VALID PRACTICE
FOR THE
PRODUCTION PROCESS
#10 – BALL CEMENT MILL
MONITORING, INSPECTION & EVALUATION
Athens, December 2007
Valid Practice #10
16/10/2007 Page 2 of 6
Valid Practice #10
BALL CEMENT MILL
MONITORING, INSPECTION & EVALUATION
The main parameters of the Tromp Curve, are depicted hereafter:
i. Cut size:
Separator Performance
Coarse Grade Efficiency - Tromp Curve
100
90
80
Coarse Grade Efficiency (%)
70
60
“Equiprobable” Size, e
50
Separation “cut” point
40
30
20
e = 35 microns
10
0
0 1 10 100 1000
Particle Size
16/10/2007 Page 3 of 6
Valid Practice #10
ii. Kappa (Imperfection) – slope:
Separator Performance
Coarse Grade Efficiency - Tromp Curve
100
90
80
D75
Coarse Grade Efficiency (%)
70
60 Imperfection =
D75 - D50
D50 50
2 * D50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 10 100 1000
Particle Size
iii. By-pass:
Separator Performance
Fines
Coarse Grade Efficiency - Tromp Curve
Separator
100
90
80
Coarse Grade Efficiency (%)
70
Feed
60
50
40
By-Pass
30
“Separating
Zone”
20
10
By-Pass Rejects
S = 18%
0
0 1 10 100 1000
Particle Size
16/10/2007 Page 4 of 6
Valid Practice #10
The above are being compared to the reference values:
Reference Values
Product Blaine cm2/g 3.800
Mill Outlet Blaine cm2/g <2.000
Filter outlet Blaine cm2/g ~2.200
Separator rejects Blaine cm2/g <900
1-2 for dynamic separator
Circulation load #
2-3 for high efficiency separator
Vs, 25%-40% for 1st generation
Separator efficiency as reduction in power % 40%-60% for 2nd generation
consumption 75%-85% for 3rd generation
0,8-0,9 for Ball mill (open circuit)
0,9-1,0 for Ball mill (closed circuit)
Rosin Rammler slope #
1,0-1,1 for Ball mill (high efficiency separator)
1,1-1,2 for Vertical mill/roller press
Rosin Rammler characteristic diameter, d' μm 10 - 30 μm
By-pass,
% 5-15
Tromp value at the lowest point of curve
Cut size,
μm depends on rotor speed and fineness level
particle size corresponding to the Tromp value 50%
Kappa (k),
% 0,5-0,6
slope of the curve in the interval 25%-75%
max 0,85kgproduct/Amair3
Separator Load Kg/Am3
max 2.5kgfeed/Amair3
It should be noted that we should not compare separator performance at different
circulation values, as well as the results of the laser analysis from different
instruments.
16/10/2007 Page 5 of 6
Valid Practice #10
16/10/2007 Page 6 of 6