MIT Physics
MIT Physics
Graduate Physics
at MIT
M A S S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y
Janet Conrad Lead Professor and Originator of Course
Janet Conrad grew up in Wooster, Ohio. She became excited about particle physics
while at Swarthmore College. After graduating in 1985, she attended Oxford University
for her M.Sc. and Harvard for her Ph.D. She then spent 15 years with Columbia
University, as a postdoc and then faculty. She moved to MIT in 2008, where she
developed the 8.226 class. She studies neutrinos, a particle in the Standard
Model with distinctly non-standard behavior. She likes to search for and follow
up on experimental anomalies in neutrino physics, because she is sure nature
is trying to tell us something new – if we just listen closely enough.
Alex
Tinguely
It’s official: our favorite spinning
space-rock is in trouble. The Earth
is rapidly becoming too hot to handle
because we can’t stop consuming energy
from fossil fuels. But, what if there were
a way to unleash oodles of energy from
extremely abundant fuel without producing
harmful byproducts? A phenomenon
so awesome that it lights the sun
and every other star in the sky?
This
does for them to exist apart. That said, it isn’t easy
to convince nuclei to get close enough to fuse,
because they are positively charged and repel each
process
other with colossal force.
It may be helpful to think of fusion like trying to
is called
get two people who hate each other to carpool:
As difficult as it may be, once you manage to
get them both in the same car, you save a lot of
nuclear
energy. Analogously, once you manage to get
the hydrogen nuclei to fuse into a single nucleus,
energy is saved by the combination. You can then
fusion, and
use that extra energy to do useful things, like
generate electricity.
Tinguely gets nuclei to smash into each other by
the good
getting them moving fast enough to plow through
the barrier of electrical force. For hydrogen atoms
in a gas, this means heating them to such a high
news is,
temperature that the electrons are ripped from
their nuclei, resulting in a plasma, a gas full of free
charged particles. As exotic as they may sound,
it here
brightness of a flash of lightning, and the awe-
inspiring shimmer of the polar aurorae. They’re
even more mundane in outer space, where they
on Earth.
make up much of the matter between stars, and
the stars themselves. In fact, most natural fusion
reactions occur in plasmas at the hearts of stars.
This gives us an idea of how hard it is to make
The bad news, however, is that there are problems fusion happen on Earth: we need to create condi-
with our methods of harnessing it that make it tions comparable to the inside of a star. Great for
impossible to use as a viable power source. Solving dramatic flair, but also great for melting expensive
these problems could mean a bright future for scientific equipment.
our bleak energy landscape, which is what Alex Unsurprisingly, hot star-stuff can’t be allowed
Tinguely, a graduate student at the MIT Plasma to run amok on Earth: it would dissipate and
Science and Fusion Center, is working on. never produce any useful reactions. “You have
Tinguely is doing research on an impressive to somehow confine it,” explains Tinguely. “The
machine with an even more imposing name: Sun produces fusion energy, and it’s confined
the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak. It’s a device that, by gravity. If we wanted a reactor like that, we
against all odds, allows us to achieve nuclear would need something the size of the Sun in order
fusion reactions in the middle of Cambridge, MA. to have it confine itself, and we can’t have that
A fusion reaction involves taking two nuclei, on Earth, because Earth is like a million times
the cores of atoms, and smashing them together smaller than the Sun, right? But what we can do is
so they become a single nucleus. This releases confine it with magnetic fields.”
a lot of energy, because it takes less energy for That is exactly what the tokamak was designed
hydrogen nuclei to exist bound together than it to do.
Arolyn
Conwill
There are nearly 1030 bacterial cells on
Earth – that is one trillion bacteria for every
grain of sand on the planet! But despite their
omnipresence inside us and around us, as well
as their importance in soil and medicine, little is
understood about how different types of bacteria
engage in teamwork and warfare.
Arolyn
peting other bacteria. Interestingly, bacteria help
humans process nutrients within our intestines.
