WELCOME
ULTIMATE CAPACITY OF STEEL ANGLES SUBJECTED TO ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION
BY NONLINEAR GEOMETRIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSES
by
Sanjib Kumar Sarkar
#200404170
supervised by
Professor Khan Mahmud Amanat
Structural Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (BUET)
DHAKA, BANGLADESH
Steel Angles under Eccentric Compression
Electrical Transmission Tower Microwave Tower
End Connection (Bolt Joint)
Bolt Joint
The end connection is generally not concentric with the cg of angle cross section;
so imposed compression on angle acts eccentrically.
Objective of Present Analyses
To find the ultimate capacity in compression of the eccentrically
loaded steel angle using FEA
To compare results with test results of Bathon.
To compare results with
Euler’s formulae and ASCE Manual 52 (1988) formulae.
To provide some guidelines and recommendations
Methodology
Modeling of the angle using shell element
Application of the load concentrically as well as eccentrically
Determination of the buckling load based on non-liner geometric
analysis
Comparison of results with Bathon test data as well as ASCE
formula
Summarization and recommendation
Basic Features of Bathon’s Test
75 steel angles tested
ASCE Manual 52 (1988) specifications were followed
All specimens failed due to member buckling
Test results compared with ASCE Manual 52 (1988) formulae.
Finite Element Modeling (using ANSYS10.0)
SHELL181 Geometry The Arc Length Method
Typical Deformed Shape of the Model
Un-deformed Deformed
Isometric View
Typical Deformed Shape of the Model (contd.)
Un-deformed Deformed
Elevation
Load vs. Deflection curve
300
10
250
l/r
60
200
150
Load (kN)
100
150 120
50
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Deflection (mm)
Results (Critical Stress-Slenderness Ratio Characteristics)
Comparison with Euler’s Formula
Short Intermediate Slender
400
350
Present Analysis
300
critical stress (MPa)
Euler’s Formula
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200
l/r
Results (Critical Stress-Slenderness Ratio Characteristics)
Comparison with Bathon’s Test Results
L 44x44x3 L 76x76x6 L 102x102x6
350
300 Present Analysis
Bathon’s Test
critical stress (Mpa)
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200
l/r
Major Findings of the Study
The ultimate capacity is a function of
slenderness ratio, eccentricity, material and geometric properties,
buckling behavior and the type of analysis.
With eccentricity, the capacity is significantly reduced for angles
with short and intermediate lengths compare to Euler Formula
For slender members effect of eccentricity is negligible compare
to Euler Formula
Major Findings of the Study
Buckling failure occur before other failure in slender member
FEA may be affected by angle cross section also.
FEA provides more conservative results
THE END
THANK YOU