0% found this document useful (0 votes)

45 views

Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods of Pumps - EEP

This document compares four common methods for controlling pump flow rate: throttling, bypassing, on-off control, and variable speed drive (VSD) control. It provides illustrations and explanations of each method. Throttling and bypassing are less efficient than on-off or VSD control. VSD control allows the pump duty point to follow the optimal system curve, precisely matching flow rate to demand. As a result, VSD control is shown to have the lowest estimated power consumption of the four methods at 45% of maximum for the example given. The energy savings with VSD control over other methods can be significant.

Uploaded by

navigaree

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

45 views

Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods of Pumps - EEP

Uploaded by

navigaree

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 5

27/3/2016 Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps | EEP

electricalengineeringportal.com
http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps

Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps
Google+

Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps (photo credit: directindustry.com)

Pump as a part of the process //
When in use, the pumps are always part of a pumping system. A pumping system is usually a network of
pipes, tanks, valves and other system parts. The receiver is usually at a higher geographic level than the
supply of the system. These parts can be also on the same level, as in the case of a closed circuit heat
transfer system.

Pumping systems nearly always require a variation of flow rate.

Examples include the daily cycle in the consumption of drinking water, the varying process demand for a liquid
or seasonal heating demand. However, the variation required may be in the pump head, such as for cyclical
changes in process pressure, or pumping to tanks with a variable liquid level.

http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps 1/5
27/3/2016 Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps | EEP

Efficiency optimized pumping system schematic (credit: ietd.iipnetwork.org)

In spite of the variations, the pump capacity is selected according to the maximum flow and
head or even to the future needs, perhaps with a certain safety margin.

The average pumping capacity may be only a fraction of the maximum capacity and this will require some
kind of control.

Flow control methods //
There are several different methods to match the flow to the system requirements. The four most
common flow control methods of pumps are throttling, bypassing, onoff control and variable speed drive
(VSD) control. These are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – Illustrations of pump flow control methods. A – throttling, B – bypassing, C – onoff control and D – VSD control

The relative power consumption of the different control methods can be estimated from the area between the
x and yaxes and the operating point.

It is using the formula:

P = Q x H

In the following example (see Figure 2), the relative power consumption on an average flow rate of 70% is
http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps 2/5
27/3/2016 Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps | EEP

calculated with different control methods. More detailed explanations on power consumption and energy
savings relating to different pump applications are described in the following chapters.

Power consumption of 4 flow control methods //

Figure 2 – The power consumption of the four most common flow control methods for centrifugal pumps

Control Energy

Throttling 89

Bypassing 82

Onoff control 70

VSD control 45

Throttling

Throttle control is the most commonly used method. The flow caused by the constant speed pump is
reduced by increasing the losses in the system by closing the valve. In the example in Figure 2 the operating
point is moved from (Q = 10, H = 10) to (Q = 7, H = 12.7).

The relative power consumption can be calculated by:

P = 7 x 12.7 = 89

http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps 3/5
27/3/2016 Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps | EEP

Bypassing

Although not commonly used, bypassing is applied mainly to circulation pumps. The flow output to the system
is reduced by bypassing part of the pump discharge flow to the pump suction. This means that the total
flow increases (from 10 to 12.4), but the head decreases (from 10 to 6.6).

The relative power consumption is:

P = 12.4 x 6.6 = 82

Onoff control

Onoff control is often used where stepless control is not necessary, such as keeping the pressure in a
tank between preset limits. The pump is either running or stopped. The average flow is the relationship
between the “on” time and the “total” time (on+off).

The relative power consumption can be easily calculated by:

P = 0.7 x 100 = 70

VSD control

To understand the benefits of VSD control consider to the pump curves in Figure 2. With low static head
systems, the optimal efficiency of the pump follows the system curve. With VSD control, the duty point of the
pump follows the unchanged system curve.

Changing the speed of the pump moves the pump curves in accordance with the affinity laws. If the pump
impeller speed is reduced, the pump curve moves downwards. If the speed is increased, it moves upwards.
This means that the pumping capacity is exactly matched to the process requirements. According to our
earlier example both flow rate (from 10 to 7) and head (from 10 to 6.4) are reduced.

The relative power consumption can be calculated by: P = 7 x 6.4 = 45

This example shows that the variable speed control method is the most energy efficient for pumping
applications. The examples discussed were calculated for one flow rate only (70%), but the relative power
consumption with different control methods depends on the flow rate. This relationship is shown in Figure 3
(see below).

In these curves, the pump, motor and drive efficiencies are also taken into account and for that reason the
results differ somewhat to those in Figure 2.

http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps 4/5
27/3/2016 Comparison of 4 Different Flow Control Methods Of Pumps | EEP

Figure 3 – Power consumption with different pump control methods as a function of flow rate. The
percentage values of flow and power are related to the nominal values of the pump.

Throttling control leads to high loss in the pump and in the valve when the system is running at a reduced
flow rate. The loss in the motor remains relatively constant over the whole flow range. In VSD control, the
operating point follows the system curve, which is optimal for pump efficiency. In general, based on affinity
laws, the energy consumption drops dramatically when speed is reduced.

The energy savings with variable speed drive (VSD) control are significant.

Pumping up Energy and Water Savings with a VSD

Reference // Using variable speed drives (VSDs) in pump applications – ABB Drives (Download)

http://electricalengineeringportal.com/comparisonof4differentflowcontrolmethodsofpumps 5/5