However, if those bacteria escape to another
Conwill,
location in the body, they can cause an infec-
tion. Antibiotics are designed to stop the bacte-
rial infection, by either killing the bacterial cells or
graduate
to grow in the presence of antibiotics, a phenom-
enon called resistance. When resistant and non-
resistant bacteria live together, it can lead to what
student in
bacterial ecologists call the “cheater-cooper-
ator” setup between two bacteria. The cooper-
ator bacteria degrade the antibiotic around them
Jeff Gore’s
and are thus resistant to it. The so-called cheater
bacteria are not resistant to the antibiotic and
will die in its presence – but if both the resistant
laboratory
cooperator and non-resistant cheater bacteria are
grown together with the antibiotic, then even the
non-resistant bacteria can survive. The cooper-
at MIT, is
ator bacteria degrade the antibiotic, reducing the
concentration enough for the cheater bacteria to
live. The idea here, as Conwill said, is “if the coop-
to fill this bacteria allows them to divide faster and more effi-
ciently, because they forgo the work of degrading
gap in our
the antibiotics. Yet, without the cooperator
bacteria, the cheaters would not be alive at all.
Previous experiments have studied the cheater-
knowledge
cooperator situation, but Conwill tested a setup
in which this cooperation between the two types
of bacteria goes both ways. Specifically, bacteria
resistant to the antibiotic ampicillin survive in
using new technology to quickly and accurately the presence of ampicillin but not chloramphen-
count bacteria. “The work is really exciting because icol, another antibiotic. Chloramphenicol-resistant
there are a lot of new experiments that would not bacteria survive in the presence of chloramphen-
have been possible before,” says Conwill. icol but not ampicillin. But when grown together
with both ampicillin and chloramphenicol present,
Bacteria are small cells containing DNA, much
they both survive because they each degrade the
like their larger human cell counterparts. One
antibiotic that would inhibit the other’s growth.
bacterial cell can split into two identical copies
Understanding this bacterial teamwork is the
in a process called division. This allows a large
current focus of Conwill’s research.
number of bacterial cells to accumulate if there are
sufficient nutrients in the environment. A type of Thus far, she has been interested in how many
bacteria is successful if it divides quickly, outcom- bacterial cells are present over time for each type
John
Hardin
We’ve learned a lot about atoms in the past
150 years. The atom has gone from merely a
hypothesis to a staple of elementary physics,
from the unknown to a symbol of science in
pop culture. Atoms, we are taught, make up
matter as we know it. But what are the
components of atoms?
The nucleus
Thankfully, with the computation power devel-
oped in the last 50 years, physicists can simu-
late the behaviors of quarks and the particles they
of an atom
make up, through a process called Lattice QCD
(LQCD). In LQCD, by choosing discrete points
in space and time, and defining the strength of
consists of
the interaction they want to model, scientists can
solve numerically for solutions that specify the
behavior and decay of quarks. Testing these solu-
protons and
tions is the work of MIT graduate student John
Hardin. Along with other members of the MIT
Hadronic Physics group, he works on the phys-
neutrons,
ical hardware that will detect the products of
predicted quark interactions.
which in
But there is a catch– some of the mesons, a type
of subatomic particle predicted by LQCD, have
not been observed experimentally. The typical
turn are
components of a meson are a single quark and a
single antiquark, both of which contribute spin,
charge, angular momentum, and other charac-
made up
teristics to the particle as a whole. There are strict
rules about how those contributions relate to each
other. However, some of the mesons predicted
of quarks.
by LQCD have a momentum, spin, and charge
that could not result from a quark-antiquark pair.
The additional component would come from the
excitation of gluons. These mesons, which have
significant gluonic contributions, are known as
In the same way that protons and electrons have exotic mesons.
electric charge in accordance with the electro- If LQCD is a perfect representation of QCD, the
magnetic force, quarks have “color” charge, which nonexistence of these mesons would mean huge
is carried by gluons, the particles that bind quarks problems for the dominant theory in the field for
together. The theory that describes this interac- the last 30 years – or imply that the methodology
tion is called quantum chromodynamics, or QCD. in performing the numerical calculation uses too
The primary goal of any theory is to successfully many approximations to be useful. “A deviation
explain observable phenomena, but the observa- from the spectra implies that something about
tion aspect is difficult for QCD. LQCD is wrong,” says Hardin. If those mesons do
That’s because a fundamental point of QCD is appear, it would reaffirm the validity of QCD, and
the idea that you cannot separate two quarks. If predictions based on LQCD would be limited only
you do, the energy in the gluon field will result by computational power. So which is it?
