 MPa
Max. Permissible Tensile Stress in Steel = -400 -400 MPa
1375 1375
230 ec
150
300
x
1800 325
N.A
d-x
150
250 es
625
Bending Moment MED KN-m 350 700 700 1250 2100 2252
Depth of N.A, x mm 407 407 407 431 431 431
INA mm4 3.12E+11 3.07E+11 3.07E+11 3.35E+11 3.35E+11 3.35E+11
Stresses at
Deck top Dtop N/mm2 0.46 0.93 0.93 1.61 2.70 2.90 OK
Deck top Dbottom N/mm2 0.26 0.52 0.52 0.86 1.44 1.55
Girder Top Gtop N/mm3 0.26 0.52 0.52 0.86 1.44 1.55
Girder Steel c.g Gst_cg N/mm2 -24.42 -49.61 -49.61 -78.96 -132.66 -142.26
Girder Steel Outer Gst_o N/mm2 -25.38 -51.56 -51.56 -82.79 -139.09 -149.16 OK
Bending Moment MED KN-m 300 640 640 1550 1950 2180
Depth of N.A, x mm 407 407 407 431 431 431
INA mm4 3.12E+11 3.07E+11 3.07E+11 3.35E+11 3.35E+11 3.35E+11
Stresses at
Deck top Dtop N/mm2 0.39 0.85 0.85 1.99 2.51 2.80 OK
Deck top Dbottom N/mm2 0.22 0.48 0.48 1.06 1.34 1.50
Girder Top Gtop N/mm2 0.22 0.48 0.48 1.06 1.34 1.50
Girder Steel c.g Gst_cg N/mm2 -20.93 -45.36 -45.36 -97.91 -123.18 -137.71
Girder Steel Outer Gst_o N/mm2 -21.75 -47.14 -47.14 -102.66 -129.16 -144.39 OK
Design of RCC T-Girder Superstructure
Minimum area of reinforcement required to Crack control As,min = (kc * k * fct,eff * Act ) / sc , where
Coefficient kc = 0.40 for Bending member
Coefficient k = 0.65 for Web with h>800 mm
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete fct,eff = fctm = 2.77 MPa
Max. Stress permitted in reinforcement after crack sc = fyk = 500 MPa
Permissible Crack width (for Moderate Exposure) wk.max = 0.3 mm Table 12.1 of IRC
112:2011
Check for Min. Reinforcement for Crack control:-
At Span At Support
Total height of T-girder h = 1.800 1.800 m
Center of gravity (c.g) of T-girder from bottom y = 1.207 1.141 m
Moment of Inertia of girder section I = 0.454 0.518 m4
Area of girder section A = 1.285 1.625 m2
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecm = 3.23E+07 KN/m2
o
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete a = 0.000012 C
o
T1 = 17.8 C h1 = 0.150 m
o
T2 = 4.0 C h2 = 0.250 m
o
T3 = 2.1 C h3 = 0.150 m
0.150
3 0.150 814.2 0.250
2.1 0.625 0.625
Section of Girder at Span Section of Girder at Support
o
T1 = 10.6 C h1 = 0.250 m
o
T2 = 0.7 C h2 = 0.250 m
o
0.800 T3 = 0.8 C h3 = 0.250 m
o
T4 = 6.6 C h4 = 0.250 m
3
0.8 0.250 -310.2
4 6.6 0.250 -2558.8
1.570 3
1.020
2 2 0.150
1 1
0.250
0.150 0.325 0.150
0.625
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
No's of Total Unit Wt
Girder E.No Nos B (m) H (m) Area(m2) Length(m) Total Wt (t)
Girder Area(m2) (t/m3)
1 2 0.150 0.250 0.075 5 0.38
2 2 0.150 0.150 0.023 5 0.11
3 1 0.325 1.570 0.510 5 2.55
4 2 0.300 0.150 0.045 5 0.23
5 2 0.300 0.000 0.000 5 0.00
Single Girder 0.653 17.40 2.5 28.4
Deck Slab 1 13.50 0.230 3.11 1 3.11 17.40 2.5 135.1
Total 6.37 17.40 2.5 277.0
RCC T girder/PSC I girder section at support/end portion
0.925
0.150 0.150
3 3 0.000
2 2 0.075
1.57 1 1.495
0.625
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Dimensions of Superstructure on RHS
Span c/L to c/L of Expansion joint = 22.000 m
Span c/L to c/L of Bearing = 20.600 m
Expansion joint = 0.040 m
Overall Span of girder = 21.200 m
Dist bet. exp joint and c/l of bearing = 0.700 m at deck slab level
Length of end thickning zone of girder = 0.700 m beyond c/Ll of bearing
Length of tapering zone of girder = 0.900 m
Spacing of girder (center to center) = 2.750 m
No's of Girder = 5 Nos
Web thickness of girder = 0.325 m
Total Carraigeway width of Deck Slab = 13.500 m
Overall depth of girder = 1.800 m
Deck slab Thickness = 0.230 m
Width of Crash Barrier = 0.500 m
Width of Foot Path = 1.500 m
Wearing Coat Thickness = 0.100 m
1.570 3
1.020
0.150
2 2
1 1 0.250
0.150 0.325 0.150
0.625
1.57 1 1.495
0.625
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Eccentricity of Class A load (Single Lane Vehicle) in transverse direction placed in median side.
Cl A (1L) c/L of Bridge
(0.15+0.25+0.9)=
1.30 4.95
12.50
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = 4.95 m
Transverse moment on Pier = 4.95 x 50.9
= 251.8 t-m
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Eccentricity of Class A load (Two Lane Vehicle) in transverse direction placed in median side.
Cl A (2L) c/L of Bridge
(0.15+0.25+1.8+0.25+0.6)=
3.05 3.20
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = 3.20 m
Transverse moment on Pier = 3.2 x 101.8
= 325.9 t-m
Eccentricity of Class A load (Three Lane Vehicle) in transverse direction placed in median side.
Cl A (3L) c/L of Bridge
(0.15+0.25+1.8+0.25+1.2+0.25+0.9)=
4.80 1.45
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = 1.5 m
Transverse moment on Pier = 1.45 x 137.4
= 199.2 t-m
Eccentricity of Class A load (Four Lane Vehicle) in transverse direction placed in median side.
Cl A (3L) c/L of Bridge
(0.15+0.25+1.8+0.25+1.2+0.25+1.8+0.25+0.6) =
6.55 -0.3
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = -0.30 m
Transverse moment on Pier = -0.3 x 162.9
= -48.9 t-m
Eccentricity of 70 R Wheeled (First Lane Vehicle) load in transverse direction placed in median side.
70 R c/L of Bridge
(1.2+2.79/2)=
2.60 3.66
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = 3.66 m
Transverse moment on Pier = 3.655 x 102.4
= 374.3 t-m
Eccentricity of 70 R Wheeled (Second Lane Vehicle) load in transverse direction placed in median side.
70 R c/L of Bridge
(7.25+2.79/2) =
8.65 -2.40
6.25
Eccentricity of LL = -2.40 m
Transverse moment on Pier = -2.395 x 102.4
= -245.3 t-m
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Eccentricity of combined Class A and 70 R Wheel load in transverse direction placed in median side (CL A +70 R)
Eccentricity of combined Class A 2 Lane and 70 R Wheel load in transverse direction placed in median side (CL A 2 Lane +70 R)
17 17 17 17 12 12 8
Ecc of combined Class A and 70R Wheel load in Transverse direction placed in median side(CL A +70R)
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Ecc of combined Class A 2 Lane and 70R Wheel load in Transverse direction placed in median side(CL A 2 Lane +70R)
First Train
% of Load to be taken Load of Vehicle in Breaking
Load Case
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lanes 3,4 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 force (t)
Cl A 1L 20 0 5 55.4 0 0 0 11.1
Cl A 2L 20 0 5 55.4 55.4 0 0 11.1
Cl A 3L 20 0 5 55.4 55.4 55.4 0 13.9
Cl A 4L 20 0 5 55.4 55.4 55.4 55.4 16.6
70R 1L 20 0 5 100 0 0 0 20.0
70R 2L 20 0 5 100 0 100 0 25.0
70R 1L+Cl A 1L 20 0 5 100 0 55.4 0 22.8
70R 1L+Cl A 2L 20 0 5 100 0 55.4 55.4 25.5
Other Trains
% of Load to be taken Load of Vehicle in Breaking
Load Case
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lanes 3,4 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 force (t)
Cl A 1L 10 0 5 55.4 0 0 0 11.1
Cl A 2L 10 0 5 55.4 55.4 0 0 11.1
Cl A 3L 10 0 5 55.4 55.4 55.4 0 13.9
Cl A 4L 10 0 5 55.4 55.4 55.4 55.4 16.6
70R 1L 10 0 5 100 0 0 0 20.0
70R 2L 10 0 5 100 0 100 0 25.0
70R 1L+Cl A 1L 10 0 5 100 0 55.4 0 22.8
70R 1L+Cl A 2L 10 0 5 100 0 55.4 55.4 25.5
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
LL1 LL2 LL3
Design horizontal frictional force 48.5 t 47.1 t 48.5 t
a) Fixed Bearing
Design horizontal force = 45.3 t 41.9 t 44.7 t 13.4 t
b) Free Bearing
Design horizontal force = 33.9 t 31.9 t 33.4 t 13.4 t
Horizontal frictional force due to bearing = 45.3 t 41.9 t 44.7 t 13.4 t
FRL
142.000 m 4.40
12.50 0.700
Cap top lvl 1.50 0.700 1.50
139.348 m Height of pedestals,
0.50 PD1 = 0.200 m
0.50 PD2 = 0.269 m
HFL PD3 = 0.338 m
134.709 m PD4 = 0.406 m
PD5 = 0.475 m
6.0 1.0
A
6.33
B
Pier Cap
Lowest Bed lvl Area Y from base AxY
132.670 m 55.0 0.75 41.3 A
4.6 0.28 1.3 B
Pile cap bot. lvl 59.6 - 42.5
130.220 m 1.80 c.g from base = 0.713 m
3.15 6.00 3.15 2.05 1.0 2.05
Scour lvl 12.30 5.10
124.220 m 3.60 3.60
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Self Weight of Pier Shaft:-
Radius of Cutwater Portion = 0.5 m
Total height of Pier shaft = 6.33 m
Area of Pier Shaft including Cutwater = 6.57 m2
Weight of Pier Shaft at Dry condition = 103.9 t
Weight of Pier Shaft at HFL condition = 86.3 t
Load (t) Eccentricity eL (m) Moment Eccentricity eV Base (m) Eccentricity eV Shaft (m)
Description
LHS Span RHS Span Total Long. LHS Long. RHS ML (t-m) Trans. Long. Trans. Long. Tran. L
Superstructure DL & FPDL 225.2 225.2 450.5 0.700 0.700 0.0 11.187 9.431 9.387 7.631
Super Imposed Dead Load 19.3 19.3 38.5 0.700 0.700 0.0 12.230 9.431 10.430 7.631
Surfacinf / Wearing coat 23.0 23.0 46.0 0.700 0.700 0.0 11.730 9.431 9.930 7.631
Total DL, SIDL & Surfacing 267.5 267.5 535.0 0.700 0.700 374.5 11.308 9.431 9.508 7.631
8.1.1 Summary of Seismic component of Permanent load (DL, SIDL & Surfacing):-
V HL HT ML MT M L/Shaft M T/Shaft
At Fixed End
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
Seismic Longitudinal force - 96.3 - 908.1 - 734.8 -
Seismic Transverse force - - 96.3 - 1088.9 - 915.6
Seismic Vertical force 64.2 - - 0.0 - 0.0 -
Load (t) Moment (t-m) Tran. force Ecc. (m) Eccentricity eL (m) Tran Mom.
Description
LHS Span RHS Span Total Long. ML Trans. MT HT (t) eV Base Long. LHS Long. RHS MT (t-m)
Max LL Reaction case LL1 71.0 72.0 143.1 2.4 363.0 0.0 12.980 0.700 0.700 0.0
Max Trans Moment case LL2 50.0 52.4 102.4 1.7 374.3 0.0 12.980 0.700 0.700 0.0
Max Long Moment case LL3 5.4 126.9 132.2 76.5 310.6 0.0 12.980 0.700 0.700 0.0
Lever arm above Shaft eV/Shaft = 11.180 11.180 m 11.180 11.180 m 11.180 11.180 m
Longitudinal moment MT/Shaft = 143.0 144.9 t-m 100.6 105.5 t-m 10.8 255.3 t-m
Seismic Vertical force:-
Vertical seismic coefficient Av = 0.120
Seismic component of LL = 8.5 8.6 t 6.0 6.3 t 0.6 15.2 t
Lever arm about c/L of base slab eL = 0.700 0.700 m 0.700 0.700 m 0.700 0.700 m
Longitudinal moment ML = 6.0 6.0 t-m 4.2 4.4 t-m 0.5 10.7 t-m
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
8.2.1 Summary of Seismic component of Live Load:-
V HL HT ML MT M L/Shaft M T/Shaft
At Fixed End for LL1 Case
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
Seismic Transverse force - - 25.7 - 334.2 - 287.9
Seismic Vertical force 17.2 - - 0.1 - 0.1 -
V HL HT ML MT M L/Shaft M T/Shaft
At Fixed End for LL2 Case
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
Seismic Transverse force - - 18.4 - 239.2 - 206.1
Seismic Vertical force 12.3 - - 0.2 - 0.2 -
V HL HT ML MT M L/Shaft M T/Shaft
At Fixed End for LL3 Case
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
Seismic Transverse force - - 23.8 - 309.0 - 266.1
Seismic Vertical force 15.9 - - 10.2 - 10.2 -
8.3.1 Summary of Seismic component of Substructure & Foundation:- (At Founding Level) (At Shaft Bottom Level)
At Fixed End for LWL V HL HT ML MT V HL HT M L/Shaft M T/Shaft
Condition t t t t-m t-m t t t t-m t-m
Seismic Longitudinal force - 89.7 - 316.9 - - 38.9 - 464.1 -
Seismic Transverse force - - 89.7 - 316.9 - - 38.9 - 464.1
Seismic Vertical force 59.8 - - 0.0 - 25.9 - - 0.0 -
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
2.27 t 2.86 t
10.5
6.993m 6.993m
Velocity Profile
9.1 Summary of Water Current force calculation at HFL condition:-
Wind Load V (t) H L (t) H T (t) eV/Base (m) M L (t-m) M T (t-m) eV/Shaft (m) M L (t-m) M T (t-m)
on Superstructure 47.4 4.1 16.4 10.781 44.3 177.2 8.981 36.9 147.6
on Substructure - 11.1 1.8 5.789 64.2 10.7 3.989 44.2 7.4
on Live load - 3.0 11.8 13.280 39.2 156.7 11.480 33.9 135.5
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
11.0 Summary of Forces at Founding Level
Span Dislodge Condition
Summary of Forces Forces about c/L of foundation Forces about c/L of foundation
Founding level (LWL) V HL HT ML MT V HL HT ML MT
Description t t t t-m t-m t t t t-m t-m
1) DL of Superstructure 450.5 0.0 0.0 225.2 157.7 0.0
2) SIDL - Crash Barrier 38.5 0.0 0.0 19.3 13.5 0.0
3) SIDL - Wearing Coat 46.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 16.1 0.0
4) Carriageway Live load, LL1 143.1 0.0 2.4 363.0
LL2 102.4 0.0 1.7 374.3
LL3 132.2 0.0 76.5 310.6
5) Bearing frictional force, LL1 45.3 420.2 13.4 124.1
LL2 41.9 388.5
LL3 44.7 415.2
6) Substructure & Foundation 498.3 498.3
7) Overburden earth 73.0 73.0
8) Wind load 47.4 15.2 18.3 108.5 187.9
Seismic Longitudinal
10) DL, SIDL component of Superstructure 96.3 908.1 48.1 454.1
11) Substructure & Foundation component 89.7 316.9 89.7 316.9
Seismic Transverse
12) DL, SIDL component of Superstructure 96.3 1088.9 48.1 544.5
13) Cariageway Live load, LL1 25.7 334.2
LL2 18.4 239.2
LL3 23.8 309.0
14) Substructure & Foundation component 89.7 316.9 89.7 316.9
Seismic Vertical
15) DL, SIDL component of Superstructure 64.2 0.0 32.1 22.5
16) Cariageway Live load, LL1 17.2 0.1
LL2 12.3 0.2
LL3 15.9 10.2
17) Substructure & Foundation component 59.8 0.0 59.8 0.0
11.1 Load Combination for Pile Capacity Check (as per IRC:78-2014)
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
LC-20: SS,HFL,LL3,SL=1,ST=0.3,SV=0.3 932 209 53 1623 495 LC-20
LC-21: SS,HFL,LL1,SL=0.3,ST=1,SV=0.3 934 96 170 780 1514 LC-21
LC-22: SS,HFL,LL2,SL=0.3,ST=1,SV=0.3 926 93 169 748 1497 LC-22
LC-23: SS,HFL,LL3,SL=0.3,ST=1,SV=0.3 932 96 170 789 1498 LC-23
LC-24: SS,HFL,LL1,SL=0.3,ST=0.3,SV=1 856 96 53 780 507 LC-24
LC-25: SS,HFL,LL2,SL=0.3,ST=0.3,SV=1 849 93 53 748 504 LC-25
LC-26: SS,HFL,LL3,SL=0.3,ST=0.3,SV=1 854 96 53 788 495 LC-26
LC-27: NC,LWL,SD 839 13 0 311 0 LC-27
LC-28: SS,LWL,SD,SL=1,ST=0.3,SV=0.3 859 117 31 895 194 LC-28
LC-29: SS,LWL,SD,SL=0.3,ST=1,SV=0.3 859 44 103 490 646 LC-29
LC-30: SS,LWL,SD,SL=0.3,ST=0.3,SV=1 908 44 31 502 194 LC-30
LC-31: NC,HFL,SD 672 16 3 314 3 LC-31
LC-32: SS,HFL,SD,SL=1,ST=0.3,SV=0.3 655 101 29 861 189 LC-32
LC-33: SS,HFL,SD,SL=0.3,ST=1,SV=0.3 655 41 89 474 623 LC-33
LC-34: SS,HFL,SD,SL=0.3,ST=0.3,SV=1 614 41 29 463 189 LC-34
1 2 3 4 5 6
V HL HT ML MT
Critical Load Combination LC No.
