The Manual For The Quality Management of Educational Programmes in Myanmar
The Manual For The Quality Management of Educational Programmes in Myanmar
Quality Management of
Educational Programmes in
Myanmar
The case of Myanmar Maritime
University (MMU)
The Manual for the Quality Management of Educational Programmes in
Myanmar (The case of Myanmar Maritime University (MMU)) is published by:
Chapter Page
Acknowledgements i
Foreword ii
Introduction 1
The manual is jointly prepared and written by Mr. Johnson Ong Chee Bin, AUN-QA
Expert and the Documentation Team from Myanmar Maritime University as listed
below.
Documentation Team
i
Foreword
IQA and EQA are two sides of the same coin. Without IQA, there is no sustainable
quality enhancement in higher education institutions (HEIs).
I wrote this foreword while I was attending the Policy Forum titled “Higher Education
Quality and Employability” at Xiamen University, China, in June 2016.Many quality
experts from 26 countries presented and discussed openly on that topic. It reinforces
my conviction that QA is an important and necessity system in HEIs.
Staff members from QMS Office of Myanmar Maritime University have participated
with their hearts and souls in writing the documentation for this project under the
good guidance of Mr. Johnson Ong Chee Bin, QA expert from AUN-QA Network.
I do hope that this manual would be a very fruitful one to guide CLM universities in
implementing QA at programme level.
Last but not the least, I would like to express my deepest thanks to AUN-QA Network
for its kind and continuous support.
ii
Foreword
AUN-QA is the higher education quality assurance (QA) system and practices of the
ASEAN University Network (AUN). Its overarching working principle is to empower
universities and their management staff to establish, develop and continually
improve their QA systems through documentation, capacity building and quality
assessment.
This manual is the fruit of collaboration between AUN and participating CLM
universities in Cambodia, Lao PDR and Myanmar under the funding from Asian
Development Bank (ADB). ADB has been providing financial support for AUN-QA
activities involving Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar since 2012 under the “GMS
Higher Education Harmonisation and Networking: Strengthening Capacity of
University Quality Assurance System Project”.
Lastly, I would like to acknowledge and express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Johnson
Ong Chee Bin, AUN-QA Expert and the Documentation Team from Myanmar
Maritime University for their contributions to the development of this manual.
iii
Introduction
1. Objectives
1
Introduction
Of the nine (9) departments above, seven (7) departments offer six (6)
Bachelor Engineering degrees (B.E) and one (1) Bachelor of Science degree B.Sc.
(Hons.). Shipping Management and Port Management departments offer two (2)
Post Graduate Diplomas while the three (3) Engineering departments offer three (3)
Master degrees. The university has received regional recognition for its quality
education.
2
Introduction
AUN recognises the importance of quality in higher education, and the need
to develop a holistic quality assurance system to raise academic standards and
enhance education, research and service of universities in ASEAN. The AUN-QA
3
Introduction
The AUN-QA model for programme level (Version 3) starts with stakeholders
needs (see Figure 4). These needs are formulated in to the expected learning
outcomes which drive the programme (1st Column). There are four rows in the
middle of the model and the first row addresses the question of how the expected
learning outcomes are translated into the programme; and how they can be achieved
via teaching and learning approach and student assessment.
The second row considers the "input" into the process including academic and
support staff; student quality and support; and facilities and infrastructure.
The third row addresses the quality enhancement of the programme covering
curriculum design and development, teaching and learning, student assessment,
quality of support services and facilities, and stakeholders’ feedback.
The fourth row focuses on the output of the programme including pass rates
and dropout rates, the average time to graduate, employability of the graduates,
research activities and stakeholders’ satisfaction.
The model ends with the fulfilment of stakeholders’ needs and the continuous
improvement of the quality assurance system and benchmarking to seek best
practices.
4
Introduction
The 3rd version of the AUN-QA model for programme level encompasses the
following 11 criteria:
In the following chapters, the requirements of each AUN-QA criterion are given in
a box. To facilitate implementation and assessment of each criterion, the list of
statements of each criterion is translated into sub-criterion listed in the checklist. The
number in brackets [ ] in the sub-criterion indicates the corresponding statement(s) in
the box. A complete checklist of the AUN-QA criteria at programme level is
documented in Annex I.
5
Introduction
Rating Description
1 Absolutely Inadequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is not implemented. There are no
plans, documents, evidences or results available. Immediate
improvement must be made.
2 Inadequate and Improvement is Necessary
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is still at its planning stage or is
inadequate where improvement is necessary. There is little document or
evidence available. Performance of the QA practice shows little or poor
results.
3 Inadequate but Minor Improvement Will Make It Adequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is defined and implemented but
minor improvement is needed to fully meet them. Documents are
available but no clear evidence to support that they have been fully
used. Performance of the QA practice shows inconsistent or some
results.
4 Adequate as Expected
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is adequate and evidences support
that it has been fully implemented. Performance of the QA practice
shows consistent results as expected.
5 Better Than Adequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is better than adequate. Evidences
support that it has been efficiently implemented. Performance of the QA
practice shows good results and positive improvement trend.
6 Example of Best Practices
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be example of best
practices in the field. Evidences support that it has been effectively
implemented. Performance of QA practice shows very good results and
positive improvement trend.
7 Excellent (Example of World-class or Leading Practices)
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be excellent or
example of world-class practices in the field. Evidences support that it
has been innovatively implemented. Performance of the QA practice
shows excellent results and outstanding improvement trends.
In assigning rating to criterion and sub-criterion, only whole number should be used.
The overall verdict of the assessment should be computed based on the arithmetic
average of the 11 criteria with only one decimal place.
6
Introduction
Annex I
7
Introduction
5 Student Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5.1 The student assessment is constructively aligned
to the achievement of the expected learning
outcomes [1, 2]
5.2 The student assessments including timelines,
methods, regulations, weight distribution, rubrics
and grading are explicit and communicated to
students [4, 5]
5.3 Methods including assessment rubrics and
marking schemes are used to ensure validity,
reliability and fairness of student assessment [6,
7]
5.4 Feedback of student assessment is timely and
helps to improve learning [3]
5.5 Students have ready access to appeal procedure
[8]
Overall opinion
6 Academic Staff Quality
6.1 Academic staff planning (considering succession,
promotion, re-deployment, termination, and
retirement) is carried out to fulfil the needs for
education, research and service [1]
6.2 Staff-to-student ratio and workload are measured
and monitored to improve the quality of education,
research and service [2]
6.3 Recruitment and selection criteria including ethics
and academic freedom for appointment,
deployment and promotion are determined and
communicated [4, 5, 6, 7]
6.4 Competences of academic staff are identified and
evaluated [3]
6.5 Training and developmental needs of academic
staff are identified and activities are implemented
to fulfil them [8]
6.6 Performance management including rewards and
recognition is implemented to motivate and
support education, research and service [9]
6.7 The types and quantity of research activities by
academic staff are established, monitored and
benchmarked for improvement [10]
Overall opinion
8
Introduction
9
Introduction
10
Introduction
11 Output 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11.1 The pass rates and dropout rates are
established, monitored and benchmarked for
improvement [1]
11.2 The average time to graduate is established,
monitored and benchmarked for improvement [1]
11.3 Employability of graduates is established,
monitored and benchmarked for improvement [1]
11.4 The types and quantity of research activities by
students are established, monitored and
benchmarked for improvement [2]
11.5 The satisfaction levels of stakeholders are
established, monitored and benchmarked for
improvement [3]
Overall opinion
Overall verdict
In assigning rating to criterion and sub-criterion, only whole number should be used.
The overall verdict of the assessment should be computed based on the arithmetic
average of the 11 criteria with only one decimal place.
11
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1. The formulation of the expected learning outcomes takes into account and
reflects the vision and mission of the institution. The vision and mission are
explicit and known to staff and students.
2. The programme shows the expected learning outcomes of the graduate. Each
course and lesson should clearly be designed to achieve its expected learning
outcomes which should be aligned to the programme expected learning
outcomes.
3. The programme is designed to cover both subject specific outcomes that relate
to the knowledge and skills of the subject discipline; and generic (sometimes
called transferable skills) outcomes that relate to any and all disciplines e.g.
written and oral communication, problem-solving, information technology,
teambuilding skills, etc.
4. The programme has clearly formulated the expected learning outcomes which
reflect the relevant demands and needs of the stakeholders.
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• How the ELOs reflect the vision and mission of the university?
