Futurism Modern Fo 00 Solo
Futurism Modern Fo 00 Solo
^OV-VECT.ON
•41
X^^
s-
4^
v^
/ ^"
#
5'
J?'
C
ns
a:
HHWHMH
it\3^^
Yo c\i^
>Ao det^
K
—Hnnnm^n^aimnmHnn^ mw. in " 1 1—
HPPPHHI
FUTURISM
A Modern Focus
Library of Congress
231 Documentation
Meaningful collecting is both object and idea bound. Neither "taste" operating in a conceptual vac-
uum, nor "systems" that arrange items within a preconceived pattern will yield live and rewarding
results. The former tends to produce capricious fragments, the latter translates the objectives of the
stamp collector into an area where these do not apply. Dr. and Mrs. Barnett Malbin's Lydia and
Harry Lewis Winston Collection avoided both pitfalls from the outset. Harry and Lydia Winston,
who started the collecting process many years ago, and Dr. Barnett Malbin who, at Lydia's side,
continued the work in recent years, were all committed to an attentive scrutiny of individual works
as well as to a functional placement of such works within the collection as a whole. It is this parallel
awareness that determined the authority of the effort and the quality of the result.
The key concept in the Winston Collection is Futurism; and it is the quantity and quality of
Futurist works that confer a particular status upon the collection and that assure its distinctive-
ness and character. But Futurism in the Winston Collection merely provides the main accent.
Cubism and Purism, Dada and Surrealism, as well as some European and American currents of the
post-war era are not only represented but have become an integral part of a visual unity, in fact, a
study in visual relationships between styles of modern art. Boccioni, Balla, and Severini — the great
trio of Futurist artists — are represented by key examples in various media, and in relatively large
numbers. The Italian contingent is rounded out by the painters Russolo, Carta and Sironi and
the sculptor Medardo Rosso. From this Italian core, the collection moves easily into Cubism where
Picasso, Braque, Leger and Gris are supported by Delaunay, de La Fresnaye and Gleizes. In a dif-
ferent direction the Futurist center radiates toward Dada and Surrealism, as witnessed by a group
of carefully chosen Schwitters, some Arp sculptures and works on paper. Max Ernst, Picabia and
a marvelous Miro oil. The Guggenheim selection here attempts to follow the collection's impar-
tiality toward medium. Archipenko is shown in works on paper as is Max Ernst, while the sculp-
tors Brancusi, Calder, Giacometti, Lachaise, Laurens, Moore and Pevsner are represented by their
most characteristic three-dimensional achievements. While the Winston Collection remains, for
the most part, a grouping of European modernists of the now classical phase, post-war develop-
ments are by no means neglected. Tobey, Pollock, Louis, Noland and Stella represent an impor-
tant segment of the collection's American holdings while Appel, Jorn, and Corneille, as well as
and Mrs. Barnett Malbin's Lydia and Harry Lewis Winston Collection exemplifies an attainment
of the collector's clear and positive mirror-image that is the result of authentic involvement and of
serious, knowledgeable striving.
I am grateful to the numerous individuals within and outside the Guggenheim Museum who
have been involved in the organization and presentation of the exhibition and its accompanying
catalogue. In particular I would like to thank Linda Shearer, Research Fellow at the Guggenheim,
who has worked on all phases of the project, assisted in the selection of works for the exhibition
and contributed an essay to the catalogue. Also central to the success of the undertaking was the
participation of Marianne W. Martin, Professor at New York University and author of the second
catalogue essay. Mrs. Martin's special knowledge of Futurism made her generous advice invaluable
to us. Ellen Sharp and Paul Binai of the Graphics Department of the Detroit Institute of Arts as-
sisted with the Boccioni drawings and Jane Hickey, who has kept Lydia Malbin's extensive rec-
ords up to date, has also been most helpful. Marianne Martin, in turn, expresses her gratitude to
Joan M. Lukach of Cambridge, Massachusetts and Piero Pacini of Florence for their help, while
Linda Shearer is indebted to William A. Camfield, Houston and to Sidney Geist, New York for
clarifying matters of scholarly importance. The entire Guggenheim staff has contributed its time
and skills and the following should be singled out for their direct participation: Roger Anthony,
Carol Fuerstein, Linda Konheim, Beverly Liftman, Sabine Rewald and Orrin Riley.
Lydia Winston Malbin grew up in Detroit in an atmosphere of devotion to the highest cuhural
aims. Her father was the innovative industrial architect Albert Kahn (1869-1949). He amassed an
important library of rare books and filled his home with art; his greatest architectural achieve-
ments, like the Packard Motor Car Co. {1903-05) and the Chrysler Corporation de Soto Press
Shop (1936), foreshadow much contemporary architecture. His daughter's collection demonstrates
her own particular understanding of the forces of the twentieth century. Its encyclopedic scope
reflects the numerous creative responses to the unique demands of our time.
Surrounded by art from childhood, it was not until the late 1930's that Mrs. Malbin began to
collect seriously. In 1938 she had the good fortune to meet Alfred Stieglitz, who then had his Amer-
ican Place Gallery. He discussed modern art with her at great length and encouraged her burgeon-
ing taste for the abstract. Among the first modern works she acquired were two Marins, two Fein-
ingers, a Chagall and a Soutine which represent her early interest in both American and European
art. By 1945 Mrs. Malbin had come into contact with Rose Fried, whose Pinacotheca Gallery even-
tually became the Rose Fried Gallery, which she often visited when she was in New York. Mrs.
Malbin frequently acknowledges Mrs. Fried's important role in the formation of her collection:
she had championed Arp, van Doesburg, Gabo, Kandinsky, Lissitzky, Mondrian, Picabia and
Schwitters at a very early time. As the body of works grew, so did its scope. Yet, remarkably, de-
spite the increasing range, a distinct direction began to emerge, for the collection evolved into one
of the finest collections of Futurism extant.
Arp understood the fullness and diversity of the Winston/Malbin collection when he said:
At the one pole the "Winston collection contains works whose beauty has not been touched by
the eternal transformation of the ephemeral. Among those I would include the works of Mon-
drian, van Doesburg, Albers, Freundlich, Herbin, Lissitsky, Pevsner and Gabo. At the opposite
pole are to be found Boccioni, Masson, Pollock and Schwitters.'
Arp implicitly poses the question of whether it is possible for the apparent opposition to be
resolved. Can Arp and Albers or Miro and Mondrian co-exist with their dissimilarities of inten-
tion and inspiration, which extend to the point of openly stated antagonisms of the esthetic sen-
sibility? Can an awareness of twentieth-century art be revealed through a seemingly chaotic
assembly of work? Arp seems to be emphasizing precisely the potefitial for such contradiction be-
tween the two fundamentally different approaches — romantic/classical, open/closed, multiple/uni-
fied, the commitedly political/the purely esthetic. A confrontation of this nature is central to the
Futurists" art; from such a collision a synthesis emerges to form a higher vision.
Let us leave Wisdom behind like a horrible mine . . . Let us throw ourselves to be devoured by
the LJnknotvn, not because we are desperate, but simply to enrich the bottomless reservoirs of
the Absurd. r t- xa ^^- ^
F. T. Martnettt, 1909
1. Jean Arp, "Serious and Droll Speculations," Collecting Modern Art, exhibition catalogue, Detroit In-
stitute of Art, 1957-58, p. 28
2. F. T. Marinetti, "First Futurist Manifesto," quoted in Marianne W. Martin, Futurist Art and Theory:
1909-19 rj, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968, p. 40
0«e >nust start with the central nucleus of the object one wants to create, in order to discover
the new forms which connect it invisibly and mathematically to the visible plastic infinite and
to the interior plastic infinite. The new plasticity will thus be the translation in plaster, bronze,
glass, wood, or any other material, of atmospheric planes that link and intersect things. 'What
I have called physical transcendentalism can render plastically the sympathies a?td mysterious
affinities which produce the reciprocal and formal influences of the objects' planes.
The range of Futurist theories opened up countless areas for other artists. The Dada and Surrealist
movements developed directly out of ideas such as those expressed by Marinetti, while the Russian
Constructivists were able to actualize what Boccioni had vehemently advocated but never realized
in full. The international repercussions of the Futurists are due largely to their proselytizing mani-
festos and lecture tours. In addition, it has been observed that Boccioni's 1913 sculpture exhibition
in Paris seems to have left an impression on a variety of artists: see Brancusi's Prodigal Son, 1915,
Duchamp-Villon's The Horse, 1914, Archipenko's Boxers, 191 3, all of which evidence a new ele-
ment of dynamic and assymetrical thrusts of space and mass.'' But without doubt, the greatest im-
pact of Futurism occurs in the two seemingly opposed movements of Dada/Surrealism on the one
hand, and of Constructivism on the other.
The initial Futurist movement was cut short by World War I; by 1916 Dada had grown out of
it. Artists reacted in various ways to pressures exerted by the War. The Futurists had welcomed
War enthusiastically since they felt it heralded the destruction of all traditional values. However
the Dadaists' social point of view is negative and cynical: war and its attendant death and devas-
tation is to them one expression of society's decay. In Germany particularly, where the economic
depression was most severe, the Dada spirit was most active. Dadaists like Arp, Ernst and Schwit-
ters in Germany and Duchamp and Picabia in New York and Paris created an art form as revolu-
tionary as the Futurists had — an idiom which was a unique expression of the period. Irreverence
and love of nonsense, blasphemy and political activism exists in both Dada and Futurism, tying
them together on one level.
On a more substantial level, the two movements are related by an overriding faith in the artist's
intuitive powers. Reinforced in part by the philosophy of Bergson and Nietzsche, men like Arp,
Ernst and Schwitters recognized the need to return to a near-primary state in order to establish a
non-static viewpoint that encouraged the artist's most personal expression and reflected the fluc-
tuating and changing nature of life. Arp evolved one such solution. Speaking of his and Sophie
Taueber's work of c.1915, Arp wrote:
We rejected everything that ivas copy or description, and allowed the Elementary and Sponta-
neous to react in full freedom. Since the disposition of planes, and the proportions and colors
of these pla?ies seemed to depend purely on chance, I declared that these works, like nature, were
ordered "according to the law of chance," chance being for me merely a limited part of an un-
fathomable raison d'etre, of an order inaccessible in its totality.^
Not only is Arp's work associated with nature through eternal laws contributing to its creation,
but also through his particular type of abstraction, whose organic configurations recall and suggest
foliage or animal life. Pre-dating Surrealist automatic writing, Arp's spontaneous approach re-
3. Umberto Boccioni, "Technical Manifesto of Futurist Sculpture," reprinted in Modern Artists on Art,
ed. Robert L. Herbert, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1964, p. 51
4. See Sidney Geist, Brancusi: A Study of The Sculpture, Grossman, New York, 1968, pp. 149-150
5. Jean Arp, On My Way: Poetry and Essays, 1912-1947, Wittenborn, New York, 1948, p. 40
veals a profound grasp of his inner powers. His unique biomorphic shapes recur in both Miro and
Calder (cat. nos. 68, 34) who also create a world based on imagination unrelated to objectively
perceived reality. Because of Arp's emphasis on fantasy and the spontaneous workings of the mind,
his art functions on multiple levels of association; certain shapes quite literally metamorphose
into others, simultaneously altering and expanding their original connotations. These image trans-
formations parallel the states and processes of the mind which preoccupied Arp. He found a subtle
and abstract style to express these ideas — ideas which had been more explicitly handled by Russolo
in Perfume, c. 1909 (cat. no. 93).
By 19 19, Arp was working closely with Ernst in Cologne where they established an alternative
to the far more political Dada contingent based in Berlin. Ernst, too, was concerned with the meta-
morphosis or multiple identity of images. But he, for the most part, uses absolutely realistic objects
arranged in specific, and often ironic, relation to one another. The collage Sitting Buddha (cat. no.
38) is a humorous vision of the subject put together from biological drawings and reveals Ernst's
peculiar sense of juxtaposition which later had great impact on Surrealism. Although their work
assumed very different forms, Arp and Ernst's sensibilities were remarkably alike. Ernst endeavored
to explore his mind's apparatus as freely as possible by means of "frottage." Frottage is a process,
named in 19Z5 by Ernst, based on the traditional technique of rubbing. Ernst was no doubt encour-
aged in his quest for such a method by Breton's 1924 Surrealist Manifesto. Ernst has described the
events which led to his discovery of this revelatory procedure.
Beginning with a memory of childhood . . . in the course of ivhich a panel of false mahogany, sit-
uated in front of my bed, had played the role of optical provocateur of a vision of half-sleep, and
finding myself one rainy evening in a seaside inn, I was struck by the obsession that showed to my
excited gaze the floor-boards upon which a thousand scrubbings had deepened the grooves. I
decided then to investigate the symbolism of this obsession and, in order to aid my meditative
attd hallucinatory faculties, 1 made from the boards a series of drawings by placing on them, at
random, sheets of paper ivhich I undertook to rub with black lead. In gazing attentively at the
drawings thus obtained . . . 1 was surprised by the sudden intensification of my visionary capac-
ities and by the hallucinatory succession of contradictory images superimposed, one upon the
other, with the persistence and rapidity characteristic of amorous memories.''
Both Come Into the Continents and the oil Composition (cat. nos. 40, 39) were made in this manner,
demonstrating his unique insight into a fantasy world quite unlike Arp's. Appropriately, Arp wrote
the introduction to Ernst's 1926 Natural History, a portfolio of his frottage drawings (an edition
of which is in the collection). Come Into the Continents is related to two of this portfolio's plates.
In his introduction, Arp incorporated the actual titles from the drawings — "enter the continents
without knocking but with a muzzle of filligree."'
Both artists foreshadowed the Surrealist movement in which they were active participants by
1924. The Surrealist insistence on "pure psychic automatism" and "the omnipotence of the dream"
obviated, to a certain extent, that quality of spontaneity which characterizes the early Arp and Ernst.
This lack of spontaneity on the part of the Surrealist painters largely resulted from the influence of
Breton, who extolled conscious control of the unconscious. Moreover, Breton's literary background
undoubtedly set the stage for a movement less oriented toward the visual. Nevertheless, Miro's
paintings of the 20's, like Personage (cat. no. 68), and Tanguy's work in his best known man-
trasts dramatically with Tanguy's precisely rendered dream-like and abstracted shapes grounded in
a landscape setting. While Miro and Tanguy developed respectively the poetic/magical and the sub-
conscious/dream-like tendencies of Surrealism, Masson (cat. no. 65), abandoned himself to the
powers of automatism which enabled him to utilize to the fullest extent his intuitive sense of line
and tension. The elements of chance, of accident, of randomness and coincidence have, of course,
always played a certain part in the creative process. The Dadaists, however, impelled by the Futur-
ists, made these elements more integral to their work to create a more dynamic art.
Another artist who, like the Futurists, strove vigorously to break down the barriers between dis-
crete states of mind and precise points of termination was Kurt Schwitters (cat. nos. 94-98).
Working out of a Cubist-Futurist impetus, he exemplifies the artist who totally and absolutely inte-
grates object with background, life with art. Schwitters, who developed his own exuberant form
of Dada in Hanover called "Merz" (from Kommerzbank), was a poet, as was Arp. Perhaps their
propensity toward other art forms enabled them to be more open and expansive in the plastic arts
and less concerned with the purely formal. The Futurists had been greatly involved with concrete
poetry and carried over the use of words, sounds and letters into their art. These concerns are also
very much a part of Schwitters' work. Although Schwitters' delicate collages and frequently less
gentle constructions are based on well-composed Cubist structural formats, his unorthodox use
of materials — personal possessions, discarded scraps and refuse culled from the streets — expanded
Boccioni's concept of new materials creating a new reality:
Transparent planes, glass, sheets of metal, wires, externa! or internal electric lights can indicate
the planes, inclinations, tones and halftones of a new reality . .
.'
Why, then, should sculpture remain shackled by laws which have no justifications'^ Let us break
them courageously and proclaim the complete abolition of the finished line and the closed
statue. Let us open up the figure like a window and enclose within it the environment in which
it lives. Let us proclaim that the environment must form part of the plastic block as a special
ii'orld regulated by its own lawsf
Although Boccioni had advanced such theories, he still clung, in practice, to the figure as subject.
