Structural Analysis and Design Report

of
Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
at
Ekantakuna, Jawalakhel, Lalitpur

May – 2017

Structural Design Consultant:

CE Engineering Solutions [CES] Pvt. Ltd.

Tripureshwor – 11, Kathmandu
P.O. Box: 1223, Kathmandu
[email protected]
Contents
 2

1. Project Detail-----------------------------------------------------------------3
1.1 Building Design Parameters--------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.2 Materials-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.2.1 Concrete--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.2.2 Reinforcement-------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.3 Load Calculations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.3.1 Dead Load-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.3.2 Live Loads-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
1.3.3 Seismic Loads-------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
1.4 Load Combination-------------------------------------------------------------------------------8

2. Structural Analysis----------------------------------------------------------9

3. Design of Elements--------------------------------------------------------15
3.1 Sample design of Column---------------------------------------------------------------------18
3.2 Sample design of Beam------------------------------------------------------------------------21
3.3 Sample Design of Foundation-----------------------------------------------------------------24
3.4 Slab Design--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------25
3.5 Design of Staircase-----------------------------------------------------------------------------28
3.6 Check for Strong Column weak Beam-------------------------------------------------------31

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 3

1. Project Detail
Name of the Project : Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
Location : Ekantakuna, Jawalakhel, Lalitpur
Type of Building : The Building covers a plinth area of 400.54 SQ. M. at ground
floor the building has been designed for 4 numbers of storeys and
stair cover.

Figure 1: Architectural Plan of the Building

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 4

1.1 Building Design Parameters

The building consists of a RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-
in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consists of cast-in-place concrete
slabs. Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame elements only and the system
has been designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920 - 1993.
For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant IS
1893:2016 have been referred to.

1.2 Materials

Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on
the relevant Indian Standards.

1.2.1 Concrete

Concrete is to conform to IS 456: Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise

concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2 and 25 N/mm2.

1.2.2 Reinforcement

Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon steel
bars for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786:
specification for high deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete. For
Ductile Detailing Code: IS13920: 1993 was referred. The following design strengths are
to be used for the design of concrete and reinforcement.

Grade of Concrete : M25 for columns and M20 for others

Grade of steel : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2

1.3 Load Calculations

1.3.1 Dead Load

Dead loads are calculated on the basis of unit weights of the specified construction
materials in accordance with IS 875 Part I.

Reinforced concrete: 25 KN/m3

Brick work with plaster: 19.20 KN/m3
Sand/ cement screed: 20 KN/m3

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 5

Wall load Calculation

Unit Weight 19.2 Kn/m3 JHC
  Wall Opening Weight
Storey Grid Length Width Height Length Width Height  
    mm mm mm mm mm mm Kn/m
E-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.3 3 0.3 1.25 9.25
D-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.3 3 0.3 1.25 9.25
Third

6-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.3 2.95 0.3 1.25 8.53

7-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.3 1.35 0.3 2.25 9.36
C-3-4 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
C-4-5 5.4 0.3 2.55 4.95 0.3 2.4 2.02
C-5-6 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
D-2-3 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
D-3-4 5.4 0.125 2.55 1 0.125 2.55 4.99
D-4-5 5.4 0.125 2.55 1 0.125 2.55 4.99
D-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
E-2-3 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
E-3-4 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
E-4-5 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
Second

E-5-6 5.4 0.3 2.55 2.15 0.3 1.15 12.05

E-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
2-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.55 2.95 0.3 1.55 8.84
3-C-D 4.5 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 5.47
3-D-E 4.5 0.125 2.55 1 0.125 2.55 4.76
4-C-D 4.5 0.125 2.55 0 0.125 0 6.12
4-D-E 4.5 0.125 2.55 1.5 0.125 2.55 4.08
5-C-D 4.5 0.125 2.55 0 0.125 0 6.12
5-D-E 4.5 0.125 2.55 1.5 0.125 2.55 4.08
6-C-D 4.5 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 5.47
6-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.55 1.35 0.3 2.55 10.28
7-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.55 2.95 0.3 1.55 8.84
B-2-3 3.235 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 8.28
B-3-4 3.235 0.3 2.55 2.5 0.3 2.4 4.00
B-4-5 5.4 0.3 2.55 4.95 0.3 2.4 2.02
B-5-6 3.235 0.3 2.55 2.5 0.3 2.4 4.00
B-6-7 3.235 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 8.28
D-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.55 4.95 0.3 2.55 1.22
E-2-3 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
E-3-4 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 7.01
E-4-5 5.4 0.125 2.55 3 0.125 2.4 2.92
First

