(RSC Green Chemistry Series, 4) Rainer Höfer - Sustainable Solutions For Modern Economies-Royal Society of Chemistry (2009)
(RSC Green Chemistry Series, 4) Rainer Höfer - Sustainable Solutions For Modern Economies-Royal Society of Chemistry (2009)
Series Editors:
James H Clark, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK
George A Kraus, Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA
Edited by
Rainer Höfer
Cognis GmbH, Monheim, Germany
The front cover image has been taken from the website of EFPRA, the
European Fat Processors and Renderers Association, Rijswijk, Netherlands,
http://www.efpra.eu. The picture shows SARIA Bio-Industries’ SIFDDA SAS
site in Benet, France. Reproduction with kind permission of EFPRA and
SARIA Bio-Industries, Selm, Germany.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes or for
private study, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003, this publication may not
be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
permission in writing of The Royal Society of Chemistry or the copyright owner, or in the
case of reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright
Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the
appropriate Reproduction Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning
reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to The Royal Society of
Chemistry at the address printed on this page.
The RSC is not responsible for individual opinions expressed in this work.
v
vi Foreword
words, to know when your solutions to sustainability challenges are themselves
sustainable.
This book is a collection of work by thoughtful designers who have
approached their work with sustainability in mind; who recognize the errors
of our past and are designing new systems that reduce or eliminate intrinsic
hazard wherever possible. It is one of the great scientific challenges that we
face and we need to face it with creative, rigorous design. We cannot count on
accident or serendipity to get us off the unsustainable trajectory that we are on
currently.
The achievements of the field of Green Chemistry and sustainable design
in its short life are truly amazing. They span every molecular sub-discipline.
The achievements can be found across virtually every industry sector that
chemistry touches from electronics to aerospace, to chemicals, pesticides and
medicines, to paints, plastics and cosmetics. However, the most remarkable
thing about the accomplishments of the field of Green Chemistry thus far is
that collectively they are just a small fraction of the power and the potential
of the achievements yet to be realized. The achievements in this book are yet
another glimmer of how thoughtful design can lead us towards a sustainable
civilization.
Paul T. Anastas
Teresa and H. John Heinz III Professor
In the Practice of Chemistry for the Environment
Yale University
USA
Preface
Apocalypse now? Was the financial crisis which erupted in 2008 the ‘‘writing
on the wall’’, the Menetekel for the Industrial Age? Is mankind approaching
the impasse of Easter Island, Anasazi and Maya societies shortly before
collapse – ‘‘which followed swiftly upon the society’s reaching its peak of
population, monument construction and environmental impact’’? Or will
mankind be capable of a new global common sense? After 200 years
of industrial development largely based on easily available, abundant, and
hence cheap fossil raw materials, will there be a concept and an agreed-upon
action plan to preserve these more and more precious materials, because they
are finite, fossil resources and substitute them with renewable raw materials,
enforcing sustainable development on a global basis and bringing global
warming to a halt?
This introduction to Sustainable Solutions for Modern Economies has been
written in the first week of April 2009, after the G20, NATO and EU-USA
summits in London, Kehl-Strasbourg and Prague, which have created hope
that such a vision might become a reality. There is no doubt, however, that
concepts for energy savings on a global basis and a fair value for finite fossil
resources need to be part of such reality.
Sustainable Solutions for Modern Economies is not meant as a political
pamphlet. However, the very concept of sustainability and its social, eco-
nomical and ecological aspects have been established and accepted at the Earth
Summit in Rio de Janeiro as a political initiative obligating the signatory states
to implement Agenda 21, the wide-ranging blueprint for action to achieve
sustainable development worldwide. Sustainable Solutions for Modern Econo-
mies is meant as an essay to reflect the aspects of sustainability in the different
sectors of national and global economies, to draft a roadmap for public and
corporate sustainability strategies, and to outline the current status of markets,
applications, use and research and development for renewable resources.
vii
viii Preface
Besides history of the sustainability concept, Chapter 1 brings up philoso-
phical aspects of the relationship between man and nature and highlights
the key sustainability initiatives of the chemical industry, i.e. The Responsible
Cares Global Charter and the 24 Principles of Green Chemistry and Green
Engineering.
Chapter 2 depicts the position and the systemic role of the financial market in
the economic circuit on the one hand and, on the other, recently developed key
performance indicators for the sustainability rating of companies used
as criteria for socially responsible investments and asset management, and
to analyze and measure the non-financial enterprise value on a normative
basis. A normative basis necessary to comparatively measure sustainability
in industrial products, processes and applications is provided by the eco-
efficiency analysis. Chapter 3 describes the eco-efficiency analysis as a man-
agement tool incorporating economic and environmental aspects for the
comprehensive evaluation of products over their entire life-cycle from concept
development, design, implementation and marketing to end-of life issues like
recycling or disposal. For the first time, Chapter 4 describes a holistic approach
to define sustainability as a guiding principle for modern logistics, i.e.
throughout the process that plans, implements and controls the effective, effi-
cient, forward and reverse flow and storage of goods, services, finance and/or
information between the point of origin and the point of consumption in order
to meet customers’ requirements.
Consumer behaviour and expectations, indeed, are crucial aspects to be
considered when dealing with further development of the sustainability con-
cept. This is done in Chapter 5 for consumer goods, taking detergents as an
example with the life-cycle of the washing process acting as indicator, while
Chapter 6 specifies the achievement of food security at a global level as a key
element of sustainable development and details the importance of, and atten-
tion attributed to, the food and nutrition industries to consumer expectations
throughout the value chain starting with green agriculture, animal husbandry
and fishing followed by sustainable food production and processing, packa-
ging, retailing and service.
Key challenges for society at the beginning of the twenty-first century are
energy economy and alternative energies. Tens of millions of years ago, bio-
mass provided the basis for what we actually call fossil resources and biomass
again is by far the most important resource for renewable energies today. The
actual status and the potential of biomass as well as biomass conversion
technologies to provide green energy in the form of heat and/or power are
detailed in Chapter 7, while Chapter 8 summarizes the manufacturing and
usage of first-generation biofuels and gives an outlook to biomass-based
second- and third-generation transportation fuels.
Together with the increasingly efficient utilization of fossil resources for heat
and power generation and as fuel for transportation of people and goods, the
chemical industry has established the basis for more or less all modern indus-
tries. Machinery wouldn’t work and cars and trucks wouldn’t move without
synthetic lubricants. The chemical industry provides dyes and pigments which
Preface ix
make our world bright and colourful. Hunger has been a problem throughout
history until chemical fertilizers and pesticides made efficient agriculture and
plant protection possible. Lightweight and shock resistant plastics guarantee
the safe transport and storage of goods. Modern communication and infor-
mation storage systems depend on liquid crystals, printed circuit boards or
ultrapure silicon wafers. Human population growth, increased life expectancy
and reduced risk of physical infirmity (as well as voluntary birth control) only
became possible when the chemical industry emanated into the pharmaceutical
industry, and when synthetic detergents ensured hygiene in personal care,
laundry care and institutional cleaning. It needs to be noted, however, that
organic molecules are composed of small molecular building blocks pre-
dominantly derived from coal, natural gas and crude oil. The efficient
complementation and eventual substitution of these raw fossil materials by
biomass is the subject matter of green chemistry and is comprehensively
described in Chapter 9, which comprises lipid-based biomass (natural fats and
oils, Chapter 9.1), industrial applications of carbohydrate-based biomass
(starch, Chapter 9.2, and sucrose, Chapter 9.3), wood (Chapter 9.4), natural
rubbers (Chapter 9.5), natural fibres (Chapter 9.6) and plant-based biologically
active ingredients for cosmetics (Chapter 9.7).
The notion of sustainability in highly specialized markets where specifica-
tions and performance are key requirements is discussed in Chapter 10 (green
solvent alternatives for fine chemicals, for metal treatment, for coatings and for
crop protection formulations) and in Chapter 11 (sustainable solutions for
adhesives and sealants).
Last but not least, White Biotechnology (Chapter 12) is largely regarded as a
particularly promising gateway to a sustainable future. Reduction in green-
house gas emissions, energy and water usage are examples of the benefits
brought about by greener, cleaner and simpler biotechnology processes. White
biotechnology can contribute to the reduction in the dependency on fossil
resources through the utilization of renewable raw materials. An especially
notable feature of white biotechnology, though, is the ability to perform spe-
cific biochemical reactions without by-product formation or waste generation,
which synthetic chemistry is not able to provide.
As an employee of Henkel and Cognis I have had the chance to follow,
observe and contribute to the successful implementation of sustainability
as a guiding principle and business model for the company and for relations
with our customers. I would like to thank my colleagues Benoı̂t Abribat,
Carsten Baumann, Manfred Biermann, Joaquim Bigorra, Paul Birnbrich,
Christoph Breucker, Wolfgang H. Breuer, Stefan Busch, Dieter Feustel, Mat-
thias Fies, Roland Grützmacher, Bernhard Gutsche, Jochen Heidrich, Uwe
Held, Karlheinz Hill, Klaus Hinrichs, Ronald Klagge, Alfred Meffert, Harald
Rößler, Thorsten Roloff, Setsuo Sato, Harald Sauthoff, Jörg Schmitz, Ulrich
Schörken, Markus Scherer, Heinz-Günther Schulte, Alfred Westfechtel,
Andreas Willing and Guido Willems, who have accompanied this enterprise
and, in one way or another, have framed the concept and the content of
this book.
x Preface
I would like to thank all the authors for their commitment and for bringing
in their knowledge, their professional experience and their expertise.
I would also like to thank the Management Board of Cognis GmbH,
particularly Paul Allen, Helmut Heymann and Antonio Trius, for their support
of this project.
Rainer Höfer
Düsseldorf
Contents
Abbrevations xxi
xi
xii Contents
3.1 Introduction 25
3.2 The Eco-Efficiency Analysis as an Approach for the
Checking of Sustainability in Industrial Products and
Applications 26
3.2.1 Conducting an Eco-Efficiency Analysis 27
3.3 Industrial Examples for Using Sustainability
Metrics 29
3.3.1 Eco-Efficiency Study of Curing Alternatives
for Wooden Substrates 29
3.3.2 Vitamin B2 Case Study 30
3.3.3 Eco-Efficiency Analysis Confirms: Ionic
Liquids Provide Benefits 33
3.4 Beneficial Uses of Eco-Efficiency Analysis and
Metrics for Sustainability 34
3.5 Outlook 35
References 35
4.1 Introduction 37
4.2 Definition and Role of Logistics 38
4.3 Current Situation 40
4.4 The Four Logistic Drivers 41
4.4.1 Logistic Reliability 42
4.4.2 Logistic Efficiency 43
4.4.3 Logistic Agility 45
4.4.4 Eco-logistics 46
4.5 Towards Sustainable Logistics in the Service of
Sustainable Development 48
4.6 Conclusion 50
References 51
5.1 Introduction 53
5.2 Demographic Dynamics and Global Megatrends 54
5.3 Life-cycle of the Washing Process – an Example for
Sustainability in Consumer Goods 57
5.3.1 Raw Materials 59
5.3.2 Logistics 61
5.3.3 Production 61
5.3.4 Use Phase 61
5.3.5 Disposal Phase 62
Contents xiii
6.1 Introduction 68
6.2 Sustainability in Food and Nutrition 69
6.2.1 Sustainable Milk Procurement in Rural
Turkey 71
6.2.2 Sustainable Cow Feed in France 74
6.2.3 Sustainable Exploitation of the Evian Mineral
Water Source 80
6.3 Conclusion 84
References 85
7.1 Introduction 86
7.2 Biomass Sources 90
7.2.1 Properties 90
7.2.2 Biomass Potential 93
7.3 Biomass Conversion 95
7.3.1 Thermo-chemical Conversion 95
7.3.2 Physico-chemical Conversion 107
7.3.3 Bio-chemical Conversion 109
7.4 Biomass Use 113
7.5 Final Considerations 115
7.5.1 Competition Areas 116
7.5.2 Effects on Competition 118
7.5.3 Configuration Approaches 119
7.5.4 Conclusions and Recommendations 122
References 123
References 166
1
2 Chapter 1
‘‘Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from
observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures,
widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.’’
(Summary for Policymakers of the Synthesis Report of the IPCC Fourth
Assessment Report.)2
Figure 1.1 Hannß Carl von Carlowitz (copper engraving, Johann Martin Bernigeroth
(1711), with the permission of Stadt- und Bergbaumuseum, Freiberg),
Obermarkt Freiberg (Aquarell, Carl August Müller (1883), with the per-
mission of Stadt- und Bergbaumuseum, Freiberg) and Skyline Dresden
(with the permission of D. Berthold, B&V Verlag, Dresden).
‘‘Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs’’ (Brundtland, 1987).
This way, the report became the catalyst for global thinking processes
about the relationship between man and nature9,26 and about future prospects
of mankind in the potentially conflicting contexts of ethics, state policies and
social, ecological and economical interests.4,23,27 In 1992, the UN Conference
on Environment and Development (UNCED), more commonly known as the
6 Chapter 1
Rio Earth Summit, established a number of initiatives to promote the uptake of
sustainable development worldwide:
7% 93 %
Petroleum chemistry energy
Agricultural 5% 95 %
products: others food + feed
Oleo-
chemicals 14 % 86 %
chemistry food + feed
(2004):
Oleo-
10 % 25 % 65 %
chemicals chemistry biodiesel food + feed
(2010):
worldwide. Renewable raw materials may in the future also be the only solution
when fossil resources are gradually exhausted.
Currently, 93% of crude petroleum is used for energy generation, while only
7% is used for chemistry. Similarly, 95% of agricultural products are used for
food and feed, with only 5% being used for the chemical industry (Figure 1.4).
45 Mio mto of annual worldwide biodiesel capacity (forecast for 2010 based on
published projects;32 a more conservative forecast envisages 32 Mio mto by
201233) would already represent 25% of total renewable fats and oils produc-
tion and would reduce the share of food and feed from 86% to 65% and the
History of the Sustainability Concept – Renaissance of Renewable Resources 9
percentage of chemical uses from 14% to 10%. Finally, 30% of the global
arable land (450 Mio ha of 1.4 billion ha) is needed for biomass cultivation to
meet 10% of the 2030 annual world oil demand34 (41 billion barrels forecast;
forecast 2009: 32 billion barrels35).
These figures demonstrate the rift that must be overcome before renewable
resources can completely substitute fossil supplies of raw materials.36 If both
the emerging energy gap and the fuel crisis are to be solved while at the same
time providing sufficient feedstock for the chemical industry and foodstuffs
for humans and animals by cultivation of renewable raw materials, then a
well-organized, anticipatory, cross-border cultivation policy including water
management is required. This entails concrete measures to increase yields per
area unit; that means concentrated advancement of green agricultural research
and green crop protection, including white biotechnology and green genetic
engineering.37 A great deal could be gained by giving worldwide priority to
sparing fossil resources to permit development of constructive and long-term
successful solutions based on renewable raw materials.
References
1. G. Brundtland, ed., Our Common Future, The World Commission on
Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987,
http://www.worldinbalance.net/agreements/1987-brundtland.html; http://
www.un-documents.net/ocf-ov.htm (retrieved 31.07.2008).
2. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report – Summary for Policymakers,
An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Valencia,
2007, http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf
(retrieved 05.08.2008).
3. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 203.
4. Global Ethic Foundation, http://www.weltethos.org/dat-english/index.htm;
H. Küng, Projekt Weltethos, Piper, München, 1990.
5. C. Brandt, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 2002, 36(4), 224.
6. G. Zirnstein, Ökologie und Umwelt in der Geschichte, Ökologie und
Wirtschaftsforschung, Bd. 14, Metropolis, Marburg, 1996.
7. J. Passmore, Man’s Responsibility for Nature, Duckworth, London,
2nd edn, 1980.
8. R. Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind, revised edn. Yale University
Press, New Haven, London, 1973.
9. L. White Jr, Science, 1967, 155(3767), 1203.
10. W. Haedecke, Neue Rundschau, 1975, 86(2), 290.
11. Gaius Plinius Secundus, Historia Naturalis, Pliny the Elder, The Natural
History, ed. and translation: English J. Boston, Book XXXIII, http://
www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup¼Plin.+Nat.+toc (retrieved
08.08.2008).
12. J. Diamond, Collapse, Penguin Books, London, 2006.
13. K. -W. Weeber, Smog über Attika: Umweltverhalten im Altertum, Rowohlt,
Reinbek, 1993.
10 Chapter 1
14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_test (retrieved 08.08.2008); quotation
is taken from Robert Jungk, Brighter Than a Thousand Suns, Harcourt,
Brace, 1958.
15. D. L. Meadows, et al., The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York,
1972.
16. J. W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, Pegasus Communications, Waltham,
1961; J. W. Forrester, World Dynamics, Pegasus Communications,
Waltham, 1973.
17. H. C. von Carlowitz, Sylvicultura oeconomica – Anweisung zur wilden
Baum-Zucht, reprint der Ausg. Leipzig, Braun, 1713/bearb. von K. Irmer,
A. Kießling, TU Bergakademie Freiberg u. Akad. Buchh., Freiberg, 2000;
U. Grober, DIE ZEIT, 25.11.1999, 48, 98 (nur in der Print-Ausgabe); U.
Grober, Von Kursachsen nach Rio – Ein Lebensbild über den Erfinder der
Nachhaltigkeit Hannß Carl Edler von Carlowitz und die Wegbeschreibung
eines Konzeptes – aus der Silberstadt Freiberg, http://www.forschung-
sheim.de/fachstelle/arb_carl.htm (retrieved 04.11.2007).
18. B. Boutefeu, VertigO – La Revue en sciences de l’environnement, Sept. 2005,
6(2), 1.
19. G. Bachmann, in Kollaps von Gesellschaften, GAIA, 2006, 15(4), 260M.
20. M. Jeucken, Sustainability in Finance: Banking on the Planet, Eburon,
Delft, 2005.
21. S. Sterling, Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change,
Schumacher Briefings 6, Green Books for the Schumacher Society, Bristol,
2001.
22. M. Kopatz, Nachhaltigkeit und Verwaltungsmodernisierung: eine theore-
tische und empirische Analyse am Beispiel nordrhein-westfälischer Kommu-
nalverwaltungen, Diss., Univ. Oldenburg, 2006.
23. D. Pearce, E. Barbier and A. Markandya, Sustainable Development,
Edward Elgar Publ., Hants, Brookfield, 1990.
24. W. Brandt, North-South: A Programme for Survival, MIT Press, Cam-
bridge, 1980; The Brandt Commission, Common Crisis – North-South
Co-operation for World Recovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1983.
25. Palme Commission, Common Security, Pan Books, London, 1982.
26. G. D. Bennett, Perspectives of Science and Christian Faith, March 2008,
60(1), 16.
27. K. E. Goodpaster and K. M. Sayre, Ethics and Problems of the 21st
Century, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, London, 1979;
H.-J. Harborth, Dauerhafte Entwicklung statt Selbstzerstörung, Ed. Sigma,
Berlin, 1991; C. V. Kidd, J. Agr. Environ. Ethics, 1992, 5(1), 1; W. Beck-
erman, Environ. Val., 1994, 3, 191; H. E. Daly, Environ. Val., 1995, 4, 49;
W. Beckerman, Environ. Val., 1995, 4, 169; P. Fritz, J. Huber and H. W.
Levi, Hrsg., Nachhaltigkeit in naturwissenschaftlicher und sozialwis-
senschaftlicher Perspektive, S. Hirzel, Wiss. Verlagsges., Stuttgart, 1995;
K. Rennings, K. L. Brockmann, H. Koschel, H. Bergmann and I. Kühn,
Nachhaltigkeit, Ordnungspolitik und freiwillige Selbstverpflichtung, Physica-
Verl., Heidelberg, 1996; H. G. Kastenholz, K.-H. Erdmann and M. Wolff,
History of the Sustainability Concept – Renaissance of Renewable Resources 11
Hrsg., Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Zukunftschancen für Mensch und
Umwelt, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996; K.-W. Brand,
Hrsg., Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Eine Herausforderung an die Soziologie,
Leske+Budrich, Opladen, 1997; BUND/Misereor, Hrsg., Zukunftsfähiges
Deutschland – Ein Beitrag zu einer global nachhaltigen Entwicklung,
[R. Loske . . .unter Mitarb. von T. Böhmer . . .] 5. Aufl., Birkhäuser Verl.,
Basel, 1998.
28. R. L. Carson, Silent Spring, REPRINT, Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
29. http://www.cefic.be/Templates/shwStory.asp?NID¼471&HID¼8.
30. P. T. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice,
Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
31. P. T. Anastas and J. B. Zimmerman, Env. Sci. Tech., 2003 37(5), 95A–
101A.
32. R. Gubler, Biodiesel, SRI Consulting, ed., CEH Marketing Research
Report, Nov. 2006.
33. S. Hansen, Rabobank’s View on the Global Biofuel Market, 6th European
Motor BioFuels Forum, Rotterdam, 2008.
34. S. Marcinowski, Renewable Raw Materials – a Novel Approach in Polymers,
Bio & Polymers, Biannual Meeting of the GdCh-Division of ‘‘Macro-
molecular Chemistry’’, Aachen, 2008.
35. IEA, Oil Market Report, http://omrpublic.iea.org/ (retrieved 30.09.2008).
36. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, June 2008,
1(2), 79.
37. R. Höfer in F. Brickwedde, R. Erb, M. Hempel and M. Schwake, Hrsg.,
Nachhaltigkeit in der Chemie-13. Internat. Sommerakademie St. Marienthal,
Initiativen zum Umweltschutz Bd. 70, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, 2008,
p. 150–166.
CHAPTER 2
Sustainability in Finance –
Banking on the Planet
PHILIPPE SPICHER,a JULIANE CRAMER VON
CLAUSBRUCHb AND PABLO VON WALDENFELSb
a
Centre Info SA, Sustainable Investment Consulting, Rue de Romont 2,
CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland; b PricewaterhouseCoopers AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Germany
2.1 Introduction
Markets are a product of society and must reflect society’s concerns; society
simply could not exist without financial services (Figure 2.1: economic circuit,
Wirtschaftskreislauf in German). In the production industry material flow is
paralleled by ‘‘cash flow’’; from buying a house to insuring a car or saving for a
pension, financial services also touch every aspect of private households; central
banks are responsible for achieving price stability and maintaining the overall
financial stability of a country or a community of countries.
As an integral part of the economy, financial systems ex ante produce and
screen information about potential investments which enable the market par-
ticipants to make investment decisions; they mobilize investment capital and ex
post monitor the investment. Monitoring includes supervising investments
to ensure they are on-course and on-schedule in meeting the objectives and
performance targets in order to effect value enhancement and preclude value
destruction. With regard to Corporate Responsibility (CR) and the contribu-
tion of enterprises to sustainable development, screening operations of financial
systems fix capital expenditure and the marginal productivity of invested
12
Sustainability in Finance – Banking on the Planet 13
tax tax
transfer Government expenditures
Financial
Household saving investment Corporation
Market
consumption
Climate change;
Energy efficiency;
Social aspects in the supply chain;
Corruption handling and compliance with laws and regulations;
Health and safety of products and services.
There are several ways or channels through which financial activities (or
transactions) have the potential to impact – positively and negatively – upon
sustainable development (project finance, credit activities, retail banking, etc.).
We will focus in this chapter on asset management (in traditional asset classes,
e.g. stock quoted companies and corporate bonds).
Under the generic name of socially responsible investment, there are actually
a multitude of different philosophies: ethics, sustainable development, materi-
ality of extra-financial factors, etc. These various approaches differ as regards
both the criteria and analytical tools used to assess corporate behaviour and
performance, and the techniques used to build portfolios.
Even though the term ‘‘Socially Responsible Investment’’ covers many dif-
ferent approaches, it is useful to adopt a general definition:
Exclusion;
Best-in-class;
Engagement.
There is a continuum between these approaches and two of them, or even all
three, are quite commonly applied together. It is, however, true that many
investors focus only on one. It is worth noting that exclusion and best-in-class
techniques affect the selection of the stocks which are held in the portfolio (ex
ante screening), while the engagement technique does not (ex post monitoring).
In the following pages we will review each of these approaches by focusing on
the underlying research needed to implement them, the kind of results
this research delivers and to what extent and how investors are actually using
these results.
2.3.1 Exclusion
Exclusion involves the creation of an investable universe. In other words, it
means defining some companies as eligible for an investment and some others
as not. The companies that are not eligible – the excluded companies – are
those that do not meet certain criteria, called the exclusion criteria or screen.
These criteria can be of three types:
1. activity-based
2. policy-based
3. practice-based
2.3.2 Best-in-class
A best-in-class approach involves the selection or the overweighting of stocks
of companies that perform particularly well compared to their peers. A best-in-
class approach thus involves the realization of an assessment of corporate
ESG performance and behaviour. Such a sustainability rating can be based on a
sector assessment (chemical industry, energy industry, etc.) and on the sustain-
ability assessment of individual companies and their peers in different industry
sectors.8
This kind of assessment is conducted by dedicated teams within asset man-
agement firms or banks and, more generally, by specialized research organi-
zations and rating agencies. More recently, brokerage houses, encouraged by
the Enhanced Analytics Initiative (EAI, see below) growing demand, have
started to deliver interesting pieces of research in this area.
According to Eurosif, a total of 29,000 Mio h is invested in Europe using
best-in-class strategies. This figure may be slightly underestimated as a part of
the 641,000 Mio h assets managed using an ‘‘integration’’ approach9 is most
probably using the best-in-class technique as defined above.
Sustainability in Finance – Banking on the Planet 19
2.3.3 Engagement
Engagement is used by investors to apply direct pressure to corporations to
improve their social and environmental performance. It encompasses various
means to gain dialogue with management and influence corporate behaviour,
including letter writing, meetings with top management and board of directors,
proxy voting and ultimately filling in shareholder resolutions. In 2005, invest-
ment through engagement strategies accounted for 703,000 Mio $ in the United
States7 and 730,000 Mio h in Europe.5
Shareholder advocacy is a particular form of engagement that is used by
stakeholders other than investors, mainly Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs, e.g. Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders) and
unions. Shareholder advocacy is more popular in countries where shareholders’
rights require little capital to bring resolutions to an annual general meeting
such as in the United States.
Table 2.1 below gives an overview of the importance of engagement strate-
gies in the US market in 2005 as reported by the US Social Investment
Forum. Among a total of 348 resolutions, 98 were withdrawn, which is an
indication of the responsiveness of companies to pre-vote dialogues and
negotiations. On average, the shareholders’ resolutions that have been voted on
received 10% of the votes. This low figure does not necessarily mean, however,
that these resolutions were not successful since quite often companies take
these votes as a signal and undertake some of the requested changes.
42 Political contributions
35 Climate change
25 Global labour standards
11 Human rights
20 Chapter 2
Germany
Since January 2002, the new pension law requires private and corporate
pension schemes to disclose their policies on socially responsible investment.
France
Since February 2001, the French law on Employee Saving Plans requires
mutual funds, which collect money from the Employee Saving Plans, the
Inter-companies Saving Plans and the Voluntary Partnership Employee
Saving Plans, to report on their policies on socially responsible investing.
Sweden
Since January 2001, the five biggest public pension funds have to consider
the environmental and social aspects in their environmental policy.
2.5 Conclusion
As we have seen, the same words can have different meanings, depending
on who is using them and in what context. More particularly Sustainability in
Finance has two meanings which are overlapping but not identical: on one hand
we have a sustainable management of companies rated by financial and sector
specific strategic non-financial ESG aspects; on the other hand we have sus-
tainable investment strategies directing capital according to SRI/ESG princi-
ples. Whatever the meaning, and behind the differences in approaches and in
the objectives followed by the investors (investing according to own values,
seeking higher performance by capturing the materiality of ESG factors), in the
end, from a sustainable development perspective, the key question is:
Are these investment practices having a tangible impact on sustainable
development?
If SRI/ESG is able to push companies to rethink their activities and business
models, it certainly already makes a contribution to sustainable development.
The question that remains is: does SRI turn out to be the key driver for sus-
tainable development? To be able to answer this question, one would need to
have metrics actually measuring this impact. Research in this area is still in its
infancy and a lot remains to be done. In this regard, however, it is worth
mentioning two recent initiatives going in this direction.
In a paper14 published in May 2008, Christoph Butz and Olivier Pictet argue
that ‘‘Financial performance is not a sufficient condition for the success of an
SRI investment strategy. Social investors’ objectives are not one-dimensional
but multi-dimensional. Their utility function also explicitly includes a social
and an environmental performance dimension. Hence the need for a credible
and transparent extra-financial reporting.’’ They present in their paper how
such extra-financial reporting might look and ‘‘show that the companies in the
sustainable portfolio emit less CO2 and create more jobs than their peers and
thus provide the sustainable investor with a measurable social and environ-
mental added value’’.
In a similar attempt to inform investors, the Caisse d’Epargne – a French
banking group – introduced in June 2008 the sustainability label for savings
products. This labelling allows consumers to compare passbook savings
accounts, mutual funds and life insurance offerings on the basis of three
criteria: financial risk (Security Criterion), the use of social and environmental
Sustainability in Finance – Banking on the Planet 23
criteria in managing the product (Responsibility Criterion) and the impact on
the climate of the activities financed with the products (Climate Criterion).15
These two initiatives will most certainly be followed by others, which will
hopefully lead to a comprehensive system of reporting the extra-financial
performance – or sustainable added value – of investment.
In the same way as the chemical industry, following growing ecological
concerns over waste as well as catastrophic events like Seveso and Bhopal, had
to reconsider the way it was doing business, the current financial crisis will also
lead to a redefinition and reconsideration of the role and functioning of the
financial system. In order to make a sustainable contribution to the solution of
the current crisis the financial markets must return to their supportive function
(Figure 2.1). In the last years they have taken the goal setting position within
the economy which in turn has driven short termism within the real economy.
The concepts and current practices related to sustainability in finance presented
in this chapter are now more relevant than ever before.
References
1. R. Levine, Finance and Growth, Theory and Evidence, NBER Working
Paper 10766, NBER, Cambridge, 2004, http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/
Ross_Levine/Publication/Forthcoming/Forth_-
Book_Durlauf_FinNGrowth.pdf (retrieved 17.03.2009); B. Scholtens,
J. Bus. Ethics, 2006, 68(1), 19–33.
2. H. Garz and F. Schnella, KPIs for ESG, DVFA Financial Papers, No. 8/
08_e, Version 1.1 – Draft, DVFA, Dreieich, 2008.
3. J. Bouma, M. H. A. Jeucken and L. Klinkers, Sustainable Banking – The
Greening of Finance, Greenleaf Publ., Sheffield, 2001.
4. D. Sarokin and J. Schulkin, Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, Feb.
1991, 73, 6–19.
5. European SRI Study, Eurosif, 2006, http://www.eurosif.org/publications/
sri_studies_2006_2003 (retrieved 14.10.2008).
6. In its ‘‘European SRI Study 2006’’, Eurosif defines simple screens as ‘‘an
approach that excludes a single given sector from a fund such as arms
manufacture, publication of pornography, tobacco, animal testing, etc.
Simple screens also include simple human rights screens (such as excluding
companies for activities in Sudan or Myanmar) and Norms-based screening’’.
7. Social Investment Forum, 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing
Trends in the United States, Washington, 2006, http://www.socialinvest.org/
pdf/research/Trends/2005%20Trends%20Report.pdf (retrieved 15.10.2008).
8. E. Plinke, in Nachhaltigkeit in der Chemie – 13. Internat. Sommerakademie
St. Marienthal, Initiativen zum Umweltschutz. ed. F. Brickwedde, R. Erb,
M. Hempel, M. Schwake, Bd. 70, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, 2008, p. 329.
9. Eurosif defines integration as ‘‘the explicit inclusion by asset managers of
[corporate governance]/[social, environmental, ethical] risk into traditional
financial analysis’’.
24 Chapter 2
10. UNEP FI/Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, A Legal Framework for the
Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional
Investment, Genève, October 2005.
11. The Global Compact, Who Cares Wins – Connecting Financial Markets to
a Changing World, Financial Sector Initiative, December 2004, http://
www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/WhoCaresWins.pdf
(retrieved 15.10.2008).
12. UNEP Finance Initiative, PRI Report on Progress 2008, New York, 2008,
http://www.unpri.org/files/2008PRI_Report_on_Progress.pdf (retrieved
15.10.2008).
13. W. Baue, Social Funds, Oct. 05, 2005, http://www.socialfunds.com/news/
article.cgi/1826.html (retrieved 14.03.2009); S. Forrest, Goldman Sachs ESG:
Integrating ESG into Investment Research, June 2006, www.ahcgroup.com/
powerpoint/GoldmanSachsPresentation.ppt (retrieved 14.03.2009).
14. C. Butz and O. Pictet, The SRI Performance Paradox – How to Gauge and
Measure the Extra-financial Performance of Socially Responsible Invest-
ment, Pictet & Cie, Geneva, May 2008, www.pictet.com.
15. Groupe Caisse d’Epargne & Utopies, Etiquetage De´veloppement Durable des
produits bancaires Premie`re approche méthodologique, M.-C. Korniloff, S.
Dupré (Coordination), Juin 2008, http://programme.beneficesfutur.fr/themes/
perso/pdf/Methodologie_Generale_Juin_2008.pdf (retrieved 15.10.2008).
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Introduction
Meeting society’s needs without damaging the environment requires new ways
of thinking. In spite of a strong record of innovation – in products that meet
customers’ needs, in manufacturing processes that protect the environment and
human health and in solutions that directly address environmental problems1 –
the greater public often has a critical relationship with industrial chemistry.
Society perceives a need that industry acts more responsibly and governments
all around the world introduce increasingly strict legislation to ensure it does
so.2 Quantifying the sustainability benefits of industrial chemistry is therefore
an important issue for the further development of this field of opportunities
in the future. A realistic and validated estimate of innovative potentials of
industrial chemistry by using quantitative methods is essential for the devel-
opment of new products and processes. Therefore, a link between industrial
chemistry and metrics for sustainability will be one of the key factors of
sustainable development within the chemicals industry. New approaches and
developments of ‘‘Green Chemistry’’, ‘‘Green Engineering’’, etc. in combina-
tion with the development of industrial processes should be evaluated with a
powerful and extensive methodology.3
The chemical industry has played a key role in the development of new tools
and techniques as well as in impact assessment research, consistently allocating
a large portion of its resources to research and development.4 To promote
communication and understanding between the academic community and the
25
26 Chapter 3
chemical industry is also important. The best way to bridge the gap between the
ideas that academia generate and the ideas that the product development
industry seeks should also be evaluated.5
determine ecological
impacts of individual life determine relevance
identify cycle segments and society factors
products / for aggregation of the
processes effects categories
aggregate impacts to form
effects categories
normalize
establish life environmental
cycle impact
combine the effects
categories for each life
DIN-ISO 14040; 14044 cycle segment create eco-
efficiency portfolio
1.9
1.9 1.0 0.1
Costs (normalised)
4000
Costs [ /user benefit]
3000
2000
1000
0
UV-system Aqueous 2 C-PU AC-system NC-system
system system
0.1
Aqueous varnish
1.9
1.9 1.0 0.1
Costs (normalised)
Figure 3.5 Scenario of the eco-efficiency analysis for alternative curing systems.
2 CPU ¼ two-component polyurethane, AC ¼ acid curing, NC ¼ nitro-
cellulose.
feed, it is vital to ensure the animals’ health and fitness; vitamin B2 deficiency
leads to slower growth and poor feed conversion.9
Eco-efficiency demonstrated which vitamin B2 production process is the most
eco-efficient. Three ‘‘bio-technological’’ processes and one ‘‘chemical’’ process
were evaluated for the production of 100 kg of vitamin B2 for use in animal feed
pre-mix. All of the processes include renewable resources such as plant oil or
glucose as a raw material (Figure 3.6). The bio-technological processes use
fermentation, while the chemical process starts with a bio-technological pre-
cursor like glucose or soybean oil and afterwards uses traditional chemistry to
produce the vitamin B2.
As Figure 3.7 shows, Biotech process 1 was the most eco-efficient. It had
the least overall environmental impact, and was one of the lowest cost alter-
natives. Biotech process 3 had noticeably higher environmental impact and
higher costs. In this case the chemical process alternative had the highest
cost and a greater environmental impact than Biotech process 1, resulting in the
lowest eco-efficiency. BASF produces vitamin B2 via one-step fermentation
from vegetable oil by using the fungus Ashbya gossypii. BASF pioneered the
shift from chemical to biotechnological vitamin B2 production on an industrial
scale and runs a production facility in Korea. It is an excellent example of
industrial-scale production using the most eco-efficient technology currently
available.
The eco-efficiency analysis in this case study was able to outline and to
describe new goals of research activities. It was able to highlight the most
important factors that influence the system.
The results can be used for decision-making processes in ‘‘white bio-
technology’’, which can be assessed and compared to the actually established
chemical processes. The eco-efficiency study is able to support strategic
decision-making processes with a different life-cycle-based view on the different
32 Chapter 3
K arabonate
Ca arabonate
Production Ca ribonate
of vitamin B2
Ribonolactone
Ribose
Ribitylxylidine
Phenylazo-RX
Vitamin B2
Figure 3.6 Chemical and biotechnological production pathways for vitamin B2.
0.4
High eco-efficiency
Environmental burden (normalized)
Biotech
process 1
Chemical
Customer-related
process
benefit: 1.0
100 kg vitamin B2
Biotech
for production of process 2
Biotech
feed premix
process 3
Low eco-efficiency
1.6
1.6 1.0 0.4
Costs (normalized)
Existing process
+ 2 R3 N P O + 2 R3N * HCl
O
DEPP
H
+ 2 O + NaOH
P Cl
Cl
1-methylimidazole as an acid scavenger
DCPP
P O
+ 2 MIA
O + 2 MIA * HCl
DEPP
New process
-0.5
High eco-efficiency
Amine
Customer EDPP
Environment (normalized)
benefit:
Providing
acid quench BASIL
chemicals for EDPP
neutralization 1.0
of acids in
the
production of
1,000 kg
Phenyl- In the Base case
phosphine the BASIL
Products process is the
Low eco-efficiency
most eco-efficient
2.5 alternative
2.5 1.0 -0.5
Costs (normalized)
Sector of significant
differences
hydrochloride salt. The BASILt process is less cost-intensive and at the same
time better for the environment (Figure 3.9). The new process for synthesizing
phosphorus compounds, which are used as chemical building blocks to produce
photo initiators in UV-curable coatings, reliably avoids a number of problems
encountered to date. Stability and product yield improve, and the process is less
laborious. The ionic liquids can be easily separated from the desired products,
like oil from water, and can also be recycled.
The eco-efficiency analysis has demonstrated that BASILt is much more
eco-efficient than the conventional method.13
This tool can be used for further improvement, even for chemical synthesis in
the laboratory phase to realize more sustainable chemical processes.
The BASILt developers received the ‘‘Innovation Award’’ of the ‘‘European
Chemical News’’ trade journal and the BASF Innovation Award in October
2004.
3.5 Outlook
In order to arrive at a comprehensive assessment of products or processes, it
is in general necessary to include all three dimensions of sustainability. The
objective was to develop a tool, comparable to the BASF eco-efficiency ana-
lysis, which is simple to use by LCA-experts and easy to understand for people
without any prior experience in the field. Moreover, the results of even the most
complex studies should be understandable at a glance.
This new method is named SEEBALANCE. SEEBALANCE targets the
adoption of life-cycle social data to the results of eco-efficiency analysis for a
complete sustainability assessment methodology. It is a helpful tool in different
fields for the evaluation of product or process alternatives.14
References
1. P. T. Anastas and J. B. Zimmerman, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37(5),
94A.
36 Chapter 3
2. J. Bigorra and R. Höfer, Comunicaciones, Jorn. Com. Esp. Deterg.,
Barcelona, 2008, 38, 179.
3. D. R. Shonnard, A. Kicherer and P. Saling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003,
37(23), 5340.
4. Cefic, the European Chemical Industry Council: One Vision, One Voice
http://www.cefic.be.
5. H. Gavaghan, Nature, 2000, 406(6797), 809.
6. P. Saling, A. Kicherer, B. Dittrich-Krämer, R. Wittlinger, W. Zombik,
I. Schmidt, W. Schrott and S. Schmidt, Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7(4), 203.
7. R. Landsiedel and P. Saling, Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7(5), 261.
8. P. Saling, Kunststoff-Trends, GIT Verlag, 2007, 4, 8.
9. BASF Group, ed., Press release, A big step forward in the extension of
BASF’s vitamins business, 10 November 2003, P-03-495.
10. P. Saling, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2005, 68, 1.
11. R. P. Swatloski, R. D. Rogers and J. D. Holbrey, US 2003/0157351, 2002
(Univ. of Alabama); J. Holbrey, R. P. Swatloski, J. Chen, D. Daly and
R. D. Rogers, US 2005/0288484, 2005 (Univ. of Alabama); D. A. Fort,
R. C. Rensing, R. P. Swatloski, P. Moyna, G. Moyna and R. D. Rogers,
Green Chem., 2007, 9, 63.
12. M. Maase, C & E News, 2003, 81(13), 9.
13. P. Saling, M. Maase and O. Huttenloch, ACHEMA, Frankfurt, 2006; P.
Saling, Green Innovation in the Chemical Industry, E.N.G.’s 2 senior
executive summit, Amsterdam, 2007; http://corporate.basf.com/de/sus-
tainability/oekoeffizienz/label.htm.
14. I. Schmidt, M. Meurer, P. Saling, A. Kicherer, W. Reuter and C. Gensch,
in Greener Management International, ABI/INFORM Global, ed. S.
Seuring, Greenleaf Publishing Ltd., Sheffield, Spring 2004, 45, p. 79.
CHAPTER 4
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM), 292, rue Saint Martin,
F-75003 Paris, France
4.1 Introduction
Given the close relationship with transportation, logistics clearly lies at the
heart of sustainable development issues because of the environmental pollution
generated in supplying factories, warehouses, sales outlets and consumers. But
logistics also makes a major contribution to social equity in terms of
employment, regional development and fair trade. At the same time, it con-
tributes to sustainable growth by the enormous saving potentials still to be
raised by quality improvement and efficient supply chain management.
Transport consumes 70% of the oil used in Europe and represents the primary
generator of greenhouse gas emissions (in 2004, inland transport accounted
for 21% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the EU-15). Other factors on the
downside are traffic congestion in urban areas, energy consumption, toxic
exhaust emissions, noise and the imprint left by logistic infrastructure on the
environment. The situation is all the more alarming if we consider that a 60%
increase in trade is expected between 2005 and 2015 within the European
Union. Conversely, under the Kyoto Protocol greenhouse gases are due to be
reduced by 5.2% with respect to the 1990 levels between 2008 and 2012. While
it is the subject of much criticism regarding the negative impact of transport on
the environment, the logistic function gives rise to a great deal of expectation in
37
38 Chapter 4
meeting the challenges of sustainable development, as in the broadest sense this
management discipline plays a role in controlling and optimizing production
and distribution systems. This feature makes it one of the key players capable
of contributing across the board to sustainable development, operating
not only on reducing greenhouse gas emissions but also on business competi-
tiveness and the economic vitality of society. This less well-known aspect
of logistics as a performance driver connects it de facto with the other two
pillars of sustainable development – the economic and social – once it is able
to influence economic growth, employment and purchasing power while
reducing the impact of its activities on the environment. While acknowledging
that there is still a lot of headway to be made, the purpose of this chapter is to
show how sustainable logistics can reconcile the three economic, social and
environmental aspects by developing eco-technological solutions and adopting
‘‘responsible practices’’ between suppliers, manufacturers, retailers and logistic
service providers. We shall see that this global project calls for the same vision
of the value chain to be shared and for collaboration in achieving common
objectives for the benefit of business, society and the environment.
logistic reliability;
logistic efficiency;
logistic agility;
eco-logistics.
Far from being limited in action, logistics consequently offers several drivers
in the service of sustainable development. In the following sections we shall
be attempting to show how logistics can reconcile the expectations of share-
holders, customers, the staff, society and the environment by being more reli-
able, efficient, agile and mindful of the preservation of social and environmental
balances.
Customer Customer
service requirements
Correspondence between:
Informations Products
Resources Needs
etc. etc.
The various time-based strategies also offer prospects for sustainable devel-
opment by enabling local industries to be more reactive while holding less stock
to meet a demand that is more difficult to forecast. In responding to demand
better, quicker and more cheaply, turnover, profitability and working capital
are all up, while the impact on the environment is down, particularly as regards
excess inventory and obsolete products to recycle. To illustrate logistic agility,
we use a flexible lever consisting of quickly serving products and services in
terms of fluctuations in demand, as in Figure 4.4.
4.4.4 Eco-logistics
According to Martinet and Reynaud, ‘‘companies must internalise a part of the
environmental costs and the social costs they would [earlier] have rejected.
Managing sustainable development becomes an element of differentiation’’.6
Today, the application of several sustainable development programmes is
possible, such as ISO14001 certification concerning environmental manage-
ment, the use of renewable energies, reduction of water consumption, sorting
and recycling packaging (the Eco-packaging program) and regional develop-
ment, thanks in particular to the development of local products, the develop-
ment of fair trade, the integration of social workers, etc. But these projects have
to be balanced against the achievement of economic and financial performance
if they are to be sustained and develop.
In terms of logistics, sustainable programmes concern more specifically fuel-
efficient driving, the use of hybrid modes of propulsion or a shift towards
environmentally friendly transport modes. Freight initiatives concern multi-
modal transport combining road, rail, waterway, air freight and shipping to
reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gas emission and traffic congestion.
Limitations on packaging and the increased recyclability of products also
represent practical measures to reduce the ecological footprint of goods. In the
same way, reverse logistics provides the collection, sorting, dismantling and
recovery of value from used products.
Other avenues concern the certification of logistic platforms and buildings
according to the HEQs (High Environmental Quality) method promoted by
the AFILOG association in France. This standard exists in other forms in
Sustainable Logistics as a Part of Modern Economies 47
Economic Environmental
Social
other countries in Europe and reviews various criteria such as flow impact on
the immediate environment, the use of combined transport, energy consump-
tion in offices and warehouses, water management (reduced waterproofing on
the grounds, landscaping of catchment area, saving water for fire extinguishing
purposes, etc.), the treatment of hazardous materials, health quality of air and
of working conditions.
Finally, the transport and logistic trades offer a considerable source of
employment with the development of trade and commerce. According to a
study by the Centre d’Analyse Stratégique,7 it should offer about 700,000 new
positions to be filled between 2005 and 2015, out of a total of 2 million jobs
dedicated to logistics in a country like France.
Because of its approach directed towards social and environmental objectives
allied to economic performance, the eco-logistic driver is represented as a vir-
tuous loop combining the three pillars of sustainable development applied to
logistics (see Figure 4.5).
The measurement of eco-logistic performance potentially uses several indi-
cators such as energy consumption, number of tonnes of CO2 emitted by
logistics platforms and transport (according to weight carried, mode used and
distance travelled), traffic congestion rate, infrastructure simplification rate,
hours of staff training, the number of social disparities, etc.
Combined with the three leverage drivers of reliability, efficiency and logistic
agility – sources of social, economic and environmental benefits – the eco-
logistic lever strengthens the contribution of the supply chain to the social and
environmental aspects of sustainable development.
Mastery of these four logistic drivers ensures optimum customer service
without out-of-stocks or overstocks under the best economic, social and
environmental terms. It requires a structure, an organization and a process to
be set up plus an integrated cross-cutting information system as demonstrated
in the Supply Chain Wheel8 (Figure 4.6).
This figure symbolizes all the logistic supply chain components drawn
from the Supply Chain Masters reference model. To improve their logistic
performance, companies have these drivers available dedicated to reliability,
48 Chapter 4
efficiency, agility and eco-logistics which clearly have a positive effect on eco-
nomic growth, social development and the protection of the environment.
The whole issue now hangs on the ability of the players in the supply chain, in
particular SMEs, to operate these drivers in accord with all the partners to get
significant leverage on sustainable development.
behaviour;
policy on inter-modality development;
infrastructure developments;
pricing for the use and management of infrastructure;
technological improvements.
The guide published in 2007 highlights the Marco Polo programme9 aimed at
encouraging the use of combined transport and developing more efficient and
sustainable transport chains. The idea is to combat congestion, environmental
Sustainable Logistics as a Part of Modern Economies 49
degradation, accidents and the danger of loss of competitiveness of European
industry, which needs to be able to rely on cost-effective and reliable transport
systems to manage its supply chains. However, forecasts on the increase of road
freight in 2013 exceed 60% in the European Union and it is expected to double
in the ten new states by 2020. In this context, greater use of inter-modality is
required. It contributes to better use of existing infrastructure and service
resources by integrating short journey shipping, rail and waterway transport in
the supply chain. The sea highways are an illustration of this with the launch
in 2009 of the sea link between the French Atlantic coast (Nantes) and the
north of Spain (Gijón – Asturias) short-cutting and relieving thousands of
kilometres of international state roads.
Other initiatives for logistics directed towards the requirements of sustain-
able development are under way. For example, in the fast-moving consumer
goods industry, the Global Commerce Initiative (GCI) defined the key changes
required for the future supply chain in 2016.10 Seven areas for improvement are
identified in:
Thus, the players in the supply chain are called on to play their part in
bringing about the changes that partially cover existing challenges but also
fresh challenges involving sustainable development. According to the GCI
estimates, ‘‘the total impact of this supply chain redesign could potentially reduce
transport costs per pallet to the order of more than 30%, cut handling costs per
pallet to the order of 20%, reduce lead time by 40% and lower CO2 emissions per
pallet to the order of 25%, while also improving on-shelf availability. This does
not include additional energy cost savings stemming from more efficient assets
such as green buildings and fuel-efficient/aerodynamic and jumbo trucks’’.
These improvements hinge on maximizing loads, cutting down empty jour-
neys, training drivers in eco-driving, the renewal of truck fleets and the transfer
from road to combined freight. Apart from eco-technological innovations,
collaboration between the players in the supply chain is the sine qua non for
the programme’s success. While customer–supplier collaboration has been
developing successfully for fifteen years driven jointly by ECR (Efficient
Consumer Response), VICS (Voluntary Inter-industry Commerce Solutions)
and GS1 organizations in different models (Vendor-Managed Inventory,
50 Chapter 4
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment, stream consolidation,
cross-docking, better traceability, etc.), it must be backed up and henceforth
take in the transporters, warehouse operators and the small and medium-sized
industries hitherto not generally incorporated in this approach.
To do this, real-time information sharing and particularly point-of-sales data
sharing in standardized formats must become general practice between retai-
lers, manufacturers, logistic service providers and suppliers. This development
is designed to enhance visibility of demand and events on the supply chain with
a view to limiting out-of-stocks and further optimizing the use of resources. To
reduce stocks, transport costs and CO2 emissions, the emergence of colla-
borative warehouses and hubs – where flows from different industries and
different retailers can be bulked and cross-docked before being distributed
optimally to consumers (to city stores, local stores and home delivery via shared
facilities) – will revolutionize the way the supply chain works today.
According to the Global Commerce Initiative, the challenges ahead will force
the players in the supply chain to change their operation to a future model
leading to sustainability and new business opportunities. It is actually under way.
Companies are by no means helpless. Several technologies and support tools are
available today such as global communications standards (product identifica-
tion, barcodes, RFID, EDI), Supply Chain Management software, tracing and
tracking tools, the optimization of shipping units and of secondary and tertiary
packaging, etc. The real challenge lies elsewhere: it involves adopting in unison
‘‘new ways of working together in the physical supply chain (including management
of required investments, capabilities, organisational resources and design, incentives
and measures, social regulations like working hours, etc.).11
To achieve this, the key success factor is to convince tens of thousands of small
and medium-sized businesses to join the future supply chain so as to reach the
critical mass necessary for the reduction by 20 to 40% of the impact of supply
chain activities on the environment. Of course, this objective has to be reconciled
with the needs of economic growth and the sharing of the gains between the
players while supporting purchasing power and regional development.
4.6 Conclusion
Representing an essential function to trade, logistics is a complex system made
up of a multitude of players and interrelationships between suppliers, manu-
facturers, logistic service providers and the retailers whose job it is to deliver to
the end user the product or service required under the best economic, social and
environmental conditions. Meanwhile, its impact on the environment is impor-
tant because of the many forms of pollution generated by road transport – the
major delivery mode used today. The transport sector consumes 70% of all
petrol consumed in the EU and produces 21% of all greenhouse gas emissions.
At the same time, it is well recognized that transport is the very life blood of a
modern economy and its effects go far beyond the direct economic effects of
employment and the added value of the transport sector in an economy.
Sustainable Logistics as a Part of Modern Economies 51
In this chapter, we have reported the principal initiatives launched in Europe
to ensure that transport systems meet society’s economic, social and environ-
mental needs while minimizing their undesirable impacts on the economy,
society and the environment. But the biggest challenge seems to come from the
difficulty of getting the supply chain players to work together on the three
aspects of sustainable development and to prepare all the people involved for
the new world of collaboration. To assist them in working together, we have
outlined the purpose of ‘‘modern’’ logistics and highlighted the existence of
the four logistic drivers of individual, joint and global performance. Taken
separately, these aim at improving reliability, efficiency, agility and relations
with the environment. Operating together, they prove to be powerful perfor-
mance activators in the service of economic growth, social development and
protection of the environment. This includes shared success measures across
financial, operational, environmental and consumer-based dimensions that
drive outcomes throughout the value chain and greater overall value for all
stakeholders.
Finally, we note that the economic, social and environmental aspects of
logistics are indissociable and all three participate in the emergence of this
strategic function in the service of sustainable development, alongside the
sustainable solutions of eco-design, eco-industrialization and eco-production
used in industry.
References
1. AFNOR, NF X 50-600, Logistique – Fonction et de´marche logistiques,
AFNOR 2005, 12, 4.
2. Cf. Barometre ECR France IRI based on the analysis of out-of-stocks
(OOS) of 61 categories of products in 1449 hypermarkets in France,
2008.
3. S. Pasi, Chargements moyens, distances et parcours à vide dans le transport
routier de marchandises, Eurostat, 2007, 8, 6.
4. M. Christopher, Supply Chain Management, Create networks with high
added value, Cre´er des re´seaux à forte valeur ajoute´e, Village Mondial, 2005,
318, 288.
5. Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment Voluntary Guide-
lines; Roadmap to CPFR, VICS, 1999.
6. E. Reynaud, De´veloppement durable et entreprise: vers une relation sym-
biotique? CNRS, 2003, 15, 9.
7. Rapport du groupe, Prospectives des métiers et qualifications, Les me´tiers
en 2015, Centre d’Analyse Strategique, DARES, 2007, 179, 123.
8. T. Jouenne, How to contribute to the competitiveness and development of
SMEs by using APICS concepts, Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle,
2008, 27(3), 3, 7.
9. European Commission, A sustainable future in our hands, European Com-
munities, Brussels (2008), http://bookshop.europa.eu/eubookshop/download.
52 Chapter 4
action?fileName=KA7007020ENC_002.pdf&eubphfUid=602686&catalog
Nbr=KA-70-07-020-EN-C (retrieved 21.06.2009).
10. Future Supply Chain 2016, Serving consumers in a sustainable way, Global
Commerce Initiative, Cap Gemini, 2008, 52, 24.
11. Future Supply Chain 2016, Serving consumers in a sustainable way, Global
Commerce Initiative, Cap Gemini, 2008, 52, 46.
12. J. T. Mentzer et al., Defining Supply Chain Management, Journal of Busi-
ness Logistics, 52(2), 2001, 5, 41.
CHAPTER 5
+
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkelstrasse 67, D-40589 Dusseldorf, Germany
5.1 Introduction
‘‘Everybody in the consumer industry, from fast-food services to big-box
retailers, have put out their green agenda to assure customers, regulators,
shareholders and Non Governmental Organiations (NGOs) that they are
walking toward the right, ethical direction. Most of the key initiatives made by
global consumer businesses last year deal with reducing their carbon footprint,
such as using or selling more environmentally responsible products, reducing
carbon dioxide emissions in stores or supply chains, phasing out ingredients
and raw materials that they deem hazardous, reducing waste and pushing their
supply chains to improve their own sustainability, among others.’’1 This
statement reflects the current worldwide concern about climate change and the
state of the environment and consequently consumers are asking for more
sustainable products. Consumer goods manufacturers have to take these con-
cerns seriously and develop new types of product concepts, which combine
superior performance with improved environmental profile and greater social
benefits. Since there is no clear cut definition on how a sustainable product
might look, this chapter describes those elements in a fast-moving consumer
goods life-cycle that might contribute to the overall sustainability profile.
Detergents are chosen as an example since a lot of relevant information is
available for this product category.