t t t t-m t-m
NC: Max. Axial load, Vmax 1249 45 0 423 363 LC-02
NC: Min. Axial load, Vmin 672 16 3 314 3 LC-31
NC: Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 1071 47 3 494 313 LC-17
NC: Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 1042 44 3 392 377 LC-16
NC: Max. Long. Force, HL,Max 1082 48 3 425 366 LC-15
NC: Max. Trans. Force, HT,Max 939 2 3 2 3 LC-14
SS: Max. Axial load, Vmax 1262 101 57 788 514 LC-11
SS: Min. Axial load, Vmin 614 41 29 463 189 LC-34
SS: Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 1171 231 57 1656 502 LC-07
SS: Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 1173 101 191 788 1545 LC-08
SS: Max. Long. Force, HL,Max 1173 231 57 1646 514 LC-05
SS: Max. Trans. Force, HT,Max 1173 101 191 788 1545 LC-08
11.2 Load Combination for Design of Piles & Pile Cap at ULS (Table B.2 & B.4 of IRC:6 -2017)
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
11.3 Load Combination for Design of Piles & Pile Cap at SLS (Table B.3 of IRC:6 -2017))
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
12.1 Load Combination for Design of Shaft at ULS (Table B.2 of IRC:6 -2017)
12.2 Load Combination for Design of Shaft at SLS (Table B.3 of IRC:6 -2017)
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no P1 of Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
13.0 Calculation of Loads and Moments for Pier Cap Design
Live Load :-
Vertical Load (MT) M-T
Live Load
LHS Span RHS Span Total MT-m
Load Case 1 71.0 72.0 143.1 363.0
Load Case 2 50.0 52.4 102.4 374.3
Load Case 3 5.4 126.9 132.2 310.6
Page -
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Rev. R0
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Date 15 Apr,20
Detail Project Report- Ref.
Foundation for Pier no P1 of Bridge at Ch: Design by D.S.R
129+905 Check by S.G
As per IRC:SP:114-2018, Seismic effects need not to be checked for structures up to 10.0 m span in all Seismic zones
and for structures in Zone II & III, satisfying both limits stated below.
i) Span is less than 15.0 m.
ii) Total length of the Bridge/ Structure is less than 60.0 m
Since Bridge/ Structure are in Zone- V, Vertical component of Seismic force is to be considered to act simultaneously
with Horizontal component in design. (Refer Cl. 4.2.1 of IRC:SP:114-2018)
AV = 0.667 x Ah
Horizontal seismic force, Feq = Ah x (DL + b x LL) (Refer Cl. 5.2.1 of IRC:SP:114-2018)
where, Feq = Seismic Force to be resisted
DL = Dead Load from superstructure & substructure
LL = Appropriate Live Load
b = Multiplying factor for Live Load as per Cl. 4.6 of IRC:SP:114-2018
= 0.2 (when seismic force is acting perpendicular to traffic)
= 0.0 (when seismic force is acting parallel to traffic)
Tables as per IRC:SP:114-2018, for Zone Factor, Importance Factor and Foundation Strata:
As per Table 4.2 As per Table 4.3 As per Table 5.1
Zone Zone Seismic Importance Foundation Strara Notation
Number Factor (Z) Class Factor (I) Soil Type
II 0.10 Normal 1.00 Rock/Hard Soil (I) HS
III 0.16 Important 1.20 Medium/ Stiff Soil (II) MS
IV 0.24 Critical 1.50 Soft Soil (III) SS
V 0.36
x = 7.328 m
x'L = 0.303 m
x'T = 1.207 m
Minimum DL & LL has been considered for calculating fundamental time period on conservative side as the same
coefficient is used for all max load, min load and max longitudinal moment cases.
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Rev. R0
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Date 15 Apr,20
Detail Project Report- Ref.
Foundation for Pier no P1 of Bridge at Ch: Design by D.S.R
129+905 Check by S.G
Long. Trans.
Pile No. n xi2 yi2 Pile Arrangement - PLAN
xi (m) yi (m)
P1 -1.80 -5.40 1 3.24 29.16
P2 1.80 -5.40 1 3.24 29.16
P3 -1.80 -1.80 1 3.24 3.24
P4 1.80 -1.80 1 3.24 3.24
Transverse Direction
8 25.9 129.6
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT WITH PILE FOUNDATION
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
P1 of Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
V ML MT HL HT HR/Pile
Critical Load Combination LC No.
kN kN-m kN-m kN kN kN
NC: Max. Axial load, Vmax 12493 4226 3630 453 0 57 LC-02
NC: Min. Axial load, Vmin 6717 3136 28 156 29 20 LC-31
NC: Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 10714 4940 3135 470 29 59 LC-17
NC: Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 10415 3924 3771 441 29 55 LC-16
NC: Max. Long. Force, HL,Max 10822 4248 3658 476 29 60 LC-15
NC: Max. Trans. Force, HT,Max 9391 23 28 23 29 5 LC-14
SS: Max. Axial load, Vmax 12623 7882 5144 1011 573 145 LC-11
SS: Min. Axial load, Vmin 6145 4625 1890 414 286 63 LC-34
SS: Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 11708 16561 5024 2307 572 297 LC-07
SS: Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 11731 7882 15453 1011 1911 270 LC-08
SS: Max. Long. Force, HL,Max 11731 16457 5144 2313 573 298 LC-05
SS: Max. Trans. Force, HT,Max 11731 7882 15453 1011 1911 270 LC-08
Comb. Type NC NC NC NC NC NC SS SS SS SS SS SS
Pile No. Vmax(kN) Vmin(kN) ML-max(kN) MT-max(kN) HL,Max(kN) HT,Max(kN) Vmax(kN) Vmin(kN) ML-max(kN) MT-max(kN) HL,Max(kN) HT,Max(kN)
P1 1117 621 866 872 905 1171 816 368 104 275 109 275
P2 1704 1056 1552 1417 1495 1174 1911 1011 2404 1370 2395 1370
P3 1218 621 953 977 1007 1172 959 421 244 704 252 704
P4 1805 1057 1639 1522 1597 1175 2054 1063 2544 1799 2538 1799
P5 1319 622 1040 1082 1109 1173 1102 473 383 1134 395 1134
P6 1905 1058 1726 1627 1699 1176 2197 1116 2683 2228 2681 2228
P7 1419 623 1127 1187 1210 1174 1245 526 523 1563 538 1563
P8 2006 1059 1813 1732 1800 1177 2340 1168 2823 2658 2823 2658
Max. values 2006 1059 1813 1732 1800 1177 2340 1168 2823 2658 2823 2658
Min. values 1117 621 866 872 905 1171 816 368 104 275 109 275
Check for pile capacity
Max. values 2855 1907 2661 2580 2648 2025 3188 2016 3671 3506 3672 3506
Min. values 1965 1469 1714 1720 1754 2019 1664 1216 952 1123 957 1123
Vertical
2950 2950 2950 2950 2950 2950 3688 3688 3688 3688 3688 3688
Capacity
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
V ML MT HL HT HR/Pile
Critical Load Combination LC No.
kN kN-m kN-m kN kN kN
Max. Axial load, Vmax 17691 4794 7136 544 165 71 LC-02
Min. Axial load, Vmin 8588 4725 3751 347 543 81 LC-40
Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 15955 20613 7225 3013 858 392 LC-10
Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 15978 7618 22816 1063 2867 382 LC-11
Max. Long. Force, HL,Max 15978 20481 7353 3016 860 392 LC-08
Max. Trans. Force, HT,Max 15978 7618 22816 1063 2867 382 LC-11
Max. Vert.
2842 1558 3727 3477 3726 3477
load (kN)
Min. Vert.
1581 589 262 517 269 517
load (kN)
Hor. Load
71 81 392 382 392 382
(kN)
Moment
235 266 1293 1262 1295 1262
(kN-m)
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT WITH PILE FOUNDATION
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
P1 of Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
Material data:
Charecteristics concrete comp. strength, fck = 35 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, Ecm = 32308 MPa
Strength reduction factor, a = 0.67
Concrete material factor, gm = 1.50
Design concrete comp. strength, fcd = afck/ gm = 15.63 MPa
Peak concrete strain at failure, ecu2 = 0.0035
Concrete strain at peak stress, ec2 0.002
Grade of Reinforcing steel, = Fe 500
Charecteristic strength of r/f, fyk = 500 MPa
Partial factor of safety for r/f, gs = 1.15
Design tensile strength, fyd = fyk/ gs = 435 MPa
Design yield of strength of shear r/f, fywd = 400 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, Es = 200000 MPa
Yield strain of steel, es = fyd /Es = 0.00217
Max. strain of steel, es.max = 0.002 + fyd /Es = 0.00417
Creep Coefficient, f = 1.00
Geometric data:
Diameter of section, D = 1200 mm
Actual column length, l0 = 14.054 m
Effective length factor, = 1.00
Effective length of column le = 14.054 m
Radius of Gyration, i = 0.300 m
Slenderness ratio, λ = l e/ i = 46.85
R/f detail at column at potential plastic hinge location:
st
Diameter of long bars (L1) 1 layer = 20 mm
2nd layer = 20 mm
Number of long bars 1st layer = 16
2nd layer = 16
Area of steel provided, Asc = 10053 mm2
Percentage of steel provided = 0.89 % OK
Diameter of spiral/ hoop, = 16 mm
Spacing spiral/ hoop, SL = 95 mm
Cover to spiral/ hoop, c = 75 mm
Effective cover to long r/f, = 101 mm
Effective diameter of r/f, = 998 mm
Effective depth of the section, = 1099 mm
R/f detail at column at outside of potential plastic hinge location:
Diameter of long bars (L1) 1st layer = 20 mm
Number of long bars 1st layer = 16
Area of steel provided, 5027 mm2
Percentage of steel provided = 0.44 % OK
Calculation of demand points incorporating second order effects:
V ML MT HL HT HR/Pile
Critical Load Combination LC No.
kN kN-m kN-m kN kN kN
SR: Max. Axial load, Vmax 12869 3196 4757 363 110 47 SR-02
SR:Min. Axial load, Vmin 6763 3168 28 156 29 20 SR-16
SR:Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 10760 5400 3486 561 138 72 SR-14
SR:Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 10792 3021 4899 365 138 49 SR-10
SQ-P: Max. Axial load, Vmax 11154 2101 0 226 0 28 SQ-P-1
SQ-P:Min. Axial load, Vmin 9483 2101 0 226 0 28 SQ-P-4
SQ-P:Max. Long. Moment, ML-max 11154 2101 0 226 0 28 SQ-P-1
SQ-P:Max. Trans. Moment, MT-max 8433 3146 0 134 0 17 SR-15
Max. Vert.
2029 1067 1865 1763 1540 1331 1540 1273
load (kN)
Min. Vert.
1189 624 825 935 1248 1040 1248 836
load (kN)
Hor. Load
47 20 72 49 28 28 28 17
(kN)
Moment
157 66 239 161 93 93 93 55
(kN-m)
Description/ Load case > SQ-P:Vmax SQ-P:Vmin SQ-P:ML-max SQ-P:MT-max SQ-P:Vmax SQ-P:Vmin SQ-P:ML-max SQ-P:MT-max
Diameter of section, d = 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 mm
Depth of Neutral axis, x = 2155 1945 2155 2776 1861 1650 1861 2029 mm
Tensile stress in R/f, ssc = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MPa
Area of steel, As = 10053 10053 10053 10053 10053 10053 10053 10053 mm2
hc,eff = 253 248 253 253 220 150 220 253 mm
Ac,eff = 173141 168920 173141 173141 142363 81546 142363 173141 mm2
rpeff = As / Ac,eff = 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.06
esm - ecm = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Sr.max = 314 312 314 314 303 283 303 314
Wk = 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 mm
Status = OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT WITH PILE FOUNDATION
Component: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation Rev. R0
Date 15 Apr,20
Details: Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation for Pier no Detail Project Report- Ref.
Design by D.S.R
P1 of Bridge at Ch: 129+905
Check by S.G
P7 P8
P5 P6
Transverse Direction
(Acrosss Traffic)
Longitudinal Direction
(Along Traffic) P3 P4
P1 P2
Bending moment (BM) & shear force (SF) due to s/w of Pile cap & Earth fill :
Longitudinal direction:-
Length from face of shaft for Bending moment = 2.050 m
Length from deff. from shaft for Shear force = 0.350 m
Downward Bending moment (incl. 15% submergence) = 1404 kN-m
Downward Shear force (incl. 15% submergence) = 234 kN
Transverse direction:-
Length from face of shaft for Bending moment = 3.150 m
Length from deff. from shaft for Shear force = 1.475 m
Downward Bending moment (incl. 15% submergence) = 1375 kN-m
Downward Shear force (incl. 15% submergence) = 409 kN
Check for Punching Shear stress of Pile cap for Edge pile at ULS:-
BML (kN-m) 5807 1848 3640 4520 5088 4001 5088 2942
BM*L (kN-m)
BMT (kN-m) 1693 649 1272 1047 1972 1470 1972 1155
BM*T (kN-m)
Introduction
The following design note pertains to the details design of longitudinal PSC T girders type superstructure.
The analysis is done with Grillage analogy using STAAD pro. software. Design parameters used in the
Grillage model & details design of longitudinal PSC T girder has been presented in the following pages.
