Vacunas Covid-19 Son Seguras en Personas Con Alergias
Vacunas Covid-19 Son Seguras en Personas Con Alergias
Aleena Banerji, MD, Paige G. Wickner, MD, Rebeca Saff, MD, PhD, Cosby A. Stone,
Jr., MD, MPH, Lacey B. Robinson, MD, MPH, Aidan A. Long, MD, Anna R. Wolfson,
MD, Paul Williams, MD, David A. Khan, MD, Elizabeth Phillips, MD, Kimberly G.
Blumenthal, MD, MSc
PII: S2213-2198(20)31411-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.047
Reference: JAIP 3355
Please cite this article as: Banerji A, Wickner PG, Saff R, Stone CA Jr, Robinson LB, Long AA, Wolfson
AR, Williams P, Khan DA, Phillips E, Blumenthal KG, mRNA Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Disease
and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current Evidence and Approach, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical
Immunology: In Practice (2021), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.047.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
1
1 mRNA Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Disease and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current
of
8 Aidan A. Long, MD1,2
ro
9 Anna R. Wolfson, MD1,2
2
16 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Jo
3
17 Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s
18 Hospital, Boston MA
4
19 Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
3
20 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas
24 MA
26
2
27 Corresponding Author:
28 Aleena Banerji
31 UNITED STATES
32 617-726-3850
of
34
ro
35 Manuscript Contents
39 Figures: 6
40
na
References: 33
41
ur
42 Key Words: mRNA, COVID-19, vaccine, drug allergy, allergic reactions, anaphylaxis,
Jo
44
45 Abbreviations:
47 United States, US
51 United Kingdom, UK
53 confidence interval, CI
55 Funding
57
58 Disclosures
of
60 R01AI152183, R21AI139021, U01AI154659) and from the National Health and Medical
ro
61 Research Council of Australia. She receives Royalties from Uptodate and consulting fees from
62 Janssen, Vertex and Biocryst. She is co-director of IIID Pty Ltd that holds a patent for HLA-
63
-p
B*57:01 testing for abacavir hypersensitivity, and has a patent pending for Detection of Human
re
64 Leukocyte Antigen-A*32:01 in connection with Diagnosing Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and
lP
65 Systemic Symptoms without any financial remuneration and not directly related to the submitted
66
na
67
ur
69
70 Abstract
71 The recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of two highly effective COVID-19
72 vaccines from Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna has brought hope to millions of American in the
73 midst of an ongoing global pandemic. The FDA Emergency Use Authorization guidance for both
74 vaccines is to not administer the vaccine to individuals with known history of a severe allergic
75 reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the COVID-19 vaccine. The Centers for
76 Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) advises that all patients should be observed for 15
77 minutes after COVID-19 vaccination and staff must be able to identify and manage anaphylaxis.
78 Post-FDA approval, despite very strong safety signals in both phase 3 trials, reports of possible
4
79 allergic reactions have raised public concern. To provide reassurance and support during
80 widespread vaccination across America, allergists must offer clear guidance to patients based on
81 the best information available, but also in accordance with the broader recommendations of our
82 US regulatory agencies. This review summarizes vaccine allergy epidemiology and proposes risk
83 stratification schema: (1) for individuals with different allergy histories to safely receive their first
84 COVID-19 vaccine and (2) for individuals who develop a reaction to their first dose of COVID-
85 19 vaccine.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
5
86 Introduction
87 Vaccination, one of the most effective public health interventions modern medicine can offer, has
88 become increasingly relevant as the global pandemic from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
89 19) continues to worsen throughout the world. In the United States (US), the pandemic has risen
90 to crisis levels in every state, setting records with tens of thousands of new cases reported daily
91 and deaths mounting. As of December 2020, over 18 million people in the US have had
92 confirmed infections and more than 320,000 have died of COVID-19.1 Medical necessities are
of
93 often in short supply, hospitals are overwhelmed, and healthcare workers are exhausted after
ro
94 months of fighting an uphill battle. At the time of writing this review, immediate allergic
95 reactions clinically compatible with anaphylaxis have occurred at a rate of 1.3 per 100,000 doses
96
-p
of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Currently the specific mechanism and the inciting
re
97 antigen have not been identified. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge of
lP
98 immediate allergic reactions associated with the mRNA vaccines and a hypothesis regarding a
99
na
potential relationship with the lipid-PEG2000 component of the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) mRNA
101
Jo
103 The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of two highly effective COVID19
104 vaccines in December 2020 was a landmark in the pandemic response for Americans. The Pfizer-
105 BioNTech two-dose COVID19 vaccine regimen given on day 0 and 21 showed a 95% efficacy at
106 preventing symptomatic COVID19 infection, measured forward from seven days after the second
107 dose was administered.2 The vaccine appeared equally protective across age groups as well as
108 racial and ethnic groups.2 The Moderna two-dose COVID19 vaccine regimen given on day 0 and
109 28 was 94% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID19, measured from 14 days after the
110 second dose onward.3 The efficacy of the Moderna vaccine appeared to be slightly lower in
111 people 65 years of age and older, but it was equally effective across different racial and ethnic
6
112 groups.3 The safety of both vaccines over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral
113 vaccines. Severe systemic events were reported in less than 2% of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
114 recipients after either dose, except for 3.8% reporting fatigue and 2.0% reporting headache after
115 the second dose. The majority of adverse events after receiving the Moderna vaccine were mild or
116 moderate in severity. A small number of participants reported systemic reactions lasting longer
117 than 7 days, but there was no difference between vaccine and placebo groups. The Pfizer-
