0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 2K views231 pagesPJS Vol 77 No3 4 Jul Aug 1947 PDF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Jury-Aucust, 1947
Vo. 77, Nos, 3 & 4
ARITA
“ye PRINTING
BUREAU
a>
Fe
&
4
3
3
=
SCIENTIE!
SeLinFoauNel3THE PHILIPPINE
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Vou. 7 JULY-AUGUST, 1947 Nos, 3-4
OUTLINE REVIEW OF PHILIPPINE ARCHAEOLOGY BY
ISLANDS AND PROVINCES
By H. Oxuey Bayer
OF the Museum and Institute of Archacology and Buoplogy
University of tke Philippines
.
TWENTY-TWO PLATES AND TWO TEXT FIGURES
INTRODUCTION
A geographical outline of what has been actually accomplished
in Philippine archacological exploration has long been needed,
An adequate account of the finds themselves would easily fill
two or three printed volumes, but the bresent paper is merely
an effort to furnish a guide outline of actual accomplishment,
based either on personal examination of specimens found or on
Yeported finds of a reliable nature. The areas discussed are
arranged geographically, from north to south as far as possible;
and, for convenience, some closely related outside areas, not
properly belonging to the Philippine Archipelago, are also in-
eluded.
The authorities for the various finds are usually cited, and,
where no names are mentioned, it may be generally assumed
that the finds were made by myself or by workmen operating
under my direction. So far as practicable, the data under each
geographical heading have been arranged chronologically or
typologically, but this arrangement has not been rigidly adhered
to if inconvenient. The object has been merely to furnish the
essential information concerning each province or island in the
briefest practical way, with uniformity of presentation followed
only where convenient under the circumstances.
History—Only two important archaeological investigations
had been carried out prior to 1926: (1) Alfred Marche’s explo-
ration of Mavinduque Island, from April to July, 1881; and
ams 205
NEN TCT,
—-__ST112-8726206 The Philippine Journal of Science wr
(2) Dr. Carl E, Guthe’s work in the central V.
1922-1924. While many accidental fints had been recorded
from time to time, and a few burial-caves and other sites had
been casually explored by Ruropean or Joel scientists, no really
systematic work had been done anywhere, except for the eiforis
of Marche and Guthe. M. L, Miller and Fr, D. Burdett had
explored burial mounds in the Babuyan Islands; E. 2B, Christie
had collected from the burial-caves around Dapitan and in
the Zamboanga Peninsula; Miller and Parker, similarly from
northern Panay; and Hartendorp, from eastern Samar. Dean
C. Worcester had collected eeladon porcelains from burial-sites
jn Cebu, and some of his employees also from Samar, Siquijor,
and other islands; while E, de Mitkiewicz collected numerous
jars and other ceramics from both Cebu and Luzon. None of
this work was very scientifically done, however, and the chief re-
suits were miscellaneous collections of ceramics and skeletal
material.
In 1923-1924 I attempted a compilation of all known data
on true Philippine Stone-Age finds, and after a very diligent
search of the literature, as well as an examination of all rumored
finds, I was able finally to aecumuiate data on some 60 imple-
ments that scemed to be genuine prehistoric Stone-Age arti-
facts. Of these, 1 acquired or personally examined about 3v
yeal Neolithic implements, scattered over a wide geographic
range, from Davao te northern Luzon. Most of these tools
were obviously Middle or Late Neolithic in type, but they were
sufficient to show that we had a true Late Stone-Age population
here, even if the remains were scarce and widely scattered.
Doctor Guthe's work had added only six ox seven specimens to
the list of known Neolithic artifacts—the first two Visayan Is-
Jands specimens being the very good implements obtained in
1920 by Dr. Warren D. Smith from a cave in Masbate. How-
ever, our combined efforts offered sufficient refutation of the
commonly repeated statement in books about the Philippines
prior to 1920 that the Islands had never had a true Stone-Age
population.
Such was the state of affaiys down to 1926, when the for-
tuitous discoveries at the Novaliches Dam (Rizal Province)
ushered in a new era in Philippine archaeology. Since that
time systematic work has been going on continuously, except
as interrupted by the war during the greater part of 1g42-1945.
Naturally, however, there have been variations in the degree206 The Philippine Journal of Seience wir
(2) Dr. Carl E. Guthe’s work in the central Visayan Islands,
1922-1924. While many accidental finds had been reeorded
from time to time, and a few burial-caves and other sites had
been casually explored by Kuropean or local scientists, no really
systematic work had been done anywhere, except for the efforts
of Marche and Guthe. M. L. Miller and F. D. Burdett had
explored burial mounds in the Babuyan Islands; B. B. Christie
had collected from the burial-caves around Dapitan and in
the Zamboanga Peninsula; Miller and Parker, similarly from
northern Panay; and Hartendorp, from eastern Samar. Dean
C. Worcester had collected eeladon porcelains from burial-sites
in Cebu, and some of his employees also from Samar, Siquijor,
and other isiands; while E. de Mitkiewicz collected numerous
jars and other ceramics from both Cebu and Luzon, None of
this work was very scientifically done, however, and the chief re-
sults were miscellaneous collections of ceramics and skeletal
material.
In 1923-1924 I attempted a compilation of all known data
on true Philippine Stone-Age finds, and afler a very diligent
search of the literature, as well as an examination of all rumored
finds, I was able finally to accumulate data on some 60 imple-
ments that seemed to be genuine prehistoric Stone-Age arti-
facts. Of these, I acquired or personally examined about 3¢
real Neolithic implements, scattered over a wide geographic
range, from Davao to northern Luzon, Most of these tools
were obviously Middle or Late Neolithic in type, but they were
sufficient to show that we had a true Late Stone-Age population
here, even if the remains were scarce and widely scattered.
Doetor Guthe’s work had added only six or seven specimens to
the list of known Neolithic artifacts—the first two Visayan Is-
lands specimens being the very good implements obtained in
1920 by Dr. Warren D. Smith from a cave in Masbate. How-
ever, our combined efforts offered sufficient refutation of the
commonly repeated statement in books about the Philippines
prior to 1920 that the Islands had never had a true Stone-Age
population.
Such was the state of affairs down to 1926, when the for-
tuitous discoveries at the Novaliches Dam (Rizal Provinee)
ushered in a new era in Philippine archaeology. Since that
time systematic work has been going on continuously, except
as interrupted by the war during the greater part of 1942-1945.
Naturally, however, there have been variations in the degree24 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 207
of activity, and my own chief occupation with the work may
be classified briefly as follows:
1, Rizal Province Archacological Survey (1926-1930).
2, Visayan Islands collecting (1929-1933, 1936-1939, 1941, espe-
cially).
8, Batangas Archacological Survey (1932~1941).
4, Special Pugad-Babuy (Bulakan) eoliection (1993-1938, espe-
cially).
5. Special Santa Mesa and Kubao collections, Rizal Province
(1935-1940).
6, Several small collections at intermediate intervals (see espe-
cially Pampanga, Busuanga, Camarines Norte, Cavite, Zam-
bales, Sulu, and other places), .
Usefy] comparative data and material were obtained during
the three meetings of our Far Eastern Prehistoric Congress
(Hanoi, 1932; Manila, 1935; and Singapore, 1988—the 4th
planned meeting at Hongkong, 1941, being prevented by the
war), Also from the visits of various noted foreign scientists
to our sites (especially during and after the F. E. P. C. meeting
at Manila in 1935). The importance of correlating Philippine
archacological data with those from South China, Hongkong,
and Formosa, on the north; Indo-China, on the west; the Pa-
cific islands, on the east; and from Borneo, the Dutch East
Indies, and the Malay Peninsula, on the south, was especially
brought out during these visits and Congress meetings.
It is obviously not practical to add all of these areas (espe-
cially the more remote ones) to our present outline; but, for
convenient comparative reference, I have included South China,
Hongkong, and Formosa, on the north, and Borneo and Celebes
on the south, The oufline itself is more or less self-explanatory.
It is further planned to publish, in the near future, more ex-
tended accounts of some of the more interesting sites mentioned
in this outline, with full discussion of the collections, and an
attempt at interpreting their significance. Such papers will
be accompanied by adequate illustrations and pertinent biblio-
graphic data, which the pian of the present outline necessarily
excludes.
Chronology and horizon lists —The oldest artifacts, or man-
made stone implements, yet found in the Philippines have been
dated by associated fossils as coming within the Mid-Pleistocene
geologic period—a time that most modern geologists estimate
to be not less than 250,000 to 300,000 years ago, This oldest
horizon has, so far, been identified only in Rizal, Bulacan,
Batangas, and Davao Provinces.208 The Philippine Journal of Science wT
The full list of subsequent Stone-Age and later horizons may
be tabulated as follows (the tentative dates given to be regarded
as fair estimates only):
Palaeolithic (Old Stone Age}:
Barly type (Middle Pleistocene); as above.
Later type (Late Pleistocene) ; between 159,000 and 60,000 n. c.
Mesolithic (Middfe Stone Age)—(larly to Late Post-Pleistocenc) :
Large implement culture; perhaps 20,000 to 15,000 #, c.
Semimieroliths and microliths: 12,000 to 8,000 8. c.
Neolithic (New Stone Age)—(Recent) :
Protoncolithic (Bacsonian) } perhaps 5000-4000 B. o.
Early (round or oval axe-adze cultures) ; 4000-2250 ».
\. Middle (shouldered and ridged axe-ndze cultures)
1760 B. ©.)
Late (rectangular and trapezvidal adze cultures)’; (1750-
250 B. c.).
Firat phase (Early Nephrite Culture); (1750-1250
b,c. 2).
Second phase (transitional types dominant); (1250-800
B. G}+
‘Third phase (early “stepped” types, ete); (800-500
nC).
Fourth phase (fully stopped implements; with sawing,
hole-boring, and “jade-eut” jewelry, etc.; with some
imported Greek-culture beads and coins) ; 500-200 x. c.
Bronze Age: (Mixed with 2nd to 4th phase of the Late Neolithic) ;
about 800-250 8. ¢.
Prehistoric Iron Age: (about 250-200 u. © to 9th century a. D.):
Early (incised pottery, without slip covering); (200 B. c. to
about 300 4, D.).
Late (slip-covered and molded pottery) ; (about 300-850 a. v.).
Jar-burial culture: (Contemporary with Late Iron Age); xbout
300-850 a. D, (Pre-Poreelain, in Philippines).
Poreclain Age: (Pre-Spanish: Sth to 16th century 4. D.):
Early monochrome period (Tang and Early Sung); 9th-
12th century.
Later monochrome period (Southern Sung and Yuan) } 13th—
14th eontury.
Early Ming period (13th and early 16th centuries).
Late Ming period (ate 16th and early 17th eenturies).
Spanish period remains: (Histories 17th-10th century):
Enrly (1565 to British occupation in middle 18th century).
Late (1765 to 1208).
Source of data.—Most of the facts contained in the present
paper have been derived from two major sources: First, a six-
volume work compiled by myself and entitled “Philippine A
chacology” (1926-1947), containing 55 separate papers a list17, G4
Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 209
of which may be added as an appendix to the present “Outline.”
Second, a two-volume work by myself entitled “Chinese and
Southest Asia Ceramic Wares found in the Philippines” (1939-
1940), containing approximately 800 typewritten pages. In
addition to these two manuseript works, the catalogues of the
various collections have been utilized where necessary. Any
citation of data from other authors is duly eredited in the text.
A. SOUTH CHINA TO LUZON ,
1. Hoifung areas Kwangtung Province, South China:
Early Neolithic (oval axe-adze culture), (Advaneed types.)
Middle Neolithic (shouldered and eavly ridged axeradze forms) ;
characteristic types, most common in site,
{ate Neolithic: Early and transitional type only; a few stepped
specimens with ground butts, no sawing; stone spearheads in
two areas, but only 2 few rare specimens are perforated. (No
jade culture found.)
Neolithic coxd-marked and net-marked pottery in part of aren.
Chou to Han stamped or molded hard pottery (scarce, and limited
in area).
Workers.—D, J, Finn and R. Maglioni.
2. Hongkong, Lamma Island, and New Territory areas:
Limited areas of Late Palaeolithic and large implement Mesolithie
cultures.
Barly Neolithie (widely senttered, and including some primitive
Baesonian types).
Middle and Late Nealithie types (limited distribution, and speci-
mens searce); including a few showldercd specimens, severat
transitionals, and two or three fully stepped specimens —but not
sawn, (With limited jade culture, and hole-boring; both
scare.) Also quartz-disk eultare,
Neolithic cord-marked and netemarked pottery in Lamma Island
area; searee elsewhere,
Chou to Han stamped and molded hard pottery (plentiful); with
limited bronzes (including celts and spearheads, similar to
Indo-China types and to Batangas),
Early glazed poreellaneous wares (Han to Tang); in considerable
quantities, in severst different areas, (Many with potter's
marks on base.)
Early Ming sherds or midden dumps in certain specific aveas
(usually marking early Evropesn tyade-centers and residence
areas),
Workers.—C. M. Heanley, J, L, Shellshear, D, J. Finn, W. Scho
field, and R. Magiioni.
3. Formosa Island (Taiwan):
(Certain possible palacoliths found with Pleistocene mammalian
fossils; of rhinoceros, stegodon, ete, (See notes by I. Hayasaka,
1942.)210 The Philippine Journal of Science 197
Barly Neolithic, (round or oval axe-adze eutturc); plentiful at
certain limited areas in northern part of Island.
Middle Neolithic (shouldered and ridged axe-ndze forms); typici!
of Maruyama Site, Taihoku, and a few other places.
Late Neclithic: The usual carly trapezoidal adze forms, and
fow transitional stepped forma; spearheads: limited hole-boring,
hot sawn forms absent or very searce. (Jade culture present
in specific areas, according to Kano.)
Bronze-Age remains scarce (but known from limited apecifie areas
in several parts of Island).
Neolithic pottery reported, but authenticity doubtful.
(Records lacking for true Iron-Age and Poreclain-Age sites; but
some undoubtedly exist, and many rare Ivon-Age beads are
found treasured among the pagan mountain peoples, who arc
close kin to the pagans of northern Luzon.)
Chinese historical records indicate Visayan settlements ix south-
‘ern Formosa as estly as the 12th century or before (see Hirth
and Rockhill; ete.).
Workers—T. H. Linn, N. Utsurikawa, Eri Asui, Tadao Kano,
and others.
4. Samasama Islund (Kasho-té) near castern Formosa coast) =
Late Neolithic (with jade-culture ornaments, and some bronze).
Jar-burial culture (of the Batancs-Babuyan type?).
Worker.—Tadao Kano.
5, Bolet Tobaga Island (Koto-sho) :
Early Neolithie (oval adze culture) ; a few specimens only.
Late Neolithic; regular plain-backed rectangular and trapezoidal
‘axe-adze forms only; no shouldered or stepped forms yet found,
but limited jade culture present.
Jar-burial euliure (similar to Batanes-Babuyan type).
Chinese historieal records of 12th-13th century refer to this Island
as “T’on-ma-yon” (or, in Cantonese, “Tam-ba-gan”}; sce
Hirth and Rockhill.
