Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 1
Recycling Plastic – a Toxic Impact to our Future
By Stephanie Pettee
04/11/2018
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 2
Introduction
Recycling plastic has zero positive impact on the environment. For example,
when placing your plastic water bottle, grocery bag, laundry detergent bottle into the
recycling bin, it is not recycled in the way we commonly think it is. It’s simply putting it
into a labeled bin where it gets trucked to the nearby processing center, sorted, possibly
baled, shipped or trucked to a reclamation plant which is most likely hundreds or
thousands of miles away. Afterwards, it’s reclaimed into either the same or different
plastic before being distributed around the world as a final product. On Maui, the County
reports about 40% of “recycled” consumer goods goes directly to the landfill as
unrecyclable (Botkin, 2018). As we follow the life cycle of recycled plastic, we must take
into account its environmental impact as well as the health, safety and compensation of
those involved in the recycling process, to comprehensively determine if it is classified as
sustainable or not. According to the Bruntland Report for the World Commission on
Environment and Development (1987), “Sustainable development is development that
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs.”
Some studies show that recycling plastic into second-life products requires less
energy and resources, diverts waste from the landfill and has many applications. Others
believe the lifecycle of recycling plastic is inefficient, energy intensive and unsafe.
Through further inspection of both sides, it is shown the total energy cost required to
reprocess plastic has negative environmental and health impacts.
Arguments for Plastic Recycling as Unsustainable
The Environmental Cost of Recycling
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 3
The current process of recycling plastic is energy intensive and environmentally
costly. Before the beginning of 2018, approximately 80% of the world’s recycled plastics
were being shipped in containers to China for reprocessing. For our plastics to have
another life, fossil fuels are used during each of the stages - collection, sorting,
reclamation, manufacturing and distribution. According to The International Council on
Clean Transportation, the shipping green house gas (GHG) emissions are increasing due
to the growing demand for shipping and the production of new ships (Olmer, 2017).
Container ships along with bulk carriers, and oil tankers compose 55% of the CO2
emissions of all class of ships (Olmer, 2017)). They burn the unrefined, heavy fuels,
which results in higher pollutant rates. In one year, the amount of sulfur oxide produced
by the 15 biggest ships exceeds the amount produced by all the cars in the world
(Toepfer, 2016). There are very few regulations on ocean transportation, and large ships
are speeding up, becoming less efficient, and polluting more (Olmer, 2017).
With the turn of the New Year, China heavily reduced its allowance of imported
plastics from 3.9 million tons to 9,335 tons. That is 0.24% of last year (Staub, 2016)!
Now that China is no longer an option for many countries, they are scrambling to find
buyers for their recycled plastics. Other countries are allowing imports, but at a much
smaller scale. Shipping plastics around the world to be reprocessed is harmful to marine
life and the atmosphere protecting our beautiful planet.
According to the Report on Postconsumer PET Container Recycling Activity, in
2016, Americans consumed 6,172 million pounds of plastic bottles, which are made of
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic, the most widely known member of plastic
resins. If you look at the bottom of a plastic water bottle you will see a number 1 in a
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 4
triangle. Because these plastics are clear, they are the easiest to reclaim and the biggest
moneymakers for recyclers. Out of this available amount for recycling, only 992 million
pounds (16%) from US grounds was produced into reusable product. Another 246 million
pounds reclaimed was imported from other countries. That totals to 21% of our annual
consumed plastic. Because the recycling rate in the US is so poor, they import plastic to
reprocess it into Recycled PET flakes (rPET) and then export it again across the world to
buyers to make products. Then, once again, these products are exported to multiple
countries. How much fuel is being used to transport recycled plastic around for its second
life? That is the question no one asks when placing plastic into the recycling bin!
In the US, alone, we only have 21 reclamation plants in operation with a total
capacity of 2,080 million pounds of plastic (T, 2015). If everyone recycled in America,
about two thirds of it would need to be shipped to other countries to be reclaimed. We
simply don’t have the waste-management infrastructure to meet our needs within our own
borders. The complete process of recycling plastic is inefficient and costly to the
environment.
