Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

From:
General Post Office. Zip Code Exempt By Registered Mail RE 332 991 075 US
[glenn winningham; house of fearn] To: Will Johnson, Chief of Police
C/O 6340 Lake Worth Boulevard, #437 City of Arlington
Fort Worth, Texas [RR 76135] C/O 620 West Division Street
Non-Domestic, Without the UNITED STATES Arlington, Texas 76010

NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-NEGOTIABLE
NOTICE AND DEMAND BY DECLARATION

i, me, my, myself, a man, a living soul, a sovereign, an inhabitant of the land of Texas, and a holder of the office of
"the people", with an address correction: General Post Office. Zip Code Exempt [glenn winningham; house of fearn], C/O
6340 Lake Worth Boulevard, #437, Fort Worth, Texas, [RR 76135] Non-Domestic, Without the UNITED STATES, do
hereby Notice you of the following:

1. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, i accept your Oath of Office.

2. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, equality under the
Law is paramount and mandatory by Law.

3. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, i did not give you, the
authority for making a legal determination for me.

4. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, if you think or
assume that you are representing me, you are FIRED!

5. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, neither you, nor
any other person, is competent in dealing with any of my affairs.

6. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, i am competent for
dealing in all of my affairs.

7. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, were Noticed of
My copyrights on the name(s) Glenn W. Fearn©, GLENN WINNINGHAM FEARN©, FEARN, GLENN
WINNINGHAM©, or any derivative(s) thereof and others as found in NON-NEGOTIABLE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
recorded with the PINAL COUNTY RECORDER at FEE NUMBER 2005-121243, which is incorporated herein by
reference in its entirety, which is now the unrebutted truth and public policy.

8. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, were
ORDERED that any communication with me is to be signed "under the penalty of perjury".

9. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, were
Noticed that any violation my copyright(s), or making a legal determination for me, representing me, or communicating
with me in any manner not "under penalty of perjury" shall constitute an agreement to the fee of;
a. ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), minimum; or
b. one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit or gain; or
c. ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit or gain more than three (3) times within a
year,
for each and every violation, payable only in lawful money pursuant to the coinage Act of 1792.

10. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, were also
noticed that any violation as described in paragraph 9 above would constitute an agreement that i could seek relief
from all of your corporate officers and directors as well as your parent corporation(s), and its officers and directors,
jointly, severally, and personally.

Page 1 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
11. You Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that pursuant to your 18 USC § 1342, my proper name is glenn winningham; house of fearn and my proper
address is;
General Post Office. Zip Code Exempt
[glenn winningham; house of fearn]
C/O 6340 Lake Worth Boulevard, #437
Fort Worth, Texas [RR 76135]
Non-Domestic, Without the UNITED STATES

and in the event you wish to communicate with me, it shall be shown EXACTLY like this, unless you intend to be guilty
of mail fraud.

12. Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, you are
NOTICED that it is my intent, NEVER to act as SURETY, or in any be the guarantor, or an accommodation party for
the fictitious entities created by government officials through FRAUD, COERCION, INTIMIDATION, and PERJURY
OF OATH, and i shall sign NOTHING, if assaulted with an unlawful arrest by one of your code enforcer LEOs.

13. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that pursuant to your edict under Martial Law, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52,
“An allegation that a corporation is incorporated shall be taken as true, unless denied by the affidavit of the
adverse party, his agent or attorney, whether such corporation is a public or private corporation and however
created.” Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52

which is a reaffirmation of what the courts have said

“Failure of any adverse party to deny under oath allegation that party is a corporation dispenses with
necessity of proof of that fact.” Galleria Bank v. Southwest Properties, Inc. ( Civ.App. 1973) 498 S.W.2d 5.

When the complaint is lodged by the Government for a fine, fee or a tax, all of which are revenue, they are
imposed only on Corporations. See Colonial Pipe Line Co. v. Triagle, 421 US 100 (1975)

therefore, i am not a UNITED STATES citizen, 14th Amendment Citizen, corporation or other fictitious entity as found
in CORPORATE DENIAL AFFIDAVIT, recorded with the Pinal County Recorder at FEE NUMBER 2013-032373, and
as evidenced by the true copy of another Affidavit that is attached hereto, all of each of which are incorporated herein
by reference in their entirety,
if Respondent is not a Corporation he cannot appear and plead. See West Union Tel. Co. v Eyser, 2 Colo. 141;
Greenwood v. Railroad Co., 123 Mass. 32; Foster v. white Cloud, 32 Mo. 505; Hobich v. Folger, 20 Wall. 1; Boyce v
M.E. Church, 43 Md. 359; Folsom v. Star Union Etc. Freight Line, 54 Iowa 490

and if you, or your subordinates or successors attempt to compel me to appear, or make a plea, it shall be evidence of
the intent of you and your subordinates to engage in all of the crimes described herein.

14. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that i have no first hand knowledge of my birth, and any evidence of my birth is hearsay and inadmissible in
any court of law, but i do remember finishing high school in the year 1975, over 40 years ago, therefore i am well past
the age of majority, and any attempt by you or your subordinates to coerce me into providing hearsay evidence of my
date of birth is a felony, and a War Crime as described herein.

15. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that Texas has been under a military occupation since the war between the States
“…Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence
of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.” Article 1, Lieber Code [emphasis added]
“Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army..” Law and
Customs of War on Land (Hague IV), Article 42

and the ONLY way the military occupation can end is by specific mention in the Treaty of Peace, or by special
Proclamation by the Commander in Chief

Page 2 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the
commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war,….” Article 2, Lieber Code
[emphasis added]

and there was no treaty of peace with Texas, and the President of the United States has failed to make any
proclamations about ending the military occupation, therefore the Lieber Code and certain Articles of the Geneva
Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949 apply
“….the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may
arise…..
…The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory ….” Article 2,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

and certain provisions of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 apply
for the duration of the occupation
“….…. the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power
exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the
present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to 34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.” Article 6, Geneva Convention
Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

and since you and your subordinates all wear military uniforms and use military rank structures and are also armed,
therefore, ANY interaction between me and you or your subordinates is warfare and an armed conflict
"A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons."
Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420

and since i am a PEACEFUL non-combatant, i am further protected by the Geneva Convention Relative to the
Protection of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949, and i have a right to my political opinions, and my right NOT to
participate in your satanic religious ceremony/court case/kangaroo court under Article 27,
“Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honour, their family
rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs.
…all protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose
power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion.”,
[emphasis added],

and persecuting me for my political opinions, is a war crime, and terrorism, pillaging, and reprisals, as well as
punishing me for crimes i have not personally committed under Article 33, are all war crimes,
“No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective
penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited. Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.” Article 33,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added].

and your military uniforms and the colors and paint scheme of your vehicles, and your emergency lights are all
designed to be threatening and intimidating, therefore you and your subordinates are terrorists, and seizing any of my
property is pillaging, and nobody may be compelled to work for the occupying power under Article 52, and by coercing
me to produce a government issued identification card, which is for government employees ONLY, or a Social
Security Number, which is a number for “Federal Personnel”, or even a date of birth (that can be used to retrieve a
Social Security Number) you are compelling me to work for the occupying power, which is another war crime,
“No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair the right of any worker, whether voluntary or not and
wherever he may be, to apply to the representatives of the Protecting Power in order to request the said
Power’s intervention.
All measures aiming at creating unemployment or at restricting the opportunities offered to workers in an
occupied territory, in order to induce them to work for the Occupying Power, are prohibited.” Article 52,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

because anybody with a Social Security Number is “federal personnel”

“(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States,
members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to

Page 3 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the
United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a.(a)(13) [emphasis added]

and i have a right NOT to have my property pillaged and a right NOT to be subjected to threats, intimidation and
terrorism against me in violation of Article 33, or to your military police coercing information from me or from third
parties, like the Texas Department of Public Safety hearsay database, in violation of Article 31
“No physical or moral coercion shall be exercised against protected persons, in particular to obtain
information from them or from third parties.” Article 31, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians
in a Time of War of 1949

and i have a right to a neutral and unbiased judge in any proceedings under your International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, Article 14, Clause 1.
“All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge
against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public
hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.” International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, Article 14, Clause 1

“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a neutral and detached judge preside over the judicial
proceedings.” Ward v Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34 L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v
Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 5209, 47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)

“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.” Article 9, Universal Declaration of Human
Rights [emphasis added]

which is also another War Crime under Article 71

“No sentence shall be pronounced by the competent courts of the Occupying Power except after a regular
trial….” Article 71 Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949

which is also found in the Lieber Code

“All wanton violence committed against persons in the invaded country, all destruction of property not
commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main
force, all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or
such other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.
A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to
abstain from it, may be lawfully killed on the spot by such superior.” Article 44, Lieber Code [emphasis added]

and, since i am neither a subject, nor an alien, i have a right NOT to be subjected to a Military Commission, or a
Courts Martial
“Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which
is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner
therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under
the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the
local laws of each particular country.
In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come
within the "Rules and Articles of War," or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by
military commissions.” Lieber Code Article 13.

and you and your subordinates may NOT personally profit

“Neither officers nor soldiers are allowed to make use of their position or power in the hostile country for
private gain, not even for commercial transactions otherwise legitimate. Offenses to the contrary committed
by commissioned officers will be punished with cashiering or such other punishment as the nature of the
offense may require; if by soldiers, they shall be punished according to the nature of the offense.” Article 46,
Lieber Code [emphasis added]

16. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that you and your subordinates may NOT coerce me, or any third party, into giving you any information at all, like a

Page 4 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
Social Security Number, or a date of birth, or even identification, or it will be a war crime under Article 31 of the
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949
“No physical or moral coercion shall be exercised against protected persons, in particular to obtain
information from them or from third parties.” Article 31, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians
in a Time of War of 1949

which means you may NOT access your Texas Department of Public Safety database or the Federal Bureau of
Investigation database, or any other database for information about me, because they are third parties, and if you, or
your subordinates do coerce information from any third party it shall be evidence that you intend to engage in Abuse
of Official Capacity
“(a) A public servant….with intent to obtain a benefit or….to harm or defraud another, he intentionally or
knowingly;
(1) violates a law relating to the public servant’s office or employment; or
(2) misuses government property, services, personnel or anything of value belonging to the government that
has come into the public servant’s custody or possession by virtue of the public servant’s office or
employment.” Texas Penal Code § 39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity

and your coercing me for any information whatsoever shall be evidence that you intend to engage in Official
Oppression
“(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he;
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession,
assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or
immunity, knowing his conduct to be unlawful; or….
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or
purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.” Texas Penal
Code § 39.03 Official Oppression.

17. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that Martial Law ONLY applies to subjects and aliens
“Martial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that
government.” Lieber Code, Article 7

and subjects are government employees and corporations and anything created by the government
“All subjects over which the sovereign power of the state extends are objects of taxation, but those over
which it does not extend are exempt from taxation. This proposition may also be pronounced as self-evident.
The sovereignty of the state extends to everything which exists by its authority or its permission.”
McCullough v Maryland, 17 U.S. [4 Wheat] 316 (1819). [emphasis added]

“Let a State be considered as subordinate to the People: But let everything else be subordinate to the State.”
Chisholm v Georgia 2 US 419 at 455

"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states,
in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)

and subjects are subject to the regulations and therefore property and slaves are property
“The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the….
other property belonging to the United States…...” Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, Constitution for the United
States of America

“Section 2 Definitions (1) In this Act,

owned means, subject to the regulations,…..;” Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act,

and all statutes are Martial Law statutes and apply to subjects ONLY
“Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which
is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner
therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under

Page 5 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the
local laws of each particular country.
In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come
within the "Rules and Articles of War," or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by
military commissions.” Lieber Code Article 13

and all statutes, codes, rules, regulations, Constitutions and Amendments are edicts under Martial law
“NOTE: Under the Law-Martial, only the criminal jurisdiction of a Military Court is the recognized law. But as
Article Three says, "the civil courts can continue wholly or in part as long as the civil jurisdiction does not
violate the Military orders laid down by the Commander in Chief or one of his Commanders." By this means; a
military venue, jurisdiction, and authority are imposed upon the occupied populace under disguise of the
ordinary civil courts and officers of the occupied district or region, because the so-called civil authorities in
an occupied district, or region, only act at the pleasure of a military authority.
It should also be noted here that the several State Legislatures, County Boards of Commissioners, and City
Councils, are constantly legislating to please the edicts of the federal government ( the occupying force) and
that their legislation, in this sense, is not an exercise of State sovereignty, but instead, a compliance with
edicts of the military force which occupies the several States and consequently are edicts of Martial Law
Rule.” Dyett v Turner 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 [1968] The Non-Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment by
Judge A.H. Ellett, Utah Supreme Court [emphasis added].

18. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that all police in America (City police, State police, county police, etc.) are Military Police
“Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes, whether imposed by the
expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety,
and the safety of its operations.” Lieber Code, Article 10

19. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that when a Judge is dealing with a statute, he is no longer a Judge but becomes a (bought and paid for)
Clerk masquerading as a Judge
“"When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the
municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts administrating or
enforcing statutes do not act judicially, but merely ministerially….but merely act as an extension as an agent
for the involved agency -- but only in a “ministerial” and not a “discretionary capacity...” Thompson v. Smith,
154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US 428; F.R.C. v. G.E., 281, U.S. 464 [emphasis added]

"It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is
enforcing administrative law they are described as mere 'extensions of the administrative agency for superior
reviewing purposes' as a ministerial clerk for an agency..." 30 Cal 596; 167 Cal 762

"...judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise),
act as mere "clerks" of the involved agency..." K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West's 1965 Ed.)

and when a clerk (masquerading as judge) is an agent for the administrative agency it is always a kangaroo court and
a Bill of Pains and Penalties because it is a non-judicial proceeding
“Kangaroo court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person's rights are totally
disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other
tribunal.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 868, [emphasis added]

“Bill of Attainder” means Legislative acts, no matter what their form, that apply either to named individuals or

to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a
judicial trial. United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 448-49, 85 S. Ct.  1707, 
1715, 14 L.Ed. 484, 492; United States v. Lovett,  328  U.S.  303, 315,  66 S.Ct.  1073, 1079, 90 L.Ed. 1252

“bill of attainder. 2. A special legislative act prescribing punishment, without a trial, for a specific person or
group. • Bills of attainder are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution (art. I, § 9, cl. 3; art. I, § 10, cl. 1). — Also
termed act of attainder. See ATTAINDER; BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES . [Cases: Constitutional Law 82.5.
C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 496
Page 6 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

“BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES bill of pains and penalties. A legislative act that, though similar to a bill of
attainder, prescribes punishment less severe than capital punishment. • Bills of pains and penalties are
included within the U.S. Constitution's ban on bills of attainder. U.S. Const. art I, § 9. [Cases: Constitutional
Law 82.5. C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 499

20. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that you or any (bought and paid for) Clerk enforcing administrative law and pretending to be a judge, DO
NOT have the authority to do anything for me, like issuing orders or warrants. If you or any Clerk pretending to be a
judge attempt to do anything judicial, it is a fraud and a nullity and you shall accept all liability for their actions.
"Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in
attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities" Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1

"Where there is no jurisdiction there is no judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such has been the law from
the days of the Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351." Manning v. Ketcham, 58 F.2d
948.

21. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that all orders, judgments, or warrants issued by any Clerk masquerading as a Judge are void
“A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect” Lubben v.
Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27,  453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972).  Hobbs v. U.S.
Office of Personnel Management,  485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980)

“Void judgment is one which has no legal force or effect whatever, it is an absolute nullity, its invalidity may
be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place and it need not be attacked
directly but may be attacked collaterally whenever and wherever it is interposed.”  City of Lufkin v. McVicker,
510 S.W. 2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. – Beaumont 1973)

“A void judgment, insofar as it purports to be pronouncement of  court, is an absolute nullity” Thompson v.
Thompson,  238 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App. – Waco 1951)

“Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time”  In re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d
801, certiorari denied, See also Steinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809, (Ill. 1994)

“A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without
legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and
incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree.” Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So. 2d
577 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985)

"Not every action by any judge is in exercise of his judicial function.  It is not a judicial function for a Judge to
commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a Trespasser
of the Law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject matter jurisdiction and The Judge's
orders are void, of no legal force or effect"! Yates Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D.
Ill. 1962)

“brutum fulmen”:  “An empty noise; an empty threat.  A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no
judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds
nor bars anyone.  Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus
Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition

and if you, or your subordinates, arrest me, or cause me injury or harm in any way based on a Void Judgment you
shall be guilty of assault, kidnapping, false arrest, and false imprisonment, at a minimum.

22. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that all legislative courts are inferior courts of limited jurisdiction that can give advisory decisions ONLY that
do NOT have the force of law

Page 7 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“It is noted as significant that the act constituting the court dispenses with trial by jury, a provision which
was distinctly upheld in spite of the Seventh Amendment in McElrath v. United States, 102 U. S. 426. With
respect to the status of the court, the opinion concludes (pp. 279 U. S. 454-455):
“…. A duty to give decisions which are advisory only, and so without force as judicial judgments, may be laid
on a legislative court, but not on a constitutional court established under Art. III."” Williams v United States 289
U.S. 553 (1933)

and common law courts are superior courts and the decisions of common law courts do have the force of law
“Because the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not
preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter, at least, no such "supervisory" judicial authority exists”
United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

"[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history," Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960)
(Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of
the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first
three Articles. It "`is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'" United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312
(CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert.
denied, 434 U.S. 325 (1977)” United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

“In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government,
serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States,
361 U.S. 212, 218 (1960); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61 (1906); G. Edwards, The Grand Jury 28-32 (1906)”
United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

“Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said that the Fifth Amendment's "constitutional
guarantee presupposes an investigative body `acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

23. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that all judges operating as (bought and paid for) Clerks are operating in their private capacity and have
walked away from their immunity and are personally liable, and since you put them up to it, so are you
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const.
Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94

“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right, for they are deemed to know
the law.” Owens v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 (Ezra 7:23-26)

“...where any state proceeds against a private individual in a judicial forum it is well settled that the state,
county, municipality, etc. waives any immunity to counters, cross claims and complaints, by direct or
collateral means regarding the matters involved.” Luckenback v. The Thekla, 295 F 1020, 226 Us 328; Lyders v.
Lund, 32 F2d 308

“Judge loses his absolute immunity from damage actions only when he acts in clear absence of all
jurisdiction or performance of an act which is not judicial in nature.” Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202

“In arriving at our decision in this matter we do not depart in any way from our holding in Huendling v.
Jensen  [*300]  that HN9 the doctrine of judicial immunity extends to courts of limited jurisdiction. But, when a
minor magistrate acts wholly without jurisdiction, civil liability attaches for his malicious and corrupt abuse
of process and his willful and malicious oppression of any person under the pretense of acting in his official
capacity. See Huendling v. Jensen, 168 N.W.2d at 749 and authorities cited.”188 N.W.2d 294; 1971 Iowa Sup.
LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d 1242

24. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that in order for you to have jurisdiction over me, there has to be a contract, and i have no contract with
you, except your oath.
"It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary
subscription to license.  All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must
Page 8 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
appear on the record of the court."  Pipe Line v Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22
[emphasis added]

A “penal action” is an action on a penal statute; an action for recovery of penalty given by statute. NcNeely v.
City of Natchez, 114 So. 484, 487; 148 Miss. 268.

Where an action is founded entirely upon a statue, and the only object of it is to recover a penalty or
forfeiture, such action is a “penal action.” Gawthrop v. Fairmont Coal Co., 81 S.E. 560, 561; 74 S.Va. 39.

The words “penal” and “penalty” in their strict and primary sense denote a punishment, whether corporal or
pecuniary, imposed and enforced by the state for a crime or offense against its laws. The noun penalty is
defined forfeiture or to be forfeited for noncompliance with an agreement . The words forfeit and penalty are
substantially synonymous. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Dewey Portland Cement Co., 242 P. 257, 259, 113 Okla.
142. [emphasis added]

A “penal action” is one founded entirely on statute and brought with the sole object of recovering a penalty
or forfeiture imposed as punishment for specific offense, while “remedial action: is one brought to obtain
compensation or indemnity. Smith Engineering Works v. Custer, 151 P2d 404, 407, 194 Okl. 318.

A “penal action” is a civil suit brought for the recovery of a statutory forfeiture when inflicted as punishment
for an offense against the public. Such actions are “civil actions, “ on the one hand closely related to
criminal prosecutions and on the other to actions for private injuries in which the party aggrieved may, by
statute, recover punitive damages. State ex rel. McNamee v. Stobie, 92 SW 191, 212, 194 Mo. 14

25. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are are
NOTICED that i am not interested in being a surety or otherwise an accommodation party for a fraudulently created
cestui que trust originated by the Roman Curia.
"But individuals, when acting as representatives of a collective group, cannot be said to be exercising their
personal rights and duties, nor be entitled to their purely personal privileges. Rather they assume the rights,
duties and privileges of the artificial entity or association of which they are agents or officers and they are
bound by its obligations." Brasswell v. United States 487 U.S. 99 (1988) quoting, United States v. White 322 U.S.
694 (1944),

and a (bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading as a Judge (military Commissioner) does NOT have authority to
forge my signature onto a contract under your United Nations UNIDROIT controlled and governed edicts under Martial
Law Uniform Commercial Code
“Whenever [the Uniform Commercial Code] creates a "presumption" with respect to a fact, or provides that a
fact is "presumed," the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced
that supports a finding of its nonexistence.” UCC § 1-206 Presumptions [emphasis added]

“(a) In an action with respect to an instrument, the authenticity of, and authority to make, each signature on
the instrument are admitted unless specifically denied in the pleadings. If the validity of a signature is denied
in the pleadings, the burden of establishing validity is on the person claiming validity, but the signature is
presumed to be authentic and authorized unless the action is to enforce the liability of the purported signer
and the signer is dead or incompetent at the time of trial of the issue of validity of the signature.” Uniform
Commercial Code § 3.308 Proof of Signatures and Status as Holder in Due Course [emphasis added]

and if a (bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading as a Judge (military Commissioner) does forge my signature onto a
contract, securitizes it and sells it on Wall Street, he will be doing it on your behalf, and you will be personally liable in
your private capacity.
“The following rules apply in an action on a certificated security against the issuer:
(1) Unless specifically denied in the pleadings, each signature on a security certificate or in a necessary
indorsement is admitted.
(2) If the effectiveness of a signature is put in issue, the burden of establishing effectiveness is on the party
claiming under the signature, but the signature is presumed to be genuine or authorized.” Uniform Commercial
Code § 8.114 Evidentiary Rules Concerning Certificated Securities [emphasis added].