(Natives show cultural and linguistic kinship to the Ivatan; but
in physical type, and in their stone-walled terrace culture, they
most resemble the Bontok group of northern Luzon.)
Workers—Brin Asai, 2. Torii, Tadao Kano, and K. E, Stewart.
(For stone implements, sce also B, R. Leach, 1988.)
6. Batanes Islands (sites ecanined all being on Batan Island}
(No true Stone-Age remains have yet been recovered; and no
bronze, but certain very old ornaments of Bronze-Age forms,
and certain imported Greek-culture and Bactrian beads, may £0
back to a Bronze or very carly Eron-culture period.)
Jar-turial eulture.—-First discovered and explored by Pio Mon-
tenegro in 1981-1035, and is perhaps the oldest jar-burial type
in the Philippines—going backs to the early centuries of the
Christian Era. The jars ore largor and of somewhat different
shape than those found in the Babuyan Islands and south-
wards. Several large-size burial-jars were first exeavated in210 The Philippine Journal of Science 197
Barly Neolithic, (round or oval axe-adze culture); plentiful at
certain Himited areas in northern part of Island.
Middle Neolithic (shouldered and ridged axe-adze forms) ; typicul
of Maruyama Site, Taihoku, and a few other places.
Late Neolithic: The usual early trapezoidal adze forms, and a
few transitional stepped forms; spearheads; limited hole-boring,
but sawn forms absent or very scarce. (Jade culture present
in specifie areas, according to Kano.)
Bronze-Age remains scarce (but known from limited specific areas
in several parts of Island).
Neolithic pottery reported, but authenticity doubtfel.
(Records lacking for true Tron-Age and Poreclain-Age sites; but
some undoubtedly exist, and many rare Iron-Age beads are
found treasured among the pagan mountain peoples, who are
close kin to the pagans of northern Luzon.)
Chinese historical reeords indicate Visayan settlements in south-
ern Formosa as early as the 12th century or before (see Hirth
and Rockhill; ete.).
Workers—T. H. Lin, N. Utsurikawa, Erin Asai, Tadao Kano,
and others,
4, Samasame Island (Kasho-t6) near eastern Ferimosa coast):
Late Neolithic (with jade-culture ornaments, and some bronze).
Jar-hurial culture {of the Batanes-Babuyan type?).
Worker—Tadao Kano.
5. Botel Tobago Island (Kéto-sho) :
Early Neolithic (oval adze eulture); a few specimens only.
Late Neolithies regular plain-backed rectangular and trapezoidal
axe-adze forms only; no shouldered or stepped forms yet found,
ut limited jade culture present.
Jar-burial culture (similar to Batanes-Babuyan type).
Chinese historieal records of 12th=18th centary refer to this Island
as “Tan-ma-yen” (or, in Cantonese, “Tam-ba-gan”); see
Hirth and Rockhill.
(Natives show cultural and Lingvistic kinship to the Ivatan; but
in physical type, and in their stone-walled terrace culture, they
most resemble the Bontok group of northern Luzon.)
Workers—Etin Asai, R, Torii, Tadao Kano, and K. E, Stewart.
{For stone implements, see also E. R, Leach, 1938.)
G. Batones Islands (sites examined all being on Batan Island) :
(No true Stone-Age remains have yet been recovered; and no
‘bronze, but certain very old ornaments of Bronze-Age forms,
and certain imported Greck-culture and Bactrian beads, may go
back to a Bronze or very early Eron-culture period.)
Jor-burial euliure—First discovered and explored by Pio Mon-
tenegro in 1931-1935, and is perhaps the oldest jar-burial type
in the Philippines—going back to the early centuries of the
Christian Era. ‘The jars are larger and of somewhat different
shape than those found in the Babuyan Istands and south-
wards, Several large-size burial-jars were first excavated in210 The Philippine Journal of Science sour
Barly Neolithic, (round or oval axe-adze culture); plentiful a!
certain limited areas in northern part of Island.
Middle Neolithie (shouldered and ridged axe-ndze forms) ; typical
of Maruyama Site, "Taihoku, and a Lew other places.
Late Neolithic: The usual early trapezoidal adze forms, ond a
few transitional stepped forms; spearheads; Jimited hole-Loring,
‘put sawn forms absent or very searee, (Jade eulture present
in specific areas, according to Kano.) .
Bronze-Age remains scarce (but known from limited specific areas
in several parts of Island).
Neolithic pottery reported, but authenticity doubtful.
(Records lacking for true Iron-Age and Porcelain-Age sites; Lut
some undoubtedly exist, and many rare Tron-Age beads are
found treasured ‘among the pagan mountain peoples, who are
Hose kin to the pagans of nerthern Luzon.)
Chineze historical records indicate Visayan settlements in south.
ern Formosa as early as the 12th century or before (see Hirth
and Rockhill; etc.).
Woerkers.—T. H. Linn, N. Utsurikawa, Erin Asai, Tadao Kano,
and others.
4. Samasama Istand (Kesho-t8) near eastern Pormosa coast) +
Late Neolithic (with jade-culture ornaments, and some bronze).
Jamburial culture (of the Batanes-Babuyan type?).
Worker.—Tadao Kano.
§. Botel Tobago Island (Kété-sho) +
Early Neolithic (oval adze culture) ; a few specimens only.
Late Neolithic; regular plain-backed rectangular and traperoidal
‘axe-adze forms only; no shouldered or stepped forms yct found,
ut limited jade culture present.
Jar-burial culture (similar to Batanes-Babuyan type).
Chinese historical records of 12th-13th century refer to this Isiand
as “T’an-ma-yen” (or, in Cantonese, “Tam-ba-gan"); see
Hirth and Rockhill.
(Natives show cultural and linguistic kinship to the Tvatan; but
in physical type, and in their stone-walled terrace culture, they
most resemble the Bontok group of northern Luzon.)
Workere.—Erin Asai, R. Torii, Tadao Kano, and K. E. Stewart
(For stone implements, sec also H, R. Leach, 1938.)
6. Batanes Islands (sites examined all being on Botan Island):
(No true Stone-Age remains have yet been recovered; and no
bronze, but certain very old ornaments of Bronze-Age forms,
and certain imported Greek-culinre and Bactrian beads, may go
‘ack to a Bronze or very carly Ivon-culture period.)
Jarburial eulture—First discovered and explored by Pio Mon-
tenegro in 1981-1935, and is perhaps the oldest jar-burial tyre
in the Philippines—going back to the early centuries of the
Christian Era. The jars are larger and of somewhat different
shape than those found in the Baluyan Islands and south-
wards, Several large-size burial-jara were first excavated in“34 Beyer; Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 211
the site known as “Etbud," in the district of Uyugan, some
distance to the southeast of Ivana. Five other iocalities were
later investigated, and two of them produced typieal jar-burials
from the peculiarly shaped mounds known as pade-paday by
the local residents. The most interesting specimens were found
in 1932 at the small site known as “Changrian,” in the north
central part of the Island.
The jax containing the body was usually first put into an
excavation—sufficiently deep so that the top of the cover was
seldom much above the ground level—and then the hole was
filled in and covered with an earthen mound of some size (in
the Babuyan Istands being still garther covered with a stono
cairn). In most of the jars found the bones were already
wholly disintegrated, but in a fow eases the tecth and some
sizable bone-fragments still remained. The jars ake all made
» of a thick half-baked hard pottery or a medium-soft stoneware,
doubtless of local manufacture. ‘They rarely contain ornaments
or other durable objects besides the body itself, though occasion-
ally # few small beads and other ornaments have been found.
Iron-Age sites:—~In two of the sites explored by Montenegro a
very different type of buriat that seems to belong to a rather
Jate but pre-Porcelain Iron Age was found. Here quantities
of beads of Tron-Age types (including some typical paitdo},
some small iron tools or weapons, pieces of common pottery, and
several very interesting gold ornaments, have been recovered,
At Uyugan, in November, 1933, a similar grave was found that
seems to be transitional to the Early Porcelain Age—seemingly
containing elements from both eultures,
Early Porcelain-Age sites—The true Porcelain-Age graves of
Batan Island contain some of the earliest porcelain pieces yet
found in the Philippines. Only in parts of the Sulu Archipelago,
and in Site 7 of the Rizal Provinee exploration have equally
old specimens turned up. (This type of ware is characterized
by fn unusual proportion of white or light-colored pieces with
incised or impressed designs of Late Tang and Early Sung -
styles, Some of them are probably Yi-yao ware from Che-
Kiang.) The midden fragments from such sites also contain
a good many examples cf thin or mediam-thin stoneware jars,
of various sizes, which also appear to be of Late Tang or Early
Sung date,
Later Porcelain-Age and historic finds—Several scattered acci-
dental finds of celadon dishes and other pre-Spanish ceramic
Bieces, and some interesting heirloom pieces from the early
Spanish poried, are known not only from Batan Istand itscli
but also from Itbayat and Sabtan. Some curious bead neck-
ornaments, gold earrings and headbands, of undoubted pre-
Spanish date, are still preserved among some of the wealthier
families, (Search of old records by Dampier and the carly
Dominican missionaries should be made for references to pre-
Spanish culture.)212
197
The Philippine Journal of Science
Workers-—Otto Scheerer, Pio Montenegro, Tadao Kane. (For ad-
ditiona’ data on Batan Island, see Addendum.)
7, Babuyon Islands (Camiguin, Dalupiri, Fuge, Calayan, Bahuyar
Clare) ¢
(No true Stone-Age or Bronze-Age remains yet recorded.) A
Early or Middle Iron-Age sites—Some quite Early Hron-Age
ry aime have been found, on Camiguin Island especially. Some
Iumbermen, working there, have reported frequent finds of
typieal Iren-Age burials, in the shallow excavations made for
cgtablishing their camps, in “the now-forested eastern part of
the Island. The descriptions given by several of the men
jndicate that quantities of beads, bracelct fragments, potshers
picees of iron tools and weapons, and other objects, were
found in these graves. The few specimens that I have seen
‘were almost identical with the Iron-Age remains from Sites
‘A, © and H, in Rizal Provinec. (Further investigation shout
be made here whenever opportunity offers.)
Jor-burial euttwre—On all of the Babuyan Istands (except pos
sibly Fuga) typieal early jar-burial remains have been found.
Their presence is usually indfeated by stone cairns or earthen
mounds—although in some inhabited areas cultivation hax
dliminated the earthen mounds and the local people have some-
times carried away the stones from the eairns {called “kun
kan”) for building purposes, The least disturbed remains have
been found on Camiguin, Dalupiri, and Babuyan Claro—where
the present population is very sparse—but literally handreds
of jar-burials are said to still exist in Calayan Island, where
the population is considerably larger, (Parts of Fuga Island
are also said, by Willeox, to contain jar-burials, but this report
has not been satisfactorily verified.)
The first serious exploration was made by Merton L. Miller,
on Carsiguin Island in 1910, reported in a brief paper.' Many
mounds were examined but only a few were excavated and the
remains brought to Manila. Practically all of the jars were
ford broken in the ground, and the skcletat remains entircly
disintegrated. An interesting variation from Batan was the
finding of smaller pieces of native pottery (usually with stands
and motded rims) buried alongside the larger jars. Several of
hese pieces were ecoverd whole, Some later and] amore suc-
cessful work was done on the Isla F r
cessful work was ind by Capt. F. D. Burdett,
Calayan Island was first explored by F. D, Burdett (in 1912-
19187), and several good burial-jars were obtained and later
sold to the old Philippine Museum. In 1932 Alcko E, Lilius
and I, B. Maddela exeavated jar-burial eairns and mounds at
Tumulod and Silpi, obtaining one burialjar in nearly perfect
condition, and several broken ones, As usual the bones were
in a much-deeayed condition. A few red carnelian beads, and
*Phil. Jour. Sei. § D 6 (21911) 1-5, pla, 5.mes Beyer: Outline Review of Phillppine Archaeology 243
some pottery rings or ear-ornaments were found in one jar,
Dut no metal objects of any sort. (There ave probably still
nearly 2 hundred unopened mounds on Calayan. Some of thom
should be excavated carefully.)
Babuyan Claro Island was visited in the late 1980s by several
officers of the Coast and Geodetic Survey who reported the exist«
ence of numerous unexcavated jar-buriais and several other
interesting types of remains.
Dalupiri Island was first explored, rather briefly, in 1935,
by Dr. H, H. Bartlett accompanied by José V. Santos and
M. Kalaw, of the University of the Philippines Department of
Botany, A few jar-burials in cairns were carefully explored—
being located near the mouth ane along the sides of the
canyon called Manolong. One almost perfect burial-fay was ob-
» tained from a cairn} while in a burial niche facing the sea,
“another broken jar was found firmly wedged among, the rocks.
(These spechmons are now in the University of Michigan
Muscum) ; in 1938 Doctor Bartlett published an excellent gan-
eval review of “Jar Burials in the Babuyan Group * * *
especially those of Dalupiri Island.”? The bones had entirely
decayed in all of the jars examined, although one tooth was
found.
‘The Rabuyan Group is stilt a treasure house of jar-burials
of the early type—most of them definitely dating from the
first half (if not the first quarter) of the Christian Era. (Full
reasons for thus dating these jar-buriala are given in my MS,
paper entitled “Jar-burial in the Philippines,” Manila, 1958_
with supplement in £941,) .
Early Porcelain Age—One of the graves excavated by Aleko BE.
Lillus on Calayan in 1932 contained a burial-jar of an entirely
different type, and of somewhat later date. ‘This is a medium-
large but short and widemouthed jar with six ears, covered
with a green glaze, and undoubtedly of Late Tang or Early
Sang date—almost identical with some half dozen similar pleces
found in the older section of the Hacienda Ramona Site, in
Pampanga Province. In all cases these jars contained a con-
Siderable quantity of disintegrated bone fragments, and usually
a few carnelian beads and other small objects (in one ease a
spindle whorl),
About 1923-1924 Mx. Frank D. Yost, of the Bureau of Lands,
obtained a small and very well-made celadon dish, with a grey-
ish green crackled glaze, from a homesteader on Calayan Island,
who found it when excavating holes for his house-posts. The
piece is undoubtedly of Sung date, and probably indicates an
Early Porcelain-Age burial in that vicinity,
Several other ccladon dishes and stoneware Pieces have been
reported from aecidental excavations on Calayan and Fuga, but
T have not yot examined any of them,
* Papers Mich, Acad, Sci, &. 23 (1937) 1-20, 5 pls,197
214 The Philippine Journal of Science
Later Poreclain Age-—F. D. Burdett reported finding @ dragon-
jar on Camiguin, and Mx. F, W. Sapp brought in several Early
Ming fragments oblained in a cave along the coast of the same
jsland, Doctor Bartlett found a few Early Ming blue-and-white
fragments on Dalupiri; while J. Scott MeCormick and some C.
& G. §. officers found quantities of Barly Ming sherds in the
caves of Babuyan Claro. Those specimens that I have seen were
probably all of 14th and 15th centuries, and were all Chinese
wares.
