Biochemical and Pathological Effects of Palm, Mustard and Soybean Oils in Rats
Biochemical and Pathological Effects of Palm, Mustard and Soybean Oils in Rats
net/publication/326346685
CITATIONS READS
2 180
9 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Md. Tazinur Rahman on 23 July 2018.
108
Biochemical and pathological effects in rats
Growth performance
Body weight: The body weight gain percentages in different groups are shown in Table 1. All the edible oil
treated rat groups had significantly (P<0.01) increased body weight gain than control group. After 3 months,
control group weight gain percentage was 51, whereas in palm, mustard and soybean weight gain percentages
were 102, 104.44 and 103.78 respectively. The highest weight gain occurred in soybean oil fed treated rat group
(153 %) after 6 months of age, less than in palm (131.63 %), mustard (109 %) and control group (51 %). Besides,
as shown in Table 2, there was significant (P<0.05) difference in body weight gain among the edible oil
treatment groups. The observed findings supported by the experimental studies where edible oil especially
soybean was effective in increasing body weight gain (Rashid et al., 1998; Barek, 2002; Gaiva et al., 2003;
Rahman et al., 2012) in different animals.
Table 1. Comparison of body weight gain percentage at 3 months and 6 months of age in different treatment
groups by Dunnett’s test procedure
Treatment % body weight % body weight
Serial
Group gain at 3 months gain at 6 months
1 Control 51 51
2 Palm 102** 131.63**
3 Mustard 104.44** 109**
4 Soybean 103.78** 153**
**
indicates that values having double asterisk within the same column differ significantly (P<0.01).
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for body weight gains of the experimental rats
Source of variance Sum of Squares Degree of freedom Mean Square Sig.
Between Groups at 3 month 1068.917 3 356.306 .012
Between Groups at 6 month 9843.667 3 3281.222 .001
From this table, it could be interpreted that there is existence of significant (P<0.01) difference among the
treatment groups.
Organ weight: The proportional organ weight percentage is shown in relation with the body weight of the rats of
different treatment groups at day 0, 3 months and 6 months in Table 3. The study findings revealed that edible oil
treatment had impact on organ weight gain in rats. From Dunnett’s test, heart weight showed no statistically
significant difference in edible oil treated groups compared to control group in both at 3 months and 6 months of
age. Mustard oil had significant (P<0.05) impact on increasing liver (4.557g) weight where palm oil significantly
(P<0.05) reduced the liver weight (2.846g), than control group (3.497g) after at the age of 6 months. In kidney,
palm and mustard oil significantly (P<0.05) reduced the kidney weight from their initial value, but soybean oil
treated group significantly (P<0.05) increased the weight at 3 months of age and found significant (P<0.05)
reduced weight at 6 months of age. Saha et al. (2005) reported that higher liver weight gain in mustard oil fed
group than palm and soybean, where this study had similar findings compared with control and other groups.
Palm oil caused reduction of kidney weight in rat, this result also corroborated by Jaarin et al. (2015).
109
Hoque and others
Table 3. Comparison of the organ weight proportional percentage in relation to body weight in 0 day, 3 months
and 6 months of age of different treatment group by Dunnett’s test procedure
Experimental Group
Organ weight gain Time
Control Palm Mustard Soybean
0 day 0.380 0.379 0.377 0.373
Heart (mg) 3 months 0.330 0.359 0.338 0.340
6 months 0.311 0.325 0.331 0.312
0 day 4.080 4.110 4.090 4.130
Liver (g) 3 months 3.711 3.310 4.660* 3.730
6 months 3.497 2.846* 4.557* 3.424
0 day 0.458 0.445 0.450 0.461
Kidney- L (mg) 3 months 0.363 0.313* 0.408 0.465*
6 months 0.342 0.332 0.398* 0.427*
0 day 0.472 0.462 0.471 0.467
Kidney- R (mg) 3 months 0.355 0.331* 0.331* 0.471*
6 months 0.334 0.341 0.416* 0.433*
*
indicates that values having asterisk within the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
110
Biochemical and pathological effects in rats
Table 4. Comparisons of lipid profile (TC, TG, HDL and LDL) levels at 0 day, 3 months and 6 months of age in
different treatment groups by Dunnett’s test procedure
Experimental Group
Lipid Profile Time
Control Palm Mustard Soybean
0 day 113.99 ± 2.18 114.2±2.11 112.12±1.89 114 ±2.02
TC mg/dl 3 months 189.1±4.19 187.15±1.86* 171.67±1.99** 165.57±5.89**
6 months 182.23 ±1.06 186.00 ±4.71* 175.18±4.67** 204.25±3.43*
0 day 76.13 ± 2.38 75.15 ±1.85 74.17±2.12 78.24 ±2.11
TG mg/dl 3 months 179.75±3.92 185.31±4.92* 193.23±2.97* 150.96±3.66**
6 months 196.17±7.49 186.36±5.74* 182.76±8.04* 176.64±7.68*
0 day 42.14 ± 1.05 41.13 ± 1.25 40.12 ± 2.10 41.23± 2.12
HDL mg/dl 3 months 40.01±5.58 47.12±6.87* 38.87±.71 46.85±4.84*
6 months 41.85±2.78 46.68±4.52* 39.54±2.32 53.15 ± 27**
0 day 99.64 ± 1.82 98.50 ±1.45 99.50±1.25 98.32±1.02
LDL mg/dl 3 months 105.36±3.94 96.20±6.40* 97.47±5.54* 86.53±7.53**
6 months 94.36±12.95 99.04±9.09* 93.07±9.62 113.06±9.32**
Values having asterisks within the same column differ significantly (** indicates P<0.01, * indicates P<0.05).