Page 9 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
26. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that in the event that one of your Peace Officers turns on his emergency lights (meant for emergencies
ONLY) and stops me without a lawful court order and when there has been no breach of the peace, your Peace
Officer will not be operating in his official capacity, but will instead be operating in his private capacity
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const.
Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94

“OATH….All oaths must be lawful, allowed by the common law, or some statute; if they are administered by
persons in a private capacity, or not duly authorized, they are coram non judice, and void;… 3 Inst. 165; 4
Inst. 278; 2 Roll. Abr. 277.” Tomlin’s Law Dictionary, 1835 Edition, Volume 2 [emphasis added],

as a revenue officer under the Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966

"(h) DEFINITION’s. …. "
“(1) SECURITY INTEREST.-The term 'security interest' means any interest in property acquired by contract for
the purpose of securing payment or performance of an obligation or indemnifying against loss or liability. A
security interest exists at any time
(A) if, at such time, the property is in existence and the interest has become protected under local law against
a subsequent judgment lien arising out of an unsecured obligation, and
(B) to the extent that, at such time, the holder has parted "with money or money's worth.
"(3) MOTOR VEHICLE.-The term 'motor vehicle' means a self-propelled vehicle which is registered for
highway use under the laws of any State or foreign country.
"(4) SECURITY.-The term 'security' means any bond, debenture, note, or certificate or other evidence of
indebtedness, issued by a corporation or a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest coupons
or in registered form, share of stock, voting trust certificate, or any certificate of interest or participation in,
certificate of deposit or receipt for, temporary or interim certificate for, or warrant or right to subscribe to or
purchase any of the foregoing: negotiable instrument: or money.” Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 at Public Law 89-
719 at 80 Stat. 1130-1131.

and since he will be wearing a Peace Officer’s uniform, he will be impersonating a Peace Officer in violation of your
Texas codes,
“(a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) impersonates a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official authority or
to rely on his pretended official acts; or
(2) knowingly purports to exercise any function of a public servant or of a public office, including that of a
judge and court, and the position or office through which he purports to exercise a function of a public
servant or public office has no lawful existence under the constitution or laws of this state or of the United
States.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.” Texas Penal Code, Section 37.11.
IMPERSONATING PUBLIC SERVANT, [emphasis added],

and he will be subjecting me to the deprivation of my immunities under the color of his codes
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant
of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, …….. shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; ………”18 USC § 242 Violating Rights under Color of
Law [emphasis added]

and he will be following instructions as an “order follower” from his supervisors, to threaten, intimidate, injure, and
oppress me in the free exercise of my rights
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; …They
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; …” 18 USC § 241 Conspiracy to
Violate Rights under Color of Law [emphasis added]

27. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that a US citizen is a cestui que trust created by Satanists in Congress with edicts under Martial Law
Page 10 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“Chap. 854. – An Act to establish a code of law for the District of Columbia.” which was Approved on March 3,
1901, by the Fifty-Sixth Congress, Session II, at 31 Stat. 1189, and at Chapter Fifty-Six in Sec. 1617, at 31 Stat. 1432,
where it says; “The Legal Estate to be in Cestui Que Use”

"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states,
in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)

“A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of
the PCT (Public Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment,
which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc.” Congressional Record, June 13 1967, pp. 15641-15646

". . . (E)very taxpayer is a cestui que trust having sufficient interest in preventing abuse of the trust to be
recognized in the field of this court's prerogative jurisdiction . .” In Re Bolens (1912), 135 N.W. 164.

"...it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. ..... A citizen of any
one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and
abstractly there is no such thing." Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300

28. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that the cestui que trust was originated by the Satanic Roman Curia to control and govern over estates of
men.
“Yet still it was found difficult to set bounds to ecclesiastical ingenuity; for when they were driven out of all
their former holds, they devised a new method of conveyance, by which the lands were granted, not to
themselves directly, but to nominal feoffees to the use of the religious houses; thus distinguishing between
the possession and the use, and receiving the actual profits, while the seisin of the lands remained in the
nominal feoffee, who was held by the courts of equity (then under the direction of the clergy) to be bound in
conscience to account to his cestui que use for the rents and emoluments of the estate: and it is to these
inventions that our practitioners are indebted for the introduction of uses and trusts, the foundation of
modern conveyancing.” Tomlins Law Dictionary 1835 edition, Volume 2 under the definition of Mortmain

29. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that your edicts under Martial Law the so-called Fourteenth Amendment and your edicts under Martial Law
statutes always talk about “persons” and “individuals” which are fictitious entities – US citizens – cestui que trusts and
i am neither of the aforementioned
“Chap. 854. – An Act to establish a code of law for the District of Columbia.” which was Approved on March 3,
1901, by the Fifty-Sixth Congress, Session II, at 31 Stat. 1189, and at 2, where it says;
“And be it further enacted, That in the interpretation and construction of said code the following rules shall
be observed namely:…
“Third. The word “person” shall be held to apply to partnerships and corporations,...” [emphasis added]

“(2) the term “individual” means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence;” 5 USC § 552a.(a)(2)

and i fail to be “federal personnel” pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law that subscribed to any retirement benefits
by way of Social Security
“(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States,
members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to
receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the
United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a.(a)(13) [emphasis added]

“(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the
intent thereof—
(1) Person
The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership,
association, company or corporation.” 26 USC § 7701. Definitions

Page 11 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
and a “person”, or an “individual”, and a “Party” under your Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 are all fictitious
entities (Roman Cult cestui que trust)
“(b) PERSON AND PARTY. - "Person" includes individuals, partnerships, corporations, associations, or
public or private organizations of any character other than agencies. "Party" includes any person or agency
named or admitted as a party, or properly seeking and entitled as of right to be admitted as a party, in any
agency proceeding; but nothing herein shall be construed to prevent an agency from admitting any person or
agency as a party for limited purposes.” 60 Stat. 237.

30. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that the word “include” is limiting
“Include’ or the participial form thereof, is defined ‘to comprise within’; ‘to hold’; ‘to contain’; ‘enclosed’;
‘comprised’; ‘comprehend’; ‘embrace’; ‘involve’.” Montello Salt v. Utah 221 US 455  

“Include 1. To confine within; to hold; to contain; as, the shell of a nut includes the kernel; a pearl is included
in a shell. [But in these senses we more commonly use inclose.] 2. To comprise; to comprehend; to contain.”
American Dictionary of The English Language, Noah Webster, 1828

“Include. (Lat. Inclaudere, to shut in, keep within.) To confine within, hold as in an inclosure, take in, attain,
shut up, contain, inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve. Premier Products Co. v. Cameron, 240
Or. 123, 400 P.2d 227, 228.” Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition, page 763

31. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that in statute writing the maxim ejustem generis says that the term “individual” as listed in your 26 USC §
7701 is a fictitious entity because the rest of the things listed are fictitious entities
“EJUSDEM GENERIS. Of the same kind, class, or nature. In the construction of laws, wills, and other
instruments, the "ejusdem generis rule" is, that where general words follow an enumeration of persons or
things, by words of a particular and specific meaning, such general words are not to be construed in their
widest extent, but are to be held as applying only to persons or things of the same general kind or class as
those specifically mentioned. Black, Interp. of Laws, 141; Goldsmith v. U. S., C.C.A.N.Y., 42 F.2d 133, 137;
Aleksich v. Industrial Accident Fund, 116 Mont. 69, 151 P.2d 1016, 1021.” Example: if a law refers to
automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles and other motor-powered vehicles, "vehicles" would not include
airplanes, since the list was of land-based transportation. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition, Page 608

32. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that the US Supreme Court has ruled on several occasions that the boundaries of the District of Columbia
expand to cover the whole country for US citizens and they are not entitled to an Article 3 Court but instead get an
Article 1 military tribunal
"We therefore decline to overrule the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall: We hold that the District of Columbia
is not a state within Article 3 of the Constitution. In other words cases between citizens of the District and
those of the states were not included of the catalogue of controversies over which the Congress could give
jurisdiction to the federal courts by virtue of Article 3. In other words Congress has exclusive legislative
jurisdiction over citizens of Washington District of Columbia and through their plenary power nationally
covers those citizens even when in one of the several states as though the district expands for the purpose
of regulating its citizens wherever they go throughout the states in union" National Mutual Insurance Company
of the District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582, 93 L.Ed. 1556 (1948)

“Eliminating, then, from the opinions of this court all expressions unnecessary to the disposition of the
particular case, and gleaning therefrom the exact point decided in each, the following propositions may be
considered as established:
1. That the District of Columbia and the territories are not states within the judicial clause of the Constitution
giving jurisdiction in cases between citizens of different states;” Downes v Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 [emphasis
added]

33. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that since all Texas edicts under Martial Law Statutes talk about “persons” and a “person” is a US citizen
under the commerce clause, that all state edicts under Martial Law statutes are actually federal edicts under Martial
Law statutes
Page 12 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“INTERNATIONAL LAW RULE: Adopted for areas under Federal legislative jurisdiction” “Federalizes State
civil law, including common law.--The rule serves to federalize not only the statutory but the common law of a
State. Kniffen v. Hercules Powder Co., 164 Kan. 196, 188 P.2d 980 (1948); Kaufman v. Hopper, 220 N.Y. 184.
115 N.E. 470 (1917), see also 151 App. Div. 28, 135 N.Y.Supp. 363 (1912), aff'd., 163 App. Div. 863, 146 N. Y.
Supp. 1096 (1914); Norfolk & P.B.L.R. v. Parker,…STATE AND FEDERAL VENUE DISCUSSED: The civil laws
effective in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction are Federal law, notwithstanding their derivation from
State laws, and a cause arising under such laws may be brought in or removed to a Federal district court
under sections 24 or 28 of the former Judicial Code (now sections 1331 and 1441 of title 28, United States
Code), giving jurisdiction to such courts of civil actions arising under the "* * *laws * * * of the United States"
where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs.”
Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States – Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of
Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States, Part II, A Text of the Law of Legislative Jurisdiction Submitted to the
Attorney General and Transmitted to the President June 1957, page 158-165 [emphasis added]

and all of your statutes (state or federal) are edicts under Martial Law statutes
“Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which
is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner
therein directed; ….” Article 13, Lieber Code

“We can't even begin to count the number of times Judges, Lawyers, and Statesmen have said:
“There isn't any common law anymore. It has been replaced by Statutes.”
They would be more truthful if they said:
“There isn't any common-law any more, it has been replaced by martial law.”” Non-ratification of the Fourteenth
Amendment, by Judge A.H. Ellett, Utah Supreme Court, Dyett v Turner, 439 P2d 266

34. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that in the event that you or a (bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading as a Judge assault me with one of
your United Nations UNIDROIT controlled and governed, illicit Uniform Commercial Code contracts and put me into
your commercial prison, you will have sold me into slavery
“He [the prisoner] has as a consequence of his crime, not only forfeited his liberty but all his personal rights
except those which the law in its humanity affords him. He is for the time being a slave of the state.” 62 Va.
(21 Gratt.) 790, 796 (1871)

35. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are
NOTICED that since i do not carry passengers or property for hire, i am not involved in commerce in any way and i
shall not subscribe to or maintain a drivers license, and there is no such thing as a drivers license under Texas law
This court has held that there is no such license known to Texas Law as a “driver’s license.” Frank John
Callas v. State, 167 Tex. Crim. 375; 320 S.W. 2d 360

We have held that there is no such license as a driver’s license known to our law. Claude D. Campbell v. State,
160 Tex. Crim. 627; 274 S.W.2d 401

An information charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a public highway without a driver’s license
charges no offense, as there is no such license as a driver’s license known to the law. Keith Brooks v. State
158 Tex. Crim. 546; 258 S.W.2d 317

There being no such license as a “driver’s” license known to the law, it follows that the information, in
charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a highway without such a license, charges no offense. W. Lee
Hassell v. The State, 149 Tex. Crim. 333; 194 S.W.2d 400

nor do i have a Motor Vehicle pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law 18 USC § 31 which says;
"The term "Motor Vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by
mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers,
passengers and property, or property or cargo.
The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate,
charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking
intended for profit."
Page 13 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

36. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that there are 2 national governments, the trust that was set up in 1789, and an unconstitutional
corporation that was set up by Congress in 1871
“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the
other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of
Justice Marshall Harlan. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901

because the southern states walked out of Congress in 1861 and Congress ceased to have a quorum and Lincoln
ordered Congress to re-convene under executive authority and in 1871 Congress set up an unconstitutional
corporation that has been operating to this day and because the unconstitutional corporation went bankrupt in 1933
"It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency
Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt
and insolvent, H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold
Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the
official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further
evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.” United States Congressional
Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33

and the BAR members imposed Martial Law at the same time they declared their unconstitutional corporation
bankrupt
"Since March 9, 1933; the United States has been in a state of declared National Emergency . . . Under the
powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of
production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all
transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a
plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens. . . . A majority of the people of the
United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental
procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force
by states of national emergency . . .“ In Reg: U.S. Senate Report No. 93-549 dated 11/19/73 (73 CIS Serial Set
S963-2 - [607 Pages]):

which resulted in the Roman Cult seizing the bankrupt unconstitutional corporation
“Within twenty years this country is going to rule the world. Kings and Emperors will soon pass away and the
democracy of the United States will take their place….When the United States rules the world, the Catholic
Church will rule the world….Nothing can stand against the church. I’d like to see the politician who would try
to rule against the Church in Chicago. His reign would be short indeed.” Roman Catholic Archbishop James E.
Quigley (October 15, 1854 – July 10, 1915) Chicago Daily Tribune May 5, 1903

“There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.” John Adams
1826

which is evidenced by the Roman fascia that are on each side of the Speaker’s podium in the United States House of
Representatives and the Roman Aquila military staff that is carried in battle by all Roman commands and that is also
planted on all conquered nations, which is located on the right side of the Speaker’s podium in the United States
House of Representatives, but all government officials have an oath of office which is to the lawful de jure government
of the United States of America,
“the power which is derived cannot be greater than that from which it is derived” – Derativa potestas non
potest esse major primitiva – Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 Edition,

and when you and your subordinates choose to operate in your private capacity as revenue officers under the Federal
Tax Lien Act, you are working for the Roman Cult promoting their satanic agenda, as “order followers” as described
herein by Mark Passio.

37. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that there is no such thing as a bank loan as found in Modern Money Mechanics which was published by
the Chicago Federal Reserve in May, 1961:

Page 14 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“…the money creation process takes place principally through transaction accounts.” Modern Money
Mechanics, page 2

“Of course, they do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no
additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in
exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts.” Modern Money Mechanics, page 6

and a deposit is made into a Bank, the deposit becomes the property of the bank, but the Bank has a contract to give
it back, and Banks are NOT allowed to loan their own money
“(a) GENERAL PROHIBITION - No national bank shall make any loan or discount on the security of the shares
of its own capital stock.” 12 U.S. Code § 83 - Loans by bank on its own stock

and the courts have even talked about it

“What is said to be an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money is itself money. The words on the
face of the paper money, “will pay to the bearer on demand”, cannot alter its character as money and turn it
into a different document which calls for the payment of money.” Bank of Canada v. Bank of Montreal, [1978] 1
S.C.R. 1148 at page 1155

“A cashier's check differs in that it is a bill of exchange drawn by the bank upon itself and is accepted by the
act of issuance. A cashier's check is the primary obligation of the remitting bank. See RCW 62A.4211(1)(b). …
An ordinary check is considered as merely a promise to pay, but a cashier's check is regarded substantially
as money, which it represents. The gift of such a check is completed upon delivery of the check. Pikeville
Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Shirley, 281 Ky. 150, 135 S.W.2d 426, 126 A.L.R. 919 (1939). See also Scott v.
Seaboard Sec. Co., 143 Wash. 514, 255 P. 660 (1927), which quoted with approval extensively from Drinkall,
and then quoted from Hathaway v. Delaware Cy., 185 N.Y. 368, 78 N.E. 153 (1906) as follows: "That by reason
of the peculiar character of cashiers' checks and their general use in the commercial world they were to be
regarded substantially as the money which they represented,“ Crunk v State Farm Fire and Casualty 719 P.2d
1338

and Lincoln issued US Treasury Notes during the civil war era, which are forced loans, where government employees
and contractors were forced to loan the government money
"The forced loans of 1862 and 1863, in the form of legal tender notes, were vital forces in the struggle for
national supremacy. They formed a part of the public debt of the United States, ..." Julliard v. Greenman, 110
US 432

and the banksters have always been owned and operated by the Roman Cult
“It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the
present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.” Jewish Encyclopedia 1901 – 1906, Volume 2,
page 497,

and Federal Reserve Notes are negotiable instruments, and negotiable instrument law is a subset of Roman Law, and
Congress knew that they were not required to “borrow” the banksters fake money but the Roman Cult and their owned
and operated banksters infiltrated Congress they created the Rothschilds owned and operated Federal Reserve Bank
in the middle of the night on Christmas eve, 1913, and borrowed their fake money, and it took less than 20 years to
bankrupt their unconstitutional corporation, on March 9, 1933, as part of Roosevelt’s new communist deal, therefore,
they intended to convert their unconstitutional corporation over to the Roman Cult using their fake money from the
Rothschild owned and operated Federal Reserve, under their Roman negotiable instrument law
“Within twenty years this country is going to rule the world. Kings and Emperors will soon pass away and the
democracy of the United States will take their place….When the United States rules the world, the Catholic
Church will rule the world….Nothing can stand against the church…...” Roman Catholic Archbishop James E.
Quigley (October 15, 1854 – July 10, 1915) Chicago Daily Tribune May 5, 1903

and it is all a fraud, and it is all treason, and it is a seditious conspiracy, and the Roman Cult is now running their
unconstitutional corporation as an international criminal racketeering enterprise, but the lawful de jure trust that was
established in 1789 still exists and all oaths of office are to that trust, because nobody owes any duty to any
unconstitutional corporation.

Page 15 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
38. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that all BAR members have an exclusive privilege from the Inns of Court
INNS OF COURT - "These are certain private unincorporated associations, in the nature of collegiate houses,
located in London, and invested with the exclusive privilege of calling men to the bar;..." Black's Law
Dictionary, 5th Edition page 709

and Inns of Court are comprised of four of these associations located in London, Grey’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, Inner
Temple, and Middle Temple, and they are all located in downtown London near the Parliament buildings, in an area
that has a wall around it, that was never conquered by William the Conqueror (circa 1066) but was seized in a
bankruptcy because King John agreed to pay the Roman Cult tribute
“… we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession we will establish that from the proper and
especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms, for all the service and customs which we ought to render for
them, saving in all things the penny of St. Peter, the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks
sterling, namely at the feast of St. Michael five hundred marks, and at Easter five hundred marks-seven
hundred, namely, for the kingdom of England, and three hundred for the kingdom of Ireland…” Concessions of
England to the Pope (1213)

but failed to make his payments because the Welsh Barons rose up in rebellion and compelled him to agree to the
Magna Carta
“The Magna Carta is not a unilateral act, emanating solely from the spontaneous will of the King, as the
Charters of the predecessors of John; neither is it a treaty; for we cannot say it was concluded between two
legitimate and independent sovereignties; nor between two nations, nor is it a law. The Barons do not appear
in it as subjects, for they are freed from their promise of fidelity, and the King, brought captive, placed before
them, submitted to the conditions which the conquerors imposed upon him. Magna Carta is therefore a
contract, but resembles a treaty concluded between two nations, in that one of the parties, in virtue of the law
of war, can impose its will upon the other.” Perlman v Piche and Attorney General of Canada, Intervenant, Re
Habeus Corpus, 4 D.L.R. 147

and there is an American Inns of Court foundation, and chapters in every state, which makes all BAR members
foreign agents of the Roman Cult, and Congress is approximately 70-90% BAR members and all legislation passed
by Congress is approved by BAR members, and BAR members have now infiltrated into control of every major
corporation, government or otherwise.

39. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that all BAR members have received and accepted an honor from a foreign power (the Roman Cult) under
the true Article Thirteen in Amendment
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall,
without the consent of congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind
whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the
United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them. “
Article Thirteen in Amendment, Constitution for the United States of America,

and no BAR member is capable of holding any office of trust, which requires an oath of office, or profit, which is why
they wanted to facilitate its “disappearance” during the civil war, and none of the BAR members in this case have
registered themselves as foreign agents under their own Foreign Agents Registration Act under their 52 Stat. 631,
and these satanic BAR members do everything they can to assault you with their so-called court, and a good example
is when they give you a court appointed attorney
“He is however in a sense an officer of the state with an obligation to the Court…” 7 Corpus Juris Secundum §
4 Attorneys

“His first duty is to the courts and to the public, not to the client, and whenever his duties to his client conflict
with those as an officer of the court, in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.” 7
Corpus Juris Secundum § 4 Attorneys

so they can convert you into an imbecile

“Clients are also called “wards of the court”…” 7 Corpus Juris Secundum § 4 Attorneys

Page 16 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. Davis' Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d
189, 190. Their rights must be guarded jealously. Montgomery v. Erie R. Co., C.C.A.N.J., 97 F.2d 289, 292.”
Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 1755

and deny your challenges to jurisdiction

“IN PROPRIA PERSONA. In one's own proper person. It is a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of
the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an
attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the
jurisdiction. Lawes, PI. 91.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 899-900

and all attorneys are actually liars because they make all sorts of statements to their BAR member (bought and paid
for) clerks masquerading as Judges, (military commissioners) thereby giving testimony, and none of them have any
first hand knowledge of anything
"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness".
Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647

"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in the disposition of [a] case." U. S. v.
Lovasco (06/09/77) 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752,

and they call this justice, but it would be more correctly called “justus”.

40. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that the current Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments were martial law amendments for the
slaves (edicts under Martial Law)
"This court declared in the Slaughter-House cases that the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the Thirteenth
and Fifteenth were adopted to protect the Negroes in their freedom." Madden v. Kentucky 309 US 83 (1940)

"The thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments were designed mainly for the protection of the newly
emancipated negroes." United States v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, Case No. 14,459

"After the adoption of the 14th Amendment, a bill which became the first Civil Rights Act was introduced in
the 39th Congress, the major purpose of which was to secure to the recently freed Negroes all the civil rights
secured to white men... (N)one other than citizens of the United States were within the provisions of the Act.”
Hague v. C. I. O., 307 U. S. 496, 509

The forced loans of 1862 and 1863, in the form of legal tender notes, were vital forces in the struggle for
national supremacy. They formed a part of the public debt of the United States, the validity of which is
solemnly established by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.“ Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 432
[emphasis added]

but the truth of the matter is they were used to enslave everybody under Martial Law
“No white person born within the limits of the United States and subject to their jurisdiction, or born without
those limits and subsequently naturalized under their laws, owes his status of citizenship to the recent
amendments to the Federal Constitution.” Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal 43

and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is unconstitutional because an amendment is very limited and specific
"includes only the power to amend any section in such a manner that such Amendment, if approved, would
be complete within itself, relate to one subject and not substantially affect any other section of Articles of the
Constitution or require further Amendments to the Constitution to accomplish its purpose.“ Adams v Gunter
238 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1970)

and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is actually a revision changing many things in the Constitution for the United
States of America
". . . the wide and diverse range of subject matters proposed to be voted upon, and the revisional effect which
it would necessarily have on our basic plan of government. The proposal is offered as a single amendment
but it obviously is multifarious. It does not give the people an opportunity to express approval or disapproval
severally as to each major change suggested. . . ." McFadden v Jordan, 196 P.2d 787
Page 17 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

for example it converts citizenship into the opposite of what the founding fathers intended
"And while the Fourteenth Amendment does not create a national citizenship, it has the effect of making that
citizenship "paramount and dominant" instead of "derivative and dependent" upon state citizenship." Colgate
v Harvey 296 US 404 at p 427

"The amendment (fourteenth) reversed and annulled the original policy of the constitution," United States v.
Rhodes, 27 Federal Cases, 785, 794

and makes many other changes

“It violates the Preamble, which defines the whole intent of all powers granted to Congress, by introducing a
foreign member into the sovereign body.
It is an "ex post facto law" punishing Southerners in many ways for acts not necessarily illegal at the time of
their commission.
It is a "bill of attainder" (in its lesser form of a "bill of pains and penalties") depriving all southern slave
holders of property without trial.
It deprived Southerners of property by unreasonable seizure and without just compensation, bringing
Congress beyond limitations set out by the Fourth and Fifth Articles in Amendment (Bill of Rights).”
“It lays prohibitions upon the States beyond those known to the original Constitution of the United States and
makes inroads upon the Constitutions of the several States, encroaching upon sovereignty belonging to the
people of the several States which is prohibited by the Tenth Article in Amendment (Bill of Rights).
It created purely legislative "Tribunals" without respect to the separation of powers.
It extended Congress' "martial law power" allowing the emission of "bills of credit“ and etc..” Non-Ratification
of the Fourteenth Amendment by Judge AH Ellett, Utah Supreme Court, Dyett v. Turner, 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d
403 [1968]

“The forced loans of 1862 and 1863, in the form of legal tender notes, were vital forces in the struggle for
national supremacy. They formed a part of the public debt of the United States, the validity of which is
solemnly established by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.” Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 432

and the ratification of the so-called Fourteenth Amendment failed,

“The dissenting opinion asserts that "The Fourteenth Amendment is a part of the Constitution of the United
States." While this same assertion has been made by The United States Supreme Court, that court has never
held that the amendment was legally adopted. I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its
faculties could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted." State v Phillips 540
Pac. Rep.2d 936

all of which is further evidence that the current Thirteenth Amendment and all subsequent so-called amendments
ONLY apply in the District of Columbia and the Territories, and are for the unconstitutional corporation ONLY.

41. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that because the tyrant King George signed the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 as the arch-treasurer of
the Holy Roman Empire
“It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince
George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and
Luneburg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of
America…” Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 [emphasis added]

that the tyrant King George had perjured his oath of office because he was operating in his private capacity as a
revenue officer and because he was the successor to King John, his handlers were the Roman Cult and since he was
also arch-treasurer of the United States of America, and Queen Elizabeth is his successor, which is further evidence
that the Roman Cult is the real party of interest in this matter and Queen Elizabeth is keeping with the traditions of her
predecessors by perjuring her oath to operate in her private capacity as a revenue officer
“The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November,
1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of
Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
Page 18 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
And the Queen answering, I am willing.
The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer
each question severally as follows:
Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and
Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according
to their respective laws and customs?
Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.
Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?
Queen. I will.
Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the
Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed
Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of
England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England?
And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their
charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them? [emphasis
added]
Queen. All this I promise to do.
Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her,
shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying
her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is
now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and
saying these words:[emphasis added]
The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.
Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.
The Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the
Dean of Westminster.;

because the District of Columbia is a possession of the Queen, who is now arch-treasurer and prince elector of the
United States of America, which is why your subordinates are so adamant to assault me with their US citizen slave in
support of their extortion racket
"We therefore decline to overrule the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall: We hold that the District of Columbia
is not a state within Article 3 of the Constitution. In other words cases between citizens of the District and
those of the states were not included of the catalogue of controversies over which the Congress could give
jurisdiction to the federal courts by virtue of Article 3. In other words Congress has exclusive legislative
jurisdiction over citizens of Washington District of Columbia and through their plenary power nationally
covers those citizens even when in one of the several states as though the district expands for the purpose
of regulating its citizens wherever they go throughout the states in union" National Mutual Insurance Company
of the District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582, 93 L.Ed. 1556 (1948),

so they can collect their commission as third party debt collectors in their private capacity as revenue officers.

42. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that i am NOT a person as per your statutes because a “person” is
a. “a variety of entities other than human beings.” Church of Scientology v U.S. Department of Justice, 612 F2d
417 (1979) at pg 418

b. ”...foreigners, not citizens...." United States v Otherson, 480 F. Supp. 1369 (1979) at pg 1373

c. the words "person" and "whoever" include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships,
societies, and joint stock companies...Title 1 U.S.C. Chapter 1 – Rules of Construction, Section 1

and a sovereign is NOT a "person" as per your statues;

a. " 'in common usage, the term 'person' does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the
[word] are normally construed to exclude it.' Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct
2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US7 600, 604, 85 L Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941). See

Page 19 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 275, 91 L Ed 884, 67 S Ct 677 (1947)" Will v Michigan State
Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S.Ct. 2304

b. “a sovereign is not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S. v. Fox, 94 U.S.
315, 24 L. Ed. 192

43. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that i can be an Texas Citizen without being a US citizen
"There is a clear distinction between national citizenship and state citizenship." 256 P. 545, affirmed 278 US
123, Tashiro vs. Jordan

"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither
incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects
only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which
relate to state citizenship." Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226

"there is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United
States  Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own." US vs. Cruikshank, 92 US 542,

“A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he
resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States**. To hold
otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, -- the right to declare who are
its citizens.” State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380 6 S. 602 (1889), [emphasis added]

"One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State, 15 Ind. 449;
Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443." Mc
Donel v State, 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;

"Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make
such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment.“
Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643.

44. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that State citizens are the ONLY ones living under free government
“The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms and mean the same thing.
They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions form the sovereignty, and
who hold the power, and conduct the government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly
call the sovereign people, and every citizen is one of these people, and a constituent member of the
sovereignty.” Dredd Scott v Sandford 60 U.S. 393

"The people or sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or
interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been
ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,.." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)

"...at the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the
country... the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty."
Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471

"People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to the King by his prerogative." Lansing v
Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9,20 (NY)

"It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal
government, through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign within
their respective states." Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997

Page 20 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
"A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical
and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the
Right depends." Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907)

"The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract." see, Dred
Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is
independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his
fellowmen without his consent.” CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70, [emphasis added]

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by
the citizenship to the agencies of government.” City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

"State citizens are the only ones living under free government, whose rights are incapable of impairment by
legislation or judicial decision." Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 97, 1908

"State Citizenship is a vested substantial property right, and the State has no power to divest or impair these
rights." Favot v. Kingsbury, (1929) 98 Cal. App. 284, 276 P. 1083

45. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that you are not authorized to serve commercial process on me.

46. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that because i am a sovereign living man, and a holder of the office of "the people", and an inhabitant of the land of
Texas, that it also holds true that i am not a "person" as found in any of your corporate commercial codes, rules, and
regulations, and therefore, your law merchant, a/k/a private international law, a/k/a martial law, a/k/a canon law, a/k/a
ecclesiastical law, does not apply to me, and if you or one of your subordinates attempts to impose one of your law
merchant so-called contracts upon me, your subordinate and you will be engaging in Perjury of Oath, Sedition to the
Constitution, and giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war, which is the prosecutable form of Treason as
found in the constitutions for the united States of America, the Texas republic.
Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a
government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is
that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them. Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters 3 U.S. 54; 1
L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, (1795) [Emphasis added].

47. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that the use of any statutes, codes, rules, regulations, or court citations within any document created by me
at any time, is only to notice that which is applicable to you, and is not intended, nor shall it be construed to mean that
i have conferred, submitted to or entered into any jurisdiction alluded to thereby.

48. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that i am not bankrupt like your corporation UNITED STATES, and i hereby certify that i have in my possession much
more than twenty-one dollars in lawful money (troy ounce silver eagle specie with a face value of one dollar).

49. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, are further
NOTICED that i regularly travel on the land called Texas, Arizona, Nevada and elsewhere from time to time, but i am
not even remotely interested in being in your municipal corporation called UNITED STATES or any of its political
subdivisions called STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF NEVADA, etc. Any attempt by you, or your
subordinates, to coerce or intimidate me into your municipal corporation is PERJORY OF OATH at a minimum, and
constitutes violations of your 18 USC § 241, § 242, as well as other crimes.

50. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that the ONLY legitimate power held by ANY governmental entity in the United States and or the several States, or
their agencies is power delegated by “we the people”. And “we the people” are not subject to your codes, rules, and
regulations.

