World Seed Market Developments and Strategy-Wageningen University and Research 309403
World Seed Market Developments and Strategy-Wageningen University and Research 309403
1994
LEI - DLO Rabobank Nederland Ministry of Agriculture,
Agribusiness Research Nature Management and
Fisheries
A.F. van Gaasbeek A.M.A. Heijbroek P. Vaandrager
G.J. Boers
NLG 75-/US $40 -
Research and analysis were carried out by the Agricultural Economic Institute (LEI-
DLO) in cooperation with Rabobank and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature
Management and Fisheries.
We are grateful for the active contribution of the following organisations in compi-
ling this report:
- Wageningen University of Agriculture, Department of Management Studies,
Wageningen;
- Netherlands Potato Consultative Institute (NIVAA), The Hague;
- Commodity Board for grains, seeds and pulses, The Hague;
- Dutch Seed Trade Association (NVZP), Zeist;
- Dutch Seed Potatoes Federation, (NFP) The Hague;
- General Netherlands Inspection Service for Agricultural Seeds and Seed Potatoes
(NAK), Ede
Contents
4 World trade 21
4.1 Export 21
4.2 Import 25
4.3 Summary and outlook 26
5 International structure 27
5.1 The United States 27
5.2 France 30
5.3 The Netherlands 31
5.4 Central and Eastern Europe 36
5.5 Summary and outlook 36
Source: FAO
Over 90% of rice acreage is to be pearance of feed potato production. An
found in Asia, the major producer coun- all-time low was reached in 1989, with
tries being China, India, Indonesia, an acreage of 1.4 million hectares. The
Bangladesh and Thailand. In Asia, increase in potato acreage in 1991 was
acreage increased from 122million hec- largely the effect of the unification of
tares in 1970 to 132 million hectares in Germany. In France, Germany and the
1990. At present world acreage appears Netherlands acreage has increased since
to be stabilising. 1990. Acreage declined in Spain, Italy
and Portugal. The recent extension of
Maize (corn) acreage in Asia shows potato acreage in the EU reflects not
a steady increase from 31 million hecta- only relatively favourable prices in the
res in 1970 to at least 40 million hecta- period 1989-1991 but also the substan-
res in 1990, and therefore accounts for tial drop in the grain price, which
most of the world growth. Since 1990 caused a number of arable farmers to
acreage has stabilised. In North and move over to 'free' products, such as
Central America, acreage increased potatoes.
from 33 million to 39.2 million hectares
in the same period, to recover to 1980 Between 1980 and 1992 the world
levels. The United States holds a 75% acreage of pulses increased by 6% to 67
share. When production is measured in million hectares. Asia is the major pro-
tons, however, North and Central ducer of pulse crops, accounting for
America produce twice as much as 51% of the world acreage. At the start
Asia. Maize acreage in the EU has been of the 1980s pulse production and
on the increase again in recent years and acreage increased significantly in the
totalled 3.7 million hectares in 1992 - EU, a trend which is now being follo-
just 3% of world acreage. wed in world production as a whole.
France accounts for much of this in-
The world acreage of root and tuber crease, and production is destined pri-
crops increased by 3% between 1980 marily for animal fodder. The increase
and 1992, to 48 million hectares. came about as a result of EU policy to
Potatoes and cassava are responsible for support these crops. Since 1990 the
38% and 33% respectively. World pulse acreage in Europe has tailed off
acreage of potatoes declined between slightly.
1981 and 1992 by 6% to 18million hec-
tares. Potato acreage in the EU has been Among oilseeds, soybeans are by
halved in the last 20 years, falling from far the most significant on a world
3 million to 1.6 million hectares in scale. Over the last 10 years the world
1992. The two main contributory fac- acreage of soybeans has increased by
tors were a change in consumption 10% to 54 million hectares. It had risen
patterns within the EU and the disap- steeply to 58 million hectares in 1989,
Source: FAO
but then fell back to 54 million hectares. Table 2.2 Productivity of grain,
Major producers are the United States, rice and maize in 1992
Brazil. China and Argentina. Produc- (tons/hectare)
tion in these countries has risen in re- Grain Rice Maize
sponse to the increase in international
demand, particularly from the EU.