• How is feedback from stakeholders gathered and used for the formulation and
revision of ELOs? (related to criterion 10)
• Who are involved in the formulation and revision of ELOs and how often are
ELOs updated or revised? (related to criterion 10)
• How ELOs are formulated for the programme and all courses, and the
relationship between them? (related to criterion 3)
• What taxonomy of educational objectives (e.g. Bloom) is used for the
formulation of ELOs?
• How are ELOs aligned to teaching & learning approach and student
assessment? (related to criterion 4 and 5)
• What life-long learning skills are promoted and taught?
• What pathways and professional progression or development are available to
students and graduates for life-long learning?
1-1
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
3. Outcome-Based Education
4. Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom’s taxonomy (1956) classifies learning outcomes into 3 key domains: cognitive
(knowledge), affective (attitude) and psychomotor skills (skills). Each domain is
organised into a hierarchy ranging from low to high level skills.
Figure 1.1 represents the cognitive domain which covers knowledge and the
development of intellectual skills. This includes the recall or recognition of specific
facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of
intellectual abilities and skills.
1-2
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-3
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
Figure 1.2 represents the affective domain which covers feelings, values,
appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations and attitudes.
1-4
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-5
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-6
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-7
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
Bloom’s taxonomy was revised and updated by Lorin Anderson and his collaborators
including David Krathwohl in 2001 as documented in Figure 1.4.
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
1-8
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
1-9
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
Learning outcomes are concerned with the achievements of the learner. They are
statements of what a learner is expected to know, understand and/or be able to
demonstrate after completion of a process of learning.
Aims or objectives, on the other hand, are concerned with teaching and the teacher’s
intentions as expressed in the aims or objectives of a course or lesson.
Learning outcomes are commonly divided into different categories of outcomes such
as discipline-specific outcomes that relate to the subject discipline and the
knowledge and/or skills related to it; and generic (sometimes called transferable
skills or lifelong learning skills) outcomes that non discipline-specific e.g. written,
oral, problem- solving, information technology, and team working skills etc.
Bloom’s taxonomy is popularly adopted for writing learning outcomes. The guidelines
for writing learning outcomes are listed below.
1-10
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
• Begin each learning outcome with an action verb, followed by the object of the
verb and a phrase that gives the context. For example, “To apply economics
and business management concepts to solve business problems in the real
world”.
• Use only one action verb per learning outcome.
• Avoid vague terms like know, understand, learn, be familiar with, be exposed
to, be acquainted with, and be aware of. These terms are associated with
teaching objectives rather than learning outcomes.
• Avoid long sentences. If necessary use more than one sentence to ensure
clarity.
• Ensure that the learning outcomes of the lesson support the learning
outcomes of the module which in turn are aligned to the overall outcomes of
the programme.
• The learning outcomes must be observable, measurable and capable of being
assessed.
• When writing learning outcomes, bear in mind that they are realistic and
achievable within the period of study.
• Use higher order thinking skills for learning outcomes as learner progresses to
a higher level of study.
• Review and rewrite the learning outcomes to keep them current and relevant.
Formulation of expected learning outcomes begins with the gathering of the needs of
the stakeholders including faculty members, current and past students, employers,
relevant government ministries/agencies, accreditation bodies, professional bodies,
and employers. These needs are usually written in the form of graduate profile or
competencies. They are then translated into programme learning outcomes using
educational taxonomy such as the Bloom’s taxonomy.
Programme learning outcomes describe what the learner will be able to do at the
end of the programme. They describe learning that is significant and related to what
learners will be expected to do in the “real world. The guidelines for writing
programme learning outcomes are:
1-11
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
The needs of the stakeholders, graduate profile and their relationships with the
learning outcomes should be clearly stated as illustrated in Figures 1.6 and 1.7.
1 F F M F ?
2 F M F
3 F F F F
4 F F F F
5 F P F
6 F P
7 F F F
8 F F F F ?
1. A strong
fundamental chemical
engineering knowledge
and the ability to apply and
integrate knowledge to
X X X
identify, formulate and
solve problems of
chemical engineering
fields
1-12
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
2. The professional
skills necessary to be
effective and succeed in
the modern workforce
including work well in
multi-disciplinary teams,
the ability to design and X X X X X
solve problems, and the
ability to communicate
effectively, and to uphold
standards of ethics and
professionalism
3. The ability to
engage in life-long learning
by acquiring new skills and
to remain relevant in
today’s fast changing X X
environment
The programme learning outcomes are then cascaded into course learning
outcomes and lesson learning outcomes. Course learning outcomes describe clearly
what learners will know and be able to do at the end of the course. Each course
learning outcome should align with one or more of the programme learning
outcomes. The expected course learning outcomes are derived from “designing
backward” from the programme learning outcomes, which contribute to the
achievement of the programme outcomes. Collectively, the course learning
outcomes from all the courses in the programme lead to the achievement of the
programme learning outcomes. When planning or revising a course it is important to
know how this course will work with the other courses in the programme to help
learners achieve the programme learning outcomes.
Curriculum maps are often used to help relate a course within the broader
programme of study. Some reviewing questions for writing course learning outcomes
are:
Like course learning outcomes, lesson learning outcomes describe clearly what
learners will know and be able to do at the end of the lesson. They are sub-sets of
1-13
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
the course learning outcomes and they contribute to the achievement of the course
learning outcomes.
Examples of how the programme learning outcomes are cascaded into course
learning outcomes and lesson learning outcomes are illustrated in Figures 1.8 and
1.9.
1-14
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
Figure 1.11 shows the formulation of expected learning outcomes for Marine
Engineering Programme at Myanmar Maritime University.
1-15
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
The expected learning outcomes are established and defined. After ending the 5-
year programme, graduates will have the ability to:
1-16
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-17
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-18
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-19
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-20
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-21
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-22
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
1-23
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
CLOs PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
CLO 1 × ×
CLO 2 × × × × × × ×
CLO 3 × × × × × ×
CLO 4 × × × × ×
CLO 5 × × × × ×
CLO 6 × × × × × × ×
CLO 7 × × × × × ×
CLO 8 × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 9 × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 10 × × × × ×
CLO 11 × × × × × ×
CLO 12 × × × × × ×
CLO 13 × × × × ×
CLO 14 × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 15 × × × × × × ×
CLO 16 × × × × ×
CLO 17 × × × × ×
CLO 18 × × × × ×
CLO 19 × × × × ×
CLO 20 × × × × ×
CLO 21 × × × × × × ×
CLO 22 × × × × ×
CLO 23 × × × × ×
CLO 24 × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 25 × × × × × ×
CLO 26 × × × × × ×
CLO 27 × × × × × × ×
CLO 28 × × × × × ×
CLO 29 × × × × × × ×
CLO 30 × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 31 × × × × × × ×
CLO 32 × × × × × × × × × ×
CLO 33 × × × × × ×
CLO 34 × × × × × × × × ×
1-24
Chapter 1 – Expected Learning Outcomes
CLO 35 × × × × × ×
CLO 36 × × × × × ×
CLO 37 × × × × × ×
The programme activities and PLOs are based on feedback and comments from
experts, researchers, lecturers, students and employers. Feedback from these
stakeholders set the basis for revision and improvement to the programme. The
relationship between the needs of stakeholders and programme learning outcomes
is as follows:
Figure 1.13 - The relationship between the Needs of Stakeholders and Programme
Learning Outcomes
1-25
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2 Programme Specification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2.1 The information in the programme specification is
comprehensive and up-to-date [1, 2]
2.2 The information in the course specification is
comprehensive and up-to-date [1, 2]
2.3 The programme and course specifications are
communicated and made available to the stakeholders
[1, 2]
Overall opinion
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
2-1
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-2
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
• Awarding body/institution
• Teaching institution (if different)
• Details of the accreditation by a professional or statutory body
• Name of the final award
• Programme title
• Expected Learning outcomes of the programme
• Admission criteria or requirements to the programme
• Relevant subject benchmark statements and other external and internal
reference points used to provide information on programme outcomes
• Programme structure and requirements including levels, courses, credits, etc.
• Date on which the programme specification was written or revised
• Course title
• Course requirements such as pre-requisite to register for the course, credits, etc.
• Expected learning outcomes of the course in terms of knowledge, skills and
attitudes
• Teaching, learning and assessment methods to enable outcomes to be achieved
and demonstrated
• Course description and outline or syllabus
• Details of student assessment
• Date on which the course specification was written or revised.