Schwitters furthered the Futurist proclivity toward the fusion of sculptural object and environment
through the destruction of traditional definitions of line, mass and space. Starting in the 1920's,
Schwitters fabricated the Merzbau, which was built into his house in Hanover. It was an accretion
of objects which proliferated and changed daily, growing over the years into a huge all-encompass-
ing sculptural structure, hi the course of his career, he built three of these; he worked on the sec-
ond between 1937 and 1940 in Norway, while the third was begun in 1941 in England. These
constructions, now destroyed, were the fulfillment of his ideal of total inclusiveness. Schwitters'
accumulated environment represented something very different from the Futurist concept of fast-
moving modern Europe. The age of technology had not left a positive impression on him; its waste
products rather than its achievements consumed his interest.
Certain Dadaists did not ignore the fact that the machine age had spawned them. The Dada
obsession with thought processes and states of mind was translated through the exploration of
chance and accident into a kind of psychic mechanism. Picabia's Alarm Clock 1 (cat. no. 79) is a
hotel room, with the impetuosity for which he was famous, Picabia dipped its parts in ink, placed
the inked elements on paper to leave an image, and then added a few lines to hold the composi-
tion together. The rashness of the esthetic decision combined with the reassembled, now useless
clock expresses the artist's irreverent attitude toward technology and, even more, his ability to
transform and break down a mechanical object so that its inner workings are fully revealed.
Duchamp and Picabia well understood that the machine which makes "things" work could be an
apt metaphor for the workings (or non-workings) of all "things," even humans. The fact that Picabia
depicted Marie Laurencin and the dancer Napierkowska (cat. nos. 78, 77) as non-functional
mechanical beings confirms a sense of extreme ambiguity and irony. Both these female apparatuses
could perform effectively if they were "turned on," but neither one would perform a concrete,
logical function. Both works imply self-contained revolving movement, rather than directional
thrust. Moreover, Napierkowska slightly resembles a spinning top, which is what she must have
looked like to her audiences. These portraits have ceased to represent an external reality, rather
they exist as specific, self-referential fantasy-realities.
The Dada sense of the mechanical age is far removed from the Constructivist sense; yet, both
movements were passionately concerned with revealing the laws which govern universal processes.
Dada machines are odd, magical, often anthropomorphic and sometimes sinister. The Construc-
tivists never depicted actual machines, but rather attempted to utilize and incorporate real tech-
nology to create an art in keeping with the times, times in which they had ultimate faith. Their
efforts to surpass external reality in order to arrive at the universal were imbued with a great
sense of optimism and enthusiasm, resulting from both the innumerable esthetic possibilities
which flowed from the new technology and from the volatile political atmosphere in Russia im-
mediately following the 1917 revolution. Gabo and Pevsner, two Constructivists who figure prom-
inently in the Winston/Malbin collection, both actively absorbed and expanded the basic tenets of
Futurist theory in a way quite unlike the Dadaists. Their Realist Manifesto, written in 1920 at the
height of cooperation between all branches of art and technology in Russia, defines their position
vis-a-vis Futurism:
1. To communicate the reality of life, art should be based on the two fundamental elements:
space and time.
2. Volume is riot the only spatial concept.
3. Kinetic and dynamic elements must be used to express the real nature of time; static rhythms
are not sufficient.
4. Art should stop being imitative and try instead to discover new forms."
The use of the word "realist" has Platonic implications. Gabo and Pevsner propose that their art
is founded on the same fundamental and invisible laws of energy and tension as those of the universe
itself. Their sculpture constitutes its own world, never imitating or referring to an external reality.
The concept of harmony is central and is predicated on an ever-changing and actively regenerative
reality.
Boccioni's remarks furnish insight into Gabo and Pevsner's emphasis on space and time in
sculpture:
In sculpture as well as in painting, one can renew art only by seeking the style of move-
ment, that is, by forming systematically and definitely into a synthesis that which Impression-
10. Quoted in Gabo-Pevsner, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1948, p. 10
13
ism offered in a fragmentary, accidental, and consequently analytical way. The systematization
of the vibration of light and of the interpenetrations of planes tvill produce Futurist sculpture: it
will be architectonic in character, not only from the point of view of the construction of the
masses, but also because the sculptural block will contain the architectonic elements of the sculp-
tural milieu in which the subject lives.""
The Russian Constructivists created an art based on the renunciation of mass and the subsequent
opening up of space; hne was articulated as direction of force and energy, rather than as descrip-
tion. Time was introduced by means of actual and implied movement, capable of defining the space
within which the motion occurred. The Dadaists embodied time in their work in a more cerebral
and gestural fashion since a certain duration of time often determined the precise form a work of
art assumed. Constructions like Tallin's complex revolving Monument to the Third International
of 1910, (never executed in final form) incorporated time as movement in both symbolic and actual
forms. The Futurists had articulated the need for a "style of movement," but they integrated it into
Gabo and Pevsners' investigations of motion, though based on an extension of Futurist inspira-
tion, nevertheless stood for a radical departure. Gabo has described the inherent distinctions:
Ask any Futurist hoiv he imagines speed, and on the scene ii'ill appear a whole arsenal of raging
automobiles, ridmbling stations, tangled wire, the clang, bang, noise and ring of the whirling
streets .... This is not at all required for speed and its rhythms .... Look at a ray of sun— the
quietest of the silent strengths— it runs three thousand kilometers in a secotid. Our starry sky
— does anyone hear it?''
Pevsner expressed equally vehement feelings about the Futurist actualization of theories on move-
ment:
In the field of painting the task of Futurism went no further than revised attempts to affix on can-
vas the optical reflex. . . . It is clear to anyotte that we cannot re-create motion through a single
graphic record of a series of snapshots of arrested movement."
The Constructivists did not seek to transform the human figure into a mechanized robot; instead,
in their hands, the figure becomes a form of interacting geometric solids and voids, as in Pevsner's
Cubist-derived copper Figure of 1915 (cat. no. 74). The far-reaching effects of Cubism are apparent
in both Futurism and Constructivism, but the latter movement more accurately represents a syn-
thesis of the other two. Dependence on Cubist formal innovations, such as constructed objects and
the incorporation of unorthodox materials," combined with the realization of Futurist concepts in
relation to energy, motion and the breakdown of mass contributed to the uniqueness of the Con-
structivist style.
Figure, like Gabo's earlier works of a similar style, has been split open to reveal its invisible
workings — not in a biological, individual sense, hut in a cosmological, ideal one. In spirit, their
abstract constructions correspond to works by the mature Mondrian (cat. no. 69) who also was
not concerned with representing externals, but with the creation of a self-contained reality encom-
passing the delicate balances and contradictions of a total cosmology. By 1921, Gabo, Pevsner,
14
and Kandinsky had left Russia because they believed in art for its own sake and not in the serv-
ice of any other cause, such as the state. Tatlin, Rodchenko and Lissitzky continued their careers
as artist-engineers with greater stress on the latter; they devoted themselves to the government in an
effort to combine their artistic pursuits with the needs and demands of the state, an effort that
proved futile in a system which was hostile to non-representational art.
Technology did not catch up with the ideas of Gabo and Pevsner until the late 30's and early
40's. Plastic, which allowed for greater delicacy and transparency, became available, and works
like Linear Construction in Space No. i, 1950," resulted. In this piece and others like it, the im-
portance of light has been increased to enhance the artist's manipulation of positive and negative
Naum Gabo
Linear Construction in Space No. i, 1950
15. This piece is not included in the exhibition because it is too fragile to travel.
15
space. From the 30's on, Pevsner concentrated on exploring the inherent spatial contrasts of dif-
ferent metals. The Constructivists' handling and use of materials invariably differed from the Da-
daists': the latter frequently relied on a juxtaposition of various materials or objects, often of a
found or used nature which would result in an ironic statement. On the other hand, man-made or
fabricated materials presented the greatest esthetic possibilities to the Constructivists who were
encouraged to fully exploit the newest technological discoveries. As with Gabo, stretched lines and
rods predominate in Pevsner's works whose organic and natural appearance belies their mathe-
matical basis. In Fresco, Fauna of the Ocean (cat. no. 75) of 1944, the straight rods of copper and
tin have been fused on the surface to create solid planes which turn and develop within a circular
pattern. As a result, the surface appears to vibrate and dematerialize. Furthermore, the appear-
ance of the material slowly changes because oxidation alters the original metal colors to create a
luminous turquoise and gold hue. The strong rhythmic energy reiterates the actual motion of the
universe, vividly recalling the Futurist "lines of force." Balla's Fist of Boccioni; Lines of Force (cat.
no. 19) in form and title suggests most accurately a source of many Constructivist works; Balla's
sculpture exemplifies a theoretical fusion of physical (the fist) and cosmological (lines of force)
energy and tension.
Consistent with their advanced notions, Gabo and Pevsner stressed the importance of "a synthesis
of the plastic arts: painting, sculpture and architecture. . .
."" — again, a type of structural fusion.
Lissitzky (cat. no. 61), however, envisioned his art as an even more total statement which integrated
all the applied arts, especially typography and photography. He had been a pupil-disciple of Male-
vich, but was equally enthusiastic about Tallin and Rodchenko's concern with the unity of art and
the state. Like van Doesburg, his personality enabled him to bridge the gap between the two fun-
damentally opposite approaches. Van Doesburg (cat. no. 37) originally championed the pure and
ideal esthetics of the De Stijl movement, and later embraced the theories and theatrics of Dada as
well. With his wife, Nelly, and Schwitters, van Doesburg traveled throughout Holland presenting
Dada lectures and performances. He wrote Dada poetry under the pseudonym of I.K. Bonset, only
to be warned by his former De Stijl colleague Mondrian about an unknown writer whose ideas
seemed extremely dangerous and anarchistic. Of course, this writer was van Doesburg himself,
in his Dada guise! This assimilation of contrasting viewpoints does not point to a schizophrenic
tendency in van Doesburg; on the contrary, it reveals his personal sense of the inherent similarities
of both movements and the equal need of each to construct new realities.
All the artists discussed here were intent upon creating a total world view. Whether it is a Schwit-
ters collage or an Arp sculpture, a Lissitzky Proun painting or a Pevsner construction — the inten-
tion of the artist was based on the profound need to construct a new vision in relation to the
contemporary world. Without doubt, the Futurists were instrumental in furthering and expanding
the highly influential Cubist breakthrough. Widening the scope of their art by introducing social
and political elements and including allied media like photography, they affected the artists associ-
ated with Dada and the fantastic on the one hand and Constructivism and geometric abstraction
on the other. The esthetic reverberations of Futurism are still felt today in such areas as kinetic and
environmental art, as well as performances.
A particular emphasis on the collection has been the basis for this discussion. Alternate possi-
bilities exist; different connections and conclusions may be drawn. The Winston/Malbin Collection
offers the viewer, no matter what path is followed, a rewarding insight into twentieth-century art.
LINDA SHEARER
16
Malbin living room 1969
,
Umberto Boccioni in studio, c. 1913, with plaster of Synthesis of Human Dynamism, 1912 (destroyed)
Futurism Now
Boccioni to Barbantini
Boccioni's impassioned plea, made in 1911, is one of the many moving testimonies to the great
struggle which he imposed upon himself in his brief and intense career. In retrospect Boccioni's out-
cry may also be viewed as a metaphorical appeal for a sympathetic and, more importantly, a
balanced assessment of the Futurists' endeavors. For it seems that no twentieth-century creative
effort has been subjected to such continuing, highly colored, hence misleading and often incorrect
interpretation as Futurism. Such distortions were partly brought on by the Futurists themselves:
their overambitiousness, swagger and exaggeration were intended to arouse, astound and offend,
and could not but result in a vehement, partisan response. In addition, the movement's equivocal
and complex connections with the rise and later triumph of Fascism have further clouded the
evaluation of Futurism. And lastly, the very shape of the movement, its efforts to encompass all
the arts and even establish a mode of life, has tended to confuse and discourage all but the most
persistent of its students. However, the perspective imposed by time has also revealed some of the
deeper reasons for the difficulties in comprehending and assessing this Italian contribution to mod-
ern art. Factors such as those mentioned above are relatively superficial. It is becoming increasingly
apparent that Futurism was not only contradictory, but was more prophetic and daring than had
been suspected. And, generally, the Italian movement, in all of its manifestations, emerges as one
of the earliest and, above all, most inclusive and vocal expressions of the great creative and mora!
concerns of our century. These ingredients doubtless have given the Futurist message its continu-
ing appeal.
Turning to some of the better known external aspects of the Italian movement, one notes, for
example, that the Futurists' image of themselves as artists, their attitudes towards society and their
methods differed markedly from those who preceded them and from most of their contemporaries.
Rather than accepting and propagating the comfortable cliches about the artist as a disheveled but
proud escapist loner, they were fashionably dressed and appeared easy-going; their projected image
was that of energetic and powerful world leaders or industrialists. Quite resolutely they discarded
for themselves and the public the nostalgic idea of the artist as a romantic anachronism, like the
imaginary artisan of the past. Baldly, if somewhat suicidally, the Futurists faced the fact that in
order to put their creative views across they had to employ the methods (and some of the attitudes)
of the controlling sectors of society. Their brilliantly planned international and national exhibition,
lecture and performance campaigns resemble Henry Ford shaping his empire. For it was with
enterprises such as these that the Futurists had to compete for attention from a commodity and
consumption-oriented public. Their aggressive and often trying methods were relieved and human-
ized by the group's youthful high-spirits, which turned all of their activities into hilarious, if irrev-
erent, events. Beneath the din and dust of their uproar there appeared a firm optimism and courage.
Italians called them gli allegri futuristi (the happy Futurists), for the mood of excitement and ex-
pectancy which they created was a welcome change from the pessimism and sensuous self- abandon
19
Umberto Boccioni in studio, 1913.
Boccioni standing to right behind his Spiral Expansion of Muscles in
is Movement (destroyed).
Seated are Giacomo Balla and Boccioni's mother.
ture, like that of his Russian contemporary Diaghilev, was the successful creation of a unified artistic
ensemble, made up of disparate yet temporarily cooperating individuals. To extend the analogy
further, it may be said that like Diaghilev's principal dancers, each of the Futurists placed his per-
sonal endeavors in the service of an all-encompassing vision and dedicated himelf totally to its
fulfillment. Yet Marinetti received as much as he gave. An extremely alert and perceptive impre-
sario, he welcomed and thrived, as did the movement, on the lively exchange and collision of ideas
within it. However, these differences which ultimately became irreconcilable, led in part to
militancy from themselves and from those they sought to reach. This was expressed in fierce
1909: "We shall sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and fearlessness." Such a mode of
life, creative and otherwise, represented, above all, the Futurists' determination to combat the
mental, moral and physical lethargy that seemed to have overcome mankind, partly as a result of
the greater wealth and ease which the industrial age had brought about. The external complacency
and comfort of human existence had reduced the arts to an agreeable, relaxing pastime for "rich
and mature men with scornful minds and very bad digestion, which makes all mental effort impos-
sible," in Marinetti's words.' The Futurists clearly recognized that the scope of art, as well as the
conditions for its creation, had so narrowed as to threaten it with meaninglessness or annihi-
lation. They were by no means the first to note this cultural crisis, in the making for over a cen-
tury. But with the help of Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Sorel, Whitman, Jarry and many others, they
took the lead in many respects in diagnosing it afresh and in seeking a remedy. And in their fun-
damental efforts and their willingness to risk all for art, they provided fuel and guidelines for
contemporary and subsequent quests for regeneration and liberation of the human spirit.
Today it seems obvious to assert that creation for the Futurists involved an intensely intimate
awareness of and identification with the dynamic spirit and forces that the modern scientific and
technological era had revealed. Yet what this implied in practice has still not been spelled out fully.
What is clear, and cannot be stressed enough, is that it meant much more than "automobilism,"
as Wyndham Lewis bitingly characterized the Futurist doctrine in 1914. The realization that
the mode of perception of modern life had been as drastically altered as life itself was a significant
aspect of the Futurist esthetic; yet it implied more than this. Basically, Futurism stood for an exten-
sive and unsparing questioning of the nature and place of art in the twentieth century, necessary if
art were to survive and evolve as a profound human manifestation. The questioning begun by
the Futurists aimed beyond the soul-searching of previous generations, which in their estimation
had been far too limited. Marinetti's over-quoted slogan from the Foundation Manifesto that "a
racing car . . . is more beautiful than the Victory of Samothrace" brutally points to the crux of the
matter as he saw it: that the tension between the past and present, between dream and reality, or
human will and failure, could in the twentieth century no longer be accommodated by the kinds of
compromise that all speculative spirits effect in order to create.