“At least two village midden sites of probable Eariy or Middie
Ming date have been reported from Babuyan Claro,
Spanish period records —Only on Babuyan Claro do any of the
original Babuyan inhabitants survive. On the other islands
«they were induced to migrate to Luzon, between 1690 and 1750,
‘by the early Dominican missionaries, and most of them appear
+o have settled in the Malaueg arca of Cagayan Province. (A
unique dialect is still spoken in that area.) ‘The present popu-
Jation of the Babuyan Islands (except Babuyan Claro} is chiefly
a mixture of recent Toko and Ibanag settlers.
Workers-Captain Mitchell, Merton L. Miller, H. G. Ferguson,
PF. D. Burdett, ©, Willeox, Henry Becker, F. W. Sapp, Aleko
B, Lilius, I. B, Maddela, J. Scott McCormick, If. H. Bartlett,
and others. (For historical period: Olto Scheerer, Fr. Julian
Malumbres, and H, ¥. Bartlett.)
B. LUZON AND ADJACENT SMALL ISLANDS
8, Cagayan and Isabela Provinces (Cagayan Valley arca) :
Mid-Pleistocene—Fossil bed, containing rhinoceros tecth and
bones, and probable remains of other large mammals, found
by prospectors Alfonso Bagunu and Rodolfo Albano, in 1936, in
the mountains just back of Laya, Cagayan (almost on the Ca-
gayan-Isabela boundary line); and sampics brovght to their
home in Cabagan, Isabela. (Later brought to Manila by Jose
Datul.) This bed has not yet been properly explored.
Tebtites.—A few true transported tektites found in October, 1945,
by Lieut, William G. Beyer, in a ficld with reddish soit and
containing manganese nodules, about 2 kilonicters southeast of
the Tagan provincial hospital, Isabela Provinee, Five whol
“Claveria-type” pseudotextites found on beach near Claveria,
Cagayan, in 1928, and sent to Bureau of Science for deter-
mination.
Prehistoric shell-henps.—Several large prehistoric shell-heaps
were eut through, in road-building, near the Cagayan-Isabcla,
boundary line. (Reported by Provincial Engineer before the
war, but not yet properly investigated.)
Late Neolithic remaine.—Three good Late Neolithic implements
(two adzes and one chisel) were found by a Japanese officer in
northern Isabela (exact loeality not recorded) in 1942 (shown
to me in Manila 1943, and drawings made). Two specimens
are fully stepped, and one is plain-backed. (Taken by Mr.“4 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 215
Aikawa, of the educational department, Military Adminis-
tration, in August, 1944, and probably lost or destrayed at end of
war.)
Post-Stone-Age remains.—No vecord as yet of any Bronze-Age,
Iron-Age, or pre-Spanish Poreslain-Age sites or finds, in these
provinecs, Undoubtedly some such remains exist—particularly
of the Poreslain Age. For early history of the area, see Julian
Malumbres “Historia de Cagayan,” “Historia de Isabela,” ete.
Workers—(As mentioned under the preceding various items.)
9. Apayao Subpravinee (formerly under Cagayan; mow under the
Mountain Province) :
(No record as yet of any Stone-Age or other pre-Poreclain re-
mains.) ,
Porcelain-Age survivals—Ming jars, and possibly » few pre-
Ming ceramic pieces, are still preserved among the well-to-do
” Apayaos 2s heirlooms. Also some ancient beads and silver or-
naments. (It is said that such objects were formerly buried
with the dead; but there has never been any proper archaco-
logical exploration within the areca.)
Spanish period remains—The ruins of at least two old Spanish
missions of the 17th century are known, but they have not
been investigated.
Workers—H. 0. Beyer, Morice Vanoverbergh, Otto Scherer, and
(or history especially) Julian Malumbres,
10. Hocos Norte Province:
Pseudo-tektites—No true tektites have yet been found in this
provineo, but a large number of the so-called “Claveria-typo”
of psendo-tektites have been found at the Selga Site, near Pa-
suquin. (Fr, Miguel Selga has written a paper on this material,
published by the Philippine National Research Council in 1935
1936.)
Stone Age—No genuine Stone-Age artifacts have yet been re
ported, except one small obsidian flaked microlith, sent to me
by a local geologist, shortly bofore the outbreak of the war,
with statement that he had found it in a field near Pasuquin.
(The area should be further explored, as no other obsidian
implement has yet been reliably reported north of Bulakan
Province.)
Early Porcclaii—At teast two Late Tang-Early Sung midden
dumps or old village sites located by me on low elevations
near Pacay Lake, during a brief trip in the fall of 1928. Tt
is probable that other similar sites could be found near the
coastal area,
Later Pre-Spanish Porcelain Age.—Late Sung, Yan, and Early
Ming celadons and other ceramie pieces have come from aeci-
dental exeavations at various places in Iocos Norte and Abra.
Doctor Palencia, formerly attached to the mission hospital
in Laoag, possesses an interesting collection of such specimens.
Spanish period remains and records—Some very interesting old
stone churches, rained missions, “Moro” towers, and other216 The Philippine Journal of Science sour
remains of the early Spanish period exist in this province
(Photographic and. descriptive records should be made for per-
manent. preservation.)
Workers--Miguel Selga, H. Q. Beyer; and (for history espe-
cially) Isabelo de los Reyes, and Camilo Millan.
11. Abra Provinces
{Some interesting fossils and shell-beds, near Kimalisag barrio,
Pilar municipality, have been reported as carly as 1926 by
Jose V. Corrales; but have never been properly explored or
verified.)
Late Neolithic artifacts—Several good adzes and chisele (at
Jeast two of which are early “stepped” forms) were located by
‘Dr. Fred Eggan in 1934-1935. A few were accidental finds,
preserved in the charm-boxes of Tinggian medicine-men as
magie stones. (No actual Neolithic site was located.)
Other Late Stone-Age remains.—A number of sandstone knives,
daggers, and arrow-points or spearheads, of a peculiar type
associated with a crude hand-made pottery, were found by Jose
¥. Corrales from 1926 to 1928, in the Pilar Sites near the
Hocos Sur boundary line.
Mixed Late Iron-Age and Barly Porcelain-Age area—The “Cor-
yales Sites’ in Kimalésag barrio, Pilar—explored chiefly in
1926-1927—contain what appears to be a Late Iron-Age and a
Sung-period Poreclain-Age mixed eulture. Both burial sites
and midden deposits were found, and some very interesting
specimens obtained.
Later Porcelain Age~—Numeraus heirloom jars and other ceramic
pieces, specimens of ancient beads, and other objects are
preserved in the homes of the wealthier Tinggians in many
parts of the province. A number of good burial-pieces have
also turned up in accidental excavations, and several private
collectors in Bangued had accumulated a number of them before
the war. (The best of these collections, in Bangued, Vigan,
and Laoag, were examined and described by E. D. Hester, in
March-April, 1938.) Much data on the rare beads was recorded
by Dr. F. G. Cole.
Surviving carly records, ctc—Much interesting data on pre-
Spanish conditions survives in epic poetry, both in Moko and
in Tinggian (Itneg). Some of these epies have been discussed
by myself und Tsabelo de los Reyes, F. Blumentritt, Juan T.
Burgos, Dr. F.C, Cole, and Ernestina L. Llanes.
Workers——(As mentioned under the preceding various items.)
12, Kelinga Subprovince (now under Mountain Province):
(No true Stone-Age artifacts yet recovered.)
Bronse- and Iron-Age survivals.—Certain ancient metal ornaments,
gongs, and rare beads, still possessed as heirlooms by the
wealthior Kalingas, may be Bronze- or Barly Tron-Age produc-
tions. Certain bead types especially, that are very highly
valued by the Kalingas, seem to be definitely of Greek or Roman34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology
manufacture sometime prior to the beginning of the Christian
Era. Exactly similar beads have keen found in Rizal Province
in sites of the 2nd century 8. c., and one type, at least, is still
earlicr than this (pre-Iron Age) in Batangas Province.
Pre-Spanish Poreclain-Age survivats.—The Kalingas, like the
Apayaos and Tinggians, are great collectors of ancient porce-
lains and jars, A majority are of Early Ming dates or later;
nevertheless, a number of good pieces of Yéan and even Late
Sung dates are still to be found. They are not easily ob-
tained, however, as the value that the Kalingas place upon
such pieces is often as high, or even higher, than their worth
to a foreign collector,
A number of good celadons have eome from northern Kalinga;
and, rather surprisingly, several of the hest specimens that
I have seen are of Sawankhalok manufacture. Barly and
2 Middle Ming bluc-and-whites and polychrome wares have also
been found. It is still uncertain as to how many of these
Picees are true heirlooms—and I believe that a number of
them, at least, have actually come from accidental excavations.
Monumental and other remains—The origin of the great
stone-walled rice terraces, and certain other remains of a monu-
mental character, will be taken up later in connection with
fugao and Benguet Subprovinces.
Workers—H. 0. Beyer, R. F. Barton, W. . Boston} and
(for linguistics and history) Otto Scherer,
13. Bontok, Lepanto, and Amburayan Subprovinces (old boundaries, as of
1918, Then wholly under Mountain Provines; now partly joined
to Hocos Sur, etc.) +
(No true Stone-Age original artifacts yet found; but much use
of stone tools in later cultures—some of them doubtless being
carryovers from Stone-Age times.)
Bronze-Age and fron-Age remains and survivals—A true Copper-
Bronze culture, centering in Lepanto Subprovince, is probably
also to be associated with the early stone-walled rice terraces
and other speeial features of the Terrace Culture in general.
Remains of ancient copper, silver, and gold mining, smelting,
and working have been found in various places. Also certain
ancient ornaments and beads, as well as a few old gongs, images
and copper or bronze vessels, that probably go back before the
heginning of the Christian Era, although many others of later
periods, are still in use.
Porceluin-Age romates and survivats.—Ancient jars, beads, and
the like are scarce among the Bontoks, but more plentiful
among the Igorots of outlying areas. However, a few Ming
pieces are found nearly everywhere, but only in the Bakun
highlands of Amburayan are the older pieces really common.
The only pre-Spanish midden sites yet found are located
on the low tableland on which the town of Cervantes now stands,
both ta the north and the south of the town. The specimens
examined secm to be mostly Barly Ming sherds, with a little218
The Philippine Journal of Seience 1957
later material mixed in. A few old fragments were also picked
up by me at one spot near the town of Baako—but timo was
not available for careful examination of the area.
‘The most interesting [gorot remains oceur in the region
around the Sagada Plateau, where the abundant limestone caves,
niches, and rock-shelters have long been used as burial places.
Numerous fragments of decayed wooden coffins, siuls and other
hones, and cecasionally sizable ceramie fragments are common
jn rock-sheliers under the edges of the cliffs, (None of these
have ever been properly exeavated; and a earcful survey should
be made there, if opportunity offers.)
‘This whole area presents a rich field for future archaedlogical
work, Doubtless many old village sites and burial places could
ihe located by a little pationt research, in all three subprovinees,
‘and their careful investigation might well throw much new
light on the whole past history of the region. €
Workers—A. E, Jenks, James A, Robertson, H. O. Beyer, R. F.
Barton, Morice Vanoverborgh, Angel Perez, M. Goodman, A. J.
Eveland, and W. F. Hale.
14. Hoeos Sur and La Union Provinces?
Stone-Age remains—A true Late Neolithic stone adze or chisel,
of regular trapezoidal form, was found near San Juan, La
‘Union in the 19208, by Forester Dacanay. (The exact site has
not been recorded.)
(The stone daggers, mentioned under the next item below,
from Santa, Nocos Sur, may also possibly be of Late Neolithic
date.)
Early Porcelain-Age romains—At Santa, Uecos Sur, near the
‘Abra River Gap, several graves were eut into during road-
building, containing early Sung funerary pottory and poree-
Janous wares (exactly similar, in type, to those illustrated and
described by B. Laufer, as coming from Barly Sung graves
in north-central China), On a nearby hill, another stilt older
grave was cut into, containing no imported wares, but only
two pieces of hand-made native pottery associated with two
stone daggers of the peculiar sandstone type described under
Abra Province,
Epie poetry and early traditions—In northern La Union, and
‘elsewhere, several ancient epic poems (dating probably from the
late pre-Spanish and early Spanish periods) have been pre-
served, Some of them describe wars with the “Tattooed Igo-
rote,” and give anany interesting details of pre-Spanish Loko
life and beliefs. The best known of this group of epics and
traditions is Biog ni Lam-ung, recorded at an carly date by &
priest of Bangar, La Union, and first printed in 1889; but
there are other pocms also of much interest. (A serious comt-
parative study of this early literature should be undertaken.)
Workers —Gorardo Blanco, Isabelo de los Reyes, José V. Corrales,
Juan T. Burgos, Emerson B, Christie, Morico Vanoverbergh,
Leopoldo ¥, Yabes, Jose R, Calip, and Brnestina L. Llanes.
(Also see Addendum for further data on La Union Province.)1 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 219
15, Benguet Subprovinee (now under the Mountain Province)
Stone-Age remains —A Late Noolithie stone adze or chisel, with
a slightly curved back and of a rather rough trapezoidal form,
was found in a hillside clearing near Haight’s Place (K. 53,
Mt. trail). Igorot tradition reports similar specimens being
occasionally found around Kabayan, and in the Agno and Ka-
pangan River Valleys where they are known a3 “thunder teeth,”
and are regarded as possessing potent magic properties,
Terrace culture-—Tho stone-walled riee terraces of the Kaiyapa
District are probably the most ancient in the Mountain Prov-
ince—and have been the subject of a special study by myself,
(Many areas there have been long abandoned, and both ancient
village-sites and walled-up tombs in the mowntain sides should
be sought for and excavated.) >
A long-abandoned village site, with a nearby walled-up tomb
» of good size, exists on top of the high ridge above the Itogon
Mino—first called to my attention in 1937 by J. H, Marsman,
I made a careful examination of the area, and regard it as well
worthy of study and excavation, but work there will be dificult
owing to the nature of the terrain, (The age may be anywhere
from a few generations past up io several centuries, but it ia
no longer remembered in local tradition.)
Barly Metal-Age remains.—Certain ancient copper and gold work-
ings, in the Itogon-Biia area especially, go far back into the
past and seem to show a kinship to the old Lepanto workings
(deseribed under item No. 13, above). Some very ancient gold
ornaments, copper vessels, sacred drums, gongs, and the like,
still existed among the wealthier Igoro's before the war,
Porcelain-Age site and survivala—A grave containing whole
pieces of late 15th and early 16th century Ming poreelains wes
cut into during development work on the Gold Creek Mining
Co. property near Bia in November, 1032 (found by the late
C. L. O'Dowd); while other graves with similar contents are
reported to have been destroyed in former times in the same
vicinity.
