Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity
Abstract
The accurate quantitation of proteins and an analysis of their purity are essential in numerous areas of scientific
research, and is a critical factor in many clinical applications. The large number and variety of techniques
employed for this purpose is therefore not surprising. The selection of a suitable assay is dependent on such
factors as the level of sensitivity required, the presence of interfering agents, and the composition of the pro-
tein itself. Here, protocols for the most commonly used protein determination methodologies are outlined,
as well as for the more recently adapted technique of quantitative immuno-Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Key words Protein, Lowry, Bradford, BCA, ELISA, Quantitative immuno-PCR (qIPCR)
1 Introduction
Dermot Walls and Sinéad T. Loughran (eds.), Protein Chromatography: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology,
vol. 1485, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6412-3_12, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017
225
226 Eva M. Campion et al.
Table 1
A comparison of UV absorption, Bradford, Lowry, BCA, and fluorescent protein assay methods
2 Materials
2.4 The Bradford 1. Protein standard solutions (e.g., 1 mg/mL BSA): dilute in the
Protein Assay range 20–100 μg/mL in a total volume of 100 μL. Aliquot
and store at −20 °C.
2. Buffer (for blanking, see Note 6).
3. 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (see Note 7).
4. Bradford reagent available from Sigma-Aldrich, or prepare
oneself by adding 100 mg Coomassie brilliant blue G-250
(Thermo-Scientific) to 50 mL 95 % (v/v) ethanol. When
Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 has dissolved add 100 mL 85 %
(w/v) phosphoric acid and stir overnight. Dilute to 1 L with
dH2O. Store for up to 3 months at 4 °C (see Note 8).
5. Cuvettes (see Note 9) (Sarstedt).
2.6.2 Micro-BCA Assay The Micro-BCA assay uses three reagents whose concentrations
are significantly higher than the two reagents used in the Macro-
BCA format. Here, BCA is prepared as a separate reagent in order
to avoid its precipitation.
1. Micro-BCA assay reagent A: Dissolve 8 g sodium carbonate
monohydrate, 1.6 g sodium tartrate in dH2O, adjust the pH to
11.25 with 10 M NaOH, and bring to 100 mL with
dH2O. Stable for 1 year at room temperature.
2. Micro-BCA assay reagent B: Dissolve 4 g BCA in 100 mL
dH2O. Stable for 1 year at room temperature.
3. Micro-BCA assay reagent C: Dissolve 0.4 g CuSO4·5H2O in
10 mL dH2O. Stable for 1 year at room temperature.
4. Micro-BCA assay solution (prepare fresh): 25:25:1 (v/v/v)
Micro-BCA assay reagent A/Micro-BCA assay reagent B/
Micro-BCA assay reagent C.
5. Buffer for blanking (see Note 11).
2.11.2 Preparation 1. Detection antibody (in PBS, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 (adjust the
of Antibody/DNA Label pH of buffer by adding dilute HCl/NaOH if necessary).
Conjugate 2. 2-iminothiolane (Traut’s reagent, Sigma-Aldrich).
3. 1 M glycine-NaOH pH 7.3.
4. 5′ amino-modified DNA (in PBS, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2,
adjust the pH of the buffer by adding dilute HCl or NaOH if
necessary).
5. Sulfo-succinimidyl4-[ N- maleimidomethyl]cyclohexane-1-
carboxylate (SMCC).
6. Zeba 2 mL desalt spin column (Thermo-Scientific).
7. Ion exchange column (Resource Q 1 mL, Biosciences).
8. 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0.
9. 1.5 M NaCl.
10. Centricon YM-100 (Millipore).
2.11.4 qIPCR Assay 1. Wash buffer: 0.154 M NaCl, 5 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.75, 0.02 %
(Common Components) (w/v) sodium azide (NaN3) (see Note 13).
2. Blocking buffer: PBS, 0.1–1 % (w/v) BSA (or other suitable
blocking agent, see Note 14) and 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20.
3. Antigen/unknown samples: dilute the antigen standard, pre-
paring a suitable concentration range (see Note 15).
4. Ultrapure water (see Note 16).
2.11.9 Real Time PCR Real Time PCR mixture (assemble on ice):
(qPCR) Assay
1. 2 μL 10× PCR buffer (4 mM MgCl2) (Promega).
