Economic Outlook 2021
Economic Outlook 2021
2021
Copyright Reserved
Chief Economist,
Fiscal and Economics Division,
Ministry of Finance Malaysia,
Level 9, Centre Block,
Kompleks Kementerian Kewangan,
No. 5, Persiaran Perdana,
Precint 2,
Federal Government Administrative Centre,
62592 Putrajaya.
Fax: 03-88823881
E-mail: [email protected]
PRINTED BY
PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BERHAD
KUALA LUMPUR, 2020
www.printnasional.com.my
email: [email protected]
Tel.: 03-92366895 Fax: 03-92224773
FOREWORD
PRIME MINISTER
MALAYSIA
The year 2020 began with nations around the world gearing up to contain the spread
of COVID-19 pandemic by undertaking various measures which include enforcing
movement restrictions and closing borders. The unprecedented situation has severely
impeded overall global economic activities with the world economy experiencing a sharp
contraction that economists believe to be worse than the Great Depression in the 1930s.
Being a highly open economy, Malaysia’s GDP has also been adversely affected.
From the onset, the Government has been resolute in its stand to safeguard lives
and protect the livelihood of the rakyat. We seek to address the pandemic through
a systematic approach that focuses on three pillars: safeguard the rakyat, support
businesses and finally, strengthen the economy. These three pillars underline all
subsequent economic stimulus packages that we have unveiled throughout the year.
Apart from implementing various stages of the Movement Control Order (MCO) since
March 2020 to curb the transmission of COVID-19, the Government has embarked on a
series of economic stimulus measures totalling RM305 billion entailing fiscal and non-
fiscal measures. In this regard, the Economic Stimulus Package Prihatin Rakyat (PRIHATIN)
totalling RM250 billion was unveiled in March 2020, followed closely by the PRIHATIN
SME+ worth RM10 billion in April. In June, we announced the Short-Term Economic
Recovery Plan (PENJANA) totalling RM35 billion and in September, we released the RM10
billion additional package, dubbed the PRIHATIN Supplementary Initiative Package (KITA
PRIHATIN).
Under the PRIHATIN package, the nation’s healthcare services were strengthened by
additional allocation for among others, medical equipment, enhancing testing capacity
and developing the MySejahtera application for contact tracing. PRIHATIN also provided
immediate financial assistance to ease the cash flow burden of the rakyat and businesses,
including employment retention support, deferment or restructuring of loan repayments
as well as provision of credit facilities. Furthermore, we implemented the PRIHATIN SME+
to ensure the survival and ease the financial burden of SMEs.
When the COVID-19 curve flattened, the subsequent strategy was to reopen the economy
by allowing the rakyat to return to work and companies to resume operations. Hence, the
PENJANA package was announced in June to support the economy to operate in a new
normal.
LAKSANA, a unit under the Ministry of Finance, was established to ensure all economic
stimulus programmes are implemented promptly and can effectively reach the
targeted groups. The Unit has now evolved into a full-fledged agency in monitoring
implementation outcomes of the stimulus programmes across 53 ministries and
Government agencies nationwide.
Together, we have braved and withstood the unprecedented crisis as a nation. I would
like to express my deepest gratitude to the frontliners whose efforts have saved
countless lives and upheld Malaysia’s healthcare system as among the best in the world.
Let me also thank the rakyat for their patience and close cooperation in combating the
pandemic together. Alhamdulillah, we have achieved positive results thus far. However, we
cannot afford to be complacent because the war against COVID-19 is not over yet, until
and unless a vaccine has been found and is made available across the world.
The crisis has given us the opportunity to look inwards, reassess our priorities and reset
our targets. Moving forward, we will continue to revitalise and reform our economy for
a sustainable future of shared prosperity under a new normal. It is our aspiration to
steer the economy to a higher growth trajectory that is inclusive in nature. I would like
to reiterate that this Government is committed to serving the rakyat and ensuring their
well-being as well as supporting the businesses to thrive. Insya-Allah, we will be able to
achieve this if we all work closely together.
MINISTER OF FINANCE
MALAYSIA
COVID-19 has had a major impact on global growth, particularly due to its capacity to
disrupt and dismantle development progress that has been made across social, business
and economic fronts. For as long as a vaccine is yet to be found, the entire global
economy – Malaysia included – remains at its mercy. At the heart of this unprecedented
economic challenge is the consequential threat to lives, as well as risk of increased
poverty and long-term systemic damage to our socio-economic fabric.
It was against this backdrop that Malaysia instituted the Movement Control Order (MCO).
Although the Malaysian economy lost an estimated RM2 billion each day while the MCO
was in effect, the Government was decisive in crafting our own unique 6R Strategy,
comprising six stages of Resolve, Resilient, Restart, Recovery, Revitalise and Reform, to
help the nation cope.
Against a backdrop of many unknowns, the Government had to put together no less
than four stimulus packages in record time to protect lives, businesses and the economy.
Deciding on what would be sufficient was not easy. Our fiscal limitations needed to be
matched with our fiscal muscle. One thing was clear, though: our response had to be
fast and decisive. Hence, the RM250 billion PRIHATIN Economic Stimulus Package was
born, incorporating a RM25 billion fiscal injection.
Subsequently, three additional packages followed: PRIHATIN SME+, PENJANA and KITA
PRIHATIN in April, June and September respectively. All four packages – comprising fiscal
and non-fiscal measures – totalled RM305 billion, or 21% of our gross domestic product
(GDP). With the measures’ rollout being tracked and monitored by the Economic Stimulus
Implementation and Coordination Unit Between National Agencies (LAKSANA), many lives
were saved, livelihoods supported, and businesses remained afloat.
The MCO and its various iterations not only flattened our COVID-19 curve but also
contributed to the deep contraction in the GDP by 8.3% in the first half of 2020.
Nevertheless, month-to-month economic data clearly signals green shoots of recovery,
with a rebound in production and trade figures, a decline in unemployment and a
recovery in private consumption compared to the monthly data of the second quarter of
2020. The Government’s stimulus packages are expected to contribute over 4 percentage
points to the nation’s GDP growth.
This momentum is expected to set the foundation for the nation’s GDP to grow by up
to 7.5% in 2021. That achievement hinges heavily on the next phase in our 6R strategy
– Revitalise – represented by Budget 2021. As a strategic plan for ensuring Malaysia’s
Meanwhile, it is important for us to not only adapt to this new norm, but also find
growth opportunities. COVID-19 has accelerated the adoption of digitalisation by
businesses, the education sector and society. Studies have estimated that the economic
value of digital trade-enabled benefits to the Malaysian economy, if fully leveraged, could
grow to RM222 billion by 2030 from RM31 billion in 2019. This presents a new growth
trajectory for many service-based industries and supporting sectors like E&E, e-commerce
and the gig economy. Another huge potential is in healthcare and its ancillary sectors.
Medical products, services and equipment are expected to grow in the coming years.
Budget 2021 has been crafted across four broad principles, namely, caring for the
people; steering the economy; enabling sustainable living and enhancing public service
delivery. The Government will continue with its targeted initiatives to support lives and
livelihoods while prioritising vulnerable groups.
Sustainability, as one of the key principles, will also lay the foundation for existing and
fresh policies to be mapped against the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Related to this, one of the sectors that is a natural fit into our sustainability aspiration
is Islamic finance, which subscribes to Value-Based Intermediation principles, similar to
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles. This could help grow the Islamic
economy, through various concepts including wakaf, and in developing communities
sustainably. On multiple other fronts, the Government also hopes to work closely with
its agencies, the private sector and civil society to catalyse a higher, more sustainable
growth trajectory from 2021 onwards.
The Government expects its fiscal deficit to reach 6% of GDP, the highest since the 2009
Global Financial Crisis, while the Federal Government's statutory debt is expected to
rise to about 57% of GDP by end-2020, due to the four necessary economic stimulus
packages. Nonetheless, the Government is committed to its fiscal responsibility agenda,
in line with the goal of reducing the fiscal deficit to under 4% of GDP over the next three
to four years.
Against the backdrop of a huge unknown that is outside our control, we have been
focusing on aspects that we can and must control. Our economic fundamentals are still
strong, our economic base sufficiently diversified, and we still have fiscal muscle. But
above all, I believe the economic rebound in 2021 and beyond depends as much on our
strategy, as it does on Malaysians’ indomitable spirit to work together and brave the
unknown as one.
Thank you to all Malaysians for your past, present and future contribution in helping the
nation face this enormous challenge. I am confident that together we can and will win
this war against COVID-19, and emerge from this episode as a stronger nation, Insya-
Allah.
Public
Investment1
Exports of 4.1%
Services
5.8%
Public
Consumption
8.0%
Private
Consumption
39.9%
Private
Investment1
9.7% DEMAND
RM 2,225,935
MILLION
Exports
of Goods
32.5%
Mining Construction
4.4% 2.8%
Agriculture
4.8%
Imports
of Services
7.0% Services
38.3%
S U P P LY
RM 2,225,935
Manufacturing
14.9% MILLION
Imports
1
Includes change in stocks of Goods
Source: Ministry of Finance, Malaysia 27.8%
PREFACE v
Conclusion 33
References 34
Conclusion 59
References 60
Domestic Demand 92
Feature Article 3.4 – Shadow Economy in Malaysia 94
External Sector 97
Prices 102
Feature Article 3.5 – Dynamic Relationship Between Consumer and 104
Producer Price Indices
Figure 2.1. Real GDP Growth for Global, Advanced Economies, and Emerging Market and 41
Developing Economies
Figure 2.2. Inflation Rate for Global, Advanced Economies, and Emerging Market and 42
Developing Economies
Figure 4.3. Banking System: Impaired Loans and Net Impaired Loans Ratio 121
Economic
Management and
Prospects
05 ov e rv i e w
06 outlook
Feature Article 1.1 – COVID-19: Impact and Policy
Responses
29 s tr ategic i n i t i at i v e s – 2021
budge t
Information Box 1.2 – Social Safety Net in Malaysia
33 conclus ion
34 r e fe r e nce s
CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY: ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT AND PROSPECTS
Covid-19
Malaysia:
Pandemic Economic
Restriction in the movement of
Management
people and goods as well as
provision of services & Prospects
11 March 2020
6 April OPR
Overnight
Supportive Policy Rate
PRIHATIN SME+ Monetary
Policies SRR
Statutory Reserve
Requirement
5 June
Robust
PENJANA Banking Sector
23 September Resilient
KITA PRIHATIN Capital Market
Global
Economy Global Outlook
Global
Impacting Impacting Challenges
Malaysian the health
businesses and livelihood Muted Global
of Malaysians Growth
Volatile Commodity
Prices
CHAIRED BY
YAB PRIME MINISTER WITH MOF AND EPU AS JOINT SECRETARIAT
Budget 2021
2020 Budget 2021 enters 5th
— R stage – Revitalise
2021
OBJECTIVE: Address the
challenges faced by Malaysia
Economic towards becoming an
Management advanced and inclusive
nation
Aggravating Factors NEW ACT: Temporary
Measures for Government
Financing (Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19))
2020 was passed in
Pace of Global
Economic Recovery Parliament on 21
September 2020.
Escalating US-China
tensions
Measures are being
IMPLEMENTATION formulated to enhance
Weak Commodity people’s livelihood, rejuvenate
Prices
OF STIMULUS
PACKAGES UNDER the economy, ensure
THE 6R STRATEGY sustainable development and
Volatile Global Financial improve public service
Markets delivery. "Rakyat’s Prosperity,
Business Continuity and
Economic Resilience."
Domestic
Economy
chapter 1 economic management and prospects
chapter 1
PROGRAMME RM BILLION
PRIHATIN 250.0
1 Loan Moratorium 100.0
2 Danajamin: Financing Guarantee Scheme 50.0
3 EPF: i-Lestari Scheme 40.0
4 Bantuan Prihatin Nasional 10.0
5 EPF: Employer Advisory Services 10.0
6 Wage Subsidy Programme 5.9
7 BNM: Facilitation Fund 4.0
8 Small Infrastructure Projects 2.0
9 Healthcare (COVID-19) 1.5
10 Food Security Fund 1.0
11 Micro Credit Scheme 0.5
12 Assistance for Tertiary Students 0.3
13 Other PRIHATIN Measures 5.1
14 Economic Stimulus Package 19.7
PRIHATIN Plus 10.0
15 Additional Wage Subsidy Programme
7.9
(enhancement of the existing programme)
16 Geran Khas PRIHATIN 2.1
PENJANA 35.0
17 Initiatives to Empower the People 13.2
18 Initiatives to Propel Businesses 9.7
19 Initiatives to Stimulate the Economy 6.7
20 Other PENJANA Measures 5.4
KITA PRIHATIN 10.0
21 Bantuan Prihatin Nasional 2.0 7.0
22 Wage Subsidy Programme 2.0 2.4
23 Geran Khas PRIHATIN 0.6
GRAND TOTAL 305.0
In 2021, the global economy is projected to market. Monetary policy will continue to be
recover with a growth of 5.2%. The advanced supportive of the domestic economy. The
economies are forecast to rebound by 3.9%, banking sector will remain robust and orderly,
led by improved domestic demand and trade underpinned by ample liquidity and strong
activities. Likewise, the GDP of the EMDEs is capital buffers. Likewise, the capital market
expected to record a growth of 6%, driven by is anticipated to be resilient, driven by well-
steady domestic demand and higher exports. developed infrastructure and instruments.
Risks to global outlook include re-intensified However, the pace of global economic recovery,
US-China trade disputes, uncertainties weak commodity prices and volatile global
surrounding Brexit, continued low oil prices financial markets are among factors which
and deepening climate crisis. may hamper the performance of the domestic
financial market.
Domestic Economy
Economic Management
The Malaysian economy contracted by 8.3%
in the first half of 2020, with a decline of The immediate focus of the Government in
17.1% in the second quarter. The economy is managing the crisis is on ensuring the safety
expected to contract at a slower pace in the of the people and addressing the needs
second half of the year, aided by the speedy of households and businesses adversely
implementation of various stimulus packages affected by the COVID-19. A new Act entitled
to support the people and revitalise the Temporary Measures for Government Financing
economy. In 2020, the economy is expected to (Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)) 2020
contract by 4.5%. The impact of the packages was passed in Parliament on 21 September
is anticipated to have spill-over effects and 2020 to finance the stimulus packages. The
provide an additional boost to the economy Act enables the Government to implement
in 2021. With the anticipated improvement the stimulus packages formulated on the six-
in global growth and international trade, the stages of R effectively. The “Resolve” stage
Malaysian economy is projected to rebound was characterised by the Government’s effort
between 6.5% and 7.5% in 2021. Growth will to contain the spread of the virus through the
continue to be supported by strong economic implementation of a full Movement Control
fundamentals and a well-diversified economy. Order (MCO). The “Resilient” stage was when
However, the favourable outlook hinges on the Government announced the PRIHATIN and
two major factors – the successful containment the PRIHATIN Plus stimulus packages. During
of the pandemic and sustained recovery in the “Restart” and “Recovery” stages when the
external demand. COVID-19 curve was flattened and the economy
was gradually opened, the Government
Monetary and Financial announced the PENJANA package. PENJANA
aimed at rejuvenating the economy based
Developments on three strategic thrusts – empowering the
people, propelling businesses and stimulating
The Overnight Policy Rate was reduced
the economy. The next two stages – “Revitalise”
successively by 125 basis points to a historic
and “Reform”, will involve the formulation
low of 1.75% during the first seven months
and implementation of measures in the 2021
of 2020. Similarly, the Statutory Reserve
Budget and the Twelfth Malaysia Plan, 2021-
Requirement was reduced by 100 basis points
2025 (12MP). In particular, the 2021 Budget
from 3.00% to 2.00% to ensure sufficient
will focus on caring for the people, enabling
liquidity to support the domestic financial
local businesses and revitalising the economy.
Introduction
COVID-19, the viral outbreak that was first detected at the end of 2019, coincided with a worldwide
economic slowdown amid trade tensions and commodity price volatility. As the virus spreads
around the world, it has far-reaching consequences beyond the disease and the efforts to contain
it. Various measures to contain the outbreak, such as border closures, physical distancing and
lockdowns, have led to sluggish aggregate demand and disruptions in the supply chain. The
pandemic is now expected to cause the worst global recession in history, far worse than the Great
Depression in the 1930s (International Monetary Fund, 2020). Governments worldwide responded
by expanding their monetary policy and increasing fiscal spending to prop up household incomes,
support employee retention and provide liquidity assistance for businesses.
The crisis brought on by the pandemic presents a unique challenge as policymakers have to
balance between protecting lives and livelihood in managing the pandemic. Malaysia is no
exception. During the initial stage of the outbreak, the impact was limited to the tourism-related
industries, including airlines, tour operators, recreational activities, accommodation and restaurants.
In response, the Government announced the first stimulus package of RM20 billion on 27 February
2020. The package was aimed at increasing capacity of the healthcare sector in containing the
outbreak, supporting the cash flow of affected businesses and stimulating domestic tourism
industry.
1,200 8
900 6
600 4
300 2
0 0
9-Feb
25-Jan
24-Feb
10-Mar
25-Mar
9-Apr
24-Apr
9-May
24-May
8-Jun
23-Jun
8-Jul
23-Jul
7-Aug
22-Aug
6-Sep
21-Sep
6-Oct
19-Oct
Local cases started to escalate in early March 2020 (Figure 1.1.1.), with more clusters began to
emerge during what was categorised as the second wave of transmission. Within a few weeks,
Malaysia recorded the largest cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 transmission in Southeast
Asia, with over 2,000 active cases by the end of March. In a critical move to mitigate the outbreak
and flatten the curve as recommended by the World Health Organisation, the Government imposed
a full Movement Control Order (MCO) effectively on 18 March 2020. In addition, the Government
established a task force to manage the crisis led by the Prime Minister himself, with representation
by relevant ministries and agencies. The task force is responsible for gathering intelligence on the
development of the pandemic and coordinating efforts to contain the outbreak.
The MCO was made more lenient under the Conditional Movement Control Order (CMCO) on 4 May
2020, where most economic sectors were allowed to resume operations under certain Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs). At this stage, all businesses, with a few exceptions, were allowed to
reopen under strict SOPs, including contact tracing, mandatory use of face masks in public and
physical distancing. Nonetheless, international and interstate travels were still restricted as the
threat of the virus persisted.
As cases began to de-escalate, the economy was reopened for people to resume their economic
activities and livelihood. The CMCO was then followed by the Recovery Movement Control Order
(RMCO) starting 10 June 2020, which is extended until 31 December 2020. The implementation of
the RMCO is based on protecting vulnerable groups, empowering the community, embracing the
new normal, resuming almost all economic sectors, continuing border control and enhancing public
health.
Malaysia received global recognition as among the more successful countries in containing the
pandemic. Nonetheless, the Government is fully aware that this containment move has to be
parallel with the reopening of the economy to prevent long-term structural damage. Therefore, the
Government applied the 6R approach, representing six stages: Resolve, Resilient, Restart, Recovery,
Revitalise and Reform (Figure 1.1.2.).
BUDGET
TWELFTH
MALAYSIA
PLAN
2021-2025
REFORM
REVITALISE Menyusun
Memperkasa Semula
RECOVERY
Pemulihan
RESTART
6R
RESILIENT Memulakan
Ketahanan Semula
RESOLVE
Ketegasan Strategy
The Resolve strategy was implemented as early as when the MCO was first announced on
18 March 2020. The movement control and physical distancing resulted in temporary closures of
most businesses, especially the non-essential sectors, which resulted in higher unemployment.
Accordingly, the Government announced the second stimulus package on 27 March 2020. The
package, known as Prihatin Rakyat Economic Stimulus Package (PRIHATIN), totalling RM230 billion,
was aimed at softening the impact of the crisis. PRIHATIN provided cash transfers to supplement
the loss of income and wage subsidies to encourage businesses to retain employees. In addition,
the package includes an automatic moratorium on loan repayments for six months to households,
which ended in September 2020, partly to encourage private consumption. Subsequently, the
Government announced an additional RM10 billion through PRIHATIN PLUS on 6 April 2020,
particularly to help the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) remain resilient to weather the
unprecedented crisis.
As part of the fourth stage of the 6R approach (Recovery), the Government announced a short-term
economic recovery plan or Pelan Jana Semula Ekonomi Negara (PENJANA) on 5 June 2020 totalling
RM35 billion. The main objective of PENJANA was to restart the economy by incentivising people
and businesses to resume their activities, amid the new normal. It was complemented with the
implementation of the RMCO, with almost all restrictions lifted. However, businesses were required
to self-regulate, adhere to the SOPs and adjust to the new normal.
As the loan moratorium period and wage subsidy ended in September 2020, the Government
received feedback that people and businesses were still financially-stricken. Hence, an additional
stimulus package was announced on 23 September 2020 to further ease the people’s burden and
keep businesses afloat. The package, PRIHATIN Supplementary Initiative Package (KITA PRIHATIN),
amounting to RM10 billion, will benefit micro SMEs, local workers as well as B40 and M40 groups.
In addition, a targeted loan moratorium was extended to businesses and people to ease their
financial commitment.
Budget 2021 is the fifth stage of “Revitalise” in the 6R approach, aiming to revitalise post-crisis
economic growth. The Budget focuses on four areas – caring for the people, steering the economy,
sustainable living and enhancing public service delivery. The final stage of the 6R approach is
“Reform”, where medium-term strategies to reform the economy will be outlined in the Twelfth
Malaysia Plan, 2021 – 2025. These strategies will take advantage of the economic momentum in
efficiency and productivity, towards a more sustainable and higher value-added economy
(Figure 1.1.3.).
1. Mitigating Impact of 1. Protecting Rakyat Supporting Businessess, 1. Empowering Rakyat Supporting Micro SMES,
COVID-19 2. Supporting Businesses especially SMEs 2. Propelling Businesses Local Workers and People
2. Spurring Economic 3. Strengthening Economy 3. Stimulating Economy
Growth
3. Promoting Quality Measures (among others): Measures (among others): Measures (among others): Measures (among others):
Investment • Bantuan PRIHATIN Nasional • PRIHATIN Special Grant • Wage Subsidy (extension) • PRIHATIN Special Grant
• Wage Subsidy for micro SMEs • Reskilling fund for micro SMEs (new)
Measures (among others): • Automatic six-month loan • Wage Subsidy (additional) • One-off support to • Wage Subsidy 2.0
• Support healthcare sector moratorium vulnerable groups (extension)
• Cash flow assistance for • EPF i-Lestari • Financing and liquidity • Bantuan PRIHATIN
tourism-related sector • Cash aid for government supports Nasional 2.0
servants and pensioners • E-commerce incentives
Note: There was a change of • SME soft loan funds • Tax exemption measures
Government on 23 February 2020 • Corporate loan guarantees
Efforts by the Government to revive the economy have proven to be effective as reflected in the
improving macroeconomic indicators from the significant decline in the second quarter of 2020
(Figure 1.1.4.). The stimulus packages that consist of fiscal and non-fiscal measures totalling
RM305 billion are expected to cushion the crisis and stimulate the economy by boosting aggregate
demand and sustaining employment. Internal estimates project that the packages would add to the
gross domestic product (GDP) growth by 4.0 – 4.2 percentage points in 2020. The estimated impact
on employment is 3.5 percentage points, preventing about 560,000 workers from losing their jobs.1
Conclusion
The timely response by the Government in imposing the MCO to flatten the curve, complemented
by swift stimulus packages, has cushioned the impact of the crisis. This success was also supported
by the overall strict adherence of the public to the different phases of MCO and SOPs, which was
crucial in containing the pandemic. As a result, the economy is expected to improve gradually
in the second half of the year, as reflected by various macroeconomic indicators. The stimulus
measures have paved the way for a firm economic recovery, subject to successful, continued
containment of the pandemic. Being an open economy, the speed and magnitude of Malaysia’s
full economic recovery are also dependent on the performance of its major trading partners.
Nevertheless, the crisis offers businesses the opportunity to reform strategies, expedite digital
transformation and reallocate resources to increase efficiency and productivity. Unless and until a
vaccine is found and made widely accessible, the war against COVID-19 is not over, and efforts to
curb the virus and its impact are still ongoing.
Note:
The third wave of COVID-19 outbreak suddenly emerged and a 14-day CMCO had to be imposed
commencing 13 October 2020 in Sabah, 14 October 2020 on three states – Selangor, Federal Territories
of Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya and 17 October 2020 in Federal Territories Labuan, to re-flatten the
COVID-19 curve. At the time of printing, the number of positive cases has yet to peak.
1
Based on the Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) for the Malaysian Economy (MyAGE) model, Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Introduction
Education plays a significant part in building human capital. It creates a sufficient pool of
educated workforce and is an essential determinant of a high-income and advanced nation. Given
its importance, the percentage of Government expenditure on tertiary education has increased
significantly from 11.3% of total expenditure on education in 1971 to 21.3%1 in 2018 (World Bank,
2020) to support this aspiration. The Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 [Act 555]
was also introduced to further complement the effort to increase access to tertiary education. This
investment has resulted in millions of knowledge workers with tertiary2 education entering the
labour market.
On the demand front, the unemployment rate is a common proxy to measure the health of the
labour market. While a low unemployment rate is an ideal situation, it can hide other aspects
such as underemployment or a mismatch. In general, underemployment3 or mismatch refers to
the underutilisation of workers’ education and skills (Figure 1.2.1.). Malaysia’s achievement in
maintaining the economy at full employment level since 1992 is commendable. However, there are
concerns on whether the investment in education has achieved the desired outcome, given the
current high incidence of underemployment or mismatch, particularly among graduates.
1
Excludes private expenditure in education, where the sector was liberalised in 1996.
2
According to the International Labour Organisation (ILO), tertiary educated refers to graduates with diplomas and above.
3
ILO defines time-related underemployment as a situation in which a worker is employed for less than 30 hours per week.
FIGURE 1.2.2. Employment by Education and Skills for Selected Countries, 2018
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Indonesia
Japan
Malaysia
Republic of
Korea
Singapore
Thailand
Viet Nam
Indonesia
Japan
Malaysia
Republic of
Korea
Singapore
Thailand
Viet Nam
PRIMARY & BELOW LOW-SKILLED
SECONDARY SEMI-SKILLED
TERTIARY SKILLED
Situational Analysis
Occupational analysis in Malaysia for the period 2010 to 2019 indicates the existence of the
continuous phenomenon of the educated workforce being employed in the lower occupational
category (Figure 1.2.3.). The scenario, which is also commonly referred to as a vertical mismatch,
reflects that graduates are accepting jobs despite being overqualified.
FIGURE 1.2.3. Employment by Education and Skills FIGURE 1.2.4. Graduate Mismatch vs
in Malaysia, 2010 – 2019 Graduate Unemployment
% %
100 8.8 11.8 14.0 61.7 72.8 70.1 30
overqualified
56.0
25
80
20
60
15 7x
40
10
4x
20 underqualified
5
0 0
2010 2015 2019 2010 2015 2019 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
Low-and Skilled
Semi-Skilled
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
The difficulty of the workforce in finding suitable jobs that match their qualifications and skills is
due to the shortcomings in the labour market capacity. The phenomenon has been ongoing for
some time, thus contribute to rising graduate unemployment (Malaysia Employer’s Federation,
2019). While the graduate unemployment rate remained relatively stable, between 3.1% to 4.1%,
the graduate mismatch rate has more than doubled between 2001 and 2019 (Figure 1.2.4.).
The increasing rate of mismatch is a concern as more graduates are working in the semi- and
low-skilled categories. The 2019 Graduates Tracer Study by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE)
also indicates that 30.6% of the respondents with tertiary education were underemployed. In the
incidence of horizontal mismatch, Zakariya, Z. (2014) reveals that 52% of workers were employed in
jobs that are not related to their field of study.
The main contributing factor for the mismatch is due to limited jobs in the market to meet the
increasing number of labour supply, including new graduates. Today, having a university degree
does not guarantee a job. With the rising number of graduates every year, the labour market has
become very competitive, especially when there is economic uncertainty. Consequently, the job
seeker is left with no option but to accept being underemployed.
For almost a decade, there were more than three million new jobs created in the economy.
However, job creation has remained concentrated in low- and semi-skilled jobs. From the total new
jobs created during the period, only 26% were in the skilled category while the remaining 74%
were in the low- and semi-skilled categories (Figure 1.2.5.).
As at December 2019, out of 62,400 vacancies in the market, only 5% were for skilled workforce.
In contrast, from a total of 299,600 job seekers, 72% were graduates, of whom more than half
were fresh graduates with less than one-year experience (Figure 1.2.6.). The 2019 Graduates Tracer
Study highlights that 13.7% of graduates were still unemployed six months after completing their
studies. They were mainly graduates from education; arts and humanities; as well as agriculture
and veterinary.
FIGURE 1.2.5. Jobs Created by Skills FIGURE 1.2.6. Vacancies and Job Seekers, 2019
Number of
jobs creation %
10,000 Share 2019: 100
59.2%
8,000 80 6.1
72.0
6,000 60
Share 2019:
26.0%
4,000 40 21.9
Share 2019:
14.8%
2,000 20
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia Source: Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia
FIGURE 1.2.7. Jobs Created by Age Cohort From the perspective of new jobs created by
age cohort, only 16.6% of jobs created were for
% youths aged 15 – 24 (Figure 1.2.7.). Whereas,
100
65.6 59.8 83.4 data on job seekers showed that 78.9%4 of
80 the total active job seekers were youths. This
indicates that jobs were mostly created for the
60 adult cohort, hence the continuous double-
digit youth unemployment rate in the past two
40
40.2 decades. These scenarios also attest that there
34.4
20
were insufficient jobs created in the market
16.6 to absorb the increasing demand from job
0 seekers, especially graduates.
2010 2019 2010 - 2019
Another reason that pushes many individuals to accept mismatch and lower-quality jobs is due to
the geographical factor. Employees’ disposition to move to another job or position is very much
linked with location and commuting issues which results in work-life balance (Direnzo et al., 2015;
Lambert et al., 2005). In the case of Malaysia, Khazanah Research Institute (2018) highlights that
19% of their respondents rejected job offers due to inconvenient locations. This may be partially
contributed by the increasing cost of living in urban areas that discouraged new graduates from
accepting job offers, even with higher pay.
Impact of Mismatch
Skills mismatch can impact workers’ well-being in several ways. It has led workers to receive a
lower pay as compared to what they deserve. According to the 2019 Graduates Statistics report,
salaries obtained by graduates working in the low- and semi-skilled categories were 3.0 times and
2.3 times lower than that of graduates working in the skilled category (Figure 1.2.8.). When skilled
individuals work in a lower-skilled category, not only they are underpaid, their potential is under-
exploited, leading to lower productivity. Labour mismatch is one factor that may contribute to
cross-country differences in labour productivity.
Studies indicate that greater skills mismatch is associated with lower labour productivity through
less efficient allocation of resources. Skills mismatch is also known to be correlated with low job
satisfaction as a result of unequal wage-earning, underutilisation of skills and fear of job insecurity.
Ogbonnaya et al. (2017) reports that overqualified employees are more likely to feel they are being
tasked for more work due to their education but are given low wages. This decreases their job
satisfaction.
4
Based on December 2019 active job seekers.
FIGURE 1.2.8. Mean Monthly Salary for Graduates by Skills Category, 2016 – 2019
RM
7,000
5,882
6,000 5,591
5,305
5,000 4,858
2.3x 2.3x
4,000 2.3x 2.9x 3.0x
2.2x 2.7x
3.6x
3,000 2,511
2,418
2,219 2,267
1,966 1,902 1,991
2,000
1,347
1,000
0
2016 2017 2018 2019
LOW-SKILLED
SEMI-SKILLED
SKILLED
Recommendations
If Malaysia is to harness the full potential of its human capital, the persistence of skill mismatches
in the labour market must be addressed. All stakeholders, including industries, learning institutions
and Government agencies, need to closely collaborate to tackle the issue, both from the supply
and demand-side perspectives. Labour market capacity to provide sufficient jobs is limited unless
and until the production structure of industries undergoes a rapid transformation into high-end
production as envisaged in the industrial master plans. In such a situation, self-employment can
be a viable option for job seekers. Initiatives should be focused on generating more job creators
through entrepreneurship opportunities. As entrepreneurs generally face difficulties in securing
loans, financial institutions and relevant agencies may facilitate entrepreneurs applying for soft-
loans or matching grants and other business support programmes.