World 2.6 3.6 4.0
Asia 2.5 3.7 3.3
In the EU rapeseed and sunflowers
Africa 1.6 1.9 1.3
are the major oilseeds, with an acreage
USA 2.7 6.4 6.8
of 2.4 and 2.7 million hectares respecti-
South America 2.0 2.6 2.5
vely. The increase in production of
Europe 4.5 5.6 4.7
these crops in Europe is a result both of
Oceania 1.7 8.2 5.1
an increased demand for vegetable oils
CIS 2.0 4.4 2.0
and the EU agricultural policy.
Source: FAO
In 1992 we find approximately half
of the world's sugar-beet acreage in ding. In Asia, as a result of the Green
Europe. Sugar-beet is influenced revolution and the use of much impro-
strongly by EU agricultural policy, ved wheat and rice varieties, yield per
which includes aproduction quota anda hectare has increased significantly in
system of guaranteed prices. Between the last ten years. Population growth,
1990 and 1992, EU acreage went down increased consumption and restricted
by 6c/c. largely due to the decrease in acreage in Asia and South America
acreage in Germany following unifica- point to the need for further improve-
tion. ments in production per hectare, and
hence for new varieties and new tech-
The demand for grass seeds comes nology.
from two specialist market sectors: fod-
der grass and grass for recreational use. In developed countries the producti-
The market for fodder grass is stagna- vity of certain crops is increasing. In
ting. Following the introduction of milk addition to this aim for breeding seed
quotas and the increase in cattle per companies increasingly include the in-
hectare, grassland acreage in the EU ternal and external quality of varieties
has declined by 3% over the last 10 and resistance in their research pro-
years, to stand at 48.4 million hectares; grammes.
maize for silage has also replaced the
use of grass in silage. Demand for grass 2.3 Consumer trends
seed is also dependent on weather con- World consumption of grain and
ditions, as grassland frequently requires vegetable oils measured in kilograms
reseeding after frost or drought. The per capita continues to rise; consump-
market for recreational use is reasona- tion of sugar and confectionary is stabi-
bly stable now. but cyclically sensitive. lising but shows a shift towards confec-
Demand is affected by factors which in- tionary: the consumption of sweets is 2
clude government expenditure on rec- to 3 times as high in developed coun-
reation facilities and private expendi- tries as in Asia and Africa but is decli-
ture on gardening. ning slightly in per capita terms.
Consumption of root and tuber crops is
2.2 Productivity falling worldwide.
The improvement of plant varieties,
along with the use of natural or artificial In developed countries, the
fertilizer and pesticide, plays an impor- consumption per capita of all major ar-
tant role in the increase of crop yields. able crops is either levelling off or fal-
In the US and EU wheat productivity ling, with the exception of vegetable
has increased by an average 1%per year oils. General prosperity has ensured
for many years, half of which is ac- that maximum food consumption has
counted for by the improved seed been reached, in terms of both kilo-
quality. Maize yield increases have grams and calorie intake; public health
largely been achieved through bree- departments suggest that it has, in fact,
been exceeded. As prosperity increases 2.5 Industrial applications
still further, it stimulates the consump- The industrial non-food use of
tion of luxury and exotic vegetables and arable products is generally low. Less
fruit, pushing aside such traditional than 2% of total world grain production
staples as potatoes and grain products. is processed. In North and Central
The market in this part of the world is America this figure stands at 3.5%, and
consequently showing clear signs of is on the increase. In Brazil alcohol for
saturation, especially as population fuel is produced from sugar on a large
growth has slowed. scale. In the EU starch is extracted from
potatoes and maize for raw materials.
In developing countries consump-
tion per capita of all categories is on the In the US and the EU extensive re-
increase, with the exception of root and search is being carried out into new in-
tuber crops. Population growth is high, dustrial uses for arable products.
leading to growth in total consumption Attention isfocused particularly on bio-
of arable products. Asia in particular is plastics, paper, cardboard and energy.
significant: in both quantity and rate of However, high production costs
growth, it is the most important con- involved in agricultural raw materials,
sumer; it has a huge, growing popula- uncertainty concerning delivery and
tion and some regions show significant fluctuating quality and price prevent
economic growth. In countries which arable products becoming a major
are developing rapidly, the basic food source of industrial raw materials.
package is broadening with a shift
towards wheat (alongside traditional Some analysts expect EU non-food
rice), vegetables, fruit and meat. oilcrops for the production of bio-ethe-
nol and bio-diesel to increase further
World consumption of foodstuffs is from 200,000 hectares in 1993 to
expected to increase by 1.6% a year up 700,000 hectares in a few years time.
to the year 2000. In developing coun- This would represent approximately
tries, an increase in consumption of 3% 14% of EU oilseed production.
a year is anticipated.