in the spontaneous creation of another quark/ In Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson National
anti-quark pair. We are able to study protons and Accelerator Facility, known as JLAB, Hardin is
neutrons by examining their interactions individ- trying to find out using an apparatus designed to
ually, but we cannot simply do this with quarks. solve this problem. JLAB is home to four halls –
As a result, creating experiments that test the within each, specialized spectrometers are dedi-
validity of QCD requires a careful approach. cated to investigating collisions with photons
Lina
Necib
For all the glittering stars we
see populating the sky, another
unidentifiable material is thirty
times as prevalent. Understanding
this material, mysteriously named
“dark matter,” is a unifying problem
in physics that pulls together
scientists trying to describe
nature at drastically different
scales– from galactic interactions
to fundamental particles.
MIT
But although the mystery of dark matter still
haunts us today, it took a long time for physi-
cists to appreciate the magnitude of the problem.
graduate
Fritz Zwicky first stumbled onto the problem
of “missing mass” in 1933 when he analyzed the
movement of a group of galaxies. Zwicky found
student
that more gravitating mass was needed than
could be explained by the stars he saw. He wrote,
“It is not certain how these startling results
Lina Necib
must ultimately be interpreted.” Yet, the discon-
nect between visible mass and unseen mass was
dismissed for several decades.
to solve this
the 70’s. She determined that there was a uniform
halo of non-luminous material around galaxies,
extending past their visible edge. Astonishingly,
dilemma.
this mysterious halo composed the majority of
the galaxy’s mass, pulling the stars into a complex
choreography. “Think of it as a puppet show,”
With
Necib says. Dark matter acts like hidden strings,
rotating galaxies and pulling clusters together.
Finally, the hunt was on to discover what made
complex
up dark matter. “There were different theories,”
Necib explains. “Either it is a particle that we don’t
know, or it is modified gravity, which means we
computer
don’t understand the laws of gravity and that is
why things are acting up.”
The best test in deciphering which of these theo-
sifts through vations that gas clouds from the two galaxies
were colliding and heating up. Yet, using gravita-
tional lensing to map all the gravitating matter, it
became apparent that the majority of the groups’
mounds of astrophysical data, looking for the mass passed through without colliding – some-
smallest suggestion about the identity of dark thing that normal gas could never do. Only an
matter and how it interacts with known particles unknown particle could explain this: dark matter
like photons and electrons. So far, dark matter had to be a substance, not just modifications to our
has remained elusive, refusing to reveal its true current understanding of gravity. But, the ques-
nature, but offering hints along the way. “This tion remained: what is this particle? Even now, we
problem in physics has grown over the past 20 still don’t understand it.
years, especially in the past decade,” she says, and ***
the payoff for solving it could be huge. “It might Dark matter captivates Necib. From her early
complete our picture of particle physics.” childhood in Tunisia, Necib was enthralled by
Nancy
Aggarwal
A silent explosion rocks the very fabric
of space-time. The perpetrators of the
chaos – two massive black holes – have
ended a journey of epic scale. Caught
in each other’s gravitational grasp some
point long past, the singularities have
spiraled towards each other for an
unknowable time, circling like boxers
before the first punch.
Together,
Aggarwal. “I think I took it as a challenge.”
But she observed a profound gender bias in her
the black
college cohort. “People know how to solder things,
people have worked with Legos,” she says. “I wasn’t
really doing that when I was a kid, and I saw it
holes weigh
was the same for other women around me.” So
Aggarwal began mentoring women in science and
technology, saying, “Hey – you can do this. This is
in at over
not something that has to be only men.” She decided
experimental physics’s hands-on culture would
allow her to further blaze the path. She remembers
sixty times
thinking “I want to change the face of this – I want
to be that woman who’s interested in robotics and
who’s interested in making things with her hands.”
the mass
Committed to experimental physics, Aggarwal
moved to MIT’s Kavli Institute post graduation.