A sample programme specification for the Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the
University of Leicester is documented below. (Source:
http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/sas2/courses/documentation/1112/undergraduate/css/ba-economics.pdf)
2-3
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-4
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-5
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-6
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-7
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-8
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-9
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-10
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-11
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-12
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
6. Module/Course Specification
Like the programme, the learning outcomes, teaching and learning strategies and
student assessments of a module or course should also be documented in a module
or course specification. A comprehensive course specification serves the same
purposes as a programme specification and forms part of a programme specification.
2-13
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-14
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
Entry Requirement
Programme Objectives
i. Prepare graduates with the knowledge, understanding and proficiency skills to
work as officer in charge of the engineering watch on ship of 750 kW and
above propulsion power.
ii. Prepare graduates who can succeed in graduate school, research and
continuously improve themselves.
iii. Produce graduates who possess ethical qualities and are competent in
solving problems intellectually based on facts and ideas to enable effective
lifelong learning.
2-15
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
Preparation for
Academic April, 2013
Handbook
Selection Plan 19.8.2013
Selection Date
26.9.2013 28.9.2013 3 Days
(H.E)
Eye Test/Health 30.10.2013 1.11.2013 1 Weeks
Interview 4.11.2013 5.11.2013 2 Days
Entry Result 2.12.2013
st
1 Year 2.12.2013 13.12.2013 12 Days
Enrolment 2
nd
to 5 Year &
th
15.11.2013 29.11.2013 16 Days
All Diplomas
Contact Time 2.12.2013 11.3.2014 16 Weeks
Private Study 12.3.2014 23.3.2014 12 Days
First Semester
24.3.2014 7.4.2014 10 Days
Exam
Vacation 8.4.2014 4.5.2014 4 Weeks
Contact Time 5.5.2014 22.8.2014 16 Weeks
Private Study 23.8.2014 31.8.2014 9 Days
Second Semester
Exam
1.9.2014 12.9.2014 10 Days
Re-Open 1.12.2014
Preparation for
16.12.2014 17.1.2015 4 Weeks
Convocation
Convocation
Ceremony 6.2.2015
(Rehearsal)
Convocation
7.2.2015
Ceremony (Final )
2-16
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
Engineering
ME 2005 3.3 3.3 6.6
Mechanics
Applied Electrical
EE 2011 3.1 3.1 6.2
Engineering
NA 3006 Fluid Mechanics 3.1 3.1 6.2
NA 3007 Naval Architecture I 2.6 2.6 5.2
NA 4004 Engineering Materials 1.9 1.9 3.8
NA 4007 Naval Architecture II 2.6 2.6 5.2
Marine Electrical
EE 4009 2.4 2.4 4.8
Engineering
Control & Monitoring
EE 4011 2.4 2.4 4.8
Systems
Environmental
RC 5008 2.4 2.4
Engineering
Marine Electronic
EE 5002 1.9 1.9
& Control
NA 5002 Ship Construction 1.9 1.9
Sub-Total Credit Hours 6.4 6.4 5.7 5.7 9.3 9.3 6.2 49
DEPARTMENTAL COURSES
Marine Engineering
ME 2001 2.4 2.4 4.8
Drawing I
Marine Engineering
ME 3001 2.2 2.2 4.4
Drawing II
Engineering
ME 3003 3.1 3.1 6.2
Thermodynamics I
ME 3004 Strength of Materials 3.1 3.1 6.2
Management &
Me 4008 Maritime 1.9 1.9 3.8
Laws I
Engineering
ME 4003 3.8 3.8 7.6
Thermodynamics II
Dynamics of
ME 4005 2.6 2.6 5.2
Machinery
General Engineering
ME 4007 2.6 2.6 5.2
Knowledge I
Management &
ME 5008 Maritime 2.6 2.6
Laws II
Marine Engineering
ME 5001 2.6 2.6
Design
2-17
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
Motor Engineering
ME 5003 1.9 1.9
Knowledge
ME 5005 Vibration and Control 1.9 1.9
General Engineering
ME 5007 2.4 2.4
Knowledge II
Computer Application
ME 5009 2.4 2.4
in Marine Engineering
Intern ship & Design
ME 5000 20 20
Project
Sub-Total Credit Hours 2.4 2.4 8.4 8.4 10.9 10.9 33.8 77.2
Total Credit Hours 20.2 20.2 14.1 14.1 20.2 20.2 40 189.4
Remark:
1 credit hour = 1 hour of lecture
1 credit hour = 2 hour of practical
Credit system has not been started in this Academic Year. When the University will
use the credit system, each department will need to calculate specifically.
Note
A student who has completed all the coursework and Workshop Skill Training
requirements will be allowed to take a General Viva Voce, in which general technical
knowledge of the student to practise as a qualified Marine Engineer as well as his
English language proficiency will be tested.
The tutorial/lab performance (if any) together with the examination marks for both
terms will be considered in making the final evaluation of a student in a particular
subject. Minimum of 75% classroom attendance and 100% laboratory attendance
are required for a student to be qualified for taking the examinations.
After graduation, a student who has met the requirements of all the academic
courses require approved sea service which mentioned requirements for certification
of OEW (Officer in charge of Engineering Watch) on ships, 750 kW or more
propulsion power in STCW 78 as amended.
2-18
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
2-19
Chapter 2 – Programme Specification
Three sets of question papers for each subject, marking scheme and a key answer
prepared by the subject teacher. Head of Department collects the questions and
submits them to the Rector. Questions from all departments are kept in a locker by
the Rector.
The Rector selects one set of them and the selected questions are kept in the locker
in the strong room. About three days before the examination, the questions are
copied according to the amount of students and put in bags and sealed. They are
kept safely in the strong room by the Registrar (Exam section) until the day of
examination.
On the examination day, 30 minutes prior to the examination time, the sealed
question paper bags are handed over to the Chief Invigilator by the Registrar
(Examination section) in front of the Head of Department (Academic).
After the examination, the answer papers are collected and handed over to the Head
of Department by the Registrar in front of the Head of Department (Academic) and
Chief Invigilator.
Selection of Examiner
Each department of Myanmar Maritime University chooses examiners who teach the
concerning subjects in lectures and tutorials.
2-20
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
1. The curriculum, teaching and learning methods and student assessment are
constructively aligned to achieve the expected learning outcomes.
2. The curriculum is designed to meet the expected learning outcomes where the
contribution made by each course in achieving the programme’s expected
learning outcomes is clear.
3. The curriculum is designed so that the subject matter is logically structured,
sequenced, and integrated.
4. The curriculum structure shows clearly the relationship and progression of
basic courses, the intermediate courses, and the specialised courses.
5. The curriculum is structured so that it is flexible enough to allow students to
pursue an area of specialisation and incorporate more recent changes and
developments in the field.
6. The curriculum is reviewed periodically to ensure that it remains relevant and
up-to-date.
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
3-1
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
Programme design and development often begins with the needs analysis.
Gathering information about the needs of stakeholders and marketplace; and
matching that with the mission of the university and its resources is an important first
step of the needs analysis process in determining the need for a new or revision of
an existing programme. The programme design and development process using a
backward curriculum design framework is illustrated in Figure 3.1.
After the needs are determined, a rationale for developing the programme should be
written. A rationale contains a general statement of educational goals and serves as
a guide in course planning and alignment of various courses. The rationale is
articulated into graduate attributes or competencies which are in turn translated into
expected learning outcomes using educational taxonomy as illustrated in Figure 3.2
below.
3-2
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
Expected Proposed
Graduate
Stakeholders Learning Modules/
Needs Attributes
Outcomes Courses
University
(Institution, faculty,
department,
faculty members)
What the
university wants to
teach?
Learners (Current
students and
Alumni)
What the students
want to learn?
Society
(Employers,
government
agencies,
professional
bodies)
What the society
expects the
graduate to have?
At this stage, there is a need to determine the student requirements for admission
into the programme. Some questions to ask in determining the student requirements
for admission may include:
• How the programme fulfills the entry, curriculum and exit requirements of the
Education Ministry, National or Professional Qualification Framework?
• What prior qualifications or competencies are recognised and accepted for the
programme?
• What educational pathways are needed to accommodate students with prior
qualifications or different academic performance during the course of study?
• What courses and electives are needed to achieve both discipline-specific
and non discipline-specific (such as transferable skills) learning outcomes?