2. 200 μM dNTPs (dUTP, dGTP, dCTP, dATP) (Invitrogen).
3. Hot start Taq polymerase (Promega).
4. 200–400 nM primers [specific for DNA label (see
Subheading 3.11.1)] (Eurofins MWG operon).
5. 0.5 μL 50× SYBR green solution (vortex for 30 s before use)
(Quantace).
6. Uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) (Bioline) (see Note 19).
7. Bring to 20 μL with molecular grade H2O (Sigma-Aldrich).
8. Filter/barrier tips (Anachem).
3 Methods
3.1 Protein Simple and rapid estimations of protein concentration can be made
Determination by UV by monitoring the absorbance of ultraviolet light. Absorbance of
Light Absorption near-UV light at 280 nm depends largely on the presence of aro-
matic amino acids, in particular tryptophan and tyrosine, and to a
much more minor extent on phenylalanine and disulfide bonds.
Absorption is affected by pH and ionic strength. In addition,
strong interference from nucleic acids is a particular problem at
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 235
Table 2
Preparation of protein standards for standard curve generation
3.4 The Bradford The Bradford Assay is based on the formation of a complex between
Protein Assay the dye, Brilliant Blue G-250, and the proteins in a solution. The
absorption maximum of the dye shifts from 465 to 595 nm when
it complexes with protein and the amount of absorption observed
is proportional to the quantity of protein present. This is a simple,
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 237
3.5 The Lowry The Lowry assay involves two reactions, the first resulting in the
Protein Assay formation of a copper ion complex with amide bonds, which forms
reduced copper in alkaline solution. The second reaction is the
reduction of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, mainly by the reduced
copper–amide bond complex, but also by tyrosine and tryptophan
residues. The reduced reagent is blue and is thus detectable using
a spectrophotometer, detectable in the region of 500–750 nm.
The assay has a dynamic range of 1–100 μg of protein. A major
238 Eva M. Campion et al.
3.6 The The principle of the Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay is similar to
Bicinchoninic Acid that of the Lowry procedure, in that both rely on the formation of
(BCA) Assay a Cu2+-protein complex under alkaline conditions, followed by
reduction of the Cu2+ to Cu1+. Here, BCA reagent replaces the
Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, and the amount of reduction is propor-
tional to the protein present as before. BCA forms a blue–purple
complex with Cu1+ in alkaline solutions, the appearance of which
can be monitored by absorbance at 562 nm. Unlike the Lowry
assay, BCA does not interact with detergents and is less susceptible
to interference from other compounds that may be found in buf-
fers used for cell lysis and protein preparation. Some reducing or
chelating agents such as DTT and EGTA are best avoided however
as they interfere by either reducing or sequestering Cu2+.
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 239
3.6.1 Macro-BCA Assay 1. Prepare the protein standards in the range 0–100 μg diluted in
dH2O (as per Subheading 3.2) in a final volume of
100 μL. Prepare a blank tube using 100 μL water/buffer.
2. Pipette 100 μL of sample/blank/standard into test tubes, add
2 mL of the working solution and mix thoroughly.
3. Incubate for 15 min at 60 °C (see Note 34).
4. Cool the samples to room temperature (see Note 35) (the
color is stable up to 1 h following incubation at 60 °C).
5. Mix the samples using a vortex and transfer to cuvettes.
6. Set the spectrophotometer to read A562 and leave to stabilize
for 15–20 min. Zero the instrument, blank, and measure the
absorbance of every sample in turn.
7. Plot a standard curve of absorbance as a function of initial pro-
tein concentration and use it to determine the protein concen-
trations in the samples (see Subheading 3.2).
3.6.2 Micro-BCA Assay 1. Set up microfuge tubes containing samples and known amounts
of standard protein in the range of 0.5–20 μg with a final sam-
ple volume of 500 μL. Prepare two blank tubes using 500 μL
water/buffer.
2. Add 500 μL of micro-BCA assay solution to each tube, vor-
tex, and incubate the sample for 15 min at 60 °C (see Notes
34 and 36).
3. Cool samples to room temperature (see Note 35).
4. Vortex the samples and read the absorbance at 562 nm as
described in Subheading 3.1.