Histopathological Examination
The histopathological studies of heart, liver, aorta and kidney tissues were performed to investigate the effects
of different oil-supplementation in rats of 3 and 6 months of age. Among all the edible oils, the palm oil treated
group showed only significant lesions on heart blood vessels, liver and aorta. In heart, the blood vessels wall had
become thickened in palm and soybean oil treated rat groups (Figures 1 & 2). The aorta wall had become
thickened in the palm oil treated rat group which indicates the arterioscelorisis (Figure 3). Further, section of
liver of control group, soybean oil and mustard oil treated rat groups showed normal histology without showing
any detectable lesions but severe fatty changes in liver were found in palm oil group (Figure 4). Few studies
reported that palm oil was responsible for degenerative changes in hepatocytes, congestion of central vein and
fatty changes in liver (Jaarin et al., 2015; Saha et al., 2005), and these reports upheld the result of this
experiment. In addition, the present experiment showed only mild inflammation in kidney of mustard oil fed rat
group where other oil fed groups showed normal histoarchitecture. So histopathologically palm oil proved as the
worst and mustard oil proved as the best one among these three groups.
From the present experiment it could be concluded that edible oils have effect on growth performance and
lipid profiles in rat. After the investigation, on the basis of TC, HDL, LDL level and histopathology, it is clear
that mustard oil had less harmful effect on body than the other oils although it was observed that the results of 3
months age were quite different than the result of 6 months of age. There may have age relation or something
else that caused this variation. However, it is a preliminary work and in future this would require further study
for better explanation in this regard.
111
Hoque and others
Figure 1. Section of heart: Palm oil treated rats group. Figure 2. Section of heart: Soybean oil treated rats
Arrow mark Shows narrowing of blood vessel. (H & E group. Arrow mark shows narrowing of blood vessel.
staining, 10X) (H & E staining, 10X)
Figure 3. Section of aorta: Palm oil treated rats Figure 4. Section of liver: Palm oil treated rats group.
group. Arrow shows thickening of aorta. (H & E Arrow shows severe fatty changes. (H & E staining,
staining, 10X) 10X).
112
Biochemical and pathological effects in rats
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors highly acknowledged the Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES),
Mymensingh, Bangladesh for providing the fund to carry out the research.
REFERENCES
1. Austin MA, McKnight B, Edwards KL, Bradley CM, McNeely MJ, Psaty BM, Brunzell JD and Motalsky AG
(2000). Cardiovascular disease mortality in familial forms of hypertriglyceridemia: A 20-year prospective study.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington,
Seattle 98195-7236, USA. Circulation.101, 2777-2782.
2. Barek MA (2002). Hemato-biochemical parameters and performances of broiler fed with soybean oil and protein
supplementation. Unpublished MS thesis, Department of Physiology, Bangladesh Agricultural University,
Mymensingh.
3. Baron BR and Browner WS (1998). Lipid abnormalities, In: Current Medical Diagnosis and treatment. 37th
edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersy, 1138-1149.
4. Choi YS, Ahn C, Rhee HI, Choe M, Kim CH, Kim JD, Lee SY and Sugano M (1993). Comparative effect of
dietary palm oil, perilla oil, and soybean oil on lipid profiles in differently aged rats fed on hypercholesterolemic
diets. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 57: 65-8.
5. Fernandez S, Gonzalez C, Diaz F, Fueyo AM, Gutierrez JM and Patterson AM (1996). Long term effects in two
generations of enriched soybean and olive oil diets on some cardiovascular and biochemical parameters in male
rats. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 66: 393-399.
