0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views42 pages

Perencanaan Tata Letak Fasilitas 090421

The document discusses different types of manufacturing layouts including process, product, and cellular layouts. It provides examples and comparisons of process and product layouts. It also covers how to design process, product, and cellular layouts including block diagramming, relationship diagramming, line balancing, and grouping parts into machine cells.

Uploaded by

Leonard Antonius
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views42 pages

Perencanaan Tata Letak Fasilitas 090421

The document discusses different types of manufacturing layouts including process, product, and cellular layouts. It provides examples and comparisons of process and product layouts. It also covers how to design process, product, and cellular layouts including block diagramming, relationship diagramming, line balancing, and grouping parts into machine cells.

Uploaded by

Leonard Antonius
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Designing

Layouts
Designing
Layouts
OUTLINE

Designing Process Layouts

Designing Product Layouts

Designing GT (Cellular) Layouts


Manufacturing Process Layout
Milling
Lathe Department Department Drilling Department
L L M M D D D D

L L M M D D D D

L L G G G P

L L G G G P

Grinding Painting Department


L L Department

Receiving and A A A
Shipping Assembly
A Product Layout
IN

OUT
Comparison PRODUCT LAYOUT PROCESS LAYOUT
1. Description Sequential arrangement Functional
Of Product grouping

And Process of machines of machines

Layouts 2. Type of Process Continuous, mass Intermittent, job shop


production, mainly batch production,
assembly mainly fabrication
3. Product Standardized Varied,
made to stock made to order
4. Demand Stable Fluctuating
5. Volume High Low
6. Equipment Special purpose General purpose
7. Workers Limited skills Varied skills
PRODUCT LAYOUT PROCESS LAYOUT

8. Inventory Low in-process, High in-process,

Comparison high finished goods low finished goods

Of Product 9. Storage space

10. Material
Small

Fixed path
Large

Variable path
And Process handling (conveyor)

Layouts 11. Aisles


(forklift)

Narrow Wide

12. Scheduling Part of balancing Dynamic

13. Layout decision Line balancing Machine location

14. Goal Equalize work at Minimize material

each station handling cost

15. Advantage Efficiency Flexibility


Designing Process Layouts
Objective: Minimize Total material handling costs

minimize nonadjacent loads


Block Diagramming use when quantitative data is available

based on location preference between areas


Relationship Diagramming use when quantitative data is not available
Create Create load summary chart

Block
Diagramming
Calculate Calculate
movements
composite (two way)

Develop Develop trial layouts minimizing


number of nonadjacent loads
Block Diagramming Example
LOAD SUMMARY CHART
DEPARTMENT
DEPT. 1 2 3 4 5
1 100 50
2 200 50
3 60 40 50
4 100
5 50 60
Initial & Final Designs
Block Diagrams
Used when quantitative data
Relationship is not available
Diagramming
Muther’s grid displays
preferences

Denote location preferences


with weighted lines
Ranking A - absolutely necessary
System For E - especially important
Departments
I - important

O - okay

U - unimportant

X - undesirable
Relationship Diagramming
Example
Production
O
Offices A
U I
Stockroom O E
A X A
Shipping and Receiving U U
U O
Locker Room O
O
Toolroom
Original Layout
Revised Layout
Product layouts or assembly lines
Designing
Product Develop precedence diagram of tasks
Layouts
Jobs divided into work elements

Assign work elements to workstations

Try to balance the amount work of each


workstation
Precedence diagram

•network showing required


Line Balancing order of tasks

Cycle time

•maximum time product


spends at any one
workstation
Flow Time vs Cycle Time
Flow time = time to complete all stations

Cycle time = max time spent at any station

1 2 3 Flow time = 4 + 5 + 4 = 13
Cycle time = max (4, 5, 4) = 5
4 min 5 min 4 min
Drawing A Precedence Example
Work element Precedence time

A. Press out sheet of fruit - 0.1

B. Cut into strips A 0.2

C. Outline fun shapes A 0.4

D. Roll up and package B, C 0.3

B 0.2
0.1 A D 0.3
C
0.4
Computing Cycle Time
C = maximum time product spends at station
production time available
C=
desired units of output

Produce 6,000 units per 40 hour week

40 hours x 60 minutes / hour 2,400


C= = = 0.4 minutes
6,000 units 6,000
Balancing The Line
Workstation Task Time (remaining) Feasible tasks
1 A 0.1 (0.3) B
B 0.2 (0.1) none
2 C 0.4 (0.0) none
3 D 0.3 (0.1)
1 2 3
A, B C D

0.3 min 0.4 min 0.3 min


Calculating Efficiency
j j

t i t i
Theoretical min # stations = i =1
Efficiency = i =1
C nC
0.1+ 0.2 + 0.3 + 0.4 0.1+ 0.2 + 0.3 + 0.4
= = 2.5 = = 83.3%
0.4 3(0.4)
Solution Trial and error method of
Methods line balancing

Computerized line
balancing
U-shaped Line Improves
Efficiency
Hybrid Layouts
Cellular layouts

Flexible Manufacturing Systems

Mixed Model Assembly Lines


Cellular Layouts
Identify families of parts with similar flow paths

Group machines into cells based on part families

Identifying dominant flow patterns of parts families as a basis for location or


relocation of processes.
Arrange cells so parts movement is minimized

Locate large shared machines at point of use


A GT Cell
Machine 2

Machine 3
Machine 1

Materials in

Finished
goods out

Machine 4
Machine 5
Group Technology Layout
Product layouts with low-volume processes.

Creates cells not limited to just one worker and groups parts or products
with similar characteristics into families and sets aside groups of machines
for production.

Goal is to minimize setup or changeovers for similar processing


requirements
Original Process Layout
Assembly

4 6 7 9

5 8

2 10 12

1 3 11

A B C Raw materials
Part Routing Matrix
MACHINES

PARTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A x x x x x

B x x x

C x x x

D x x x x x

E x x x

F x x x

G x x x x

H x x x
Part Routing Matrix
Reordered To Highlight Cells
MACHINES
PARTS 1 2 4 8 10 3 6 9 5 7 11 12
A x x x x x
D x x x x x
F x x x
C x x x
G x x x x
B x x x
H x x x
E x x x
Cellular Layout Solution
Assembly

8 10 9 12

11
4 Cell1 6 Cell 3
Cell 2
7

2 1 3 5

Raw materials A C B
Reduced material handling and transit time

Advantages Of Reduced setup time


Cellular
Layouts Reduced work-in-process inventory

Better use of human resources

Improved operator expertise

Easier to control

Easier to automate
Disadvantages Of Cellular
Layouts
Inadequate part families

Poorly balanced cells

Expanded training and scheduling of workers

Increased capital investment


Flexible Manufacturing Systems

Automated machining Automated material Automated tool


operations handling changers

Designed around size


Can process wide
Computer controlled of parts processed &
variety of items
system average processing
quickly
time for parts
FMS Layouts
Open Field FMS Layout
Mixed Model Assembly Lines
Produce multiple models in any order on one
assembly line

Issues in mixed model lines

•line balancing
•U-shaped line
•flexible workforce
•model sequencing
Your best quote that reflects your
approach… “It’s one small step for
man, one giant leap for mankind.”

- NEIL ARMSTRONG

You might also like