3-3
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
The following four fundamental questions known as “Tyler’s Principles (1950)” serve
as a guide for curriculum planning:
3-4
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
3-5
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
The programme mapping will lead to the development of the curriculum of each
course in the programme. It is essential that the curriculum of each course be
designed so that the teaching and learning as well as the student assessment
methods support the achievement of the expected learning outcomes. Biggs (2003)
refers to this process as “constructive alignment”. “Constructive” refers to the
concept that students construct meaning through relevant learning activities; and
3-6
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
“alignment” refers to the situation when teaching and learning activities and student
assessment are aligned to achieve the expected learning outcomes. Constructive
alignment of any course involves:
Lastly, the organisation of the programme and its courses should be integrated
showing the course relationship within the discipline and connection between other
disciplines. The programme and its content should be periodically reviewed to
ensure that they remain relevant and up-to-date.
The curriculum for each subject is well-developed and in line with the expected
outcomes, goals and objectives of the programme according to the MMU’s
operational environment model shown in Figure 3.8.
Relevant National
Educational Policies Relevant Maritime
Education Policies
Department of Marine
Administration (DMA)
3-7
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
Training: Personal Survival Course and Basic Parade during the vacation period.
3-8
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
Total 20 4 7 31
Total 21 7 6 34
Total 21 6 5 32
3-9
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
Industrial Training: Six months during the second semester and vacation
The skill matrix of the programme is as follows: (This matrix relates to the graduate
abilities)
B.E( Marine Engineering )
Math1001
Math2001
Math3001
Math3002
Com1001
Com2001
ME 3001
Mar1001
ME2001
ME3003
ME3004
ME4003
ME4005
ME4007
ME4008
ME5000
ME5001
ME5003
ME5005
ME5007
ME5008
ME5009
WS2001
NA2005
NA3006
NA3007
NA4004
NA4007
NA5002
RC5008
EE2011
EE4009
EE4011
EE5002
Ch1001
Ph1001
E1001
E2001
E3001
3-10
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
3-11
Chapter 3 – Programme Structure and Content
3-12
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
4-1
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
• What and how academic staff is trained in the teaching and learning
methods? (related to criterion 6)
• What and how the effectiveness of teaching and learning is evaluated? What
is the trend and what is done to improve the trend? (related to criterion 10)
• How ICT is harnessed to facilitate teaching & learning? (related to criterion 9)
• How research output is used to enhance teaching and learning? (related to
criterion 10).
Learning activities are designed, grouped and sequenced so that they help learners
achieve the expected learning outcomes. Through these learning activities learners
also receive feedback about their progress and are prepared for evaluation where
they can demonstrate their achievement of the expected learning outcomes.
Research shows that “deep learning” is more likely to occur when learning activities
engage learners and challenge them to apply, extend, and critique knowledge and
skills and to use the newly acquired abilities in different contexts. Learning
paradigms are fields of knowledge with associated beliefs, concepts and principles,
and they are useful in understanding how learners acquire knowledge and skills.
In this section, three key teaching and learning paradigms are discussed.
Behaviourism
Strengths
Learner is provided with clear goal and can respond to cues of that goal in a
predictable manner under certain conditions. For example, a driver stops the car
when the traffic light turns red.
Weaknesses
Learner does not respond when the cues are removed. For example, the driver who
has been conditioned to react to red light signal on the road may run into an accident
when the signal/cue is removed
Cognitivism
Cognitivism focuses on the internal mental activities through which learners process
information. It is necessary to determine how processes such as thinking, memory,
knowing and problem solving occur. Learners are viewed as rational beings whose
actions are a consequence of thinking.
Strengths
An organised structure to learning, where problems are broken down into smaller
and more manageable parts in an organised manner. For example, a child learning
how to read using phonics.
4-2
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Weaknesses
Learner might have difficulty adapting to changes as learning is too structured. For
example, the child is unable to sound words that do not follow the phonics rules .
Constructivism
Strengths
Learner relates information with his/her own experiences, beliefs and attitudes to
construct knowledge. He will be able to better deal with real-life situations. For
example, a lawyer would examine the case from various angles and consider ways
to defend his client.
Weaknesses
In situations where conformity is essential, divergent thinking and action may cause
problems. For example, there would be chaos if every lawyer decides to interpret
laws and practices in their own unique way.
The implication of the teaching and learning paradigm points to the need for
university to have an educational philosophy. Educational philosophy can be defined
as a set of related beliefs that influences what and how students are taught. It
represents answers to questions about the purpose of education, a teacher's role,
and what should be taught and by what methods. A well-articulated educational
philosophy will aid curriculum designers to choose an appropriate array of teaching
and learning approaches or instructional strategies with respect to situational factors
to ensure effectiveness of learning. Figure 4.1 below illustrates the alignment of
teaching and learning approach to culture, people and system.
Figure 4.1 – Alignment of Teaching and Learning Approach to Culture, People and
System
4-3
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
In this section, the following instructional strategies and their associated instructional
methods are discussed.
Direct lnstruction
According to Moore (2009), the teacher is seen as "a major information provider" in
this teacher-centred model. Common instructional methods under direct instruction
are documented below.
Lecture
One way instruction from teacher to learners by downloading information relating to
the topic.
Explicit Teaching
Explanation and elaboration of a subject with examples to help learners better
understand and relate to the topic.
Didactic Questioning
Asking questions to elicit response from learners using 5Ws and 1H.
Demonstration
Teacher demonstrates a skill to the learners (e.g. how to put on a life vest).
4-4
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
lndirect lnstruction
In indirect instruction, learners are deeply involved in the learning process without
any overt teaching being done by the teacher. Common instructional methods under
indirect instruction are documented below.
Inquiry
Learners are asked to develop questions to explore and apply the subject matter.
Problem Solving
Specific real-life issues are given for learners to apply problem solving techniques.
Case Studies
Scenarios of actual real life cases related to the industry are used for discussions
and brainstorming of potential solutions for the cases.
Concept Formulation
Learners connect pieces of what they have learnt into a bigger concept.
Experiential Learninq
Experiential learning assumes that learners learn best when they go through an
experience of learning. Common instructional methods under experiential learning
are documented below.
4-5
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Simulation
Learners learn through interacting with a simulated environment.
Focused Imaging
Requires learners to visualize, for example, what you want to be in 5 years’ time.
Role Play
Learners assume different roles in a learning situation through human interaction.
Model
Learners build a physical model based on the learning acquired.
Game
Learners play games to pick up concepts or skills.
Field Trip
A field trip is a journey by a group of learners to a place away from their normal
learning environment.
Experiment
Learners try out different things to see what the outcomes are.
Interactive instruction
ln this strategy, learning occurs from peers and teacher. Multiple types of interactions
amongst the learners are used by the teacher to encourage thinking and sharing
amongst them. Common instructional methods under interactive instruction are
documented below.
Debate
Learners take different sides of a topic to examine different perspectives.
Discussion
Learners talk to each other to generate ideas and opinions of the topic.
Problem Solving
Specific real-life issues are given for learners to apply problem solving techniques.
4-6
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Brainstorming
Learners in groups come together to generate ideas.
Peer Learning
Learners teach each other or help each other to pick up skills through practising
together.
Reflection
Learners reflect on a lesson/experience individually or in group.
lndependent Studv
Moore (2009) defined this as "any educational activity carried out by an individual
with little or no guidance". Common instructional methods under independent study
are documented below.
Work Assignment
Leaners complete work assigned by teacher who is away from class in an allocated
time.
Research Project
Learners research on learning topics and submit a report.
Computer-Aided Instruction
Learners learn independently through computer assistance (e-Learning).
Reflection
Learners reflect on a lesson/experience individually or in group.
4-7
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
4-8
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
− Produce
− Relate
− Show
− Choose
− Form
4-9
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Levels
Verbs Instructional Methods Assessment
Methods
The above template is formulated by the core teams from the Myanmar Maritime University and
st
University of Yangon at the 1 QA Documentation Meeting 18 – 20 September 2014.
Active learning involves providing opportunities for students to meaningfully talk and
listen, write, read, and reflect on the content, ideas, issues, and concerns of an
academic subject (Meyers & Jones, 1993). Most of the non-direct instructional
methods listed above support active learning. The following tips may help in
choosing the appropriate instructional methods to aid learning:
• Match methods to learning outcomes
• Match learner characteristics and expectations
• Policy of university
• Teacher’s skills & comfort level
• Time availability
• Variety of instructions
• Create teacher-student interactions
• Logistical constraints (e.g. cost, space, equipment, etc.)