E-5-6 5.4 0.3 2.55 2.15 0.3 1.15 12.05

E-6-7 5.4 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.55 6.53
1-C-D 4.5 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 5.47
2-B-C 2.335 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 5.81
2-D-E 2.335 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 5.81
5-D-E 4.5 0.125 2.55 1.15 0.125 2.55 4.56
6-D-E 4.5 0.125 2.55 0 0 0 6.12
7-B-C 2.335 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 5.81
7-D-E 4.5 0.3 2.55 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.08
8-C-D 4.5 0.3 2.55 3 0.3 2.4 5.47
Ground

B-2-3 3.235 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 6.19

B-3-4 3.235 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 6.19
B-4-5 5.4 0.3 3.3 4.95 0.3 2.4 6.34
B-5-6 3.235 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 6.19
B-6-7 3.235 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 6.19
D-6-7 5.4 0.3 3.3 4.95 0.3 2.55 5.54
E-2-3 5.4 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 11.33
E-3-4 5.4 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 11.33
E-4-5 5.4 0.125 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 0.24
E-5-6 5.4 0.3 3.3 1.2 0.3 2.4 15.94
E-6-7 5.4 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 3.2 8.77

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 6

1-C-D 4.5 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 9.79

2-B-C 2.335 0.3 3.3 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.13
2-D-E 2.335 0.3 3.3 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.13
6-D-E 4.5 0.3 3.3 0 0 0 19.01
7-B-C 2.335 0.3 3.3 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.13
7-C-D 2.335 0.3 3.3 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.13
7-D-E 4.5 0.3 3.3 2.4 0.3 2.55 11.17
8-C-D 4.5 0.3 3.3 3 0.3 2.4 9.79

1.3.2 Live Loads

The Live Load for building has been adopted as given IS 875 - Part II Table I Loads
for Business and Office Buildings.
For Rooms without separate 4 kN/m2
For staircases, balcony, passage 4 kN/m2
For terrace 1.5 kN/m2

1.3.3 Seismic Loads

Lateral Seismic Load is computed as per IS1893:2016.

The design base shear is computed as follows:
VB = Ah * W
W=Seismic weight of the building
Ah=Z*I* (Sa/g) / (2*R)
Where,
Z = Zone factor = 0.36
I = Importance factor = 1.2 (Table 3 (Clause 6.4.2))( Sl No. 2)
R = Response reduction factor =5
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient based on nature period and
damping of structure and soil condition at the site.
All symbols and notations in the above equation are as IS 1893: 2016.

ETABS utilizes the following procedure to generate the lateral seismic loads.
 User provides seismic zone co-efficient and desired seismic load command.
 The structural period (T) is calculated manually and input in the software.
 W is obtained from the weight data provided by the user.

The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program
among different levels of the structure

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 7

 Load parameter

a. Dead Load :- as per IS 875

b. Live Load :- as per IS 875
c. Seismic Load: -as per IS1893:2016.
1. Zone Factor :-0.36 for Kathmandu
2. Importance Factor :-1.2
3. Fundamental Time Period :- 0.651 sec

Height (m) h 17.84

Time Period = 0.075*17.84^0.75

T
(sec) = 0.651

4. Response Reduction Factor :-5

5. Seismic Coefficient (Ah ) :- 0.09
6. Seismic Weight :- 21203.70 KN
7. Base Shear (Vb x/y) : 1913.61 KN
8. Soil Type : II
9. Damping :-0.05

 Method of analysis : Dynamic Analysis

a. No. of modes considered : 12
b. Modal Mass Participation : 95.13, 94.95 :greater than 90 %
c. Scale Factor
Along X-direction: 1.602
Along Y-direction: 1.638

 Total Deflection of Building :-

a. Along X - direction : 21.75 mm < 71.36 mm
b. Along Y- direction : 24.04 mm <71.36 mm

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 8

 Inter Storey Drift: 0.002269, 0.002484 within the limit i.e. 0.004 and are shown in
the table below
 Load combination: IS1893(Part1) :2016
 Concrete design Code : IS 456 : 2000
 Ductile Detailing Code: IS 13920: 1993
 Concrete Grade : M25 in specific columns and M20 in other structural members
 Reinforcement Grade : Fe500

Table 1: Auto Seismic –IS 1893:2002

Load Eccentric Soil Period Coeff Weight Base

Pattern Type ity Z Type I R Used Used Used Shear

    %         sec   kN kN
Seism 0.3 1.
EQX ic 5 6 II 2 5 0.651 0.09 21203.70 1913.61
Seism 0.3 1.
EQY ic 5 6 II 2 5 0.651 0.09 21203.70 1913.61

1.4 Load Combination

The load combination has been taken as given IS1893:2016. The said code has recommended
the following load combination

 1.5DL + 1.5LL
 1.2DL + 1.2LL ± 1.2EQ
 1.5DL ± 1.5EQ
 0.9DL ± 1.5EQ

Table 2: Mass Source

Load Multiplier
DEAD 1
LIVE<3 0.25
WALL 1
FINISH 1
PARTITION WALL LOAD 1
STAIR 1
WATER TANK LOAD 1
LIVE<3 0.5
TRUSS REACTION 1

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 9

1.Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called ETABS v13.1.5, which is
a special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and
optimize the structural elements in a building model. The building geometry based on
architectural drawings been generated using above named software. The dead load, live load
and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as per standard code of practices. Several
analysis run were performed to achieve the best result to meet the design and service
requirements.