53
54 Chapter 5
5.2 Demographic Dynamics and Global Megatrends
The human population has been increasing constantly since the beginning of
mankind. Between the years 1800 and 2006 population has increased more than
six-fold (see Figure 5.1). In parallel to this demographic development per capita
consumption and consequently total production volume have been growing
proportionally (see Figure 5.2). This process has been accelerated even further
by globalization.
However, with respect to population development there are striking differ-
ences between the northern and the southern hemisphere. In the developed
countries located in the northern hemisphere, population growth is generally
slow or even stagnant in some countries, resulting in a fundamental change in
societal structure. The development in Spain between 1995 and 2005 may serve
as a typical example:3
6 6,3
6.3
5,3
5.3
4,5
4.5
3,7
3.7
3
(a) 29,3
29.3
[kg/capita]
20,6
20.6
18,8
18.8
13
11 17,3
17.3
9,8 15,2
15.2
7,94
7.94
12
2,2
2.2 8 2.7
2,7 3,5
3.5
1,9
1.9
1.1
1800 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2003 2006
60 105
43 81 50
30 59
14.8 18.9
6.7 31
3,3
3.3 8,4
8.4
1800 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2003 2006
Figure 5.2 Per capita consumption (a) and total production (b) for major chemical
raw materials.
food and nutrition – e.g. organic and natural food, vitamin supplements;
home life – e.g. natural cleaning products, efficient appliances, recycled
paper;
56 Chapter 5
buildings and energy – e.g. water tanks, solar hot water, ‘‘green’’ energy;
work and money – e.g. socially responsible investing, ‘‘green’’ loans.
performance;
convenience;
aesthetics.11
growing
population
Packaging waste
Fresh water
Raw materials
Food
Energy
plants
cattle
rice Drought
CO2 CH4
Infectious diseases
Chapter 5
Rising sea level Flooding
Raw Materials:
Mineral Oil,
Naturals, Minerals
Transportation
Manufacturing
Disposal of Ingredients
Cradle to Gate
includes 4 stages
Cradle to Grave
includes 7 stages
Manufacturing of Detergents
Use phase + Packaging
Transportation + Trade
surfactants (organic);
builders (typically inorganic);
bleaching agents (typically inorganic);
auxiliaries.
5.3.2 Logistics
From an energy perspective (this also includes the generation of greenhouse
gases) logistics plays a minor role in the life-cycle of a detergent. Nevertheless,
there are clear differences between the various modes of transport. One metric
ton of freight transported by ship generates about 6–11 kg CO2 eq km 1, while
its transport by rail and road generates respectively 39 and 117 kg CO2
eq km 1.17 An optimized transport mode mix can therefore be devised to take
account of the geographical circumstances.
5.3.3 Production
In general, there are basic differences between the production of liquid and
powder laundry detergents. In terms of energy, liquid detergents are more
favourable, as no drying steps are required.18 Other opportunities for opti-
mizing production with respect to the use of primary energy include the recy-
cling of process water, and combined heat and power generation.
Figure 5.5 SPC model, Sustainability Masters to describe the sustainability profile of
an ecological cleanser – reference scenario; all circles set to 100%.
64 Chapter 5
Figure 5.6 SPC model, Sustainability Masters to describe the sustainability profile of
an ecological cleanser – environmental, social and economic circles set to
120, 70 and 70% of original area, respectively.
Figure 5.7 SPC model, Sustainability Masters to describe the impact of compaction
on the sustainability profile – environmental, economic and social circles
set to 120, 120 and 100% of original area, respectively.
5.5 Conclusion
Against the background of a growing concern about the global climate and the
general state of the world’s environment, sustainability became a megatrend in
recent years. Consumer goods manufacturers have to take public concerns and
the demand of consumers into account and develop new product concepts. To
fulfil all requirements, a holistic approach is needed that takes all single phases
of a product’s life-cycle into account. In the case of laundry detergents this
encompasses the raw material extraction, the manufacture of the ingredients
and the formulation of the end product as well as transportation, consumer use
of the product, disposal and treatment in the wastewater treatment plant. To
collate all this information, ‘‘Life-Cycle Assessment’’ provides useful infor-
mation. To further consolidate this information and visualize the impact on the
area of sustainability, the Sustainability Profile Circle (SPC) model, Sustain-
ability Masters is introduced. Using the SPC approach the individual impact
of ecological, economical and social parameters can be assessed separately and
their contribution to a ‘‘sustainability zone’’, where these parameters converge,
can be displayed.
References
1. D. De Guzman, ICIS Chemical Business, 30 Jan. 2008, http://www.icis.
com/Articles/2008/02/11/9096925/consumer-industry-increases-sustainability-
initiatives.html (retrieved 16.10.2008).
2. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., June 2008, 1(2), 79.
3. C. Miñarro Garcı́a, in Comunicaciones, 36 Jorn. CED, Barcelona, 2006,
p. 219.
4. J. Naisbitt, Megatrends, Warner Books, Clayton, 1982.
5. Research and Markets, Detailed Analysis of the Lifestyles of Health and
Sustainability Consumer Market in Australia, Mobium Group, Dublin,
Aug 2007, http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/c86981 (retrieved
27.10.2008).
6. Anonymous, Agricultural Ecosystems, Facts and Trends, World Business
Council for Sustainable Development/IUCN, Gland, Conches-Geneva,
2008.
66 Chapter 5
7. Stern review on the economics of climate change, Annex 7g: Emissions from
the agriculture sector, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_final_
report.htm (retrieved 22.11.2008).
8. F. Bertrich, Kulturgeschichte des Waschens, Econ-Verl., Düsseldorf, Wien,
1966.
9. E. Smulders, Laundry Detergents, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
10. E. Smulders, W. von Rybinski, E. Sung, W. Rähse, J. Steber, F.Wiebel and
A. Nordskog, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, online posting 2007.
11. U. Lehner, Surfactants Surfing Around the World, 6th World Surfactant
Congress, CESIO, Berlin, 2004.
12. M. Stalmans, H. Berenbold, J. L. Berna, L. Cavalli, A. Dillarstone,
M. Franke, F. Hirsinger, D. Janzen, K. Kosswig, D. Postlethwaite,
T. Rappert, C. Renta, D. Scharere, K. P. Schick, W. Schul, H. Thomas and
R. Van Sloten, Tenside Surf. Det., 1995, 32(2), 84–109.
13. C. Gutzschebauch, G. van Hoof, H. King, H. J. Klüppel, E. Saouter and
T. Taylor, 2001, Life Cycle Assessment of Washing Systems: Results from
the AISE-LCA Working Group, European Climate Change Program
(ECCP), Renewable Raw Materials Working Group 5, AISE presenta-
tion; E. Saouter, G. van Hoof and P. White, in Handbook of Detergents,
Part B: Environmental Impact, ed. U. Zoller, Surfactant Science Series,
121, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004, p. 195.
14. W. Umbach, in Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Chemie, ed.
H. Eierdanz, VCH, Weinheim, 1996.
15. F. R. Schroeder, in Nachhaltige Chemie, ed. M. Angrick, K. Kümmerer
and L. Meinzer, Metropolis Verl., Marburg, 2006.
16. K. Hill, W. von Rybinski and G. Stoll, ed., Alkyl Polyglycosides, VCH,
Weinheim, 1996.
17. Data Ecoinvent 2.1, www.ecoinvent.org.
18. M. Franke, H. J. Klüppel, K. Kichert and P. Olschewski, Tenside Surf.
Det., 1995, 32, 508.
19. K. Schmitt, Ökoinstut, Freiburg, personal communication.
20. BDEW Bundesverband der Energie und Wasserwirtschaft, Berlin, 2008, http://
www.bdew.de/bdew.nsf/id/DE_7DBKHD_Grafiken (retrieved 01.12.2008).
21. Miljøstyrelsen, Environmental and Health Assessment of Substances in
Household Detergents and Cosmetic Detergent Products, Miljømini-
steriet, Environmental Project 615, 2001, http://www2.mst.dk/common/
Udgivramme/Frame.asp?http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2001/87-
7944-596-9/html/helepubl_eng.htm (retrieved 23.11.2008); E. Smulders, W.
Rähse, W. von Rybinski, J. Steber, E. Sung and F. Wiebel, Laundry
Detergents, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
22. http://www.heraproject.com.
23. http://www.aise.eu.
24. http://www.cefic.be.
Sustainable Solutions for Consumer Products 67
25. Concentrated Laundry Detergents Become Latest Trend in Green Retail
Packaging, http://www.sustainableisgood.com/blog/2007/09/concentrated-
la.html; Wal-Mart to Only Sell Concentrated Liquid Laundry Detergent
by 2008, http://www.sustainableisgood.com/blog/2007/09/wal-mart-to-onl.
html (retrieved 23.11.2008); Sustainability Report 2006, Henkel KGaA,
Düsseldorf, 2007, p. 20; M. McCoy, C&EN, January 29, 2007, 85(5),
13–19.
CHAPTER 6
6.1 Introduction
Sustainable development has become a subject of animated public discussion in
recent years. The term covers economic, social and environmental dimensions.
The heightened interest in the subject can be explained by challenges and
threats from already observed or merely anticipated changes in climate and
environment. Innovative companies have identified the field of sustainable
development as a source of differentiation and opportunity. Consumers have
become very sensitive to the environmental impact of their consumption habits.
They have begun to modify their behaviour and have come to expect from
consumer brands the inclusion of sustainability aspects in their product design
and marketing. At Danone, sustainable development has always been a point
of great importance and attention. Over the years stable practices were devel-
oped inside the company: fundamental social principles; a business, environ-
mental and health and nutrition charter; as well as a biodiversity charter; form
the company’s approach to sustainable growth. It is of importance for the
company to build a trust relationship with consumers, to guarantee absolute
product safety, to respect the environment and to be concerned with the social
68
Sustainable Solutions for Nutrition: A Consumer Expectation 69
and societal impact to the various markets where the business is present.
Equally important is the solid foundation of mutually profitable relationships
with suppliers. This chapter reports on recent progress in sustainable devel-
opment efforts, which were undertaken by the company. In the area of agri-
culture Danone decided to become more involved with upstream processes in
order to assure more sustainable processes for the production of key agri-
cultural ingredients. For Danone’s water business a comprehensive water
source protection policy guides all businesses in all markets.
77
78 Chapter 6
Their studies have shown that animal fat composition depends almost exclu-
sively on the animal feed, regardless of the particular species involved. Changes
in cattle feeding practices directly influence the animal fat composition. For
example, conventional beef contains a 4 : 1 o-6 : o-3 ratio while grass-only diets
produce a 2 : 1 o-6 : o-3 ratio. As another example, progressive introduction of
cereals into dairy cattle feed has increased the level of palmitic acid, from 20%
in grass-fed dairy cows to 40% in cereal-fed cows.
In collaboration with the French foundation Bleu-Blanc-Coeur, and together
with the company Valorex, Danone France succeeded in introducing 5% of a
special linseed preparation into the daily ration for cows delivering milk for
Danone’s fresh cheese ‘‘Jockey’’. This product, popular in France, is manu-
factured in the Danone Ferrières-en-Bray factory in the north of France.
Valorex has been chosen as a supplier for their particular variety of linseed,
named Tradi-Lins, which is extremely rich in Omega-3 fatty acid content.
Approximately 60% of total fatty acids in this feed supplement are ALA
Omega-3. A patented high-pressure cooking and extrusion method transforms
raw linseed into extruded linseed pellets which are void of any toxic compo-
nents while being at the same time easily digestible for cows (Figures 6.5–6.8).14
These improvements are due to the better digestibility of linseed enriched feed.
Dairy cows ferment their food and produce fermentation gases, notably carbon
dioxide and methane. One cow produces up to 900 litres of CO2 per day along
with 600 litres of CH4. Both are greenhouse gases. Methane’s contribution to
atmospheric warming is 21 times that of CO2 per molecule. Patrick Herpin and
his group at the French National Institute of Agriculture (INRA) have shown
that linseed feeding in cows reduces methane emission by 37%. In view of the
actual debate about greenhouse gas emissions, this reduction appears to be
highly significant. Danone Research collaborates with the INRA group to
study possible gas reductions in the Danone milk collective. Extension of the
linseed project to Danone’s entire milk collective is under current investigation.
Impervious
Recharge area layer (clays)
Aquifer
(sands)
Flow path
Discharge area
Qe
Qp
Qs
Qr
Qs=Qp–Qe–Qr
Figure 6.10 Illustration for the Water Balance at the Source, Qs ¼ amount of surface
water, Qe ¼ evaporation, Qp ¼ precipitation, Qr ¼ run-off.
84 Chapter 6
time of 20 years, is constantly monitored. Particular attention is drawn to the
installations at the catchment sites. This is an area of specific technical know-
how. Quality management includes sanitation protocols and detailed hazard
analysis of critical control points. A sanitary defence perimeter is described
around the discharge area. This is a physically enclosed zone prohibiting
all activity and entry of unauthorized persons. It corresponds to the size of the
zone owned by the company. The recharge area, the zone where water infil-
trates the reservoir, is protected in close collaboration with the local commu-
nity. A special association in Evian works with local partners to implement and
finance the protection of this sensitive zone. A specific convention has been
signed with local farmers to stop the use of phyto-sanitary products. Buildings
for livestock were constructed with the help of this association in order to
protect the source from animal waste. A risk management system was estab-
lished together with 12 villages in the vicinity of the Evian source. Risks related
to human activity such as drainage works, waste treatment, fuel storage, wet-
land management, road maintenance and others are identified and controlled in
this local network. Water exploitation limits have been established in conven-
tions signed by four villages in order to promote sustainable management of
the communal drinking water supply. Specific efforts were made to measure
and influence local economic and social impacts. Evian contributes largely to
the industrial employment of the region. Tourism is developed to introduce the
Evian area to Evian consumers. Transportation methods are constantly
optimized.
6.3 Conclusion
Three different examples of projects for sustainable development inside a food
company were illustrated. They have two important elements in common:
first, they are strictly business oriented and firmly embedded with the overall
commercial strategy. Second, they are mid-term to long-term projects,
which require continued motivation, resources and energy from the entire
organization. It is fair to say that in today’s world sustainability aspects in
Sustainable Solutions for Nutrition: A Consumer Expectation 85
business projects are no longer ‘‘nice-to-haves’’, but they have become central
elements for successful business project management.
References
1. C. J. Baldwin, ed., Sustainability in the Food Industry, Institute of Food
Technologists Series, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009.
2. United Nations Development Programme, Millennium Development Goals,
Millennium Declaration, UN Millennium Summit (Sept. 2000), http://
www.undp.org/mdg/basics.shtml (retrieved 19.09.2008).
3. M. L. Wahlquist, Publ. Health Nutr., Sept. 2005, 8(6A), 766.
4. FAO, ed., Summary of World Food and Agricultural Statistics, Rome
(2005), http://www.fao.org/ES/ESS/sumfas/sumfas_en_web.pdf (retrieved
22.09.2008).
5. SUSTAINET, Sustainable Agriculture Information Network, Combating
World Hunger through Sustainable Agriculture, gtz, ed., http://
www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/04-5888.pdf (retrieved 19.09.2008); M. A.
Altieri, P. Rosset and L. A. Thrupp, The Potential of Agroecology to
Combat Hunger in the Developing World, http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/
Bagroeco3/the_potential_of_agroecology.html (retrieved 19.09.2008).
6. O. D. Mjøs, The Nobel Peace Price 2006: Presentation Speech, Oslo (2006),
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2006/presentation-
speech.html (retrieved 21.09.2008).
7. IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), Putting globaliza-
tion to work for the poor, Summary Note, R. S. Johnson, Panelist, in 2020
Vision: Sustainable food security for all by 2020, Bonn (2001), http://
www.ifpri.org/2020conference/PDF/summary_johnsonrobbin.pdf; http://
www.ifpri.org/pubs/books/2020conpro/ch11.pdf (retrieved 23.09.2008).
8. K. Bergmann, in K.-M. Brunner and G. U. Schönberger, Hrsg., Nach-
haltigkeit und Ernährung: Produktion – Handel – Konsum, Campus Verl.,
Frankfurt, New York, 2005.
9. D. G. Lemay, C. J. Dillard and J. B. German, Food Structure for Nutrition,
Special publication – Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006, 308, 1.
10. World Health Organization/FAO, Preparation and use of food-based diet-
ary guidelines, WHO Technical Report Series No. 880, Geneva (1998).
11. M. L. Wahlqvist, Requirements for healthy nutrition: Integrating food sus-
tainability, food variety, and health, World Congress of Food Science and
Technology No. 12, Chicago, J. Food Sci., 2004, 69(1), CRH16, http://
www.iuns.org/features/requirement_for_healthy_nutrition.pdf.
12. M. de Lorgeril, P. Salen, J.-L. Martin, I. Monjaud, J. Delaye and
N. Mamelle, Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of
cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the
Lyon Diet Heart Study, Circulation 99, 779–785.
13. M. J. VandeHaar, J. Dairy Sci., 1998, 81(1), 272; M. J. VandeHaar and
N. St-Pierre, J. Dairy Sci., 2006, 89(4), 1280.
14. P. Weill, EP1155626, 2001 (Valorex).
CHAPTER 7
7.1 Introduction
Energy from biomass currently contributes on a world-wide basis 10 to 12% to
the gross primary energy demand.
Due to geographical, economic and climatic differences, the share of biomass
energy in relation to total energy consumption differs widely between different
countries, ranging from less than 1% in some industrialized countries like
the United Kingdom to significantly more than 50% in some developing
countries in Africa and Asia. Biomass is by far the most important renewable
energy source, being significantly larger in energetic terms than the second
largest, hydropower. This becomes obvious in Figure 7.1, which shows the
energy consumption exemplarily for Germany subdivided into the different
energy carriers contributing to cover the given energy demand. Overall on a
global scale the energy from the oldest fuels (i.e. biofuels) utilized by human
beings is much larger in absolute terms than the energy from the newest,
nuclear fuels. In terms of numbers of people, biofuels dominate the world
picture, for it is probably true to say that most people in the world still
rely on biomass fuels for most of their energy, a situation that has not changed
86
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 87
Lignite
Hard Coal 12 %
14 %
Nuclear
11 % Hydro 0.5 %
Renew-
ables Biomass 4.9 %
6,7 %
Wind 1.0 %
Natural Gas
Others 0.3 %
22 %
Crude Oil
34 %
Total: 13.8 EJ (2007)
since the mastery of fire a hundred thousand years ago. This is due to the
available conversion technology, the relatively low costs and the easy access of
biofuels, such as wood, dung and crop residues, in the poor rural areas of
developing countries where about half of the world population still lives.
However, soot from the burning of biomasses, largely wood and animal dung
used for cooking by Asia’s poor, has recently been identified by radiocarbon
analysis as causing the brown cloud that hovers over the Indian Ocean and
South Asia every winter. As well as being linked to global warming, the brown
cloud is believed to lengthen droughts, exacerbate monsoons and further melt
the Himalayan glaciers, which currently provide fresh water to billions of
people.2 In addition, however, more and more processed biofuels such as wood
chips, wood pellets, biogas, biodiesel and bio-ethanol play an important role in
many regions where they perform favourably compared to the given alter-
natives. The potential size of total biofuel resources is considerable throughout
the world. Depending on how they are utilized, biofuels also have the advan-
tage of being relatively environmentally sound compared to many other sources
of energy, a characteristic that has led to a resurgence in interest throughout the
world.
Cooking with biofuel is extremely rare today in rich countries, although there
is significant use of biofuel for space heating in regions with easy access to
forests. Specific space heat demand is generally decreasing because of improved
insulation of old and new buildings due to regulations and other incentives in
most industrialized countries. Average living area per citizen in most countries
of the western world is still increasing, however, while population itself is not
growing significantly or even decreasing. The net result is that space heat
demand is likely to remain more or less stable in industrialized countries for the
next decade. The household market in developing countries is still increasing
due to increasing population and economic growth. The rapid urbanization
88 Chapter 7
common in many developing countries acts as a countervailing trend, however,
because urban households tend to rely less on biofuels than do rural house-
holds. The net result is probably similar to that in developed countries, i.e.
overall consumption of household biofuels is relatively stable, although in this
case with large regional variations. China may well be an important exception
because there seems to be an on-going trend to substitute coal for biomass in
rural household applications.
The demand for electric energy is increasing in industrialized as well as in
developing countries. Therefore, electricity production from biomass is often
seen as one of the most important future markets for biomass worldwide. The
same is also true, in principle, for the production of transportation fuels from
biomass (see Chapter 8).
More broadly, expanded use of biomass in clean applications offers a way
toward more sustainable energy systems in all countries, an issue of growing
international concern. Because many renewable energy sources offer the
potential to provide useful energy with reduced emissions of e.g. greenhouse
gases and be additionally environmental advantageous compared to fossil fuel
energy, their attractiveness has been increasing during the last decade. In
particular, biomass is considered as environmentally and climatically sound
because:
Among the various possibilities for exploiting solar energy, biomass shares
with a hydropower reservoir the characteristic of being a form of ‘‘stored’’ solar
energy. This offers significant advantages over wind or direct solar energy (like
photovoltaic3), which need to be linked with expensive storage systems to be
available reliably throughout the day, month and year. In addition, being a
chemically based fuel, the energy density of biomass is fairly high, although not
as high as that of most fossil fuels.
Biofuel is rarely directly affected by energy crises, being an indigenous
energy carrier (i.e. biomass is, in most cases, produced close to the place where
it is used) characterized in most cases by short supply chains with low
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 89
physical-chemical
thermochemical conversion conversion biochemical conversion
pressing/extraction
gasifi- fermen- compo-
coaling pyrolysis digestion
cation esterification tation sting
gaseous
solid fuel liquid fuel
fuel
combustion
power heat
Figure 7.2 Possibilities to provide heat and/or power as well as fuels from biomass.4
91
92 Chapter 7
calorific value, net CV) of a fuel is defined as the amount of heat released by
combusting a specified quantity at a reference state and returning the tem-
perature of the combustion products to 150 1C. The LHV assumes that the
latent heat of vaporization of water in the fuel and the reaction products is not
recovered. It is useful in comparing fuels where condensation of the combustion
products is impractical, or heat at a temperature below 150 1C cannot be put to
use. By contrast, the higher heating value (HHV) (also known as gross calorific
value or gross CV) includes the heat of condensation of water in the com-
bustion products.
The LHV is greatly influenced by the water content. Figure 7.3 shows that
the LHV of wood decreases from approximately 18.5 MJ kg1 with increasing
water content. Normally the water content of air-dried wood is between 12
and 20% yielding a heating value of 13 to 16 MJ kg1. Freshly harvested wood
is characterized by a water content of about 50% or more. A low LHV is the
result.
Besides the LHV a lot of additional quality aspects are relevant concern-
ing biomass provision, storage, transportation and efficient conversion pro-
cesses. Density and heat capacity, for example, are important parameters for
unconditioned and for conditioned biomass. Particle density and particle-size
distribution are of importance for chips and pellets, viscosity for liquid
biomass.
For this reason during the last couple of years on a European level such
parameters characterizing solid fuels have been standardized to allow for
growing biomass-based fuel markets. Recently these activities have been also
moved to the international level and an ISO-Standardization Committee has
been founded to develop standards for biomass based fuels.
20
MJ/kg
15
Lower heating value LHV
10
0 20 40 60 80 % 100
Moisture content (wet basis)
Chapter 7
b
Ethanol from sugar beets (additionally biogas substrates (95 PJ a1) would be usable energetically).
c
Vegetable oil respectively FAME from rape seed (additionally straw (125 PJ a1) and whole grain (65 PJ a1) would be useable energetically).
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 95
by-products and waste, whereas a clear increase is expected for energy crops – due
to presumably declining land area requirements for the production of food and
fodder caused by slightly fading population and ongoing yield increases. Thus an
increasing biomass potential – and hence an increasing importance of cultivating
energy crops – is likely in the future. According to forecasts the entire biomass
potential might sum up to approximately 1500 PJ a1 in Germany in the year
2010 and increase to approximately 2000 PJ a1 in the year 2020. Improvements
in the seeds for the energy crops can lead to even higher yields and thus higher
potentials. Improved environmental and nature protection requirements (e.g.
expansion of organic farming) might lead to a decrease of the agricultural area
available and thus downsize possible potential increases. But even then an
increase of the potential is expected. And this situation can be expected in most
European countries.
Heating and drying. Before any chemical reaction of the organic material
can take place, water is evaporated at temperatures up to 200 1C. The
water may leave the area where the chemical reaction takes place with the
flue gas. Alternatively it may be converted to H2. This process requires
energy (i.e. it is endothermic).
Pyrolytic decomposition. Within this step the biomass macromolecules are
decomposed by heat in the absence of oxygen and the volatile compounds
are driven out of the biomass material due to thermal effects. The process
of the pyrolytic decomposition starts at about 200 1C with the decom-
position of hemicellulose, which is a part of solid biomass like wood.
Decomposition of cellulose, which is another component of wood biomass
takes place at temperatures of 300 1C and higher. Lignin is decomposed at
even higher temperatures. During this process the volatile components of
the biofuel are vaporized at temperatures below 600 1C by a set of complex
96 Chapter 7
oxidation (λ > 1)
fully oxidation of the gaseous products produced during pyrolytic and
gasification processes
pyrolytic decomposition (λ = 0)
start of more intensive maximum decomposition is
decomposition; decomposition; rate formation of fading away;
formation of small of decomposition hydrocarbons formation of
amounts of tar, is increasing and due to viscous tar
CO, CO2 and approaches the decomposition
condensables are maximum
produced
hemicellulose
If equation (7.1) occurs in one step, we speak of full oxidation. Under these
conditions the excess air ratio is 1.0 or above (the excess air ratio is defined as
the ratio between the amount of oxidizing agent fed to the conversion process
and the amount of oxidizing agent needed to fully oxidize all reaction products;
per definition the excess ratio is 1.0 if the conversion process is realized exactly
as shown in equation (7.1)).
Oxidation can also be realized in two steps in which the excess air ratio of the
first step is below 1.0. Under these conditions the reaction products can be
further oxidized in a second step releasing the rest of the available energy.
Carbon monoxide and/or hydrocarbons are typically produced at the first step
and transported to another device for full oxidation. Within such processes the
procedure described above is paused; for example after the gasification step
(e.g. within a gasifier) is performed, the oxidizing step is realized at another time
and at another place (e.g. within the engine).
after the pyrolytic decomposition). Under these conditions the excess air
ratio of the pyrolysis process is zero. Solid, liquid and gaseous products are
formed in varying amounts depending on the process conditions (e.g.
temperature, heating rate, pressure, water content).
If a gas is to be produced at the first step, the excess air ratio is between
zero and one (Table 7.3). The gas, which often mainly contains carbon
monoxide, is called producer gas.
flue gas velocities low so that ash particles are not entrained. Table 7.4 gives an
overview of combustion technologies primarily used in industrialized countries.
Based on this a few major systems are discussed in more detail.
Oven for Wood Chips. A throw-charging system is used where wood chips
are transported from fuel storage with a stoker scroll and thrown with the
help of a centrifugal wheel into a combustion chamber equipped with a stiff
grate. Such a fully automatic feeding system allows the smaller fuel particles
to be combusted during the flight to the grate while more coarse fuel particles
are burned on the grate. The system also has the advantage that the fuel is
fed gently on the fire, thus reducing airborne emissions of particulate matter.
The primary air is blown with an automatic ventilator through holes in the
grate into the glowing fire. The secondary air is blown at the top of the burning
fuel. The air feeding system adjusts itself automatically according to informa-
tion from a sensor fixed in the flue gas outlet, minimizing pollutant emissions.
No additional flue gas treatment is needed and ash can be used as a fertilizer or
put on a landfill site.
The heat is extracted from the flue gas via a heat exchanger located on top of
the combustion device. Within the heat exchanger, the flue gas is cooled down
and water is heated up – depending on the heat utilization system – either close
to boiling point (to be used in hot water systems) or to steam for e.g. electricity
generation.
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 101
7.3.1.3 Coalification
In this process, woody biomass is heated up in a nearly oxygen-free environ-
ment. Up to about 200 1C, drying occurs, followed at higher temperatures with
pyrolytic decomposition of the organic compounds. Substantial liquid and
gaseous residues such as tar and carbon monoxide are released in the course of
creating the final product, charcoal.
Such processes can be realized with quite different technologies. In devel-
oping countries, for example, charcoal kilns are usually made from earth or
brick, although simple metal kilns are sometimes found. The efficiency of such
devices is low (less than 25%) and the airborne emissions of volatile organic
compounds are high. Additionally considerable amounts of toxic liquid resi-
dues are produced under certain frame conditions. In industrialized countries,
charcoal is produced in large fully automatic devices. Here a differentiation is
made between retort and flush gas processes. Within the former the charcoal is
produced in a batch mode in a closed container (i.e. retort) where the thermo-
chemical conversion from wood to charcoal takes place. The heat necessary to
allow this process to take place is obtained from the combustion of the gaseous
and liquid by-product. There are also continuous charcoal production systems
where the wood is fed constantly through a reactor. Within such a reactor
different zones with various settings of reaction conditions ensure that the
charcoal is produced during the migration of the material through the reactor.
Also here the gas and liquids produced as by-products are used as a source of
energy to keep the coalification process going.
In general the importance of such processes is relatively low in industrialized
countries because charcoal plays only a minor role within the energy systems of
the countries of the western world. However, charcoal is used to a certain extent
as a raw material (e.g. to produce activated charcoal for filtering) and as fuel for
leisure. In developing countries charcoal is used as a clean fuel for heating and
cooking.
7.3.1.4 Pyrolysis
The pyrolytic decomposing processes realized during pyrolysis are similar to
those during charcoal production, but here the process conditions are set to
ensure that the main product of the thermo-chemical conversion process is
liquid rather than solid. There has been a broad variety of technologies
developed during the last decades attempting to make pyrolysis oil for use in
engines without any additional processing.
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 103
Most promising is flash pyrolysis in which fuel particles are heated very
rapidly (more than 1,000 1C s1) and remain in the hot zone for a very short
time (in general less than 1 s). After this very short time period, the liquid
compounds produced from the solid biomass by decomposing the organic
compounds (i.e. lignin, celluloses) have to be removed and cooled rapidly to
avoid further decomposition into gases. To date, flash pyrolysis reactors have
reached laboratory stage development level and the first pilot plants are
available.
Reactors with ablative impact designs, for example, decompose the biolo-
gical raw material primarily into liquid components on the surface of a hot
rotation wheel (Figure 7.7). On the surface of this wheel the solid biomass is
‘‘melted’’. To avoid further decomposition, the produced components have to
be removed quickly from the hot zone close to the rotating wheel. After that
they are cooled down to produce the desired liquid energy carrier. Necessarily,
gaseous and solid components are also produced, which are used to heat the
wheel.
Pyrolysis oil is a mixture of different hydrocarbons (many of which are partly
oxygenated) along with charcoal, ash and water. The actual composition is
strongly dependent on the pyrolysis process as well as the specific process
conditions and the type of biomass. This is especially true for the average
composition and structure of the hydrocarbons (e.g. chain length, degree of
Wood chips
Filling
Rotating hot disc
Pressure
(ca. 30 bar)
Operation
7.3.1.5 Gasification
Gasification describes the complete conversion of solid biomass at high tem-
peratures to a gaseous fuel by adding a small amount of oxidizing agents to the
gasification process. Unlike coalification and pyrolysis, gasification of biomass
is realized in the presence of a limited amount of oxygen. The main objective of
gasification is to transfer the maximum possible share of the chemical energy
within the feedstock into a gas.
This so-called ‘‘producer gas’’ can be used on the one hand as a fuel for the
provision of heat through direct combustion or used in engines, turbines or
even fuel cells. On the other hand the producer gas can act as a feedstock for the
production of liquid and/or gaseous fuels (like Fischer–Tropsch diesel, bio-
methane, methanol and hydrogen).
Biomass gasification consists of the following, more or less spatially dis-
tributed, steps: heating and drying of the biomass, pyrolytic decomposition of
the biomass (i.e. extracting the volatile components by heating) and gasification
(i.e. partial oxidation of the biomass, partial reduction of the oxidation pro-
ducts [CO2 and H2O to CO and H2] and simultaneous transformation of solid
carbon to CO).
The physical and chemical processes of biomass gasification are carried out
in a variety of different forms of equipment and technical concepts. Each of
them offers certain advantages and disadvantages concerning feedstock possi-
bilities, plant size and gas quality.
The gasification techniques can be distinguished related to different criteria
such as reactor type (fixed bed or fluidized bed), gasifying agent (air, oxygen, or
steam), heat supply into the reactor (directly or indirectly heated) and reactor
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 105
Figure 7.8 Principle of an updraft gasifier (left) and a downdraft gasifier (right).4
Commonly, the goal of gasification is not to provide gaseous fuel itself but to
provide an easy to handle and environmentally sound intermediate energy
carrier with clearly defined characteristics that can be converted easily into
another, more valuable, energy carrier, for example electricity or biomethane as
one possible biofuel. To reach that goal, gas cleaning is usually necessary to
ensure a long lifetime of the downstream conversion device because the gas
produced within the gasifier does not usually match the fuel requirements in
terms of condensable organic compounds and/or particles.
106 Chapter 7
The gas leaving the gasification reactor is often called producer gas. The same
name is also used if this gas is cleaned to match the requirements for com-
bustion within e.g. an engine or a turbine for the provision of electricity (and
heat). If the gas is conditioned to fulfil certain requirements concerning the
composition and it is intended to use this gas for the synthesis of liquid or
gaseous biofuels it is called synthesis gas (or in abbreviated form ‘‘syngas’’).
For the provision of a gas to be used as a fuel for CHP-systems (e.g. engines,
turbines) a raw gas cleaning operation – either low temperature wet gas
cleaning or, alternatively, hot gas cleaning – can be applied. The effectiveness of
wet gas cleaning (e.g. cyclone and filter, scrubbing based on chemical or phy-
sical absorption and ZnO-bed) has been well proven for large-scale coal gasi-
fication systems. On the contrary, not all elements of hot gas cleaning (e.g. tar
cracking, granular beds and filters, physical adsorption or chemical absorption,
ZnO-bed, physical absorption) have reached technical maturity yet. Never-
theless, hot gas cleaning offers benefits for the overall energy balance and with
regard to the avoidance of contaminated waste water.
Additionally the producer gas can be conditioned to fulfil the required gas
characteristics especially for the conversion route to fuels (Figure 7.9). For that
different system components can be applied: hydrocarbons within the product
gas can be converted by means of an additional steam reforming step resulting
in a higher H2/CO ratio.
The cleaned producer gas can be used for the provision of electricity within
already existing gasoline engines or gas turbines. The former is demonstrated
Gasification
Gas cleaning
Gas conditioning
Syngas (m CO + n H2 + o CO2)
Fischer- Dimethyl-
Methanol CO-shift
Tropsch ether Methanation
synthesis conversion
synthesis synthesis
Liquid Gaseous
Figure 7.9 Possible routes to the production of liquid and/or gaseous fuels from
producer gas derived from biomass.
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 107
within the gasification plant in Güssing, Austria, where wood chips are gasified
and the cleaned producer gas is then used within an engine-based CHP-plant
for the simultaneous provision of heat and electricity. Similar systems are in
operation and also under planning in other European countries. The next
development step will be biomass-based integrated gasification combined cycles
(IGCC).9
Alternatively the cleaned and conditioned gas can be used for the provision
of liquid and gaseous fuels. The necessary technology is currently under
development (see Chapter 8).
The final step, i.e. conversion of refined vegetable oil into fatty acid methyl
ester (FAME) is shown in Figure 7.10. According to this exemplarily shown
process the mixture of cleaned vegetable oil together with a catalyst and
methanol is pumped with a low velocity through a vertical pipe. The low
velocity of the liquid ensures that the glycerine produced during the transes-
terification process can settle in the reactor and can be removed for use as a raw
material. After the removal of the remaining methanol, the liquid is cleaned
by a multi-stage washing process. The produced FAME is now ready to be
used as a fuel either within power trains for cars and trucks or in engine-based
CHP-systems.
Pure vegetable oil can be used in some existing engines either for mobile
(e.g. in cars) or stationary application (i.e. in CHP-systems), but in most cases
it lowers engine lifetime and increases maintenance requirements. Therefore
only under very specific frame conditions could the use of crude vegetable oils
be a promising option for the transportation sector or to provide power (or
decentralized electrification and heat, if required) especially in rural areas. This
is true for developing as well as for industrialized countries.
108 Chapter 7
Table 7.5 Selected properties of diesel fuel, FAME and rape oil (various
sources).
Diesel fuel/light
heating oil FAME Rape oil
Composition in %
carbon 52 86
hydrogen 13 14
oxygen 35 0
LHV in MJ kg1 26.8 42.7
in MJ l1 21.3 ca. 32.0
Density (15 1C) in kg l1 0.794 0.72–0.78
Viscosity (20 1C) in mm2 s1 1.5 0.6
Boiling point in 1C 78 25–215
Flame point in 1C 12.8 –42.8
Ignition temperature in 1C 420 ca. 300
Evaporation heat in kJ kg1 904 380–500
Minimum air volume in kg kg1 9 14.8
Octane-value 107 93
Table 7.7 Yield targets of biogas for different substrates (various sources).
Yield of biogas in Yield of biogas in
m3 mto1 organic m3 mto1 organic
Material dry matter Material dry matter
heat power
biogas
heat reservoir
stable
material flow
animal manure
pit for
material gas proof storage for
preparation digested material
Figure 7.12 Biogas plant using animal manure as feedstock and commonly used in
countries like Denmark, Germany and Austria.11
Land area;
Biomass;
(End-)energy sources.
116 Chapter 7
The development in Germany as well as in other European countries
throughout recent years shows that all these possible competitions exist in
reality. Thus competitions so far influence prices on all different levels. While
land and biomass competition rather result in increasing prices due to estab-
lishing of additional demand, price increasing effects might be restrained in the
field of (end-)energy sources with an increasing substitution of fossil fuel energy
at a high energy price level because of reduced price volatility of fossil fuels. The
different levels of competition are analyzed in the following exemplarily for
Germany. But it is expected that the conclusions to be drawn are also true for
most industrialized countries of the western world.
Level ‘‘Biomass’’. The increased biomass use goes along with an additional
demand: in Germany, for example, bioethanol, biodiesel and biogas plants
demand an increasing amount of e.g. cereals and oil seeds from the regional,
national and global agricultural markets, which so far have been used mainly
for food and fodder as well as for chemistry. Additionally there is a demand
from the energy markets for forest and industry (residual) wood to be used
for the provision of solid bioenergy carriers; this stands in competition to the
markets for wood as a raw material to be used e.g. in the pulp and paper
industry as well as for the production of furniture. The results are – and this
appeared in the past on the cereals and oil seed markets as well as on the
wood markets – rising prices. Also, in the field of residues, by-products and
waste, the price structure has partly been changed significantly due to the
emerging new energy markets (i.e. for demolition wood or certain organic
waste fractions, which can be used e.g. in biogas plants). So, for biomass
resources national and even international markets were developed during the
last years, which answer the resource competitions by quantity-price pro-
blems (which means the desired quantities are not available at the intended
price at the market).
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 117
Competitions for the biomass are basically solvable by an expansion of the
production, an import and a substitution with other (non-biogenic) products
(i.e. substitution of woody materials by plastics or stones). However, they differ
according to the organizational extent and the necessary time periods.
120
Development of Security of
Usage path Economy Climate and resources protection Development of technology rural regions supply
Dependency from
oil (calculations,
Specific CO2- orientated at ‘‘oil
Specific actual Marginal costs on Level of fuel uti- equivalent- Specific invest- dependency indi-
costs(hct an oil basisa lization– netb savingsc (g Development ment costs Local processing cator’’ of the
Energy fuel** kWhoutput1)* (US$ barrel1) (%) kWhoutput1)* potentiald (h kWoutput1)* possible World Bank)
(‘‘Pure’’) heat solid biofuels 6–9 45–75 70–85 140–250. Low 300–1500 Energy provision Medium
and use
Power (CHP Biogas 10–25 No direct 40–55 480–550 Medium 2000–4500 Medium
plants solid biofuels 13–25 correlation 25–60 450–600 Medium 2400–7000 Energy provision
included) (combustion)
solid biofuels 12–27 45–55 500–600 High 4000–6000
(gasification)
vegetable oil 15–37 20–60 170–320 Low 950–2350 Energy provision
and use
f e
Fuel vegetable oil 4–6(42–69) 40–75 35–65 170–180(85–95) Low 40–380 High
biodiesel 5–7(52–73)f 55–80 50–60 185–250(95– Low 120–210 Biomass
125)e provision
bioethanol from 8–12(68–104)f 75–120 45–50 40–200(25–123)e Medium 2080–3740
starch (corn)
bioethanol from B12(108) f
B125 B45 210–360(100– High B2400 Very high
lignocelluloses 190)e
(straw)
synthetic biofuels 8–10(86–93)f 95–110 B45 200–205(100– High 1900–2100
(BtL) 150)e
biogenous 10–12(97–113)f 110–125 B55 215–260(100– High 6740–26,700
hydrogen 120)e
f
Natural gas sub- biogas 5–16(59–91) 60–100 45–85 160–245(100– Medium 1470–5160 Energy provision High
stitute (mainly 150)e
fuel) synthetic natural B7.4(74)f B80 B65 160–180(100– High B990
gas Bio-SNG 110)e
*for heat: kWhth respectively kWth (th: thermal); for power: kWhel respectively kWel (el: electrical); for fuels and natural gas substitute: kWhfe respectively kWfe
(fe: fuel equivalent).
**if not indicated differently, the conversion of the fuel is based on combustion technology.
a
for liquid biofuels the costs for the distribution until the filling pump are included, but no profit margins for producers and traders.
b
rate of fuel utilization relating to the biomass (solid biofuel, corn, oil seeds) respectively the biogas potential of wet biomasses (manure, silage).
Chapter 7
c
in relation to the appropriate references (heat: oil or gas burner/power: power mix in D; CHP is incorporated/fuel: petrol or diesel vehicles).
d
concerning an increase of the rate of utilization, CO2 and cost reduction; development potentials for the mitigation of emissions (e.g. particulate matter) are not
incorporated.
e
additional declaration in g km1.
f
additional declaration in hct lfe1.
Biomass-based Green Energy Generation 121
Regarding the political setting of the frame conditions within the (bio-)-
energy system for minimizing unintended competitions the different, partly
conflicting goals of an intensified biomass use for energy have to be evaluated
and assessed in order to derive appropriate priorities.
It is rather unlikely – regarding the high complexity of the goals and inter-
ests – that there is a silver bullet, which can avoid all use competitions on all the
different levels they might occur. This means that for the time being all pro-
mising pathways for the conversion of biomass into useful energy have to be
developed further. Such an approach is also supported by e.g. the following
considerations.
References
1. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, ed., Nature Conservation
and Nuclear Safety, Berlin, 2008, http://www.bmu.de/english/aktuell/
4152.php.
2. Ö. Gustafsson, M. Kruså, Z. Zencak, R. J. Sheesley, L. Granat, E.
Engström, P. S. Praveen, P. S. P. Rao, C. Leck and H. Rodhe, Science, 23
January 2009, 323(5913), 495.
3. M. Kaltschmitt, W. Streicher and A. Wiese, ed., Renewable Energy –
Technology, Economics and Environment, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
2007.
4. M. Kaltschmitt, H. Hartmann and H. Hofbauer, ed., Energie aus Biomasse,
2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.
5. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, ed., Biokraftstoffe, 3. Aufl., Gül-
zow, 2007.
6. D. Thrän, Personal communication, German Biomass Research Centre,
Leipzig, 2008.
7. PYTEC Thermochemische Anlagen, Personal communication, Hamburg,
2008.
8. F. Müller-Langer, Personal communication, German Biomass Research
Centre, Leipzig, 2008.
9. IEA Energy Technology Essentials, Biomass for Power Generation and
CHP, ETE03, http://www.iea.org/Textbase/techno/essentials3.pdf (retrieved
23.01.2009).
10. M. Kaltschmitt, Lessons taught at Hamburg University of Technology,
Winterterm, 2008/09.
124 Chapter 7
11. J. Daniel, Personal communication, German Biomass Research Centre,
Leipzig, 2008.
12. V. Lenz, M. Edel and M. Kaltschmitt, Erneuerbare Energien – Stand 2007
in Deutschland; BWK, 2008, 60(4), 106–117.
13. A. Vogel, F. Müller-Langer and M. Kaltschmitt, Chem. Eng. Technol.,
2008, 31(5), 755–764.
14. D. Thrän and M. Kaltschmitt, Biotechnol. J., 2007, 2, 1514–1524.
15. M. Thrän, M. Kaltschmitt, A. Kircherer and M. Piepenbrink, Kriter-
ienmatrix zur stofflichen und energetischen Nutzung nachwachsender Roh-
stoffe, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
16. M. Kaltschmitt and M. Weber, Biomass & Bioenergy, 2006, 30, 897–907.
17. M. Kaltschmitt and D. Thrän, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 2008,
58(7), 8–13.
18. M. Kaltschmitt and D. Thrän, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 2008,
32(2), 127–138.
CHAPTER 8
8.1 Introduction
The importance of biofuels is growing rapidly and this is reflected in steadily
increasing research activities in both academia and industry as well as an
increasing number of joint ventures comprising several institutions. Thus, not
only is the extent of publications on this highly dynamic topic strongly
increasing but so too, due to its obvious socioeconomic relevance, is public
interest.
In the European Union (EU) the strategy with respect to the implementation
of biofuels is outlined for the member states in several directives and com-
munications such as the Renewable Energy Directive of the European Com-
mission from 2003 (2003/30/EC), the Communications from the Commission
Biomass Action Plan (COM(2005) 628 final), An EU Strategy for Biofuels
(COM(2006) 34 final), Towards a European Strategic Energy Technology Plan
(COM(2006) 847 final) and An Energy Policy for Europe (COM(2007) 1 final).
Most recently, the European Commission has enacted a Renewable Energy
125
126 Chapter 8
Directive due to boost EU renewable energy use to 20% by 2020. The latter
also aims for a substitution of 10% of transport fuels by biofuels in 2020 as a
mandatory target for the Member States. Furthermore, this directive also
defines minimum sustainability standards, e.g. a 35% reduction of greenhouse
gas emission and a focus on the type of land used for biomass cultivation.
A wide variety of biomass types based on vegetable organic materials can be
used for the generation of biofuels. Food and feed crops, e.g. wheat, other
cereals, rapeseed, sugar cane or sugar beet, and ‘‘energy crops’’ designed for
non-nutritional consumption, e.g. willow, short rotation trees or grasses, can be
used. To minimize competition with traditional applications, low-value mate-
rials such as agricultural residues and wastes, e.g. straw, bark, reclaimed wood,
bagasse or waste paper, are largely regarded as the preferable resource. Value
chain considerations, however, additionally credit value-added by-products
like energy-rich proteins in the case of certain food and feed crops.
The biomass volume available for biofuel production in Europe was reported
to be 95 Mio mto oil equivalent (MtOE) per year in 2005 with an estimated
increase to a value between 112 and 172 MtOE in 20201 and 243 to 316 MtOE in
2030.2 For comparison, predicted energy demands for the transport sector are
416.3 MtOE in 2020 and 437.2 MtOE in 2030.2 Biomass yields under average
conditions are assumed to be approximately 10 mto of dry biomass per hectare
and year in the case of willow.
The term biofuels is used for all types of biomass-derived fuels employed in
the transportation sector. Most biofuels can be applied either as a substitute for
common fossil fuels such as gasoline and diesel or in blends with these fuels.
Engines can need some modification as, for instance, in Flexible Fuel Vehicles
(FFVs). Other biofuels, e.g. biomass-based natural gas, require major changes
in both vehicle construction and fuel distribution infrastructure. Biofuels,
mainly for historical reasons, are assigned to three main categories, the so-
called first- and second-generation biofuels and the recently emerging third-
generation biofuels.3,4
Figure 8.1 Bioethanol production processes (reproduced from J. Bigorra and R. Höfer, Comunicaciones, 38 Jornadas CED, Barcelona, 2008,
pp. 179–200).
129
130 Chapter 8
kernels, the endosperm containing starch granules, are separated from
the bran and the germ by dry- or wet-milling (see Section 9.1.4.2.10). Wet-
milling facilities are more flexible and have the ability to switch between the
production of ethanol and the production of syrup and/or fructose. How-
ever, virtually all of the new starch bio-ethanol facilities being built are less
costly dry-milling operations simply grinding the unprocessed heterogeneous
seed into granules preferably using hammer mills.15 Producing ethanol from
starch-containing biomass instead of sugar adds an extra step to the process.
This stage, called saccharification, consists in depolymerizing the amylose
and amylopectin structures, which compose starch by enzymatic reactions
into a glucose syrup or hydrolysate (see Chapter 9.2). In some concepts the
saccharification and the fermentation take place simultaneously.16,17
Figure 8.2 Cellulose structure and hydrolysis challenges (Genomics: GTL Roadmap,
US Department of Energy Office of Science, August 2005, http://
genomicsgtl.energy.gov/roadmap).
Fructose/Glucose Ethanol
8.2.1.2.5 Ethanol Fermentation with Bacteria. In the 1980s the use of ther-
mophilic bacteria for the production of ethanol was the focus of study for a
number of research groups. The idea behind it was the facilitated recovery of
ethanol at elevated temperature, the lower costs for heating a thermophilic
fermentation rather than cooling a mesophilic one, increased process stabi-
lity, lower contamination risk and the higher substrate versatility of thermo-
philic bacteria compared to that of the mesophilic ones.36 Thermophilic
clostridia such as C. thermocellum, C. thermohydrosulfuricum and C. thermo-
saccharolyticum are able to use a wide range of substrate, from polymeric
carbohydrates such as cellulose, pectin, xylan and starch to mono- and dis-
accharides such as glucose, cellobiose, xylose and xylobiose. A disadvantage
of these micro-organisms is the product pattern. Besides ethanol the side
products acetate, lactate, carbon dioxide and hydrogen are also formed in
various amounts.
Another promising micro-organism for the production of fuel ethanol is
Zymomonas mobilis.37 This facultative anaerobic, Gram-negative bacterium
degrades glucose by the so-called Entner-Doudoroff-pathway with the
consequence that only 1 mol of ATP is produced during the breakdown of
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 135
1 mol glucose. This means that less biomass than by S. cerevisiae is generated
and more carbon is converted to ethanol fermentation.38 It was reported
that the ethanol yield of Z. mobilis could be as high as 97% of the theoretical
yield of ethanol to glucose.39 However, despite these advantages Zymomonas
mobilis is not applicable for the ethanol industry. First of all the species
has a very specific substrate spectrum including just the three sugars glucose,
fructose and sucrose. Maltose or maltotriose – generated by the liquefaction
of starch by a-amylases – can not be converted by this bacterium. Another
disadvantage is that its growth on sucrose is accompanied by the formation
of extracellular fructooligosaccharides (levan) and sorbitol.21 Finally, the
use of Zymomonas mobilis is not commonly accepted as animal feed and this
generates problems for its biomass disposal if being replaced by Sacchar-
omyces cerevisiae in the industrial ethanol production. Therefore Sacchar-
omyces cerevisiae is still the workhorse for the industrial synthesis of fuel
ethanol.
KOH Methanol
crude
refining Glycerine
Glycerine
crude
refining Biodiesel
Biodiesel
recycled greases
esterification
soapstock
diluted Methanol or
H2SO4 Glycerine
Figure 8.5 Production of biodiesel (reproduced from R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green
Chem. Lett. Rev., June 2008, 1(2), 79–97).
such as sodium or potassium hydroxide. Once the ester chains are broken off,
the leftover glycerine molecule is a valuable by-product of the reaction.56
Different feedstock can be used, such as more or less any vegetable oil,
including recycled oils and soapstock.57 Process improvements such as higher
reactivity, more complete conversion, less use of base initiator and faster
separation time to increase throughput are claimed when performing the
transesterification in the presence of a phase-transfer catalyst58 or when using a
stable ionic liquid as both solvent and catalyst.59 Technical feasibility of bio-
diesel synthesis by alcoholysis of vegetable oils catalyzed by commercial lipases
has also been described.60 Finally, a dramatic improvement in the rate of the
transesterification reaction has been demonstrated in selected micro-reactor
systems.61
Pure plant oils (PPO) can be used directly as a starting material for biodiesel
synthesis via transesterification. To reduce free fatty acids, raw materials con-
taining such are submitted to an esterification step prior to transesterification.
Composition of the oil feedstock, more particularly the fraction of saturated
fatty acids, has a decisive influence on biodiesel specifications and properties;
more particularly on viscosity, consistency and wax crystal settling, i.e. plug-
ging at low temperature. Fuel properties (Table 8.1) and performance as engine
fuel in comparison to petroleum diesel (PD) have continuously been studied
following the development of new motor generations and machine applications
including exhaust emissions and mutagenic potential of particulate matter as
well as exhaust-gas limit value requiremens.62 Compared with PD European
biodiesel based on rapeseed methyl ester (RME) has similar viscosities and
a remarkably higher cetane number. The caloric value of RME relative to the
140 Chapter 8
Table 8.1 Influence of saturated fatty acids fraction on specifications of
biodiesel.
Oil and ester characteristics
Saturated
Melting range (1C) Iodine Cetane CFPP fatty acids
Type of oil Oil/fat FAME value number (FAME) (%)
mass is 13.4% below that of PD, relating to the volume 7.9%. As RME con-
tains oxygen the minimal air consumption decreases by 13% regarding the
mass, and by 7% regarding the volume. The caloric value of the air-fuel mix-
ture, however, is almost identical in both cases.
RME is biodegradable and non-toxic. The flash point of 130 1C (compared
to Z 55 1C for PD) ensures a safe storage. Compared to petroleum fuels RME
has a more favourable combustion emission profile such as low emissions of
carbon monoxide, sulphur and particulate matter. As a consequence of the
so-called NOx-particle trade-off phenomenon, emissions of NOx are increased.
Mutagenicity of RME emissions, however, is much lower compared to PD
indicating a reduced health risk from cancer.63
Exploration
Energy crop
Crude oil Energy crop
farming
extraction farming
143
Figure 8.6 Flow diagram of lipid-based fuels compared to petroleum diesel.
144 Chapter 8
plants from short rotation forestry. Compared to first-generation biofuels,
extended raw material options offer a significantly improved production
capacity and CO2 reduction potential. Furthermore, such feedstock may be
considered more sustainable and does not compete directly with food.
Advanced production technologies are employed which have become available
now, even on a commercial scale. The most important second-generation
biofuels are hydrogen, synthetic natural gas (SNG), bioethanol from lig-
nocellulosic raw materials (Section 8.2.1.2.3), butanol and HTU diesel as well
as the extensive class of Biomass to Liquid (BtL) fuels based on synthesis gas
(syngas). The latter fuel type comprises methanol, ethanol, dimethylether, BtL
gasoline and BtL diesel.
8.5.3 Biobutanol
Acetone, butanol and ethanol can be produced in a ratio of approximately 3 : 6
: 1 from sugars derived from food crops or sugars obtained from the degra-
dation of cellulose using Clostridium bacteria (ABE fermentation). Butanol/
diesel and also butanol/gasoline blends can be used in unmodified or slightly
modified engines and represent another attractive option. However, as in the
case of ethanol, cellulose conversion to fermentable sugars and the following
fermentation have to be optimized.80
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 145
8.5.4 HTU Diesel
Conversion of biomass at a temperature of 300–350 1C and a pressure of 120–
180 bar within the so-called HydroThermal Upgrading (HTU) process yields a
mixture of hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, water and dissolved organics, which
can be further processed in a catalytic HydroDeOxygenation (HDO) step to
yield diesel with characteristics similar to fossil diesel.81 A major advantage
is that wet biomass feedstocks can be employed without drying; in contrast,
water at hydrothermal conditions acts as a solvent and reactant at the same
time, leading to a product with less oxygen compared to biocrude prepared by
pyrolysis.
(TOTAL) Oligomerization
Syngas MeOH DME Olefins Synfuel
MTO (UOP)
MTS (Lurgi, Südchemie)
Sasol
Shell
BASF
Fischer-Tropsch
Figure 8.7 Production of biosynfuels from syngas: catalytic processes and some
selected suppliers.
As outlined above, biomass feedstock can also be employed for the pro-
duction of syngas and, thus, methanol produced from biomass-derived syngas
and fuels obtained through processing of biomass-based methanol can be
considered as typical biofuels. Blends with petrol containing up to 20% of
methanol can be used in combustion engines without elaborate modifications.
However, the comparatively low energy density and safety concerns have
limited so far broad applications of methanol as fuel. Another option is the use
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 147
88–90
of methanol in fuel cells, either directly in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells
(DMFCs) or indirectly as hydrogen source.
Ethanol and Higher Alcohols from Syngas. Direct synthesis of ethanol from
syngas is intensely investigated especially in North America.91,92 Another
approach in this context is the homologization of methanol, i.e. the reaction
of methanol with syngas to yield ethanol. Higher alcohols can also be
formed. The reactions are summarized in equations (8.3) and (8.4).
