0% found this document useful (0 votes)
552 views9 pages

Unit 13 Strategy Formulation and Strategic Choice

This document provides an overview of strategy formulation and strategic choice. It discusses evaluating current performance, reviewing corporate governance, scanning the internal and external environments, analyzing strategic factors, and generating and evaluating strategic options. It also describes criteria for evaluating strategic alternatives, including suitability, acceptability, feasibility, and portfolio analysis techniques like the BCG matrix. The BCG matrix analyzes business units based on their market growth rate and relative market share to categorize them as stars, cash cows, dogs, or question marks.

Uploaded by

Pradip Hamal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
552 views9 pages

Unit 13 Strategy Formulation and Strategic Choice

This document provides an overview of strategy formulation and strategic choice. It discusses evaluating current performance, reviewing corporate governance, scanning the internal and external environments, analyzing strategic factors, and generating and evaluating strategic options. It also describes criteria for evaluating strategic alternatives, including suitability, acceptability, feasibility, and portfolio analysis techniques like the BCG matrix. The BCG matrix analyzes business units based on their market growth rate and relative market share to categorize them as stars, cash cows, dogs, or question marks.

Uploaded by

Pradip Hamal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.

info

Unit 13 Strategy Formulation and Strategic Choice


Strategy formulation is the process of choosing the best possible strategy out of
several other strategic options.
“Strategy formulation is designed to guide executives in defining the business their
company is in‚ the aims it seeks‚ and the means it will use to accomplish these
aim….. Strategy formation combines a future-oriented perspective with concern
for a firm’s internal and external environment in developing its competitive plan of
the action.” (Pearce and Robinson)
Process of Strategy formulation
Following steps are involved in strategy formulation process:
a. Evaluate current performance result: In the process of strategy
formulation it is essential to evaluate the concerned firm’s current
performance in terms of profit and loss situation and return on investment. It
is also required to appraise the current mission, objectives, strategies and
policies adopted by the firm.
b. Review corporate governance: This includes appraisal of performance of
the BODs, CEOs and other top level managers. It is also essential to
examine the organizational vision, mission, objectives culture and
management practices as successful drives for governing the corporation.
c. Scan and assesses the internal corporate environment: It is also essential
to assesses organizational competencies, skills, abilities and resources in
order to cope with external changes. These are the determining factors to
enhance organizational strength and minimize weaknesses and to fit a firm
with the external challenges and opportunities.
d. Scan and assesses the external environment: This is related with the
examination of external factors that are posing threats as well as
opportunities. The firm’s market shares and growth depend largely on
external opportunities and threats.
e. Analyze strategic factors: Strategic factors are external and internal
elements determining the future of a firm. At this stage of strategy
formulation process, it is essential to pin point the problematic areas and
issues relating to getting competitive advantages. Problems and issues are
analyzed in the SWOT form. The SWOT variables are important for the
effective implementation of the strategy.
f. Generate, evaluate, and select the basic strategic options: This is relative
to the identification of the strategic options upon which a new strategy may

1
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

be build. At this stage, one or more of the strategic option is selected for
implementation.
Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives
The criteria used for evaluation of strategic alternatives are:
1. Suitability-: It is concerned with environmental fit of the strategic
alternative. It also provides the rationale to a strategy. It indicate whether the
strategic alternative make sense in relation to environmental circumstances.
It is also a basic of qualitative assessment concerned with testing out the
rational of strategy and is useful for screening options. The assessment of
suitability consists of two stages.
• Establishing the rational: Various tools and techniques are used to
establish the rational which describes the ideas whether they are good
or not some of these tools are lifecycle portfolio matrix, positioning,
value chain analysis and portfolio analysis.
• Screening Options: Suitability of a specific strategic option is relative
to other available options. The methods used for understanding
suitability are ranking, decision tree and scenarios.
2. Acceptability-: It is concerned with the expected performance outcomes of
a strategic alternative. It is strongly related to people expectations and
therefore the issues of require careful analysis. The criteria for acceptability
of strategic alternative are
i. Return-: Expected return from specific strategic options is assessed.
The various approaches to analyze return are
• Profitability analysis: It assesses financial return to investment. The
tools used for this analysis are return on capital employed, payback
period, and discounted cash flow.
• Cost benefit analysis: It assesses the overall economic impact of
strategic options. This analysis attempts to put a money value of all
the costs and benefits of strategic options.
• Shareholder value analysis: It assesses the impact of strategic options
in generating shareholders value. The shareholder value is the total
shareholder return.
ii. Risks; It involves probably estimate about robustness of strategic
options. The level of risk is important for acceptability of strategic
options. New product development carries high level of risks. The
approaches for analyzing risks are.
• Financial ratio projection,
• Sensitivity analysis
• Simulation modeling