Figure 2: 3D Modeling of the Building

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 10

Figure 3: Plan of the Building

Figure 4: Elevation of the Building

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 11

Table 3: Modal Participating Mass Ratios

Case Mode Period UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ

    sec            
Modal 1 0.791 0.0021 0.857 0 0.0021 0.857 0
Modal 2 0.765 0.7624 0.000008872 0 0.7645 0.857 0
Modal 3 0.707 0.1071 0.0133 0 0.8716 0.8704 0
Modal 4 0.261 0.00002398 0.0501 0 0.8717 0.9205 0
Modal 5 0.254 0.0171 0.00004007 0 0.8888 0.9205 0
Modal 6 0.247 0.0341 0.000008384 0 0.9228 0.9205 0
Modal 7 0.161 0.0099 0.000004901 0 0.9328 0.9205 0
Modal 8 0.16 0.000002087 0.0202 0 0.9328 0.9407 0
Modal 9 0.154 0.0098 0.0002 0 0.9425 0.9409 0
Modal 10 0.104 0.0028 0.006 0 0.9453 0.9468 0
Modal 11 0.104 0.0059 0.0026 0 0.9512 0.9495 0
Modal 12 0.097 0.0001 0 0 0.9513 0.9495 0

Table 4: Center of Mass and Rigidity

Story Diaphragm Mass X Mass Y XCCM YCCM XCR YCR

    kg kg m m m m
PL D1 256117.77 256117.77 15.6003 8.4815 15.4573 8.1917
1F D2 277953.77 277953.77 15.9063 8.1281 15.9802 8.7493
2F D3 269954.58 269954.58 15.9036 8.2508 16.0121 8.8727
3F D4 228764.61 228764.61 15.6967 9.2331 16.0833 8.9192
TOP D5 104707.37 104707.37 16.7674 11.9043 15.9322 9.8141
Story1 D6 42693.5 42693.5 15.5 13.25 15.6933 10.905

Table 5: Base Shear Calculated

Locatio
Story Load Case/Combo n P VX VY T MX MY
      kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Story
1 RSX Max Top 0 92.15 3.82 1232.16 0.00 0.00
Story
1 RSX Max Bottom 0 92.15 3.82 1232.16 10.51 253.41
Story
1 RSY Max Top 0 1.80 93.04 1438.17 0.00 0.00
Story
1 RSY Max Bottom 0 1.80 93.04 1438.17 255.86 4.94
TOP RSX Max Top 0 372.95 17.01 4666.77 10.51 253.41
TOP RSX Max Bottom 0 384.58 21.13 4882.19 67.28 1376.68
TOP RSY Max Top 0 5.74 373.81 5803.58 255.86 4.94
TOP RSY Max Bottom 0 5.51 384.47 6084.69 1380.47 19.73
3F RSX Max Top 0 911.74 41.47 10150.94 67.28 1376.68
3F RSX Max Bottom 0 924.17 45.74 10411.07 196.11 4079.05
3F RSY Max Top 0 34.97 909.31 13978.12 1380.47 19.73
3F RSY Max Bottom 0 34.67 920.56 14275.43 4063.23 118.65
2F RSX Max Top 0 1464.86 71.14 15552.22 196.11 4079.05
2F RSX Max Bottom 0 1474.18 74.51 15751.68 413.14 8407.49
2F RSY Max Top 0 71.15 1464.25 22559.84 4063.23 118.65
2F RSY Max Bottom 0 70.94 1472.85 22788.41 8379.30 330.15
1F RSX Max Top 0 1858.61 91.91 19477.44 413.14 8407.49
1F RSX Max Bottom 0 1864.18 94.12 19630.26 751.93 15086.40
1F RSY Max Top 0 96.43 1860.68 28707.99 8379.30 330.15
1F RSY Max Bottom 0 96.31 1865.80 28845.17 15056.80 680.32
PL RSX Max Top 0 1913.61 96.84 20162.32 751.93 15086.40
PL RSX Max Bottom 0 1913.61 96.84 20162.32 987.65 19711.84