Methane 5 8
Ethylene 0 4
Ethane 1 3
Propylene 2 11
Propane 1 2
Butylenes 2 9
Butane 1 1
C51 Gasoline 19 36
Gasoil/Distillate 22 16
Heavy Oil/Wax 46 5
Oxygenates 1 5
150 Chapter 8
2 : 1 and feature longer lifetimes as well as higher selectivities than iron
catalysts.
nCO þ ð2n þ 1ÞH2 ! Cn H2nþ2 þ nH2 O ð8:9Þ
CO þ H2 O ! H2 þ CO2 ð8:10Þ
as a separate process step the ratio has to be adjusted to the requirements of the
synthesis applied.
However, the gas produced by gasification contains impurities, depending
on the type of feedstock and conversion technology applied. Typical are the
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 151
Table 8.5 Main chemical equilibrium reactions for gasification.
Heterogeneous key reactions for complete gasification including C, CO,
CO2, H2, O2, H2O, CH4 at T 4 1200 1C DrH kJ mol1
organic impurities like tar and BTX (benzene, toluene and xylenes), the inor-
ganic nitrogen-, sulphur- and chlorine-containing impurities NH3, HCN, H2S,
COS and HCl, as well as volatile metals (regarding biomass in particular Na
and K), dust and char or soot. Larger hydrocarbons, summarized as tars being
produced at low temperature gasification processes, may cause fouling of
downstream equipment, coat surfaces and plug pores in filters and sorbents.
Other impurities are corrosive or act as catalyst poisons in the subsequent
synthesis stages. Therefore, crucial toleration levels are set for contaminants;
Table 8.6 shows e.g. those for methanol synthesis.105
For gas cleaning, conventional technology is available. Tars and BTX may
be removed by either thermal or catalytic cracking, or by scrubbing with an oil-
based medium. The other above-mentioned impurities are removed by stan-
dard wet gas cleaning technologies, e.g. the well-established Rectisol process. In
that process, CO2 and sulphur compounds are removed in separate fractions,
resulting in a pure CO2 product (e.g. for urea production) and an H2S/COS
enriched Claus gas fraction suitable for sulphur production. In a multi-stage
process, the impurities are absorbed by cold methanol under elevated pressures
between 30 and 60 bar. The contaminants are then separated or even fractioned
by pressure release and temperature increase during solvent regeneration. In
advanced dry, hot gas cleaning, the residual contaminants are removed by
chemical adsorbents at elevated temperatures. However, for syntheses operated
between 200 and 300 1C there is only little energy advantage, if syngas
152 Chapter 8
compression is required prior to synthesis (compression require cold inlet gas).
In the case that gasification occurs already at pressures slightly above that of
the subsequently following synthesis, dry pressurized gas cleaning predicts
significant energetic benefits.
For biomass gasification, a variety of technologies exist.106 In view of large
scale production of high-quality synthesis gas as required for synfuel produc-
tion mainly two types of gasifiers have to be considered here. Direct or indirect
gasification using fluidized bed and entrained flow gasifiers is possible with
potential plant capacities of up to several hundred MW fuel input capacity.
Here, experience from commercially operated plants with coal and lignite as
fuels is available and has already been transferred to the use of biomass as a
feedstock for heat and electricity production via gasification.
For reasons of economy of scale, syngas production and further processing
demand large-scale facilities; for comparison, a crude oil refinery has an input
capacity in the order of 10 Mio mto a1. On the other hand, biomass usually
exhibits low volumetric energy densities, has to be harvested and collected from
wide areas of agriculture or forestry and does not constitute a uniform feed-
stock. Chemical composition and the content of minerals and other inorganic
material, usually denoted as the ash content, may vary significantly. There are
four major sources of biomass: agricultural and forestry residues, municipal
solid waste, industrial waste and purpose-grown bioenergy crops. The
technologies applied should be able to be fed by different kinds of biomass
(multi-feed) to achieve high throughput capacities improving economic viabi-
lity of the plants.
In fixed bed reactors, the feedstock is exposed to the gasifying agent in a
packed bed that slowly moves from the top of the gasifier to the bottom, where
the ash is discharged. By moving through the reactor, the biomass passes dis-
tinct zones of drying, pyrolysis, oxidation and reduction. Usually the different
types of fixed-bed reactors are characterized by the direction of the gas flow
through the reactor and consequently are denoted as updraft, downdraft and
horizontal (crossdraft) gasifiers. Depending on fuel and product gas applica-
tion, a multitude of fixed bed gasifier designs exist. In general biomass fuelled
fixed bed reactors are suited for district heat and power production up to fuel
input capacities of 20 MW. For syngas production, substantial gas cleaning
would be required, due to the relatively high amounts of tar, residual pyrolysis
products, ash and dust particles, depending on the type of reactor applied
(Figure 8.8).
In fluidized-bed gasifiers, biomass particles are rapidly mixed and heated by
hot fluidized sand. Air, oxygen or steam is used as fluidization and gasification
agent. The biomass is quickly decomposed into a combustible gas. In an
autothermal process, a part of the incoming biomass is burned in the bed to
maintain the reaction temperature at the desired value of typically 700–900 1C.
Due to the intense mixing, the gasification reactions cannot be distinguished in
local zones as in fixed-bed reactors, but occur throughout the whole bed leading
to a uniform temperature distribution. The degree of fluidization can be small
(bubbling fluidized bed, BFB) or high (circulating fluidized bed, CFB). BFB
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 153
Fixed bed Fluidized bed Entrained flow
Ash (slag) Air (O2), Steam Ash Fluidization gas Molten slag Raw syngas
gasifiers, having a well-defined interface between the reaction zone of the flui-
dized bed and the freeboard above the bed surface, are well known and com-
monly used because of their robust properties but show higher tar formation of
the order of 1–2 wt.%. In a CFB gasifier, there is no distinct interface between
the fluidized sand bed and the freeboard; the entrained media and char are
recycled back to the gasifier via a cyclone. The carbon conversion is con-
siderably better than in BFB gasifiers. In addition, a CFB gasifier can be
operated at high pressures, which is advantageous and more economic in
regard to hydrogen, liquid fuels and chemicals production.
In order not to poison the sensitive synthesis catalysts, synthesis gas must be
of high purity and free from dust and tar. Unlike most fixed-bed and fluidized-
bed gasifiers, entrained-flow gasifiers are able to generate a gas practically free
from tar with only little methane at the high gasification temperatures above
1000 1C. When the operating pressure in the gasifier is above the synthesis
pressure, there is no need for the technically expensive step of recompression of
the synthesis gas, and gas purification is facilitated. An entrained flow gasifier
can be slurry or particle fed using air, oxygen or steam as the gasification agent.
Any feed material which can be pumped and sprayed pneumatically, and which
has a heating value in excess of 10 MJ kg1 is suitable in principle for entrained
flow gasification. Also biomass powders can be transferred out of a pressurized
entrained flow into the gasifier by a so-called high-density flow feed system.
However, this requires periodic operation of a sophisticated system of locks,
which becomes more complicated as the pressure rises. By virtue of the short
residence time (about 1 s), high temperature (1200–1600 1C), high pressure
(20–40 bar) and high capacity (4100 MW), a tar-free synthesis gas with low
methane content is produced.
To use also biomass and biogenic waste with higher ash and alkali contents,
the gasifier type used may be operated at slagging conditions: depending on the
alkali content ash softening or melting already occuring below 1000 1C. The
154 Chapter 8
liquid slag can be handled e.g. by a reactor equipped with a cooling screen,
which originally had been developed for salt-bearing lignite at the DBI
(Deutsches Brennstoff Institut, German Fuel Institute) of Freiberg, Saxony
after 1976. This so-called GSP gasifier can tolerate high alkali chloride and ash
contents and rapid fluctuations of quantities and softening points typical of
straw and similar residues.
SVZ fixed-bed gasifier for municipal solid waste and refuse derived fuels
(RDF) in mixtures with coal (24 bar operation pressure);
BGL fixed-bed gasifier for solid waste/coal mixtures;
Entrained flow gasifier (GSP-type) for oil slurries, pastes, fuel mixtures
from tar and sewage sludge etc. (25 bar operation pressure).
Coal was added to the secondary fuels to balance out the significant fluc-
tuations in fuel properties, e.g. heating value, and to provide residual char as
energy source for the endothermic gasification process (autothermal opera-
tion). In 2007 the Swiss Sustec Industries AG, then owner of SVZ, put the
gasification plant out of service and discontinued the waste conversion
operation because of insufficient profitability.
References
1. F. Seyfried and K. Lenz, Renewable fuels for advanced power train, Final
Report, European Commission 6th Framework Programme, SYNCOM,
Ganderkesee, 2008, https://www.renew-fuel.com.
2. Biofuels in the European Union – A vision for 2030 and beyond, Final draft
report of the Biofuels Research Advisory Council, 2006.
3. www.biofuelstp.eu.
4. www.refuel.eu/biofuels.
5. M. Roehr, ed., The Biotechnology of Ethanol, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2001; J. Goettemoeller and A. Goettemoeller, Sustainable Ethanol: Bio-
fuels, Biorefineries, Cellulosic Biomass, Flex-fuel Vehicles, and Sustainable
Farming for Energy Independence, Prairie Oak Pub., Maryville, 2007; L.
Olsson, Biofuels, Springer, Berlin, 2007; W. Soetaert, E.J. Vandamme, ed.,
Biofuels, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2009.
6. D. Antoni, V. V. Zverlov and W. H. Schwarz, Appl. Microbiol. Bio-
technol., Nov. 2007, 77, 23–25.
7. G. Felletschin, J. Knaut and M. Schöne, Deutsche Hydrierwerke
(DEHYDAG), Schriften des Werksarchivs, Bd. 12, Henkel KGaA,
Düsseldorf, 1981.
8. Wa. Ostwald, Zeitschr. für angew. Chemie, 1922, 35(46), 278–280.
9. World Watch Institute, Biofuels for Transport. Global Potential for Sus-
tainable Energy and Transport, Earthscan, London, Sterling, 2007.
10. M. G. S. Andrietta, S. R. Andrietta, C. Steckelberg and E. N. A. Stu-
piello, Int. Sugar J., 2007, 109(1299), 195–200.
11. H. Honkanen, P. Uotila, M. Koskinen and M. Sourander, Biofuels
Technology, 2008, Q4, 19–23.
12. I. Klenk and M. Kunz, Sugar Industry, 2008, 133, 625–635.
13. I. Klenk and M. Kunz, Sugar Industry, 2008, 133, 710–718.
14. International Energy Agency, Biofuels for Transport – An International
Perspective, Paris, 2004.
15. D. R. Kelsall and T. P. Lyons, in The Alcohol Textbook, ed. K. A. Jac-
ques, T. P. Lyons and D. R. Kelsall, Nottingham University Press,
Nottingham, 4th edn, 2003, 9–21.
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 159
16. R. F. Power, in The Alcohol Textbook, ed. K. A. Jacques, T. P. Lyons and
D. R. Kelsall, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 2003, 23–32.
17. V. Sharma, K. D. Rausch, M. E. Tumbleson and V. Singh, Starch/Stärke,
2007, 59, 549–556.
18. M. J. Taherzadeh and K. Karimi, BioResources, 2007, 2, 472–499.
19. B. D. Solomon, J. R. Barnes and K. E. Halvorsen, Biomass and Bioenergy,
2007, 31, 416–425.
20. R. Katzen and D. J. Schell, in Biorefineries – Industrial Processes and
Products, ed. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 129–138.
21. European Biofuels Technology Platform: Strategic Research Agenda &
Strategy Deployment Document, CPL Press, Newbury, 2008.
22. B. Kamm, M. Kamm, M. Schmidt, T. Hirth and M. Schulze, in Bior-
efineries – Industrial Processes and Products, ed. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber
and M. Kamm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 97–149.
23. M. Galbe, P. Sassner, A. Wingreen and G. Zacchi, Adv. Biochem. Engin./
Biotechnol, 2007, 108, 303–327; C. N. Hamelinck, G. van Hooijdonk and
A. P. C. Faaij, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28, 384–410.
24. J. Larsen, M. O. Petersen, L. Thirup, H. W. Li and F. K. Iversen, Chem.
Eng. Technol., 2008, 31, 765–772.
25. M. P. Tucker, K. H. Kim, M. M. Newman and Q. A. Nguyen, Appl.
Biochem. Biotechn., 2003, 105–108, 165–177.
26. G. M. Walker, Yeast Physiology and Biotechnology, Wiley & Sons, Chi-
chester, 1998.
27. C. A. Abbas, in The Alcohol Textbook, ed. K. A. Jacques, T. P. Lyons and
D. R. Kelsall, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 4th edn, 2003,
pp. 41–57.
28. I. Russell, in The Alcohol Textbook, ed. K. A. Jacques, T. P. Lyons
and D. R. Kelsall, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 2003,
pp. 85–120.
29. Z. Ciesarova, et al., Folia Microbiol, 1996, 41, 485–488.
30. S. C. Sharma, D. Raj, M. Forouzandeh and M. P. Bansal, Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol., 1996, 56, 189–195.
31. T. D’Amore, C. J. Panchal, I. Russell and G. G. Stewart, Crit. Rev.
Biotechnol., 1990, 9, 287–304.
32. M. Knauf and K. Kraus, Sugar Industry/Zuckerindustrie, 2006, 131,
753–758.
33. H. Alexandre, I. Rousseaux and C. Charpentier, FEMS Microbiol. Lett.,
1994, 124, 17–22.
34. N. Kosaric and F. S. Vardar, in The Biotechnology of Ethanol, ed.
M. Roehr, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, pp. 90–98.
35. S. Alfenore, C. Molina-Jouve, S. E. Guillouet, J. L. Uribelarrea, G. Goma
and L. Benbadis, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2002, 60, 67–72.
36. S. E. Lowe, M. K. Jain and J. G. Zeikus, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 1993,
57, 451–509.
160 Chapter 8
37. P. S. Panesar, S. S. Marwaha and J. F. Kennedy, J. Chem. Technol.
Biotechnol., 2006, 81, 623–635.
38. F. W. Bai, W. A. Anderson and M. Moo-Young, Biotechnol. Advances,
2008, 26, 89–105.
39. G. A. Sprenger, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1996, 145, 301–307.
40. J. Becker and E. Boles, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2003, 69, 4144–4150.
41. K. Otterstedt, C. Larsson, R. M. Bill, A. Ståhlberg, E. Boles, S. Hohmann
and L. Gustafsson, EMBO Rep., 2004, 5, 532–537.
42. M. Sonderegger, M. Jeppsson, C. Larsson, M. -F. Gorwa-Grauslund,
E. Boles, L. Olsson, I. Spencer-Martins, B. Hahn-Hägerdal and U. Sauer,
Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2004, 87, 90–98.
43. K. Karhumaa, B. Wiedemann, B. Hahn-Hägerdal, E. Boles and M.-F.
Gorwa-Grauslund, Microbial Cell Factories, 2006, 5, 18.
44. B. Hahn-Hägerdal, K. Karhumaa, M. Jeppson and M. -F. Gorwa-
Grauslund, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 2007, 108, 147–177.
45. www.ethanol-gec.org.
46. T. Scheers, R. Philippaerts, L. Van Langendonck, W. Duquet, N.
Duvigneaud, L. Matton, M. Thomis, K. Wijndaele and J. Lefevre, Publ.
Health Nutr., 2008, 11, 1098–1106; J. A. Hawley, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.,
2002, 34(9),1475–1476; J. A. Hawley, The Physician and Sports Medicine,
1998, 9, 26.
47. J. Van Gerpen, B. Shanks, R. Pruszko, D. Clements and G. Knothe,
Biodiesel Production Technology, Subcontractor Report NREL/SR-510-
36244, Golden, 2004.
48. Exposition universelle internationale de 1900 à Paris, Rapports du jury
international, Groupe IV – Mate´riel et proce´de´s ge´ne´raux de la me´canique.
Deuxième partie, Classe 20, Imprimerie nationale, Paris, 1904, http://
cnum.cnam.fr/PDF/cnum_8XAE568.2.pdf.
49. R. Diesel, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 1912, pp. 179–280; R. Diesel, Die
Entstehung des Dieselmotors, Springer, Berlin, 1913. Faksimile mit einer
technikhistor. Einführung und einem Lebensbild von Rudolf Diesel von
H.-J. Braun, Steiger, Moers, 1984; W. R. Nitske and C. M. Wilson, Rudolf
Diesel, Pioneer of the Age of Power, University of Oklahoma Press,
Norman, 1965; G. Knothe, Inform, 2001, 12(11), 1103–1107; G. Knothe,
J. Van Gerpen, J. Krahl, ed., The Biodiesel Handbook, AOCS, Cham-
paign, 2005; Stadt Augsburg, Hrsg., Augsburg feiert 150 Jahre Rudolf
Diesel, Jubiläumsschrift, WEKA info Verl., Mering, 2008.
50. J. Walton, Gas Oil Power, 1938, 33, 167–168; I. Mormino, Vegetable oils
and fats for use in compression ignition engines: chemical and physical
properties, engine performance and emissions, Thesis presentation, Flo-
HeaCom, Universiteit Gent, 2008.
51. T. Breuer and A. Becker, Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 2008, 86, 226–241.
52. A. Demirbas, Fuel, 2008, 87, 1743–1748.
53. A. W. Schwab, M. O. Bagby and B. Freedman, Fuel, 1987, 66, 1372–1378.
54. R. Olbert, Kultur und Technik, 1990, 2, 62–71.
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 161
55. B. Gutsche, Fett/Lipid, 1997, 99(12), 418; Ch. Breucker, V. Jordan, M.
Nitsche and B. Gutsche, Chem.-Ing.-Techn., 1995, 67, 430; A. Zellner,
Katalytische Herstellung von Rapsölmethylester, Dissertation Uni GH
Duisburg, 1989.
56. M. Pagliaro and M. Rossi, The Future of Glycerol: New Usages for a
Versatile Raw Material, RSC Publ., Cambridge, 2008.
57. S. Sato, W. Bueno de Almeida and A. Shigueu Araújo, WO 2006/050589,
2006 (Cognis).
58. H. Hüsken, B. Gutsche and J. Richter, EP 1 870 446, 2006 (Cognis); M.
Halpern, WO/2007/111604, 2007 (PTC Organics).
59. J. M. Earle, K. R. Seddon and N. V. Plechkova, WO/2006/095134, 2006
(The Queen’s University of Belfast).
60. M. Nielsen, J. Brask and L. Fjerbaek, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech., 2008,
110(8), 692–700; R. Rodrigues, G. Volpato, K. Wada and M. Ayub,
JAOCS, 12/2008, 925–930.
61. G. N. Jovanovic, B. K. Paul, J. Parker, A. Al-Dubabian, WO/2007/
142983, 2007 (State of Oregon); S. R. Buddoo, N. Siyakatshana and
B. Pongoma, CSIR Biosciences, Modderfontein, http://researchspace.
csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/2680/1/Buddoo_P_2008.pdf (retrieved
11.01.2009).
62. G. Vellguth, Grundl. Landtechnik, 1982, 32, 17–186; M. Mittelbach, M.
Wörgetter, J. Pernkopf and H. Junek, Energ. Agr., 1983, 2, 369–384; M.
Wörgetter und Mitarbeiter, Pilotprojekt Biodiesel, LT 2/87, Teil 1+2,
Bundesanstalt Landtechnik, BM Land Forst Wasser, Heft Nr. 25+26,
Wieselburg, Dezember 1991; A. Munack and J. Krahl, ed., Beiträge
Fachtagung Biodiesel – Potenziale, Umweltwirkungen, Praxiserfahrungen,
Braunschweig, 2002, Sonderheft 239, Landbauforschung Falkenrode,
http://literatur.fal.de/fallitdok_extern/zi027595.pdf; A. S. Ramadhas,
S. Jayaraj and C. Muraleedharan, Renew. Energ., 2004, 29, 727–742;
J. Krahl, A. Munack, Y. Ruschel, O. Schröder and J. Bünger, SAE
Transactions, 2008, 116, 931–937.
63. J. Krahl, A. Munack, O. Schröder, H. Stein, M. Dutz and J. Bünger, in
Fuels 2003: 4th International Colloquium TAE, ed. W. J. Bartz, Ostfildern,
2003, pp. 115–123, http://www.ufop.de/downloads/Biodiesel_comparison.
pdf; Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Jahresbericht 2003,
Braunschweig, 2004, http://www.fal.de/nn_789864/SharedDocs/07__TB/
DE/Downloads/tb__e3__jb03__de,templateId¼raw, property¼ publication
File.pdf/tb_e3_jb03_de.pdf.
64. B. Smith, H. C. Greenwell and A. Whiting, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009,
published on the web 25th November 2008, DOI: 10.1039/b814123a; S.
Lestari, I. Simakova, A. Tokarev, P. Mäki-Arvela, K. Eränen and D. Y.
Murzin, Catal. Lett., 2008, 122, 247–251; M. (R. W.) Snåre, Development
of Next Generation Biodiesel Technology, Faculty of Technology –
Department of Chemical Engineering, Åbo/Turku, 2006; J. Myllyoja, P.
Aalto and E. Harlin, WO 2007003708, 2006 (Neste); D. Y. Murzin, I.
Kubickova, M. Snåre, P. Mäki-Arvela and J. Myllyoja, WO 2006075057,
162 Chapter 8
2006 (Neste); A. Kocal, New Mexico Biodiesel Policy Summit,
‘Albuquerque, 2008, http://www.biodieselnewmexico.com/pdfs/UOP_
NMSummit2008.pdf.
65. J. St. John, http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/biofuel-powers-air-
new-zealand-test-flight-5436.html (retrieved 13.01.2009).
66. E. Parente, Lipofuels: Biodiesel & Biokerosene, www.nist.gov/oiaa/
TECHBIO1.pdf (retrieved 13.01.2009).
67. D. L. Daggett, R. C. Hendricks, R. Walther and E. Corporan, Alternative
Fuels for Use in Commercial Aircraft, The Boeing Company, 2007, http://
www.boeing.com/commercial/environment/pdf/alt_fuels.pdf (retrieved
13.01.2009).
68. www.biogas.org.
69. D. Deublein and A. Steinhauser, Biogas from Waste and Renewable
Resources, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008.
70. www.hfpeurope.org.
71. A. Kruse, Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref., 2008, 2, 415–437.
72. Y. -C. Lo, S. -D. Chen, C. -Y. Chen, T. -I. Huang, C. -Y. Lin and J. -S.
Chang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, 5224–5233.
73. H. Argun, F. Kargi, I. K. Kapdan and R. Oztekin, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy, 2008, 33, 1813–1819.
74. J. K. Kim, L. Nhat, Y. N. Chun and S. W. Kim, Biotechnol. Bioprocess
Eng., 2008, 13, 499–504.
75. M. Krupp, Biohydrogen production from organic waste and wastewater by
dark fermentation – a promising module for renewable energy production,
Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2007.
76. K. Nath and D. Das, Industrial Biotechnology, 2006, 2, 44–47.
77. D. Das and T. N. Veziroğlu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26, 13–28.
78. J. Yanik, S. Ebale, A. Kruse, M. Saglam and M. Yüksel, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy, 2008, 33, 4520–4526.
79. J. Yanik, A. Ebale, A. Kruse, M. Saglam and M. Yüksel, Fuel, 2007, 86,
2410–2415.
80. T. C. Ezeji, N. Qureshi and H. P. Blaschek, Curr. Opin Biotechnol., 2007,
18, 220–227.
81. P. Lako, D. J. Gielen, L. Dinkelbach and R. van Ree, Biomass for Energy
and Industry, 1998, 533–536.
82. Z. Qi, J. Chang, T. Wang and Y. Xu, Energ. Convers. Manag., 2007, 48,
87–92.
83. A. V. Bridgwater, Therm. Sci, 2004, 8, 21–49.
84. D. C. Elliott, D. Beckman, A. V. Bridgwater, J. P. Diebold, S. B. Gevert
and Y. Solantausta, Energy & Fuels, 1991, 5, 399–410.
85. G. A. Mills, Fuel, 1994, 73, 1243–1279.
86. A. V. Bridgwater, Chem. Eng. J., 2003, 91, 87–102.
87. H. Heinrich, Sustainable Fuels for Road Traffic, Solvsafe Prelude
Convention, Düsseldorf, 2007, www.solvsafe.org; H. Heinrich, Die
Kraftstoffstrategie von Volkswagen für eine nachhaltige Mobilität, Wiener
Green Fuels – Sustainable Solutions for Transportation 163
Energiegespräche, Wien, 2006, http://www.eeg.tuwien.ac.at/events/egs/
pdf/egs061128_heinrich.pdf (retrieved 26.02.2009).
88. H. Liu, C. Song, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, H. Wang and D. P. Wilkinson,
J. Power Sources, 2006, 155, 95–110.
89. L. Carrette, K. A. Friedrich and U. Stimming, ChemPhysChem, 2000, 1,
162–193.
90. S. Wasmus and A. Küver, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1999, 461, 14–31.
91. V. Subramani and S. K. Gangwal, Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22, 814–839.
92. J. Hu, Y. Wang, C. Cao, D. C. Elliott, D. J. Stevens and J. F. White,
Catal. Today, 2007, 120, 90–95.
93. F. S. Ramos, A. M. Duarte de Farias, L. E. P. Borges, J. L. Monteiro,
M. A. Fraga, E. F. Sousa-Aguiar and L. G. Appel, Catal. Today, 2005,
101, 39–44.
94. F. Yaripour, F. Baghaei, I. Schmidt and J. Perregaard, Catal. Commun.,
2005, 6, 147–152.
95. www.total.com.
96. F. J. Keil, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 1999, 29, 49–66.
97. http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/energy.
98. F. Fischer and H. Tropsch, US 1746464, 1930.
99. www.choren.com.
100. K. R. Radtke, M. Heinritz-Adrian and C. Marsico, VGB PowerTech.,
2006, 86, 78–84.
101. P. L. Spath and D. C. Dayton, NREL Technical Report NREL/TP-510-
34929, 2003.
102. A. Steynberg and M. Dry, ed., Fischer–Tropsch Technology, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 2004.
103. B. W. Hoffer, E. Schwab, G. Kaibel, D. Neumann, J. Bürkle and T. Butz,
DE 102005056784, 2005 (BASF).
104. I. Wender, Fuel Process. Tech., 1996, 45, 189–297.
105. W. Torres, S. S. Pansare and J. G. Goodwin Jr, Cat. Rev., 2007, 49,
407–456.
106. H. A. M. Knoef, ed., Handbook of Biomass Gasification, BTG, Enschede,
2005.
107. N. Dahmen, E. Dinjus and E. Henrich, Biofuels, Bioproducts & Bior-
efining, 2009, 3, 28–41.
108. J. N. Rosenberg, G. A. Oyler, L. Wilkinson and M. J. Betenbaugh, Curr.
Opin Biotechnol., 2008, 19, 430–436.
109. H. Xu, X. Miao and Q. Wu, J. Biotechnol., 2006, 126, 499–507.
110. A. Melis and T. Happe, Plant Physiol., 2001, 127, 740–748.
111. S. Atsumi, T. Hanai and J. C. Liao, Nature, 2008, 451, 86–89.
112. G. Strobel, B. Knighton, K. Kluck, Y. Ren, T. Livinghouse, M. Griffen,
D. Spakowicz and J. Sears, Microbiology, 2008, 154, 3319–3328.
113. W. Charusiri and T. Vitidsant, J. Energy, 2003, 5, 58–68.
114. F. A. Twaiq, N. A. M. Zabidi and S. Bhatia, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999,
38, 3230–3237.
115. K. K. Treseder and M. F. Allen, New Phytol., 2000, 147, 189–200.
CHAPTER 9
Coal tar dyes mark the beginning of the chemical industry in the UK, in
France and in the Rhine Valley with chemists like August Wilhelm Hofmann
and William Henry Perkin and company names like Ciba, BASF, Hoechst
and Bayer. Since the last century crude oil and natural gas have become the
key raw material sources for the modern chemical industry yielding all base
chemicals like olefins, acetylene and more particularly aromatics. In the
future, as in the past, a reliable and economically reasonable supply of car-
bon and hydrogen as raw material source for basic chemicals and their deri-
vatives will be the basic requirement for the chemical industry.1
Fossil raw materials such as crude oil, gas and coal are limited, though. In
contrast, nature is producing 170 billion mto of biomass every year simply by
photosynthesis.2 Thereby nature provides a remarkably wide range of renew-
able raw materials from agricultural, marine and forestry production of varying
material properties and differing chemical compositions, which constitute a
substantial potential for industrial production and energetic use besides the
traditional areas of food, feed, construction and garments.3 The term biomass
means all organic materials of biogenic, non-fossil character and comprises also
matter living and growing in nature and waste materials resulting from both
living matter and organic matter that is already dead (Table 9.1).
While petrochemical feedstock in a modern national economy like Germany
accounts for 17 Mio mto of the chemical industry’s raw materials mix, the use
of renewable resources represents approximately 2.7 Mio mto, i.e. 14%.
164
Biomass for Green Chemistry 165
Table 9.1 Agrarian raw materials for use in the chemical industry, Germany,
2006. For comparison: Petrochemical raw materials: 17 Mio. mto.
With the permission of Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe,
Gülzow; source: FNR, VCI, meó Consulting Team, Mantau/
University Hamburg, BFH; http://www.fnr.de/cms35/Industrielle-
Nutzung.1709+M54721168da5.0.html#content3341 (retrieved
18.08.2008).
Raw material Consumption (mto)
renewable
resources carbohydrates
synthesis
gas
value-
natural ethene/ adding
gas crude olefins chains
coal oil
acetylene
lignin
aromatics
Figure 9.1 Basic raw materials yielding key intermediates for the chemical industry.
References
1. J. -D. Arndt, S. Freyer, R. Geier, O. Machhammer, J. Schwartze, M. Vol-
land and R. Diercks, Chem. Ing. Techn., 2007, 79(5), 521.
2. W. Umbach, in Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Chemie, ed.,
H. Eierdanz, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, p. XXIX.
3. meó Consulting Team, Institut für Energetik und Umwelt, Faserinstitut
Bremen, Marktanalyse Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (Teil I+II), ed., Facha-
gentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Gülzow, 2006.
4. J. H. Clark, Green Chem., 2006, 8, 17.
5. S. Andre, C. Günther, S. Sanghvi and A. Vogel, McKinsey on Chemicals,
2008, 1, 31.
CHAPTER 9.1
9.1.1 Introduction
Depending on geography, climate and soil conditions, fish and venison from
wildlife, milk, butter, meat from domestic animals and vegetable oils are all
part of the human diet and are essential daily items for food and non-food
applications. Vegetable oils are frequently classified into two main groups,
according to their source: pulp oils (palm, olive, avocado) and seed oils (soy-
bean, cottonseed, peanut, sunflower, rapeseed, sesame, palm-kernel, coconut,
linseed, castor and other minor). The major edible animal fats, also termed as
meat fats, are lard and tallow, butter and marine oils. Lard and rendered pork
fat are produced from the fat of pigs. Edible tallow is produced mainly from the
fat of cattle (beef tallow) or sheep (mutton tallow). The importance of fats for
humans, animals and plants lies in their high energy contents. Their calorific
value is more than double that of carbohydrates and proteins. In addition, fats
allow humans and animals to consume fat-soluble vitamins and provide them
with essential fatty acids. Securing the consistent availability of fats and oils in
sufficient quantity with equitable geographic distribution is required to fight
hunger and under-nourishment on Earth.
Besides utilization for food and feed, fats and oils are one backbone for green
industrial chemistry and key components of bio-refinery concepts.2 Vegetable
oils and their by-products, cysts, shells, hulls and parings as well as waste and
167
168 Chapter 9.1
recycling products can serve as energy sources for the generation of thermal or
electrical power and as raw material base for alternative fuels. Efforts to
manage production of fats and oils involving the entire crop and its biomass as
a zero waste operation throughout the value chain from sowing, harvesting and
processing, to shipping, trade and disposal are important elements of modern
industrial ecology3 and of the Chemical Industry Responsible Cares – Global
Charter.
Commonwealth of
Harvest Area;
Total World
Uzbekistan
Philippines
ðMio mtoÞ
Other EU
Argentina
Indonesia
Malaysia
EU 27
Pakistan
Thailand
Ukraine
Oilseed;
Canada
Mexico
Turkey
Russia
Africa
Brazil
China
Total
Total
India
USA
Pulp oils
Olive oil – – – – o0.1 o0.1 2.1 0.1 0.3 3
Palm oil 0.2 1.2 16 17.2 1 1.6 38
Total pulp oils 0.2 0.1 1.2 2.1 0.1 16 17.2 1 1.9 41
Grand Total oil 97.8 13.7 0.6 61.7 52.6 124.8 26.83 1.2 7.6 7 2 18.7 2.2 54.54 30.9 5 1.7 20.2 24.2 1.7 12.1 405 128.3
seeds & vegetable
oils
Sources: ISTA Mielke, Oil World Annual 2007, private communication Thomas Mielke. mto ¼ metric tons; Mio ¼ Million; ha ¼ hectare (2.471 acres)
1
shelled basis, 70% of unshelled; 2including canola; 3Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela; 4Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan,
169
Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Aserbaijan, Georgia, Kyrgystan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan; 5(for comparison 1983/84: 150 Mio. ha)
170 Chapter 9.1
Mio. mto
50
42,5
37,7 1960 2008
40
30 Mio. mto 159,4 Mio. mto
30
20 19,4 17,1
10,1
10 8,6 8,1 7,8 8,8
7,1
3,4 3,5 4,2 2,4 3,6
1,3 1,2 1,8
0
Soybean Palm Rapeseed Sun- Tallow Butter Laurics Other Other
flower (coconut veg- animal
+ palm etable* (incl.
*cotton, peanut, sesame, corn, olive, linseed, castor kernel) fish oil)
25%
14% 10% 45
18 20
On a global basis annual production of oil seeds reached 405 Mio mto in
2006/20078 (Figure 9.1.3, Table 9.1.1). In the 2007/2008 season, though, world
output of oilseed dropped back to 391 Mio mto. After more than 20 years of
more or less steady growth the global area devoted to ten oilseeds declined by
1 Mio ha to 232.6 Mio ha reflecting the high interdependence and growing
volatility of grain and oilseed farming and their respective outlets to the food,
dairy, livestock and biofuels markets. Production of fats and oils reached
152.3 Mio mto in Oct./Sept. 2006/2007, i.e. more than five-fold higher than
1960, and production is estimated to be 159.4 Mio mto in 2007/2008. World
production of oil meals was 255.8 Mio mto in Oct./Sept. 2006/2007 and reached
an estimated 261.5 Mio mto in 2007/2008.
Natural Fats and Oils 171
420
380
300
220
180
140
82/83 87/88 92/93 97/98 02/03 07/08
Figure 9.1.3 Oilseeds: world area and production8 (reproduced with permission of
ISTA Mielke Oil World, Hamburg).
Possibly even more dramatic than the sky-rocketing of overall production are
regional changes in cultivation and alterations in the types of fats and oils
which have occurred. In 1960 butter and tallow ranked number 1 and 2 in
world production, respectively. Since then they have been largely surpassed by
vegetable oils, i.e. soybean, palm, rape seed and sunflower oils (Figure 9.1.1).
Europe is only one example for these changes. Towards the end of
last century large areas of European landscape changed from the green of
grassland to the brown-yellow of rapeseed and sunflower crops. This alteration
in postcard colours reflects a fundamental change in agro-production in Cen-
tral and Northern Europe, which traditionally had been focusing on farmyard
products like milk, butter and beef tallow. Permanent grassland decreased
significantly, accentuated by the fall in numbers of livestock after the EU
imposed milk quotas in 1984 in order to stop subsidized overproduction of milk
(which had resulted in so-called milk-lakes and butter-mountains). This
released land that could be farmed for the production of crops. Areas sown
leapt from just a few thousand hectares in the early 1980s to 4.8 Mio ha by 1990
and 10.2 Mio ha by 2007. Additionally, the reformed Common Agricultural
Policy, CAP, and a considerable body of legislation and energy-related policies
have provided incentives to encourage the use of energy crops for the pro-
duction of renewable energy, in particular biofuels. Meanwhile the E-27
became the world’s largest producer of rapeseed oil and number 2 (behind the
CIS) in sunflower seed and oil, which is dominant in the southern European
countries.
172 Chapter 9.1
Regional changes of similar magnitude have happened in South America.
Enlarged production of soy beans and livestock farming of cattle for meat
production helped the Brazilian national economy to significantly improve its
international financial position and to participate in the dynamics of global
growth. Brazil succeeded in reaching record highs in exports, trade balance
and, since 2003, a consecutive yearly current account surplus resulting in a
significant improvement of Brazilian external sustainability indicators to the
best levels of the historical series.11
At the same time soya has overtaken illegal logging and ranching as the main
engine of deforestation of virgin rainforest to make room for the crop. It needs,
however, to be noted that the Brazilian Agro Energy Plan 2006–2011 envisages
optimizing the use of areas affected by human action on natural vegetation,
maximizing the sustainability of the production systems, discouraging unjus-
tifiable expansions of the agricultural frontier and encroachment upon sensitive
or protected systems.12
In Southeast Asia the ambitious expansions of oil palm plantations in the
tropical areas have made this region by far the main palm oil producing region
in the world outdistancing natural rubber cultivation as the key agro resource
in Malaysia (Figure 9.1.4).
The accelerated extension of oil palm plantations has also initiated discus-
sions about the social and environmental impacts, more particularly violation
of land rights of indigenous people, destruction of community-based econo-
mies, deforestation of rainforests, oil palm cultivation as false pretence for
illegal logging, biodiversity loss including risk of orang-utan, Asian elephant,
clouded leopard, Sumatran and Javan rhino extinction,14 fragmentation and
loss of Sumatran tiger habitat and climbing pollution levels due to forest fires
for land-clearance.15
Figure 9.1.4 Planted area for oil palm and natural rubber in Malaysia13 (reproduced
with permission of Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
Natural Fats and Oils 173
Petroleum oil reserves are concentrated in a relatively small number of
countries. World consumption has surged steadily upward. The rapidly
industrializing economies of China and India are projected to increase their
demand dramatically. The consumption of Asia including Japan is already at
the level of North America. The crude oil main streams flow from a few
countries in the Persian Gulf, West Africa, the Gulf of Mexico and the Car-
ibbean plus Russia to the highly industrialized regions in North America,
Europe and Asia16 (Figure 9.1.5).
Compared with crude oil, biofuels are expected to reduce many of the vul-
nerabilities associated with today’s highly concentrated energy economy.17
Developing countries will have a competitive advantage in biofuel production
due to lower land and labour costs, warm tropical climates and longer growing
seasons. International trade channels will follow those already established
between grain and oilseed exporting countries like Brazil, Argentina, USA and
palm oil exporters like Malaysia and Indonesia and consumers in Europe and
Asia (Figure 9.1.6).
Africa has enormous potential to become a grain and vegetable oil exporting
region if ever political and administrative frameworks become sustainable and
the concept of good governance18 is established within each country. However, it
needs to be noted that with growing importance of biofuels the markets for food,
fuel and energy, when based on biomass, will increasingly become inter-twined.
Downstream processing will eventually move away from historical centres
of technology to the sites of origin, a phenomenon which is happening already
for fatty acid, fatty alcohol and fatty acid ester production.20 Indeed, there
is no guarantee for low freight charges supporting global trade and global
533
186
1186
251
Middle East
1091 380
441 124 Asia/Oceania
Africa
485
Production 307
millions of tonnes Latin America
Transport route
Consumption Source: Pétrole 2004, Comité Professionel Du Pétrole, Cedre, Agence Hippocampe
Figure 9.1.6 Global trade grains and oilseeds (Reproduced with the permission of
Rabobank).19
transportation forever. On the contrary, increasing crude oil prices will sooner
or later impact on transportation cost. This could compensate the lower energy
density of biomass compared to fossil crude and further push towards decen-
tralized bio-refinery concepts.
harvesting
preparation
transport
preparation
conditioning
extraction
oil cake
10 –13% oil
oil desolvation meal
crude vegetable oil
meal desolvation
animal feed
refining
chemical (caustic) refining
(enzymatic)
physical refining/ esterification
bleaching
steam refining -
deodorization distillation
deodorization
solvent fatty acid
cristallization esters
steamer
derivatization
distillate
tocopherols,
refined sterols,
sterols,
vegetable oil sterol esters
squalenes
Figure 9.1.9 Physical refining, schematic diagram (reproduced with the permission
of Ma Manuela Prieto Gonzalez, Universidad de Oviedo, Departa-
mento de Energı́a; [email protected]).
178 Chapter 9.1
also, going beyond food applications, in the manufacturing of candles, indus-
trial lubricants, fabric softeners, thixotropes, mould release agents, cosmetics
and toiletries, and household and automotive polishes.
Milk
Animal fat Fish or sea
3,25 –5% fat
tissue mammelia
O/W emulsion
Skimmed milk
cooking
skimming sorting
Low fat milk pressing
mincing
Cream desintegration
18 –40% fat chopping Press Press
cake liquid
pasteurization
rendering
decanting
churning Butter milk
wet dry raking heating
Butter grains
rendering rendering
separation
kneading centrifuge
drying
Butter separation sieving
80 –85% fat milling/
W/O emulsion grinding
O O HO
O C O C 15 – 55 % unsaturated fatty acids
O O
HO
O C O C 20 – 65 % rosin acids
O O HO
5 – 30 % unsaponifiables
O C O C
Jojoba oil is a vegetable oil obtained from the crushed bean of the jojoba shrub. The jojoba
shrub is native to the Sonoran Desert of Northwestern Mexico and neighbouring regions in
Arizona and Southern California. Jojoba has flat gray-green leathery leaves and a deep root
system that make it well adapted to desert heat and drought. It has a life span of 100 – 200
years. Like sperm whale oil, jojoba oil is composed almost entirely of liquid wax esters of
straight chain mono-unsaturated cis C20 – C24 fatty acids and unsaturated higher fatty alcohols.
Main component is Docosenyl-eicosenoate (C42) and it's chemical structure is
CH3(CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)9C(O)O(CH2)12CH=CH(CH2)7CH3(37%).
Jojoba oil is similar to, and miscible with, sebum, which is secreted by human sebaceous
glands to lubricate and protect skin and hair. Obtained by cold pressing, its peculiar chemical
properties make it the only vegetable oil in nature having the same characteristics as sperm oil.
Sperm oil occurs in the blubber and in the head cavities of the sperm whale (this cavity helps
the whale keep part of his head above water to breathe). The oil contains a solid fraction
(spermaceti, cetin, cetylpalmitate) which can be cristallised. The liquid fraction mainly contains
oleyloleate and higher mono-unsaturated fatty acid monesters of unsaturated fatty alcohol.
sun-flower oil
double bonds
trivial name
linseed oil
peanut oil
hering oil
castor oil
Jatropha
palm oil
formula
tallow
lard
hexanoic acid 0 caproic acid C6H12O2 0.5 0.3
0.2–0.8 0–1
octanoic acid 0 caprylic acid C8H16O2 8 3.5
6–9 3–5
decanoic acid 0 caprinic acid C10H20O2 6 3.5 3
4–8 3–5 1–3
dodecanoic acid 0 lauric acid C12H24O2 48 48 0.2 0.2 0.2 16
46–52 46–50 0–0.4 0–0.5 0–0.5 14–18
tetradecanoic acid 0 myristic acid C14H28O2 18 16 1.5 1 o1.4 1.5 2.5 13 8
15–20 14–17 0.5–3 0.5–2 0–3 1–4 12–14 6–10
hexadecanic acid 0 palmitic acid C16H32O2 2 9 8 44 10 21 10 6 4 7 3 4.5 14.7 26 28 9 12
1–2 8–10 6–9 40–47 7–12 20–27 9–11 5–7 3.5–4.5 6–7 2–4 4–5 10–17 21–29 21–29 8–10 10–14
octadecanoic acid 0 stearic acid C18H36O2 1 2.5 2 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 1 1.5 6.1 16 20 2 1
1–2 1–3 1–3 2–7 2–6 1–3 3–5 3–6 3.5–5 3–5 0.5–2 1–2.5 5–10 13–18 15–24 1–3 0.5–1.5
eicosanoic acid 0 archidic acid C20H40O2 0.1 0.1 0.3 3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3
0–0.4 0–0.4 0–0.5 2–4 0.2–1 0.3–1 0.5–1 0.1–1 0–1 0–0.5
docosanoic acid 0 behenic acid C22H44O2 2 1 1 o0.1
0.1–3 0.4–1.5 0.4–1.5
tetracosanoic acid 0 lignoceric acid C24H48O2 o0.1 2 o0.1
1–3
dodecenoic acid 1 lauroleic acid C12H22O2 4
3–5
tetradecenoic acid 1 myristoleic acid C14H16O2 0.3 0.5 12
0–1 0–1 11–13
hexadecenoic acid 1 palmitoleic acid C16H30O2 0.2 Sp. 0.5 o0.5 Sp. Sp. o1 3 3 14 9
0–0.4 0–2 2–4 2–4 12–16 7–11
octadecenoic acid 1 oleic acid C18H34O2 3 6.5 16 38 50 29 28 24 83.5 22 15 60 40.7 41 38 17 10
2.5–4 5–8 13–19 36–42 35–70 20–35 20–35 18–28 82–90 12–34 11–24 50–65 36–64 39–45 33–46 15–18 9–11
eicosenoic acid 1 gadoleic acid C20H38O2 0.1 9 1.5 1 0.5 7 13
0–0.4 8–11 1–2.5 0–2 0–1 5–8 11–15
docosenoic acid 1 erucic acid C22H42O2 47 o0.1 18
41–52 15–21
12-hydroxy-octadecenoic acid 1 ricinoleic acid C18H34O3 87
86–92
9,12 octadecadienoic acid 2 linoleic acid C18H32O2 3 1.6 2.5 11 30 45 53.5 64 5 17 13 21 36 7.5 4 1
3–8 0–2.5 1–3 7–2 20–35 42–54 50–56 60–68 2–10 14–26 10–15 18–25 18–45 4–9 2–7
9,12,15 octadecatrienoic acid 3 linolenic acid C18H30O2 0.5 0.3 1 8 52 8 10 0.2 0.7 0.7 0.5
0.2–0.8 0–0.5 0.1–2 7–10 35–65 7–13 8–11.5 0–2 0–1.5 0–1
5,8,11,14,17 eicosapentanoic acid 5 C20H32O2 10
0–1 0–0.5 8–12
4,7,10,13,16,19 docosahexanoic acid 6 C22H34O2 7
6–8
Analytic numbers of oils iodine value (after Wijs) 81–91 7.5–10.5 14–23 44–54 84–100 99–113 120–140 126–136 80–100 155–205 97–108 110–120 96 53–57 40–48 70 123–142
saponification value 177–197 250–264 245–255 195–205 188–195 189–198 189–195 186–194 186–194 188–196 170–180 180–190 196 190–202 190–200 140–144 179–194
melting point 1C 10t.–15 23–26 24–26 30–40 –2 2 to.+2 10 15 10 20 9 5 33–46 40–46
* Source: Henkel KGaA, Hrsg., Fettalkohole, Düsseldorf, 1983; R. Höfer, D. Feustel, M. Fies, Welt der Farben 11 (5/1997), updated, based on proprietary analysis and
C. Thywissen, Neuss/D, K. Becker, G. Francis, Univ. Hohenheim/D for Jatropha, bold figures are average values, natural figures indicate the range of fatty acid composition in %.
Analytical methods: DGF C6 10A + 11D
184 Chapter 9.1
9.1.4.2.1 Soya Bean Oil, Soybean Oil
Historical Development and Economic Importance. Since 1965 global soybean
production has increased from 30 Mio mto to 237 Mio mto and soya oil pro-
duction from 5 Mio mto to 37 Mio mto in 2007. This change in the pattern of
soya seed production is reflecting both the growing importance of soybean oil
and also the growth in importance of oilcake and meal as a protein source for
human nutrition and animal feed.
Soya beans originate from China (Figure 9.1.14). Since the 1930s they have
been grown in the Midwest, the Corn Belt of the USA. In 1996 the United
States produced about 49% of the world’s soybeans. To feed growing demand,
new agricultural frontiers have been opened up in Brazil and Argentina and
meanwhile MERCOSUR countries have become by far the largest regional
producers. Although Chinese soybean acreage ranks fourth in the world, its
productivity is still lower than in the other soya-growing regions. This makes
China actually a net importer for soybean oil – imports in 2007 actually dou-
bled national production.
Genetic Modification. The soya bean success story would not have been pos-
sible without weed control pesticides on one side and modern genetic engineer-
ing technologies on the other. In 1995 Monsanto introduced Roundup
Readys (RR) soybeans that are genetically modified.36 RR soybeans have
greatly improved agricultural efficiency allowing a farmer to spray widely the
herbicide glyphosate in soya plantations in order to kill unwanted plants like
annual grasses, perennial weeds and other pests, to reduce tillage or even to
sow the seed directly into an unploughed field. The transgenic RR plant is
resistant against glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine. Glyphosate is a
non-selective, post-emergence, systemic broad-spectrum herbicide, absorbed
through the leaves, and was first sold as the isopropylammonium salt (IPA
salt) under the trade name Roundups.
O O
HO – C – CH2 – N – CH2 – P– OH
H OH
glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine
and now makes up approximately 90% of all soya crops in the USA.38 Also
Brazil and Argentina are going towards 90% adoption of GM soya crops.
Soybean tolerant to glyphosate has also been approved for use, import and
processing in Europe since 1996 under Directive 90/220/EEC.39
Composition and Uses. Soybeans are distinguished from other oil crops in
that they only yield approximately 21% oil but 40–50% protein. Because of
the high content in proteins soybeans historically have been a protein rather
than an oil seed crop. The market for soybean products is largely driven by
soy meal applications, more particularly by the food and the livestock feed
industries (Figures 9.1.15 and 9.1.16). The majority of soy protein is a
186 Chapter 9.1
Protein
Protein 41%41%
Oil 21%
Oil 21%
Fibre 6%
Fibre 6%
OtherOther
25% 25%
Other 1%
Soya Feed Oil
beans 77% 0%
Meal
Poultry 51%
77%
Swine 26%
About 11% are processed to yield soya fatty acid, amines, amides, esters,
soaps and other oleochemical derivatives.
The production of methyl soyate for environmentally friendly solvents
and for biodiesel fuel (in the USA) is becoming a significant outlet for soy
oil in non-food applications. Further progress in the demand for soy
biodiesel will result in additional soybean meal supplies, which will con-
siderably increase soy meal competitiveness as feedstock for livestock farming
and aquaculture.
Indonesia. The leading role of palm oil compared to other oil crops arises from
the high yield of oil per hectare.44,45
Further increase of palm oil production by yield increase, e.g. by better seed
material, as an alternative to land expansion, is one of the challenges faced by
the palm oil growing industry (Table 9.1.3).
Sustainable Palm Oil Cultivation. For a number of reasons palm oil has
become the focus for concerns dealing with the basic means of sustainable
development:
public availability of health and safety plans, land titles and user rights;
compliance with local, national and international laws and regulations
including the UN declaration of indigenous people;
business plans to achieve long-term economic and financial viability;
water management programs to minimize peat soil subsidence;
appropriate integrated pest management (IPM) techniques;
development, implementation and monitoring of plans to reduce pollution
and emissions, including greenhouse gases;
a minimum age of workers, which should be not less than 15 years;
involvement of governments with the problem of stateless persons.
Distinctive Features of Palm Oil and Palm-kernel Oil Production. The oil
palm is a perennial crop. It bears fruit 30 months after planting and is eco-
nomically viable for up to 30 years. The oil palm bunch is harvested manu-
ally using a knife attached to a pole which dissevers the stalk of the fruit
bunch from the palm (Figure 9.1.17). The harvested bunches are termed
fresh fruit bunches (FFBs). The oil palm is distinguished from other oil crops
as it delivers two vegetable oils with different chemical composition: palm oil
and palm-kernel oil (Figure 9.1.18).
Palm oil is the pulp oil extracted promptly after harvesting from the fleshy
mesocarp of the oil palm fruit using continuous screw presses. The liquid
coming from the press is a mixture of oil, water and non-oily solids
(NOS). After separation from sludge in a settling tank, clarification, purifica-
tion and vacuum drying, crude palm oil (CPO) is yielded from the press liquid.
Palm-kernel oil is the seed oil contained in the kernel of the palm fruit. The
kernel is the endosperm of white cellular mass coated with a tough black
190 Chapter 9.1
Water 41%
Kernel 45% Shell 55%
Fibre 20%
Protein 4,5%
Palm oil 39%
Palm-kernel oil 22,5%
Other 18%
membrane or testa, which is encased in a thick shell or endocarp of the oil palm
seed nuts (Figures 9.1.17 and 9.1.18). When extracting the palm oil, nuts and
fibres remain in the press cake. Nuts are separated from the fibres and cracked.
After separating kernel and shell the palm-kernel oil is extracted from the
kernels by unit operations employed for vegetable seed oil extraction.
Natural Fats and Oils 191
Palm oil is traded as CPO and, increasingly, after physical/steam refining or
chemical/alkali refining as processed palm oil (PPO).
PPO ¼ processed palm oil, stands for different categories of treatment, i.e.
neutralized, bleached, deodorized and/or fractionated; according to the
degree of processing different export duty tariffs may apply: N/RPO ¼
neutralized/refined palm oil, BPO ¼ bleached palm oil, CPL ¼ crude palm
olein, N/RBPO ¼ neutralized/refined bleached palm oil, N/RPL ¼
neutralized refined palm olein, BPL ¼ bleached palm olein, N/RBDPO
¼ neutralized refined bleached deodorized palm oil, N/RBPL ¼
neutralized refined bleached palm olein, N/RBDPL ¼ neutralized/refined
bleached deodorized palm olein, Dp ¼ duty on PPO and Dc ¼ duty on
CPO; source: A. Mohd Nasir.52
Because of its fatty acid composition, which includes 50% saturated and
50% unsaturated fatty acids, palm oil is a semi-solid oil, which sediments at
room temperature even in tropical countries. Fractionation of CPO or RBDPO
by separating palm oil into a low melting fraction (palm olein) and into a higher
melting fraction (palm stearin) significantly extends the application. One of the
main objectives of fractionating palm oil is to obtain palm olein of low cloud
point for cooking oil or further processing, whereas palm stearin is used as a
component of harder frying fats or for the production of shortening, margarine
and vanaspati.
Three different technologies can be applied for palm oil fractionation:53
Composition and Uses. Palm oil is an oleic oil, which is distinguished by its
high percentage of the saturated palmitic acid. Palm-kernel oil is a lauric oil
and to some degree exchangeable with coconut oil due to a similar fatty acid
composition.
Traditionally, about 80% of palm oil has been for edible use and 20% for
non-edible applications. Products for food are used as a medium for frying; as a
major component of non-dairy shortenings, margarines and vanaspati; in tai-
lored applications for bakery products and confectionery fats; and in reduced
fat spread, mayonnaise and salad dressings.55 Non-food applications comprise
the direct use of the triglyceride yielding palm oil polyols for polyurethane
foams.56 CPO is processed to yield glycerine, palm oil or hydrogenated palm oil
fatty acids, soaps, amides, esters and other oleochemical derivatives for
industrial and human care chemicals.57 The global trend associating ‘‘natural’’
with plant-derived products and belief that these are milder and healthier has
created a special Asian lifestyle favourable for palm oil derived cosmetics.
Religious considerations also mean consumers prefer plant-derived products
since they are regarded as kosher or halal.
This applies, of course, also for palm kernel oil (PKO), which is used either on
its own or in combination with palm oil products in the manufacture of spe-
cialty fats. Incorporation of palm kernel oil or its derivatives, particularly in
table margarine and spreads, improves the melting characteristic of the pro-
ducts. Non-food applications include soaps, which in Southeast Asia are pri-
marily made from palm oil and PKO or coconut oil. A typical blend of soap
noodles would be 80% palm oil and 20% PKO, giving about the right balance
Natural Fats and Oils 193
of lather, cleansing ability and hardness. PKO may also be used in a multitude
of other cosmetic and body-care products for its moisturizing properties. Palm-
kernel oil and coconut oil are distinguished from other vegetable oils because of
their high content in lauric and myristic acid. Both oils have a relatively sharp
melting point at 24–26 1C. It may be noted, however, that coconut oil has more
of the short-chain fatty acids while PKO has more of the longer-chain fatty
acids. Hydrogenation and fractionation of PKO fatty acid methylester yields
lauryl alcohol and lauryl alcohol-based plant-derived surfactants for cosmetic,
detergent and industrial applications.