Many old jars and other ceramic pieces are also kept by
the wealthier Igorots, especially in northern and eastern Ben-
guet,
Burial caves and mumnics—One of the most interesting types of
remains in this Subprovince, however, is the great number
of burial eaves and niches, containing wooden coffins, bones, and
especially (in some places) dried mummies. These mummies
have remarkable lasting qualities, considering the climate; and
the history of several specimens, at least, has been traced back
to from 150 to over 200 years. (‘The preservative used is the
sablut concoction, also known to the ancient Tokos and to the
Tfagaos.) One cave on Mt, Sto. Tomas, near Baguio, was found
to contain more than 20 mummies, of which at least half were
in a fair state of preservation, Near Duguias and Loo, in the
northern part of the Subprovinee, the famous mummy of Ané-
long kept in a burial niche in a nearby cliff, treated with re-220 The Philippine Jowrnal of Science 307
spect, and made frequent offerings by the people—was stolen by
2 missionary from San Fernando, La Union, and later became
the object of a court case. The specimen, having been placed
in my charge for some time, was examined by me carefully
and its history investigated, It proved to be over 200 years
old, and was still in perfect condition, having been kept in 2
wooden coffin in a dry niche, at an elevation of nearly 7,000
feet above sea level. The hody was completely tattooed, from
the top of the forehead to the soles of the fect, with an intricate
pattern of the type illustrated by Hans Meyer in his mono-
graph on the Igorots in 1885. (All mummies still existing
should be scientifically studied and photographed.)
Workerg-—lfans Meyer, Angel Perez, Otto Schecrer, H. 0, Beyer,
, Alphonse Clacthoudt, and others, (See Addendum for further
data on Benguet.)
16, Ifugao Subprovince (now under the Mountain Province):
‘Stone-Age remains —A well-made Late Neolithic stone adze, of
‘a trapezoidal early stepped form, was found by Colonel Munson~
and Doctor Pick in a newly excavated road-bank between
Karug and Piwong, in central Hugao. Several years later
examined the area briefly, finding no more stone implements, but
locating in a similar road-bank nearby a vein of much disinte-
grated pottery fragments. These small sherds had exactly
the appearance of the Eaily Iron-Age wares of Rizal Province.
(The area should be thoroughly examined at the first oppor-
tunity.)
Stone-Age aurvivals—In addition to the riee-terraces there are
qoany other modern uses of stone in Ifugao Tife,—-some of which
seem to be direct survivals of a Neolithic culture, Until re~
cently Ifugao smiths did oll their finest metal work with
stone hammers and stone anvils, in addition to the usual three-
stone set-up of thelr forges and fireplaces, Sharpening stones,
polishing stones, small mortars and pestles, mullers, stone beads,
and a variety of other objects; throwing-stones, as weapons;
ete., all testify to such survivals,
Stone implements, tektites, and fossil mammalian teeth (par-
ticularly of the timarao and wild carabao) have all been
reported as being found emong the “Buga” or megie stones,
in Ifugao sacred “medicine-boxes.” (I have collected some of
‘the fossil teeth, but have so far failed to secure any authentic
ti specimens of the tektites or stone implements.)
Terrace culture-—The great system of Ifugao rce-terraces—most
spectacular of its type in the world—is now believed to have
had its beginning in the Copper-Bronze period, several centuries
g.c. The Hungduan-Ahin Valley, which is the greatest single
termeed area, and the Hapao Vailey adjoining, both contain
remnants of important secondary copper-bronze industries—-
although the copper, gold, and silver themselves mostly came
from the Lepanto area previously diseussed, Ancient copper
pots, spoons, images, and ornaments were formerly very or:734 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 221
mon in these valleys, but have now largely disappeared. Cop-
per silver bronze gongs, and bronze-silver-goid ornaments were
atill quite common prior to the recent war.
Ancient beads, jars, and gonga.—The oldest Iiugao bead types
are probably Greek and Roman specimens dating from the
5th to 1st century B. Cc. but the commonest of the rare types
is a special Bactrian bead, known as Pd‘o, consisting of two
amber-glass cylinders with a layer of gold-leaf between, prob-
ably also dating from before the beginning of the Christian
Era. (Pafigo beads are also found in the Batanes Islands,
end among the Tinggians of Abra and western Kalinga.)
Old jars and bronze gongs, mostly of Chinese origin, are
possessed by wealthy families and sothe pieces have been handed
down as heirlooms for a dozen generations or more, Ming jars
2 are still fairly common, but pre-Ming pieces are very searce—
those that I have seen being probably all of Late Sung or
Yéan dates.
Literary ontiquities.Ifagao epie poems and myths (especially
the Hudhud and the Alim) are worthy of extended study for
the light that they may throw on the past, as well as for
their literacy character itself. (They should te studied os-
pecially im comparison with similar epie and myth material
from adjoining Igoret regions in Lepanto and Benguet Sub-
provinces; etc.)
Workers—Juan F. Villaverde, Julian Malumbres, B, Camps, An-
gel Perer, Dean C. Worcester, H. 0. Beyer, R. F. Barton, Jeff
D. Galiman, and Francis Lambrecht.
17, Nueva Vizcaya Province:
{No true Stone-Age material yet recovered. Although potentially
interesting and possessing a long historical record, this prov-
ince has been but little explored archaeologically, and few
pre-Spanish remains of any sort have been found.)
Possible Iron-Age site—Some possible Late Tron-Age decorated
pottery of a very interesting type was found by the Inte Tom
Myers on an ancient village site in the heart of the Hongot
country, in May-June, 1935. On the Conwap River, several
hours to the west of Pugu (in the Abaké country), an interest-
ing site was found on the crest of a ridge or hill above the
stream. The chief content of the midden site was a quan-
tity of peculiarly decorated pottery, with incised designs of a
unique pattern not yet found in any other Philippine area, A
liberal sample was brought in for my collection, bat much
more could be gathered there. No porcelain fragments were
found in the midden area, and it seems very possible that the
site may be pre-Poreclain Age.
Ruined Spanish Missions.—Interesting 17th and 18th century Span-
ish-period objects have been found around the ruins of the
early Augustinian missions in the Ilongot country-—all of which
were closed down and completely abandoned about 200 years ago.
The ruins of at least cight or ten stone churches are known,
at222 The Philippine Journal of Science rout
but only a few have been visited or described, Myers found
two that had not been previously reported. Seventeenth and
eighteenth century ceramic fragments were plentiful around
both of them. (Mostly Chinese porcelains and stoneware, native
wares being rather scarce.)
Workera—Franciseo Gainza, B. Campa, Julian Malumbres, W.
C. Bryant, Wilfrid Turnbull, Carl Taylor, H. 0. Beyer, Tom
Myers, and Antonio Mozo,
18, Nuova Ecija und northern Payabas (old “Principe") Provinces: (These
tivo areas ave combined for geographical reasons, but will be ais.
cussed separately: (a) The old Spanish province of Principe, now a
part of Tayabas [Quezon] Pronince; and (b) Nucwa Ecija Provinee
proper (which formerly included alt of northern Tayabas) :
(0) Northern Taynbas.—(No true Stone-Age remains yet found
and only one pre-Spanish site of any considerable importance.
However, other .pre-Spanish remains should be sought, espe-
cially at Baler and Kasiguran, around Dingalan Bay, and on
the Island of Polillo.) [See Addendum for further data on
Poliilo Island.]
Lampong Bay avea—One pre-Spanish porcclain-beaving site of
Ming date was found by W. S. Boston near the port area at
Lampong Bay, in the early 1930s. (‘This area should be eare-
fully explored, as it was an important landing place not only
for Chinese traders but also for the Spanish galleons, at cer
tain seasons.)
Workers.—Alexander Schadenberg, Wilirid Turnbull, W. S. Bos-
ton, and others.
(b) Nueva Eeija Provineo.—(Stone-Age or other pre-Spanish sites
have not yet been located; but a natural tektite site and some
Interesting Spanish period remains are worthy of mention) :
Tektites--Some two dozen true natural tektites were found about
1928, hy B. K. Harper, in the area around and a little to the
cast of Balete Pass, on the Nueva Vizeaya border. Most of
these specimens are now in the American Museum of Natural
History (New York). They are not plentiful, but Harper is of
the opinion that many more eould be found there by diligent
search,
A few transported tektites were found in 1938 in a gravel heap
at Mufioz (eaid to have been brought from a river bed a few
Kilometers away). The original find was made by the late
Fidel Mayson, but was not followed up and no farther speci-
mens have come from that area,
Porcelain-Age and Spanish period remaius—A few old and prob-
ably pre-Spanish porcelain fragments were found by myself
and Mr. E. D. Hester in 1938 on a hill above Laur,—probably
part of an old village midden, The grass-covered terrain and
lack of time prevented any proper exploration.
Some interesting 17th and 18th entury jars and other ceramic
Pieces have come from around San Leonardo, doubtless being34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 223
all or mostly heirloom pieces. No specific burial pieces have
deen reported.
(Souree of old Tinggian villages near Cuyapo, and their history,
should be sought. Also, the 17th and 18th century mission sites
at Punean, Caranglan, and Pantabafigan should be further
explored.)
Workers—(As mentioned under the foregoing various items.)
Also Luther Parker, Perey A. Hill, David P. Barrows, Epifanio
de los Santos, and Dr, J. P, Ranting.
19. Tarlak Provinee:
(No Stone-Age or other prehistoric sites have yet been reliably
reported from this province.) :
Porcelain-Age finds.—A few scattered ceramic pieces and some
jars of Yian, Ming, or later dates have been reported as acci-
) dentat finds or as inherited heirlooms; but no actual site has
been recorded or explored.
Workers—None. (See Addendum for data on eaves, ete.)
20. Pengasinan Province:
Tektites and Pleistocene fossila.-Two interesting natural tektite
areas have been Jocated, one along the Zambales-Pangasinan
border, and the other in the Bolinao area, The latter area
produced the largest specimen (620 grams) yet known from
the Philippines north of the Bikol area; also some unusually in-
teresting large tektite disks. They were found by F. W. McCaw
and J. Kershner, in the early 1930s. (For the border site, see
Zambales Province.)
A completely fossilized elephant tooth of a probably unique
dwarf species (but possibly merely a baby form of a larger
species) was found before 1920 on Cabarruyan Island in Linga-
yen Gulf, near Alaminos. (It has been identified as an extinet
form, and, a possible new species, of probably Late Pleistocene
date, by Dr, G. H. R. von Koenigswald.)
Stone-Age remaine.—A few used stone hammers and grip-marked
stones of uncertain prehistoric dates (one being a large tektite)
have been found in the Bolinao area.
Barly Porcelain-Age site—A very interesting ancient burial
site was discovered by Mariano Dizon in 1928 near the town
of Balineaguin, in the hilly region of the western part of the
province. The site is in a recently cultivated area near a
small spring, several kilometers from the present town,
The first find was a burial-jar, the top of which was acei-
dentally struck by the plow, This was dug out, but found to
contain only part of a skull and some bone fragments. Further
excavation in the vicinity turned up many other burial-jars,
together with a considerable number of smaller pieces of porce-
lain, stoneware, and pottery. It is also claimed that one of
the jars contzined several old coins, all having a square hele
in the center and bearing Chinese characters. A dozen of
the smaller whole pieces, and one of the coins, were later
turned over by Dizon to H. P. Whitmarsh, of Baguio, who224
The Philippine Journal of Science a9e7
subsequently took them to England where I belicve they
still arc. Before leaving, Mr. Whitmarsh brought these pieces
to me in Manila for examination. They all scem to be defi-
nitely Late Tang and Barly Sung productions, somewhere be-
tween the 9th and 12th centuries,
In 1929 this site was visited by Vietoriano Braganza, who
jater wrote an article about it He obtained a few more
pieces, including a very carly type of dragon-jar similar to
those from the Hacienda Ramona Site jn Pampanga Province,
He also loeated a village midden site, on a neighboring hill,
containing quantities of fragments of various Chinese wares,
Everything that he deseribes or illustrates seems to be pre-Ming,
and his interpretation of the site is entirely wrong,
© This whole area should be carefully investigated when oppor-
tunity offers. &
Later Porcelain-Age rencine—Two other pre-Spanish porcelain
sites were found between Lingayen and Bolinao, in a canal that
was being dug. One of them contained a unique Chinese jar
of probable Late Sung or Yuan date, bearing an embossed
European head similar to the designs on Roman coins, This
specimen, and other early jars from both sites, were brought
to me by the late Major Eugene de Mitkiewiex in Aprif, 1929.
A few other accidentally exeavated picees have been reported,
but, so far, no Sawankhalok or other imported Southeast Asia
wares are known from Pangasinan Provines.
Another find that should have Been mentioned above is that
of a coin of the third century B. c., bearing a Greek design bu:
Probably of Celto-Iberian origin, which was found while doing
road-work between Pozorrubio and Camp One, in the northcast-
ern part of the province. This coin, of whieh an illustration
has been published, was formerly in the collection of Dr. J.
P, Bantug, and lost during the war, (An exactly similar coin
was found in a garden at San Pedro Makati; sec Rizal
Province.)
Other protohistorie aurvivels—Pangasinan offers rich archacolo-
gical possibilities for further exploration. The name Lingayen
(“place of the Ungga”) suggests the former presence of a Hindu-
Malayan community with phailie monuments, and elements
in the traditional history and surviving myths support such
Possibility. The province has been the entry point for several
of our ancient and more interesting cultures, and it seems
very probable that remains of their former presence or passage
here can still be found,
Workers.—Justo Claudio, Eusebio Rosario, Paz R. Reyes, Ricardo
Sison, Carlos P. Romulo, H. O. Boyer, Leslie F. Taylor; and
names mentioned under the foregoing various items.
21. Zambales Province (present boundaries only; old northern Zambale
being now a part of western Pangasinan, q. v,):
Teltites-Found in large number along the present Panga-
sinar-Zambales border, Also on two chromite mining prop-
“Philippines Free Press, August 3, 1929.1434 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 225
erties, in the foothills a little south of the border, What
appears to be another natural site lies in the hills back of
San Marcelino, near some copper mining claims formerly oper
ated by Aguado Hermanos. (The Zambales tektites are all
good naturat specimens, with unusual form-characteristics that
Give them special interest. Plate 2, fig. 2.)
(No true Stone- or Sron-Age remains yet reported.)
Porcelain-Age remains and survivals—One interesting midden site
of Yian and Barly Ming date has recently been located by
Robert B. Fox and Governor Francisco Anonas (June, 1947),
on a small hill at the sitio of Purakin, near Ugik, on the old
Cushman Ranch (now belonging to the Governor). Another
similar site exists at Alibaiyan, neay Ugik, but no fragments
from this aren were brought in. (Fox expects to esplore the
area more fully, soon; it lies only about three kilometere from
>the Villar Farm School.)
A few scattered ceramic pieces—all of Late Sung, Yiian, or
Early Ming dates—have been reported as accidental finds, in
several other Zambales areas (particularly near Botolan), but
no definite burial site has yet been located or explored.
A few ancient beads have been occasionally found among the
Zambales Negritos, and some were collected in 1913 by J. M.
Garvan. Tradition speaks of stone arrow-points also being
used among the Negritos in pre-Spanish times, but no trace
of such material has yet been found.
