0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Qp3a 1

This document contains instructions for a 25-question multiple choice examination on numerical methods and computer programming. The exam covers topics like the bisection method, secant method, regula falsi method, Newton's method, curve fitting, and solving systems of equations. It provides the questions, multiple choice answers, and specifies that questions 1-20 are worth 1 mark each and questions 21-25 are worth 2 marks each. The examinee must darken the appropriate circle on the OMR sheet to select their answer.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Qp3a 1

This document contains instructions for a 25-question multiple choice examination on numerical methods and computer programming. The exam covers topics like the bisection method, secant method, regula falsi method, Newton's method, curve fitting, and solving systems of equations. It provides the questions, multiple choice answers, and specifies that questions 1-20 are worth 1 mark each and questions 21-25 are worth 2 marks each. The examinee must darken the appropriate circle on the OMR sheet to select their answer.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Numerical Methods and Computer Programming

Name:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Roll No:. . . . . . . . . . . . Shift:. . . . . .


Total Marks:30 Duration: 30min
Set-A MCQ Examination

Instructions to students:
This exam contains 2 pages and 25 problems.
MCQ from 1-20 are for 1 marks and 21-25 for 2 marks
Dark appropriate circle in OMR sheet.

[1] The bisection method can be used to solve . . . . . .


(A) algebraic equations only (B) transcendental equation only (C) both algebraic and transcendental
equations (D) none of these

[2] Let 12 and initial approximate interval is [3,4], the next approximate interval is . . . . . . in Bisection method.
(A) [3.5,4.5] (B) [3.5,4] (C) [3,3.5] (D) None of these

[3] If initial approximation to solve f (x) = 0 are x0 and x1 produces opposite signs, the formula used to determine
new approximation in the bisection method is . . . . . ..
x0 x1 x0 +x1 x0 −x1 2
(A) x2 = 2
(B) x2 = 2
(C) x2 = 2
(D) x2 = x0 +x1

[4] Which is not correct statement if x0 and x1 are initial approximations to solve f (x) = 0?
(A) Bisection method is suitable, if f (x0 ) is positive and f (x1 ) is negative. (B) Bisection method is suitable, if
f (x0 ) is negative and f (x1 ) is positive. (C) Bisection method is suitable, if f (x0 ).f (x1 ) < 0. (D) Bisection
method is suitable, if f (x0 ) is positive and f (x1 ) is positive.

[5] Find x5 using Secant method if x3 = 1.482 and x2 = 1.513, for the equation x3 − 3x + 1 = 0
(A) 1.407 (B) 1.704 (C) 1.525 (D) 1.843

[6] In the secant method of finding roots of equations, initial interval will not be [x0 , x1 ], if . . . . . .
(A) f (x0 ) = f (x1 ) (B) f (x0 ) = −f (x1 ) (C) f (x0 ) 6= f (x1 ) (D) none of the above

[7] For finding the root of sin(x) = 0, the following choice of initial guesses would be not suitable if the secant method
is to be used
(A) [ π4 , π3 ] (B) [ π4 , 3π
4
] (C) [ −π , π]
3 2
(D) [ π6 , π3 ]

[8] The next iterative value of the root of x2 − 4 = 0 using secant method is . . . . . ., if the initial guesses are 3 and 4,
is
(A) 2.2857 (B) 2.5 (C) 3.5 (D) 5.2857

[9] In the regula-falsi method of finding roots of equations, initial interval is [x0 , x1 ]. Then value of approximate root
at the end of iteration is . . . . . .
x0 f (x1 )−x1 f (x0 ) x0 f (x1 )+x1 f (x0 ) x0 −x1 x0 −x1
(A) x2 = f (x1 )−f (x0 )
(B) x2 = f (x1 )+f (x0 )
(C) x2 = f (x1 )−f (x0 )
(D) x2 = f (x1 )+f (x0 )

[10] In method of false position to find root of an equation, generalize formula is . . . . . .


xn −xn+1 xn f (xn+1 )−xn+1 f (xn ) xn f (xn+1 )+xn+1 f (xn )
(A) xn+2 = f (xn+1 )−f (xn )
(B) xn+2 = f (xn+1 )−f (xn )
(C) xn+2 = f (xn+1 )+f (xn )
(D) xn+2 =
xn −xn+1
f (xn+1 )−f (xn )

[11] In regula falsi method, if f (x0 ) is negative and f (x1 ) is positive and next approximation x2 produces f (x2 ) is
negative, then . . . . . . is replaced by x2
(A) x1 (B) x0 (C) x2 (D) None of these

[12] Regula Falsi means


(A) Method of Correct position (B) Method of false position (C) Method of unknown position (D) Method
of known position

[13] . . . . . . method is faster than bisection method.