118 BioNTech Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is for individuals age 16 and older while
of
119 Moderna is for individuals age 18 and older.
ro
120
121 Prior to FDA EUA of a COVID-19 vaccine, the United Kingdom (UK) Commission on Human
122
-p
Medicines initiated their COVID-19 vaccination program using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
re
123 Within 48 hours, there were two reports of severe allergic reactions in the UK that prompted
lP
124 treatment with epinephrine. These reported allergic reactions led to a closer review of the Pfizer-
125
na
BioNTech clinical trial data by the FDA. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna clinical trials
126 excluded patients with a prior history of severe adverse reactions associated with a vaccine, and
ur
127 the Pfizer-BioNTech trials further excluded severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any
Jo
128 component of their COVID19 vaccine. Hypersensitivity-related adverse events were observed in
129 0.63% of Pfizer-BioNTech and 1.5% of Moderna vaccine clinical trial participants who received
130 the vaccine, compared to 0.51% and 1.1% respectively in the placebo groups. One case of
131 anaphylaxis and one drug hypersensitivity reaction were reported in the Pfizer-BioNTech trial,4
132 and two cases of delayed hypersensitivity reactions were reported in the Moderna trial.3 Only one
133 of the Moderna delayed allergic reactions was in the vaccine group, and, since it occurred several
134 months after vaccination, it was unlikely to be related to the vaccine. Also, in the Moderna trial,
135 there were three events of lip/face swelling 1-2 days after vaccination but exclusively in patients
136 with a history of dermal fillers but unclear from which manufacturer. There were no anaphylactic
7
137 or severe hypersensitivity reactions reported with close temporal relation to administration of the
139
141 The FDA EUA guidance for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID19 vaccine specifies, “do not
142 administer Pfizer-BioNTech COVID19 vaccine to individuals with known history of a severe
143 allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID19
of
144 vaccine.” Given the reported reactions in healthcare workers, the US Centers for Disease Control
ro
145 and Prevention (CDC) subsequently advised that all patients – regardless of allergy history –
146 should be observed for 15 minutes after COVID19 vaccination and that vaccination staff must be
147
-p
trained to manage anaphylaxis. The CDC provided further recommendations, “that persons who
re
148 have had a severe allergic reaction to any vaccine or injectable therapy (intramuscular,
lP
149 intravenous, or subcutaneous) discuss the risk of receiving the vaccine with their doctors and be
150
na
monitored for 30 minutes afterward.” In addition, patients who have a severe allergic reaction
151 (e.g., anaphylaxis) to an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine should not receive a second dose. CDC
ur
152 precautions and contraindications for the Moderna vaccine under EUA were the same as the
Jo
154
156 Similar to the UK experience, within a few days of widespread vaccination of healthcare workers
157 in the US, several reports of presumed allergic reactions to the COVID19 vaccine emerged. At
158 the time of publication, there have been at least 10 reported allergic reactions to the Pfizer-
159 BioNTech vaccine across greater than 2 million doses administered in the United States and two
160 reports of a reaction to the Moderna vaccine. The most apparent reactions have occurred within
161 the CDC-recommended observation window, and patients have been treated immediately with
8
162 complete resolution of symptoms. To date, there are no long-term sequelae or fatalities associated
164
166 Allergic reactions to vaccines are generally described as occurring at a rate of 1.31 (95%
167 confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.84) cases per million vaccine doses from a large population-
168 based study, with no fatalities reported.6 Rates remain similar when stratified by age and gender,
of
169 although slightly higher frequencies have been observed in females.6 The incidence of allergic
ro
170 reaction by specific vaccine, however, is difficult to quantify in epidemiologic studies, as often
171 multiple vaccines are administered on the same day. The cases that followed administration of a
172
-p
single vaccine involved predominantly trivalent influenza vaccine, for which the rate of reaction
re
173 was estimated to be 1.35 (95% CI, 0.65-2.47) per million vaccine doses.6 Of concern is that,
lP
174 while numerically rare, vaccine reactions can cause substantial fear and anxiety in the general
175
na
176
ur
177 Confirmed allergic reactions to vaccines are not frequently attributed to the active ingredients but
Jo
178 rather to the inactive ingredients, or excipients, including egg protein, gelatin, formaldehyde,
179 thimerosal, or neomycin. Excipients are necessary and added to a vaccine for specific purposes
181 stabilizing the potency of the vaccine during transportation and storage. Excipients represent the
182 major contributor to specific IgE-mediated and immediate reactions associated with vaccines.7
183 Efforts to specifically decrease well-known excipients like egg and gelatin in vaccines have been
184 highly successful in reducing subsequent allergic reactions.8,9 Other excipients, like polyethylene
185 glycol (PEG) and polysorbate (Figure 1), are used to improve water-solubility in drugs and
186 vaccines. PEG itself has not previously been used in a vaccine but polysorbate has been identified
187 as a rare cause of allergic reactions to vaccines. First dose reactions to vaccines containing
9
188 polysorbates may have occurred due to prior sensitization from polysorbate 80.10 The recently
189 approved Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID19 mRNA vaccines are not formulated with any
190 food, drugs, or latex, but both contain the excipient PEG (Table 1, Table 2) for the purpose of
191 stabilizing the LNP containing the mRNA. The specific PEG in these vaccines is different from
192 the PEG used most commonly in other healthcare products, both in molecular weight and due to
193 its coformulation as a stabilizing portion of a liposome.10,11 The AstraZeneca and Johnson &
194 Johnson COVID19 vaccines currently under development do not contain PEG but instead contain
of
195 the excipient polysorbate 80 (Table 2).