Workers.—A. B. Meyer, W. A. Reed, Francisco Cafiamaque, Fr.
Domingo Perez (1680}, J. M. Garvan, Paul Sehebesta, Robert
B. Fox; and (for tektites) Otto Frauendorf, Wilfrid Turnbull,
Churchill Scott, and Herminia Gaerlan de Hernandez (for Bo-
buyan Site).
22, Bataan Provine
Stone Age-—On the China Sea side of Bataan Province, partieu-
larly on certain sloping tablelands used for grazing, consider-
able numbers of protoneoliths of Bacsonian type (varying from
crude to quite well-made specimens) have been found scat-
tered over the present surface. Several collectors have gathered
specimens, but no systematic exploration has becn carried out.
Four rather similar specimens were picked up by Leonardo
Vasquez, in February, 1929, on a low ridge near the Lamao
Agricultural Station, but no other stone implements, of either
pre-Neolithie or true Neolithic types, have been recorded from
Bataan Province.
Porcelain-Age remains —A number of accidental finds of ceramic
pieces, mostly of Late Sung or Ming date, have been made in
this provinee; but no actual ceramic site has been located or
properly excavated there. Some interesting early fragments
have been picked up along the Manila Bay shore, particularly
etween Samal and Orani in the northeastern part of the prov-
ince. (also see next item.)
Gold coins of the pre-Spanish period —Several small button-shaped
gold coins, usually beating the embossed character “ma” in226
The Philippine Journal of Science aT
the old syllabary, of types current in Java and Indo-China
during the Hindu period, have been accidentally excavated in
Bataan. Dr. J. P. Bantug bas described a find of 70 such
pieces, made in October, 1914, in the barrio of Tiis, Bagak
jnunicipality, and he had in his possession one of the specimens
at the beginning of the war. This was a hoard, boried in an
old clay pot which was aceidentally plowed up and broken
dy a farmer named Alberto Ledesma, (These coins are exactly
similar to another hoard buried in a pottery vessel near San
Felipe Neri, Rizal Province, discovered in 1837 and deseribed
by Isabelo de los Reyes and Dr, A. B. Meyer. See later refer-
ence under Rizal Province.)
(All of the eoastal area and nearby foothills in Bataan should
‘he carefully explored, especially white the post-war reeon-
struction is going cn, The Mariveles area should ngt be over-
Jooked, despite the great wartime destruction there, as it was
probably here that the first Chinese and forcign tradecenters
were located.)
Workers.—A. B. Meyer, W. A. Reed, J. Mf. Garvan, E, B. Ro-
driguez, Major Albert J. Brazee, Dr. José P. Bantug, and
Robert B. Fox,
23, Pampange Province:
(No pre-Neolithie artifacts, and no fossils or tektites, yet re.
covered in this province.)
Neolithic romaine.—A good specimen of a slightly trapezoidal
Late-Neolithic chisel, and two other probable Neolithic arti-
facts of a cruder type, were found in plowed fields near the
Hacienda Ramona ceramic site, but were probably in no way
connected with that site itself (A number of interesting used
hammers, mullers, grip-marked stones, ete, were found in the
ceramic site, but most of these are undoubtedly Porcelain-Age
survivals from the Neolithic.)
Poreelain-Age remains and survivals ~The remarkable site at
the Hacienda Ramona will first be taken up, after which
several other miscellaneous finds, ete. will be treated sepa-
ratel:
Hacienda Ramona Site--On this plantation, near Porak, there
exists a remarkable and extensive Poreclain-Age site of
an early type, known as the “Goodall Site,” and first ex-
plored in 1985-1926 by G. M. Goodall and two Filipino
assistants, working under my general direction, (The re-
suiting collections are mostly in Manila.)
A. more extensive exploration was carried out in 1930
by E. D. Hester, George Woods, and Herman Costenoble,
assisted by Manager Suarez and certain other officials of
Warner, Barnes & Co, who own the Hacienda, A large
quantity of burial-jars, and of smaller ceramie picces of
various shapes and sizes, was obtained—most of which I
saw or examined briefly from time to time. (A part of
these specimens were sent to the United States, but the
ee226
28. Pampanga Province:
The Philippine Journal of Science 1st
the old syllabary, of types current in Java and Indo-China
during the Hindu period, have been accidentally excavated in
Bataan, Dz. J. P. Bantug has deseribed a find of 70 stich
pieces, made in Qetober, 1914, in the barrio of Tits, Bagak
municipality, and he had in his possession one of the specimens
at the beginning of the war. ‘This was a hoard, buried in an
old clay pot which was accidentally plowed up and broken
by a farmer named Alberto Ledesma. (These coins are exactly
similar to another hoard buried in a pottery vessel near San
Felipe Neri, Rizal Province, discovered in 1887 and described
by isabelo de los Royes and Dr. A. B. Meyer. Sec later refer-
ence under Rizal Province.)
(All of the coastal area and nearby foothills in Bataan should
«be earefully explored, especially while the post-war recon-
struction is going en. The Mariveles arca should ngt be over-
looked, despite the great wartime destruction there, as it was
probably here that the first Chinese and foreign tradecenters
were located.)
Workers—A. B, Meyer, W. A. Reed, J. M. Garvan, E. B. Ro-
driguez, Major Albert J. Brazee, Dr. José P, Bantug, and
Robert B. Fox.
(No pre-Neolithie artifacts, and no fossils or tektites, yet re-
covered in this province.)
Neolithic remains—A good specimen of a lightly trapezoidal
Late-Neolithie chisel, and two other probable Neolithic arti-
facts of a cruder type, were found in plowed fields near the
Hacienda Ramona ceramic site, but were probably in no way
connected with that site itself, (A number of interesting used
hammers, mullers, grip-marked stones, etc., were found in the
ceramie sito, but most of these are undoubtedly Poreelain-Age
survivals from the Neolithic.)
Porcslain-Age remains and survivals—The remarkable site at
the Hacienda Ramona will first be taken up, after which
several other miscellaneous finds, etc., will be treated sepa-
rately:
Hacienta Ramona Site —On this plantation, near Porak, there
exists a remarkable and extensive Porcelain-Age site of
an early type, mown as the “Goodall Site,” and first ex-
plored in 1935-1986 by G. M. Goodall and two Filipino
assistants, working under my general dircetion. (The re-
sulting collections are mostly in Manila.)
Amore extensive exploration was carried out in 1939
by HE, D. Hester, George Woods, and Herman Costenoble,
assisted by Manager Suarez and certain other officials of
Warner, Barnes & Co, who own the Hacienda. A large
quantity of burial-jars, and of smaller ceramie picces of
various shapes and sizes, was obtained—most of which I
saw or examined briefly from time to time. (A part of
these specimens were sent to the United States, but theM34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 227
great majority were, unfortunately, disseminated or def-
initely destroyed during the war.)
The site is large and at least three periods of inhabita-
tion are identifiable:
2, An extensive burial area dating from Late Tang
to Middle Sung (mostly with plain glazed burial-
jars, exactly like the one from Calayan Island,
mentioned under item No. 7, above.)
2. A village site and less extensive burial area, dating
chiefly Late Sung and Yden (with early dragon-
jars, and similar object).
8. A small village site, and possibly a few graves,
dating from the beginning of the Ming period;
located a short distance up the slope from the
major site. °
It also seems probable, from reports of plantation work-
men and local natives, that several other as yet unworked
burial sites exist in this vicinity.
Tn addition to the three types of burial-jars and asso-
ciated wares the Hacienda Ramona Site presents certain
features of special interest for ecramic study and inter-
pretation—e few of which are: (a) The presence of large
quantities of Yiichow and other southern Sung wares, (6)
Several good examples of the rave tobi-seiji, or spotted
celadon, associated with Ying Ch'ing fragments—one whole
piece being in the form of an unusually well-made carabao
(the glaze between the spots being a delicate transiueent
biuegreen that is typieally Ying Ch'ing). (c) The fact
that no whole picees and only two early fragments of blue-
and-white ware have been found in the entire site (and
these may be Yuan rather than Early Ming). (d) No
identifiable Sawankhalok or other southeast Asia wares
have yet been found, although some probable Tang black-
glazed and apple-green glazed pieces and fragments closely
resembie the Kalong wares of northern Siam. (¢) Several
uniquely fluted small teapots and wine-pots, of types rather
unusual in Philippine sites, are worthy of special study.
The Hacienda Ramona Site is still far from exhausted,
although many good ceramic pieces have been crushed and
scattered by the use of heavy tractors and mechanical plows
and cultivators on the plantation, Much of the exploration
work in the past has been far from scientifically con-
ducted—and, in the future, some small undisturbed areas
should be fenced off and excavated systematically, The
results might well settle some important points concerning
the history of the site that are still vague or definitely
doubtful.
Other Poreslain-Age sites.—The late Herman Costenoble, in 1940-
1941 found two other Early Poreelain-Age sites on a sugar
plantation some distance to the southeast of the Hacienda Ra-
mona. (Shortly before he was killed during the war, he fur-228 The Philippine Journal of Science oar
nished me with a map and some notes on these sites, as well
as a number of midden fragments found in the vieinity. How-
ever, there was no opportunity for further exploration.)
Dr. José P. Bantug formerly possessed several very interest.
Jng ceramic pieces from Pampanga sites, One of these—ac-
cidentaily excavated in the vicinity of Lubao while a well
was being dug—was a medium-large Tzechow type of black-
and-white decorated jar or vase, of a type heretofore known
only from Site B in Rizal Provinec. He also had other pieces,
both Sung and Ming, excavated in the Lubao arca, as well as
one or two from other localities.
On the whole, Pampanga, together with neighboring parts of
Bulakan and Batagn, offers the best field for our next system-
atic exploration} and the work should not be tco long delayed.
Workers.(As indicated under the preecding various iteris.)
Also Ricardo E. Galang, Sol H. Gwekon, Cornelio Pabalan
Byron, Luther Parker, W. Huse Chapman, H. O. Beyer, and
Leslie F. Taylor,
24, Bulakon Province:
(Like Rizal Province, Bulakan probably contains practically all
of our known archacologicat horizons; but, so far, we have
systematically explored only a rolatively narrow strip along
tho Rizal-Bulakan boundary line. Our systematie explorations
have been chiefly in the Marilao River Valley and along the
Novaliches-Ipo Road, and throughout the rest of the provinee
we have made only the usual type of easual or accidental finds.
As the Marilao and Ipo Road finds have all been included in
the regular “Rizal-Bulakan Collection,” they will be discussed
under No, 25 below, and, for the present, we will confine our-
selves chiefly to the other Bulakan Province finds that are
not included in that systematic collection.)
Tektites: (1) The Pugad Babuy eoltection-—The old Tagalog bar-
rlo of Pagad-Babuy (now known officially as “Torres Bugallon”),
part of Polo municipality, contains what is probably the
world’s largest concentration of natural tektites—eertainly much
the largest deposit yet discovered, More than 50,000 good
specimens have been taken out of this site for my own collec~
tion, and probably around 10,000 more by other collectors,
And there are still many more to be had in the area, In ad-
dition to the Pugad-Babuy Site proper, the Maysan und Kara-
watan areas are also included in the main collection,
(2) Other Bulakan tektite arcas.No other extensive natural
tektite deposits have yet been found outside the Pugad-Babuy,
Karawatan, and Maysan areas—although they may exist—but
several secondary or transported deposits have been found. At
twe points along the road from Mayean to Novaliches, a few
Specimens have been found. Also, at three points in Mey-
cauayan municipality Miss Natividad P. Noriega found a few
Specimens in old rice-felds—all showing signs of transport, or
use as charmstones, No systematic search for tektites hag yet
been made in other parts of the province.m4 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 2929
Pre-Neolithic stone artifacts—In addition to tektites, portions of
the Pugad-Babuy and Maysan areas contain a sizable quantity
of Mesolithie obsidian and flint microliths, and a few undoubted
palacoliths have also heen found in plowed fields within the
tektite-bearing area,
A number of true palacoliths found in the Marilao Valley
will be included in the Rizal Province diseussion, as also will
be several sinal! Mesolithic sites in the same area,
A few scattered specimens have been picked up elsewhere
in the Province—mostly as surface finds—but none worthy of
special discussion.
Neolithic artifacts—All so far found (considerable numbers in
Some cases) have been within the systematic area—and will be
discussed with the Rizel material—except the Ginyug Site, see
No. 4 below.
etal Agos—One of our best combined Late Neolithle and
Bronze-Age sites, and our third largest Early Iron-Age site,
both Ie direetly on the Bulakan-Rizal boundary at Site H.
No other pre-Potcelain sites have boon found so far, outside
the area of systematic exploration.
However, the largest Central Luzon iron-ore deposit yet known
lies in the Angat-Norzagaray area, and it has been more or less
continuously worked in a desultory way since early Spanish
times. It seems quite probable that a pre-Spanish iron work-
ing may have existed in the area, but it has never been prop-
erly explored with a view to locating the remains of such an
industry, and such a search should certainly be carried out at
an early date.
Pre-Spanih Poreelain-Age sites—The following pre-Spanish ee-
ramic sites have been located (but very casually explored)
in parts cf Bulakan Province outside the area of systematic
exploration:
(1) Dalawén barrio, San José municipality; 15th and 16th
century porcelain and jar fragments, found by “Ario”
de Ia Cruz in 2923,
{2) In June, 1929, W. 8. Boston found seven 15th century
ceramic fragments on a small hill at the site known as
“Boston's New Mine,” on the upper Santa Maria River,
a short distance to the east of Ipo.
(8) In 1981 seven whole or noarly whole ceramic pieces, three
certainly of Sung date and four others dating from the
Jdth to the early i6th century, were obtained from
homesteaders who had accidentally exeavated them on
their tands in the area above the Ipo dam and around
the headwaters of the Santa Maria River about 7 to 8
kilometers east of Ipo. (Collected by Feliciano and
Islao directly from the homesteaders.)
{4) In June, 1984, a very remarkable site (but one quite
difficult to get to) was found by a farmer named Isabelo
Ramos at a place called Kinyug or Ginyug, on land
owned by a certain “Doctor Araneta” about 6 kilo-
meters east of the Novaliches-Ipo Road at Km, 36?230 The Philippine Journal of Science tsa
(Said to He on Tiaiok Creek, about 5 kilometers above
its junction with the Santa Maria River; and to be
hoars walk from Site H, in a generally east or south-
easterly direction.)
This Ginyug Sile consists of at least two distinctive
horizons: (1) an area of about one square kilometer
containing only Early to Middle Neolithic stone arti
facts; and (2) a strip along one side of the area—and
comprising several plowed ficlds and a small hill or
ridge—containing numerous common pottery fragments
mixed with sherds of Late Sung, YGan, and possibly
Early Ming date.
‘The, Neolithic area contains Luzon adzes (at least
three Were found) of Middte Neolithie type, asscciatod
with Early Neolithic adzes of more or less typical
form, and some other interesting artifacts.
On the whole this site seems to demand further ex-
ploration at the earliset practicable date.