3.7 Immunoassay: ELISAs are common antibody-based tests that are used to detect
Indirect ELISA antigens or other antibodies in a sample. It is imperative that a robust
antibody directed against the protein of interest (i.e., the antigen) be
available to the investigator for the purpose of target protein quanti-
tation. There are many direct and indirect formats available, and the
specific detection antibody can be covalently linked to a reporter
enzyme or can alternatively be itself detected using an enzyme-
labeled secondary antibody. Many ELISAs utilize chromogenic sub-
strates, though newer assays employ fluorogenic markers enabling
much higher sensitivities to be achieved. The amount of target pro-
tein in a sample is inferred from the level of activity/signal from the
reporter. Traditional ELISA can be performed in four different for-
mats; direct, indirect, sandwich, and competitive [18–21]. Here, the
format typical of an indirect ELISA is outlined.
3.7.1 Antigen Coating 1. Dilute the antigen standard and the unknown sample in the
to Microtiter Plates antigen-coating buffer to set up a concentration range of 0.1–
10 μg/mL.
240 Eva M. Campion et al.
3.7.2 Blocking 1. Empty the wells and wash three times with assay buffer fol-
lowed by three further washes with PBS (see Note 37 for wash-
ing procedure). Ensure the wells are washed sufficiently by
completely filling them with wash buffer. It is important not to
let the wells dry out or enzyme activity will be lost.
2. Add 200 μL of blocking buffer and incubate overnight (or
alternatively for 1–2 h at 37 °C).
3. Thoroughly wash the plate again three times with the assay buf-
fer followed by three washes with PBS as before (see Note 37).
3.7.3 Primary Antibody 1. Add 100 μL of primary antibody (at the experimentally deter-
Binding Step mined optimal working concentration) to each well and incu-
bate for 5–6 h at room temperature (see Note 38).
2. Wash the plates as before (see Note 37).
3.7.4 Secondary 1. Add 100 μL of the diluted secondary antibody (at the experi-
Antibody Binding Step mentally determined optimal working concentration) to each
well and incubate at room temperature for 1 h.
2. Thoroughly wash the plates with assay buffer, as before (see
Note 37).
3.7.5 Detection Step 1. Detect bound antibody by the addition of a suitable substrate
solution to the wells (see Note 39).
2. As soon as the color develops add stop solution.
3. Read the plates immediately at A450 nm on a microtiter plate reader.
4. Draw the standard curve and estimate the protein concentra-
tion in the unknown sample.
3.8 Sodium Dodecyl SDS-PAGE is a widely used method for fractionating proteins
Sulfate- based on their mobility in an electric field. Binding of the deter-
Polyacrylamide Gel gent SDS confers different proteins with similar charge per unit
Electrophoresis mass ratios, and separation by PAGE is therefore based on protein
(SDS-PAGE) size. Many variations of this protocol have been described in the
of Proteins literature which become useful when the limits of the classical pro-
tocols are reached [22] (see Note 40). Instructions for use with an
ATTO protein gel electrophoresis system are laid out here and can
easily be adapted to other equivalent systems.
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 241
1. Wash glass plates with detergent, rinse first with tap water, then
with dH2O and finally wipe in one direction with tissue soaked
in 100 % ethanol.
2. Place the gasket around the ridged plate, assemble the plates,
and secure with clamps.
3. Prepare a 10 % resolving gel by mixing 3.3 mL acrylagel,
1.35 mL bis-acrylagel, 2.5 mL 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8),
2.61 mL dH2O, 0.10 mL 10 % (w/v) SDS, 0.10 mL 10 %
(w/v) APS (freshly prepared) and 0.01 mL TEMED.
4. Pour the gel to within 2 cm of the top of the larger plate (allow-
ing space for the stacking gel) and overlay with 100 % ethanol.
The resolving gel should be fully polymerized within 30 min.
5. Prepare the 5 % stacking gel by mixing 0.42 mL of acrylagel with
0.168 mL bis-Acrylagel, 0.312 mL 1 M Tris–HCl (pH 6.8),
1.55 mL dH2O, 0.025 mL 10 % (w/v) SDS, 0.025 mL 10 %
(w/v) APS and 0.0025 mL TEMED (see Note 41).
6. Remove the ethanol, pour the stacking gel, and immediately
insert a clean comb (wiped with 100 % ethanol). Allow the gel
to polymerize for at least 20 min.