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 12

PL RSY Max Top 0 98.98 1913.61 29593.99 15056.80 680.32

PL RSY Max Bottom 0 98.98 1913.61 29593.99 19679.85 921.31

Figure 5: Story Displacement along X-Direction

Figure 6: Story Displacement along Y-Direction

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 13

Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction

Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 14

Figure 9: Bending Moment Diagram along Grid 6-6

Figure 10: Shear Force Diagram along grid 6-6

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 15

3.Design of Elements
The concrete has been designed using limit state method based on IS 456 –2000. All relevant
Limit State is considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability. The detailing
of reinforcement has been based on IS 13920 –1993 and where required Uniform Building
Code of USA has been also referred to for detailing of reinforcement.
The design has been based on the most critical load combination mentioned above.
For the above loads and load combinations, the design of beams and columns is carried out by
the ETABS.
The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be considered
as a whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly defined
standards for materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of structure in
service.
This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as
column, beam, slab and foundation.

Figure 11: Reinforcement Details along Grid A-A

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 16

Figure 12: Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B

Figure 13: Reinforcement Details along Grid C-C

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 17

Figure 14: Reinforcement Details along Grid D-D

Figure 15: Reinforcement Details along Grid E-E

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 18

1.5 Sample design of Column

Column Design
1.5(DL-
Combo ID RSX)
Element C20 450*450
1F

Axial Force Pu = 1,526.109 KN

Factored Moment about x-axis Mux = 165.080 KN-m

Factored Moment about y-axis Muy = 354.260 KN-m

Breadth b= 450.000 mm

Depth D= 450.000 mm

Grade of concrete fck = 25.000 N/mm2

Grade of reinforcement fy = 500.000 N/mm2

Cover considered d' = 40.000 mm

d'/D 0.089

Percentage of steel Pt = 3.830 %

Pt/fck = 0.153

Pu/(fck*b*D) = 0.301

From graph of SP16, Mu/(fck*b*D^2 ) 0.23

Moment carrying capacity of Column

Along X-axis (Mux1) = (Mu/fckbD^2)*(fck*b*D^2) 523.969 KN-m

Along Y-axis (Muy1)= (Mu/fck*b*D^2)* (fck*D*b^2) 523.969 KN-m

Gross Area (Ac) = 202,500.00 mm2

Area of steel taken from software 7,755.00 mm2

Axial Load Carrying capacity of Column
(Pz)=0.45*fck*Ac+0.75*fy*Asc 5,186.250 KN

Pu/Pz 0.294

Mux/Mux1 0.315

Muy/Muy1 0.676

α =1+((Pu/Pz-0.2)/(0.8-0.2))*1 1.157

(Mux/Mux1) ^ α + (Muy/Muy1) ^ α 0.899 <1

SAFE

Area of reinforcement required(As) 7,755.000 mm2

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 19

ETABS 2013 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Sway Special (Summary)

Level Element Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF

1F C20 C-450*450-12-25 1.5(DL-RSX) 0 3650 0.62

Section Properties

b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)

450 450 60.5 30

Material Properties

Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)

25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
1526.109 165.0879 354.2642 30.5222 30.5222 7755 3.83

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment

Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.830464 2040 186.8361 0 30.5222
Minor Bend(M2) 0.883496 3200 77.7151 0 30.5222

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 20

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 110.8163 222.2824 70.1094 110.8163 498.8
Minor, Vu3 234.8525 222.2824 70.1094 84.3797 498.8

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio

N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
2025 77.5 5186.2223 1150.0308 1526.109 0.906824

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma

Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.559 450 3.765 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.877 450 6.283 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 21

1.6 Sample design of Beam

Beam Design
Along grid C(4-5)
1F
30
Breadth b= 0 mm
45
Depth D= 0 mm
2
Grade of concrete fck = 0 N/mm2
50
Grade of reinforcement fy = 0 N/mm2
3
Cover considered d' = 0 mm
0.06
d'/d= 7
42
effective depth d= 0 mm
140.7
Limiting bending moment (Mlim)=0.133*fck*b*d^2 7 KN-m

Moment at right end (Mu) 1.5(DL+RSX) 150.816 KN-m

Mu>Mlim

xm=0.46*d 193.20

Area of tension steel (At1)=( 0.36*fck*b*xm)/0.87*fy 959.34 mm2

Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 229.50 mm2

Strain at the level of compression steel= 0.0035((xm-d')/xm) 0.0030

fsc (by interpolation) 353.46 N/mm2

fcc= 0.446 * fck 8.92

Asc= (M-Mlim)*10^6/((fsc-fcc)*(d-d')) 74.79 mm2

Corresponding tension steel At2= (fsc*Asc)/(0.87*fy) 60.77 mm2

Total tension steel At= At1+At2 1,020.10 mm2

Area of steel Provided = 1,035.00 mm2

Moment at mid span 1.5(DL+RSX) 42.5

214.2
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 0 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.11
b -425.00

