Unit 13 Strategy Formulation and Strategic Choice
Unit 13 Strategy Formulation and Strategic Choice
info
1
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
be build. At this stage, one or more of the strategic option is selected for
implementation.
Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives
The criteria used for evaluation of strategic alternatives are:
1. Suitability-: It is concerned with environmental fit of the strategic
alternative. It also provides the rationale to a strategy. It indicate whether the
strategic alternative make sense in relation to environmental circumstances.
It is also a basic of qualitative assessment concerned with testing out the
rational of strategy and is useful for screening options. The assessment of
suitability consists of two stages.
• Establishing the rational: Various tools and techniques are used to
establish the rational which describes the ideas whether they are good
or not some of these tools are lifecycle portfolio matrix, positioning,
value chain analysis and portfolio analysis.
• Screening Options: Suitability of a specific strategic option is relative
to other available options. The methods used for understanding
suitability are ranking, decision tree and scenarios.
2. Acceptability-: It is concerned with the expected performance outcomes of
a strategic alternative. It is strongly related to people expectations and
therefore the issues of require careful analysis. The criteria for acceptability
of strategic alternative are
i. Return-: Expected return from specific strategic options is assessed.
The various approaches to analyze return are
• Profitability analysis: It assesses financial return to investment. The
tools used for this analysis are return on capital employed, payback
period, and discounted cash flow.
• Cost benefit analysis: It assesses the overall economic impact of
strategic options. This analysis attempts to put a money value of all
the costs and benefits of strategic options.
• Shareholder value analysis: It assesses the impact of strategic options
in generating shareholders value. The shareholder value is the total
shareholder return.
ii. Risks; It involves probably estimate about robustness of strategic
options. The level of risk is important for acceptability of strategic
options. New product development carries high level of risks. The
approaches for analyzing risks are.
• Financial ratio projection,
• Sensitivity analysis
• Simulation modeling
2
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
• Decision matrices:
iii. Stakeholder expectation: It provides political dimensions to the
organizations acceptability of a strategic alternative. The approaches of
stakeholder are
• Stakeholder mapping
• Game theory.
3. Feasibility: It is concerned with availability of resources and competencies
to deliver strategic alternatives. It determines an option implement ability
and work ability in practice. It assesses the organizations capability to make
the strategic alternatives succeed. The approaches for available to
understand feasibility are
i. Funds flow analysis: It assesses financial feasibility. It forecasts the
funds required and the likely resources of funds for strategic
alternatives.
ii. Break even analysis: It studies costs volume profit relationships to
assess financial feasibility. This analysis identifies BEP when revenue
equal costs.
iii. Resource deployment analysis-2: It identifies need for resources and
competencies for specific strategic alternatives. It is used to judge
• Sufficiency of current resources and competencies to pursue
strategic options.
• Need for unique resources and competencies to sustain strategic
advantages.
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio is defined as the range of investment held by the organization.
Portfolio analysis is a systematic way to analyze the products and services that
make up an organization’s business portfolio.
In other words, portfolio analysis is a method of categorizing a firm’s products
according to their relative competitive position and business growth rate in order to
lay the foundation for sound strategic planning.
Portfolio analysis method is a technique of strategy examination at the corporate
level.
Following are the techniques for portfolio analysis:
1. Boston Consulting Group(BCG) Matrix
2. General Electric Matrix (GE nine cell matrix)
3
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
Market growth rate: The projected rate of sales growth for the market being
served by a particular business.
Relative competitive strength: The market share of a business divided by the
market share of its largest competitors.
BCG matrix is divided into four cells which give the information of relative
competitive position of business (SBUs) for comparing the relative strength of
businesses in the firm’s portfolio in terms of position in respective market.
• Stars (High growth-High market share): Stars are businesses in rapidly
growing markets with large market shares. These businesses represent the
best long-run opportunities (growth and profitability) in the firm’s portfolio.
They acquire substantial investment to maintain (and expand) their
dominant position in a growing market.
• Cash cows (Low growth-High market share): They are businesses with a
high market share in low growth markets or industries. Because of their
strong competitive positions and their minimal reinvestment requirements,
these businesses often generate cash in excess of their needs.
• Dogs (Low growth-Low market share): Low market share and low
market growth businesses are the dogs in the firm’s portfolio. Facing
mature markets with intense competition and low profit margins, they are
4
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
managed for short-term cash flows (e.g. through ruthless cost cutting) to
supplement corporate level resource need.
• Question Marks: They are businesses whose high growth rate gives them
considerable appeal but whose low market share makes their profit potential
uncertain. They are cash guzzlers (consume excessively) because their rapid
growth results in high cash needs, while their small market share results in
low cash generation.
Strategic option for making portfolio
• Build: Allocate more resources to Star and Question Marks to gain and
sustain market share.
• Hold: Allocate present level resources to Cash Cows to defend market
share
• Harvest: Allocate less resource to weak cash-cows. Eventually
withdraw them from the market.
• Divest: Do not allocate resources to Dogs. Liquidate them.
Limitation of BCG Matrix:
The BCG Matrix produces a framework for allocating resources among different
business units and makes it possible to compare many business units at a glance.
But BCG Matrix is not free from limitations, such as-
• BCG matrix classifies businesses as low and high, but generally businesses
can be medium also. Thus, the true nature of business may not be reflected.
• Market is not clearly defined in this model.
• High market share does not always leads to high profits. There are high costs
also involved with high market share.
• Growth rate and relative market share are not the only indicators of
profitability. This model ignores and overlooks other indicators of
profitability.
• At times, dogs may help other businesses in gaining competitive advantage.
They can earn even more than cash cows sometimes.
• This four-celled approach is considered as to be too simplistic.
5
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
6
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
7
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info
8
Business Environment and Strategy Management Complete Notes | www.edunepal.info