It is significant that the tnise au point of the modern artistic dilemma was posed not by a French-
man but by an Italian (although a Francophile), and rapidly acted upon by a number of the most
gifted and adventurous of his countrymen. Could it have been that such a bare revelation was more
I. Manifesto dei drammaturghi, broadsheet dated October 11, 1910, Poesia, Milan
Boccioni in studio, c. 1914, against Materia, 1912.
readily achieved in Italy? For in the clear, unsparing light of this peninsula all human achievements,
artistic, moral and other, dwindle in stature before the ubiquity of its bygone giants. The directness
of the Futurists' protest, the extremes to which they went in communicating and fighting this ma-
laise, can perhaps only be grasped fully within this local context. The fact that Italy then believed
itself to be behind in cultural and socio-economic matters, and the widespread disillusionment in
the aftermath of the Risorgimento may further have sharpened the Futurists' insight into the
From the beginning. Futurism thus burdened itself with a moral charge similar in weight and
urgency to that which fired the medieval artist of the eleventh and twelfth centuries. With analo-
gous, near barbaric force the modern Italians attempted to expurgate the ready-made, meretricious
and soothing alibis which filled men's minds and deflected them from the essential issues. And like
their predecessors they emphasized that spiritual, hence creative survival could only be assured
through war-like vigilance and combat, which Marinetti believed to be the heart of human exist-
ence. His exclamation of 1909 that "war is the world's only hygiene," therefore stands for more
than a simple-minded, chauvinistic celebration of the actual thrills of battle. However, in his more
adolescent, unreflective moments Marinetti was not unreceptive to these superficial sensations.
The widespread and seemingly distorted view that Futurist words preceded deeds should be dis-
cussed. This over-simplification has permitted an all too easy dismissal of Futurism as primarily
a verbal program rather than an actual, self-contained and meaningful artistic phenomenon. And
not surprisingly, such a view has supported the notion of an easy and direct transition from
Futurism to Fascism, in which words were indeed one of the most profuse products. Futurism did,
of course, burst forth with a seemingly endless number of manifestos, but its basic creative views
were the result of prolonged gestation in the work of its guiding figures. But the Futurists' expos-
itory statements do raise the difficult and well-worn problem of the relationship of actual creation
to its verbal justification. As the century passes and commentaries by artists multiply, providing a
seeming permission, even invitation, to transpose one for the other, this problem becomes even
more acute. Such curious and deliberate over-intellectualizations, an acerb comment on the crea-
tive anxiety of the present, are ultimately traceable to Futurism. This should not blind us to the fact
that the Italians initially composed their verbal statements quite simply for purposes of publicit)',
public illumination, as well as personal clarification. The need to do this, as suggested earlier, was
implied in their efforts to give the arts a central and dramatic place in human existence.
Futurism originated in a literary milieu with a principally literary point of view. Yet it may not be
unjust to suggest that its most distinguished and, in a sense, most fulfilled early contributions were
made in the visual arts. However, the Futurists' intrepid efforts to break down the borders between
the different disciplines resulted in hybrids such as "free-word poetry," "free-word painting," "art
of noises," kinetic, multi-material, colored, noise-making "plastic complexes," which, in their day,
were radically novel. Hence in any evaluation one must make allowances for the cross-fertilization
that, whether obvious or subtle, underlies most Futurist contributions.
What was most important in primarily determining the artistic direction of this closely knit
group? Although not acknowledged at first, one of the most fundamental points of agreement
among the painters and writers was their awareness of the double-edged thrust of photography
and the moving picture as a powerful means of visual communication. The Futurists accepted
these new media as direct artistic challenge and inspiration, although, at first, they denied such
dependence. Their early detractors, however, had been quick to point out this influence. The Ital-
ians understood from the beginning that the survival of their own media was sharply threatened.
The dual consequences — the threat and the inspiration — of photography had been recognized and
responded to by artists ever since its invention in the second quarter of the nineteenth century. But
2-3
the advent of the enormously appealing and popular moving picture seems to have heightened
the competitive challenge of the mechanical eye. And Futurism, with its anti-traditional and
dynamic esthetic was undoubtedly the first large-scale and consistently worked-out attempt to
provide "artistic" counterparts to the mechanically achieved illusion of movement that the photo-
graphic lens had revealed. Almost predictably, in 191 6 the first phase of Futurism, after con-
siderable internal change, culminated in an effort to transform the "traditionless," esthetically in-
nocent film into an all-embracing, multi-media form of expression. The film Vita fiiturista and
the accompanying manifesto of Futurist Cinematography testify to the open acceptance of the
camera by the movement.
Specific debts to the camera and its related discoveries are clearly discernible in early Futurist
works and theory. It must be added that ideas pertaining to optical, psycho-physiological or philo-
sophical aspects of perception almost simultaneously helped to stimulate, rationalize and dignify
the Futurists' recourse to the camera. For example, the scientific principles underlying Neo-Im-
pressionism — one of their chief technical points of departure — came to the Futurists' attention
through some of its French exponents and apologists and through their Italian counterparts, the
Divisionists. Or theories of empathy reached them in such diverse forms as those of Lipps, Beren-
son, Bergson, and through their socio-artistic elaboration in Romains' Unanimisme. Unquestion-
ably, Bergson is an extremely important Futurist source, especially with regard to verbal justifica-
tions of their endeavors. For the French philosopher, probably more than any other thinker of the
period, was able to translate contemporary spiritual yearnings into evocative metaphors. These
provided attractive rubrics for many of the expressed or non-verbalized and often contradictory
ideals of the time.
The Futurists' rejection of the conventions of time and space, the experimentation with both
analytic and synthetic renditions of motion, and lastly, their quest for a powerful artistic analogue
for the universal flux — Bergson's "duration" and Boccioni's "painting of states of mind" — can all,
most complete and prophetic early realization of these ideas was accomplished by Balla in his decor
of 1917 for Stravinsky's Feu d'artifice. This "dancerless ballet," commissioned by Diaghilev, demon-
strated theatrically the Futurist desideratum of placing the spectator in the center of the work of
art. By means of a time-controlled spatial interaction of sound, moving three-dimensional abstract
colored forms and colored lights, which played on and off stage, Balla transformed the entire audi-
torium into a synesthetic ambience. Balla was the only one among the original Futurist artists able
to carry on with the aims of the movement
after the group had broken apart. By late 19 16 its most
forcefulmember, Boccioni, was dead, and Carra and Severini had turned away from Futurism.
The Winston/Malbin collection, so sensitively and intelligendy assembled, conveys a fine sense of
the general course of Futurism and its aftermath. In so doing, it also reveals some of the difficulties
14
that confront the modern artist, which, not unexpectedly, came newly into focus during the prime
years of Futurism. These seem to point to an often unspoken awareness that the discovery and
development of alternatives for the western tradition, outworn in their view, pose greater obstacles
than anticipated. The technical and mechanical problems arising from the Futurists' wish to super-
sede the conventional, arrested representational likeness, as well as the isolated static art object
were enormous, but not insurmountable. Early in the century, Balla's abstract decor, the work of
the Constructivists and the De Stijl group variously fulfilled some of these requirements with great
conviction and ingenuity. On the other hand, the force of past artistic civilization has proved to be
a more stubborn problem, perhaps beyond resolution. The conscious or unconscious dialogue with
this seemingly indestructible heritage, which had given human meaning and resonance to earlier
It is evident that the critical tension which characterizes the mature Futurism of Boccioni and of
most of the other participants was brought to the surface by their contact with Cubism, which be-
gan in mid-1911. To Futurist eyes. Cubism as an artistic idiom and social phenomenon represented
the kind of creative compromise which they had fiercely rejected as anachronistic; yet, as individ-
uals and on purely artistic grounds, they desired and even envied it. For Cubism, unlike Futurism,
was bred and sheltered in a nation with a prized modern tradition and supported by a few informed
and wealthy apologists of the "new." Hence its purest masters, Picasso, Braque and Gris, were able
to work within an austerely circumscribed artistic realm and to update radically some aspects of
the classical heritage. Cubism thus remained proudly traditional and hermetic, deliberately side-
stepping some of the artistic issues which the optimistic Italians faced.
The Futurists wished, above all, to communicate and to communicate with power. And Boccioni,
whose work is as ingenuous as it is ardent, lays bare in his three sculptural masterworks, Anti-
Graceful, Dei'elopt}ient of a Bottle in Space, Unique Forms of Continuity in Space (cat. nos. 18, 29,
30) some of the high ambitions and conflicts of Futurism. This extraordinarily gifted artist identi-
fied by natural inclination more closely with the ethos of Futurism than most of the other partici-
pants in the movement. Thus, quickly and dramatically, he gave substance to Marinetti's initial
precepts, allowing the movement to expand and grow and survive artistically after his death.
On the most immediate level, Boccioni's three sculptures represent spirited attacks on the palat-
able academic standbys — the portrait, the still life and the monumental figure — with their usually
banal conceits alluding to eternal attributes. On a more constructive plane, the sculptures, executed
successively in 1911-13, are increasingly searching tests in three dimensions of the persistent inter-
action of objects with their environment and the mutual transformations that result. In this, they
provide a brilliant adaptation and development of some of the analytic and synthetic procedures of
Cubism. At the same time, they are also a partial answer to the problem posed by the Futurist belief
that the flat surface of a painting had become insufficient for a forceful symbolic expression of the
vital continuum. Yet Boccioni's use of a single material, rather than proceeding with his earlier
multi-material assemblages, reflects his often-noted realization that he was seeking solutions for
too many problems at once. He thus left it for Balla, his Russian contemporaries and their joint
heirs to carry on along those lines.
One does not know if and how Boccioni would have wished to have his pieces cast. But the
bronze versions by which they are now mostly known, give them a stardingly appropriate old-
master look, while, at the same time, underlining their revolutionary quality. This dramatizes the
struggle that seems to have been waged in the artist's mind in the course of creating them and which
is symbolically communicated. The sculptures express Boccioni's — and by extension, man's — con-
suming desire to assert his momentary presence in the engulfing stream of change, seeking to shape
it and himself to a harmonious concordance.The violent spiritual and material vicissitudes to which
2-5
Dr. and Mrs. Barnett Malbin in living room of the Malbin home
the subject, his mother, and sculptural form are subjected in this encounter, shown in Anti-Graceful,
give way to the highly controlled and calculated, but still undecided contest of the Bottle. And fi-
nally, a triumphant breakthrough is achieved and proudly proclaimed in the weightless, soaring fig-
ure of Unique Forms. This metamorphosed multi-image, now motorcyclist-flyer, now flame and
wave, possesses the complete formal ease appropriate to its statement. Boccioni has succeeded, as
Apollinaire hoped the Cubists would, in "elevat[ing] the melody to a symphony."^ Ironically, this
breakthrough was accomplished with perhaps some unconscious and certainly grudging conces-
sions to that derided paradigm of past beauty and dynamic action, the Victory of Samothrace, as
has often been pointed out.' With it goes the tacit but increasingly pervasive admission, in Bocci-
oni's work after late 1913, that art must draw on art. References to the uncircumventible presence
of the classical past, filtered through Cezanne, appear with increasing frequency in his late paint-
ings. Boccioni's acceptance of the seemingly unbreakable chain of tradition becomes tantamount
to his recognition, verbalized only shortly before his death, that the wish to achieve an artistic re-
Marinetti, more resilient and more thoroughly iconoclastic than Boccioni, never went so far as to
admit these insights openly. But a similar awareness is implicit in his directives issued to the remain-
ing Futurists during the War. He recommends that they simplify their work to make it compre-
hensible and fulfill propagandistic purposes. Similarly, Marinetti's growing involvement in the
theatrical and cinematic activities of the movement bespeak, in part, his concession that the public
and art cannot be served to the same extent at the same time. Yet the discoveries made in these
areas, even if rudimentary, attest to the unflagging vitality of the Futurist impulse.
Whereas Cubism, with its narrow but deep commitments, had precipitated the artistic crisis of
Futurism, the War pointed up the social one. Futurism, in keeping with its reforming aims, had
from the beginning, pretended to a political role, and the actual and increasingly dominant polit-
icizing of the movement that started in 1915, brought its fundamental dilemma to a head. Other
idealistic European artistic endeavors experienced a similar trauma at the time. In desperation, some
of the German Expressionists and Russian Constructivists, like the Futurists, linked their hopes for
worldly fulfillment of their dreams to extremist revolutionary groups. In all instances these political
bodies first exploited these artists, but once in power, sooner or later rejected them. For the under-
lying message of spiritual freedom that such artists brought to real politics threatened the self-
ance in 1929 of membership in the Italian Academy. Did these acts mean, as is often said, that Mar-
inetti travestied all that Futurism had stood for, and, worse still, that Futurism was one of the many
roads to Fascism? In a sense the answer must, of course, be yes. But the condemnation of Futurism
as a misguided enterprise does not necessarily follow. Rather it tragically suggests that Marinetti,
the "St. John the Baptist of Futurism" in his blind and boundless zeal accepted the temporan,- death
of Futurism in Fascism "much as Christianity was quenched by the Spanish Inquisition or charity by
bishops."" This remark was made in 1938 by the English painter and ex-Futurist C.R.W. Nevinson.
Yet Futurism lives so long as men dream and "keep alive the primal wonder and curiosit>- concern-
ing the universe,"' as the keen American critic Christian Brinton had noted two decades earlier.
MARIANNE W. MARTIN
2. Guillaume Apollinaire, Chroniqiies d'Art (1901-191S), Gallimard, Paris, i960, p. 217
3. example, John Golding, Boccioni's Unique Forms of Continuity in Space, University of Newcastle-
See, for
upon-Tyne, 1972, p. 26
4. C.R.W. Nevinson, Paint and Prejudice, Harcourt Brace, New York, 1938, pp. 89-90
5. Christian Brinton, Impressions of the Art at the Panama-Pacific Exposition, John Lane, New York, 1916,
p. 26
2-7
Constantin Brancusi, Paris
Works in the Exhibition
30
I. JOSEF ALBERS EXHIBITIONS:
D.I.A., 197Z-73
PROVENANCE:
REFERENCES:
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Degand and Arp, Aujoiird'hui, 1957, ill. p. 31
Winston Collection, 1946
Read, Herbert, A Concise History of Modern Painting,
Praeger, New York, 1959, no. 113, p. 349, ill. p. 306 (here-
after cited as Read, Modern Painting, 1959)
G-IZ5
31
Karel Appel b. 1921
31
2. KAREL APPEL EXHIBITIONS:
l.r.
" '54/K. AppeP' September 21-October 30, 1955; Los Angeles County
Museum of Art, November 21, 1955-January 7, 1956; San
PROVENANCE: Francisco Museum of Art, February i-March 15, 1956
D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 3, p. 33, ill. p. 34
the artist
Winston Collection, 1955 (through The Museum of D.I. A., March The Dutch Contribution
8-April 7, 1963, to
Modern Art, New York) The International Development of Art Since 194J
REFERENCE:
W-142
33
ALEXANDER ARCHIPENKO
Nude No. I. c. 1912-13
PROVENANCE:
Alexander Archipenko 1887-1964 Librairie Kundig, Geneva
Liebman Collection, New York
Born in Kiev, Ukraine, Russia. 1901-05 studied art in Kiev, Parke-Bernet Galleries, New York
1906-07 Moscow, 1908 Paris; considered himself self-taught. Winston Collection, 1955
1908 settled in Paris. 1911 executed first Sculpto-Peintures
EXHIBITIONS:
combining various materials and painted surfaces. Exhibited
4. ALEXANDER ARCHIPENKO
Nude No. 2. c. 1912-13
PROVENANCE:
Librairie Kundig, Geneva
Liebman Collection, New York
Parke-Bernet Galleries, New York
Winston Collection, 1955
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCE:
34
5- JEAN ARP
1.1. "Arp"
PROVEN.'\NCE:
G-191
36
>0<l
:)
i ^^
^\^
"N^^^^^^
^x^
V
JEAN ARP
I.r. "ARP"
PROVENANCE:
Tristan Tzara, Paris
Winston Collection, 1954
EXHIBITION:
REFERENCE:
p. 16
G-181
38
7. JEAN ARP
l.r. "ARP"
PROVENANCE:
Tristan Tzara, Paris
Winston Collection, 1954
EXHIBITION:
REFERENCE:
P-37
G-182
39
JEAN ARP 9. JEAN ARP
PROVENANCE: PROVENANCE:
Walter P. Chrysler, Jr. the artist, Basel
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York Winston Collection, 1956
Winston Collection, 1950
EXHIBITIONS:
EXHIBITIONS:
Kunsthalle, Bern, April 7-May 6, 1956, Hans Arp itnd Kurt
Cranbrook, 195 1, no. 86, ill. Schwitters, no. 7
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 3, p. 9 D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 8, p. 35, ill. p. z8
D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 6, p. 35. Did not travel
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, October 8-Novem-
ber 30, 1958, Jean Arp, Retrospective, no. 77, p. 122, ill. p. 70
W-140
D.I.A., 1972.-73
REFERENCES:
p. 109
"The Winston Collection on Tour," Arts, ill. p. 35
W-139
40
lo. JEAN ARP
L'Ecolier). I938;i958
PROVENANCE:
the artist, Meudon
Winston Collection, 1958
EXHIBITION:
D.I.A., 1972-73
REFERENCE:
W-141
The upper portion dates from 1938, whereas the lower was
made in 1958. The artist combined the two parts to make a
single sculpture.