2.6 Agricultural policy
2.4 Animal consumption Almost all countries which are
Animal consumption is an impor- major arable crop producers use some
tant factor in the demand for arable form of protection or support for their
products. In Europe, North and Central own arable sector.
America and the CIS especially, most
grain products are sold for cattle fodder. EU
A compound feed industry exists in the EU agricultural policy focuses pri-
US and the EU; heavy use is made of marily on the development of the agri-
imported grain substitutes such as cultural sector, and has a strong tend-
tapioca, corn, gluten and soya meal to ency to shield the internal market from
mix compound feeds in northwest world market influences. Falling prices
Europe. Alterations to European agri- and sales problems in the international
cultural policy have led to a fall in grain market have, however, increased the
prices. Lower grain prices may lead to costs of the policy and given rise to a
more grain being sold as cattle feed in number of policy changes. The
the EU, at the expense of imported grain MacSharry policy provides for a drastic
substitutes. reduction in guaranteed prices and
overproduction by only offering income
On a world scale, animal consump- compensation to large farmers if they
tion of arable crops is rising. In the EU, allow 15% of their acreage currently de-
however, demand is stagnating as live- voted to grain, protein-containing crops
stock levels fall in the face of manure and oilseeds to lie fallow; grain pro-
problems, environmental pressure and duction in the EU will decrease, as will
the milk quota. acreages for sugar-beet, oilseed, fodder
crops and rape. The fodder pea market
will remain stable.
EU estimates for 1993 show an differences can be seen from region to
average fallow rate on agricultural land region. The acreage of oil crops is still
of 8%. Percentages vary from country rising. The acreage of arable crops is
to country because of differences in determined by both government policy
scale of farming. In the United and the demand for end products.
Kingdom and France, fallow percen- Demand for propagating material is in-
tages stood at an estimated 14% and creasingly determined by the factor of
11% respectively in 1993; in Germany quality, whereby consumer demand is
and the Netherlands these are estimated passed on to suppliers of propagating
at 5% and 2%.This will have short-term material via retailers, wholesalers, pro-
consequences for the agricultural seed cessors and farmers.
sector, and a 5% reduction in grain seed
is anticipated. In Southeast Asia acreage is in-
creasing only slightly, for lack of suita-
Lower sales prices will also force ble farming land. Required increases in
farmers to attempt to reduce production production will have to be achieved pri-
costs by decreasing the intensity of marily through higher productivity.
grain production. The lower grain
prices resulting from the MacSharry World consumption of grain and
policy will therefore lead to lower grain vegetable oils (in kilograms per capita)
seed prices. In order to reduce cultiva- continues to grow; consumption of
tion costs, European farmers are in- sugars is stabilising, with a shift from
creasingly propagating seed of wheat, natural sugars to sweeteners. Consump-
barley, oats, rape seed and pulses for tion of root and tuber crops is falling. In
themselves from their own crops. developed countries, the general trend
for arable crops is towards falling or
The common agricultural policy stabilising per capita consumption, with
(CAP) also affects 'free' crops. the exception of vegetable oils. Popula-
Potatoes are a good example of this, tion growth is slow. The market in de-
facing 'push' side effects from the veloped countries is therefore unlikely
CAP. Restrictions on dairy, wheat and to increase.
sugar-beet have resulted in an increase
in potato production. Potato prices have In Asia. Africa and South America
fallen considerably as supply exceeds consumption of all major arable crops is
demand for both seed potatoes and po- growing, with the exception of root and
tatoes for consumption. tuber crops. The high rate of population
growth in these regions, together with
The United States growing consumption, will of course
US agricultural policy has also af- cause demand for arable products to rise
fected cultivation acreages. Farmers in sharply.
