Seamus Heaney is often called as a poet of “ in-betweeness” because of the delibrate
embracing of ambiguities in his work. He became internationally famous because his
most remarkable talent was his ability to appeal to all levels and types of readers. As
Heaney said, “The point is to fly under or out and beyond those radar systems.” He
usually depicts both sides of the debate in his work. He writes in between formal and
free verse, between personal and private experience and in the world of accelerating
change he deals between the traditional rituals and the contemparay needs.
From the ahistorical poems about his childhood and innocence to the
historical poems of Great Famine of 1845 he genuinely laid down the example of in-
betweeness.In this poem “Death of a Naturalist’ he laments for the loss of his
childhood innocence and talks about the change of the child’s perspective. .The
'Follower' and 'Mid-term Break', they all share the theme of childhood memories and
are absoulutely ahistorical poems.Through these poem he is potraying his personal
experience. On the other hand through his poem “ digging” Heaney narrates the
horror of potato famine and describes the changed attitude of mistrust towards the
land in order to bring out the altered notion of an irish identity.
Another appearance of in-betweenness in Heaney’s work is his shifting
between his personal memories and his poetic position against the cruel realities of
Northern Irish politics. In a world of accelerating change, Heaney embrace his rituals
and beautiful rural upbringing.Heaney also gives us comforting tone of traditional
patterns . In “Digging” there is the resonance of the traditional choice offered by a
father between a spade and a book or pen, depicting the need to decide whether to
work at home on the land or to study assiduously at school. In “The Given Note,” we
have an echo of the tale of the origin of “Port na bPúcaí” (The Tune of the Fairies),
which travellers or fisherman who stayed overnight on Inis Mhic Fhaolain in the
Blasket Islands.Although Heaney was never explicitly political in his poetry, the
traumatic nature of this sectarian violence informed much of his work, said Brodhead,
who read "VII" from "Station Island".
"Ireland has been characterized by a tradition of sectarian violence,Not armies against
armies, but between people who live together by day and (had) the violence suddenly
intrude on their domestic lives. His poems are an uncanny evocation of this intimate
violence."
His poem deals with politics, both historical and contemporary. This selection
includes an early sonnet titled “Requiem for the Croppies” one of the few poems
dealing with the 1798 rising in Ireland, written in the voice of dead soul;
Terraced thousands died, shaking scythes at cannon.
The hillside blushed, soaked in our broken wave.
They buried us without shroud or coffin.
And in August the barley grew out of the grave.
On the other hand Heaney also writes some finest poem on the political
atmoshphere of Northern Ireland such as “ A Constable Calls, Caasualty and
whatever you say say nothing”. In his poem “Punishment” he describes
himself as the “artful voyeur” who knows he would have cast “the stones of
silenceion from ” . In the section from “Station Island” he speaks to a dead
victim; “ Forgive the way I have lived indifferent- Forgive my timid
circumspect involement”
The another betweenness in Seamus Heaney’s work is use of language. His voice
fuse with the rich language of Wordsworth, whom he so admired, with the abrupt
Anglo-Saxon feel of Hopkins. We hear the sweeping Wordsworthian tone in “Into
Arcadia” from “Sonnets from Hellas,” which opens with: “It was opulence and amen
on the mountain road.” And closes with: “Subsisting beyond eclogue and
translation.”There are enough examples throughout this selection of Heaney’s
Latinate tone: “fructified like an aquarium,” “superannuated pageantry” (from
“Personal Helicon” and “A Sofa in the Forties,” respectively). But this tone is offset
by his delight in Anglo-Saxon compound nouns and adjectives such as “oak-bone,”
“brain-firkin,” “frond-lipped,” “brine-stung,” “glitter-drizzle,” “sud-luscious,”
“snotty-guttery”—examples all from poems in this selection. Clearly, some of these
adjectives have Latin origins, but the composite usage is in the Hopkins vein. This
retrieval and renewal of both traditions has an immense attraction for readers.
Russell writes of Heaney’s “agnosticism, that shades even towards atheism at times.”
Heaney, speaking about his childhood Catholicism, said that “part of the mission of
the young graduate in my time was to secularize yourself,” and that “the doctrinal
observance, the practicing Catholicism, it just went.” Yet gestures toward what might
be beyond the ethics of The Haw Lantern or The Republic of Conscience begin to
appear in his later work. His well-known phrase “crediting marvels” signals this.” In
“Postscript” he writes, “Big soft buffetings come at the car sideways / And catch the
heart off guard and blow it open.” Yet it feels in “The Gravel Walks” as if he is
almost holding out against that lift-off: “So walk on air against your better
judgement / Establishing yourself somewhere in between.”
Heaney is truly the most tranisitional poet of the contemporary world. His unque style
lie in “in betweeness” in which he writes between the zone and believes in the debate
of both sides . He never sees a boundary between art and compassion, but rather
believed that art was fundamentally driven by empathy, by a bond that links every living
person.