1.1 Geometry:
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
YtG = 0.4837 m
ZtG = 1.3633 m3
B. Section Properties of Girder at the Span
Area 0.8200 m2 Yb = 0.8982 m Yt = 0.9018 m
IZ = 0.3102 m4 Zb = 0.3453 m3 Zt = 0.3440 m3
YtG = 0.5782 m
ZtG = 1.3395 m3
D. Section Properties of Girder at the Support
Area 1.3503 m2 Yb = 0.9274 m Yt = 0.8726 m
IZ = 0.3817 m4 Zb = 0.4116 m3 Zt = 0.4374 m3
1.1 Section Properties of Top/ Deck Slab & Cross girder/ Diaphram Members
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 1.1000 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0147 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 1.0500 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0140 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
0.400
0.300
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 0.0660 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0009 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
Wind Speed & design wind pressure for Basic Wind speed & design wind pressure for Basic
wind speed of 33 m/s wind speed of 39m/s
H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions
(m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10 27.8 463.7 17.8 190.5 < 10 38.8 647.6 24.9 266.1
15 29.2 512.5 19.6 230.5 15 40.8 715.8 27.4 321.9
20 30.3 550.6 21 265.3 20 42.3 769.0 29.3 370.5
30 31.4 590.2 22.8 312.2 30 43.9 824.3 31.8 436.0
50 33.1 659.2 24.9 370.4 50 46.2 920.7 34.8 517.3
60 33.6 676.3 25.6 392.9 60 46.9 944.6 35.8 548.8
70 34.0 693.6 26.2 412.8 70 47.5 968.7 36.6 576.6
80 34.4 711.2 26.9 433.3 80 48.0 993.3 37.6 605.2
90 34.9 729.0 27.5 454.2 90 48.7 1018.2 38.4 634.4
100 35.3 747.0 28.2 475.6 100 49.3 1043.3 39.4 664.3
17 Load Case 17 Class A for combination of 70R Eccentric on Left 70R + Class A 1 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 2.13 m
70R Z2 = 2.13 + 1.93 = 4.06 m
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 7.25 + 0.5/2 = 8.00 m
Class A Z2 = 8 + 1.8 = 9.80 m
18 Load Case 18 Class A for combination of 70R Eccentric on Right 70R + Class A 1 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 7.25 - 0.5/2 - 1.8 = 3.70 m
Class A Z2 = 3.7 + 1.8 = 5.50 m
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 1.2 - 2.79 + 0.86/2 = 9.44 m
70R Z2 = 9.44 + 1.93 = 11.37 m
19 Load Case 19 Class A 2 Lane for combination of 70R Eccentric on Left 70R + Class A 2 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 2.13 m
70R Z2 = 2.13 + 1.93 = 4.06 m
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 7.25 + 0.5/2 = 8.00 m
Class A Z2 = 8 + 1.8 = 9.80 m
2nd Lane Z3 = 9.8 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 11.50 m
Class A Z4 = 11.5 + 1.8 = 13.30 m
20 Load Case 20 Class A 2 Lane for combination of 70R placed near Center70R
of +
Superstructure
Class A 2 Lane
(7.25 from end)
1st Lane Z1 = 7.25 - 0.86/2 - 1.93 = 4.89 m
70R Z2 = 4.89 + 1.93 = 6.82 m
1st Lane Z1 = 6.82 + 0.86/2 + 1.2 + 0.5/2 = 8.70 m
Class A Z2 = 8.7 + 1.8 = 10.50 m
2nd Lane Z3 = 10.5 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 12.20 m
Class A Z4 = 12.2 + 1.8 = 14.00 m
21 Load Case 21 70R W for combination of Class A 2 Lane Eccentric on Left
Class A 2 Lane + 70R From CB
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 0.15 + 0.50/2 = 0.90 m
Class A Z2 = 0.9 + 1.8 = 2.70 m 1.800
2nd Lane Z3 = 2.7 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 4.40 m
Class A Z4 = 4.4 + 1.8 = 6.20 m 5.300
1st Lane Z5 = 6.2 + 0.5/2 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 8.080 m
70R Z6 = 8.08 + 1.93 = 10.010 m 9.045
22 Load Case 22 70R W for combination of Class A Eccentric on Right Class A 1 Lane + 70R
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 0.15 - 2.3 - 1.2 - 2.79 + 0.86/2 = 6.99 m
70R Z2 = 6.99 + 1.93 = 8.92 m
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 -0.5 - 0.15 - 0.25 - 1.8 = 10.80 m
Class A Z2 = 10.8 + 1.8 = 12.60 m
Weight of the Deck Slab & Cross Girder during Stage-2 Loading
R1 R2
1.50 m 1.500 m
0.450 m 33.500 m 0.450 m
Design of Superstructure with PSC I-Girder Slab
R1 R2
0.75 m 33.500 m 0.75 m
R1 R2
0.75 m 33.500 m 0.75 m
L1, Straight Portion L2, Curved in Elevation Soffit Level L4, Straight in Plan
Jacking End Elevation of Cable
Angle g
P2 Angle a
Plan Deviation, P1
L5 L6 Plan of Cable
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
34.200
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
1
2 Lx 0.350 4.275 8.550 12.825 17.100
x 0.35 4.275 8.55 12.825 17.1
x1 0.000 2.206 5.208 5.208 5.208
x2 2.206 5.208 17.208 17.208 17.208
y1 0.400 0.242 0.135 0.135 0.135
y2 0.242 0.135 0.135 0.135 0.135
yord 0.375 0.168 0.135 0.135 0.135
q 4.099 1.275 0.000 0.000 0.000
pf1 2479.950 2469.034 2424.586 2424.586 2424.586
pf2 2469.034 2424.587 2367.089 2367.089 2367.089
ps1 2230.285 2241.201 2285.649 2285.649 2285.649
ps2 2241.201 2285.649 2343.146 2343.146 2343.146
Pf 2478.218 2438.394 2408.571 2388.088 2367.605
Ps 2232.018 2271.841 2301.664 2322.147 2342.631
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
1
4 Lx 0.350 4.275 8.550 12.825 17.100
x 0.35 4.275 8.55 12.825 17.1
x1 0.000 0.000 5.225 9.230 9.230
x2 5.225 5.225 9.230 17.230 17.230
y1 1.200 1.200 0.690 0.495 0.495
y2 0.690 0.690 0.495 0.495 0.495
yord 1.166 0.783 0.528 0.495 0.495
q 5.597 5.597 0.952 0.000 0.000
pf1 2479.950 2479.950 2454.170 2394.493 2394.493
pf2 2454.170 2454.170 2394.493 2356.486 2356.486
ps1 2228.874 2228.874 2254.654 2314.331 2314.331
ps2 2254.654 2254.654 2314.331 2352.338 2352.338
Pf 2478.223 2458.857 2404.621 2377.412 2357.102
Ps 2230.601 2249.967 2304.203 2331.412 2351.722
1
5 Lx 0.350 4.275 8.550 12.825 17.100
x 0.35 4.275 8.55 12.825 17.1
x1 0.000 0.000 5.736 10.744 10.744
x2 5.736 5.736 10.744 17.244 17.244
y1 1.600 1.600 0.956 0.675 0.675
y2 0.956 0.956 0.675 0.675 0.675
yord 1.561 1.120 0.798 0.675 0.675
q 6.444 6.444 2.832 0.000 0.000
pf1 2479.950 2479.950 2451.661 2381.261 2381.261
pf2 2451.661 2451.661 2381.261 2350.505 2350.505
ps1 2227.247 2227.247 2255.536 2325.937 2325.937
ps2 2255.536 2255.536 2325.937 2350.505 2350.505
Pf 2478.224 2458.868 2412.106 2371.415 2351.187
Ps 2228.974 2248.330 2295.092 2333.802 2349.960
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / P3
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
4.0 Effect of Temperature Gradient (As per Clause 218.3 of IRC:6 - 2010) - Outer Girder
At Span At Support
3
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 0.9371 0.9704 m
Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 1.3633 1.3395 m3
3
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 0.5010 0.6340 m
o
T1 = 17.8 C h1 = 0.15 m
o
T2 = 4.0 C h2 = 0.25 m
o
T3 = 2.1 C h3 = 0.15 m
Y Y
0.2
3 0.15 432.3 0.25
2.1 0.725 0.725
Stresses
Stress due
Assuming Stress due
y to release Final
Height Stress b Force e Moment End to release
Segment from top of Axial Stress
Restrained of Moment
Force
2
m KN/m m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1 0.150 3664.6 2.625 883.60 0.059 0.645 569.49 3664.63 -780.40 -672.38 2211.8
2 0.070 823.5 2.625 130.14 0.183 0.521 67.75 823.51 -780.40 -462.17 -419.1
3 0.180 592.9 1.000 53.36 0.280 0.424 22.61 592.93 -780.40
4 0.150 432.3 0.725 23.51 1.970 -1.266 -29.77 432.34 -780.40 1257.74 909.7
1090.61 630.08
Stresses
Stress due
Assuming Stress due
y to release Final
Height Stress b Force e Moment End to release
Segment from top of Axial Stress
Restrained of Moment
Force
2
m KN/m m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1 0.220 -2182.3 2.625 -742.38 0.084 0.714 -529.92 -2182.31 477.82 409.91 -1294.6
2 0.030 -388.7 1.000 -7.99 0.233 0.566 -4.52 -388.70 477.82 296.94 386.1
3 0.195 -144.1 1.000 -17.14 0.327 0.472 -8.08 -144.11 477.82
4 0.055 -31.7 0.725 -0.63 0.463 0.335 -0.21 -31.71 477.82
5 0.250 -164.7 0.725 -14.93 1.687 -0.888 13.26 -164.70 477.82
4 0.250 -1358.8 0.725 -138.07 1.752 -0.954 131.71 -1358.79 477.82 -627.41 -1508.4
-921.14 -397.76
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Stress at Top of Deck, stS KN/m2 -1005.8 -184.2 198.5 294.5 224.4
2
Stress at Top of Girder, stG KN/m 6887.1 11363.3 12524.9 14830.6 15842.3
Stress at Bottom of Girder, sb KN/m2 6682.8 10371.0 9436.9 7384.3 6648.0
2) Stress at service with Differential Shrinkage and Differential Creep effect (with Live Load)
2
Stress at Top of Deck, stS KN/m -1005.8 1129.7 2445.2 3125.8 3327.8
2
Stress at Top of Girder, stG KN/m 6887.1 12266.5 14069.2 16776.7 17975.4
Stress at Bottom of Girder, sb KN/m2 6682.8 7913.2 5234.1 2088.1 842.9
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Stress at top of Stress at top of Stress at bottom Allowable Stress Allowable Stress
STAGES Deck Girder of Girder in Slab in Girder Status
max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve
Stress after 49 days before (SIDL i.e Crash Barrier & Surfacing) -0.03 -0.69 13.02 5.34 14.70 8.64 21.60 -2.70 21.60 -2.98 OK OK
Stress at service without LL 0.95 -0.15 13.88 5.13 11.17 7.45 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with LL 3.98 -0.15 16.01 5.13 8.71 1.64 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with Diff. Shr.& Creep (without LL) 0.29 -1.01 15.84 6.89 10.37 6.65 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with Diff. Shr.& Creep (with LL) 3.33 -1.01 17.98 6.89 7.91 0.84 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service without LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise 2.51 1.32 15.42 6.59 11.28 7.56 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service without LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall -0.90 -2.30 16.34 7.27 9.04 5.17 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with75% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise 4.76 1.32 17.02 6.59 9.44 3.20 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with 75% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall 1.36 -2.30 17.94 7.27 7.20 0.96 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with 100% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise with
4.65 0.39 17.72 6.71 8.46 1.39 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
60% temp. gradient
Stress at Service with 100% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall with
2.61 -1.78 18.27 7.12 7.11 0.04 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
60% temp. gradient
PSC T Girder_OG_35.0M / F2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
8.0 ULTIMATE MOMENT CHECK (ULS) FOR PSC T-GIRDER (OUTER) AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011 :-
200 Tu
250
725
GIRDER DIMENSIONS RECTANGULAR STRESS BLOCK
Moment due to 1st Stage Dead Load (DL) 0.0 1311.9 2232.9 2779.5 2966.7 1.35
Moment due to 2nd Stage Dead Load (DL) 0.0 992.9 1714.4 2138.8 2287.4 1.35
Moment due to SIDL (Crash Barrier) 0.0 297.0 452.0 479.0 383.7 1.35
Moment due to SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) 0.0 274.3 478.2 608.7 664.8 1.75
Moment due to Pedestrian Live Load (LL) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Moment due to Live Load (LL) 0.0 1231.2 2105.4 2653.2 2908.2 1.5
Material Data
Grade of Reinforcement Steel Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500
Charecteristic strength of Reinforcement, f yk
500 500 500 500 500 Table 18.1, IRC 112
(Mpa)
Partial factor for Reinforcement Steel, gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
Design value for Tensile Strength,
434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.78 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
fyd = fyk/gs (Mpa)
Modulus of Elasticity of Reinforcement,
200 200 200 200 200 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
Es (Gpa)
Grade of Concrete M 45 M 45 M 45 M 45 M 45
Charecteristics compressive strength, fck
45 45 45 45 45 Table 6.5, IRC 112
(Mpa)
a 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
Concrete material factor, gm 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
Design value for concrete compressive
20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
strength, fcd = afck/gm (MPa)
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, Ecm (GPa) 34 34 34 34 34 Table 6.5, IRC 112
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Steel,
195 195 195 195 195
Ep (GPa)
Charecteristic tensile strength of Prestressing
1860 1860 1860 1860 1860 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
steel, fpk (Mpa)
Partial factor for Prestressing Steel, gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
Design tensile strength of Prestressing steel,
1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
fpd (MPa)
Initial prestrain of prestressing steel 0.00494 0.00502 0.00518 0.00526 0.00531
Geometric Data
Width of Bottom Flange of Girder, b (mm) 725 725 725 725 725
Total Depth of Girder, D (mm) 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
c.g of Reinforcement from soffit girder, c (mm) 58 58 58 58 58
Dia. of Untensioned Reinforcement, f (mm) 12 12 12 12 12
Effective depth of Girder, d (mm) 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962
Spacing of Reinforcement, s (mm) or 0 0 0 0 0
Number of Reinforcement Bar, n 6 6 6 6 6
Area of Untensioned Reinforcement, At (mm2) 679 679 679 679 679
Number of Strands 89 89 89 89 89
Area of Single Strand (mm2) 98.7 98.70 98.70 98.70 98.70
Total area of Strand (mm2) 8784 8784 8784 8784 8784
c.g of Strands from soffit of Girder (mm) 851 540 383 352 352
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.0463 0.0463 0.0463 0.0463 0.0463
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Position of N.A from Compression face, x (mm) 340 340 340 340 340
Total Compressive Force, C (N) 12655706 12655706 12655706 12655706 12655706
Total Tensile Force, T (N) 12655706 12655706 12655706 12655706 12655706
Difference, C-T 0 0 0 0 0
Strain in Concrete 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035
Strain in Reinforcement 0.01669 0.01669 0.01669 0.01669 0.01669
Strain in Prestressing Steel 0.01347 0.01674 0.01852 0.01892 0.01897
So, Stress in Reinforcement (MPa) 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8
So, Stress in Prestressing Steel (MPa) 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1
Lever Arm from c/g of Reinforcement (mm) 1825.9 1825.9 1825.9 1825.9 1825.9
Lever Arm from c/g of Prestressing Steel (mm) 1033.3 1343.5 1500.5 1531.7 1531.8
Tensile Force in Reinforcement (KN) 295.0 295.0 295.0 295.0 295.0
Tensile Force in Prestressing Steel (KN) 12360.7 12360.7 12360.7 12360.7 12360.7
Moment of Resistance of the Section (KN-m) 13311 17145 19086 19472 19473
Status OK OK OK OK OK
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
9.0 CHECK FOR SHEAR (ULS) FOR PSC T-GIRDER (OUTER) AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011 :-
d' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2 Factor As per table 3.2 of IRC 6-2014
Support ULS
Distance from Support in (m) 2.00 4.188 8.375 12.563 16.750
Loadings
1st Stage DL (KN) 378.5 262.9 173.5 87.6 0.0 1.35
2nd Stage DL (KN) 271.1 205.2 134.3 68.4 0.0 1.35
SIDL (Crash Barrier) (KN) 94.0 76.3 43.8 7.3 26.7 1.35
SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) (KN) 76.3 67.8 47.2 26.3 5.1 1.75
Carriageway LL (KN) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Carriageway LL (KN) 339.9 336.6 289.9 223.7 128.3 1.5
d' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2
Remarks
Support
Ultimate Shear, Vu (KN) 1647.3 1358.6 992.1 602.1 237.4
1. Elements not requiring Design Shear Reinforcement
a) Effective Width, bwc (m) 0.68 0.255 0.255 0.255 0.255 = web thk. - 0.5 x dia of duct.