ro
196
197 Numerous FDA-approved and over-the-counter products contain PEG, including medications,
-p
198 skin creams and personal lubricants, as well as foods utilizing PEG as an anti-foaming agent
re
199 (Table 3). Additionally, PEG3350 is the active ingredient in several medications prescribed for
lP
200 treating constipation (e.g., Miralax) and in bowel preps used prior to colonoscopy (e.g.,
na
201 GoLytely). While considered to be safe and biologically inert, several reports have shown that up
202 to 70% of patients who have undergone treatment with PEGylated therapeutics will develop anti-
ur
203 PEG IgG antibodies.12 A more recent study in the general population showed that 5% to 9% of
Jo
204 1721 serum samples tested were positive for anti-PEG IgG, 3% to 6% of 948 such samples tested
205 were positive for anti-PEG IgM, and 2 of 2091 (0.1%) samples tested were positive for anti-PEG
206 IgE.13 Also, reactions to PEG-containing products on the first exposure suggests previous
207 sensitization to PEG. However, a review of FDA voluntary reporting data from 2005 through
208 2017 identified an average of just four cases (range, two to eight cases) per year of PEG-
209 associated anaphylaxis during colonoscopy preparation or laxative use.10 Interestingly, more
210 subtle PEG allergies are usually discovered during allergist evaluation of patients being evaluated
211 for reactions to seemingly unrelated products, including injectable steroids, processed foods,
212 cosmetics, drugs, and other substances that contain PEG.14 Specific IgE directed against PEG has
213 recently been demonstrated in PEG allergic patients who reacted both to PEGs and, in one case,
10
215 methods.10,11,13 In the earliest of these three reports, the binding of PEG specific IgG from PEG
216 anaphylaxis patients showed increased avidity as the molecular weight of the PEG assayed
217 increased from 1000 and above, with clinical tolerance of PEG300 upon challenge, suggesting
218 that not all PEGs are equally risky to cause reactions.10 Although an exact threshold of reactivity
219 based upon molecular weight of PEG is not known, tolerance of PEG with molecular weight
220 <400 has been described in those who have documented anaphylaxis to PEG3350.10
of
221
ro
222 Polysorbate, structurally similar to PEG with polyether domains with observed clinical cross-
223 reactivity (Figure 1), is also an excipient in a multitude of medical preparations (e.g., vitamin
224
-p
oils, vaccines, and anticancer agents), creams, ointments, lotions, and medication tablets (Table
re
225 4).15 For example, at least 70% of injectable biological agents and monoclonal antibody
lP
226 treatments contain a polysorbate, most typically polysorbate 80.16 Unfortunately, polysorbate and
227
na
229 biologics, vaccines, steroids, and chemotherapeutics, although there is limited in vivo and in vitro
Jo
230 evidence to support this, and isolated sensitization through polysorbates appears rare and less
231 common than through higher molecular weight PEG.17-22 Attempts have been made to address
232 these issues by using safer alternatives to polysorbate, but the negative allergic outcomes are
233 often outweighed by the clinical benefit of improved drug performance. In the context of
234 evolving literature demonstrating PEG as an allergen, many allergists have hypothesized that any
235 cases of anaphylaxis during the rollout of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna SARS-CoV2
236 vaccines, which utilize different liposomal delivery vehicles but contain PEG2000, could
237 potentially be due to preexisting PEG allergy.23 However, to date, confirmation that IgE-mediated
238 reactions to PEG are responsible for reported reactions to COVID-19 vaccines is lacking.