The issue of job opportunities has gained more attention during the COVID-19 outbreak when
retrenchment surged during the first half of 2020 as compared to the same period last year. As
most of economic activities were not allowed during the Movement Control Order (MCO), many
workers were laid off. Nevertheless, some industries had benefitted, especially online retail and
delivery services. There was an increase in the number of marts and restaurants migrating to the
digital platforms to facilitate the people who were unable to leave their homes while adhering to
the MCO. Similarly, recruitment for food delivery workers and ride-hailing drivers also increased to
cater for the spike in demand for delivery services during the MCO period. In this case, technology
plays a vital role as the enabler to make online marketplaces accessible.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also brought changes to the employment landscape from traditional
full-time employment to short-term and more flexible employment. Gig works have become
predominantly important to the economy, and gig workers are likely to have better income
prospects. A survey on the ride-hailing workers also reported that 54% of respondents indicated
that gig jobs is their primary source of income (The Centre, 2019). The result has shown that online
platform should be strengthened to facilitate these gig workers and online entrepreneurs.
Nevertheless, there is a strong ground for having a more comprehensive social safety net in place,
especially given the growing number of gig workers. Unlike paid employees, many of the self-
employed, including gig workers, are lacking access to social security protection, such as insurance
benefits and pensions, and are not covered by labour legislation. There is also the potential for a
transition from standard employment to business-digitalisation related activities, implying that the
vulnerable workers should be provided with sufficient and structured safety net. As an immediate
strategy, all self-employed, including gig workers, should make a mandatory contribution to social
security protection under the Self-Employment Social Security Act 2017 [Act 789]. This will entitle
them to receive assistance, especially during unprecedented economic downturns.
From the labour supply perspective, education and training institutions need to have more and
closer collaboration with industries to determine the type of skills that suits companies requirement
in the future. In-house assessment by individual employers is required to develop the retraining
and upskilling programmes needed by their employees to minimise the mismatch. This will lead to
better wages for the employees, and indirectly, can eventually address both the mismatch and low-
wage issues.
Conclusion
Over the years, underemployment or mismatch continues to be persistent in the Malaysian labour
market despite strategies to balance between labour supply and demand. The lack of job creation,
particularly for skilled occupations, seems to be the main contributing factor to the phenomenon.
A prolonged mismatch indicates that the potential of the educated workforce has not been fully
optimised for economic growth, thus limiting the nation’s economic potential. Self-employment
or gig job opportunities should be promoted as the career of choice for job seekers, given the
growing importance of the gig economy. Thus, structured and comprehensive regulations and
social safety net need to be in place to safeguard the workers’ well-being, especially during
economic downturns.
being of the rakyat. For example, water At the international level, Malaysia has adopted
disruptions in the Klang Valley as a result the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda,
of river pollutions in Selangor had not only which outlines 17 Sustainable Development
social but also economic impact, affecting Goals (SDGs). Malaysia needs to establish a
both the households and businesses alike. The comprehensive mechanism to measure and
implementation of the MCO to contain the monitor the development and progress of the
COVID-19 pandemic has indirectly contributed SDGs to ensure it covers the overall financing
to better air and water quality. Nevertheless, dimension in attaining SDGs. For example,
this situation is likely to be temporary as development allocation is mainly categorised
it will continue to be business as usual according to ministries and agencies and are
when economic activities recover. However, more focused on projects and programmes.
this situation can still be maintained if all As such, there is a need to realign budget
parties were to realise and take responsibility allocations to the SDGs to ensure the
for ensuring environmental sustainability achievement of national indicators, targets and
accompanied by comprehensive enforcement goals.
action.
Introduction
All member states of the United Nations (UN) adopted the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development (2030 Agenda) in 2015, and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are to be
achieved by the year 2030. The SDGs, among others, aim to end all forms of poverty, fight against
inequalities, create peace, tackle urgent environmental issues and ensure that no one is left
behind. The success of the global initiative requires concerted efforts by member states to ensure
that related plans, programmes and projects at national levels are geared towards achieving these
goals within the stipulated timeline.
Sustainable and inclusive development has always been the mainstay of Malaysia’s development
since the 1970s. Economic growth has always been emphasised by the Government. At the same
time, various initiatives have been implemented to eradicate poverty, improve the well-being of
the people, provide universal access to education and health and protect the environment. The
Eleventh Malaysia Plan, 2016 – 2020 (11MP), continued to pursue sustainable development based
on three main goals, namely achieving a high-income economy, promoting inclusivity and ensuring
sustainability. In line with the 2030 Agenda, all the SDGs were subsequently incorporated into all
initiatives under the 11MP to ensure alignment between national objectives and SDGs as well as for
sufficient resource allocation and proper monitoring. As the implementation of various programmes
and projects will be supported by the annual allocation, this article highlights the efforts taken by
Malaysia towards mapping the SDGs in the annual budget (Figure 1.1.1.).
1 2 3 4 5 6
AFFORDABLE AND DECENT WORK INDUSTRY, INNOVATION REDUCED SUSTAINABLE CITIES RESPONSIBLE
CLEAN ENERGY AND ECONOMIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE INEQUALITIES AND COMMUNITIES CONSUMPTION
GROWTH AND PRODUCTION
7 8 9 1O 11 12
CLIMATE LIFE BELOW LIFE ON LAND PEACE, JUSTICE PARTNERSHIPS
ACTION WATER AND STRONG FOR THE GOALS
INSTITUTIONS
13 14 15 16 17
Source: United Nations, 2015
The 2015 UN Addis Ababa Action Agenda (Action Agenda) provides a global framework for
financing sustainable development, which supports the implementation of the 2030 Agenda,
including the SDGs. The Action Agenda aligns all domestic and international resource flows, policies
and international agreements with economic, social and environmental priorities. The specific
action areas of the Action Agenda are:
With the SDGs fully aligned to the initiatives and targets of the 11MP, development expenditure
(DE) has been allocated to support both national objectives and the SDGs. However, for the
annual budget allocation, a mechanism has yet to be established to monitor the progress of the
allocations to support the SDGs comprehensively and more frequently. The 2021 Budget will be the
base to align its annual budget to the SDGs, beginning with the DE’s allocation.
At the Federal level, the yearly budget is determined through several processes involving
engagement with ministries and central agencies such as the Economic Planning Unit. These
include dissemination of guidelines in preparing the estimated budget for the following year to
all ministries and agencies, receipt of proposals from all ministries and agencies by the Ministry
of Finance, followed by budget screening by respective budget review officers. The next process
involves approval by the Cabinet before presentation and debate in Parliament. After the budget is
approved by Parliament and consented by Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the General
Warrant is issued. This allows expenditures in the budget to be spent on various programmes and
projects.
Mapping the SDGs onto the Programmes and Projects in the Annual Budget
There are many ways in which countries adopt the SDGs into their national budgeting process.
According to Hege & Brimont (2018), there are four approaches to achieve this: improving the
budget proposal narrative; mapping and tracking the budgetary contribution to the SDGs; using
SDGs as a management tool for negotiations; and improving budget performance evaluation. This
article focuses on mapping Malaysia’s annual budget through the lens of the SDGs as an initial
effort to improve its alignment to the SDG financing for development framework.
At this juncture, the ex post mapping exercise is focused on the actual spending on all development
projects for two ministries, the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (KeTSA) and the Ministry
of Environment and Water (KASA) for budget year 20191 in comparison with that for the Ministry
of Energy, Green Technology and Water (KeTTHA) and the Ministry of Natural Resources and
Environment (NRE) for budget year 20152. In terms of methodology, each project was first assigned
to the respective SDGs. For example, the project of upgrading of the Congok Dam in Mersing in
2019 was aimed at resolving water woes in the area. Therefore, its DE was classified as supporting
SDG6, which is to attain Clean Water and Sanitation. However, the main challenge arises if a project
could support the attainment of more than one SDG. For example, the project of management
and conservation of forest reserve can contribute towards attaining two SDGs, namely SDG13 on
Climate Action and SDG15 on Life on Land.
There were 361 projects worth RM3.2 billion in 2019 under the responsibility of the two ministries,
compared with 272 projects worth RM2.9 billion in 2015. As the two ministries are mainly
responsible for the sustainability, the DE of the ministries would naturally support the SDGs directly
related to sustainable energy, utilities, environment and natural resources. So, it is not surprising
that almost 90% of their DE supported SDGs 6, 7, 11 and 13 for both years. However, expenditure
on four SDGs which were directly under the purview of the ministries was relatively lower
compared to the SDGs of 6, 7, 11 and 13. The another four SDGs are Responsible Consumption and
Production (SDG12), Life Below Water (SDG14), Life on Land (SDG15) and Partnerships for the Goals
(SDG17). It is interesting to note that DE allocation for the two ministries was provided, albeit in
smaller magnitudes, to other SDGs not directly related to sustainability. This proves that the SDGs
are very much inter-related with each other and should not be treated in a silo. Therefore, there
is still room for improvement in mapping SDGs covering all ministries and the private sector (Table
1.1.1. and Figure 1.1.2.).
1
Year 2019 was chosen to reflect the most recent actual year of expenditure.
2
Year 2015 was chosen as the base reference year when 2030 Agenda was first signed by all countries. The portfolios for KeTTHA and NRE were
reassigned to KASA and KeTSA, respectively.
TABLE 1.1.2. Development Expenditure for KeTTHA and NRE in 2015, and for KASA and KeTSA in 2019 by SDG
2015 2019
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL
% %
RM MILLION RM MILLION
TOTAL TOTAL
Goal 1 No Poverty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Goal 2 Zero Hunger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Goal 3 Good Health and Well-Being 2.03 0.10 0.03 0.00
FIGURE 1.1.2. Development Expenditure for KeTTHA and NRE in 2015 and for KASA and KeTSA in 2019 by SDG
2015 2019
10.7% 10.2%
13.9%
16.9%
12.2%
23.7%
13.0%
4.5%
Moving Forward
The ex post mapping of DE to the respective SDGs in the annual budget of the two ministries is
just a beginning. The next step is to replicate the same exercise across all ministries, where the
final aim is to identify gaps in the implementation of the SDGs. This can then be a useful guide
to fill the gap from various sources of financing. The methodology of ascertaining ex post which
programme or project supports which SDG needs to be further refined. In addition, the mapping
of the DE to various SDGs needs to be further improved by central agencies and ministries,
especially in cases where programmes and projects support more than one SDG. For effective
monitoring, the respective public project monitoring systems will have to be enhanced to allow
ex ante SDG tagging codes on all programmes and projects. Thus, at the start of the budgeting
process, each programme and project proposal will have its own SDG tag which allows subsequent
ex post classification easier. In addition, efforts to increase awareness of SDG-aligned budgeting
process and enhance capacity building among public servants to embed SDGs in their budget
considerations will be necessary.
Conclusion
As Malaysia has taken on board the main elements of the sustainability and inclusivity in its
development strategies since the 1970s, embedding the SDGs in its development planning process
was an easier task. However, continuous efforts need to be undertaken including establishing
a comprehensive financing framework that encompasses various forms of financing and meet
the needs of stakeholders to ensure fair and equitable resources are allocated, overlaps are
minimised, and gaps are addressed towards the attainment of the SDGs. While Malaysia’s five-year
development plans have now been fully aligned to the SDGs, efforts are underway to ensure its
annual budget will also be so. In addition, there is clearly room for other stakeholders, especially
the private sector and non-governmental organisations to be contributors to SDG-related initiatives.
Efforts are also in place to establish appropriate mechanisms to enable more of such financing.
complemented by the provision of financing unaffordable, mainly due to house prices rising
facilities for affordable housing as well as faster than income growth. The median house
rental and rent-to-own housing programmes. price from 2012 to 2014 rose at a compound
Khazanah Research Institute (2019) reported annual growth rate of 23.5%, while the median
that the median multiple1 affordability for household income expanded significantly
Malaysia increased from 4.1 to 5.0 from slower at 11.7% (Khazanah Research Institute,
2002 to 2016. According to the World Bank 2019). Since 2014, house prices have
(2019), the median multiple of more than moderated following the measures undertaken
3.0 is considered unaffordable. This indicates by the Government. However, houses remain
that house prices in Malaysia are generally unaffordable for the majority of the rakyat.
Introduction
Home ownership continues to be a concern for most of the rakyat, particularly those in the B40
and lower M40 households. The Government has undertaken various efforts to ensure greater
home ownership for the rakyat, particularly the lower-income group through various affordable
housing programmes. Affordable housing can be defined as the provision of adequate homes
that meets the needs of the people in terms of quality and location as well as reasonably priced,
whereby house buyers will still have discretionary income to purchase other basic necessities (UN-
Habitat, 2011). This article analyses housing affordability in Malaysia based on the 2019 Household
Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS & BA).
Home Ownership and Trends of Household Income and House Prices in Malaysia
Based on the HIS & BA report, home ownership has marginally improved between 2016 and 2019.
In 2019, 76.9% of households owned their homes compared to 76.3% in 2016. At this rate, home
ownership in Malaysia can be considered as high by any standards, especially when Malaysia does
not have a universal home ownership policy (Figure 1.3.1.). In this regard, Malaysia compares well
with other advanced countries such as Canada at 66.3%, US (65.3%), UK (65.2%) and South Korea
(56.8%).
Nevertheless, there is some disparity in home ownership among states in Malaysia. States with
high ownership of above 84% include Terengganu, Sarawak, Kelantan, Kedah and Perlis. However,
home ownership was lower than 76% in Labuan, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Sabah and Pahang.
1
Median multiple, also known as house-price-to-income ratio, is the ratio of the median house price by the median annual gross household income.
0 20 40 60 80 100
% household
Note: Putrajaya has a low home ownership rate as the majority of houses are quarters for civil servants
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Regarding the trend of house prices and household incomes, it is evident that prices of houses
rose slower at 3.4% on average than that of household incomes at 5.2% during the period of
2001 – 2009 (Figure 1.3.2.). However, house prices rose in double digits by 11.8% compared to
household income at 9.9% during the period of 2011 – 2013. The drastic increase during the period
has generally rendered many types of houses unaffordable to many segments of the people.
To address the drastic increase in house prices, the Government instituted several measures to
manage both the demand and supply of houses. Subsequently, the impact of these measures can
be seen from the slower rise in house prices at 6% for the period of 2014 – 2019, slightly lower
than the rate of increase in household income at 6.3% on average.
FIGURE 1.3.2. The Trend of House Prices and Household Income, 2000 – 2019
% growth
16
14
12
10
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Source: Department of Statistics and National Property Information Centre, Valuation and Property Service Department, Malaysia
Measurement of Affordability
In assessing home affordability, policy makers and researchers have relied on short-term measures
such as the median1 multiple ratio which compares house prices with current incomes. This
article applies a similar model. Based on the definition by the World Bank, a home is considered
affordable if the median multiple score is 3.0 or less (Table 1.3.1.). It is considered moderately
unaffordable for scores of between 3.1 and 4.0, seriously unaffordable (4.1 to 5.0) and severely
unaffordable (5.1 and above).
score2 description
Home affordability has generally improved in Malaysia in the last few years. The overall median
house price had fallen by 1% annually on average from RM298,000 in 2016 to RM289,646 in 2019
(Table 1.3.2.). During the same period, the annual median household income had risen by 4%
annually from RM62,736 in 2016 to RM70,476 in 2019. Thus, the median multiple score dropped to
4.1 in 2019 compared to 4.8 in 2016. Although it has gradually decreased, the 2019 ratio implies
that homes remained seriously unaffordable in general. Nevertheless, the median multiple score
may differ across income groups, types of property and states.
It is interesting to note that home affordability has generally improved even at the state level
between 2016 and 2019. In 2016, homes in five states (Putrajaya, Sabah, Kelantan, Pulau Pinang
and Pahang) were considered severely unaffordable. By 2019, homes in only two states (Sabah
and Sarawak) remained so. Likewise, in 2016 homes in nine states were considered seriously
unaffordable, but by 2019 homes in only four states were in the same category. Houses in eight
states were considered moderately unaffordable in 2019 compared to just two states in 2016.
While there were no states categorised as affordable based on the median multiple scores in 2016,
houses in two states (Melaka and Putrajaya) were considered affordable in 2019.
A further analysis was conducted on the affordability of homes for the B40 group to own three
types of residential houses, namely low-cost flats3, low-cost houses and flats4 across states. The
same analysis was conducted on the affordability of the M40 group to own flats, condominiums or
apartments and terrace houses. The selection of states for the analysis is based on the following
criteria: the highest median house price (Kuala Lumpur), the highest median multiple score (Sabah)
and the most populous state (Selangor).
1
The median statistic is preferred over the mean as household incomes and house prices variables are typically skewed to the right (positive
skewness) such that their mean are typically above their median, thus not representing the population.
2
Median multiple score = Median price of houses / Median annual household incomes
3
Refers to an affordable housing unit that is self-contained but is part of a larger building with larger units and is low-priced.
4
Refers to an affordable housing unit that is self-contained but is part of a larger building with larger units and is priced lower than condominiums
or apartments.
table 1.3.2. Housing Median Multiple Score by States, 2016 and 2019
Negeri Sembilan 270,000 206,750 54,950 60,060 4.9 3.4 Moderately unaffordable
Pulau Pinang 350,000 285,000 64,909 74,028 5.4 3.8 Moderately unaffordable
Kuala Lumpur 520,000 480,000 108,874 126,588 4.8 3.8 Moderately unaffordable
Note: 1 Annual median household income is calculated based on monthly median household income multiplied by 12 months based on data from
the Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019
Source: Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (estimate)
FIGURE 1.3.3. Median Multiple Scores for B40 by Types of Houses in the Selected States, 2015 – 2019
Kuala Lumpur Sabah Selangor
14 14 14
12 12 12
10 10 10
8 8 8
6 6 6
4 4 4
2 2 2
0 0 0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Based on the analysis, it was observed that during the period of 2015 – 2019, the B40 group in
Kuala Lumpur has been facing severe unaffordability issue for all three types of housing properties
(Figure 1.3.3.). In fact, the median multiple scores for all types of properties remained high above
5.0 throughout the period. Similarly, in Sabah, the B40 group faced similar affordability issue with
owning the same types of properties over the same period. However, the severity of unaffordability
in Sabah was not as severe as in Kuala Lumpur. Selangor has resolved the issue of unaffordability
for the B40 group with low-cost flats since 2016. Nevertheless, the B40 group would find it
challenging to upgrade to the other types of housing properties in the state.
FIGURE 1.3.4. Median Multiple Score for M40 by Types of Houses in the Selected States, 2015 – 2019
The issue of housing unaffordability remained severe among the M40 in the three states during the
period of 2015 – 2019 (Figure 1.3.4.). In Kuala Lumpur, the M40 could only afford flats. However,
they were not qualified to do so under the public low-cost housing programmes. Even worse, the
other two types of properties were beyond their affordability as the median multiple scores for
condominiums or apartments and terrace houses were 8.0 and above. The situation in both Sabah
and Selangor was similar to Kuala Lumpur. However, the severity of the unaffordability was not as
extreme as that in the nation’s capital. The M40 in both states could only afford low-cost flats but
still could not upgrade to the other two types of properties.
Based on this evidence, it is observed that some states are facing greater challenges in
housing the rakyat. The Government remains committed to addressing home accessibility and
affordability issues. Through collaboration with the private sector since 2000, various public
housing programmes were implemented to meet the needs of the different segments of the
society, particularly the M40 and B40 groups. Among the programmes include 1Malaysia Housing
Programme (PR1MA), 1Malaysia Civil Servants Housing Programme (PPAM), MyFirst Home Scheme
and MyHome Scheme.
Conclusion
The provision of affordable housing to the rakyat is vital to ensure their well-being. The
Government has provided various programmes aimed at assisting the low and lower-middle income
groups in owning affordable houses. However, as the issue continues to persist, especially among
the middle- and lower-income groups across the states, more effective and efficient delivery of
these programmes is imperative. Thus, alternative models of social housing programmes should
be considered, taking into account new ownership models and innovative ways of financing and
pricing mechanisms.
Social safety net is described as non-contributory transfers targeted in some ways to the poor and
vulnerable to address chronic poverty and inequality, help the poor invest in developing human capital, and
protect the poor and vulnerable from individual and systemic shocks, including during economic reforms
(IEG – World Bank, 2011). In the context of Malaysia, it is a collection of programmes designed to protect the
livelihood and well-being of the poor and vulnerable. It entails programmes such as welfare assistance, cost
of living assistance, unemployment benefits, workers’ compensation, subsidised healthcare and education
as well as low-cost housing. Based on Paitoonpong et al. (2008), the safety net analogy is drawn from high-
wire walkers who are protected by a safety net if they fall. The net prevents any walker who falls, whether
unexpectedly or otherwise, from hitting the floor and incurring injuries.
Based on the 2019 Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey, 5.6% of Malaysian households are
considered poor at Poverty Line Income (PLI) monthly threshold of RM2,208 (Department of Statistics of
Malaysia, 2020). However, unlike many other countries, the PLI in Malaysia measures the minimum income
required to maintain a certain quality of life taking into consideration the optimum healthy food intake
requirements and access to basic necessities for non-food items. The social safety net in Malaysia may not
be as cohesive as that of advanced countries. However, Malaysians are provided with various social support
programmes such as cash transfers, subsidised healthcare, education, transport and housing. This article
focuses on the social safety net in Malaysia and makes recommendations for improvement.
In 2019, the Government spent a total of RM26.6 billion1 (Figure 1.2.1.) or 1.8% of gross domestic product
(GDP) for various social safety net programmes. The largest portion amounting to RM14 billion (52.6% of the
total assistance) was allocated to minimise the impact of the rising cost of living and improve the welfare of
the rakyat, particularly the poor and vulnerable. These include subsidies for cooking oil; liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG), diesel and petrol; electricity; and flour. Other assistances include the Cost of Living Aid (BSH) as
well as allowances and cash transfers to the people with disabilities, aged, and the poor as well as children
without guardians and Orang Asli groups. These assistances are necessary as the rising cost of living
continues to be a main concern for most of the rakyat, particularly the poor and vulnerable.
As education is an essential enabler for social mobility and human capital development, the second-largest
amount, RM6.7 billion (25.3%), was allocated for this sector. This includes programmes on food, textbooks
and other assistance for school and pre-school children as well as matriculation and higher education
students. Other assistances include various scholarships and loans for school and university students.
Agriculture is a priority sector, not only due to its linkages to the rest of the economy but also a
disproportionate share of B40 households are in this sector. Hence, this sector is a significant beneficiary
of assistances amounting to approximately RM1.9 billion (7.2%). Farmers and fishermen are among the
beneficiaries through various programmes including paddy price and fertiliser subsidies, paddy production
incentives, monsoon season assistances and oil palm re-planting as well as the implementation of Malaysian
Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certification. In addition, fishermen receive fish catch incentives.
1
Including assistances provided under development expenditure as well as supplies and services for social safety net programmes.
Assistances were also provided to transportation, health and security sectors amounting to RM1.6 billion
(6.0%) to ensure access to quality and affordable services. These include toll compensation as well as
subsidies in the transportation sector for RapidKL’s unlimited-ride monthly pass, Keretapi Tanah Melayu
Berhad's uneconomic train subsidy and rural air services in Sabah and Sarawak. Subsidies to the health
sector cover Skim Peduli Kesihatan for the B40 group (PeKa B40) and medical treatment for retirees. Other
assistances amounting to RM2.4 billion (9.0%) include interest rate subsidies to help reduce the costs of
borrowing for students at institutions of higher learning as well as assistance for community and religious
affairs.
Additional Social Safety Net Programmes during
FIGURE 1.2.1. Percentage of Federal Government COVID-19 Pandemic
Expenditure on Social Safety Net by Categories of
Assistance in 2019
The nation was severely impacted as a result
9% of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent
6% implementation of the Movement Control
7% Order (MCO). Businesses were badly hit while
RM26.6 unemployment rose. As more people became
billion 53%
vulnerable, the Government had to cast a more
25%
comprehensive safety net to support them. Hence,
the Government announced several economic
stimulus packages to protect lives and livelihoods.
COST OF LIVING TRANSPORTATION,HEALTH &
EDUCATION SECURITY
AGRICULTURE OTHERS Under the Prihatin Rakyat Economic Stimulus
Package (PRIHATIN) and the PRIHATIN PLUS
Source: Ministry of Finance, Malaysia announced in March and April 2020, various
one-off assistances were provided to households
to ease their financial burden. This includes cash transfers, benefitting around 5 million households. Cash
transfers were also provided to single individuals aged 21 and above with monthly income of not more than
RM4,000. In addition, a one-off cash aid of RM200 per person was provided to students at institutions of
higher learning with an estimated cost of RM270 million and RM500 per person to 120,000 full-time e-hailing
drivers with an allocation of RM60 million.
Under the same package, a wage subsidy programme was also implemented to encourage the retention of
workers earning less than RM4,000 and employers experiencing more than 50% decrease in their income
since 1 January 2020. These subsidies enable employers to be flexible in retaining the workers during the
movement control period. The programme involved an allocation amounting to RM13.8 billion, benefitting
approximately 4.8 million workers. This has contributed to the moderation of the unemployment rate to
4.7% in August 2020 as compared to 5.3% in May 2020.
With the resumption of economic activities, the Government announced the Pelan Jana Semula Ekonomi
Negara (PENJANA) in June 2020 to accelerate economic recovery. As a result of the MCO, people’s movements
were restricted, spurring the demand for on-line transactions. Hence, many individuals and households
engaged in the gig economy, including deliveries, e-hailing and remote or mobile businesses. The stimulus
package, among others, provides additional social protection and training for gig workers. A total of
30,000 gig workers are expected to benefit from the programme, involving an allocation of RM75 million.
Furthermore, a total of RM200 million was allocated to ease the burden of working parents during the
Conditional Movement Control Order (CMCO) through subsidised child care expenses.
The Government also announced the PRIHATIN Supplementary Initiative Package (KITA PRIHATIN) package
in September 2020 amounting to RM10 billion. A total of RM7 billion was allocated for Bantuan Prihatin
Nasional 2.0, and another RM3 billion for Wage Subsidy Programme 2.0 and Geran Khas PRIHATIN.
This package aims at providing continued support for the people, ensuring employment and assisting
businesses, particularly the SMEs, in enduring the challenges faced as a result of the pandemic.
Based on an improved methodology, the PLI has been increased from RM980 in 2016 to RM2,208 in 2019
(Department of Statistics of Malaysia, 2020). Under the new PLI, the number of households categorised as
poor increased to 405,441 households compared with 24,700 households in 2016 which was based on the
PLI 2005 methodology. As more households are considered poor, greater financial resources are required
to provide the necessary support. As the existing assistance mechanism involves various ministries and
agencies, there is a need to establish an integrated database for effective distribution of assistances.
The integrated database will be used for the identification and registration of beneficiaries, effective
disbursement and monitoring of programmes and prevent duplication of assistances and exclusion of
eligible recipients. Furthermore, the reactivation of the Malaysia Social Protection Council (MySPC) chaired
by the Prime Minister will review existing social protection policies and programmes. This would further
enhance the social safety net in Malaysia and provide an exit mechanism to reduce over-dependence on
Government assistance except for welfare cases.
Conclusion
The Government provides various assistance to the rakyat, particularly to the poor and vulnerable but
assistance cuts across many ministries and agencies. Thus, an effective and efficient integrated delivery
system is needed. The private sector, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders have an
important role in complementing the Government in ensuring that no one is left behind in the national
development agenda.
The Government will continue to focus on enhancing the usage of technology and
addressing the needs of the vulnerable digitalisation across public and private sectors
group, particularly the B40. In this respect, as well as ensuring a stable labour market.
the Malaysia Social Protection Council was Various initiatives will be formulated to provide
reactivated to coordinate and integrate all a more conducive environment for businesses
and FDI to thrive.
social welfare programmes. Thus, the overall
mechanism in delivering assistances to target
The 2021 Budget will also introduce measures
groups will be improved.
to increase productivity by enhancing the
adoption of technology across the board,
Steering the Economy including individuals, SMEs and corporates.
Efforts will focus on the development of
As Malaysia recovers from the impact of resilient SMEs. As the backbone of the
the COVID-19, the economy must return economy, the challenges faced by SMEs during
to a more sustainable growth path. The the COVID-19 pandemic signifies the need
focus will be on increasing foreign direct for adoption and adaptation of new business
investment (FDI), enhancing productivity and approaches. The Government will continue to
re-instilling consumer confidence. As such, provide the necessary support for SMEs to
the Government will prioritise essential areas, prosper in the new environment, including the
such as improving the ease of doing business, potential for going global.
References
Abdul Hadi Nawi. (2019). Property Talk 2019: Direnzo, Marco S., Jeffrey H. Greenhaus,
Affordable House vs Affordability. Retrieved & Christy, H. Weer. (2015). Relationship
from https://www.ikpkt.kpkt.gov.my Between Protean Career Orientation and
Work–Life Balance: A Resource Perspective.
Allen, J. & Andries de Grip. (2012). Does Skill Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36.4
Obsolescence Increase the Risk of Employment (2015), 538-560.
Loss? Retrieved from https://www.
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036846.2 Economic Planning Unit. (2017). Malaysia
011.570727 Sustainable Development Goals Voluntary
National Review. Retrieved from https://
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2018). Financial Stability sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/
and Payment Systems Report 2018. Retrieved documents/15881Malaysia.pdf
from https://www.bnm.gov.my/files/
publication/fsps/en/2018/cp02_001_box.pdf Economic Planning Unit. (2015). Eleventh
Malaysia Plan 2016-2020. Retrieved from
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2017). Annual Report https://www.epu.gov.my.
2016. Retrieved from https://www.bnm.gov.
my/files/publication/ar/en/2016/cp04_002_ Economist Intelligence Unit. (2019). Global Food
box.pdf Security Index 2019. Retrieved from https://
foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Index
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2016). Annual Report
2016: Demystifying the Affordable Housing Enterprise Community Partners Inc. (2014).
Issue in Malaysia. Retrieved from https:// Impact of Affordable Housing on Facilities
www.bnm.gov.my. and Communities: A Review of the Evidence
Base. Retrieved from https://www.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). enterprisecommunity.org
Graduates Statistics Report.
Hege, E. & Brimon, L. (2018). Integrating SDGs
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). into National Budgetary Processes. (IDDRI
Household Expenditure Survey Report 2019. Study Number 5/18).
Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my.
International Labour Organisation. (2020). ILO
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Statistics. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.
Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey org/data/bulk/
Report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.
dosm.gov.my International Labour Organisation. (2017).
How Useful is the Concept of Skills Mismatch?
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/skills/
Labour Force Survey Report. pubs/WCMS_552798/lang--en/index.htm
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). State International Labour Organisation. (2015). Time
Socioeconomic Report 2019. Retrieved from Related Underemployment. Retrieved from
https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-
ep/epProductFreeDownloadSearch.seam --dgreports/---stat/documents/ publication/
wcms_422452.pdf
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020).
Supply and Utilisation Accounts Selected International Monetary Fund. (2020). World
Agricultural Commodities. Retrieved from Economic Outlook Update, June 2020: A
https://www.dosm.gov.my Crisis Like No Other, An Uncertain Recovery.
Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2017). Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/
Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey WEOUpdateJune2020 on 26 September 2020
Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.
dosm.gov.my.
Kaufman, H.G. (1974). Obsolescence and National Property Information Centre. (2016).
Professional Career Development. Retrieved The Residential Prices Yearly Update 2016.
from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED102297 Retrieved from https://www.napic.gov.my.
Khazanah Research Institute. (2019). Rethinking National Property Information Centre. (2015).
Housing: Between State, Market and Society. The Residential Prices Yearly Update 2015.
Retrieved from http://www.krinstitute.org Retrieved from https://www.napic.gov.my
Khazanah Research Institute. (2018). The Ogbonnaya, C., Daniels, K. & Nielsen, K.M.
School-to-Work Transition of Young Malaysians. (2017). Does Contingent Pay Encourage
Retrieved from http://www.krinstitute.org Positive Employee Attitudes and Intensify
Work? Human Resource Management Journal,
Lambert, S.J., & Kossek, E.E. (2005). Future 27(1), 94-112.
Frontiers: Enduring Challenges and Established
Assumptions in the Work-Life Field. Retrieved Organisation for Economic Co-operation
from https://msu.edu/user/kossek/future.pdf and Development. (2015). Labour Market
Mismatch and Labour Productivity: Evidence
Malaysia Employers Federation. (2019). from PIAAC Data. Retrieved from http://www.
Graduates Face Skills Mismatch and Job oecd.org/economy/growth/Labour-Market-
Shortages. Retrieved from http://www.mef. Mismatch-and-Labour-Productivity-Evidence-
org.my/MEFITN/MR191111a.pdf from-PIAAC-Data.pdf
Malik, N.M., Samsurijan, M.S., Leng, K.S., Gopal, Paitoonpong, S., Abe, S., & Puopongsakorn, N.
P.S. & Hamad, Z. (2017). The Ability town a (2008). The Meaning of Social Safety Nets.
House among Urban Families in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(5-6), 467-473.
Geografi Journal, 5(2), 69 - 77.
SME Corporation Malaysia. (2018). SME Annual
Ministry of Higher Education. (2019). Graduates Report 2017/18. Retrieved from https://www.
Tracer Study Report. smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/laporan-
tahunan/3342-laporan-tahunan-pks-2017-18
Ministry of Human Resources. (2020). Job
Registration Statistics. The Centre. (2019). Gig Work: Full-Time Benefits
for Full-Time Work? Retrieved from https://
National Housing Department. National www.centre.my/post/gig-work-full-time-
Housing Policy (2018 -2025). Retrieved from benefits-for-full-time-work
https://www.ehome.kpkt.gov.my
UN-Habitat. (2011). Affordable Land and Housing
National Property Information Centre. (2019). in Asia. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/
Property Market Report 2019. Retrieved from
wpdm-package/affordable-land-and-housing-
https://www.napic.gov.my.
in-asia/?wpdmdl=111395
National Property Information Centre. (2019).
The Residential Prices Yearly Update 2019. United Nations. (2015). United Nations Summit
Retrieved from https://www.napic.gov.my. on Sustainable Development. Retrieved from
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20
National Property Information Centre. (2018).
The Residential Prices Yearly Update 2018. World Bank. (2020). World Development
Retrieved from https://www.napic.gov.my. Indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.
worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-
National Property Information Centre. (2017). development-indicators
The Residential Prices Yearly Update 2017.
Retrieved from https://www.napic.gov.my. World Bank. (2019). Malaysia Economic
Monitor: Making Ends Meet. Retrieved from
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/
handle/10986/32810
World Bank. (2018). Logistics Performance Index. World Health Organisation. (2020). WHO
Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org/ Director-General’s opening remarks at the
international/global media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March
2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
World Bank (2018). Malaysia’s Digital Economy: dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-
A New Driver of Development. Retrieved from opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-
https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ covid-19---11-march-2020 on 26 September
malaysia/publication/malaysias-digital- 2020
economy-a-new-driver-of-development
Zakariya Z. (2014). Wage Effect of Over-
World Bank (2011). An Evaluation of World Education and Mismatch in Malaysia: A
Bank Support: Social Safety Nets. Retrieved Random Effect Approach. Jurnal Ekonomi
from https://www.oecd.org/derec/ Malaysia, 48(2), 3-17.
worldbankgroup/49023353.pdf
Global
Economic
Outlook
41 ov e rv i e w
42 globa l econom y
Information Box 2 .1 - Response to the
COV ID -19 Pandemic by S elec ted Multilateral
Development B ank s
59 conclus ion
60 r e fe r e nce s
CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY: GLOBAL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
GL OB AL E CON OMI C O U T L O O K
2020
DISMAL GROWTH The Impact of
COVID-19 Pandemic
Restricted movement
Forced lockdowns
Negative
Global Growth
Anticipated
in 2020
ADVANCED
ECONOMIES
EMDES Decelerated activities
-5.8% -3.3%
Economic disruptions
5.2%
ECONOMIES
3.9% 6%
Global
Economy
to Rebound
in 2021
ADVANCED
GLOBAL ECONOMIES EMDES
I N FLATI ON
3.4% 1.6% 4.7%
8 .3 %
2021
WORLD
-10.4% TRADE
2020
Silver Lining
Ef f ec tiv e T o d ec l i n e f u r t h e r i n 20 21 a s
i m plem entatio n o f r e st r i c t i v e i n v est m en t p o l i c y
FDI
f i s c al and m o netar y m ea su r es a f f e c t c r o ss- b o r d e r
m e a sur es M & A a c t i v i t i es
C O VID- 19 v ac c ine
d i s cov er y and
co n tainm ent of
p and em ic
Ri s k s t o g l o b a l e c o n o m y p e r si st s:
chapter 2
2
Estimate a favourable trade environment.
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020)
1
ASEAN-5 comprises Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam.
World trade is set to plummet by 10.4% in and approval of new investments. In 2021,
2020 (2019: 1%), owing to subdued demand the FDI is projected to further decline by 5%
for goods and services, compounded by the to 10%, as new restrictive investment policy
COVID-19 pandemic. Lacklustre demand for measures affect cross-border merger and
goods is expected, despite rising needs for acquisition (M&A) activities.
medical equipment and supplies, amid volatile
commodity markets as well as escalating Global inflation is expected to be mild at
trade and trade-related tensions, particularly 3.2% in 2020 (2019: 3.5%). Inflation is on a
between the US and China. The demand for downward trend in advanced economies at
services is also anticipated to fall, with cross- 0.8% (2019: 1.4%), while inflation in the EMDEs
border tourism activities adversely affected. is anticipated to remain at 5% (2019: 5.1%),
Nevertheless, global trade is projected to turn resulting from low oil prices. In 2021, global
around by 8.3% in 2021 as economic activities inflation is expected to slightly increase to
gain momentum. 3.4%. Inflation in the advanced economies is
anticipated to increase to 1.6%. In comparison,
Global foreign direct investment (FDI) is inflation in the EMDEs is forecast to be at
expected to decline up to 40% in 2020 4.7%.
(2019: 13%), dragging the FDI below USD1
trillion for the first time since 2005. This drop Risks to the global outlook are mainly due
is due to heightened uncertainties concerning to the impact and severity of the COVID-19
the pandemic, which may continue to slow crisis, compounded by the uncertainty in
down the implementation of existing projects discovering a vaccine. A protracted economic
slowdown may result in a vicious cycle, where
FIGURE 2.2. Inflation Rate for Global, Advanced financial distress may expose borrowers to
Economies, and Emerging Market and vulnerabilities. Subsequently, this will drag
Developing Economies, 2019 – 2021
economies into debt crises and decelerate
(% change)
activities even more. In addition, cross-border
spillovers from weaker external demand
% Inflation Rate
could further magnify the impact of country-
6
or region-specific shocks on global growth.
5.1 5.0
Strained relationships among the coalition
5 of oil producers of the Organization of the
4.7
Petroleum Exporting Countries Plus (OPEC+)2
4 and widespread social unrest may pose
3.5
3.2
3.4 additional headwinds to the global economy.
3 Furthermore, uncertainties surrounding the
Brexit outcomes, rising government debts and
2 unemployment, as well as climate crisis, are
1.6 among the major factors that could impede
1.4
future growth.
1 0.8
0
2019 20201 20212
Global Economy
GLOBAL Navigating unprecedented challenges
ADVANCED ECONOMIES
EMERGING MARKET AND DEVELOPING ECONOMIES The US’ economy contracted by 4.4% in the
first half of 2020, resulting from a decline in
1
Estimate consumer spending, as the economy struggled
2
Forecast with the COVID-19 pandemic. Personal
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020)
2
OPEC+ comprises 13 members of OPEC, namely Algeria, Angola, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi
Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela as well as 10 of the world’s major non-OPEC oil-exporting nations, namely Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei Darussalam,
Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan.
consumption expenditure, which contributes TABLE 2.1. Selected Indicators for the United
67.1% to total GDP, plummeted by 5%, States, 2019 – 2021
particularly in the health care as well as food
services and accommodation sectors. Private INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
investment fell by 10.6% following a sharp Real GDP (% p.a.) 2.2 -4.3 3.1
decline in transportation equipment as well as
a decrease in mining structures, resulting from Inflation (% p.a.) 1.8 1.5 2.8
subdued oil and gas production activities. Current Account of BOP -2.2 -2.1 -2.1
(% of GDP)
In the same period, the US recorded a trade Unemployment Rate (%) 3.7 8.9 7.3
deficit of 7.5%, amounting to USD50.7 billion,
as exports declined following subdued 1
Estimate
demand, particularly in petroleum products 2
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
and fuel oil. Likewise, imports decreased, (October 2020)
The economy is projected to decline by 9.8% Inflation (% p.a.) 1.8 0.8 1.2
in 2020 (2019: 1.5%), as the services sector Current Account of BOP -4.0 -2.0 -3.8
continues to contract following prolonged (% of GDP)
lockdowns imposed by the Government. Unemployment Rate (%) 3.8 5.4 7.4
Several schemes have been announced to
stimulate demand in sectors affected by 1
Estimate
the pandemic, particularly in hospitality and 2
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
tourism. The UK announced various stimulus (October 2020)
and relief packages since March 2020, including
the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme,
which helped pay the wages of people in In 2021, the UK’s economic growth is forecast
9.6 million jobs. In addition, the Eat Out to bounce back by 5.9%, largely contributed
to Help Out Scheme boosted hospitality- by a recovery in the services sector. The
related activities. As of September 2020, the resumption of retail- and hospitality-related
Bank of England maintained the policy rate activities is likely to support the recovery,
at 0.10%, after reducing the rate twice in boosted by stimulus measures aimed at
March by a total of 65 basis points to bolster consumers. The conclusion of the negotiation
the economy. The unemployment rate is of the Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement
projected to register 5.4% (2019: 3.8%) as the (CFTA) between the UK and the EU and a
Government’s furlough scheme is expected smooth post-Brexit transition are expected to
to be discontinued by the end of the year. support growth. The unemployment rate is
Introduction
The COVID-19 outbreak began at end-2019 and was declared as a pandemic in March 2020 by the
World Health Organization. The pandemic has affected people worldwide, and to date, has resulted
in over 1.1 million fatalities out of 40.7 million confirmed cases (World Health Organization, 2020).
The rising trend of positive cases, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding the discovery of a
vaccine, signal that a protracted pandemic may be probable. In containing the spread of this virus,
governments have imposed lockdowns, enforced business closures, limited international travels and
restricted individuals from their usual physical and social activities. These containment measures
have resulted in severe economic disruptions. Amid an already softening world economic growth
and volatile commodity prices, the added economic impact of the pandemic is expected to lead
to the worst global economic crisis ever recorded in recent times. To mitigate the socioeconomic
impact of the pandemic and the containment measures, governments have implemented stimulus
measures to protect lives and livelihoods as well as support businesses to remain afloat. These
stimulus measures include additional health expenditure as well as assistance in the form of cash
transfers, loan moratoriums, credit guarantees and tax incentives.
However, the limited fiscal space of many governments may not be able to sustain the provision
of the relief and recovery assistance for long due to the existing economic conditions amid the
pandemic. The adverse impact of COVID-19 on economies is evidenced in shrinking tax revenues,
decreased gross domestic product (GDP) growth, volatile private capital flows, declining exports
and falling remittances. Middle- and low-income countries that are constrained by limited financial
resources and weak health systems are particularly vulnerable and slow to recover. Projections
by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for 2020 reflects that as GDP contracts and public
expenditures expand, the share of gross public debt will generally rise to a record high. This is
especially so for the middle-income countries whose debt is projected to rise to 62.2% of GDP
(2019: 52.6%) with an expected fiscal deficit of 10.7% of GDP (2019: 4.9%). Likewise, the share of
gross public debt in low-income countries is expected to increase to 48.8% of GDP (2019: 43.3%),
with their fiscal deficit increasing to 6.2% of GDP (2019: 4%).
Against this backdrop of uncertainty and vulnerability of the current economic situation,
multilateral development banks (MDBs) can play a critical role in the overall global economic
recovery. MDBs are generally recognised as international financial institutions that have been
commissioned by countries to promote inclusive and sustainable economic development. There
are more than 20 MDBs worldwide with various roles and functions. The unique structure of
MDBs allows them to tackle challenges that cross national borders, including global pandemics,
which demand cross-border solutions (Maasdorp, 2020). Malaysia is a member of five of these
institutions, namely the World Bank Group (WBG), the IMF, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the
Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).
The challenge to manage the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an increasing
need of many developing countries in seeking financial support from the MDBs. This has led to
the MDBs expediting the disbursement of loans and expanding concessional financial assistance
through existing resources. The additional obligation is imposed on their existing roles in
supporting the reconstruction and development of member countries as well as mobilising
resources for infrastructure and sustainable development.
The COVID-19 response initiatives by the MDBs include expanding the allocation of existing
assistance, extending assistance to wider recipients and expediting the process of disbursement.
The forms of assistance provided by the five MDBs, of which Malaysia is a member of, are listed in
Table 2.1.1.
mdbs
programme/initiative
wbg imf adb isdb aiib
Trade Finance √ √
Guarantees √ √
Other Initiatives √ √
Sources: World Bank Group (2020), International Monetary Fund (2020), Asian Development Bank (2020), Islamic Development Bank (2020) and Asian
Infrastructure Investment Bank (2020)
The MDBs provide financial support to fund infrastructure and development projects in
member countries. The MDBs also allocate special funding, in the form of loans and grants,
to help member countries mitigate the impact of health-related crises, especially pandemics,
on the economy. Loans are provided on a market or concessional basis, while grants are
only provided for limited purposes, based on specific terms and conditions. Details of these
programmes are listed in Table 2.1.2.
WBG1 COVID-19 Initial Financing to strengthen health systems and disease IBRD and IDA:
Response Package surveillance. USD6 billion
Program-for-Result PforR can be restructured for prompt response with funds Financing from
(PforR) disbursed directly for the delivery of defined results in the IDA
health sector.
Contingent Emergency Contingent windows to escalate the emergency Financing from the
Response Component response for provision of additional financing to existing IBRD, IDA or trust
investment projects after a crisis has or is about to occur. funds
Catastrophe Deferred Contingent financing line providing immediate liquidity to Financing from
Drawdown Option address shocks following a natural disaster and/or health- IDA
related event.
Global Trade Liquidity Shoring up local banks through funding and risk-sharing IFC:
Programme and Critical support to continue financing companies in emerging USD2 billion
Commodities Finance markets.
Programme
IMF Rapid Financing Increase access limits of the emergency financial facilities The amount for
Instrument (RFI) of RFI and RCF (rapid, low-access and one-off) without both RFI and RCF
the need to have a full-fledged programme in place. RFI is close to SDR20
Rapid Credit Facility is available to all Fund members, while RCF is available billion
(RCF) to Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust-eligible (PRGT)
members only.
1
The World Bank Group (WBG) consists of five unique agencies – the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the International
Development Association (IDA), the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) and the International Centre for
Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
continued
ADB COVID-19 Response Address the social and economic consequences of Sovereign:
Options the pandemic through sovereign and non-sovereign USD18.2 billion
operations.
Non-Sovereign:
USD1.8 billion
IsDB2 Strategic Preparedness Reallocation of existing funds under IsDB in supporting USD2.3 billion
and Response member countries’ efforts to prevent, contain, mitigate
Programme for the and recover from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19 Pandemic
AIIB COVID-19 Crisis Recovery Financing for both public and private sector entities in USD10 billion
Facility member countries to alleviate and mitigate economic,
financial and public health pressures arising from adverse
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Special Fund Window Interest rate buy-down on sovereign-backed financing for USD10 million per
lower-income members. country
Sources: World Bank Group (2020), International Monetary Fund (2020), Asian Development Bank (2020), Islamic Development Bank (2020) and Asian
Infrastructure Investment Bank (2020)
Debt relief programmes provided by the MDBs include debt restructuring and debt service
suspension. During this challenging period, these programmes are particularly helpful for the
poor and vulnerable countries to manage their debt burden and sustain their economies with
adequate resources at the same time. Details of programmes are listed in Table 2.1.3.
WBG Debt Service Suspension Available to IDA-eligible countries and the United Approximately
Initiative Nations' (UN) least developed countries. USD5 billion
disbursed as of mid-
September 2020
IMF Catastrophe Containment Provides grants for the PRGT-eligible member countries SDR700 million
and Relief Trust to cover IMF debt service. This helps countries channel
their financial resources towards vital emergency
medical and relief efforts during most catastrophic of
natural disasters and public health disasters.
Sources: World Bank Group (2020) and International Monetary Fund (2020)
Trade finance provides credit as well as payment guarantees and insurance to businesses.
This facility allows businesses to manage fluctuating exchange rates and mitigate other risks.
Assistance from the MDBs for companies involved in cross-border transactions is critical,
particularly those in low-income countries, especially during crisis periods. Details of this
facility are listed in Table 2.1.4.
2
The Islamic Development Bank Group (IsDBG) consists of the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), the Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), the Islamic
Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC), the Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD) and the
International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation (ITFC).
WBG Global Trade Finance Cover payment risks of financial institutions by providing IFC:
Programme additional allocation for trade financing to companies USD2 billion
that import and export goods, particularly the small and
medium enterprises (SMEs) involved in global supply
chains during the pandemic.
IsDB Strategic Preparedness Trade finance to support least developed member ITFC:
and Response countries (LDMCs) and severely affected non-LDMCs to USD300 million
Programme purchase emergency COVID-19 preparedness-related
medical equipment and supplies.
Sources: World Bank Group (2020) and Islamic Development Bank (2020)
(iv) Guarantees
Guarantees by the MDBs are made available to eligible member countries to back financial
obligations such as loans and bonds issuance in both domestic and international markets.
These guarantees address both political and credit risks. Details of this assistance are listed in
Table 2.1.5.
WBG MIGA Fast-Track Facility Issuance of guarantees through streamlined and MIGA:
expedited procedures through credit enhancement, de- USD6.5 billion
risking solutions and supporting trade finance.
IsDB Strategic Preparedness Provision of credit and political risk insurance to sustain ICIEC:
and Response Programme imports of strategic commodities, protect investment USD150 million
and minimise volatility in mitigating negative health and for insurance
socioeconomic impact. coverage
Sources: World Bank Group (2020) and Islamic Development Bank (2020)
Technical assistance and policy advice are made available to all member countries through
capacity building and training as well as consultation and research. These assistances are
focused on fulfilling developing countries’ needs to improve and implement policies as well
as strengthen institutions to support further development and growth. In the wake of the
COVID-19 pandemic, the MDBs offer policy analyses and recommendations to governments,
on request, in formulating measures to mitigate and recover from the impact of the crisis.
The MDBs also provide a platform for the sharing of good practices among member countries
in addressing the effects of the crisis on respective economies.
The MDBs also assist member countries in procuring medical equipment and supplies in light
of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through this assistance, member countries are able to acquire the
equipment and supplies at the earliest possible time and at economical prices. The WBG and
ADB facilitate their member countries through a streamlined and fast-track procedure as well
as help create a sizeable order volume to support countries’ procurement in these items.
In the period between April and September 2020, the five MDBs have cumulatively approved
almost USD132.6 billion in the form of loans, guarantees and grants for debt relief. Approximately
138 countries have received these assistances to implement measures in containing the outbreak,
resume development projects and enable local banks to continue supporting businesses. To date,
most recipients are the middle- and low-income member countries (Center for Strategic and
International Studies, 2020).
The MDBs recognise the continued need for assistance by member countries, especially during this
challenging period. Presently, their focus is to build the countries’ resilience once the pandemic
subsides. The MDBs remain committed to easing the burden of member countries in their
endeavour towards sustainable and inclusive growth.
Malaysia fully recognises the importance of the MDBs in providing support to vulnerable countries,
particularly during this challenging time and supporting member countries’ journeys towards
sustainable growth. Thus, Malaysia remains supportive of the efforts by the MDBs in aiding
countries in need through its existing contributions to the MDBs. The country will continue
to benefit from the continuous engagement with the MDBs to formulate policy measures in
responding to the COVID-19 crisis.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about global challenges that have never been experienced
before. Governments have had to carry out unprecedented measures in addressing the impacts
of the pandemic on their economies. Notwithstanding the various measures undertaken by
governments, much remains uncertain regarding a full economic recovery in the near term. The
MDBs play an important role in partnering with governments towards achieving a rapid recovery
and return to a more resilient and sustainable growth trajectory.
forecast to worsen to 7.4%, while inflation is many countries to protect jobs. Inflation was
projected to rise to 1.2%. Risks to the UK’s GDP lower at 0.7%, owing to significantly low oil
forecast include the dual-threat of prolonged prices, despite higher food prices.
COVID-19 infections and Brexit uncertainties.
The slow progress of Brexit negotiations will Growth in the euro area is projected to
affect the execution of the CFTA, which is shrink by 8.3% in 2020 (2019: 1.3%), mainly
scheduled to enter into force at the beginning dragged by weak household consumption and
business investment. Household consumption
of 2021.
is expected to remain sluggish, primarily
due to elevated precautionary savings amid
The GDP growth in the euro area contracted
uncertainties concerning job and income
by 9% in the first half of 2020 as domestic
prospects. Investment is expected to slump
demand was severely affected by the COVID-19
as companies, particularly those with larger
pandemic. Household consumption plummeted
debt burdens, are anticipated to suspend their
by 9.8% due to lower spending following investment plans. The European Commission
temporary closures of shops, restaurants and has announced a package of safety nets
other services-providing businesses, as most amounting to EUR540 billion, which includes
European governments imposed lockdowns providing support for euro area countries
within the period of March until June 2020. in health-related spending. In addition, the
Similarly, business investment plunged by package allows the European Investment Bank
9.6%, resulting from factory shutdowns, to finance companies, especially the small
which affected production. The labour market and medium enterprises (SMEs) as well as
remained stable, with the unemployment for EU member countries to protect jobs and
rate at 7.5%, largely supported by the incomes. The unemployment rate is expected
implementation of short-term work schemes in to be higher at 8.9% (2019: 7.6%) following the
gradual phasing out of the furlough scheme. consumption plummeted by 7.3%, mainly
Inflation is anticipated to be subdued at 0.4% due to lower spending on services following
(2019: 1.2%), reflecting continued low oil lockdown measures from 23 March to
prices. 10 May 2020. Private investment slumped
by 4.3%, as a result of a disruption in the
TABLE 2.3. Selected Indicators for the Euro Area, supply chains and weak global demand,
2019 – 2021 particularly in the automotive subsector as
major car manufacturers temporarily shut
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
down operations. Likewise, exports plunged
by 13.4%, largely due to reduced demand
Real GDP (% p.a.) 1.3 -8.3 5.2 for motor vehicles as well as machinery and
Inflation (% p.a.) 1.2 0.4 0.9 equipment. The unemployment rate was
recorded at 4%, while inflation eased to 1.2%,
Current Account of BOP 2.7 1.9 2.4 owing to low oil prices.
(% of GDP)
Unemployment Rate (%) 7.6 8.9 9.1 Growth in Germany is anticipated to contract
by 6% in 2020 (2019: 0.6%), weighed down
1
Estimate by sluggish domestic demand, despite the
Forecast
announcement of fiscal stimulus packages
2
Growth in the euro area is exposed to several TABLE 2.4. Selected Indicators for Germany,
risks. The high cost of fiscal policy measures 2019 – 2021
may lead to a spike in government debts and
subsequently, increase the risk of sovereign
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
debt crises in the medium term. On the
external front, a disorderly Brexit continues Real GDP (% p.a.) 0.6 -6.0 4.2
to be a major cause of uncertainty in the
Inflation (% p.a.) 1.3 0.5 1.1
region, as the UK and the EU are scheduled to
conclude the CFTA before the transition period Current Account of BOP 7.1 5.8 6.8
ends in December 2020. (% of GDP)
Risks to the economy include labour market TABLE 2.5. Selected Indicators for France,
disruptions, stemming from the acceleration 2019 – 2021
of the automation technologies’ development
and implementation, due to the COVID-19
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
pandemic. Additionally, unfavourable
demographic trends, amid a declining Real GDP (% p.a.) 1.5 -9.8 6.0
working population, will increasingly constrain Inflation (% p.a.) 1.3 0.5 0.6
productivity and potential economic growth.
Current Account of BOP -0.7 -1.9 -1.8
On the external front, prolonged supply chain
(% of GDP)
disruptions and challenges among main
trading partners in curtailing the pandemic Unemployment Rate (%) 8.5 8.9 10.2
may weigh on growth prospects of the export-
Estimate
oriented economy. Additional risks include
1
2
Forecast
possible retaliation from the country’s largest Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020)
trading partner, which will depend on the
Government’s decision related to partnership
in the country’s 5G network infrastructure For 2021, growth in France is projected to
development. Subsequently, this may also expand by 6%, mainly supported by a recovery
adversely affect trade, particularly auto exports. in domestic demand. Household consumption
is expected to turn around, backed by higher
The economy of France contracted by spending as consumer confidence is restored.
12.3% in the first six months of 2020 due Likewise, private investment is anticipated to
to weak domestic demand. Household rebound, spurred by the Government’s support
consumption plummeted by 10.4%, with a in the form of state-guaranteed loans and
significant reduction in spending on energy, tax breaks. Public investment is expected to
engineered goods as well as transportation, rise, in line with the EUR100 billion recovery
accommodation and food services. Private plan to support green and digital transitions
investment slumped by 13.9%, with the as well as improve the competitiveness of
suspension of building constructions following French companies. In addition, the recovery
lockdown measures from March until May plan also aims to strengthen the resilience
2020. The unemployment rate improved of strategic sectors, particularly aeronautics,
automobile, construction and tourism. support of the same amount was earlier
However, France is anticipated to register a rolled out in April. The Government plans
double-digit unemployment rate at 10.2% as to announce additional economic stimulus
the Government is expected to progressively measures in early 2021 to boost the economy.
reduce coverage of the short-term activity The unemployment rate is anticipated to be
scheme. Inflation is expected to be at 0.6%. at 3.3% (2019: 2.4%). Meanwhile, deflation is
projected to register 0.1% (2019: 0.5%) due to
Risks to the economy include widening fiscal a drop in oil prices.
deficit, with a reduction in tax revenues and
higher social transfer expenditure following a TABLE 2.6. Selected Indicators for Japan,
sizeable drop in economic activities, amid the 2019 – 2021
COVID-19 pandemic. The general escape clause
in the EU fiscal rules allows more fiscal space INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
for the Government to address the impact of
Real GDP (% p.a.) 0.7 -5.3 2.3
the pandemic. The activation of this clause
will lead to a sharp expansion in the country’s Inflation (% p.a.) 0.5 -0.1 0.3
fiscal deficit. In addition, possible new tariffs
Current Account of BOP 3.6 2.9 3.2
imposed by the US on a broader range of (% of GDP)
imported items from France, amid re-escalating
Unemployment Rate (%) 2.4 3.3 2.8
trade tensions over the digital services tax
levied by France and aerospace subsidies, 1
Estimate
could adversely affect business investment 2
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
plans and undermine exports. (October 2020)
Japan’s economy contracted by 5.9% in the The GDP is forecast to turn around by
first half of 2020, mainly due to a decline in 2.3% in 2021, supported by a rebound in
private consumption and exports, which were private consumption, private investment and
severely affected by the pandemic. Private exports. Private consumption is expected
consumption decreased significantly by 10.9%, to be buoyed by the Tokyo Olympic Games,
as a result of services-related businesses scheduled in the summer of the year. Private
closure and the implementation of voluntary investment is expected to increase due to
emergency measures. Likewise, exports shrunk higher usage of automation and digitisation,
by 23.3%, owing to low shipments of transport which will enable companies to lower costs
equipment and machinery, amid deteriorating and boost productivity. This is in line with
global demand. The unemployment rate the Government’s plans to automate 27%
slightly rose to 2.7%, while inflation was lower of existing work tasks by 2030 to address
at 0.1%. a shrinking workforce due to the ageing
population. The unemployment rate is
Growth in Japan is forecast to decline by 5.3% projected to be lower at 2.8%, while inflation
in 2020 (2019: 0.7%), mainly due to worsening is expected to remain at 0.3%.
private consumption and exports. Private
consumption, which deteriorated in the first Risks to the economy include continued
few months of the year, is expected to rise recession brought about by the pandemic,
gradually with the reopening of businesses in escalating trade tensions and an unfavourable
late May. Exports are anticipated to remain fiscal outlook due to the high level of
sluggish due to the ongoing trade tensions government debts. Risks also stem from
with the Republic of Korea and the US, and macro-financial vulnerabilities and limited
uncertainty in the outlook of global demand. monetary policy space, which make the
In May 2020, the Government announced country more vulnerable to shocks. The ageing
a second stimulus package amounting to population may slow down growth and remains
USD1.1 trillion to provide relief to people and one of the major challenges for the economy.
businesses affected by the pandemic. Fiscal
The GDP of Australia fell by 2.4% in the first rate twice in March, by a total of 50 basis
half of 2020, mainly due to weak private points, from 0.75% to 0.25% to support the
consumption and exports. Private consumption economy.
plunged by 6.5%, as a result of a large decline
in household expenditure, particularly in Australia’s economy is forecast to turn around
transport services, recreation as well as hotels, by 3% in 2021, attributed to robust domestic
cafes and restaurants. Exports plummeted by demand and a recovery in exports. Private
6.3%, largely due to significantly lower demand consumption is expected to gain momentum,
for metal ores and minerals, particularly from with a growth of 5.7%, backed by improved
China and Japan. The unemployment rate consumer confidence, amid the recovery in
was registered at 5.9% following job losses in employment prospects. Public investment is
the accommodation and food services, retail forecast at 3.3%, with higher spending on
trade industries as well as arts and recreation transport infrastructure, health care and other
services. Inflation was recorded at 1%, with essential services. Exports are projected to pick
lower oil prices. up by 5.1% due to rising demand for liquefied
natural gas (LNG). The unemployment rate is
Overall, Australia’s GDP growth is expected anticipated to register 7.7%, while inflation
to contract by 4.2% in 2020 (2019: 1.8%) as is expected to record 1.3%. Risks to the
private consumption and exports declined. economy include a resurgence of the COVID-19
Private consumption is anticipated to shrink pandemic, re-intensification of trade tensions
following massive job losses and lower income and a cold war over technology with China as
levels, coupled with higher savings. Exports well as volatile commodity prices.
are forecast to fall by 5.4% (2019: 3.1%) due to
sluggish demand from China, amid heightening The Republic of Korea’s economy contracted
trade tensions between the two nations. Public by 1.5% during the first six months of 2020,
consumption is projected to increase by 5.4% mainly due to weak private consumption
(2019: 5.3%) following the announcement of and a plunge in exports, particularly in
four stimulus packages amounting to AUD17.6 the second quarter. Private consumption
billion. These include tax-free cash payments decreased by 4.5%, mainly in services-related
and wage subsidies to support households activities, owing to a reduction of income
and small- and medium-sized businesses. The and self-isolation measures encouraged by
unemployment rate is forecast to register 6.9% the Government. Exports dropped by 8%,
(2019: 5.2%) due to job losses in industries particularly in automotive products and
affected by movement restrictions, particularly semiconductors, as a result of slower demand
in accommodation and food services. Inflation from advanced economies and the temporary
is anticipated to record 0.7% (2019: 1.6%). The shutdown of factories. Public consumption,
Reserve Bank of Australia reduced its policy which expanded by 6.4%, has helped
the economy from shrinking further. The
unemployment rate was registered at 4.3%,
TABLE 2.7. Selected Indicators for Australia, while inflation remained at 0.6%.