2
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

• Decision matrices:
iii. Stakeholder expectation: It provides political dimensions to the
organizations acceptability of a strategic alternative. The approaches of
stakeholder are
• Stakeholder mapping
• Game theory.
3. Feasibility: It is concerned with availability of resources and competencies
to deliver strategic alternatives. It determines an option implement ability
and work ability in practice. It assesses the organizations capability to make
the strategic alternatives succeed. The approaches for available to
understand feasibility are
i. Funds flow analysis: It assesses financial feasibility. It forecasts the
funds required and the likely resources of funds for strategic
alternatives.
ii. Break even analysis: It studies costs volume profit relationships to
assess financial feasibility. This analysis identifies BEP when revenue
equal costs.
iii. Resource deployment analysis-2: It identifies need for resources and
competencies for specific strategic alternatives. It is used to judge
• Sufficiency of current resources and competencies to pursue
strategic options.
• Need for unique resources and competencies to sustain strategic
advantages.
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio is defined as the range of investment held by the organization.
Portfolio analysis is a systematic way to analyze the products and services that
make up an organization’s business portfolio.
In other words, portfolio analysis is a method of categorizing a firm’s products
according to their relative competitive position and business growth rate in order to
lay the foundation for sound strategic planning.
Portfolio analysis method is a technique of strategy examination at the corporate
level.
Following are the techniques for portfolio analysis:
1. Boston Consulting Group(BCG) Matrix
2. General Electric Matrix (GE nine cell matrix)

3
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

3. Hofer’s Matrix (Product life cycle )


a. Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix: It is developed by Boston
Consulting Group. It uses relationship between market share and market
growth to balance the portfolio.

Market growth rate: The projected rate of sales growth for the market being
served by a particular business.
Relative competitive strength: The market share of a business divided by the
market share of its largest competitors.
BCG matrix is divided into four cells which give the information of relative
competitive position of business (SBUs) for comparing the relative strength of
businesses in the firm’s portfolio in terms of position in respective market.
• Stars (High growth-High market share): Stars are businesses in rapidly
growing markets with large market shares. These businesses represent the
best long-run opportunities (growth and profitability) in the firm’s portfolio.
They acquire substantial investment to maintain (and expand) their
dominant position in a growing market.
• Cash cows (Low growth-High market share): They are businesses with a
high market share in low growth markets or industries. Because of their
strong competitive positions and their minimal reinvestment requirements,
these businesses often generate cash in excess of their needs.
• Dogs (Low growth-Low market share): Low market share and low
market growth businesses are the dogs in the firm’s portfolio. Facing
mature markets with intense competition and low profit margins, they are

4
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

managed for short-term cash flows (e.g. through ruthless cost cutting) to
supplement corporate level resource need.
• Question Marks: They are businesses whose high growth rate gives them
considerable appeal but whose low market share makes their profit potential
uncertain. They are cash guzzlers (consume excessively) because their rapid
growth results in high cash needs, while their small market share results in
low cash generation.
Strategic option for making portfolio
• Build: Allocate more resources to Star and Question Marks to gain and
sustain market share.
• Hold: Allocate present level resources to Cash Cows to defend market
share
• Harvest: Allocate less resource to weak cash-cows. Eventually
withdraw them from the market.
• Divest: Do not allocate resources to Dogs. Liquidate them.
Limitation of BCG Matrix:
The BCG Matrix produces a framework for allocating resources among different
business units and makes it possible to compare many business units at a glance.
But BCG Matrix is not free from limitations, such as-
• BCG matrix classifies businesses as low and high, but generally businesses
can be medium also. Thus, the true nature of business may not be reflected.
• Market is not clearly defined in this model.
• High market share does not always leads to high profits. There are high costs
also involved with high market share.
• Growth rate and relative market share are not the only indicators of
profitability. This model ignores and overlooks other indicators of
profitability.
• At times, dogs may help other businesses in gaining competitive advantage.
They can earn even more than cash cows sometimes.
• This four-celled approach is considered as to be too simplistic.

b. General Electric (GE) Nine Cell Matrix: Developed by McKinsey


&Company at General Electric, the GE matrix shows a 9-cell business screen
useful to make a strategic choice on the basis of industry attractiveness and
competitiveness.