b) Overall Depth, D (m) 2.020 2.020 2.020 2.020 2.020 = Depth of Girder + Depth of Deck Slab
c) CG of Tendons from Bottom Yord (m) 0.851 0.540 0.383 0.352 0.352
db = D - Yord of cable from soffit of
d) Depth , db (m) 1.169 1.480 1.637 1.668 1.668
girder
e) Axial Tensile Strength of Concrete,
2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Ref. Cl 10.3.2, IRC:112
fctk,005 (Mpa)
f) Partial Safety factor fo Concrete, gm 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
g) Partial Safety factor fo Steel, gm 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
h) Design Tensile Strength of Concrete,
1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 = fctd/gm, where gm = 1.5
fctd (Mpa)
= Axial Prestressing Force - Total loss
i) Applied Longitudinal Force,NED (KN) 8455.9 8592.1 8869.4 9015.8 9091.8
due to prestress
j) Compressive Stress due to prestress,
4.02 4.02 4.02 4.02 4.02 Min. value of NED/Ac or 0.2 x fcd
scp (Mpa)
k) Second Moment of Area, I (m4) 0.7746 0.6594 0.6594 0.6594 0.6594 Calculated from section property
l) First Moment of Area, S (m3) 0.5411 0.4290 0.4290 0.4290 0.4290 Considered from section property
m) Value of k1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Ref. Cl 10.3.1, IRC:112
= Vertical Prestressing Force x (1 -
n) Effect of Vertical Prestress, Vpd (KN) 697.8 542.62 114.59 29.48 0.00 Ratio of loss due to prestress with
Applied lobgitudinal Force)
o) Area of Prestressing Steel, As(mm2) 8784 8784 8784 8784 8784
p) Value of K 1.41 1.37 1.35 1.35 1.35 Ref. Cl 10.3.1, IRC:112
q) vmin = 0.031 K3/2fck1/2 0.349 0.333 0.326 0.325 0.325 Eq. 10.3
r) % of Prestressing Steel, r1 0.011 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.021 = Area of Prestressing Steel/(bwc x d)
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
'd' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2 Factor
Support ULS
Distance from Support in (m) 2.000 4.188 8.375 12.563 16.750
Loadings
1st Stage DL (KN) 378.5 262.9 173.5 87.6 0.0 1.35
2nd Stage DL (KN) 271.1 205.2 134.3 68.4 0.0 1.35
SIDL (Crash Barrier) (KN) 94.0 76.3 43.8 7.3 26.7 1.35
SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) (KN) 76.3 67.8 47.2 26.3 5.1 1.75
Carriageway LL (KN) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Carriageway LL (KN) 339.9 336.6 289.9 223.7 128.3 1.5
Introduction
The following design note pertains to the details design of longitudinal PSC T girders type superstructure.
The analysis is done with Grillage analogy using STAAD pro. software. Design parameters used in the
Grillage model & details design of longitudinal PSC T girder has been presented in the following pages.
1.1 Geometry:
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay u
YtG = 0.5624 m
ZtG = 1.5016 m3
B. Section Properties of Girder at the Span
Area 0.8800 m2 Yb = 0.9963 m Yt = 1.0037 m
IZ = 0.4097 m4 Zb = 0.4112 m3 Zt = 0.4082 m3
YtG = 0.6707 m
ZtG = 1.5069 m3
D. Section Properties of Girder at the Support
Area 1.4953 m2 Yb = 1.0278 m Yt = 0.9722 m
IZ = 0.5204 m4 Zb = 0.5063 m3 Zt = 0.5353 m3
1.1 Section Properties of Top/ Deck Slab & Cross girder/ Diaphram Members
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 1.1000 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0147 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 1.0500 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0140 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
0.400
0.300
N
0.400 Modulus of Elasticity ratio = 1.000
A
Area = 0.0660 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y) = 0.2000 m
Moment of inertia (Iz) = 0.0009 m4
Moment of inertia girder (Ix) = 0.0001 m4
Wind Speed & design wind pressure for Basic Wind speed & design wind pressure for Basic
wind speed of 33 m/s wind speed of 39m/s
H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions H Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstructions
(m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10 27.8 463.7 17.8 190.5 < 10 38.8 647.6 24.9 266.1
15 29.2 512.5 19.6 230.5 15 40.8 715.8 27.4 321.9
20 30.3 550.6 21 265.3 20 42.3 769.0 29.3 370.5
30 31.4 590.2 22.8 312.2 30 43.9 824.3 31.8 436.0
50 33.1 659.2 24.9 370.4 50 46.2 920.7 34.8 517.3
60 33.6 676.3 25.6 392.9 60 46.9 944.6 35.8 548.8
70 34.0 693.6 26.2 412.8 70 47.5 968.7 36.6 576.6
80 34.4 711.2 26.9 433.3 80 48.0 993.3 37.6 605.2
90 34.9 729.0 27.5 454.2 90 48.7 1018.2 38.4 634.4
100 35.3 747.0 28.2 475.6 100 49.3 1043.3 39.4 664.3
17 Load Case 17 Class A for combination of 70R Eccentric on Left 70R + Class A 1 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 2.13 m
70R Z2 = 2.13 + 1.93 = 4.06 m
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 7.25 + 0.5/2 = 8.00 m
Class A Z2 = 8 + 1.8 = 9.80 m
18 Load Case 18 Class A for combination of 70R Eccentric on Right 70R + Class A 1 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 7.25 - 0.5/2 - 1.8 = 3.70 m
Class A Z2 = 3.7 + 1.8 = 5.50 m
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 1.2 - 2.79 + 0.86/2 = 9.44 m
70R Z2 = 9.44 + 1.93 = 11.37 m
19 Load Case 19 Class A 2 Lane for combination of 70R Eccentric on Left 70R + Class A 2 Lane
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 2.13 m
70R Z2 = 2.13 + 1.93 = 4.06 m
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 7.25 + 0.5/2 = 8.00 m
Class A Z2 = 8 + 1.8 = 9.80 m
2nd Lane Z3 = 9.8 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 11.50 m
Class A Z4 = 11.5 + 1.8 = 13.30 m
20 Load Case 20 Class A 2 Lane for combination of 70R placed near Center70R
of +
Superstructure
Class A 2 Lane
(7.25 from end)
1st Lane Z1 = 7.25 - 0.86/2 - 1.93 = 4.89 m
70R Z2 = 4.89 + 1.93 = 6.82 m
1st Lane Z1 = 6.82 + 0.86/2 + 1.2 + 0.5/2 = 8.70 m
Class A Z2 = 8.7 + 1.8 = 10.50 m
2nd Lane Z3 = 10.5 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 12.20 m
Class A Z4 = 12.2 + 1.8 = 14.00 m
21 Load Case 21 70R W for combination of Class A 2 Lane Eccentric on Left
Class A 2 Lane + 70R From CB
1st Lane Z1 = 0.5 + 0 + 0.15 + 0.50/2 = 0.90 m
Class A Z2 = 0.9 + 1.8 = 2.70 m 1.800
2nd Lane Z3 = 2.7 + 0.5 + 1.2 = 4.40 m
Class A Z4 = 4.4 + 1.8 = 6.20 m 5.300
1st Lane Z5 = 6.2 + 0.5/2 + 1.2 + 0.86/2 = 8.080 m
70R Z6 = 8.08 + 1.93 = 10.010 m 9.045
22 Load Case 22 70R W for combination of Class A Eccentric on Right Class A 1 Lane + 70R
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 - 0.5 - 0.15 - 2.3 - 1.2 - 2.79 + 0.86/2 = 6.99 m
70R Z2 = 6.99 + 1.93 = 8.92 m
1st Lane Z1 = 13.5 -0.5 - 0.15 - 0.25 - 1.8 = 10.80 m
Class A Z2 = 10.8 + 1.8 = 12.60 m
Weight of the Deck Slab & Cross Girder during Stage-2 Loading
R1 R2
1.50 m 1.500 m
0.450 m 35.500 m 0.450 m
Design of Superstructure with PSC I-Girder Slab
R1 R2
0.75 m 35.500 m 0.75 m
R1 R2
0.75 m 35.500 m 0.75 m
L1, Straight Portion L2, Curved in Elevation Soffit Level L4, Straight in Plan
Jacking End Elevation of Cable
Angle g
P2 Angle a
Plan Deviation, P1
L5 L6 Plan of Cable
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
36.200
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
1
2 Lx 0.350 4.525 9.050 13.575 18.100
x 0.35 4.525 9.05 13.575 18.1
x1 0.000 2.205 5.407 5.407 5.407
x2 2.205 5.407 18.207 18.207 18.207
y1 0.400 0.246 0.135 0.135 0.135
y2 0.246 0.135 0.135 0.135 0.135
yord 0.376 0.166 0.135 0.135 0.135
q 3.992 1.101 0.000 0.000 0.000
pf1 2479.950 2469.036 2424.390 2424.390 2424.390
pf2 2469.036 2424.390 2363.113 2363.113 2363.113
ps1 2231.575 2242.490 2287.136 2287.136 2287.136
ps2 2242.490 2287.136 2348.413 2348.413 2348.413
Pf 2478.218 2436.692 2406.951 2385.289 2363.627
Ps 2233.308 2274.834 2304.574 2326.237 2347.899
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
1
4 Lx 0.350 4.525 9.050 13.575 18.100
x 0.35 4.525 9.05 13.575 18.1
x1 0.000 0.000 5.223 9.728 9.728
x2 5.223 5.223 9.728 18.228 18.228
y1 1.200 1.200 0.707 0.495 0.495
y2 0.707 0.707 0.495 0.495 0.495
yord 1.167 0.773 0.527 0.495 0.495
q 5.411 5.411 0.816 0.000 0.000
pf1 2342.175 2342.175 2317.835 2260.463 2260.463
pf2 2317.835 2317.835 2260.463 2222.360 2222.360
ps1 2107.391 2107.391 2131.731 2189.103 2189.103
ps2 2131.731 2131.731 2189.103 2222.360 2222.360
Pf 2340.544 2321.089 2269.101 2243.219 2222.935
Ps 2109.022 2128.477 2180.465 2204.153 2221.858
1
5 Lx 0.350 4.525 9.050 13.575 18.100
x 0.35 4.525 9.05 13.575 18.1
x1 0.000 0.000 5.732 11.741 11.741
x2 5.732 5.732 11.741 18.241 18.241
y1 1.600 1.600 0.993 0.675 0.675
y2 0.993 0.993 0.675 0.675 0.675
yord 1.563 1.121 0.817 0.675 0.675
q 6.077 6.077 2.729 0.000 0.000
pf1 2342.175 2342.175 2315.477 2246.940 2246.940
pf2 2315.477 2315.477 2246.940 2217.918 2217.918
ps1 2108.452 2108.452 2135.150 2203.687 2203.687
ps2 2135.150 2135.150 2203.687 2217.918 2217.918
Pf 2340.545 2321.099 2277.631 2238.750 2218.546
Ps 2110.082 2129.527 2172.995 2207.703 2217.610
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructur e
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / P3
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
4.0 Effect of Temperature Gradient (As per Clause 218.3 of IRC:6 - 2010) - Outer Girder
At Span At Support
3
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 1.0794 1.1347 m
Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 1.5016 1.5069 m3
3
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 0.5875 0.7603 m
o
T1 = 17.8 C h1 = 0.15 m
o
T2 = 4.0 C h2 = 0.25 m
o
T3 = 2.1 C h3 = 0.15 m
Y Y
0.2
3 0.15 432.3 0.25
2.1 0.725 0.725
Stresses
Stress due
Assuming Stress due
y to release Final
Height Stress b Force e Moment End to release
Segment from top of Axial Stress
Restrained of Moment
Force
2
m KN/m m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1 0.150 3664.6 2.625 883.60 0.059 0.723 639.05 3664.63 -748.27 -658.91 2257.4
2 0.070 823.5 2.625 130.14 0.183 0.599 77.99 823.51 -748.27 -473.64 -398.4
3 0.180 592.9 1.000 53.36 0.280 0.502 26.81 592.93 -748.27
4 0.150 432.3 0.725 23.51 2.170 -1.388 -32.62 432.34 -748.27 1210.69 894.8
1090.61 711.23
Stresses
Stress due
Assuming Stress due
y to release Final
Height Stress b Force e Moment End to release
Segment from top of Axial Stress
Restrained of Moment
Force
2
m KN/m m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1 0.220 -2182.3 2.625 -742.38 0.084 0.806 -598.56 -2182.31 444.39 398.64 -1339.3
2 0.030 -388.7 1.000 -7.99 0.233 0.658 -5.26 -388.70 444.39 300.18 355.9
3 0.195 -144.1 1.000 -17.14 0.327 0.564 -9.67 -144.11 444.39
4 0.055 -31.7 0.725 -0.63 0.463 0.427 -0.27 -31.71 444.39
5 0.250 -164.7 0.725 -14.93 1.887 -0.996 14.87 -164.70 444.39
4 0.250 -1358.8 0.725 -138.07 1.952 -1.062 146.56 -1358.79 444.39 -594.95 -1509.3
-921.14 -452.33
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Stress at Top of Deck, stS KN/m2 -998.3 -274.1 16.4 86.0 21.3
2
Stress at Top of Girder, stG KN/m 4297.1 9084.0 11173.9 13529.2 14511.5
Stress at Bottom of Girder, sb KN/m2 7832.3 10879.7 9068.9 6967.8 6232.8
2) Stress at service with Differential Shrinkage and Differential Creep effect (with Live Load)
2
Stress at Top of Deck, stS KN/m -998.3 866.6 1967.0 2544.1 2715.5
2
Stress at Top of Girder, stG KN/m 4297.1 9904.0 12576.0 15296.1 16448.1
Stress at Bottom of Girder, sb KN/m2 7832.3 8783.8 5484.9 2451.3 1282.3
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F1
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Stress at top of Stress at top of Stress at bottom Allowable Stress Allowable Stress
STAGES Deck Girder of Girder in Slab in Girder Status
max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve max +ve max -ve
Stress after 28 days before 2nd Stage DL 4.12 2.75 19.12 9.96 19.5 -2.98 OK OK
Stress after 49 days before (SIDL i.e Crash Barrier & Surfacing) -0.01 -0.67 11.75 2.72 14.78 9.76 21.60 -2.70 21.60 -2.98 OK OK
