Institutional Arrangement: A Challenge in The Philippine Transport System
Institutional Arrangement: A Challenge in The Philippine Transport System
It is undeniable that transport is a not a simple system but rather a complex one. It is
mainly composed of the infrastructure itself, logistics and most importantly, the information
system that manages and leads the actual movement of vehicles. Moreover, this transport
system has an international dimension. This means that transportation system varies from
country to country. Transportation system of the Philippines might be the same or different to
that of other countries. Ultimately, countries also diverge in their ways and strategies in
dealing with transport problems. These diversities are related to different factors including
the differences in institutional arrangements.
Many studies suggest that it is very important to have a consistent transport policy,
plans, and programs and there must be coordination of action among the people involves in
such planning. In this regard, institutional arrangement plays an important role in addressing
this concern. In the absence of an institutional mechanism, typically transport development
decisions, planning and policy formulation, and coordination of actions between responsible
agencies are undertaken within a setting which is deficient to address the consistency of
policies.
In the context of the Philippine Transport system, it can be seen that our system is
continuously facing challenges and problems throughout the years. One great support to this
claim is the country’s ranking in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness
JEFREY A. DE LEON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
BSCE V-A ACTIVITY 1
Report 2012–2013. The Philippines was ranked 87th of the 144 countries surveyed for
quality of roads, 94th for railroads, 112th for airports, and 120 th for port infrastructure.
Because of this poor performance in the transport sector, it becomes a perception that the
Philippines is not a good investment location due to the loss of economic opportunities,
increased pollution, and decreased productivity caused by poor transport infrastructure.
This massive challenge in our transport sector is primarily caused by weak sector
governance and institutional capacity. Based on reports and studies, the capacity of
transport agencies in the Philippines to undertake procurement, financial management,
internal audit, and quality control continues to be weak. In fact, although the DPWH received
a substantial increase in its budget in 2007, it only managed to disburse 66% of its available
budget, despite extensive demands on that budget in terms of proposed capital and
recurrent expenditures. This was due to deficiencies in financial management and
procurement procedures.
A survey of more than 2,800 DPWH projects in 2006 showed that 353 (12.5%) had
major defects. While steps have been taken to improve project supervision, the overall
quality of projects is still poor. In addition, as reported by Bantay Lansangan, a road
stakeholder partnership, there is a common perception that procurement procedures in the
DPWH suffer from a lack of transparency and widespread corruption.
and nontransparent, which can undermine the integrity of the design, procurement, and
implementation processes. This is evident here in the province and in the country as a
whole. The distortion of the functional classification system for roads, through the
redesignation of local roads as national roads to enable the DPWH to take over
responsibility for maintenance, is largely a consequence of this.
With the above mentioned information, it can be said that the challenge that our
transport system is facing here in the Philippines, is already in its severe state. It is therefore
a must that this challenge is addressed by the government through our transport sector
agencies.
REFERENCES
UN Statistics Wiki. (2017, February 24). Retrieved February 26, 2021, from
https://unstats.un.org/wiki/display/M2CG/B.+
+Purpose+and+types+of+institutional+arrangements
Reitveld, P., & Stough, R. (2006). Institutions, Regulations and Sustainable Transport, a
Review.