239
11
240 In addition to considering excipients as the cause of IgE-mediated allergic reactions to the
241 currently approved COVID-19 vaccines, alternative non-IgE pathways for activating mast cells
242 and other inflammatory cells must also be considered, as they can lead to a similar clinical
243 presentation. For example, activation of the complement system leads to the generation of C3a,
244 C4, and C5a, which are potent activators of inflammation and are called anaphylatoxins due to
245 their ability to cause non-IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation. One of the first reports of acute
246 anaphylaxis associated with serum complement depletion was of a 45-year-old female
of
247 experiencing anaphylaxis after receiving lidocaine. She developed faintness, flushing, pallor,
ro
248 dyspnea, and hypotension, but she did not have urticaria or bronchospasm. Complement levels
249 were markedly low (C1q, C3, C4, C5, and Factor B).24 Depletion of complement levels and
250
-p
production of C3a and C5a have been seen in both mouse models of anaphylaxis and in clinical
re
251 studies. C5a is the most potent of the anaphylatoxins and can contribute to vascular permeability
lP
252 as well as activation and chemotaxis of neutrophils, basophils, and mast cells. Infection and
253
na
tissue injury can lead to activation of the complement system resulting in the generation of C3a
254 and C5a, and these mediators can lead to anaphylaxis. PEG IgM and IgG can cause complement-
ur
256 nanoparticle-based medicines.26 This pathway may be responsible for reactions to medications
257 such as liposomal doxorubicin27 and other drugs in clinical trials.26 Clearly, it is important to
258 consider both IgE and alternative mechanisms for the current reactions. Measurement of serum
259 tryptase, complement, and PEG antibodies may help elucidate the mechanism of the drug-induced
261
262 It is also important to note that other non-immunologic reactions may masquerade as allergic
263 reactions including anaphylaxis. Vasovagal reactions are a well-known cause of hypotension and
264 syncopal reactions associated with injections including vaccines. Panic or anxiety reactions can
265 also present with symptoms masquerading as allergic reactions such as flushing, shortness of
12
266 breath, tachycardia and lightheadedness. Inducible laryngeal obstruction (i.e., vocal cord
267 dysfunction) may also masquerade as anaphylaxis with prominent symptoms of shortness of
268 breath and throat tightness but may also include flushing.
269
270 Evaluation of Patients with a Severe Allergy Histories and Guidance for Initial
272 Massive vaccination programs were initiated within a few days after the FDA EAU of the
of
273 COVID-19 vaccines. However, many questions surrounded the safety of giving these vaccines to
ro
274 individuals with a prior allergy history. One approach is to risk stratify patients prior to COVID-
275 19 vaccination. The authors from Mass General Brigham (MGB, formerly Partners HealthCare;
276
-p
comprised of 16 healthcare institutions in the New England area and the largest employer in
re
277 Massachusetts) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a plan of care to risk-stratify
lP
278 employees to guide safe vaccination in patients with higher risk allergy histories (Figure 2). In
279
na
order to ensure vaccination in as many individuals as quickly as possible, our guidance, in line
280 with FDA and CDC guidance, results in the rapid assessment of patients with concerning
ur
281 anaphylaxis histories but does not preclude large groups of individuals from receiving the
Jo
282 COVID-19 vaccine per usual protocol with either 15 minute or 30 minute observation periods.
283
284 Four screening questions are presented to patients prior to the initial vaccination assess risk:
288 3. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to another allergen (e.g., food, venom,
289 or latex)?
290 4. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol (PEG),
291 a polysorbate or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (e.g. paclitaxel) containing injectable or vaccine?
13
292 The screening questions are accompanied by a “Frequently Asked Questions” document
293 explaining medical terminology, including descriptions of PEG and polysorbates (Table 5).
294
295 If the answer is “no” to all four questions, the individual would be deemed “lower risk” and
296 receive the vaccine under usual conditions with 15-minute observation period. If the answer to
297 question #1, #2 or #3 is “yes,” the individual would be deemed “medium risk” and require a 30-
298 minute observation period. In addition, if “yes” for #1 and #2, specific investigation as to the
of
299 specific injectable products and vaccines should be pursued to determine if these products could
ro
300 have contained high molecular weight PEG, polysorbate or polyoxyl 35 (e.g. paclitaxel). If the
301 answer to question #4 is “yes,” the individual would be deemed “higher risk,” prompting
302
-p
evaluation with an allergist for expanded skin testing using non-irritating skin testing
re
303 concentrations (Figure 3, Figure 4).10 If skin testing to PEG is positive, under EUA, the
lP
304 individual is not a candidate for the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, and the
305
na
skin test result to polysorbate 20 and 80 become important with regards to the safety of future
306 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. If skin testing to PEG is negative, vaccination with the
ur
307 Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines could proceed with 30 minutes of observation.
Jo
308
309 Evaluation and Management of Patients with Potential Reactions to the COVID-19
310 Vaccines
311 For patients presenting to the allergist with a possible reaction to the first dose of their COVID-19
312 vaccine, the primary concern will be the suggested action for the second dose (Figure 5).
