Network Topology MCQs and Answers
Uploaded by
Little princeNetwork Topology MCQs and Answers
Uploaded by
Little princeCommon questions
Powered by AITime Division Multiplexing (TDM) enables the allocation of the entire channel bandwidth to individual signals for very brief, alternating time slots. This temporal separation implies that each channel can utilize the maximum available bandwidth during its assigned time slot. While efficient in use, it necessitates precise synchronization to ensure that each signal occupies its designated slot without overlap. Missteps in timing can lead to data loss or collision, demanding robust synchronization mechanisms and buffering strategies .
Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) operates by allocating each signal a unique frequency bandwidth within the main communication channel. By shifting each signal to a different carrier frequency, FDM allows multiple signals to be transmitted simultaneously without interference. This technique is effective when the channel bandwidth is greater than the total bandwidth of all combined signals, allowing separate signals to retain their integrity as they are isolated from each other within distinct frequency bands .
Centralization in a star topology simplifies network management and troubleshooting, as all data flows through the hub, providing a singular point for monitoring and control. Problems such as node failure can be easily isolated without affecting the rest of the network, since the issue typically involves only the hub-interface or specific node. Conversely, hub failures can have widespread impact, requiring robust preventive maintenance and options for redundancy to mitigate central point failure risks .
Bus topology has the advantage of being simple to implement and cost-effective since it requires less cable compared to other topologies. It works well for small networks and can be easily expanded. However, its disadvantages include being prone to collisions since all nodes share a common channel, which can significantly degrade network performance as traffic increases. Also, a fault or break in the central cable can disrupt the entire network, highlighting its lack of robustness .
Physical topologies influence network speed and reliability; for instance, a mesh topology enhances resilience via multiple routes but may add complexity and cost. Meanwhile, logical topologies allow more flexible data flow arrangements independent of physical connections, like implementing a star logical model over a bus physical layout for centralized traffic control. The choice involves trade-offs: a more complex physical design can enhance reliability and capacity, while simpler logical models may compromise potential efficiency for improved organizational control .
The choice between a LAN and a MAN depends on the geographic scope and bandwidth needs. A LAN is appropriate for a limited physical area like a single building, offering high throughput and low latency at lower cost. A MAN, extending across a city or campus, suits larger enterprises needing interconnected facilities. It balances expansive reach with moderate cost, still retaining higher performance than WANs. Considerations include installation cost, scale of the network, maintenance overhead, and potential for future expansion .
The physical arrangement of a network refers to the actual layout of cables and devices, while the logical arrangement pertains to the way data flows within the network, independent of its physical design. For example, in a bus topology, the physical arrangement consists of a single cable with nodes attached in a linear manner, but logically, it might operate like a star topology, where signaling is managed centrally despite devices being connected in a line. Another example is a mesh topology, which can physically connect each node with many others or logically route data through a singular node path .
A Wide Area Network (WAN) would be preferred over a Local Area Network (LAN) for applications requiring connectivity over large geographic distances, such as interconnecting offices in different cities or countries. WANs facilitate resource sharing and communication across expansive areas, crucial for global businesses. However, WANs entail higher costs, complexities in infrastructure such as leased lines or satellite links, and possibly greater latency compared to LANs, which are confined to smaller areas and offer lower latency and costs .
In a star topology, a central controller or hub is responsible for connecting all nodes in the network. Every data transmission or reception must pass through this hub, which acts as a repeater or signal dispatcher. The hub thus manages data traffic and routes information to the correct destination. This centralization can lead to efficiency in data handling but also means that the hub is a single point of failure; if it fails, the entire network becomes inoperable .
Network topology significantly affects data integrity and security. For instance, in a mesh topology, multiple data paths improve redundancy and reliability, making data interception harder. In contrast, a bus topology is vulnerable to collisions affecting data integrity since all nodes share a single communication line. Security is also a concern in star topologies; while centralized hubs simplify monitoring, they can become targets for attacks, potentially compromising the entire network's integrity if breached .