42
REFERENCES:
Giacomo Balla, 1902, Roma" Martin, Marianne W., Futurist Art and Theory, i')o<)-i')i;.
Umberto Spironello, Rome Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna, Rome. December 23,
Luce and Elica Balla, Rome, 1952 1971-February 27, 1972, Giacomo Balla, "Documenti foto-
EXHIBITIONS: W-13
44
II. GIACOMO BALLA
Spring Buds (Germogli primaverili). c. 1906
PROVENANCE:
Luce Balla, Rome
Winston Collection, i960
EXHrBlTIONS:
p. 13
REFERENCES:
W-38
Balla has depicted a favorite early motif: the view from his
Roman (now via Paisiello) onto the row
studio in via Parioli
of trees, shown below, which divided his yard from the
adjoining meadow of the Villa Borghese that fills most of the
canvas. The mysterious and dramatic shadow on the left
may have been cast by a wall.
^
i^}
*??fc- ,"7i;fc;„,
46
13. GIACOMO BALLA
The Stairway of Farewells (Gli addii scala; Salutando).
c. 1908
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1958
EXHIBITIONS:
p. 15
D.I.A., 1972.-73
REFERENCES:
W-17
47
This finely organized canvas anticipates some important
artistic desiderata of Futurism. Its hazardous and uncustom-
ary angle of vision like a vortex draws the spectator into the
depths of the picture. Balla's novel viewpoint as well as his
exploration of the dynamic potential of lines and shapes
were suggested at least in part by photographic experiments.
Thus the compelling image of the continuum of motion
created by the spiralling steps is an imaginative analogue
to the abstract oscillation patterns which Etienne-Jules
Marey derived from his chronophotographic images of
moving objects. Such abstract schemata were points of
departure not only for Balla's Futurist representation of
velocity, but also for works such as Boccioni's Uniqiie Forms
of Continuity i?i Space.
14. GIACOMO BALLA REFERENCES:
49
8
15. GIACOMO BALLA Balla's abstract, analytical studies of color date from a trip
to Diisseldorf during the winter of 1912. There he began a
Iridescent Interpenetration (Compenetrazione iridescente). series of small watercolors in which contrasting or more
Oil on canvas, 391/8 x 23" closely related colors are arranged in patterns made up of
variously shaped triangles or segmented circles. At present
I.l. vertically "BALLA 1912"; on reverse "Compenetrazione
it is not known when Balla began to consider these abstract
Iridescente/G. Balla" studies as the basis for self-sufficient paintings such as the
splendid example in the Winston/Malbin Collection. The
PROVENANCE:
first oil versions of this theme seem to have been executed
Luce Balla, Rome for decorative purposes from c. 1913 onward. Balla appears
Winston Collection, 19^0 not to have dared or cared to exhibit these significant
experiments until the 1950's when the evolution of abstract
EXHIBITIONS:
art was newly reconsidered.
Galleria Origine, Rome, April 1950, Omaggio a G. Balla
fiittirista, no. 18
Amici della Francia, Milan, November lo-December 2,
p. 13
Museum of Modern Art, 1961, Futurism, no. 7, p. 141, ill.
p. 62
D.I.A., 1971-73
REFERENCES:
i97i,P-3i7, ill-P-275
Apollonio, Umbro, ed. Futurist Manifestos, Viking, New
York, 1972, pi. 64
Fagiolo dell'Arco, Maurizio, "The Futurist Construction of
the Universe," Italy. The Neiv Domestic Landscape:
Achievements and Problems of Italian Design, The Museum
of Modern Art, New York, 1972, p. 296
Rye, Jane, Futurism, Studio Vista, London, 1972, ill. p. 69
W-16
If sir ifUEi HTl^ teawr
50
i6. GIACOMO BALLA
Goldfish (Soleil ail couchant poisson roiige-mer). c. 1914
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1958
W-33
51
ly. GIACOMO BALLA
Study for "Mercury Passing before the Sun." 1914
PROVENANCE;
rhe artist
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1954
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-25
Verso:
Pencil drawing of abstract forms similar to those used in the
series of Interventionist Demonstrations (Dimostrazioni
interventiste) of c. 1915. Inscription in pencil: "Via Paisiello
ORE 9 domani".
52-
i8. GIACOMO BALLA EXHIBITIONS:
Pencil on paper, 16% x 25" sota, Minneapolis, February 3-March 15, 1964; The Fogg
Art Museum, Cambridge, April 6-May 14, 1964 (hereafter
1.1. "FUTUR BALLA"
cited as Guggenheim, 1963-64, 20th Century Drawings)
PROVENANCE: D.LA., 1972-73
G-176
CI
53
15), GIACOMO BALLA A related graphic motif of Boccioni's Fist appeared on the
front page of Italia Futurista of August 25th, 1916, which
Fist of Boccioni; Force-Li?ies of the Fist of Boccioni (Piigno was dedicated to Boccioni who had died eight days earlier.
di Boccioni; Linee forze del pugno di Boccioni) This dynamic design may originally have been intended as a
Plastic complex (complesso plastico): cardboard, wood and letterhead for the Futurist movement, and was used as such
subsequently. It may have been conceived in 1915. The
paint, 33 X 31 X 121/2"
translation of the motif into three dimensions is consonant
Unsigned with the notion of "plastic complexes" as explained in Balla
ill. p. 117
D.I.A., 1972.-73
REFERENCES:
W-14
55
"
Patriottiche). 1915?
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1958
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
p. 403
W-21
56
21. GIACOMO BALLA
Futurist Necktie (Cravatta futurista). c. 1916
PROVENANCE:
Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1954
REFERENCE:
W-236
58
GIACOMO BALLA
Piith of a Gunshot (Colpo di fucile). c. 1918
PROVENANCE:
II Milione, Galleria d'Arte Moderns, Milan
Winston Collection, 1954
EXHIBITION:
REFERENCE:
W-Z7
59
23- GIACOMO BALLA REFERENCES:
Oil on canvas, 31% x 45 14" Mellquist, XX^ Steele, 1958, ill., n.p.
l.r. "INIEZIONE DI FUTURISMO/ BALLA/ FUTURISTA" Ashton, Dora, "L'Exposition du Futurisme a New York,"
XX*^ Siecle, Nouvelle Serie, no. 17 (Noel) 1961, "Supple-
(Frame made and painted hy the artist)
ment— Chroniques du jour," ill. p. 149
PROVENANCE: Archivi del futurismo, vol. 2, no. 314, p. 171, ill. p. 134
Carrieri, Raffaele, Futurism, Milione, Milan, 1963, pi. 88
the artist
Galleria Civica d'Arte Moderna, Turin, 1963, Giacomo
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Balla, p. 82
Winston Collection, 1954
Taylor, Collections, 1963, p. 294, ill. p. 303
EXHIBITIONS: Baro, Art in America, 1967, ill. p. 77
Calvesi, Maurizio, "Penetrazione e magia nella pittura di
III Rome, 1915, no. II
Biennale,
Balla," L'Arte moderna, vol. V, no. 40, 1967, ill. p. 134
V Quadriennale, Rome, 1948, no. 4, ill. p. 37
Galleria Origine, Rome, April 195 1, Omaggio a G. Bulla
Miesel, The Connoisseur, 1968, fig. 2, ill. p. 260
60
The vitalizing effect of Futurism with its explosive and gay 24. GIACOMO BALLA
atmosphere is suggested in this painting. Just off center to
the right Balla shows Marinetti in characteristic declamatory Self Portrait (Aiitoritratto). c. 1920
poses, wearing a red and green Futurist outfit in accordance Ink on paper, 9'/^ x 8'/^"
with Balla's 1914 manifesto, Anti-neutral Clothing. The large
u.c. "BALLA/FU/TU/RISTA"
encircled eye on the left, the two oval forms within the
leftward moving arrow, as well as the "abstract" shapes on PROVENANCE:
the right refer to the beauteous Marchesa Casati whose
Luce Balla, Rome
celebrated literary and artistic salon in Rome seems to have
Winston Collection, i960
inspired this picture. Balla's lost relief portrait of the
Marchesa, which apparently had moving parts, contained REFERENCE:
similar individualizing features (illustrated in Archivi
Dorazio, Balla, ill. on jacket in green
del futurismo, vol. 1, no. zi6, ill. p. 115).
G-178
61
25. MARIA BLANCHARD
Composition with Figure (Composition avec Personnagej.
1916
introduced her to Cubist painters. 1913 returned to Spain. Winston Collection, 1956 '
geometric but never totally abstract. 1919 work became Maria Blanchard Periode Cubiste, no. 10, p. 7, ill. p. 15
more realistic, though Cubist structure retained. Portrayed D.LA., 1957-58, no. 15, p. 38, ill. p. 40
men and women in scenes from daily life and solitary REFERENCE:
children. Palette of earth colors heightens melancholic
Degand and Arp, Aujourd'hiii, 1957, p. 31
feeling. Died in Paris.
62
z6. UMBERTO BOCCIONI
Self Portrait (Autoritratto). c. 1908
PROVENANCE:
Umberto Boccioni 1882-1916 Raffaela Callegari-Boccioni, Verona
Winston Collection, 1958
Born in Reggio Calabria. 1897 completed studies at Istituto
EXHIBITION:
Tecnico, Catania; moved to Rome c. 1900. 1901 with
Severini worked in Balla's studio. Travelled extensively in
Museum of Modern Art, 1961, Futurism, no. 11, p. 142
Italy; 1906, 1908 visited Paris; 1906 to Russia. Late 1907 REFERENCES:
settled in Milan. With help of Carta and Russolo wrote two
Falqui, Enrico, Bibliografia e iconografia del fiitiirismo,
Futurist painting manifestos, 1910. Became the leading
Sansoni, Florence, 1959, Tav. VI, p. 15
figure and spokesman of Futurists' artists' wing: numerous
Kramer, Hilton, "Futurism Today," Arts Magazine, vol. 36,
influential theoretical writings. Pittiira, scultura futiiriste
no. I, October 1961, ill. p. zz
(dinamismo plastico), published 1914. From 1911-iz
Archii'i del fiitiirismo, vol. z, no. 55, p. 255, ill. p. 187
created important sculpture. By late 1913 had begun to turn
Ballo, Boccioni, 1964, no. 22, ill. p. 435
toward Cezanne. Enlisted and fought at front with other
Calvesi, Maurizio, "II manifesto del futurismo e i pittori
Futurists, killed during cavalry exercises in Verona.
futuristi," L'Arte moderna, vol. V, no. 37, 1967, ill. p. 38
Archii'i del divisionismo, vol. z, no. 2220, p. 182, pi. 465
W-15
64
*,^o^.^-.
27. UMBERTO BOCCIONI A date of 1914 has frequently been given to this powerful
work, but both the subject and its interpretation suggest an
The Street Pavers (1 Selcialori). 1911 earlier execution, probably during the summer of 1911. The
Oil on canvas, 39% x 39%" theme of a worker is thus directly related to Boccioni's hymn
to labor. The City Rises of 1910-11 at The Museum of
1.1. "UB"
Modern Art, New York. He did not return to this subject in
p. 396
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 7, ill. p. 9
Museum of Modern Art, 1961, Futurism, no. 31, pp. 43, 142,
ill. p. 44
D.I.A., 1972--73
REFERENCES:
pi. I
W-22
67
2,8. UMBERTO BOCCIONI Francoeur, Chicago Mid-West Art, 1967, ill. on cover
pi. 42
This is the only cast from the original plaster now in the
1953,
Giedion-Welcker, Carola, Contemporary Sculpture,
Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna, Rome. It was made in
68
29. UMBERTO BOCCIONI
Development of a Bottle in Space (Still Life) (Sviluppo di una
Bronze, 15 x 24"
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1957
EXHIBITIONS:
February 21, 1971, The Cubist Epoch, no. 9, pp. 232, 275, pi.
294, p. 295. In collaboration with The Metropolitan Museum
of Art, New York, April 7-June 7, 1971 (hereafter cited as
The Cubist Epoch, 1970-71)
D.I. A., 1972-73
REFERENCES:
p. 501
Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century, i960, p. 358, ill. p. 358
Taylor, Collections, 1963, p. 295
Bowness, Alan, Modern Sculpture, Dutton, New York, 1965,
ill. p. 126
Barilli, Renato, La scultura del novecento, Fabbri, 1968,
pi. 28, pp. 46-47
Kramer, Hilton, "The Cubist Epoch," Art in America, vol.
59, no. 2, March-April 1971, ill. p. 54
W-26
71
30. UMBERTO BOCCIONI Museum of Modern Art, New York, and two in 1949 by
Giovanni and Angelo Nicci, Rome, now in this collection
Unique forms of Continuity in Space (Forme iiniche della and that of Paolo Marinotti, Milan. The earlier edition did
contimiita nello spazio). 19 13 not include the flat double base of the original plaster.
EXHIBITIONS:
D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 18, p. 38, ill. on front and back cover
D.I. A., 1969, Detroit Collects, no. 17
D.I.A., 197:^-73
REFERENCES:
W-24
72-
31. UMBERTO BOCCIONI Boccioni's early evolution, unlike that of most other major
artists, lacked exposure to Cezanne and African sculpture.
Study for "The Drinker" (Studio per "ll Bevitore"). 1914 A meaningful encounter with both occurred only during the
Oil, gouache, and collage on paper, 11V2 x I4V'2" climactic years of Futurism. This collage is a singularly
frank, if anxious, statement of Boccioni's creative process.
l.r. "Boccioni"
The artist is trying to appropriate a Cezannian content as
EXHIBITION:
REFERENCES:
W-18
73
3z. CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI
The Blond Negress (La Negresse blonde). 1933
Polished bronze and stone, head 15 %" h; z bases, each
W-127
74
33. GEORGES BRAQUE
Cards and Dice. 1914?
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
Georges Braque 1882-1963 the artist
Marius de Zayas
Born in Argenteuil, France. Began career as apprentice house Arthur B. Davies, Paris
painter. Studied Ecole des Beaux Arts, Le Havre and Paris Mrs. Morris Hillquit, New York, 1929
until 1904. 1907 exhibited as Fauve in Salon des Indepen- Jacques Seligmann & Co., New York, 1948
dants. 1908 discarded Fauve palette in favor of Cubist color Winston Collection, 1948 (through Rose Fried)
Worked in isolation throughout the War, 1948 published Representative Modern Masters, no. 3, p. 5
REFERENCES:
W-2
Cooper dates the painting 1914 (The Cubist Epoch, no. 33,
p. 278), which is earlier than the frequently cited 1915-16;
the latter is certainly less likely since Braque was severely
wounded in 1915 and did not resume painting until 1917.
Since the artist had introduced a pointillist technique into
his general style by 1913-14, the earlier date is further
substantiated.