Recycling Requires More Effort Than We Know
Recycling, especially in the US, is not sustainable because individuals aren’t
doing it right, or not doing it at all. Recycling is a conscious decision and requires more
effort than tossing everything into one trashcan. Not everyone cares enough to make that
effort, resulting in a large percentage of recyclables being sent to the landfill. To be fair,
recycling can be complex; the demand for it is consistently changing and recycling rules
are different from county to county. There are 7 different recycling codes on plastics that
determine the material it’s made of. To be even more confusing, that recycling code
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 5
doesn’t necessarily mean it’s recyclable. The 1’s and 2’s are worth the most and have the
best chance at multiple lifetimes of recycling, such as plastic water bottles, and the others
are less desirable but still reclaimable. These others, codes 3 through 7, are down cycled
to create products of lesser quality plastic, until they eventually see their death in a
landfill.
To make recycling easier on consumers, single stream bins were distributed for
people to combine all their recyclables together. This happened with very little education
about the do’s and don’ts. A huge problem with this has been plastics contaminated by
food, other plastics, or paper products getting mixed in with clean plastics rendering them
unrecyclable. A quarter of single stream recyclables get sent to the landfill (Beachler,
2018). Some plastics have mixed resins in them, but aren’t labeled as such, which also
contaminate other plastics. The proper separation of plastics is remarkably important. An
entire batch of 10,000 PET bottles can be spoiled by just one PVC bottle (U. & T., 2005).
It is a much more delicate system than we think.
This single stream system also puts more stress on the local processing plants
since the existing materials recovery facilities were not originally designed to efficiently
sort the diverse plastic packaging we use today. Technological advancements and market
price fluctuations of recycled goods and raw materials are consistently changing the items
that can and cannot be recycled. This makes for an extremely inefficient system resulting
in more trash in the landfills and oceans.
Of all the plastics waste ever created only 9% has been recycled (Parker, 2017).
The rest ends up in the landfills, incinerated, or worse, the ocean. The biggest landfill on
the planet is in the Pacific Ocean. 90% of the trash floating in the world’s oceans is
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 6
plastic and it’s mistaken for food killing many seabirds and marine life every year. Plastic
has been found in the stomachs of 44% of all seabird species, 22% of cetacean species
and in all sea turtle species (Weyler, 2017). Even China’s table salt has trace amounts of
micro plastics in it (Everts, 2015). Sadly, a quarter of the ocean plastic was “recycled”. If
recycling is a sustainable practice, why does 8-12 million tons of plastic pollute the ocean
every year (Weyler, 2017)?
Plastic is Toxic
The toxicity of plastics makes them difficult to recycle. All 7 types of recyclable
plastics are toxic and most of them are in low demand for recycled material, resulting in
low recyclable rates. The resins that are more difficult to recycle include codes 3 through
7. Some of the reasons that make them difficult include: not enough applications or
buyers for their use, low quality, they are mixed with other resins that are hard to
separate, they get contaminated by other plastics and the low price of oil can render
recycled plastic more expensive.
PVC plastic, labeled with a 3, happens to be the most toxic and hazardous of them
all, and it is the most commonly used plastic resin in the world. Most recycling centers
will not accept them. Its entire lifecycle, from cradle to grave, imposes health and
environmental pollution problems (M., 2014). It has a bad reputation for contaminating
the recycling stream, and is difficult to recycle and reprocess on an industrial scale. Even
if PVC is recycled into other products, the process does not remove any toxins. Those
who handle it before, during, and after its recycling stage are exposed to carcinogens as
well as endocrine disrupters (M., 2014). This creates a dangerous work environment for
those who work in sorting and reclamation facilities.
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 7
The plastics labeled 4 are called Low Density Polyethylene, which are the most
widely used family of plastics in the world. Some examples of these include bags for
grocery, garbage, newspapers, frozen food, and dry cleaning. They are generally safer for
food and drink applications, but have been shown to leach endocrine disrupters when
exposed to UV light (M., 2014). They are also difficult to recycle and have very few
options to be down cycled into.