6. Friedewald WT, Levy RI and Fredrickson DS (1972). Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry 18: 499-502.
7. Erukainure OL, Ajiboye JA, Lawal BA, Obode OC, Okoro EE, Amisu-Tugbobo AO and Zaruwa MZ (2016).
Alterations in atherogenic indices and hypolipidemic effect of soybean oil in normocholesteremic rats.
Comparative Clinical Pathology 25: 75-78.
8. Gaiva MH, Couto RC, Oyama LM, Couto GE, Silveira VL, Ribeiro EB and Nascimento CM (2003). Diets rich in
polyunsaturated fatty acids: effect on hepatic metabolism in rats. Nutrition 19: 144-149.
9. Go RE, Hwang KA, Kim YS, Kim SH, Nam KH and Choi KC (2015). Effects of palm and sunflower oils on
serum cholesterol and fatty liver in rats. Journal of Medicinal Food 18: 363-369.
10. Gomez KA and Gomez AA (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Second edition. John Wiley
and Sons, New York, pp. 207-215.
11. Islam K, Ahemd N, Majumder S, Islam R and Barek MA (2002). Effect of dietary supplementation of soybean oil
body weight certain haemato-biochemical parameters in broiler birds. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal 36: 15-17.
12. Islam AKMM and Majumder AAS (2012). Hypertension in Bangladesh: A review. Indian Heart Journal 64: 319–
323.
13. Islam MK, Chowdhury MMR, Islam MM, Hoque MN and Rahman MM (2009). Effects of feeding palm oil and
soybean oil on body weight and blood cholesterol in black Bengal goats. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary
Medicine 7: 354-357.
14. Jakobsen MU, O'Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA, Bälter K, Fraser GE, Goldbourt U, Hallmans G, Knekt P,
Liu S and Pietinen P (2009). Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11
cohort studies. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89: 425-432.
15. Jaarin K, Nor-Aini U, Siti-Aishah MA and Das S (2015). Palm oil fat diet consumption and its effects on
serum liver enzymes and microscopic changes in experimental Rats. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 14: 575-580.
16. Kagawa K, Matsutaka H, Fukuhama C, Fujino H and Okuda H (1998). Suppressive effect of globin digest on
postprandial hyperlipidemia in male volunteers. The Journal of Nutrition 128: 56-60.
17. Lichtenstein AH (1998). Trans fatty acids and blood lipid levels, Lp (A), parameters of cholesterol metabolism
and hemostatic factors. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 9: 244-248.
18. Luna LG (1968). Manual of Histopathologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3 rd
edn., McGrew-Hill Book Company, London.
19. Rahman MA (2009). Effects of some selected fatty acids supplement on haemato-biochemical parameters in rats.
Unpublished MS thesis, Department of Physiology, Bangladesh Agricultural University. Mymensingh.
Bangladesh.
20. Rahman MA, Jahan M, Karmaker S and Islam MK (2012). Effects of different fatty acid supplementation on body
weight and haematobiochemical parameters in rat. International Journal of Natural Sciences 2: 21-25.
113
Hoque and others
21. Rashid MH, Naser MA, Reza MM, Chowdhury BL and Gheyasuddin S (1998). Changes in the characteristics of
fats and oils on cooking and their effects on growth performance of rats. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal 32: 96-
103.
22. Saha SK, Ahmad N, Majumder S, Hosain MZ and Miah MA (2005). Effects of different edible oils on growth
performance, different organ weight and serum transaminases in rats. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine
3: 79-81.
23. Sayeed MA, Banu A and Malek MA (2010). Blood pressure and coronary heart disease in noninsulin
dependent diabetes mellitus subjects at diagnosis: prevalence and risks in a Bangladeshi population. Diabetes
Research and Clinical Practice 39: 147-155.
24. Soler PE and Casado Ruiz V (2010). Epidemiology and risk factors of cerebral ischemia and ischemic heart
diseases: similarities and differences. Current Cardiology Reviews 6: 138-49.
25. Steel RG and Torrie JH (1980). Principle and procedures of statistic: A biometrical approach.
26. Wood PDS, Shioda R and Kinsell K (1966). Dietary regulation of cholesterol metabolism. Lancet. 17: 604-607.
27. Xenoulis PG and Steiner JM (2010). Lipid metabolism and hyperlipidemia in dogs. The Veterinary Journal 183:
12-21.
28. Zaman M, Ahemd J, Choudhury SR, Numan SM, Parvin K and Islam MS (2007). Prevalence of ischemic heart
disease in a rural population of Bangladesh. Indian Heart Journal 59: 239-241.
114