76
34- ALEXANDER CALDER
Mobile. 1949
PROVENANCE:
the artist
EXHIBITIONS:
Born in Philadelphia. 1919 graduated as mechanical engineer Cranbrook, 1951, no. 87 '
from Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New D.LA., 1957-58, no. 24, p. 39. Did not travel
Jersey. 1922 began studies at Art Students' League, New
York. 1926 travelled to Paris; created circus figures, ani- REFERENCES:
mated toys and wire sculpture. 1927 first one-man exhibi- Saarinen, Art News, 1957, p. 33, ilL p. 32
tion Weyhe Gallery, New York; began to divide his time Baro, Art in America, t^96-j, ill. p. 72
between United States and France. 1930 after visit to
78
•
Carlo Carra 1881-1966
80
35- CARLO CARRA
The Night of January zo, 191;, I Dreamed This Picture
PROVENANCE:
The New Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, i960
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-39
81
36. ROBERT DELAUNAY
aire coined term Orpbisme to describe Delaunay's personal University of Michigan, 1955, no. 12, p. 10
idiom emphasizing color, light and motion. 1911 "construc- D.I.A., 1957-5S, no. 29. p. 45, ill. p. 47
tive" period, characterized by works organized through D.LA., I972.-73
colored planes and their "simultaneous contrasts"; series of
REFERENCES:
paintings of chromatically dissected circular forms, among
best known works. Continued emphasis on color, light and Taylor, Collections, 1963, p. 303
motion in figurative works of 20's and abstract paintings of Baro, Art in America, 1967, p. 72
30's.
W-150
82
37. THEO VAN DOESBURG
•
Still Life. 1916
PROVENANCE:
Theo van Doesburg 1883-1931 Nelly van Doesburg, Meudon
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Born C.E.M. Kiipper in Utrecht. 1899 began painting. 1908 Winston Collection, 1949
first shown at The Hague. 1917 founded De Stijl periodical
EXHIBITIONS:
whose contributors, Mondrian, Oud, Wils, Bart van der
Leek, Vantongerloo, formed the De Stijl movement which
Art of this Century, New York, April 29-May 31, 1947,
REFERENCES:
W-74
38. MAX ERNST
Sitting Buddha (Sitzender Buddha). 1920
S6
'
!'>iiA>i4f^ i-.-.'/v »».'Vi->-, 'w *** t'*it'/f*
39- MAX ERNST
Composition. 1924-Z6
PROVENANCE:
Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1955
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-138
88
40. MAX ERNST
Come into the Continents. 192.6
PROVENANCE:
Galerie Rive Gauche, Paris
Winston Collection, 1951
EXHIBITIONS:
p.12
G-177
89
41. PAUL FEELEY
Katadoro. 1963
PROVENANCE:
Paul Feeley 1910-1966 the artist
Betty Parsons Gallery, New York
Born in Des Moines, Iowa. 19ZZ began studying painting, Winston Collection, 19S4
Palo Alto, California. 1931 moved to New York; studied at
EXHIBITIONS:
Art Students' League; joined Mural Painters Society of
New York. Supported himself by decorating restaurants,
Betty Parsons Gallery, New York, May 13-31, 1963,
Paul Feeley
hotels and nightclubs. 1935 teacher at Cooper Union Art
School. 1939-43 teacher at Bennington College in Vermont.
Betty Parsons Gallery, New York, October 27-November 21,
90
42. OTTO FREUNDLICH
The Unity of Life and Death (L'Unite de la vie et de la
mort). 1936-38
Born in Stolp, Pomerania, Germany. 1903 studied art history, mence / mars 1936 / termine Sept 38"
Nazis. Persecution by Nazis; died in concentration camp. University of Michigan, 1955, no. 20, p. 11
D.LA., 1957-58, no. 41, p. 48, ill. p. 49
D.I.A., 1972-73
REFERENCES:
W-158
91
Alberto Giacometti 1901-1966
94
43. ALBERTO GIACOMETTI
Paris"
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Galerie Maeght, Paris
Maurice Lafaille, Paris
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
P-393
W-84
95
44. ALBERT GLEIZES
PROVENANCE:
Albert Gleizes 1881-1953 Theodore Schempp, Paris
Earl L. Stendahl, Hollywood, California
Born in Paris. Served as apprentice in his father's textile Winston Collection, 1950
design studio. 1902 exhibited pointilhst paintings at Societe
EXHIBITIONS:
Nationals des Beaux Arts. 1906-08 became involved with
Utopian SociaHsm and founded a free university and com- Societe Normande de Peinture Moderne, Rouen, opened
arrived at own Cubist idiom. 191Z collaborated with Met- Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, October 6-November
zinger on treatise Dit Ctibisme. 1915, 1917-18 visited New 7, 1912, Moderne Kunst Kring, no. 113
York. Paintings of 1910's reveal his search for metaphysical Cranbrook, 195 1, no. 8
REFERENCES:
W-174
96
45. JULIO GONZALEZ
Woman with Broom (La Femine an balai). 1929-30
Unique piece
structivist group Cercle et Carre. 1937 Montserrat exhibited Gonzalez, no. 37, ill. Travelled to Palais des Beaux Arts,
at Spanish Pavillion of World's Fair, Paris. 1940 gave up Brussels, May 20-June 19, 1955; Kunsthalle, Bern, July 2-
welding because of war; concentrated on drawing and August 7, 1955; Musee des Beaux Arts, La Chaux de Fonds,
molding in plaster. Switzerland (in Bern catalogue ill. fig. 37; not in catalogue
listing)
REFERENCES:
W-118
98
46. JULIO GONZALEZ
The Kiss (Le Baiser). 1930
Unique piece
PROVENANCE:
the artist, Paris
Mario Tozzi, Paris, c. 1930-34
Winston Collection, 1958
EXHIBITIONS:
fig- 51)
REFERENCES:
W-117
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
Juan Gris 1887-1927 Jeanne Bucher, Paris
Julius Loeb, New York
Born in Madrid. 1902 School of Arts and Industry, Madrid. New York, 1947
Parke-Bernet Galleries,
1904 left Moreno Car-
school to study with Jose Maria Kleeman New York, 1947
Galleries,
bonero; did Art Nouveau book illustration. 1906 moved to Buchholz Gallery, New York
"Bateau Lavoir" in Paris near Picasso. Met Apollinaire, Max Winston Collection, 1950
Jacob, Andre Salmon. By 1911 painting in Analytic Cubist
EXHIBITrONS:
style. 1911 exhibited with Cubists at the Section d'Or. 191Z-
23 sets for Diaghilev ballets. 1923 first one-man exhibition Buchholz Gallery, New York, January i6-February 11, 1950,
Galerie Simon, Paris. 1924 delivered lecture on Cubism at jiian Gris, no. 42
the Sorbonne, On the Possibilities of Painting. Buchholz Gallery, New York, September 26- October 4,
REFERENCE;
G-175
1
W-65
103
49. AUGUSTE HEREIN
PROVENANCE:
Auguste Herbin 1882-1960 Leonce Rosenberg, Paris
Galerie Rive Gauche, Paris
Born in Quievy, France. 1898-1901 Ecole des Beaux Arts, Winston Collection, 1952
Lille. 1901 moved to Paris. 1905 exhibited Impressionist
EXHIBITIONS:
paintings at Salon des Independents. 1909 moved to "Bateau
University of Michigan, 1955, no. z6, p. 11, ill.
Lavoir" near Picasso, Braque and Gris. By 1913 was painting
D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 51, p. 56, ill. p. 54
in Cubist style. By 1918 had rejected the object and was
D.I.A., 197^-73
painting abstractions based on his personal pictorial lan-
guage of color and form. 193 1 co-founder with Vantongerloo REFERENCE:
of Abstraction-Creation group. 1940's invented his "plastic
Baro, Tbe Collector in America, 1971, ill. p. 18
alphabet." 1949 published his theories of color and form
L'art non-figuratif r^on-objectif; founded Salon des Realites W-161
Noiwelles where he exhibited until his death.
104
50. VASILY KANDINSKY
PROVENANCE:
Vasily Kandinsky 1866-1944 Nierendorf Gallery, New York
Wmston Collection, r944
De Profundis. 1932
PROVENANCE:
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1948
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCE:
Kandinsky, Vasily, Aits der Tiefe, Paris, 1932, sketch no. 473.
Unpublished notebook
W-59
106
^
m
5a
Paul Klee 1879-1940
108
52. PAUL KLEE EXHIBITIONS:
D.I.A., 1971-73
u.r. "Klee"
W-135
PROVENANCE:
Karl Nierendorf, New York
Winston Collection, 1944
109
53- PAUL KLEE
PROVENANCE:
the artist
JurgSpiller, Basel
Little Gallery, Birmingham, Michigan, c. 1955
Winston Collection, i960
EXHIBITION:
G-131
Crr
*<ftr.
'I V
5-
-SA'T (-
-1—y- tfe^
.;>,^ / n
54- PAUL KLEE
u.l. "Klee"
PROVENANCE:
Nierendorf Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1947
EXHIBITIONS:
D.I.A., 1972-73
W-3
i -4
^.^JiJOB,-
55. GASTON LACHAISE
(a) Woman Arranging Hair. c. 1910-12
Bronze, 10 V2 x 5 x 3'X"
Bronze, 11x5x5"
Gaston Lachaise 1882-1935
base l.r. "G. Lachaise"; bottom "12"
REFERENCES:
B.C. "A Season for Sculpture," Arts, vol. 30, no. 4, January
W-123, 122
56. ROGER DE LA FRESNAYE
Study for "The 14th of July" (Etude pour "Le Quatorze
juillet"). 1913
Paris; 1904 and 1906-08 Ecole des Beaux Arts, Paris; 1908 Winston Collection, 1951
studied with Denis and Serusier. 1910 exhibited at Salon des
Independants and Salon d'Aiitomne. 1911 growing interest EXHIBITIONS:
in Cubism; association with Puteaux Group which formed Galerie de Berri, Paris, 194S and 1949, no. 41
Section d'Or. Participated in Section d'Or exhibitions, 1911, Musee National d'Art Moderne, Paris, 1950, no. loi, p. 33
1912.. 1914 first one-man exhibition Galerie Levesque, Paris. Cranbrook, 195 1, no. Z3
1914 enlisted; 1918 discharged for ill health which continued Albion College, 1956, no. 16
until his death. 1910 abandoned Cubism for return to D.I.A., i957-5S,no. 58, p. 57
classical, realistic style. Albright- Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, September iS- October
12, 19S7, The Painters of The Section d'Or, no. 18, pp. 28, 31,
ill. p. 31
REFERENCE:
Seligmann, Germain, Roger de La Fresnaye: ti'ith a catalogue
raisonne. New York Graphic Society, Greenwich, 1969,
no. 142, p. 158, ill. (hereafter cited as Seligmann, de La
Fresnaye, 1969)
W-57
114
k
1
January 1918
PROVENANCE:
Van der Klip, Paris
Galerie Percier, Paris t
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCE:
G-163
116
1
Stone, 17 X 5% X 6"
PROVENANCE:
Henri Laurens 1881-1954 Leonce Rosenberg, Paris
Yves le Delion, Paris, 195
Born in Paris. Self-taught. Early influence of Rodin. 1904-10 Jacques Ullman, Paris, 1951
studio in "Bateau Lavoir." 191 1 formed life-long friendship Galerie Rive Gauche, Paris
with Braque. 1913 exhibited at Salon des Independants. Winston Collection, 1954
1915 began Cubist still-life constructions influenced by
EXHIBITIONS:
Picasso. 1915-18 papiers colles. 1918 began direct carving in
stone and plaster modeling. Utilized technique of faceting University of Michigan, 1955, no. 32, p. 12, ill.
W-137
118
5
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
Fernand Leger 1 881-195 Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, Paris
Alphonse Kann, Paris
Born in Argentan, France. 1897-99 studied architecture in Mary Gallery, New York
Caen. 1900 arrived in Paris. 1903 Ecole des Arts Decoratifs, Earl L. Stendahl, Hollywood, California, c. 1945
Academic Julian. 1910-11 participated in formation of Winston Collection, 1950
Section d'Or group. 1912 first one-man exhibition
EXHIBITIONS:
Kahnweiler Gallery. 1912-14 reduction of form to cubic
volumes and primary colors. World War I increased his
Cranbrook, 1951, no. 16, ill.
awareness of machines; 1917 began Mechanical Period. 1910 The Art Institute of Chicago, April 12-May 17, 1953,
became flatter with undulating rhythms. 1940-45 in the The Museum of Modern Art, New York, October 20,
United States where he taught at Yale University and Mills 1953- January 19543,
REFERENCES:
p. 16
Vassar Alumnae Magazine, 1958, ill. p. iz
Delevay, Robert L., Leger, Skira, Paris, 1962, p. 48, ill. p. 46
Parker, Clifford S. and Paul L. Grigaut, Initiation ci la cul-
W-7S
6o. FERNAND LEGER
Still Life. 1921
PROVENANCE:
Curt Valentin Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 195Z
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCE:
Baro, Art in America, t-96j, ill. p. 74
G-162.
61. EL LISSITZKY
PROVENANCE:
REFERENCES;
W-81
124
MORRIS LOUIS
Quo Niimine Lasso. 1959
PROVENANCE:
Morris Louis 1912-196Z Galerie Lawrence, Paris
Winston Collection, 1964
/
Born Morris Bernstein in Baltimore. 1929-33 studied at
EXHIBITIONS:
Maryland Institute, Baltimore. Lived in Baltimore until
1949. 1951-56 taught at Workshop Center for the Arts, Institute of Contemporary Arts, London, Spring i960,
Washington, D.C. Style influenced by Helen Frankenthaler's Morris Louis
"stain" painting, Moitntains and Sea, 1952.. "Veil" paintings Galerie Neufville, Paris, March 17-April 12, 1961, Morris
REFERENCE:
W-221
The title for this veil painting was chosen by Clement Green-
berg, taken from the first book of Virgil's Aeneid — "What
."
Diety Offended . .
126
63. MORRIS LOUIS
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Galerie Lawrence, Paris, 196Z
Winston Collection, 1964
EXHIBITION:
W-222
r28
64. STANTON MACDONALD-WRIGHT
Conception Synchromy; Cotiception; Arm Organization
1916-17?
First Synchromist exhibition Neiie Kiinst Salon, Munich, formerly in the Earl L. Stendahl Collection, Hollywood,
1913. 1916-18 lived in New York, e.xhibited at Steiglitz' zi)!. California)
1919 produced first full-length stop motion color film. D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 64, p. 60, ill. p. 61
Developed color process for movies. 1920 interest in Oriental D.I. A., 19S2, American Drawings and Watercolors, no. 178,
philosophies; 19Z4 returned to representation under p. II
influence of Chinese painting. Active as teacher and writer. The Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., April 26-
From 1954 both non-objective and figurative work. Repeated June 2, 1963, The Neiu Tradition — Modern Americans
visits to Orient. Lived in California and Tokyo. before 1940, no. 67, p. 62, ill. p. 25
D.I.A., 1972-73
REFERENCES:
W-94
130
Although this painting has often been dated c. 1914, the
1916-17 date attributed to it by William Agee seems more
probable. (Agee, Knoedler catalogue, 1965, p. 51) It is a
smaller version of the very similar 1916 painting formerly
in the collection of Earl L. Stendahl, Hollywood, California,
(current whereabouts unknown); that fact alone increases
the likelihood of the accuracy of the later date.
131
65. ANDRE MASSON
Nude under Fig Tree. 1944
PROVENANCE:
Andre Masson b. 1896 Buchholz Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1946
Born in Balagny, France. Studied art at Academie Royale
EXHIBITIONS:
des Beaux Arts, Brussels; 191Z at Ecole des Beaux Arts,
Paris under Baudouin. 1917 wounded in World War I
D.I.A., 1947, A Loan Exhibition of French Fainting,
turned to figurative Surrealism influenced by Picasso. D.I. A., 1962, French Drawings and Watercolors
Indiana University, 1971, Reflection, no. 98, pp. 18, 65,
1941-45 to United States; this period marked by automatist, ill.
G-165
13Z
Henri Matisse 1869-1954
134
66. HENRI MATISSE EXHIBITIONS:
135
67. JEAN METZINGER
Still Life ivith Pears. 1912-1917
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Jean Metzinger 1883-1956
Leonce Rosenberg, Paris
Galerie La Gentilhommiere, Paris
Born in Nantes. 1898 began to paint; settled in Paris;
Winston Collection, 1953
attended many academies but was dissatisfied with all of
them. 1903-08 work influenced first by Neo-Impressionists, EXHIBITIONS:
then Fauves. 1909 exhibited at Salon des hidependants and University of Michigan, 1955, no. 43, ill. p. 14
with the Section d'Or. 1911 published Dtt Citbisme with D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 6<), p. 60, ill. p. 63
Albert Gleizes, first theoretical work on the movement.