2019 – 2021
In response to the pandemic crisis, the
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212 Government rolled out three stimulus packages
Real GDP (% p.a.) 1.8 -4.2 3.0 amounting to USD222 billion, which focused
on urgent relief measures, particularly for
Inflation (% p.a.) 1.6 0.7 1.3 the vulnerable sectors, SMEs and the self-
Current Account of BOP 0.6 1.8 -0.1 employed. Additionally, a five-year New Deal
(% of GDP) programme, with a total of USD133 billion, was
Unemployment Rate (%) 5.2 6.9 7.7 announced in June 2020. The programme aims
to create 1.9 million new jobs in the digital and
1
Estimate green sectors as well as spur the economy,
Forecast
to cushion the impact of the crisis. Hence,
2
by 1.9% (2019: 2%), owing to sluggish private was recorded at 3.8%. Meanwhile, inflation
consumption and exports. Private consumption registered 3.9%, with higher prices of food,
is forecast to remain weak at 3.2% (2019: 1.9%), tobacco and liquor.
as a result of a decline in household incomes
and low consumer confidence. Exports are The economy is expected to expand by 1.9%
projected to fall by 5.1% (2019: 1.5%), with in 2020 (2019: 6.1%) as economic activities
slow demand from major trading partners. The recover in the second half of the year. Private
unemployment rate is forecast to increase to consumption is projected to increase by
4.1% (2019: 3.8%), while inflation is projected 0.8% (2019: 7.4%), especially in non-essential
to register 0.5% (2019: 0.4%). items following the distribution of vouchers
and coupons for in-store purchases. Private
TABLE 2.8. Selected Indicators for the Republic of investment is projected to improve by 1.7%
Korea, 2019 – 2021 (2019: 4.4%), with an expected increase in
infrastructure and manufacturing activities
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
as well as real estate development. The
Government announced the New Infrastructure
Real GDP (% p.a.) 2.0 -1.9 2.9 plan for 2020 until 2025 to accelerate
Inflation (% p.a.) 0.4 0.5 0.9 infrastructure development. The plan comprises
seven focus areas, including 5G networks,
Current Account of BOP 3.6 3.3 3.4
artificial intelligence and intercity high-speed
(% of GDP)
rail. A fiscal stimulus package totalling USD500
Unemployment Rate (%) 3.8 4.1 4.1 billion was introduced in May 2020 to counter
the adverse effects of the pandemic. Measures
1
Estimate
2
Forecast
in the package include tax cuts, lower interest
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook rates, reduced utility prices and employment
(October 2020)
support. The unemployment rate is expected
to record 3.8% (2019: 3.6%), while inflation is
The economy of Korea is forecast to anticipated to remain at 2.9% (2019: 2.9%).
rebound by 2.9% in 2021, driven by private
consumption and exports. Private consumption TABLE 2.9. Selected Indicators for China,
and exports are expected to turn around 2019 – 2021
as the impact of the pandemic outbreak
eases. The unemployment rate is projected INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
to remain unchanged at 4.1%, while inflation
Real GDP (% p.a.) 6.1 1.9 8.2
is anticipated to record 0.9%. Risks to the
economy include a prolonged spread of the Inflation (% p.a.) 2.9 2.9 2.7
pandemic, deepening of the US-China trade
Current Account of BOP 1.0 1.3 0.7
dispute, trade tension with Japan and a delay (% of GDP)
in the recovery of the semiconductor industry.
Unemployment Rate (%) 3.6 3.8 3.6
at 2.7%. Risks to the economy emanate from TABLE 2.10. Selected Indicators for India,
rising asset price inflation, continued supply 2019 – 2021
chain disruptions, broad global recession and
heightening trade tensions with the US. A INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic and
Real GDP (% p.a.) 4.2 -10.3 8.8
emergence of new epidemics may also pose
risks to the economy. Inflation (% p.a.) 4.8 4.9 3.7
TABLE 2.11. Selected Indicators for ASEAN-5, TABLE 2.12. Selected Indicators for Indonesia,
2019 – 2021 2019 – 2021
Real GDP (% p.a.) 4.9 -3.4 6.2 Real GDP (% p.a.) 5.0 -1.5 6.1
Inflation (% p.a.) 2.1 1.5 2.3 Inflation (% p.a.) 2.8 2.1 1.6
Current Account of BOP 1.1 0.8 0.1 Current Account of BOP -2.7 -1.3 -2.4
(% of GDP) (% of GDP)
1
Estimate 1
Estimate
2
Forecast 2
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020) (October 2020)
The Government announced four stimulus anticipated to record 1.8%. Risks to the
packages from March until September, economy include weak investor confidence
amounting to approximately THB2.1 trillion or due to uncertainties in the domestic political
14.5% of the GDP, to mitigate the economic atmosphere, further disruptions in the supply
impact of the pandemic. The Bank of Thailand chains as well as subdued tourism activities.
also reduced the policy rate four times,
amounting to 75 basis points, to 0.50% to The economy of Singapore plummeted by 6.7%
sustain the economy. The GDP growth in 2020 in the first half of 2020 due to a decrease in
is anticipated to contract by 7.1% (2019: 2.4%), the services producing industries. The services
as a result of sluggish private consumption producing industries contracted by 7.9%,
and exports. Private consumption is particularly in the wholesale and retail trade,
expected to be subdued, mainly due to lower business services as well as accommodation
spending in the tourism-related industry and food services sectors, as a result of
and transportation. Exports are anticipated weaker global demand and disruptions in
to plunge, resulting from lower demand, supply chains due to the pandemic. The
particularly in automotive and tourism services. unemployment rate was marginally higher at
The unemployment rate is expected to remain 2.5%, mainly due to layoffs in the tourism-
at 1% (2019: 1%), while deflation is estimated related services sectors. Deflation was recorded
to record 0.4% (2019: 0.7%). at 0.2%, owing to lower housing and utility
prices as well as transport costs.
TABLE 2.13. Selected Indicators for Thailand,
2019 – 2021 The Government announced four stimulus
packages from February until May 2020,
INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212 namely the Unity Budget, Resilience Budget,
Solidarity Budget and Fortitude Budget, with
Real GDP (% p.a.) 2.4 -7.1 4.0
a total of approximately SGD100 billion. In
Inflation (% p.a.) 0.7 -0.4 1.8 August 2020, the Government announced an
Current Account of BOP 7.1 4.2 4.6 additional allocation of SGD8 billion. These
(% of GDP) budgetary measures are expected to cushion
the fall in employment and economic output
Unemployment Rate (%) 1.0 1.0 1.0
as well as to support economic, social and
1
Estimate public health management. The economy
2
Forecast is projected to contract by 6% in 2020
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020) (2019: 0.7%), with a decline in the wholesale
and retail trade, business services as well as
The GDP of Thailand is projected to rebound transport and storage services subsectors.
by 4% in 2021, largely supported by robust
domestic demand and a recovery in exports. TABLE 2.14. Selected Indicators for Singapore,
Private consumption is expected to pick 2019 – 2021
up, contributed by higher online spending,
particularly on electronics and media as well INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
as digital products. Private investment is
Real GDP (% p.a.) 0.7 -6.0 5.0
forecast to expand as tax incentives offered by
the Government are projected to encourage Inflation (% p.a.) 0.6 -0.4 0.3
companies to invest in automation in projects, Current Account of BOP 17.0 15.0 14.5
particularly for medical equipment and food (% of GDP)
security. Similarly, exports are envisaged to
Unemployment Rate (%) 2.3 3.0 2.6
improve, with higher demand for manufactured
goods, primarily electronics, vehicles and 1
Estimate
machinery. The unemployment rate is expected 2
Forecast
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
to remain steady at 1%, while inflation is (October 2020)
Likewise, sectors that are reliant on tourism In 2020, the economy is expected to decline
and foreign workers are anticipated to shrink by 8.3% (2019: 6%), weighed down by a drop
due to the lingering pandemic situation. The in household consumption and exports.
expected recovery in the manufacturing and Household consumption is projected to weaken
financial services subsectors, in the second half following lower spending, particularly on
of 2020, is projected to support the economy restaurants and hotels as well as transport
from a further decline. The unemployment rate categories, amid uncertainties over job
is forecast at 3% (2019: 2.3%), while deflation prospects. Public spending is expected to
is expected to register 0.4% (2019: 0.6%) due
accelerate as the Government announced
to declining oil prices.
programmes, amounting to approximately
PHP1.7 trillion, to stimulate the economy.
The GDP is projected to rebound by 5% in 2021,
Exports are anticipated to be sluggish due
spearheaded by the services producing industries
to lower demand for electronic products,
and manufacturing subsector. The services
particularly semiconductors and electronics.
producing industries are expected to gradually
The unemployment rate is forecast to rise to
recover, driven by the finance and insurance
10.4% (2019: 5.1%) following job losses in the
services subsector. Similarly, the manufacturing
services sector, particularly in wholesale and
subsector is expected to expand, supported
retail trade as well as repair of motor vehicles
by higher production of pharmaceutical and
and motorcycles services. Inflation is expected
biological products. The unemployment rate is
to moderate to 2.4% (2019: 2.5%) due to lower
forecast at 2.6%, while inflation is anticipated
oil prices.
to record 0.3%. Risks to the economy include
uncertainties over the pandemic, which may
continue to drag several outward-oriented TABLE 2.15. Selected Indicators for the
sectors, particularly manufacturing and wholesale Philippines, 2019 – 2021
trade. Likewise, domestically-oriented sectors,
namely construction and real estate, may be INDICATOR 2019 20201 20212
severely affected by a further downturn in the Real GDP (% p.a.) 6.0 -8.3 7.4
domestic economy.
Inflation (% p.a.) 2.5 2.4 3.0
The economy of the Philippines contracted Current Account of BOP -0.1 1.6 -1.5
(% of GDP)
by 9% in the first half of 2020 due to weak
household consumption, private investment Unemployment Rate (%) 5.1 10.4 7.4
and exports. Household consumption
1
Estimate
contracted by 7.8% due to reduced spending 2
Forecast
on expenditure items services, particularly Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
(October 2020)
restaurants and hotels as well as transport.
Private investment shrank by 22.3%, resulting
from lower investment in durable equipment In 2021, growth in the Philippines is
and construction. Exports plunged by 17.6% expected to rebound by 7.4%, spurred by
due to sluggish demand for electronic domestic demand. Household consumption is
products, manufactured goods as well as forecast to recover, backed by an increase in
machinery and transport equipment. Bangko remittance inflows and improved consumer
Sentral ng Pilipinas cut its policy rate four confidence. Public spending is anticipated to
times, from 4.00% to 2.25%, between March increase following the proposed 2021 Budget,
and June 2020. The unemployment rate amounting to PHP4.5 trillion, to stimulate
increased significantly to 11.5% due to drastic growth and create jobs. This is coupled with
job losses in services-related sectors following annual spending of PHP1 trillion for its Build,
business closures and layoffs. Inflation eased Build, Build programme. The unemployment
to 2.5%, owing to a fall in oil prices. rate is projected to moderate to 7.4%, while
References
ASEAN Economic Integration Brief. (2020). Bank Indonesia. (2020). Inflation Report.
Retrieved from https:// asean.org/asean- Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id/en/
economic-community/aec-monitoring/asean- moneter/inflasi/data/Default.aspx
economic-integration-brief/
Bank of Korea. (2020). Economic Outlook,
ASEAN Policy Brief, April 2020. Retrieved from August 2020. Retrieved from http://
https://asean.org/storage/2020/04/ASEAN- www.bok.or.kr/eng/bbs/E0000634/view.
Policy-Brief-April-2020_FINAL.pdf do?nttId=10059976&menuNo=400069&page
Index=2
Asian Development Bank. (2020). ADB Triples
COVID-19 Response Package to $20 Billion. Bank of Korea. (2020). Real Gross Domestic
Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/news/ Product: 2nd Quarter of 2020 (Advance
adb-triples-covid-19-response-package-20- Estimate). Retrieved from http://www.bok.
billion or.kr/eng/bbs/E0000634/view.do?
nttId=10059416&menuNo=400069&page
Asian Development Bank. (2020). Joint Statement Index=4
by Heads of Multilateral Development Banks
and the WTO on Supporting Trade Finance Bank of Thailand. (2020). Inflation. Retrieved
during the COVID-19 crisis. Retrieved from from https://www.bot.or.th/English/Monetary
https://www.adb.org/news/joint-statement- Policy/MonetPolicyComittee/MPR/Pages/
heads-multilateral-development-banks-and- default.aspx
wto-supporting-trade-finance-during
Banque de France. (2020). Retrieved from
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. (2020). https://www.banque-france.fr/en
AIIB Doubles COVID-19 Crisis Response to
USD10 Billion. Retrieved from https://www. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2020).
aiib.org/en/news-events/news/2020/AIIB- Eat Out to Help Out: More Than 10.5m Meals
Doubles-COVID-19-Crisis-Response-to-USD10- Claimed In First Week. Retrieved from https://
Billion.html www.bbc.com/news/business-53731002
Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington: Coralde, J.L. & Tamonan, M.A. (2020). MDBs:
US Department of Commerce. (2020). Fast-Tracking Procurement in the Time of
News Release, 30 September 2020: Gross COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.devex.
Domestic Product: Second Quarter 2020 (Third com/news/mdbs-fast-tracking-procurement-
Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.bea. in-the-time-of-covid-19-97635
gov/site/default/files/2020-09/gdp2q20_3rd_0.
pdf Department of Finance. (2020). Economic
Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.dof.gov.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington: US ph/data/economic-bulletin/
Department of Labor. (2020). Press Release,
11 September 2020: Consumer Price Index – Department of Statistics, Singapore. (2020). CPI
August 2020. Retrieved from http://www.bls. for August 2020. Retrieved from https://
gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/news/
cpiaug2020.pdf
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington: US
Department of Labor. (2020). Press Release, Department of Statistics, Singapore. (2020).
2 October 2020: The Employment Situation – Data and News. Retrieved from https://www.
September 2020. Retrieved from http://www. singstat. gov.sg/
bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Economic Intelligence Center. (2020). Thailand’s
Cabinet Office Japan. (2020). Quarterly Estimates Growth in Q1 2020. Retrieved from https://
of GDP for April-June 2020 (The Second www.scbeic.com/en/detail/file/product/6843/
Preliminary Estimates). Retrieved from https:// fnqybahfpf/EICFlash_GDP_ Q1_ 2020_
www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/data/sokuhou/ EN_20200525.pdf
files/2020/toukei_2020.html
European Central Bank. (2020). Retrieved from
Cabinet Office Japan. (2020). Recent Economic https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/html/index.
Developments. Retrieved from https://www5. en.html
cao.go.jp/keizai3/getsurei-e/reference/
reference20200903.pdf European Commission. (2020). Retrieved from
https://ec.europa.eu/info/index_en
Central Bank of the Philippines. (2020).
Inflation. Retrieved from http://www.bsp.gov. European Economic Forecast, Spring 2020. (2020).
ph/downloads/Publications/2020/IR2qtr_2020. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/
pdf sites/info/files/economy-finance/ip125_en.pdf
Center for Strategic and International Studies Eurostat. (2020). Retrieved from https://
(CSIS). (2020). CSIS IFI COVID-19 Response ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/home
Tracker, CSIS Economic Program. Retrieved
from https://www.csis.org/analysis/tracking- Evans, D. & Over, M. (2020). The Economic
international-financial-institutions-covid-19- Impact of COVID-19 in Low-and Middle-Income
response. Countries. Retrieved from https://www.cgdev.
org/blog/economic-impact-covid-19-low-and-
Centre for Strategic International Studies middle-income-countries
(CSIS). (2020). The Economic Toll of Covid-19
on Southeast Asia: Recession Looms as Growth Focus Economics. (2020). UK Economic Forecast.
Prospects Dim, April 2020. Retrieved from Retrieved from https://www.focus-economics.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/economic-toll- com/countries/united-kingdom
covid-19-southeast-asia-recession-looms-
growth-prospects-dim
France National Institute of Statistics and International Monetary Fund. (2020). Speech on
Economic Studies (Insee). (2020). Retrieved the Global and Asia Economic Outlook: Greater
from https://insee.fr/en/accueil Bay Area Chief Economist Forum. Retrieved
from https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/
Germany Federal Ministry of Finance. 2020/07/10/sp071020-speech-on-the-global-
(2020). Retrieved from https://www. and-asia-economic-outlook
bundesfinanzministerium.de/Web/EN/Home/
home.html International Monetary Fund. (2020). World
Economic Outlook, April 2020: The Great
Germany Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). Lockdown. Retrieved from https://www.imf.
(2020). Retrieved from https://www.destatis. org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/ 2020/04/14/
de/EN/Home/_node.html weo-april-2020
Gopinath, G. (2020). The Great Lockdown: International Monetary Fund. (2020). World
Worst Economic Downturn since the Great Economic Outlook, Update June 2020: A
Depression. Retrieved from https://blogs. Crisis Like No Other, An Uncertain Recovery.
imf.org/2020/04/14/the-great-lockdown- Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/
worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great- Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/
depression/ WEOUpdateJune2020
Humphrey, C. & Annalisa, P. (2014). Guarantees Islamic Development Bank. (2020). As part
for Development: A Review of Multilateral of the US$23 Billion Package, IsDB Provides
Development Bank Operations. Retrieved US$1.86 Billion to 27 Member Countries to
from https://www.odi.org/publications/9130- Contain COVID-19. Retrieved from https://
guarantees-development-review-multilateral- www.isdb.org/news/as-part-of-the-us-23-
development-bank-operations billion-package-isdb-provides-us-186-billion-
to-27-member-countries-to-contain-covid-19
International Monetary Fund. (2020). Fiscal
Monitor: Policies for the Recovery. Retrieved Kassim, H. (2020). The Latest on the UK-EU
from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/ Negotiations. Retrieved from https://ukandeu.
FM/Issues/2020/09/30/october-2020-fiscal- ac.uk/explainers/the-latest-on-the-uk-eu-
monitor negotiations/
International Monetary Fund. (2020). Policy Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department
Tracker, United States of America. Retrieved for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade,
from https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and- Office of the Economics Adviser. (2020).
covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19#U Wholesale Price Index Press Release Archive.
Retrieved from https://eaindustry.nic.in/wpi_
press_release_archive.asp
Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Recovery, Office for National Statistics. (2020). Retrieved
France. (2020). Retrieved from https://www. from https://www.ons.gov.uk/
economie.gouv.fr/
Office for National Statistics. (2020). GDP
Ministry of Trade and Industry of Singapore. Quarterly National Accounts, UK: April to June
(2020). Economic Survey of Singapore Second 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.
Quarter 2020. Retrieved from https://www. uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/
mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Resources/Economic- bulletins/quarterlynationalaccounts/
Survey-of-Singapore/2020/Economic- apriltojune2020
Survey-of-Singapore-Second-Quarter-2020/
FullReport_2Q20.pdf Office for National Statistics. (2020).
Inflation and Price Indices. Retrieved
Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2020). from https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/
Recent Economic Development in Singapore, inflationandpriceindices
July 2020. Retrieved from https://
www.mas.gov.sg/publications/recent- Office for National Statistics. (2020).
economic-developments/recent-economic- Unemployment. Retrieved from https://www.
developments-in-singapore-july-2020. ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/
peoplenotinwork/unemployment
Moody’s Investors Service. (2020). Coronavirus
– ASEAN-5: Policy Response Provides Some Office of the National Economic and Social
Support but Unlikely to Offset Rising Credit Development Council, Thailand. (2020).
Risk, 25 June 2020. Retrieved from https:// Economic Report Quarterly Statistics. Retrieved
www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-ASEAN-5- from https://www.nesdc.go.th/nesdb_en/
face-rising-credit-risk-as-stimulus-measures-- article_attach/article_file_20200525140723.pdf
PBC_1235355?showPdf=true
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Morris, S. (2020). Coronavirus Response: Development. (2020). Business Insights on
Addressing the Near-Term Financing Needs of Emerging Markets. Retrieved from https://
Low-Income Countries. Retrieved from https:// www.oecd.org/dev/EMnet-Business-
www.cgdev.org/blog/coronavirus-response- Insights-2020.pdf
addressing-near-term-financing-needs-low-
income-countries Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development. (2020). Economic Outlook,
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2020). Interim Report. Coronavirus (COVID-19): Living
Preliminary Accounting Results of GDP for
With Uncertainty, Sept. 2020. Retrieved from
the Second Quarter and the First Half Year
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
of 2020. Retrieved from http://www.stats.
gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202007/
t20200717_1776596.html
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Societe Generale. (2020). Country Risk of the
Development. (2020) Economic Outlook United Kingdom: Economy. Retrieved from
Volume 2020 Issue 1: The World Economy on https://import-export.societegenerale.fr/en/
a Tightrope. Retrieved from http://www.oecd. country/united-kingdom/economy-country-
org/economic-outlook/june-2020/ risk
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Data and News.
Development. (2020). Interim Report: Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/
Coronavirus (COVID-19)- Living With
Uncertainty, Sept. 2020. Retrieved from Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Economic Growth
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org of Indonesia Second Quarter 2020. Retrieved
from https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease
Pettinger, T. (2020). Threats to UK Economy.
Retrieved from https://www.economicshelp. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2020). Country
org Report on France. Retrieved from http://www.
eiu.com/index.asp?layout=
Pettinger, T. (2020). UK Unemployment Stats country&geography_id=1350000135
and Graphs. Retrieved from https://www.
economicshelp.org/stats The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2020).
Country Report on Germany. Retrieved
Philippines News Agency. (2020). CITIRA Passage, from http://www.eiu.com/index.
BBB to Help Economic Recovery: Dominguea. asp?layout=country&geography_id=
Retrieved from https://www.pna.gov.ph/ 1360000136
articles/1102563
The Economic Intelligence Unit. (2020).
Philippines Statistics Authority. (2020). Press Country Report on United Kingdom.
Release. Retrieved from http://www.psa.gov. Retrieved from http://www.eiu.com/index.
ph/national-accounts/base-2018/estimates asp?layout=displayIssue&publicationid=
1700000970
Philippines Statistics Authority. (2020). Special
Release-Merchandise Trade. Retrieved from The Economist. (2020). The Geopolitics of 5G:
http://www.psa.gov.ph America’s War on Huawei Nears its Endgame.
Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/
PwC. (2020). UK Economic Update, September briefing/2020/07/16/americas-war-on-huawei-
2020. Retrieved from https://pwc.co.uk/ nears-its-endgame
premium/covid-19/uk-economic-update-
covid-19.pdf The Straits Times. (2020). Coronavirus Pandemic
to Bring Asia’s Growth to a Halt for 1st Time
Read, S. (2020). Coronavirus Furlough Scheme to in 60 Years: IMF Press Release, 16 April 2020:
Finish at End of October, says Chancellor, BBC. https://www.straitstimes.com/business/
Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/ economy/pandemic-to-bring-asias-growth-to-
business-52853333 a-halt-for-1st-time-in-60-years-imf
Reserve Bank of Australia. (2020). Statement on World Bank. (2020). Global Economic Outlook,
Monetary Policy. Retrieved from https://www. June 2020, Pandemic, Recession: The Global
rba.gov.au/publications/smp/2020 Economy In Crisis. Retrieved from https://
www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-
Reserve Bank of India. (2020). Minutes of the economic-prospects
Monetary Policy Committee Meeting May
20 to 22, 2020. Retrieved from https:// World Bank. (2020). Global Economic Prospects.
rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PressRelease/PDFs/ Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/
PR24591AE8154A8C00484D85E29CA51184761D. en/publication/global-economic-prospects
PDF
World Bank. (2020). Global Economic World Health Organization (WHO). (2020).
Prospects, June 2020. Retrieved from Coronavirus Disease Dashboard. Retrieved
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ from https://covid19.who.int/
handle/10986/33748
World Trade Organization. 2016. Trade Finance
World Bank. (2019). The World Bank Group’s and SMEs: Bridging the Gaps in Provision.
Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/
from https://www.worldbank.org/en/who-we- res_e/publications_e/tradefinsme_e.htm
are/news/coronavirus-covid19
Macroeconomic
Outlook
71 ov e rv i e w
71 s ec tor a l
Feature Article 3.1 – Gig Economy
Feature Article 3.2 – Digitalisation in the Logistics
Industry
Feature Article 3.3 – Small and Medium Enterprises:
Building Resilience to Weather Crises
Information Box 3.1 – The Importance of Commodity
Sector to the Malaysian Economy
92 dome s t ic de m a nd
Feature Article 3.4 – Shadow Economy in Malaysia
97 e x te r n a l s ec tor
102 pr ice s
Feature Article 3.5 – Dynamic Relationship between
Consumer and Producer Price Indices
107 l a bour m a r k e t
110 r e fe r e nce s
CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
MALAYSIA’S
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
Economy is
Expected to
Contract
-4.5% 2019: 4.3%
-1.0% 4.2%
Economy is
Expected to
Rebound
6.5%–7.5% 2020:-4.5%
RM20.3
AT CURRENT PRICE
2.5% 3.5%
chapter 3
Macroeconomic Outlook
Overview Sectoral
Gradual economic recovery in the second half of Services Sector
2020 before normalising in 2021
New norms accelerate the growth of the digital
The Malaysian economy experienced the economy
full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in
the second quarter of 2020, with the real The services sector contracted by 6.7% in the
gross domestic product (GDP) contracting by first half of 2020 largely due to worldwide
17.1%. The contraction was mainly attributed travel bans, domestic movement restrictions
and quarantines, which severely affected
to the imposition of the Movement Control
the tourism-related subsectors and airlines.
Order (MCO) to contain the outbreak. Though
Among the subsectors that have been severely
affecting all sectors in the economy, the move affected include wholesale and retail trade,
was necessary to flatten the COVID-19 curve food & beverages and accommodation,
and save lives. Hence, the Government has transportation and storage as well as real
announced several stimulus packages totalling estate and business services. Nevertheless,
RM305 billion to support both households and the information and communication subsector
businesses. Reinforced by the reopening of expanded as online transactions increased
the economy in phases, growth is expected to significantly during the MCO. The services
improve gradually during the second half of sector is expected to record a smaller decline
the year, cushioning the significant contraction of 1% in the second half of the year, reflecting
the gradual resumption of economic activities.
in the first half. Thus, Malaysia’s GDP is
Overall, the sector is projected to contract by
expected to contract by 4.5% in 2020, before
3.7% in 2020 before rebounding by 7% in 2021.
rebounding between 6.5% – 7.5% in 2021. With the normalisation of economic activities
With the bold and swift measures undertaken, in 2021, all subsectors are projected to record
Malaysia has been recognised as one of the positive growth.
most successful countries in managing the
socio-economic impact of the pandemic. TABLE 3.1. GDP by Sector,
2019 – 2021
Although domestic demand is expected to (at constant 2015 prices)
remain soft throughout 2020, there are signs
of recovery in the second half of the year, SHARE CHANGE
particularly in private consumption. On the (%) (%)
external front, the collapse in global demand 20201 2019 20201 20212
and world trade led to a decline in exports Services 58.1 6.1 -3.7 7.0
during the year. However, current account Manufacturing 22.6 3.8 -3.0 7.0
of the balance of payments is expected to
Agriculture 7.4 2.0 -1.2 4.7
remain in surplus. On the supply side, all
sectors are expected to contract, affected by Mining 6.9 -2.0 -7.8 4.1
the unprecedented crisis. Nevertheless, the Construction 4.0 0.1 -18.7 13.9
pace of improvement gathered momentum in
GDP 100.0 4.3 -4.5 6.5 – 7.5
the third quarter, especially in the services and
manufacturing sectors, with the resumption of 1
Estimate
economic activities. 2
Forecast
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding and exclusion of import
duties component
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
The wholesale and retail trade subsector TABLE 3.2. Services Sector Performance,
contracted by 10.8% in the first half of 2020 2019 – 2021
due to disruptions in the global and domestic (at constant 2015 prices)
supply chains. The subsector is expected to
record a smaller decline by 1.9% in the second SHARE CHANGE
half of the year with the gradual resumption (%) (%)
of business operations, online platforms, 2020¹ 2019 2020¹ 20212
cash assistance, sales campaigns and sales
Wholesale and retail 28.8 6.7 -6.1 8.5
tax exemption for the purchase of new cars. trade
For the year, the subsector is projected to
contract by 6.1%. The subsector is anticipated Finance and insurance 11.8 4.6 -0.1 5.5
to rebound by 8.5% in 2021, supported by all Information and 11.4 6.6 6.4 7.9
segments. The wholesale segment is expected communication
to be backed by food-related industries. At Real estate and business 7.7 7.8 -11.6 7.6
the same time, the expansion in e-commerce services
activities will support the retail segment. The Transportation and 6.0 6.8 -11.9 7.5
growth of the motor vehicles segment will storage
be underpinned by the introduction of new
Food & beverages and 5.5 9.6 -13.3 10.7
models and higher household disposable accommodation
income.
Utilities 4.9 6.0 1.7 5.7
The information and communication Other services 8.2 5.5 -8.1 6.2
subsector expanded by 5.8% in the first half Government services 15.7 3.7 4.0 3.7
of 2020, primarily supported by higher usage
Services 100.0 6.1 -3.7 7.0
of internet, particularly online transactions,
entertainments, educational and work from 1
Estimate
home (WFH) activities. The subsector is 2
Forecast
projected to expand further by 7.1% in the Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
second half of the year buoyed by various
Government initiatives. The initiatives include
a tax exemption of up to RM5,000 for moratorium and slower lending activities.
information, communication and technology Nonetheless, the better performance of the
(ICT) equipment to support WFH activities insurance segment reflects the increase in life
and individual income tax relief of up to insurance subscriptions, which partly cushioned
RM2,500 on the purchase of digital devices. the overall decline of the subsector. The trend
For the year, the subsector is anticipated to is expected to continue in the second half
accelerate by 6.4% as WFH activities, virtual following the extension of moratorium to
communication and online businesses become targeted borrowers. Overall for the year, the
the new normal. In 2021, the subsector is subsector is expected to contract marginally
projected to expand by 7.9%, with the fifth- by 0.1% with the expansion in the insurance
generation cellular network (5G) spectrum segment, reflecting the net impact of higher
facilitating e-commerce and e-learning premiums amid lower claims.
activities. The roll-out of the National Fourth
Industrial Revolution (4IR) Policy and Digital The subsector is projected to rebound by 5.5%
Economy Blueprint in the fourth quarter of
in 2021, driven mainly by the finance segment,
2020 is expected to enhance the productivity
benefitting from the normalisation of loan
and competitiveness of the subsector. The
repayments and continuation of bank lending
formation of the Malaysian Digital Economy
amid stronger domestic economic activities.
Task Force, which focusses on digital
The insurance segment is also expected to
technology, cybersecurity, trade and digital
content is expected to support the acceleration grow steadily with the promotion of innovative
of the subsector. and risk-based pricing in motor and fire
insurance. In addition, the launching of the
The finance and insurance subsector in the Financial Sector Blueprint 2021 – 2025 in the
first half of 2020 contracted marginally by first quarter of 2021 is expected to further
0.2%, mainly due to the six-month wide-scale boost the growth of the subsector.
