3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
(/)
Search...
Subscribe (https://www.materialsperformance.com/subscribe)
Open Navigation
Home (/home) / Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
Chemical Treatment (/topics/chemical-treatment)
Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom
Corrosion Control
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 1/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
By Pavan K. Shukla, Len J. Krissa, Jerry DeWitt, Laurie Perry on 5/4/2020 1:18 PM
Soil-side corrosion of aboveground storage tank (AST) bottoms is a major challenge. ASTs
typically include active cathodic protection (CP) systems to mitigate this corrosion.
FACEBOOK TWITTER LINKEDIN EMAIL
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 2/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
study was recently completed by the Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) to determine corrosion mitigation performance
A
of vapor corrosion inhibitors (VCIs) for the soil-side of aboveground storage tank (AST) bottom plates. PRCI is a
nonpro t research organization that is comprised of energy pipeline operating and service companies located
worldwide. The study details are published in a report.1 This article provides a summary of the study.
Soil-side corrosion of the bottom plates of ASTs is a major concern and maintenance issue. ASTs are typically
supported by concrete ring walls or sometimes by compacted dense gravel aggregate. The tank bottoms are typically
bare steel and supported by a sand pad of varying thickness. The sand is expected to be in accordance with API 6512 or operator-
developed standards. In North America, most ASTs include active cathodic protection (CP) systems to protect the tank bottoms.
Review of industry experience and literature indicated that soil-side corrosion could occur at elevated rates and CP alone may be
insuf cient. This is because CP could partially or completely fail, or CP may not reach the entire surface of the plate—as in the case of
local soil settlement and associated depressions which could form due to repeated exing of the bottom plates. In addition, a tank
without a CP system could experience elevated corrosion depending on the pad conditions.
To address these issues, VCIs have been applied under ASTs for many years and are being promoted as alternative corrosion control
measures. Tank operators needed an independent study to establish the ef cacy and applicability of VCIs. Speci cally, the operators
needed a basis to determine life cycle applicability of VCIs for their assets, both from an integrity management perspective and for
regulatory compliance.
There were three key questions that were asked: (i) are VCIs effective in mitigating corrosion comparable to a working CP system, (ii)
what is the best way to apply and monitor ef cacy of VCIs, and (iii) are VCIs compatible with CP? The study was conducted to address
these questions, with the objective of rigorously evaluating and documenting the effectiveness of VCIs. The scope included literature
review, laboratory experiments, and eld testing.
VCIs have been used for corrosion mitigation in numerous applications for decades. However, their application for tank bottom
corrosion control began in the early 2000s; literature exists on application of VCIs such as recent work by Pynn and Abed.3 VCI
technical specialists have devised methods to apply VCIs into a tank pad. Application methods are dependent on tank operating
conditions that could include a tank being in-service, out-of-service, and during construction. The application relies upon the process
of chemical volatilization and diffusion for distribution of VCIs throughout a tank pad. VCIs’ volatilization obviates a need for direct
access to the bottom plate surface. VCIs could be injected and distributed in the sand pad for an in-service tank, and at the pad
surface for an out-of-service tank. The most common ways to introduce VCIs in the pad include liquid slurry (prepared by mixing
potable water with VCI) injection and dry powder application.
A VCI chemistry must be contained adjacent to the tank bottom to be available for corrosion control. A typical AST includes a
concrete support ring wall surrounding the pad that is underlain with a containment liner. The bottoms are typically A36 steel and
are constructed on the pad surface, then the plates extend onto the concrete ring wall. The chime of the tank in contact with the ring
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 3/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
wall can be sealed with a sealant. This creates suf cient containment under ASTs for VCIs to be available long-term. When VCIs are
delivered and released either within interstitial space or at the pad surface, volatilization coupled with diffusion occurs until
equilibrium, determined by partial vapor pressure and concentration gradients, is reached. The mechanism for corrosion control is
the formation of molecular-level inhibitor layer over the entire plate surface. Inhibitors adsorb on the steel surface and then suppress
both metal dissolution and reduction reaction. The mechanism is like the action of inhibitors that are used widely, and recognized by
regulators, for protection of pipelines from internal corrosion.