The lack of buyers for low quality or mixed plastics makes them undesirable to
recycle, and not very cost effective. At times when oils prices decrease, companies are
not incentivized to use recycled plastic.
Recycling is Dangerous to People
The entire process of recycling plastics is dangerous to people. In Wen’an China,
where there used to exist lush green land with fruit trees, lie the ghostly remains of what
was once a lively zone of industrial size recycling plants. Wen’an was the heart of the
international scrap-plastic market. Adam Minter, a journalist, and Josh Goldstein, a
professor who speaks Chinese, decided to investigate the processing of these plastic
recycling facilities before they were shut down. What they discovered was an
overwhelming amount of plastic waste, dirty streets, unsafe work environments, and an
increase in blood pressure problems within the local population. They curiously toured
one factory claiming to have better conditions than the others. What they witnessed was
an unregulated environment with no safety equipment, no respirators, no hard hats, no
gloves or steel-toed boots. Some employees were wearing sandals. But a Rolex shines
from the wrist of the factory owner. The price of that one Rolex could afford to keep his
employees safe from inhaling toxic plastic fumes. On the outskirts of town where a
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 8
cemetery rests is where the businesses dump plastic cleaning fluid and unusable waste. If
you look closely you can see exposed human remains floating around the sea of
unregulated trash. The nearby towns are known to have increased rates and severities of
blood pressure problems. (Minter, 2013)
All plastics leach toxins that have a range of negative health effects
including but not limited to- endocrine disruption, asthma, neurological impairment,
altered immune function, increased risk to breast cancer, prostate cancer, infertility, skin
irritations, metabolic disorders and cardiovascular system damage (M,2014). The
employees that handle plastics in sorting facilities and reclamation plants all day are
exposed to the variety of toxic chemicals from plastics.
The downside to plastic recycling shows up in the toxicity of children’s toys.
Some plastics are made with flame-retardants and contaminate others when they are
disposed of together. Children’s toys are made from recycled plastics contaminated by
flame-retardants (I., 2017). This is the potential danger of single stream recycling.
Arguments For
Recycling Plastic Saves Greenhouse Gases
Recycling plastic is more environmentally friendly than creating new plastics.
Making a product from recycled resin requires less energy and emits less greenhouse
gases than the production of virgin resin. If you account for the entire lifecycle of the
production of recycled plastic, you see the energy required in the main areas: energy of
material resource, transportation energy, and process energy. The main reasons recycling
plastic is more sustainable are: it replaces virgin resin, which requires oil extraction, and
it diverts waste from the landfill. According to the Lifecycle Inventory Results for
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 9
Production of Postconsumer PET and HDPE Resin, the amount of total energy to produce
virgin resin is 31.9MJ per 1000lbs of resin versus 18.4MJ for recycled PET flake and
19.7MJ for recycled HDPE pellets. The total pounds of CO2 emissions from the
production of 1000lbs of virgin resin are 2,746. Recycled PET emissions equal 36% less
(Kuczenski, 2011).
In 2012, recycling diverted 2.8 million tons of plastics from the landfills. That
amount of plastics diverted from the landfill was equivalent to taking 640,000 cars off the
road for the year, saving our environment from greenhouse gas emissions (US, EPA,
2015). According to the US EPA, the energy savings of each one-ton of recycled PET,
HDPE and mixed plastics equals approximately 21 million barrels of oil. Diversion from
landfill of these recycled plastics also resulted in 70-80% reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions.
The potential of recycled plastic products is high, but most products are only
made with 2 of the 7 types of resins. This leaves much of our plastic waste without a
demand or application for its reuse. Even though recycling plastic results in less energy
consumption and less greenhouse gas emission, the cost of recycled resin sometimes
cannot compete against the low cost of crude oil. The market price of recycled plastic
goes up and down in relation to crude oil prices. Another encumbrance of recycled plastic
is how much solid waste is created during its reclamation process. The solid waste per
1000lbs of recycled resin is more than double that of virgin resin. This is mostly because
some of the recycled plastic co-collected is contaminated, unusable and sent to the
landfills. Even water bottles made from recycled resin require packaging made from
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 10
virgin resin to be distributed to stores, thus not properly representing the 100% recyclable
label.