Ast = 245.27 mm2

505.
Area of steel Provided = 00 mm2

Moment at left end 1.5(DL+RSX) 152.88 KN-m

Mu>Mlim

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 22

xm=0.46*d 193.20

Area of tension steel (At1)=( 0.36*fck*b*xm)/0.87*fy 959.34 mm2

Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 214.20 mm2

Strain at the level of compression steel= 0.0035((xm-d')/xm) 0.0030

fsc (by interpolation) 353.46 N/mm2

fcc= 0.446 * fck 8.92

Asc= (M-Mlim)*10^6/((fsc-fcc)*(d-d')) 90.15 mm2

Corresponding tension steel At2= (fsc*Asc)/(0.87*fy) 73.25 mm2

Total tension steel At= At1+At2 1,032.59 mm2

Area of steel Provided = 1,059.00 mm2

Design of Shear reinforcements

Top reinforcement = 4-16dia + 2-16dia 1206 mm2
Bottom reinforcement = 4-16dia 804 mm2
Shear force at the section = 118.57 KN
Percentage of steel = 0.64%
For M20 concrete,

tc = 0.524 N/mm2

tv = 0.941 N/mm2

tus = 0.42 N/mm2

Asv = 100.53 mm2

Dia of shear reinforcement = 8 mm
Legs that can be provided = 2

Spacing of stirrups required = 349.70 mm

Spacing of stirrups provided = 100/150 mm

ETABS 2013 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design (Envelope)

Beam Element Details

Level Element Section ID Length (mm) LLRF

1F B27 B-300x450 5400 1

Section Properties

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 23

b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)

300 450 300 0 35 35

Material Properties

Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)

22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Flexural Reinforcement for Major Axis Moment, Mu3

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J

Rebar Area Rebar Rebar Area Rebar Rebar Area Rebar
mm² % mm² % mm² %
Top (+2 Axis) 1035 0.77 290 0.21 1059 0.78
Bot (-2 Axis) 517 0.38 505 0.37 530 0.39

Flexural Design Moment, Mu3

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J

Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc
kN-m mm kN-m mm kN-m mm
Top (+2 Axis) -152.7506 225 -4.2087 3600 -156.7761 5175
Combo 1.5(DL-RSX) 1.5(DL-RSX) 1.5(DL-RSX)
Bot (-2 Axis) 35.2345 225 81.7264 2700 35.3118 5175
Combo 1.5(DL-RSX) 1.5(DL-RSX) 1.5(DL-RSX)

Shear Reinforcement for Major Shear, Vu2

End-I Middle End-J

Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s
mm²/m mm²/m mm²/m
1338.14 760.5 1321.53

Design Shear Force for Major Shear, Vu2

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J

Design Vu Station Loc Design Vu Station Loc Design Vu Station Loc
kN mm kN mm kN mm
142.9253 900 0.1116 1800 144.1893 4500
1.5(DL-RSY) 1.5(DL-RSY) 1.5(DL-RSY)

Torsion Reinforcement

Shear
Rebar Asvt /s
mm²/m
895.87

Design Torsion Force

Design Tu Station Loc Design Tu Station Loc

kN-m mm kN-m mm
20.5643 900 20.5643 900
1.5(DL-RSY) 1.5(DL-RSY)

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 24

1.7 Sample Design of Foundation

Isolated Footing
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
Depth of Foundation (Df) = 1.52 m
Allowable soil pressure (Palw) = 150 KN/m2
yt 16
Effective cover (d') = 50
d0 = 200

MODEL NODE 6
1,090.4
Pu From Model 3
1,199.4
Pu (KN) 7
Mux (from model) 1.363 KN-m
Muy (from model) -0.556 KN-m
45
Width of column (Bc) 0 mm
45
Depth of column (Dc) 0 mm
7.4
Required Area 3 m2
8.9
Required Length 5 ft
8.9
Required Breadth 5 ft
Provided
9.2
Length of Foundation (Lf) 5 ft
9.2
Breadth of Foundation(Bf) 5 ft
151.2
Actual Bearing Capacity (S) 8 KN/m2
106.1
BM/M 5
Effective depth according to moment (d 116.8
M) 0 mm
550.0
Assumed Deptrh (D) 0 mm
1
Bar dia 2 mm
15.0
Spacing 0 cm c/c
6.6
Ast 0 (cm2)/M
426.1
Effective depth due to tapper section (d) 4 (mm)
150.7
p2 6 KN/m2
151.2
p3 8 KN/m2
105.7
BM2 9
106.1
BM3 5