The teaching and learning approach for Marine Engineering programme at Myanmar
Maritime University includes:
Classroom Teaching
There are 2 theatres and 5 two-storey buildings. The following table shows
the number of class rooms and lab rooms.
4-10
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
There is computer based engine room simulator which was installed in 2002. It is
imported from Transus Company, Italy. It includes one teacher server, 16 monitors.
Using one monitor, two or three students can be trained. Hence, 32 or 48 students
can be trained simultaneously. The marine engineering students get the good
opportunities to learn the followings:
For naval architecture students and marine engineering students, Myanmar Maritime
University proudly established the newly hydrodynamic center. The 60m long, 4m
wide and 4m depth educational towing tank is currently installed. It is the only towing
tank in Myanmar. It is very useful for measuring the resistance subjected to the ship
hull. Upon getting the resistance value, the required engine power to overcome this
resistance can be quickly and accurately calculated. Moreover self-propulsion test
can be made using this towing tank.
Tutorial / Test
The tutorials and tests are regularly carried out according to the curriculum.
4-11
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
Assignment
Industrial training
• From the second year to fourth year of study, students are sent to the dockyards
and ports under the Ministry of Transport.
• According to the 2010 Manila amendment, the students who want to be marine
engineer onboard must only attend the workshop skill training.
The syllabus of this course under STCW convention, Regulation III/1 is as follows:
4-12
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
4-13
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
4-14
Chapter 4 – Teaching and Learning Approach
.5 Valves.
.6 Air compressors.
.7 Heat exchangers.
.8 Diesel engine.
.9 Turbocharger.
.10 Maintains Oil fuel burners and boiler
.11 Pump shaft alignment adjustment procedures.
.12 Pipes.
.13 Refrigeration maintenance.
.14 Oil fuel and lubricating system maintenance.
.15 Deck machinery maintenance
.16 Maintains steering gear.
.17 Refurbishes Diesel engine components
Industrial Visit
Port and harbor students and River and Coastal students are required to visit the
Myanmar International Terminal Thilawa, Asia Port and dam projects under the
Ministry of Electrical Power. The visit equips them with the first-hand port and harbor
operational experience and knowledge.
After final year first semester examination, students are grouped to carry out
projects. They conduct the seminar and defense. The project carries 120 marks.
Sports such as chess, football, badminton, basketball, swimming etc. competition are
held in raining season as well as in cold season.
4-15
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
1. Assessment covers:
• New student admission
• Continuous assessment during the course of study
• Final/exit test before graduation
2. In fostering constructive alignment, a variety of assessment methods should be
adopted and be congruent with the expected learning outcomes. They should
measure the achievement of all the expected learning outcomes of the
programme and its courses.
3. A range of assessment methods is used in a planned manner to serve
diagnostic, formative, and summative purposes.
4. The student assessments including timelines, methods, regulations, weight
distribution, rubrics and grading should be explicit and communicated to all
concerned.
5. Standards applied in assessment schemes are explicit and consistent across
the programme.
6. Procedures and methods are applied to ensure that student assessment is
valid, reliable and fairly administered.
7. The reliability and validity of assessment methods should be documented and
regularly evaluated and new assessment methods are developed and tested.
8. Students have ready access to reasonable appeal procedures.
5 Student Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5.1 The student assessment is constructively aligned
to the achievement of the expected learning
outcomes [1, 2]
5.2 The student assessments including timelines,
methods, regulations, weight distribution, rubrics
and grading are explicit and communicated to
students [4, 5]
5.3 Methods including assessment rubrics and
marking schemes are used to ensure validity,
reliability and fairness of student assessment [6,
7]
5.4 Feedback of student assessment is timely and
helps to improve learning [3]
5.5 Students have ready access to appeal procedure
[8]
Overall opinion
5-1
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• How are ELOs, teaching and learning approach and student assessment
aligned? (related to criterion 1, 3 and 4)
• What are the types and methods of assessment used throughout the course
of study?
• What is the assessment rubric and how it is formulated to test the
achievement of ELOs for each course? (related to criterion 1)
• When and how is the assessment requirements, methods and criteria
communicated to students? (related to criterion 8)
• How is in-course assessment and final results communicated to students?
(related to criterion 8)
• What is the student appeal process for examination results?
• What is the quality assurance process for student assessment to ensure fair,
accurate and consistent marking by academic staff? (related to criterion 10)
5-2
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Diagnostic Assessment
Formative Assessment
Summative Assessment
Continuous Assessment
Competency-Based Assessment
Integrated Assessment
5-3
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
4. Principles of Assessment
Validity
Reliability
Fairness
5-4
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Assessment Methods
Assessment
Levels Verbs Instructional Methods
Methods
5-5
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Assessment
Levels Verbs Instructional Methods
Methods
5-6
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Short form tests are also known as objective tests which do not usually test
higher order thinking skills. They include multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, true-false
and matching types questions.
Essays
Performance Tests
Written Reports
Fieldwork/Practicum Tests
Projects
5-7
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Presentations
Case studies
A case study involves a situation, information and issues that provide deep
learning opportunities for students. The case could be the account of a real
experience, including authentic details, or a real experience in which some
elements are changed to prevent identification, or it could be completely
hypothetical. The aim is to give students opportunities to explore and apply skills
and theories that they have learnt in a related field of study. A case study
analysis, which includes the student’s personal response to a case, is usually
presented as a written or verbal report. Case studies are usually used to test
higher order thinking skills.
Posters
Journals and blogs are written by students over a period of time, such as a
semester, to reflect on their learning experiences. They provide an opportunity
for students to express their feelings, thoughts and beliefs about the content and
process of learning and themselves as learners using an informal writing style
and structure. They are used for assessing higher order thinking skills.
Portfolios
The following questions may help in choosing the most appropriate assessment
method:
5-8
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
5. Assessment Rubrics
5-9
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Figure 5.4 below listed some questions for designing useful rubrics
(source: Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: shifting the focus
from teaching to learning by Huba and Freed 2000)
Question Action
1
What criteria or essential elements must be
present in the student’s work to ensure that
it is high in quality? Include these as rows in your rubric
• These should be the criteria that
distinguish good work from poor work
5-10
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
3
For each criterion or essential element of quality,
what is a clear description of performance at
each achievement level?
• Avoid undefined terms (e.g.,
“significant”, “trivial”, “shows Include descriptions in the
considerable thought”) appropriate cells of the rubric
• Avoid value-laden terms (e.g., “excellent”,
“poor”)
• Use objective descriptions that help
provide guidance to the students for
getting better when needed
4
What are the consequences of performing at Add descriptions of consequences to the
each level of quality? commentaries in the rubric
5
What rating scheme will I use in the rubric?
• Some criteria may be weighted differently Add this to the rubric in a way that fits
in with your grading philosophy
than others
6 When I use the rubric, what aspects work well
and what aspects need improvement?
• Does the rubric help you distinguish
among the levels of quality in a student
sample?
• Do the criteria seem to be appropriate? Revise the rubric accordingly
• Are there too many or too few levels of
achievement specified?
• Are there any descriptions that are
incomplete or unclear?
Continuous assessments are usually carried out via class tests, tutorials,
individual/group assignments, group projects, lab experiment-based problem solving,
etc. Assessments of students are documented and approved by the Head of
Department and submitted to the Office of Quality Management System.
5-11
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
All assessments and their results are carefully recorded, maintained and
regularly evaluated. The university also ensures that all assessments are valid,
reliable and fair. Rules and regulations of assessment are made known and clear to
students and faculty members to follow. The appeal and examination procedures of
Myanmar Maritime University are documented below.
Appeal Procedure
Students who are not satisfied with their examination results are allowed to
submit their appeal within 2 weeks after announcement of examination results. The
appeal procedure is as follows:
Examination Procedure
questions selected by the Rector. The examination papers are then enclosed
in bags before transferring them to the Registrar. Question bags that have
been sealed are safely kept in a cabinet held in the strong room.
5. Examination rooms are prepared according to student list. Registrar takes
responsible for the arrangement of seats, sticking roll number cards on desks,
seating plan, checking of lights and toilets, doors and lock for security of
examination rooms.
6. All examination rooms are monitored for security, violations of examination
rules, and emergency case such as health problems. Monitoring Board for
examination is responsible for arranging and approving appropriate
adjustments to the examination if necessary.