Recycled Plastic Has Many Applications
Recycled plastic can be made into numerous functions and durable products that
replace limited natural resources, and last longer. One new exciting example is plastic
roads to replace conventional asphalt. Recycled plastic pellets replace most of the
material that’s extracted from oil, and are mixed with the usual rocks to create cheaper
and longer lasting plastic asphalt roads. MacRebar is a company that has already laid
down polymer-modified asphalt made form 100% recycled plastic. Because this kind of
asphalt has a longer lifespan, it reduces maintenance cost, fossil fuel usage, and
ultimately a reduction in carbon footprint (n,d., 2018).
An associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Texas at
Arlington, Dr. Sahadat Hossain, engineered a way to utilize recycled plastic water bottles
to repair roads for the cost of $200K compared to million of dollars. His solution was in
the form of 10-foot long pins made of recycled plastic that were drilled into sections of
roadway slope to prevent them from significant movement due to contractions and
swellings from weather changes (D., n.d.).
Global demand for plastic lumber has been on the rise due to its advantages over
traditional treated lumber. The US Army Corps of Engineers did a study on the plastic
composite lumber and concluded it is durable, stable, resilient, and resistant to termites,
rot, and mildew without chemical pressure treatment (Cirko, 2018). Unlike most recycled
plastic products, this composite lumber uses four different kinds of resin: LDPE, HDPE,
PS, and PVC, giving the more difficult to recycle resins another life. This type of lumber
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 11
is compatible with traditional carpentry tools and has both inside and outdoor
applications. By recycling plastic into lumber and building as much as possible, we can
greatly decrease our need for deforestation and the plethora of negative environmental
impacts as a result.
However, even though manufacturing plastic lumber is a great way to recycle our
waste, it does not come without negative impact. PE’s and PVC’s emit harmful volatile
organic compounds during its manufacturing and remanufacturing stages. Plastic asphalt
roads are made from recycled plastic pellets, which are manufactured with only the
cleanest of resins. They neglect the plastics that need more demand for a second life.
Conclusion
The contribution of recycled plastic to current plastic consumption is small
compared to the potential, due to the limitations on recycling the variety of resins.
Recycling plastic has become a way to divert waste from landfills, but it has not shown to
be environmentally friendly nor economically efficient. If we reached our full potential
and recycled every plastic we consume, we wouldn’t have the infrastructure to meet those
needs. Building more reclamation centers to meet needs at a regional level could be a
solution, but they are costly, require land, result in air pollution, and require electricity. It
would lessen the miles it takes a bottle to travel, therefore less fuel burned in the
transportation phase, but will the plants use just as much fuel for electricity? These are
the trade-offs we make when trying to improve the system. Ultimately plastic is bad for
the environment whether it’s new resin or recycled resin. The process of recycling plastic
still requires new plastic packaging, which is inherently futile to the entire process.
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 12
Because plastic is toxic, wherever it goes it is detrimental to those that handle it
and the land it sits on. Jobs in all stages of recycling can be toxic, dangerous, and
difficult. The real solution is to reduce, then reuse, and lastly, is recycle. Most people go
straight to recycling and feel like they are acting sustainably. Refusing to use plastic and
choosing products with a lifecycle inventory that embodies a lesser carbon footprint such
as compostable products are the kind of changes industries need to make. It should be
extremely obvious that recycling plastic is not having a positive impact on the
environment solely from the gyre of plastic the size of Texas in the Pacific Ocean! Alas,
more plastic ends up there every year. Recycling plastics is a lot more complex than the
average consumer understands. The current process and infrastructure of recycling is
failing the environment and us.
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 13
References
Baechler, N. (2018, February 12). 'Wishful Recycling': More Harm Than Good.
