Project: Name: Muhammad Siddique
Project: Name: Muhammad Siddique
Class: B.Ed.
Semester: fifth
In a mediation model, the independent variable cannot influence the dependent variable directly,
and instead does so by means of a third variable, a ‘middle-man’.
There may be a relationship between socio-economic status and how often women perform
self-exams on their breasts. Age is possibly a numerical moderating variable: the relationship for
socio-economic status and breast self-exams might be weaker in younger
.
Difference between Moderator and Mediator variables
Moderator variables
A moderator is a variable that affects the strength of the relation between the predictor and
criterion variable. Moderators specify when a relation will hold. It can be qualitative (e.g., sex,
race, class…) or quantitative (e.g., drug dosage or level of reward). Moderating variable are
typically an interaction term in statistical models. For instance, imagine researchers are
evaluating the effects of a new cholesterol drug. The researchers vary the participants in
minutes of daily exercise (predictor/independent variable) and measure their cholesterol levels
after 30 days (criterion/dependent variable). They find that at low drug doses, there is a small
association between exercise and cholesterol levels, but at high drug doses, there is a huge
association between exercise and cholesterol levels. Drug dosage moderates the association
between exercise and cholesterol levels.
A moderator is a qualitative (e.g., sex, race, class) or quantitative (e.g., level of reward)
variable that affects the direction and/or strength of the relation between an independent or
predictor variable and a dependent or criterion variable. Specifically within a correlation
analysis framework, a moderator is a third variable that affects the zero-order correlation
between two other variables. ... In the more familiar analysis of variance (ANOVA) terms, a
basic moderator effect can be represented as an interaction between a focal independent
variable and a factor that specifies the appropriate conditions for its operation."
Mediator variables
A mediating variable explains the relation between the independent (predictor) and the
dependent (criterion) variable. It explains how or why there is a relation between two
variables. A mediator can be a potential mechanism by which an independent variable can
produce changes on a dependent variable. When you fully account for the effect of the
mediator, the relation between independent and dependent variables may go away. For
instance, imagine that you find a positive association between note-taking and performance on
an exam. This association may be explained by number of hours studying, which would be the
mediating variable.
In general, a given variable may be said to function as a mediator to the extent that it accounts
for the relation between the predictor and the criterion. Mediators explain how external
physical events take on internal psychological significance. Whereas moderator variables
specify when certain effects will hold, mediators speak to how or why such effects occur."
The general test for mediation is to examine the relation between the predictor and the criterion
variables, the relation between the predictor and the mediator variables, and the relation
between the mediator and criterion variables. All of these correlations should be significant.
The relation between predictor and criterion should be reduced (to zero in the case of total
mediation) after controlling the relation between the mediator and criterion variables.
A recent paper by Frank, Amso, & Johnson (2014) examined the developmental relationship
between early perceptual abilities and face perception in infancy. In the study, the authors
tested visual search abilities of 3-, 6-, and 9-month-old infants. Infants were shown panels of
red rods against a black background. One of the rods was either slanted at a diagonal or moved
back and forth. Accuracy at looking at the slanted or moving rod was calculated as “visual
search accuracy”. Infants also viewed excerpts from Charlie Brown and Sesame Street and
relative amount of time spent viewing faces was measured. They found that infants looked
more at faces and were more accurate at identifying a moving target with age. This effect was
fully mediated by visual search accuracy for moving rods. That is, developmental
improvements in visual search accuracy fully accounted for the amount of time infants looked
at faces.