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 25

40.0
K 0
0.1
percentage of tension steel (pt %) 5
One way shear
323.4
Vu 9
0.2
Shear strength of M20 concrete (Tc>) 9 N/mm2
0.2
Shear Stress (Tv) 7 N/mm2
Tc>Tv OK

Two Way shear

1,086.2
Vu 5
3.5
Perimeter (b0) 0 m
1.1
Shear strength of concrete (Tc' >) 2 N/mm2
0.7
Shear Stress (Tv) 3 N/mm2
Tc'>Tv OK

Description size(mm) D
L B (mm)
F1
2775 2775 550

d/2 d0 dia spacing

  (mm) (mm) (mm)
20
274.00 0 12.00 150

1.8 Slab Design

1. DESIGN DATA

Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 5.40 m

Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 4.50 m

Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20 N/mm2

Width of slab, b = 1000 mm

Grade of steel used (σy) = 500 N/mm2

Unit weight of Marble= 27 kN/m3

Unit weight of screed = 20.4 kN/m3

Unit weight of plaster = 20.4 kN/m3

Thickness of screed = 25 mm
Thickness of plaster = 12.5 mm
Assume Thickness of slab (D) = 139.5 mm
Effective depth of slab d= 119.5 mm

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 26

2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT

Type of slab Panal = 2 Adjescent Edge Discontinous

Aspect Ratio of the slab Considered Ly/Lx = 1.200 30
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.2 for 1.2 for 1.200
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.0600 0.0600 0.060
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.0450 0.0450 0.045
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.0470   0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.0350   0.035

3. LOAD CALCULATION

Dead load of slab = 3.4875 kN/m2

Dead load due to screed = 0.51 kN/m2

Dead load due to plaster = 0.255 kN/m2

Dead load due to Partition Wall = 1.5 kN/m2

Live load at Slab = 4 kN/m2

Total Load = 9.7525 kN/m2

Factored Design Load = 14.62875 kN/m2

Factored Design Load per meter = 14.62875 kN/m

4. MOMENT CALCULATION

Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 17.8 kN-m

Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 13.3 kN-m
Design -ve moment for long span, My 13.9 kN-m
Design +ve moment for long span, My 10.4 kN-m

5. CALCULATION OF REINFORCEMENT

Design for -ve Reinforcement =

Along Short span 370.7 mm2

Along Long span 284.8 mm2

Design for +ve Reinforcement =

Along Short span 271.9 mm2

Along Long span 208.6 mm2

Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 209.3 mm2

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 27

Spacing Area
Bar dia. Area Required Spacing
Direction Required provided
Provided mm mm2 Provided mm
mm mm2

Shorter Support 10 371 200.00 150 523.33

Shorter Mid 10 272 288.70 150 523.33

Longer Support 10 285 275.62 150 523.33

Longer Mid 10 209 375.15 150 523.33

6. CHECK FOR SHEAR

Shear coefficient = 0.60

Design Shear Force Vu = 39.50 kN

Nominal shear stress (tv) = 0.33 N/mm2

Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.38 N/mm2

Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.38% steel tc = 0.43 N/mm2

Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm2

Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.56 N/mm2

Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max = 2.80 N/mm2
Safe in shear

7. CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:

Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.21

Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.38
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span > 10m β = 1

Mu/bd2= 0.93
Steel stress of service fs= 150.68
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.45
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 2.00
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 52.00
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (Lx/d) = 37.66
Safe in deflection

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 28

1.9 Design of Staircase

1. Design Data
Total Width of the staircase well: 3240 mm
Width of Flight = 1620 mm
Total Length of the staircase well: 4500 mm
Total Height of the staircase well: 3650 mm
Rise of The Flight (R) : 150 mm
Tread of the Flight (T) : 270 mm
Grade of Steel (Fy) = 500 Mpa
Grade of Concrete (Fc) = 20 Mpa
Floor Finish Considered = 1.3 kN/m²
Live Load Consoidered = 5.0 kN/m²
Length of Front landing = 0 mm
Length of End landing = 1500 mm

2. Calculation for Effective Span & Effective Depth

Projected span of stair = 4500 mm
Length between supports, lc/c =lc+ bs = 4500 mm
Eff. depth of the waist slab =leff/(23*modification factor ) = 115 mm
Minimum depth to be provided dmin. =√M / 0.1336fckb = 133 mm
Overall Depth (D) =d + clear cover +Φ/2 = 138 mm
Provided Overall depth of Waist Slab (D)= 175 mm
Dia. Of Bar Used , Φ = 16 mm
Provided Eff. depth of Waist Slab (d)= D-clear cover-Φ/2 = 152 mm
Effective span, leff. = lc/c =Length between supports 4500 mm
Critical depth of neutral axis: Xm = 0.46 d = 70 mm
Limiting moment: Mlim. = 0.36xm/d (1-0.42xm/d) bd²fck = 100 kN m