(A) Regula-falsi (B) Gauss-elimination (C) Newton Raphson’s method (D) Secant
f (x0 )
[14] If the ratio f 0 (x0 )
is small then . . . . . .
(A) The next approximation approximation is near to root (B) The next approximation approximation is root
(C) The next approximation approximation is away to root (D) Can’t say
Set-A MCQ Examination - Page 2 of 2

[15] In Chebyshev method to find root of an equation, generalize formula is . . . . . .


f (xn ) 1 [f (xn )]2 00 f (xn ) 1 f (xn ) 0 f (xn )
(A) xn+1 = xn + f 0 (xn )
+ 2 [f 0 (xn )]3
f (xn ) (B) xn+1 = xn − f 0 (xn )
− 2 f 00 (xn )
f (xn ) (C) [xn+1 = xn − f 0 (xn )
f (xn ) 2
1 [f (xn )]
(D) xn+1 = xn − f 0 (xn )
− 2 [f 0 (xn )]3
f 00 (xn )

[16] To solve x3 − 5x + 1 = 0 and initial guess of x0 = 0.5 using Chebyshev method for one iteration we need to find
out
(A) f 0 (x) at x0 = 0.5 (B) f 00 (x) at x0 = 0.5 (C) Both A and B (D) None of the above

[17] In NR method of two variable Jacobian matrix is given by . . . . . .


 ∂u ∂u   ∂u ∂v   ∂v ∂u   ∂u ∂u 
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
(A) J = ∂v ∂v (B) J = ∂u ∂v (C) J = ∂u ∂v (D) J = ∂v ∂v
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y

[18] In curve fitting by method of least square, second order curve fitting equation are as follows except
n n n n n n n n n n n
(A) a x2i +b xi + nc = yi (B) a x3i +b x2i + c xi = xi yi (C) a x4i +b x3i + c x2i =
P P P P P P P P P P P
x
i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1
n n n
x2i + b
P P P
(D) a xi + c = yi
i=1 i=1 i=1

[19] . . . . . . method is slower than Newtons Raphson Method.


(A) Gauss-elimination (B) Newtons (C) Horners (D) Regula-falsi

[20] If for a real continuous function f (x), you have f (x0 )f (x1 ) < 0, then in the interval [x0 , x1 ] for f (x) = 0, there
is (are) . . . . . .
(A) one root (B) an undeterminable number of roots (C) no root (D) at least one root

[21] Use NR method to find the root of equation f (x) = x − cos(x) = 0 if initial guess is x0 = 1 at the end of one
iteration root is
(A) 0.75036 (B) 0.73919 (C) 0.55036 (D) ill condition

[22] To solve the given system of equations by Newton Raphson method f (x) = sin(xy)+x−y and g(x) = ycos(xy)+1,
df dg
The values of The dy and dy are
(A) xcos(xy) + 1 and cos(xy) − xysin(xy) (B) xcos(xy) + 1 and cos(xy) + xysin(xy) (C) xcos(xy) − 1 and
cos(xy) − xysin(xy) (D) −xcos(xy) + 1 and −cos(xy) − xysin(xy)

[23] The equation of a best fit straight line for the following data is
x 5 10 15 20 25
y 16 19 23 26 30
x = 75, y = 114, x2 = 1375, xy = 1885
P P P P

(A) y = 0.7x − 12.3 (B) y = 0.7x + 12.3 (C) y = 12.3x − 0.7 (D) y = 12.3x + 0.7

[24] The equation of a best fit parabola for the following total 5 data is
30a + 10b + 5c = 76, 100a + 30b + 10c = 243, 354a + 100b + 30c = 851
x 0 1 2 3 4
y 1 5 10 22 38

(A) P x = 10, P y = 76, P x2 = 30, P


P 2 P 3
x = 100, Px4 = 354
P P P P P
xy = 243, P x y = 851, P
(B) P x = 30,P y = 76, P x2 = 1000,P xy = 243,P x2 y = 851,P x3 = 10, P x4 = 354
(C) x = 0, y = 100, x2 = 100, xy = 243, x2 y = 851, x3 = 100, x4 = 354
(D) none of these

[25] Solve f (x) = x3 − 9 = 0 using Chebyshev method if initial guess is x0 = 2 and f 0 (x) = 3x2 and f 00 (x) = 6x.
(A) 2.0890 (B) 2.1087 (C) 2.70986 (D) 2.07986

> > > BEST OF LUCK > > >

You might also like