Since then she has worked with Professor Nergis
of the sun
Mavalvala, studying and designing quantum-
optical systems to further improve the sensitivity of
the LIGO observatories.
When Aggarwal arrived, LIGO’s search had
and the ultimate collision and combination turns proceeded for eight years without seeing a gravi-
three suns’ worth of that mass straight into tational wave. Scientists agreed that LIGO’s noise
energy.This energy becomes ripples in reality, floor, the point at which internal fluctuations in
gravitational waves, radiating outward as final, the detector shroud useful signals, was too high.
fleeting evidence of this cosmic clash. Important parts of this noise floor come from the
These ripples made waves of a different sort 1.3 quantum mechanics of the lasers LIGO uses to
billion years later: they became the first gravi- detect gravitational waves. Aggarwal’s work focuses
tational waves detected by humans. The Laser on lowering these particular noise sources with
Interferometer Gravitational Observatory, LIGO, quantum states of light called “squeezed states.”
caught the vibrations flitting through the Earth Squeezed states are a consequence of the quantum
in late 2015. A true feat of experimentation, the mechanical uncertainty inherent in measuring
discovery astounded and invigorated the world- light. Light has two principle measurable qual-
wide physics community. ities: power, which is essentially brightness,
It was, however, simply the next chapter in a and phase, which describes what point the light
larger story for Nancy Aggarwal, a Ph.D. candi- currently inhabits in its electromagnetic cycle.
date in physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Light’s inherent uncertainty can be shared equally
Technology. Hailing from India, Aggarwal grad- between power and phase, as is the case for laser
uated from the Indian Institute of Technology light. In squeezed states, however, careful manip-
Bombay in 2011. At IIT, Aggarwal’s high school ulation has “squeezed” uncertainty from one
love for math and physics translated predictably quality into the other. It is this exchange of uncer-
well into university – “I was that kid who didn’t tainty between power and phase that will prove
like anything else!” – and she immediately began invaluable for lowering LIGO’s noise floor.
pursuing a degree in physics. Although not much of One source of quantum noise in LIGO is shot
a tinkerer prior to college, she nevertheless decided noise – the uncertainty in measuring flows of
to explore experimental physics. “All of my class- distinct objects solely due to their distinct nature.
mates, everyone was doing theoretical physics,” says The laser LIGO uses to detect gravitational waves
Spencer
Tomarken
Consider, for a moment, the
millenia of collective endeavor,
the dedication of countless careers
to the understanding of the nature
of interactions between two isolated
particles. From the rigid body
collisions of Sir Isaac Newton to
the field interactions of Feynman
and Schwinger, the struggle of
fundamental physics has been
to grasp at a deeper understanding
of the simplest possible processes.
In light of
entity can be visualized as a free electron which
has been “dressed” by the electromagnetic fields
of the matter through which it propagates. As it
this history,
travels, the pull of these fields will alter the inter-
actions and mechanics of the particle, causing it to
appear heavier or lighter than the bare electron.
These quasiparticles are the focus of Tomarken’s
it is a daunting truth that the world around us
experimental work in graphene.
consists of condensed matter: systems of unthink-
ably large numbers of particles acting in concert. Graphene is a single sheet of carbon atoms linked
How can we ever hope to understand this reality together in a hexagonal “honeycomb lattice”.
if our two-body models are still incomplete? Elegant theoretical models exploit the symmetry
and repetition of the lattice to produce simple
Spencer Tomarken, a graduate student at MIT,
models of non-interacting electrons. The reality
is working towards such an understanding by
of these systems, however, is a complex inter-
probing pure samples of carefully arranged
play of electrons as they skitter across the surface.
matter with cutting edge experimental tech-
Electron interactions in graphene are signifi-
niques. He dedicates great time and effort to
cantly augmented by the lattice “dressing” effects.
preparing the perfect sample and performing the
Electrons under the influence of these abnor-
perfect experiment. His samples are idealizations
mally large interactions, called “strongly corre-
of more common objects in terms of their purity,
lated electrons”, are notoriously difficult to model.
structure, and the conditions of their testing.