VCI Effectiveness Study
Laboratory testing was conducted to determine ef cacy of two commercially available VCIs. Field sand samples from an existing tank
pad were procured and used. The bottom plate at the sand sampling site experienced severe soil-side pitting; therefore, the samples
were considered corrosive. Two sets of VCI experiments were set up. For the rst set, control and VCI effect experiments were set up
in plastic tubs that were lled with the sand, dosed with VCIs, and sealed to avoid escaping VCIs. A36 steel coupons were placed in
contact with sand, and in the vapor space of the tubs. Electrical resistance (ER) probes were also placed in some of the tubs. The
coupons were extracted after several months and analyzed for corrosion. For the second set, VCI and CP compatibility experiments
were set up in glass beakers using eld sand dosed with VCIs. Mixed metal oxide and Mg-based anodes were used in impressed
current CP (ICCP) and galvanic CP systems, respectively. A36 coupons were used in the CP compatibility experiments. Various
electrochemical techniques such as potentiostatic polarization and galvanic coupling were employed to evaluate VCI and CP
compatibility.
The eld sand was corrosive and caused pitting on A36 coupons in the control experiments. The control experiment coupons were
compared with the VCI experiment coupons; the comparison showed that VCIs mitigated pitting when the vendor-recommended
dosages were used. Speci cally, pitting of A36 decreased substantially in the presence of vendor-recommended dosages of the two
VCIs; however, the pitting rates were not mitigated to the extent speci ed in NACE SP01934 and NACE SP01695 for demonstrating
adequate CP. Experiments were also conducted at dosages lower than what is recommended, and included 10% and 1% of the
recommended values. These dosages were selected to determine if there is a threshold level that will trigger reinjection of VCIs after
initial dosing. With the 10% and 1% VCI dosages, pitting was equally severe in the control and VCI-exposed coupons, indicating that
any large deviation from vendor-recommended dosages will render the VCIs ineffective.
ER probes are designed to measure the surface average corrosion rate and are sometimes used to measure tank pad corrosivity.
Suitability of the ER probes for monitoring the effectiveness of VCIs was evaluated by comparing ER-probe derived corrosion rates
with the surface average corrosion rates of the coupons. ER-probe corrosion rates were within the range of the coupons’ surface
average corrosion rates. Further, in both VCI exposed coupons and ER probe data, the effect of VCIs was evident by a reduction in
surface average corrosion rates compared to the control. ER probes are suitable enough to monitor VCIs’ effectiveness. It is
recognized that pitting is the dominant contributor to overall corrosion and failure of the plates. While there was agreement between
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 4/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
ER-probe and coupon corrosion rates, ER probes cannot measure pitting rates. ER probe and coupon agreement indicates that there
exists a correlation that can be derived between the surface average and pitting corrosion rates. The correlation could be used to infer
changes in the pitting rates using the ER-probe rates.
There could be situations where VCIs are used in combination with CP. VCIs and CP provide protections by different mechanisms:
VCIs by chemical action and CP by cathodic polarization. An advantage of using the combination is that inhibitors can reach metal
surface areas that could be dif cult to protect using CP. Additional advantages include VCIs providing protection to a plate portion
that has lost contact with the tank pad and where the CP system is unavailable due to power loss, damage to, or downtime associated
with CP.
The study found that VCIs are compatible with an ICCP system, and do not adversely affect delivery of CP to the plate. However, VCI
and CP compatibility is complicated by the fact that the native potential of A36 steel shifts with exposure to VCIs. Additional changes
in the native potential could occur after polarization of a VCI-exposed plate. These changes in native potential should be considered
when operators use a speci c VCI and select one of the SP0193 CP criteria to meet regulatory requirements. For galvanic anode CP
systems, the data was limited and varied widely; therefore, no conclusion could be drawn on the compatibility.