7. If there are no irregularities after checking by the heads of the related
subjects, the question bags will be handed to the Chief Invigilator by the
Registrar.
8. At the end of the examination period, answer booklets are collected and
transferred to course leaders by Chief Invigilator.
9. Answer booklets are kept in the cabinets in the strong room at the respective
departments.
10. Answer booklets are assessed by course leaders/examiners within the
specified period. Heads of Department shall monitor the assessment process.
1. Students who have failed 50% of the total subjects and got at least 25% of the
total marks of each respective subject shall sit for the supplementary
examination.
2. A candidate is considered failed if he or she scored less than 25% of the total
marks. Candidates who are absented during the examination or if they
misconduct themselves during the examination will not be allowed to sit for
the examination.
3. Only theoretical knowledge shall be tested in supplementary examination. The
candidate can only get a maximum of 50% of total marks in supplementary
examination. Marks attained in practical works and tutorials during the
semester will remain unchanged.
4. Those who were absented and have failed in supplementary examination will
be recorded as 1F. Those who have failed 2 times will be recorded as 2F and
they are not allowed to continue their studies at the university and they will be
regarded as external students. For the external students, they have one
chance to sit for the examination to be held in the next academic year.
5. Supplementary Examination must be held within 2 weeks after the
announcement of final examination results.
6. Supplementary examination results will be announced in order of merits after
the final examination results.
7. Candidates who passed the supplementary examination are not regarded as
passed with credits or passed with distinctions.
5-13
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
5-14
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
After final year first semester examination, students are grouped to carry out
projects. They conduct the seminar and defense. Head of the Department will
announce the guideline for the project.
5-15
Chapter 5 – Student Assessment
Analysis/Design 40
Presenting the Result 20
To ensure the effectiveness of the adopted Quality Management System and for
continual improvement, all heads of the department are to collect the information
relating to the customer complaints, customer satisfaction, examination results,
setting examination questions, changes to technical matters etc. The information
collected is analysed and submitted to management review meeting for discussion
and improvement.
The University solicits feedback from the various stakeholders through its hotline,
feedback channels, surveys, focus groups, evaluation, etc. These are analysed and
reported for continuous improvement. Feedback is periodically sought from various
stakeholders, like graduates, employers, students and alumni.
5-16
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
6-1
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• How has the number of academic staff grown in the past? What is the
forecasted number of academic staff in the future? How they have grown or
shrink in respond to student cohort sizes?
• What are the current number, qualification, experience, and profile (age and
gender) of full-time and part-time academic staff?
• What is the method used for calculating FTEs of academic staff and students?
• What is the ratio of staff/student? How is this compared to other programmes,
faculties and universities?
• What are the roles, responsibilities, ethics and accountability of academic
staff?
• How are academic staff selected, appointed, promoted?
• How are academic staff appraised and rewarded for their performance
(teaching, research and service)?
• How are competencies and training needs of academic staff identified?
• What is the current and future training and development plan for academic
staff?
• How are academic staff redeployed, transferred, terminated and retired?
• What are the research activities (projects, papers, presentation, publication,
etc.) and funds carried out by academic staff over the past 5 years?
6-2
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
• How academic staff applied their research output to enhance teaching and
learning? (related to criterion 10).
In the human resource framework, the following four key areas are identified
as being important in supporting the quality of academic staff and support staff of the
university.
Manpower Planning
6-3
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Manpower planning allows the university to develop an action plan for the
organisation’s present and future manpower requirements in response to educational
needs. The steps include:
6-4
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
• Developing the university training and development plan based on the needs
identified. In developing the university training and development plan, the
following points need to be considered:
− Orientations
− Workshops
− Seminars/conferences
− On-the-job training
− Exchanges and industrial attachments
− Professional and academic development programmes
− Coaching and mentoring programmes
6-5
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Performance Management
• Developing performance appraisal forms which may include but not limited to:
− Key performance indicators (KPIs) for the review period
− Comments and ratings on specific areas of responsibility and overall
performance in relation to established KPIs or standards
− Feedback on areas of concern and performance improvement needed
− Opportunities for training and development, and career growth
6-6
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
− Performance bonus
− Promotion
− Recognition programmes
− Informal encouragement
− Training and Development programmes
− Performance warning
− Demotion
− Reduction or withholding of performance bonus
− Termination for non-performance
6-7
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
There are different ways in calculating FTEs and institutions should state the
method, parameters and assumptions used. One of the methods to calculate FTEs is
based on the investment of time. For example, if 1 FTE is equal to 40 hours per
week (full-time employment), then the FTE of an academic staff member with a
teaching load of 8 hours per week will be 0.2 (i.e. 8/40). The investment of time
method can also be used for calculating FTEs of student. For example, if 1 FTE
student has to attend 20 hours of lesson a week, then the FTE of a part-time student
with 10 hours of lesson a week will be 0.5 (i.e. 10/20).
Figure 6.3 may be used to specify the number of academic staff and their FTEs.
5. Staff-to-student Ratio
This indicator is the ratio 1 FTE academic staff member employed to the
number of FTE students enrolled. The aim is to give an idea of how much contact
time and academic support students at the institution may expect to receive. Figure
6.4 may be used to specify the staff-to-student ratio.
6-8
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Figure 6.4 – Staff-to-student Ratio (specify the method of calculation used for FTE of
students)
6. Competences of Academic Staff
6-9
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
7. Research Activities
- Ensure that personnel assigned to the various tasks connected with the
provision of the services offered by the University is of adequate
experience and well-trained in that task;
- Identify training and development needs by means of ongoing appraisals
of individual development and performance of quality related activities; and
- Provide appropriate training and development to all personnel that is in
line with resources available and current operational demand.
Recruitment Procedure
The recruitment process for new staff position through the Union of Civil Service
Board is as follows:
1. All departments have to list and propose the need of new staff based on the
number of vacancies and qualifications required.
2. The administration department will scrutinize the educational qualification
requirements and to determine the number to be employed.
3. The proposals are then submitted to the university administrative committee.
4. A report to employ the new staff in each department will be fully described
and submitted to the Executive Committee of the Ministry of Transport and
Communications( former: The Ministry of Transport).
5. If the submission is granted by the Executive Committee of Ministry, it will be
submitted to the Project Appraisal Progress Reporting Department and the
6-10
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Mandatory Training
New employees joining Myanmar Maritime University will be given a mandatory
training to ensure that they are aware of the university’s quality policy, working hours,
security system, benefits and other administration matters:
The Administration Department shall ensure that a record is kept to verify that the
required mandatory training has been carried out. Head of the departments are to
determine the training needs and to obtain approval from the Rector to conduct/attend
training. Training records are considered as quality records and to be kept for at least 5
years. Training needs will be reviewed at the annual management review meetings.
.
On-the-Job Training
6-11
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Departments and will cover subjects such as safety, health and emergency
situations.
3. Identification of training needs may also be originated from non-conformance raised
during internal audits.
4. Performance/appraisal reports are forwarded to Administration Department by the
Head of Departments and training needs if any will be extracted and acted upon,
where appropriate.
Staff Promotion
1. Staff who conformed with the Q-sheet under the provision of university can
request for promotion from the recommendation of respective head of department.
2. The administration department will scrutinize the educational qualification
requirements and vacancy to determine the number to be promoted.
3. University will announce the entitled list to sit for the promotion examination
(written and personal interview).
4. Promotion Board will select the final selection list based on the promotion
examination result.
5. The final selection list is submitted to the Executive Committee of Ministry of
Transport and Communications (former: The Ministry of Transport) for approval.
6. For promotion of candidate from staff to officer, the approval from the Union of
Civil Service Board is required.
7. Promotion order will be issued to the selected person by the Ministry / the
University according to the approval of the Executive Committee.
8. The selected person needs to submit the duty report to Rector through the
respective Head of Department.
Academic Department
The structure of the Academic Department in Myanmar Maritime University is as
follows:
Academic Department
6-12
Chapter 6 – Academic Staff Quality
Total No: of
Country /
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Graduate/
Year
certificate
China 3 3
Japan 1 1 1 1 1 5
1 1
Sweden
1 1
Singapore
Total 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 10
6-13
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
7-1
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• What are the number, qualification, experience and profile of support staff in
the libraries, laboratories, computer facilities, student services at the
university, faculty and department?
• How is the support staff appointed, selected, promoted, appraised, rewarded?