Tomarken summarizes the state of the theory
Nevertheless, if Tomarken can reach through the
as “contentious” and submits that it is up to the
complexity and isolate a new behavior, then he has
experimentalists to explore the subtleties of these
learned something fundamental about the micro-
interactions. “We’re the ones, on the ground level,
scopic life of matter.
answering questions,” he says. “I have this many
The key to studying these systems, says electrons, … how do they organize themselves,
Tomarken, is emergence. Emergence is the and how does energy minimize itself? Often it’s
appearance of collective, coordinated phenomena counter-intuitive.” They must find ways to listen
in many-particle systems. In Tomarken’s words: for interactions among the overwhelming buzz of
“If you can understand one particle, it feels like disorder. This is Tomarken’s art.
you can understand N particles, but, in fact, you
His research group, headed by professor Ray
can’t. You would never be led to something like
Ashoori, has developed a technique of unprece-
superconductivity by understanding the nature of
dented sensitivity for measuring the energy struc-
a handful of particles and then generalizing.” He
ture of thin condensed matter systems. Since
says: “The whole point is that you get something
matter is quantum mechanical in nature, its
which is greater than the sum of its parts.”
constituent particles may only occupy a discrete
There is a gulf between fundamental and emer- set of energy levels. The configuration of a
gent phenomena that reductionist methods quantum system will have a telling signature in
cannot bridge. Theorists must build models that the pattern with which its component particles fill
can predict emergent phenomena using clever these energy states. Due to the crystalline struc-
analogies and incisive approximations, rather ture of materials like graphene, these energy levels
than ground-up constructions from small- separate into distinctive bands. Through great
scale interactions. Perhaps the most important experimental effort, these bands can be mapped
of these theoretical constructs is the quasipar- out in detail.
ticle. Although they appear in all kinds of phys-
Tomarken is working on the application of a
ical systems, the quasiparticle of greatest interest
novel experimental method, known as tunneling
to Tomarken is the “electron quasiparticle”. This
Ryan
Lynch
In our universe, many mysterious
and beautiful objects are invisible to
the naked eye – but we have created
ways to see them. Telescopes, science’s
most traditional method, use portions of
the electromagnetic spectrum to study
celestial bodies.
For example,
Lynch is a working on statistical methods for fast
signal detection and processing for the MIT LIGO
project. Developing methods to accurately and
most amateur
quickly detect signals is a key step in gravitational-
wave astronomy because it will allow us to “hear”
the violent and beautiful outcries of the universe,
astronomers
making Lynch’s research very powerful for
furthering insight and knowledge of the universe.
use visible
In Lynch’s line of work, he has to find ways to
separate the important sounds of the universe
from the background noise. Imagine you are
light to see
given a list of characteristics describing the
voices of 5 different people. Furthermore, you
are standing on a busy street – many cars and
objects like
beeping horns – and are asked to distinguish a
person’s voice from the background noise. Given
the noise of the cars, people etc., imagine how
stars or
difficult it would be to accurately distinguish a
single voice. What if a friend joined you? There
would be a better chance that you both would
the moon.
hear similar sounds and agree on who spoke.
However, in actuality, you and your friend would
not hear exactly the same background noise, so
trying to agree on what was said would be more
difficult, but – as Lynch’s research shows – not
Scientists are also developing techniques to use impossible. This analogy is essentially the LIGO
other types of waves scan the sky – giving us a project and Lynch’s research problem.
better look into the unknown. Interpreting noisy signals is the core of Lynch’s
Gravitational waves are ripples in the fabric of the research with LIGO: fast identification of a
universe caused by high-energy objects and inter- signal’s source so as to alert astronomers to point
actions – like two black holes merging together! their telescopes at the right place – to catch a
These waves stretch and squish the length of the glimpse of the excitement! “Think of LIGO as
objects through which they pass by an incredibly two really big antennas,” Lynch says. Similar to
tiny amount – a fraction of the size of an atom. our earlier voice analogy, data received by LIGO’s
LIGO, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational- instruments must be shown to be a real signal,
Wave Observatory, is the leading institution and a source for those signals must be identified.