Although actually (2007) only 1% of world biodiesel is based on palm oil,
because of the high yield per ha palm oil could become a highly competitive raw
material for biodiesel manufacturing.45,58 Palm biodiesel obtained by transes-
terification of CPO has a pour point of 15 1C. The relatively high pour point
and poor cold stability hamper the use as fuel and as a green solvent or carrier
oil. Using winterization as well as rewetting of palm biodiesel a palm olein
methyl ester with properties comparable to methyl soyate or methyl canolate is
yielded, besides palm stearin methyl ester. Economies of palm biodiesel are
improved, when sulphonating the palm stearin methyl ester by-product with
sulphur trioxide to yield a-sulphonic fatty acid methyl ester surfactants
(MESs). MESs based on palm stearin methylester are light-coloured washing
detergents, which provide good cleaning ability, are less sensitive to water
hardness and have better biodegradability characteristics compared to other
detergents like linear alkyl benzene sulphonates.59
Non-refined cold pressed crude palm oil, also called ‘‘Red Palm Oil’’, has
been consumed in Central and West Africa since time immemorial, as it has
also been in Central America and Brazil. Red palm oil has a wonderful rich
flavour; it is the richest known natural product in tocotrienols and carotenes,
which give rise to the red colour. Development of techniques like integrated
extraction technologies to recover these functional components from palm oil
has contributed to the emergence of the nutraceutical industry in Malaysia that
produces tocopherol and tocotrienol capsules, carotene-rich palm oil and palm
carotene concentrate.60
Coconut fruit
Water 27%
Copra 32%
Protein 2%
Oil 22%
Other 8%
The oil pressed from the seed historically has been used in oil lamps and
(because of the bitter taste) as poor people’s cooking oil, later as lubricating oil
in steam-powered ships and trains.63 For two reasons, the nutritional aspects of
rapeseed have been questioned: for the high fraction of eicosenoic and erucic
acids in the oil on one hand, and the high glucosinolate content in the meal on
the other. Glucosinolates (Figure 9.1.23) are thioethers, which contribute a
bitter, ‘‘hot’’ taste to condiments (mustard, horseradish) and give flavour and
Natural Fats and Oils 197
Rapeseed
Protein 20%
Oil 35%
Other 30%
OH O-
O S
HO O
HO S O
OH N O
Composition and Uses. The sunflower kernel represents 75% of the seed,
with an oil content of approximately 55%, amounting to 41% with respect
to the whole seed (Figure 9.1.25). Sunflower oil contains 485% unsaturated
fatty acids with linoleic acid accounting for 60%. The linoleic acid content in
the original ‘‘linoleic sunflower oil’’ is very much dependent on climatic con-
ditions and can deviate as much as 20% from the average. Selected parcels
Natural Fats and Oils 199
Sunflower seed
Protein 19%
Oil 41%
Other 15%
of oil, also called high-PUFA, contain 469% linoleic acids. Sunflower is one
of the most important edible oils and is generally considered to be premium
oil compared to most other natural oils because of its light colour, flavour,
high level of linoleic acid and absence of linolenic acid.
High oleic sunflower oil (HOSO) is a cultivar, which has been developed
through conventional breeding. Introduced in the mid 1980s, it is usually
defined as having a minimum 80% monounsaturated oleic acid. The oil has a
very neutral taste and provides excellent stability towards oxidation without
hydrogenation. Demand for HO sunflower oil has been increasing as con-
sumers look for healthier vegetable oils in response to concerns over saturated
fats and trans fats in traditional edible oils and in part because of requirements
for labelling of trans fats. A diet rich in high-oleic-acid sunflower oil favourably
alters low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.64
NuSun is the name chosen by the US National Sunflower Association (NSA)
to represent an entirely new class of sunflower seed and oil to meet the needs of
the food industry.65 Needs were identified as ‘‘oil that had a pleasing taste,
200 Chapter 9.1
stability without needing partial hydrogenation and low saturated fat levels’’.
Initial testing of the new sunflower type (also developed through conventional
plant breeding methods) began in 1996. In 2007, it is estimated that 85 to 90%
of the sunflower acreage was NuSun with the rest equally divided between high
oleic and traditional linoleic sunflowers. NuSun, also called mid-oleic sunflower
oil, is lower in saturated fat (9%) than linoleic sunflower oil and has higher oleic
levels (55–75%) with the remainder being linoleic.
Besides food uses the original linoleic sunflower oil as well as HOSO are used
in industrial applications because of their specific properties.66 For example, in
view of the higher oxidative stability high-oleic sunflower oil is used as diesel
and gasoline engine lubricant. Containing around 70% linoleic acid, sunflower
oil is a semi-drying oil. Insofar as is economically feasible, sunflower oil may
replace soybean oil in the manufacture of resins or carrier oils for paint and ink
formulations.67
Peanut
Protein 16%
Oil 25%
Other 14%
Corn (maize)
Protein 2% Protein 6%
Starch 1% Fibre 2%
Sugar 2% Other 1%
Other 2%
processed by two basic methods known as ‘‘dry milling’’ (to produce bio-
ethanol, see Chapter 8) and ‘‘wet milling’’. In the wet milling process the
cleaned corn is conveyed to steep tanks where it is soaked for 30–50 h at ele-
vated temperature in an aqueous sulphurous acid solution resulting in the
softening of the corn kernels. The corn germs can now be removed from the
water-soaked kernels by a series of mills and cyclone germ separators. While
the corn kernel is further processed yielding starch (see Chapter 9.2), syrup,
corn gluten feed and sweeteners, the germ is dried and cold pressed through
screw presses or expellers before solvent extraction with hexane.
The golden yellow corn oil has a distinctive musty flavour and odour and a
composition similar to sunflower oil. However, it has a different tocopherol
composition with mainly g-tocopherol, which makes it more heat stable. Corn
oil is used especially as a salad oil and in salad dressings as well as in cooking,
where its high smoke point (unrefined 160 1C, refined 232 1C) makes it valuable
as frying oil.
202 Chapter 9.1
9.1.4.2.11 Rice Bran Oil
Rice oil, also called rice bran oil, has been used extensively in Asian countries.
It is the preferred oil in Japan as frying oil for its subtle flavour and odour.
During rice milling bran and germ are separated from the starchy endosperm
(Figure 9.1.28).71 The bran has an oil content of 12–18%. This means that the
potential volume of rice bran oil is 0.8% of the total rice produced.
The fatty acid spectrum of rice bran oil is 22–25% palmitic acid, 37–41%
oleic acid and 37–41% linoleic acid. More recently, interest in rice oil escalated
with its identification as a ‘‘healthy oil’’ that reduces serum cholesterol. Rice
bran is a good source of antioxidants including vitamin E and oryzanol (ferulic
esters of sterols and triterpene alcohols), cholesterol-lowering waxes and anti-
tumor compounds like rice bran saccharide.72 Besides applications in nutrition
and in phyto-chemicals, rice bran oil has traditionally been used for industrial
applications, such as dimer acid manufacturing, depending on pricing for
alternative vegetable oils.
Figure 9.1.29 Sesame indicum. Sources: Sesame plant, Koeh-129.jpg from Wikipe-
dia. Sesame flower (reproduction with permission of Karlheinz Knoch
Botanik-Fotos, Bruchsal).
countries. Sesame oil is one of the most stable edible oils despite its high degree
of unsaturation: oleic acid and linoleic acid constitute more than 80% of the
total fatty acids in sesame oil with the percentages of oleic acid (36–42%) and
linoleic acid (42–50%) close to each other. The presence of lignan type natural
antioxidants (sesamin, sesamolin and their transformation products sesamol
and sesaminol, respectively73) accounts for both the superior stability of sesame
oil and the beneficial physiological effects of sesame.
More than any other vegetable oil crop, sesame is embedded since ancient
times in a mythological background that lasts until today. Accounts
from ancient history document early recognition of sesame seed as a source of
high-quality food. Sesame was the symbol of immortality in early Hindu
legend. Women of ancient Babylon would eat halva, a mixture of honey and
sesame seeds to prolong youth and beauty. ‘‘Open sesame’’, the magic words
used by Ali Baba to open the treasure cave in ‘‘The Thousand and One Nights’’,
reflects the distinguishing feature of the sesame seed pod, which bursts open
when it reaches maturity. As part of modern lifestyle, sesame is applied in food
and cuisine, cosmetics and wellness treatment and in alternative medicine.74
Sesame oil plays a prominent role in Ayurvedic medicine. The oil absorbs
quickly, penetrates through the tissues and keeps the skin supple and soft. This
makes sesame oil an outstanding massage oil and carrier oil for cosmetic and
therapeutic activities and explains its use during abhyanga, a form of Indian
massage. Abhyanga is believed to improve energy flow and help free the body
204 Chapter 9.1
of impurities. Used on baby skin, sesame seed oil will protect the tender skin,
and more generally will cause young facial skin to have and display natural
good health.
C16:0 26 22–30
C18:0 36 30–37
C18:1 33 30–36
C18:2 3 1.5–4.0
Iodine value 37 34–40
Natural Fats and Oils 205
Table 9.1.6 Fatty acid composition of shea butter in %.
Typical Range
C16:0 4 3–6
C18:0 42 36–44
C18:1 44 42–52
C18:2 7 4–8
Iodine value 57 55–65
nut, source of shea butter. Shea butter is similar to cocoa but somewhat higher
in oleic acid content. Shea butter has up to 11% unsaponifiable matter con-
taining 4–10% kariten [(C3H8)n, mp 63 1C], mainly a trans-1,4-polyisoprene like
gutta-percha (Table 9.1.6).
Shea butter is one of the most affordable and widely used vegetable fats in the
Sahel and an important ingredient for indigenous medicine and body care. The
refined fat is sold as baking fat, margarine and other fatty spreads. Shea butter
is traditionally used in medicines, particularly for the preparation of skin
ointments, as a rub for rheumatism and to treat inflammation, rashes in chil-
dren, dermatitis and sunburn. The kariten latex in shea is responsible for the
sealing property that shea butter has and that may aid in protecting skin and
preventing sun allergies. In cosmetics shea butter serves as a moisturizer and
emollient and as a base for cosmetics that prevent skin drying; good-quality
lipsticks also use shea butter. As a result, cosmetic industries in the Sahel and
elsewhere market this ingredient in many soap, shampoo and skin-cream
preparations.
C16:0 8
C18:0 2
C18:1 11
C18:2 69
C18:3n–6 9
Iodine value 150
Adapted from N. A. M. Eskin, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2008, 110(7), 651–654 and P. Clough,
Lipid Technol., 2001, 13, 9–12.
cultures, the olive tree or its branches have been a symbol of peace, life and
salvation. Besides food, olive oil has been used for religious rituals and medi-
cine, as fuel in oil lamps as well as in skin care applications. In Ancient Greece,
athletes ritually used olive oil to rub over their bodies. The Bible, the Quran and
Hadith contain manifold references to olive oil. Still today the King of Saudi
Arabia gives it as a traditional gift to pilgrims to Mecca.
The olive fruit contains oil of very similar composition in the pulp
(approximately 20%) and in the kernel (approximately 12%). Genuine olive oil
contains up to 83% oleic acid, between 4 and 21% linoleic acid and 8 to 25%
saturated palmitic and stearic acids. The proportion of polyunsaturated fatty
acids is low. Olive pomace oil is the oil obtained by solvent extraction of olive
pomace. Pomace is the ground flesh and pits after pressing.
Internationally recognized quality definitions were promulgated by the
International Olive Oil Council (IOOC) and have been adopted in the Joint
FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme. The best virgin oils (those called extra
virgen in Spanish) are cold-pressed, which produces a natural level of low
acidity (under 1%) and a minimum organoleptic rating of 6.5 or more as
determined by the IOOC method. Extra virgin olive oil can be used in endless
ways in the kitchen, and has been a traditional ingredient in everything from
antipasti to desserts. It is best used raw in salads, in order to enjoy its real
flavour.
Figure 9.1.30 Linseed, flax. Sources: flax botanical, Koeh-088.jpg; Linum usita-
tissimum, released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence,
both from Wikipedia.
Flax seed has a warm, earthy and subtly nutty, butter flavour. The seed can be
eaten entirely, and has traditionally been used as an add-on to cereal or bread.
Today flaxseed is experiencing a renaissance among nutritionists, the health
conscious public, food and feed processors (see Chapter 6) and chefs alike. It is
one of the richest sources of lignan and a-linolenic acid (450%), one type of
fatty acid in the polyunsaturated o-3 fatty acid (PUFA) family, considered
essential fatty acids. Lignans, like isoflavones, are one of the major classes of
phytoestrogens, which are estrogen-like chemicals and act as antioxidants.
Linseed oil, or flax seed oil, is cold-pressed from the dried ripe seeds of flax.
For medicinal purposes recently expressed linseed oil, oleum lini, is preferable.
In order to enlarge the breadth of the linseed application profile crop breeding
efforts have led to new flax species, called Linolat and NuLint. Linola is high in
oleic and linoleic acid (485%) and low in linolenic acid (approximatley 2%).
Linolat received GRAS status from the US FDA. It is a substitute to sunflower
oil, to be used in margarines and in salad and cooking oils. NuLint on the
contrary is a high o-3 fatty acids flax (465% linolenic acid, IV 4205) and targets
industrial applications and health food such as bakery products.77
Figure 9.1.31 Castor oil plant, castor seed. Sources: Ricinus communis, botanical
Koeh-257.jpg, from Wikipedia.
Uses. Medicinal castor oil is prepared from the yield of the first pressing.
The oil is classified as an oleaginous vehicle. It is present in some topical
pharmaceuticals and is used as a purgative and laxative. The castor bean
contains 50–55% oil. Among vegetable oils, castor oil is distinguished by its
high content (485%) of ricinoleic acid. As a result, in contrast to other
vegetable oils castor oil is highly reactive for derivatization in the hydro-
carbon moiety of the acylglycerol molecule.78 It reacts with isocyanates to
form polyurethanes, especially in the field of surface coatings, potting and
Natural Fats and Oils 211
encapsulation compounds. Ethoxylates of castor oil are well known as emul-
sifiers for cosmetic and technical emulsions. Rather than alkali catalyzed
alkoxylation, castor oil alkoxylates suitable for PUR slab stock foams for
mattresses require special ‘‘double metal cyanide’’ (DMC) catalysis.79
Hardening of castor oil yields hydrogenated castor oil (HCO, glycerol
12-hydroxy tristearate also known as castor wax). HCO has a broad applica-
tion profile covering cosmetic applications like hair wax,80 topical ointment
compositions perceived as pharmaceutically elegant,81 internal lubricants for
PVC and other plastics;82,83 saponification of HCO yields Li-, Ca- or Al-soaps
which have been known for many years as thickeners or gelling agents for
the preparation of lubricating greases and biodegradable oleogels;84 when
micronized, castor wax acts as thixotropic agent for organic surface coatings
and sealants.85
Non-drying castor oil is converted into a drying oil when the hydroxyl group
and adjacent hydrogen are removed from each ricinoleic acid chain by action of
an acid catalyst at 230 to 260 1C. An additional double bond is created,
resulting in two double bonds on each chain, of which 25% are in the con-
jugated position. The result is a light-coloured, odourless drying oil known as
dehydrated castor oil (DCO). Varnishes, alkyds and resin systems based on
DCO are noted for fast-drying, flexibility, excellent chemical resistance, adhe-
sion to metals, high gloss and water-resistance.
O
O O
O
O O
Sulphation of castor oil with sulphuric acid or oleum yields an easily water-
soluble or dispersible sulph(on)ated castor oil also called Turkey red oil, one of
the first synthetic detergents, which has been used for textile dyeing, softeners
and metal working.86
Castor oil is also a raw material for the ‘‘green polyamide’’ PA 11, Rilsans.
jatropha interesting as an energy crop, for example when grown for biofuel
production thus satisfying local needs for farm machinery and even for export.
O O O HOH OH
C(O)O C(O)OR C(O)OR
OH
O O HO – X – OH
C(O)O OH OH OH OH
C(O)OR
O
OH
C(O)OR X
O O
OH C(O)OR
OH OH
+
O OH
C–O C(O) – O C(O)OR
OH O
O (X)–OH
OH
C–O
from castor oil C(O) – O
O
OH OH
C–O OH
caustic
pyrolysis ozonolysis dimerization biooxidation
oxidation
pelargonic monomer
n-heptaldehyde 2-octanol
acid acid/iso
enantic acid/ stearic acid
n-heptanol
10-undecenoic octa-
sebacic acid azelaic acid
acid decan-
dioic acid
11-bromoundecanoic acid
dimer acid
11-aminoundecanoic acid
CH2 – O – C(O) – R
CH – O – C(O) – R
CH2 – O – C(O) – R
O O
R – C(O) – O – CH3 R–C R–C
OH O] − K+
Ester splitting/esterification/transesterification
O
R2
R1 OH + O
O
[cat] R1
O + R2 OH
Hardening
O H2 O
HO [cat] HO
unsaturated fatty acid saturated fatty acid
Hydrogenation
O H2
RO [cat] HO
saturated fatty acid (ester) saturated fatty alcohol
O
H2
RO [cat] HO
Partial
Esterification Glycerides
Gly-
cerol Polyether
Alkoxylation polyols
Splitting
Fatty Acid
Esterification Esters
Epoxidation Epoxidized
Vegetable Oils
Ethoxylated
Ethoxylation Triglycerides
Hardened
Hydrogenation Triglycerides,
Hydrogenated
Castor Oil, HCO
Sulphation/ Fat liquors/
Sulphitation Turkey Red Oil
In industrial applications liquid fatty acid esters are well known as plasti-
cizers for pyroxyline varnishes and as secondary plasticizers for PVC.91
They are used as thinners and carrier oils and have become established as
green solvents (see Chapter 10) for printing inks (Table 9.1.9) and for industrial
surface cleaning due to their low volatility, environmental compatibility and
contribution to work hygiene and industrial safety.20,67
As green carrier oils or solvents – together with green surfactants – they also
play a key role as ‘‘inerts’’, i.e. non-active, inert formulation aids in modern
crop protection, such as pesticide microemulsions or emulsifiable con-
centrates.114 Besides fatty acid esters, certain liquid fatty acid amides, more
particularly capryl dimethylamide, are also increasingly creating interest as
green solvents and carrier oils.
Natural Fats and Oils
Table 9.1.9 Specifications of oleo-based oils in comparison to mineral oil based printing ink distillates.
Titer (pour Flash Boiling Visc. At Kauri butanol Anilin Iodine value
point) (1C) point (1C) point (1C) 25 1C (Mpas) value point (Wijs)
221
222 Chapter 9.1
9.1.5.5 Glycerine as C3-Building Block
The manufacturing of fatty acids by fat splitting and of fatty acid methylesters
by alcoholysis of fats and oils yield approximately 10% to 13% of glycerine
(glycerol) as by-product. Established glycerine markets are applications as
hydrotrope, humectant, solvent, solubilizer, antifreeze and plasticizer for
aqueous systems in cosmetics, pharma, food and industrial markets; as
humidity stabilizer and preservative for tobacco; as raw material for glycerol
esters, for polyetherpolyols, for synthetic resins, and nitroglycerine.115
The emergence of biodiesel had a major impact on the glycerol market. In the
European 300 to 400,000 mto a1 glycerol market appeared an additional offer
of 200 to 400,000 mto a1 crude glycerol. Glycerol price was cut to half between
2003 and 2006 reaching the level of ethylene glycol or below and one-third
approximately of propylene glycol. As a result glycerine became of interest as a
commodity solvent and C3-building block. More particularly, synthetic glycerine
made in a three-step process by oxychlorination of propene and hydrolysis of the
epichlorohydrin intermediate nearly disappeared from the market. Glycerine was
cheap enough to make epichlorohydrin in an alternative way, i.e. starting from
glycerine instead of propene (Epicerols process, Solvay; GTE process, DOW).
Similarly, hydrogenolysis of glycerine to manufacture 1,2-propylene glycol is
being explored by several companies. Glycerol formal, glycerol butyral or gly-
cerol carbonate as green solvents, glycerol tert.-butylether (GTBE) as a gasoline
additive, triacetine as a plasticizer, dihydroxyacetone as a sunless tanner and 1,3-
propanediol (1,3-propylenglycol) by bioconversion (as alternative to the acro-
lein-3-hydroxypropionaldehyde route116) are other existing or potential appli-
cations for a low-cost glycerol feedstock. Meanwhile a recovery in glycerine
quotations can be noticed. These fluctuations of glycerol pricing in fact are
indicating the upcoming dependency of glycerine valuation on tax regulations
and state policies for the transportation and energy sectors.
FA · EO FA α-Olefine
Phenole
Sorbitan
esters Naphtalene Propylene
NP OP DP
Butylene
Turkey Red
Oil (SCO)
QAC AEO Dowfax®
O
HO – C – CH – NH2
O
CH2
+ Cl
CH2
O C
OH
NaOH - HCl
O O
HO – C – CH – N
H
CH2
CH2
O C
O-Na+
OH
O
HO H+
HO OH + H O
OH -H2O
Glucose Fatty alcohol
OH
OH O
HO
HO O
O
HO OH
HO
OH O
+
O
HO
HO
OH O
n
hydrophilic hydrophobic
Nitrogen
Water
monomer solubilisation M
in the micelle M M
micelle
M M 103 nm
M M M
3,5 nm 5 nm
momomer droplet
. .
.
I+ I I
swollen micelle
102 nm
.
I = initiator radical
M = monomer molecule latex particle
= surfactant molecule
9.1.6 Perspectives
Natural fats and oils are extremely well positioned to produce environmentally
compatible and powerful products in the sense of a sustainable development.
Oil crops are a unique combination of useful base stock materials. They supply
essential protein for human food and animal feed. They need neither refining
(in the sense of crude oil refining) nor cracking, before being processed for food
or feed or being transferred into useful oleochemical specialties. The high
biocompatibility of oleochemical surfactants, solvents and biolubes will even
further increase their importance for all applications, which come into direct
contact with the environment be it as fabric or body care detergents, additives
for paints, inks or adhesives, lubricating oils, agrochemicals and even oil-well
drilling adjuvants. Hulls, shells and other by-products are biomass for energy
generation. They eventually carry extractives, which can be used as specialty
chemicals, and their potential to be converted in new chemical products via
biochemical technologies is by far not exploited. It can clearly be assumed that
in future further possibilities for using renewable resources will be intensely
investigated. Here the combination of different types of vegetable raw mate-
rials, such as vegetable oils, carbohydrates and proteins, to form new products
and intelligent product concepts in order to meet market and consumer needs
will be a challenge for research and development.
References
1. H. Schönfeld, ed., Chemie und Technologie der Fette und Fettprodukte,
Verl. Julius Springer, Wien, 1936; M. Bockisch, Fats and Oils Handbook,
updated and revised translation of the original German work, AOCS
Press, Champaign, 1998; F. Shahidi, ed., Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat
Products, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 6th edn, 2005; M. P. Malveda, R.
Gubler, K. Yagi, Fats and Oils Industry Overview, Chemical Economics
Handbook – SRI Consulting, 2005; J.-O. Lidefelt, ed., Handbook
of Vegetable Oils and Fats, AAK AB, Karlshamn, 2nd edn, 2007; A.
Thomas, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 7th edn, 2007.
Natural Fats and Oils 229
2. J. H. Clark, V. Budarin, F. E. I. Deswarte, J. E. Hardy, F. M. Kerton, A.
J. Hunt, R. Luque, D. J. Macquarrie, K. Milkowski, A. Rodriguez, O.
Samuel, S. J. Tavener, R. J. White and A. J. Wilson, Green Chem., 2006, 8,
853; B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, ed., Biorefineries – Industrial
Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.
3. S. Erkman, vers une e´cologie industrielle, ed. Charles Léopold Mayer – La
librairie FPH, Paris, 1998; D. T. Allen and D. R. Shonnard, Green
Engineering, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, 2002; M. M. Sri-
vasatava and R. Sanghi, ed., Chemistry for Green Environment, Narosa
Publ., New Delhi, 2005.
4. G. Hatje, in Oil Crops of the World, ed. G. Röbbelen, R. K. Downey and
A. Ashri, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989, p. 1.
5. F. Bohmert, Vom Fang der Wale zum Schutz der Wale, Schriften des
Werksarchivs der Henkel KGaA, Bd. 14, Düsseldorf, 1982.
6. R. A. Caulfield, Greenlander, Whales, and Whaling: Sustainability and
Self-determination in the Arctic, Dartmouth College, University Press of
New England, Hanover, 1997.
7. J. Diamond, Collapse, Penguin Books, London, 2005.
8. B. S. Mielke, Fett Wiss. Techn. Fat Sci Techn., 1987, 89, 99; ISTA Mielke
GmbH, ed., Oil World Annual 2007, vol. 1, Hamburg, 2007; ISTA Mielke
GmbH, ed., Oil World Annual 2008, vol. 1, Hamburg, 2008.
9. R. Gubler, Biodiesel, ed. SRI Consulting, CEH Marketing Research
Report, Nov. 2006.
10. S. Hansen, 6th European Motor BioFuels Forum, Rotterdam, 2008.
11. J.-P. Langellier, Le Bre´sil devient un pays cre´diteur apre`s deux
sie`cles d’endettement, Le Monde (27. Février 2008); Banco Central do
Brazil, Focus-BC Report: Brazilian External Sustainability Indicators –
Recent Evolution (2/29/2008), http://www.bcb.gov.br (retrieved
05.03.2008).
12. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Plano Nacional
de Agroenergia/Brazilian agroenergy plan 2006–2011, Embrapa Publ.,
Brası́lia, 2006, http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/docs/brazil.govt.
agroenergyplan2006-2011.eng.pdf.
13. Y. Basiron, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2007, 109, 289.
14. S. Trent, ed., The Politics of Extinction, Environmental Information
Agency/Telapak, London, 1998; http://www.eia-international.org/
old-reports/Forests/Indonesia/PolExtinction/intro.html.
15. R. Carrere, Gen. Coordination, The Bitter Fruit of Oil Palm: Disposses-
sion and Deforestation, World Rainforest Movement, Montevideo,
2001, www.wrm.org.uy/plantations/material/OilPalm.pdf (retrieved
06.03.2008).
16. Main worldwide oil transportation routes, http://www.black-tides.com/
uk/oil/transport-oil/main-oil-transport-routes.php.
17. Worldwatch Institute, Biofuels for Transport, German Federal Ministry of
Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, ed., Earthscan, London,
Sterling, 2007.
18. http://www.unhchr.ch/development/governance.html.
230 Chapter 9.1
19. S. Hansen and K. Ahti, Rabobank, private communication.
20. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 203.
21. European Commission, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Food, Drink and
Milk Industries, August 2006; IFC, Environmental, Health, and Safety
Guidelines Plantation Crop Production, April 30, 2007; IFC, Environ-
mental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Vegetable Oil Processing, April
30, 2007.
22. Council Directive 1999/13/EC, March 11, 1999.
23. E. Ferchau, Equipment for decentralized cold pressing of oil seeds, http://
www.folkecenter.dk/plant-oil (retrieved 21.04.2008).
24. K. Dahlke, Ole´agineux, Corps Gras, Lipides, 1997, 4(1), 55.
25. H. C. Holm, Novozymes, private communication; http://www.novozymes.
com/NR/rdonlyres/66481D20-BE7E-4C12-ADD2-DC2C3E4D53CD/0/
degumming.swf (retrieved 02.05.2008); C. L. G. Dayton, K. P. Staller and
T. L. Berkshire, WO 2005063950, 2004 (Bunge Oils).
26. M. M. Prieto, J. C. Bada, M. Leon-Camacho and E. Graciani Constante,
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech., 2008, 110(2), 91; W. de Greyt, Deodorization and
physical refining, IUPAC-AOCS Workshop on fats, oils & oilseeds ana-
lyses & production, Tunis (2004).
27. W. Normann, DRP 141 029, 1902 (Herforder Maschinenfett und Ölfabrik
Leprince & Siveke); W. Normann, Chemiker Zeitung, 1937, 61, 20.
28. R. L. Earle and M. D. Earle, Unit Operations in Food Processing – the
Web Edition, http://www.nzifst.org.nz/unitoperations.
29. R. Jost, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH,
published online: 15 July, 2007.
30. J. C. Castilla and O. Defeo, Science, 26 August 2005, 309(5739), 1324c;
H. Mathies, kontinente, 4-2009, 14, 06; www.msc.org.
31. R. Froese, A. Stern-Pirlot, H. Winkler and D. Gascuel, Fish. Res., 2008,
92, 231.
32. L. Jeromin, W. Johannisbauer, B. Gutsche, V. Jordan and H. Wogatzki,
EP 0656894, 1993 (Henkel).
33. S. Both, T. Alexandre, B. Gutsche, J. Kray, C. Beverungen and
R. Eickenberg, US 7 091 012, 2006 (Cognis).
34. S. Sato, H. J. Sousa Sales, H. Peloggia, P. Kempers, S. Both and
U. Schörken, WO 2004/080 942, 2004 (Cognis).
35. S. Puleo and T. P. Rit, Lipid Technol., July/Aug. 1992, 82–90;
U. Wolfmeier, H. Schmidt, F.-L. Heinrichs, G. Michalczyk, W. Payer,
W. Dietsche, K. Boehlke, G. Hohner and J. Wildgruber, in Ullmann’s
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
36. S. R. Padgette, K. H. Kolacz, X. Delannay, D. B. Re, B. J. LaVallee,
C. N. Tinius, W. K. Rhodes, Y. I. Otero, G. F. Barry, D. A. Eichholtz,
V. M. Peschke, D. L. Nida, N. B. Taylor and G. M. Kishore, Crop Sci-
ence, 1995, 35(5), 1451; J. Carpenter and L. Gianessi, AgBioForum, 1999,
2(2), 65.
Natural Fats and Oils 231
37. T. Funke, H. Han, M. L. Healy-Fried, M. Fischer and E. Schönbrunn,
2006, PNAS, 103, 13010; L. Moran, The Molecular Basis of Roundups
Resistance, http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2007/03/molecular-basis-of-
roundup-resistance.html (retrieved 09.07.2008).
38. J. E. Carpenter and L. P. Gianessi, Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated
Benefit Estimates, NCFAP Reports, January 2001, www.ncfap.org/
pubs.htm; S. Bonny, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2007, 28.
39. GVO-Zulassungen nach EU-Recht: Stand der Dinge, Press Release 04/17
(28/01/2004), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference¼
MEMO/04/17&format¼HTML&aged¼0&language¼DE&guiLanguage
¼en (retrieved 07.05.2008).
40. Anonymous, Tetraconazole: a Success Story, ISAGRO Focus, February
2005.
41. Y. Dersjant-Li, in Memorias del VI Simposium Internacional de Nutrición
Acuı´cola, ed. L. E. Cruz-Suárez, D. Ricque-Marie, M. Tapia-Salazar, M.
G. Gaxiola-Cortés and N. Simoes, Cancún, 2002; A. Allodi, Sustainability
– European Aquaculture Perspectives: Will feed be a bottleneck? FAO/
FEAP Joint Workshop, Rome, 2007.
42. M. Fitzpatrick, Soybean Use and Trends 2001–2006, U.S. Meat Export
Federation, October 30, 2007, www.usmef.org/TradeLibrary/files/
07_1030_Soybeans.pps (retrieved 07.05.2008).
43. R. H. V. Corley and P. B. Tinker, The Oil Palm, Blackwell, Oxford, 2003.
44. C. F. Rober and S. Menon, Trade and Environment Dimensions in the
Food and Food Processing Industries in Asia and the Pacific, http://
www.un-trade-environment.org/documents/asia/study%20paper/
Case%20study%20Palm%20oil%20Malaysia.pdf (retrieved 15.05.2008).
45. Y. M. Choo, C. W. Puah and M. Basri Wahid, Outlook of Palm Biodiesel
in Malaysia, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, 2007; Y. M. Choo, H. L. N. Lau
and C. L. Yung, Biodiesel Standard Development in Malaysia & Impacts of
Palm Biodiesel on Engines and Emissions, www.tistr.or.th/APEC_website/
APEC_pdfs/A-9_Dr.%20Choo_Bangkok_APEC%20-%2025%20Oct%
202007.pdf (retrieved 14.05.2008).
46. O. Ong’wen and S. Wright, Small Farmers and the Future of Sustainable
Agriculture, Ecofair Trade Dialogue Discussion Papers, No. 7, March 2007.
47. R. Butler, Malaysian palm oil industry puts sustainability in the spotlight,
mongabay.com, April 17, 2008.
48. Working Group on Developing Sustainability Criteria and Standards for
the Cultivation of Biomass used for Biofuels, Compilations of existing
certification schemes, policy measures, ongoing initiatives and crops used for
bioenergy, 2007, http://www.uneptie.org/energy/act/bio/doc/Working%
20Paper_Developing%20Standards%20and%20Criteria%20for%20
Biomass%20Production_June%202007.pdf.
49. RSPO Certification Systems – Final document, June 2007, http://www.rspo.
org/RSPO_Certification_Scheme_for_Sustainable_Palm_Oil_Launched_at_
RT5.aspx; M. Salleh, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and
232 Chapter 9.1
the Supply Chain, PORAM FORUM 2007, http://www.poram.org.my/
database/Dato%20Mamat%20Salleh.pdf.
50. RSPO, Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production,
October 2007, http://www.rspo.org/resource_centre/RSPO%20Principles%
20&%20Criteria%20Document.pdf.
51. M. W. Vis, J. Vos and D. van den Berg, Sustainability Criteria and Cer-
tification Systems for Biomass Production – Final Report, Report Nr. 1386,
btg, Enschede (2008).
52. A. Mohd Nasir, Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 2003, 3(2), 21.
53. W. Stein, JAOCS, 1968, 45(6), 471; L. Jeromin, N. Bremus, G. Friederici
and P. Pfeiffer, US 3950371, 1974 (Henkel); E. Deffense, JAOCS, 1985,
62(2), 376; O. Zaliha, C. L. Chong, C. S. Cheow, A. R. Norizzah and M.
J. Kellens, Food Chem., June 2004, 86(2), 245; M. Kellens, V. Gibon, M.
Hendrix and W. De Greyt, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2007, 109, 336.
54. K. Poku, Small-Scale Palm Oil Processing in Africa, FAO Agricultural
Services Bulletin 148, Rome, 2002; N. Thomma, Migros World Tour,
2002, 118.
55. Y. Basiron and K. W. Chan, J. Oil Palm Research, June 2004, 16(1), 1.
56. D. Reed, Urethanes Technology, Oct./Nov. 2003, 20(5), 41; K. S. Norin
Zamiah, T. L. Ooi, A. Salmiah, J. Oil Palm Research, June 2006, 18, 198.
57. 66. Y. Akaike, JAOCS, 62, February 1985, (2), 335.
58. Y. M. Choo, A. N. Ma, K. W. Chan and Y. Basiron, J. Oil Palm
Research, June 2005, 17, 47.
59. K. Schmid, H. Baumann, W. Stein and H. Dolhaine, in Proceedings of the
World Surfactants Congress, München, vol. II, Kürle, Gelnhausen, 1984,
p. 105; B. Fabry, U. Kratzel, W. Schmidt and G. Kreienfeld, EP 0524996,
1991 (Henkel); A. E. Sherry, B. E. Chapman, M. T. Creedon, J. M.
Jordan and R. L. Moese, JAOCS, 1995, 72(7), 835; S. Ahrnad and Y.
Basiron, All Business, March 1, 2003; W. B. Sheats, N. C. Foster, Con-
centrated Products from Methyl Ester Sulfonates, Published Papers, 2007
(Chemithon).
60. B. Tan and M. H. Saleh, US 5 157 132, 1990 (Carotech); Y. A. Tan,
R. Sambanthamurthi, K. Sundram and M. B. Wahid, Eur. J. Lipid Sci.
Technol., 2007, 109, 380.
61. F. L. Jackson and H. E. Longenecker, Oil & Soap, March 1944, 74;
K. S. Markley, Economic Botany, 1971, 25(3), 267; Babassu Breakers,
http://www.tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid¼912 (retrieved 03.06.2008).
62. R. Kleiman, in Advances in New Crops, ed. J. Janick and J. E. Simon,
Timber Press, Portland, 1990, p. 196.
63. R. K. Downey, in Agricultural Biotechnology: Economic Growth Through
New Products, Partnerships and Workforce Development, ed. A. Eagle-
sham and R. W. F. Hardy, NABC Report 18, 2006, http://nabc.cals.
cornell.edu/pubs/nabc_18/NABC18_Downey.pdf (retrieved 11.02.2008).
64. E. L. Ashton, J. D. Best and M. J. Ball, J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 2001, 20(4),
320; A. Allman-Farinelli, K. Gomes, E. J. Favaloro and R. A. Petocz,
JADA, July 2005, 105(7), 1071.
Natural Fats and Oils 233
65. L. W. Kleingartner, in Trends in New Crops and New Uses, ed. J. Janick
and A. Whipkey, ASHS Press, Alexandria, 2002.
66. A. Westfechtel, in Nachwachsende Rohstoffe für die Chemie, Schriftenreihe
Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Bd. 18, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster,
2001, p. 297; G. P. Vannozzi, HELIA, 2006, 29(44), 1.
67. S. Z. Erhan, M. O. Bagby and H. W. Cunningham, JAOCS, 1992, 69(3),
195; R. Höfer and M. Fies, Paintindia, 2001, 51(11), 65; J. Baro and
P. Bene, Farbe Und Lack, 10/2007, 113, 42.
68. R. Höfer, F. Jost, M. J. Schwuger, R. Scharf, J. Geke, J. Kresse,
H. Lingmann, R. Veitenhansl and W. Erwied, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry, A11, VCH Weinheim,1988, p. 456; M. J. Owen, in
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons,
Article Online Posting, 2001, p. 236.
69. E. Shaaya, M. Kostjukovski, J. Eilberg and C. Sukprakarn, J. Stored
Prod. Res., 1997, 33(1), 7; M. B. Isman, Crop Protection, 2000, 19(8–10),
603.
70. Anonymous, Maize in Human Nutrition, FAO, Rome, 1992, http://www.
fao.org/docrep/T0395E/T0395E00.htm#Contents (retrieved 04.06.2008).
71. F. T. Orthoefer, Food Technology, 1996, 50(12), 62; J. S. Godber and
B. O. Juliano, in Rice Chemistry and Technology, ed. E. T. Champagne,
American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, 3rd edn, 2004, p. 163.
72. R. Schramm, A. Abadie, N. Hua, Z. Xu and M. Lima, J. Biol. Eng., 2007,
1, 9.
73. J. S. Kim, Einfluss der Temperatur beim Rösten von Sesam auf Aroma und
antioxidative Eigenschaften des Öls, Dissertation, Berlin, 2001.
74. C. K. Lyon, JAOCS, 1972, 49, 245; L. A. Johnson, T. M. Suleiman and
E. W. Lucas, JAOCS, 1979, 56, 436; W. Collinge, The American Holistic
Health Association Complete Guide to Alternative Medicine, Warner
Books, New York, 1996; G. Mateljan, The World’s Healthiest Foods –
Essential Guide for the Healthiest Way of Eating, gmf pub, Seattle,
Washington, 2007.
75. T. Beckett, The Science of Chocolate, RSC Publ., Cambridge, 2008.
76. R. Höfer, 6000 Jahre Sinn fürs Schöne – 6000 Jahre Lack, Schriftenreihe
VILF-Vorträge, Bd. 7, 2005, p. 23.
77. P. Dribnenki, Flax for Industrial Uses, Canadian Plant Bio-Industrial Oils
Workshop, Saskatoon, 2006.
78. F. C. Naughton, JAOCS, 1974, 51(3), 65.
79. J. Müller, S. Quaiser, P. Saling, V. Manea, J. E. Maloney and C. Bradley,
PU Magazin, Sept./Okt. 2008, 8, 253.
80. P. Gross and E. Flemming, EP 0301197, 1988 (Wella).
81. D. P. Jones, D. W. Hobson and P. P. Pilar, US 6479060, 2001
(Healthpoint).
82. K. Worschech, in Becker/Braun – Kunststoff Handbuch, ed. K. Felger,
Hanser, München, Wien, 2nd edn, vol. 2/1, 1985. p. 570.
83. R. Höfer, in Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Chemie, ed.
H. Eierdanz, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, p. 91.
234 Chapter 9.1
84. J. A. Waynick, US 5133888, 1990 (Amoco); R. A. Fletcher, WO/1997/
003152, 1996 (Shell); Yu. L. Ishchuk, Lubricating Grease Manufacturing
Technology, New Age Intern., New Delhi, 2005; R. Sánchez, J. M.
Franco, M. A. Delgado, C. Valencia and C. Gallegos, Green Chem., 2009,
11, 686–693.
85. R. Höfer, H.-G. Schulte and J. Schmitz, in H. Kittel – Lehrbuch der Lacke
und Beschichtungen, 2. völlig neu bearb. Aufl., vol. 4, ed. M. Ortelt and
S. Hirzel Verl. Stuttgart, 2007, p. 277.
86. K. Lindner, Tenside-Textilhilfsmittel-Waschrohstoffe, Wiss. Verlagsges.,
Stuttgart, 1964.
87. R. K. Henning, Jatropha curcas L in Africa, http://www.under
utilizedspecies.org/Documents/PUBLICATIONS/jatropha_curcas_
africa.pdf; The Jatropha System, http://www.jatropha.de (retrieved
03.02.2009).
88. D. Bowles, ed., Micro- and Macro-Algae: Utility for Industrial Applica-
tions, York, 2007, http://www.epobio.net/pdfs/0709AquaticReport.pdf
(retrieved 09.11.2008).
89. Anonymous, A look back the US Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species
Program: Biodiesel from algae, http://www.biodieselamerica.org/files/
articles/Biodiesel%20from%20Algae.pdf (retrieved 27.06.2008); Office of
Biomass Program, U.S. Department of Energy Biomass and Biofuels
Update to the United States Congress, 2008, http://www.eere.energy.gov/
news/pdfs/may_2008_hill_briefing.pdf (retrieved 27.06.2008).
90. M. Alvarez Cobelas and J. Zarco Lechado, Grasas y Aceites, 1989, 40,
118–145.
91. K. Brudermanns, M. Graß, R. Höfer, J. Koch and N. Scholz, in H. Kittel –
Lehrbuch der Lacke und Beschichtungen, 2. völlig neu bearb. Aufl., vol. 4,
ed. M. Ortelt, S. Hirzel Verl., Stuttgart, 2007, p. 203.
92. R. Höfer, P. Daute, R. Grützmacher and A. Westfechtel, JCT,
June 1997, 69(869), 65; R. Höfer, ECJ, 3/2000, 26; T. Roloff,
U. Erkens and R. Höfer, Urethanes Technology, August/September
2005, 29.
93. B. Gruber, R. Höfer, H. Kluth and A. Meffert, Fett Wiss. Technol., Fat
Sci. Technol., 1987, 89(4), 147; R. Miel, Urethane Technologies Interna-
tional, Oct./Nov. 2007, 40.
94. F. M. Casati, B. Dawe, S. Fregni and Y. Miyazaki, PUMagazin, Sept./
Okt. 2008, 8, 234; Z. Lysenko, A. K. Schrock, D. A. Babb and A. Sanders,
US 2006/0276609, 2004 (DOW).
95. C. Priebe, M. Skwiercz and K. Böge, WO 00/06632, 1998 (Cognis); M.
Skwiercz, in Nachwachsende Rohstoffe für die Chemie, Schriftenreihe
Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Bd. 18, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster,
2001, p. 441; U. Riedel and J. Nickel, in Biopolymers, Vol. 10 – General
Aspects and Special Applications, ed. A. Steinbüchel, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2003, p. 1.
96. K. Weissermel and H.-J. Arpe, Industrielle Organische Chemie, 5, vollst.
überarb. Aufl., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998.
Natural Fats and Oils 235
97. J. G. Zeikus, M. K. Jain and P. Elankov, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
1999, 51(5), 545.
98. M. Biermann, in Schriftenreihe des Fonds der Chem. Industrie, Heft 26,
Fette und Öle, 1986, p. 26; S. Warwel, P. Bavaj, M. Rüsch gen. Klaas
and B. Wolff, in Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Chemie, ed.
H. Eierdanz, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, p. 119.
99. R. G. Fayter, in Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Chemie, ed.
H. Eierdanz, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, p. 107.
100. D. V. Kinsman, JAOCS, Nov. 1979, 56, 823A.
101. A. G. Hinze, in Schriftenreihe des Fonds der Chem. Industrie, Heft 26,
Fette und Öle, 1986, p. 19.
102. L. Dudley Eirich, D. L. Craft, R. W. Frayer and C. R. Wilson, Bioox-
idation – A Platform to Produce Specialty Chemicals, Soc. for Industrial
Microbiology – Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, 2003; U. Schörken,
Cognis, private communication; T. Roloff, U. Nagorny and U. Erkens,
Kunststoffe, 5/2004, 94, 104; R. Höfer, S. Winkels and H.-J. Pütz, Pitture e
Vernici, European Coatings, 16/2004, 28.
103. M. Meier and W. J. Feder, in Nachhaltigkeit in der Chemie – 13. Internat.
Sommerakademie St. Marienthal, Initiativen zum Umweltschutz, Bd. 70,
ed. F. Brickwedde, R. Erb, M. Hempel, M Schwake and Erich Schmidt,
Verlag, Berlin, 2008, p. 172.
104. E. Twitchell, US 601 603, 1897 (Emery).
105. K. H. Nottinger, 6th World Surfactant Congress, CESIO, Berlin, 2004.
106. K. Schumann and K. Siekmann, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, published online 15 June 2000.
107. M. Magne, S. El Kasmi, M. Dupire, M. Morard, C. Vaca Garcia, S.
Thiebaud-Roux, S. J. Peydecastaing, E. Borredon and A. Gaset, US
20050163935, 2003 (Lapeyre); T. Lucas, L’Usine Nouvelle, 4 Mai 2006
[3008], 42.
108. Ch. Breucker, V. Jordan, M. Nitsche and B. Gutsche, Chem.-Ing.-Techn.,
1995, 67, 430.
109. B. Gutsche, H. Rößler and S. Würkert, in Handbook of Heterogeneous
Catalysis, ed. G. Ertl, H. Knoezinger, F. Schueth and J. Weitkamp,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn, 2008, p. 3329.
110. B. Gutsche, Fett/Lipid, 1997, 99(12), 418.
111. F. Bongardt, Henkel-Referate, 1993, 29, 112; Bundesministerium für
Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, ed, Bericht über
biologisch schnell abbaubare Schmierstoffe und Hydraulikflüssigkeiten,
Bonn, 2002; M. Scherer and D. Rettemeyer, Fluid Spezial, 2007, 32.
112. R. Luther, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
113. S. Boyde, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 293.
114. B. Abribat and R. Höfer, Info Chimie Magazine, Mai 2007, 479, 44; Juin/
Juillet 2007, 480, 38.
115. F. Bohmert, 75 Jahre Henkel Glycerin, Schriften des Werksarchivs, Bd.
18, Henkel KGaA, Düsseldorf, 1985; R. Christoph, B. Schmidt, U.
236 Chapter 9.1
Steinberner and W. Dilla, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chem-
istry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 6th edn, 2000; A. Westfechtel, Glycerol
Derivatives – An Overview, 26th ISF World Congress, Prag, 2005; J. N.
Chheda, G. W. Huber and J. A. Dumesic, Angew. Chemie, Int. Ed., 2007,
119(38), 7298; M. Pagliaro and M. Rossi, The Future of Glycerol: New
Usages for a Versatile Raw Material, RSC Publ., Cambridge, 2008.
116. T. Haas and D. Arntz, EP 0577972, 1993 (Degussa).
117. H. Sanderson, S. E. Belanger, P. R. Fisk, Ch. Schäfers, G. Veenstra,
A. M. Nielsen, Y. Kasai, A. Willing, S. D. Dyer, K. Stanton and R.
Sedlak, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2008, doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.10.006;
H. Sanderson, S. E. Belanger, P. R. Fisk, Ch. Schäfers, G. Veenstra,
A. M. Nielsen, Y. Kasai, A. Willing, S. D. Dyer, K. Stanton and
R. Sedlak, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2008, doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.
2008.07.013.
118. http://www.zenitech.com/documents/new%20pdfs/articles/All%20about
%20fatty%20alcohols%20Condea.pdf (retrieved 11.11.2008); B. Brack-
mann and C.-D. Hager, 6th World Surfactant Congress, CESIO, Berlin,
2004.
119. K. Hill, in Catalysis for Renewables, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007, p. 75;
K. Hill Pure Appl. Chem., 2007, 79, 1999.
120. A. Sander, E. Eilers, A. Heilemann and E. von Kries, Fett/Lipid 1997, 99,
115; Henkel Referate, 1998, 34, 14.
121. K. Hill and O. Rhode, Fett/Lipid, 1999, 101, 25; K. Hill and C. LeHen-
Ferrenbach in C. Carnero Ruiz, ed., Sugar-based Surfactants, Surfactant
Science Series, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009, 143, 1–20.
122. K. Hill, W. von Rybinski, G. Stoll, Alkyl Polyglycodies VCH, Weinheim,
New York, Basel, Cambridge, Tokyo (1996); K. Hill, Household and
Personal Care Today, 2008(2), XVII.
123. N. Kurth and C. Weichold, SÖFW-Journal, 2007, 133, 51; A. Mehling,
G. Pellón and H. Hensen, Cosmetics & Toiletries, June 2008, 123(6),
53.
124. M. Schäfer-Korting, U. Bock, A. Gamer, A. Haberland, E. Haltner-
Ukomadu, M. Kaca, H. Kamp, M. Kietzmann, H.C. Korting, H-U.
Krächter, C-M. Lehr, M. Liebsch, A. Mehling, F. Netzlaff, F. Niedorf,
M. K. Rübbelke, U. Schäfer, E. Schmidt, S. Schreiber, K.-R. Schröder, H.
Spielmann and A. Vuia, ATLA: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 2006,
34, 283; A. Mehling, M. Kleber and H. Hensen, Food Chem. Toxicol.,
2007, 45, 747.
125. R. Piorr, R. Höfer, H. J. Schlüßler and K. H. Schmid, Fett Wissenschaft
Techn. – Fat Sci. Techn., 1987, 89(3), 106; S. Both, F. Bauer and
M. Weuthen, SÖFW-Journal, 2008, 134(10), 10.
126. A. F-C. Chan, W. M. Bohon, D. J, Blumer and K. T. Ly, WO/1999/
041342, 1999 (Atlantic Richfield/Arco).
127. A. F. Chan and K. T. Ly, US 5830831, 1996 (Atlantic Richfield).
128. C. Baumann, D. Feustel, U. Held, R. Höfer, Henkel-Referate, 1997, 33,
121; J. Bigorra, W. H. Breuer, S. Heldt, Ll. Llaurado, Comunicaciones,
Natural Fats and Oils 237
Jorn. Com. Esp. Deterg., 2005, 35, 155–162; A. M. Fernandez, U. Held,
A. Willing and W. H. Breuer, Progr. Organic Coatings, 2005, 53, 246;
BDI-Umweltpreis 2005/2006, www.bdi-online.de.
129. W. H. Breuer and R. Höfer, Tenside Surf. Det., 4/2003, 40, 208–214;
Z. Dou, J. P. Ruiz, Y. Li, Z. Zong and F. Trezzi, PPCJ, March 2008,
22–26.
130. M. Aven, EP1023832, 2000 (BASF); M. J. Hopkinson, C. E. Moore and
J. D. Fowler, WO/2003/022049, 2002 (Syngenta); S. B. Cush and
M. J. Hopkinson, EP1603388, 2004 (Syngenta); G. Frisch, G. Schnabel
and J. Rude PCT/EP 2005/005525, 2005 (Bayer Cropscience); B. Abribat,
Specialty Chem. Magazine, April 2008, 22.
CHAPTER 9.2
9.2.1 Markets
Starch and its derivatives can be produced from several raw materials including
corn, wheat, pea, potato, and tapioca and, in general, its production follows
local raw material availability. In 2006 European (EU-25) production of
starches, modified starches and refinery products was approximately 8.6 Mio
tons.1 The main consumer, accounting for 4.5 Mio tons, was the food industry,
followed by the paper and board sector with 2.4 Mio tons, the pharmaceutical
and chemical sector with 1.2 Mio tons and the industrial bindersi sector with 0.6
Mio tons (Figure 9.2.1).
The botanical source of the primary starch products, from which also
refinery products are derived, has been roughly as follows: corn starch 4.0 Mio
tons, wheat starch 2.9 Mio tons, potato starch 1.8 Mio tons.2
i
Industrial Binders includes the adhesives, gypsum boards and textile industries.
238
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 239
The total raw material processed to produce these starches and derivatives
has been estimated at 12.5 Mio tons of potatoes and 10 Mio tons of cereals
(corn and wheat).3
The perishable nature of potatoes limits the market of this raw material to
the region of production: what is produced in Europe is predominantly con-
sumed in Europe. On the other side, cereals are commodities traded globally
and therefore subject to the dynamics of a global market. A recent demon-
stration of these global dynamics was the temporary shortage of cereal on the
market caused, among others, by an increased demand for food coming from
China and India, bad weather conditions and the use of cereals as feedstock for
‘‘bioethanol’’ production.
It is worthwhile noting that there are regional differences in the use of crops
for bioenergy. In the USA, bioenergy is mostly bioethanol, which reflects on the
high share (B25%) of corn crop used for energy production.4 In Europe,
bioenergy mainly comes from biodiesel, which is derived from oilseeds and has
no impact on corn availability. According to the forecast of the European
Commission the use of corn for bioethanol production in Europe will be very
limited (see Figure 9.2.2 and Table 9.2.1).
Industrial
Binders
6%
Pharma &
Chem.
13%
Food
53%
Paper &
Board
28%
300
250
Mio Tons
200
150
100
50
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
The internal hydrogen bond network also provides a barrier to water pene-
tration inside the granules that are therefore insoluble in cold water. However,
when heat is applied, the surrounding water molecules acquire enough energy to
massively penetrate the network of hydrogen bonding and start competing with
it, resulting in the hydration and dissolution of the polymer chains. This process
is called gelatinization because it eventually leads to a starch gel (or paste) with
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 241
Table 9.2.1 Total cereal market projections – EU-27.
Total cereal market projections for EU-27 (Mio MT)
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Feed 153.2 154.9 153.7 165.2 166.5 167.8 167.9 168.6 168.8 168.6 168.5
Food & Industrial 78.4 76.9 78.6 86.6 87.9 88 88.1 88.1 88.2 88.3 88.3
Bioenergy 0.7 2.7 2.5 1.9 4.8 4.5 5.5 7.5 10.3 15.7 18.4
Amylose Amylopectin
Polymeric structure;
Fermentation feedstock (glucose source);
242 Chapter 9.2
Chemical intermediate for synthesis;
Protective colloid;
Binder;
Humectant;
Carrier;
Rheology modifier.
Modified Starches
Even though native starch can be used for some applications, chemical mod-
ifications of its structure are generally necessary to optimize a particular func-
tionality and to obtain a product that can be handled on an industrial scale.
Even relatively low-level modifications in the chemical structure of starch
have a significant impact on its properties such as:
Viscosity;
Paste viscosity stability;
Retrogradation;
Rheology;
Water retention;
Film formation capacity and film flexibility;
Ionic charge;
Affinity with hydrophobic molecules.
Colour formation
Crystallisation control
Emulsion stabilisation
Fermentability
Foam stabiliser
Hygroscopicity
Osmotic pressure
Viscosity
Glucose syrups are produced via the same process described for mal-
todextrins but the hydrolysis reaction is run more extensively, resulting in
products with higher DE. In general, the properties of syrups produced using
the same process can be related to the DE value (Table 9.2.2).
Hydrolysate is a special type of glucose syrup in which starch has been
hydrolyzed to obtain a D-glucose content of at least 90% on a dry basis, with a
typical value ranging between 95 and 96%.
Hydrolysate is the starch-based product most widely used as a carbon source
for fermentation processes. It is also the product used as feedstock to produce
dextrose.
Dextrose is the common name of the monosaccharide D-glucose (CAS
50-99-7). It is an aldohexose that, when crystalline, assumes a hemiacetal form
(a or b) of the six-membered ring (pyranose) while in solution it reaches
equilibrium between the hemiacetal forms and the aldehyde open form (see
Figure 9.2.4). The open form of D-glucose has the typical reducing property of
the aldehyde group. It is worth mentioning that every amylose and amylopectin
molecule at the end of the chain has one and only one glucose unit that is in
equilibrium between the pyranose and the open form. This is normally called
the reducing end.
Catalytic hydrogenation of an aqueous solution of glucose leads to the main
polyol used in industrial applications: sorbitol. The aqueous solution of sor-
bitol is purified by ion exchange chromatography, decolourized and con-
centrated to give a 70% solution that is sold as such or further processed to give
a crystalline powder (Figure 9.2.5).
