Scribd
Upload
1K views4 pages

Contextualized Quarterly Performance Evaluation of Teachers S.Y. 2020-2021

This document contains a quarterly performance evaluation of a teacher. It evaluates the teacher on three criteria: (1) complete submission of learning documents and grading sheets, (2) quality and format of learning activity sheets and formative assessment, and (3) quality and format of summative assessments. Each criterion contains several sub-criteria that are scored from 1 to 4, with an average calculated for each main criterion and an overall general average. General observations about the teacher's performance are also included for discussion between the teacher and school head.

Uploaded by

WILLY C. DUMPIT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views4 pages

Contextualized Quarterly Performance Evaluation of Teachers S.Y. 2020-2021

This document contains a quarterly performance evaluation of a teacher. It evaluates the teacher on three criteria: (1) complete submission of learning documents and grading sheets, (2) quality and format of learning activity sheets and formative assessment, and (3) quality and format of summative assessments. Each criterion contains several sub-criteria that are scored from 1 to 4, with an average calculated for each main criterion and an overall general average. General observations about the teacher's performance are also included for discussion between the teacher and school head.

Uploaded by

WILLY C. DUMPIT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CONTEXTUALIZED QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TEACHERS

S.Y. 2020-2021

Name of Teacher
Grade Level / Subject
Quarter
Date
Observed by / Signature

Directions: Check the score of the teacher based on the observations you had.

1 – Needs improvement 2 – Satisfactory


3 – Very satisfactory 4 – Outstanding

A. Complete Submission of Learning


Documents, Monitoring & Grading Sheets 1 2 3 4 Remarks
(40%)
1. Weekly Learning Action Plan (WLAP)
2. Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP)
3. Learning Tasks (LT)
4. Student Weekly Monitoring Template (SWMT)
5. Individual Learning Monitoring Template (ILMP)
6. Supplementary Materials (SM)
7. Learning Activity Sheets (LAS)
8. Feedback Forms
9. Summative Test Documents (Test Plan, TOS,
Questionnaire, Item Analysis, MPS, LLCs, RRE)
10. Grading Sheets

Average:

B. Quality Assured LAS, Conduct of


Remediation & Follow Up (Formative
1 2 3 4 Remarks
Assessment)
(30%)
1. The LAS was quality assured by School Head,
Asst. SH, and Master Teachers
2. The objectives were written in KSA format.
3. The activities were in congruent to objectives.
4. Its objectives and activities are consistent to
meet the weekly MELC (Most Essential Learning
Competency)
5. It is contextualized based on diverse needs of
the learners & key concepts of the subject are
simplified and could be understood by the
diverse learners
6. The performance task was authentic with rubric.
7. Scores are recorded for formative assessment
purposes, analyzed and given feedback
8. Supplemental activity is given to those learners
who manifest difficulties based on the formative
assessment records/analysis prior to the
summative assessment
9. Communication lines of teacher are open for
clarification and follow up
10. Qualitative data are available through
anecdotal records

Average:

C. Quality Assured Long Test (Summative


Assessment) 1 2 3 4 Remarks
(30%)
1. The Summative Test was quality assured by
School Head, Asst. SH, and Master Teachers
2. Summative assessment was conducted based on the
MELC of the quarter (Written outputs and
Performance tasks)

3. Test Plan and Table of Specifications were


prepared consistent to the MELCs
4. Item Analysis was conducted
5. Least Learned Competencies (LLCs) were
identified based on quarterly MELCs.
6. Remediation was given

Average:
INDICATORS Average
A. Complete Submission of Learning Documents, Monitoring &
Grading Sheets

B. Quality Assured LAS, Conduct of Remediation & Follow Up


(Formative Assessment)

C. Quality Assured Long Test (Summative Assessment)

General Average:
D. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:

These are the observations using STAR written for post-conference purposes. The
observations are based on the different parts of the teachers’ tasks and activities. These
will be used for collegial discussion and non-prescriptive agreement among the School
Head and the teacher.

You might also like