Tourist Arrivals and Receipts Volume Index of Wholesale & Retail Trade
(2015 = 100)
RM billion Million Index
120 42 200
TOURIST RECEIPTS WHOLESALE & RETAIL TRADE
40
20 7
0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 20201 J A J O J A J O J A J
2018 2019 2020
40
6 10,000
0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 20201 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
12,000
0.9 90
9,000
0.6 60
6,000
0.3 30
3,000
0.0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 J A J O J A J O J A J
2018 2019 2020
1
Estimate
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia; Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad; Malaysia Tourism Promotion Board; Senai International Airport;
and seven major ports (Bintulu, Johor, Klang, Kuantan, Kuching,Pulau Pinang and Tanjung Pelepas)
Gig Economy
Introduction
The gig economy is a free market system, characterised by temporary job positions where
corporations tend to engage independent workers for short-term durations. Unlike the traditional
economy, the gig economy is characterised by flexible, temporary, or freelance jobs with irregular
income and working hours. The primary distinction between the gig economy and traditional
working arrangements is the digital element (Burtch et al., 2016). According to Khazanah Research
Institute (2019), the benefits of being a freelancer or gigs include having an additional income,
more flexible working schedules, more accessibility to the market via the internet and lower cost of
doing business.
In 2019, the Global Gig-Economy Index revealed that freelancers in the US had the most significant
revenue growth at 78%, followed by the UK (59%) and Brazil (48%). Digital service intermediary
platform providers in the US, such as Uber, Airbnb and Lyft, are the cornerstone of the gig
economy. Furthermore, according to a survey by MBO Partners (2017), nearly 60% of the workforce
in the US would be independent professionals and companies will spend up to USD6 billion on
improving the rights of gig workers by 2027.
FIGURE 3.1.1. Top 10 Countries with the Fastest Growing Earnings for Freelancers, 2019
78%
59%
48%
47% 36% 35%
29% 27%
20% 19%
Type of Jobs Offers temporal jobs such as contracts or Offers long-term and permanent
short-term gigs jobs
Flexibility Has a high level of work flexibility Does not offer work flexibility with
rigid or set hours
Employee Benefits Employees do not enjoy additional benefits Employees enjoy additional benefits,
such as health insurance and leave
days
Cost to Employers Employers eliminate unnecessary overhead Employers incur overhead costs
costs, such as additional benefits, office including the payment of additional
space and employee training benefits, office space and employee
training
Work Monotony Breaks routine work, hence promoting Tend to be monotonous, thus could
enthusiasm creativity and innovation be demotivating, discouraging
creativity and innovation
A study by the Zurich-University of Oxford (2018) found that 38% of the respondents in Malaysia,
who were in full-time employment, would be looking to enter the gig economy in the following
12 months. According to Employees Provident Fund (2019) nearly 40% of the workforce would be
gig workers in the next five years, significantly higher than the global average of 20%. The rise of
millennials1 and digital technology are the main factors contributing to this surge.
Rise of Millennials
Most millennials are no longer interested in the concept of secure and permanent employment.
Millennials grew up in the technological era, and so they are more immersed digitally. This means
gig economy often occurs due to its online platform element, which provides the facility for
millennials to use their talents and abilities (Hershatter & Epstein, 2010). Hence, they account for
the major share of employment in the gig economy as it offers greater flexibility. In Malaysia, there
are about 15.6 million people in the labour force, and 1.3 million are in the informal sector, with
50.2% in the 25 to 44 age group (2013: 46.5%) (Figure 3.1.2.). This reflects that many millennials
are opting out of the traditional workforce as the gig economy offers higher independence and
flexibility in line with their aspirations.
The digital economy in Malaysia grew by 18.5% between 2015 and 2019 per annum. In 2020,
Malaysia remains ranked 26th out of 63 countries in the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking
2020. With the Government investing heavily on digital technologies, Malaysians are among the
most digitally connected in the world and produce some of Southeast Asia’s most recognisable
digital start-ups (World Bank, 2018). As digitalisation is the main enabler for the gig economy, the
upsurge in digital platforms encourages more millennials to become gig workers and freelancers.
As of August 2020, there were around 140 platforms providing gig and freelance opportunities
with an estimated 540,000 gig and active freelance workers in Malaysia. Firms, such as Grab and
Foodpanda, continue to record an increasing number of gig workers. Furthermore, there were
about 190,000 gig workers providing services as riders and drivers on various logistic and delivery
platforms in the country.
1
Refers to anyone born between 1981 and 1996 (Pew Research Centre, 2019).
FIGURE 3.1.2. Employment in the Informal FIGURE 3.1.3. Employment in the Informal Sector by Age
Sector by Age Group, 2019 Group, 2013 – 2019
(% share)
% ‘000
30 400
2013
2015
350 2017
25
2019
300
20
250
15 200
150
10
100
5
50
0 0
15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64
Source: Informal Sector Workforce Survey Report, Department of Statistics, Malaysia, 2019
Despite offering greater work flexibility, gig workers do not have the advantage of a steady job
with regular pay and benefits. In addition, there is still no specific regulation, law or guideline
to protect the welfare of the gig workers except for provisions under the Self-Employment Social
Security Act 2017 [Act 789] which require self-employed to register and contribute under this
scheme. As they are not formally recognised as employees, they are not legally covered under
specific labour provisions, such as the minimum wage, working hours limitation, paid annual and
sick leave as well as unfair dismissal. In addition, unlike traditional employees, gig workers do not
have financial safety nets, such as pension and savings in the EPF. A survey by The Centre (2019)
indicates that nearly 60% from more than 400 of e-hailing and delivery drivers did not have savings
for emergencies, and 59% did not have retirement or old age savings.
FIGURE 3.1.4. Financial Security among E-hailing and Delivery Drivers, 2019
76%
57%
37%
Way Forward
The workforce needs to be equipped with the required skills to support the gig economy as one
of the new sources of growth in the country. This includes more training in software development
and technology, creative and multimedia work, data entry and analyses as well as writing and
translation (Human Resources Development Fund, 2019). Towards this end, Malaysia Digital
Economy Corporation (MDEC) has embarked on the Global Online Workforce (GLOW) training
programme, with an allocation of RM25 million, to enable Malaysians to earn higher income
digitally. The Government also has launched the myGIG Programme on 23 June 2020 to support
youths to participate in the gig economy by providing appropriate training and supporting
equipment.
With the increasing number of graduates joining the gig economy, Institutions of Higher Learning
(IHLs) should move away from educating and preparing students for full-time employment. This
traditional method does a disservice to graduates who will be ill-equipped and unprepared to
succeed as independent workers in the gig economy. To better prepare students as gigs, IHLs
should embark on teaching the basic skills to work independently, expanding career services to
offer gigs and promoting online courses. Reframing business school syllabus, such as learning
how to be self-employed and running a business, will prepare students to work independently.
In addition, the use of technology needs to be further accelerated to teach crucial skills, such as
self-directed learning, effective communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration and
project management.
Providing career services by developing apps and websites will also help students to find short-
term projects and assignments. For example, in the US, The DePaul School of Music uses an
app called The Gig Connection to help students find a freelance job throughout Chicago. Boston
University has developed a Quick Job board, which offers short-term opportunities for students
to assist in medical research studies. In addition, IHLs also need to emphasise online courses
and programmes that provide options to students to learn at their own pace and location. These
approaches will enable IHLs to better prepare students to join the gig economy.
The Government is considering new laws to regulate the gig economy and to protect the welfare
of the gig workers. A committee comprising representatives from three ministries2 has been set up
to formulate long-term solutions to resolve various issues on the gig economy in the country. The
committee will also be looking for ways to create a win-win situation for workers and employers.
Conclusion
The emergence of digital platforms connecting freelancers with businesses and the rise of
millennials have all played a contributing role to the surge in the gig economy. It offers benefits,
particularly in the form of job flexibility for workers. Nonetheless, there are numerous issues and
challenges, including the status and welfare of the gig workers, that need to be addressed before
the gig economy becomes a source of sustainable growth. Given its importance, the Government has
implemented several initiatives to ensure its development. Moving forward, revamping of the syllabus,
incorporating project-based learning and upskilling are needed to better prepare graduates for the gig
economy.
2
Ministry of Human Resource, Ministry of Youth and Sports, and Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs.
The real estate and business services The food & beverages and accommodation
subsector declined by 11.3% in the first half subsector declined by 19.9% in the first half
of 2020, attributed to temporarily suspension of 2020 due to stringent travel restrictions
of construction activities during the MCO. on movement and business operations. With
The subsector is expected to continue to a continuous drop in international tourist
decline by 11.9% in the second half and arrivals, the subsector is projected to contract
11.6% for the whole year. This is mainly by 7.3% in the second half of 2020. For the
due to deferred construction projects and whole year, the subsector is anticipated to
subdued business activities. However, with
decline by 13.3%, mainly due to the sluggish
projected economic recovery and the roll-out of
performance of the accommodation segment
delayed infrastructure projects, the subsector
following the significant drop in tourist arrivals.
is expected to rebound by 7.6% in 2021.
Nevertheless, an increase in demand for online
The exemption of Real Property Gains Tax
food delivery and domestic tourism activities
(RPGT), launching of the National Affordable
Housing Policy and Rent-to-Own (RTO) scheme, are expected to cushion the subsector.
extension of Youth Housing Scheme (YHS)
and Home Ownership Campaign (HOC) are The subsector is expected to expand markedly
expected to support the subsector. In addition, by 10.7% in 2021, mainly backed by domestic
higher demand for construction-related tourism-related activities with support from
services is expected to drive the business several initiatives. These initiatives include tax
services segment. exemptions on tourism and accommodation
services as well as an extension of income
The transportation and storage subsector tax relief of up to RM1,000 on domestic travel
contracted significantly by 24% in the first half services. In addition, attractive packages
of 2020 with all segments severely affected by coupled with promotions, marketing and
the border closure and lower trade activities. campaigns via digital platforms to restore
However, the subsector is anticipated to public confidence is expected to revitalise the
decline marginally by 0.5% in the second half domestic tourism industry. The implementation
following the lifting of interstate travel bans, of the Reciprocal Green Lane and Periodic
increasing domestic travellers, improving trade
Commuting Arrangement between Malaysia
activities and loosening of port restrictions.
and Singapore for official cross-border travel
With prolonged border closure for tourism-
for businesses and work purposes will also
related activities and the extension of Recovery
help to spur the subsector. The Government’s
Movement Control Order (RMCO) until year-
effort to promote travel bubbles with more
end, the subsector is forecast to record a
decline of 11.9% in 2020. destinations is anticipated to further support
the subsector.
The subsector is projected to rebound by 7.5%
in 2021, driven by the land transport segment, The utilities subsector declined by 2% in the
following operations of new highways, first half of 2020 following lower usage by the
including the Setiawangsa – Pantai Expressway industrial segment. Nevertheless, the subsector
(SPE), Damansara – Shah Alam Elevated is estimated to rebound in the second half of
Expressway (DASH) and partial alignment the year by 5.3% attributed to the resumption
of Pan Borneo Highway. In addition, the of industrial activities. Overall, the subsector is
launching of seven sets of four-car trains for expected to expand by 1.7% in 2020, supported
KL Monorail is expected to increase the daily by higher demand from both residential and
ridership. Likewise, the air transport segment industrial segments. In 2021, the subsector is
is anticipated to recover moderately, due to projected to further grow by 5.7%, primarily
the increase in domestic passenger traffic and supported by higher usage by the industrial
cargo movement. The water transport segment segment in line with expansion in economic
is forecast to improve gradually, as world
activities as well as the implementation of
maritime trade recovers.
renewable energy projects and Rural Electricity
Supply Programme.
The other services subsector contracted by COVID-19 cases. Thus in 2020, the subsector is
9.6% in the first half of 2020 due to lower expected to decline by 8.1%. The subsector is
medical travellers and decline in enrolments projected to expand by 6.2% in 2021, following
in private colleges and universities. The aggressive branding and digital marketing for
contraction is expected to narrow to 6.6% health tourism in targeted countries, such as
in the second half of the year following Cambodia, China, Indonesia and Myanmar. The
the arrival of registered foreign students Government services subsector is projected to
and critically ill patients, except those from maintain its expansion by 4% in 2020 and 3.7%
high-risk countries with more than 150,000 in 2021.
Logistics refer to the process of managing and controlling the flows of goods, energy, information
and other resources such as facilities, services and people. It involves the integration of
information, transportation, inventory, warehousing, material handling and packaging (Gen et al.,
2008). In general, this industry has undergone three phases and is now entering the fourth stage
which represents the integration of internet with production processes in line with the emergence
of Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0) (Figure 3.2.1.). This enables the communication between
machines and humans in real-time and the use of what is known as “smart products and smart
services” as well as the advanced digitalisation within factories (Lasi et al., 2014).
Degree of Complexity
Year
1700 Industry 1.0 1800 Industry 2.0 1969 Industry 3.0 2000 Industry 4.0 2020
In Malaysia, the industry is highly integrated across various sectors. It has been a key enabler for
the advancement of industrialisation, international trade and competitiveness. The logistics industry
has contributed immensely in the production and distribution processes as well as facilitating
trade activities. In 2019, the logistics industry1 expanded by 6.8% contributing RM53.7 billion to the
country’s GDP (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2020). Nevertheless, the industry faces various
challenges inhibiting it from reaching its full potential and efficiency. Accordingly, it is imperative to
transform the industry with the applications of IR4.0 to improve efficiency and productivity as well
as to remain competitive.
1
Proxied by the transportation and storage subsector.
Business Services
Wireless Sensors Internet Automatic 3D Printing Drone
Network of Things Guided Vehicle
LOGISTICS 4.0
Cloud Computing Blockchain Big Data Robotics and Automation Augmented Reality
Logistics 4.0
Logistics 4.0 is defined as the specific application of connecting machines, products, systems
and people that can share information and manage themselves (Bamberger et al., 2017). It uses
technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT), wireless sensor network, cloud computing, blockchain,
big data as well as robotics and automation. These technologies enable real-time information
flows, monitoring of market demand, personalisation of products and autonomous management of
global supply chains. Matyushenko et al. (2019) indicate that there are five elements of Logistics
4.0, namely, transparency, smart utilities, adaption to IoT, integration with IR4.0 and collection of
analytics.
Transparency
Lor
Provides integrity control and quality condition on the products, thus enabling logistics to be much more
efficient and comprehensive.
Smart Utilities
Alerts the supplier on the stock level without requiring any human intervention.
Adaption to IoT
Provides an increased inventory visibility to ensure an environment of sustainability, safety and security
which reduces wastage, theft and tampering of products.
Collection of Analytics
Improves demand and delivery forecasts while detecting possible improvement or potential risks in their
value streams.
Digital transformation will benefit industries through lower cost and additional revenues. Cost
is expected to be reduced by 34.2% while increasing revenue by 33.6% in the logistics services
industry through this transformation (Lehmacher et al., 2017). According to the World Economic
Forum (2016), digitalisation in the logistics industry could unlock USD1.5 trillion of value for
logistics players and a further USD2.4 trillion worth of societal benefits over the next decade. A
study across EU countries indicate that a 10-percentage point rise in the share of firms using high-
speed broadband internet at the industry level results in an increase in multi-factor productivity
of 1.4% after one year and 3.9% after three years (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, 2019).
The logistics industry in Malaysia is still facing various challenges, such as inadequate infrastructure
and limited internet connectivity, low adoption of digitalisation, burdensome regulations, lack of
skilled workers, and external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, Malaysia’s
information communication and technology (ICT) infrastructure lag behind global standards,
especially in rural areas (Ismail & Masud, 2020). At the same time, high cost, unstable internet
connectivity and low digitalisation hamper efficiencies and competitiveness of Malaysian logistics
firms. In addition, the industry lacks expertise and skilled workers, especially in the design of the
supply chain network, integrated warehouse management and information technology application.
Given the immense variety of economic goods and the different modes of transportation, there
are various regulations concerning the governance of the logistics industry, which slows down the
adoption of digitalisation and innovation. External shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have
also disrupted the industry. The ensuing lockdown has restricted export-import activities globally
which severely affected the logistics industry in the country.
Way Forward
The Logistics and Trade Facilitation Masterplan (2015 – 2020) aims to provide the strategic
framework and roadmap to strengthen Malaysia’s position as the preferred logistics gateway in
Asia (Ministry of Transportation, 2017). The masterplan outlines that by leveraging the potential
of e-commerce and adopting digitalisation, competitiveness and efficiency in the logistics industry
will improve. This will pave the way for new, advanced and automated logistics services. The
core aspects of digital infrastructure, such as ICT networks, data infrastructure, digital platforms
and devices must be reliable and compatible for logistics firms to invest in digitalisation. For
instance, the broader roll-out of the fifth-generation cellular network (5G) internet would provide a
convenient way to send and track packages, schedule deliveries and get real-time updates anytime
and anywhere. Furthermore, the efficiency of the first and last mile aspects, including keeping
the customers informed throughout is vital in ensuring customer delivery experience is achieved
efficiently and effectively.
With the COVID-19 disrupting the logistics supply chain network, the industry needs to adopt a new
business model by accelerating digital transformation. Post COVID-19, consumers have adjusted
their behaviours and preferences to use logistics services that provide last-mile deliveries of various
sizes of appliances and commercial goods. As a result, many logistics firms are shifting from
business-to-business (B2B) to business-to-consumer (B2C) models which increases the demand for
couriers and online delivery services platforms. Government’s intervention by providing institutional
support and initiatives will ease the adoption of digitalisation in the logistics industry. This includes
developing skills and technology, reducing unnecessary regulatory burden and ensuring data
protection and security.
Conclusion
The adoption of digitalisation enables the logistics players to manage their operations efficiently
and provide seamless logistics services to their clients worldwide. This will allow businesses to
run with greater resilience and flexibility to remain competitive. The COVID-19 pandemic has
precipitated the digital transformation of firms, including those in the logistics sector, which can no
longer do business conventionally. With the rise of e-commerce activities, logistics players need to
ramp up their performance while adjusting to strict guidelines to keep in pace with the new norms.
Therefore, Logistics 4.0 can enhance operational efficiency by reducing time and cost for goods to
reach consumers and subsequently increases the competitive advantage of domestic firms. It also
accelerates convergence with global supply chains and helps key export industries connect with
international markets.
-35
Nonetheless, the manufacturing sector is
expected to improve by 2.4% in the second -40
J A J O J A J O J A J
half of 2020, as industrial activities resume 2018 2019 2020
operations in line with the gradual lifting of
MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION INDEX
the MCO. Within the export-oriented industries,
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION INDEX
the E&E segment is projected to improve
following rising demand for computer and
electronic products. Chemical and rubber Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
products are anticipated to continue to record digital transformation as WFH and virtual
high growth, benefitting from higher demand communication become part of new business
for rubber gloves and pharmaceutical products. practices. Higher demand for integrated
Within the domestic-oriented industries, circuits, memory and microchips within the
the food products and transport equipment global semiconductor market will further
segments are expected to rebound, supported support the segment. The production of
by higher demand. Overall, for the year, the chemical and rubber products is expected to
manufacturing sector is expected to decline expand rapidly in tandem with the increase
by 3%. in demand for disinfectants, sanitisers and
rubber gloves. With the economic recovery,
The manufacturing sector is forecast to consumer-related products will benefit from
rebound by 7% in 2021, driven by steady higher household disposable income, while
improvement in both the export- and construction-related products will be supported
domestic-oriented industries. The E&E segment by major infrastructure and affordable housing
is projected to accelerate in line with the projects.
CHANGE SHARE
INDEX
(%) (%)
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Export-oriented industries 118.6 114.5 3.6 -3.5 69.2 70.8
Electronics and electrical product cluster 124.4 122.4 4.0 -1.6 27.2 28.3
Electronics 129.0 128.7 3.7 -0.2 15.1 16.0
Electrical products 119.1 115.1 4.4 -3.4 12.1 12.3
Primary-related cluster 115.1 109.8 3.4 -4.7 42.0 42.5
Chemical and chemical products 115.9 109.3 2.3 -5.7 12.8 12.8
Petroleum products 112.2 99.3 3.0 -11.5 12.9 12.1
Textiles, wearing apparel, leather products 123.8 101.0 5.3 -18.4 2.0 1.7
and footwear
Wood and wood products 119.9 100.7 4.8 -16.0 3.2 2.8
Rubber products 122.2 175.6 8.0 43.8 3.0 4.7
Off-estate processing 109.3 110.5 2.2 1.1 5.1 5.5
Paper and paper products 118.0 108.6 4.6 -8.0 3.0 2.9
Introduction
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) form a vital component of the Malaysian economy,
contributing more than a third of total gross domestic product (GDP). It also provides jobs
to more than seven million workers (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019). Furthermore,
SMEs account for 98.5% of total establishments, mainly in the services sector. In Malaysia, an
establishment is classified as an SME based on annual sales turnover or the number of employees,1
subject to further conditions stipulated under the guideline of SME definition established by SME
Corporation Malaysia (SME Corp. Malaysia) as the secretariat of the National Entrepreneur and SME
Development Council (Figure 3.3.1.).
1
Endorsed at the 14th National SME Development Council Meeting (now known as the National Entrepreneur and SME Development Council) in July
2013.
Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2016 and SME Corporation Malaysia, 2020
The severity of the impact of COVID-19 on the global economy is unprecedented. The International
Monetary Fund (IMF) projects that global growth in 2020 would experience the worst recession
since the Great Depression in the 1930s and far worse than the 2009 Global Financial Crisis. The
crisis is mainly caused by the movement control, lockdowns and physical distancing measures
implemented globally to contain the spread of the virus. The cumulative loss to global GDP arising
from the pandemic crisis for 2020 – 2021 is estimated to be around USD9 trillion (International
Monetary Fund, 2020). In Malaysia, the impact of demand cut-backs and supply chain disruptions
on cash flow, employment and sustainability are the main challenges for most businesses, in
particular the SMEs. As the backbone of the country’s economy, the Government has introduced
various initiatives to support SMEs during the crisis, including soft loans, grants, wage subsidy, tax
exemptions and moratorium.
Findings by Omar et al. (2020) highlights the impact of the Movement Control Order (MCO) on
SMEs. The effect is characterised as operational problems, such as operation and supply chain
disruptions, difficulties in the fore-sighting of future business direction as well as financial-related
issues. This is in line with a quick survey by Marketing Insight (2020) on the impact of MCO in
Kuala Lumpur and Pulau Pinang, businesses were switching their business conduct into online
transactions in line with the changes in consumers’ purchasing behaviour. An online survey by the
Department of Statistics, Malaysia (2020), indicates that 68% of establishments had no source of
income during the initial MCO period and 12.3% earned revenue through online sales or services.
To assess the impact of the MCO on SMEs, the SME Corp. Malaysia undertook a series of internal
surveys between March and May 2020.2 These surveys aimed to understand the challenges faced by
SMEs and to assess the effectiveness of Government assistance. More than 1,900 SMEs in various
sectors throughout the nation participated in the surveys.
The SME Corp. Malaysia's surveys indicate that cash flow disruptions were the main challenge
to SMEs during the COVID-19 crisis, followed by lower demand, supply chain disruption and
legal issues (Figure 3.3.2.). These challenges caused SMEs to halt their business operations
temporarily with the possibility of huge losses. This is in line with the findings of Bourletidis
and Triantafyllopoulos (2014) that SMEs in a period of prolonged economic crises may suffer
disproportionately from economic downturns because of limited financial resources.
FIGURE 3.3.2. SMEs Top Challenges and State of Business Operations During the Crisis by Ranking
Cash flow issues arise mainly due to the drop-in sales, insufficient cash-in-hand as well as high
overhead costs. The surveys revealed that nearly 60% of SMEs reported not having any sales during
the MCO period, while 39% experienced lower sales. SMEs also claimed to have cashflow problems
in paying employees’ salaries and benefits, business loan repayments, rental and utility payments
as well as for the purchase of raw materials and packaging. Consequently, more than 90% of SMEs
were expected to survive only up to five months with existing cash-in-hand.
The global economic fallout from COVID-19 has been devastating, with many losing jobs and
business, and unable to pay their commitments (Hakovirta & Denuwara, 2020). SME Corp. Malaysia
surveys reveal that only 34% of the SMEs were able to continue operations as essential services
providers. Majority of SMEs had to undertake various alternative actions, including negotiating with
employees on salary and benefits cut (37%), retrenching employees (34%), limiting business trips
(33%) and working from home (33%).3
The surveys also indicate that for SMEs to regain their pre-crisis growth momentum, assistance
other than commercial loans are necessary. This include, soft loans, deduction on corporate and
business tax as well as a dedicated government agency as SMEs focal point. In addition, advice on
2
The surveys cover the period between the MCO and the reopening of the economy (excluding the initiatives under Pelan Jana Semula Ekonomi
(PENJANA) which was announced in June 2020).
3
Figure may not add up to 100% due to multiple choices by the respondents.
restructuring and remodelling of businesses, identifying new business areas and access to online
platforms are among assistance needed by SMEs. Hence, of all the initiatives under the stimulus
packages, the wage subsidy programme, six-month automatic moratorium on loans, free internet
services and special relief facility initiatives were the most impactful measures. Other beneficial
programmes include discounts on electricity bills and micro-credit schemes.
With the support and assistance, a total of 72% of SMEs are anticipated to rebound within a year.
However, the rest would require more than a year to stabilise their businesses. Nonetheless, most
SMEs faced challenges to restart their businesses due to lesser demand, insufficient capital, supply
chain issues and difficulties in complying with the standard operating procedures (SOPs).
Way Forward
With the significant presences of SMEs in the economy, any crisis will inevitably affect various
sectors and overall economic growth. Therefore, it is vital to ensure the sustainability and resilience
of SMEs at all times. Moving forward, among the initiatives that will enable SMEs to endure any
crisis are accelerating digitalisation, adopting strategic financial planning and enhancing branding
capabilities.
Accelerating Digitalisation
The adoption of digitalisation is necessary to transform SMEs to be more competitive and resilient.
Nonetheless, businesses in Malaysia have adopted digital technologies less readily than the
Government and the population in general. Only 62% of companies are connected to the internet,
46% have fixed broadband and 18% have a web presence of some kind (World Bank, 2018). A
study by Association of Small & Medium Enterprises, Singapore (2018) found that SMEs which have
embraced digitalisation saw revenue growth of 26% on average. The digitalisation helps businesses
better understand their customers, gauge the effectiveness of marketing campaigns, increase the
efficiency of their business operations, transform products and empower employees.
According to a survey conducted by Bank Negara Malaysia (2018), more than 70% of SMEs’
financing needs are sourced internally or from personal savings and the rest obtained from banks
as well as development financial and microcredit institutions. It is also found that many SMEs lack
awareness and the know-how to conduct effective and efficient budgeting, including alternate
financing. Strategic financial planning involves a process by which firms derive a strategy to enable
them to anticipate and respond to the dynamic business environment (Kee Luen et al., 2013). Such
efforts inevitably improve the competitiveness of business firms and eventually their performances.
Thus, the study confirmed that adopting strategic financial planning would improve the business
performance and success rate of SMEs.
Currently, local SMEs contribute only 18% of total exports due to lack of knowledge on market
access and readiness in exporting. Insufficient funds for brand and marketing is the top internal
challenge for SMEs. In contrast, the high cost in brand communication was the main external
challenge (Bizsphere Online Reviews, 2017) (Figure 3.3.3.). The commercialisation process is claimed
to be more difficult for SMEs since they lack the presence and resources necessary for broad reach
on the marketplace (Walsh et al., 2017). Thus, there is a need for SMEs to adopt cost-effective
methods through technology-oriented approaches to commercialise their products.
FIGURE 3.3.3. Top Five Challenges to Bring Brand to the Next Level
External Internal
53% 52%
36%
33% 32% 32%
INSUFFICIENT FUND FOR BRAND AND MARKETING HIGH COST IN BRAND COMMUNICATION
DIFFERENTIATING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES INTENSE PRICE COMPETITION
INCREASING COST OF OPERATION ACCESSING AND EXPANDING TO NEW MARKETS
LACK OF PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE FROM BRANDING EXPERTS UNABLE TO GET GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE FOR BRAND AND MARKETING
UNCLEAR ON HOW TO LEVERAGE ON DIGITAL PLATFORMS MARKET MOVING TOO FAST WITHOUT MARKET INTELLIGENCE TO PLAN
Notes: Figure may not add up to 100% due to multiple choices by the respondents
Source: Bizsphere Online Review, 2017
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed underlying problems in the way SMEs conduct businesses.
The timely intervention by the Government through PRIHATIN dan PRIHATIN SME+ is expected to
sustain SMEs to survive in a challenging business environment. The pandemic has also created a
new normal in business practices, which includes adopting digital business models, re-orientation
in supply chains and embrace the shift in consumer behaviours. Thus, SMEs need to improve their
capability and capacity to be more resilient, agile and flexible to face uncertainties.
3
Forecast
subsector. The output of livestock and other Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
agriculture subsectors are also expected to higher biodiesel mandate in Indonesia and
expand, supported by stable demand for food Malaysia. The rubber subsector is expected
items, primarily during festivities. Hence, the to surge as global demand for natural rubber
agriculture sector is projected to decline by increases in line with the expansion of the
1.2% in 2020. automotive industry. The production of
livestock and other agriculture and fishing is
The agriculture sector is expected to also expected to improve in line with various
turnaround by 4.7% in 2021, supported Government’s initiatives in modernising the
mainly by higher production of palm oil and agro-food subsector. This include integration
rubber. The oil palm subsector is anticipated of agriculture technologies, such as agro-
to rebound following improvements in robotic, sensor, precision farming, drones,
global demand, particularly from China agriculture data development and Internet
and India. The crude palm oil (CPO) price of Things (IoT) applications. In addition, the
is projected to remain stable with higher Government’s efforts to increase domestic
demand following recovery in the hotel, food production in ensuring food security are
restaurant and catering operations as well as expected to continue to sustain the growth of
the subsector.
Introduction
The commodity sector1 continues to play an important role in the Malaysian economy. However, with the
focus shifting from purely upstream to various downstream activities, the contribution of the commodity
sector has declined. Furthermore, the sector is vulnerable, mainly due to the volatility in global demand and
supply. Using an input-output methodology and a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model,
this article assesses the contribution of the commodity sector to economic growth.
In 1970, the commodity sector accounted for 54.9%2 of gross domestic product (GDP) or RM43.2 billion
(in 2015 prices) (Figure 3.1.1.). The commodity sector constituted about 80% of total exports, comprising
mainly of rubber and tin (Figure 3.1.2.). However, during the subsequent decades, oil and gas (O&G) and
oil palm replaced rubber and tin as the major commodities. In 2019, despite an increase in value to RM203
billion, the share of the commodity sector to GDP had reduced to 14.3%. This was due to the rapid growth
of the manufacturing sector during the industrialisation phase of the mid-1980s. The sector’s share further
declined during the 1990s following the transformation into a services-driven economy. Despite accounting
for a smaller percentage of GDP, the sector has cushioned the economy from external shocks, especially
during the crises of 1998, 2009 and the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
1
Includes oil palm, rubber as well as oil and gas.
2
Backcasting data from Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department.