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 245
H OH
H O
HO
HO H
H OH O H
H OH
α-D-glucose H OH
HO H
H OH
H OH
H OH
H O
HO CH2OH
HO OH
H OH
H H
β-D-glucose
O H
CH2OH
H OH H OH
HO H H2, Δ HO H
Catalyst
H OH H OH
H OH H OH
CH2OH CH2OH
Sorbitol
Baked Foods
Dairy Products 5%
11%
Figure 9.2.6 Starch products conumption in the food sector. Europe 2006.10
Confectioneries
Starches are widely used in confectioneries as binding or gelling agents. They
provide quick gelling action upon cooling and texture-stabilizing properties.
Starch-containing gum candies are typically prepared with thinned starches
that ensure a relatively low viscosity when cooked but then quickly form a gel
upon cooling. This rapid gel formation is also appreciated in gelled con-
fectioneries such as jelly beans and orange slices.
Maltodextrins are also used as a source of energy with sweetening activity in
the so-called ‘‘energy bars’’.
Glucose syrups are mainly used to control crystal size and texture in various
products.
Processed Foods
This market segment includes a wide variety of products with a very diverse set
of requirements on starch functionality. In dressings and sauces, starches have
to be stable at acidic pH and compatible with hydrophobic components such as
oils and fats.
The use of harsh processing conditions, food safety and the long-shelf-life
requirements are the major challenges for the starch product used in this segment.
In sauces and soups starch is used as a thickener that provides also a specific
texture and mouthfeel. Those functionalities are particularly critical in low-fat
products where starches are expected to provide the same textural and
mouthfeel experience commonly associated with conventional products.
Beverages
A significant amount of glucose syrups are used in this segment as sweeteners.
High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS), a glucose syrup with high concentration
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 247
of fructose, is used in soft drinks as sugar (saccharose) replacement with very
similar sweetness profile.
Glucose syrups are also used as fermentables in beer and alcohol production.
Finally, modified starches are used to encapsulate vitamins that are frequently
added to juices.
Drug Formulations
Starch is used in many solid formulations as binder, diluent and disintegrant.
A special grade suitable for direct compression has been developed for tablet
formulations.
Polyols and dextrose are used to impart a sweet taste to chewable tablets and
syrups.
Active Ingredients
Dextrose is an essential ingredient of intravenous and dialysis solutions. In
addition to its nutritional value, it allows the control of the liquid osmotic
pressure.
Maltodextrins develop lower osmotic pressure than low-molecular-weight
carbohydrates; therefore they are used at higher concentration without causing
stomach irritation.
Hydroxyethyl starches with specific molecular weights are commonly found
in formulations of plasma expanders, typically required after an accident or
surgery involving a large loss of blood. They can be used as a temporary
measure to restore blood volume, water and salts while the patient’s condition
is stabilized.
Acarbose Precursor
In 1990 the first drug of a new class of oral antidiabetic was commercialized
under the name of Acarbose (Glucobays)11 and used to treat type-2 diabetes
mellitus (Figure 9.2.7). Acarbose is an a-glucosidase inhibitor that acts by
competitive and reversible inhibition of a-amylase from the pancreas and a-
glucosidase. The inhibition of these enzymes results in a delayed absorption of
glucose from the gut and a reduced post-prandial increase in plasma glucose
and insulin.12
248 Chapter 9.2
HOCH2
HO
HO HO2HC
OH O
N
H HO HOCH2
OH O
O
HO
HOCH2
OH O
O
HO
OH
OH
Sorbitol as a Humectant
Sorbitol offers a broad range of functional properties including: humectancy,
plasticizing ability, sweet taste, non-cariogenicity and good chemical stability in
harsh conditions such as alkaline pH and heat. Furthermore, it is a Generally
Recognized as Safe (GRAS) product by the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA).
Toothpaste production is the second largest application of sorbitol,
accounting for 50,000 mto a year in Western Europe alone. In the past,
toothpaste formulations were glycerine-based but almost every producer went
through a reformulation process to use sorbitol when the latter became avail-
able on an industrial scale.
With the recent drop in glycerine prices, the choice between sorbitol and
glycerin is now primarily determined by their price.
Other important uses of sorbitol as a humectant include formulation of
cough syrups, multivitamin preparations, emulsions and suspensions. Because
of its humectancy properties, sorbitol reduces the tendency of liquid formula-
tions to crystallize.
Biodegradable Plastics
Research efforts spanning eight decades have led to extensive improvements on
the performances of conventional plastics such as polypropylene, polyethylene
and polystyrene. On the other side, use of renewable materials in plastic
250 Chapter 9.2
production is still in an early stage, compared to traditional plastics, and still
suffers from some performance limitations and high costs.
Starch has been one of the first materials extensively studied for its potential
as polymer for biodegradable plastics. Impetus in this direction has come from
shortage of municipal landfills and pressure to reduce the visual pollution
caused by plastic residues abandoned in the landscape. Despite considerable
interest from both the academic and industrial sectors, production of com-
mercially viable materials has been delayed for technical and economic reasons.
The former are inherent to the chemical structure of starch itself: the vast
quantity of internal hydrogen bonds hampers thermoplastic behaviour, and the
hydrophilic nature of the polysaccharide translates into sensitivity to the
environmental humidity that, in its turn, may affect the mechanical properties
of the material.
With extensive efforts, these technical challenges have now been effec-
tively solved. Starch, in the presence of a suitable plasticizer, can be conver-
ted into a thermoplastic starch (TPS) that is suitable for conventional
plastic processing technologies, such as extrusion, film blowing, injection
moulding, etc. In addition, incorporation of polycapromolactone, poly-
vinylalcohol or other biodegradable and relatively hydrophobic polymers has
made it possible to effectively reduce the strong hydrophilic character of the
finished material.
The second factor hindering the development of starch-based material for
plastics has been the high cost of the technology required to solve the technical
issues, ultimately reflected in the cost of the finished products.
Today, there are products that satisfy the technical requirements and have
an acceptable market price. One commercial success story is represented by
Mater-bis,13 a plastic material based on TPS and other polymers that is very
versatile and suitable for applications such as composting bags, mulch film,
disposable cutlery, etc.14 However, due to the complexity of its production,
its cost is higher than conventional polyethylene or polypropylene, and it is
generally sold for applications where biodegradability is mandatory.
As legislation in several European countries is poised to limit the use of
shopping bags made of conventional polyethylene, it is likely that starch-based
materials will at least partially replace that type of plastic.
Expanded polystyrene (EPS) has been the sole packaging material for many
years and its extensive use has led to environmental concerns, partly because
of its visibility in landfills and partly because of the use of a chlorofluoro-
carbon, allegedly responsible for destroying the ozone layer, as blowing agent
during its production. Today, starch-based foam materials are commonly
produced and sold at a competitive price compared to EPS. They are biode-
gradable, have a very low density and, because of their better static electricity
insulating properties, are considered even superior to EPS for use in electronic
applications.
In 2007, about 73,640 metric tons of loose-fills made from starch were pro-
duced and consumed worldwide15 (Table 9.2.3).
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 251
Table 9.2.3 Global biodegradable polymer market (mto) – adapted from
Schlechter.15
Application 2006 2007 2012
Plasticizers
In general, polyols have good plasticizing properties, especially when it comes
to plasticizing carbohydrate-based products such as TPS. They have a dual
action: as primary plasticizers, altering the interaction between adjacent poly-
saccharide chains, and secondary plasticizers ensuring the presence of water –
the most efficient plasticizer for carbohydrates.
All starch-based plastics on the market contain polyols such as sorbitol,
glycerol or mixtures thereof ensuring flexibility and mechanical properties
stability of the finished product.
Formaldehyde-based Resins
The presence of numerous hydroxyl groups able to react with formaldehyde
makes starch-derived products suitable chemicals for formaldehyde-based
resins. Research on this subject started many years ago and showed that
in a number of applications it is possible to partially replace or ‘‘extend’’
urea formaldehyde, phenol formaldehyde and melamine formaldehyde resins
without significantly affecting the finished product’s performance.16 In many
applications, adhesive systems based on formaldehyde resins incorporate a
polysaccharide component. More than 4.5 Mio mto of formaldehyde-
based resins have been produced in Western Europe alone.17 The use of car-
bohydrates allows lower consumption of oil-based resins and, consequently,
reduced release of formaldehyde in the environment.
Chemical Synthesis
L-Ascorbic acid, known as vitamin C, occurs naturally in a number of sources
such as citrus fruit, berries, kiwi fruit and green vegetables. Because of its
pharmaceutical and nutritional value, ever since its discovery there has been a
strong interest in obtaining it by chemical synthesis. In 1934 Haworth was
awarded the Nobel Prize for establishing the first industrial process for the
synthesis of vitamin C, but the process is named after the Polish chemist Tadeus
252 Chapter 9.2
OH
OH
O
O
OH OH
L-Ascorbic acid
Vitamin C
OH
H OH H2 H2 H2 H2
OH OH HO C C O O C C OH
y z
CH2OH
Sorbitan esters are often used in the food industry, especially in chocolate
and margarine production, where a high affinity for fats is desired.
Polysorbates are also commonly used as (O/W) emulsifiers in the food
industry (salad dressing, ice cream), and in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, deter-
gents, and in a myriad of other industrial applications. Current Western Eur-
ope consumption of sorbitol for surfactants manufacture can be estimated at
around 15,000 tons per year.
To produce polyether polyols (PEP), sorbitol is reacted in the presence of a
catalyst with propylene or ethylene oxide (see Figure 9.2.12). The reaction is
aimed at achieving polyols with a hydroxyl numberii of between 350 and 550.
Sorbitol-based PEPs are then used to manufacture rigid or semi-rigid poly-
urethane foams by reaction with a suitable polyisocyanate. These foams are
typically used in the construction industry and in packaging, industrial insu-
lation, appliances and transport applications.
Sorbitol, sucrose, pentaerythritol and other polyalcohols or polyamines are
used for the preparation of PEP for rigid foams where structures with high
cross-linking density are required, while glycerol is mainly used for flexible
foam production. Some PEP producers modulate the rigidity of the foam by
using blends of sorbitol and glycerol in different ratios.
Simple carbohydrates and polyols have mild metal-complexing properties
that are generally not good enough for industrial applications. However, it is
sufficient to introduce a carboxylic group to significantly enhance this func-
tionality. Today, two chemicals derived from glucose are used as sequestrant:
gluconic acid and glucoheptonic acid.
Gluconic acid is commonly obtained by fermentation while glucoheptonic
acid is synthesized from the cyanohydrin of glucose (see Figure 9.2.13).
These organic acids and their derivatives are mainly used as additives for
concrete admixtures, in industrial cleaning formulations, metal finishing and
agricultural applications. The functionality of gluconic and glucoheptonic acids
in these applications, except for concrete, is based on their complexing ability
towards polyvalent metal ions such as calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, etc.
ii
Hydroxyl number is defined as the number of milligrams of KOH that is chemically equivalent to
the activity of one gram of the polyol.
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 255
OH
H2
O C C CH3
OH H2 H
H H2C OH H2 H H2C O C C CH3
H3C C C O H OH
H H2 H2
HO H H3C C C O H O C C CH3
H H H H2 H
OH OH- O C CH CH3
H H2 H2
OH O O C CH CH3
HO H3C C C O
H H2 H2 H
H H3C C C O H O C C CH3
H2C H2C
OH OH
OH O
H
H2C C CH3
H2 H
O C C CH3
OH
Sorbitol Polyether polyol
O OH
H OH
HO H gluconic acid
Aspergillus niger H OH
O H
H OH
CH2OH
H OH
HO H
O OH
H OH
H OH CHOH
1. CN-
CH2OH H OH
glucoheptonic acid
2. Saponification HO H
H OH
H OH
CH2OH
OH
O O
HO OH
OH
Differently from citrates and EDTA, they effectively chelate ions in strongly
alkaline solutions and they are biodegradable.
Sodium gluconate is also the precursor of Glucono-delta-lactone (Figure
9.2.14), its cyclic internal ether, a product used in the food industry to control pH.
Calcium and ferrous gluconates are used in the treatment of calcium and iron
deficiencies as well.
Coal Briquettes
During the production of coal briquettes, coal dust is mixed with starch and
water before heating and compression into an ovoidal shape. Once gelatinized,
starch provides structural support to the briquette shape and ensures that the
structure is maintained during transport of the briquette to the oven on the
conveyor belt. Once the briquette is dry, starch provides another interesting
functionality that can be appreciated during the actual use of the briquette.
When starch is exposed to high temperatures (as during combustion) a
decomposition process starts. Among the possible decomposition pathways,
one leads to the formation of a carbon skeleton that no longer burns but acts as
a supporting structure for the briquette, increasing exposure of the coal to the
air flow. This results in a better combustion and glowing of the briquette.
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 257
plaster (gypsum) mix
water
card board
(back side) cutter
turn over machine
foamer
hydration belt
finishing
store e.g. edge polish
Gypsum Boards
Gypsum boards or plasterboards are typical materials used to build light walls.
The production process is based on gypsum hydration technology. At the very
beginning of the process de-hydrated calcium sulphate (gypsum) is converted
into CaSO4 0.5H2O by heating. Once dehydrated, gypsum is mixed with
starch, a foaming agent and other additives. Gypsum foam is then obtained
and spread onto cardboard running on a conveyor belt (see Figure 9.2.15).
CaSO4 0.5H2O starts the hydration and the crystallization process immedi-
ately after coming into contact with water to form CaSO4 2H2O. The new
crystals have a needle-like structure and interlock with each other creating a
solid, firm structure. The crystallization of CaSO4 2H2O generates heat that
helps starch gelatinize and migrate towards the cardboard.
During the drying phase, starch completes the gelatinization process and
concentrates in the interface between gypsum and paper, where it functions as
adhesive between the two materials.
Machine
Chest Headbox Fourdrinier Presses Drying Film Coating Reeling
(Wire Section) Section Press
After
Dryers IR Dryer
Corrugated Board
A corrugated board is composed by a fluting medium (the wavy part of cor-
rugated board) glued between two layers of linerboard to achieve a very strong
structure. Very often, the paper used for the boards is recycled paper that has
been surface sized with starch to reach a good strength. The glue used to bind
the tips of the flutes to the linerboards is made of starches, caustic soda and
borax. Special equipment is used to automatically prepare glues with the right
viscosity and gel point for the variety of corrugated board qualities to be
produced. This glue is applied to the tips of the flutes that are then contacted
with the liner which is subsequently taken over a heated plate. Upon heating,
the starch gelatinizes and forms a strong bond between the flutes and the
linerboard. These steps are repeated on the other side of the fluting to create the
known sandwich structure of corrugated board.
9.2.7 Outlook
Starch and its derivatives have proven to be very versatile materials for several
different applications in many sectors. With relatively simple carbohydrate
chemistry it has been possible to have access to carbohydrates with superior
functionalities. There is still considerable potential to generate innovative
solutions based on starch but this requires a better understanding of the starch
chemistry and a strong cooperation between the agro-industry and the chemical
260 Chapter 9.2
industry. This cooperation is necessary for the starch industry to overcome the
challenges associated with the complex nature of starch and is beneficial also to
the chemical industry in its search for new and sustainable products to exploit.
Ambitious projects are already taking place and are expected to be successful
in a few years. A few of them are mentioned below.
H
O
H O H
H
H H
H H
O
H OH
References
1. R. K. Will, U. Loechner and K. Yokose, ed., Hydrocolloids, SRI Con-
sulting, CEH Marketing Research Report, 2007.
2. Cargill internal data.
3. AAF data.
4. Breaking the link between food and biofuels, http://www.card.iastate.edu
(retrieved 22.07.08).
5. European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural
Development, Prospects for agricultural markets and income in the
European Union 2007–2014, 2008.
6. D. J. Manners, Carbohydr. Res., 1981, 90, 99–110.
7. A. Buléon, P. Colonna, V. Planchot and S. Ball, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 23,
85–112.
8. J. S. Chronakis, Crit. Rev. Food Sci., 1988, 38(7), 599–637.
9. D. Howling, in Starch Hydrolysis Products – Worldwide Technology,
Production and Applications, ed. F. W. Schenck and R. E. Hebeda, VCH,
Weinheim, 1992, pp. 277–317.
10. Frost & Sullivan, Strategic Analysis of the European Food Starch Markets,
2007.
11. Glucobays is a registered trademark of Bayer HealthCare AG.
12. W. Puls, U. Keup, H. P. Krause and G. Thomas, Diabetologia, 1977, 13, 426.
Starch: A Versatile Product from Renewable Resources for Industrial Applications 263
s
13. Mater-bi is a registered trademark of Novamont.
14. C. Bastioli, Renewable Raw Materials For Industry: Contribution to Sus-
tainable Chemistry Symposium, Brussels, Oct 2007; C. Bastioli in
Degradable Polymers, ed. G. Scott, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht,
2nd ed., 2002, p. 133–161.
15. M. Schlechter, BCC Research Report: PLS025C, 2007, Wellesley, Massa-
chussets, USA.
16. H. Koch, F. Krause, R. Steffan and H. U. Woelk, Die Stärke – Starch,
1983, 35(9), 304–313.
17. S. N. Bizzari, ed., SRI Consulting, CEH Marketing Research Report
‘‘Formaldehyde’’, 2004.
18. R. Eskuchen and M. Nitsche, in Alkyl Polyglycosides: Technology, Prop-
erties, and Applications, ed. K. Hill, W. Rybinski and G. Stoll, VCH,
Weinheim, 1996, pp. 9–22.
19. D. J. Adelman, L. F. Charbonneau and S. Ung, WO 2003106531, 2003
(Du Pont de Nemours).
20. H. Luitjes and J. C. Jansen, WO9945060, 1998 (ATO-DLO).
CHAPTER 9.3
Industrial Sucrose
STEFAN FRENZEL, SIEGFRIED PETERS, THOMAS
ROSE AND MARKWART KUNZ
264
Industrial Sucrose 265
140,0
120,0
100,0
80,0
60,0
40,0
20,0
0,0
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Figure 9.3.1 World production of beet and cane sugar since 1900.1
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
8
/0 88
7
08
98
05 198
27 199
17 199
04 199
26 199
24 199
25 199
21 199
11 199
02 199
05 199
02 199
28 199
22 200
14 200
11 200
03 200
26 200
11 200
30 200
20 200
16 200
06 200
9
20
/1
/1
8/
6/
3/
1/
1/
8/
6/
4/
2/
2/
0/
8/
6/
3/
1/
1/
9/
7/
4/
2/
1/
9/
7/
5/
1
0
/0
/1
/0
/0
/0
/1
/0
/0
/0
/0
/1
/1
/0
/0
/0
/0
/1
/0
/0
/0
/0
/1
/0
/0
/0
04
20
11
Figure 9.3.2 Price development of raw sugar and white sugar during the last two
decades.
kg fertilizer / t sugar / ha
30
N
25 P2O5
K2O
20
15
10
0
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
00
02
04
06
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
Figure 9.3.3 Trend of the consumption of mineral fertilizer for sugar beet cultivation
in southern Germany.
7.000
4.000
3.000
2.000
1.000
0
19 /51
19 /54
19 /57
19 /60
19 /63
19 /66
19 /69
19 /72
19 /75
19 /78
19 /81
19 /84
19 /87
19 /90
19 93
19 /96
20 /99
20 /02
20 /05
8
/0
/
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
04
07
19
year
Figure 9.3.4 Specific energy demand for the production of white sugar in the beet
industry.
Industrial Sucrose 269
Cane Beet
Washing Washing
Cutting/
Slicing
Crushing
Raw Juice
Thin Juice
Evaporation
Thick Juice
Crystallisation
Run off to be
recrystallised
Molasses Centrifugation
with a residual moisture content of about 0.5% is dried and cooled for the
subsequent storage.
The syrup (mother liquor) separated in the centrifuge still contains sucrose
which has to be recovered in further crystallization steps. In this way, there is a
multi-stage process of crystallization yielding a final mother liquor (known as
molasses) from which the sucrose cannot be economically further crystallized.
Depending on the economy – i.e. price of sugar crystallized vs. price of sugar
in the molasses – in some regions of the world further extraction of sucrose
using chromatography is applied.
OH
6
HO 4
O
5
2
HO 3
1
HO
α
HO 6'
O
O
5' HO 2' β
4'
3' 1' OH
OH
9.3.2.1.1 Bio-ethylene
One example for a successful effort to utilize sucrose as feedstock for the
manufacture of bulk organic chemicals is the production of ‘‘green’’ ethylene
from sugar via bio-ethanol. In Brazil, the company Braskem has announced
‘‘the first certified linear polyethylene in the world made from 100% renewable
raw material’’ and planned its production on a 200,000 mto scale for 2010.12 In
a joint venture between SantelisaVale/Crystalsev and Dow Chemical the pro-
duction of 350,000 mto of polyethylene is planned to start in 2011.13
Solvay Indupa announced the expansion of their manufacturing plant of
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in Santo Andre (Brazil) to a total amount of 360,000
mto per year. Thereby for this capacity extension the required monomer
feedstock vinyl chloride should also be based on bio-ethylene (based on bio-
ethanol sourced from Copersucar) and thus finally on sucrose and salt.14
The capacity of sugar-derived bio-ethylene seems low compared to the total
annual ethylene production of 100 Mio mto (2000) but enough to show the
capability of utilizing sucrose as feedstock for organic chemicals thereby opening
the door for the whole ethylene-derived C2-chemistry. Bio-ethylene is particularly
interesting for ‘‘decentralized’’ biorefinery concepts with good access to sucrose or
other carbohydrate feedstock where crude oil-based integrated production facil-
ities are not on-hand. There are far more syntheses possible for ‘‘petrochemicals’’
based on renewables. The long-term development of naphtha vs. sugars will
decide the industrial implementation. Well-known examples are e.g. acrylic acid
and its derivatives. A very promising new synthesis of methacrylic acid based on
sucrose or other carbohydrates is the recently developed fermentation of sugars to
3-hydroxyisobutyric acid followed by catalytic dehydration.207
CH3 O H3 C O
Sugar Cat.
Ferm.
Lactose H C C C C Polymers
Glycerol -H2O
HO CH2 OH H2C OH
O O
HO
H+ O
Hexoses HO H OH + O
- 3H2O +2 H2O H
O
HMF Levulinic acid Formic acid
O
O O
H2N NH2 HO NH2 O
HO OH
Bis(5-methylfurfuryl) ether
O O
O
H2N
OR OH
O O
2-Methyl-tetrahydrofuran Levulinate esters δ-Aminolevulinic acid
(MTHF)
O
OH
O O O O
OH OH
50 - 65 %
H2 / Co-Cu-Mn cat. HO OH minor components:
Sucrose 1, 2-Butylen glycol
230 - 280°C,
Hexan 1, 2, 5, 6-tetraol
250 - 300 bar
20 - 25 %
HO OH
Scheme 9.3.5 Conversion of sucrose to 1,2-propylene glycol and other di- and
polyhydric alcohols.38,39
9.3.2.2.1 Sucralose
Studies on the selective replacement of hydroxyl groups in the sucrose molecule
by halogens led to a variety of halogenated sucrose derivatives which partly
showed a remarkably enhanced sweetness compared to sucrose itself.40–43
From these compounds finally sucralose (4,1 0 ,6 0 -Trichloro-4,1 0 ,6 0 -trideoxy-
galactosucrose) was evaluated to show the most convenient physico-chemical
properties concerning the quality and intensity of sweet taste, good solubility in
water (for use in beverages) and attractive stability of the glycosidic linkage
under acidic conditions. Dependant on the field of application, sucralose is
about 400 to 800 times sweeter than sucrose and has been commercialized by
Tate & Lyle under the Splendas brand name44 up to a scale nowadays of more
than 1000 tons per year used in the food industry.
Since its first synthesis, optimizations of the detailed reaction sequence have
been carried out during the past decades finally leading to a bundle of patents
covering different possibilities to execute this reaction cascade.45–64 Out of these
patents a rather straightforward sucralose synthesis could be assembled
(Scheme 9.3.6), the first step of which is a dibutyltin-oxide-supported selective
Industrial Sucrose 277
OH OAc
selective 6
O OH O OH
HO acetylation HO
HO O HO O
HO HO HO HO
O O
OH OH
OH OH
Sucrose Sucrose-6-acetate
regioselective
chlorination
Cl OH Cl OAc
4 O 4 6
Cl O Cl
1' deacetylation
HO O 1' O
HO
HO HO HO HO
O O
6' Cl Cl
OH 6'
OH
4,1',6'-Trichloro-4,1',6'-trideoxy- 6-O-Acetyl-4,1',6'-trichloro-
galactosucrose 4,1',6'-trideoxy-galactosucrose
Sucralose
Scheme 9.3.6 Short and efficient reaction pathway from sucrose to sucralose.
OH OR
6
O O
HO 4 5 RO
2
HO 3 1 RO
HO RO
HO 6' O RO O O
O
5' HO 2' RO
4'
3' 1' OH OR
OH OR
R= n = 1-7
n
prefered esterification O
at primary OH-groups (Sucrose polyesters)
Scheme 9.3.7 Preferred substitution positions for sucrose fatty esters and fully
esterificated sucrose esters.
Sucrose polyesters (Scheme 9.3.7) have characteristic properties like fats and
oils but are only partly or even totally non-digestible by the body’s lipases and
not absorbed by the human digestive system. In 1996, the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved sucrose polyesters with 6 to 8 acyl moieties
for certain uses as fat replacers67 known under the brand names Olestras and
Oleans. They are used in food application e.g. in the preparation of dietary
fried snacks.
Sucrose fatty esters could be prepared by reacting sucrose with fatty acid
esters (interesterification) in a solvent (DMF, DMSO) or emulsion process
(propylene glycol).65–66,68–70 Most interesting – because it avoids hazardous
solvents – is the melt process where sucrose and the fatty acid ester (e.g. methyl)
are reacted together without any solvent.65
By these esterification reactions preferably the three primary OH groups of
sucrose could be addressed, though the reactivity of the OH groups in sucrose
decreases in the order 6-OH, 6 0 OH, 1 0 -OH and secondary-OH (Scheme 9.3.7)
mixtures of different substitution patterns are obtained. Enzymatic esterifica-
tions became attractive due to the more specific reactions and thus better
defined products.65–66,71
Sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB, Scheme 9.3.7) is a mixed sucrose polye-
ster prepared by reaction of sucrose with acetic and isobutyric anhydrides.70
It is by far the largest industrially utilized sucrose ester and covers food
(weighting agent in beverages) as well as non-food applications (gloss and
adhesion improvement in lipstick and nail polish, pigment dispersion).72,202
9.3.2.2.3 Polyurethanes
Polyurethanes are formed by polyaddition of diisocyanates with dihydroxy
compounds. The use of polyhydric alcohols instead of diols leads to cross-
Industrial Sucrose 279
linked polyurethanes which proved to be more rigid: the higher the number of
OH functionalities the bigger the impact on the rigidity of the polyurethane.
Therefore, sucrose with its eight hydroxyl groups is of great importance in the
preparation of rigid polyurethane foams.73–76 Physico-chemical properties
of the polyurethane foam are improved when sucrose is first alkoxylated
with alkylene oxide (ethylene or propylene oxide) and the resulting polyether
polyols are used as polyhydric components for the polyurethane formation
reaction.73–77
A number of studies used partially protected sucrose esters to obtain well-
defined polymers.78 Investigations into the regioselectivity of the carbamoyla-
tion reaction of sucrose in DMF showed in the case of alkylisocyanates a clear
preference for the reaction position at the 2-OH and that for phenylisocyanate
the 6-OH group in the glucose-part is the favoured position.79,80 These
regioselectivities could also be proved in the reaction of the respective diiso-
cyanates with sucrose.80
Besides sucrose itself, also short chain di- and polyols derived from partial
hydrogenolysis of sucrose could be used for the formation of polyurethanes.
Industrial Sucrose
O O
HO HO
α + HO
HO 1 2
HO OH
OH OH
glucose fructose
cleavage H+
hydrolysis ion exchange resin
inversion β-D-invertase (EC 3.2.1.26)
OH
OH
OH transglucosylation O OH transglucosylation
HO
HO O
O HO 1 O glucosyltransferase
HO glucosyltransferase
HO α HO EC 5.4.99.11 HO 1'
HO EC 5.4.99.11
1 O
β
2
HO α
HO α 6
OH O
1
O O OH OH O
HO sucrose HO
OH
α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-fructofuranoside HO OH
OH OH
isomaltulose (palatinoseTM) trehalulose
α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-fructofuranose polymerisation α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→1)-β-D-fructofuranose
GOS FOS OH OH
glucans fructans O O
OH + fructose + glucose HO HO
HO 1
dextran HO
O
glucosyl- fructosyl-
HO 1
α α
HO HO
α-(1→6)-linked glucose HO α
1 transferase
O OH O
HO O O
O HO O O O O
HO HO HO HO
OH CH2
6 OH
O OH OH
O HO
HO OH OH OH OH CH2
1 HO 1
α
HO α OH
HO
n n
HO 4
O O
n levan OH O
O
HO 1 OH CH2 β-(2→6)-linked fructose O
HO 4 6 O
O HO HO
inulin
O n HO 1
HO α β-(2→1)-linked fructose OH
amylose (neo-amyloseTM) HO HO OH
OH OH
α-(1→4)-linked glucose
281
Figure 9.3.7 Reactions of sucrose maintaining the carbohydrate structure.
282 Chapter 9.3
Table 9.3.2 Natural isomers of sucrose (a-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-x)-b-D-
fructofuranose).
a-D-glu-(1-x)-b-D-fru Isomer CAS No.
1 Trehalulose 51411-23-5
2 Sucrose 92004-84-7
3 Turanose 5349-40-6
4 Maltulose 17606-72-3
5 Leucrose 7158-70-5
6 Isomaltulose (palatinoset) 13718-94-0, 15132-06-6
with the propagation of the cells. Because there is no need for isolation of
the enzyme effecting the conversion of sucrose to isomaltulose (Palatinoset), the
whole cells are immobilized. Almost all immobilization methods described in the
literature are suitable for P. rubrum. The best technique so far is the immobili-
zation in classical calcium alginate beads according to the method of Lim and
Sun (1980).142,146,147,152 The biocatalyst is transferred to a packed bed reactor.
The sucrose used for conversion to isomaltulose (Palatinoset) is dissolved and
the pH is adjusted to 6.0 before it is sterilized and pumped into the reactors.
Downflow operation has been found to be advantageous. Flow rate is adjusted
individually for each reactor to convert almost all sucrose being supplied. The
product pattern of the solution leaving the reactors is shown in Table 9.3.3.146,147
Long-time stability of the immobilized enzyme is remarkably high even if
high concentrations of sucrose up to 550 g L1 are used. A half-life of more
than 5,000 hours is very common.199
The by-products can be easily removed from the product solution leaving the
column reactors by multi-step crystallization. After evaporation and crystal-
lization isomaltulose (Palatinoset) is separated by centrifugation and dried. The
process yields isomaltulose (Palatinoset) as a free-flowing, non-hygroscopic
crystalline substance with one mole crystal water. The mother liquor of the
isomaltulose (Palatinoset) crystallization is the only by-product of the process.
Because this liquid is used e.g. as feed stuff, the whole isomaltulose (Palatinoset)
production process is free of waste products.112,124,142,146,147
Industrial Sucrose 285
Production of isomalt. Although isomaltulose (Palatinoset) is a sugar replacer
itself, most of the product is currently used as a precursor for the production of
the sugar replacer isomalt. If isomaltulose (Palatinoset) is processed to isomalt
by hydrogenation wet crystals from crystallization are directly used.
Hydrogenation of isomaltulose (Palatinoset) solution can easily be done
under moderate temperature and pressure conditions and at neutral pH or under
mildly alkaline conditions using, for example, Raney-Nickel or supported
e.g. noble metals in pelletized form in a fixed bed reactor. The reduction of
isomaltulose (Palatinoset) is expected to yield an equimolar mixture of
1-O-a-D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol (1,1 GPM, CAS No. 20942-99-8 or 64519-
82-0) and 6-O-a-D-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol (1,6 GPS) but depending on the
conditions of hydrogenation the rate of each component can vary between 43
and 57% (Figure 9.3.9). The other sucrose isomers and saccharides can be
hydrogenated in the same way leading to the corresponding sugar alcohols
(Table 9.3.4).114,142,146,147 After filtration and ion exchange (to remove traces
of nickel) the isomalt solution is evaporated to appropriate concentration.
The isomalt solution is either sold as such or evaporated to super saturation
followed by crystallization.114,142,146,147 The GPM part of isomalt crystallizes
with two moles of crystal water,127 whereas GPS crystals are anhydrous.122,134
This results in an overall water content of about 5% in crystalline
isomalt.114,142,146,147
Properties and applications of isomalt. Isomalt is an odourless, white, crys-
talline substance containing about 5% (w/w) water of crystallization. It tastes
just as natural as sugar, is not sticky, is tooth-friendly (it helps to prevent
cavities and plaque formation), is suitable for diabetics and has only half the
OH
H2
O
HO
HO 1' OH O catalyst
HO α OH
O 6
OH OH
isomaltulose (palatinose™)
OH OH
O HO O
HO
1' OH OH HO 1' OH OH
HO
HO α HO α OH
OH O 6
O 1
OH OH
OH OH
6-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol
1-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol (1,6-GPS)
(1,1-GPM)
isomalt (palatinit™)
Amylosucrase
Sucrose þ ða-1; 4-GlucanÞn ! ða-1; 4-GlucanÞnþ1 þ Fructose
9.3.3 Outlook
At first sight, the consumer’s choice for products mostly depends on reasonable
prices and convenience. But times have changed and the consumer’s awareness
focuses – besides price and application profiles – more and more on ecological
aspects like greenhouse-gas emissions. There are far more products on the basis
of sucrose developed in the past being able to replace ecologically unfavourable
petrochemically based products of today.
Just to mention only two examples:
Until today, petrochemicals often are very cheap products because they
are produced on the basis of cheap by-products of oil refineries in a very
integrated processing on large scales.
Newly developed ecologically more favourable products based on renew-
ables have to start on small scales but cannot compete price-wise with
the cheap mass products based on non-renewables. Their production is
not possible in the same integrated steam-cracker-based facilities of the
chemical industry but very often in stand-alone production sites.
To conclude: even today – being faced with increasingly high oil prices – if
society wants to have more ecologically favourable products it remains a
political task to support the introduction of these products. But – bearing in
mind regulations like ‘‘REACH’’ – the reality is exactly the contrary.
References
1. Bartens, Zuckerwirtschaft Europa, Verlag Dr. Albert Bartens KG, Berlin,
2007.
2. Y. Queneau, S. Jarosz, B. Lewandowski and J. Fitremann, Adv. Carb.
Chem. Biochem., 2007, 61, 217.
3. D. Peters, Nachwachsende Rohstoffe in der Industrie, Fachagentur
Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, 2. Aufl., Gülzow, 2007.
4. Jahresbericht 2005/2006, Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe,
Gülzow, 2006.
5. F. W. Lichtenthaler, in Biorefineries – Industrial Processes and Products ,
ed. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006,
2, p. 3.
6. P. W. van der Poel, H. Schiweck and T. Schwartz, Sugar Technology –
Beet and Cane Sugar Manufacture, Dr. Albert Bartens KG, Berlin,
1998.
7. P. Rein, Cane Sugar Engineering, Dr. Albert Bartens KG, Berlin, 2007.
8. H. Hoffmann, W. Mauch and W. Untze, Zucker und Zuckerwaren, Paul
Parey, Berlin, 1985.
9. E. Hugot, Handbook of Cane Sugar Engineering, Elsevier Publishing
Company, Amsterdam/London/New York, 1972.
10. F. W. Lichtenthaler and S. Peters, C. R. Chimie, 2004, 7, 65.
11. J. N. Chheda, G. W. Huber and J. A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2007, 119, 7298.
292 Chapter 9.3
12. Press release from 28.03.2008, http://www.braskem.com.br (retrieved
31.07.2008).
13. Press release from 04.06.2008, http://www.marketwatch.com (retrieved
28.07.2008).
14. Press Release from 14.12.2007, http://www.solvinpvc.com (retrieved
25.02.2008); http://desarrolloydefensa.blogspot.com/2008/04/solvay-
indupa-firma-contrato-con.html (retrieved 27.11.2008); N. Denis, A.
Meiser, J. Riese and U. Weihe, McKinsey on Chemicals, 2008, 1, 22.
15. J. Lewkowski, ArkiVoc, 2001, i, 17.
16. B. F. M. Kuster, Starch/Stärke, 1990, 42, 314.
17. H. Schiweck, M. Munir, K. Rapp and M. Vogel, in Carbohydrates as
Organic Raw Materials, ed. F. W. Lichtenthaler, VCH, Weinheim, 1991,
p. 57.
18. P. Claus and G. H. Vogel, Chem. Ing. Tech., 2006, 78, 991.
19. A. Gaset, L. Rigal, G. Paillassa, J.-P. Salome and G. Fleche, FR 2 551
754, 1985 (Roquette Freres).
20. D. W. Brown, A. J. Floyd, R. C. Kinsmann and Y. Roshan-Ali, J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol., 1982, 32, 920.
21. R. M. Musau and R. M. Munawu, Biomass, 1987, 13, 67.
22. J. Hirth, Dissertation, TU Darmstadt, 2002.
23. M. Bicker, T. Hirth and H. Vogel, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 280.
24. M. Bicker, Stoffliche Nutzung von Biomasse mit Hilfe überkritischer Fluide,
Dissertation, TU Darmstadt, 2005.
25. M. Bicker, D. Kaiser, L. Ott and H. Vogel, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2005, 36,
118.
26. H. Zhao, J. E. Holladay, H. Brown and Z. C. Zhang, Science, 2007, 316,
1597.
27. K. M. Rapp, EP 230 250, 1987 (Südzucker AG).
28. B. Kamm, M. Kamm, M. Schmidt, T. Hirth and M. Schulze, in Bio-
refineries – Industrial Processes and Products, ed. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber
and M. Kamm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, 2, p. 97.
29. A. Gandini and M. N. Belgacem, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1997, 22, 1203.
30. F. W. Lichtenthaler, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 6th edn, 2002, 6, p. 237.
31. T. Werpy and G. Petersen, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/
35523.pdf (retrieved 01.08.2008).
32. L. E. Manzer, A.C.S. Symp. Ser., 2006, 921, 40.
33. D. T. Win, Assumption University Journal of Technology, 2005, 8, 185.
34. R. Weidenhagen and H. Wegner, Chem. Ber., 1938, 71, 2712.
35. G. V. Ling, A. J. Driessen, A. C. Piet and J. C. Vligter, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Prod. Res. Dev., 1970, 9, 210.
36. L. W. Wright, US 3 965 199, 1976 (CI America Inc.).
37. K. Weissermel and H. -J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
38. L. Schuster and W. Himmele, DE 38 18 198, 1989 (BASF AG).
39. L. Schuster, DE 39 28 285, 1991 (BASF AG).
Industrial Sucrose 293
40. P. H. Fairclough, L. Hough and A. C. Richardson, Carbohydr. Res., 1975,
40, 285.
41. L. Hough, S. P. Phadnis, R. A. Khan and M. R. Jenner, GB 1 543 167,
1977 (Tate & Lyle).
42. S. V. Molinary and M. R. Jenner, Food & Food Ingredients Journal of
Japan, 1999, 182, 6.
43. S. V. Molinary and M. E. Quinlan, in Sweeteners and Alternatives in
Food Technology, ed. H. Mitchell, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford UK,
2006, p. 130.
44. C. W. Sham, Nutritional Bytes, 2005, 10/2, Article 5. (http://repositor-
ies.cdlib.org/uclabiolchem/nutritionbytes/vol10/iss2/art5).
45. J. L. Navia, US 4 950 746, 1990 (Noramco Inc.).
46. D. S. Neiditch, N. M. Vernon and R. E. Wingard, US 5 023 329, 1991
(Noramco Inc.).
47. R. E. Walkup, N. M. Vernon and R. E. Wingard, US 5 089 608, 1992
(McNeill PPC Inc).
48. G. H. Sankey, N. M. Vernon and R. E. Wingard, US 5 470 969, 1995
(McNeill PPC Inc.).
49. J. E. White and B. A. Bradford, EP 776 903, 1997 (McNeill PPC Inc.).
50. J. D. Clark and R. R. LeMay, US 6 939 962, 2003 (Tate & Lyle).
51. K. S. Mufti and R. A. Khan, US 4 380 476, 1983 (Talres Dev.).
52. P. J. Simpson, US 4 889 928, 1989 (Tate & Lyle).
53. J. S. Dordick, A. J. Hacking and R. A. Khan, US 5 128 248, 1992 (Tate &
Lyle).
54. J. S. Dordick, A. J. Hacking and R. A. Khan, US 5 270 460, 1993 (Tate &
Lyle).
55. S. Bornemann, J. M. Cassells, L. Combes, J. S. Dordik and A. J. Hacking,
US 5 141 860, 1992 (Tate & Lyle).
56. D. C. Palmer and F. Terradas, US 5 445 951, 1995 (McNeill PPC Inc.).
57. K. S. Mufti and R. A. Khan, US 4 380 476, 1983 (Talres Dev.).
58. R. E. Walkup, J. L. Navis and N. M. Vernon, US 4 980 463, 1990
(Noramco Inc.).
59. R. A. Khan, G. H. Sankey, P. J. Simpson and N. M. Vernon, US 5 136
031, 1992 (Tate & Lyle).
60. J. L. Navia, R. E. Walkup and D. S. Neiditch, US 5 530 106, 1996
(McNeill PPC Inc.).
61. J. L. Navia, R. E. Walkup, N. M. Vernon and D. S. Neiditch, US 5 498
709, 1996 (McNeill PPC Inc.).
62. J. L. Navia, R. E. Walkup, N. M. Vernon and R. E. Wingard, US 5 298
611, 1994 (McNeill PPC Inc.).
63. S. J. Catani, D. A. Leinhos and T. O’Connor, US 5 977 349, 1999
(McNeill PPC Inc.).
64. N. M. Vernon, E. Micinski, S. J. Catani and J. L. Navia, US 6 890 581,
2003 (McNeill PPC Inc.).
65. B. A. P. Nelen and J. M. Cooper, in Emulsifiers in Food Technology, ed.
R. J. Whitehurst, Wiley-Blackwell, 2004, p. 131.
294 Chapter 9.3
66. Y. -J. Wang, in Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Saccharides,
ed. P. Tomasik, CRC Press, 2004, p. 35.
67. C. Bimal and Z. Guonong, Food Rev. Int., 2006, 22, 245.
68. H. B. Hass, in Sugar Esters, Noyes Development Corporation, Park
Ridge NJ, 1968, p. 1.
69. L. Osipow, F. D. Snell, W. C. York and A. Finchler, Ind. Eng. Chem.,
1956, 48, 1459.
70. L. Hough, in Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, ed. F. W. Lich-
tenthaler, VCH, Weinheim, 1991, p. 33.
71. S. K. Karmee, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 2008, 2, 144.
72. B. E. Brockway, Cosmetics & Toiletries Magazine, 2005, 120, 93.
73. J. W. Le Maistre and R. B. Seymour, J. Org. Chem., 1948, 782.
74. V. Kollonitsch, Sucrose Chemicals, The International Sugar Research
Foundation, Inc., Washington, 1970.
75. K. C. Frich and J. E. Kresta, in Sucrochemistry, ed. J. L. Hickson, ACS
Symposium Series, ACS, Washington, vol. 41, 1977, p. 238.
76. K. Vohrspohl, W. Hinz and B. Güttes, in Nachwachsende Rohstoffe –
Perspektiven für die Chemie, ed. M. Eggersdorfer, S. Warwel and
G. Wulff, VCH, Weinheim/New York, 1993, p. 383.
77. P. Gupta, H.-J. Sandhagen, W. Betz, U. Leyrer and M. Hoppe, EP 618
251, 1994 (Bayer).
78. D. Jhurry and A. Deffieux, Eur. Polym. J., 1997, 33, 1577.
79. C. Chauvin, K. Aczko and D. Plusquellec, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58,
2291.
80. R. Kohlstrung, Polyurethan – Präpolymere auf der Basis von Sacchariden
und Saccharid-Derivaten-Von der Selektivität zur anwendungstechnischen
Prüfung, Dissertation, TU Darmstadt, 2001.
81. S. J. Ahn, J. H. Yoo, H. C. Lee, S. Y. Kim, B. S. Noh, J. H. Kim and
J. K. Lee, Biotechnol. Lett., 2003, 25, p. 1179.
82. A. Aroonnual, T. Nihira, T. Seki and W. Panbangred, Enzyme Microb.
Technol., 2007, 40, 1221.
83. J. Asquith, K. Pickering, S. Trenchard-Morgan and S. Sangster, Com-
pletion of Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test on Isomaltulose, Toxicol. Lab.
Ltd, Ledbury, Herefordshire, 1986.
84. J. Bruhns, Zuckerind., 1991, 116(8), 736.
85. K. Buchholz, E. Stoppock, K. Matalla, K. D. Reh and H. J. Joerdening,
in Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, ed. F. W. Lichtenthaler,
VCH, Weinheim, 1991, p. 155.
86. K. Buchholz and V. Kasche, Biokatalysatoren und Enzymtechnologie,
VCH, Weinheim, 1997, p. 11.
87. A. Baer, Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 22, 46.
88. R. Cartarius, T. Krause and H. Vogel, Chem. Ing. Tech., 2001, 73, 1+2,
118.
89. R. Cartarius, T. Krause and H. Vogel, Chem. Ing. Tech., 2002, 74, 869.
90. P. S. J. Cheetham, C. E. Imber and J. Isherwood, Nature, 1982,
299, 628.
Industrial Sucrose 295
91. H. Chick, H. S. Shin and Z. Ustunol, J. Food Sci., 2001, 66, 478.
92. P. Egerer, W. Haese, H. Perrey and G. Schmidt-Kastner, EP 160 253,
1985 (Bayer AG).
93. P. Egerer, W. Haese, H. Perrey and G. Schmidt-Kastner, EP 160 260,
1985 (Bayer AG).
94. W. Geis, P. Quirnbach, S. Schwartz and W. Weiland, DE 197 18 672, 1998
(Zschimmer & Schwarz).
95. D. R. Gruell, A. Haji Begli, N. Kubadinow, M. Kunz and M. Munir, EP
943 030, 1998 (Suedzucker AG).
96. J. H. Huang, L. H. Hsu and Y. C. Su, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1998,
21, 22.
97. H. C. Jarell, T. F. Conwell, P. Moya and I. C. P. Smith, Carbohydr. Res.,
1979, 76, 45.
98. D. Jonker, B. A. R. Lina and G. Kozianowski, Food Chem. Toxicol.,
2002, 40, 1383.
99. T. Kaga and T. Mizutani, Proc. Res. Soc. Jap. Sugar Refin. Technol.,
1985, 34, 45.
100. J. Kashimura, Y. Nagai and T. Ebashi, J. Nutr. Sci. Vitamino. (Tokyo),
2003, 49, 214.
101. H. Y. Kawaguti, E. Manrich, L. F. Fleuri and H. H. Sato, Braz. J.
Microbiol., 2005, 36, 227.
102. H. Y. Kawaguti, E. Manrich and H. H. Sato, Biochem. Eng. J., 2006, 29,
270.
103. H. Y. Kawaguti, E. Manrich and H. H. Sato, Electr. J. Biotechnol., 2006,
9, 482.
104. H. Y. Kawaguti, M. F. Buzzato, D. C. Orsi, G. T. Suzuki and H. H. Sato,
Process Biochem., 2006, 41, 2035.
105. H. Y. Kawaguti, M. F. Buzzato and H. H. Sato, J. Ind. Biotechnol., 2007,
34, 261.
106. H. Y. Kawaguti and H. H. Sato, Biochem. Eng. J., 2007, 36, 202.
107. H. Y. Kawaguti and H. H. Sato, Process Biochem., 2007, 42, 472.
108. K. Kawai, Y. Okuda and K. Yamashita, Endocrinol. Jpn., 1985, 32, 933.
109. K. Kawai, H. Yoshikawa, Y. Murayama, Y. Okuda and K. Yamashita,
Horm. Metab. Res., 1989, 21, 338.
110. S. Kishihara, A. Ideno, M. Okuno, S. Fujii, T. Ebashi and Y. Nagai, Proc.
Res. Soc. Jap. Sugar Refin. Technol., 2002, 50, 67.
111. S. Kishihara, H. Ikegami, M. Okuno, S. Fujii, T. Ebashi and Y. Nagai,
Proc. Res. Soc. Jap. Sugar Refin. Technol., 2002, 50, 75.
112. J. Kowalczyk, in Handbuch Süßungsmittel, ed. K. Rosenplenter and
U. Noehle, Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg, 2007, p. 194.
113. J. Kowalczyk, in Handbuch Süßungsmittel, ed. K. Rosenplenter and
U. Noehle, Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg, 2007, p. 295.
114. J. Kowalczyk, in Handbuch Süßungsmittel, ed. K. Rosenplenter and
U. Noehle, Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg, 2007, p. 340.
115. A. Krastanov and T. Yoshida, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2003, 30,
593.
296 Chapter 9.3
116. A. Krastanov, D. Blazheva, I. Yanakieva and M. Kratchanova, Enzyme
Microb. Technol., 2006, 39, 1306.
117. A. Krastanov, D. Blazheva and V. Stanchev, Process Biochem., 2007, 42,
1655.
118. M. Kunz, in Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, ed. F. W. Lich-
tenthaler, VCH, Weinheim, 1991, p. 127.
119. C. Kutzbach, G. Schmidt-Kastner and H. Schutt, EP 049 801, 1982
(Bayer AG).
120. O. J. Lantero, US 4 390 627, 1983 (Miles Laboratories Inc.).
121. X. Li, C. Zhao, Q. An and D. Zhang, J. Appl. Microbiol., 2003, 95, 521.
122. F. W. Lichtenthaler and H. J. Lindner, Liebigs Ann., 1981, 2372.
123. F. W. Lichtenthaler, P. Pokinskyj and S. Immel, Zuckerind., 1996, 121,
174.
124. A. Liese, K. Seelbach and C. Wandrey, in Industrial Biotransformations,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, p. 512.
125. B. A. R. Lina, A. E. Smits-van Prooji and D. H. Waalkens-Berendsen,
Food Chem. Toxicol., 1997, 35, 309.
126. B. A. R. Lina, D. Jonker and G. Kozianowski, Food Chem. Toxicol, 2002,
40, 1375.
127. H. J. Lindner and F. W. Lichtenthaler, Carbohydr. Res., 1981, 93, 135.
128. S. Lorenz, Zuckerind., 1958, 8, 490.
129. S. Lorenz, Zuckerind., 1958, 8, 535.
130. N. Low and P. Sporns, J. Food Sci., 1988, 53, 558.
131. T. Minami, T. Fujiwara, T. Ooshima, Y. Nakajima and S. Hamada, Oral
Microbiol. Immunol., 1990, 5, 189.
132. A. L. L. Moraes, C. Steckelberg, H. H. Sato and A. Pinheiro, Cie´nc.
Tecnol. Aliment., Campinas, 2005, 25(1), 95.
133. P. Mundra, K. Desai and S. S. Lele, Bioresource Technol., 2007, 98, 2892.
134. Y. Nagai, T. Sugitani, K. Tsuyuki, K. Yamada, T. Ebashi and S. Kishi-
hara, Proc. Res. Soc. Jap. Sugar Refin. Technol., 2002, 50, 57.
135. Y. Nagai, T. Sugitani, K. Yamada, T. Ebashi and S. Kishihara, J. Jpn.
Soc. Food Sci. Technol., 2003, 50(10), 488.
136. Y. Nakajima, Proc. Res. Soc. Jap. Sugar Refin. Technol., 1984, 33, 55.
137. Y. Nakajima, Denpun Kagaku, 1988, 35, 131.
138. T. Ooshima, A. Izumitani, S. Sobue, N. Okahashi and S. Hamada, Infect.
Immun., 1983, 39, 43.
139. K. Ohata and I. Takazoe, Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll., 1983, 24, 1.
140. S. Ravaud, X. Robert, H. Watzlawick, R. Haser, R. Mattes and
N. Aghajari, J. Biol. Chem., 2007, 282(38), 28126.
141. E. Reinefeld, Zuckerind., 1987, 112(12), 1049.
142. T. Rose and M. Kunz, in Practical Aspects of Encapsulation Technologies,
ed. U. Prüsse and K. D. Vorlop, Federal Agricultural Research Centre
(FAL), Braunschweig, 2002, 241, p. 75.
143. N. Sasaki, V. Topitsoglou, I. Takazoe and G. Frostell, Swed. Dent. J.,
1985, 9, 149.
144. P. J. E. Schelwald, EP 601 615, 1993 (Philips Electronics N.V).
Industrial Sucrose 297
145. H. Schiweck, Alimenta, 1980, 19, 5.
146. H. Schiweck, M. Munir, K. M. Rapp, B. Schneider and M. Vogel,
Zuckerind., 1990, 115(7), 555.
147. H. Schiweck, M. Munir, K. M. Rapp, B. Schneider and M. Vogel, in
Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, ed. F. W. Lichtenthaler, VCH,
Weinheim, 1991, p. 57.
148. I. Shimizu, K. Suzuki and Y. Nakajima, JP 55 113 982, 1980 (Mitsui
Sugar Co.).
149. J. Seibel, R. Beine, R. Moraru, C. Behringer and K. Buchholz, Biocat.
Biotrans., 2006, 24, 157.
150. F. R. Seymour, R. D. Knapp, J. E. Zweig and S. H. Bishop, Carbohydr.
Res., 1979, 72, 57.
151. I. R. Siddiqui and B. Furgala, J. Agric. Res., 1967, 6, 139.
152. O. Smidsrød and G. Skjåk-Bræk, Trends Biotechnol., 1990, 8, 71.
153. P. Sporns, L. Plhak and J. Friedrich, Food Res. Int., 1992, 25, 93.
154. P. J. Straeter, Zuckerind., 1987, 112(10), 900.
155. I. Takazoe, Int. Dent. J., 1985, 35, 58.
156. I. Takazoe, G. Frostell, K. Ohta, V. Topitsoglou and N. Sasaki, Swed.
Dent. J., 1985, 9, 81.
157. H. Taniguchi, in Handbook of Industrial Catalysis, ed. C. T. J. Hou, CRC
Press, Taylor & Francis Group, BocaRaton, 2005, 20, p. 1–25.
158. V. Topitsoglou, N. Sasaki and G. Frostell, Caries Res., 1984, 18, 47.
159. T. Tosa and T. Shibatani, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1995, 750, 365.
160. D. Vasik-Racki, in Industrial Biotransformations, ed. A. Liese, K. Seel-
bach and C. Wandrey, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, p. 29.
161. T. Verones and P. Perlot, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 1999, 24, 263.
162. W. Wehner, R. Drewes, K. J. Kuhn, H. J. Sander and M. Kolb, EP 677
549, 1995 (Ciba-Geigy AG).
163. R. Weidenhagen and S. Lorenz, Angew. Chem., 1957, 69, 641.
164. R. Weidenhagen and S. Lorenz, Zuckerind., 1957, 533.
165. R. Weidenhagen and S. Lorenz, DE 10 49 800, 1959 (Süddeutsche
Zucker AG).
166. R. Wilson, Sweeteners, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2007.
167. L. Wu and R. G. Birch, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2005, 71(3), 1581.
168. D. Zhang, X. Li and L. H. Xhang, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2002, 68,
2676.
169. D. Zhang, N. Li, S. M. Lok, L. H. Zhang and K. Swaminathan, J. Biol.
Chem., 2003, 278(37), 35428.
170. C. M. Anand, F. Ashton, H. Shaw and R. Gordon, J. Clin. Microb., 1991,
29, 22434.
171. V. Büttcher, T. Welsh, L. Willmitzer and J. Kossmann, J. Bacteriol., 1997,
179, 3324.
172. G. P. DeMontkalk, M. Remand-Simeon, R. M. Willemot, V. Planchot
and P. Mousan, J. Bacteriol., 1999, 181, 375.
173. H. Bengs and A. Brunner, WO 0038537, 2000 (Aventis Res & Tech
GmbH).
298 Chapter 9.3
174. H. Bengs and A. Schneller, WO 0038623, 2000 (Aventis Res & Tech
GmbH).
175. H. Bengs and A. Brunner, WO 0038537, 2000 (Aventis Res & Tech GmbH).
176. R. M. Alsop, in Microbial Polysaccharides, ed. M. E. Bushell, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1983, p. 1.
177. A. N. de Belder, in Polysaccharides in Medical Applications, ed.
S. Dumitriu, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, p. 505.
178. T. D. Leathers, in Biopolymers, Vol. 5. Polysaccharides I Polysaccharides
from Prokaryotes, ed. E. J. Vandamme, S. de Baets and A. Steinbüchel,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002, p. 299.