7. Fill the electrophoresis tank with 1× Tris–glycine running buf-
fer to a level of about 5 cm deep.
8. After polymerization, remove the clamps and gaskets and lower
the prepoured gels into the buffer (place the gels into the buf-
fer at an angle to exclude air bubbles from the gel interface)
notched plate facing inward.
9. Fix the gel plates firmly in place using the pressure plates.
Completely fill the tank (including the chamber formed by the
inner plates) with 1× running buffer and carefully remove the
comb from the gel (see Note 42).
10. Load the sample into the wells. Include at least one well with a
prestained molecular weight marker.
11. Complete the assembly of the gel unit and connect to a power
supply.
12. Electrophorese at a constant current of 30 mA per gel until the
blue dye front has reached the bottom of the gel.
13. When complete remove the plates, separate, and process the
gel as required (see Subheading 3.9 or 3.10).
3.9.1 Coomassie Brilliant The dye Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 binds nonspecifically to vir-
Blue Staining of SDS-PAGE tually all proteins and is commonly used as a convenient stain for
Gels proteins following fractionation by PAGE. Gels are first soaked in a
solution of the dye, and any dye that is not bound to protein diffuses
out of the gel during the destain steps. This stain binds to proteins
more or less stoichiometrically, and so this method can be used when
relative amounts of protein needs to be established by densitometry.
1. After electrophoresis, disconnect the gel unit from the power sup-
ply and disassemble the apparatus. Carefully separate the plates
and remove and discard the stacking gel. Cut one corner from the
resolving gel to allow the orientation of the gel to be followed.
2. Immerse the gel in Coomassie blue solution for 30 min with
constant gentle agitation.
3. After staining, immerse the gel in destain with constant agita-
tion. Refresh the destain four or five times at 1 h intervals until
all of the background staining has been removed from the gel
(see Note 43).
4. An image of the gel in black and white can be captured using a
UV trans-illuminator (switched to white light only and using a
white tray), or alternatively the gel can be imaged or scanned
onto a computer (see Note 44).
3.9.2 Silver Staining Silver staining is a highly sensitive method for visualizing proteins
of SDS-PAGE Gels following electrophoresis. Detection of 0.3–10 ng of protein is
possible, making it up to 100 times more sensitive than Coomassie
Blue staining. Although sensitive, not all proteins stain equally
using this method, and the linear dynamic range is rather limited.
Silver staining is therefore not favored when quantitative protein
expression analysis is required. Commercially available silver stain-
ing kits that offer improved compatibility with subsequent mass
spectrometric work include SilverQuest™ Silver Staining Kit
(Thermofisher), Pierce™ Silver Stain for Mass Spectrometry,
ProteoSilver™ Plus Silver Stain Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and PlusOne
Silver Staining Kit (GE Healthcare).
1. Following electrophoresis (see Note 45), disconnect the gel
unit from the power supply and disassemble the apparatus.
Carefully separate the plates and remove and discard the stack-
ing gel. Cut one corner from the resolving gel to allow the
orientation of the gel to be followed.
2. Place the gel in a clean container in fixing solution for 1–2 h
with gentle agitation at room temperature (for gels previously
stained with Coomassie blue, wash overnight with dH2O and
start from step 3).
3. Discard the fixing solution and wash the gel three times for
20 min each in wash solution.
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 243
3.10.1 Electrophoretic 1. Carry out SDS-PAGE as previously described (see Subheading 3.8).
Transfer of Proteins The use of commercially available prestained protein size markers
from PAGE Gels is recommended.
to Nitrocellulose Filters 2. Disconnect the gel unit from the power supply and disassem-
ble the apparatus. Carefully separate the plates and remove and
discard the stacking gel. Cut one corner from the resolving gel
to allow the orientation of the gel to be followed.
3. Soak the gel in transfer buffer for 15 min to equilibrate the gel
removing salts and detergents.
4. Cut the transfer membrane (e.g., nitrocellulose) to the same
dimensions as the gel, along with six pieces of 3MM filter paper
required to complete the gel/membrane sandwich.
5. Place a presoaked sheet of filter paper onto the platinum anode.
Roll a pipette over the surface of the filter paper to exclude all air
bubbles. Repeat this step with two more sheets of filter paper.
6. Place prewetted blotting membrane on top of the filter paper
and exclude all air bubbles as before (not all types of mem-
brane require prewetting).
