Scribd
Upload
37 views5 pages

Mid-Term Evaluation Form-LAURA BERNAL

Laura Bernal is completing a mid-term evaluation for her internship at MAPP/OEA Colombia. She is rated as meeting or exceeding expectations for her objectives and skills. Her supervisor notes she has been attentive to assigned tasks but her health issues have impacted her capacity. The supervisor recommends strengthening attention to detail. Laura agrees the feedback will help her improve.

Uploaded by

Laura Sofía Bernal Bonilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views5 pages

Mid-Term Evaluation Form-LAURA BERNAL

Laura Bernal is completing a mid-term evaluation for her internship at MAPP/OEA Colombia. She is rated as meeting or exceeding expectations for her objectives and skills. Her supervisor notes she has been attentive to assigned tasks but her health issues have impacted her capacity. The supervisor recommends strengthening attention to detail. Laura agrees the feedback will help her improve.

Uploaded by

Laura Sofía Bernal Bonilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Page 1 of 4

OAS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM - MID TERM EVALUATION

DIRECTIONS: This form needs to be completed by the supervisor and intern and emailed to [email protected].

Name: LAURA BERNAL

Department / Country Office: MAPP/OEA Colombia

Supervisor: PIEDAD MORENO

PART 1 - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVES

In order to complete this form you have to consider the following assessment criteria:

1 Unsatisfactory= Does not fulfill performance expectations


2 Below Expectations= Partly fulfills performance expectations
3 Satisfactory= Completely fulfills performance expectations
4 Exceeds Expectations= Frequently exceeds performance expectations
5 Outstanding= Constantly exceeds performance expectations

Objectives for evaluation: Objectives established at the beginning of the Internship

1 Diligenciamiento y actualización de matrices de apoyo del área de gestión 1 2 3 4 5


del conocimiento: registro de hallazgos y recomendaciones informes
semestrales, referencias de tercer a la MAPP y comentarios de entidades de
X
Gobierno.

2 Generar un documento de análisis frente al estado de información 1 2 3 4 5


registrada en las matrices de apoyo del área de gestión del conocimiento:
matriz de citas de terceros y matriz de referencias MAPP/OEA
X

3 Apoyo a las actividades de gestión documental y memoria institucional que 1 2 3 4 5


desarrolla el área de Gestión del Conocimiento.
X

4 1 2 3 4 5

5 1 2 3 4 5
Page 2 of 4

PART 2 - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

In order to complete this part form you must consider the following assessment criteria:
1 Unsatisfactory= does not fulfill performance expectations
2 Below Expectations= partly fulfills performance expectations
3 Satisfactory= completely fulfills performance expectations
4 Exceeds Expectations= frequently exceeds performance expectations
5 Outstanding= constantly exceeds performance expectations
On the following page is a brief description of the rating standards.

PROFESSIONAL SKILLS 1 2 3 4 5
Customer orientation X
Sharing knowledge and learning X
Work in teams X
Leadership X
Quality of work X
Responsibility X
Communication skills X
Learning abilities X
PERSONAL SKILS 1 2 3 4 5
Personal presentation X
Relationships with others X
Reliability X
Attendance X
Punctuality X
GENERAL EVALUATION OF INTERN X

Supervisor’s comments on the intern’s performance and recommendations:


Laura ha estado atenta a todas las tareas que le asignamos dentro del área y ha cumplido con las
mismas. Sin embargo, somos conscientes de que su nivel de trabajo no ha podido estar en toda su
capacidad debido a situaciones personales de salud. Haciendo esta salvedad, reiteramos que estamos
satisfechos con el desempeño que ha podido generar, así como el apoyo en las tareas.
Es importante que en el cumplimiento del periodo restante se fortalezca la atención al detalle en los
productos que entrega.
Interns´s comments on the feedback provided:
El equipo de trabajo ha sido bastante comprensivo y claro conmigo, he recibido el correcto
acompañamiento y retroalimentación de las labores realizadas, así que siento el apoyo que me
permite fortalecer mi trabajo y mejorar en cada una de las actividades, a pesar de las condiciones
que ha presentado mi salud. Estoy segura de que los elementos mencionados me ayudaran a
fortalecer y mejorar mi atención al detalle en los productos que son entregados para así generar un
resultado de calidad.
Page 3 of 4

Please send this Form to [email protected] and copy your supervisor.


Page 3 of 4

UNDERSTANDING THE RATING STANDARDS

5. Outstanding ("5")
The intern consistently exceeds performance expectations in the achievement of the objectives for
the evaluation cycle.

In order to rate the performance as Oustanding ("5") it is important to note that this rating is to be
used only in very exceptional cases and should be given very selectively, to only the highest
performers, the Staff Member must demonstrate:

1. Performance that is consistently and significantly above expectations


2. Has consistently demonstrated an exceptional quality of work
3. Repeatedly complete his/her assignments before time
4. The final product is of excellent quality or shows extraordinary initiative or volunteers for
other tasks.

4. Superior ("4")
The intern frequently exceeds performance expectations in the achievement of the objectives for the
evaluation cycle.

The ratings of superior("4") should be applied in all those cases when the Direct Supervisor feels that
neither of the "cornerstone" ratings, "3" or "5", adequately reflects/describes the Staff Member’s
performance.

Superior rating ("4") should be assigned in all those cases where performance in some waysor aspects
exceeds the expectations associated with the rating of Satisfactory ("3"), but does not fully meet the
criteria to be rated as Outstanding ("5").

3. Satisfactory ("3")
The intern fully meets performance expectations in the achievement of the objectives for the
evaluation cycle.

This is the rating that is to be given to all those Staff Members who:
5. Fully and satisfactorily perform his/her duties
6. Complete assignments within the timeframes,
7. Consistently deliver a good quality product, and do his/her job well.
8. Intern meets timeliness requirements or delivers quality and quantity of work
9. Makes sufficient or significant contributions

2. Somewhat Below Expectations ("2")


The intern partially meets performance expectations in his/her work toward achieving the objectives
for the evaluation cycle;
Page 4 of 4

The ratings "Somewhat Below Expectations ("2") should be applied in all those cases when the
supervisor feels that neither of the "cornerstone" ratings, "1" or "3" adequately reflects/describes
the Staff Member's performance.

This rating should be applied in all those cases, where:


1. The staff performance is lacking in some aspects
2. Did not fully meet the expectations.
3. The "shortcomings" are not significant enough to deserve the rating unsatisfactory

1. Unsatisfactory ("1")
The intern does not meet performance expectations in the achievement of the objectives for the
evaluation cycle;

This rating would reflect a performance marked by:


1. Failing to meet timeliness requirements
2. Inadequate quality and quantity of work
3. Low or poor work impact standards;
4. Disregarding assignments
5. Requiring constant and repetitive supervision
6. Avoiding team projects and making insufficient or insignificant contributions, as compared
to other team members.

You might also like