179. M. Naessens, A. Cerdobbel, W. Soetaert and E. J. Vandamme, J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol., 2005, 80, 845.
180. L. Pasteur, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1861, 30.
181. J. Piret, J. Lamontagne, J. Bestman-Smith, S. Roy, P. Gourde, A. Des-
ormeaux, R. F. Omar, J. Juhasz and M. G. Bergeron, J. Clin. Microbiol.,
2000, 38, 110.
182. J. F. Robyt, in Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science, Vol. 4, ed. J. I.
Kroschwitz, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1985, p. 753.
183. A. Tanriseven and J. F. Robyt, Carbohydr. Res., 1993, 245, 97.
184. R. Ueno and S. Kuno, Lancet, 1987, 3, 796.
185. M. Yalpani, CRC Critical Rev. Biotechnol., 1985, 3(4), 375.
186. J. Edelman and T. G. Jefford, New Phytologist, 1968, 67, 517.
187. A. Franck and L. de Leenheer, in Biopolymers, Vol. 6. Polysaccharides II:
Polysaccharides from Eukaryotes, ed. A. Steinbüchel, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2002, p. 439.
188. R. Greig-Smith, Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S., 1901, 26, 589.
189. Y. W. Han, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 1990, 25, 171.
190. M. Iizuka, N. Minamiura and T. Ogura, in Glycoenzymes, ed. M. Ohnishi,
Karger, Tokyo, 2000, 15, p. 241.
191. A. van Laere and W. van den Ende, Plant Cell Environ., 2002, 25, 803.
192. E. O. Lippmann, Chem. Ber., 1881, 14, 1509.
193. H. G. Pontis, in Methods in Plant Biochemistry Carbohydrates, Vol. 2, ed.
P. M. Dey, Academic Press, New York, 1990, p. 353.
194. S. K. Rhee, K. B. Song, C. H. Kim, B. S. Park, E. K. Jang and K. H. Jang,
in Biopolymers, Vol. 5. Polysaccharides I: Polysaccharides from Prokar-
yotes, ed. E. J. Vandamme, S. de Baets and A. Steinbüchel, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2002, p. 351.
195. J. Seibel, R. Moraru, S. Goetze, K. Buchholz, S. Na’amnieh, A.
Pawlowski and H. J. Hecht, Carbohydr. Res., 2006, 341, 2335.
196. R. Cartarius, Bioabbaubare Tenside durch reduktive Aminierung von
Isomaltulose – Katalysator und Verfahrensentwicklung, Dissertation, TU
Darmstadt, 1999.
197. W. Dreissig and P. Luger, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B, 173, 29, 514.
198. Y. Nagai, T. Sugitani and K. Tsuyuki, Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 1994, 58,
1789.
Industrial Sucrose 299
199. P. S. J. Cheetham, in Methods in Enzymology, ed. K. Mosbach, Academic
Press, New York, 1987, 136, p. 432.
200. W. Wach, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 7th edn, 2004, DOI: 10.1002/14356007.a12.047.
201. J. S. James, AIDS Treat. News (electronic journal), 1988, 50.
202. M. A. Godshall, Lut. Sug. J., 2001, 103, 1233.
203. J. W. Yun, in Recent Advances in Fructooligosaccharides Research, ed.
S. Norio, B. Noureddine and O. Shuichi, 2007, 19, p. 357.
204. M. J. Mabel, P. T. Sangeetha, K. Platel, K. Srinivasan and S. G. Prapulla,
Carbohydr. Res., 2008, 343, 56.
205. J. Yoshikawa, S. Amachi, H. Shinoyama and T. Fujii, Biotechnol. Lett.,
2008, 30, 535.
206. S. Kralj, K. Buchholz, L. Dijkhuizen and J. Seibel, Biocatal. Biotrans.,
2008, 26, 32.
207. A. Marx, M. Poetter, S. Buchholz, A. May, H. Siegert, B. Albert,
G. Fuchs and L. Eggeling, WO/2007/141208, 2006 (Evonik Röhm
GmbH).
CHAPTER 9.4
Wood
ELISABETH WINDEISEN AND GERD WEGENER
9.4.1 Introduction
The twenty-first century is expected to become the century of bio-based materials
and biorefining processes,1–5 which are now on the horizon to replace fossil-
based materials gradually but continuously. Comparable developments are
taking place in the energy sector where a multitude of renewable energy resources
are complementing and substituting fossil-based energy and nuclear power.6
Driving forces are primarily the fact of dwindling fossil resources, along with
uncertainties concerning availability and prices as well as the globally accepted
certainty of society and politicians about climate change and the resulting
effects on quality of life and living space for man, animals and plants. Keeping
these aspects in mind, including all basics of sustainability, it is no exaggeration
to say that forests and wood utilization play an important role in meeting
global demands for materials and energy on the one hand and on the other
hand contributing effectively to quality of life and climate protection.
In the context of ‘‘Green Chemistry’’ and against the background of sus-
tainability wood utilization is demonstrated on the basis of the chemistry of
wood in four sectors:
300
Wood 301
Wood and biomass are raw materials (Figure 9.4.1) for traditional building
products like sawn timber, prefabricated timber elements and systems as well as
wood-based materials in the form of boards (e.g. particle- and fibreboards), but
also as construction elements from glued products like laminated beams, ply-
wood, oriented structural boards or laminated veneer lumber.7
New developments give options in the form of hybrid materials combining
wood with conventional plastics (e.g. Wood Plastic Composites, WPC) (Section
9.4.4) or as solid wood improved by heat treatment or chemical modification,
e.g. acetylation, oil treatment etc. (Section 9.4.5).
Additionally, wood and biomass represent traditional and new energy pro-
ducts (such as pellets or briquettes) to be used both in small private heating
systems and also in large biomass heat processing units, also producing elec-
trical power by power-heat-coupling systems. In this sector wood and biomass
compete with typical fossil energies such as oil, gas and coal but also with
additional renewable energy sources like wind, water, geothermal heat and
waste, besides the most promising natural energy coming from the sun and
used by different techniques like sun collectors, photovoltaic systems, etc. For
electricity, nuclear power is still an important factor for many countries
worldwide. In the field of fuels for stationary and mobile systems biofuels based
on forest and agricultural biomass (biodiesel, ethanol, etc.) are the option as
alternatives to fossil fuels like petrol and diesel but also to future hydrogen
power systems, etc. In the wide field of chemistry wood- and biomass-based and
derived green chemicals compete with established oil-based chemicals and
plastics as described in other chapters.
In the context of chemical utilization of wood, other parts of the tree, the
so-called Non-Timber-Forest-Products (NTFP), have always been closely related
Figure 9.4.2 Global annually harvested amount of round wood and its utilization.
timber, 220 Mio m3 wood-based materials and 370 Mio mto paper are pro-
duced (Figure 9.4.2).9
Even though Europe only has 5% of the global forest area, it produces nearly
30% of all wood products worldwide due to its large stocks of wood, efficient
manufacturing technologies and a high rate in net product.
Today, in a global comparison, Germany, ahead of Sweden (2.9 billion m3),
holds the largest stocks of wood in its forests (3.4 billion m3). Eight percent of
the entire European net product is contributed by the forest, wood and paper
industry. Europe also holds the globally leading market for wood and wood-
based products. 60% of all exports and nearly 50% of all imports are trans-
acted in the European market.
In view of economy, and from the viewpoint of ecology, forest, wood and
paper constitute ‘‘heavyweights’’. According to the European definition also
downstream economic sectors like the printing and publishing industry are
assigned to the forest and wood domain. Ecological advantages arise already as
wood is being produced in the forest. In addition wood products replace fossil
and other non-renewable resources and their subsequently manufactured
products.
Since the residues accruing during wood processing make good raw material
for further products, the wood industry hardly produces any refuse. When
wood products like paper are no longer wanted, they can either be recycled or
burnt, subsequently supplying new products or utilizable energy. Therefore,
already today, the forest and wood domain contribute substantially to meeting
important environmental demands. Thus, a renewable resource is employed
snatching greenhouse gas from the air; its production processes use up little
energy and generate few pollutants. Not only does the bioproduct wood supply
sustainable energy, but it also facilitates building sustainability.
Wood 305
For climate protection construction material too needs to be selected
according to ecological criteria. This is particularly important, because con-
struction represents an essential economic element, also reflecting the intellec-
tual and cultural value benchmark of a society.
In Germany, for example, more than two-thirds of the wood utilized ‘‘ends
up’’ in buildings as construction material, insulating material or furniture.
Therefore, the forest and wood industry plays an important part where envir-
onmental objectives are concerned. Its task is to offer suitable wood species
characterized by the required properties like density, strength, stability, hardness,
durability, surface shape and colour. From glulam (glue-laminated timber) to
ultra-light structural particle board, high-capacity raw material and suitable
building parts as well as structural systems need to be supplied, fulfilling all the
technological, aesthetic and hygienic requirements of future construction.
Building has always been of significant importance for mankind’s culture and
development. It determines the appearance of our villages and cities, reveals the
social structures of the society and is an important economic factor itself.
Architecture and construction are essential characteristics of all types
of buildings in general. Under ecological and environmental aspects, however,
the choice of the building materials is additionally gaining more and more
importance. Taking these aspects into account a renaissance of wood as a
building material is taking place. There are good reasons for that, e.g.:
J high strength and stiffness and low mass at the same time;
J it can be processed easily and with low energy input;
J it has excellent heat and sound insulation properties;
J it provides a healthy living climate in houses due to the ability of
absorbing and releasing moisture;
306 Chapter 9.4
J it reveals important fire safety characteristics;
J thousands of different wood species with different properties and
appearance offer a wide range of options for the use of wood as con-
struction, equipment and decoration material;
J wood and wood products keep their energy content over the whole
lifetime of a building and the energy can be used at the end of the life
span.
Wood for building purposes can be used in the form of roundwood, but
mostly as sawn timber such as beams, planks, boards or slats as traditional
components of building elements such as floors, walls, ceilings, roofs, etc.
Mostly softwoods, preferably spruce or pine wood, but also hardwoods such as
oak, are used e.g. for windows, doors or parquet.
The solid wood products are supplemented by a large number of wood-based
composites (see Section 9.4.4).
forming the cell wall; the extractives can often be found in comparatively low
percentages (Tables 9.4.1 and 9.4.2).
Even if, in the first instance, it might seem that this material does not vary a
lot, the different amounts and differing chemical composition of the polyoses
(see Section 9.4.2.3) and the lignins (see Section 9.4.2.4) in hardwood and
softwood strongly affect the manufacturing processes. This applies for the
extractives too, which due to their large chemical diversity influence some of
the properties of wood and behave respectively different with regard to the
chemical utilization of the wood.
As previously mentioned the chemical diversity of the wood species devel-
oped by nature most often is a utilization benefit; however, with regard to the
chemical utilization, methods and processes must often be optimized for each
wood species separately, as due to the specific chemistry of the wood species it is
not always possible to transfer them.
In the following, the chemical components cellulose, polyoses, lignin,
extractives and ash are briefly described. Further information can be found in
various books and literature cited therein.12–17
9.4.2.2 Cellulose
With an estimated vegetable production of 1011 mto per annum, cellulose is on
a quantity basis the most important organic natural material worldwide.12
Since cellulose is a homopolymer it is composed of a single component, namely
the D-glucopyranose, which is linked by ß-1-4-glycosidic bonds. The cellulose
308 Chapter 9.4
Table 9.4.2 Comparison of the chemistry of various wood species excluding
inorganic components18 (with permission of Wiley-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. KGaA).
Cellulose Polyoses Lignin Extrac-
Wood species Common name [%] [%] [%] tives [%]
Softwood
Abies Balsam fir 38.8 28.5 29.1 2.7
balsamea
Pseudotsuga Douglas fir 38.8 26.3 29.3 5.3
menziesii
Tsuga Eastern hemlock 37.7 27.9 30.5 3.4
canadensis
Juniperus Common juniper 33.0 30.3 32.1 3.2
communis
Pinus radiata Monterey pine 37.4 33.2 27.2 1.8
Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 40.0 28.5 27.7 3.5
Picea abies Norway spruce 41.7 28.3 27.4 1.7
Picea glauca White spruce 39.5 30.6 27.5 2.1
Larix sibirica Siberian larch 41.4 29.6 26.8 1.8
Hardwood
Acer rubrum Red maple 42.0 28.9 25.4 3.2
Fagus sylvatica Common beech 39.4 33.3 24.8 1.2
Betula Silver birch 41.0 32.4 22.0 3.2
verrucosa
Betula Paper birch 39.4 34.5 21.4 2.6
papyrifera
Alnus incana Gray alder 38.3 30.9 24.8 4.6
Eucalyptus Blue gum 51.0 25.2 21.9 1.3
globulus
Acacia Black wattle 42.9 33.6 20.8 1.8
mollissima
content in wood varies between 40 and 50%. The mean degree of poly-
merization of native cellulose ranges on average between 8000 and 10,000.
Cellulose forms linear, unbranched chains. Intramolecular hydrogen bridges,
which may predominately occur in native cellulose (cellulose I) between the
hydroxyl groups on C2 and C6 and the hydroxyl groups on C3 and the C5
oxygen (Scheme 9.4.1), prevent free rotability and account for the relatively
high stiffness of the straight-chained molecular chains. Due to the formation of
intermolecular hydrogen bridges further degrees of order are formed. Thus, in
solid state, crystalline regions alternate with the ones of a lower degree of order
(amorphous regions).
Thirty to one hundred strands of cellulose aggregate into so-called elemental
fibrils (cross section approximately 2–4 nm) via H-bridges, which in turn
aggregate into microfibrils (cross section approximately 10–30 nm) and these
into macrofibrils (cross section approximately 500 nm). The orientation of the
cellulose fibrils in the wood cell wall differs. The strongest cell wall layer, for
example, shows a constitution parallel to the axis which accounts for the high
tensile strength of wood.12
Wood 309
Due to its structure, cellulose does not dissolve in common solvents nor in
water or in dilute acids, even though non-crystalline structural regions can swell
in water and in doing so adsorb 8–14% of its volume to water. In alkaline
solutions, cellulose strongly swells at first and the short-chained parts with
DPo200 are dissolved (e.g. a-cellulose can be obtained after treatment with
17.5% NaOH or 24% KOH). Only strong acids cause a hydrolytic degradation.
In addition to several solvent systems containing heavy metal salts and ammonia
or aliphatic di- or triamines (Schweizers reagent respectively cuoxam (Cu/NH3),
cuen (Cu/ethylene diamine), nitren (Ni/diethylene triamine), 4-methylmorpho-
line-4-oxide (NMMO), dimethylsulfoxide blends and ionic liquids (ILs), besides
others, are employed as organic solvents for cellulose.12,18–23
The chemical reactivity of cellulose generally depends on the percentage of
accessible hydroxyl groups, which are not occupied by hydrogen bonds. At
first, chemical reactions occur in amorphous regions of a lower degree of order
until crystalline regions take part. A further decisive factor for the succession
and the extent of the interaction is the molecular size and character of the
interacting agent in relation to the capillaries and interstices allowing its
penetration into the cellulose substrate.24
The possible uses of cellulose of various forms is manifold (fibres, cellulose
derivatives as well as new products such as cellulose aero gels), however a che-
mical synthesis of cellulose, as demonstrated by nature, has not yet been rea-
lized.20,25,26 In order to meet the high requirements for products made of
cellulose, it is usually necessary to obtain cellulose from plant material by selective
removal of non-cellulose components. In the case of wood, mechanical, mainly
mechanical-chemical, as well as chemical pulping is employed (see Section 9.4.3).
9.4.2.4 Lignin
Lignin (lat. lignum ¼ wood) is the second most common organic natural
material and the real lignification substance. By integration of lignin in the cell
wall and by association with the cellulose fibrils via the polyoses, high material
strength develops, whereby the tree can stand upright and absorb static and
dynamic forces. Hence, the presence of lignin in the cell wall of the plant is a
pre-condition for the strength of the wood.
The aromatic lignin is formed by way of the so-called Shikimate biosynthesis
from glucose. Lignin components form phenylpropan units with differing
amounts of methoxy groups (Scheme 9.4.4). Depending on the plant group, the
percentage of the basic units of coumaryl- (H), coniferyl- (G-) and sinapyl
alcohol (S-) varies. Thus, softwood mainly contains G-lignin, whereas hard-
wood is composed of G- and S-units. The lignin of softwood lignin is more
strongly condensed than the lignin of hardwood; it features a higher carbon
content due to the lower amount of methoxy groups as well as less acid-soluble
parts.12
Lignin is an amorphous, three-dimensional heteropolymer without any
defined chemical structure (Scheme 9.4.5). According to present knowledge, the
polymerization not only takes place by reaction of monomers with polymer
stages but also by reaction of already existing aggregates (di-, tri-, etc. lignans).
The described molar masses, e.g. approximately 10,000 in the case of spruce
MWL (milled-wood-lignin) produced in the laboratory, of isolated lignins are
not uniform or representative, as they depend on the isolation method.
Lignin shows thermoplastic properties at approximately 160 1C (glass
transition), which are used for the manufacture of certain composites
(Section 9.4.4).
Regarding lignin, it always has to be considered that it is not a uniform and
defined product, but it can vary a lot depending on the origin and the isolation
312 Chapter 9.4
method.12,27 This is one of the reasons why lignin is materially utilized only in
specific cases, although it is, along with the fossil resources, the only natural
resource for aromatic compounds.
Most of the 70 Mio mto of lignin annually accruing as a by-product in
pulping is used for energy generation in the course of sulphate pulping (Kraft
pulping). Only about 1.5% of lignin and its by-products are materially utilized.
In particular sulphurous lignin variations like lignin sulphonate obtained from
the sulphite pulping are commercially utilized in quantities of 1,000,000 mto
a1 or Kraft lignins (alkali lignin) obtained from Kraft pulping in quantities of
100,000 mto a1.28–30
The existing markets of lignin are either for low-value products as lig-
nosulphonates mainly in dispersing and binding applications or limited to
very narrow market segments as high-quality dispersants from chemically
modified Kraft lignin as well as speciality chemicals like vanillin or agro-
chemicals.31 Nevertheless, numerous potential applications have been studied,
e.g. as tanning agent, resin component for wood-based boards, dispersing
agent, antioxidants and binder for different purposes.12,29,32 Lignin has a
relatively high application potential in the sector of wood-based products,
where wood adhesives, phenol and epoxy resins or carbon fibres can be
made from lignin. Approximately 300,000 mto a1 of lignin are required for
the resin market. Lignin with a high degree of purity is employed as a UV-
stabilizer for the polyolefin production or as a filler for the production of
polyurethane.31,33
In the form of thermoplastically processed products (e.g. ARBOFORMs
and FASALs), lignin is used as a composite material for various applications
(see Section 9.4.4). However, these are mainly niche products shown by the
production volume of ARBOFORMs of approximately 300 mto a1.34 A
significantly higher material utilization of lignin would, on the one hand,
increase the added value of wood and on the other hand, crude oil-based
substances like plastics could partly be replaced.
Wood 313
9.4.2.5 Extractives
Table 9.4.3 and Scheme 9.4.6 show that contents as well as structure of the
extractives can vary greatly between the wood species. Furthermore, there are
large differences between wood parts of, for example, sapwood and heartwood
(see below) or between wood and bark. Therefore, it is very difficult to briefly
describe extractives and the reader is referred to the literature.12,14,15,16,17
Since the name of the extractives refers to their isolation method, it follows
that the term extractives includes non-specifically all substances which can be
extracted from the wood using solvents with most different polarities. Hence
the term extractives must be considered in a much differentiated manner, as
314 Chapter 9.4
35
Table 9.4.3 Typical extractive contents in wood.
Solvent Cyclohexane/Ethanol [%] Water [%]
Softwood
Spruce 1–2 0.5–2
Pine 4–7 0.5–2
Larch 3–6 8–10
Douglas fir 3–6 3–6
Hardwood
Beech 0.5–1.5 o1
Oak 3–8 6–10
Tropical wood
Teak 5–7 2–3
Quebracho up to 40 20–25
most probably only part of the low molecular organic compounds of a number
of wood species have yet been described.
The classification of extractives is rarely made strictly according to substance
classes. Therefore it can usually be divided into lipophilic and hydrophilic
extractives due to the polarity (Table 9.4.4) or into primary and secondary
extractives due to their biological function (Table 9.4.5).
The first differentiation is used in various sectors of the wood-processing
industry like the pulp and paper industry, as its chemical behaviour is
defined by the polarity. Depending on the chemical pulping, certain extractives
can show negative effects on the production, e.g. pinosylvin and its mono-
methyl ether during acid sulphite pulping.13 In contrast, other pine extractives
(resin acids, terpenes, etc.) are useful by-products in Kraft pulping (see
Section 9.4.3).
Looking at the biological function, the primary extractives are necessary for
maintaining the metabolism and supply of the components for the biosynthesis
of the secondary substances. Typical primary substances include carbohydrates
(sugars), which can be found for example as monosaccharides, disaccharides
and as starch as well as fats and proteins. As sapwood is responsible for the
constant water and nutrient supply of the whole tree, mainly primary extrac-
tives are involved, which are also used by various micro-organisms as a source
of food.
Heartwood contains very few or no primary extractives, but usually sig-
nificantly more secondary extractives than sapwood. The secondary substances
include almost all the other extractive classes, hence they have enormous
structural variety including most different substance classes like alkaloids,
quinones, fats, oils, saponins, terpenes, tropolones, waxes and a number of
aromatic or phenolic compounds (stilbenes, lignans, flavonoids, tannins, etc.).
The secondary substances play an essential role in the use of wood, for example
the heartwood of most of the wood species is more durable than the sapwood.
Whether and to what extent the chemical, biological, physical and optical
properties of the wood species are influenced by the extractives depends gen-
erally on the quantity and the substance class, which is in turn specific to the
Wood 315
wood species. In Table 9.4.5, the effects on properties as well as the processa-
bility are summarized.35
A very important criterion determined by the extractives is the natural
durability of wood. Furthermore, colour, odour and taste are mainly caused by
316 Chapter 9.4
14
Table 9.4.4 Solubility of wood extractives.
Glycosides,
Resin acids, Fats, fatty sugars,
Major compound monoterpenoids, acids, steryl Phenolic starch,
classes other terpenoids esters, sterols substances proteins Inorganics
Solubility in
Alkanes +++ +++ 0 0 0
Diethyl ether or +++ +++ ++ 0 0
dichloromethane
Acetone +++ +++ +++ ++ +
Ethanol ++ ++ +++ + +
Water 0 0 + +++ ++
+++: easily soluble, ++: soluble, +: slightly soluble, 0: insoluble
Figure 9.4.5 Energy input per ton of pulp and paper production in Germany.54
322 Chapter 9.4
18
Table 9.4.6 Global pulp production by category (2000) (with permission of
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA).
Pulp production
Pulp category [Mio mto]
Chemical 131.2
Kraft 117.0
Sulfite 7.0
Semichemical 7.2
Mechanical 37.8
Nonwood 18.0
Total fibres 334.0
Total virgin fiber 187.0
Recovered fiber 147.0
The pulp and paper industry is a branch where large, multinational com-
panies dominate pulp production on a global scale, often combined with mass
paper production. On the other hand, medium-sized and small companies are
producing a large number and variety of speciality papers. In Germany, for
example, four to five international companies (‘‘global players’’) produce
pulp and paper in big tonnages, while about 160 paper mills act in the field of
speciality papers.
Pulp represents the major raw material basis for the two main applications: a)
about 95% for paper and board production, where the pulp fibres are addi-
tionally modified to give a coherent paper sheet and b) about 5% for chemical
Wood 323
Figure 9.4.7 Major trade flow of wood pulp worldwide (2004). (Thickness of arrows
corresponds to trade volume.)
9.4.3.2 Products
There are manifold applications for dissolved pulp, as can be seen in
Table 9.4.7. Today, regenerated cellulose fibres are of utmost importance. They
are produced either through the viscose process by derivatization with CS2 or
according to the lyocell process through direct solution in 4-methylmorpholine-
4-oxide (NMMO). In addition, there are a number of cellulose derivatives
with very specific properties. Thus, cellulose ethers and esters like methyl cel-
lulose (MC), methyl hydroxypropyl cellulose (MHPC), carboxymethyl cellu-
lose (CMC) and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) are used, for example, as glue
for wall paper (MC), as protective colloids in suspension polymerization of
vinyl chloride (MC, MHPC) and in emulsion polymerization of vinyl acetate
(HEC) as entire deposition agent for laundry detergents (CMC) or as thick-
ening agents in aqueous paints, cosmetics and food (e.g. E 461–E 466) due to
their ability to influence the rheology of liquid systems. Cellulose esters such as
acetates are used for cigarette filters due to their specific filtration and
adsorption properties and they are also used as raw material in photographic
films due to their excellent optical properties. Properties like surface activity,
impact strength, transparency and brilliancy present an advantage when
nitrocellulose is used as a coating raw material.56
As already mentioned, 95% of the pulp is used for the production of paper.
In Figure 9.4.9 it can be seen that, despite the development of electronic media,
the worldwide production of paper is still increasing. Thus, the paper demand
in developing countries is especially increasing.54
In Table 9.4.8 the largest paper and paperboard producing countries
worldwide and their share in the world production are presented.
USA 84.0 22
China 65.0 17
Japan 31.1 8
Germany 22.6 6
Canada 18.1 5
Finland 14.1 4
Sweden 12.0 3
South Korea 10.7 3
France 10.0 3
Italy 10.0 3
Total of top ten 277.6 73
World 382.6 100
9.4.6 Outlook
The principles of green chemistry may be summarized in the simple statement
‘‘applying fundamental knowledge of chemical processes and products to
achieve elegant solutions with the ultimate goal of hazard-free, waste free,
energy-efficient synthesis of non-toxic products without sacrificing efficacy of
function’’.82
As the worldwide shortage of exhaustible resources can be predicted quite
reliably and is accompanied by an increase in price of crude-oil-based products,
this will in turn promote the marketability of substitution products on the basis
of renewable raw materials, which is more sustainable than the production of
oil-based materials and products.
The trees and the forests as well as any other biomass are a renewable resource,
the potential of which has not yet been exploited. Hence, different compounds
like flavonoids, lignans, terpenes, phenols, alkaloids, sterols, waxes, fats, tannins,
sugar, gum, suberins and resins from different woods and plant components can
be extracted and converted to useful market products. The utilization of wood as
a provider of components for niche and premium products is certainly able to
grow. In this regard, various research fields have been opened and extended,
focused on raw materials, products, processes and development of methods as
well. This needs efforts and contributions by politics, industry and research. Even
if science will not eventually invent or detect another acetylsalicylic acid, there are
a number of open questions like identification of unknown, biologically active
compounds or the regulation of the biosynthesis of various extractives. Fur-
thermore, a large added value could be achieved by the production of pharma-
ceutically active or health beneficial ingredients, which include for example
phytohormones, polyphenols or triterpenes.
In future, by using wood, or one of its components, as a renewable resource,
the entire process chain or an entire reaction system can be regarded under
‘‘green’’ aspects including energy efficiency.
Wood 335
An established instrument for ecological evaluation of processes or products
is life-cycle-assessment, which is particularly useful for ecological comparison
and optimization of processes and products. A consequent realization of the
mentioned aspects and challenges will lead to a better and more sustainable
situation on our planet for both nature and mankind.
References
1. J. E. Winandy, A. W. Rudie, R. S. Williams and T. H. Wegner, Forest.
Prod. J., 2008, 58, 6–16.
2. G. Gellerstedt, in Proceedings 10th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics
and Pulp, Stockholm, 2008.
3. C. Konijnendijk, ed., Forest-Based Sector Technology Platform – FTP,
2008.
4. J. H. Clark, V. Budarin, F. E. I. Deswarte, J. E. Hardy, F. M. Kerton,
A. J. Hunt, R. Luque, D. J. Macquarrie, K. Milkowski, A. Rodriguez,
O. Samuel, S. J. Tavener, R. J. White and A. J. Wilson, Green Chem., 2006,
8, 853–860.
5. B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, ed., Biorefineries – Industrial
Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.
6. M. Kaltschmitt and H. Hartmann, Energie aus Biomasse, Springer Verlag,
Berlin, 2001.
7. T. Herzog, J. Natterer, R. Schweitzer, M. Volz and W. Winter, ed.,
Holzbau Atlas, Institut für internationale Architektur Dokumentation,
München, 4. Auflage, 2003.
8. K. Töpfer, in Nachhaltig bauen und modernisieren, ed. Holzabsatzfonds,
Bonn, 2006, p. 2.
9. FAO, http://faostat.fao.org/site/381/default.aspx (retrieved 01.07.08).
10. R. Wagenführ, Holzatlas, Carl Hanser Verlag, 6. Auflage, 2007.
11. J. Sell, Eigenschaften und Kenngrößen von Holzarten, Baufachverlag
Lignum, Dietikon, 4. Auflage, 1997.
12. D. Fengel and G. Wegener, Wood. Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions.
Reprint Kessel, http://www.forstbuch.de, Remagen, 2003.
13. R. Alén, I. Forsskahl, B. Holmbom and P. Stenius, Forest Products
Chemistry, Fapet Oy, Helsinki, 2000.
14. E. Sjöström and R. Alén, ed., Analytical Methods in Wood Chemistry,
Pulping, and Papermaking, Springer, 1999.
15. J. W. Rowe, (Ed.), Natural Products of Woody Plants I and II, Springer,
1989.
16. R. M. Rowell, (Ed.), Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites,
Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, London, NJ, Singapore, 2005.
17. M. Ek, G. Gellerstedt and G. Henriksson, ed., Ljungberg Textbook, Wood
Chemistry and Wood Biotechnology, Stockholm, 2006.
18. H. Sixta, ed., Handbook of Pulp Volume 1 and 2, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2006, p. 9, 11, 23, 1–20, 997–1004.
336 Chapter 9.4
19. D. Klemm, B. Philipp, T. Heinze, U. Heinze and W. Wagenknecht,
Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998.
20. J. Falbe and M. Regitz, ed., Römpp Chemielexikon, Thieme Verlag, 10.
Auflage, 1996.
21. L. Göttsching and C. Katz, ed., Papier Lexikon, Deutscher Betriebswirte-
Verlag, Gernsbach, 1999.
22. R. P. Swatloski, R. D. Rogers and J. D. Holbrey, US 2003/0157351, 2002
(Univers. of Alabama).
23. D. A. Fort, R. C. Rensing, R. P. Swatloski, P. Moyna, G. Moyna and R.
D. Rogers, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 63.
24. H. A Krässig, Cellulose. Structure, Accessibility and Reactivity, Gordon
and Breach Science Publishers SA, Yverdon, 1993.
25. J. F. Kennedy, G. O. Philips, P. O. Williams and L. Piculell, (Ed.),
Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives, Woodhead Publishing, 1995.
26. T. Rosenau, http://bfw.ac.at/nawaros/documents/02_Praes_Rosenau.pdf
(retrieved 14.08.08).
27. S. Y. Lin and C. W. Dence, ed., Methods of Lignin Chemistry, Springer
Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
28. R. J. A. Gosselink, E. de Jong, A. Abächerli and B. Guran, Ind. Crops
Prod., 2004, 20, 121–129.
29. International Lignin Institute, http://www.ili-lignin.com (retrieved
13.04.2006).
30. M. Hofrichter and A. Steinbüchel, Biopolymers: Lignin, Humic Substances
and Coal, Wiley-VCH, 2001.
31. R. J. A. Gosselink, E. de Jong, A. Abächerli and B. Guran, in The 7th ILI
Forum: Bringing lignin back to the headlines, Proceedings, Barcelona, 2005.
32. W. G. Glasser and S. Sarkanen, ed., Lignin: Properties and Materials,
American Chemical Society, Washington, 1989.
33. B. A. Acha, C. Capurro, N. E. Marcovich, N. I. Aranguren and M. M.
Reboredo, in The 7th ILI Forum: Bringing lignin back to the headlines,
Proceedings, Barcelona, 2005.
34. H. Nägele and J. Pfitzer, http://www.tecnaro.de (retrieved 17.01.2006).
35. E. Windeisen and G. Wegener, Mat. Sci. Forum, 2009, 599, 79–106.
36. H.-D. Belitz, W. Grosch and P. Schieberle, Lehrbuch der Lebensmitte-
lindustrie, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
37. B. Hausen, Woods Injurious to Human Health, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin,
New York, 1981.
38. M. Ohlmeyer, M. Makowski and D. Meier, http://www.bfafh.de/iud/pro-
jekte/4-2004/6-2.pdf (retrieved 23.01.2008).
39. D. C. Ayres and J. D. Loike, Lignans: Chemical, Biological and Clinical
Properties, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
40. P. M. Dewick, Medicinal Natural Products, Wiley, 2001.
41. Ch. Schwager and W. Lange, Biologischer Holzschutz. Literaturstudie über
akzessorische Bestandteile dauerhafter Holzarten mit resistenzwirksamer
Aktivität, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, 1998.
Wood 337
42. B. Holmbom, C. Eckermann, P. Eklund, J. Hemming, L. Nisula, M.
Reunanen, R. Sjöholm, A. Sundberg, K. Sundberg and S. Willför, Phy-
tochem. Rev., 2003, 2, 331–340.
43. http://web.abo.fi/meddelanden/english/2007_01/2007_01_trees.sht (retrieved
23.01.2008).
44. http://www.finnfacts.com/pdf/FF_4_06_saksa_web.pdf (retrieved 23.01.2008).
45. http://www.tekes.fi/eng/publications/Tekes_Foods.pdf (retrieved 29.11.
2007).
46. http://www.pte.at/pte.mc?pte¼010925008 (retrieved 23.01.2008).
47. G. S. Jayatilake, D. R. Freeberg, Z. Liu, S. L. Richheimer, M. E. Blake,
D. T. Bailey, V. Haridas and J. U. Gutterman, J. Nat. Prod., 2003, 66,
779–783.
48. L. Packer, G. Rimbach and F. Virgili, Free Radical Biol. Med., 27,
704–724.
49. http://www.betulin.de/ (retrieved 23.01.2008).
50. http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/sonstiges/meldungen/single/artikel/rosska-
stan/ (retrieved 23.01.2008).
51. J. Gullichsen and C.-J. Fogetholm, (Ed.), Chemical Pulping 6A, 6B, Fapet
Oy, Helsinki, 1999.
52. M. Ek, G. Gellerstedt and G. Henriksson, ed., Ljungberg Textbook,
Pulping Chemistry and Technology, Stockholm, 2006.
53. W. Sandermann, Papier. Eine Kulturgeschichte, Springer, Berlin, 3.
Auflage, 1997.
54. Verband Deutscher Papierfabriken e.V. (VDP), ed., Papier: Ein Leis-
tungsbericht, 2008.
55. R. Janzon, B. Saake and J. Puls, http://www.bfafh.de/iud/projekte/3-2006/
5-1.pdf (retrieved 23.01.2008).
56. H. Harms, in Lignovisionen, High-Performance Materials from Nature,
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, 2006,
pp. 27–34.
57. Anonymous, http://www.nova-institut.de/pdf/06-01_WPC-Studie.pdf (ret-
rieved 13.04.2006).
58. A. Teischinger, U. Müller and H. Korte, Holztechnologie, 2005, 46, 30–34.
59. M. P. Wolcott and P. M. Smith, in Nachrichtenportal für Nachwachsende
Rohstoffe, 2004: Opportunities and challenges for Wood-Plastic Compo-
sites in structural applications (retrieved 28.05.2004).
60. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V., ed., Naturfaserverstärkte
Kunststoffe, 2008, p. 29.
61. P. Schwarzbauer and A. Eder, in 4. Internationales Seminar für die
Holzindustrie in der Schweiz, Wien, 2003.
62. D. Kaczmarek and J. Wortberg, Kunststoffe, 2003, 93, 18–23.
63. Anonymous, Holz-Zentralblatt, 2004, 130(51), 661–666.
64. G. Wegener, E. Windeisen, G. Scholz, C. Schrader, J. Pfitzer and
H. Nägele, in 9th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp, Pro-
ceedings, Wien, 2006, pp. 126–129.
338 Chapter 9.4
65. S. Krischok, M. Himmerlich, S. I. U. Ahmed, A. Kauffmann, J. Pfitzer,
M. Huber, W. Bengel and J. A. Schaefer, in Biannual Report 2005/2006,
Technische Universität Ilmenau, 2006, p. 136–137.
66. E. Windeisen, G. Wegener, J. Pfitzer and H. Nägele, in Zukunftsmärkte für
das Bauen mit Holz, DRW Verlag, 2008, pp. 86–99.
67. http://www.austel.at/deutsch/home.html (retrieved 28.02.2007).
68. C. A. S. Hill, D. Jones, H. Militz and G. A. Ormondroyd, ed., The Third
European Conference on Wood Modification, Cardiff, 15–16th October
2007.
69. C. A. S. Hill, Wood Modification. Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes,
Wiley, 2006.
70. M. Westin and S. Lande, http://www.bfafh.de/inst4/45/ppt/3furfury.pdf
(retrieved 04.03.08).
71. S. Lande, Doctoral Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As,
2008.
72. A. Nurmi, http://www2.spm.slu.se/bitwon/seminars/mikkeli_060527_28/
Nurmi_Chemical%20modification_Mikkeli_06.pdf, (retrieved 04.07.08).
73. W. Scheiding, in Tagungsband 5. Europäischer TMT-Workshop, Dresden,
24–25 April 2008, p. 1–6.
74. M. Boonstra, J. van Acker, E. Kegel and M. Stevens, Wood Sci. Technol.,
2007, 41, 31–57.
75. B. Esteves, J. Graca and H. Pereira, Holzforschung, 2008, 62, online DOI
10.1515/HF.2008.057.
76. E. Windeisen, C. Strobel and G. Wegener, Wood Sci. Technol., 2007, 41,
523–536.
77. E. Windeisen and G. Wegener, Mat. Sci. Forum, 2009, 599, 143–158.
78. S. Hofer, C. R. Welzbacher, A. O. Rapp and C. Brischke, in Tagungsband
der 25. Holzschutz-Tagung der DGfH, Biberach 20–21 September, 2007,
pp. 143–161.
79. D. Johansson, Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, 2005.
80. B. Sundquist, Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, 2004.
81. J. Follrich, U. Müller and W. Gindl, Holz Roh Werkst., 2006, 64, 373–376.
82. http://www.chem.monash.edu.au/green-chem/docs/cgc-report-2001.pdf
(retrieved 04.07.08).
CHAPTER 9.5
Natural Rubber
LAURENT VAYSSE,a FRÉDÉRIC BONFILS,b PHILIPPE
THALER,c AND JÉRÔME SAINTE-BEUVEb
a
CIRAD, UMR 1208, Joint Research Unit ‘‘Agropolymers Engineering and
Emerging Technologies’’ CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, Université
de Montpellier 2; Rubber Technology Laboratory Agro-Industry Building 3,
8th floor Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; b CIRAD, UMR
1208, Joint Research Unit ‘‘Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging
Technologies’’, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de
Montpellier 2, 73 rue JF Breton, F-34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;
c
CIRAD, UPR80, Functioning and management of tree based cropping
systems, Campus international de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier Cedex 5,
France
9.5.1 Introduction
Natural rubber, India rubber and caoutchouc are all names for the solid elastic
material isolated, one way or another, from the ‘milk’ or latex of Hevea bra-
siliensis, and various other tropical plants like Castilloa elastica. Natural rubber
and natural rubber products have been known to the ancient cultures of
Amazonia and Mesoamerica since time immemorial. According to the Spanish
historian Antonio de Herrera Tordesillas, Christopher Columbus returned
from his second voyage, bringing back the first rubber balls from the West
Indies to Europe. The term cahuchu or caoutchouc was used by the Maninas
Indians according to the French explorer Charles de la Condamine. It is gen-
erally taken to be based on the Indian cao ochu, which could be translated as
339
340 Chapter 9.5
teardrops of the weeping tree, an interpretation which was publicized by Vicki
Baum’s eponymous novel The Weeping Wood.124
Rubber is one of the most important products to come out of the rainforest.
The history of natural rubber since the beginning of the industrial age is a
fascinating sequence of inventions (vulcanization, Charles Goodyear and
Thomas Hancock, 1843/1844; pneumatic automobile rubber tyres, Robert
William Thomson, 1846; synthetic rubbers: polyisoprene, Fritz Hofmann,
1909; polydimethylbutadiene, IG Farben 1910; BUNA, IG Farben, 1910;
SBR emulsion polymerization, Walter Bock, 1929) as well as a trade
embargo (the Brazilian export embargo for Hevea seeds enforced by the death
penalty and broken by Henry Wickham’s ‘‘rubber theft’’, which laid the ground
for the Southeast Asian rubber plantations), the opulence of social life and the
brutality of the rubber barons in Manaus (e.g. Alberto Vazquez-Figueroa’s
novel, Manaos and Werner Herzog’s epic movie Fitzcarraldo, starring Klaus
Kinski).
Rubber is one of the few examples where chemical synthesis succeeded in a
nearly identical performance copy of a natural polymer (polyisoprene) – albeit
with a completely different chemical composition (styrene-butadiene-rubber,
SBR). Regarding sustainable development, the complete imbalance of the early
rubber history has emanated during recent years into equilibrium between
natural and synthetic rubber.
Natural rubber from Hevea brasiliensis is a natural polymer composed of an
association of poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) [poly(2-methyl-1,3-butadiene)] and biolo-
gical elements,1 giving it highly specific properties. Originating from the
Amazon Basin, Hevea was already booming in Asia at the turn of the twentieth
century.
(+6.3%), whilst over the same period North America reduced its synthetic
rubber consumption (–3.4%) and stabilized its natural rubber consumption
(+0.8%). The effect of globalization has been to relocate the means of tyre
production to Southeast Asia, particularly to China. The rising price of energy
is likely to modify that situation profoundly as transport costs escalate. In
addition, the impending arrival of new stakeholders – especially in the Middle
East – in the synthetic rubber production sector risks destabilizing the elasto-
mer market.
Newly planted rubber trees take 5 to 7 years before they can be tapped and
reach their peak production in 10 to 20 years. Of the major global challenges,
the environment occupies a dominant place for rubber trees and natural rub-
ber, even on smallholdings where Hevea is usually intercropped with other tree
crops or food crops, thereby constituting agro-forests, which nowadays have
important secondary functions (maintaining biodiversity, environmental con-
servation, rehabilitation of degraded zones, etc.).4
As a tree, Hevea plays a role in carbon sequestration and may therefore be
eligible for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).5
Lastly, Hevea produces wood, which is effectively exploited today6 and
produces natural rubber in its laticifer rings, which man has learned perfectly to
use to his advantage. The car industry exerted such demand that supplies fell
short, opening up the way for synthetic rubbers, which have become the ideal
substitute capable of satisfying all the requirements of the industry. Substitu-
tion of natural rubber by synthetic rubber peaked in 1979 (29.5% of elastomers
consumed worldwide were made from natural rubber). Since then, the trend has
reversed, mainly due to industrial development in producing countries, which
favoured their own national production of natural rubber; in 2006 43% of
elastomers consumed worldwide were made from natural rubber. Since 2001,
342 Chapter 9.5
SMR20
3 100
Brent 90
2.5 80
70
US$ barrel-1
US$ kg-1
2 60
50
1.5 40
30
1 20
10
0.5 0
2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008
Date
Figure 9.5.1 Natural rubber prices – TSR 20 – FOB Kuala Lumpur. SMR ¼
Standard Malaysian Rubber, SMR 20 is a medium grade
CO
CO22
Vertical
growth
Photosyntesi
Photosyntesis s
Carbohydrate
Carbohydrates s
R
Respiration (growth e
and maintenance) s Radial
e growth
r
v
e
s
Latex regeneration
9.5.4.1 Polyisoprenoids
Poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) belongs to the family of polyisoprenoids, which are the
most structurally diverse and abundant natural products known, with more
than 23,000 primary and secondary metabolites. This huge family comprises,
for example, sterols which display not only structural functions (control of
biological membrane fluidity) but also hormonal functions (steroid hormones).
Key phyto-hormones, such as abscisic acid, gibberellins and cytokinins, are
isoprenoids too. Moreover, isoprenoids are used in protein prenylation, which
is a key step in the activation and the localization of metabolic enzymes in many
organisms. The first common step of all isoprenoid biosynthesis pathways is the
formation of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP).39
9.5.4.2.1 Initiation
The initiation step consists in the formation of IPP (12), and its isomer DMAPP
(13). The conventional metabolic pathway to form these two molecules is called
the acetate/mevalonate pathway (MVA pathway) in which three molecules of
acetyl-CoA (3) condense successively to form 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA
(HMG-CoA) (5), which leads to a key intermediate molecule, namely meva-
lonic acid (MVA) (6). The latter is further phosphorylated and decarboxylated
to form the IPP molecule (12). In Hevea brasiliensis, this cytosolic pathway was
described by Lynen43 and Lebras44 in the early 1960s and reviewed more
recently by Kekwick45 and Ohya.46 Most experimental validations were
obtained by observing the incorporation of radioactive tracers, such as [2-14C]
MVA and [3-14C]HMG-CoA. The incorporation of [14C]IPP into rubber was
found to be much faster than that of [2-14C] MVA. This was assumed to be due
to slow conversion of MVA into IPP.43–44,46 Another explanation might be that
the MVA pathway was not exclusive for IPP biosynthesis. Indeed less than 10
years ago, a new, mevalonate-independent, IPP biosynthesis pathway was
discovered by Rohmer.47 This plastidic DXP-MEP pathway initiates with a
348 Chapter 9.5
9.5.4.2.2 Elongation
Elongation consists of the sequential condensation of IPP and allylic diphos-
phate through the action of the prenyl chain elongating enzyme, commonly
called prenyl transferase. The reactions catalyzed by prenyltransferases start
with the formation of allylic cations after the elimination of pyrophosphate
ions, to form allylic prenyl diphosphate. This is followed by addition of an IPP
with stereo-specific removal of the proton at the 2-position. This is the key
reaction which determines cis- or trans-configuration of the double bonds
contained in the linear isoprenoid chain. Cis-trans isomerism is dependent on
the nature of the prenyltransferase involved in elongation catalysis. A com-
prehensive review of cis- and trans-prenyltransferases was recently undertaken
by Takahashi and Koyama.39 Cis-prenyltransferases are much less well known
than their trans-homologues.
For linear isoprenoid biosynthesis, elongation of the polymer chain can be
described in two main phases as shown in Figure 9.5.3:
In the case of natural rubber from Hevea brasiliensis, which is almost entirely
made of cis-isoprene units, it could be assumed that cis-prenyltransferase is
exclusively involved in phase 2. Unfortunately it is more complex. Authors agree
on phase 1, which is trans-condensation catalyzed by a cytosolic soluble trans-
prenyl transferase40,50–52 Farnesyl diphosphate synthase has been cloned from
rubber latex.53 The most probable prenyldiphosphate used as a primer for phase 2
is farnesyl-PP (15) or geranylgeranyl-PP (16).46,54,55 Phase 2 is catalyzed by a still
not clearly identified ‘‘rubber transferase’’ system. Different proteins have been
350 Chapter 9.5
described as being involved in cis-condensation of IPP by acting as prenyltrans-
ferase itself, or as co-factors. A dimeric protein with a monomeric molecular mass
of 38 kD was purified by Light56 and showed prenyltransferase activity leading to
chain elongation. Nevertheless, in the presence of DMAPP, that enzyme only
catalyzed trans-condensation of IPP leading to FPP and GGPP.46 Many authors
have stated that this reaction is catalyzed by the association of a prenyltransferase
with several co-factors. The two most cited are Rubber Elongation Factor (REF),
which is a 14 kD protein tightly bound with large rubber particle membrane, and
Small Rubber Particle Protein (SRPP), which is a 22 kD protein.50,57,58 More
recently, two Hevea brasiliensis genes encoding Hevea rubber transferases (HRT1
and HRT2) were isolated by homology with other cis-prenyltransferases cloned in
other organisms.52 The expressed protein HRT2 had a molecular mass of 33 kD
and showed cis-prenyltransferase activity in the presence of washed bottom
fraction particles (WBFP). It is interesting to note that in most of the reported in
vitro studies, the addition of some part of initial latex, such as washed rubber
particles or WBFP, is required to achieve cis-prenyltransferase activity. This
shows that the rubber synthesis machinery is complex and probably involves the
participation of several proteins. In addition to proteins, the presence of metal
divalent cations such as magnesium or manganese ions is required as a co-factor
of rubber transferase activity.54
9.5.4.2.3 Termination
Very little is known about the final biochemical termination event. Different
alpha end groups have been identified by NMR indicating the presence of
phosphate and fatty acid. These could be attributed to the presence of a
phospholipid molecule.
Although it is not part of the biosynthesis pathway, stricto sensu, it is worth
mentioning that after termination the linear isoprene chain may undergo fur-
ther chemical modifications. Indeed, abnormal groups such as aldehyde, epoxy
or lactone have been detected on the polymer chain.59
The concentration of substrates such as IPP and FPP. High IPP con-
centration leading to higher molecular weight, while a contrary phenom-
enon occurs with FPP concentration;
The magnesium ion, which is a necessary co-factor for Hevea brasiliensis
prenyltransferase, has also been described as a molecular weight
regulator;54
Tangpakdee60 also assumed that molecular weight could be regulated by
the activity of IPP isomerase, which is necessary to produce DMAPP, and
Natural Rubber 351
then to initiate rubber biosynthesis. A lower IPP isomerase activity would
lead to a higher molecular weight.
9.5.4.4 Conclusion
The details and understanding of rubber biosynthesis are still ambiguous and
clear evidence has not yet been convincingly presented. Modern proteomic
techniques should provide a clearer understanding of reaction mechanisms,
especially the cis-condensation of IPP, as well as the biosynthesis location. This
knowledge would be very useful for considering genetic improvement of the
biosynthesis machinery. This work should be done in close collaboration with
rubber tree physiologists who are working on sugar availability in laticiferous
cells: indeed, it is pointless optimizing engine power if there is a lack of fuel.
9.5.5.2 Microstructure
For synthetic rubbers, analysis problems boil down to two determinations:
identification of the constitutive groups and determination of spatial arrange-
ment. For natural rubber, those two determinations have undergone a great
deal of research already mentioned.68 The poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) chain in the
plants studied comprises three parts (Figure 9.5.4): a (o) end group containing
1 dimethylallyl group and 2 or 3 trans groups, a long chain of cis configuration
and an (a) end group (Figure 9.5.4a). For natural rubber from Hevea, the
chemical structure of the two end groups has yet to be completely identified.
Neither the hydroxyl group nor the dimethylallyl group have been revealed.
Studies on deproteinized natural rubber from which lipids had been removed
by methanolysis led Tanaka et al. 69,70 to suggest the existence of a protein
(or polypeptide) on the (o) group and a phospholipid (or fatty acid) on the
(a) end group (Figure 9.5.4b). Those two non-isoprene compounds attached by
covalent bonds to the polyisoprene chain would seem to lie behind the inter-
actions responsible for the associative structure of natural rubber.
Non-isoprene compounds (lipids, proteins and sugars) will be covered in
Section 9.5.6.
9.5.5.3 Mesostructure
The mesostructure covers both the macromolecular scale (dimension, con-
formation and architecture of the macromolecules) and also the supramole-
cular scale (complex aggregates between macromolecules). It is this last point
that is the key to the specific properties of natural rubber. This associative
CH3
(b)
CH2
Protein CH2 CH2 CH3
CH3
C CH C CH
CH3 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2C CHCH2 Lipid
m n
Figure 9.5.4 Microstructure of poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) (a) for latex plants other than
Hevea and (b) for Hevea.
Natural Rubber 353
mesostructure is gradually and partly destroyed when dissolved in a conven-
tional solvent of polyisoprene (cyclohexane, tetrahydrofuran). However, in
many cases, a proportion of natural rubber remains insoluble in those solvents,
a fraction commonly referred to as the gel phase or macro gel. The soluble
fraction contains polyisoprene macromolecules and a variable quantity of
micro-aggregates making up the micro gel.
VM515
GT1 or PB312
RRIC121
PB330
Figure 9.5.5 Examples of inherent molar mass distribution for several Hevea clones
(Size Exclusion Chromatography in cyclohexane according to Bonfils
et al.80).
354 Chapter 9.5
73
latex-bearing plants studied by Swanson et al. only rubber from guayule
contained such long macromolecules.
9.5.5.3.2 Gel
Non-isoprene mechanisms and compounds responsible for gel formation have
been intensely studied. Prior to the recent proposals made by Tanaka et al.,69
so-called abnormal compounds were incriminated in the interactions respon-
sible for gel. Those compounds (aldehydes,74 epoxy,75 esters76) were linked to
the polyisoprene chain and reacted with some non-isoprene compounds (amino
acids77 or proteins,76 metal ions78).
Many methods can be used to determine the quantities of macrogel and
microgel in a polymer.79 For natural rubber, the proportion of macrogel is
determined by gravimetry after centrifugation. The quantity of microgel can be
measured by filtration, but that quite laborious method can be replaced by size
exclusion chromatography (SEC).80 Macrogel and microgel exist in both dry
rubber (TSR or RSS) and stabilized latex (field latex or concentrate) that has
matured.81,82
The proportion of macrogel can vary enormously, reaching rates of almost
60% in extreme cases depending on the authors. Allen and Bristow83 showed
that the proportion of gel depended on the solvent used, and the dissolution
time and temperature. It is therefore unlikely that difficulties in dissolving dry
rubber are solely linked to chemical cross-linking problems.
In many studies, the authors settled for measuring the amount of macrogel
whilst microgel is clearly preponderant in many cases.84 Bloomfield85 defined
the microgel found in latex harvested from Hevea left to rest for several months
as: internally cross-linked molecules similar in size to latex particles. The
quantity of microgel, determined by filtration, in a natural rubber sample (5 to
30%) would seem to vary and greatly depend on clonal origin.86 Larger
quantities can be found depending on the technique used.87 Campbell and
Fuller88 associated the same definition with the term microgel to describe the
cloudy solutions obtained when dissolving a sample of SMR L in dichlor-
omethane. Allen and Bristow83 presumed that microgel is due to chemical
bridges generated inside latex particles. Those bridges would seem to form
between leaving the tree and coagulation, maybe even inside the tree. Voz-
nyakovskii et al.89 used dynamic light scattering (DLS) to study natural rubber
solutions (RSS and DPNR,i [NR]E1 to 3 mg ml1). They showed that
microgel displayed two populations, one centred on 1.1 mm (P1, 0.9odo5 mm)
and the other around 10 mm (P2, 5odo12 mm). The deproteinized sample
(DPNR) only contained small-sized micro-aggregates (P1), whereas for smoked
sheet (RSS1) they were mostly around 10 mm (P2). Steam treatment, which
eliminates a proportion of the proteins, reduced the quantity of large micro-
aggregates (P2) to the benefit of small micro-aggregates and the soluble por-
tion. Although protein removal did not eliminate all the microgel,
i
RSS: Ribbed Smoked Sheet; DPNR: Deproteinized Natural Rubber.
Natural Rubber 355
population P1 persisted. They concluded that the interactions lying behind
micro-aggregate formation were linked to the existence of proteins. They also
discovered the thermo-reversibility of the interactions leading to microgels.
Heating solutions (20 to 80 1C) did not eliminate microgels but reduced
the average size (dE10 mm at 20 1C, dE5 mm at 60 1C, for RSS). The con-
centration and size of micro-aggregates also depend on the concentration in
the solution.
Table 9.5.2 Composition of natural rubber latex and raw dry rubber.
Latexa Dry rubberc
% w/w dry
% w/v fresh latexa matter of latexb % w/w dry matter
9.5.6.2.1 Proteins
Fresh latex contains roughly 1.5% of proteins of which about 25–30% are
bound to the rubber phase, another 25% being associated with the bottom
fraction (lutoid) and the remainder (45–50%) being reported as cytosolic.99,100
Two major particle surface-bound proteins of 14 kD (rubber elongation factor)
and 22 kD (small rubber particle protein) have been identified. In the bottom
fraction, the two major proteins are hevein (450%), an anionic protein, and
hevamine. The molecular weight of the proteins in this fraction is narrow,
ranging from 14 to 45 kD. In C-serum, proteins are numerous and range from
14 kD to 133 kD.94,98,100
Proteins play an important role in metabolism, in the structure of rubber
particles and in the quality of rubber products. Enzymes involved in the gly-
colysis as well as the rubber biosynthesis pathways are obviously part of
the protein pool of latex. Furthermore, rubber particle proteins confer,
with phospholipids, a negative charge to the particle surface, which
ensures colloidal stability. Proteins have been declared to influence the tech-
nological properties of rubber. For example, they are involved in the
water retention process during rubber drying101 and in the stress relaxation of
unfilled NR vulcanizate.102 Lastly, an unwanted property of latex proteins is
their allergenic character in latex-dipped goods. However, proper washing
processes can reduce allergenicity to a reasonable level. Nevertheless, this
remains an issue for a minor, overexposed population such as healthcare
workers.99
O-CH3
HO OH O
O
H3C
HO OH
OH
CH3
HO
Figure 9.5.7 Two examples of potentially high value-added by-products from Hevea
latex.