313 Although the vaccines have good efficacy related to only one dose, both the Pfizer-BioNTech and
314 Moderna vaccines received EUA approval for efficacy that was evaluated with two doses. As
315 such, a crucial determination will be establishing whether or not an allergic reaction occurred. For
316 patients with a possible allergic reaction after their first dose that does meet criteria for
317 anaphylaxis (e.g. immediate urticaria), vaccination programs should prioritize follow-up with an
14
318 allergist who can perform specialized skin testing and risk stratify the patient for future SARS-
319 CoV-2 vaccine administration (Figure 5). Antihistamines do not prevent anaphylaxis and could
320 mask cutaneous symptoms leading to a delay in treatment. As such, we do not recommend
321 antihistamine pretreatment at this time. If a patient develops anaphylaxis to the first dose, shared
322 decision making with an allergist including risk stratification and expanded skin testing must
323 occur before any consideration of vaccine rechallenge (Figure 5). There are no data on the safety
324 of the second vaccine after anaphylaxis to the first dose. For other vaccines for which there is
of
325 much more allergy experience, split dose challenges (e.g. 10-25% of dose followed 30 minutes
ro
326 later by remaining 75-90% dose) have been used. For patients with convincing anaphylaxis
327 histories (e.g. objective documentation of hypotension, hypoxia), we recommend expanded skin
328
-p
testing (Figure 3) and if positive, avoidance of a second dose of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2
re
329 vaccine from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna (Figure 3, Figure 5). We do not
lP
330 recommend vaccine skin testing at this time due to limited vaccine supply, lack of
na
331 information on sensitivity or specificity, and unclear safety of skin testing to these
332 vaccines
ur
333
Jo
334 All patients with potentially allergic reactions should be reported through formal processes,
335 which include the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (clinician entry), and
336 patients should be encouraged to use V-Safe CDC application for second dose reminders and to
338
339 Supporting Safe Vaccination and Addressing Public Concern: A Role for the Allergist
340 Allergists’ expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic reactions is invaluable for the
341 screening of high-risk individuals, the training of clinic staff conducting vaccinations, and the
342 management of patients who experience potentially allergic reactions to a COVID-19 vaccine.
15
343 To date, MGB screening methods prior to vaccination consist of self-reported answers to a
344 questionnaire followed by telemedicine visits with an allergy clinician for high-risk patients. This
345 allows for both determination of risk and reassurance to patients deemed low or medium risk, that
346 they can safely receive the vaccine. For reactions that happen onsite, vaccination clinics are
347 reliant on staff that do not regularly diagnose and treat anaphylaxis, but CDC guidance
348 emphasized a minimum of 15 minutes of observation after all doses and ready access to
349 appropriate medical treatment for allergic reactions. Those staffing the vaccination clinic should
of
350 have education around anaphylaxis treatment guidelines. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening
ro
351 hypersensitivity reaction where rapid, early administration of epinephrine is vital for recovery.
352 Along with the CDC educational and training videos, allergists can help reassure patients and
355 vasovagal and anxiety reactions from anaphylaxis and defining anaphylaxis with
356
na
357 2) Education on the treatment of anaphylaxis. Allergists should review epinephrine use and
ur
358 anaphylaxis-kit contents. For example, prior to the roll-out of MGB employee
Jo
359 vaccination, allergists provided education and replaced epinephrine vials with
361 kits.
362 3) Providing at-the-elbow support to vaccination programs. Allergists may need to be on-
363 site or on-call during higher risk vaccination. This will ensure that vaccinated individuals
364 with possible reactions receive the best diagnostic evaluation and treatment plan, while
365 linking them to appropriate follow-up care prior to the second vaccine dose.
366 4) Providing support to individuals with benign symptoms after discharge. Up to 80% of
367 individuals in the vaccine clinical trials had local symptoms after vaccination. Large local
368 reactions with symptoms of pain, itching, burning, or swelling at the site of injection do
16
369 not preclude an individual from getting the vaccine again. Non-steroidal anti-
370 inflammatory drugs used to treat fever or myalgias may precipitate urticaria that could be
371 misattributed to the vaccine. Allergists can provide assessments and reassurance and
373
374 Summary
375 Allergic reactions to vaccines occur and can be attributed to various vaccine components. In
of
376 support of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout programs, allergists must offer clear recommendations
ro
377 based on the best available information to date, which includes the comprehensive ingredients in
378 -p
the vaccines, allergy contraindications from the FDA, and guidance on administration from the
re
379 CDC.
380
lP
381 As the US prepares for massive COVID-19 vaccination, allergists must prepare for two main
na
382 population health challenges: (1) ensuring that highly allergic individuals feel appropriately
383 informed and supported to receive the vaccine and (2) ensuring that rare patients who suffer from
ur
384 a potentially allergic reaction to the first dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine have the requisite
Jo
385 information and support needed to decide if and how to receive the second dose. While these
386 challenges require attention immediately during the current vaccination process, it is of equal
387 importance that we must also design and conduct adequately powered studies to investigate the
388 potential mechanistic etiology of these reactions. We need to understand the safety issues
389 surrounding these vaccines, because the success of this the mRNA vaccine platform is
390 foundational to the flexibility of the COVID-19 response and our response to other viruses with
392 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
393 The authors thank the Mass General Brigham health system faculty and staff, including Dean
394 Hashimoto, MD, Tanya Laidlaw, MD, David Hong, MD, Anna Feldweg MD, Karen Ferreira,
395 Keisha Lewis, Barbara Schmidt, Nahal Beik, Adam Landman, MD, Erica S. Shenoy, MD, PhD,
396 and Rajesh Patel, MD, MPH. The authors thank Upeka Samarakoon, PhD, MPH, Allen Judd,