Page 21 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system,
while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the
people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts." Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356, at pg 370;

“There is no such thing as power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this
country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their
Constitution entrusted to it; All else is withheld.” Julliard v Greenman 110 U.S. 421

51. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that the Constitution for the United States of America is a trust indenture
"The governments are but trustees acting under derived authority and have no power to delegate what is not
delegated to them. But the people, as the original fountain might take away what they have delegated and
entrust to whom they please. ... The sovereignty in every state resides in the people of the state and they may
alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure." --Luther v. Borden, 48 US 1, 12 Led 581.

and it is impossible for me to delegate authority to violate anyone else’s rights, since i myself do not have such
authority, and there is no authority to delegate anything to any municipal corporation, whether it is called UNITED
STATES or STATE OF TEXAS or COUNTY OF TARRANT, COUNTY OF DALLAS or anything else.
“A delegate cannot delegate; an agent cannot delegate his functions to a subagent without the knowledge or
consent of the principal; the person to whom an office or duty is delegated cannot lawfully devolve the duty
on another, unless he be expressly authorized so to do.” 9 Coke, 77; Broom, Max. 840; 2 Kent, Comm. 633; 2
Steph. Comm. 119 [emphasis added]

“A delegated power cannot be again delegated.” 2 Inst. 597; Black's, 2d. 347; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1300

“A deputy cannot have (or appoint) a deputy.” Story, Ag. s.13; 9 Coke, 77; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1936

52. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that any (so-called) contract which alienates any of my God given rights involving any government in America or any
agency of any government in America, is a NULLITY because the government shall not commit treason (breach of
trust). ANY presumption to the contrary by ANY Officer of ANY Court, is Perjury of Oath, deprivation of my rights and
immunities.

53. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that the ONLY valid contract involving me, one of “the people”, is a common law contract, between living souls, with
full disclosure in writing, with full knowledge and expressed intent, and signed in red ink on the soil of America, and
this does NOT include ANY law merchant (so-called) contracts or any contracts with any fictitious entities.

54. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that a man called Mark Passio, a former Priest of the Church of Satan - turned whistleblower, has a Youtube channel
called “Whatonearthishappening”. He has video lectures about natural law, mind control and eugenics. He discusses
the highest tenet of Satanism as being “order following” i.e. how people become willing slaves, following unlawful
commands. “Order Followers” are responsible for all of the atrocities in history and it is my sincerest wish that neither
you or your subordinates follow unlawful orders.

55. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that all of the Nazi’s in the Nuremburg trials claimed that they were “just following orders”. They spent the rest of their
lives in jail and/or suffered death by hanging and some of them are still hunted to this day.

56. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that when one of your Peace Officers decides to impose your UNITED STATES/STATE OF TEXAS codes upon me,
by stopping me (an arrest) when there is no breach of the peace, and no lawful warrant, he will be operating in his
private capacity, as an “order follower”, thereby surrendering any immunity he may have enjoyed
“Perhaps it should be mentioned that as a general rule a person is placed under arrest when he is deprived of
his liberty by an officer who intends to arrest him. It is not always necessary for the officer to make a formal
declaration of arrest. See: 1 Varon, Searches, Seizures and Immunities, 75 (1961);” Henry v. United States,
361 U.S. 98, 4 L.Ed.2d 134, 80 S.Ct. 168 (1959) and United States v. Boston, 330 F.2d 937 (1964).
Page 22 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

“The stopping of an automobile by a highway patrol officer for inspection of a driver’s license, or for any
other purpose where it is accomplished by the authority of the officers, is an “arrest.” Robinson v. State, 198
S.W.2d 633, 635, 184 Tenn. 277

“A motorist stopped by a traffic officer for a traffic offense would be considered “arrested” . . . even if the
motorist was not specifically informed that he had been arrested.” People ex rel. Winkle v. Bannan, 125 N.W.2d
875, 879, 372 Mich. 292.

“Any restraint, however slight, upon another’s liberty to come and go as one pleases, constitutes an “arrest.”
Swetnam v. W.F. Woolworth Co., 318 P.2d 364, 366, 83 Ariz. 189. [emphasis added]

57. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that an unlawful arrest is an assault, and also;
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and
transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private
individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex.
App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the
same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v.
Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest
stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense.” State v.
Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100.

“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted,
molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an
officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16,
48 S.E. 910)

and the ONLY lawful warrant is in writing, signed by a Judge and supported by affidavits from two or more people,
under penalty of perjury, otherwise it is presumptively invalid
"ANY ARREST, made without a PROPER warrant, Signed by a judge and backed up by an affidavit from two
persons that states, under penalty of perjury, you have broken a contract or hurt somebody, if challenged by
the defendant (person), is presumptively invalid...the burden is upon the state" to justify it as authorized by
statute, and does not violate the constitutional provisions and Or( human rights.) State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d
695 (1969); Butler v. State, 212 So.2d 577 (Miss 1968).

58. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that a 'Statute' is not a Law,' (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport , 197 La. 1067, 3 Sold 244, 248), and a "Code'
is not a Law," (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law, a concurrent or joint resolution
of legislature is not "Law," (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292,179 N. E. 705,707; Ward v State. 176 Old. 368.56 P.2d
136, 137; Stale ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 1G5), all codes, rules, and regulations are
unconstitutional and lacking due process. (Rodriques v. Ray Donavan  (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d
1344, 1348 (1985).) and the common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations,
policy and statutes are "not the law", (Self v Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 2611).

59. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that there are no common law offenses against the United States.
Only those acts which Congress has forbidden, with penalties for disobedience of its command, are crimes.
United States v. Hudson & Goodwin, 11 U.S. (7th Cr.) 32 (1812); United States v. Coolidge, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 415
(1816); United States v. Britton, 108 U.S. 199, 206 (1883); United States v. Eaton, 144 U.S. 677, 687 (1892)

because all offenses are offenses against the Martial Law, and are edicts under Martial Law for US citizens, or
resident aliens under the commerce clause, and “United States” is another phrase for the District of Columbia and the
Page 23 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
territories.

60. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that there are no common law offenses in any of the States
“Under Texas law, no act or omission is a crime unless made so by statute.”
Dawson v. Vance, 329 F.Supp. 1320, (D.C.Tex. 1971). The Legislature may create an offense and in same
enactment, provide exceptions to its application. Williams v. State, 176 SW2d 177, Tex.Cr.App., 1943

because all offenses in Texas, or any other State, are edicts under Martial Law for US citizens, or resident aliens,
under the commerce clause.

61. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that nobody is bound to obey an unconstitutional law
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16th American
Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177 late 2nd, Section 256

“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates
no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby
County, 118 U.S. 425, p. 442

"An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offence created by it is not a crime." Ex parte Siebold,
100 U.S. 371, 376 (1880), quoted with approval in Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 408 (1963)

"it never became a law and was as much a nullity as if it had been the act or declaration of an unauthorized
assemblage of individuals." (Ryan v. Lynch, 68 Ill. 160)

62. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that under your edicts under Martial law called the Uniform Commercial Code as long as i do not carry passengers or
property for hire with my private conveyance, there is no requirement to register it with the State of Texas
“Goods are;
(1) “consumer goods” if they are used or bought for use primarily for personal, family or household
purposes;
(2) “equipment” if they are used or bought for use primarily in business (including farming or a profession) or
by a debtor who is a non-profit organization or a governmental subdivision or agency or if the goods are not
included in the definitions of inventory, farm products or consumer goods;” Uniform Commercial Code 9-109
Classification of Goods: “Consumer Goods”; “Equipment”; “Farm Products”; “Inventory”.

“Under UCC §9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those
purchased for business use. The two are mutually exclusive and the principal use to which the property is
put should be considered as determinative.” James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv 1028; 266 Cal.App.2d
384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).

“The classification of goods in UCC §9-109 are mutually exclusive.” McFadden v Mercantile-Safe Deposit &
Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273 A.2d 198 (1971).

“Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his place of employment was
``consumer goods'' as defined in UCC §9-109.” Mallicoat v Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv
1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn. App., 1966)

“The provisions of UCC §2-316 of the Maryland UCC do not apply to sales of consumer goods (a term which
includes automobiles, whether new or used, that are bought primarily for personal, family, or household
use).” Maryland Independent Automobile Dealers Assoc., Inc. v Administrator, Motor Vehicle Admin., 25 UCC Rep
Serv 699; 394 A.2d 820, 41 Md App 7 (1978).

“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, . . . it is NOT a type of vehicle required to
be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4
UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14
Page 24 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to
the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20

“The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were
properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly
disposed of.” Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907)

“A soldier's personal automobile is part of his “household goods[.]” U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226,
235” 19A Words and Phrases - Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94

“... [T]he exemptions provided for in section 1 of the Motor Vehicle Transportation License Act of 1925 (Stats.
1925, p. 833) in favor of those who solely transport their own property or employees, or both, and of those
who transport no persons or property for hire or compensation, by motor vehicle, have been determined in
the Bacon Service Corporation case to be lawful exemptions. --In re Schmolke (1926) 199 Cal. 42, 46

“Consumer goods – automobile for transportation to and from work. The use of a vehicle by its owner for
purposes of travelling to and from his employment is a personal, as opposed to a business use, as that term
is used in UCC 9-109(1) and the vehicle will be classified as consumer goods rather than equipment.” In Re
Barnes, 11 UCC Reporting Service 670

“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the
transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them.” --State v. Johnson, 243 P.
1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94, page 581

and under the edicts under Martial Law called the Texas Constitution, consumer goods (household goods), like my
private conveyance, are not subject to taxation,
“(d) The Legislature by general law shall exempt from ad valorem taxation household goods not held or used
for the production of income and personal effects not held or used for the production of income.” Article 8,
Sec. 1 (d) [emphasis added]

and the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that “income” is corporate profits
"...it becomes essential to distinguish between what is and what is not "income," according to truth and
substance without regard to form. Congress cannot, by any definition it may adopt, conclude the matter,
since it cannot by legislation, alter the Constitution, from which it derives its power to legislate, and which
within those limitations alone, that power can be unlawfully exercised... [Income is] Derived -- from -- capital
-- the -- gain -- derived -- from -- capital, etc. Here we have the essential matter -- not gain accruing to capital,
not a growth or increment of value in the investment; but a gain, a profit, something of exchangeable value ...
severed from the capital however invested or employed, and coming in, being "derived," that is received or
drawn by the recipient for his separate use, benefit and disposal -- that is the income derived from property.
Nothing else answers the description...." Eisner v Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 [emphasis in the original]

therefore, your entire edicts under Martial Law called the Transportation code is for commercial vehicles, carrying
passengers or property for hire by US citizens, pursuant to your edict under Martial Law 18 USC § 31 which says;
"The term "Motor Vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by
mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers,
passengers and property, or property or cargo.
The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate,
charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking
intended for profit."

and since i do not use my private conveyance to carry passengers or property for hire, and because your Department
of Motor Vehicles will not allow a vehicle to be registered without first paying ad valorem tax (sales tax), therefore
there is no requirement for it to be registered but my private conveyance will have republic of Texas plates, or
American National plates, true copies of which are attached hereto, all of each of which are incorporated herein by
reference in their entirety, or i may have an advertising plate from a dealer, or a new buyer temporary plate

Page 25 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
(unexpired or expired) and your edicts under Martial law speed signs are form of regulation and for commercial
vehicles carrying passengers or property for hire
“Speed Signs. The Department shall erect and maintain on the highways and roads of this state appropriate
signs that show the maximum lawful speed for commercial vehicles, truck tractors, truck trailors, truck
semitrailers, and motor vehicles engaged in the business of transporting passengers for compensation for
hire.” Texas Transportation Code § 201.904

"At Common Law there is no precise limit of speed. A traveler by automobile must adopt a reasonable
speed." Gallagher v. Montplier, 52 ALR 744; 5 Am Jur. page 645

“…the reason for the initial detention, speeding & running a red light are not a breach of the peace.” Perkins v
Texas, 812 S.W. 2d 326

and any evidence of me following your speed limits shall not be construed to mean that i am a slave subject to your
regulations,
“The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the
territory or other property belonging to the United States…...” Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, Constitution for the
United States of America [emphasis added]

but should be construed to mean that i have respect for my neighbors on the road and near the road and do not wish
to cause them harm or injury.

63. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, you may NOT require me to register my vehicle, pay a tax associated
with registration, or pay a tax associated with a license,
“(a) .. a political subdivision of this state may not require an owner of a motor vehicle to; (1) register the
vehicle;
(2) pay a motor vehicle registration fee; or
(3) pay an occupation tax or license fee in connection with motor vehicle.” Texas Transportation Code §
502.003. Registration By Political Subdivision Prohibited

which your Certificate of Title Act applies ONLY to government owned vehicles
“(a) This chapter applies to a motor vehicle owned by the state or a political subdivision of the state.
(b) This chapter does not apply to;
(3) a motor vehicle while it is owned or operated by the United States. (Postal Service or military vehicles)”
Texas Transportation Code § 501.004. Applicability. (of Certificate of Title Act).

64. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, entry in or on my automobile is a FORBIDDEN
“(a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on or in property,….or other vehicle, or another
without effective consent…& he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(b) for purposes of this section;
(2) “Notice” means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;
(e) A person commits an offense if without express consent or if without authorization provided by any law,
whether in writing or other form, the person:
(3) had notice that the entry was forbidden or received notice to depart but failed to do so.” Texas Penal Code
30.05 Criminal Trespass.

65. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, a Class “C” misdemeanors does not impose any legal disability
“(c) Conviction of a Class C misdemeanor does not impose any legal disability or disadvantage,” Texas Penal
Code § 12.03 Classification of Misdemeanor

and your edicts under Martial Law say the penalty can be a fine ONLY
Page 26 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
“An individual adjudged guilty of a Class “C” misdemeanor shall be punished by fine only, not to exceed
$500.” Texas Penal Code § 12.23 Class (C) Misdemeanors

and your edicts under Martial Law say an arrest warrant may NOT be issued, therefore, there is no such thing as a
warrant for a Class “C” Misdemeanor
“(a) If the owner of the motor vehicle fails to timely pay the amount of the civil penalty imposed against the
owner: (1) an arrest warrant may NOT be issued for the owner; & (2) the imposition of the civil penalty may
not be recorded on the owner’s driving record.” Texas Transportation Code § 707.019 Failure to Pay Civil Penalty
[emphasis added]

and your edicts under Martial Law say a failure to appear is also a fine ONLY
“(e) An offense under this section is a Class “C” misdemeanor if the offense for which the actor’s appearance
is required is punishable by fine only.” Texas Penal Code § 38.10 Bail Jumping and Failure to Appear

and pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law your Municipal Courts may ONLY hear cases that are misdemeanors
punishable by jail, or felonies
“(a) A municipal court, including a municipal court of record, shall have exclusive original jurisdiction within
the municipality’s territorial limits in all criminal cases that;
(1) arise under (A) the ordinances of the municipality
(b) The municipal court has concurrent jurisdiction with the justice court of a precinct in which the
municipality is located in all criminal cases arising under state law that arise within the municipality's
territorial limits
(c) In this section, an offense which is punishable by “fine only” is defined as an offense that is punishable
by fine and such sanctions, if any, as authorized by statute not consisting of confinement in jail or
imprisonment” Texas Government Code § 29.003 Jurisdiction (Authority of Municipal and Justice of the Peace
Court)

“(a) A municipal court, including a municipal court of record, shall have exclusive original jurisdiction within
the territorial limits of the municipality in all criminal cases” Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 4.14
Jurisdiction of Municipal Court

because a criminal case involves a crime, and a “DEFENDANT” ONLY, is accused of a crime
“(5) Crime means (A) a misdemeanor punishable by confinement (jail); or (B) a felony
(6) “DEFENDANT” means a person accused of a crime” Texas Government Code § 79.001 Definitions

and your edicts under Martial Law say the Certificate of Title ONLY applies to motor vehicles that are owned by the
state or a political subdivision of the state
“(a) This chapter applies to …a motor vehicle owned by the state or a political subdivision of the state” Texas
Transportation Code 501.004 Applicability

because the Certificate of Title certifies that the state has the Title, which means the vehicle is owned by the state,
and your edicts under Martial Law say no political subdivision may require me to register my property
“(a) …a political subdivision of this state mat not require the owner of a motor vehicle to; (1) register the
vehicle; (2) pay a motor vehicle registration fee” Texas Transportation Code, 502.003 Registration by Political
Subdivision Prohibited,

therefore the registration of my vehicle is none of your business, and it is none of the business of any of your
subordinates, which is proof that any action involving a private automobile that is considered “consumer goods” or
“household goods” as described herein, is a malicious prosecution
"Although probable cause may not be inferred from malice, malice may be inferred from lack of probable
cause." Pauley v. Hall, 335 N. W. 2d 197, 124 Mich App 255

and since they may NOT issue a warrant, they do issue a capias, as described herein, which is NOT a warrant,
“A capias is NOT a “Warrant of Arrest,”….” Knox v State, 586 S.W. 2d 504, 506 (Tex.Crim.App.
1979)

Page 27 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
but is a debt instrument and if you or your subordinates arrest me for anything involving a Class “C” misdemeanor, it
shall be evidence that you and your subordinates intend to act in your private capacity as third party debt collectors in
support of an extortion racket.

66. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that i am entitled to a jury of my peers who fail to be government employees
"An employee of United States is not qualified to serve as member of grand jury in any District." UNITED
STATES v. GRIFFITH et aI., 2 F.2d 925, (Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.  Submitted October 9, 1924.
Decided December 1, 1924.), No. 4114

and pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law “federal personnel” is anybody who has a Social Security Number
“(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States,
members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to
receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the
United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a.(a)(13) [emphasis added]

and if a government employee fails to be qualified to participate in a jury, they also fail to be qualified to complain
about anything that i do.

67. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that in any event that i am arrested for any reason, pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, i hereby DEMAND to be
taken before a magistrate, and i do NOT consent to any arrest, and i will sign nothing, and i make no promises
whatsoever
“(a) A person arrested for a violation of this subtitle punishable as a misdemeanor shall be immediately taken
before a magistrate if:
(1) the person is arrested on a charge of failure to stop in the event of an accident causing damage to
property; or
(2) the person demands an immediate appearance before a magistrate or refuses to make a written promise
to appear in court as provided by this subchapter.” Texas Transportation Code 543.002 Person Arrested to be
Taken Before a Magistrate.

68. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that i have a right to a nationality as a Texian national
“1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.” Article
15, Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

and in the event that you and your subordinates deprive me of my Texian nationality by assaulting me with your US
citizen slave status, pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, it shall be evidence of the intent of you and your
subordinates to subject me to the deprivation of my immunities as an Texian national under color of your District of
Columbia codes (edicts under Martial Law)
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant
of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, …….. shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; ………” 18 USC § 242 Violating Rights under Color of
Law

and in the event one of your subordinates does it, under the supervision of you or another subordinate, pursuant to
your edicts under Martial Law, it shall be evidence of a conspiracy to oppress me, intimidate me, threaten me, and
injure me in the free exercise of my rights that are protected by the Constitution
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; …They
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; …” 18 USC § 241 Conspiracy to
Violate Rights under Color of Law [emphasis added].

Page 28 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
69. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that in the event that there is any interaction between you and your subordinates and me, that fails to involve a breach
of the peace, or a lawful court order, it shall be evidence that you and your subordinate intend to cease to represent
the government
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const.
Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94

and pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, it shall be evidence that you and your subordinates intend to
impersonate a public servant
“(a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) impersonates a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official authority or
to rely on his pretended official acts; or
(2) knowingly purports to exercise any function of a public servant or of a public office, including that of a
judge and court, and the position or office through which he purports to exercise a function of a public
servant or public office has no lawful existence under the constitution or laws of this state or of the United
States.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.” Texas Penal Code, Section 37.11.
IMPERSONATING PUBLIC SERVANT, [emphasis added]

and pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, it shall be evidence that you intend that any action that may be brought
is simulating a legal process
“(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document
that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended
recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered…..” Texas Penal Code Sec. 32.48. Simulating
Legal Process,

all of which is in furtherance of their quasi contract

“Assumpsit - ….In its origin an action of tort, [assumpsit] was soon transformed into an action of contract,
becoming afterwards a remedy where there was neither tort nor contract. Based at first only upon an express
promise, it was afterwards supported upon an implied promise, and even upon a fictitious promise.
Introduced as a special manifestation of the action on the case, it soon acquired the dignity of a distinct form
of action, which superseded Debt, became concurrent with Account, with Case upon a bailment, a warranty,
and bills of exchange, and competed with Equity in the case of the essentially equitable quasi-contracts
growing out of the principle of unjust enrichment. Surely, it would be hard to find a better illustration of the
flexibility and power of self-development of the Common Law.” James Barr Ames, “The History of
Assumpsit,” in 3 Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History 298 (1909).” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th
Edition, page 379 [emphasis added]

"Both in Roman and English law there are certain obligations which were not in truth contractual, but which
the law treats as IF they were. They are contractual in law, but not in fact, being the subject-matter of a
fictitious extension of the sphere of contract to cover obligations which do not in reality fall within it."
Salmond, Salmond on Jurisprudence, p. 642 (9th Edition, 1937, Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd. England). [emphasis added]

where they assault you with some of their so-called “benefits”

"It is a well settled rule of law that he who seeks benefits of contract must also assume burdens." Higgins v.
Monckton (1938), 28 C.A.2d 723, 83 P.2d 516

"Voluntary acceptance of benefit of transaction is equivalent to consent to all obligations arising from it, so
far as facts are known, or ought to be known, to person accepting." Northern Assurance Co. v. Stout (1911), 16
C.A. 548, 117 P. 617

Page 29 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
"A quasi contractual action presupposes acceptance and retention of a benefit by one party with full
appreciation of the facts, under circumstances making it inequitable for him to retain the benefit without
payment of its reasonable value." Major-Blakeney Co. v. Jenkins (1953), 121 C.A.2d 325, 263 P.2d 655, hear
den.; Townsend Pierson, Inc. v. Holly-Coleman Co. (1960), 178 C.A.2d 373, 2 Cal. Rptr. 812. [emphasis added]

which is why you and your subordinates are so adamant about coercing information from me about your Roman Cult
cestui que trust / government employee / Social Security Number
"Constructive/quasi contracts are based solely upon a legal fiction or fiction of law." Hill v. Waxberg, 237 F.2d
936

because they create a fraudulent fictitious debt and issue a capias pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law
“CAPIAS AD SATISFACIENDUM (shortly termed a CA. SA.) A judicial writ of execution which issues out on
the record of a Judgment, where there is a recovery in the courts…, of debt, damages, &c. And by this writ
the sheriff is commanded to take the body of the defendant in execution, and him safely to keep, so that he
have his body in court at the return of the writ, to satisfy the plaintiff his debt and damages. Vide 1 Litt Abr.
249.” Tomlin’s Law Dicitonary 1835 Edition