the US and Canada are supported to the
same extent as those in the EU. In order The agricultural sector increasingly
to limit production, the United States operates as abuyers' market rather than
applies fallow regulations which vary a sellers' market. Each link in the chain
according to the product and the fore- raises its own quality standards in an at-
cast production level. A US grain pro- tempt to provide the increasingly dis-
ducer only qualifies for subsidy if he cerning consumer with a high quality
complies with the acreage restrictions product. The market is gradually divi-
laid down by the government. The US is ding into market segments each with its
also planning a reduction in agricultural own specific quality standards. Mass
subsidies in order to reduce the federal produced goods are being replaced by
deficit. products with higher added value or in-
novative images, with repercussions for
2.7 Summary and outlook the choice of propagating material.
Total demand for agricultural seed Apart from phytosanitary standards,
is determined in part by the world buyers are becoming increasingly con-
acreage of arable crops. In most product cerned about the cultivation methods
groups, acreage is stabilising although employed, and are looking for a greater
choice of varieties. The increase in inte- Under current market conditions it will
grated and biological cultivation of be difficult to demand higher prices for
arable crops will result in a limited de- new high-quality varieties.
mand for biologically cultivated seed
for the time being.
Table 3.2 Total world consumption of agricultural seed, by crop (million tons)
US 4 5 2 1 ^ ^ Ä |
| ^ ^ ^ Finland77
Switzerland60 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H
Canada357 f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ B y \ Japan2780
Austria357 MwHMM*i^S^
V v^J ^ ^ ^ Australia196
/ Sweden69
\
EU5 8 0 0 ^ ^
France 1600
Italy 600
UK470
Table 3.8 Financial position of categories of seed companies (average 1990- 92)
equity gross net days
% balance margin profit stock
total %turnover %turnover
600
500
III. •
400
300
200
100
Source:EXM1S,USDA
Maize 209 16 61 4
Wheat 38 3 98 7
Other grains 48 4 117 8
Pulses 69 5 42 3
Sugar-beet seed 295 23 25 2
Oilseeds 67 5 30 2
Grasses 203 16 166 12
Seed potatoes 361 28 836 61
Total 1.290 100 1.376 100
Source:EXMIS
Figure 5.1 Estimated market value of agricultural seed in the United States
($ million)
Corn 1600
Soja 700
Wheat 230
Sorghum 53 Forage 450
Table 5.2 Total seed consumption of major crops in the United States
(1,000 tons)
lion of which is accounted for by home areas, around 90% of seed potato requi-
gardening and $500 million by the pro- rements are purchased.
fessional market.
In the last twenty years, there has
The use of commercial seed differs been a fall in the number of varieties
significantly from state to state. In used for each crop in the United States.
Kansas, the state with the highest win- The need to improve productivity has
ter wheal acreage, only 27% of seed re- stimulated the rapid spread of new, ge-
quirements are met by purchase, whilst netically uniform varieties. Modern
in the state with the lowest winter wheat varieties are also more suited to mecha-
acreage, 70% of seed requirements are nical harvesting, enabling extensive
purchased. In Colorado, only 4 5 % of agricultural production.
seed potato requirements were bought
in, the lowest percentage in the United The cost of seed makes up only a
States. In the largest potato production small fraction (approximately 3%) of
total production costs incurred by
Table 5.3 Use of commercial seed American farming companies. Expen-
in the US (%) diture on agricultural seed in the United
States measured $3 billion in 1991. The
Winter wheat 36%
cost of seed varies considerably from
Seed potatoes 84% crop to crop. The percentage of variable
Soya 77% cost per crop accounted for by seed is as
Corn, sorghum, beans, follows: rice 8%, sorghum 7%, wheat
grasses, sugar-beet > 95% 11%. corn 17% and soya 2 1 % .
The breeding of agricultural crops is sing, service and regional crop demon-
carried out in both private seed compa- stration fields.
nies and the public sector. Seed compa-
nies focus on the breeding of hybrid Trade
varieties, whilst public research bodies For seed companies in the United
breed non-hybrid varieties, including States, the sale of corn seed abroad
wheat. Those varieties developed by forms only a relatively small part of the
public bodies (universities, USDA and total sales (10-30%), though it is in-
Agricultural Research Services) are creasing. Most of their production is
often put on the market by private seed sold on the huge domestic market.
companies. As a result of far-reaching Sixty-five per cent of US corn exports
cuts imposed by both federal and state go to the EU, with Italy, France and the
governments, basic and applied re- Netherlands as the largest markets.
