Scribd
Upload
202 views

Analysis of The Monitoring/Evaluation Results

This document contains a quality assurance monitoring and evaluation form used to analyze training programs conducted by the National Educators Academy of the Philippines. It collects data on (1) session and facilitator evaluations, (2) daily operations, and (3) overall program evaluation. For each component, monitors identify strong points and areas for improvement, as well as critical incidents. The analysis is used to provide feedback to program management for immediate action or long-term improvements.

Uploaded by

Acire Nonac
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
202 views

Analysis of The Monitoring/Evaluation Results

This document contains a quality assurance monitoring and evaluation form used to analyze training programs conducted by the National Educators Academy of the Philippines. It collects data on (1) session and facilitator evaluations, (2) daily operations, and (3) overall program evaluation. For each component, monitors identify strong points and areas for improvement, as well as critical incidents. The analysis is used to provide feedback to program management for immediate action or long-term improvements.

Uploaded by

Acire Nonac
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES


2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City

ANNEX D
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 1
ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)

Title of the Training Program: _____________________________________________ Inclusive Dates:_________________________


Learning Service Provider (Division/TEI):_______________________________ Class Section: __________________________
Venue: _____________________________________ Proponent: ________________________________
NAME OF MONITOR: ________________________________ Date Monitored: ___________________________
Mobile number of Monitor: _____________________________

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation


Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site
monitors, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended Steps
(This may be done Improvement have contributed to Address the
through a Focus- to the areas for Issue/s. (Indicate
Group Discussion) improvement whether action can be
(This may be done immediate or long-
through a Focus- term)
Group Discussion)
Session1:_________________
Average Session Rating:
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
Facilitator :
___________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session2:_________________
Average Session Rating:

Facilitator :
___________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session3:_________________
Average Session Rating:

Facilitator :
___________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session4:_________________
Average Session Rating:

Facilitator
_____________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address
Standard/s the Deviation

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management


Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1

4
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
5

AVERAGE RATING
FOR OPERATIONS

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the
Standard/s Deviation

IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )


Identify Class Section/s Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
and batches Management of Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:


SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

FURTHER LEARNING

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

Submitted by: ____________________________________________ Copy Given to: On-Site QAME Team Leader
M & E Coordinator/On-site Monitor

Noted by:_________________________________________________
Program Manager

You might also like