“In this chapter: (1) "Capias" means a writ that is: (A) issued by a court having jurisdiction of a case after
judgment and sentence; and (B) directed "To any peace officer of the State of Texas" and commanding the
officer to arrest a person convicted of an offense and bring the arrested person before that court immediately
or on a day or at a term stated in the writ.
(2) "Capias pro fine" means a writ that is:
(A) issued by a court having jurisdiction of a case after judgment and sentence for unpaid fines and costs;
and
(B) directed "To any peace officer of the State of Texas" and commanding the officer to arrest a person
convicted of an offense and bring the arrested person before that court immediately.” Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure Article 43.015 Definitions

and pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law, your code enforcers can have an excuse to assault (unlawfully arrest)
me, kidnap me and falsely imprison me and claim “good faith” and call it a warrant
“(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or
laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in
evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case.
(b) It is an exception to the provisions of Subsection (a) of this Article that the evidence was obtained by a
law enforcement officer acting in objective good faith reliance upon a warrant issued by a neutral magistrate
based on probable cause.” Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 38.23 Evidence Not to Be Used [emphasis
added],

when they know that a capias is NOT an arrest warrant

“A capias is NOT a “Warrant of Arrest,”….” Knox v State, 586 S.W. 2d 504, 506 (Tex.Crim.App. 1979).

which is also what precipitated the War of Independence

“…statutes have been passed extending the courts of admiralty and vice-admiralty far beyond their ancient
limits for depriving us the accustomed and inestimable privilege of trial by jury, in cases affecting both life
and property…….to supersede the course of common law and instead thereof to publish and order the use
and exercise of the law martial….…and for altering fundamentally the form of government established by
charter. We saw the misery to which such despotism would reduce us.” Causes and Necessity for Taking up
Arms (1775)

"In doing this, I shall have occasion incidentally to evince, how true it is that States and Governments were
made for man, and, at the same time, how true it is that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next
vilified, and, at last oppressed their master and maker." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 455

especially since Samuel Adams coined the phrase “give me Liberty or give me death” after witnessing a man
flogged to death for refusing to take a license
"A state like a merchant makes a contract. A dishonest state, like a dishonest merchant willfully refuses to
discharge it." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 456
Page 30 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

for their extortion racket to get Federal Reserve Notes which are meant for internal use of the government ONLY, and
for US citizens ONLY pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law
“Sec. 15. As used in this Act the term “United States” means the Government of the United States…the term
“currency of the United States” means currency which is legal tender in the United States, and includes
United States notes,…Federal Reserve Notes…” Gold Reserve Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 337

and since a capias can ONLY be issued “”by a court having jurisdiction, after judgment and sentence”, and i NEVER
give jurisdiction to hear the matter, if you or your subordinates arrest me based on a capias, you shall be a participant
in an extortion racket, and a malicious prosecution, since there is no crime, no probable cause, and no lawful arrest.

70. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that all i have to do is make the false arrest allegation and the burden is upon you and your subordinates to prove that
you acted lawfully
“The only thing the plaintiff needs to do is to allege a false arrest, is either (1) that the defendant made an
arrest or imprisonment, or (2) that the defendant affirmatively instigated, encouraged, incited, or caused the
arrest or imprisonment.” Burlington v. Josephson, 153 Fed.2d 372,276 (1946)

”When the plaintiff has shown that he was arrested, imprisoned or restrained of his liberty by the defendant,
"the law presumes it to be unlawful." People v. McGrew, 20 Pac. 92 (1888); Knight v. Baker, 133 P. 544(1926).

"The burden is upon the defendant (cop) to show that the arrest was by authority of law." McAleer v. Good, 65
Atl. 934, 935 (1907); Mackie v. Ambassador, 11 P.2d 6 (1932).

"As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer... must keep within the law at his peril." Thiede v. Scandia, 217
Minn. 231, 14 N.W.2d 400 (1944)

and the ONLY lawful warrant is in writing, signed by a Judge and supported by affidavits from two or more people,
under penalty of perjury, otherwise it is presumptively invalid
"ANY ARREST, made without a PROPER warrant, Signed by a judge and backed up by an affidavit from two
persons that states, under penalty of perjury, you have broken a contract or hurt somebody, if challenged by
the defendant (person), is presumptively invalid...the burden is upon the state" to justify it as authorized by
statute, and does not violate the constitutional provisions and Or( human rights.) State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d
695 (1969); Butler v. State, 212 So.2d 577 (Miss 1968).

71. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that anyone who attempts to compel me to work for the occupying power
“No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair the right of any worker, whether voluntary or not and
wherever he may be, to apply to the representatives of the Protecting Power in order to request the said
Power’s intervention.
All measures aiming at creating unemployment or at restricting the opportunities offered to workers in an
occupied territory, in order to induce them to work for the Occupying Power, are prohibited.” Article 52,
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]

by coercing any information from me or any third party, including any third party database for information of your
Roman Cult cestui que trust or a Social Security Number because anybody with a Social Security Number is “Federal
personnel” pursuant to your edicts under Martial Law
“(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States,
members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to
receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the
United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a. (a)(13) [emphasis added]

with the objective of enslaving me because government employees are subject to regulations and because
regulations are for “other property of the United States” (slaves)
“The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the….
other property belonging to the United States…...” Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, Constitution for the United
States of America, [emphasis added]
Page 31 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

“Section 2 Definitions (1) In this Act,

owned means, subject to the regulations,…..;” Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act

and slaves are owned and slaves are property and slaves are regulated, and it in violation of your own Article Thirteen
in Amendment edict under Martial Law
“Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party
shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction…” Article XIII in Amendment

it shall be evidence of the intent of you and your subordinates to engage in all of the crimes described herein,
including but not limited to enslavement, and under your Lieber Code the punishment for enslavement is death
“The law of nations knows of no distinction of color, and if an enemy of the United States should enslave and
sell any captured persons of their army, it would be a case for the severest retaliation, if not redressed upon
complaint.
The United States cannot retaliate by enslavement; therefore death must be the retaliation for this crime
against the law of nations.” Article 58 Lieber Code

which is consistent with the Pentateuch, if you were Christian

“If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him, or
selleth him ; then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you.” Deuteronomy 24:7.

72. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that you can no longer operate in your private capacity as a revenue officer and claim plausible deniability that you are
operating in “good faith”, as required by your Texas Codes in numerous places, and you and your subordinates no
longer enjoy qualified immunity, or limited immunity,
“When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially (and thus are not protected by
“qualified” or “limited immunity,” - SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404)

and if you proceed against me in any matter not involving a breach of the peace, you will not be operating in good
faith as required by your edicts under Martial Law Texas Statutes
“(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or
laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in
evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case.
(b) It is an exception to the provisions of Subsection (a) of this Article that the evidence was obtained by a
law enforcement officer acting in objective good faith reliance upon a warrant issued by a neutral magistrate
based on probable cause.” Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 38.23 Evidence Not to Be Used [emphasis
added],

or your edicts under Martial Law federal statutes

“(e)DEFENSE.—A good faith reliance on—
(1) a court warrant or order, a grand jury subpoena, a legislative authorization, or a statutory authorization
(including a request of a governmental entity under section 2703(f) of this title);
(2) a request of an investigative or law enforcement officer under section 2518(7) of this title; or
(3) a good faith determination that section 2511(3) of this title permitted the conduct complained of;
is a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this chapter or any other law.” 18 US Code
2707 Civil Action

but in any event your corporation is responsible

“The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons may be, is responsible for the treatment
accorded to them by its agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be incurred.” Article
29, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949.

73. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are NOTICED
that you are now put into estoppel
“ESTOPPEL - A bar that prevents one from asserting a claim or right that contradicts what one has said or
done before or what has been legally established as true.” Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition page 1662
Page 32 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim
Title Holder: glenn winningham; house of fearn Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019

“estoppel by silence. Estoppel that arises when a party is under a duty to speak but fails to do so. — Also
termed estoppel by standing by; estoppel by inaction.” Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition, page 1664

"The principles of estoppel apply against the state as well as individuals." Cal. v. Sims, 32 C3d 468

74. You, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, are further
NOTICED that after saying all of this, i also want you to know that when you are operating in your official capacity as a
Peace Officer, if you ever need me to give aid, in carrying out your lawful duty, i fully comprehend my duty in that
respect and i will be there for you, anytime, anyplace
“Posse comitatus. Latin. The power or force of the county. The entire population of a county above the age of
fifteen, which a sheriff may summon to his assistance in certain cases, as to aid him in keeping the peace, in
pursuing and arresting felons, etc. Williams v. State, 253 Ark. 973, 490 S.W.2d 117, 121.” Black's Law
Dictionary 6th Ed. 1990

75. As a sovereign living man, i hereby DEMAND that you Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of
Police, subordinates and successors, protect me from all foreign agents, like agents from the FBI Military Police, the
DEA Military Police, the INS Military Police, Customs Military Police, ICE Military Police, the IRS Military Police, the
DHS Military Police, the IMF Military Police, the CIA Military Police, City Military Police, State Military Police, and any
other agents of foreign governments.

76. Finally, Will Johnson, the private man acting as Arlington Chief of Police, subordinates and successors, et al, as a
sovereign living man, i hereby DEMAND that you, and your subordinates, protect my unalienable rights.

77. Signed and Sealed in red ink on the soil of Texas pursuant to locus sigilli, under penalties with perjury pursuant to
your Rule 201 of your Rules of Evidence.
“locus sigilli - The place of the seal. Today this phrase is almost always abbreviated "L.S." ” Black’s Law
Dictionary 9th Edition, page 102

i, glenn winningham; house of fearn, Sui Juris, a natural man of the republic, living in the republic, does declare that i have
scribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of my firsthand knowledge, such are true, correct,
complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, before God, Angels, and everybody who
reads this document as witnesses, and pursuant to your rules of evidence.

This Declaration is dated this ______________ day of April in the year, two thousand and nineteen.

Notice for the principal is notice for the agent and notice for the agent is notice for the principal.

This instrument was prepared by glenn winningham; house of fearn.

GLENN WINNINGHAM FEARN, and all derivatives thereof

my Copyright

______________________________________L. S.
glenn winningham; house of fearn, sui juris
Judicial Power Citizen by right of blood
a man on the soil of Texas
With full responsibility for my actions
under YHWH’s law as found in the Holy Bible and no other

Page 33 (plus attachments) Will Johnson, Arlington Chief of Police, Notice and Demand 042019
This matter/text copyright © by the Title Holder. All right to this matter/text and what it may represent is by terms and conditions of the Title
Holder.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title Holder glenn winningham;
house of fearn
With the Copy-Claim