Scribd
Upload
70 views1 page

41 - Us v. Catolico, 18 Phil. 504 (1911)

The justice of peace had decided 16 civil cases in favor of Juan Canillas for breach of contract by various defendants. All defendants appealed but did not post proper appeal bonds. The justice of peace dismissed the appeals and ordered money attached from the bonds be delivered to Canillas to satisfy the judgments. The judge was prosecuted for malversation of funds. The court reversed the conviction, finding the judge acted in good faith and without criminal intent, believing he was correctly fulfilling his judicial duties, and ordered the defendant be discharged from custody.

Uploaded by

Digesting Facts
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views1 page

41 - Us v. Catolico, 18 Phil. 504 (1911)

The justice of peace had decided 16 civil cases in favor of Juan Canillas for breach of contract by various defendants. All defendants appealed but did not post proper appeal bonds. The justice of peace dismissed the appeals and ordered money attached from the bonds be delivered to Canillas to satisfy the judgments. The judge was prosecuted for malversation of funds. The court reversed the conviction, finding the judge acted in good faith and without criminal intent, believing he was correctly fulfilling his judicial duties, and ordered the defendant be discharged from custody.

Uploaded by

Digesting Facts
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

US vs Catolico GR No 6486 18 Phil 504 02 March 1911

Facts: The justice of peace of Cagayan had before him 16 separate civil cases initiated by
Juan Canillas for damages resulting from breach of contract. All cases were decided in
favour of Canillas and all defendants appealed the decision and deposited Php 16 and a
bond of Php 50 as required by law. It appears that the sureties of the bond were insolvent
and new bonds were not presented on the extension given. Canillas appealed. The justice of
peace dismissed the appeals and ordered the sm of money attached and delivered to
Canillas in satisfaction of the judgment. The judge was prosecuted for malversation of
funds.

Issue: Whether or not the defendant is guilty of felony.

Decision: Judgment of conviction is reversed and defendant ordered to be discharged from


custody.

The judge decided in good faith under the belief that he was acting judiciously and correctly.
It was a result of erroneous exercise of judicial function and not an intention to deprive any
person of his property feloniously. He acted that debts might be paid t those who they are
legally and justly due and not to enrich himself or another by criminal misappropriation. It
was a mistake not a crime.

You might also like