Retrieved April, 2018, from https://smea.uw.edu/about/student-blog/blog/wishful-
recycling-more-harm-than-good/
Botkin, T. (Director). (2018, April 12). Waste Week at UHMC- A panel discussion about
waste on our island. Live performance in UHMC, Kahului.
Caliendo, H. (2014, October 8). Recycling for PET packaging reaches 31 percent in
2013. Plastics Today. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.plasticstoday.com/content/recycling-pet-packaging-reaches-31-
percent-2013/14167649421276
Cirko, C. (n.d.). Plastic Lumber Possibilities. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://greenbuildingsolutions.org/blog/plastic-lumber-possibilities/
D. (n.d.). Texas Roads Made From Plastic. Retrieved from
http://www.dykespaving.com/blog/texas-roads-made-from-plastic/
D'Alessandro, N. (2014, April 07). 22 Facts About Plastic Pollution (And 10 Things We
Can Do About It). Retrieved April, 2018, from https://www.ecowatch.com/22-
facts-about-plastic-pollution-and-10-things-we-can-do-about-it-1881885971.html
E. (2015). Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2013 Fact SheetAssessing
Trends in Material Generation, Recycling and Disposal in the United
States(Rep.). Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Retrieved April, 2018, from www.epa.gov/waste.
E. (n.d.). PTF: Reprocessing Plastics. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://ecologycenter.org/plastics/ptf/report5/
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 14
Embree, K. (2016, January 4). Postconsumer Recycling: It takes a village. Plastics
Today. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.plasticstoday.com/content/postconsumer-recycling-it-takes-
village/72389409223921
Evans, P. (2009, April 23). Big polluters: One massive container ship equals 50 million
cars. New Atlas. Retrieved April, 2018, from https://newatlas.com/shipping-
pollution/11526/
Everts, S. (2015, October 29). Plastic Contaminates Table Salt in China. Scientific
American. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/plastic-contaminates-table-salt-in-
china/
F. (2010). Life Cycle Inventory of 100% Postconsumer HDPE and PET Recycled Resin
From Postconsumer Containers and Packaging (Rep.). Prairie Village, KS: ERG.
Retrieved April, 2018, from chrome-
extension://kjlghdmljfgngjdpeaiogebkiilpiimk/pdf_viewer.html?
file=http://www.container-recycling.org/assets/pdfs/plastic/LCA-
RecycledPlastics2010.pdf
I. (2016). Documentation for Greenhouse Gas Emission and Energy Factors Used in the
Waste Reduction Model (WARM), Containers, Packaging, and Non-Durable
Good Materials Chapters (US, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Resource
Conservation and Recovery).
I. (2017, April 17). Recycling contaminates plastic children's toys with toxic chemicals
from electronic waste, says IPEN and Arnika. Cision PR Newswire. Retrieved
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 15
April, 2018, from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/recycling-
contaminates-plastic-childrens-toys-with-toxic-chemicals-from-electronic-waste-
says-ipen-and-arnika-300440648.html
J. S. (2007, September 19). Why is the world's biggest landfill in the Pacific Ocean?
Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/oceanography/great-
pacific-garbage-patch.htm
Kuczenski, B., Geyer, R., Bren, D., & U. (2011). Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Beverage Bottles Consumed in the State of California(Rep.).
CA: CalRecycle. Retrieved April, 2018, from chrome-
extension://kjlghdmljfgngjdpeaiogebkiilpiimk/pdf_viewer.html?
file=http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/publications/Documents/1487/20141487.pdf
Lowry, A. (2011, April 29). Post-Consumer Recycled Plastic (PCR) Is the Answer.
