Scribd
Upload
95 views2 pages

Durban Apartments Corporation v. Pioneer Insurance

The Supreme Court ruled that Durban Apartments Corporation was solely liable for the loss of Jeffrey See's vehicle based on the following: 1) See checked into the City Garden Hotel and entrusted his vehicle keys to the parking attendant, Justim baste, to park his vehicle. 2) In the early morning, See was notified that his vehicle was stolen while parked in the Equitable PCI Bank parking area, which was an annex of the hotel. 3) Under Articles 1962 and 1998 of the Civil Code, the contract of necessary deposit was formed between See and the hotel when See delivered his vehicle keys to the parking attendant, making the hotel responsible for its safekeeping.

Uploaded by

Ansai Claudine Calugan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
95 views2 pages

Durban Apartments Corporation v. Pioneer Insurance

The Supreme Court ruled that Durban Apartments Corporation was solely liable for the loss of Jeffrey See's vehicle based on the following: 1) See checked into the City Garden Hotel and entrusted his vehicle keys to the parking attendant, Justim baste, to park his vehicle. 2) In the early morning, See was notified that his vehicle was stolen while parked in the Equitable PCI Bank parking area, which was an annex of the hotel. 3) Under Articles 1962 and 1998 of the Civil Code, the contract of necessary deposit was formed between See and the hotel when See delivered his vehicle keys to the parking attendant, making the hotel responsible for its safekeeping.

Uploaded by

Ansai Claudine Calugan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

DURBAN APARTMENTS CORPORATION v.

PIONEER INSURANCE
GR No. 179419, 2011-01-12
NACHURA, J.:

Facts: Durban Apartments Corporation solely liable to respondent Pioneer


Insurance and Surety Corporation for the loss of Jeffrey See's vehicle. On April
30, 2002, See arrived and checked in at the City Garden Hotel in Makati corner
Kalayaan Avenues, Makati City before midnight, and its parking attendant,
defendant Justim baste got the key to said Vitara from See to park it.  On May
1, 2002, at about 1:00 o'clock in the morning, See was awakened in his room
by a telephone call from the Hotel Chief Security Officer who informed him that
his Vitara was carnapped while it was parked unattended at the parking area
of Equitable PCI Bank along Makati Avenue between the hours of 12:00 a.m.
and 1:00 [a.m.]; Vitara was lost due to the negligence of [petitioner] Durban
Apartments and [defendant] Justim baste because it was discovered during the
investigation that this was the second time that a similar incident of
carnapping happened in the valet parking service of [petitioner] Durban
Apartments and no necessary precautions were taken to prevent its
repetition;... upon arrival at the City Garden Hotel, See gave notice to the
doorman and parking attendant of the said hotel, Justimbaste, about his
Vitara when he entrusted its ignition key to the latter. Justimbaste issued a
valet... parking customer claim stub to See, parked the Vitara at the Equitable
PCI Bank parking area, and placed the ignition key inside a safety key box
while See proceeded to the hotel lobby to check in. The Equitable PCI Bank
parking area became an annex of City Garden Hotel when the... management
of the said bank allowed the parking of the vehicles of hotel guests thereat in
the evening after banking hours.

Article 1962, in relation to Article 1998, of the Civil Code defines a contract of
deposit and a necessary deposit made by persons in hotels or inns:
Art. 1962. A deposit is constituted from the moment a person receives a thing
belonging to another, with the obligation of safely keeping it and returning the
same. If the safekeeping of the thing delivered is not the principal purpose of
the contract, there is no deposit but some other contract.
Art. 1998. The deposit of effects made by travelers in hotels or inns shall also
be regarded as necessary. The keepers of hotels or inns shall be responsible for
them as depositaries, provided that notice was given to them, or to their
employees, of the effects brought by the... guests and that, on the part of the
latter, they take the precautions which said hotel-keepers or their substitutes
advised relative to the care and vigilance of their effects.

Issue: Ultimately, whether petitioner is liable to respondent for the loss of See's
vehicle.

Ruling: Yes. Article 1962, in relation to Article 1998, of the Civil Code defines a
contract of deposit and a necessary deposit made by persons in hotels or inns:
Plainly, from the facts found by the lower courts, the insured See deposited his
vehicle for safekeeping with petitioner, through the latter's employee,
Justimbaste. In turn, Justimbaste issued a claim stub to See. Thus, the
contract of deposit was perfected from See's delivery,... when he handed over to
Justimbaste the keys to his vehicle, which Justimbaste received with the
obligation of safely keeping and returning it. Ultimately, petitioner is liable for
the loss of See's vehicle.

You might also like