Continued to work in the Cubist idiom until his death. W-151
136
68. JOAN MIRO
Personage; The Brothers Fratellini. 1927
PROVENANCE:
Joan Miro b. 1893 the artist, Paris
Pierre Loeb, Paris
Born in Barcelona. 1907-15 intermittent attendance at var- Pierre Chadourne, Paris '
ious art schools. 1918 firstone-man exhibition, Barcelona. Theodore Schemmp & Co., New York
1920 moved summered at parents' farm in Montroig,
to Paris, Winston Collection, 1952
Spain. 1920 first participation in Dada activities. Joined Sur-
EXHIBITIONS:
realist group 1924. 1925 major one-man exhibition Galerie
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 45, p. 14
Pierre, Paris. Use of imaginary and dream imagery encour-
aged by friendship with Arp and Masson and acquaintance D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 73, p. 64, ill. opposite title page
with Klee's work. Around 1940 more rhythmically patterned The Museum of Modern Art, New York, March i8-May 10,
compositions appeared; 1950's and 6o's a gestural idiom of 1959, Joan Miro, p. 51, ill. Did not travel
D.I.A., 197^-73
expressive calligraphy developed; 1950's more concentrated
work in ceramics and sculpture. Resides in Palma de Mal-
REFERENCES:
lorca.
Saarinen, Art Neivs, 1957, ill. on cover and p. 5
W-80
138
7
/
^
69. PIET MONDRIAN
Composition in Black and White with Blue Square. 1935
PROVENANCE:
Piet Mondrian 1872-1944 the artist
George L. K. Morris, Paris, 1936
Born in Amersfoort, The Netherlands. 1892-97 studied at The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York, 1947
Amsterdam Academy of Fine Arts. 1911 saw Cubist works Winston Collection, July 1947
by Braque and Picasso. 1912 moved to Paris. By 19 13 style
EXHIBITIONS:
had developed beyond Cubism to a more radical abstraction.
Detained in The Netherlands during World War I. 1917
Museum of Living Art, New York University, 1937, Piet
REFERENCES:
Akane, Kazuo, Piet Mondrian — Life and Art, 1971, no. 78,
ill. (in Japanese)
W-71
140
70. HENRY MOORE
Abstract Sculpture. 1937
Unique piece
W-54
142
71. KENNETH NOLAND
Baba Yagga. 1964.
Acrylic resin on unsized canvas, 64 x 66Vi"
On reverse, vertically "Baba Yagga/1564/Kenneth Noland"
PROVENANCE:
Kenneth Noland b. 1924 the artist
Andre Emmerich Gallery, New York
Born in Ashville, North Carolina. 1946-48 studied with Ilya Winston Collection, 1964
Bolotowsky at Black Mountain College. 1948-49 studied
EXHIBITION:
vi'ith Zadkine in Paris. Taught at Institute of Contemporary
Art,Washington, D.C. and Catholic University. 1953 went to
Andre Emmerich Gallery, New York, November 10-28,
1964, Kenenth Noland
Helen Frankenthaler's studio with Morris Louis where he
was introduced to the "stain" technique. 1957-58 first one- W-223
man show at Tibor de Nagy Gallery, New York. Stylistic
144
72. EDUARDO PAOLOZZI
Head. 1957
Bronze, 381/2x161/2"
Unique piece
cast-off objects assembled within a human framework. 1950 Betty Parsons Gallery, New York, March 14-April 1, i960,
began work in graphics. 1950-54 worked on several architec- Paolozzi, no. 4
tural projects. 1955-58 taught at St. Martin's School of Art,
REFERENCES:
London. Work after 1961 composed of simply structured
monumental components, assembled with technological Alloway, Lawrence, "London Chronicle," Art hiternational,
precision. vol. II, no. 9-10, 1958-59, ill. p. 58
Taylor, Collections, 1963, p. 303
Read, Modern Sculpture, 1964, no. 269, p. 234
Kuh, Katherine, Break-Up: The Core of Modern Art, New
York Graphic Society, Greenwich, 1965, no. 90, p. 136,
ill. p. 128
Kirkpatrick, Diane, Eduardo Paolozzi, New York Graphic
Society, Greenwich, 1971, no. 25, p. 136, ill. p. 36
W- 44
146
'
"TSl
r
PROVENANCE:
Antoine Pevsner 1886-1962 Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1952
Born in Orel, Russia. Attended School of Fine Arts, Kiev;
EXHIBITIONS:
Academy of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg. 1912, I9i3-r4 in Paris.
1915-16 in Oslo with younger brother Naum Gabo. 1917 Rose Fried Gallery, New York, Januar)- i6-February 23,
returned to Russia and taught at Moscow Academy of Fine 1952, Coincidences, no. 16
D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 77, p. 64
Arts with Kandinsky and Malevich. 1920 wrote Realist
D.I.A., 197^-73
Manifesto with Gabo expressing a revolutionary esthetic for
sculpture as space and void, incorporating the dimension of REFERENCE:
time. 1923 moved to Paris. 1930 became French citizen. 193
Peissi, Pierre and Carola Giedion-Welcker, Antoine Pevsner,
joined Abstraction-Creation; 1946 co-founder of group
Griffon, Neuchatel, Switzerland, 1961, no. 29, p. 148, ill.
Realites Noiivelles. 1948 large retrospective at The Museum
ofModern Art, New York with Gabo. 1957 retrospective at W-148
Musee National d'Art Moderne, Paris.
148
74- ANTOINE PEVSNER EXHIBITIONS:
W-147
150
75. ANTOINE PEVSNER REFERENCES:
Brass and oxidized tin, zo% x 18" (Reprinted in English as "Pevsner or Constructivism,"
Aspects of Modern Art: The Selective Eye III, Paris and New
l.r. "AP 44"
York, 1957, ill. pp. 156-57)
D.I. A.,
Francoeur, Chicago Mid-West Art, 1967, ill. p. 7
1972-73
W-58
151
76. FRANCIS PICABIA
l.r. "Picabia"
PROVENANCE:
Francis Picabia 1879-1953 Gabrielle Buffet-Picabia, Paris
Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Born in Paris of Spanish father and French mother. 1895 Winston Collection, 1951
entered Ecole des Arts Decoratifs, Paris. Painted in Im-
EXHIBITIONS:
pressionist style. 1909 began to work in manners related to
Fauvism, Cubism, and Abstract art. 1911 met Marcel Du-
Galerie Rene Drouin, Paris, March 4-Z6, 1949, 41)1, ;o ans
de plaisir, no. 7
champ and joined the Puteaux group which became Section
d'Or. 1913 came to United States for the Armory Show. One- Rose Fried Gallery, New York, opened February 15, 1950,
Picabia, no. i
man exhibition at 291, New York, 1913. 1915 beginning of
machinist or mecanomorphic period in which he made Rose Fried Gallery, New York, December 7, 1953-January
REFERENCES:
W-146
152
77- FRANCIS PICABIA yS. FRANCIS PICABIA
Mechanical Expression Seen ihrough Our Own Mechanical Portrait of Marie Laiirencin, Four in Hand, c. 1917
l.r. "Picabia 1913"; u.c. "Mechanical Expression Seen / FOUR IN hand"; I.e. "a l'ombre d'un boche"; r.c. "le fidele
Through Our Own/ Mechanical/ Expression"; c. "New coco"; l.r. "iL n'est pas donne a tout le monde/d'aller
York"; I.e. "NPIERKOWSKA" a barcelone"; "a mi-voix"
provenance: PROVENANCE:
Tristan Tzara, Paris Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1954 Winston Collection, 1952
EXHIBITIONS: EXHIBITIONS:
Modern Gallery, New York, January 5-25, 1916, Picabia, Galerie Colette Allendy, Paris, October i8-November 16,
no. 15 1946, Picabia, no. 17
D.I.A., 1957-58, p. 80. Did not travel Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, February 11-
D.I. A., 1962, Trench Drawings and Watercolors
REFERENCES:
ThKov&h Our
'
0,^k,
Camfield, Art Bulletin, 1966)
Laroiisse, 1969, no. 1147, p. 367 I
W-35
154
March ii, 1951, and The Bahimore Museum of Art, March REFERENCES:
2i-April zi, 1951, Pictures for a Picture: of Gertrude Stein Baur, John I. H., "The Machine and the Subconscious: Dada
as a Collector and Writer on Art and Artists, no. 23, p. 33
in America," Magazine of Art, vol. 44, no. 6, October 1951,
Rose Fried Gallery, New York, May- June 195 1, Some Areas
P-2.35
of Search Art d'Aiijoitrd'hiii, serie 4, no. 3-4, May-June 1953, p. 61
Rose Fried Gallery, New York, January i6-February 23, Buffet-Picabia, Gabrielle, Aires abstraites, 1957, p. 37
1952, Coincidences Saarinen, Art News, 1957, fig. 4, ill. p. 34
Rose Fried Gallery, New York, December 7, 1953-January "The Winston Collection on Tour," Arts, 1958, ill. on cover
8, 1954, Dtichanip and Picabia Johnson, Una E., zoth Century Dratvings, Part I: 1900-1940,
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 5 1, p. 14 Shorewood, New York, 1964, ill. p. 78
D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 81, p. 67, ill. p. 68 Sanouillet, Michel, Picabia, I'oeil du temps, Paris, 1964,
Vassar College, 1961, Centennial Loan Exhibition, no. 114 102
p.
D.I.A., 1962, French Draivings and Watercolors Camfield, Art Bulletin, 1966, pp. 317-18, ill. no. 19
Guggenheim, 1963-64, 10th Century Master Draivings, LeBot, 1968, pp. 127-28, ill. no. 41
no. 98 Larousse, 1969, no. 1078, p. 345
Museum of Modern Art, 1968-69, The Machine, ill. p. 88
Pearlstein, Philip, "Hello and Goodbye, Francis Picabia," Art
Guggenheim, 1970-71, Picabia, no. 56, p. loi Neivs, vol. 6^, no. September 1970,
5, ill. p. 54
D.I.A., 1972-73
Seuphor, L'Art abstrait, i97i,no. 11, p. 211, ill. p. 21
W-43
/^
155
79. FRANCIS PICABIA
PROVENANCE:
Tristan Tzara, Paris
Winston Collection, 1954
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
G-171 J
156
F^EVEIL t^hXlfl
8o. PABLO PICASSO
PROVENANCE:
Pablo Picasso 1881-1973 Buchholz Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1947
Born in Malaga, Spain. 1891 studied at Da Guarda School of
EXHIBITIONS:
Arts and Industries where father taught. 1S95 to Barcelona,
Cranbrook, 1951, no. 71
entered art school there. 1900 first trip to Paris. 1904 settled
Albion College, 1956, no. 24
in Paris, studio in "Bateau Lavoir." 1901-04 Blue Period;
D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 82, p. 70, ill. p. 6^
1904-0S Rose Period. Association with Steins at this time.
D.I. A., 1962, Picasso
1907 influence of African and Iberian art. 1908 association
with Braque; with him evolved Analytic, Synthetic Cubism
Marlborough-Gerson Gallery, New York, November-
and collage. 1920's neo-classic period. 1925 through 30's
December, 1963, Artist and Maecenas: A Tribute to Curt
Valentin, no. 176, p. 94, ill.
marginal Surrealism. 1919-30 produced many sculptures.
Late 30's monochromatic and diagrammatic style of
Fort Worth Art Center Museum and Dallas Museum of Fine
Arts, February 8-March 26, 1967, Picasso Retrospective
Guernica. Spent War years in Paris; refused to return to
Exhibitions, no. 168, p. 102
Spain during Franco regime. Intense activity in ceramics and
Indiana University, 1971, Reflection, no. iii, pp. 70,
lithography after War. 1948 moved to south of France. Late 8, ill.
p. 8
4o's-5o's paintings more loosely constructed. 1963 opening
D.LA., I972--73
of Picasso Museum, Barcelona. Series of erotic works 1969-
70. 1971 major e.xhibition at Museum of Modern Art, New G-157
York, on 90th birthday.
158
8i. PABLO PICASSO
l.r. "Picasso"
PROVENANCE:
Daniel-Henry Kahnvveiler, Paris
Jean Lur^at, Paris, 192.1
EXHIBITIONS:
D.I.A., 1972-73
REFERENCE:
W-96
159
82. PABLO PICASSO
PROVENANCE:
the artist, Paris /
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-97
160
83. PABLO PICASSO
PROVENANCE:
the artist, Paris
Ronald Emanuel, London, 1938
London and New York
Charles Fry,
B. T. Batsford, Ltd., New York
Winston Collection, 1948
EXHIBITIONS:
G-189
162
PABLO PICASSO EXHIBITIONS:
l.i. "Picasso"; on stretcher "25 mi 41" Fort Worth Art Center Museum and Dallas Museum of
Fine Arts, February 8-March 26, 1967, Picasso Retrospective
PROVENANCE: Exhibitions, no. 64, p. 96
the artist, Paris D.I.A., 1972-73
W-98
163
Jackson Pollock 191Z-1956
mobile accident.
164
85. JACKSON POLLOCK
Moon Vessel. 1945
PROVENANCE:
the artist, New York
Peggy Guggenheim, New York
Winston Collection, 1946
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
p. 97
Miesel, The Connoisseur, 1968, fig. 5, ill. p. 262
Baro, The Collector in America, 1971, ill. p. 183
W-124
165
86. MEDARDO ROSSO
The Flesh of Others (Came altrui; Chair a plaisir;
W-219
166
^: 1
87- MEDARDO ROSSO
Man in the Hospital (Malade a I'hopital; Malato all'
Bronze, 9x8x11"
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
the artist ;
Etha Fles
Agatha Verkroost, Amsterdam
Winston Collection, 1963 (through Alexandrine
Osterkamp, Amsterdam)
REFERENCES:
W-216
bronze in Paris.
168
MEDARDO ROSSO
Jewish Boy (Enfant jiiif; Bimbo ebreoj. 1892
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Etha Fles
Agatha Verkroost, Amsterdam
Winston Collection, 1963 (through Alexandrine
Osterkamp, Amsterdam)
REFERENCES:
W-218
170
MEDARDO ROSSO
Sick Boy (Enfant malade; Bimbo malato; Bimbo
morente). 1S513
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Etha Fles
Agatha Verkroost, Amsterdam
Winston Collection, 1963 (through Alexandrine
Osterkamp, Amsterdam)
REFERENCES:
Barr, "Rosso and Etha Fles," 1962, ill. p. 241
Barr, Rosso, 1963, pp. 38, 40, ill. p. 78
Barr, "Rosso and Friend," 1964, ill. p. 78
W-217
171
90. MEDARDO ROSSO
Ecce Flier; Behold the Boy. 1906-07
PROVENANCE:
Anita Gemito, Rome
Peridot Gallery, New York, June 1959
Winston Collection, December 1959
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-so
This piece, Man in the Hospital and Jewish Boy were among
Rosso's favorite works. In these he believed he had suc-
ceeded in transmitting "the emotion, the unification of light,
lyz
31. MORGAN RUSSELL
PROVENANCE:
Morgan Russell 1886-1953 Rose Fried Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1953
Born in New York. Studied at Art Students' League, New EXHIBITIONS:
i
tions 1913 Munich and Paris; included in Armory Show, 1952, Coincidences, no. 18
New York. After 1920 returned to figurative work. Died m Rose Fried Gallery, New York, October 26-November 30,
REFERENCES:
W-126
174
William Agee dates the painting 1913 and titles it
175
Luigi Russolo 1 885-1947
176
LUIGI RUSSOLO REFERENCES:
Russolo, Maria Zanovello, Russolo, I'uomo, I'artista,
Nietzsche; Nietzsche mid Madness (Nietzsche e la pazzia).