3. Calculation of Loads
Load Factor 1.5
No. of treads per meter = n = 1000/T = 4

Load for Landing =

Self weight of landing = 4.38 kN/m²
Floor Finish Considered = 1.3 kN/m²
Live Load Consoidered = 5.0 kN/m²
Total Load on Landing = 10.63 kN/m²
Factored load on landing = 15.94 kN/m²
For 1.62 m width of flight ,Design Load = 25.82 kN/m

Load for Flight =

Area of Step Section = 0.02 m²
Area of Inclined Slab = 0.05 m²
Area of floor finish = 0.01 m²
Total area = 0.09 m²

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 29

In 1.62 m width and given Tread in plan length ,DL of step section = 2.17 kN/m²
DL per m² on plan = 8.69 kN/m²
LL per m² on plan = 5.0 kN/m²
Total load of Flight = 13.7 kN/m²
Factored load of Flight = 20.5 kN/m²
For 1.62 m width of flight ,Design Load = 33.3 kN/m²

3. Computation of Reinforcement
Maximum Support Reaction Taken from ETABS = 66 kN
Maximum Moment Taken from ETABS = 47 kN m
Maximum Reinforcement at Support from ETABS = 893.00 mm²
Maximum Reinforcement at Mid from ETABS = 522.00 mm²

Calculation of Main Bars :

Mu = 0.87*fy*Ast*(d -Ast * fy /fck/b)
a 0.025
b -155
c 108022.99
Ast min 210.0
Tension Reinforcement = Ast = 893.00 mm²
Try, Φ = 16 mm
AΦ = ΠΦ²/4= 200.96 mm²
Spacing = bx AΦ / Ast reqd. = 365 mm
Provide 16 mm - Φ HYSD steel bars @ 150 mm c/c
Ast .provided = b x AΦ /spacing = 2170.37 mm²
pt =100Ast./bd = % > 0.12% = 1.4 %
Φ-max = 1/8*D= 21.875 12 mm
Maximum spacing = least of 3d & 300mm 300 mm
> spacing provided
Distribution Bars in waist slab :
Area of distribution bars =0.12% of bD = 210.00 mm²
Try, Φ = 10 mm AΦ = ΠΦ²/4= 78.50 mm²
Spacing = b x AΦ / Ast reqd. = 374 mm
Provide 10 mm - Φ HYSD steel bars @ 150 mm c/c
Maximum spacing = least of 5d & 450mm 450 mm
> spacing provided
Distribution Bars in steps :
Provide 1 - 12 Φ bar as temperature reinforcement in each step.
Provide the landing slab distribution reinforcement similar to waist slab distribution reinforcement.

4. Development Length / Anchorage

Design Bond Stress of concrete M20 for plain bars in tension, Гbd 1.2 N/mm²
Design Bond Stress of M20 for deformed bars in tension, Гbd' =1.6 x Гbd = 1.9 N/mm²
Design Bond Stress of M20 for deformed bars in compression=1.25*above= 2.4 N/mm²
Stress in bar at the section considered at design load = σs =0.87*fy = 435.0 N/mm²
Diameter of the main tension bars (Fe 500) = Φ = 16 mm

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 30

Tension Steel Development length = Ld =Φσs/4Гbd (Cl.26.2.1) = 906 mm

Compression Steel Development length = Ld =Φσs/4Гbd (Cl.26.2.1) = 725 mm
Min. embedment = Ld / 3 (Cl.26.2.3.3) 302 mm
Embedment with U hooks behind centre of support = bs/2 -25 +16Φ = 381 mm
Development length, Ld should be available in either direction to top as well as bottom bars.
Hence provide , Ld = 550 mm for comp. bars & 700 mm for tension. bars.

Step 4 > Deflection Check ( as per IS 456:2000 ,Cl. 23.2)

Ast required = 893.00 mm²
Ast,provided = 2170.37 mm²
fs =0.58x fy x Ast, required / Ast, provided (Cl.23.2.c & Fig.4) 163.67
Effective span = L = 4500 mm
Effective depth = d = 152 mm
Mu/bd^2 1.26
fs= 163.7 N/mm²
Mf 1.73
Modification factor ( α =26 for continuous slab & β = 1 for L <10 m ),γ =
L / d actual = 29.60526316 <<<< L / d per. = αβγ 44.98
....Safe.....
6. Check for Shear Check
Vmax =V at d distance from support = 65.8 kN
Nominal ShearStress , Гv =V/bd (Cl. 40.1) = 0.4 N/mm²
Maximum shear Stress, Гcmax for M20 ( Cl.40.2.3, Table 20) 2.8 N/mm²
Percentage of Tension Reinforcement =pt =100Ast/bd = 1.4 %
Design Shear Strength of Concrete with pt% and M20, Гc = 0.7 N/mm²
Enhanced Shear Strength , Гc' = k x Гc (Cl.40.2.1.1) =1.3 x Гc = 0.9 N/mm²
Since Гc >> Г , No Shear reinforcement is required in the staircase ► ► ….Safe …..