FIGURE 3.1.1. Value and Contribution of Commodity FIGURE 3.1.2. Contribution of Commodity and
and Non-Commodity Sectors Non-Commodity Sectors to Total Exports
RM'000 %
1,600 14.3% 100
1,400
1,200 80
20.2%
1,000
60
800
26.7%
600 40
400 37.6%
46.1% 20
200 54.9%
0 0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2019 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2019
Based on the input-output analysis, there are three notable trends observed in the forward and backward
linkages3 for the commodity sector. Firstly, there was a gradual increase in the forward linkages for oil
palm and O&G since 2000. This reflects the compositional shift in both commodities as they moved
to higher value-added downstream activities in the resource-based industry, which constituted 44.3%
of the manufacturing sector. The output of crude palm oil was mainly used by oils and fats as well as
manufacturing of animal feeds industries. The output of O&G was consumed by the petroleum refinery,
basic chemicals, wholesale and retail trade as well as motor vehicle industries. The evolution of downstream
activities was in line with Industrial Master Plans (IMPs), which aimed at ensuring the manufacturing sector,
including the resource-based industry, remains an essential source of growth. On the contrary, the forward
linkage for rubber industry remained low following increasing usage of synthetic rubber for the production
of gloves.
3.0
1.6
2.5
1.4
2.0
1.2
1.5
1.0 1.0
1978 1983 1987 1991 2000 2005 2010 2015 1978 1983 1987 1991 2000 2005 2010 2015
OIL PALM OIL PALM
RUBBER RUBBER
CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS
3
Backward linkage is the interconnection with the industry of upstream industries for inputs. Forward linkage is the interconnection of the industry
to downstream industries as markets for its output (Miller & Blair, 2009).
Secondly, all the three commodities have higher backward linkages for the period of 2000 – 2015 as
compared to 1978 – 1991. This reflects that industries consumed more input as they expanded to meet
demand from more diversified downstream industries (Figure 3.1.3.). Thirdly, the commodity sector has
more extensive forward linkages as compared to backward linkages as they supply natural raw materials
to the economy. This is in line with the study by Valdés and Foster (2010), which revealed that agricultural
commodities have higher forward linkages rather than backward linkages.
Subsequently, the CGE model was applied to assess the contribution of the commodity sector to the
economy. The analysis shows that with a 10% increase in productivity of O&G, oil palm and rubber
industries, real GDP will increase by 1.5, 0.5 and 0.03 percentage points, respectively (Figure 3.1.4., 3.1.5. and
3.1.6.). In addition, other industries that are associated with the commodity sector, such as civil engineering,
oils and fats as well as rubber processing, are also expected to benefit. The CGE results indicate that
industries that sell the most to households are expected to gain from higher household disposable income.
In comparison to the commodity industry, a 10% increase in productivity of electronics and basic chemicals
will increase real GDP by 0.3 and 0.12 percentage points, respectively. The lower contribution to GDP is
attributed to the high dependency of these industries on imports of intermediate inputs.
FIGURE 3.1.4. Crude Oil and FIGURE 3.1.5. Oil Palm FIGURE 3.1.6. Rubber
Natural Gas
Baseline deviation Baseline deviation Baseline deviation
(percentage point) (percentage point) (percentage point)
1.8 0.6 0.06
1.6
0.5 0.05
1.4
1.2 0.4 0.04
1.0
0.3 0.03
0.8
0.6 0.2 0.02
0.4
0.1 0.01
0.2
0.0 0.0 0.00
2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 2021
Conclusion
The Malaysian economy has experienced a relatively rapid growth during the last four decades and has
also undergone a structural transformation. From an agriculture-based economy, diversification has
proceeded to the extent that services and manufacturing have become the engine of growth. Nevertheless,
the commodity sector continues to play an essential role in the economy through the inter-sectoral
linkages, particularly in terms of forward linkages. This is mainly attributed to the emphasis on enhancing
resource-based downstream activities. The oil palm and O&G industries also contribute higher to the GDP
as compared with electronics and basic chemicals industries which have high import content. Therefore,
research and development (R&D) collaborations between the industry and research institutes need to be
enhanced to produce more high value-added products. In line with the Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0),
adoption of technology such as usage of robotics, sensors and the Internet of Things (IoT) will increase
productivity and ensure the sustainability of the sector.
Construction Sector 8
80,000 2,400 84
60,000 1,800 82
40,000 1,200 80
20,000 600 78
0 0 76
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2
Estimate
3
Forecast outlays, especially in the first half of the year.
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding and excluding change in
stocks component Public investment expenditure, which shrunk
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
by 24.2% during the period, is expected
Private consumption is anticipated to increase to gradually improve in the second half of
by 7.1% in 2021, mainly supported by higher 2020. This follows the implementation and
disposable income arising from buoyant acceleration of investment in infrastructure,
domestic economic activities, stronger export such as small-scale projects under the
earnings, accommodative financial stance, economic stimulus packages and the National
extension of tax relief on childcare and Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP). The
favourable stock market conditions. Better Federal Government’s development expenditure
job prospects, following broader improvement (DE) continues to prioritise investment with
in the economy and measures addressing high multiplier impact and value for money.
employability, are also expected to contribute The DE, averaging about RM59 billion between
to household spending. Furthermore, the 2020 – 2021, is mostly targeted at promoting
expected recovery in the tourism-related sustainable development and bridging urban-
industries following tax incentives on domestic rural infrastructure gap as well as enhancing
tourism expenses for households will also the living standards of the people. Among
provide additional impetus to private sector major projects, include expansion of several
spending. As the nation rapidly shifts towards airports as well as construction of hospitals
adopting digitalisation, the broader availability and Klang Valley Double Track Phase 1 (KVDT
of various e-commerce platforms and roll- 1). The continuation of large-scale transport-
out of 5G technology will facilitate economic related projects, such as MRT2, LRT3, Rapid
activities.
Transit System (RTS) and Pan Borneo Highway, these initiatives are expected to support public
will also provide impetus to public investment. investment to expand by 16.9% in 2021.
Public corporations are expected to continue
investing in new and on-going projects, Public consumption is anticipated to increase
among others, development of O&G-related by 1.6% in 2020, with higher expenditure
projects, upgrading of digitalisation-related on emoluments mainly to meet the staff
activities and construction of energy plants. All requirements in critical sectors. The 3.6%
increase in public consumption in the first
FIGURE 3.6. Savings-Investment Gap half of 2020 is mostly attributed to the
(% of GNI) implementation of stimulus packages. Public
consumption is expected to expand by 2%
RM billion %
35 16 in 2021 with the Government continuing to
further improve public services delivery and
optimising spending.
30 12
Gross national income (GNI) in current prices
is anticipated to decline by 3.7% in 2020,
following slower economic activities. Gross
25 8 national savings (GNS) is also expected to fall
by 11% to RM328.3 billion, with the bulk of
savings contributed by the private sector. With
20 4 total investment declining at a slower rate than
savings, the savings-investment gap is forecast
to record a surplus of RM48.5 billion.
15 0
2017 2018 2019 20201 20212 In 2021, GNI is projected to rebound by 7.8%
to RM1.53 trillion, while GNS by 2% to RM335
GROSS NATIONAL SAVINGS
billion. During the year, the savings-investment
TOTAL INVESTMENT3
SAVINGS-INVESTMENT GAP (RIGHT SCALE) gap is anticipated to record a lower surplus
of RM20.3 billion. However, the surplus will
1
Estimate continue to provide ample liquidity to finance
2
3
Forecast
Including change in stocks
domestic economic activities and be mobilised
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia for long-term productive investment.
Shadow economy (SE) exists around the world. However, there is no standard definition and
methodology to account for its activities in the official national gross domestic product (GDP), given
its hidden nature. Apart from SE, there are many terms used, such as underground economy, non-
observed economy, hidden economy and informal economy (Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development, 2017). The SE includes all market-based legal production of goods
and services that are deliberately concealed from public authorities to avoid payment of taxes
and social security contributions as well as to avoid complying with labour market standards and
administrative obligations (Schneider, 2011).
The incentive to be in SE is driven by the higher cost in the hiring of workers, which includes tax
burden and social contributions as well as regulations to control economic activities (Schneider,
2011). An increase in the rate of self-employment as a percentage of the labour force also
contributes to the size of SE (Dell’Anno, 2004). Although self-employment is high in many countries,
they may not enjoy the benefits of formal contracts (Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development, 2009). Thus, the information on the size of SE is crucial for the government in
making policy decisions to reduce tax evasion (Medina & Schneider, 2018). The estimation on SE
would also provide insights for governments to enhance social security protection among low-
income households and unemployed persons.
Many studies have estimated the size of the SE in Malaysia using various methodologies. Using the
Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model and Currency Demand Approach (CDA), Medina
and Schneider (2019) estimated the average size of SE in Malaysia at 31% of GDP between 1991
– 2017. This article estimates the size of the Malaysian SE between 1990 – 2019 using a similar
method. It also provides some insights on the main causes and best practices in other countries
to minimise shadow economic activities. In this context, SE is defined as legal productive economic
activities that remain unreported from the official authority to avoid government regulations, tax
obligations and social security contributions1.
There are two steps in the estimation of SE. Firstly, the MIMIC model is applied to estimate
the relative size of the SE. The model is derived from structural equation modelling (SEM) to
confirm the influence of causal variables as well as the effect of SE on macroeconomic indicators.
Secondly, the CDA is applied to calibrate the relative estimates into the absolute size of SE in
Malaysia for the period between 1990 – 2019. The size of SE depends on various variables. The
MIMIC estimation uses causal variables of SE, which include trade openness, real GDP per capita,
unemployment rate, size of government and the rule of law. The effect of SE on macroeconomic
indicators are reflected in money supply (M1), labour force participation rate and real GDP.
The model shows that trade openness, real GDP per capita and size of government are
contributors to the larger size of SE. Many research indicate that real GDP per capita and trade
openness have an inverse relationship with the size of SE. However, for Malaysia, both variables
have a positive relationship with the size of SE, suggesting that an increase in real GDP per capita
or trade openness will lead to a larger size of the SE. These relationships are also observed in
advanced countries. A positive relationship with real GDP per capita occurs when an economy has
reached a certain threshold of real GDP per capita or when an economy is more developed (Wu
& Schneider, 2019). In addition, high trade openness indicates minimal trade barriers. As such,
businesses or individuals may involve in illegal trading without difficulty (International Chamber of
Commerce, 2017).
Trade Openness
+
Real GDP Per Capita Money Supply (M1)
+ +
SHADOW Labour Force
Unemployment Rate + -
ECONOMY Participation Rate
+ +
Size of Government Real GDP
-
Rule of Law
1
Any undeclared, under-reporting and suppression of income in Malaysia are regarded as tax evasion (Malaysian Income Tax Act, 1967 and Service Tax Act, 1975).
In the labour market, tight regulations have a significant effect on employers’ costs and workers’
incentives. In many Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries,
high labour costs are the leading reason for the rising unemployment rate, and thus, for the
expansion in the SE, which employs many unemployed people. As growing numbers of people work
in the hidden sector, participation rates in the official economy may fall (Schneider & Enste, 2000).
Nevertheless, better job prospects in the labour market are expected to reduce the size of SE.
A positive relationship exists between SE and the size of government, which is the proxy for the
burden of indirect taxation (Schneider et al., 2010). A bigger government is associated with greater
red tape, which induces some firms to operate underground (Goel et al., 2017). On the contrary,
the size of SE declines as the overall institutional quality and the rule of law improves. Businesses
also have an incentive to go underground, not to avoid high taxes but rather to reduce the burden
of the regulation (Friedman et al., 2000).
Heightened activities in SE is likely to push up the demand for the currency. This is because SE
transactions tend to be in cash or cryptocurrencies, which is difficult to be detected. Hidden
transactions are assumed to be carried out in cash to avoid leaving a paper trail for authorities
(Tanzi, 2002). Thus, higher M1 reflects the increase in the size of SE.
This article estimates the average size of Malaysian SE at 33.7% of GDP from 1990 – 2019. Figure
3.4.2. indicates that the size of SE has declined over the years fluctuating around 50% of GDP
between 1990 – 1999. The size of SE continued to fall to about 30% between 2000 – 2009 before
averaging about 21% between 2010 – 2019. In 2019, the size of SE stood at 18.2%.
(% GDP)
60
1990 –1999: 49.6%
50
40
2000 – 2009: 30.2%
30 2010 – 2019: 21.2%
20 18.2%
10
0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Tax administrators globally have strengthened their efforts to identify and reduce the size of SE.
Data sharing among agencies are crucial in detecting SE. For instance, New Zealand provides a tax
number to every new-born child upon registration of birth. The Australian Taxation Office allows
taxpayers to pre-fill their income tax returns with information, such as salary, interest and health
insurance, with data sourced directly from employers, banks and insurers. In Singapore, the inland
revenue agency sourced information from vehicle records and the Central Provident Fund Board to
help determine whether a company is active or dormant (Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development, 2017).
In Nigeria, electronic payments and cashless transactions have been implemented to limit
undeclared economic activities by gradually reducing and eliminating unrecorded cash payments
(Yusuf & Agbi, 2018). Liberalising the labour market is also among measures implemented to
minimise SE. Denmark, for example, has a renowned “flexicurity” model, where businesses are
given the “flexibility” in hiring and firing workers. At the same time, the model has increased the
“security” for people who have lost their jobs by providing unemployment benefits, retraining and
job search assistance (Packard et al., 2012).
Way Forward
Advanced technology can help reduce the size of SE and the incidence of tax evasion. The
emergence of the sharing economy and gig economy allows the migration from cash to digital
transactions and creates digital footprints. Data sharing among government agencies, for example,
registration of properties and vehicles as well as the introduction of tax identification number,
will provide information on the expenditure patterns of individual and businesses. Thus, the
government could analyse the collected data effectively and enable the identification of fraudulent
tax activities. The government’s welfare distribution platforms could also be utilised to register
business entities in the informal sector.
The government will enhance efforts to make working in the formal sector more beneficial, for
example, by improving efficiency in the labour market and simplifying tax compliance procedures
with greater adoption of technology. Efforts will be continued to enhance and emphasise the rule
of law and enforcement rather than increasing the number of regulations.
Conclusion
As SE under-values the actual size of the economy, this article applies the MIMIC model and CDA
approach to estimate the size of SE in Malaysia between 1990 – 2019. The results indicate that
although the size of SE is on a declining trend, its presence is still significant and deters the
development of an inclusive economy. It deprives potential high tax revenue collection to finance
development projects, such as healthcare, education and public transportation. Measures to reduce
the size of SE include adopting advanced technologies, higher data sharing among government
agencies, emphasis on the rule of law and stringent enforcement.
RM MILLION CHANGE
(%)
2019 20201 20212 2019 20201 20212
Total trade 1,844,483 1,738,477 1,805,749 -2.1 -5.7 3.9
Gross exports 995,072 943,761 968,793 -0.8 -5.2 2.7
of which:
Manufactured 840,586 808,851 828,862 0.4 -3.8 2.5
Agriculture 65,958 66,441 69,381 -1.6 0.7 4.4
Mining 81,520 63,771 65,118 -9.3 -21.8 2.1
Gross imports 849,411 794,716 836,956 -3.5 -6.4 5.3
of which:
Capital goods 100,179 87,642 100,219 -10.9 -12.5 14.3
Intermediate goods 467,211 437,406 460,280 1.1 -6.4 5.2
Consumption goods 74,155 74,718 76,967 1.5 0.8 3.0
Trade balance 145,661 149,045 131,838 17.7 2.3 -11.5
1
Estimate
2
Forecast
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
1
Including gold scrap and waste; worn clothing; and special transaction not classified
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation
Gross exports are expected to rebound by demand for chemicals and chemical products,
2.7% in 2021, benefiting from the recovery rubber products and manufactures of metal.
in global trade and supply chains. Exports
of manufactured goods are anticipated to Exports of agriculture goods are projected to
turnaround by 2.5%, supported by improved expand by 4.4% in 2021, led by an increase
demand for E&E and non-E&E products. Higher in demand for palm oil and palm oil-based
demand for semiconductor, telecommunication agriculture products as well as natural rubber.
equipment parts as well as automatic data In line with the recovery in world economic
processing equipment in line with the global activities and improvement in crude oil prices,
digital transformation and 5G roll-out is export earnings from mining goods are
projected to recover by 2.1%, contributed by
expected to expand the exports of E&E by 3%.
higher demand from major markets for crude
Similarly, exports of the non-E&E are expected
petroleum (2%) and LNG (2.2%).
to improve by 2.1%, contributed by higher
15.9%
20.7%
27.1% 25.3%
RM620.6 14.3%
billion RM517.7 9.3%
3.2% 3.0% billion
3.2%
3.4%
3.5% 10.8% 4.0% 9.0%
3.8% 4.4%
4.7% 6.8% 6.3% 7.4%
6.5% 7.3%
Capital goods (except transport equipment) 59,712 62,221 -5.3 4.2 10.7 12.0
Food and beverages, primary and processed, mainly 12,173 13,182 3.5 8.3 2.2 2.5
for industry
Fuel and lubricants, primary, processed and others 39,293 32,403 7.0 -17.5 7.0 6.3
Industrial supplies, primary, processed and n.e.s.1 143,404 125,442 1.2 -12.5 25.7 24.2
Parts and accessories of capital and transport equipment 111,940 107,239 -4.2 -4.2 20.0 20.7
Food and beverages, primary and processed, mainly 20,071 21,464 5.2 6.9 3.6 4.1
for household
Transport equipment (non-industrial) 689 562 32.1 -18.4 0.1 0.1
1
Not elsewhere stated
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
1
Estimate
2
Forecast
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
The outflows of secondary income account, The primary income account is anticipated
which primarily consist of remittances, are to record a larger deficit of RM41.6 billion,
expected to decline to RM34.6 billion as following improvements in investment
the income of foreign workers is affected activities. This is in line with higher
during the MCO. At the same time, inflows of repatriation of profits and dividends by foreign
secondary income account are anticipated to investors and net outflows of compensation
increase to RM26.1 billion following a one-off for foreign professionals. Net outflows in the
receipt, contributing to a lower deficit of RM8.5 secondary income account are projected to
billion in secondary income account. widen to RM20.6 billion as remittances by
foreign workers will more than offset inflows,
The financial account registered a net outflow following the anticipated recovery in domestic
of RM33.1 billion due to higher net outflows economic activities.
in portfolio investment amid lower net inflows
in direct investment and financial derivatives FIGURE 3.8. International Reserves
accounts. Despite the pandemic, FDI registered
RM billion Months/Times
a net inflow of RM8.6 billion during the first
500 10
half of the year and channelled mainly to the
manufacturing and mining sectors as well
as financial and insurance/takaful segments. 400 8
CONTRIBUTION TO
CHANGE
CPI GROWTH
WEIGHT 1 (%)
(PERCENTAGE POINTS)
2019 2020 2019 2020
CPI 100.0 0.5 -1.0 0.50 -1.00
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 29.5 1.6 1.2 0.51 0.39
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.4 1.6 0.2 0.05 0.01
Clothing and footwear 3.2 -2.4 -1.0 -0.06 -0.02
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels 23.8 1.9 -1.0 0.44 -0.24
Furnishings, household equipment and routine household 4.1 1.3 0.3 0.05 0.01
maintenance
Health 1.9 0.3 1.2 0.01 0.02
Transport 14.6 -3.6 -10.0 -0.51 -1.37
Communication 4.8 0.0 1.6 0.00 0.06
Recreation services and culture 4.8 0.6 0.7 0.03 0.03
Education 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.02 0.02
Restaurants and hotels 2.9 1.2 0.7 0.04 0.02
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.7 -0.6 2.7 -0.04 0.17
1
Based on Household Expenditure Survey 2016
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
CHANGE CONTRIBUTION TO
(%) PPI GROWTH
WEIGHT1 (PERCENTAGE POINTS)
2019 2020 2019 2020
PPI 100.000 -2.0 -2.4 -1.96 -2.39
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 6.730 -10.3 12.5 -0.66 0.74
Mining 7.927 -3.8 -32.7 -0.30 -2.50
Manufacturing 81.571 -1.1 -0.2 -0.92 -0.16
Electricity and gas supply 3.442 1.6 -0.2 0.06 -0.01
Water supply 0.330 -2.1 -0.6 -0.01 0.00
PPI by stage of processing 100.000 -2.0 -2.4 -1.96 -2.39
Crude materials for further processing 16.410 -5.7 -12.4 -0.97 -2.04
Intermediate materials, supplies and components 56.119 -1.6 -0.3 -0.89 -0.16
Finished goods 27.471 0.2 0.3 0.05 0.08
1
Based on Economic Census 2016
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
The Producer Price Index (PPI) by local in the mining sector (-32.7%) followed by a
production declined by 2.4% during the first contraction in other sectors, namely water
eight months of 2020 and is expected to supply (-0.6%), manufacturing (-0.2%) and
remain stable due to low input costs. This electricity and gas supply (-0.2%). In contrast,
is attributed to weaker global commodity the index for agriculture, forestry and fishing
prices, particularly that of crude oil and sector rose by 12.5%. The PPI is expected
natural gas. The PPI by sector was weighed to improve in 2021 following the projected
down, particularly by a significant contraction recovery of the domestic and global economy.
9 20 40
15
15 30
6 10
10 20
3 5 5 10
0 0 0 0
-3 -5 -5 -10
-10 -20
-6 -10
-15 -30
-9 -15
-20 -40
-12 -20 -25 -50
-15 -25 -30 -60
J A J O J A J O J A J J A J O J A J O J A J
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
CPI PPI
TRANSPORT MANUFACTURING
FOOD AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES RIGHT SCALE MINING RIGHT SCALE
HOUSING, WATER, ELECTRICITY, AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND
GAS AND OTHER FUELS FISHING
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the percentage change in the cost of purchasing a
constant “basket”1 of goods and services which represents the average pattern of purchases by a
particular population during a specified period. Changes in the costs of items in the basket are
therefore due only to “pure” price movements, not associated with changes in the quantity and
quality of the set of consumer goods and services in the basket. On the other hand, the Producer
Price Index (PPI) for local production is an output-based index, which measures the change in
the price of commodities sold to the domestic market valued at the ex-factory price. The PPI
for local production measures the average change in the prices charged by producers of goods
of an industry in a reference month compared with the base period. Thus, it is an important
macroeconomic indicator used for monitoring the price movements of local outputs and is often
viewed as a leading indicator of CPI (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2020).
1
The “basket” is of an unchanging or equivalent quantity and quality of goods and services, consisting of items for which there are continually
measurable market prices over time.
According to Clark (1995), PPI can be transmitted to CPI via the pass-through effect. Meanwhile,
research on the developing economies (Sidaoui et al., 2010) and advanced economies (Woo et al.,
2018) revealed that there is a long-run relationship between CPI and PPI, which helps to forecast
inflation. This article analyses the relationship for the period from January 2011 to July 20202, which
provides an insight on inflation expectation for better management of the macroeconomic policy.
CPI measures the price changes in a fixed basket of goods and services and used as a proxy for
inflation. In Malaysia, the CPI basket consists of 12 main groups of 552 items with fixed weights.
Food and non-alcoholic beverages (29.5%), housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels (23.8%),
as well as transport groups (14.6%) form the largest weightage at 67.9% within the basket.
In comparison, the PPI is measured by stages of processing and by five sectors. By stages of
processing, the PPI is skewed towards intermediate materials, supplies and components, which
account for 56.1% of the total weightage, while by sector, manufacturing (81.6%) and mining (7.9%)
formed the largest weightage at 89.5%.
The CPI trend remained relatively stable and exhibited a smaller variation than PPI from January
2011 to July 2020 period (Figure 3.5.1.). In contrast, the PPI recorded two distinct trends during the
same period. From January 2011 until January 2017, the PPI had a wider variation before stabilising
and converging with the CPI after the weekly setting of fuel prices.
FIGURE 3.5.1. The Trend of CPI and PPI over 10-Year Period
%
15
PPI
Monthly setting Weekly setting Weekly setting
CPI of fuel prices of fuel prices of fuel prices
10 AVERAGE CPI (Dec 2014 - Feb 2017) (Mar 2017 - Aug 2018) (Jan 2019)
5
Average CPI = 2%
-5 Monthly setting
of fuel prices
(Sept - Dec 2018)
-10
Brent crude oil price above Implementation period of Goods and
USD100 per barrel Services Tax (GST) (Apr 2015 - June 2018)
-15
J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J O J A J
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
By and large, the inflation rate has remained low and stable. The CPI hovered around 2% on
average, while the PPI at 0.6% during the analysis period. However, there were periods of high
inflation rate. The highest rate recorded for CPI was 4.9% in March 2017 following the shift from
a monthly to a weekly setting of fuel prices. CPI recorded its largest decline in April and May
2020 at -2.9%, attributed to the weaker private consumption during the second quarter of 2020
2
Base year index set at 2010 = 100.
following the implementation of the Movement Control Order to stem the transmission of COVID-19
pandemic. Meanwhile, the PPI recorded its maximum rate increase of 15% in July 2011, which
coincided with the surge in global crude oil prices averaging USD116.46 per barrel. In May 2015,
the PPI reached the deepest trough at a rate of -9.4% following the slump in global crude oil prices
to an average of USD64.56 per barrel.
Methodology
The relationship between the CPI and PPI in the period under review was examined using the
Threshold Vector Error Correction Model (TVECM) with Momentum Threshold Autoregressive
(MTAR) adjustment (Enders & Granger, 1998; Woo et al., 2018). Both CPI and PPI variables were
transformed into natural logarithms. Within the relevant time series, the MTAR cointegration model
was deployed, followed by the TVECM to measure the asymmetric adjustments to equilibrium.
Findings
The analysis indicates the existence of a bidirectional relationship between the CPI and PPI. Thus,
price changes can be transmitted from producers to consumers and vice versa. Therefore, different
approaches are needed to address inflation, depending on the sources of price variation. Other
than that, the downward reversion of CPI to its long-run equilibrium will take approximately
9.1 months compared to PPI at approximately 15.5 months. This implies that more efforts are
needed to soften the impact on PPI as it takes a longer time for the PPI to return to its long-run
equilibrium.
Recommendations
Based on the findings, the lengthy downward adjustment of PPI is a primary concern in Malaysia.
Therefore, effort should be focused on addressing this issue which in turn will contribute to a
lower cost of doing business and reduce the pass-through effect. Lowering barriers to entry for
new firms, especially small and medium enterprises, will increase the total number of domestic
producers while ensuring a highly competitive market environment. It is also imperative to
strengthen market competition and enhance domestic production capacity to increase aggregate
supply (Benkovskis, 2017). In addition, the existing rules and regulations could be strengthened
and strictly enforced. This is to prevent anti-competitive practices and ensure the prices of essential
goods remain reasonable for consumers.
Conclusion
The analysis has established bidirectional properties between the CPI and PPI during the period
under review. It also indicates that the time taken for prices to adjust to long-run equilibrium
varies between both price indices, implying there are imperfections in the market. Thus, there is a
need for a more effective supply management policy to contain the transfer of impact between the
two indices. At the same time, cost-push factors in PPI should be identified to weaken the pass-
through effects from producers to consumers.
(‘000) SHARE
(%)
H12 20203 20214 H12 20203 20214
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 1,655.9 1,644.3 1,565.5 11.0 10.9 10.2
1
Total includes ‘Activities of extraterritorial organisations and bodies’
2
January to June 2020
3
Estimate
4
Forecast
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
packages. The productivity of the agriculture followed by China (18.9%) and the Philippines
sector is projected to record an increase of (7.4%). They were mainly employed in the
0.6%, with a decline in manufacturing (-1.4%) services (50.5%), information technology
and services (-3.6%) sectors. In 2021, labour (34.5%) and construction (5.9%) sectors.
productivity is projected to rebound by 4.9% to The Government will continue to undertake
reach RM95,400, supported by strong economic initiatives to reduce the dependency on
growth, particularly in services, manufacturing migrant workers by ensuring the employment
and construction sectors. of migrant workers, particularly low-skilled
foreign workers, is based on the actual needs
Foreign workers continued to represent of the economy. This will allow for more
a substantial part of the Malaysian labour high-income job opportunities for the local
market, thus, they were not spared from the workforce and the opportunity for industries to
effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. As at end- automate.
August 2020, registered low-skilled foreign
workers fell to 1.7 million persons and is
expected to remain at this level throughout Conclusion
the year, due to the temporary halt in new
employment in most sectors. The foreign After a dismal economic performance in 2020
workers were mainly from Indonesia (34%), due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Malaysian
Bangladesh (28.3%) and Nepal (15.3%). The economy is expected to rebound firmly in
manufacturing sector employed the highest 2021, in line with the expectation of a more
number of foreign workers with a share of synchronised global recovery. At the same
35.5%, followed by construction (21.3%) and time, domestic demand is projected to record
services (15.2%) sectors. Nevertheless, the a steady growth, supported by improvements
share of low-skilled foreign workers at 11.1% in labour market conditions, low inflation and
is still below the threshold of 15% to total favourable financing conditions as well as
employment. the revival of major infrastructure projects.
All sectors in the economy are expected to
Meanwhile, the number of expatriates fell by turnaround, with services and manufacturing
17.9% to reach 100,373 persons. The majority sectors continuing to spearhead growth.
of expatriates were from India (23.8%),
Nevertheless, downside risks to the growth the Government will continue to promote
outlook remain, arising from the resurgence resilient and sustainable economic growth,
of COVID-19 cases and the duration of while safeguarding the welfare of the people.
containment measures domestically and Efforts will be enhanced to accelerate the shift
globally. Geopolitical tensions, volatility in to digitalisation, skilled workforce, quality FDIs
financial and commodity markets as well as and strengthening environmental, social and
prolonged trade and tech war may dampen governance principles to ensure sustainable
the recovery pace. Against this background, and inclusive growth.
References
Association of Small & Medium Enterprises, Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B.
Singapore. (2018). Singapore SMEs: Are N. (2016). Can You Gig It. An Empirical
You Ready for a Digital Future? Retrieved Examination of the Gig-Economy and
from https://news.microsoft.com/en- Entrepreneurial Activity. SSRN, March 2016.
sg/2018/10/23/singapore-smes-who-embrace-
digital-transformation-expect-to-see-average- Clark, T. E. (1995). Do Producer Prices Lead
revenue-gains-of-26-asme-microsoft-study/ Consumer Prices? Economic Review, Federal
Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 80(3), 25-39.
Bamberger, V., Nansé, F., Schreiber, B., Zintel,
M. (2017). Logistics 4.0 - Facing Digitalization Dell’Anno, R. (2004). Estimating the Shadow
Driven Disruption. Retrieved from http:// Economy in Italy: A Structural Equation
www.adlittle.com/sites /default/files/prism/ Approach. (Economics Working Papers
logistics_section.pdf 2019-02-25. Number 2003-7), Department of Economics
and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Monthly
Statistical Bulletin. Retrieved from https:// Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020).
www.bnm.gov.my/ Consumer Price Index, July 2020, Technical
Notes, 97-100. Retrieved from https://www.
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2018). Understanding dosm.gov.my/
Financing through the Lens of Small and
Medium Enterprises. Retrieved from https:// Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020).
www.bnm.gov.my/files/publication/fsps/ Monthly External Trade Statistics. Retrieved
en/2018/cp02_001_box.pdf from https://www.dosm.gov.my/
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019) Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., &
Informal Sector Workforce Survey Report 2019. Zoido-Lobaton, P. (2000). Dodging The
Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my Grabbing Hand: The Determinants of
Unofficial Activity in 69 Countries. Journal of
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019) Input- Public Economics, 76(3), 459-493.
Output Tables, 2005, 2010 and 2015. Retrieved
from https://www.dosm.gov.my Gen, M., Cheng, R., & Lin, L. (2008). Logistics
Network Models: Network Models and
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019). Small Optimisation. Springer, London, 135-229.
and Medium Enterprises 2019. Retrieved Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-
from https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss- 84800-181-7.
portalx/ep/epFreeDownloadContentSearch.
seam?cid=22660 Global Gig Economy-Index. (2019). The
Global Gig-Economy Index. Retrieved from
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2016). https://cdn.techjuice.pk/wp-content/
Economic Census 2016, Profile of Small uploads/2019/08/Index-freelance.pdf
and Medium Enterprises. Retrieved from
https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss- Goel, R. K., Saunoris, J. W., & Schneider, F.
portalx/ep/epFreeDownloadContentSearch. (2017). Drivers of the Underground Economy
seam?cid=23136 Around the Millennium: A Long Term Look for
the United States. (IZA Discussion Papers
Number 10857). Boon, Germany, IZA
DifferenceBetween.net. (2020). Difference
Institute of Labor Economics.