Decorated Manila-ware jars, and the like——Rive of our finest
specimens of lirge decorated “Manila-ware” woter-jars—of
1sth, 17th, 18th century—have come from Bulakan barrios,
where they have heen Preserved as heirloom pieces. Found
chiedly in San José, Meycauayan, Polo, and one from Pugad-
Babuy barrie. One plain Manila-ware jar also came from
Bocaue. (All wore manufactured at San Pedro Makati; see
Rizal Province.)
Workers.—(As indicated ebove) Also H. O. Beyer, W. S.
Boston, J. P. Bantug, Fidel Mayson; and (for tektites) P.
W. McCaw, Miguel Selga, Ralph Busick, E. D. Hester. (For
further Bulakan data, see Addendum]
25, Rizal Province (including results of the Rizal-Bulakan Archeological
Survey):
Early period —Prior to the year 1926, the chief finds made in
Rizal Province and the Manila area had been as follows:
(4) In 1887 6 small stoneware jar was excavated in San
Felipe Neri, filled with small button-shaped gold
eoins—each embossed with the character “ma” in
the old syllabary—of a type common during the
Hindu period, Most of them were melted up or
disseminated, but Isabelo de los Reyes obtained a
few, one of which he gave to Dr. A. B. Meyer, who
Seposited an accurate cast of it in the Batavia
Museum, where it probably still is.
(2) Around 1901 Felipe G. Calderon and Dr, David P.
Barrows exeavated two or more Sung-neriod graves
in Santa Ana (sce later Beyer-Boston notes on same
site}, and obtained some fine ecladon and Ting-ya0
pieces—some of which were sent to the United States
by Doctor Barrows and by Dr. Wm. Musgrave of
the Philippine General Hospital.34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 231
(3) In 1908 a small Sung-type stoneware jar and a small
ecladon dish were found at a depth of about 4 fest
in the bank of the Marikina River at the town of
Montalban, by a woman washing clothes—the bank
having recently partially caved down due to a
storm.
(4) Early in 1920 four very interesting Late Neolithic
stone adzes were found by employees of Aguado
Hermanos—one from the hill at the top of a stone
quarry at Binangonan, and three nephrite specimens
while dredging gravel from the bottom of the Pasig
(just in front of the Provincial Building at Pasig).
(5) In 1920 Contractor Charles G, Wing found, two fossil
bovine teeth (carabao) in a deep excavation in San
a Juan; while another fossil teow found while boring
an artesian well through the tufa in the same viei-
nity proved to be that of a prehistoric deer.
. (6) An extensive hoard of iéth and 17th century silver
coins, of early Spanish types used in the West
Indies, Mexico, and the Philippines, was dredged
up in the Marikina River (1914-1015), at a point
a little below where the present bridge stands.
(D In 1922 a very interesting Celte-Therian coin of the
3d century B.c, bearing a well-preserved Greek
design, was dug up in a garden near the Pasig
River at San Pedro Makati. (The importance of
this coin was greatly enhanced by the finding of
another exactly similar specimen in Pangasinan
Province, q. v.)
(8) About 1919-1923 Mus, Robert M. McCrory and Hazel
Glark Taylor assembled a remarkable collection
of old Manila gold work (both preSpanish and
early Spanish, in origin), including especially bead
neeldaces, earrings, finger-rings, brooches, hair-orna-
ments, and the like (it is to be feared that this
colleetion was partly disseminated and the remainder
destroyed during the war),
Period of systematic exploration (1926-1930). (Stimutated by
the discoveries at the Novaliches Dam, in Febroary 1926, a
period of active exploration was begun—later known as the
Rizal-Bulakan Archacological Survey-—which ultimately covered
about three-fourths of Rizal Province and nearly one-fourth
of Bulakan. About 120 different sites were examined, and
a few of the most important were explored extensively—others
being explored in part only, with sections reserved for future
more detailed work, The collections of this five-year period
totalled nearly a half-million specimens, of which, unfortu-
nately, about 73 per eont of the bulkier material wes destroyed
during the recent war, Some specimens can of course be
recovered from the Burean of Science and Ermita ruins, but232
The Philippine Journal of Science asker
they are all more or less damaged and the labels lost, Luckily,
however, the full set of catalogues and field-notes was prev
served, and a good cross-section of the entire collection still
sarvives. Many of the raze specimens jost had been photo
graphed and described in detail, and, although our negatives
were lost, a fairly good set of file-prints still remains.
‘The RizalBulakan area explored by myself, assisted by
W. S. Boston, was divided into three main districts, known re-
spectively as: I. Novaliches-Marilao; I. Contral District; and
TIL. Lake Distriet, The collections for I and IIE were each
Kept a8 a single unit, but the Central District was subdivided
into five smailer units, cach with a separate catalogue. These
subdivisions covered the San Juan River Valley, the Pasig-
«Tagig River Valleys, the Marikina-Paray River Valleys, the
special Santa Ana Collection, and the Manila sites.
The various sites in the Novaliches-Marilao Distriet were
designated by single or double Roman letters, white those
in the Lake District were designated by Arabic numerals.
In the Central District the various subdistricts and sites were
distinguished by the use of one or more key-letters in front of
the mumber. For example, all Manila sites south of the Pasig
River were distinguished by the key-letter “E” (beeause of
Ermita being the first area expiored); while, for convenience,
those sites north of the Pasig River were distinguished by
“RE-”. Despite the great size of the collections, it was thus
possible to avoid the use of very long numbers—which tend
to be nuisance and the source of frequent mistakes, in
specimen handling, (As will be scen later, a stil? simpler
system was adopted for Batangas Province—which was also
applied to the Visayan Islands collections and to the Luzon
tektite sites.)
It will be possible here to give only a very brief outline
of the Rizal Province finds, and, for convenience, the three
principal districts and the various subdistricts will be dis-
cussed separately.
1, NOVALICHES-MARILAO DISTRICT
A total of 29 separate sites were examined (some being
divided into several areas), and they were designated A to
%, 22, YY, and XX, respectively.
Sites A, B, C, E, Fy H, M,N, 8, U, W, X, Z, and XX
(14 in all) may be regarded as of major importance.
Sites D, G, I, L, RB, V, and ZZ (seven in all) are of sec-
ondary, but considerable, importance.
While the remaining eight sites, J, K, O, P, Q, T, ¥, and
‘YY are of relatively little importance (although each has pro-
dueed some interesting specimens or information), and may be
disregarded in the present account.+4 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 233
The contents of the major ond secondary sites may be
indicated very briefly, as foliows: (By horizons):
Early Palacolithic.-Outerops at Sites A, M, and X contain
our oldest palaecliths; associated with stegodon teeth and
other fossils of probable Middle Pleistocene date, and in some
cases with natural tektites,
Later Palacolithic—Scattered finds of other palaeoliths
(mostly Pleistoceno}, and a few definite outerops, cecur partic-
ularly at Sites D, G, H, N-b, W, and XX. (Between Sites
X and H, and again at Site G, there are pretty definite Late
Pleistocene outcrops, containing numerous implements with
recognizable characteristics.)
Mesolithic —Sites G, I, Z, ZZ, and 4 few other minor localities,
contain considerable quantities of pre-Neolithic obsidian and
9 flint microliths (mostly early post-Pleistoeene in dato), and a
few larger mesoliths. (Site % is one of our best mixed Meso-
lithie and Hearly Neolithic sites, with practically no intrusion of
material of either earlicr or later date.)
Early Neotithic.—(Certain interesting protoneoliths, occur-
ying at Site D and elsewhere, may be here regarded as a pre-
Yiminary subelass,) The Novoliches-Marilao District contains
the best and most extensive Rarly Neolithic deposits yet found
in the Philippines, ranging in type from rather crude Bacso-
nian forms to fully ground axes and adzes of round or oval
cross-section, and in date from about 4000 to 5000 B.¢., down to
2500 B.c. or a litile later. Sites A, B, D, F, GH, M, Ne
b, S, V, W, X, Z, ZZ, and XX (16 in all) contain an Karly
Neolithic area or horizon, but only a few of them have con-
centrated deposits indicative of settlements. “Hospital Hill”
at Site A, the western border of Site H, the castern border
of Site M, and parts of Sites D, G, N-b, X, Z, and XX, have
produced the most and best specimens.
Middle Neolithic.—A few rare shouldered types, and = more
numerous group of ridged (or “Luzon") adzes, are now recog-
nized as a Middle Neolithic group (dating somewhere around
2000 #.0.), ancestral to the “tanged” and ridged adzes of
Polynesia. ‘Their distribution is sharply defined, covering a
circumseribed but continuous area in three river valleys of the
Rizal-Bulakan area (the San Juan, the upper Novaliehes, and
upper Marilao valleys), and a smail area in Batangas Province.
Sites D, G, H, M, N-b, S, V, W, X, and XX, have all produced
good specimens of thia type in small quantities.
Late Neolithic—Plain-backed, transitional, and early stepped
Late Neolithic adzes, chiseis, and the like (all rectangular or
trapezoidal in cross-section) have a wide distribution in Rizal
Provinee, but are always very limited in quantity, and nothing
Tike the rich deposits of Batangas Province has been found
here, Sites A, D, G, H, L, M, N, V, X, and XX, have all
produced one or more good specimens, the largest numbers234
The Philippine Journal of Science i937
ming from Sites H, L, and X. Site L is purely Late Neolithic
Gong ehisels, parkeloth beaters, early stepped adzes, and other
fools) and scems like a spot out of the Batangas culture,
No nephrite (Jade) tools ogeur in this Distriets but green jade
beads of the Batangas types have been found at Sites K and L.
Bronce-Age ariifacts—No bronze celts have been found in
the Risal-Bulakan area; but bronzo ornaments, very similar
to the Batangas types, have been found in Early Iron-Age
graves at Sites A, C, and H, in this distriet, and at sile 18
gad elsewhere in the Lake Distriet, (The Site 13 extensive
Geposit is probably truly Bronze Age, as will be hereafter in-
dicated.)
Prehistoric Fron Age—(u) Early Iron Age (2nd or ard cen-
“gary 3. ¢, down to rd or 4th century 4, D.); (b) Late Tron
‘Age (dth to 9th century A.D,): Sites A, C, and H contained
extensive and rich Iron-Age deposits, unmixed with any later
material but only with earlior Stone-Age remains. All three
Jocalities contained Iron-Age burial grounds combined with vil-
Jago sites—and we excavated large arcas at each site, We
found that jewelry, weapons, tools, pottery, and other material
were buried with the dead—and especially the graves of the
wealthy ot chieftain class produced objects of groat interest,
and often of artistic merit. The four great new industries
were metal working, pottery making, glassmaking, and weaving,
‘The latter art was discovered and studied through the existence
of cloth imprints in the rust cakes of iron tools and weapons,
placed in the same grave. Gold, silver, copper, bronze, and
lead were all used to some extent, chiefly for ornaments. The
carly pottery is often eovered with incised or perforated de-
signs, and only the Late Iron-Age pottery is slip-covered and
plain or with molded designs. Site C had most extensive Early
Jron-Age deposit; Site A was about one-third Early and two-
thirds Late Iron Age: while at Site H over three-fourths of
the area was chiefly Late Iron Age.
In addition to the three sites already mentioned, Sites B,
, I, M, and possibly one or two others, had small Iron-Age
deposits associated with later material,
Special Iron-Age jar-burial culture—(About 8rd to 10th
century A.D.2) Does not occur in tho Novaliches-Marilao Dis-
trict.
Poreelain-Age remains~(a) Early Monochromes (9th to
12th century a.p.); (b} Later Monochromes (13th and 14th
centuries); (¢) Ming period (15th to 17th century); and
(@) Spanish period and modern,
(a) Part of Site B, Site B, and parts of Sites M, S, U,
and, an contain Early Monoehromes in varying quantity.
ite B also contains a large cremation-type butial-
ground, with sovera! whole porcelain pieces in cach grave.
Site E is an old village site of Sung date.
ot ee a ae SU W, and XX, all contain a stratum
, Sometimes mixed with or overlain by74 Beyer; Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 235
Ming ware. (At Site B mony Thank-hoa and other Indo-
China wares occur, as well az Chinese.)
(c) Site F is the best Early Ming-period site, dating mostly
from the 15th century; but Sites M, S, U, and W, all contain
some Ming material mixed with earlier morochromes. This
whole distriet appears to have heen largely depopulated during
the Middle and Late Ming periods (16th and 17th centuries).
(d) Very few early Spanish-period remains have been found
in this district, and it is not until the middle 18th century,
or after, that extensive reinhabitation appears. Historic re-
mains of 18th and 19th century date are found chiefly in parts
of Sites D, J, K, O, P, and other less important places. Cer-
tain fragments of “Manila-ware” vessels, clay-pipes, and jars
have the chief distributional interest.
» (IL. Contra} Distriet: For convenience, discussion of the much
subdivided Central District will follow the Lake District.)
I, LAKS pistnct
Seventy-one sites were examined, of which some 14 were
excavated partially or extensively. The quality of the various
sites may be estimated as follows:
Prot slace-Sites 5, % 11, 18, 15, 17, 22 24, 34, 52, 54, 67
and 63 (or 18 im all), (Not all of such sites have been com-
pletely explored.) (Sites 18, 17, and 24 were most productive
in specimen quantities.)
Scoond class.—Sites 2, 3, 8, 16, 21, 28, 31, 82, 98, 35, 36,
88, 42, 48, 45, 53, 56, 58, 68, and 71 (or 20 in all}. ‘These
are good sites, but smaller; a fow partly exeavated. (All
have contributed information of value.)
Third class—Siles 6, 9, 10, 14, 18, 19, 27, 37, 41, 44, 48, 56,
59, 60, 67, and 69 (or 16 in all.) (‘These sites should mostly
be further explored.) (Some important specimens have been
obtained from all these sites.)
Of Tittle importance,—Sites 1, 4, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30,
89, 40, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, and 70 (or 22 in
al). (A few are worth further exploration.)
The contents of the above sites may be classified briefly
as follows:
Palaeolithic —Some early palaeoliths end natural tektites
(but no important fossils) found in Sites 19, 24, 42, 53, 58,
$0, and 63; good later palacoliths in Sites 18, 23, 48, 55, and
87 especially.
Mesolithic.—Extensive deposits of pre-Neolithie obsidian and
flint microliths, ete,, in Sites 18, 21, 22, 27, 57, and 68; and less
quantities in several other areas. (These Lake District Me-
solithic sites are the best yet found in the Philippines—exeept,
perhaps, the Kubao sites of the Central Distriet, to he dis-
cussed hereafter.)
Protoncoliths—Found in considerable numbers in the Tanay
River Valley; see especially Sites 23, 88, 43, 54, ete.236
The Philippine Journal of Science sett
Barly Neolithic—Scarce in the Lake Distriet, except in, the
Baras and Pililla River Vaileys; see chiefly Sites 17, 22, 24-b,
ete.
‘Middle Neolithie—(Typical ridged and shouldered specimens
are wholly absent im the Lake District; but some interesting
transitional forms between Early and Late Neolithic exist.)