for detection and analysis of gravitational-wave In order to determine whether the received data
signals. “In maybe 40 years, 50 years, we could represents a signal, it must pass a series of tests.
see everything through gravitational waves,” Initially, because of the large quantity of data over
notes Ryan Lynch, a current graduate student in which to search, Lynch trims down the search-
the physics department at MIT. Lynch started space by selecting high-activity areas with high-
working on the LIGO project as an undergrad- amplitude data. Secondly, “it has to be received
uate researcher, eager about the possibility of by both detectors [at the appropriate time] and
discovery. “We were turning on the upgraded the signal has to look the same,” Lynch explains.
instruments … There was a possibility that I was Going back to the busy street, Lynch’s description
going to be one of the ones that detected things.” of LIGO’s signal detection process is like waiting
Greg
Dooley
It has long been known that baryonic
matter, which make up stars, planets,
and living organisms, contributes
only a small fraction to the total mass
of the universe. The rest is dark matter,
a mysterious substance which has
never been directly observed, but
whose existence has been confirmed
from its gravitational interactions with
ordinary matter.
According
This model is simple yet effective in explaining
many properties of the universe, such as the exis-
to measure-
tence and structure of the cosmological micro-
wave background, the distributions of galaxies,
the chemical abundances of elements, as well
ments of
as the accelerating expansion of the universe.
However, there are problems yet to be resolved by
the ΛCDM model.
actions, the
and observations of density distributions of
dark matter halos (a component of a galaxy that
envelops the galactic disc and extends well beyond
amount of
the edge of the visible of galaxy). In simulations,
the dark matter density profiles increase steeply
dark matter
at small radii (i.e. cuspy), whereas observations
of rotation curves (the plot of orbital velocity as
a function of distance from the center) of dwarf
in the uni-
galaxies suggest that the profile is much flatter
near the center. Another problem is the “too big
to fail” problem, which again shows disagree-
verse is
ment between simulations and observations. Cold
dark matter simulations predict circular veloci-
five times
ties of subhalos that are too high to be consistent
with any known Milky Way satellites. Scientists
propose different resolutions to help alleviate
as much as
these problems, introducing baryonic phenomena
such as supernova outflow, bursty star forma-
tion, or tidal disruption. Dooley, however, takes
ordinary
a different approach: he modifies the prop-
erties of dark matter to allow for non-trivial
matter,
self-interaction.
In the ΛCDM model, the dark matter is hypoth-
esized to be slow-moving compared to the speed
of light (thus, cold), and interact almost exclusively
yet there is much to be learn regarding its prop- through the gravitational force. Therefore, cold
erties. Greg Dooley, a graduate student at MIT, dark matter is collisionless – the interaction cross-
is running dark matter cosmological simula- section is so low that dark matter collisions, either
tions to study how dark matter models affect with itself or with baryonic matter, are virtually
the formation and evolution of clusters of non-existent. However, Dooley and his research
galaxies in the universe. group observe that, by prescribing a new type
Currently the most widely adopted cosmolog- of dark matter with strong self-interaction (self-
ical model is the Lambda-Cold Dark Matter, interacting dark matter), the cuspy halo problem
called the ΛCDM model, which postulates that and the “too big to fail” problem could be allevi-
the universe contains a cosmological constant Λ, ated. Self-interacting dark matter will have a non-
associated with dark energy, and cold dark matter. trivial probability of colliding with one another
Fahad
Mahmood
Superconductivity at room temperature
has long been an unattainable goal for
scientists and engineers working in
the field of condensed matter physics.
Although Heike Kamerlingh Onnes
first discovered the effect of super-
conductivity in 1911, the critical
temperature required to observe this
effect was only 4.2K, which made
its utilization impractical for many
potential applications.