Between Gig Economy and Traditional
Economy. Retrieved from http://www.
Hakovirta, M., & Denuwara, N. (2020).
differencebetween.net/business/economics-
How COVID-19 Redefines the Concept of
business/difference-between-gig-economy-
Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.
and-traditional-economy/
mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3727
Economic Forum. (2016). Digital Transformation Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials
of Industries: Logistics Industry, White Paper. and the World of Work: An Organisation and
Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/ Management Perspective. Journal of Business
digital-transformation/wp-content/blogs. and Psychology, 25(2), 211-223.
dir/94/mp/files/pages/files/dti-logistics-
industry-white-paper.pdf Human Resources Development Fund. (2019).
HRDF Human Capital Report, Issue: Jan
Employees Provident Fund. (2019). The Gig 2019/2. Retrieved from https://www.hrdf.
Economy Is Real and Here to Stay. Retrieved com.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/02.-
from https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/ issue_Jan02_2019-Human-Capital-Report-Gig-
digital-economy/gig-economy-real-and-here- Economy-and-Training.pdf
stay
IMD World Competitiveness Center. (2020). The
Enders, W., & Granger, C. W. J. (1998). Unit- IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking
Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with 2019. Retrieved from https://www.imd.org/
an Example Using the Term Structure of wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/
Interest Rates. Journal of Business & Economic world-digital-competitiveness-rankings-2020
Statistics, 16(3), 304–311.
Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (IRB). (1975). Lehmacher, W., Betti, F., Beecher, P.,
Service Tax Act. Retrieved from http://www. Grotemeier, C., & Lorenzen, M. (2017).
agc.gov.my Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
on Supply Chains. World Economic Forum.
Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (IRB). (1967). Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/
Malaysian Income Tax Act. Retrieved from whitepapers/impact-of-the-fourthindustrial-
http://www.agc.gov.my revolution-on-supply-chains
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input- Radivojevic, G., & Milosavljevic, L. (2017).
output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. The Concept of Logistics 4.0: 4th Logistics
Cambridge University Press. International Conference. Retrieved from
http://logic.sf.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/
Ministry of Finance. (2019). Economic Outlook Papers/LOGIC2019/ID-32.pdf
2019: Determinants of Inflation in Malaysia,
75-77. Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow
Economies Around the World: Size, Causes
Ministry of Transport. (2017). Logistics and and Consequences. International Monetary
Trade Facilitation Masterplan: Performance Fund.
Report 2016. Retrieved from http://www.mot.
gov.my Schneider, F. (2011). The Shadow Economy
Labour Force. World Economics, 12(4), 53 -
Omar, A. R. C., Ishak, S., & Jusoh, M. A. (2020). 92.
The Impact of Covid-19 Movement Control
Order on SMEs’ Businesses and Survival Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C.
Strategies. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of (2010). Shadow Economies All Over the World:
Society and Space, 16(2). New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999
to 2007. (The World Bank Policy Research
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Working Paper Series Number 5356).
Development (2019). Digitalisation and Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.
Productivity: In Search of The Holy Grail org/curated/en/311991468037132740/pdf/
– Firm-Level Empirical Evidence from EU WPS5356.pdf
Countries. OECD Economic Outlook, 2019(1).
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/ Sidaoui, J., Capistran, C., Chiquiar, D., & Ramos-
b2e897b0-en Francia, M. (2010). On the Predictive Content
of the PPI on CPI inflation: The Case of
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Mexico. Bank for International Settlements
Development. (2017). Shining Light on the Papers, 249–257.
Shadow Economy: Opportunities and Threats.
Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/tax/ SME Corporation Malaysia. (2020). Malaysian
crime/shining-light-on-the-shadow-economy- SME Definition. Retrieved from https://
opportunities-and-threats.pdf www.smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/
policies/2020-02-11-08-01-24/sme-definition
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development. (2009). Is Informal Normal? SME Corporation Malaysia. (2020). Survey on
Towards More and Better Jobs in Developing Access to COVID-19 Stimulus Incentives and
Countries. OECD Publishing and OECD Next Steps to Rebuild the Business of SMEs.
Development Centre
SME Corporation Malaysia. (2020). Survey on
Packard, T.G., Koettl, J., & Montenegro, C. Impact of COVID-19 on SMEs.
(2012). In From the Shadow: Integrating
Europe’s Informal Labor. The World Bank SME Corporation Malaysia. (2020). Survey on
SMEs Response towards the Restarting of the
Pew Research Center. (2019). Defining Economy.
Generations: Where Millennials End and
Generation Z Begins. Retrieved from https:// Tanzi, V. (2002). The Shadow Economy, Its
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/ Causes and Its Consequences. Edited Lecture.
where-millennials-end-and-generation-z- Brazilian Institute of Ethics.
begins/
The Centre. (2019). Ensuring Social Protection World Bank. (2018). Malaysia’s Digital Economy:
Coverage for Malaysia’s Gig Workers. Retrieved A New Driver of Development. Retrieved from
from https://www.centre.my/post/voluntary- https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/
versus-automatic-figuring-out-the-right- malaysia/publication/malaysias-digital-
approach-on-social-protection-for-informal- economy-a-new-driver-of-development
workers
World Economic Forum. (2016). Digital
Valdes, A., & Foster, W. (2010). Reflections on Transformation of Industries: Logistics Industry,
the Role of Agriculture in Pro-Poor Growth. White Paper. Retrieved from http://reports.
World Development, 38, 1362-74. weforum.org/digital-transformation/wp-
content/blogs.dir/94/mp/files/pages/files/dti-
Walsh, G. S., Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, logistics-industry-white-paper.pdf
W. (2017). Supporting the SME
Commercialization Process: The Case of 3D Wu, D. F., & Schneider, M. F. (2019). Nonlinearity
Printing Platforms. Small Enterprise Research, between the Shadow Economy and Level of
24(3), 257-273. Development. International Monetary Fund
Wang, K. (2016). Logistics 4.0 Solution: New Yusuf, Ismaila & Agbi, Sam. (2018). The Impact
Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of of Electronic Payments and Cash- Less Policy
the Conference: 6th International Workshop on the Shadow Economy in Nigeria. ICAN
of Advanced World. Retrieved from https:// Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 154 -
doi.org/10.2991/iwama-16.2016.13 165.
Woo, K. Y., Lee, S. K., & Ng, J. C. Y. (2018). An Zurich-University of Oxford. (2018). Agile
Investigation into the dynamic relationship Workforce Study: Gig Economy Rises in
between CPI and PPI: Evidence from the UK, Malaysia, Income Protection Lags. Retrieved
France and Germany. The Singapore Economic from https://www.zurich.com.my/en/about-
Review, 1-19. zurich/zurich-in-the-news/2020/2020-01-16
Monetary
and Financial
Developments
119 ov e rv i e w
131 i s l a m ic ba nk i ng a nd c a p i ta l
m a r k e t pe r for m a nce
132 conclus ion
133 r e fe r e nce s
CHAPTER 4 SUMMARY: MONETARY AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Monetary policy
cushioned the adverse Pace of global
effects of measures
implemented to contain economic
the spread of COVID-19 recovery
virus on the economy.
Performance
JANUARY FEBRUARY
of Ringgit RM
In January 2020, the ringgit appreciated In February and March, the local note, along
against the US dollar mainly due to with regional currencies, faced significant
non-resident portfolio inflows. This was depreciation against the US dollar. The
supported by improved investors’ risk downward trend of the ringgit was
sentiment attributed to positive contributed by geopolitical uncertainties,
development in the US-China trade declining commodity prices and rapid
negotiation. escalation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Robust & Orderly Resilient Capital
Banking Sector Market
ample liquidity & well-developed
strong capital buffers infrastructure & instruments
From the second quarter onwards, recovery in Going forward, the expected recovery in the global and
global investor sentiments amid monetary and domestic economy will provide some support for the
fiscal stimulus measures deployed to combat the ringgit.
pandemic led the ringgit to appreciate by 3.5%
against the US dollar, in line with the appreciation
of regional currencies. As at end-September, the
ringgit recorded a depreciation of 1.6% against the
US dollar.
chapter 4 monetary and financial developments
chapter 4
claims on the Government and extension of 3.5% against the US dollar, in line with the
credit to the private sector, primarily through appreciation of regional currencies. As at end-
securities. The money supply is expected to September, the ringgit recorded a depreciation
expand further backed by higher demand for of 1.6% against the US dollar. Going forward,
loans and securities by the private sector. the expected recovery in the global and
domestic economy will provide some support
for the ringgit. However, lingering uncertainties
TABLE 4.1. Factors Affecting M3, over the COVID-19 pandemic, global political
January – July 2019 and 2020 and policy environment could lead to periods
of heightened exchange rate volatility.
CHANGE
(RM BILLION)
2019 2020 FIGURE 4.2. Performance of Ringgit against Selected
M3 18.8 68.1
Currencies
(% change)
Net claims on Government -10.9 62.8
Claims on Government 18.3 81.9
Less: Government deposits 29.2 19.1 End-2019 – End-September 2020
EURO
Performance of Ringgit
100 PHILIPPINE PESO
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
1
Excess total capital buffer refers to the total capital above the banks’ regulatory minima, which also includes the capital conservation buffer (2.5%
of risk-weighted assets) and bank-specific higher minimum requirements.
15.1% and 18.3%, respectively. The ratios are financial markets following the fallout from the
well above the Basel III minimum regulatory COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing geopolitical
levels of 4.5%, 6% and 8%, of risk-weighted tensions, the banking sector liquidity remains
assets. sufficient and stable in the near term.
The pre-tax profit of the banking sector fell Lending activities slowed down, reflecting
by 11.7% to RM20.5 billion in the first seven cautious sentiment on the global and domestic
months of 2020. Despite the challenging growth outlook. In the first seven months of
environment, domestic banks remain strong, 2020, loan approvals and disbursements fell by
supported by orderly financial markets and 22% and 7.3% to RM185.5 billion and RM657.1
sustained confidence in the banking sector. billion, respectively. This was mainly due to
As a result, returns on assets and equity financial institutions taking precautionary
continued to be stable at 1.2% and 10.5%, measures to approve new loans following
respectively. restricted economic activities. However, total
loans outstanding expanded by 4.5% to
The loan quality and liquidity of the banking RM1,806.1 billion as at end-July 2020.
sector also remain sound. As at end-July
2020, the net impaired loans ratio and loan
loss coverage ratio (including regulatory
TABLE 4.2. Banking System: Loan Indicators,
reserves) remained healthy at 0.91% and
January – July 2019 and 2020
121%, respectively. Similarly, the Liquidity
Coverage Ratio was at 152%, well above the CHANGE
RM BILLION
100% minimum requirement. Notwithstanding (%)
uncertainties and heightened risks from global 2019 2020 2019 2020
Total1
FIGURE 4.3. Banking System: Impaired Loans and Loans applications 501.3 447.9 -1.7 -10.6
Net Impaired Loans Ratio
Loans approvals 237.9 185.5 5.8 -22.0
(End-period)
Loans disbursements 709.0 657.1 3.2 -7.3
Loans outstanding 2,3
1,728.8 1,806.1 3.9 4.5
RM billion %
of which:
36 4
Businesses
Loans applications 203.8 200.9 -0.6 -1.4
27 3 Loans approvals 92.2 80.7 2.7 -12.5
Loans disbursements 450.2 430.7 1.0 -4.3
18 2 Loans outstanding 3
609.2 633.3 2.6 4.0
Households
1
End-July 2020
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
Loan approvals to businesses decreased by TABLE 4.3. Banking System: Loans Outstanding by
Sector,
12.5% to RM80.7 billion as at end-July 2020.
End-July 2019 and 2020
Total disbursements to businesses fell by 4.3%
to RM430.7 billion, representing 65.5% of
RM BILLION SHARE
total loans disbursed. The bulk of loans were (%)
channelled into manufacturing (22.2% of total
2019 2020 2019 2020
loans), wholesale and retail trade, restaurants
Businesses 609.2 633.3 35.3 35.2
and hotels (19.4%) as well as construction
Non-SMEs1 326.9 351.5 19.0 19.5
(6.6%) sectors. At the same time, total loans
outstanding to the business sector increased SMEs 282.3 281.8 16.4 15.6
loan approvals declining by 30% to RM88.9 Manufacturing2 115.0 122.3 6.7 6.8
billion. Loans disbursed to households also Electricity, gas and 13.0 14.7 0.8 0.8
water supply
declined by 16.3% to RM165.3 billion, mainly
for consumption credit (13.1% of total loans), Wholesale and retail 127.6 134.4 7.4 7.5
trade, restaurants
purchase of residential properties (6.3%) and and hotels
securities (2.7%). As at end-July 2020, total Construction 91.9 91.6 5.3 5.1
household loans outstanding rose by 4.4% Real estate 117.1 119.0 6.8 6.6
amounting to RM1,024 billion, which accounts
Transport, storage 37.2 39.8 2.2 2.2
for 56.8% of total loans outstanding in the and communication
banking sector. Finance, insurance 42.2 43.8 2.4 2.4
and business
activities
The overall household debt increased by 4%
Households 981.1 1,024.0 56.9 56.8
to RM1,265.9 billion, accounting for 87.5% of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as at end-June of which:
2020. The increase was mainly due to the Purchase of 551.6 594.4 32.0 33.0
residential
sharp contraction in GDP during the first half properties
of the year. The bulk of the debt comprises of Purchase of 80.4 80.5 4.7 4.5
loans for the purchase of residential properties non-residential
properties
(55.9%), followed by personal use (14.2%) and
passenger cars (12.3%). Total household assets Purchase of 145.1 146.2 8.4 8.1
passenger cars
were valued at RM2,751.9 billion with growth
Consumption credit 133.5 135.4 7.7 7.5
in household financial assets continuing to
of which:
outpace that of debt. Although household debt
has risen, it is expected to remain manageable, Credit cards 38.3 35.3 2.2 2.0
supported by programmes to rein in the debt Personal use 95.2 100.1 5.5 5.6
level and measures enacted to cushion the Purchase of 68.9 66.1 4.0 3.7
securities
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the
economy. Others 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0
Other sectors 134.2 144.1 7.8 8.0
Total3 1,724.4 1,801.4 100.0 100.0
1
Non-SMEs refers to large corporations, including foreign entities,
other domestic entities, Government and others
2
Including agro-based
3
Total = Businesses + Households + Other sectors
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
Introduction
The banking industry has experienced multiple transformations to suit customer demands and
keep up with technological advancements, such as secure digital ledger transactions and artificial
intelligence (AI). Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced societies to favour cashless
transactions, all of which enable a faster shift towards the establishment of digital banks. A digital
bank is essentially a virtual bank, which operates in a digital environment and is devoid of brick-
and-mortar presence of a traditional bank. However, digital banks offer similar services to that of
traditional banks, such as savings and current accounts, withdrawals and transfers. As such, digital
banks are expected to revolutionise the financial landscape by offering financial services through
digital and automated platforms (Deloitte, 2020).
Currently, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, Republic of Korea, South
Africa, Taiwan, the Philippines, the UK and the US have established their own digital banks
(PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2020). Singapore is expected to issue its digital bank licences in 2020.
Meanwhile, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) is at the stage of finalising the updated Exposure Draft
on Licensing Framework for Digital Banks issued on 3 March 2020. With this development, Malaysia
looks forward to establishing several digital banks in the near future, paving the way for a more
vibrant financial services landscape.
A digital bank works differently from mobile or online platforms as it requires full digitalisation
of banking services. The bank makes use of high-end technology called middleware solution to
connect the nodes between front- and back-end processes. The middleware solution bridges
the operating systems or databases with other applications while adopting other technologies
in its processes (Figure 4.1.1.). Digital banks demand high-end technologies such as Application
Programming Interface (APIs), AI Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Big Data, Cybersecurity, Data
Visualisation, User Interface (UI) – User Experience (UX) Design and Blockchain. These technologies
allow multilayer processes to be conducted simultaneously across all its delivery channels (Figure
4.1.2.).
Branches
and call centre
Source: ATKearney
Source: Fintalent
• The complete dependency on online services will • In line with increasing digitalisation within the
expose customers with issues such as breach of financial sector, the automation feature of
services fees revenue through
to be integrated as customers’ needs
through customer-centric
a one-time process, and preferences.
automation and experiences by
which allows for
self-serve providing custom-made
automation of core
technology chapter 4 monetary and financial developments
products and services.
processes and
(Bertrand, 2020). eliminates
duplication.
• The complete dependency on online services will • In line with increasing digitalisation within the
expose customers with issues such as breach of financial sector, the automation feature of
confidential data as well as cybersecurity threats digital banking will reduce the need for human
(Chauhan, 2018). intervention since some of its essential
procedures are conducted digitally.
• Nevertheless, technologies to solve these
threats include cloud-based digital banking • While some roles may become obsolete in the
platforms which have a built-in functionality for future, the real concerns would be on tackling
constant security upgrades will provide data the change management, particularly on talent
security for customers. availability issue, which requires a small yet
succinct team force with technical knowledge
(TM & Akamia Netalliance, 2020).
Digital bank holds a promising future in Malaysia. The journey towards establishing digital banks
will become a reality with digital transformation in the Malaysian financial landscape subjected to
three key elements:
The establishment of an effective regulatory ecosystem for digital banks in Malaysia is still in
progress. The updated draft by BNM on 3 March 2020 has proposed a balanced approach to enable
the admission of digital banks with strong value propositions while safeguarding the integrity and
stability of the financial system (BNM, 2020).1 Through the framework, up to five licences may be
issued, subject to applicants’ ability to meet the requirements of the Financial Services Act 2013
and the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013.
Digital banks should adopt and innovate the latest technologies, which leverage cloud systems,
APIs, automation and AI Machine Learning. Malaysia is not far off when it comes to digital
maturity, as most traditional banks are now adopting the digital approach as part of their business
models (TM & Akamia Netalliance, 2020). According to a survey by Finder.com conducted in
March 2020, there will be a rise in digital bank adoption in Malaysia with an estimated 8.4 million
people likely to open up a digital bank account by 2025 (Cruz, 2020). Similarly, a study conducted
by PricewaterhouseCoopers in November 2019 indicated that 74% of Malaysian respondents are
interested in becoming a digital bank customer (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2019).2 The move towards
complete digitalisation in the financial sector is supported by the National Fiberisation Connectivity
Plan. This is also in line with the Communications and Multimedia Blueprint (2018 – 2025) to
accelerate the development of a digital economy.
1
New applicants for digital banks are referred to as challenger banks or entrants (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2020).
2
1,517 respondents from Malaysia were surveyed for the study (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2019).
Cultural Adaptation
The road towards digital bank requires digital transformation, mastering new skills, adopting new
processes, and changing the way business is being done. Thus, all interested parties need to
reform their business models and culture and emphasise on innovation as well as greater adoption
of big data analytics to create a customer-centric orientation. The transition to digital banks may
not be straightforward, and it could disrupt financial services (Sharko et al., 2017). Traditional
banks may also form new ventures and apply for a digital bank licence as part of efforts to reform
their business model. The models must also cater to the underserved and unserved segments of
society, such as low-income individuals, early income millennials, start-ups as well as small and
medium enterprises (SMEs).3
Conclusion
The journey towards the establishment of digital banks is an expected progression in the
Malaysian financial market as the country evolves into a digital economy. For the transformation
to materialise, a whole new wave of digital products and solutions must be in place. This has to
be supported by a robust regulatory ecosystem, innovative technology and cultural adaptation
to accelerating economic growth and financial inclusion in Malaysia. Furthermore, the COVID-19
pandemic, which accelerated remote and contactless transactions, provides the impetus for the
establishment of digital banks.
3
Refers to groups such as the bottom 40% of household income group (B40) as well as micro enterprises and SMEs, including those in rural and
remote areas (Raj, 2020). They are typically underserved due to high servicing cost and low revenue potential.
than-expected economic growth. Yields on MGS TABLE 4.5. New Issuance of Corporate Bonds by
1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year declined Sector,
within the range of 76 and 119 bps. Yields January – July 2019 and 2020
for the corporate bond on the 5-year AAA-
rated, AA-rated and A-rated securities also fell RM MILLION SHARE
between 75 and 77 bps. (%)
Initial Public Offers 1,570.0 292.1 FIGURE 4.4. Malaysian Government Securities (MGS)
Indicative Yields
Rights Issues 3,466.7 - (End-period)
Warrants - -
%
New issues of shares/warrants 5,036.8 292.1
5.0
Debt securities2
4.5
Straight bonds 3,090.0 386.5
FIGURE 4.5. Share of Foreign Holdings in Total MGS At the beginning of the year, the FTSE Bursa
Outstanding Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
(End-period) (FBM KLCI) and other regional indices fell into
bearish territory. The local bourse was dragged
RM billion % down below 1,600 points in the second
460 60 week of January 2020, following the rising
geopolitical tensions between the US and
Iran. Despite the improvement in the US and
420 54
China trade deal on 15 January 2020, the FBM
KLCI along with major and regional bourses
380 48 remained on a softer note.
1
End-July 2020
Nevertheless, the subsequent relaxation of
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia lockdown measures and gradual resumption
of economic activities supported the recovery
of the local bourse. The FBM KLCI rebounded
FIGURE 4.6. 5-Year Corporate Bond Yields
to 1,575.27 points on 10 June 2020 in tandem
(End-period)
with regional markets’ optimism amid the
upward performance of the Wall Street. In
% addition, the improvement of the local index
12
was also attributed to the launching of the
various stimulus packages announced by
10 the Government to mitigate the impact of
COVID-19 pandemic on the economy.
8
The FBM KLCI started to decline again to
1,488.14 points on 26 June 2020. This was due
6
to the announcements by the Fed, IMF and
World Bank on downside risks to global and
4 domestic growth following mounting concerns
over the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.
2
However, the local bourse elevated to reach
M J S D M J S D M J S D M J S D M J J1 1,504.82 points at end-September 2020 upon
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 investors’ positive sentiment towards the
Government’s effort to contain the pandemic
BBB
A
despite fresh lockdowns by several countries.
AA
AAA There has been a significant improvement in
trading activities in the first nine months of
2020. Total volume and total market transacted
1
End-July 2020 value rose by 162.2% to 1,272 billion units
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
and 90% to RM749 billion, respectively. Market
velocity was sustained at 62.4%, while market
volatility at 36.3%. Foreign holdings based 2020. Nevertheless, the market capitalisation
on market capitalisation in the local bourse declined by 2.1% to RM1,638.7 billion as at
remained stable at 12.6% as at end-September end-September 2020. The domestic equity
market is expected to regain traction following
FIGURE 4.7. Performance of Bursa Malaysia investors’ optimistic outlook on the pace of
global market recovery and domestic economic
Billion Points growth supported by various strategic projects.
800 2,200
2,000
600 TABLE 4.6. Bursa Malaysia: Selected Indicators,
End-September 2019 and 2020
1,800
400
2019 2020
1,600 Indices
FIGURE 4.8. Performance of Selected Stock Markets Volume (million units) 2,694.70 6,911.47
(% change)
Value (RM million) 2,190.37 4,070.69
End-2019 – End-September 2020
Market capitalisation 1,673.53 1,638.72
US (NASDAQ)
(RM billion)
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Total number of listed
CHINA (SHANGHAI) companies
JAPAN
Main Market 773 765
US (DOW JONES)
1
Based on market transactions and direct business transactions
between January and September
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bursa Malaysia
the world. As at end-July 2020, the domestic Education, health 20.2 33.7 -4.6 66.8
size of ICM was valued at RM2.2 trillion, and others
accounting for 66.2% of RM3.3 trillion of Households 367.3 399.6 10.7 8.8
Malaysia’s total capital market size. Meanwhile, Others 15.1 5.7 1.6 -62.1
sukuk issuances amounted to RM130.8 billion
Liabilities 748.6 794.0 11.2 6.1
or 60.2% of total bonds issuances. Sukuk
Deposits and 610.3 633.1 13.6 3.7
outstanding was valued at RM986.9 billion
Investment Account
or 62.6% of total bonds outstanding. While
Investment 0.7 0.6 -16.1 -19.7
Malaysia continued to account for the largest
share of global sukuk outstanding at 45.6% Savings 44.2 58.1 8.1 31.4
as at end-June 2020, the turmoil in the global Demand 82.7 99.7 11.2 20.5
market has affected the performance of Investment account 80.6 97.1 6.0 20.5
the ICM. This was reflected in the subdued
Others 482.6 474.7 14.6 -1.6
performance of corporate sukuk issuances
during the initial MCO period. Nevertheless, 1
Excluding DFIs
2
Including agro-based
the reopening of almost all economic Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
sectors in the middle of the year led to the Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
2
Includes Development Financial Institutions (DFIs).
7.7% 11.0%
3.1%
4.4%
7.5%
7.2%
21.7% 23.6%
1
Others include Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Gambia, Hong Kong SAR, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Maldives, Mauritius, Nigeria, Oman,
Pakistan, Qatar, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, Turkey, the UK and the US
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
References
ATKearney. (2015). Going Digital: The Banking Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Monthly Highlights
Transformation Road Map. Retrieved from https:// and Statistics January 2020. Retrieved from
tinyurl.com/y23dwvad https://www.bnm.gov.my
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Annual Report 2019. Bertrand, M. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on
Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from https://www.bnm. Malaysia’s Looming Digital Banking Revolution.
gov.my Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y49jzbqh
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Exposure Draft on Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Bursa Malaysia Amends Main
Licensing Framework for Digital Banks. Retrieved and ACE Market Listing Requirements to Facilitate
from https://tinyurl.com/y47krph4 Application of Specified Corporate Exercises via
Electronic Means. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Economic and com/y23u764k
Financial Developments in the Malaysian Economy
in the Second Quarter of 2020. Retrieved from Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Bursa Malaysia Amends
https://www.bnm.gov.my Main Market and ACE Market Listing Requirements
in Relation to New Issues of Securities and other
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Economic and Areas. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/
Financial Developments in the Malaysian Economy y48u9zcv
in the First Quarter of 2020. Retrieved from
https://www.bnm.gov.my Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Bursa Malaysia Introduces
World’s First Options Contract on US Dollar
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Financial Stability and Denominated Palm Olein Futures. Retrieved from
Payment Systems Report 2019. Kuala Lumpur. https://tinyurl.com/y2yqc3l7
Retrieved from https://www.bnm.gov.my
Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Bursa Malaysia Launches
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Monthly Highlights
Bursa Academy for a Unique Experience in
and Statistics July 2020. Retrieved from https://
Elevating Financial Literacy and Investor Education.
www.bnm.gov.my
Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y4tjttga
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Monthly Highlights Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Taiwan Futures Exchange
and Statistics February 2020. Retrieved from and Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad Sign
https://www.bnm.gov.my Memorandum of Understanding. Retrieved from
https://tinyurl.com/y22dn6su
Chauhan, Y. (2018). How Important is Digital Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). Annual
Banking? Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ Report 2019. Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from
y2nk7n5o https://www.sc.com.my
Comfort, N. (2019). Banks Set for Biggest Job Cull Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). SC
Since 2015 as Morgan Stanley Cuts. Retrieved Introduces Enhanced IPO Framework for Main
from https://tinyurl.com/wjj9n88 Market. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/
y5xprmoy
Cruz, P. (2020). The Rise of Digital Banks. Retrieved
from https://tinyurl.com/yx8oow79 Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). SC
Liberalises Regulation on Private Retirement
Deloitte. (2020). Banking on Digital. Retrieved from Schemes (PRS) to Enhance Competitiveness of the
https://tinyurl.com/y5p2us2c Industry. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/
y3et5zob
Fintalent. (2020). Future-Enabled Digital Banking Skill
Sets You Need to Have. Retrieved from https:// Sharko, A. D., Meka, E., Sharko, G. and Baholli, I.
tinyurl.com/y445vc3d (2017). Digital Banking the Wave of the Future.
International Conference Proceedings, ISTI-2016.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). Digital Banking:
Malaysian Banks at a Crossroads. Retrieved from TM and Akamai Netalliance. (2020). Transforming
https://tinyurl.com/y3ousv2z Digital Banking in Malaysia: More than a Channel
Strategy. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2019). Virtual Banking: y26aupp6
Malaysian Customers Take Charge. Retrieved from
https://tinyurl.com/yywa9398 Zujev, A. (2020). The Road to True Digital Bank.
Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y6qhpmlj
Raj, A. P. (2020). Is Focus on Underserved Worthwhile
for Digital Banks? Retrieved from https://tinyurl.
com/y2p9uujl
Statistical
Tables
III. Macroeconomy
National Accounts
Gross Domestic Product by Kind of Economic Activity at Constant 2015 Prices 3.1
Index of Services 3.2
Industrial Production Index 3.3
Gross National Income by Demand Aggregates 3.4
Private Consumption Indicators 3.5
Private Investment Indicators 3.6
External Sector
Malaysia’s Trade with Major Trading Partners 3.7
External Trade Indices 3.8
Production, Exports Volume and Value of Major Primary Commodities 3.9
Direction of Major Exports 3.10
Exports of Manufactured Goods 3.11
Source of Major Imports 3.12
Balance of Payments 3.13
Prices
Consumer Price Index by Region 3.14
Consumer Price Index by Stratum 3.15
Consumer Price Index by State 3.16
Core Index 3.17
Producer Price Index - Local Production 3.18
Labour Market
Labour Force 3.19
Employment by Industry 3.20
Active Registrants 3.21
Vacancies and Placements 3.22
STATISTICAL ANNOTATION
The Statistics Appendix provides time series data on the economic variables. Each table contains current
selected economic data. Percentage changes are provided for important variables as an indication of
economic trends. In addition, percentage of totals and footnotes are also provided where necessary.
The sum of the component figures may not tally with the subtotal or total due to rounding. In some
series, historical figures have been revised. Estimates for 2020 are based on six to eight months of
data and forecasts for 2021 have been provided where appropriate. Unless otherwise stated, the
source of data is from the Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
The PLI measurement model used in Malaysia was reviewed in depth in 2005 by the Economic Planning
Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, and DOSM in collaboration with United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP). The Cost of Basic Needs method that takes into account three basic components
i.e. food items, non-food items and the characteristics of the household. In 2019, the calculation of
the PLI was reviewed and updated. The updating of PLI involves the process of updating of food items
by the Ministry of Health while the non-food items in the non-food component are updated based on
the latest household expenditure survey conducted by the Department of Statistics Malaysia in 2019.
The new methodology in determining the food item emphasises the intake of healthy foods at an
optimal rate as compared to the 2005 methodology that emphasised on consuming food to meet
minimum health requirements. The re-evaluation of the optimal food calorie requirement is based on
the Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) 2017 and the Malaysian Diet Guide (PDM) 2020. Therefore,
food needs are calculated based on individual caloric needs and converted to total meals according to
food groups in PDM 2020. The total serving of these food items will be converted to weight (grams)
/ quantity and then adjusted to the price data from the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The Non-Food PLI takes into account the minimum requirements for a decent quality of life required
by a person including clothing, housing, transportation and other non-food needs according to one’s
gender and age. The Non-Food PLI component is calculated based on the pattern of low-income
households identified through the household expenditure survey. As a result of the study that includes
food and non-food items, the determination of the item of goods for the calculation of PLI is made
and adjusted to the current price based on the CPI. The PLI is constantly updated in line with the
implementation of the household income survey and basic amenities. It also takes into account the
needs of national planning and price changes that occur as well as changes in the lifestyle of the
Malaysian society.