Corticelli, Milan, 1958, p. 24
c. 1909 Archivi del divisionismo, vol. 2, no. 2726, p. 221,
no. 133
177
93- LUIGI RUSSOLO
PROVENANCE;
Benedetta Marinetti, Rome
Winston Collection, 1956
EXHIBITIONS:
146, ill. p. Z7
D.I.A., 197Z-73
REFERENCES:
W-12
178
?t^/
'"rr^
Kurt Schwitters 1887-1948
180
94. KURT SCHWITTF.RS EXHIBITIONS:
l.r. "Kurt Schwitters, zi" Albion College, 1956, no. 25, ill. on cover
D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 93a, p. 73
181
95- KURT SCHWITTERS EXHIBITIONS:
I.e. "KS/46"; 1.1. "Kurt Schwitters 1946 Mz F 15' D.I.A., 1957-58, no. 93c, p. 73, ill. p. 72
Museum of Modern Art, 1561-62, The Art of Assemblage,
l.r. "C 46/s y cut"
no. 223, p. 164
PROVENANCE: W-46
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1948
^"^^
^(^%l
6 .
y ^^
96. KURT SCHWITTERS EXHIBITIONS:
Collage and watercolor on paper, y'/ir, x 5%" D.I. A., 1957-5S, no. 93b, p. 73
PROVENANCE:
Katherine S. Dreier, "West Redding, Connecticut
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1948
183
97- KURT SCHWITTERS
Ent Garett, Merz. 1947
PROVENANCE:
the artist
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1948
EXHIBITION:
W-63
184
KURT SCHWITTERS
Examiner z86i Merz. 1947
PROVENANCE:
the artist
The Pinacotheca Gallery, New York
Winston Collection, 1948
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCE:
W-So
t-.i.-
i «• R„!BBL
JCf
,k.;.'- t i.M-'
185
Gino Severini 1883-1966
186
99- GINO SEVERINI
PROVENANCE:
the artist
AJfinston Collection, 1955
EXHIBITIONS:
D.I.A., i97i-73
REFERENCES:
W-4
187
loo. GINO SEVERINI
PROVENANCE:
the artist
Winston Collection, 1952
EXHIBITIONS:
REFEREN'CES:
W-6
V.'i/'
loi. GINO SEVERINI REFERENCES:
l.r. "G. Severini" 11)00-1^40, Shorewood, New York, 1964, pi. 40, p. 72
Seuphor, Abstract Painting, 1962, no. 22, p. 315, ill. p. 29
PROVENANCE: Francoeur, Chicago Mid-West Art, 1967, ill. p. 7
the artist
Martin, 1968, note i, p. 145, pi. 102
. ~-jfi"
189
loz. GINO SEVERINI During the winter and spring of 1913, while recuperating
from a severe illness at Anzio, Severini worked on a
Sea = Dancer; Dancer beside the Sea (Mare = Danzatrice). number of pictures which he called "plastic analogies."
Bords de la Mer/a Monsieur at Madame Harry Winston movements and scintillating contrasts of silver and emerald,
the artist Sea = Dancer was the first Futurist work to enter the
EXHIBITIONS:
ill. p. 73
D.I. A., 1972-73
REFERENCES:
W-5
150
I03. GINO SEVERINI
provenance:
Galerie Berggruen, Paris
Winston Collection, 1956
EXHIBITIONS:
G-164
New York. But Piero Pacini and Joan M. Lukach agree that
it is preparatory for another unexecuted work in the
same group.
192.
I04. GINO SEVERINI Severini executed a number of fastidiously organized
collages with corrugated cardboard such as this one. These
Still Life with Cherries. have posed considerable problems in dating and are
Collage on paper, ig'/i x 261/2" usually assigned to the years of 1912 or 1913 on the basis of
dated references within the work. The Lacerba page of
l.r. "G. Severini"
March 15, 1913 with Papini's provocative heading
Museum Modern The Art stay in Italy and in close touch with Braque, Picasso and
of Art, of Assemblage, no. 117,
Gris, Severini gradually turned to Cubism. In 1916 Leonce
p. 164, ill. p. Z9
Rosenberg became his dealer and no doubt favored and
Indiana University, 1971, Reflection, no. 130, pp. 2.0, 79,
encouraged the dominantly Cubist control which is found
ill. p. 19
in this collage.
D.I. A., 1972-73
G-8
193
I05. MARIO SIRONI
Composition (Composizione). c. 1913
PROVENANCE:
Mario Sironi 1885-1961 II Milione, Galleria d'Arte Moderna, Milan
Winston Collection, 1954
Born in Tempio Pausania, Sardinia. To Rome to study
EXHIBITIONS:
mathematics at University, met Severini and Boccioni with
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 67, p. 16
whom he visited Balla's studio; decided to become an
D.I. A., 1957-58, no. loi, p. 76, ill. p. 77
artist. 1914 first exhibited in Futurist-sponsored show in
W-z8
194
1
l.r. "Sironi"
PROVENANCE:
II Milione, Galleria D'Arte Moderna, Milan
Winston Collection, 195
EXHIBITION:
REFERENCE:
Archil'! del juturismo, vol. 1, no. 69, p. 391, ill. p. 388
W-3Z
155
107- FRANK STELLA
Sketch Red Lead. 1964
Oil on canvas, 55 x 40", shaped canvas
PROVENANCE:
Frank Stella b. 1936 the artist
Galerie Lawrence, Paris, 1964
Born Maiden, Massachusetts. 1950-54 at Phillips
in Winston Collection, 1964
Academy, Andover, Massachusetts with Hollis Frampton
W-Z27
and Carl Andre; 1954-58 at Princeton, studied there in
William Seitz's open painting studio and with Stephen
Greene. Early works influenced by Abstract Expressionism
and Jasper Johns. Personal style began to emerge with
Black Series, 1958. i960 included in 16 Americans
exhibition, the Museum of Modern Art; first one-man
exhibition Castelli Gallery, New York. 1961 first trip to
Europe. 1964 included in 32nd Venice Biennale; Shaped
Canvas exhibition at Guggenheim Museum. 1965 trip to
196
1
PROVENANCE:
Yves Tanguy 1900-1955 Galerie Rive Gauche, Paris
Winston Collection, 195
Born in Paris. 1918 joined Merchant Marines and travelled EXHIBITIONS:
to South America and Africa. 1910 formed lasting
Cranbrook, 1951, no. 53
friendship with film-maker and poet Jacques Prevert. 1923
University of Michigan, 1955, no. 70, p. 16 ill.
started painting, inspired by seeing a work by de Chirico.
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, September 6-
Painted stark landscapes probably inspired by Brittany
October 30, 1955, Yves Tanguy— A Retrospective, ill. p. 15
where he vacationed as a child. By 1927 had met Andre
D.I. A., 1957-58, no. 105, p. 76, ill. p. 80
Breton and joined Surrealist group, exhibiting with them
D.I.A., 197^-73
thereafter. Early 30's after trip to Africa, forms shifted from
vegetal to mineral: "boneyard" images, chains of indeter- REFERENCES:
minate beings in infinite landscapes. 1939 upon outbreak
Read, Herbert, Surrealism, Harcourt-Brace, London, 193S,
of War, to United States. 1940 married American Surrealist,
pi. 89
Kay Sage. 1941 moved to Woodbury, Connecticut.
Canaday, John, Mainstreams of Modern Art, 1959, no. 677,
ill- P- 534
Matisse, Pierre, ed., Yves Tanguy: A Summary of his Work,
New York, 1963, no. 64, ill. p. 60
Goldwater, Space and Dream, 1967, ill. p. 77
W-73
109. MARK TOBEY
Battle of the Lights. 1956
PROVENANCE:
Mark Tobey b. 1890 the artist
Willard Gallery, New York
Born in Centerville, Wisconsin. 1906-09 attended Art Insti- Winston Collection, 1958 '
Met Janet Planner, Marcel Duchamp. 1922-Z5 Seattle. 1923 The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, March
studied Chinese brush painting. 1925-26 travelled to Europe 26- June 7, 1957, Guggenheim International Awards.
and Near East. 1927-29 lived in Seattle, Chicago, New York.
Exhibited at Musee National d'Art Moderne, Paris,
1931-38 taught in London. 1934 to Orient, studied Japanese
November 28-December 15, 1956
calligraphy in Zen monastery. 1935 developed "white writ-
Museo Nacional des Artes Plasticas, Mexico City, June 6-
ing" of mature
August 24, 1958, First hiter-American Biennale Exposition
style. 1948, chosen for 24th Venice Biennale;
Award of Painting and Graphic Arts, sponsored by the Instituto
1956 received Guggenheim International for Battle
Nacional de Bellas Artes
of the Lights; 1958 first prize 29th Venice Biennale. i960 to
Basel where he still resides. 1961 received first prize Carnegie
D.I. A., 1962, America?! Paintings and Drawings, no. 195,
p. II, ill. p. 30
International, Pittsburgh. 1968 retrospective Dallas Museum
of Fine Arts.
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, September 12-
November 4, 1962, Mark Tobey, no. 94, p. 109. Travelled to
the Art Institute of Chicago, February 22-March 24, 1963
REFERENCES:
W-49
Joaquin Torres-Garci'a 1874-1949
PROVENANCE:
Manolita P. de Torres-Garci'a, Montevideo
Winston Collection, 1956
EXHIBITIONS:
REFERENCES:
W-86
Z03
III. ANDY WARHOL
Self Portrait. 1966
Unsigned
PROVENANCE:
Andy Warhol b. 1928? the artist
Leo Castelli, New York
Born in Cleveland, Ohio. 1945-49 studied pictorial design at Winston Collection, 1967 ,
dance, as well as in graphic art. Lives and works in New York. REFERENCES:
W-104
204
Umberto Boccioni
113. Study for "Beata Solitudo." 1907 Pencil on buff wove, 5% x9%"
l.r. "U Boccioni"
Pencil on brown wove with blue-gray thread, 13V2 x 8V4"
T-Z5;W-x35
l.r. "Umberto Boccioni/907"
T-18; W-203 119. Study for "Landscape with Four Peasants at Work." 1907-08
Pencil
115. Pianist and Listener, c. 1907
1.1. "U. Boccioni"
Pen and brush with black ink, 7 x 7I4"
l.r. "Boccioni"
T-13; W-162
114 116
2.08
izi. Study of a Bull's Body. i^o-/-o8 124. Study for "Lombard Landscape: Rural Symphony." 1908
Pencil on white wove, 4V2 x 6Vs" Pencil on white wove, 6Ve. x 4V2"
I.r. "Boccioni"; I.e. "UB" I.r. "Umberto Boccioni"
T-ii;W-X4 T-113; W-X24
Pencil Pencil
Unsigned Unsigned
122. Study of a Bull's Forelegs. 1907-08 125. Study for "Lombard Landscape: Rural Symphony." 1908
Pencil Pencil
Unsigned I.r. "Boccioni"
123. Study for "Lombard Landscape: Rural Sy?npho?iy." 1908 126. Study of Trees ivith Tivo Kneeling Figures and Urn. c. 1908
Pencil on white wove, 4I4 x 6'/^"
Pencil on white wove, 4I/2 x 6%"
I.r. "Boccioni" "UB"
I.e.
T-7; W-xia T-123; W-X75
•i-r'
&:,-
119
L--
117
209
128. Seated Woman; Study for "The Story of a Seamstress." 1908
Verso: Graffiti
Pencil
Unsigned
Pencil, pen, brush with India ink and wash on white wove,
65/8x43/4"
u.r. "Quanto c'e di male nella felicita
T-38; W-X20
T-36; W-X74
134
Verso: Fragment of a Page with Arithmetical Figures, etc.
Pencil
Unsigned
Pencil, pen and black ink with blue and ochre wash on
white ruled paper, 6% x I2V^"
"Umberto Boccioni/908"
l.r.
T-39;W-x87
Pencil, pen, brush and India ink on white wove, 14I4 x 91/2"
"Umberto Boccioni/908"
u.r.
T-55;W-x8
Pencil
Unsigned
135- Kneeling Allegorical Figure; Study for a Decorative Page 138. Boccioni's Mother in Bed. 1908
Heading. 1908 x 6"
Pen and black ink on white wove, 7%
Pen, brush and black ink over pencil on tan wove with gray- "Umberto Boccioni"
l.r.
l.r. "Boccioni"
Verso; Graffiti.
T-72;W-i9i
Pen, brush and India ink
Unsigned
138 142
142.. Figure of an Old Woman, c. 1909 147. Landscape with Geese, c. 1909
Pencil on white wove, 7 x 2.%" Pencil and pen and black ink on buff laid, 5 % x ioVt'
l.r. "Boccioni" l.r. "Boccioni"
T-79;W-x38 T-iz5;W-i67
143. Woman Leaning on a Chair (Boccioni's Sister), c. 1909 148. Street ivith Houses, c. 1909
"UB"
I.e. l.r. "Boccioni"
T-68;W-xi5 T-1S9; W-X70
Pencil
Unsigned
Pencil
Unsigned
"UB"
1.1.
T-85;W-xzS
Pencil
Unsigned
153
213
157- Workman Wearing a Derby, Inverted Head of Man with 161. Seated Male Nude. c. 1909-10
Cap Lower Right, c. 1910 Pencil on white wove, 15 x 10^4 "
Pencil on white wove, 6% x 3%" u.r. "UB"; l.r. "Boccioni"
1.1. "Boccioni" T-97;W-i38
T-90; W-X49
Verso: Seated Woman with Dark Blouse
Verso: Untitled Pencil
Pencil l.r. "UB"
Unsigned
162. Harnessed Horse with Feedbag. c. 1909-10
158. Walking Man in a Rumpled Suit. c. 1910 Pencil on buff wove, 7 x 9V8"
Pencil on white wove, 6I/2 x 41/8" I.e. "UB"
l.r. "Boccioni" T-104; W-X44
T-93;W-i78
Verso: Rear and Profile of Harnessed Horse
159. Study for "Giants and Pygmies"; Dramatic Composition of Pencil
a Tree. c. 1909-10 Unsigned
Pen and brownish-black ink on white wove, 6V2 x 4%"
163. Head of a Horse with Feedbag. c. 1909-10
l.r. "Boccioni"
T-40; W-xzi Pencil on white wove, 7% x 41/2"
l.r. "Boccioni"
160. Reclining Male Nude. c. 1909-10 T-105; W-X32
Pencil on buff wove, 1 1 % x 7V2"
Verso: Bust of a Man
LI."Umberto Boccioni"
T-95;W-i39 Pencil
Unsigned
Verso: Graffiti and Study of a foreshortened Hand
Pencil
Unsigned
162
157
Z14
i64- Head of a Woman, c. i<}09-io 169. Wheel Barroiv. 1909-10
Pencil on buff wove, fi'/g x 45/8" Black, white and orange chalk on paper toned dark brown,
l.r. "Boccioni" 131/2x115/4"
Verso: Graffiti
Pencil
Unsigned
Black, white and orange chalk and black ink on paper toned
dark gray, is^gx 131/2"
l.r. "Boccioni"
T-i3z;W-iZ5
.M'
'Wl^.
166 169
ZI5
lyi. Head of a Woman, possibly related to Bookplate,
Verso Head of a
: Woman
Pencil
Unsigned
177
2.16
178. Curly Haired Child (Fianimetta). i^io
Pencil
Unsigned
Verso: Fragment
Pencil
Unsigned
180
181. Bust of a Woman with Black Hat. c. 1910
Pencil
I.r. "UB"
I.r. "Boccioni"
T-148; W-X33
T-i5i;W-zoo
I.r. "Boccioni"
T-i5i;W-X90
Pencil
Unsigned
Z17
185. Study of the City ivitli Overpass, Telephone Pole and Verso: Horses and Figures in a Landscape. 1910
Streetcar. 1908-10 Pen and India ink
Pencil on ivory wove, 7% x 51/2" l.r. "Boccioni"
l.r. "Boccioni" T-158 a; W-X103
T-108; W-X73 C
190. Man Leading a Horse. 1910
18S. The Bridge of Gamboloita. 19 10 Pencil on white wove, 41/2 x 7"
Charcoal, pen and ink on buff wove, lo^s x 9%" l.r. "Boccioni"
l.r. "Boccioni/ponte di Gamboloita visto/dalla altalinea T-159; W-X42
ferroviaria/ sufficientemente interessante/mattina 28 maggio
Verso: Man
1910/abbastanza nuovo"
T-II2; W-xSo Pencil and crayon
1.1. "UB"
187. Crowd in Front of Corner Building. 1910
191. Composition Study for "The City Rises." 1910
Crayon on white wove, 7 x 9"
"U Boccioni"
l.r.