5
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

• Industry Attractiveness (Long-term market attractiveness): It refers to the


subjective assessment based on the broadest possible range of external
opportunities and threats beyond the strict control of management. The
high/medium/low portfolio shows how attractive the industry is to invest or
divest or in between that depends on the log-term attractiveness.
• Competitive or business position: It refers to the subjective assessment of
how strong a competitive advantage created by a broad range of the firm’s
internal strengths and weakness is. Strong/Average/Weak determine the
competitiveness or business position of a firm.
i. Business in high priority cells is suggested to invest more.
ii. Business in medium priority cells is suggested to invest selectively.
iii. Business in low priority cells is suggested to divest and close down.
Advantages of GE Nine Cell Matrix:
i.It used 9 cells instead of 4 cells of BCG
ii. It considers many variables and does not lead to simplistic conclusions

6
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

iii. High/medium/low and strong/average/low classification enables a finer


distinction among business portfolio
iv. It uses multiple factors to assess industry attractiveness and business
strength, which allow users to select criteria appropriate to their situation
Limitation of GE matrix:
i.It can get quite complicated and cumbersome with the increase in businesses
ii.Though industry attractiveness and business strength appear to be objective,
they are in reality subjective judgments that may vary from one person to
another
iii.It cannot effectively depict the position of new business units in developing
industry
iv. It only provides broad strategic prescriptions rather than specifics of
business policy.

c. Hofer’s Product-Market Evolution Matrix: Developed by Hofer, a 15-cell


matrix is used to study interactions between the competitive position and
stages of product/market evolution. The circle in the figure represents the size
of the industry. The competitive positions are described in terms of strong,
average and weak and stages of product/market evolution are explained in
terms of development, growth, shake-out, maturity, saturation and decline.

7
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

• Strategic business unit”A” seems to be a potential”Star”. It holds a large


market share; it is in the stage of life cycle development and has a strong
competitive position on the market. As such, unit”A” represents a potential
candidate in the competition for corporate resource competition.
• Unit”B” is very similar to unit”A”. Nevertheless, investments in unit”B”
must take into account the fact that although it has a strong market position,
its market share is quite small. Consequently, the cause for which market
share has such a small value must be identified. Furthermore, a strategy that
may contribute to the increase of market share must be developed, thus
accounting for the future necessary investment.
• Unit”C” has a small market share, its salient feature resides in the fact that
it holds a competitively weak position and it entered a small market whose
development is underway. A strategy that may increase the market share
and develop the competitive position must be elaborated so that the future
investments are accounted for. For the unit”C” a strategy residing in the
elimination from the market must be applied, so that the investment for the
first two units may be favourised.
• Unit”D” is characterized by a strong competitive position on the market and
it holds a large market share. In this case, it is recommended that
investments be made with a view to maintaining the current position on the
market. On the long run, it will become a “Cash Cow”. Unit”E” together
with unit”F” are included into the “Cash Cow” category and they should be
capitalized on because of great cash flows that they generate.
• Unit”G” is included into the “Dogs” category and the management thereof
is recommended, with a view to generating short-term cash flows in as
much as it is possible. Nevertheless, on the long term the strategy of
limitation or liquidation on the market must be selected.
Advantages of Hofer matrix:
i. Used to identify developing winners.
ii. Illustrates how businesses are distributed across the stages of industry
evolution. This helps to predict how the portfolio will develop in the
future.
iii. Market life-cycle represents one of the main factors that contribute to the
adoption of strategic decisions at the level of the SBU.

8
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info

Limitation of Hofer matrix:


• This model does not focus on all the relevant factors that influence the level
of attractiveness on the market.
• Product life cycle is not same to all types of products.

You might also like