Demographic Statistics
Population1 (‘000)
Young age 4
35.3 34.7 34.1 33.7 33.4
Education
Primary school enrolment rate 6 (%) 97.2 97.2 97.9 97.9 98.1
Pupil-teacher ratio
1
Data refers to mid-year population estimates based on the adjusted 2010 Population and Housing Census of Malaysia
2
The number of males per 100 females
3
The ratio of the number of persons aged 0–14 years and 65 years and above to the number of persons aged 15–64 years
4
The ratio of the number of persons aged 0–14 years to the number of persons aged 15–64 years
5
The ratio of the number of persons aged 65 years and above to the number of persons aged 15–64 years
6
Percentage of school aged children between 6+ and 11+ years at primary level in Government and private schools
7
Percentage of school aged children between 12+ and 16+ years at secondary level in Government and private schools
8
Includes public university, private higher education institutions, polytechnic and community college
9
Aged 15 years and above with formal education, excluding non-Malaysian citizens
10
Preliminary
11
Estimate
Health
Official beds strength in public sector12 45,087 45,678 46,194 46,611 46,988
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Rural electricity coverage (% of housing unit) 98.3 95.7 96.1 96.4 97.2
Poverty Structure 13
12
Comprising Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals (includes special medical institutions) and non-MOh Hospitals (university hospitals and military hospitals)
13
Based on 2019 Household Income and Basic Aminities Survey year
Source: Department of Statistics; Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission; Ministry of Education; Ministry of Environment and Water,
Malaysia. Ministry of Higher Education; Ministry of Health and Ministry of Rural Development
Advanced
Economies
2017 2.5 50,337.9 1.7 5.6 480.5 - 14,138.7 14,565.1
United States
Australia
2017 2.4 55,967.9 2.0 5.6 -35.6 66.8 296.3 297.2
2018 2.8 56,453.4 1.9 5.3 -29.6 53.6 326.6 308.7
2019 1.8 54,348.2 1.6 5.2 8.3 59.1 342.0 293.4
2020 5
-4.2 51,885.5 0.7 6.9 24.6 43.98 171.67 139.77
2021 6
3.0 57,210.8 1.3 7.7 -1.3 - - -
Republic of Korea
2017 3.2 31,616.8 1.9 3.7 75.2 389.3 663.4 604.9
2018 2.9 33,422.9 1.5 3.8 77.5 403.7 708.5 668.3
2019 2.0 31,846.2 0.4 3.8 60.0 408.8 649.9 634.0
20205 -1.9 30,644.4 0.5 4.1 52.5 419.0 8
334.1 7
328.57
20216 2.9 32,305.3 0.9 4.1 57.7 - - -
China
2017 6.9 8,823.5 1.6 3.9 195.1 3,421.6 2,491.4 2,311.4
2018 6.8 9,919.8 2.1 3.8 25.5 3,351.9 2,753.5 2,660.8
2019 6.1 10,522.3 2.9 3.6 141.3 3,388.7 2,782.5 2,579.0
2020 5
1.9 10,839.4 2.9 3.8 193.4 3,473.9 8
1,490.4 7
1,324.37
20216 8.2 11,955.6 2.7 3.6 111.7 - - -
India
2017 7.0 1,981.7 3.6 - -48.7 411.3 465.9 548.8
2018 6.1 2,005.9 3.4 - -57.2 397.8 526.1 638.9
2019 4.2 2,097.8 4.8 - -24.6 461.8 542.5 624.7
20205 -10.3 1,876.5 4.9 - 8.5 545.58 272.07 272.57
2021 6
8.8 2,030.6 3.7 - -26.4 - - -
1
Expressed in current USD price except for Advanced Economies. GDP per capita for Advanced Economies is expressed in Purchasing Power Parity
(PPP) dollars per person
2
Composites for the country groups are averages of national unemployment rates weighted by labour force in the respective countries
3
Data refer to Exports of Merchandise and Services
4
Data refer to Imports of Merchandise and Services
5
Estimate
6
Forecast
7
As at 31 July 2020
8
As at 31 August 2020
9
As at 30 September 2020
Sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook (October 2020); IMF Database; and World Trade Organization Trade Statistics
Brunei
Darussalam
2017 1.3 12.1 -1.3 9.3 2.0 - - -
2018 0.1 13.6 1.1 8.7 0.9 - - -
2019 3.9 13.5 -0.4 6.8 0.9 - - -
2020 5
0.1 10.6 0.3 6.8 -0.0 - - -
20216
3.2 12.1 0.5 6.8 0.3 - - -
Philippines
2017 6.9 328.5 2.9 5.7 -2.1 83.3 68.7 101.9
2018 6.3 346.8 5.2 5.3 -8.8 80.9 69.3 119.3
2019 6.0 376.8 2.5 5.1 -0.5 89.8 70.9 112.9
2020 5
-8.3 367.4 2.4 10.4 5.9 102.6 8
34.1 7
46.17
20216 7.4 398.3 3.0 7.4 -6.0 - - -
Indonesia
2017 5.1 1,015.5 3.8 5.5 -16.2 130.2 168.8 156.9
2018 5.2 1,042.7 3.3 5.3 -30.6 120.7 180.2 188.7
2019 5.0 1,120.1 2.8 5.3 -30.4 129.2 167.7 171.3
2020 5
-1.5 1,088.8 2.1 8.0 -14.2 137.0 8
90.1 7
81.47
20216 6.1 1,167.2 1.6 6.8 -28.1 - - -
Cambodia
2017 7.0 22.2 2.9 - -1.8 - - -
2018 7.5 24.4 2.4 - -3.0 - - -
2019 7.0 26.7 2.0 - -4.2 - - -
20205
-2.8 26.3 2.5 - -6.7 - - -
20216
6.8 28.5 2.9 - -4.6 - - -
Lao PDR
2017 6.8 17.1 0.7 - -1.8 - - -
2018 6.3 18.1 2.0 - -2.2 - - -
2019 5.2 19.1 3.3 - -1.2 - - -
20205
0.2 18.7 6.5 - -1.6 - - -
20216
4.8 19.3 4.9 - -1.5 - - -
Malaysia
2017 5.8 9,965.1 3.7 3.4 8.9 102.4 217.7 194.7
2018 4.8 11,077.4 1.0 3.3 8.0 101.4 248.7 218.0
2019 4.3 11,193.0 0.7 3.3 12.3 103.6 240.2 205.0
20205 -4.5 10,192.5 -1.0 4.2 11.4 105.08 146.47 122.17
20216
6.5 - 7.5 11,378.4 2.5 3.5 4.8 - - -
Myanmar
2017 5.8 61.3 4.6 - -4.2 - - -
2018 6.4 66.7 5.9 - -3.1 - - -
2019 6.5 68.6 8.6 - -1.8 - - -
2020 5
2.0 70.9 6.1 - -2.5 - - -
2021 6
5.7 77.2 6.2 - -3.4 - - -
Singapore
2017 4.3 341.9 0.6 2.2 55.6 279.9 373.4 327.9
2018 3.4 373.2 0.4 2.1 64.1 287.7 413.0 370.9
2019 0.7 372.1 0.6 2.3 63.1 279.5 390.8 359.3
2020 5
-6.0 337.5 -0.4 3.0 50.5 327.5 8
233.9 8
214.58
20216 5.0 362.5 0.3 2.6 52.7 - - -
Thailand
2017 4.1 456.4 0.7 1.2 44.0 202.6 236.6 221.5
2018 4.2 506.4 1.1 1.1 28.5 205.7 253.0 248.2
2019 2.4 543.6 0.7 1.0 38.4 224.4 246.3 236.3
2020 5
-7.1 509.2 -0.4 1.0 21.2 254.6 8
133.2 7
119.17
20216 4.0 536.8 1.8 1.0 24.7 - - -
Viet Nam
2017 6.9 277.1 3.5 2.2 -1.7 - 215.0 212.9
2018 7.1 304.0 3.5 2.2 5.8 - 243.7 236.9
2019 7.0 329.5 2.8 2.2 11.3 - 264.3 253.9
2020 5
1.6 340.6 3.8 3.3 4.0 - 175.3 8
161.68
20216 6.7 369.5 4.0 2.7 6.2 - - -
1
Expressed in current USD price except for Advanced Economies. GDP per capita for Advanced Economies is expressed in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
dollars per person
2
Composites for the country groups are averages of national unemployment rates weighted by labour force in the respective countries
3
Data refer to Exports of Merchandise only
4
Data refer to Imports of Merchandise only
5
Estimate
6
Forecast
7
As at 31 August 2020
8
As at 30 September 2020
Sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook (October 2020); IMF Database; and World Trade Organization Trade Statistics
1
Community, social and personal services, private non-profit services to households and domestic services of households
2
Preliminary
3
Estimate
4
Forecast
Note: Figures in parentheses are annual percentage changes
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Wholesale & retail trade, 45.2 6.1 7.0 7.8 6.6 -12.6
food & beverages and accommodation
Wholesale and retail trade 37.9 6.0 7.0 7.7 6.1 -11.1
Business services and finance 26.8 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.1 -4.9
Professional, scientific & technical and 7.2 8.0 8.7 9.1 9.3 -17.0
administrative & support services
Information & communication and 21.9 6.8 7.4 7.4 6.5 -6.2
transportation & storage
Arts, entertainment & recreation and 2.6 5.1 6.4 8.1 8.0 -40.8
personal services & other activities
1
January to June 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Current Prices
1
Includes investment of public corporations
2
Includes statistical discrepancy arising from balancing
3
Preliminary
4
Estimate
5
Forecast
Source: Department of Statistics and Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Imports of consumption goods1 (RM million) 66,977 71,037 73,031 74,155 47,6382
1
Refers to imports by broad economic categories published by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia
2
January to August 2020
3
End-September 2020
4
January to September 2020
5
End-August 2020
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia, Bursa Malaysia, Malaysian Automotive Association, Motorcycle & Scooter Assemblers and Distributors Association of
Malaysia and Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Cement roofing tiles ('000 units) 38,241 36,073 35,472 43,484 33,0973
Ready-mixed concrete ('000 cubic metres) 28,589 30,323 32,047 34,067 23,9973
1
Refers to imports by broad economic categories published by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia
2
Based on principal amount
3
January to August 2020
4
End-August 2020
5
January to September 2020
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia, Department of Statistics Malaysia, Malaysian Automotive Association and Public Sector Home Financing Board
1
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation
Mineral fuels, lubricants, etc. 16.1 -24.7 27.8 16.4 0.1 -20.5
Animal and vegetable oils and fats 6.0 7.7 13.3 -14.6 -9.7 21.0
Machinery and transport equipment 42.3 0.6 1.2 -0.8 2.5 1.5
Miscellaneous transactions and commodities 0.4 16.7 12.3 2.2 -5.1 -7.5
Mineral fuels, lubricants, etc. 12.9 -19.6 32.5 21.7 -10.1 -23.1
Animal and vegetable oils and fats 1.1 18.9 25.8 -13.9 -12.0 12.5
Machinery and transport equipment 41.8 5.0 2.0 -0.7 1.7 -0.3
Miscellaneous transactions and commodities 2.0 17.0 4.7 -6.3 10.2 23.4
1
Weights based on values of Malaysia imports and exports of merchandise during 2015
2
Annual changes are calculated based on average unit value index from the period January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Palm oil
Natural rubber
Crude petroleum
1
January to August 2020
2
January to September 2020
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia, Department of Statistics Malaysia and Malaysian Palm Oil Board
2016 2017
Exports ‘000 ‘000
RM million share (%) RM million share (%)
tonnes tonnes
‘000 tonnes RM million share (%) ‘000 tonnes RM million share (%) ‘000 tonnes RM million share (%)
share (%)
Electrical and electronic products 287,810 343,070 381,545 373,118 237,847 44.6
1
Includes animal feed, printed matter, miscellaneous manufactured articles, etc
2
January to August 2020
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation
1
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation
2016 2017
Components
Credits Debits Net Credits Debits Net
(+) (-) (+) (-)
Balance on goods and services 834,491 751,363 83,128 960,778 866,524 94,255
1
January to June 2020
Note: Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Malaysia
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 29.5 3.9 4.0 1.6 1.7 1.2
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.4 17.2 0.2 -0.1 1.5 0.2
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels 23.8 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 -1.0
Furnishings, household equipment and 4.1 2.4 2.1 0.3 1.4 0.3
routine household maintenance
Health 1.9 2.7 2.5 0.8 0.7 1.2
Recreation services and culture 4.8 2.5 1.9 -0.4 0.7 0.7
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.7 2.9 1.2 -1.4 0.4 2.7
Peninsular Malaysia
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 29.0 4.1 4.1 1.7 1.8 1.3
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.4 17.3 0.2 0.1 1.6 0.2
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels 23.6 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 -0.9
Furnishings, household equipment and 4.2 2.5 2.2 0.5 1.6 0.4
routine household maintenance
Health 1.9 2.8 2.6 0.7 0.7 1.2
Recreation services and culture 4.9 2.5 2.0 -0.4 0.7 0.8
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.7 3.0 1.2 -1.3 0.4 2.8
1
Based on Household Expenditure Survey 2016
2
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Sarawak
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 33.5 3.1 2.6 1.6 1.0 0.6
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.7 13.7 -0.1 -1.9 0.6 0.3
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other 21.9 2.5 0.8 0.8 0.9 -1.3
fuels
Furnishings, household equipment and 3.8 1.4 2.2 -0.9 0.7 0.0
routine household maintenance
Health 1.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.3 1.4
Recreation services and culture 4.8 1.5 0.6 -0.1 0.3 -0.2
Miscellaneous goods and services 7.1 3.0 1.6 -1.8 -0.4 2.4
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 31.3 1.5 3.6 1.6 0.5 0.4
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.1 17.8 0.2 -0.5 1.2 0.1
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other 28.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 -1.7
fuels
Furnishings, household equipment and 3.6 0.5 1.1 -0.1 0.4 -0.4
routine household maintenance
Health 1.1 2.3 1.7 1.1 0.7 1.2
Recreation services and culture 3.7 2.7 2.0 -0.8 0.5 0.0
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.1 1.5 0.6 -2.4 0.3 1.5
1
Based on Household Expenditure Survey 2016
2
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Rural
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 35.6 2.9 3.6 1.0 0.9 0.8
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 3.0 18.6 0.1 -0.1 1.6 0.1
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other 19.9 2.6 1.8 1.4 1.8 -1.8
fuels
Furnishings, household equipment and 3.7 1.4 1.8 0.2 0.7 0.1
routine household maintenance
Health 2.0 2.4 1.7 0.6 0.6 1.7
Recreation services and culture 3.6 1.7 1.7 -0.4 1.0 1.2
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.3 2.6 1.1 -1.2 0.8 2.2
Urban
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 28.4 4.1 4.0 1.8 1.8 1.3
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco 2.3 16.7 0.2 -0.1 1.5 0.3
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other 24.5 2.4 2.4 2.0 1.8 -0.9
fuels
Furnishings, household equipment and 4.2 2.5 2.3 0.3 1.6 0.4
routine household maintenance
Health 1.8 2.9 2.8 0.8 0.7 1.1
Recreation services and culture 5.0 2.6 1.9 -0.4 0.6 0.6
Miscellaneous goods and services 6.7 2.9 1.2 -1.5 0.4 2.8
1
Based on Household Expenditure Survey 2016
2
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Total
Selangor and Federal Territory of Putrajaya 2.2 3.9 1.1 0.9 -0.4
Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur 2.8 3.7 1.4 1.2 -0.4
Sabah and Federal Territory of Labuan 0.7 3.0 0.7 0.2 -1.7
Sabah and Federal Territory of Labuan 1.5 3.6 1.6 0.5 0.4
1
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Food and non-alcoholic beverages 26.5 3.1 3.6 1.8 2.1 1.2
Housing, water, electricity, gas and other 26.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.6
fuels
Furnishings, household equipment and 5.5 2.4 2.1 0.3 1.4 0.4
routine household maintenance
Recreation services and culture 6.6 2.5 1.9 -0.4 0.7 0.7
Miscellaneous goods and services 9.1 2.9 1.2 -1.4 0.4 2.7
1
Based on Household Expenditure Survey 2016
2
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 6.7 16.3 7.0 -13.9 -4.0 12.5
Electricity and gas supply 3.4 -0.9 1.9 1.1 1.5 -0.2
Crude materials for further processing 16.4 3.4 14.8 2.6 -3.9 -12.4
Intermediate materials, supplies and 56.1 -3.2 6.7 -1.9 -1.4 -0.3
components
1
Based on Economic Census 2016
2
January to August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
1
The ratio of the labour force to the working age population (15-64 years), expressed as percentage
2
Based on the information in the Collective Agreement and the feedback from the employer for which has been given cognisance by the Industrial Court for the year
3
Annual change (%)
4
January to June 2020
5
As at end-August 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Human Resources Malaysia
share share
(%) (%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 1,609.9 1,635.0 1,570.3 1,541.1 10.2 1,655.9 11.0
Mining and quarrying 96.3 97.2 90.8 91.0 0.6 94.9 0.6
Transportation and storage 630.4 658.2 697.9 667.6 4.4 691.0 4.6
Information and communication 208.7 220.3 216.4 213.9 1.4 231.8 1.5
Financial and insurance/takaful activities 346.9 369.0 338.6 335.1 2.2 382.1 2.5
Real estate activities 82.4 84.5 97.2 92.1 0.6 78.3 0.5
Human health and social work activities 570.3 588.0 551.2 527.7 3.5 557.9 3.7
Arts, entertainment and recreation 80.9 84.3 85.6 79.0 0.5 49.6 0.3
Others service activities 230.8 260.1 264.8 266.1 1.8 282.9 1.9
Activities of households as employers 124.7 106.9 103.9 104.3 0.7 64.8 0.4
1
Industry is classified according to the ‘Malaysia Standard Industrial Classification (MSIC) 2008 Ver. 1.0’
2
Total includes ‘Activities of extraterritorial organisations and bodies’
3
For the first half of 2020
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia
share
(%)
Total Active Registrants (end-period) 306,037 262,756 154,850 299,648 100.0 277,840
Age
Gender
Educational Level
Employment Status
Malaysian Skills Certificate (SKM), other skills certificate and non-technical skills certificate
1
2
January to June 2020
Note: Covers job seekers registered with Labour Department through JobsMalaysia and within valid registration period
Source: Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia
share
(%)
Technician and associate professionals 14,026 16,904 19,466 34,429 3.5 8,075
Service and sales workers 41,301 63,335 34,926 42,462 4.4 8,462
Craft and related trade workers 22,228 35,244 25,063 31,982 3.3 6,837
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 174,751 264,216 240,470 204,324 21.0 47,391
1
Classification of occupational groups is based on the Malaysia Standard Classification of Occupations (MASCO) 2013
2
Data for 2016 covers period from January to November 2016. Data for 2018 covers period from January to June 2018
3
January to June 2020
Note: Definition of vacancies refers to job vacancy listings by employers in public (selected only) and private sector on JobsMalaysia. The job listing includes non-
substantive vacancies such as sales person, promoter, insurance agent and part-time workers as well as foreign workers
Source: Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia
Average rates during the period Average rates during the period in 2020
(%) (%)
2016 2017 2018 2019 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug.
Overnight interbank 3.06 2.98 3.19 3.05 2.89 2.75 2.51 2.51 2.03 1.99 1.79 1.74
1-week interbank 3.12 3.03 3.26 3.12 2.96 2.78 2.56 2.56 2.09 2.02 1.83 1.77
3-month interbank 3.48 3.38 3.66 3.46 3.24 - 2.76 2.75 - 2.27 - 1.96
Commercial banks
Fixed deposits
3-month 3.03 2.92 3.14 2.98 2.68 2.65 2.38 2.36 1.88 1.86 1.63 1.62
12-month 3.18 3.09 3.31 3.17 2.87 2.84 2.59 2.56 2.03 2.03 1.79 1.78
Savings deposit 1.00 0.96 1.04 1.01 0.89 0.87 0.78 0.77 0.61 0.59 0.48 0.48
Base lending rate (BLR) 6.73 6.67 6.89 6.78 6.50 6.48 6.26 6.26 5.78 5.75 5.52 5.49
1
Effective from 2 January 2015, the BR replaced the BLR as the main reference rate for new retail floating rate loans and financing facilities
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
End-period
Factors Affecting M3
1
Exclude interplacements among banking institutions
2
Exclude holdings by the banking system
3
Includes exchange rate revaluation losses/gains
4
End-August 2020
Note: Data based on BNM Monthly Statistical Bulletin (August 2020). Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
Special Drawing
6.0116 5.7709 5.7558 5.6592 5.8522 -1.0 4.2 0.3 1.7 -3.3
Rights (SDR)
US dollar 4.4860 4.0620 4.1385 4.0925 4.1585 -4.3 10.4 -1.8 1.1 -1.6
Singapore dollar 3.1016 3.0392 3.0322 3.0387 3.0373 -2.1 2.1 0.2 -0.2 0.0
100 Japanese yen 3.8442 3.6020 3.7475 3.7655 3.9378 -7.3 6.7 -3.9 -0.5 -4.4
Pound sterling 5.5108 5.4660 5.2532 5.3722 5.3383 15.4 0.8 4.1 -2.2 0.6
Euro 4.7238 4.8510 4.7340 4.5852 4.8775 -0.7 -2.6 2.5 3.2 -6.0
100 Thai baht 12.5167 12.4334 12.7006 13.6827 13.1224 -4.7 0.7 -2.1 -7.2 4.3
100 Indonesian rupiah 0.0334 0.0300 0.0286 0.0295 0.0279 -6.9 11.3 4.9 -3.1 5.7
100 Korean won 0.3720 0.3801 0.3721 0.3540 0.3553 -1.9 -2.1 2.1 5.1 -0.4
100 Philippine peso 9.0516 8.1232 7.8739 8.0720 8.5902 1.1 11.4 3.2 -2.5 -6.0
Chinese renminbi 0.6455 0.6230 0.6017 0.5866 0.6105 2.4 3.6 3.5 2.6 -3.9
1
US dollar (USD) rates are the average of buying and selling rates at noon in the Kuala Lumpur Interbank Foreign Exchange Market. Rates for foreign currencies
other than USD are cross rates derived from rates of these currencies against the USD and the RM/USD rate
2
End-December 2019 – End-September 2020
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
Purpose
Purchase of securities 41,368 3.8 37,505 3.4 34,092 3.0 30,864 2.7 29,221 2.5
Purchase of transport vehicles 98,152 9.1 94,928 8.6 93,847 8.3 89,358 7.7 88,595 7.6
of which:
Purchase of passenger cars 91,093 8.4 88,244 8.0 87,221 7.7 82,901 7.2 82,138 7.1
Purchase of residential property 364,966 33.8 386,446 35.2 404,159 35.6 421,993 36.6 435,311 37.5
Purchase of non-residential property 169,789 15.7 172,212 15.7 172,217 15.2 173,319 15.0 173,064 14.9
Purchase of fixed assets other than 7,570 0.7 6,620 0.6 7,415 0.7 8,945 0.8 9,640 0.8
land and building
Personal use 32,772 3.0 33,627 3.1 35,532 3.1 36,922 3.2 37,793 3.3
Credit card 34,350 3.2 35,459 3.2 36,240 3.2 37,098 3.2 32,676 2.8
Purchase of consumer durables 111 0.0 98 0.0 84 0.0 73 0.0 68 0.0
Construction 36,310 3.4 36,601 3.3 38,727 3.4 41,105 3.6 42,760 3.7
Working capital 254,908 23.6 253,462 23.1 266,071 23.4 264,301 22.9 264,645 22.8
Other purpose 39,964 3.7 41,343 3.8 46,591 4.1 49,621 4.3 48,258 4.2
Total Loans1 1,080,260 100.0 1,098,300 100.0 1,134,973 100.0 1,153,597 100.0 1,162,032 100.0
Sector 2
Primary agriculture 23,851 2.2 21,944 2.0 20,169 1.8 18,763 1.6 17,982 1.5
Mining and quarrying 7,939 0.7 5,726 0.5 5,615 0.5 7,542 0.7 7,013 0.6
Manufacturing (including agro- 81,741 7.6 81,072 7.4 86,185 7.6 94,548 8.2 92,162 7.9
based)
Electricity, gas and water supply 8,169 0.8 9,816 0.9 11,267 1.0 11,246 1.0 11,220 1.0
Wholesale and retail, restaurants 93,593 8.7 94,179 8.6 98,992 8.7 101,281 8.8 103,867 8.9
and hotels
Construction 48,002 4.4 51,381 4.7 54,033 4.8 57,140 5.0 57,148 4.9
Real estate 87,129 8.1 89,355 8.1 88,981 7.8 83,669 7.3 85,721 7.4
Transport, storage and 21,805 2.0 21,661 2.0 21,530 1.9 20,875 1.8 22,399 1.9
communication
Finance, insurance and business 73,275 6.8 71,548 6.5 84,051 7.4 82,491 7.2 80,887 7.0
services
Education, health and others 20,888 1.9 19,980 1.8 18,645 1.6 20,924 1.8 21,205 1.8
Household sector 606,544 56.1 622,330 56.7 636,839 56.1 648,438 56.2 655,060 56.4
Other sector 3
7,323 0.7 9,309 0.8 8,664 0.8 6,680 0.6 7,369 0.6
1
Includes loans sold to Cagamas
2
Definitions of economic sectors/industries are based on MSIC 2000
3
Includes loans to individual businesses
Note: Data based on BNM Monthly Statistical Bulletin (August 2020). Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
2020
2016 2017 2018 2019
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep.
1-year 3.26 2.89 3.45 2.96 2.81 2.60 2.53 2.34 2.06 2.05 1.77 1.70 1.76
3-year 3.50 3.34 3.63 3.01 2.88 2.62 2.76 2.42 2.28 2.25 1.93 1.84 1.99
5-year 3.70 3.56 3.78 3.18 2.95 2.67 3.10 2.53 2.48 2.47 2.12 2.11 2.25
10-year 4.23 3.91 4.08 3.31 3.13 2.83 3.36 2.87 2.81 2.87 2.55 2.62 2.66
AAA 4.40 4.33 4.39 3.63 3.51 3.21 3.66 3.22 3.11 3.11 2.86 2.76 2.79
AA 4.78 4.64 4.69 3.95 3.87 3.56 3.99 3.56 3.47 3.42 3.18 3.13 3.18
A 6.66 6.36 6.37 5.27 5.09 4.60 5.03 4.74 4.70 4.69 4.52 4.59 4.56
BBB 10.12 9.62 9.66 7.65 7.31 6.61 6.91 6.81 6.64 6.65 6.78 6.39 6.35
Indices1
LEAP Market - 2 13 28 34
1
End-period
2
Based on market transactions and direct business transactions
3
End-September 2020
Source: Bursa Malaysia
Purpose
Purchase of securities 28,486 6.6 32,443 6.8 41,622 7.4 48,017 7.9 48,529 7.5
Purchase of transport vehicles 72,368 16.7 74,266 15.5 75,161 13.3 77,821 12.7 82,044 12.7
of which:
Purchase of passenger cars 70,698 16.3 71,852 15.0 72,875 12.9 75,613 12.4 80,588 12.5
Purchase of residential property 112,780 26.0 132,956 27.8 158,812 28.2 181,933 29.8 197,289 30.6
Purchase of non-residential property 38,455 8.9 40,943 8.5 45,917 8.1 51,998 8.5 55,159 8.5
Purchase of fixed assets other than 2,502 0.6 2,231 0.5 3,041 0.5 3,563 0.6 3,695 0.6
land and building
Personal use 33,510 7.7 35,145 7.3 58,875 10.4 60,448 9.9 63,869 9.9
Credit card 2,799 0.6 3,200 0.7 3,680 0.7 4,094 0.7 3,699 0.6
Purchase of consumer durables 21 0.0 19 0.0 24 0.0 21 0.0 14 0.0
Construction 9,226 2.1 11,063 2.3 17,507 3.1 18,209 3.0 17,842 2.8
Working capital 112,914 26.0 117,920 24.6 126,704 22.5 132,878 21.7 137,789 21.3
Other purpose 21,270 4.9 28,767 6.0 32,757 5.8 32,086 5.3 35,476 5.5
Total Financing1 434,332 100.0 478,954 100.0 564,099 100.0 611,068 100.0 645,405 100.0
Sector2
Primary agriculture 12,359 2.8 14,234 3.0 14,876 2.6 17,175 2.8 17,590 2.7
Mining and quarrying 5,770 1.3 5,259 1.1 5,325 0.9 3,376 0.6 3,774 0.6
Manufacturing (including 20,930 4.8 21,497 4.5 24,975 4.4 27,555 4.5 29,348 4.5
agro-based)
Electricity, gas and water supply 2,286 0.5 2,271 0.5 2,880 0.5 4,516 0.7 4,635 0.7
Wholesale and retail, restaurants and 19,425 4.5 21,276 4.4 25,107 4.5 30,401 5.0 31,655 4.9
hotels
Construction 17,769 4.1 22,210 4.6 34,957 6.2 34,533 5.7 34,751 5.4
Real estate 22,621 5.2 25,419 5.3 27,569 4.9 30,163 4.9 30,951 4.8
Transport, storage and 16,684 3.8 15,786 3.3 16,277 2.9 18,567 3.0 18,248 2.8
communication
Finance, insurance and business 35,428 8.2 34,450 7.2 31,582 5.6 32,068 5.2 33,178 5.1
services
Education, health and others 22,162 5.1 21,846 4.6 21,842 3.9 19,381 3.2 32,904 5.1
Household sector 254,385 58.6 282,474 59.0 344,257 61.0 378,754 62.0 402,376 62.3
Other sectors3 4,512 1.0 12,231 2.6 14,454 2.6 14,581 2.4 5,996 0.9
1
Includes loans sold to Cagamas
2
Definitions of economic sectors/industries are based on MSIC 2000
3
Includes loans to individual businesses
Note: Data based on BNM Monthly Statistical Bulletin (August 2020). Total may not add up due to rounding
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia
MINISTER OF FINANCE
YB Senator Tengku Dato’ Sri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz
TREASURY OF MALAYSIA
Secretary General of Treasury
Dato’ Asri bin Hamidin @ Hamidon
ROYAL MALAYSIAN CUSTOMS ACCOUNTANT GENERAL’S VALUATION AND PROPERTY LANGKAWI DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF MALAYSIA SERVICES DEPARTMENT AUTHORITY
Director General of Customs Accountant General Director General of Valuation Chief Executive Officer
Dato’ Sri Abdul Latif bin Abdul Kadir Datuk Dr. Yacob bin Mustafa and Property Services Dr. Hezri bin Adnan
Sr A’zmi bin Abdul Latif
BANK SIMPANAN NASIONAL PERBADANAN INSURANS BURSA MALAYSIA BERHAD INLAND REVENUE BOARD OF
Chief Executive DEPOSIT MALAYSIA Chief Executive Officer MALAYSIA
Datuk Yunos bin Abd Ghani Chief Executive Officer Datuk Muhamad Umar Swift Chief Executive Officer
En. Rafiz Azuan bin Abdullah Dato’ Sri Dr. Sabin bin Samitah
YAYASAN TUN RAZAK MALAYSIA TOTALISATOR BOARD RETIREMENT FUND PUBLIC SECTOR HOME
Chairman Chief Executive Officer (INCORPORATED) FINANCING BOARD
Tun Mohammed Hanif bin Omar Dato’ Abdul Rauf bin Sani Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer
Tuan Syed Hamadah bin En. Mohd Farid bin Dato’ Hj Nawawi
Syed Othman
TREASURY OF MA L AYS I A
MINISTER OF FINANCE
YB Senator Tengku Dato’ Sri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz
LEGAL DIVISION
Pn. Rafidah binti Omar
INTEGRITY UNIT
Dato’ Zainul bin Darus