Summary
VCIs were found to be effective in mitigating pitting of A36 steel exposed to corrosive sand when recommended dosages were used.
VCIs signi cantly reduced the tendency of pitting, but pitting rates were not mitigated to the extent speci ed in NACE SP0193 and
NACE SP0169 for demonstrating adequate CP. Nonetheless, use of VCIs could provide protection, and thus service life extension, for
the tanks without CP or where CP systems have either failed or degenerated. ER probes, designed to measure the surface average
corrosion rate, can be used to monitor both the plate corrosion rate and ef cacy of VCIs. VCIs are compatible with ICCP systems, but
changes in native potentials of A36 steel must be considered when using VCIs in combination with CP. This work demonstrates proof-
of-concept of the VCI technology, and additional work would help optimize operating and monitoring parameters associated with the
technology.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge PRCI and its members for funding and in-kind support, and VCI manufacturers for providing products for
the study.
References
1 P. Shukla, et al., “Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors Effectiveness for Tank Bottom Plate Corrosion Control,” PRCI, Inc., Report Catalog
Number PR–015–153602-R01, 2018.
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 5/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
2 API 651, “API Recommended Practice 651: Cathodic Protection of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks” (Washington, DC:
American Petroleum Institute, 2014).
3 C.R. Pynn, K. Abed, “Compatibility and Interactions Between Cathodic Protection and a Vapor Phase Corrosion Inhibitor,” MP 57, 4
(2018): pp. 38-42.
4 NACE SP0169, “Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems” (Houston, TX: NACE
International, 2013).
5 NACE SP0193, “External Cathodic Protection of On-Grade Carbon Steel Storage Tank Bottoms” (Houston, TX: NACE, 2016).
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
PAVAN K. SHUKLA is a principal engineer at Savannah River National Laboratory, South Carolina, Aiken, South Carolina, USA,
email:
[email protected] (mailto:
[email protected]). Shukla focuses on pipeline and tank bottom corrosion
control issues and corrosion of materials in nuclear systems, and has worked in the corrosion industry for over 14 years. He has co-
invented four patents and authored over 60 journal and industry conference publications, two book chapters, and numerous
technical reports. In 2015, he received a Research and Development 100 award for developing a cased pipeline corrosion model.
Shukla has a Ph.D. and is a NACE-certi ed Cathodic Protection Technician.
LEN J. KRISSA is a supervisor, PI Corrosion Prevention at Enbridge Pipelines, Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. He is an APEGA
(Association of Professional Engineers and Geologists of Alberta) registered Professional Engineer who has worked in the
corrosion industry for over 25 years. His early career started by providing services using leading-edge technologies for CP/coating
evaluations and he has gained extensive experience from numerous pipeline assessment projects both internationally and
throughout North America. He has been employed with Enbridge Pipelines, Inc. since 2009. He is responsible for all external
corrosion control programs for the North American liquid products system. Krissa is also a NACE-certi ed Cathodic Protection
Specialist and a Level 2 Coating Inspector. He has authored over 25 technical articles and industry conference papers.
JERRY DEWITT is a corrosion prevention specialist at Enbridge, Inc., Grif ths, Indiana, USA, email: [email protected]
(mailto:[email protected]). He has been involved in corrosion control for over 32 years, with specialization in CP and
protective coatings. His recent focus areas include developing soil condition-based protection criteria for AST bottom plates and
use of VCIs to mitigate carrier pipe corrosion in cased crossings. He is also a NACE-certi ed Cathodic Protection Specialist, Senior
Corrosion Technologist, and a Level 3 Coating Inspector.
LAURIE PERRY is the program manager for the corrosion and underground storage technical committees at PRCI, Chantilly,
Virginia, USA, email: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]). She is a mechanical engineer with an M.B.A. and has more than 30
years of pipeline integrity management experience. She is a NACE-certi ed Internal Corrosion Specialist and has authored several
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 6/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
publications on internal corrosion mitigation of pipelines.