Stress at service without LL 0.81 -0.04 12.58 2.59 11.66 7.01 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with LL 3.44 -0.04 14.52 2.59 9.57 2.06 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with Diff. Shr.& Creep (without LL) 0.09 -1.00 14.51 4.30 10.88 6.23 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at service with Diff. Shr.& Creep (with LL) 2.72 -1.00 16.45 4.30 8.78 1.28 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service without LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise 2.34 1.39 14.11 4.03 11.77 7.13 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service without LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall -1.14 -2.34 14.99 4.65 9.54 4.89 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with75% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise 4.30 1.39 15.57 4.03 10.20 3.41 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with 75% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall 0.82 -2.34 16.44 4.65 7.97 1.18 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
Stress at Service with 100% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp rise with
4.07 0.44 16.21 4.14 9.32 1.82 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
60% temp. gradient
Stress at Service with 100% LL + Diff. Shr.& Creep + Temp fall with
1.98 -1.80 16.73 4.51 7.98 0.48 21.60 -2.70 21.60 0.00 OK OK
60% temp. gradient
PSC T Girder_OG_37.0M / F2
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
8.0 ULTIMATE MOMENT CHECK (ULS) FOR PSC T-GIRDER (OUTER) AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011 :-
200 Tu
250
725
GIRDER DIMENSIONS RECTANGULAR STRESS BLOCK
Moment due to 1st Stage Dead Load (DL) 0.0 1580.1 2690.4 3349.4 3575.1 1.35
Moment due to 2nd Stage Dead Load (DL) 0.0 1117.9 1930.5 2407.9 2575.5 1.35
Moment due to SIDL (Crash Barrier) 0.0 297.0 452.0 479.0 383.7 1.35
Moment due to SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) 0.0 274.3 478.2 608.7 664.8 1.75
Moment due to Pedestrian Live Load (LL) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Moment due to Live Load (LL) 0.0 1231.2 2105.4 2653.2 2908.2 1.5
Material Data
Grade of Reinforcement Steel Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500
Charecteristic strength of Reinforcement, f yk
500 500 500 500 500 Table 18.1, IRC 112
(Mpa)
Partial factor for Reinforcement Steel, gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
Design value for Tensile Strength,
434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.78 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
fyd = fyk/gs (Mpa)
Modulus of Elasticity of Reinforcement,
200 200 200 200 200 Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112
Es (Gpa)
Grade of Concrete M 45 M 45 M 45 M 45 M 45
Charecteristics compressive strength, fck
45 45 45 45 45 Table 6.5, IRC 112
(Mpa)
a 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
Concrete material factor, gm 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
Design value for concrete compressive
20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112
strength, fcd = afck/gm (MPa)
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, Ecm (GPa) 34 34 34 34 34 Table 6.5, IRC 112
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Steel,
195 195 195 195 195
Ep (GPa)
Charecteristic tensile strength of Prestressing
1860 1860 1860 1860 1860 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
steel, fpk (Mpa)
Partial factor for Prestressing Steel, gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
Design tensile strength of Prestressing steel,
1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 Cl 6.3.5, IRC 112
fpd (MPa)
Initial prestrain of prestressing steel 0.00490 0.00499 0.00514 0.00522 0.00526
Geometric Data
Width of Bottom Flange of Girder, b (mm) 725 725 725 725 725
Total Depth of Girder, D (mm) 2220 2220 2220 2220 2220
c.g of Reinforcement from soffit girder, c (mm) 58 58 58 58 58
Dia. of Untensioned Reinforcement, f (mm) 12 12 12 12 12
Effective depth of Girder, d (mm) 2162 2162 2162 2162 2162
Spacing of Reinforcement, s (mm) or 0 0 0 0 0
Number of Reinforcement Bar, n 6 6 6 6 6
Area of Untensioned Reinforcement, At (mm2) 679 679 679 679 679
Number of Strands 88 88 88 88 88
Area of Single Strand (mm2) 98.7 98.70 98.70 98.70 98.70
Total area of Strand (mm2) 8686 8686 8686 8686 8686
c.g of Strands from soffit of Girder (mm) 827 515 373 341 340
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.0422 0.0422 0.0422 0.0422 0.0422
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
Position of N.A from Compression face, x (mm) 332 332 332 332 332
Total Compressive Force, C (N) 12516823 12516823 12516823 12516823 12516823
Total Tensile Force, T (N) 12516823 12516823 12516823 12516823 12516823
Difference, C-T 0 0 0 0 0
Strain in Concrete 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035
Strain in Reinforcement 0.01932 0.01932 0.01932 0.01932 0.01932
Strain in Prestressing Steel 0.01611 0.01949 0.02114 0.02156 0.02161
So, Stress in Reinforcement (MPa) 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8
So, Stress in Prestressing Steel (MPa) 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1 1407.1
Lever Arm from c/g of Reinforcement (mm) 2029.4 2029.4 2029.4 2029.4 2029.4
Lever Arm from c/g of Prestressing Steel (mm) 1260.3 1572.4 1714.6 1746.6 1746.9
Tensile Force in Reinforcement (KN) 295.0 295.0 295.0 295.0 295.0
Tensile Force in Prestressing Steel (KN) 12221.8 12221.8 12221.8 12221.8 12221.8
Moment of Resistance of the Section (KN-m) 16001 19817 21555 21945 21949
Status OK OK OK OK OK
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
9.0 CHECK FOR SHEAR (ULS) FOR PSC T-GIRDER (OUTER) AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011 :-
d' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2 Factor As per table 3.2 of IRC 6-2014
Support ULS
Distance from Support in (m) 2.00 4.438 8.875 13.313 17.750
Loadings
1st Stage DL (KN) 431.3 299.0 197.3 99.7 0.0 1.35
2nd Stage DL (KN) 287.8 218.0 142.5 72.7 0.0 1.35
SIDL (Crash Barrier) (KN) 94.0 76.3 43.8 7.3 26.7 1.35
SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) (KN) 76.3 67.8 47.2 26.3 5.1 1.75
Carriageway LL (KN) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Carriageway LL (KN) 339.9 336.6 289.9 223.7 128.3 1.5
d' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2
Remarks
Support
Ultimate Shear, Vu (KN) 1741.0 1424.6 1035.3 624.2 237.4
1. Elements not requiring Design Shear Reinforcement
a) Effective Width, bwc (m) 0.68 0.255 0.255 0.255 0.255 = web thk. - 0.5 x dia of duct.
b) Overall Depth, D (m) 2.220 2.220 2.220 2.220 2.220 = Depth of Girder + Depth of Deck Slab
c) CG of Tendons from Bottom Yord (m) 0.827 0.515 0.373 0.341 0.340
db = D - Yord of cable from soffit of
d) Depth , db (m) 1.393 1.705 1.847 1.879 1.880
girder
e) Axial Tensile Strength of Concrete,
2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Ref. Cl 10.3.2, IRC:112
fctk,005 (Mpa)
f) Partial Safety factor fo Concrete, gm 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
g) Partial Safety factor fo Steel, gm 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
h) Design Tensile Strength of Concrete,
1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 = fctd/gm, where gm = 1.5
fctd (Mpa)
= Axial Prestressing Force - Total loss
i) Applied Longitudinal Force,NED (KN) 8301.7 8445.5 8705.4 8843.9 8916.7
due to prestress
j) Compressive Stress due to prestress,
4.01 4.02 4.02 4.02 4.02 Min. value of NED/Ac or 0.2 x fcd
scp (Mpa)
k) Second Moment of Area, I (m4) 1.0107 0.8445 0.8445 0.8445 0.8445 Calculated from section property
l) First Moment of Area, S (m3) 0.6406 0.4971 0.4971 0.4971 0.4971 Considered from section property
m) Value of k1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Ref. Cl 10.3.1, IRC:112
= Vertical Prestressing Force x (1 -
n) Effect of Vertical Prestress, Vpd (KN) 655.2 495.39 96.24 22.62 0.00 Ratio of loss due to prestress with
Applied lobgitudinal Force)
o) Area of Prestressing Steel, As(mm2) 8686 8686 8686 8686 8686
p) Value of K 1.38 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.33 Ref. Cl 10.3.1, IRC:112
q) vmin = 0.031 K3/2fck1/2 0.337 0.323 0.319 0.318 0.318 Eq. 10.3
r) % of Prestressing Steel, r1 0.009 0.020 0.018 0.018 0.018 = Area of Prestressing Steel/(bwc x d)
Design of PSC-T Girder Superstructure
'd' away
Location from L/8 L/4 3L/8 L/2 Factor
Support ULS
Distance from Support in (m) 2.000 4.438 8.875 13.313 17.750
Loadings
1st Stage DL (KN) 431.3 299.0 197.3 99.7 0.0 1.35
2nd Stage DL (KN) 287.8 218.0 142.5 72.7 0.0 1.35
SIDL (Crash Barrier) (KN) 94.0 76.3 43.8 7.3 26.7 1.35
SIDL (Surfcaing/ Wearing coat) (KN) 76.3 67.8 47.2 26.3 5.1 1.75
Carriageway LL (KN) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
Carriageway LL (KN) 339.9 336.6 289.9 223.7 128.3 1.5
11.0 Check For Stress Behind Anchorage & Design Of End Block
A. Check for Bearing Stress behind Anchorage (As per Cl. 7.3 of IRC : 18 - 2000)
350 350
-40
fcj = 40.59 Mpa
a= 350 mm
b= 300 mm
fb = 16.7 Mpa
a) Force per cable at Jacking end after friction & Slip = 2235.6 KN
b) Elastic Shortening Loss per cable = 77.1 KN
c) Relaxation Loss per cable = 136.1 KN
d) Net force after instanteneous losses , Fn = 2022.5 KN
e) Stress behind anchorage, sb=(Fn/a2) = 16.5 Mpa
Status OK
C. Design of End Block & Calculation of Bursting Reinforcement (Ref. Clause 13.5.1 of IRC:112 - 2011)
Dimension Detail:-
Design Parameter:-
20 Grade of concrete = M 35
21 Grade of steel / reinforcement = Fe 500
22 Clear cover to reinforcement top / deck slab = 50 mm
outer wall = 75 mm
internal wall = 50 mm
bottom / base slab = 75 mm
23 Unit weight of concrete = 2.5 T/m3
24 Unit weight of profile corrective course / filling = 2.5 T/m3
25 Unit weight of wearing coat (WC) = 2.2 T/m3
26 Unit weight of backfill soil = 2.0 T/m3
27 Angle of repose of backfill soil f = 30 deg.
28 Angle of friction betw wall and earthfill d = 20 deg.
29 Coefficient of earth pressure at rest KO = 0.500
30 Allowable safe bearing capacity at founding level = 15.0 T/m2
31 Allowable settlement at founding statra = 25.0 mm
32 Spring Constant at founding statra = 6000 KN/m
b. Load calculations for RCC multicell box structure"-
Self weight of the structure has been calculated directly in STAAD file by the comment
"SELFWEIGHT -1".
0.150
Parameters:
Depth of Superstructure h= 0.575 m
0.173 T2 Grade of Concrete M= 35 Mpa
2
Elasticity for Concrete Ei = 3.23E+06 T/m
2
h= 0.58 Modified Elasticity of Concrete Ec =Ei 1.62E+06 T/m
o
Coeff. of Thermal Expansion a= 0.000012 / C
Stress s= Eat
0.150 Force F= F1 + F2 + F3
Moment M= F1x1 + F2x2 -F3x3
T3
Generalised Temperature & corresponding Force Diagram
T1
s1
h1 F1
0.150 s2
h2 h/2 F2
0.173 T2 x1
x2
h CG OF SECTION
DECK SLAB
h/2 x3
0.150
h3 F3
s3
T3
Force & Moment calculation:-
h h1 h2 h3 T1 T2 T3
Member o o o
(m) (m) (m) (m) C C C
Top slab 0.575 0.150 0.173 0.150 17.80 4.00 2.10
s1 s2 s3 F1 F2 F3 Force
Member
T / m2 T / m2 T / m2 T T T T
Top slab 345.1 77.5 40.71 31.69 6.69 3.05 41.4
cg of
cg of Top cg of Mid Bottom x1 x2 x3 Moment
cg from cg from
Member Block Block Block
Top Bottom
from Top from Top from m m m Tm
Bottom
Top slab 0.2875 0.2875 0.0592 0.2075 0.0500 0.2283 0.0800 0.2375 7.0
Temperature Fall case:-
The top slab is designed for the effects of the distribution of the temperature
across the deck depth as given in the sketch below.
T1
Parameters:
0.115 Depth of Superstructure h= 0.575 m
Grade of Concrete M= 35 Mpa
2
T2 Elasticity for Concrete Ei = 3.23E+06 T/m
3
0.144 Modified Elasticity of Concrete Ec =Ei 1.62E+06 T/m
o
Coeff. of Thermal Expansion a= 1.2E-05 / C
h = 0.58 Stress s= Eat
Force F= F1 + F2 + F3 + F4
Moment M= F1x1 + F2x2 - F3x3 - F4x4
T3 0.144
0.115
T4
Generalised Temperature & corresponding Force Diagram
s1
F1
0.115
h/2 s2 x1
F2
0.144 x2
h CG OF SECTION
DECK SLAB
h/2 x3
0.144 F3
s3 x4
F4
0.115
s4
h h1 h2 h3 h4 T1 T2 T3 T4
Member o o o o
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) C C C C
Top slab 0.575 0.115 0.144 0.144 0.115 10.60 0.70 0.80 6.60
s1 s2 s3 s4 F1 F2 F3 F4 Force
Member
T / m2 T / m2 T / m2 T / m3 T T T T T
Top slab 205.5 13.6 15.5 127.9 12.60 0.98 1.11 8.25 22.9
cg of Mid cg of
cg of Top cg of Mid x1 x2 x3 x4 Moment
cg from cg from Block Bottom
Member Block Block
Top Bottom from Block from
from Top from Top m m m m Tm
Bottom Bottom
Top slab 0.288 0.288 0.041 0.163 0.163 0.073 0.247 0.125 0.125 0.215 1.3
Calculation Of Effective Width Of Live Load:-
Effective Live Load for 70R-Wheel Load
We find the effective live load & its position in a tabular as per IRC:-21 - 2000.