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 31

1.10 Check for Strong Column weak Beam

Check for Strong Column weak Beam
IITK-GSDMA
Proposed draft provisions & commentry on ductile detailingof RC structures
subjected to seismic forces, C7.1.2
Ʃ Mc >= 1.1*ƩMb
where ƩMc = sum of the moment of resistance of the columns
ƩMb = sum of the moment of resistance of beams along each
principal plane of the joint
Check capacity of column D6 at 1F
Column details
B= 450 mm
D= 450 mm
fck = 25 MPa
fy = 500 MPa
Factored axial load on column (Pu) = 1791.07 KN
(taken from ETABS model for load case 1.5(DL-
RSY)
Pu/(fck bD)
= 0.3537916
Area of steel provided (Ast) = 4-25Φ+8-20Φ = 4476 mm2
Percentage of steel (Pt) = 2.210 %
Pt/ fck = 0.088
d' = 40
0.08888888
d'/d = 9
From Sp-16, table 48, 49
Mu/(fck bD2) = 0.13
Mu = 296.156 KNm
ƩMc = 592.313 KNm

Along X-direction
For beam along D5-D6 For beam along D7-D6
B= 300 mm B= 300 mm
D= 450 mm D= 450 mm
fck = 20 MPa fck = 20 MPa
fy = 500 MPa fy = 500 MPa
d' = 25 mm d' = 25 mm
d= 425 mm d= 425 mm

d'/d = 0.059 d'/d = 0.059

Area of steel provided Area of steel provided
Ast = 4-16 dia +2-20 dia= 1432 mm2 Ast = 4-16 dia +2-20 dia= 1432 mm2
Asc = 4-16 dia= 804 mm2 Asc = 4-16 dia= 804 mm2
Percentage of steel provided Percentage of steel provided
for
Pt = 1.12% for tensile Pt = 1.12% tensile
Pc = 0.63% for compression Pc = 0.63% for compression
From table 54 of SP16 From table 54 of SP16
For Hogging moment: For Hogging moment:
Mu/bd2 = 4.2 Mu/bd2 = 4.2
KN
Hogging moment = 227.588 KNm Hogging moment = 227.588 m
For Sagging moment: For Sagging moment:
Mu/bd2 = 5.1 Mu/bd2 = 5.1
KN
Sagging moment = 276.356 KNm Sagging moment = 276.356 m

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.
 32

1.1*ƩMb= max[1.1*(227.58+276.35), 1.1*(227.58+276.35)]

554.338 KNm
Here we get
Ʃ Mc> 1.1*ƩMb
Hence the check is satisfied along X-direction

Along Y-direction
For beam along D6-C6 For Beam D6-E6
B= 300 mm B= 300 mm
D= 450 mm D= 450 mm
fck = 20 MPa fck = 20 MPa
fy = 500 MPa fy = 500 MPa
d' = 25 mm d' = 25 mm
d= 425 mm d= 425 mm

d'/d = 0.059 d'/d = 0.059

Area of steel provided Area of steel provided

Ast = 4-16 dia +2-20 dia= 1432 mm2 Ast = 4-16 dia +2-20 dia= 1432 mm2
Asc = 4-16 dia= 804 mm2 Asc = 4-16 dia= 804 mm2
Percentage of steel provided Percentage of steel provided
for
Pt = 1.12% for tensile Pt = 1.12% tensile
Pc = 0.63% for compression Pc = 0.63% for compression
From table 54 of SP16 From table 54 of SP16
For Hogging moment: For Hogging moment:
Mu/bd2 = 4.2 Mu/bd2 = 4.2
KN
Hogging moment = 227.588 KNm Hogging moment = 227.588 m
For Sagging moment: For Sagging moment:
Mu/bd2 = 5.1 Mu/bd2 = 5.1
KN
Sagging moment = 276.356 KNm Sagging moment = 276.356 m

1.1*ƩMb= max[1.1*(227.58+276.35), 1.1*(227.58+276.35)]

554.338 KNm
Here we get
Ʃ Mc> 1.1*ƩMb
Hence the check is satisfied along Y-direction

Structural Analysis Report

Jawalakhel Handicraft Center Pvt. Ltd.