‘Late Neolithic—Adzes, chisels, and barkcloth heaters
Girned), of fairly typical forms, are found in several widely
separated parts of the Lake District, bat in very small quan-
tity. One nephrite chisel and threo fully stepped adzes (similar
to Batangas types) have been found. See especially Sites 19
(horned barkeloth-beater, etc.) ; 22, 28 24-b, 84 (unique red
stepped adze); 58, and 54 (well-stepped adzcs); ete. -
‘Bronze-Age artifacts One pact of Site 18 has an extensive
deposit of Bronze-Age jewelry, ornamental objects, ‘and pos-
sibly fragments of a few tools, etc. (but no celts or speaz-
heads yet found). Sites 11 and 17 also contain a few picecs
‘of Bronze-Age type jewelry.
Prehistoric Tron AyeSite 17, our largest and richest site
in this district, containa o distinct Iron-Age horizon unmixed
with other cultures; and Sites 8, 5, 7 14, 24-¢, and 36 all
have interesting Iron-Age deposits, in contact with carly Por-
celain-Age cultures. In two or three ather sites (see 35, 53, 59,
especially), interesting fragments of Iron-Age jewelry and
other artifacts have been found. (Sites 5 and 47 contain the
largest quantities of Iron-Age beads; ete.) The Lake District
Tron-Age deposits are mostly, if not wholly, of Middie or Lute
Tron-Age dates.
Pro-Spanish Poreslain-Age sites—(«) Tang-Sung Early Mo-
nochromes; (b) Later Sung and Yuan Monochromes; (¢)
Early Ming-period wares (15th century); (d) Middle Bing
ware (16th century):
(a) Early Monochrome period.—Parts of Sites 5, 7, and
1%, especially. (Site 7 offers the greatest variety of early
types—mostiy from on old village midden, plus also a few
graves containing whole pieces.)
(8) Later pro-RMing monochromes.—Sites 5, 17, 22; plus
parts of Sites 11, 83, 36, and a few minor localities. (Site
22 contains one of tho best assortments of later monochromes
to be found anywhere in Rizal Province, and is almost eom-
pletely free of any admixture of later material.)
(c) Early Ming wares—Parts of Sites 11, 17, and 24, plus
Sites 45, 58, and 55 are good examples, with several minor
localities. (Site 24, in certain areas, contains the greatest
quantities of unmixed material in village middens; while buried
whole pieces have heen recovered from graves in Sites 11,
45, and elsowhere, in small quantity.)
(d) Middle Ming wares—Very Targe midden deposits of
16th century Ming wares, in great variety, are found in Sites
18 and 15, with practically no earlier or later wares mixed
in. (Also parts of a few other smaller sites.)34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 237
Spanish period and historie rematns—(a) Late Ming and 17th
century; (b) 18th-19th century and modern:
(a) Late Ming and other 17th century remains. —Site 16, for
ceramic wares; Site 17, for beads, other jewelry, and misecl-
Taneous artifacts; parts of a few other sites (especially Sites
8, 20, 56, ete).
(@) Etghteonth Contury to modern—Sites 8, 9; parts of 16,
Mt, and 14; 25, 36, ete,
IL, CENTRAL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL SITES
It wilt be most convenient to discuss each of the five sub-
districts or special sites completely under its separate heading,
but im a more generalized manner than was adopted for the
other districts, °
Although only about 20 sites have been allotted to the
Central District, several of them wore divided into several
areas each, while the Manila sites (counted ag a single group)
wore subdivided into a large number of special areas and sub-
areas, (We here do no more than list them, with a very
generalized indication of their contents.)
1, San Juan’ River Volley Subdistrict Bight original sites,
nomibered SJ-1 to SJ-8. Only SJ-8 and SJ-5 remained of
permanent importunee; although a number of good specimens
were found in nearly all of the others (notably our best specimen
of the Middle Neolithic “Luzon” ridged adze, from SJ-2). Four
of the original sites were afterwards (during the 1931-1941
period) incorporated either with Manila or with the special
Santa Mesa and Kubao sites, to be discussed hereafter.
Site SJ3—Covering the townsite of San Franciseo del
Monte, this site contains three groups of interesting ma-
terial: First, a large dome-shaped low elevation known
as “Buck's Hill,” containing an extensive deposit of
Middle and Late Neolithic artifacts, consisting of #
few fragmentary or damaged adzes associated with large
numbers of tmtch-nsed or worn flaked implements made
both of obsidian and of tektite natural glasa. (Arrow
or dart points, drills, scrapers, small knives, and com-
Bination tools, are the commonest types.) Sceond, an
area containing a considerable quantity of {6th and 17th
century ceramic frazments (both imported and local),
indicating a village site of that period. Third, a group
of ruins consisting chiefly of early Spanish stone build-
ings, known to have been destroyed during the “Chinese
rebellion” about 1640, and never rebuilt,
Site $J5—Known as “the Tuason Site,” this place was
apparently an ancient trading-station located at a much-
used crossing of the San Juan River. There appear to
have been Late Neolithic “stations” or small villages on
both banks of the river, and along a small ereck that
enters the river ab this point. (A few well-Gnished
WesThe Philippine Journal of Seience way
rectangular adzes ond chiscls, associated with many
faked implements of obsidian, fiint, chert, etc, are
found.) .
"After the Late Neolithic there are no signs of occupation
until the 15th century when another small village existed,
chiefly on the west bank, until the Spanish oceupation in
the late 16th century, after which it also disappears.
2. Pasig-Tagig Subdistrict.—(Covering the whole area south
of the Pasig River, through the Tagig Valley, and along the
Lake shore through Bagumbayan and Sukat as far as Alabang.)
Seven original sites, numbered PT-I to PT-7. Only three of
these (PT-2, PT-4, and PT-7) have heen extensively devel-
oped, although u few interesting specimens have come from all
(notably the three nephrite adzes mentioned on p. 231, par. 4
from Site PT-1). t
Site PT-2: San Pedro Makati; (2) Greck-coin area (see
p. 231, par. 7, already discussed); (0) Manila-ware
kilns: Three kiln-sites of 16th to 18th century exea-
vated, and large quantities of “Manila-ware” fragments
obiained.
Site PT-4: Tagig Cemetery Area. Ancient village site and
durial ground of Tang-Sung Darly Monochrome period
partly exeavated, and many good fragments and a few
whole picces obtained. (Similar to Santa Ana.)
Sito PT-7: Bagumbayan Site. A few Late Neolithic stone
adzes and chisels, associated with large quantities of
flaked obsidian and flint implements. (A large site,
near Lake shore, occupying nearly a square kilometer
of gently rolling hills and grassland.)
3. Marikina-Puray Subdistrict-—Three original sites, num-
ered MP-1 to MP-3, Of little importance as yet, except part
of MP-2 (“Sung grave Area”; see p. 281, par. 8, ante). (‘This
whole subdistrict warrants further extensive exploration, Sor
which time has not yet been available.)
4. Special Santa Ana Site-A special site, consisting of three
areas some distance apart, covering a part of the location of the
old Kingdom of Sapa, of pre-Spanish times. A special cata-
logue was set up for this collection, which is of good size and
quality. The excavations included a few graves, an ancient
shell-heap, and several sections of village middens. Arca 1 was
inhabited from the 9th or 10th century, a.p., down to the 14th
century (under Empire of Sri-Vishaya}, Area 2 wag inhabited
chiefly during the 15th and early 16th centuries (ander Mad-
Japahit and Brunei),
Many interesting objects were found In this site, that distin-
guished it clearly from alt other sites except that of Tagig
PT-4 above).
5. Special Manila Sites.— (Although properly included in the
Rizal-Balakan Collection, the Manila City area will in the"5% Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 239
Present paper be treated as a separate province, and as such
will be discussed as No. 26 below.)
Later period (sporadic exploration, 1931~1941),—Minor additions
were made to the Rizal-Bulakan Collection throughout the fol-
lowing deeade, and a now series was begun for the Novaliches-
Marilao District (distinguished by the key-letter “N-”), No
other important changes were effected, but four new special
sites were set up, the first two of which proved extensive and
iroportant enough to he each given a separate new catalogue:
1. Special Santa Mesa Tektite and Archaeological Site—
Discovered by Fidel Mayson in 1936, this soon proved to be one
of our most important areas of exploration—and an extensive
collection, totalling several hundred thousands of specimens,
was built up during thé following years, Contents include
small numbers of Middle and Late Pleistocene palaeoliths,
great numbors of tektites and pscudo-tektites, stall numbers
of Mesolithic and Neolithie artifacts, and limited areas con-
taining Poreclain-Age deposits of late pre-Spanish and
early Spanish dates. (Due to cortain geological movements
and changes in the area, a great deal was learned about
the weathering and patination of tektites and palacoliths
under certain conditions.) As this site lies along or near
the eastern and northeastern edges of Manila City, it was
readily accessible and could be explored mote or less con-
tinuously.
2, Special Kubao Tektite and Archaeological Site—Diseov-
ered by myself, accompanied by Mr. B.D. Hester, in January,
4936, this ultimately proved to be one of our largest and most
informative tektite and Early Stone-Age areas of explora-
tion, It Ties just to the cast of the Santa Mesa Site, in
the area then known as “New Manila” and now called
“Quezon City." (The extensive road-building and real-
estate development going on there, aided-greatly the ease
of our exploration.)
Here, for the first time, we found considerable areas of
undisturbed geologic deposits—with both tektites and early
stone-impiement types in place, In the lower strata we
found a few interesting Pleistocene palaeoliths in the same
layer with undisturbed tektites, while in two layers above, we
found a rich deposit of flaked mesolithic semimieroliths in an
undisturbed stratum of red lateritie clay. ‘The upper soil
layers are mostly barren, and indicate little er no inhabita-
tion of the area in Neolithic and later times~at least until the
middle 18th century.
8, A small tektite and early stone-implement area, known
as Bacsa, lies just to the north of Manila, near the Rizal-
Bulakan boundary. Contents similar te Kubao, but very much
seattered and scarce. Further exploration is warvanted, in
ome areas.240
The Philippine Journal of Science 13a7
A. The Navotas-Malabon Site-—Navotas is 2 long, nario’
spleer-shaped island, in the municipality of Malabon and in-
Lubited largely by fishermen. It is interesting ethnographic-
ily on account of the many types among the thousands of
small watereraft that line the shores.
It is interesting archaeologically because of two Tacls*
ib appears to have boon a landing-piace or trade-contor for
e eprad Chinese merehantinen in the Late Tang and Badly
Gung periods (3th to 12th conbury A.D.)3 and consideraule
sRmbers of eoramnie fragments have been found in cortain
venddunes along the shores. Second, the grounds around
genta ancient ruins of Spanish atone buildings, near the
south ond of the island, have yielded many interesting frag-
ments of 16th and 17th century ceramie wares—chiefly
Chinese, ¢
Further study, and some excavation, of the Tang-Sung
ceramiefragment area was interrupted by the war, and
should be resumed in the near future.
Workers—(As indicated under the preceding various items.)
Main survey conducted by H. Q, Beyer and W. S. Boston,
acpisted in various ways by Wm. 1. Brown, B. D. Hester, A. V-
FL. Hartendorp, James V. Pappa, Gordon & Haley, Paul Mack,
F. P. Domingo, Rafael Palma, and others.
First,
26. Manila City: (a) North of the Pasig River; (v) south of tha Pasig.
{a) North of the Pasig (key-letiers “EE").—Twelve separate indi-
vidual sites or areas explored, as follows:
LE. A Chinese building at corner of Pinpin and Das-
marifias.
Cosmopolitan building site, near Sta, Cruz
Bridge.
Great Bastern Hotel Site, Calle Echague.
Heaeock building, corner David and Escolta.
Insular Life building, Plaza Cervantes.
Reyes (now Soriano) building site, Plaza Cer-
vantes,
‘Uy Yet building (China Bank Area), Calle Das-
marifias.
Cu Unjieng building site, Escolta and Pinpin.
Ideal Theater building site, Rizal Avenue.
Trade and Commerce building, Calle Juan Tuna.
: (Miscellaneous street exeavations.}
: Santo Tomas University Campus (“Bill's Site”),
Espafia.
(Contents: Exeavations for building sites proved very in-
teresting and informative regarding the history of Manila.
Accurate chronology worked out for downtown area, showing
regular subsidence of around 14 inches per century. Good
series of datable Chinese and European porcelains obtained
in great quantity; also contemporary native and southeastern
Asia wares. Some whole pic
Asia ares, pieces found as well as fragments34 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 241
(b) South of the Pasig (key-lettor “Z-").—Fourteen separate
individual sites or areas explored to some degree, and a
few of them excavated extensively:
E-ESG: Ermita School Garden (Agriculture and Com-
merce building), Wallace Field.
E+LLT: Laong Laan Tennis Court area, Wallace
Field.
E-LD: “Luis Dato” area, cast of Tennis Court, Wal-
lace Field.
E-WF: Wallace Field, in general.
E-IP: Calle Isaac Peral area (Taft to M. H. del
Pilar).
E-UP: University of the Philippines Campus; espe-
cially area near Florida. *
E-WB: Weather Bureau and Ateneo grounds.
E-BS: Bureau of Science grounds (and fishpond
area).
E-MW: Manila Walls and Moat area.
E-WC: Various excavations inside Walled City.
E-PO: Post-Office building site,
B-MT: Metropolitan Theater building site.
E-CB: Colgante Bridge aren (south approach, Que-
zon Bridge).
E-CH: New City Hall site,
(Contents: The Post Office, Metropolitan Theater, and
Colgante Bridge areas were very deeply excavated, and
produecd enormous collections of interesting ceramic and
other material from the old Chinese Parian of the late 16th
and early 17th centuries, Little modern material, except
in upper soil layers.)
The Ermita School Garden and most of the various Wal-
Jace Field areas Hie on the site of old Bagumbayan—the
“New Town” built in the last third of the 16th century by
the Manila natives ejected from the pre-Spanish town by
Goiti and Legaspi, Many interesting types of native pot-
tery, “Monila-ware,” clay-pipes, coins, beads, native jewelry,
and other articles, have been found,
‘The Ermita area was probably made up largely of sand-
dunes of various sizes, in pre-Spanish and early Spanish
times. Some excavations show the remains of sueh duncs,
and oceasionally they contain interesting old objects, partic-
ularly on Isaac Peral, Florida, near the Weather Bureau
(Ateneo), and the Bureau of Science, Deep borings for
setting up telephone and electrie-light poles have also often
brought up interesting objects—along several strects in this
area,
General history of the Manila arca.—Results of our exploration
indieate that downtown Manila was inhabited only from about
1480 or 1500 onwards. The really old part of the area lies
up the River, and has been explored by our special Santa
Ana Site—already listed under Rizal Province.242 The Philippine Journal of Science 307
Workers—H. 0. Beyer, Anacleto Manvel, J. P. Bantug, G. E.
Miller, Waiter Robb, Salt and Heistanc, C. Bauer, I, Cohen,
Juan Nakpil. (For additional data see Addendum.)