7. Place the equilibrated gel carefully on top of the nitrocellulose
membrane, align the gel on the center of the membrane, and
ensure all the air bubbles removed.
8. Place another three sheets of prewetted filter paper on top of
the gel, again remove air bubbles (see Note 46).
9. Put the cathode on top of the stack and place the safety cover
on the transfer unit. Transfer the gel for 30 min at 17 V (trans-
fer conditions should be experimentally determined for opti-
mal results).
10. Once the transfer is complete, disassemble the apparatus. Leave
the gel in place on top of the nitrocellulose membrane so that
the membrane can be cut to the shape of the gel (including the
cut corner for orientation) using a sharp blade. The gel and any
excess membrane can then be discarded.
11. The colored molecular weight markers should be clearly visible
on the membrane.
3.11 qIPCR Assay Nucleic acid amplification methods can be used for signal genera-
tion in antibody-based immunoassays [25]. qIPCR is based on the
use of specific antibodies that have been conjugated to a nucleic
acid molecule that is targeted for amplification by real-time PCR,
the method of choice for quantitative determinations of low levels
of DNA. The benefits that are brought to bear include dramatically
improved limits of detection (by a factor of up to 10,000), the
capacity to work with small sample volumes, and assay formats that
are compatible with complex biological matrices [26].
Various synthetic DNA sequences and the corresponding PCR
primers may be used as a target region [27]. Several possible strate-
gies are available for linking antibody recognition with nucleic acid
amplification. These strategies have evolved to combine the advan-
tages of several of the latest technologies with those of qIPCR. The
pairing of a qIPCR assay with Phage display [28, 29] (where the
phage particle supplies both the detection antibody and the DNA),
use of asymmetric PCR [30] (for higher sensitivity of detection),
the incorporation of gold nanoparticles to allow easier coupling
between antibodies and DNA [31] and modified double-stranded
DNA molecules [32] have resulted in an “ultrasensitive” and
246 Eva M. Campion et al.
3.11.2 Preparation 1. Activate the antibody with thiol groups by mixing ~5 mg of anti-
of Antibody/DNA Label body (in PBS, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) with 2-iminothiolane
Conjugate Traut’s reagent in tenfold molar excess in a total volume of 1 mL.
2. Incubate the reaction for 1 h at room temperature.
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 247
3.11.4 qIPCR Assay General comments: (1) In all assay formats set up a no antigen
Set Up control (to control for unspecific binding of antibody and DNA to
the surface), a negative sample control (to determine that the sam-
ple matrix does not give rise to a signal) and a no antibody control
(to check for any unspecific binding between antibodies). (2)
Prepare a standard curve by making a dilution series of antigen
(0.1–10 μg/mL) including 6–7 concentrations. Vortex and spin
between every dilution. (3) Set up two or three replicates of all
standards and unknowns that are to be assayed.
248 Eva M. Campion et al.
3.11.6 Assay Format II 1. Add 25 μL of the diluted capture antibody to a microtiter plate
and incubate overnight on a microtiter plate shaker at 4 °C.
2. Wash the wells three times with wash buffer (see Note 37).
Ensure the wells are washed sufficiently by filling the wells with
wash buffer.
3. Add 200 μL of blocking buffer and incubate for 1 h at 37 °C.
4. Wash the wells three times with wash buffer.
5. At the same time, dilute the antigen standard and the unknown
sample in a concentration range of 0.1–10 μg/mL in the
antigen-coating buffer.
6. Mix the antigen or sample together with the diluted chemically
conjugated antibody and DNA label. Incubate for 1 h at 37 °C.
7. Add 25 μL of this mix to the wells and incubate for 30 min at
room temperature.
8. Wash the wells six times with wash buffer.
9. Wash six times with ultrapure water.
10. Quantify using qPCR (see Subheading 3.11.9).
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 249
3.11.7 Assay Format III 1. Prepare dilutions of the antigen standard and the unknown
sample in the antigen-coating buffer across a concentration
range of 0.1–10 μg/mL.
2. Block the streptavidin-coated microtiter plates with 200 μL
blocking buffer for 1 h at 37 °C.
3. At the same time, mix 5.5 μL antigen or sample with 11 μL of
diluted chemically conjugated antibody and DNA label, and
11 μL of the diluted biotinylated capture antibody. Incubate
this mix at room temperature for 1 h.