4 7
5 8
6 9
10 11 12
Summary of Bending Moment & Shear Force:-
Bottom 31.5 44.5 70.8 95.9 57.1 47.5 57.1 47.5 30.3 64.6 14.5 14.5
slab
2 Top 0.0 0.0 20.3 26.5 18.4 19.5 18.4 19.5 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0
Bottom 41.8 44.1 120.4 146.7 32.6 36.0 32.6 36.0 31.7 100.1 31.2 31.2
3 Top 176.8 185.1 279.0 318.6 83.2 84.7 83.2 84.7 129.8 218.8 115.0 115.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0 3.5 4.6 97.4 101.0 97.4 101.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0
Outer 60.7 50.2 127.7 137.7 0.0 0.0 20.8 27.2 43.7 102.0 15.3 15.3
4
Outer wall
Inner 25.4 36.7 67.1 91.0 71.0 48.7 87.8 70.6 43.4 79.6 19.6 19.6
Outer 48.5 35.8 102.4 106.2 40.0 43.9 60.8 71.0 20.4 67.3 16.4 16.4
5
Inner 42.1 24.6 54.9 41.2 0.0 0.0 16.8 21.9 36.9 48.0 15.9 15.9
Outer 199.9 191.9 280.6 297.1 174.1 142.6 194.9 169.8 150.6 220.8 120.5 120.5
6
Inner 0.0 0.0 26.4 34.5 0.0 0.0 16.8 21.9 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0
Outer 48.2 53.0 79.6 94.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 10.9 35.3 62.6 0.0 0.0
7
Inner wall
Inner 0.0 0.0 31.4 41.0 23.2 25.4 31.5 36.3 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0
Outer 0.0 0.0 13.6 17.7 0.0 0.0 8.4 10.9 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0
8
Inner 3.9 4.2 17.8 22.2 23.2 25.4 31.5 36.3 2.8 14.8 0.0 0.0
Outer 0.0 0.0 23.8 31.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 10.9 0.0 20.7 0.0 0.0
9
Inner 49.1 61.7 73.2 93.2 23.2 25.4 31.5 36.3 40.8 61.8 0.0 0.0
Top 0.0 0.0 34.8 45.4 124.0 116.8 203.3 220.3 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.0
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 221.4 202.1 280.0 278.4 123.5 118.1 219.0 242.7 164.7 215.6 123.2 123.2
Top 127.5 132.9 213.6 245.2 40.9 34.9 58.3 57.6 93.4 168.2 75.4 75.4
slab
11
Bottom 0.0 0.0 20.6 26.8 53.4 49.3 70.9 72.1 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0
Top 0.0 0.0 22.7 29.7 95.0 95.2 178.8 204.5 0.0 19.8 0.0 0.0
12
Bottom 99.9 148.2 231.0 319.1 121.3 125.3 208.7 239.3 104.6 218.6 87.4 87.4
Summary of Bending Moment & Shear Force due to Live Load:-
lf=1.15 (LL
Design lf=1.5 (LL
Beam 70 R Wheel Load 70 R Track Load Class A 3 lane Load 70 RW Bogie Load SF as Desgin Desgin
Compo Face BM (lf=1) Desgin BM as leading Desgin BM
No (lf=1) accompanyin SF SF
nent BM(KN-m) SF(KN) BM(KN-m) SF(KN) BM(KN-m) SF(KN) BM(KN-m) SF(KN) load)
g load)
Top 39.2 67.8 50.3 68.7 34.7 67.5 36.8 67.8 50.3 68.7 1.15 57.9 79.0 1.5 75.5 103.1
1
Top/Deck Bottom 34.2 64.1 32.9 63.5 20.3 62.3 31.2 63.5 34.2 64.1 1.15 39.4 73.7 1.5 51.3 96.2
slab Top 15.6 24.9 17.6 29.0 11.6 39.5 14.0 23.8 17.6 39.5 1.15 20.3 45.4 1.5 26.5 59.2
2
Bottom 53.7 27.4 68.4 25.7 59.5 31.8 54.0 26.7 68.4 31.8 1.15 78.6 36.6 1.5 102.6 47.7
Top 88.9 82.6 71.7 75.4 73.7 67.2 87.0 80.6 88.9 82.6 1.15 102.3 94.9 1.5 133.4 123.8
3
Bottom 0.0 80.2 3.1 72.3 0.0 73.6 0.0 79.5 3.1 80.2 1.15 3.5 92.3 1.5 4.6 120.4
4 Outer 49.9 17.7 58.3 18.1 42.0 7.7 50.0 16.3 58.3 18.1 1.15 67.1 20.8 1.5 87.5 27.2
Outer wall
Inner 35.5 8.9 33.2 14.6 21.3 8.0 36.2 8.0 36.2 14.6 1.15 41.6 16.8 1.5 54.3 21.9
Outer 41.0 17.7 46.9 18.1 34.4 7.7 38.7 17.7 46.9 18.1 1.15 54.0 20.8 1.5 70.4 27.2
5
Inner 11.1 8.9 10.9 14.6 4.3 8.0 10.7 14.6 11.1 14.6 1.15 12.7 16.8 1.5 16.6 21.9
Outer 70.2 17.7 66.6 18.1 48.0 7.7 68.6 18.1 70.2 18.1 1.15 80.7 20.8 1.5 105.3 27.2
6
Inner 14.2 8.9 23.0 14.6 9.7 8.0 12.4 9.7 23.0 14.6 1.15 26.4 16.8 1.5 34.5 21.9
Outer 18.6 7.1 27.3 7.3 17.7 5.0 16.9 6.4 27.3 7.3 1.15 31.4 8.4 1.5 41.0 10.9
7
Inner wall
Inner 15.8 4.2 27.3 7.3 13.7 4.7 13.8 3.6 27.3 7.3 1.15 31.4 8.4 1.5 41.0 10.9
Outer 11.8 7.1 11.5 7.3 7.9 5.0 10.6 6.9 11.8 7.3 1.15 13.6 8.4 1.5 17.7 10.9
8
Inner 9.2 4.2 12.0 7.3 5.5 4.7 9.2 3.7 12.0 7.3 1.15 13.8 8.4 1.5 18.1 10.9
9 Outer 20.7 7.1 10.9 7.3 9.3 5.0 18.7 6.3 20.7 7.3 1.15 23.8 8.4 1.5 31.1 10.9
Inner 17.1 4.2 21.0 7.3 8.0 4.7 15.9 4.0 21.0 7.3 1.15 24.1 8.4 1.5 31.4 10.9
Top 17.0 69.0 30.3 68.0 11.2 52.6 16.6 68.0 30.3 69.0 1.15 34.8 79.4 1.5 45.4 103.5
10
Bottom/Bas
Bottom 48.5 83.1 50.9 57.7 32.4 56.7 46.4 80.4 50.9 83.1 1.15 58.5 95.5 1.5 76.3 124.6
e slab
Top 74.8 9.4 67.6 15.2 51.1 7.2 70.8 8.1 74.8 15.2 1.15 86.1 17.4 1.5 112.3 22.7
11
Bottom 17.9 9.4 15.2 15.2 10.4 7.2 16.8 9.0 17.9 15.2 1.15 20.6 17.5 1.5 26.8 22.8
12 Top 19.8 72.9 18.4 62.9 6.3 46.4 18.8 72.7 19.8 72.9 1.15 22.7 83.8 1.5 29.7 109.3
Bottom 104.4 76.0 113.9 62.6 68.8 43.4 104.4 73.0 113.9 76.0 1.15 131.0 87.4 1.5 170.9 114.0
Design of RCC Box structures Component:-
Material Properties:-
Grade of Concrete = M 35 MPa
Characteristic compressive cube strength of Concrete at 28 days fck = 35 MPa
Mean value of Concrete cube compressive strength fcm = 45 MPa Page:235 of IRC:112-2011 & Table 6.5 of IRC:112-2011
Grade of Steel Reinforcement = Fe 500 MPa
Characteristic yield strength of Reinforcement fyk = 500 MPa
Design yield of strength of shear Reinforcement fywd = 400 MPa Page:86 of IRC:112-2011
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 200000 MPa Page:29 of IRC:112-2011
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, for Short Term loading Ecm = 32308 MPa Page:236 of IRC:112-2011 & Table 6.5 of IRC:112-2011
for Long Term loading Ecm' = 13842 MPa for Top/Deck slab
13726 MPa for Outer wall
13576 MPa for Inner wall
16154 MPa for Bottom/Base slab
Mean value of axial tensile strength of Concrete fctm = 2.8 MPa Page:235 of IRC:112-2011 & Table 6.5 of IRC:112-2011
Mean value of tensile strength of Concrete at time of cracks fct.eff = 2.9 MPa
Design compressive strength of concrete fcd = 15.6 MPa
Ultimate compressive strain in concrete ecu2 = 0.0035
Characteristic strain of Steel at maximum load euk = 0.0045
Limiting design strain of Steel eud = 0.00405
Limiting value of depth of N.A to effective depth (d) xumax/d = 0.464
Age of concrete at the time of loading t0 = 90 days
t∞ considered t∞ = 25550 days
Creep factor f = 1.33 for Top/Deck slab Refer:- Creep coefficient calculation
1.35 for Outer wall
1.38 for Inner wall
1.00 for Bottom/Base slab
Permissible Stresses:-
Permissible concrete compressive stress i.e 0.48*fck = 16.8 MPa at SLS Rare load combination
Permissible concrete compressive stress i.e 0.36*fck = 12.6 MPa at SLS QP load combination
Permissible tensile stress in steel i.e 0.8*fyk = 400 MPa
Permissible Crack width (for Moderate Exposure) wk = 0.3 mm at SLS QP load combination
Ast,cal=MEd/0.87
z=(d-0.416xu)
xu=0.87fyk*Ast
MRd=0.87 * fyk *
/0.362fck*b
DFd = 0.5VEd
Ast,pro>Ast,min
Ast,cal<Ast,pro
Area of steel provided
M Ed/z+DFd
Design
fyk*z
<Ast,max
M Rd/z >
Compon Section Face Dia. Spacing Dia. Spacing Ast, pro
Ast * z
ent Overall M Ed/z+
MEd b depth, D d xumax Check Ast,max Ast,min D Fd M Rd/z
Tm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm2 mm mm mm mm2 mm2 mm2 T T Tm Tm/m
Top 11.7 1000 575 519.0 ts1-12 100 w1-12 100 2262 240.6 77.7 UR,OK 486.7 552 12975 OK 748 OK 2.4 26.4 47.9 98.4 OK
1
Bottom 9.6 1000 575 519.0 ts2-12 100 100 1131 240.6 38.8 UR,OK 502.8 438 12975 OK 748 OK 2.9 21.9 24.7 49.2 OK
Top/Deck
Top 2.6 1000 575 519.0 ts1-12 100 100 1131 240.6 38.8 UR,OK 502.8 121 12975 OK 748 OK 1.0 6.2 24.7 49.2 OK
slab
2
Bottom 14.7 1000 575 519.0 ts2-12 100 ts8-00 100 1131 240.6 38.8 UR,OK 502.8 670 12975 OK 748 OK 1.8 31.0 24.7 49.2 OK
Top 31.9 1000 575 519.0 ts1-12 100 ts3-12 100 2262 240.6 77.7 UR,OK 486.7 1505 12975 OK 748 OK 4.2 69.7 47.9 98.4 OK
3
Bottom 0.5 1000 575 519.0 ts2-12 100 100 1131 240.6 38.8 UR,OK 502.8 21 12975 OK 748 OK 5.0 6.0 24.7 49.2 OK
Outer 13.8 1000 475 394.0 w1-12 100 ts1-12 100 2262 182.6 77.7 UR,OK 361.7 875 9850 OK 568 OK 1.4 39.4 35.6 98.4 OK
4
Outer wall
Inner 9.1 1000 475 394.0 w2-12 100 100 1131 182.6 38.8 UR,OK 377.8 554 9850 OK 568 OK 4.4 28.5 18.6 49.2 OK
Outer 10.6 1000 475 394.0 w1-12 100 100 1131 182.6 38.8 UR,OK 377.8 646 9850 OK 568 OK 3.6 31.7 18.6 49.2 OK
5
Inner 5.5 1000 475 394.0 w2-12 100 100 1131 182.6 38.8 UR,OK 377.8 334 9850 OK 568 OK 1.1 15.6 18.6 49.2 OK
Outer 29.7 1000 475 394.0 w1-12 100 bs1-16 100 3142 182.6 107.9 UR,OK 349.1 1957 9850 OK 568 OK 9.7 94.9 47.7 136.7 OK
6
Inner 3.4 1000 475 394.0 w2-12 100 100 1131 182.6 38.8 UR,OK 377.8 210 9850 OK 568 OK 1.1 10.2 18.6 49.2 OK
Outer 9.4 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 713 7975 OK 460 OK 0.5 31.6 14.9 49.2 OK
7
Inner 4.1 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 311 7975 OK 460 OK 1.8 15.3 14.9 49.2 OK
Inner wall
Outer 1.8 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 135 7975 OK 460 OK 0.5 6.4 14.9 49.2 OK
8
Inner 2.2 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 169 7975 OK 460 OK 1.8 9.1 14.9 49.2 OK
Outer 3.1 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 236 7975 OK 460 OK 0.5 10.8 14.9 49.2 OK
9
Inner 9.3 1000 375 319.0 w3-12 100 100 1131 147.9 38.8 UR,OK 302.8 707 7975 OK 460 OK 1.8 32.6 14.9 49.2 OK
Top 4.5 1000 600 517.0 bs3-16 100 100 2011 239.7 69.0 UR,OK 488.3 214 12925 OK 745 OK 11.0 20.3 42.7 87.5 OK
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 28.0 1000 600 517.0 bs1-16 100 w1-12 100 3142 239.7 107.9 UR,OK 472.1 1363 12925 OK 745 OK 12.1 71.4 64.5 136.7 OK
Top 24.5 1000 600 517.0 bs3-16 100 bs6-00 100 2011 239.7 69.0 UR,OK 488.3 1154 12925 OK 745 OK 2.9 53.1 42.7 87.5 OK
slab
11
Bottom 2.7 1000 600 517.0 bs1-16 100 100 2011 239.7 69.0 UR,OK 488.3 126 12925 OK 745 OK 3.6 9.1 42.7 87.5 OK
Top 3.0 1000 600 517.0 bs3-16 100 100 2011 239.7 69.0 UR,OK 488.3 140 12925 OK 745 OK 10.2 16.3 42.7 87.5 OK
12
Bottom 31.9 1000 600 517.0 bs1-16 100 bs2-12 100 3142 239.7 107.9 UR,OK 472.1 1554 12925 OK 745 OK 12.0 79.6 64.5 136.7 OK
D Fd = Additional tensile force, to be accounted in longitudinal reinforcement
*bw*z*n1*f
DFd=0.5VEd
VRd.max=acw
0.5*bw*d*
0.5*bw*d*
q adopted
n=0.6[1-
Design
fck/310)
Compon Section Face
*cotq
VEd ≤
n*fcd
n*fcd
cd/2
ent
VEd bw d z=0.9d acw n1 Check q
T mm mm mm T Check deg deg T
Top 4.8 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 0.63 45 2.4
1
Bottom 5.7 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 0.75 45 2.9
Top/Deck
Top 1.9 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 0.25 45 1.0
slab
2
Bottom 3.6 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 0.47 45 1.8
Top 8.5 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 1.11 45 4.2
3
Bottom 10.1 1000 519.0 467.1 1 0.6 219.1 OK 0.532 215.9 OK 1.32 45 5.0
Outer 2.7 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 0.47 45 1.4
4
Outer wall
Inner 8.8 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 1.51 45 4.4
Outer 7.1 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 1.22 45 3.6
5
Inner 2.2 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 0.38 45 1.1
Outer 19.5 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 3.37 45 9.7
6
Inner 2.2 1000 394.0 354.6 1 0.6 166.3 OK 0.532 163.9 OK 0.38 45 1.1
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.23 45 0.5
7
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.77 45 1.8
Inner wall
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.23 45 0.5
8
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.77 45 1.8
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.23 45 0.5
9
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 287.1 1 0.6 134.6 OK 0.532 132.7 OK 0.77 45 1.8
Top 22.0 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 2.90 45 11.0
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 24.3 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 3.19 45 12.1
Top 5.8 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 0.77 45 2.9
slab
11
Bottom 7.2 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 0.95 45 3.6
Top 20.4 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 2.69 45 10.2
12
Bottom 23.9 1000 517.0 465.3 1 0.6 218.2 OK 0.532 215.1 OK 3.15 45 12.0
Check for Shear Reinforcement requirement
+0.15sc
VRd.c=Max[VRd.c
VRd.c1=(nmin+0.