• How are the competencies and training needs of support staff identified?
What is the current and future training and development plan for support
staff?
• What are the key performance indicators of service provided by libraries,
laboratories, computer facilities and student services? How are these KPIs
monitored and reported? What is trend of KPIs performance in the last 5
years? What is done to improve the trend (related to criterion 10, 11)
In the human resource framework, the following four key areas are identified as
being important in supporting the quality of support staff of the university.
7-2
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
Manpower Planning
Manpower planning allows the university to develop an action plan for the
organisation’s present and future manpower requirements in response to educational
needs. The steps include:
7-3
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
Use Figure 7.2 may be used to specify the number of support staff required or
available.
7-4
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
• Identifying training and development needs of the support staff. The types of
competencies needed for each job grade should be developed.
• Developing the university training and development plan based on the needs
identified. In developing the university training and development plan, the
following points need to be considered:
− Orientations
− Workshops
− Seminars/conferences
− On-the-job training
− Exchanges and industrial attachments
− Professional and academic development programmes
− Coaching and mentoring programmes
Performance Management
• Developing performance appraisal forms which may include but not limited to:
− Key performance indicators (KPIs) for the review period
− Comments and ratings on specific areas of responsibility and overall
performance in relation to established KPIs or standards
− Feedback on areas of concern and performance improvement needed
− Opportunities for training and development, and career growth
7-6
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
− Performance bonus
− Promotion
− Recognition programmes
− Informal encouragement
− Training and Development programmes
− Performance warning
− Demotion
− Reduction or withholding of performance bonus
− Termination for non-performance
7-7
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
Several measures are applied to educate and train the academic as well as
supporting staff. The key activities are summarised below:
7-8
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
The number of support staff that attended the Government Service Training Courses
is as follows:
7-9
Chapter 7 – Support Staff Quality
The procedure for support staff promotion and recruitment is expressed in Work
Instruction of Myanmar Maritime University Quality manual.
All academic departments use KPI for their continual improvement and these
KPIs provide support in meeting the departmental quality objective. The following is
KPI of register (exam) section.
Remark!
1 point= very poor
2 point=below average
3 point=average
4 point= above average
5 point= very good
7-10
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
1. The student intake policy and the admission criteria to the programme are
clearly defined, communicated, published, and up-to-date.
2. The methods and criteria for the selection of students are determined and
evaluated.
3. There is an adequate monitoring system for student progress, academic
performance, and workload. Student progress, academic performance and
workload are systematically recorded and monitored, feedback to students and
corrective actions are made where necessary.
4. Academic advice, co-curricular activities, student competition, and other
student support services are available to improve learning and employability.
5. In establishing a learning environment to support the achievement of quality
student learning, the institution should provide a physical, social and
psychological environment that is conducive for education and research as well
as personal well-being.
8-1
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
Student intake and admission is the process through which university opens
its doors to admit students for a study programme offered at the university. The
intake and admission system varies widely from country to country, and from
institution to institution.
In most countries, prospective students apply for admission into university
during their last year of high school education. The processing of applications and
the administration of admission examinations, if any, may be decentralised to
universities or centralised at government agencies.
The decision to admit an applicant to a study programme often rests with the
university. The decision may be based on a variety of factors such as the results at
standard grade examinations, admission examinations (or their equivalents);
extracurricular activities; student diversity; and student character (based on essay or
interview), etc.
8-2
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
The quality of the output depends a lot on the quality of the input (see Figure
8.1). This means that the quality of the entering students is important and
universities should pay special attention to attract quality students into their
universities.
8-3
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
Research has showed that when teachers monitor their students’ progress
continuously, they can make better decisions in helping students to learn. At the
same time, students become more aware of their own performance and become
active learners.
8-4
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
Student Quality
The registrar (student affair) of the university processes the applications and
the selection of students is made based on the criteria specified by the University.
Student Admission
The policy of the student admission of the University is committed to carry out
the tasks of admission correctly, fairly and effectively in accordance with criteria for
admission.
8-5
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
The pie chart shows the lowest marks of students for entrance from 2010 to 2015.
Myanmar Maritime University accounts students loading every week and keep
record for all students. For first semester and second semester, the students’
workload progress is as shown in graph.
8-6
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
Figure 8.7- 2014 -15 Academic Year (1st semester), Academic Workload Progress
Figure 8.8- 2014 -15 Academic Year (2nd semester), Academic Workload Progress
8-7
Chapter 8 – Student Quality and Support
At the Recreation Centre, sports facilities include main stadium for playing
badminton, table tennis, indoor football, basketball and swimming pool. It has one
football field for student fitness. Moreover, students can use the gym whenever they
have leisure time.
8-8
Chapter 9 – Facilities and Infrastructure
9 -1
Chapter 9 – Facilities and Infrastructure
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• What are the types and number of facilities and infrastructure available
(lecture facilities, libraries, laboratories, computer facilities)?
• What amount of budget per annual is allocated for facilities and infrastructure
maintenance, replacement and upgrading?
• What are the key performance indicators for monitoring user satisfaction,
condition and usage of the facilities and infrastructure? What is the trend of
user satisfaction in the last 5 years? What is being done to improve the trend?
(related to criterion 10, 11)
• What activities on safety, health and environment are organised?
• What are the personal protective equipment (gowns, gloves, helmets, safety
shoes, etc.) available to students and staff to protect their personal well-
being? (related to criterion 8)
• How are fire-fighting equipment and medical aids placed and maintained?
• What are the emergency plans for fire, earthquake, pandemic, etc.?
Facilities and infrastructure do not limit to physical space but also virtual,
psychological and social spaces which are elements for conductive learning
environment (see Figure 9.1). The standards for environment, health and safety; and
access for people with special needs should be defined and implemented to ensure
that the learning environment is safe, accessible and secure.
9 -2
Chapter 9 – Facilities and Infrastructure
Classroom Facilities
There are (2) theatres and (5) two stories buildings. The following table shows
the number of class rooms and lab rooms.
Library
Teaching materials like books, articles, etc. are available at the department
and university’s libraries. Both have sufficient space and number of references for
students use. There is a library in the campus. Students can use library from 8:30am
to 4pm. The library has books plus periodicals, newspaper, magazines from around
the country and has facility to search for book from computer. As at 2014, there are
8273 books and 2654 journals in library. Budget is allocated to the library to
purchase books and other resources.
9 -3
Chapter 9 – Facilities and Infrastructure
Training Facilities
The training facilities at Myanmar Maritime University are as follows:
9 -4
Chapter 9 – Facilities and Infrastructure
Computer Facilities
Computer laboratories are equipped with modern and state-of-the-art software and
they are continuously upgraded to stay up-to-date. Students can use free wifi in the
main building.
Students have full access to university clinics free of charge (open every
weekday). The services offered are first-aid, diagnosis and medical aid, counseling
and hospital referral. Adequate health and safety standards are implemented by the
university.
9 -5
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
1. The curriculum is developed with inputs and feedback from academic staff,
students, alumni and stakeholders from industry, government and professional
organisations.
2. The curriculum design and development process is established and it is
periodically reviewed and evaluated. Enhancements are made to improve its
efficiency and effectiveness.
3. The teaching and learning processes and student assessment are continuously
reviewed and evaluated to ensure their relevance and alignment to the
expected learning outcomes.
4. Research output is used to enhance teaching and learning.
5. Quality of support services and facilities (at the library, laboratory, IT facility and
student services) is subject to evaluation and enhancement.
6. Feedback mechanisms to gather inputs and feedback from staff, students,
alumni and employers are systematic and subjected to evaluation and
enhancement.
10 Quality Enhancement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10.1 Stakeholders’ needs and feedback serve as
input to curriculum design and development [1]
10.2 The curriculum design and development process
is established and subjected to evaluation and
enhancement [2]
10.3 The teaching and learning processes and
student assessment are continuously reviewed
and evaluated to ensure their relevance and
alignment [3]
10.4 Research output is used to enhance teaching
and learning [4]
10.5 Quality of support services and facilities (at the
library, laboratory, IT facility and student
services) is subjected to evaluation and
enhancement [5]
10.6 The stakeholder’s feedback mechanisms are
systematic and subjected to evaluation and
enhancement [6]
Overall opinion
10-1
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• What is the curriculum design & development process and who are the
stakeholders involved? (related to criterion 1). What improvements have been
made to the process over the years?
• What QA activities are carried to ensure quality in teaching & learning and
student assessment? What improvements have been made in these areas?