4. Wash the wells three times with wash buffer (see Note 37).
5. Add 25 μL of the mix to the wells and incubate for 30 min at
room temperature.
6. Wash the wells six times with wash buffer.
7. Wash six times with ultrapure water.
8. Quantify using qPCR (see Subheading 3.11.9).
3.11.8 Assay Format IV 1. Dilute the antigen standard and the unknown sample in a con-
centration range of 0.1–10 μg/mL in antigen-coating buffer.
2. Add 50 μL to each well.
3. Incubate the plates on microtiter plate shaker, overnight at 4 °C.
4. Wash the wells three times with wash buffer (see Note 37).
5. Add 200 μL of blocking buffer and incubate for 1 h at 37 °C.
6. Wash the wells three times with wash buffer.
7. At the same time, mix the antigen or sample together with the
chemically conjugated antibody and DNA label. Incubate for
1 h at 37 °C.
8. Add 25 μL of the mix to the wells and incubate for 30 min at
room temperature.
9. Wash the wells six times with wash buffer.
10. Wash six times with ultrapure water.
11. Quantify using qPCR (see Subheading 3.11.9).
3.11.9 Real-Time PCR 1. Prepare the reagents for the PCR reaction as a master mix
(qPCR) Assay (make up 10 % more than the volume required so as to account
for potential pipetting error).
2. Include three “no template controls” (NTC, a minus sample
control) in each reaction plate. Set up a positive control sample
using DNA/Conjugate as template.
3. Aliquot 20 μL of PCR master mix per reaction into the indi-
vidual wells of the PCR plate containing the immobilized DNA.
4. Immediately seal the plate with an optical adhesive cover and
protect from light. Centrifuge at 500 × g for 2 min to eliminate
air bubbles. It is important to check to ensure that no bubbles
remain in any well.
250 Eva M. Campion et al.
4 Notes
References
1. Rosenburg IM (2005) Getting started with 7. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia
protein purification. In: Protein analysis and AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD et al (1985)
purification: benchtop techniques, 2nd edn. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic
Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, pp 118–152 acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85
2. Lovrien R, Matulis D (2005) Assays for total 8. Johnson M (2012) Protein quantitation. Mater
protein. In: Coico R, Kowalik T, Quarles J, Methods 2:115. Available via LABOME.
Stevenson B, Taylor R (eds) Current protocols http://www.labome.com/method/Protein-
in microbiology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp Quantitation.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2015
A.3.A.1–A.3.A.14 9. Olson BJSC, Markwell J (2007) Assays for
3. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive determination of protein concentration. In:
method for the quantitation of microgram quan- Coligan JE, Dunn BE, Speicher DW, Wingfield
tities of protein utilizing the principle of protein- PT, Ploegh HL (eds) Current protocols in pro-
dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 tein science. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ,
4. Baines D (2001) Analysis of purity. In: Roe S pp 3.4.1–3.4.29
(ed) Protein purification techniques: practical 10. Okutucu B, Dınçer A, Habib O, Zihnioglu F
approach, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, (2007) Comparison of five methods for deter-
Oxford, pp 27–46 mination of total plasma protein concentra-
5. Noble JE, Bailey MJA (2009) Quantitation of tion. J Biochem Biophys Methods
protein. In: Burgess RR, Deutscher MP (eds) 70(5):709–711
Methods in enzymology. Guide to protein 11. Shen N et al (2015) Highly selective method
purification, vol 463, 2nd edn. Academic, for rapeseed protein content determination.
New York, pp 73–95 J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc 2:107–111
6. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall 12. Davies C (2005) Introduction to immunoassay
RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin principles. In: Wild D (ed) The immunoassay
phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275 handbook, 3rd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 3–40
Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity 255
13. Walsh G (2002) Protein purification and charac- 26. Niemeyer CM, Adler M, Wacker R (2007)
terization. In: Proteins: biochemistry and bio- Detecting antigens by quantitative immune-
technology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 89–178 PCR. Nat Protoc 2:1918–1930
14. Anicetti VR, Keytand BA, Hancock WS (1989) 27. Lind K, Kubista M (2005) Development
Purity analysis of protein pharmaceuticals pro- and evaluation of three real-time immuno-
duced by recombinant DNA technology. PCR assemblages for quantification of PSA. J
Trends Biotechnol 7(12):342–349 Immunol Methods 304:107–116
15. Ernst O, Zor T (2010) Linearization of the 28. Wang X, He Q, Xu Y, Liu X, Shu M, Tu Z,
Bradford protein assay. J Vis Exp 38:1918. Li Y, Wang W, Cao D (2016) Anti-idiotypic
doi:10.3791/1918 VHH phage display-mediated immuno-PCR
16. López JM, Imperial S, Valderrama R, Navarro for ultrasensitive determination of mycotoxin
S (1993) An improved Bradford protein zearalenone in cereals. Talanta 147:410–415.