search into seed breeding carried out by Exports to Italy tripled between 1988
universities and institutes has decreased and 1992 to $52 million, 98% of which
drastically. Private seed companies consisting of corn hybrids. After an ini-
work in close cooperation with univer- tial fall from $24 million in 1990 to $3.5
sities in the area of fundamental re- million in 1991/92, US exports to for-
search. mer Comecon nations recovered to $29
million in 1992/93.Exports to the value
At present in the United States there of $27 million went to the Ukraine.
are almost 600 companies involved in Exports to central Europe have all but
breeding. Of these, more than 200 are ceased as American companies nowa-
active in the production, sale and distri- days cultivate corn seed locally them-
bution of corn seed. Most of these com- selves. In 1992/93, wheat seed made up
panies sell seed for other crops along- 34% of total US agricultural seed ex-
side their corn seed range. There is a ports; in value terms however it made
wide diversity in the type of company to uponly 10%,namely $50 million. Saudi
be found in the United States. Arabia is the largest sales market, ac-
Companies operating nationally and/or counting for 95%, which makes the
internationally distribute their seed wheat seed export rather vulnerable.
throughout America, and some have
subsidiaries orjoint ventures in Europe, The value of agricultural seed ex-
South America and Asia. The regional, ports to the EU in the 1992/93 season
medium-sized seed companies focus on measured $223 million. Of this, corn
one or more states. The hundreds of hybrids took a 46% share. The most im-
local seed companies sell a wide assort- portant sales markets for grass seed are
ment within a small geographical area. Japan, Canada and Mexico.
Small local companies are often family
businesses, focused primarily on provi- In the 1992/93 season the United
ding extra service. States imported agricultural seed to the
value of $98 million, most of this being
Given the large distances involved, made up of grasses, pulses and corn.
dealers are very important in the USA. Canada is the largest supplier. Imports
A decline in the number of traditional of agricultural seeds from the European
dealers with little added value may be
expected as a result of the declining Figure 5.2 US agricultural seed
number of traditional farmers, while exports ($ million)
dealers that support their customers
1986/87 1992/93
with information, through which they
can improve their yields will have
Wheat 18 50
better opportunities. At the same time
Corn 59 190
large farmers may chose to buy directly
Sorghum 18 31
from the seed company. Highly-
developed distribution networks are Pulses 34 39
forming for corn, and, increasingly, for Oilseeds 27 38
soya. What is more, the sale of these Grasses, other forag es 82 122
two crops is well supported by adverti- Total 238 470
Source: USDA
tries the government has a direct rally runs smoothly in the United
relationship with seed companies. The Kingdom.
location of seed company headquarters
is partly determined by the presence of Dutch government policy highlights
a number of specific factors, including three major areas: knowledge infra-
highly qualified labour and basic re- structure, education and regulation.
search, and secondary conditions such Partly thanks to the high standard of re-
as distribution, financial infrastructure, search and university education, Dutch
taxation and the regulatory environ- agricultural seed companies have ma-
ment. The seed industry is an extremely naged to establish a strong position in
know-how intensive industry, highly techniques for breeding and propaga-
dependent on the quality of its person- ting.
nel. In this area particularly the govern-
ment is able to exercise influence on the The Dutch government is currently
establishment or retention of the seed working to expand measures to stimu-
industry. It can create an attractive late the sector through fiscal R&D con-
climate through the provision of educa- cessions in order to reduce R&D costs
tion and research opportunities, thereby within companies. At present around
ensuring the availability of appropriate $53 million a year is being invested in
labour and research. While government publicly financed research into agricul-
subsidies are generally on the decrease, tural biotechnology. This is comparable
involvement is increasing through envi- to the contributions made by the
ronmental policy, quality control, and governments of the United Kingdom
the protection of intellectual property. and Japan into plant biotechnology re-
search.
Subsidies
Within the EU, policy on subsidies Environment policy
is gradually being harmonized. The EU The methods by which various na-
itself also grants subsidies, to stimulate tional governments attempt to reduce
the development of innovative plant environmental effects varies from
biotechnology and to encourage the country to country. In the United States
cross-border cooperation of companies regulations range from subsidies for
and research bodies. crop tests to imposing extra tax on fer-
tilizers. In the US a new law proposal is
The national governments of the under discussion which will result in
United States, France and Japan attach further restrictions on the use of pesti-
great value to the development of bio- cides. The health of farmers and consu-
technology. The American government mers is central and is given a higher
has formulated liberal policy concer- value than agricultural needs.
ning the introduction of biotechnologi-
cal products onto the market. In 1992 EU member states have set up va-
government expenditure on agricultural rious programmes to restrict the use of
technology measured $190.5 million. In fertilizers and chemical pesticides.