Retrieved April, 2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-
lowry/postconsumer-recycled-pla_b_853985.html
M. (2014). Common Plastics #1 to #7. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.lifewithoutplastic.com/store/common_plastics_no_1_to_no_7#.Wt66
elMvzOQ
Minter, A. (2013, November 8). How Beijing--and the Rest of China--Recycles Plastic
[Excerpt]. Scientific American. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/china-recycles-plastic/#
N., & T. (2017, October 31). Postconsumer PET container Recycling Activity in
2016(Rep.). Retrieved April, 2018, from chrome-
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 16
extension://kjlghdmljfgngjdpeaiogebkiilpiimk/pdf_viewer.html?
file=https://napcor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/NAPCOR-
APR_2016RateReport_FINAL.pdf
O'Connor, M. C. (2017, February 22). Only 14% of plastics are recycled – can tech
innovation tackle the rest? Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/feb/22/plastics-
recycling-trash-chemicals-styrofoam-packaging
Olmer, N., Comer, B., Roy, B., Mao, X., & Rutherford, D. (2017, October). Greenhouse
Gas Emissions From Global Shipping, 2013-2015[PDF]. The International
Council on Clean Energy.
Parker, L. (2017, July 19). A Whopping 91% of Plastic Isn't Recycled. National
Geographic. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/07/plastic-produced-recycling-waste-
ocean-trash-debris-environment/
Rachelson, D. (2017, December 4). What is Recycling Contamination and Why is it
Important? Retrieved April, 2018, from https://www.rubiconglobal.com/blog-
recycling-contamination/
Sinrod, M. (2016, February 16). Recycling: You’re doing it wrong. Retrieved April,
2018, from http://www.scitechnow.org/environment/recycling-youre-wrong/#
Staub, C. (2018, January 10). Stunning drop in tonnages of scrap plastics allowed into
China. Retrieved April, 2018, from https://resource-
recycling.com/plastics/2018/01/10/stunning-drop-tonnages-scrap-plastics-
allowed-china/
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 17
Staub, C. (2018, January 4). Exporter response to China: ‘We are changing our whole
strategy'. Retrieved April, 2018, from https://resource-
recycling.com/plastics/2018/01/04/exporter-response-china-changing-whole-
strategy/
T. (2015, November 25). Plastic Waste In China. Retrieved April, 2018, from
http://www.coresponsibility.com/plastic-waste-in-china/
T. (2015). 2015 United States National Postconsumer Plastic Bottle Recycling
Report(Rep.). Retrieved April, 2018, from American Chemistry Council website:
chrome-extension://kjlghdmljfgngjdpeaiogebkiilpiimk/pdf_viewer.html?
file=https://plastics.americanchemistry.com/2015-United-States-National-
Postconsumer-Plastic-Bottle-Recycling-Report.pdf
Toepfer https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-the-15-biggest-ships-in-the-world-
produce-more-pollution-than-all-the-cars, J. (2016, June 11). Is it true that the 15
biggest ships in the world produce more pollution than all the cars? Retrieved
April, 2018, from https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-the-15-biggest-ships-in-
the-world-produce-more-pollution-than-all-the-cars
U. (2014, February). Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the
United States: Facts and Figures for 2012(Rep.). Retrieved April, 2018, from
EPA website: chrome-
extension://kjlghdmljfgngjdpeaiogebkiilpiimk/pdf_viewer.html?file=https%3A
%2F%2Fwww.epa.gov%2Fsites%2Fproduction%2Ffiles%2F2015-
09%2Fdocuments%2F2012_msw_fs.pdf
U., & T. (2005). Recycling of Plastics[PDF]. University of Cambridge.
Running head: RECYCLING PLASTIC 18
US, EPA. (2015, March 13). Energy Impacts, US EPA Archive Document. Retrieved
April, 2018, from https://www3.epa.gov/warm/pdfs/Energy_Impacts.pdf
Wassener, B. (2011, August 14). Raising Awareness of Plastic Waste. The New York
Times. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/business/energy-environment/raising-
awareness-of-plastic-waste.html
Weyler, R. (2017, October 15). The Ocean Plastic Crisis. Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/11871/the-ocean-plastic-crisis/
Winter, D. (2015, December 4). The Violent Afterlife of a Recycled Plastic Bottle.
Retrieved April, 2018, from
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/what-actually-happens-
to-a-recycled-plastic-bottle/418326/