Since then,
John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and Bob Schrieffer
(“BCS”) in 1972.
scientists
Free electrons in a material, which conduct elec-
tricity through their motion, collide with the
neighboring atoms as they drift due to the
have worked
applied electric field and this is why most mate-
rials show resistance to electrical current.
However, according to the BCS theory, at fairly
diligently to
low temperatures free electrons in certain crys-
tals can pair up and form “Cooper pairs” as the
result of electron-crystal interactions, and these
that would
do. Furthermore these Cooper pairs will form
a collective group, known as a Bose-Einstein
condensate, and they will move as a group in
exhibit super-
unity, without being affected by the neighboring
atoms, or in other words without any resistance.
We can think of the electrons in a resistive mate-
at higher
every now and then they will collide or interact
with someone dancing on the floor and this will
slow down their movement in the desired direc-
temperatures.
tion. On the other hand, we can imagine the
group of Cooper pairs in a superconductor as a
group of couples dancing in a ballroom. Although
the ballroom will be packed with dancing couples,
It is still a mystery whether superconductivity these couples will follow a specific choreog-
at room temperature is actually achievable, raphy to move around without colliding with
but according to MIT graduate student Fahad other couples. The group of couples will move in
Mahmood shining ultrafast lasers on thin-film unity in a seamless way without any collisions as
superconductive materials could answer this long long as they follow the choreography. According
unsolved mystery. to Schrieffer, one of the contributors of the BCS
theory, the effect of low temperature supercon-
In 1986 it was discovered that cuprates, which ductivity in certain crystals can be thought of as a
are crystals made of copper and oxygen, exhibit special choreography of electrons when they form
superconductivity at temperatures as high as 90K Cooper pairs and dance in unity. [1]
and this new family of materials were named
high-temperature superconductors. Although “However, the effect of high temperature super-
this discovery facilitated many practical applica- conductivity observed in cuprates can not be
tions that were impossible with regular super- explained with the BCS theory,” Mahmood says.
conductors, the working principle of these new “Although we still don’t know how high temper-
materials could not be explained with the BCS ature superconductivity exactly works, we think
theory, which first explained the working prin- that phonons, magnons, or some other quasipar-
ciple of conventional low temperature supercon- ticle is probably responsible for it.”
ductors and garnered a Nobel Prize in Physics for Mahmood is working with ultrafast lasers and a
Anand
Natarajan
Entanglement, the phenomenon where
characteristics of one particle depend
on another, has captivated physicists
since Schrödinger first described it in
1935. Part of this interest stems from
entanglement’s useful real world
applications such as decryption
and information transfer.
But before
On the surface, testing whether two particles are
entangled or not – what physicists call separable
– seems easy. For electrons with spin, a quantum
entangled
yield one electron with spin up and one with spin
down. For separable electrons, some measure-
ments would yield both electrons with spin up
particles to
or both with spin down, proving that the elec-
trons were originally entangled. But while deter-
mining whether two electrons are entangled after
accomplish
measuring them is simple, predicting whether
more than two electrons are entangled without
measurement is incredibly hard.
focused on
rable. Originally interested in particle physics while
completing his undergraduate degree, Natarajan
took theoretical computer science classes before
solving a
being introduced to the fields of quantum informa-
tion and complexity. “Eventually I realized there’s
this field where you can think about complexity
more difficult
theory and physics,” he says. “That’s what led me to
be interested in quantum information.”
problem:
But unlike the fields of classical information and
computing, which today require testing and imple-
mentation on physical computers, quantum infor-
predicting
mation and computing is far more reminiscent of
theoretical physics in the early 20th century. When
tackling problems such as QUSEP, “It’s mostly pen
whether
and paper or on the blackboard,” says Natarajan.
At its most abstract level, QUSEP can be thought
particles are
of as the problem of separating the continuous
“region” of all possible quantum states into two
regions representing unentangled and entangled
entangled in
states. Imagine a large pasture of cows, your unen-
tangled states, with a cluster of sheep, your entan-
gled states, in the middle and the task of placing a
These essays were written as an exercise for MIT Class 8.226: 43: Orders of Magnitude
March 2017
http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/8/sp12/8.226
PROFESSOR J.M. CONRAD