397 Christian Mancini, Amelia Cogan, and Aubree McMahon for their research assistance.
398
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
18
of
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-
phosphocholine phosphocholine
Cholesterol Cholesterol
ro
Inactive – salts, sugars, Potassium chloride, monobasic Tromethamin, Tromethamin
buffers potassium phosphate, sodium hydrocholoride, acetid acid,
dehydrate
-p
chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate sodium acetate
re
Sugar (sucrose) Sugar (sucrose)
Diluent (Sodium Chloride) Diluent (None)
lP
401
na
ur
Jo
19
of
9
Polysorbate 80 Hepatitis B Heplisav-B 0.1 mg/ml
ro
Polysorbate 80 DTaP Infanrix <100 mcg (Tween 80)
Polysorbate 80 Japanese encephalitis JE-Vax <0.0007%
Polysorbate 80
Polysorbate 80
Polysorbate 80
DTaP + IPV
DTaP+HepB+IPV
Pneumococcal
-pKinrix
Pediarix
13- Prevnar 13
<100 mcg (Tween 80)
<100 mcg (Tween 80)
100 mcg
re
valent
Polysorbate 80 DTaP + IPV Quadracel 10 ppm
lP
B
Polysorbate 80 DTaP+IPV+HepB+Hib Vaxelis <0.0056%
Polysorbate 80* Sars-CoV-2
ur
(Astrazenica)
Jo
Sars-CoV-2
(Johnson&Johnson)
PEG2000 Sars-CoV-2
(Moderna)
Sars-CoV-2
(Pfizer)
*Not approved at the time of publication
405
20
of
(Micera) (CKD)
ro
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) 20 kD Monomethoxy Used to help reduce the
polyethylene glycol chance of infection due to a
-p low white blood cell count, in
people with certain types of
cancer (non myeloid), who
re
receive anti-cancer medicines
(chemotherapy) that can
lP
carcinoma.
Brilliant Blue G Ophthalmic PEG 3350 Disclosing agent indicated to
Solution (TissueBlue) selectively stain the internal
limiting membrane (ILM)
Sulfur hexafluoride PEG 4000 Ultrasound contrast agent
(Lumason)
Biomatoprost implant PEG, unspecified Reduction of intraocular
(Durysta) pressure (IOP) in patients
with open angle glaucoma
(OAG) or ocular hypertension
(OHT)
Trastuzumab (Herceptin, PEG 3350 Adjuvant treatment of HER2
Herzuma, Kanjinti, Ogivri, overexpressing node positive
Ontruzant) or node negative breast cancer
21
408
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
22
of
Antifungal Anidulafungin (Eraxis) Polysorbate 80
ro
Anti-inflammatory Interferon beta 1a (Avonex, Plegridy) Polysorbate 20
Omalizumab (Xolair) Polysorbate 20
Antineoplastic
-p
Ofatumumab (Kesimpta) Polysorbate 80
re
Siltuximab (Sylvant) Polysorbate 80
Paliperidone palmitate (Invega Trinza,
Antipsychotic Polysorbate 20
lP
Invega Sustenna)
Aripiprazole lauroxil (Aristada) Polysorbate 20
na
(Imraldi) /
Antipsoriatic Adalimumab (Humira, Imraldi)
Polysorbate 80
(Humira)
Jo
Daratumumab/hyaluronidase (Darzalex
Polysorbate 20
Faspro)
Denosumab (Prolia, Xgeva) Polysorbate 20
Dinutuximab (Unituxin) Polysorbate 20
Enfortumab (Padcev) Polysorbate 20
Olaratumab (Lartruvo) Polysorbate 20
Palifermin (Kepivance) Polysorbate 20
Pertuzumab/trastuzumab/hyaluronidase
Polysorbate 20
(Phesgo)
Polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy) Polysorbate 20
of
Tafasitamab (Monjuvi) Polysorbate 20
ro
Trastuzumab (Herceptin, Herceptin
Hylecta, Herzuma, Kanjinti, Ontruzant, Polysorbate 20
Trazimera) -p
Belantamab (Blenrep) Polysorbate 80
re
Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) Polysorbate 80
lP
of
II Suik, Zilretta)
ro
Diagnostic Sincalide (Kinevac) Polysorbate 20
Tuberculin purified protein derivative
Polysorbate 80
Disease-modifying
-p
(Aplisol, Tubersol)
re
Anakinra (Kineret) Polysorbate 80
antirheumatic drug (DMARD)
Tocilizumab (Actemra) Polysorbate 80
lP
inactivated-zhzo (Andexxa)
Gonadotropin Follitropin (Menopur, Follistim) Polysorbate 20
Growth hormone analog Somatropin (Nutropin AQ Nuspin 5) Polysorbate 20
Hematopoietic growth factor Erythropoietin (Retacrit) Polysorbate 20
Pegfilgrastim (Fulphila, Neulasta, Nyvepria,
Polysorbate 20
Udenyca)
Romiplostim (Nplate) Polysorbate 20
Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) Polysorbate 80
Filgrastim (Neupogen, Nivestym, Granix,
Polysorbate 80
Zarxio)
Hepatitis B/ Hepatitis C agent Peginterferon (Pegasys Pegintron) Polysorbate 80
Hemostatic Vitamin K (Phytonadione) Polysorbate 80
25
of
Mepolizumab (Nucala) Polysorbate 80
ro
Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Polysorbate 80
Kallikrein inhibitor
-p
Tildrakizumab -asmn (Ilumya)
Lanadelumab (Takhzyro)