9.5.6.2.3 Lipids
As mentioned before, lipids are the family of non-isoprenes that is the most
retained with the rubber during processing. Their extraction for analytical
purposes has been optimized recently by Liengprayoon.107 Depending on the
clone, lipids amount to 2.5 to 3.8% versus rubber in latex, and 1.8 to 3.3% in
dry natural rubber. Three families of lipids can be distinguished:108
Phospholipids: these account for 18–25% of lipids in fresh latex but only
4–5% of lipids in dry rubber. The main phospholipid is phosphatidyl
choline, amounting to more than 60% of latex phospholipids. As
amphiphilic molecules they are involved in the structure and charge of
particle membranes, but could also be linked to polyisoprene chains.
Glycolipids: these account for 25–35% of lipids in fresh latex and 10–14%
of lipids in dry rubber. Like phospholipids, they are degraded and/or
leached during dry rubber processing. The two main glycolipids are
digalactosyldiglyceride (DGDG, approximately 45% of latex glycolipids)
and steryl glucoside (SG, approximately 35%). They also have a structural
role in membranes.
Neutral lipids: these account for 40–60% of lipids in fresh latex but
82–86% of lipids in dry rubber. This share increase is due to the leaching of
hydrophilic lipids (phospho- and glycolipids) as well as to the hydrolysis of
fatty acid moieties from those hydrophilic lipids: newly released free fatty
acids thus join the neutral lipid family. Indeed, free fatty acids account for
less than 2% of lipids in latex while they account for more than 20% of
those extracted from dry rubber. Neutral lipids can be divided into fatty
acids and unsaponifiables.
9.5.6.3 Conclusion
Non-isoprenes of natural rubber are various and play important physiological
roles, especially in metabolism (carbon source and enzymes for polyisoprene
biosynthesis), and in the structural organization of latex (membranes of rubber,
lutoid or Frey-Wyssling particles, colloidal stability). They are also involved in
some technological properties of rubber, which give natural rubber its unique
properties. Finally, uncommon molecules with high value-added potential, such
as quebrachitol or furan fatty acid, are present in large quantities (41%), which
confirms that Hevea brasiliensis is a green chemical factory of great interest.
Higher elasticity;
Strain-induced crystallization;
Low heat build-up at high temperature;
Higher tack and high green strength.
360 Chapter 9.5
The main disadvantages of natural rubber still remain today its variable
processability and allergy risks for latex-based articles for uses involving
human contact.
9.5.7.1 Elasticity
Natural rubber displays elastic properties – the ability to return to its initial
shape after initial stress is halted – which are remarkable in raw rubber but also
when it is vulcanized (around 700% elongation at break) due to its ability to
crystallize under strain (100% cis- and associative structure). Its properties are
used in elastic bands but also in dipped items such as gloves.
9.5.7.5 Vulcanization
Vulcanization remains a prime stage in the manufacture of rubber articles. It
consists of linking (cross-linking) the polymer chains with each other with
sulphur, sometimes with peroxides. This essential stage eliminates flow phe-
nomena by adding crosslinking points. It makes it possible to reduce hysteresis
by maintaining an acceptable level in terms of elongation/break. Numerous
chemicals are involved with the sulphur to catalyze the reaction (stearic acid,
zinc oxide and vulcanization accelerators).121 Unlike its synthetic counterparts,
natural rubber withstands much higher vulcanization rates without losing its
properties and displays a shorter scorch time. This phenomenon has been
attributed to the existence of natural vulcanization activators, notably free fatty
acids (1.5 to 2.5% w/w NR). Some studies in this field have also identified the
involvement of certain amino compounds: neutral and basic amino acids122 and
the amino bases arising from the hydrolysis of certain phospholipids.123 Whilst
there is abundant literature on vulcanization chemistry121,123 very few studies
have been undertaken to understand the action mechanisms of natural acti-
vators in natural rubber.
9.5.8 Conclusion
Rubber and Hevea offer a tremendous opportunity for offering some solutions
to major global challenges. Indeed, rubber growing is relatively easy and not
very sophisticated, making it accessible to the largest number of people; it does
not require rich soils. Current prices are advantageous for smallholders, which
encourages them to plant rubber. It is a tremendous machine for recycling
atmospheric carbon, enabling the production of polymers that will become
increasingly rare in the future given the expected shortages in petroleum oil
production. Lastly, the richness of natural elements occurring in latex – apart
from isoprene – has yet to be exploited and suggests uses in some very different
fields.
362 Chapter 9.5
Acknowledgement
Thanks to Mr Philippe Schill for his shrewd advice, which enabled us to gain a
clearer understanding of the specificities of natural rubber.
References
1. P. Compagnon, Le caoutchouc naturel, ed. G. P. Maisonneuve et Larose,
Paris, France, 1986; M. J. R. Loadman, The Exploitation of Natural
Rubber, Publ. 1531, Malaysia Rubber Producer’s Res. Association,
Brickendonbury, Engl. version from U. Giersch and U. Kubisch,
Gummi – die elastische Faszination, Nicolai, Berlin, 1995.
2. H. Smit, Tire Technology International, 2007, 100–104.
3. F. Nkoa and B. Daviron, Recherche, De´veloppement, 1995, 2(4), 27–31.
4. S. Diaz-Novellon, E. Penot and M. Arnaud, Characterisation of biodi-
versity in improved rubber agroforests in West-Kalimantan, Indonesia:
Real potential uses for spontaneous plants. International Symposium
Land-use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in
Southeast Asia, Bogor, Indonesia, 2002.
5. O. Hamel and J. M. Eschbach, Oleagineux-Corps-gras-Lipides, Nov.-Dec.,
2001, 8(6), 599–610.
6. J. Balsiger, J. Bahdon and A. Whiteman, The utilization, processing and
demand for rubberwood as a source of wood supply, in Paper Series FAO,
Rome, 2000, 50, 75.
7. P. R. Bauquis, Quel avenir pour les hydrocarbures à l’approche des pics
pe´trolier et gazier? – Conférence-débat ‘‘Les pics pétrolier et gazier: con-
séquences et enjeux’’, IFP, 11 Mai 2006.
8. K. P. Jones, Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe, 2000, 53(12), 735–742.
9. Observatoire de l’Energie, 19 Oct. 2007.
10. R. Ceulemans, R. Gabriels, I. Impens, P. K. Yoon, W. Leong and A. P.
Ng, Trop. Agr., 1984, 61(4), 273–275.
11. A. Nugawela, S. P. Long and R. K. Aluthhewage, J. Nat. Rubber Res.,
1995, 10(4), 266–275.
12. A. Nugawela, D. C. A. Abeysinghe and R. K. Samarasekera, Journal of
the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, 1995, 75, 1–12.
13. B. Kositsup, P. Kasemsap, P. Thaler and T. Ameglio, Effect of tempera-
ture constraints on photosynthesis of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), Pro-
ceedings IRRDB International Natural Rubber Conference, Siam Reap,
Cambodia, 2007, p. 161–166.
14. C. J. Bernacchi, E. L. Singsaas, C. Pimentel, A. R. Portis Jr and S. P.
Long, Plant Cell Environ., 2001, 24(2), 253–259.
15. G. D. Farquhar, S. von Caemmerer and J. A. Berry, Planta, 1980, 149,
78–90.
16. B. E. Medlyn, E. Dreyer, D. Ellsworth, M. Forstreuter, P. C. Harley, M.
U. F. Kirschbaum, X. Leroux, P. Montpied, J. Strassemeyer, A. Walcroft,
K. Wang and D. Loustau, Plant Cell Environ., 2002, 25, 1167–1179.
Natural Rubber 363
17. J. S. Sperry, U. G. Hacke, R. Oren and J. P. Costock, Plant Cell Environ.,
2002, 25, 251–263.
18. M. T. Tyree and J. S. Sperry, Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. Mol. Bio., 1989, 40,
19–38.
19. K. Sangsing, P. Kasemsap, S. Thanisawanyangkura, K. Sangkhasila, E.
Gohet, P. Thaler and H. Cochard, Trees Struct. Funct., 2004, 18, 109–114.
20. J. K. Templeton, J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1969, 21, 259–273.
21. P. R. Wycherley, J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1976, 24, 169–194.
22. M. R. Sethuraj, Plant Cell Environ., 1981, 4, 81–83.
23. E. Gohet, J. C. Prévôt, J. M. Eschbach, A. Clément and J. L. Jacob,
Plantations, recherche, de´veloppement, 1996, 3(1), 30–38.
24. U. Silpi, P. Thaler, P. Kasemsap, A. Lacointe, A. Chantuma, B. Adam,
E. Gohet, S. Thanisawanyangkura and T. Améglio, Tree Physiology,
2006, 26, 1579–1587.
25. E. Gohet, La production de latex par Hevea brasiliensis. Relations avec la
croissance. Influence de diffe´rents facteurs: origine clonale, stimulation
hormonale, re´serves hydrocarbone´es, Thèse de Doctorat, Université
Montpellier II – Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 1996.
26. U. Silpi, Carbon partitioning in Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.: Dynamics
among functional sinks (latex regeneration, respiration, growth and reserves)
at trunk scale, PhD thesis, Graduate school, Kasetsart University, 2006.
27. J. Tupy, Physiol. Ve´g., 1973, 11(1), 1–11.
28. J. L. Jacob, J. M. Eschbach, J. C. Prévôt, D. Roussel, R. Lacrotte, H.
Chrestin and J. d’Auzac, in Proceedings International Rubber Conference,
Kuala Lumpur, ed. J. C. Rajarao and L. L. Amin, Kuala Lumpur,
J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1985, 43–65.
29. J. M. Eschbach, D. Roussel and H. Van De Sype, Physiol. Ve´g., 1984, 22, 295.
30. J. L. Jacob, J. C. Prévôt, R. Lacrotte, A. Clément, E. Serres and E. Gohet,
Plantations, recherche, de´veloppement, 1995, 2(5), 43–49.
31. U. Silpi, A. Lacointe, P. Kasemsap, S. Thanisawanyangkura, P. Chan-
tuma, E. Gohet, N. Musigamart, A. Clément, T. Améglio and P. Thaler,
Tree Physiology, 2007, 27, 881–889.
32. P. Chantuma, P. Thaler, E. Gohet, S. Thanisawaniangkura and P.
Kasemsap, Carbohydrate distribution at trunk level of Hevea brasiliensis,
International Natural Rubber Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,
2006, 175–182.
33. U. Silpi, P. Chantuma, P. Kasemsap, P. Thaler, S. Thanisawanyangkura,
A. Lacointe, T. Améglio and E. Gohet, J. Rubber Res., 2006, 9(2), 115–131.
34. P. Thaler, M. Verdier, O. Roupsard, A. Chantuma, P. Siripornpakdeekul,
P. Kasemsap and K. Sangkhasila, Partitioning of water flux in rubber
plantations. Estimation of tree transpiration by sap flow measurement.
International Workshop on Flux Estimation over Diverse Terrestrial Eco-
systems in Asia – AsiaFlux Workshop, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2006, p. 30.
35. S. W. Pakianathan, G. Harridas and J. d’Auzac, in Physiology of Rubber
Tree Latex, ed. J. d’Auzac, J. L. Jacob and H. Chrestin, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, 1989, p. 233–256.
364 Chapter 9.5
36. F. Ninane, Les aspects e´cophysiologiques de la productivite´ chez Hevea
brasiliensis au Cambodge, Thèse, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1970.
37. S. Sargnkool Na Ayutthaya, J. Junjittakarn, F. C. Do, K. Pannengpetch,
J. L. Maeght, A. Rocheteau and D. Nandris, Drought and trunk phloem
necrosis (TPN) effects on water status and xylem sap flow of Hevea bra-
siliensis, RRDB International Natural Rubber tree latex, Siam Reap,
Cambodia, 2007, p. 75–84.
38. G. F. J. Milford, E. C. Paardekooper and C. Y. Ho, J. Rubb. Res. Inst.
Malaya, 1969, 21, 274.
39. S. Takahashi and T. Koyama, Chem. Rec., 2006, 6, 194–205.
40. K. Cornish, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2001, 18, 182–189.
41. Y. Tanaka, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1989, 14, 339–371.
42. J. E. Puskas, E. Gautriaud, A. Deffieux and J. P. Kennedy, Prog. Polym.
Sci., 2006, 31, 533–548.
43. F. Lynen, Revue Ge´ne´rale des Caoutchoucs, 1963, 40, 83–97.
44. J. Lebras, Revue Ge´ne´rale des Caoutchoucs, 1963, 40, 1501–1526.
45. R. G. O. Kekwick, in Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, ed. J. d’Auzac,
J. L. Jacob and H. Chrestin, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1989, 145–164.
46. N. Ohya and T. Koyama, in Biopolymers. Vol. 2: Polyisoprenoids, ed.
T. Koyama and A. Steinbüchel, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, p. 73.
47. M. Rohmer, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1999, 16, 565–574.
48. W. N. Hunter, J. Biol. Chem., 2007, 282, 21573–21577.
49. J. H. Ko, K. S. Chow and K. H. Han, Plant Mol. Biol., 2003, 53, 479–492.
50. P. Priya, P. Venkatachalam and A. Thulaseedharan, Plant Sci., 2006, 171,
470.
51. B. L. Archer and E. G. Cockbain, Meth. Enzymol., 1969, 15, 476–480.
52. K. Asawatreratanakul, Y. W. Zhang, D. Wititsuwannakul, R. Wititsu-
wannakul, S. Takahashi, A. Rattanapittayaporn and T. Koyama, Eur. J.
Biochem., 2003, 270, 4671.
53. K. Adiwilaga and A. Kush, Plant Mol. Biol., 1996, 30, 935–946.
54. B. M. T. Da Costa, J. D. Keasling and K. Cornish, 2005, 6, 279–289.
55. Y. Tanaka, A. H. Eng, N. Ohya, N. Nishiyama, J. Tangpakdee, S.
Kawahara and R. Wititsuwannakul, Phythochemistry, 1996, 41, 1501–1505.
56. D. R. Light and M. S. Dennis, J. Biol. Chem., 1989, 264, 18589–18597.
57. H. Kang, Y. S. Kwak, J. Y. Lee, I. J. Kim, H. J. Ryu, E. J. Lim, Y. S. Na
and S. B. Ryu, FASEB J., 2001, 15, 188.
58. K. S. Chow, K. L. Wan, M. N. M. Isa, A. Bahari, S. H. Tan, K. Har-
ikrishna and H. Y. Yeang, J. Exp. Bot., 2007, 58, 2429–2440.
59. A. H. Eng, J. Tangpakdee, S. Kawahara and Y. Tanaka, J. Nat. Rubber
Res., 1997, 12, 11–20.
60. J. Tangpakdee, N. Nishiyama, S. Kawahara and Y. Tanaka, Molecular
weight distribution and branching in natural rubber, Conference proceed-
ings, IRC International Rubber Conference, Manchester, 1996, 96.
61. J. d’Auzac, J. L. Jacob, J. C. Prevot, A. Clement, R. Gallois, H. Crestin,
R. Lacote, V. Pujade-Renaud and E. Gohet, Recent Res. Devel. Plant
Physiol., 1997, 1, 273–331.
Natural Rubber 365
62. S. K. Oh, H. Kang, D. H. Shin, J. Yang, K. S. Chow, H. Y. Yeang,
B. Wagner, H. Breiteneder and K. H. Han, J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274,
17132–17138.
63. J. Tangpakdee, Y. Tanaka, K. Ogura, T. Koyama, R. Wititsuwannakul,
D. Wititsuwannakul and K. Asawatreratanakul, Phythochemistry, 1997,
45, 261–267.
64. D. Wititsuwannakul, A. Rattanapittayoporn, T. Koyama and R. Witit-
suwannakul, Macromol. Biosci., 2004, 4, 314–323.
65. J. L. Koenig, Chemical Microstructure of Polymer Chains, Wiley-Inter-
science, New York, 1980, ch. 6–8.
66. L. Sperling, Introduction to Physical Polymer Science, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 4th edn, 2006.
67. P. Mirau, F. Bovey and L. Jelinski, in Encyclopedia of Physical Science
and Technology, ed. R. Meyers, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, 857–901.
68. A. H. Eng and Y. Tanaka, Trends Polymer Sci., 1993, 3, 493–513.
69. Y. Tanaka, Rubber Chem. Tech., 2001, 74, 355–375.
70. L. Tarachiwin, J. Sakdapipanich, K. Ute, T. Kitayama and Y. Tanaka,
Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6, 1858–1863.
71. A. Subramaniam, Rubber Chem. Tech., 1972, 45(1), 346–358.
72. F. Bonfils, C. Char, Y. Garnier, A. Sanago and J. Sainte-Beuve, J. Rubber
Res., 2000, 3(3), 164.
73. C. L. Swanson, R. A. Buchanan and F. H. Othey, J. Appl. Polymer Sci.,
1979, 23, 743.
74. B. Sekhar, Abnormal groups in rubber and microgel, Proc. 4th Rubber
Technol. Conf., London, 1960.
75. D. R. Burfield and S. N. Gan, J. Polymer Sci., Polymer Chem. Ed., 1975,
13, 2725–2734.
76. T. Shiibashi, Int. Polymer Sci. Tech., 1987, 14(12), T/33.
77. M. J. Gregory and A. S. Tan, Some observations on storage hardening of
Natural Rubber, International Rubber Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 1975.
78. S. N. Gan and K. F. Ting, Polymer, 1993, 34(10), 2142–2147.
79. S. Lee, Trends Polymer Sci., 1993, 1(10), 303–309.
80. F. Bonfils and C. Char, in Encyclopedia of chromatography, ed. J. Cazes,
Marcel Dekker, 2nd edn, 2005, pp. 1101–1104.
81. F. Bonfils, J. Sainte Beuve, S. Sylla, A. Allet Don and J. C. Laigneau,
J. Nat. Rubber Res., 1995, 10(3), 143–153.
82. J. Tangpakdee and Y. Tanaka, Rubber Chem. Tech., 1997, 70, 707.
83. P. W. Allen and G. M. Bristow, Rubber Chem. Tech., 1963, 36, 1024.
84. F. Ngolemasango, E. Ehabe, C. Aymard, J. Sainte-Beuve, B. Nkouonkam
and F. Bonfils, Polymer Int., 2003, 52, 1365–1369.
85. G. F. Bloomfield, J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1951, 13, 18–24.
86. R. Freeman, Microgel in latex and sheet rubber, 3rd Rubber Technology
Conference, London, 1954.
87. E. Ehabe, F. Bonfils, C. Aymard, A. Akinlabi and J. Sainte-Beuve,
Polymer Test., 2005, 24, 620–627.
88. D. S. Campbell and K. N. G. Fuller, Rubber Chem. Tech., 1984, 57, 104.
366 Chapter 9.5
89. A. P. Voznyakovskii, I. P. Dmitrieva, V. V. Klyubin and S. A. Tumanova,
Polymer Sci., 1995, 38(10), 1153–1157.
90. S. Sylla, J. C. Laigneau, A. Koman Achi and A. Allet Don, A clonal
typology approach to natural rubber technology, IRRDB Symposium on the
Technology and End Uses of Natural Rubber, Beruwela, Sri Lanka, 1996,
7–20.
91. G. F. J. Moir, Nature (London), 1959, 184, 1626–1628.
92. E. Yip and J. B. Gomez, J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1980, 28, 86.
93. C. C. Ho, T. Kondo, N. Muramatsu and H. Ohshima, J. Colloid Interface
Sci., 1996, 178, 442–445.
94. J. L. Jacob, J. C. Prevot, D. Roussel, R. Lacrotte, E. Serres, J. d’Auzac, J.
M. Eschbach and H. Omont, in Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, ed. J.
d’Auzac, J. L. Jacob and H. Chrestin, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1989, 345–
382.
95. B. L. Ancher, B. G. Audley, G. P. McSweeney and T. C. Hong, J. Rubb.
Res. Inst. Malaya, 1969, 21, 560–569.
96. J. d’Auzac, J. L. Jacob, J. C. Prevot, A. Clement, R. Gallois, H. Crestin,
R. Lacote, V. Pujade-Renaud and E. Gohet, Recent Res. Devel. Plant
Physiol., 1997, 1, 273–331.
97. J. L. Jacob, J. d’Auzac and J. C. Prevot, Clin. Rev. Allergy, 1993, 11, 325.
98. N. U. Nair, in Natural Rubber Agromanagement and Crop Processing, ed.
P. J. George and C. K. Jacob, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kerala,
2000, 249–260.
99. E. Yip and P. Cacioli, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2002, 110, 3–14.
100. D. Wititsuwannakul and R. Wititsuwannakul, in Biopolymers.Vol. 2:
Polyisoprenoids, ed. T. Koyama and A. Steinbüchel, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2001, p. 151.
101. J. Sainte-Beuve, S. Sylla and J. C. Laigneau, J. Rubber Res., 2000, 3,
14–24.
102. A. B. Othman, G. A. W. Murray and A. W. Birley, J. Nat. Rubber Res.,
1996, 11, 183–199.
103. Y. Le Roux, E. Ehabe, J. Sainte-Beuve, J. Nkengafac, J. Nkeng, F.
Ngolemasango and S. Gobina, J. Rubber Res., 2000, 3, 142–156.
104. E. Gohet, The production of latex by Hevea brasiliensis: relation with
growth. Influence of different factors: clonal origin, hormonal stimulation,
carbohydrate reserves, PhD thesis, Montpellier II University, 1996.
105. U. Silpi, A. Lacointe, P. Kasemsap, S. Thanysawanyangkura, P. Chan-
tuma, N. Musigamart, A. Clement, T. Ameglio and P. Thaler, Tree
Physiology, 2007, 27, 881–889.
106. Y. Udagawa, M. Machida and S. Ogawa, US 5041689, 1991 (Yokohama
Rubber, The Board of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia).
107. S. Liengprayoon, F. Bonfils, J. Sainte-Beuve, K. Sriroth, E. Dubreucq
and L. Vaysse, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2008, 110, forthcoming.
108. S. Liengprayoon, Characterization of lipid composition of sheet rubber
from Hevea brasiliensis and relations with its structure and properties,
Natural Rubber 367
PhD thesis, Montpellier Sup Agro, France – Kasetsart University,
Thailand, 2008.
109. G. Spiteller, Lipids, 2005, 40, 755–771.
110. S. Kawahara, I. Isono, T. Kakubo, Y. Tanaka and A. H. Eng, Rubber
Chem. Tech., 1999, 73, 39–73.
111. M. O. David, T. Nipithakul, M. Nardin, J. Schultz and K. Suchiva,
J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 2000, 78, 1486–1494.
112. N. Na-Ranong, H. de Livonnière and J. L. Jacob, Plantations, Recherche,
De´veloppement, 1995, 2, 44–54.
113. H. Hasma and A. B. Othman, J. Nat. Rubber Res., 1990, 5, 1–8.
114. J. L. Jacob, J. d’Auzac and J. P. Prévot, Clin. Rev. Allergy, 1993, 11, 325.
115. J. Sainte-Beuve, L. Vaysse and F. Bonfils, in La Chimie Verte, Coord.
P. Colonna, Editions Tec&Doc Lavoisier, Paris, 2006, 215–237.
116. S. Kawahara, T. Kakubo, Y. Isono and Y. Tanaka, Polymer, 2000, 41,
7483–7488.
117. M. Tosaka, S. Murakami, S. Poompradub, S. Kohjiya, Y. Ikeda, S. Toki,
I. Sics and B. S. Hsiao, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 3299–3309.
118. S. Toki, B. Hsiao, S. Kohjiya, M. Tosaka, H. Tsou and S. Datta, Rubber
Chem. Tech., 2006, 79, 460–488.
119. S. Toki, I. Sics, S. Ran, L. Liu and B. S. Hsiao, Polymer, 2003, 44, 6003–
6011.
120. J. M. Chenal, L. Chazeau, L. Guy, Y. Bomal and C. Gauthier, Polymer,
2007, 48, 1042–1046.
121. G. Heideman, R. Datta and J. Noordermeer, Rubber Chem. Tech., 2004,
77, 513.
122. A. B. H. C. Othman and H. Hasma, Plast. Rubber Compos. Proc. Appl.,
1993, 19(3), 185–194.
123. A. Chapman and M. Porter, in Natural Rubber Science and Technology,
ed. A. Roberts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988, p. 593–595.
124. V. Baum, The Weeping Wood, Doubleday, Garden City, 1943, Cahuchu,
Strom der Tränen, Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Köln, 1943, 1952.
CHAPTER 9.6
Natural Fibres
MARTIN MÖLLERa AND CRISAN POPESCUb, c
a
DWI an der RWTH Aachen e.V., Pauwelsstraße 8, D-52056 Aachen,
Germany; b DWI an der RWTH Aachen e.V., Pauwelsstraße 8, D-52056
Aachen, Germany; c University ‘‘Aurel Vlaicu’’, Bd. Revolutiei 77,
RO-310130 Arad, Romania
9.6.1 Generalities
Natural fibres are raw materials directly obtainable from an animal, vegetable or
mineral source for which the diameter is negligible in comparison with the length.
Along the centuries until comparatively recently, natural fibres were the basis for
producing clothes, paper, ships’ sails and insulation and building materials.
It is not certain when people first started wearing clothes. Scientists estimate
that this happened more than 100,000 years ago, because the body louse
(pediculus humanus humanus) apparently diverged from the head louse (pedi-
culus humanus capitis) at that time. The first clothes were made from natural
materials: animal skin and furs, grasses and leaves and the first needles are
recorded about 30,000 years ago.
The use of natural fibres, both plant and animal, to meet our needs plays a
significant role throughout history. Wool, as a representative of animal fibres,
has been used since the dawn of mankind. One of the oldest recorded uses of
plant fibre for fabrics is that of hemp, already being cultivated in China in 2800
BC. The common nettle is probably the best example of how society’s interest in
natural fibres fluctuates along the years. It was used for cloth in Neolithic times,
and then became important for nets for fishing. Nettle cloth was manufactured
in Scandinavia and Scotland until the nineteenth century and shortages of
368
Natural Fibres 369
cotton during the First World War forced the Germans to use it again for
making fabrics. Now it has almost vanished from textile classifications.
With the industrial revolution, textile manufacturing turned into industry
and the requirements for a fibre to be used for textiles became more exactly
defined. For use in textiles a fibre should have properties which render it
spinnable and wearable, enumerated below:
The minimal values of the properties are very much related to those of
natural fibres, which were the only fibres when textile manufacturing emerged
as an industry.
During the last century there has been a turn away from natural fibres
towards chemically obtained materials, mostly derived from petrochemicals.
This change was a result of the technological revolution and the short-term
economic advantages of synthetics.
As a result of the developments there is a large variety of fibres available on
the market, classified into two large classes: natural and chemical fibres. Each
of them may be further developed into subclasses, as detailed in Figure 9.6.1.
Out of the group of natural fibres, those under mineral fibres (asbestos fibres)
are of diminishing interest after being related to lung cancer.1
The newly inserted group of synthetic fibres based on renewable sources is
just beginning, with poly-lactic fibres (PLA) as the prominent representative.
One may also consider that, due to the move away from petrol sources, this
group will become increasingly interesting in the coming decades.
Natural fibres
Chemical fibres
Legend: PLA polylactic acid, PE polyethylene, PP polypropylene, PVC polyvinyl chloride, PUR
polyurethane, PA polyamide, PET polyethyleneterephthalat
The new ‘‘organic’’ fibre industry that is rapidly developing across North
America and Europe aims at answering these problems. However, there is still
the need to address the steadily increasing demand of fibres by an increasing
population (now at 7.94 kg per capita for 6.3 billion inhabitants, 2006; see
Chapter 5, Figure 5.2).
Natural Fibres 371
6 Wool
Natural fibres
5 Total fibres
0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2002
Year
Cross-
section
Length-
wise view
Skin-Core Side-by-Side Fibril-Matrix
As shown in Figure 9.6.2, the demand has been responded to, so far, by a
continuously increasing contribution of chemical fibres to the total, with nat-
ural fibres seeming to reach a plateau in production. The limits of natural fibres
are imposed by the amount of arable land required for producing them: the
total arable land available is estimated at 20 Mio km2 and for producing
the 55 Gkg fibres used in 20062 one has a maximum available of some
3.5 104 km2 per kilogram of fibre. When comparing this with the demands
of roughly 0.02 km2 for 1 kg clean wool, and 0.01 km2 land for 1000 kg cotton,
respectively, it appears that developing a sustainable chemical fibres industry is
the only solution to keeping most arable land for food production.
The chains consist of 2000–14,000 residues which form crystals (cellulose Ia)
where intra-molecular (O3-H-O5 0 and O6-H-O2 0 ) and intra-strand (O6-
H-O3 0 ) hydrogen bonds hold the network flat allowing the more hydrophobic
ribbon faces to stack. Each residue is oriented 1801 to the next with the chain
synthesized two residues at a time. This tendency to form crystals utilizing
extensive intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding makes it completely
insoluble in normal aqueous solutions (although it is soluble in special solvents
such as aqueous N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide, NMNO). It is thought that
water molecules catalyze the formation of the natural cellulose crystals by
helping to align the chains through hydrogen-bonded bridging, as shown
subsequently.
Natural Fibres 373
Table 9.6.1 The 20 common natural a-amino acids found in protein fibres.
Group Name Side chain
N
Tryptophan CH2
NH
Amino acids with hydroxyl groups in the side chain
Serine –CH2–OH
Threonine –CH(CH2)–OH
Tyrosine –CH2–C6H4–OH
Sulphur-containing amino acids
Cysteine –CH2–SH
Thiocysteine –CH2–S–SH
Cystine –CH2–S–S–CH2–
Methionine –(CH2)2–S–CH3
Amino acids without reactive groups in the side chain
Glycine –H
Alanine –CH3
Valine –CH(CH3)2
Proline CH2
CH2
CH2
Leucine –CH2–CH(CH2)2
Isoleucine –CH(CH2)–CH2–CH3
Phenylalanine –CH2–C6H5
376 Chapter 9.6
Because they contain both cationic and anionic groups, protein fibres are
amphoteric. The cationic character is due to the protonated side groups of
arginine, lysine and histidine, and free terminal amino groups. Anionic groups
are present as dissociated side groups of aspartic and glutamic acid residues and
as carboxyl end groups.
The amino acid amounts differ in a-keratin fibres from silk, as revealed by
data in Table 9.6.2.
The peptide arrangement in protein fibre has been investigated since the first
half of the twentieth century. Astbury18,19 used X-rays to demonstrate the nature
of a crystalline phase in hair. The X-ray diffraction pattern of animal hairs shows
a meridian reflection at 0.51 nm and an equatorial reflection at 0.98 nm. Inter-
preting these results Pauling et al.20 proposed the a-helix structure to give
account of the secondary structure of the keratin fibre, shown in Figure 9.6.5.
The a-helix contains 18 amino acid residues in five turns, i.e. 3.6 amino acid
residues per turn. To obtain the distance between successive turns of the helix
that leads to the observed meridian reflection (0.51 nm), the helical chain must
itself be slightly coiled (super-helix, coiled coil21). Two super-helices combine to
form a left-handed two-stranded rope-like assembly in which the super-helices
are arranged in such a way that the hydrophobic side groups at the outside of
the helices interlink to form a stable ‘‘buttonhole’’ structure.22 These dimers are
the actual structural subunits of the micro-fibrils, and can be termed ‘‘mole-
cular twins’’. The force that keeps two a-helices together in the coiled-coil
dimer (the ‘‘brick’’ of the intermediate filament rod, IF) is given by the geo-
metry of the arrangement of amino acid residues in the polypeptide chain and
by the hydrophobic effect. The geometry requires a repeating sequence of seven
Figure 9.6.6 The coiled-coil dimer structure. The letters may be replaced by any
amino acid residue from Table 9.6.1, with the only requirement that
amino acids a and d are hydrophobic ones.15
Figure 9.6.8 Arrangement of hydrogen bonds in the anti-parallel chain pleated sheet
b-structure described by Pauling and Corey.23
½Gly-Ala-Gly-Ala-Gly-Ser-Gly-Ala-Ala-Gly-ðSer-Gly-Ala-Gly-Ala-GlyÞ8
Notice that almost every other residue is a glycine and that between them lie
either alanine or serine residues. This repeating structure results in simple,
tightly organized structures, such as the structure of silk fibroin shown in
Figure 9.6.9.
In raw form silk consists of some 75% fibroin, 20% sericin and 5% of
various salts. The former is crystalline fibrous proteins and the latter is
amorphous and soluble in hot water or dilute alkali solutions.15 The degree at
380 Chapter 9.6
which sericin is removed leads to the various qualities of silk materials, with the
highest value for the highest percentage of fibroin.
The amino acid composition of the two proteins forming the raw material
differs, as shown in the last two columns in Table 9.6.2.
Cotton
Protein 6.5%
Oil 6.5%
Fibre 5%
Other 10%
Flax, linum
Seed Stem
Other 36%
top of the hind limbs. This is thought to be painful for sheep and for this reason
the animal protection organization PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals) spoke against the practice. There is research targeting the development
of an alternative for this, since by 2010 mulesing will be phased out.
The bringing of the fibres to the textile industry is a labour-intensive process.
The shearing and collecting of greasy wool are manual operations and so are
the skirting (selecting the parts of the fleece) and classing. The collected greasy
(raw) wool comprises various amounts of different impurities, as detailed in
Table 9.6.4.
To deliver clean fibres to industry the greasy wool goes through scouring.
This consists of washing the raw fibres with about 1% surfactant in a con-
tinuous 5–6 bowl line for removing the grease, suint, sand and dirt from the
fibres. The discharged waters from the first three basins from washing fibres
with more than 10% grease (usually Merino type) are further used for
extracting lanolin by an Alfa-Laval process. In spite of lanolin separation the
waste waters from wool scouring are heavily polluted with organic matter and
much effort is dedicated to cleaning and reusing them for saving water con-
sumption. The recent development of biodegradable surfactants31 helps toward
building a more environmentally friendly wool scouring process. Some 5–7
litres of water are required for obtaining 1 kg clean wool under severe control of
the parameters, but 20 litres is more common.
Vegetable matter, if more than 2–3%, has also to be removed before going to
further processing. The operation, known as ‘‘carbonization’’, makes use of the
good resistance of wool to strong acids (particularly sulphuric acid) and of the
hydrolysis of cellulose in the same environment. The fibres with vegetable
matter (grass, burrs) are soaked in a 20% sulphuric acid solution, dried and
baked and then crushed for separating the carbonized cellulosic matters from
the rest. The fibres are then neutralized and dried. The process produces acid-
polluted waters and carbon dust in air, besides weakening the wool fibres,32 for
which reason alternatives, like the use of enzymes, are sought.
9.6.4.4 Silk
Silk is produced by silkworms (caterpillars) fed with fresh mulberry leaves,
while spinning their cocoons. Liquid silk produced by spinnerets is coated in
sericin, and solidifies on contact with the air. Within 2–3 days, the caterpillar
spins about 1500 m of filament and is completely encased in a cocoon. Most
Natural Fibres 385
caterpillars are then killed by heat (boiling) and some are allowed to meta-
morphose into moths to breed the next generation of caterpillars.
Stifled cocoons are sorted, and then brushed to find filaments. Several fila-
ments are gathered together and wound onto a wheel (reeling). Each cocoon
yields approximately 1000 m of silk filament, known as raw silk, or silk-in-the
gum, fibre.
Wild silk (Tussah) production cannot be reeled, because cocoons are har-
vested after the moth has matured and left. As an average yield one may take
30 kg mulberry leaves for 1 kg cocoon. As the harvesting of the silk from the
cocoon requires the killing of the larvae, silk-culture has been criticized by
animal rights activists.
These operations are similar for both natural and chemical fibres. The details
of the operations differ with the fibre chemistry and origin, and with the way the
fabric was obtained: by weaving or by knitting, respectively. In all cases chemical
products are used for assisting, or for producing the required effect, and in all
cases pollutants are produced, either in effluents, or in the atmosphere.
Most operations make extensive use of surfactants for assisting mechanical
processes, for washing/scouring, for improving the quality of bleaching, of
dyeing, or for finishing (softening, stiffening) the materials. The surfactants are
subsequently discharged into the waste waters and pose serious problems for
cleaning. Besides, the surfactants interact with the skin/eyes of the operators in
the mills, or of those laundering at home.
The actual trend of natural surfactants based on renewable raw materials33
combine a high emulsifying power with good electrolyte stability and extremely
good skin compatibility.
The biodegradability of chemical substances depends on their chemical
structure. Branched hydrocarbon chains such as tetrapropylene alkylbenzene
sulphonates, alkylphenol polyglycol ethers on the one side and quaternary
ammonium compounds on the other show poor biodegradability, more parti-
cularly under anaerobic conditions.33,34
The nature of renewable raw materials matches the requirement for biode-
gradability under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Table 9.6.6). The linear
hydrocarbon chains facilitate biodegradability without the formation of eco-
toxic metabolites as is the case with alkylphenol polyglycol ethers.
Textile softeners form a special group among surfactants. They should
remain on the textile in order to make the fabric ultra smooth and soft without
affecting its texture. Depending on the washing conditions (temperature, etc.)
2RCOOH þ CH3 NðCH2 CH2 OHÞ2 ! CH3 NðCH2 CH2 OOCRÞ2 þ 2H2 O
CH3 NðCH2 CH2 OOCRÞ2 þ CH3 Cl ! ½ðCH3 Þ2 NðCH2 CH2 OOCRÞ2 þ Cl
Esterquat
9.6.7 Conclusions
While artificial fibres came onto the market with the 1889 invention of rayon by
Hilaire de Chardonnet, and synthetic fibres emerged with the 1931 DuPont
patent for Nylon, natural fibres have been around since the dawn of mankind,
flax having a documented history (burial shrouds for the Egyptian pharaohs) of
more than 7000 years. No matter in which climatic zone humans settled, they
were able to find and utilize the fibres of native species to make products such as
clothes, cloths, buildings and cordage.
The first composite material known was made with clay and straw to
build ziggurats in the ancient world. About 3000 years later there is a strong
belief that the field of natural fibre composites is set to expand enormously in
the near future. The environmental and health problems associated with syn-
thetic fibres mean that they should be replaced by natural alternatives in a vast
number of different applications. Their moderate mechanical properties
restrain the natural fibres from being used in high-tech applications, but for
many reasons they can compete with glass fibres. The natural fibres are light-
weight, which makes them particularly attractive to the automotive industry.
Statistics show that already in 2002 Germany and Austria together used
around 17,000 mto of natural fibres in the automotive industry, out of which
about 9,000 mto are flax and 2,500 mto are hemp fibres, and the yearly growing
rate is 22%.
The modern composite materials, which merge the advantages of
natural fibres with synthetic matrices and environmental goals, aim to go
beyond the fibre competition during the last 100 years and to answer the new
challenges.
References
1. M. Albin, F. D. Pooley, U. Strömberg, R. Attewell, R. Mitha, L. Johansson
and H. Welinder, Occup. Environ. Med., 1994, 51, 205.
392 Chapter 9.6
2. http://www.youthxchange.net/main/b164_ff1_textile-fibres-intro_b.asp
(retrieved 12.08.2008).
3. I. Lee, B. R. Evans and J. Woodward, Ultramicroscopy, 2000, 82, 231.
4. A. Peterlin and P. Ingham, Textile Res. J., 1970, 40, 345.
5. J. W. S. Hearle, in Ullmann’s Fibers, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
KGaA, Weinheim, 2008, vol. 1, ch. 2, p. 39.
6. A. C. O’Sullivan, Cellulose, 1997, 4, 173.
7. A. Sarko, in Cellulose-structure, Modification and Hydrolysis, ed. R. A.
Young and R. M. Rowell, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986, p. 29.
8. J. Sugiyama, R. Vuong and H. Chanzy, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4168.
9. A. A. Baker, W. Helbert, J. Sugiyama and M. J. Miles, Biophys. J., 2000,
79, 1139.
10. J. Hayashi, A. Sufoka, J. Okita and S. Watanabe, J. Polymer Sci. Polymer
Letters Edition, 1975, 13, 23.
11. A. Sarko, in Wood and Cellulosics: Industrial Utilization, Biotechnology,
Structure and Properties, ed. J. F. Kennedy, Ellis Horwood, Chichester,
UK, 1987, p. 55.
12. E. S. Gardiner and A. Sarko, Can. J. Chem., 1985, 63, 173.
13. K. Mühlethaler, J. Polym. Sci., 1969, C28, 305.
14. P. Zugenmeier, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2001, 26, 1341.
15. H. Zahn, K. Schaeffer and C. Popescu, in Biopolymers, ed. A. Steinbüchel
and S. R. Fahnestock, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003, vol. 8, ch. 7, p. 155.
16. C. Popescu and H. Hoecker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1282.
17. H. Ito and Y. Muraoka, Textile Res. J., 1995, 65, 755.
18. W. T. Astbury and A. Street, Phil. Trans. R. London Soc., 1931, A230, 75.
19. W. T. Astbury and H. J. Woods, Phil. Trans. R. London Soc., 1933, A232,
333.
20. L. Pauling, R. B. Corey and H. R. Branson, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,
1951, 37, 205.
21. F. H. C. Crick, Nature, 1952, 170, 882.
22. F. H. C. Crick and J. C. Kendrew, Adv. Protein Chem., 1957, 12, 133.
23. L. Pauling and R. B. Corey, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1951, 37, 251.
24. W. T. Astbury, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1933, 29, 193.
25. L. Y. Yatsu, E. Espelie Karl and P. E. Kolattukudy, Plant Physiol., 1983,
73, 521.
26. E. Lord, J. Textile Inst., 1956, 47, T209.
27. United States Department of Agriculture, Better Cottons, Government
Printing Office, Washington, 1957.
28. P. Kassenbeck, Textile Res. J., 1970, 40, 330.
29. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) International Report, The impact of
cotton on fresh water resources and ecosystems, May 1999.
30. S. K. Batra, in Handbook of Fibre Chemistry, ed. M. Lewin and E. M.
Pearce, Marcel Dekker, NY, 1998, p. 530.
31. B. Wahle, W. Becker and C. Hartschen, EP 1 177 341, 2000 (Cognis).
32. J. Knott, M. Grandmaire and J. Thelen, J. Textile Inst., 1981, 72, 19.
33. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 2008, 1, 79.
Natural Fibres 393
34. R. D. Swisher, in Surfactant Biodegradation, Marcel Dekker, New York,
Basel, 1987, 2nd edn, revised and expanded; CEFIC, Anaerobic Biode-
gradation of Surfactants, Summary and Position Paper (February 1999),
www.erasm.org/position/Anaerobic_Bio1.pdf (retrieved 06.11.2007); J. L.
Berna, N. Battersby, L. Cavalli, R. Fletcher, A. Guldner, D. Schowanek
and J. Steber, Anaerobic Biodegradation of Surfactants, Scientific Review,
ERASM (1999), www.lasinfo.org/pos_papers/pos_paper_bioanaerobia.pdf
(retrieved 06.11.2007).
35. B. Wahle and J. Falkowski, Rev. Progr. Col., 2002, 32, 118.
36. Deutsche Haut- und Allergiehilfe e.V., Skin and Textiles – Protection for
Sensitive Skin (in German: Haut und Textilien – Schutz für empfindliche
Haut), Informationsreihe für Patienten und Verbraucher, MedCom Publ.,
Bonn, 2005.
37. R. Tyagi, V. K. Tyagi and R. K. Khanna, J. Oleo. Sci., 2006, 55, 337; S.
Mishra and V. K. Tyagi, J. Oleo. Sci., 2007, 56, 269; A. Scheidgen,
Development and Trends for Softeners (in German: Entwicklung und
Trends bei Weichspülern), Multiplikatorenseminar 2007, http://www.
haushaltstechnik.uni-bonn.de/PDF2007/SCHEIDGEN_Weichspueler.pdf
(retrieved 05.01.2009).
38. W. Ushakowa and B. van Roy, External Validation of Silicone Technologies
for Fabric Care, Technical Literature, Dow Corning, 2003, http://www.
dowcorning.com/content/publishedlit/27-1114-01.pdf (retrieved 06.01.2009).
39. R. Christie, in Environmental Aspects of Textile Dyeing, Woodhead Textiles
Series No. 66, Woodhead Publ., Abington, Cambridge, 2007.
40. K. von Allwörden, Z. Angew. Chem., 1916, 29, 77.
41. E. Heine and H. Hocker, Rev. Prog. Coloration, 1995, 25, 57.
42. T. Wakida, T. Tokuyama, M. Lee, J. Hun Jeon, H. Kuriyama and
S. Ishida, Textile Res. J., 2004, 60, 656.
43. A. Hesse, H. Thomas and H. Höcker, Textile Res. J., 1995, 65, 355.
CHAPTER 9.7
9.7.1 Introduction
Plant-based biologically active ingredients are used in different kinds of
industries and have achieved a particularly high importance in the development
of cosmetic actives with a proven biological effect. However, what about other
aspects of modern economies? Is it sufficient that the products are just derived
from plant origin? The simple answer is no. In today’s world, we have to find
the right balance between economic interests and the ecological limits imposed
by the capacity of the biosphere to provide society with all of its resources for
present and future generations. This is not a contradiction at all; instead,
society and industry are forced to respect nature, to set up and follow clear
rules on what sustainable development should look like and to accept their
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). These aspects are discussed using a
concrete example, cosmetic active ingredients from the Argan tree.
394
Plant-based Biologically Active Ingredients for Cosmetics 395
9.7.2 Active Ingredients and their Functionality in
Cosmetic Applications
One definition of active ingredients comes from the pharmaceutical area.1 An
active ingredient, also active pharmaceutical ingredient or API, is a drug that is
pharmaceutically active. The traditional word for API is pharmacon, adopted
from the Greek ‘‘pharmacos’’, which originally denoted a magical substance.
However, the term ‘‘active ingredient’’ is now also common and applied in other
areas, for example nutrition and personal care, especially in the field of cosmetics.
In all cases, we speak about a component that is considered to fulfil the intended
activity of a final product, described by its claim, and gives the desired physio-
logical effect. The main distinction lies in the delivery mode, which is oral intake
for nutritional application and topical application for cosmetic formulations.
Going a step deeper into the cosmetic domain and focusing on skin care appli-
cations, we can therefore describe an active ingredient as a substance or a group of
molecules with the ability to improve the structure and appearance of skin when
applied topically. To give some examples, knowing that the list of claims is much
longer, we might speak about skin moisturization, reduction of wrinkles and
protection against environmental stress, such as sun light or pollution or the wish
to change one’s skin colour either by whitening or by tanning. Figure 9.7.1 gives a
representative overview of biological targets for skin care active ingredients.
Cosmetics in general are more than simple externally applied formulations to
change or enhance the beauty of skin, hair, nails, lips and eyes. The key issues
of today are related to well-being and convenience. Consumers are looking for
solutions that reduce the complexity of their daily life, support their demand of
Souss plain, covers about 800,000 ha containing more than 2 million trees and
acts as a green belt against desert advancement. Argan is the second most
common species in Morocco, behind the evergreen oak (Quercus ilex) and ahead
of the thuya (Tetraclinis articulata). The tree is particularly resistant to the dry
and arid conditions of this region, can tolerate temperatures ranging from 3 to
501C and grows at altitudes of up to 1500 metres. Its roots, which extend over a
large area and are very deep, can search out water at more than 30 metres under
the ground, which helps it to survive the dry periods that can last for several
months each year. The tree reaches heights of 8 to 10 metres and has a shape
similar to an olive tree. Its life is quite long and it is not uncommon for it to reach
ages of 150 to 200 years; even some 250-year-old trees have been recorded.12
Argan leaves are small, dark green and grow on branches that can be spiky at
their ends. It is usually an evergreen plant but may lose its leaves in a persistent
dry period. The tree has small oval greenish yellow fruits that become brown
when they ripen and contain a very hard shell enclosing one to three almond-
like kernels. The ripening period is quite long taking 2 years.13
The Argan forest plays a crucial social and economical role as it ensures the
subsidence of over 3 million people of the rural Moroccan population.
Unfortunately, due to the demographic pressure, Argan woodland suffers from
continuous degradation. Over-exploitation, soil erosion and advancing deser-
tification are amongst the threats to this unique heritage. The natural growth of
the population leads to an increase in wood collection, which is used both for
construction and as firewood. Excessive grazing makes it more difficult for the
Argan trees to recover. The climate, which is always hard in these regions, is
accompanied by erosion that makes the soil even more arid.14
Plant-based Biologically Active Ingredients for Cosmetics 401
UNESCO, under the program ‘‘Man and the Biosphere’’ (MAB), took this
up and classed the Moroccan Argan forest as a Biosphere Reserve (RBA) in
1998.15 Biosphere Reserves are delimited regions in land-based ecosystems
where one tries to reconcile economic development with conserving the bio-
diversity. Biosphere Reserves serve in some ways as ‘‘living laboratories’’ for
testing out and demonstrating integrated management of land, water and
biodiversity, which is the principle of the ecosystem approach that has resulted
from the biological diversity convention (UNESCO 1996).16 Biosphere
Reserves have to fulfil three main tasks that are complementary and synergistic:
support and encourage the protection of the Moroccan Argan forest and in
parallel add local value. The following points were defined as main targets:
Identification of specific parts of the Argan tree (leaves and oil cake) that
could be valuable in cosmetic applications and provide additional incomes
to the Targanine members;
Evaluation of the environmental impact of harvesting Argan leaves and
definition of the most appropriate and respectful way to do this;
Involvement of local populations in the protection of the Argan forest by,
for example, creation of a tree nursery.
What is the situation now after a couple of years? Whilst the Argan is mainly
known for its seed kernel oil (see Table 9.7.1), the joint research program
Plant-based Biologically Active Ingredients for Cosmetics 403
focused on adding value to its by-product, the oil cake rich in proteins, and as a
second target on the leaves. After intensive phytochemical studies and a com-
prehensive performance-testing program including in vitro as well as clinical
assays, we were able to finalize two new active ingredients for application in
cosmetic products. The first, Argatensylt is a high-molecular-weight protein
complex extracted from the oil cake, which possesses skin-tightening properties
and a biological effect on existing wrinkles. The second one, Arganylt, is
derived from the leaves and contains valuable polyphenols that protect the skin
from premature aging and strengthens the cutaneous structure.
Furthermore, we decided together also to commercialize a cosmetic grade of
the precious oil Lipofructylt Argan, rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids
(including linoleic acid (omega-6) and oleic acid) and natural tocopherol, for its
nourishing and protective properties. Figure 9.7.5 gives an overview on the
development activities and the outcome.
Since 2004, Targanine supplies Cognis directly via its local cooperative net-
work with the Argan oil, the oil cake and the dried leaves. The principles of
sustainable trade, direct with the cooperative, paying fair prices with prepay-
ment conditions (50% payment at the time of order of the goods), are all part of
this business. These guarantee Targanine an additional and diversified income
for the network’s members and ensures a sustainable activity.
9.7.7 Conclusion
The use of natural renewable sources for the development of active ingredients
is only one of many alternatives for modern economies. Taking up the trends of
modern consumer demand and their growing environmental consciousness
forces society and industry to search for solutions, and plant-based raw
materials fit perfectly. There is an increasing need to facilitate, demonstrate and
Plant-based Biologically Active Ingredients for Cosmetics 405
References
1. Food and Drug Administration guidance, http://www.fda.gov/cder/
guidance/index.htm.
2. T. Aburjai and F. M. Natshem, Phytother. Res., 2003, 17, 987.
3. P. Hövelmann, Perspektiven nachwachsender Rohstoffe in chemischen
Anwendungen in 7. Symposium Nachwachsende Rohstoffe für die Chemie,
Schriftenreihe Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Bd. 18 Landwirtschaftsverlag,
Münster (2001).
4. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources (IUCN), Table 1: Numbers of threatened species by major
groups of organisms (1996–2004), http://www.iucnredlist.org/info/tables/
table1.
5. B. M. Schmidt, D. M. Ribnicky, P. E. Lipsky and I. Raskin, Nat. Chem.
Biol., 2007, 7, 360.
406 Chapter 9.7
6. A. Drews, The requirements in the convention on Biological Diversity
to Using Genetic Resources, International Conference ‘‘Business & Biodi-
versity’’, Bonn, 2008.
7. Convention on biological diversity, http://www.cbd.int (retrieved
12.07.2008).
8. LOHAS Market Research Review: Marketplace Opportunities Abound,
S. French and G. Rogers, 2005, The Natural Marketing Institute, http://
www.lohas.com/journal/trends.html.
9. Commission of the European Communities, COM (2001), 366 final, Green
Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Respon-
sibility, Brussels, 18.7.2001.
10. M. Hopkins, Working Paper No. 27, Policy Integration Department,
World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, Interna-
tional Labour Office, Geneva, May 2004.
11. United Nations – Division for Sustainable Development, http://www.
un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/publications.htm.
12. J. F. Morton and G. L. Voss, Econ. Bot., 1987, 41, 221.
13. O. M’Hirit, M. Benzyane, F. Benchekroun, S. M. El Yousfi and
M. Bendeenoun, in L’arganier : une espe`ce fruitie`re-forestie`re à usages
multiples, ed. Mardaga, Belgique, 1998, p. 150.
14. Z. Charrouf and D. Guillaume, J. Ethnopharmacol., 1999, 67, 7.
15. Biosphere Reserve Information – Morocco – Arganeraie, http://www.unesco.
org/mabdb/br/brdir/directory/biores.asp?code¼MOR+01&mode¼all.
16. UNESCO, Réserve de Biosphère : la stratégie de Séville et le cadre statuaire
du réseau mondial, Paris, UNESCO, 1996.
17. 20 ans de recherche-action pour le développement durable de l’Arganier –
Association Ibn Al Baytar, Professeur Z. Charrouf, 2007.
18. A. Benzaria, N. Meskini, M. Dubois, M. Croset, G. Nemoz, M. Lagarde
and A. F. Prigent, Nutrition, 2006, 22, 628.
19. F. Khallouki, C. Younos, R. Soulimani, T. Oster, Z. Charrouf, B. Spie-
gelhalder, H. Bartsch and R. W. Owen, Eur. J. Canc. Prev., 2003, 12, 67.
20. L. Pumadera, F. Henry, Z. Charrouf and G. Pauly, Environmental impact
of the cosmetic valorization of the leaves of Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels,
Morocco, Beyond wood, Cornwall, 2004.
21. L. Pumadera, F. Henry, Z. Charrouf, G. Pauly and G. Falconnet, Bois &
Foreˆts des Tropiques, 2006, 287, 35.
CHAPTER 10
IUCT, Alvarez de Castro, 63, E-08100 Mollet del Valles, Barcelona, Spain
10.1 Introduction
Solvents as a class of chemicals appear late in the history of mankind. Indeed,
Nature does not need any solvents apart from water. Ancient caveman paint-
ings, the Chinese and Japanese art of lacquering (based on urushiol, the latex of
the Chinese lacquer tree),1 the Mediterranean fresco painting and medieval oil
paintings did not use solvents (except eventually spirit of turpentine obtained
by the distillation of resin from terebinth or pine trees).The notion of solvents
appeared (in the tradition of the Arabian al-kimiya) with the European
alchemists who believed in the possibility of ‘‘transmuting’’ inferior metals,
more particularly lead and mercury, into gold. The English friar and alchemist
Roger Bacon believed that gold dissolved in aqua regia was the elixir of life. The
Swiss alchemist Philippus Paracelsus believed in the existence of one undis-
covered element common to all, of which the four elements (Fire, Earth, Air,
Water) posited by Empedokles (c. 430 BC) were merely derivative forms.
Linking alchemy with medicine, Paracelsus maintained that this prime element
of creation termed alkahest, if it were found, would prove to be the philoso-
pher’s stone, the universal medicine and the irresistible solvent.2 When in the
twelfth century alembics with efficient cooling were invented, distillation of
wine yielding concentrated alcohol, aqua vitae, was possible.3 Extraction of
aromatic substances (essential oils, from Latin quinta essentia, quintessence)
407
408 Chapter 10
with alcohol followed by distillation would eventually become the oldest
application of a solvent as such.
The ability of non-water-based solvents to remove soil and stains from fabrics
was accidentally discovered in 1825 by French dye-works owner Jean Baptiste
Jolly after his maid knocked over a lamp, spilling spirits of turpentine. Jolly had
noticed that when the oil evaporated the area of the cloth was cleaner and he
developed a service for cleaning people’s clothes in this manner, which he termed
nettoyage à sec (dry cleaning in English). In the early days, garment scourers and
dryers found several fluids that could be used as dry-cleaning solvents, including
camphene, benzene, kerosene and gasoline. These fluids are all dangerously
flammable, so dry cleaning was a hazardous business until the introduction of
carbon tetrachloride in 1910, and perchloroethylene in the 1930s.