(related to criterion 4 and 5)
• What is the process of gathering feedback from students, alumni, academic
and support staff, employers, professional bodies, etc? What has been done
to improve the feedback process?
• How service quality of support services is measured and monitored? (related
to criterion 9)
• How research output from academic staff is used for teaching and learning?
(related to criterion 4 and 6)
The evaluation of higher education can be classified into two broad areas:
• Fitness of Purpose:
− Quality of objectives in teaching, research, and service
10-2
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
A typical curriculum design and development process would embrace the PDCA
cycle as shown in Figure 10.1.
Plan. This stage begins with an analysis of the stakeholders' needs of faculty, current
and past students, employers and society in general. The stakeholders' needs are
translated into human resource terminology i.e. graduate competencies which in turn
translated into educational taxonomy i.e. learning outcomes. Based on the learning
outcomes, curriculum is designed backward to meet them.
Do. This stage involves putting the plan into action where the curriculum is delivered
and learning outcomes are assessed to gauge the achievement of them.
Check. This stage involves the analysis of assessment results and feedback from
students and faculty where areas for improvement are identified. Course evaluation,
peer evaluation and curriculum validation are some examples of activities carried out
at this stage.
Act. When the learning outcomes are achieved, the curriculum, learning and
teaching strategies and assessment methods are standardised. Best practices are
shared and improvement is made for the next cycle of PDCA.
10-3
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Service standards are important for both internal and external customers:
prospective students, students, employers, employees, management, alumni,
suppliers, and the general public of the university. They help to shape customers’
perceptions and define what they can expect from the service providers. They also
help to provide feedback to management for service improvement. The steps
involved in establishing service standards are listed below.
10-4
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
− Management
− Employees
− Current and past students
− Competitors
− Regulatory authorities
The feedback and information gathered from the stakeholders would help in
determining the level of service expected. The service standards set should focus on
the critical areas raised by customers. They can be monitored accurately with an
appropriate degree of effort and resources.
Service Standards
Phone calls to NUS (Public Hotlines
only) • Answer 80% of calls within 30 seconds
Emails to NUS
(Generic email accounts for public
• Respond to 90% of emails within 3 working days
enquiries and feedback only)
10-5
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
10-6
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Relevant National
Educational Policies Relevant Maritime
Education Policies
Department of Marine
Administration (DMA)
10-7
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
• Writing reports
• Oral presentations
• Multi-media presentations
• Simulations
• Field trips
• Other research assignments
• Tutorials
10-8
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Curriculum Design
10-9
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Course Monitoring
As teaching departments of the university are responsible to monitor the
courses they deliver, they need to perform a 3-phase course evaluation at least once
a year. In the first phase, teachers are evaluated on their teaching effectiveness. The
second phase evaluates the quality of the course and the last phase evaluates the
entire course and its components. The report including strengths and weaknesses of
the course and future changes are submitted.
Course Review
(a) Head of department and teachers have to review syllabi every year for their
respective department. University Board of Studies has been formed to
conduct necessary education and training related tasks such as syllabi and
curricula addition and amendment, and research on the subject matters. MMU
has formed boards of studies for all subjects being delivered.
(b) Each board of studies comprises professor of respective subject, lecturer
assigned duty by the Academic Board, and external experts. The membership
validation period for the board of studies is two years except for those who are
included in the board due to their rank and position in their departments.
(c) University Academic Board reviews the curricula and syllabi submitted by the
boards of studies.
Student Evaluation
Course evaluation for each lecturer is done after each semester and feedback
is collated and communicated to the lecturer for improvement and training purposes.
Students are required to evaluate the subjects taken at the end of each semester.
The evaluation covers course contents, facilities, lecturer’s performance, etc. The
feedback is collated to improve the curriculum and learning effectiveness.
Stakeholder’s Feedback
The University solicits feedback from various stakeholders through its hotline,
feedback channels, surveys, focus groups, evaluation, etc. These are analysed and
reported for continuous improvement. Feedback is periodically sought from various
stakeholders, like graduates, employers, students, and alumni.
10-10
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
10-11
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Internal Audit
In 2014, internal audit was carried out from 17.6.2014 to 10.12.2014. 5 non-
conformities, 29 observations and 49 opportunities for improvement were reported.
Thus, the Non-Conformities are discussed as follows:
There were no non-conformities at the external audit (2015) but there were two
observations and 5 opportunities for improvement as follows:
1. All academic divisions have gathered and analysed feedback form (MMU-
013), but they should implement "clear action plan" for the lower score.
(OBS)
2. All divisions have sufficient measuring/monitoring of KPIs, but they should
strengthen their "mathematical analysis". (OBS)
3. Currently preventive actions are raised in action plan, but MMU might
revise MMU-010 to better serve "action to prevent occurrence" clearly.
(OFI)
4. Administration division might consider "evaluation of in-house training
effectiveness" to be one of the KPIs. (OFI)
5. Even though MMU conducts internal audit for all relevant divisions, please
make sure that internal auditor will audit "all relevant requirements" for
each audited division. (Internal audit checklist / MMU-05). (OFI)
6. They have sufficient maintenance records of workshop machines, but they
should set up clear "maintenance period" and "checking technical term"
e.g. what voltage (+/-), temp (> or < specific number).(Workshop
Department) (OFI)
7. They have sufficient maintenance records of computers, but they should
set up clear "inspection lists".(Computer Science Department) (OFI)
10-12
Chapter 10 – Quality Enhancement
Service Standards
Service Standards
Registrar (Exam) - Within 15 working days for mark certificate and grading
certificate
- Within 5 working days for recommendation letter
Library - Make available all books returned at the loan desk every
evening
- Provide access to Library Management System from 9 am
to 3pm
IT Support - Provide Wi-Fi from 9 am to 4 pm
10-13
Chapter 11 – Output
1. The quality of the graduates (such as pass rates, dropout rates, average
time to graduate, employability, etc.) is established, monitored and
benchmarked; and the programme should achieve the expected learning
outcomes and satisfy the needs of the stakeholders.
2. Research activities carried out by students are established, monitored and
benchmarked; and they should meet the needs of the stakeholders.
3. Satisfaction levels of staff, students, alumni, employers, etc. are established,
monitored and benchmarked; and that they are satisfied with the quality of
the programme and its graduates.
11 Output 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11.1 The pass rates and dropout rates are
established, monitored and benchmarked for
improvement [1]
11.2 The average time to graduate is established,
monitored and benchmarked for improvement [1]
11.3 Employability of graduates is established,
monitored and benchmarked for improvement [1]
11.4 The types and quantity of research activities by
students are established, monitored and
benchmarked for improvement [2]
11.5 The satisfaction levels of stakeholders are
established, monitored and benchmarked for
improvement [3]
Overall opinion
The questions below aim to guide the writing of the self-assessment report (SAR)
and the establishment of QA practices for the above criterion.
• What is the trend of student pass rates, time to graduate and employability
over the last 5 years? How do they perform against benchmarked
universities? What are being done to improve the trend?
• What are the types and volume of research activities carried out by students?
(related to criterion 8)
• What indicators are used to measure stakeholders’ satisfaction (students,
staff, alumni, employers, etc? What is the trend of the indicators in the last 5
years? (related to criterion 10)
• What is the plan to improve stakeholders’ satisfaction?
• How satisfied are employers with graduate quality as compared to graduates
from other universities?
11-1
Chapter 11 – Output
After the analysing the input, the process and the output, institutions have to
analyse the satisfaction of its stakeholders such as staff, students, alumni and
employers. There should be a system to collect and measure stakeholders’
satisfaction. The information collected should be analysed and benchmarked for
making improvements to the programme, quality practices and quality assurance
system.
4. Benchmarking
11-2
Chapter 11 – Output
The following outputs of MMU are established and monitored for continual
improvement.
ME 3003
The graph shows the pass percentages of students for ME 3003 subject from
academic year 2009/10 to 2013/14. The percentage of students passing the subject
averages at 96.4% and this shows that vast majority of the students are meeting the
minimum requirements and learning objectives of the subject.
Passed Percentage of ME 3003
No. Academic Year Total No. of Student No. of Passed Student % of Passed Student
11-3
Chapter 11 – Output
11-4
Chapter 11 – Output
NA ME PH RC EE NS NA ME PH RC EE NS
11-5
Chapter 11 – Output
Research by Students
Stakeholders Satisfaction
11-6