Polysorbate 80
Polysorbate 80
re
Leptin analog Metreleptin (Myalept) Polysorbate 20
lP
of
Vitamin infusion Calcitriol (Calcijex, Rocaltrol) Polysorbate 20
Doxercalciferol (Hectorol) Polysorbate 20
ro
Vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, C, D3, E, K
Polysorbate 80
411
(Infuvite) -p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
27
of
429
430 What is a severe allergic reaction?
431
ro
A severe allergic reaction is sometimes called anaphylaxis. Symptoms start very quickly (usually within minutes) and
432 almost always within 4 hours of vaccination and typically include hives; swelling of mouth, lips, tongue or throat;
433 shortness of breath, wheezing, or chest tightness; or low blood pressure or loss of consciousness.
434 -p
435 What are the ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine?
436 1. mRNA.The active ingredient is a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike
re
437 (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.
438 2. Inactive ingredients:
439 • Lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), [(polyethylene
lP
450 • lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-
451 distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]),
452 • tromethamine,
453 • tromethamine hydrochloride,
454 • acetic acid,
455 • sodium acetate,
456 • Sugar (sucrose)
457
458 Which patients should speak to an allergist before receiving the vaccine?
459 In the vaccine trials, only patients with a history of severe allergic reaction associated with a vaccine and/or severe
460 allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine were excluded. If you are unsure about your vaccine or PEG allergy
461 history, an allergy consultation is recommended. In general, most patients allergic to one vaccine can receive other
462 vaccinations safely.
463
464 What is polyethylene glycol (PEG) and what are common products that contain PEG?
465 Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a common, water-soluble ingredient in a wide variety of commercial products including
466 some vaccines and more than 1000 FDA approved medications. It is the primary ingredient in commonly used
467 colonoscopy preparations (Golytely) or constipation treatment (Miralax) as well as in IV medications such as
468 PEGylated medications. It is also in ultrasound gel and injectable steroid injections such as methylprednisolone
469 acetate. Reactions to polyethylene glycol are exceedingly rare but anaphylaxis has been reported.
470
28
of
clammy and pallor
Diaphoresis, clammy skin, • Pruritis and urticaria
ro
Skin
pallor (>90% of cases)
• Swelling of face and
-p tongue
Hypotension (systolic pressure
<90 mmHg), which may
re
Blood pressure Transient hypotension
progress to cardiovascular
collapse
lP
473
29
475 Figure 1. Chemical structure and similarities between polyethylene glycol and polysorbate 80.
476 Figure 2. Risk stratification pathways with categories based on Mass General Brigham and
478 *If “yes” for questions 1 or 2, specific investigation as to the specific injectable products and
479 vaccines should be pursued to determine if these products could have contained high molecular
of
¶
481 Current CDC guidance suggests 30 minutes of observation for patients with any history of
ro
482 anaphylaxis
§
483 See Figures 3 and 4 for expanded skin testing algorithm and non-irritating skin test
484 concentrations.
-p
re
‡
485 If skin testing to PEG is positive, as of Dec 28th, 2020, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are the
lP
486 only FDA approved vaccines and under EUA can not be given to an individual with a history of
487
na
anaphylaxis to a component of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The skin testing result to
488 polysorbate 20 and 80 become more important with regards to the safety of any future
ur
489 vaccination.
Jo
490 Figure 3. Expanded Skin Testing Procedure. In patients with positive PEG skin testing, the result
491 of polysorbate 20 and 80 skin testing becomes important with regards to the safety of future
492 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Therefore, based on clinical history, skin testing to both
493 PEG and polysorbate during one clinic visit may be appropriate.
494 *Anaphylaxis with intradermal skin testing in PEG allergic patients has been described. We
495 recommend staff have anaphylaxis training and anaphylaxis kit available in close proximity.
¶
496 Tables 2, 3 and 4 contain a list of PEG/polysorbate containing vaccines and injectables that can
498 Figure 4: Non-Irritating Skin Testing Concentrations for PEG3350 and Polysorbate
30
499 *Methyl-prednisolone sodium succinate does not contain PEG or polysorbate 80 and can be used
505 Triamcinolone Acetonide include a range of 10-40 mg/mL for initial skin prick testing with
of
506 subsequent 10x dilutions.29 One author (EP) has extensive experience using 50 mg/mL as a non-
ro
507 irritating skin testing concentration for Methyl-prednisolone Sodium Succinate skin prick testing
509
-p
Figure 5. Risk stratification pathways with categories based on Mass General Brigham and
re
510 Vanderbilt allergy expert consensus after allergic reaction to first dose of COVID19 vaccine.
lP
511 *Ideal laboratory assessment includes reaction serum tryptase within 2 hours and complement
512
na
activation by ELISA (C3a, C3b, C5a, C5b-9 ideally within one hour; send to National Jewish);
¶
514 Shared decision making with allergist including risk stratification and expanded skin testing to
Jo
515 determine eligibility for second dose or future challenge with other SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. There
516 are no data on the safety of the second vaccine after anaphylaxis to the first dose. If decision
517 made to proceed with vaccination, consider 2-step graded challenge but no current safety or
518 efficacy data support this approach. Staff should have anaphylaxis training and anaphylaxis kit