The history of industrial chemistry cannot be dissociated from the develop-
ment of organic solvents. On the contrary, both went hand in hand. Between
1826 and 1845 August Wilhelm Hofmann’s research on coal tar led to the
development of synthetic coal tar dyes as well as to the synthesis of aromatic
solvents like benzene, xylene and toluene based on coal tar.
Solvents play vital roles in modern economies.4 Oxygenated, hydrocarbon
and chlorinated solvents, to mention only a few examples of the existing che-
mical families, make possible the formulation and manufacture of adhesives,
paints, household products, active pharmaceutical ingredients, agrochemical
compositions and edible oils. These and many other important products and
processes demand a massive solvent usage. According to a study by the Free-
donia Group5 the overall world demand for solvents, including hydrocarbon
and chlorinated types, is on the order of 20 Mio mto annually (2007), the lion’s
share of 58% being used in the coatings, inks and adhesives industries. Demand
for hydrocarbon and chlorinated solvents, though, will continue its downward
trend as a result of environmental regulations, with oxygenated and green
solvents replacing them and growing at an average of 6–7%.
Because of the solvent properties of existing solvents and the engineering
design of process technologies, a significant fraction of the solvents used in
processes or formulations is released to the environment or has to be managed
as a liquid organic waste and ultimately incinerated. Only in the fine chemicals
sector, solvents contribute to as much as 50% of the total mass of waste.6 The
impact on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is higher because SMEs often
lack efficient means to develop environmentally benign second generation
processes. In 2006, the European Commission alerted that SMEs are respon-
sible for 60–70% of all industrial pollution in the European Union.7
Table 10.1 Health hazard categories and their corresponding health effects.
Hazard
Level description Health effects
0 Negligible None
1 Low Irritation
2 Moderate Serious damage if in contact with skin, eyes or respiratory
tract. Accumulation in breast milk. Toxic to reproduction
(Cat. 3). Impaired fertility.
3 High Toxic if in contact with skin, eyes or respiratory tract. Toxic
to reproduction (Cat. 1 or 2). Carcinogenic and mutagenic
(Cat. 3). Cumulative effects.
4 Very high Very toxic by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed.
Carcinogenic and mutagenic (Cat. 1 or 2). Cancer and heri-
table genetic damage.
Negligible
Very High 3.1%
7.8%
Low
High 28.1%
23.4%
Moderate
37.5%
Figure 10.1 Distribution of the 64 most used traditional solvents in 5 health hazard
categories ranging from negligible hazard to very high hazard.
410 Chapter 10
Table 10.2 Hazardous chemicals, their Environment Health & Safety effects
and major protocols, regulations and programmes.
Protocols, Regulations
Chemical EHS Effects and Programmes Year
Table 10.2 summarizes the different regulations affecting most of the cur-
rently used solvents.
Basically, there are two principal approaches available to delineate the risk
profile and address the concerns created by the usage of solvents. First, control
of exposure minimizes the exposure to the hazardous solvent by using engi-
neering designs such as closed systems with 100% recovery and zero emissions.
An obvious disadvantage of these systems is that they do not eliminate the
intrinsic hazard of the chemical substance. The second approach is based on
control of hazard. It implies the substitution of the hazardous solvent by safer
alternatives which may in certain cases involve process modifications to
accommodate the new solvent. Replacement of hazardous solvents by bulk or
full solids technologies without the need of solvents, water-based systems or the
use of green solvents are examples of hazard control strategies.
Since the identification by Anastas and Warner of the replacement of
undesired hazardous substances by safer alternatives as a key green chemistry
research area,9 many researchers in industry and academy have united in what
Sustainable Solutions – Green Solvents for Chemistry 411
Green Solvents
• carrier oils
• plasticizers
• coalescents
TM
Figure 10.3 compares the distributions of a dataset containing the 108 most
used existing solvents and a dataset of 239 SOLVSAFE solvent candidates in
two principal components which account for the structural diversity of both
datasets. One of the defining features of chemical spaces is that molecular
structures can be represented as points whose coordinates depend on the values
of relevant descriptors or variables. To characterize each molecular structure,
SOLVSAFE used 52 structural descriptors. The principal component statistical
analysis projects the data contained in the 52-dimensional chemical space into a
two-dimensional space (plot in Figure 10.3). This approximation provides an
overview of the systematic variation and distribution of the structural infor-
mation and reveals how significant is the dissimilarity of the SOLVSAFE
dataset when compared with the traditional solvents dataset.
In a second design stage, the chemical library was evaluated with in silico
health hazard estimation methods developed by IUCT and state of the art eco-
tox expert systems. Prediction of the health hazard and eco-toxicological
profiles and physico-chemical properties with a sufficient degree of confidence
allowed selection of those molecular structures exhibiting lower levels of
intrinsic hazard. Figure 10.4 shows the calculated health hazard distribution of
the SOLVSAFE dataset.
Note that the distribution of traditional solvents is peaked on health hazard
level 2 (Figure 10.1 and Table 10.1) while the SOLVSAFE virtual library dis-
tribution is peaked on hazard level 0 (Figure 10.4). Furthermore, the fraction of
SOLVSAFE solvents in the lowest hazard levels 0 and 1 is 77%, which is sig-
nificantly higher than the corresponding fraction of traditional solvents which
amounts to 31%. In addition, no solvent candidate was predicted in the higher
hazard level 4 in the SOLVSAFE dataset. Figure 10.5 shows the percentage of
solvents in the low or negligible hazard levels according to their effects in five
414 Chapter 10
14
7
pc1
0
-10 -5 0 5 10
-7
-14
pc2
High
3.5%
Moderate
20.3%
Negligible
50.3%
Low
25.9%
100
80
60
%
40
20
0
Health Aquatic VOC Flammability Occupational
toxicity Emission Exposure
parameter that quantifies the CO2 emission upon complete oxidation, is 47%
lower than the average value of 68 traditional solvents. Note that the high
renewable mass index of SOLVSAFE solvents may contribute to greenhouse
gas savings provided that sustainable practices are used in the manufacture of
the platform molecules.
Once a subset of potentially safer solvents is available, the next step involves
the synthesis of the actual solvents. Green synthetic methodologies are selected
in order to provide economically viable manufacturing processes leading to
high quality solvents with the lowest cost per kilogram. In a subsequent stage,
technical performance in different industrial applications follows a two-stage
evaluation. First, efficacy of function for a specific industrial application is
416 Chapter 10
estimated using a predictive model developed by IUCT. Subsequently, an
experimental investigation of the relevant solvents is carried out and the results
compared with the predicted values. In the final step, the best performing
solvents are subjected to experimental toxicological evaluation using protocols
that minimize the use of laboratory animals.
We use the term safer functional organic solvent (SFOS) to refer generically to
the green solvents designed under the SOLVSAFE design strategy. For the
purpose of our investigation, we defined an SFOS as an organic solvent dis-
playing such molecular properties that enables it to achieve maximum functional
performance for a particular application while minimizing its intrinsic potential
for environmental or human health hazard. It is worth clarifying our under-
standing of the term green solvent in view of the different contributions to this
subject.18 If we consider a green solvent as an evolutionary product of chemical
innovation, then a green solvent has to bear a number of environment, health
and safety (EHS) characteristics that differentiate it from existing hazardous
solvents. Toxicologists, environmental scientists and industrial safety experts
have identified quantifiable EHS parameters, metrics (e.g. LD50, LC50,
flammability, ozone depleting potential, global warming potential, etc.) and
threshold values above which the property poses a serious hazard to human
health or the environment. Therefore, each parameter can be in the safe or
unsafe domain depending ultimately on the specific molecular structure which
determines this property. Any chemical substance with efficient solvency
characteristics displaying a higher number of green traits (EHS parameters in
the safe domain) when compared to a reference substance, typically the current
industrial standard, can be considered a green or safer solvent. Alternatively,
we could define a green solvent in absolute terms imposing the more restrictive
condition that it possesses the maximum number of green traits (i.e. all of the
EHS parameters in the safe domain). In the absence of consensus, each author
will choose the relative or absolute definition according to specific circum-
stances. In any case, a full specification of the EHS parameters is necessary to
describe and evaluate the ‘‘green solvent’’ under consideration.
SOLVSAFE is aimed at developing SFOS for their innovative application in
key products and processes within six different sectors ranging from metal
degreasing, paints and varnishes, crop protection formulations to fine chemi-
cals manufacture and extraction of vegetable oils.
O F
NH
Cl N O
HN HN
N N
Na2CO3, KI, MIBC
F F
F
(1) (2) (3)
Scheme 10.1
Table 10.5 Comparison of solvent properties and EHS data of two solvent
candidates for methyl isobutyl replacement in an SN2 reaction.
Properties Glycerol formal Glycerol isobutyral
STEP 1
STEP 2
Metal parts DEGREASING Cleaned
RINSING WITH
TREATMENT WITH metal parts
WATER
SOLVENT
SOLVENT WATER+SOLVENT
RECOVERY RECOVERY
Table 10.7 Degreasing efficacies and EHS parameters for three fatty acid
dimethylamides as compared with the current industrial standard
trichloroethylene.
CO2 emission
Vapour pres- potential Renewable
Degreasing Degreasing Health Aquatic sure at 20 1C (Tm CO2/ mass index
solvent efficacy (%) hazard a hazard a (hPa) Tm) (%)
Table 10.7 compares the degreasing efficacy and various EHS properties of
three dimethylamides of natural fatty acids with different chain lengths, tri-
chloroethylene, and the average value for traditional solvents. Because of the
low vapour pressure, the VOC emission potential is very low and the occupa-
tional exposure and flash point reach safer values. As they are based on natural
vegetable oils, the alternative solvents exhibit a high renewable mass index.21
Scheme 10.2
treated
untreated
Figure 10.7 Post-emergence control of Gallium aparine treated with PPO inhibitors.
10.5 Conclusions
The development of less hazardous and commercially viable solvents, the
shift away from inefficient, solvent-consuming chemical routes towards bio-
based synthesis and the replacement of oil-based feedstock by renewable
starting materials are only a few examples of necessary strategic goals for the
twenty-first-century chemical industry. Research efforts over the past decades
have evidenced the formidable complexity of designing commercially viable and
benign solvents and other functional products. Reconciling non-toxicity with
efficacy of function, or environmental performance with industrial operability, to
mention just two examples of simultaneously desired and often conflicting
properties, are major challenges that need to be addressed in the upfront design
stage.
SOLVSAFE, an industrial research consortium under the EU Sixth Fra-
mework Programme, is a first attempt at collaborative research between
industry, specialized research centres, and academia towards a common
research agenda for the development of safer organic industrial solvents.
Sustainable Solutions – Green Solvents for Chemistry 423
The innovative SOLVSAFE design strategy, based on novel basic science
linking molecular structure with environment, health hazard and chemical
functionality, has been very successful in surmounting current barriers to
bringing greener solvents to commercial manufacturing facilities and industrial
research laboratories. The new solvents display not only good functional
characteristics but also fundamental sustainability traits, making them highly
competitive in the marketplace.
References
1. M. Kopplin in Museum für Lackkunst, BASF Lacke + Farben AG, ed.,
Münster, s.a.
2. R. Höfer, P. Birnbrich, S. Busch and J. Bigorra, Chimica & L’Industria,,
Marzo 2007, 2, 118–121.
3. W. H. Brock, The Fontana History of Chemistry, Fontana Press, London,
1992.
4. H. Kittel, Lehrbuch der Lacke und Beschichtungen, 2. völlig neu bearb.
Aufl., Bd. 4, Lösemittel, Weichmacher, Additive, M. Ortelt, Ed. S. Hirzel
Verl, Stuttgart, 2007; E. W. Flick, ed., Industrial Solvents Handbook,
William Andrew Publishing/Noyes, Westwood, 5th edn, 1998; D. Stoye
and W. Freitag, Paints, Coatings and Solvents, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
1998; H. Gnamm and W. Sommer, Die Lösungsmittel und Weichma-
chungsmittel, Wissenschaftl, Verlagsges, Stuttgart, 1958.
5. Study #:1715 (09/2003), http://www.freedoniagroup.com/World-Solvents.
html.
6. Spanish Ministry of the Environment, Report on the Spanish Reference
Document for Best Available Techniques in the Organic Fine Chemicals
Sector, 2003.
7. A. Vettori, European sustainability policy: key elements and drivers, EBC
Ann. Congress, Edinburgh, 2006, http://www.eubuilders.org/DOC/Misc/
1%20-%20Andrea%20Vettori.ppt (retrieved 25.11.2008).
8. C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
9. P. T. Anastas and T. C. Williamson, in Green Chemistry: Designing
Chemistry for the Environment, ed. P. T. Anastas and T. C. Williamson,
American Chemical Society Symposium Series, No. 626, ACS, Washington
D.C., 1996, pp. 1–17; P. T. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry:
Theory and Practice, OUP, Oxford, New York, 2000.
10. http://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/pubs/pgcc/past.html; P. T. Anastas,
W. Leitner, P. G. Jessop, C. Li, P. Wasserscheid, A. Stark, ed.,
Handbook of Green Chemistry - Green Solvents, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
2009.
11. P. G. Jessop and W. Leitner, ed., Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical
Fluids, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
12. K. R. J. Seddon, Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1997, 68, 351.
13. A. Ogawa and D. P. Curran, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2917.
424 Chapter 10
14. N. Jiang, D. Vinci, C. L. Liotta, C. A. Eckert and A. J. Ragauskas, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47(3), 627–631; L. Phan, H. Brown, J. White, A.
Hodgson and P. G. Jessop, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 53–59.
15. R. Höfer and J. Bigorra, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 203.
16. http://www.solvsafe.org.
17. W. Coenen, Expositionsermittlung und -begrenzung bei Gefahrstoffen : eine
Standortbestimmung des Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Instituts für Arbeitssi-
cherheit-BIA ¼ Determination and limitation of exposure to hazardous
substances. Definitions of the approach adopted by the Ber-
ufgenossenschaftliches Institut für Arbeitssicherheit-BIA, Münchener
Gefahrstoff-Tage, München, 1992, Staub. Reinhaltung der Luft, 1993,
53(5), 171–176.
18. W. M. Nelson, Green Solvents for Chemistry: Perspectives and Practice
(Green Chemistry Series), OUP, Oxford, New York, 2003; C. Capello,
U. Fischer and K. Hungerbühler, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 927–934; E. J.
Beckman, in Book of Abstracts, DECHEMA Symposium, Green Solvents
for Processes, Lake Constance, ed. B. Feißt, DECHEMA, Frankfurt, 2006,
p. 14; R. A. Sheldon, Green Chem., 2005, 7, 267–278.
19. D. J. C. Constable, C. Jiménez-González and R. K. Henderson,
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2007, 11, 133.
20. C. Estévez, N. Bayarri and J. Castells, PCT/EP 2007/011420, 2006 (IUCT).
21. J. Bigorra, J. Raya, R. Valls, C. Estévez, L. Galià and J. Castells, EP 08 007
673.0, 2008 (Cognis/IUCT); C. Estévez and J. Bigorra, Comunicaciones,
Jorn. Com. Esp. Deterg., 2009, 39, 93–103.
22. S. Shah, S. Singhal, A. Khan and V. Shah, Asia Pac. Coatings J., June
2005, 18(3), 31.
23. J. Bigorra, S. Sato, B. Ramiro and E. Graupera, EP 07020568.7, 2007
(Cognis).
24. M. Vanzulli, EP-A 08151742.7, 2007 (Isagro Ricerca).
25. Patent application pending.
CHAPTER 11
The ChemQuest Group Inc., Bilker Strasse 27, D-40213 Düsseldorf, Germany
11.1 Introduction
‘‘Sustainability is changing the way products are being designed, produced, and
discarded. It will certainly change the way we think about the raw materials that
go into these products, and it will certainly have a major effect on the adhesives
and sealants industry.’’3
425
426 Chapter 11
wind and sun radiation would simply be impossible without appropriate
adhesives, adhesive resins and sealants, as are any desired weight reductions of
airplanes and cars for gaining better fuel efficiencies, as is triple glazing and
building insulation in construction for reducing energy transfer in residential
living – just to give a few illustrative examples.
The use of adhesives and sealants is almost as old as mankind. For many
millennia adhesives have been natural, based on rubbers, plant and animal
glues, and in Mesopotamia 2500 years ago even some boat sealants were
already in use based on naturally occurring crude oil tars – an early example of
the petrochemical base of today’s modern chemistry in general, and the for-
mulation of state-of-the-art adhesives and sealants in particular. Before the
invention of macromolecular or polymer chemistry in the 1920s and 1930s all
adhesives came from nature, and returned back to it through decomposition at
the end of service life. Definitely polymer chemistry disrupted the circle of
natural recycling. The use and performance of today’s adhesives and sealants
would even be unthinkable without the latest insights in polymer science and
technology. Progress in macromolecular science and advancements in adhesives
and sealants depend upon each other – adhesives are applied polymers. The
more demanding a bonding is to take place, the more precise the chemistry at
given physical frame conditions has to be adjusted for achieving a decent and
reliable job. The adhesives industry constantly strives to lowering the envir-
onmental impact of its products. Often sustainability and natural base of
materials are used interchangeably, and this chapter will shed some light on the
question to what extent, based on current knowledge, modern design of
adhesives and sealants can be achieved with technologies from renewable
sources. How dependent are adhesive and sealant formulators upon petro-
chemical raw materials? What prospects and limitations are to be seen in this
field? What do we learn from Mother Nature with its abundant examples of
bonding techniques? Do we see those techniques one day replacing petro-
chemical-based, depletable and thus non-sustainable adhesive and sealant
alternatives?
18
16 Petrochemical base
Natural base
14
Volume (1000 kt dry)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010f 2020f
Year
Figure 11.1 Total worldwide production of adhesive and sealants including share of
natural-based components.
Sustainable Solutions for Adhesives and Sealants 429
formulations may look quite immense with 7.2 Mio mto in 2006 and 8.5 Mio
mto in 2010.
However, this represents just 0.006% of all oil consumed per annum even if
this amount has been doubled by factoring in the material and energy needs for
processing the base ingredients for adhesives and sealants, and also taking into
account the difference between ‘‘dry’’ and ‘‘wet’’ adhesives as representing on
average a factor of 3.
Considering a global plastic production of 245 Mio mto (2006),9 petro-
chemical-based adhesives and sealants represent just 3% of this. ‘‘Dry’’ adhe-
sive in this sense is the solid portion of an adhesive governing its overall
performance properties, whereas ‘‘wet’’ adhesives describe the ready-to-use
product in its average proportion of solid (34%) and liquid (66%) ingredients.
The liquid phase commonly and increasingly is water, but 0.71 Mio dry mto
(2006), respectively 0.78 Mio dry mto (2010), remain solvent- and thus crude-
oil-based,10 a sizable factor that has to be regarded as well.
The following graphs (Figures 11.2 to 11.5) inform about the global usage of
adhesives relative to area of use, base chemistry, regional spread and adhesives
technology.
7000
6000 2006
dry mt x 1000
5000 2010 F
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
n
er
ng
n
pe
io
tio
um
di
di
ct
ag
Ta
rta
n
n
ru
bo
ck
bo
on
po
st
Pa
on
id
id
C
s
an
rig
ig
C
Tr
-
on
N
3500
2006
3000
2010 F
dry mt x 1000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
s
Ac
s
d
be
ic
ie
er
er
er
en
EV
VA
PU
se
PV
l
ox
m
ry
b
pr
ba
ru
ly
ly
ly
Ac
Ep
eo
po
po
po
tic
al
N
co
co
ur
he
er
at
th
nt
k
ln
oc
S/
lo
Sy
Al
Bl
Al
Figure 11.3 Global adhesive volume per base chemistry.
6000
2006
5000
2010 F
dry mt x 1000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
na
pe
LA
e
pa
op
N
A/
O
hi
ro
Ja
ur
R
C
n.
Eu
-E
ai
E-
em
W
R
the most important sources for innovations in this industry, and ranks second
next to solving or improving so far unmet customer needs.
The replacement of solvent-based adhesives by either water-based or full
solid systems is just one of those examples. Solvent-based adhesives usually are
proven technologies with a robust usage profile, whereas their rather sophis-
ticated, water-based counterparts are sensitive to low-temperature and high-
humidity applications, require film-forming (often VOC-based) agents them-
selves, and are usually 20–30% more expensive per adhesive bond. In any case
the switch from solvent to water requires drastic usage changes at higher costs,
one of the reasons why solvent-based adhesives show negative growth in
Western Europe and North America, but nevertheless grow globally with 2.2%
relative to 4.2% for adhesives in general11 due to local production in emerging
Sustainable Solutions for Adhesives and Sealants 431
Solvent-based
Water-based
Hotmelts
Radiation cure
1-c reactive
2-c reactive
Calandred
For the time being and in the foreseeable future high performance and so-
called reactive adhesives and sealants will rely on petrochemical key
components;
There is on the other hand room for stopping the downturn trend or a
further decline of adhesives and sealants based on renewable resources;
Structural adhesion and structural sealants are important growth markets
in themselves and through increasing replacement of physical joining
techniques like bolting, welding and soldering, they often require chemical
or physical means for the desired curing, and can by no means be for-
mulated based on natural key components except functional moieties like
polyurethanes based on oleochemical polyols, dimer acid based polyesters
or blends of natural and synthetic rubber in the tyre industry, but the
cross-linking reaction in all these cases is all but ‘‘natural’’;
In low to medium modulus applications of sealant caulks and adhesives,
however, where curing takes place through physical solidification, i.e. due
to cooling and/or drying, the use of raw materials based on renewable
sources is quite common, and can certainly be expanded with focused
research for overcoming inherit shortcomings.
Table 11.2 Global status for use of natural-based adhesives (wet mto, average
solids 50%).
Natural resin base 2006 2010 AGR (%)
References
1. Contains part of a presentation titled Adhesives Based on Renewable
Sources, held by the author at the World Adhesives Conference in Miami,
April 2008.
2. Daniel S. Murad, Adhesives & Sealants Industry, July 1, 2008.
3. E. M. Petrie, Adhesives and Sealants, Editorial, Oct 1, 2008.
4. G. Gierenz and W. Karmann, Adhesives and Adhesive Tapes, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2001.
5. World Adhesives Database of The ChemQuest Group Inc., partly accessible
via www.chemquest.com.
6. ASC, FEICA, IVK data, compiled by The ChemQuest Group Inc.
7. Global Market Forecast conducted by The ChemQuest Group Inc.,
Cincinnati.
8. Estimation of the author.
Sustainable Solutions for Adhesives and Sealants 435
9. S. Marcinowski, Renewable Raw Materials – a Novel Approach in
Polymers, Bio & Polymers, Biannual Meeting of the GdCh-Division of
‘‘Macromolecular Chemistry’’, Aachen, 2008, http://www.gdch.de/vas/
tagungen/tg/5325__e.htm; Anonymous, . . . .
10. ChemQuest Survey.
11. From a presentation the author held at the European Coatings Show 2007,
Nuremberg/Germany titled Drivers of growth for the worldwide adhesives
business, partly published in Adhäsion, 2007, 718, 14–19 and in European
Coatings Journal, 2007, 6, 34–46.
CHAPTER 12
White Biotechnology
THOMAS HAAS,a MANFRED KIRCHER,a TIM
KÖHLER,b GÜNTER WICH, c ULRICH SCHÖRKENd AND
RAINER HAGENe
a
Evonik Degussa GmbH, Creavis Technologies & Innovation,
Paul-Baumann-Straße 1, D-45772 Marl, Germany; b Evonik Goldschmidt
GmbH, Goldschmidtstraße 100, D-45127 Essen, Germany; c Wacker Chemie
AG, Consortium für elektrochemische Industrie, Zielstattstraße 20, D-81378
München, Germany; d Cognis GmbH, Henkelstraße 67, D-40589 Düsseldorf,
Germany; e Uhde Inventa-Fischer GmbH, Holzhauser Straße 157–159,
D-13509 Berlin, Germany
436
White Biotechnology 437
biotechnology often delivers environmental and economic benefits at the
same time.’’
The relevance of White Biotechnology is well documented. OECD, the Royal
Belgian Academy Council of Applied Science, Dechema as well as US-NREL
and US-DOE, outlined White Biotechnology’s innovative power and future
potential.1–6 The worldwide volume of white biotech production sums up to
an estimated h50 billion – close to biotech’s pharma product volume of $55
billion.7
All biotechnological processes depend on enzymes – either in whole-cell
living systems or isolated out of their biological context. In fact, purified
enzymes are established in processing food and textiles and are supplements in
feed and detergents – all products of everybody’s daily life. Whole-cell systems
particularly in the field of specialty chemicals provide a broad range of methods
and processes. For many years, enantiomerically pure amino acids for food,
feed and pharma industries have been produced by microbial fermentation.
Ambitious R&D resulted in enzymes especially modified and optimized for
a desired chemical reaction such as biocatalysis of optically active amines,
alcohols, epoxides and more.8
Chemicals
Acrylamid 100,000 1,4 Polymers Mitsubishi Rayon
Amino Acids
L-asparaginic acid 13,000 Aspartam Tanabe Seiyaku,
DSM
L-methionine 400 20 Pharma
L-Dopa 300 Pharma Ajinomoto
L-alanine 500 Pharma Tanabe Seiyaku
D-, L-valine 50 Pharma DSM
L-tert. Leucine 10 500 Pharma Evonik Industries
L-Carnitin 200 Lonza
ß-phenylalanine 1 Dow Pharma, Evonik
Industries
Food
Glucose 20,000,000 0,3 Liquid sugar
Isoglucose 8,000,000 0,8 Liquid sugar
L-malic acid 100 20 Acidification Tanabe Seiyaku
Isomalt 70,000 Sweetener Südzucker, Cerestar
Aspartam 10,000 Sweetener HSC
Fructooligosaccharides 10,500 2,5 Prebiotic Beghin Meji, Orafti,
Sensus, Cosucra
Antibiotic-derivatives
6-APA 10,000 Kaneka, DSM,
Novartis
7-ACA 4,000 Novo, Novartis
D-4-Hydroxyphenylglycin 7,000 Kaneka, Recordati
Intermediates, chiral
products
(S)-2-cloropropionic acid 2,000 Herbicides, Avecia
D-pantolacton 2,000 Pharma, Fuji Pharma
(S)-Methoxyisopropylamin 1,000 Herbicides, BASF
Mandelic acid 200 20 Pharma Mitsubishi Rayon,
BASF
Ethyl (S)-4-clor-3-hydro- 150 Pharma Daicel Chemical
xibutyric acid Industries, Rütgers
Ephedrin 1,500 90 Pharma BASF
Source: Dechema Positionspapier, Frankfurt, 2004; personal communication3
White Biotechnology 439
12.1.2.2 Cosmetic Ingredients
Also in the field of cosmetics White Biotechnology unfolds its ecological and
economical benefits. A successful example is Evonik Industry’s enzymatic
process to emollients. Emollients are functional esters in skin care products
giving skin a soft and comfortable feeling. Conventionally they are produced by
chemical synthesis through a multi-step process which needs a lot of energy
input and produces volatile, aqueous and solid waste. In contrast the new
enzymatic catalysis based on lipase needs only one step. It saves energy, avoids
waste and leads to superior product quality (Figure 12.1).
Obviously the enzymatic process is beneficial concerning the ecological bal-
ance. Energy input, side products and emissions are reduced or avoided com-
pletely. By simplifying the production plant to only a few steps fixed and
variable costs drop down.
More cosmetic ingredients or precursors thereof are produced by fermenta-
tion. The example of sphingolipids is discussed in more detail in Chapter 12.2.1.
Conventional Enzymatic
volatile
reaction catalyst reaction
comp.
aqueous
desodor. steam
waste catalyst
recycled
bleaching bleach
aqueous temperature
waste drying
> 180°C
140°C
100°C
solid 60°C
waste filtration 20°C
packing packing
Amino Acids
L-glutamate 1,500,000 1,2 Flavor Enhancer Ajinomoto
L-lysine 700,000 2 Feed Evonik Industries,
Ajinomoto, ADM
L-threonine 30,000 6 Feed Evonik Industries,
ADM
L-phenylalanine 10,000 10 Sweetener, DSM
Pharma
L-tryptophane 1,200 20 Feed-, Food Ajinomoto
L-arginine 1,000 20 Pharma, Kyowa Hakko
Cosmetic
L-Cystein 500 20 Food, Pharma Wacker
Acids
Lactic acid 150,000 1,8 Food, Leather,
Textiles
Gluconic acid 100,000 1,5 Food, Textiles, Jungblunzlauer
Metall,
Construction
Citric acid 1,000,000 0,8 Pharma, Food,
Metal, Laudry
Acetic acid 190,000 0,5 Food
Itaconic acid 4,000 Comonomer Cargill
Enzymes
Total 3,000,000 Novozymes, Genencor
Laundry Novozymes, Genencor,
Henkel
Food processing Novozymes, Genencor
Textile-, leather- Novozymes, Genencor
processing
Feed additive Novozymes, Genencor,
BASF
Antibiotics
Bacitracin A 4 3.000,00 Organ
transplatation
Cyclosporin 3 5.200,00 Pharma, Feed
additive
Penicilline 45,000 300
Biopolymers
Polylactid 140,000 2,25 Food, Nature Works
Oilproduction
Xanthan 40,000 8,4 Blood substitute Evonik Industries
Dextrane 2,600 200 Novozymes
Hyaluronic acid 500
Vitamins Feed
Riboflavin (B2) 30,000 Feed BASF, DSM
Cyanocobalamine 20 25.500,00 Feed
(B12)
Vitamin C 80,000 8
Lipids
Phytosphingosine Cosmetics Evonik Industries
Energy
Ethanol 39,000,000 0,35 Energy ADM, Brazil Sugar
Refineries
Source: Dechema Positionspapier, Frankfurt, 2004; personal communication3
442 Chapter 12
cattle bred on pure plant feed carries a high burden of nitrogen. Adapting the
feed’s amino acid profile to the animal’s need by adding essential amino acids
therefore reduces the manure’s nitrogen burden significantly.
L-Cysteine – another amino acid produced by fermentation will be described
in more detail in Chapter 12.2.2.
More essential amino acids are produced by fermentation for the pharma-
ceutical markets – as ingredients in infusion solutions or as a precursor for
pharmaceutical amino acid derivatives. The latter requires extremely ambitious
bio-catalytic processes including co-factor regeneration. Evonik Industries
developed a process to the pharma-building block L-tert.leucine based on
formate-dehydrogenase and NAD+-regeneration (Figure 12.3). Today this
process runs on a tons scale.
12.1.2.4 Monomers
O
+
CO2 NAD(P)H + H R CO2H
α-keto acid
CO2H
HCO2NH4 NAD+ R NH2
L-amino acid
10
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
00
10
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
Source: DSM
OH OH
Cell mass,
by-products
(e.g. acetate, NADH)
OH
H
NADH
1,3-Propanediol oxidoreductase (dhaT)
NAD+
OH OH
448
O HO OH
HO
HO H OH
H H
OH H Escherichia coli
HO OH
Klebsiella
pneumoniae
HO O~ P HO OH O OH
OH OH
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
HO OH
Chapter 12
Figure 12.10 Genetic pathways to industrial production of 1,3 PDO.
White Biotechnology 449
Polymers 3%
Pharmaceuticals 5–9%
0 5 1 1 2 2 3 3
Figure 12.11 Sales volume in the market segments of the German chemical industry
(VCI). In the grey segments industrial biotechnology is already
established or is starting (monomers and polymers).
Biotechnological plants of industrial scale have been announced all over the
world (Figure 12.14).
Consequently chemical industries are in urgent need of clean technologies,
processes and products. Targeting on alternative biotech processes leading to
well-established compounds is just the beginning not the end. With growing
familiarity with biotechnological processes the chemical industry more and
more realizes the potential of modern biotechnology to deliver new high-per-
formance products available by pure biotechnology or combined with
chemistry.
Petrochemicals
Ethylene C2H4 110 mio mto a-1 1228 €/mto 86% 14% 1428 €/mto C
Propylene C3H6 75 mio mto a-1 1015 €/mto 86% 14% 1180 €/mto C
Benzene C6H6 45 mio mto a-1 871 €/mto 92% 8% 947 €/mto C
BioRenewables
Production Price C H O Carbon
Sucrose C12H22O11 172 mio mto a-1 180 €/mto 42% 6% 52% 429 €/mto C
Bio-Ethanol C2H6O 39 mio mto a-1 357 €/mto 52% 13% 35% 687 €/mto C
Corn-Glucose C6H12O6 330 mio mto a-1 223 €/mto 40% 7% 53% 558 €/mto C
and repair, endocytosis, cellular aging, protein transport and degradation, and
others.14–16 To a large extent, sphingolipid biosynthesis pathways as well as
sphingolipid functions are conserved from yeast to man.
In mammals, a specific class of sphingolipids termed ceramides serves
an additional important function related to formation and maintenance
of the epidermal permeability barrier, protecting skin from desiccation and
preventing chemicals from penetrating the skin into underlying tissues.17,18
Ceramides are amide-linked fatty acids containing a long-chain amino alcohol
(sphingoid base).
Skin barrier functions can be mainly attributed to the outermost layer of
mammalian epidermis, the stratum corneum (SC). This region consists of dead,
cornified cells embedded in a matrix of extracellular lipids, containing mainly
ceramides, cholesterol, cholesterol sulphate and free fatty acids. The SC lipids
are organized in a specific lamellar, quasi-crystalline structure, which is critical
for optimal skin barrier homeostasis. However, formation of the lamellar
structure requires presence of the lipid subclasses in a defined ratio, and
ceramides by weight comprise roughly 50% of total SC lipids. The structure
and formation of the epidermal lipid barrier is explained in Figure 12.15.
Mammalian SC ceramides contain one of four sphingoid bases, namely
sphingosine, 6-hydroxysphingosine, phytosphingosine and dihydrosphingosine
White Biotechnology 451
Despite volatility sugar remains a competitive feedstoc
2500,00
2000,00
1500,00
€/t Carbon
1000,00
500,00
0,00
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Monomer Polymer
Supplier Production Marketing Market
Production
JV Mohawk Polyester
Tate&Lyle DuPont
1,3-PDO TheHomeDepot 2007 -45 kta
JV Telles Telles PHB
ADM Metabolix/ADM Telles
PHB 2008 -50 kta
JV Polyethylene
Odebrecht Braskem Braskem
Ethene 2009 -200 kta
JV Polyethylene
Crystallsev Dow Dow
Ethene 2011 -350 kta
JV PBS
Roquette DSM ???
Succinic acid 2011 -? kta
Carg./Novozy. Polyacrylate
Cargill ??? ???
3-HP 2011 -? kta
Figure 12.15 Formation of the lipid barrier of human skin. The top layer of the
epidermis called stratum corneum is a hornified and inert barrier. Its
primary functions are regulation of the skin’s moisture content and
protection of the underlying tissues against external influences. Due to
its structure it is often compared to a brick wall in which the non-
viable keratin-filled corneocytes are embedded like bricks in a matrix
of intercellular lipids. Synthesis of the stratum corneum lipids starts in
deeper skin layers, where lipids (mainly glucosylceramides and
sphingomyelin) are produced and packaged in so-called ‘‘lamellar
bodies’’. During differentiation and maturation, these lipids are
enzymatically converted to ceramides and finally assembled into den-
sely packed lamellar structures surrounding the corneocytes and filling
the intercellular spaces of the stratum corneum.
White Biotechnology 453
(sphinganine). To date, 11 different ceramide classes, with more than 300
molecular variants, have been identified in human skin. Their classification is
based on the sphingoid bases contained and the fatty acids they are linked to
(straight-chain fatty acids, a-hydroxylated fatty acids, o-hydroxylated and
esterified fatty acids). Depending on the sphingoid base present in a specific
ceramide, two or three asymmetric C-atoms occur, meaning that up to eight
different stereoisomers are conceivable. However, the sphingoid bases in nat-
ural skin ceramides have only one conformation for each base. Conformation
has proven crucial for SC skin barrier function, because interactions with other
lipids, and as a consequence formation of the lamellar structure of the SC lipid
layer, depend on proper ceramide stereochemistry.
Topical application of compositions comprising sphingolipids, such as
ceramides, improves the barrier function and moisture-retaining properties
of the skin.19–23 Moreover, sphingoid bases exhibit anti-inflammatory and
anti-microbial activities, making sphingolipids valuable active ingredients in
cosmetic formulations.24,25
12.2.2 L-Cysteine
12.2.2.1 Biotechnical Production of L-Cysteine
Glucose Sulfate
extracellular
intracellular
Degradation
Glucose-6-phosphate
CysB*
S2 - L-Cysteine Exp. L-Cysteine
3-Phosphoglycerate
CysK
SerA*
CysM
3-Phospho- L-Serine O-Acetylserine
hydroxypyruvate
CysE*
O
B OH
O A
O OH
NH
O
O O
O O O
A1
O O D O C
HO O
O O
O O
O HO O A2
O O O
O
HO
C P N+
OH
O O-
D
HO
E
Figure 12.18 Examples of lipid structures and oil soluble compounds: A) tria-
cylglycerol; B) ceramide; C) phospholipid (with enzymatic modifica-
tion sites); D) sophorose lipid; E) carotene; F) sitosterol.
White Biotechnology 463
Table 12.3 Typical examples for Lipid Biotechnology. Commercialized
lipid (including glycerol) based products manufactured
biotechnologically.
Product Process (typical)
modification of lipids, fats and oils. Several of these enzymes from microbial,
plant and animal origin are available commercially from different suppliers.69
An excellent book supplying a broad overview about biocatalysts for lipid
modification is available.70
Lipases are the most versatile catalysts in the field of Lipid Biotechnology
with a variety of industrial applications e.g. in the food, cosmetic, pharma-
ceutical, leather, pulp and paper or detergent industries (Table 12.3).70,71 Most
of them display certain fatty acid selectivity; some possess regioselective
properties and show enantioselective catalytic behaviour. Fatty acid selectivity
and regioselecticity are especially interesting properties in the field of lipid
biotechnology. The lipases are not only able to modify ester bonds of lipids but
may also catalyze non-natural reactions like the modification of hydrophilic
polyol compounds, the peroxidation of fatty acids or the transformation of
amine based compounds.70–73 Additionally the lipase-catalyzed synthesis of
several polyester compounds has been shown.74,75 The availability of high-
throughput screening methods for lipases makes them ideal targets for modern
biotechnology including e.g. metagenome screening approaches for the iden-
tification of new catalysts or genetic engineering for alteration or optimization
of the catalyst properties.76–79
464 Chapter 12
Microbial production of oils and the enzymatic synthesis of ‘‘Designer
Lipids’’ will be exemplified in this chapter in more detail.
1,3-regioselective
pancreas lipase
OH
O
H2C O
O C Oleic
HC O C Palmitic
H2C O
H2C +
HC O C Palmitic
OH
O O
H2C
O C Oleic HO C Oleic
Figure 12.19 Simplified scheme of the pancreatic hydrolysis of structured lipids (top:
1,3-diacylglycerols; bottom: human milk fat replacers).
Figure 12.20 Ring opening polymerization of lactic acid dimer yielding polylactide
(reproduced from Wikipedia: Polylactic Acid).
Industrial composting
–– Most attractive method of disposal based on public acceptance
–– No recovery of material and energy
Mechanical recycling
–– Loss of product properties cannot be recovered
–– ‘‘Downcycling’’
Chemical recycling
–– Back into polymerisation
–– Collecting and sorting yet to be solved
140
Total Fossil Energy [GJ/ mto plastic] fossil fuel
120 fossil raw material
100
80
60
40
20
0
PA 6 HDPE PET PLA
Source: M. Patel, R. Narayan, in Natural Fibers, Biopolymers and
Biocomposites, A. Mohanty, M. Misra, L. Drzal, Taylor & Francis Group,
2005, Boca Raton.
Figure 12.23 Consumption of fossil resources by PLA vs. polymers from fossil
feedstock, ‘‘cradle to gate’’.
PLA – like other biopolymers – is often criticized for the need of process
energy from fossil resources. Even if this is the case at present, 1 kg of PLA
represents fewer energy equivalents than 1 kg of polymers from petrochemical
feedstock (Figure 12.23). Consequently, PLA producers can also reap financial
benefits by trading CO2 emission certificates (Figure 12.24).
If process energy is supplied by biomass, e.g. biogas, the fossil energy
required for 1 kg PLA can be cut by half, thus duplicating the benefits
from trading CO2 emission certificates. Additionally, significant potential exists
for saving process energy by improving lactic acid and polymerization
technologies.
6
[kg CO2eq/kg]
0
PA 6 HDPE PET PLA
Source: M. Patel, R. Narayan, in Natural Fibers, Biopolymers and Biocomposites,
A.Mohanty, M. Misra, L. Drzal, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005, Boca Raton.
Figure 12.24 CO2 emissions by PLA vs. polymers from fossil feedstock, ‘‘cradle to
gate’’.
Besides some smaller suppliers (Table 12.4) NatureWorks LLC is the only
producer of PLA based on a 70,000 mto a1 facility which has been brought to
full capacity over the last years and intends to increase capacity to 140,000 mto
a1 in 2009.
injection moulding;
sheet extrusion;
extrusion blow moulding;
thermoforming;
injection stretch blow moulding;
fibre spinning;
non woven spinning, spun bonding.
12.2.4.7 Perspective
PLA combines all prerequisites of sustainability with important properties of
well-established polymers. Applications have already been found in many niches
of packaging and textile products. Within those niches fast growth of con-
sumption is expected to continue depending on the availability of PLA polymer.
High research activity is dedicated to overcome typical weaknesses of PLA –
low impact strength and low heat distortion temperature – and to develop
tailor-made PLA grades in order to serve special applications. These activities
will conquer new niches for PLA and will help to increase PLA consumption at
high velocity.
Other growth factors are the availability and prices of raw oil, agricultural
products and production plants and technology.
Within the foreseeable future PLA will not become a commodity polymer
like PE, PP and PS – this is considered to be an advantage for both PLA
producers and converters. However, this could change in the long term.
References
1. OECD, The Application of Biotechnology to Industrial Sustainability,
2001.
2. Royal Belgian Academy Council of Applied Science, Industrial Bio-
technology and Sustainable Chemistry, 2004.
3. Dechema, Weibe Biotechnologie, Chancen für Deutschland, Frankfurt,
2004.
4. NREL, Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics
Utilizing Co Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and -enzymatic Hydrolysis
Current and Futuristic Scenarios, 1999.
5. T. Werpy and G. Petersen, (Ed.), Top Value Added Chemicals from
Biomass, US DOE, Oak Ridge, vol. 1, 2004.
6. OECD , Task Force Industrial Biotechnology, 2008.
7. EuropaBio, White Biotechnology: Gateway to a More Sustainable Future,
2004, 13.
8. M. Breuer, K. Ditrich, T. Habicher, B. Hauer, M. Keßeler, R. Stürmer
and T. h. Zelinski, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43(7), 788.
9. M. Kircher, Biotechnol. J., 2006, 787–794.
10. O. Zelder, W. K. Jeong, C. Klopprogge, A. Herold and H. Schröder,
WO2007/113127, 2007 (BASF).
11. R. W. Miller, Opening Degussa Science-to-Business Center Bio, Marl,
15.3.2007.
12. H. Sunkara and H. Ng, Biobased Polyols, Sarnia, 19.10.2006.
13. C. E. Nakamura and G. M. Whited, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2003, 14,
454–459.
474 Chapter 12
14. L. A. Cowart and Y. A. Hannun, Top. Curr. Gen., 2004, 6, 383.
15. L. A. Cowart and L. M. Obeid, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2007, 1771(3),
421.
16. R. C. Dickson, C. Sumanasekera, L. Chiranthani and L. Robert, Prog.
Lipid Res., 2006, 45(6), 447.
17. C. R. Harding, A. Watkinson, A. V. Rawlings and I. R. Scott, Int. J.
Cosmet. Sci., 2000, 22(1), 21.
18. W. M. Holleran, Y. Takagi and Y. Uchida, FEBS Lett., 2006, 580(23),
5456.
19. K. De Paepe, D. Roseeuw and V. Rogiers, J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol.
Venereol., 2002, 16(6), 587–94.
20. M. Kucharekova, J. Schalkwijk, P. C. M. Van De Kerkhof and
P. G. M. Van De Valk, Contact Dermatitis, 2002, 46(6), 331–338.
21. V. Rawlings, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 2003, 25(1/2), 63–95.
22. U. Schick, U. Wollenweber, K. Korevaar and A. V. Rawlings, Fragrance
Journal, 2004, 32(11), 17–22.
23. U. Wollenweber, K. Korevaar, A. V. Rawlings and U. Schick, SOFW
Journal, 2004, 130(9), 12–14, 16–18.
24. D. J. Bibel, R. Aly and H. R. Shinefield, J. Invest. Dermatol., 1992, 98(3),
269–273.
25. T. Pavicic, U. Wollenweber, M. Farwick and H. C. Korting, Int. J.
Cosmet. Sci., 2007, 29(3), 181–190.
26. L. J. Wickerham and F. H. Stodola, J. Bac., 1960, 80, 484.
27. M. L. Greene, T. Kaneshiro and J. H. Law, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1965,
98(3), 582.
28. Y. Barenholz, N. Gadot, E. Valk and S. Gatt, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
1973, 306(2), 341.
29. H. G. Maister, S. P. Rogovin, F. H. Stodola and L. J. Wickerham, Appl.
Microbiol., 1962, 10, 401.
30. D. Boergel, Metadata Internet Doc. [Ger. Diss.], 2007, (D0313-3).
31. J. H. Bae, J. H. Sohn, C. S. Park, J. S. Rhee and E. S. Choi, Appl. Env.
Microbiol., 2003, 69(2), 812.
32. W. Stoffel, G. Sticht and K. D. Le, Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift fuer Phy-
siologische Chemie, 1968.
33. J. H. Bae, J. H. Sohn, C. S. Park, J. S. Rhee and E. S. Choi, Yeast, 2004,
21(5), 437.
34. Y. Barenholz, I. Edelman and S. Gatt, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1971,
248(3), 458.
35. Y. Barenholz and S. Gatt, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 1969, 35(5),
676.
36. Y. Barenholz and S. Gatt, J. Biol. Chem., 1972, 247(21), 6827.
37. B. Kaufman, S. Basu and S. Roseman, J. Biol. Chem., 1971, 246(13),
4264.
38. S. Schaffer, M. A. Van den Berg, D. Boergel and T. Hueller, WO2007/
131720, 2007 (Evonik Degussa).
White Biotechnology 475
39. M. A. Van den Berg and S. Schaffer, WO2006/048458, 2005
(Cosmoferm).
40. F. C. Adetuyi, A. Isogai, D. Di Giorgio, A. Ballio and J. Y. Takemoto,
FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1995.
41. M. Ikeda, in Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, ed.
T. Scheper, R. Faurie and J. Thommel, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New
York, 2003, vol. 79, pp. 1–35.
42. Wacker Chemie AG, Press release 20, 23.06.2008.
43. K. Sano and K. Mitsugi, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1978, 42, 2315–2321.
44. K. Sano, C. Eguchi, N. Yasuda and K. Mitsugi, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1979,
43, 2373–2374.
45. C. Winterhalter, in Biotechnologie für Einsteiger, ed. R. Renneberg,
Elsevier GmbH, München, 2006, p. 92.
46. G. V. Stauffer, in Escherichia coli and Salomnella typhimurium: Cellular
and Molecular Biology, ed. F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III,
J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, et al., ASM Press,
Washington, 1996.
47. N. M. Kredich, in Escherichia coli and Salomnella typhimurium: Cellular
and Molecular Biology, ed. F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingra-
ham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, et al., ASM Press,
Washington, 1996.
48. T. H. P. Maier, Nat. Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 422–427.
49. M. Flavin and C. Slaughter, Biochemistry, 1965, 4, 1370–1375.
50. D. Denk and A. Böck, J. Gen. Microbiol., 1987, 133, 515–525.
51. P. Datta, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1967, 58, 635–641.
52. C. L. Harris, J. Bacteriol., 1981, 145, 1031–1035.
53. M. A. Sørensen and S. Pedersen, J. Bacteriol., 1991, 173, 5244–5246.
54. J. M. Delaney, D. Ang and C. Georgopoulos, J. Bacteriol., 1992, 174,
1240–1247.
55. T. Maier and R. Flinspach, EP1496111, 2004 (Consortium für elek-
trochemische Industrie).
56. J. K. Bell, P. J. Pease, J. E. Bell, G. A. Grant and L. J. Banaszak, Eur. J.
Biochem., 2002, 269, 4176–4184.
57. R. Netzer, R. Faurie, P. Peters-Wendisch, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm,
R. Faurie and B. Klaßen, DE10231297, 2002 (Forschungszentrum Jülich/
Amino GmbH).
58. W. Leinfelder and P. Heinrich, EP0858510, 1995 (Consortium für elektro-
chemische Industrie).
59. M. Wada and H. Takagi, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2006, 73, 48–54.
60. T. Daßler, T. Maier, C. Winterhalter and A. Böck, Mol. Microbiol., 2000,
36, 1101–1112.
61. I. Franke, A. Resch, T. Dabler, T. Maier and A. Böck, J. Bacteriol, 2003,
185, 1161–1166.
62. M. S. Pittman, H. Corker, G. Wu, M. B. Binet, A. J. G. Moir and
R. K. Poole, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277, 49841–49849.
476 Chapter 12
63. S. Yamada, N. Awano, K. Inubushi, E. Maeda, S. Nakamori, K. Nishino,
A. Yamaguchi and H. Takagi, Appl. Environm. Microbiol., 2006, 72,
4735–4742.
64. N. Awano, M. Wada, H. Mori, S. Nakamori and H. Takagi, Appl.
Environm. Microbiol., 2005, 71, 4149–4152.
65. Cyberlipid Centre, www.cyberlipid.org/index.htm (retrieved 24.07.
2008).
66. Lipid Library, www.lipidlibrary.co.uk/index.html (retrieved 24.07.2008).
67. F. D. Gunstone and B. G. Herslöf, Lipid Glossary 2, The Oily Press,
Bridgwater, 2000, accessible via www.pjbarnes.co.uk/op/lg2pdf.htm
(retrieved 24.07.2008).
68. Seed oil fatty acids databank; http://sofa.bfel.de/ (retrieved 24.07.2008);
details in K. Aitzetmüller, B. Mattäus and H. Friedrich, Eur. J. Lipid Sci.
Technol., 2003, 105, 92.
69. Association of Manufacturers and Formulators of Enzyme Products,
accessible via http://www.amfep.org/index.html (retrieved 24.07.2008).
70. U. T. Bornscheuer, (Ed.), Enzymes in Lipid Modification, Wiley VCH,
Weinheim, 2000.
71. D. G. Hayes, JAOCS, 2004, 81, 1077.
72. F. Hasan, A. Shah and A. Hameed, Enz. Microb. Technol., 2006, 39, 235.
73. P. Villeneuve, Biotech. Advances, 2007, 25, 515.
74. R. A. Gross, A. Kumar and B. Kalra, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 2097.
75. H. Uyama and S. Kobayashi, Adv. Polym. Sci., 2006, 194, 133.
76. M. Schmidt and U. T. Bornscheuer, Biomol. Eng., 2005, 22, 51.
77. P. Lorenz, K. Liebeton, F. Niehaus and J. Eck, Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2002,
13, 572.
78. K.-E. Jaeger and T. Eggert, Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2004, 15, 305.
79. M. Bertram, P. Hildebrandt, D. P. Weiner, J. S. Patel, F. Bartnek,
T. S. Hitchman and U.-T. Bornscheuer, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 2008,
1, 47.
80. L. Dufosse, P. Galaup, A. Yaron, S. M. Arad, P. Blanc, K. N. C. Murthy
and G. A. Ravishankar, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2005, 16, 389.
81. M. A. Borowitzka, J. Biotech., 1999, 70, 313.
82. O. Thum, Inform, 2005, 16, 186.
83. S. Mukherjee, P. Das and R. Sen, TIBS, 2006, 24, 509.
84. T. Pavicic, U. Wollenweber, M. Farwick and H. C. Korting, Int. J.
Cosmet. Sci., 2007, 29, 181.
85. H. L. Holland, in Lipid Biotechnology, ed. T. M. Kuo and H. W. Gardner,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, p. 575.
86. J. Schrader, M. M. W. Etschmann, D. Sell, J.-M. Hilmer and J. Raben-
horst, Biotechnol. Lett., 2004, 26, 436.
87. M. Aguedo, M. H. Ly, I. Belo, J. A. Teixeiro, J.-M. Belin and Y. Wache,
Food Technol. Biotechnol., 2004, 42, 327.
88. K. Kroha, Inform, 2004, 15, 568.
89. A. Weiss, in Modern Biooxidation, ed. R. D. Schmid and V. L. Urlacher,
Wiley VCH, Weinheim, 2007, p. 193.
White Biotechnology 477
90. M. J. Haas, G. J. Piazza and T. A. Foglia, in Lipid Biotechnology,
ed. T. M. Kuo and H. W. Gardner, Marcel Dekker, New York,
2002, p. 587.
91. Y. Shimada, T. Nagao and Y. Watanabe, in Handbook of Industrial
Biocatalysis, ed., C. T. Hou, CRC press, Boca Raton, 2005, Chap. 8.
92. D. Hekmat, R. Bauer and J. Fricke, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 2003, 26,
109.
93. S. Hirschmann, K. Baganz, I. Koschik and K.-D. Vorlop, Land-
bauforschung Völkenrode, 2005, 55, 261.
94. C. Ratledge, in Industrial Applications of Single Cell Oils, ed. D. J. Kyle
and C. Ratledge, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1992, p. 1.
95. C. Ratledge, TIBTECH, 1993, 11, 278.
96. J. P. Wynn and C. Ratledge, in Long Chain Omega-3 Specialty Oils, ed.
H. Breivik, The Oily Press, Bridgwater, 2007, p. 43.
97. C. Ratledge, Biochimie, 2004, 86, 807.
98. O. P. Ward and A. Singh, Process Biochem., 2005, 40, 3627.
99. Y. Shinmen, S. Shimizu, K. Akimoto, H. Kawashima and H. Yamada,
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1989, 31, 11.
100. N. Totani, K. Someya and K. Oba, in Industrial Applications of Single
Cell Oils, ed. D. J. Kyle and C. Ratledge, AOCS Press, Champaign,
Illinois, 1992, p. 52.
101. S. Takeno, A. Sakuranadi, A. Tomi, M. Inohara-Ochiai, H. Kawashima
and S. Shimizu, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2005, 100, 617.
102. J.-P. Berge and G. Barnathan, Adv. Biochem Eng./Biotechnol., 2005, 96,
49.
103. X. Xu, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Biotechnol., 2000, 102, 287.
104. C. C. Akoh, in Food Lipids, ed. C. C. Akoh and D. B. Min, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 2002, p. 877.
105. X. Xu, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Biotechnol., 2003, 105, 289.
106. M. Mu and T. Porsgaard, Prog. Lipid Res., 2005, 44, 430.
107. R. G. Jensen, in Structured and Modified Lipids, ed. F. D. Gunstone,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, p. 455.
108. C. C. Akoh and X. Xu, in Lipid Biotechnology, ed. T. M. Kuo and
H. W. Gardner, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, p. 461.
109. Y. Katsuragi, T. Yasukawa, N. Matsuo, B. D. Flickinger, I. Tokimitsu
and M. G. Matlock, (Ed.), Diacylglycerol Oil, AOCS Press, Champaign,
Illinois, 2004.
110. H. Kawashima, H. Takase, K. Yasunaga, Y. Wakaki, Y. Katsuragi,
K. Mori, T. Yamaguchi, T. Hase, N. Matsuo, T. Yasukawa, I. Tokimitsu
and W. Koyama, J. Am. Diet. Ass., 2008, 108, 57.
111. T. Watanabe, H. Yamaguchi, N. Yamada and I. Lee, in Diacylglycerol
Oil, ed. Y. Katsuragi, T. Yasukawa, N. Matsuo, B. D. Flickinger,
I. Tokimitsu and M. G. Matlock, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 2004,
p. 253.
112. G. G. Haraldsson, B. Ö. Gudmundsson and Ö. Almarsson, Tetrahedron,
1995, 51, 941.
478 Chapter 12
113. J. A. Arcos, C. Otero and C. G. Hill, Biotech. Lett., 1998, 20, 617.
114. P. Borg, M. Girardin, B. Rovel and D. Barth, Biotech. Lett., 2000, 22,
777.
115. M. W. Christensen, L. Andersen, O. Kirk and H. C. Holm, Lipid Tech-
nology Newsletter, 2001, 33.
116. M. Ledoux, P. Juaneda and J.-L. Sebedio, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Biotechnol.,
2007, 109, 891.
Subject Index