r1=Min[Asl/bwd
K=Min[1+(200/
VRd.c2=[0.12K(8
nmin=0.031
Design
15scp)bwd
1 & VRd.c2]
1/2
scp
b =av/2d
0.33
,2]
Compon Section Face
fck
,0.02]
r1fck)
p]bwd
ent
0.5
3/2
VEd bw b VEd
d)
d Asl Check
0
T mm mm mm2 T Mpa T T T
Top 4.8 1000 519.0 2262 1.0 4.8 1.62 0.004 0.378 0 19.6 23.0 23.0 SR Not Required
1
Bottom 5.7 1000 519.0 1131 1.0 5.7 1.62 0.002 0.378 0 19.6 18.3 19.6 SR Not Required
Top/Deck
Top 1.9 1000 519.0 1131 1.0 1.9 1.62 0.002 0.378 0 19.6 18.3 19.6 SR Not Required
slab
2
Bottom 3.6 1000 519.0 1131 1.0 3.6 1.62 0.002 0.378 0 19.6 18.3 19.6 SR Not Required
Top 8.5 1000 519.0 2262 1.0 8.5 1.62 0.004 0.378 0 19.6 23.0 23.0 SR Not Required
3
Bottom 10.1 1000 519.0 1131 1.0 10.1 1.62 0.002 0.378 0 19.6 18.3 19.6 SR Not Required
Outer 2.7 1000 394.0 2262 1.0 2.7 1.71 0.006 0.411 0 16.2 20.2 20.2 SR Not Required
4
SR Not Required
Outer wall
Inner 8.8 1000 394.0 1131 1.0 8.8 1.71 0.003 0.411 0 16.2 16.1 16.2
Outer 7.1 1000 394.0 1131 1.0 7.1 1.71 0.003 0.411 0 16.2 16.1 16.2 SR Not Required
5
Inner 2.2 1000 394.0 1131 1.0 2.2 1.71 0.003 0.411 0 16.2 16.1 16.2 SR Not Required
Outer 19.5 1000 394.0 3142 1.0 19.5 1.71 0.008 0.411 0 16.2 22.6 22.6 SR Not Required
6
Inner 2.2 1000 394.0 1131 1.0 2.2 1.71 0.003 0.411 0 16.2 16.1 16.2 SR Not Required
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 1.1 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
7
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 3.6 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
Inner wall
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 1.1 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
8
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 3.6 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
Outer 1.1 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 1.1 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
9
Inner 3.6 1000 319.0 1131 1.0 3.6 1.79 0.004 0.440 0 14.0 14.6 14.6 SR Not Required
Top 22.0 1000 517.0 2011 1.0 22.0 1.62 0.004 0.379 0 19.6 22.1 22.1 SR Not Required
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 24.3 1000 517.0 3142 1.0 24.3 1.62 0.006 0.379 0 19.6 25.6 25.6 SR Not Required
Top 5.8 1000 517.0 2011 1.0 5.8 1.62 0.004 0.379 0 19.6 22.1 22.1 SR Not Required
slab
11
Bottom 7.2 1000 517.0 2011 1.0 7.2 1.62 0.004 0.379 0 19.6 22.1 22.1 SR Not Required
Top 20.4 1000 517.0 2011 1.0 20.4 1.62 0.004 0.379 0 19.6 22.1 22.1 SR Not Required
12
Bottom 23.9 1000 517.0 3142 1.0 23.9 1.62 0.006 0.379 0 19.6 25.6 25.6 SR Not Required
* SR stands for Shear Reinforcement
B) Serviceability Limit State (SLS) :-
1) SLS Stress Check:-
Mean flexural tensile strength of solid beam fctm,fl = max [ {1.6-(h/1000)} fctm ; fctm ]
where, h = total depth of member in mm
a) For Rare Load Combination:-
depth 'x'
Uncracked
Cracked/
Stress
ratio 'm'
Design Comp. Per. Tensile Per.
Modular
N.A
MRare Ast, pro I Y/2 fctm,fl INA
Compon Section Face Overall 'sc' stress stress Check stress stress Check
ent b depth, D d
2 4 4
Tm mm mm mm mm mm mm Mpa Mpa mm mm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
Top 10.3 1000 575 519.0 2262 1E+10 287.5 2.5 2.8 Uncracked 7.9 119.5 3.4E+09 3.6 16.8 OK 94.9 400 OK
1
Bottom 6.5 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 1.6 2.8 Uncracked 8.0 88.5 1.9E+09 3.0 16.8 OK 116.6 400 OK
Top/Deck
Top 1.8 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.4 2.8 Uncracked 6.2 78.5 1.5E+09 0.9 16.8 OK 31.6 400 OK
slab
2
Bottom 10.0 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 2.5 2.8 Uncracked 8.8 92.0 2.1E+09 4.5 16.8 OK 181.2 400 OK
Top 21.9 1000 575 519.0 2262 1E+10 287.5 5.4 2.8 Cracked 10.5 135.2 4.3E+09 6.8 16.8 OK 204.1 400 OK
3
Bottom 0.3 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.1 2.8 Uncracked 6.2 78.5 1.5E+09 0.2 16.8 OK 5.5 400 OK
Outer 10.2 1000 475 394.0 2262 5E+09 237.5 4.8 3.1 Cracked 7.4 99.6 1.8E+09 5.7 16.8 OK 125.0 400 OK
4
Outer wall
Inner 8.0 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 3.7 3.1 Cracked 8.3 76.9 1.1E+09 5.6 16.8 OK 191.0 400 OK
Outer 6.7 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 3.1 3.1 Cracked 8.2 76.9 1.1E+09 4.8 16.8 OK 161.6 400 OK
5
Inner 4.8 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 2.2 3.1 Uncracked 9.0 79.8 1.2E+09 3.3 16.8 OK 115.5 400 OK
Outer 22.1 1000 475 394.0 3142 5E+09 237.5 10.3 3.1 Cracked 10.8 132.9 3.1E+09 9.5 16.8 OK 201.0 400 OK
6
Inner 2.3 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 1.1 3.1 Uncracked 6.2 67.6 8.5E+08 1.8 16.8 OK 54.7 400 OK
Outer 6.3 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 4.3 3.4 Cracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 7.0 16.8 OK 185.3 400 OK
7
Inner 2.7 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 1.9 3.4 Uncracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 3.0 16.8 OK 80.8 400 OK
Inner wall
Outer 1.2 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.8 3.4 Uncracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 1.3 16.8 OK 35.0 400 OK
8
Inner 1.5 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 1.0 3.4 Uncracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 1.6 16.8 OK 43.8 400 OK
Outer 2.1 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 1.4 3.4 Uncracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 2.3 16.8 OK 61.3 400 OK
9
Inner 6.2 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 4.3 3.4 Cracked 6.2 60.2 5.4E+08 6.9 16.8 OK 182.8 400 OK
Top 3.0 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.8 2.8 Uncracked 6.2 101.7 2.5E+09 1.2 16.8 OK 31.2 400 OK
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 21.6 1000 600 517.0 3142 1E+10 300 5.6 2.8 Cracked 9.7 149.8 5.2E+09 6.2 16.8 OK 146.9 400 OK
Top 16.8 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 4.4 2.8 Cracked 9.0 119.7 3.4E+09 5.9 16.8 OK 175.4 400 OK
slab
11
Bottom 1.8 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.5 2.8 Uncracked 6.2 101.7 2.5E+09 0.7 16.8 OK 18.4 400 OK
Top 2.0 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.5 2.8 Uncracked 6.2 101.7 2.5E+09 0.8 16.8 OK 20.4 400 OK
12
Bottom 21.9 1000 600 517.0 3142 1E+10 300 5.7 2.8 Cracked 8.7 142.8 4.8E+09 6.5 16.8 OK 148.2 400 OK
b) For Quasi-Permanent Load Combination:-
depth 'x'
Uncracked
Cracked/
Stress
ratio 'm'
Comp. Per. Tensile Per.
Modular
Design
N.A
MQP Ast, pro I Y/2 fctm,fl INA
Compon Section Face Overall 'sc' stress stress Check stress stress Check
ent b depth, D d
Tm mm mm mm mm2 mm4 mm Mpa Mpa mm mm4 Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
Top 2.1 1000 575 519.0 2262 1E+10 287.5 0.5 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 154.4 5.6E+09 0.6 12.6 OK 20.2 400 OK
1
Bottom 1.5 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.4 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 114.9 3.2E+09 0.5 12.6 OK 26.7 400 OK
Top/Deck
Top 0.0 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.0 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 114.9 3.2E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
slab
2
Bottom 3.1 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.8 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 114.9 3.2E+09 1.1 12.6 OK 57.4 400 OK
Top 11.5 1000 575 519.0 2262 1E+10 287.5 2.8 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 154.4 5.6E+09 3.2 12.6 OK 108.7 400 OK
3
Bottom 0.0 1000 575 519.0 1131 1E+10 287.5 0.0 2.8 Uncracked 14.4 114.9 3.2E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Outer 1.5 1000 475 394.0 2262 5E+09 237.5 0.7 3.1 Uncracked 14.6 131.5 3.0E+09 0.7 12.6 OK 19.3 400 OK
4
Outer wall
Inner 2.0 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 0.9 3.1 Uncracked 14.6 98.7 1.8E+09 1.1 12.6 OK 48.0 400 OK
Outer 1.6 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 0.8 3.1 Uncracked 14.6 98.7 1.8E+09 0.9 12.6 OK 40.2 400 OK
5
Inner 1.6 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 0.7 3.1 Uncracked 14.6 98.7 1.8E+09 0.9 12.6 OK 38.9 400 OK
Outer 12.1 1000 475 394.0 3142 5E+09 237.5 5.6 3.1 Cracked 14.6 149.6 3.9E+09 4.7 12.6 OK 111.5 400 OK
6
Inner 0.0 1000 475 394.0 1131 5E+09 237.5 0.0 3.1 Uncracked 14.6 98.7 1.8E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Outer 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
7
Inner 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Inner wall
Outer 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
8
Inner 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Outer 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
9
Inner 0.0 1000 375 319.0 1131 3E+09 187.5 0.0 3.4 Uncracked 14.7 87.8 1.1E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Top 0.0 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.0 2.8 Uncracked 12.4 137.5 4.5E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 12.3 1000 600 517.0 3142 1E+10 300 3.2 2.8 Cracked 12.4 165.4 6.3E+09 3.2 12.6 OK 84.9 400 OK
Top 7.5 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 2.0 2.8 Uncracked 12.4 137.5 4.5E+09 2.3 12.6 OK 79.6 400 OK
slab
11
Bottom 0.0 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.0 2.8 Uncracked 12.4 137.5 4.5E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
Top 0.0 1000 600 517.0 2011 1E+10 300 0.0 2.8 Uncracked 12.4 137.5 4.5E+09 0.0 12.6 OK 0.0 400 OK
12
Bottom 8.7 1000 600 517.0 3142 1E+10 300 2.3 2.8 Uncracked 12.4 165.4 6.3E+09 2.3 12.6 OK 60.2 400 OK
2) SLS Crack Width Check:- (Quasi-Permanent load combination)
Check Ast,min for Crack control & Crack Width:-
As,min=kc*k*fc
hc,eff=min[2.5
Ac,eff = hc,eff *
(h-d), (h-
esm -ecm
Bar dia
Smax =
Ast, pro rpeff = As ae =
t,eff*Act/
Clear
/rp,eff
Design
sc=fyk ssc kt wk
b
Compon Section Face Overall k kc or As pro Check cover 'c' / Ac,eff Es/Ecm' Check
ent depth, Act =
b D/h d bh/2 feq
mm mm mm mm2 Mpa mm2 mm2 mm mm mm2 mm2 mm Mpa mm mm
Top 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.808 0.4 528 2262 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.016 296.3 20.2 154.4 0.5 14.4 0.0001 0.018 OK
Top/Deck slab
1
Bottom 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.8075 0.4 528 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 26.7 114.9 0.5 14.4 0.0001 0.034 OK
Top 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.8075 0.4 528 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 114.9 0.5 14.4 0.0000 0.000 OK
2
Bottom 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.8075 0.4 528 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 57.4 114.9 0.5 14.4 0.0002 0.073 OK
Top 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.8075 0.4 528 2262 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.016 296.3 108.7 154.4 0.5 14.4 0.0003 0.097 OK
3
Bottom 1000 575 519.0 287500 500 0.8075 0.4 528 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 114.9 0.5 14.4 0.0000 0.000 OK
Outer 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.878 0.4 520 2262 OK 12 75 197.0 197000 0.011 432.7 19.3 131.5 0.5 14.6 0.0001 0.025 OK
4
Outer wall
Inner 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.8775 0.4 520 1131 OK 12 75 197.0 197000 0.006 610.3 48.0 98.7 0.5 14.6 0.0001 0.088 OK
Outer 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.8775 0.4 520 1131 OK 12 75 197.0 197000 0.006 610.3 40.2 98.7 0.5 14.6 0.0001 0.074 OK
5
Inner 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.8775 0.4 520 1131 OK 12 75 197.0 197000 0.006 610.3 38.9 98.7 0.5 14.6 0.0001 0.071 OK
Outer 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.8775 0.4 520 3142 OK 14 75 197.0 197000 0.016 407.3 111.5 149.6 0.5 14.6 0.0003 0.136 OK
6
Inner 1000 475 394.0 237500 500 0.8775 0.4 520 1131 OK 12 75 197.0 197000 0.006 610.3 0.0 98.7 0.5 14.6 0.0000 0.000 OK
Outer 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.948 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
7
Inner 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.9475 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
Inner wall
Outer 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.9475 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
8
Inner 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.9475 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
Outer 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.9475 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
9
Inner 1000 375 319.0 187500 500 0.9475 0.4 482 1131 OK 12 50 140.0 140000 0.008 422.5 0.0 87.8 0.5 14.7 0.0000 0.000 OK
Top 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.790 0.4 525 2011 OK 16 75 207.5 207500 0.010 535.7 0.0 137.5 0.5 12.4 0.0000 0.000 OK
Bottom/Base
10
Bottom 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.79 0.4 525 3142 OK 14 75 207.5 207500 0.015 415.4 84.9 165.4 0.5 12.4 0.0003 0.106 OK
Top 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.79 0.4 525 2011 OK 16 75 207.5 207500 0.010 535.7 79.6 137.5 0.5 12.4 0.0002 0.128 OK
slab
11
Bottom 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.79 0.4 525 2011 OK 16 75 207.5 207500 0.010 535.7 0.0 137.5 0.5 12.4 0.0000 0.000 OK
Top 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.79 0.4 525 2011 OK 16 75 207.5 207500 0.010 535.7 0.0 137.5 0.5 12.4 0.0000 0.000 OK
12
Bottom 1000 600 517.0 300000 500 0.79 0.4 525 3142 OK 14 75 207.5 207500 0.015 415.4 60.2 165.4 0.5 12.4 0.0002 0.075 OK
STAAD INPUT FILE FOR DL, SIDL, FPLL ETC
PERFORM ANALYSIS
DEFINE ENVELOPE
101 TO 104 ENVELOPE 1 ULS EP
111 TO 114 ENVELOPE 2 ULS LL
201 TO 208 ENVELOPE 3 SLS RARE
211 TO 214 ENVELOPE 4 SLS Q-P
500 TO 505 ENVELOPE 5 BASE PRESSURE
END DEFINE ENVELOPE
PRINT SUPPORT REACTION
FINISH
Check for Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil:-
Max. Min.