France, larger companies are given par- There are guidelines which apply to the
ticular support. A number of govern- EU as a whole concerning the concen-
ment institutes are engaged in funda- tration of fertilizers and pesticides in
mental and applied research. The ground water and surface water, with
German government, through its which all member countries have to
'Biotechnology 2000' research pro- comply by the year 2000. The way in
gramme, provides considerable finan- which the policy is implemented is left
cial support to the development of bio- to the individual member states.
technological techniques in the bree-
ding of plants. In the United Kingdom, The Dutch government has a crop
investment in agricultural technology protection plan to be implemented over
measures around $53 million. Most re- a number of years which aims to halve
search is carried out in the public the use of chemical crop protection by
sector. The transfer of biotechnological the year 2000. Seed companies contri-
knowledge to private companies gene- bute to this through the development of
resistant varieties and seed coating (wheat, barley, oats) and of potatoes,
treatments. cabbages and pulses, for which the
breeder receives no reimbursement. In
Quality policy the revised UPOV agreement (1991) it
Quality research in breeding focu- is left to individual members to decide
ses on the development of resistance, to what extent they make room for far-
vitality and purity. Phytosanitary mers' privilege in national law.
quality is also of importance.
Rising R&D costs in breeding make
New varieties are tested for quality it necessary to improve the legal protec-
before being released onto the European tion of propagating material. Without
market. At the EU level quality is regu- adequate protection of nursery products
lated through commercial guidelines, it is virtually impossible for private
setting standards for the product before companies to invest in costly biotech-
it can be sold. Crop varieties traded nological research. Governments recog-
within Europe have to be checked for nise the social importance of this
registration and plant breeders rights, question. In Europe and the United
and for value for cultivation and use States, legal protection of varieties has
(vcu). The purpose of vcu standards is led to the stimulation of breeding acti-
to provide users with information about vities by private seed companies, as a
the features of new varieties, and field result of which the quality of seed has
cultivation tests are aprerequisite to ap- greatly improved.
pearing on the list of varieties. By ma-
king such tests compulsory, 2or 3 years As part of the internal market 1992,
is added to the time it takes for a new the European Community is formula-
variety to appear on the market. This is ting community plant breeders rights.
an important barrier in the current This means that if a breeder applies for,
market climate in which ever higher and is granted, breeders rights in one
production standards have tobe met. On member state, he is automatically enti-
the other hand, once a product has been tled to breeders rights protection in all
approved in one country, it can be 12 member states. In general the UPOV
released onto the market throughout the recommendations have been followed.
EU. The implementation of this regula- At the end of 1993, the EU agricultural
tion has not yet been fully harmonised, council reached political agreement
and arrival of the internal market within (with the exception of Denmark) con-
the EU has not yet, in the case of seed cerning the agricultural aspects of com-
potatoes, led to a complete removal of munity plant breeders rights, including
trade barriers. the farmers' privilege.
In the United States there is no na- Under the agreements, farmers' pri-
tional list of varieties for agricultural vilege is rooted in the regulations. This
seed, and no tests are carried out on vcu. exception to the principle of plant bree-
ders rights effectively allows farmers to
Intellectual property use legally protected varieties which
In many countries, new varieties are they themselves have harvested for
protected by national law, often based their own cultivation in the following
on the 1961 UPOV Agreement (Union season without having to obtain permis-
Internationale pour la Protection des sion from the breeder. This allowance
Obtentions Vegetables). The updated applies to a number of fodder crops,
version of this agreement, dated 1991, certain grains, potatoes and a few oil
provides for increased plant breeders crops and fibre plants.
rights.
To be able to exercise farmers' pri-
This change in the law has given vilege, farmers have to pay a token sum
rise to much discussion, centring on far- to the breeder, which is considerably
mers' privilege. Considerable quanti- less than the amount normally charged
ties of seed are retained by farmers, par- for licences.
ticularly from harvests of certain grains