521 concentrations
‡
522 Consider 2-step graded challenge to the vaccine but no current safety or efficacy data support
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
32
526 REFERENCES
of
538 Biological Products Advisory
539 Committee; 2020. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download.
ro
540 Accessed December 24, 2020.
541 4. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) [FDA Briefing
542
543
-p
Document]. Silver Spring, MD: United States Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines
and Related Biological Products Advisory
re
544 Committee; 2020. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download. Acce
545 ssed December 24, 2020
lP
546 5. Interim clinical considerations for use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines currently
547 authorized in the United States - Appendix B. Atlanta, GA: United States Centers for
548 Disease Control and Prevention; 2020 (Reviewed December 20, 2020).
na
552 Risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination in children and adults. J Allergy Clin
553 Immunol. 2016;137:868-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.048. PMID: 26452420;
Jo
571 12. Yang Q, Lai SK. Anti-PEG immunity: Emergence, characteristics, and
572 unaddressed questions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2015;7:655-
573 77. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1339. PMID: 25707913; PMCID: PMC4515207.
574 13. Zhou ZH, Stone CA Jr, Jakubovic B, Phillips EJ, Sussman G, Park J, et al. Anti-
575 PEG IgE in anaphylaxis associated with polyethylene glycol. J Allergy Clin Immunol
576 Pract. 2020. In press. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.011. PMID: 33217616.
577 14. Wenande E, Garvey LH. Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene
578 glycols: A review. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46:907-22. doi: 10.1111/cea.12760. PMID:
579 27196817.
580 15. Coors EA, Seybold H, Merk HF, Mahler V. Polysorbate 80 in medical products
581 and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma
582 Immunol. 2005;95:593-9. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61024-1. PMID: 16400901.
583 16. Hawe A, Filipe V, Jiskoot W. Fluorescent molecular rotors as dyes to
of
584 characterize polysorbate-containing IgG formulations. Pharm Res. 2010;27:314-26.
585 doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-0020-2. PMID: 20041280; PMCID: PMC2812426.
ro
586 17. Price KS, Hamilton RG. Anaphylactoid reactions in two patients after
587 omalizumab administration after successful long-term therapy. Allergy Asthma
588
589 18.
-p
Proc. 2007;28:313-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2007.28.3003. PMID: 17619560.
Badiu I, Geuna M, Heffler E, Rolla G. Hypersensitivity reaction to human
re
590 papillomavirus vaccine due to polysorbate 80. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012. doi:
591 10.1136/bcr.02.2012.5797. PMID: 22605841; PMCID: PMC3351639.
lP
592 19. Steele RH, Limaye S, Cleland B, Chow J, Suranyi MG. Hypersensitivity
593 reactions to the polysorbate contained in recombinant erythropoietin and
594 darbepoietin. Nephrology (Carlton). 2005;10:317-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-
na
600 and cremophor: A case report. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020;26:1279-81. doi:
601 10.1177/1078155219896848. PMID: 31955702.
602 22. Palacios Castaño MI, Venturini Díaz M, Lobera Labairu T, González Mahave I,
603 Del Pozo Gil MD, Blasco Sarramián A. Anaphylaxis due to the excipient polysorbate 80.
604 J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26:394-6. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0109. PMID:
605 27996954.
606 23. Cabanillas B, Akdis C, Novak N. Allergic reactions to the first COVID-19
607 vaccine: A potential role of polyethylene glycol? Allergy. 2020. In press. doi:
608 10.1111/all.14711. PMID: 33320974.
609 24. Tannenbaum H, Ruddy S, Schur PH. Acute anaphylaxis associated with serum
610 complement depletion. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975;56:226-34. doi: 10.1016/0091-
611 6749(75)90094-9. PMID: 50336.
612 25. Szebeni J, Fontana JL, Wassef NM, Mongan PD, Morse DS, Dobbins DE, et al.
613 Hemodynamic changes induced by liposomes and liposome-encapsulated hemoglobin
614 in pigs: A model for pseudoallergic cardiopulmonary reactions to liposomes: Role of
615 complement and inhibition by soluble CR1 and anti-C5a
34
of
629 Services. Available at: https://vaers.hhs.gov. Accessed December 24, 2020.
630 Broyles AD, Banerji A, Barmettler S, Biggs CM, Blumenthal K, Brennan PJ, et al.
ro
631 Practical Guidance for the Evaluation and Management of Drug Hypersensitivity:
632 Specific Drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9S):S16-S116.
633
634
-p
30. Institute for Vaccine Safety. Excipients in Vaccines per 0.5 mL Dose. Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, MD. (Accessed December 21, 2020
re
635 at https://vaccinesafety.edu/components-excipients.htm)
636 31. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed Advanced Search. National Institutes of
lP
643 33. Manivannan V, Decker WW, Stead LG, Li JTC, Campbell RL. Visual representation of
644 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and Food Allergy and
Jo
645 Anaphylaxis Network criteria for anaphylaxis. Int J Emerg Med. 2009;2(1):3–5.\
646
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of