Related Articles
ALSO ON MATERIALS PERFORMANCE
Cold-Bonding Polymeric Tech Proposed Changes to Gas Tr Coupons for Cathodic Protect
Cold-Bonding Proposed Changes to Coupons for Cathodic University Develops A Multifunctio
Polymeric … Gas Transmission … Protection … Adjustable … Additive for …
5 years ago • 1 comment 4 years ago • 1 comment 4 years ago • 1 comment 2 years ago • 1 comment 5 years ago • 1 com
Cold-Bonding Polymeric Proposed Changes to Gas Coupons for Cathodic University Develops A Multifunctional A
Technique Helps Restore Transmission Pipeline Protection Evaluation of Adjustable Atmospheric Controlling Inorga
U.K. Trains Regulations Intended to … Mixed-Metal Piping Systems Corrosion Test Rack Foulants in Indust
0 Comments Materials Performance 🔒 Disqus' Privacy Policy
1 Login
Recommend t Tweet f Share Sort by Best
Start the discussion…
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 7/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
WHITE PAPERS
The E ects of Operating a Pipeline Without Isolation (/white-papers/gpt-industries-march-2021)
By GPT Industries
Improving the Quality of Corrosion Inhibitor Treatments Using Automation (/white-papers/wellaware)
By Wellaware
View All >> (/white-papers)
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 8/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
WEBCASTS
How To Prevent Corrosion On Structural Steel Column Bases (/webinars/denso-april-2021)
Coatings for Corrosion Control in Wastewater Environments (/webinars/carboline-march-2021)
View All >> (/webinars)
FEATURED VIDEO
Materials Performance • …
Materials Performance • March 2021 Editor Video
Our March 2021 issue explores the effects of corrosion on concrete structures. In this video, MP Technical Editor Jack Tinnea
introduces a few of this month's highlights. Subscribe or log in (https://my.nace.org/User/Login.aspx?
ReturnUrl=https%3a%2f%2f2.zoppoz.workers.dev%3a443%2fhttps%2fmy.nace.org%2fSystem%2fMPRedirect.aspx%3fredirect%3d%2fsubscribe) to your pro le to read this
issue online.
View More Videos (/videos)
FEATURED VIDEO
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 9/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
Materials Performance Ed…
Ed…
Materials Performance Editor talks to GPT Industries about the new Evolution Isolation Gasket
Materials Performance Editor, Rebecca Bickham talks with Tim Hurley, Senior Product Manager at GPT Industries about their new isolation
gasket, Evolution, and its groundbreaking design.
View More Videos (/videos)
MORE ARTICLES
Coatings & Linings (/topics/coatings-linings)
Cathodic Protection (/topics/cathodic-protection)
Chemical Treatment (/topics/chemical-treatment)
Materials Selection & Design (/topics/materials-selection-design)
Phorgotten Phenomena (/topics/phorgotten-phenomena)
Failure Analyses (/topics/failure-analyses)
Case Histories (/topics/case-histories)
Corrosion Basics (/topics/corrosion-basics)
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 10/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
Home (/) News (/news) Topics (/topics) Advertise (/advertise) Submit Manuscript (/submit-manuscript) About Us (/about-us)
Sitemap (/sitemap) Contact Us (/contact-us)
(https://www.linkedin.com/company/materialsperformancemagazine/) (https://twitter.com/MPcorrosion)
(https://www.facebook.com/MaterialsPerformanceMagazine?ref=hl)
Materials Performance
15835 Park Ten Pl., Houston, TX 77084
Tel: +1 281-228-6200
© Copyright 2017 Materials Performance Magazine | Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy) | Terms of Use (/terms-of-use)
(https://www.nace.org/)
AMPP Publications
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 11/12
3/29/2021 Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors for Tank Bottom Corrosion Control
(https://corrosionjournal.org/)
(http://www.coatingspromag.com/)
materialsperformance.com/articles/chemical-treatment/2019/04/vapor-corrosion-inhibitors-for-tank-bottom-corrosion-control 12/12