Pencil on white wove, 3 % x 6"
T-i54;W-x85 l.r. "UB"
Nos. 187-193 are preliminary sketches for The City Rises T-161; W-40A
Pen and brush with India ink on white wove, 41/2 x 6V4"
Unsigned
T-158; W-.X97
187
218
190
^- k-_
^^a^ J
191 192
193- Two Composition Sketches for "The City Rises" and
Two for a Scene of an Urban Croivd. 1910
Pencil on white wove, 5V2 x 7%"
I.r. "Boccioni"
T-163; W-X40
Pencil
Unsigned
T-i63a; W-xioi
"UB"
I.r.
T-16S; W-X98
Pencil
Unsigned 195
199
" 11 11
20I. Man Laying Pai'ing Stones: Study for "The Street Pavers. Lio. Head of Pietro Mascagni. 191Z
1911 Pencil on white stationery bearing the letterhead of the
Pen and black ink on white wove, 5% x 814" Savoy Hotel, London, 8 x loVs"
l.r. "Boccioni" 1.1. "Boccioni"; l.r. "Mascagni"
T-i8o;W-6i-58-3ioB T-203;W-i53
20Z. Portrait of a Young Man (Vico Baer?). 1911 Verso: Caricatures of Pietro Mascagni and Queen
Victoria. 19 12
Pencil and gray wash on ivory wove, 11% x 9%"
l.r. "1911" Pencil
Pencil
Unsigned
T-i84;W-323
T-186; W-X19
hand)
T-i87;W-X56
l.r. "Boccioni"
T-zo5;W-i9Z
l.r. "Boccioni"
T-Z06; W-X95 Z05. (verso)
207 209
223
214- Analytical Study of a Woman's Head against Buildings, 218. Analytical Study of Woman's Head against the Light with
Pen and brownish-black ink on white wove, 11% x 8V2" Pen and brownish ink on buff wove, 12% x 8^4 "
l.L "Boccioni" Unsigned
T-188; W-xii T-220; W-X27
215. Bust of Boccioni' s Mother. 1912 219. Head against the Light (Boccioni's Sister). 1912
Pencil on buff laid pasted on white paper, 8% x 6%" Pen and brown ink on buff wove, 5 x 4"
l.r. "Boccioni" u.r. "Boccioni"
T-Z14; W-X48 T-222; W-X68
216. Bust of Boccioni's Mother; Study for "Abstract 220. Study for the Sculpture "Fusion of a Head and a Window."
Dimensions." 1912 1912
Pencil on buff laid pasted on white paper, 8% x 6%" Pen and ink on white wove envelope, 5% x 4%"
l.r. "Boccioni" l.r. "Boccioni"
T-2i5;W-X92 T-Z24; W-X58
ZI4 2-15
224
3
Unsigned
T-208; W-163
218
223
225
2Z4. Man at a Cafe Table, Paris, c. 1913 228. Head of Boccioni's Mother. 1914-15
Pen and brownish ink on lined white stationery from the Pencil, pen and India ink, and blue-black wash on rough
Taverne de I'Hermitage, SVs x 5%" white wove, ixY^ x 91/2"
225. Male Figure in Motion (Towards the Left). 1913 229. Portrait of Silvia. j$i$
Pencil on white wove, 6 x 4V8" Pencil, gray wash, and black ink on heavy tan
T-234; W-X83 paper, 253/8x185/8"
u.r. "Boccioni"
226. Head of a Man; Study related to Collage "Dynamism of a
T-293; W-131
Man's Head." 1914
Pen and brownish-black ink on lined stationery from the 230. Portrait of Boccioni's Mother. 1915-16
Ristorante Savini, Milan, 8V2 x 5I4 " Black chalk, red, green and blue watercolor on buff
l.r. "Boccioni" wove, 25 X 2oi/4"
2.24 zi8
zz6
2.Z9 230
PRINTS
T-299; W-xiz
T-304; W-xioi L
T-3IO;W-2II
l.r."U Boccioni"
T-3l6;W-X2Z
Documents and Miscellany
DOCUMENTS AND MISCELLANY
GUILLAUME APOLLINAIRE 251. L'hnagination sans fils et les mots en liberie: Manifeste
L'Antitradition futuriste: manifeste = synthese (The Futurist futuriste (Wireless Imagination and Words in Liberty:
241.
Antitradition: manifesto = synthesis), Paris, June 29, 1913
Futurist Manifesto), Milan, May 11, 1913
Pamphlet Pamphlet
11I/2X9I/8" Ill/2X9y8"
246. Palette
295/8 X 17"
CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI
247. Two Sketches for the base of the Blond Negress, Paris,
1952 (G-757)
Pencil
8 X 31/2"
ALEXANDER CALDER
24S. Three Sketches for Mobile, 1949 (G-6z2)
Ink and pencil
103/4 X SVa" each
MARCEL DUCHAMP
249. Surrealism in 1^47. {W-130)
Book cover
loYxG X 9 X 3"
F. T. MARINETTI
250. Manifeste du futurisme (Futurist Manifesto), Le Figaro,
Paris, February 20, 1909
Pamphlet
111/4 X 18"
230
Documentation
131
DOCUMENTATION Exhibitions
Master Plan," Art Neivs, vol. 56, no. 6, October 1957, Modern Art— Paintings, Sculpture and
1957, Collecting
Edwards, Hugh, "Umberto Boccioni," The Art Institute of The Art Institute of Chicago, March 14-April 27, 1958,
Chicago Quarterly, vol. LII, no. 1, April i, 1958, pp. Z5-28. Boccioni:An Exhibition of Drawings and Prints from The
Mr. and Mrs. Harry Leivis Winston Collection. E.xhibition
Mellquist, Jerome, "La Collection Winston," XXe Siecle,
no. II, Christmas 1958, n. p. Double issue.
organized by Hugh Edwards and catalogue essay by
Marianne Martin.
Canaday, John, "True Story, Happy Ending— 100 Draw-
Grand Rapids Art Museum, Michigan, December 1959-
Their Trip from Verona to Michigan," The
ings: New 3,
York Times, Sunday, July 23, 1961, p. 10. January 2, 1960, Exhibition of Greetings From
Contemporary Artists from The Winston Collection.
Winston, Lydia Kahn, "Reflections on Art Collecting as a
Creative Process," Wayne The Art Gallery of Windsor, Willistead Park, Windsor,
State University, November
Ontario, February 8-26, i960, Graphics and Drawings from
19, 1961. On the occasion of a Special Convocation.
The Winston Collection. Exhibition organized by
Winston, Lydia Kahn Harry Lewis, "Le Futurisme,"
et
Kenneth Saltmarsh; checklist.
Aujourd'hui, no. 35, February 1962, pp. 4-13.
'^
232
York. Special New York showing at Santini Brothers J. B. Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, January 7-
Warehouse, October 24 and 26, i960. February 2, 1964, Leaders of Modern Art—Pritits Lent by
Mr. and Mrs. Harry L. Winston. E.xhibition organized by
Grand Rapids Art Museum, Michigan, March i-April 7,
Franklin Page; checklist.
1961, Graphics and Drawings from The Winston
Collection; checklist. J. B. Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, February
"
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, May 31-
4-29, 1964, Modern Prints— France (Lent by Mr. and Mrs.
The Harry L. Winston). Exhibition organized by Franklin
September 5, 19S1, Futurism. In coordination with
Page; checklist.
Detroit Institute of Arts, October i8-December 19, 1961 and
Los Angeles County Museum of Art, January 14- J. B. Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, March 3-29,
February 19, 1961. E.xhibition organized and catalogue 1964, Contemporary Prints— Low Countries (Lent by
introduction by Peter Selz. Catalogues Futurism and The Mr. and Mrs. Harry L. Winston). Exhibition organized by
Graphic Work of Umberto Boccioni by Joshua C. Taylor. Franklin Page; checklist.
Flint Institute of Arts, Flint, Michigan, June 25-August i, The Arts Council of Great Britain, London, September 19-
1961, Graphics and Draivings from The Winston Collection. October 17, 1964, Umberto Boccioni: iS8z-i^i6. An Arts
Exhibition organized by Dr. G. Stuart Hodge; checklist. Council exhibition of his graphic art from the collection of
StedelijkMuseum, Amsterdam, April 19-May 28, 1962, Mr. and Mrs. Harry Lewis Winston of Birmingham,
Umberto Boccioni —Draivings and Graphics by Umberto Michigan. Travelled to City Art Gallery, Manchester,
Boccioni from The Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Harry Leivis October 31-November 21, 19S4; City Art Gallery, Leeds,
Winston. The International Council of The Museum of November 28-December 19, 1964; Art Gallery, Aberdeen,
Modern Art, New York. Exhibition organized by William S. January 2-23, 1965. Catalogue foreword by Gabriel White
Lieberman. Catalogue introduced by Willem Sandberg. and essay by Reyner Banham.
Circulated by The .Museum of Modern Art, New York, to The Bloomfield Art Association, Birmingham, Michigan,
J. B. Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, November March 13-23, 19S6, An Exhibition of Posters Designed
2-23, 1962; University of Nevada Student Union, Reno, by 20th Century Artists from The Collection of Mr. and
January 2-23, 1963; Washington University, St. Louis, Mrs. Harry L. Winston. Exhibition organized by Arlen Linn.
Missouri, March 1-29, 1963; Miami Beach Art Center,
Wayne State University, Detroit, April iz-May 2, 1966,
Miami Beach, July 1-25, 1963; Reed College, Portland,
Posters By 20th Century Artists from The Winston
Oregon, September 2-23, 19S3; Arizona State University,
Collection.
Tempe, February i6-March 7, 1964; Western Washington
State College, Bellingham, April 1-22, 1964; San Francisco Kresge Art Center Gallery, Michigan State University,
State College, June 13-August 9, 1964. East Lansing, October 2-30, 1966, Posters by 20th
Century Artists from The Lydia and Harry Lewis Winston
'
December 30, 1962, Greetings from The Lydia and Harry of Boccioni Draivings from The Lydia and Harry Lewis
Winston Collection. Exhibition organized by Franklin Winston Collection. Exhibition organized by Ellen Sharp;
Page; checklist. checklist.
The LIniversity of Michigan Museum of Art, Alumni Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio, November 1-30,
Memorial Hall, Ann Arbor, December 11, 1963-February 1967, Greetings from The Winston Collection. Exhibition
of Art Since 194). Text written and original exhibition First National Savings Bank, Detroit, January 3-March 4,
organized by Dr. Willem Sandberg; D.I. A. exhibition 1965, Posters of the 20th Century from The Lydia and Harry
organized by Paul L. Grigaut. Lewis Winston Collection.
^33
Kresge Art Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, The Detroit Institute of Arts, February 15-March 15, 1971,
Michigan, February 4-15, 1968, Prints from The Winstoti 500 Posters from The Collection of Lydia Winston Malbin.
Collection. Statement by Lydia Winston Malbin, Bulletin, Exhibition organized by Samuel Wagstaff.
Kresge Art Center, vol. i, no. 5, February 1968. The UCLA Art Galleries, Los Angeles, September 19-
Gilmore Art Center, Kalamazoo Institute of Arts, Michigan, October 31, 1971, Posters from The Lydia and Harry Lewis
November lo-December 15, 1968, Graphics from The Winston Collection/Mrs. Bar/iett Malbin, Birmingham,
Collection of Lydia and Harry Leivis Winston (Mrs. Barnett Michigan. Exhibition organized by Frederick Wight;
Malbin). Exhibition organized by Harry Greaver. checklist.
Catalogue essay by Ellen Sharp. University Art Gallery, Frick Fine Arts Building, University
The University of Michigan Museum of Art, Alumni of Pittsburgh, December 14, 1971-January 16, 1972, The
Memorial Hall, Ann Arbor, February 16- March 16, 1969, Twentieth Century Print as Seen through The Lydia and
Graphics from The Collection of Lydia and Harry Lewis Harry L. Winston Collection (Mrs. Barnett Malbin).
Winston. Exhibition organized by Charles Sawyer; Catalogue acknowledgements by Pamela Pierrepont Bardo
checklist and announcement. and text by Robert Wang.
The Detroit Institute of Arts, May 15-June 22, 19S9, The Toledo Museum of Art, Ohio, April 2-30, 1972, A
Detroit Collects. Exhibition organized by Samuel Wagstaff. Collector's Portfolio: An Exhibition of prints and posters
Krannert Art Museum, College of Fine and Applied Arts, from The Lydia and Harry Lewis Witiston Collection
(Dr. a7id Mrs. Bar?iett Malbin). Exhibition organized by
University of Illinois, Champaign, October iz-November
The Charles Gunther. Catalogue introduction by Otto Wittman
16, 1969, Extensions of the Artist: Prints from
Collection of Lydia and Harry Leiuis Winston (Mrs. Barnett and Norman Thai, Jr.
234
The Lydia and Harry Lewis Winston Collection
VI Artists as Illustrators
VII Miscellany
VIII Antiquities
^3.^
PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS, SCULPTURE
Robert Adams Square Syiake bronze 1956
236
Georges Braque Cards and Dice o/c. c. 1914
2.37
Joseph D. Downing Untitled col. 1966
Staplage No. i col. c. 1964
Staplage No. i col. c. 1964
Staplage No. 3 col. c. 1966
Untitled wc. c. 1971
238
Asger Jorn The Suicide of Mr. H. o/c. 1961
Vasily Kandinsky
'"
Luminosity o/c. 192-7
•
De Profundis wc. 1932
Light Cubes wc. 193Z
239
Jean Metzinger
'"
Still Life with Pears o/c 1512-17
Still Life with Pipe o/c
140
Germaine Richjer Praying Mantis bronze 1947
The Six-Headed Horse gilded bronze 1953-56
Medardo Rosso " The Flesh of Others wax over plaster 1883
''
Sick Boy wax over plaster 1883
''
Man in Hospital bronze 1889
" Jewish Boy wax over plaster 1891
'''
Morgan Russell
'"
Synchromy No. 2
Z4I
1
Laurence Vail Figure No. i tin, glass and found objects n.d.
2.42.
Allan D'Arcangelo Landscape silkscreen 1968
L6 litho. 1966
M3
Alfred Manessier Abstraction litho. n.d.
244
Henri Toulouse-Lautrec Marcelle Lender Doing
the Bolero in the
Operetta "Chilperie" lirho n.d.
Montmartre Le Moulin de la
MS
Max Ernst Les Chiens ont soif etch. {2); litho. (25) 1964
Histoire Naturelle, signed collotypes after 1926
original frottages
(34)
Stuart Davis, Indiana, Kelly, Ten Works by Ten Painters seri. 1964
Lichtenstein, Motherwell,
Ortman, Poons, Reinhardt,
Stella, Warhol
246
1
M7
1
Joan Miro Tristan Tzara, Parler seul poeme, Maeght, 1948, 1950
Miro-Cartones, 1959-196^, Pierre Matisse Gallery, 1965
148
VI ARTISTS AS ILLUSTRATO RS (partial listing)
Rene Pierre Tal Coat Poets, Painters and Sculptors litho. n.d.
Pre-Columbian: group of 11 stone and ceramic pieces of Aztec and Tarascan origin
249
Photographic Credits
Detroit Institute of Arts: nos. 64, 103, 112, 114, 116, 117,
152, 157, 166, 188, 190, 193, 199, 207, 220, 2z8, 230, 232
Lew Gilcrest Studios, Birmingham: nos. 10, 13, 18, 22, 40,
48, 53, 70, 93, 99, 102, 105, 106, 168, 169, 176, 191, 192,
197, 205
Joseph Khma, Jr., Detroit: nos. i, 12, 16, 19, 31, 33, 39, 50,
51, 56, 63, 67, 72, 74, 76-80, 83, 86-89, 93, 94, 98, 100,
107, 108, III, 133, 134, 177, 214
5, 7, % II, 12.- 14, i5> 17, 2.0, 24, Z7-31, 35, 37, 38, 42, 44-47,
49, 52, 55a, 55b, 57, 6z, 65, 66, 68, 71, 75, 81, 82, 85, 91, loi,
104, 109, 119, 138, 141, 142, 150, 151, 153, 162, 182, 187,
195, 196, 200, 201, 209, 215, 218, 223, 224, 129
8, 2.1, 25, 34, 36, 41, 43, 54, 58, 60, 69, 73, 92, 95, 97, no
Color Plates:
Supplementary Photographs:
8,15,18,20,22,28
250
Exhibition 73/5
151