Support Support
Support/ Reaction Reaction
Node No. (KN) (KN)
1 7.1 5.9
2 14.8 12.4
3 32.2 27.4
4 47.6 42.3
5 46.2 42.2
6 45.2 42.3
7 44.9 42.9
8 45.1 43.8
9 29.8 29.4
10 11.8 11.7
11 9.4 9.4
12 11.8 11.8
13 30.1 29.8
14 46.3 45.1
15 46.9 44.8
16 48.1 45.1
17 50.2 46.0
18 52.9 47.5
19 36.7 32.0
20 17.0 14.7
21 8.3 7.0
Bridge Data:-
Road Name = Daboka-Manja
Bridge Name/ID No. = -
Name of Nallah / Stream / River = Local stream
Existing Ch. = -
Design Ch. = 69+205 KM
Type of Proposed bridge = PSC I-Girder
Span Arrangement of proposed bridge = 1x35.3m
Existing FRL = -
Design FRL = 86.320 m
HFL at bridge location = 82.808 m
Rugosity Co-efficient,n = 0.055
(Reff: IRC: SP: 13 - 2004 , Table 5.1)
Bed Slope of Stream,S = 0.006
G.T Sheet No. = -
Scale = -
Catchment Area = 5.500 Sq. Km
Average
Bed Top width
Distance Scour HFL Depth of Average Area Perimeter
S.No. Level of Flow
(m) Bed Level (m) Water (m) Depth (m) (Sq. m) (m)
(m) (m)
(m)
1 0.00 84.922 84.922 82.80778
2 3.00 83.407 83.407 82.80778
3 6.00 82.907 82.907 82.80778
5 9.00 82.707 82.707 82.80778 0.100785 0.050 0.076 1.503 1.500
7 12.00 82.307 82.307 82.80778 0.500785 0.301 0.902 3.027 3.000
9 15.00 81.707 81.707 82.80778 1.100785 0.801 2.402 3.059 3.000
11 18.00 81.507 81.507 82.80778 1.300785 1.201 3.602 3.007 3.000
13 21.00 81.407 81.407 82.80778 1.400785 1.351 4.052 3.002 3.000
15 24.00 81.326 81.326 82.80778 1.481785 1.441 4.324 3.001 3.000
17 27.00 81.526 81.526 82.80778 1.281785 1.382 4.145 3.007 3.000
19 30.00 81.826 81.826 82.80778 0.981785 1.132 3.395 3.015 3.000
21 33.00 82.326 82.326 82.80778 0.481785 0.732 2.195 3.041 3.000
23 36.00 83.126 83.126 82.80778 0.241 0.361 1.575 1.500
25 39.00 83.555 83.555 82.80778
27 42.00 83.686 83.686 82.80778
84.000
Elevation (m)
83.000
82.000
81.000
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00
Chainage (m)
Minimum Soffit Level of Deck Slab = HFL + Afflux + Vertical Clearance = 83.708 m
1. Introduction
2. Field Investigation
3. Exploratory Boring
4. Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
5. Ground Water Table (GWT)
6. Soil Profile
7. Foundations
8. Susceptibility of Subsoil to Liquefaction
9. Capacity Calculation
10. Bore Log Data Sheet
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A subsoil investigation was necessary for the purpose of the foundation design for the
proposed structure. For this purpose borehole explorationwork was done.During borehole
exploration, disturbed/SPT samples were collected.
1. Due to overburden: N value for cohesion-less soil shall be corrected for overburden as
per Fig. 1 of IS: 2131 (N’).
2. Due to Dilatancy: The values corrected for overburden shall be corrected for dilatancy if
the stratum consists of fine sand and silt below water table for values of N’ greater than
15, as under (N”): N” = 15+0.5*(N’-15)
6.1 Stratum-I:
The soil in this layer consists of loose to medium dense, ash colouredsiltysand. Average
corrected “N” value of this layer is 19.The soil samples that could be collected from this layer,
shows the following average properties of the layer.
Gravel (%) 7.0
Sand (%) 74
Silt+Clay (%) 19
Specific Gravity 2.56
Free Swell Index (%) NIL
2
C (kg/cm ) 0.13
Phi (Degree) 33
Note: Average properties are based on laboratory test results only.
IS Classification: SM
6.2 Stratum-II:
The soil in this layer consists of dense to very dense, brownish coloured silty sand. Average
corrected “N” value of this layer is 37. The soil samples that could be collected from this
layer, shows the following average properties of the layer.
Gravel (%) 10
Sand (%) 71
Silt+Clay (%) 19
Specific Gravity 2.62
Free Swell Index (%) NIL
C (kg/cm2) 0.06
Phi (Degree) 39
Note: Average properties are based on laboratory test results only.
IS Classification: SM
7.0 FOUNDATIONS
In view of the above sub-soil conditions in mind and the type of structure, both the aspects
regarding bearing capacity of open foundationshave been discussedin the
followingparagraphs. Designer can choose the requirement depending upon the loading &
geometry of the structure envisaged.
8.0 SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SUBSOIL TO LIQUEFACTION [Ref: IS 1893 (Part 1)]
The present site is under seismic zone-V.The liquefaction potential of subsoil is evaluated as
per provision laid down in Indian Standard and “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary
Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of
Liquefaction Resistance of Soils” by Dr. Gonzalo Castro et al. published in “Journal of
Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering”, October’ 2001. Based on the SPT
values, the liquefaction resistance of the borehole was evaluated for zone – V as per IS:1893
Part I and presented below. The ratio of CRR/CSR ≤ 1.0 indicates that the soil is prone to
liquefaction whereas CRR/CSR > 1.0 or corrected N1 > 30 indicates the soil is non
liquefiable. Based on the above, the liquefaction resistance of the subsoil is determined and
presented below.
0.50 7 0.93 0.43 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.75 7.6 19 3.43 1.07 11.6 1.00 0.51 0.13 0.441 Liquifiable
1.50 15 2.78 1.28 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.75 16.3 19 3.43 1.07 20.9 0.99 0.50 0.23 0.793 Liquifiable
3.00 22 5.55 2.55 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.80 25.5 19 3.43 1.07 30.8 0.98 0.50 0.54 1.892 Non Liquifiable
4.50 26 8.33 3.83 1.62 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.85 30.5 19 3.43 1.07 36.1 Non Liquifiable
6.00 37 11.10 5.10 1.40 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 45.8 19 3.43 1.07 48.5 Non Liquifiable
7.50 39 13.88 6.38 1.25 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 43.2 19 3.43 1.07 45.9 Non Liquifiable
9.00 44 16.65 7.65 1.14 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 44.5 19 3.43 1.07 47.1 Non Liquifiable
10.50 50 19.43 8.93 1.06 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 49.2 19 3.43 1.07 51.8 Non Liquifiable
12.00 69 22.20 10.20 0.99 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 64.6 19 3.43 1.07 66.9 Non Liquifiable
13.50 62 24.98 11.48 0.93 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 54.7 19 3.43 1.07 57.2 Non Liquifiable
BH-A1 15.00 75 27.75 12.75 0.89 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 62.8 19 3.43 1.07 65.2 Non Liquifiable
17.00 68 31.45 14.45 0.83 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 53.5 19 3.43 1.07 60.8 Non Liquifiable
(N1)60CS>30
18.50 89 34.23 15.73 0.80 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 67.1 19 3.43 1.07 75.4 Non Liquifiable
20.00 93 37.00 17.00 0.77 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 67.4 19 3.43 1.07 75.7 Non Liquifiable
21.50 80 39.78 18.28 0.74 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 55.9 19 3.43 1.07 63.4 Non Liquifiable
23.00 90 42.55 19.55 0.72 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 60.8 19 3.43 1.07 68.7 Non Liquifiable
24.50 98 45.33 20.83 0.69 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 64.2 19 3.43 1.07 72.3 Non Liquifiable
26.00 96 48.10 22.10 0.67 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 81.4 19 3.43 1.07 83.5 Non Liquifiable
27.50 99 50.88 23.38 0.65 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 81.6 19 3.43 1.07 83.7 Non Liquifiable
29.00 100 53.65 24.65 0.64 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 80.3 19 3.43 1.07 82.4 Non Liquifiable
30.00 100 55.50 25.50 0.63 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 78.9 19 3.43 1.07 81.0 Non Liquifiable
C
N
P
a
Considering above conditions, it can be concluded that the soil at the present site is
liquefiable up to 3.00 m depth below EGL.
SETTLEMENT CALCULATION
At 10 t/m2 pressure, settlement for foundation of 10.00 m width founding on sandy soil with
design N = 35 is 8.00 mm.[Ref: Fig-9 of IS: 8009 (Part-I)]
Water table correction = 0.50.(Considering ground water level at ground level).
So the corrected settlement = 8.00 / 0.50 = 16.00 mm.
So for 79.04 t/m2, total settlement = St = (79.04/10)x16 = 126.46 mm.
Applying correction for depth factor,
Corrected St= 126.46 x 0.90 = 113.81 mm.
D/(L x B)0.5 = 0.35, Corresponding depth factor for L/B ratio = 1.00 is 0.90.
[Ref: Fig 12 of IS 8009 (Part I)]
Net
Depth of Net Safe Allowable
Foundation Ultimate Anticipated
foundation bearing bearing
Location size bearing Settlement
below EGL capacity capacity
(m x m) capacity 2
(mm)
(m) 2
(t/m ) (t/m2)
(t/m )
3.50 197.63 79.05 113.81 45.00
BH-1 10 x 10 4.00 210.81 84.32 118.72 48.00
4.50 224.22 89.69 123.41 50.00
Note: 1. EGL means Exiting Ground Level. 2. Permissible Settlement 75 mm for isolated footing.
[Refer IS 1904, Table-1]
10.0 BORE LOG DATA SHEET:
Bore Hole No. :- BH-2 Borehole Diameter :- 150 mm Drill Hole:- NX.
Field Tests Nos Samples Nos
Northing :-509022.27
Location :- 67+510
Easting :- -2898470.5 S 21 U -
Date :- R.L. Value :- - Vane - W 1
Water Level :- 1.50 m below GL Termination Depth (m):- 30.05 C - D 1
12 17 22 39 S 6 7.50-7.95
13 19 25 44 S 7 9.00-9.45
16 22 28 50 S 8 10.50-10.95
30 23 46 69 S 9 12.00-12.45
35 26 36 62 S 10 13.50-13.95
33 30 45 75 S 11 15.00-15.45
42 39 41 80 S 15 21.50-21.95
39 45 45 90 S 16 23.00-23.45
40 48 50 98 S 17 24.50-24.95
42 45 51 96 S 18 26.00-26.45
44 49 50 99 S 19 27.50-27.95
40 50 50 100 S 20 29.00-29.45
1. Introduction
2. Field Investigation
3. Exploratory Boring
4. Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
5. Ground Water Table (GWT)
6. Soil Profile
7. Foundations
8. Susceptibility of Subsoil to Liquefaction
9. Capacity Calculation
10. Bore Log Data Sheet
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A subsoil investigation was necessary for the purpose of the foundation design for the
proposed structure.For this purpose borehole explorationwork was done. During borehole
exploration, disturbed/SPT samples were collected.
Stratum wise “N” values are presented in tabular form given below:
Stratum “N” Values
Stratum Description
No. Average Maximum Minimum
I Loose to medium dense, silty sand 19 25 13
II Dense to very dense, silty sand. 41 49 27
Note: N Value means Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Values.
7.0 FOUNDATIONS
In views of the above sub-soil conditions in mind and the type of structure both the aspects
regarding pile capacity for deep foundation in the form of bored cast in-situ pile have been
discussedinthe following paragraphs. Designer can choose the requirement depending
upon the loading & geometry of the structure envisaged.
0.50 9 0.93 0.43 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.75 9.8 26 4.39 1.12 15.4 1.00 0.51 0.16 0.567 Liquifiable
1.50 26 2.78 1.28 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.10 0.75 28.3 26 4.39 1.12 36.1 Non Liquifiable
3.00 34 5.55 2.55 1.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.80 43.0 18 3.23 1.07 49.1 Non Liquifiable
4.50 46 8.33 3.83 1.62 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.85 58.8 18 3.23 1.07 65.9 Non Liquifiable
6.00 53 11.10 5.10 1.40 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 65.6 18 3.23 1.07 73.2 Non Liquifiable
7.50 72 13.88 6.38 1.25 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 79.7 18 3.23 1.07 88.2 Non Liquifiable
9.00 73 16.65 7.65 1.14 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 0.95 73.7 18 3.23 1.07 81.9 Non Liquifiable
10.50 74 19.43 8.93 1.06 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 72.9 18 3.23 1.07 80.9 Non Liquifiable
12.00 80 22.20 10.20 0.99 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 74.9 18 3.23 1.07 83.1 Non Liquifiable
13.50 96 24.98 11.48 0.93 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 84.7 18 3.23 1.07 93.5 Non Liquifiable
BH-P3 15.00 90 27.75 12.75 0.89 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 75.3 18 3.23 1.07 83.6 Non Liquifiable
(N1)60CS>30
16.50 95 30.53 14.03 0.84 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 75.8 18 3.23 1.07 84.1 Non Liquifiable
18.00 86 33.30 15.30 0.81 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 65.7 18 3.23 1.07 73.3 Non Liquifiable
19.50 94 36.08 16.58 0.78 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 69.0 18 3.23 1.07 76.8 Non Liquifiable
21.00 93 38.85 17.85 0.75 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 65.8 18 3.23 1.07 73.4 Non Liquifiable
22.50 90 41.63 19.13 0.72 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 61.5 18 3.23 1.07 68.8 Non Liquifiable
24.00 100 44.40 20.40 0.70 0.75 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 66.2 18 3.23 1.07 73.8 Non Liquifiable
25.50 95 47.18 21.68 0.68 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 81.3 18 3.23 1.07 89.9 Non Liquifiable
27.00 88 49.95 22.95 0.66 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 73.2 18 3.23 1.07 81.3 Non Liquifiable
28.50 100 52.73 24.23 0.64 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 81.0 18 3.23 1.07 89.6 Non Liquifiable
30.00 100 55.50 25.50 0.63 1.00 0.98 1.05 1.20 1.00 78.9 18 3.23 1.07 87.4 Non Liquifiable
C
N
P
a
Considering above conditions, it can be concluded that the soil at the present site is
liquefiable up to 2.00 m depth below EGL.
Layer No. Top Depth Bottom Depth Eff. Depth Cohesion F Adhesion Factor K0 Eff. Density Mean Pressure
(m) (m) (m) (kg/cm2) (Degree) (a) (t/m3) (t/m2)
I 2.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 30 1.000 1.00 0.90 0.45
II 3.00 22.00 19.00 0.00 35 1.000 1.25 0.95 9.83
Layer Eff. Depth Effective z fs1 = a C fs2 = K0ztanF fs =fs1 +fs2 Ultimate Shaft Safe Shaft
No. (m) 2 2
(t/m ) Resistance (t) Resistance (t)
(t/m )
I 1.00 0.45 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.98 0.39
II 19.00 9.83 0.00 8.60 8.60 615.96 246.38
26.90 616.94 246.78
For End Bearing Restricting the q(tip) value to 500t/sqm
Cohesion C= 0 kg/cm2 Uplift Pile Capacity:
Friction Angle = 35 ° Uplift capacity = 1/3 x [(Shaft Resistance in Vertical Capacity) + self weight of pile (Buoyant)]
= 208.07 t
Nq = 51.42
Eff. Ovp. Pressure=p(tip) 17.05 t/m2 So, Safe Uplift Pile Capacity = 190 t.
q(tip) =C.Nc+p(tip).Nq= 876.64 t/m2
Ultimate End Bearing = 565.49 t * Note: As per "Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fourth
Safe End Bearing = 226.19 t Edition" by M.J. Tomlinson, Page-119 & 122
Safe Shaft Resistance= 246.78 t
So, Total Pile Capacity = 472.97 t
Self weight of pile (Buoyant) = 13.56 t
So, Safe Vertical Pile Capacity = 425 t
H= 66.49 t
Corrected actual moment = 3.36 t-m per t of Thrust
Note: The above load should confirmed by Load Test of pile as per IS: 2911(Part 4)
10.0 BORE LOG DATA SHEET:
Bore Hole No. :- BH-5 Borehole Diameter :- 150 mm Drill Hole:- NX.
Field Tests Nos Samples Nos
Northing :- -
Location :- 69+205
Easting :- 510669.276 S 21 U -
R.L. Value :- 2898161.551 Vane - W 1
Water Level :- 3.00 m Termination Depth (m):- 30.05 C - D -
15 20 26 46 S 4 4.50-4.55
18 23 30 53 S 5 6.00-6.45
21 32 40 72 S 6 7.50-7.95
22 35 38 73 S 7 9.00-9.45
21 33 41 74 S 8 10.50-10.95
25 30 50 80 S 9 12.00-12.45
29 41 55 96 S 10 13.50-13.95
31 44 50 94 S 14 19.50-19.95
36 42 51 93 S 15 21.00-21.45
30 45 45 90 S 16 22.50-22.95
33 49 51 100 S 17 24.00-24.45
39 45 50 95 S 18 25.50-25.95
42 44 44 88 S 19 27.00-27.45
46 50 50 100 S 20 28.50-28.95