27. Cavite Province:
Stone-Age romoins—Several plowed fields (mostly with red
foil) along the main road to Tagaytay, and others near In-
dang, have produced small numbers of obsidian and stint mi-
eroliths, while excavation neat the Manila Hotel Site at Te-
guytay Ridge produced a good Late Neolithic barkeloth beater.
{A few other obsidian and flint microliths, probably of Neo-
Hihic date, were picked up along the trail to the Diesta Site
to be deseribed later.)
Possible Fron-Age site.—A thin layer of smali sherds of common
‘red pottery was examined in the back wall of » stzable ex-
cavation near the Van Schaick residence on ‘Tagaytay Ridge,
No associated objects were found, but the pottery itself is
almost identical with the Early Iron-Age material from the
Novaliches District sites. (This vicinity should be further
examined, both for additional Late Neolithie remains and for
possible Iron-Age artifacts.)
Porcelain-Age sites—Only one important pre-Spanish site has
‘heen investigated—that on the Diesta Farm, in Pafigil barrio,
about half-way between Amadeo and Indung, and accessible
py trail only. About 10 whole pieces of 15th and early 16th
century Ming wares were accidentally excavated when a siz-
able ditch across one end of the farm was being dug; and
a later visit by EK. D, Hester disclosed the presence of good
midden fragments, from a nearby village site, being plowed
up in the surrounding fields, One sizable piece of a 15th
century Sawankhalok tall jariet was also plowed up. Mr.
Hester expressed the opinion that a ton or moxe of midden
fragments might easily be gathered from the plowed Acids
seen by him in 1982,
Hesier’s original visit had been made from Indang, on
horseback, but in 1940 he and I tricd again to reach the
site from Amadeo—going by car nearly to Paigil barrio,
and then on foot for several kilometers. We found the midden-
filled fields now overgrown by tall grass and brush—as cul-
tivation had been shifted to other fields—but we did gather
a small bagful of fragments from two adjoining new fields.
These appear a little older than the first finds, and indicate
that the upper side of the village site began at least as early
as the 14th century. (The whole area looks very interesting,
and merits further exploration and search for other sites.)
Historie sites-—The whole Cavite coast, from old Cavite town
28 far south as Ternate, was the scat of important happenings
in the Early Spanish régime (and before), and should contain
important historical remains meviting exploration. (Als9
Buck's fire-walkers,)
Workers. de Mitkiewiez, Robert L. Pendleton, H. H. Buck,
E, D, Hester, H. 0, Beyer, Tomas Tirona.794 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 243
28. Batangas Province:
Next to the Rizal-Bulakan area, Batangas Province has proved
to be the most important archaeological area yet discovered
in the Philippines, and, as regards its uniquely rich Late
Neolithie remains, one of the most remarkable Late Stone-Age
sites found anywhere in the world, Our systematic explora-
tion, lasting for nearly 2 decade (1922-1941), is now known
as the Batangas Archaeological Survey, and has been recorded
in a special catglogue running to some eight volumes. The
area explored is a continuous one, covering a little more than
420 ‘square miles—including practically alt of the municipal-
ities of Cuenca, Alitagtag, Taal, San Luis, Bauan, and border-
ing parts of Hatangas, San José, and Lipa.
Before the results of the systematic Survey are viken up,
finds in other parts of Batangas Province will be briefly
” considered:
Batangas finds outside systematic area:
In 1920 a tenant-farmer while digging a well near Lake
Teal, inside Lipa municipality, found a brown-glazed Chinese
Jor containing a vemarkable bronze image of Oriental type
and rather crude native manufacture, Both jar and image
appear to be definitely pre-Spanish, but of uncertain date
(Early Ming or pre-Ming, apparently) .
In February, 1021, three interesting stone implements were
found by myself and Major Eugene de Mitkiewies in a ficld
near Tanauan, ond Mitkiewicz also obtained a small Early
Ming dragon-jar that had been excavated by a farmer in a
field near Lake Taal, One of the stone implements waa the
first Middle Neolithic shouldered axe to be found in the Phil-
jppines; while a second was a peculiar sharpened small
quartz disk of 2 type exactly similar to others later found
in the Late Neolithic systematic area.
Ia 1984 I briefly explored the original Lipa townsite in
Balete barrio destroyed by the great eruption of the middle
1th century. Interesting Middle and Late Ming midden
anaterial was found in several plowed fields, on a low ridge
several hundred meters distant from the vuined church, A
Good-sized pre-Spanish village was apparently located there
for at least a half-century or more before the Spanish oceapa-
tion, A small Stone-Age community probably also cxisted—
since in an orange grove on a nearby hill some 25 flaked
obsidian implements were picked up, (The area should be
explored further.)
Some time in the middle 19803 a Bureau of Science em-
ployee found two good stone axes and several pitted stone
hammers in a barrio of Lemory.
In 1936, in the barrio of San Pedro of Batangas town, a
ereek running into an old river bed exposed several Early
Ming porcelain dishes, buried at a depth of about 2 meters.
The pieces were obtained by Melecio Arceo, of Balangas, and
two of them were later brought fo me at Manila by Missist
The Philippine Journal of Science
Remedios Abdon. They are blue and white 15th century
Chinese pieces, in good condition. Tt seems evident that there
je an Early or Middle Ming burial ground in this vieinity
that should be further investigated.
Jn 1940 Pedro Malabanan, of Bulaknin barrio, Lipa mu-
nicipality, found 2 fine specimen of medium-large nephrite
Late Neolithic adze (plain-backed) on his farm; and later
found two others of slightly different color and form. The
first specimen was brought to me in Manila by Miss Emilia
Malabanan, but the two others have not been seen. They
fare interesting as being the farthest north of any similar
specimens yet found in Batangas.
Tektites—In February, 1928, an interesting whole toktite was
“found near Iban, in @ field also containing obsidian flaked
implements and cores, and was sent in to the Ryreau of
Selence for identification, In October it was turned over to
me by the Director, after I had identified it as a tektite; and
je preserved as our first recorded tektite specimen from Ba-
tangas Provinee.
Fr. Miguel Selga, who had seen the above specimen, started
his weather observers looking for tektites elsewhere in the
provinee, and they were able to find several in the barrio
of Rosario, also in Ibaan. Some of these tektites were sent
by Fr, Selga to Prof. A. Lacroix, of Paris, who had one of
them analyzed, and in 1981 published a short paper on the
Batangas specimens.
Other tektite finds from the systematic axea will be men-
tioned later.
Batangas west eowst—-Two areas have been explored on the
west coastal area: (a) the Nasugbu-Lian area; and () the
Calatagan Peninsula,
(@) Nosugbu-Lian area: In the carly 19303 Anacleto
Manuel found three guod Porcelain-Age pre-Spanish
sites im the Nasugbu-Lian area, and made o con-
siderable collection of good midden fragments
Mostly the material is 14th and 15th century Early
‘Ming, and is notable for having some Sawankhalok
fragments mixed in. (Further exploration scems
warranted.)
(4) Calatagan Peninsula.—in 1984, at the sitio known as
Bolombaté, on the Zobel Estate, there was partly
exposed an ancient pre-Spanish burial ground of
the 16th and 16th centuries—most of the graves
containing whole porcelain pieces, jewelry, and
utensils, as well as fairly well-preserved skeletons.
In certain cane-fields, and in another area where
the ground was being smoothed for a polo-field,
the middens of two or more old village sites were
also exposed. Here, in addition to much pre-
Spanish material, there were also found Spanish-
period objects {including coins) of the 16th anda4 Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 245
Vith centuries, Chinese coins of the Ming dynasty
were also found. Most of the porcelain ware is un-
dowbtedly of the 15th century, although some 14th
and 16th century material is also in evidence (both
Chinese and Sawankhalok types being found), Glass
bracelets and beads predominate among the jewelry;
also several gold objects are said to have been so-
questered or stolen by the workmen, Some porce-
lain pieces were also disseminated, and some were
Kept by the Zobel family, but a majority of the ma-
terial found was turned over by Mr. Enrique Zobet
to the National Museum.
Ricardo E. Galang visited the site for the Na-
tional Museum, and collected considerable midden
, material. He also found several Neolithic stone im-
plements in the cane-fields, They mostly resemble
the Late Neolithic adzes and ehiscls from the sys-
tematic Batangas area, but only one was stepped.
In 1940 Oloy T. Janse, Swedish archacologist, ex-
cavated nearly 60 graves in threo different burial
sites, in the Calatagan area, known as Pinagpatayan,
Pulo Bakao, and Kay Tomis. A large collection of
Early Ming porcelains, both Chinese and Sawankha-
lok, was obtained, as well as jewelry, weapons, uten-
sils, ete., including spindle-whorls in female graves.
Some bodies hed been beheaded and in one caso the
head was repiaced by a porcelain howl. One grave
contained a skull with gold-inlaid teeth, similar to
those commonly found in cave-burials in certain Vis
sayan islands, A few of the earlier graves might
be of Late Sung or Yuan date, as they contained
no blue-and-white wares, Near the Kay Toms bu-
rial-ground, a few Late Neolithic stone implements
were found in the ground,
Most of the Janse material was shipped to the
Fogg Art Museum at Harvard, but a considerable
number of pieces were kept at Calatagan by the Zobel
family. (See Addendum for further data.)
The Batangas Archecological Survey (1992-1941}.—The first
important site in the systematic area was discovered by the
late Capt. F. G. Roth in the early part of 1952, while I was
absent from Manila on a six-week trip to northern Indo-
China and South China. Roth contributed greatly to our sub-
sequent exploration, down to the end of 1937; and the results.
stand as a fitting memorial to his name.
The last collected lot of the systematie exploration was
delivered in Manila on December 2, 1941—less than a week
before the outbreak of the war, Luckily, 80 per cent of the Ba-
tangas material survived the conflict—and it stands today as
our best single collection, and one of the finest of its kind ever
made anywhere.246
The Philippine Journal of Science IMT
It consists of 282 separate deliveries or small collections, con-
taining a total of 8,505 separate packages to each of which a
single nurbor was given (preceded by the koy-letters “BM-”).
‘The size of each packago varies from a single specimen up to
several hundreds, so that the total collection comprises more than
a quarter of a million pieces.
Roth's original site, at Makulut barrio of Cuenca, contained
only Late Neolithic material, but as oux collecting ground spread
gradually southward through Alitagtag and Bauan, and west-
ward to Taz}, new horizons began to crop up, and by 193%
we had a full Stone-Age series from Early Palaeolithic to the
Jatest Neolithie and the Bronze Age. Truo prehistoric Tron-
‘Age and carly Poreelain-Age remains are very scarce—absont,
in fact, from most of the systematic area, and where found
are confined within very limited and definite boundaries. The
true modern period begins only in the 14th or 15th century,
from which time the population was continuous and gradually
multiplying down to the Spanish occupation and after.
The Late Neolithic culture runs throughout the systematic
area of Batangas, and was the basic characteristic of the largest
and most widely distributed population. The other Stone-Age
and later cultures are of much moe Jimited extent, and erop
up chiefly in circumscribed areas in different parts ef the sys-
tematically worked region. The different horizons identified
and their chief characteristics are hereunder briefly discussed:
Palacolithic romaine——While several scattered early pulaeo-
liths (mostly of chalcedony or quartz; see BM-858, BM-8387,
ete.) had been picked up in the course of our collecting, it
was not until the end of 1938 and beginning of 1939 that we
located a true Palacolithic site of definite Pleistocene date. We
had noted for sometime that many flaked Mesolithic and Neo-
Hthie implements-—cspecially those coming from the northesst-
ern part of Taal municipality—showed large patches of older
workod surfaces, as though they might be re-worked palacoliths.
But in the last lot for 1988 there eame a package from u
collector in Sampa barrio of Taal, containing whole specimens
of Palaeolithic choppers, or handaxes, showing the original
worked surfaces undamaged throughout This led to the dis-
covery in that barrio of a true Late Pleistocene outerop con-
taining whole palacoliths— and a brief preliminary exploration
of it was made in 1980-1940. ‘Tension leading jater to war
prevented oir plans for more thorough exploration from
being ever carried out, and the site still remains improperly
investigated,
Mesolithic artifacts (chiefly of obsidian and fine-yrained ba-
salts).—Considerabie numbers were found in certain parts of
the Batangas systematic area. They are of two basie types,
widely different in character: (1) A large type, showing some
kinship to the Hoabinhian and Sumatra-type late palaeoliths
of Southeastern Asia; and (2) a class of scmimicroliths
(chiefly of obsidian and fine-grained basalts).TSt Beyer: Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology 247
Natural and worked tektites. Natural whole tektites have not
so far heen found Inside the systematic area (although they
occur in limited numbers in Ibaan municipality nearby); but
cores and flaked implements of tektite glass are found in
small quantity among both the mosoliths and early neoliths,
They have probably been transported from Ihaan, or from
some other more productive site not yet located.
Early Neolithia remains.—Most of the Early Neolithic axes,
adzes, chisels, cte., so far found in Batanges show signs of
reuse by the Late Neolithic folk. Some are merely repolished
without change of form; but many others have been partially
or wholly re-ground into approximations of rectangular-adze
forms. Some have, in faet doubtless been so thoroughly re-
worked aa to conceal their origin; and have thus bers: usually
classified by us ee ordinary Late Neoliths. However, the
* total number of identifiable specimens is considerable, although
forming only a small fraction of the trae Late Neoliths, (One
factor aiding identification is the material—since Early Neo-
Hiths are usually of andesite or schist, while true Late Neo-
Jiths are of harder and different stones.) ‘This extensive reuse
renders dificuls any proper distributional studies; never-
theless from our work to date it is possible to state that the
Early Neolithic culture was much less widespread than the
Late Neolithic, and that it centered around certain definite
areas rather widely separated. The original culture appears
to have been quite similar to, and probably contemporary with,
~ that found in Rizel-Bulakan. It is still doubtful as to whether
or not the Early Neolithic folk had barkcloth beaters of stone;
but they certainly appear definitely in the Middle Neolithie,
although not fully developed and diversified until the beginning
of the Late Neolithie period.
Middle Neolithic remains.—If the Middle Neolithic ever
existed in Batangas as 2 separate period, it was certainly
@ short one and of quite limited distribution. Nevertheless,
several very characteristic shouldered and ridged specimens
of Middle Neolithic types have been found, and the few Ba-
tangas ridged specimens are even more definitely transitional
to Polynesian and Kast Pacific forms than are those of Rizal-
Belakan. The stone materials used, however, correspond more
closely to the Late Neolithic than to the Barly—which is just
the opposite from the Rizal-Bulakan Middle Neolithic, (It is
possible that the actual mixing of the Middle with the Late Neo-
lithic culture occurred on the mainland, as Heine-Geldern has
already suggested, and the Middle type-forms appeared in Ba-
tangas with the first phase of the Late Neolithie, rather than
earlier.)
Late Neolithic poriod—-As has atveady been several times
indicated, the systematically explored Batangas area is basic-
ally a rich Late Neolithic site. The specimens collected run
literally into the hundreds of thousands, and it will be possible
here to give only a brief suggestion of the great varicty of types