assay for collagen proteins. Clin Chim Acta doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.072
220(1):91–100 29. Hansen MC, Nederby L, Henriksen MO-B,
17. Kruger NJ (2009) The Bradford method for Hansen M, Nyvold CG (2014) Sensitive
protein quantitation. In: Walker JM (ed) The ligand-based protein quantification using
protein protocols handbook, 3rd edn. Humana immuno-PCR: a critical review of single-probe
Press, New York, pp 17–24 and proximity ligation assays. Biotechniques
18. Lin AV (2015) Indirect ELISA. Methods 56(5):217–228
Mol Biol 1318:51–59. doi:10.1007/ 30. Meng XY, Li YS, Zhou Y, Zhang YY, Qiao B,
978-1-4939-2742-5_5 Sun Y, Yang L, Hu P, Lu SY, Ren HL, Zhang JH,
19. Schwab M (2012) Sandwich ELISA. In: Wang XR, Liu ZS (2015) Real-time immuno-
Schwab M (ed) Encyclopedia of can- PCR for ultrasensitive detection of pyrene and
cer. Springer, Berlin, pp 3334–3334. other homologous PAHs. Biosens Bioelectron
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16483-5_5155 70:42–47. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.03.019
20. Lin AV (2015) Direct ELISA. Methods Mol 31. Sun R, Zhuang H (2015) An ultrasensitive gold
Biol 1318:61–67. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939- nanoparticles improved real-time immuno-
2742-5_5 PCR assay for detecting diethyl phthalate in
foodstuff samples. Anal Biochem 480:49–57.
21. Meyer T (2010) Competitive ELISA. In: doi:10.1016/j.ab.2015.04.010
Kontermann R, Dübel S (eds) Antibody
engineering, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, 32. Meng XY, Li YS, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Qiao B, Si CC,
pp 739–742 Hu P, Lu SY, Ren HL, Liu ZS, Qiu HJ, Liu
JQ (2016) An improved RT-IPCR for detec-
22. Rabilloud T (2010) Variations on a theme: tion of pyrene and related polycyclic aromatic
changes to electrophoretic separations that can hydrocarbons. Biosens Bioelectron 78:194–
make a difference. J Proteomics 73(8):1562– 199. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.037
1572. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.04.001
33. Ku H-K, Lim HM, Oh KH, Yang HJ, Jeong
23. Dyballa N, Metzger S (2012) Fast and sensi- JS, Kim SK (2013) Interpretation of protein
tive coomassie staining in quantitative pro- quantitation using the Bradford assay: com-
teomics. Methods Mol Biol 893:47–59. parison with two calculation models. Anal
doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-885-6_4 Biochem 434(1):178–180. doi:10.1016/j.
24. Zellner M, Babeluk R, Diestinger M, ab.2012.10.045
Pirchegger P, Skeledzic S, Oehler R (2008) 34. Akins RE, Tuan RS (2009) Ultrafast protein
Fluorescence-based Western blotting for determinations using microwave enhancement.
quantitation of protein biomarkers in clini- In: Walker JM (ed) The protein protocols
cal samples. Electrophoresis 17:3621–3627. handbook, 3rd edn. Humana Press, New York,
doi:10.1002/elps.200700935 pp 25–34
25. Sano T, Smith CL, Cantor CR (1992) 35. Walker JM (2009) SDS polyacrylamide gel
Immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detec- electrophoresis of proteins. In: Walker JM (ed)
tion by means of specific antibody-DNA con- The protein protocols handbook, 3rd edn.
jugates. Science 258:120–122 Humana Press, New York, pp 177–185