The Lithuanian Economy, No.2, 9 March 2011
The Lithuanian Economy, No.2, 9 March 2011
Economic sentiment recovery is noticeable, Economic sentiment indicator, Jan 2007 - Feb 2011
(Component weights in parentheses)
albeit very uneven
50
The economic sentiment indicator bottomed out in
April of 2009 at -39 points. This was the lowest 30
value since Statistics Lithuania started keeping 10
records in 2002. All components of this indicator
were well into the negative area, with construction, -10
Economic Research Department. Swedbank AB. SE-105 34 Stockholm. Phone +46-8-5859 1000
E-mail: [email protected] www.swedbank.com
Legally responsible publisher: Cecilia Hermansson, +46-8-5859 7720
Nerijus Mačiulis + 370 5 258 2237. Lina Vrubliauskienė +370 5 258 2275.
The Lithuanian Economy
news in the media and the ongoing upheavals in Industrial confidence indicator, Jan 2008 – Feb 2011
the political arena are partly responsible for this 30
low-confidence phenomenon.
20
Construction confidence will lag behind the 10
rest 0
Not surprisingly, the overinflated construction sector -10
has suffered the hardest hit – at its lowest point, the
-20
construction confidence indicator read -84, which
could be described as “can’t get worse.” -30
-40
Construction confidence indicator, Jan 2008 – Feb 2011
-50
60 2008 2009 2010 2011
Industrial conf idence Assesment of stocks
40
Production expectations Selling price expectations
Export expectations Employ ment expectations
20
Source: Statistics Lithuania
0
2 (4)
The Lithuanian Economy
Services confidence indicator, Jan 2008 – Feb 2011 been over. However, sales in the last month of
70 2010 were disappointing (albeit increasing) and
caused a quick relapse of confidence in January.
50
Apparently, high expectations caused retailers to
30 overstock – the assessment of the current inventory
level spiked in January, whereas expectations of
10
orders in the next two-three months have dropped
-10
at a pace seen only during the height of the crisis.
Expectations recovered slightly in February, and the
-30 outlook for employment in the trade sector is still
positive. However, the biggest positive influence on
-50 confidence, as in industry, is the high expectation of
2008 2009 2010 2011
price increases.
Serv ices conf idence Assesment of situation
Demand expectations
Price expectations
Emply ment expectations Consumer confidence needs positive
Source: Statistics Lithuania impetus
The consumer confidence indicator has been
Unlike in the industry, construction, and retail negative for more than three years now and, until
sectors, service providers do not expect rapid price the beginning of 2010, was below the -40 mark. It
increases. Expectations for demand and has improved since, but stabilised at around -25 at
employment also entered the positive area in the the end of the summer and has stayed there since.
first two months of 2011.
Consumer confidence indicator, Jan 2008 – Feb 2011
Retail trade confidence is unexpectedly
100
volatile
80
Retailers’ expectations correctly signalled the first
60
signs of a pickup in domestic demand – in June,
confidence become positive after almost two years 40
-60
60
2008 2009 2010 2011
40 Consumer conf idence Household f inancial situation
Price f orecasts Major purchases f orecast
20 Probability of sav ings Unemploy ment expectations
Source: Statistics Lithuania
0
-20
Lithuanian consumers still have few reasons to be
-40
cheerful. Unemployment is high and to a great
-60 extent it’s structural – even as business creates
-80
new working places, the unskilled or those having
2008 2009 2010 2011
outdated and irrelevant competences find little
Retail trade conf idence Orders expectations
comfort in this development. The increase in
Inv entory lev el Business activ ity expec. average wages will be slow and probably not
Employ ment expectations Price expectations enough to offset increasing prices. Thus, the
Source: Statistics Lithuania purchasing power of the average household is
falling. Add to this the unstable political
However, the confidence in the growth of environment, riddled with corruption scandals (both
household consumption might have been fake and real), threats of impeachments, and empty
prematurely strong. After a few months of positive promises, and you have a perfect breeding ground
annual increases in retail trade, retailers were for negative consumer confidence.
expecting exceptionally strong sales in the Nevertheless, in some aspects households are
December – pre-Christmas period, thinking that two starting to feel better – the assessment and forecast
years of savings and ascetic behaviour must have of households’ financial situation and general
3 (4)
The Lithuanian Economy
economic conditions are improving, and The government has few tangible instruments to
unemployment expectations are dropping rapidly. boost consumer confidence – public finances are
Consumer confidence is likely to be increasing this still strained, and there is no room to cut taxes or
year, but it would take a strong impetus to push it increase social benefits. However, a more positive
into the positive area. Amongst the strongest rhetoric and fewer pointless clashes between the
anchors of current expectations are rising consumer government and the opposition wouldn’t hurt.
prices (and future increases are well reflected in
At the end of the day, the linkage between the
inflation expectations). This affects mostly
economy and political climate is stronger than what
households of lower-than-average income, where
is often realized. Building household confidence by
almost half of the consumer basket consists of
focusing on growth oriented policies could make a
expenses on food and transport – two groups of
difference between a slow and a fast recovery in
products most affected by upheavals North Africa
Lithuania.
and the Middle East.
Nerijus Maciulis
Swedbank
Economic Research Department Swedbank’s monthly newsletter The Lithuanian Economy is published as a service to our
SE-105 34 Stockholm customers. We believe that we have used reliable sources and methods in the preparation
Phone +46-8-5859 1028 of the analyses reported in this publication. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or
[email protected] completeness of the report and cannot be held responsible for any error or omission in the
www.swedbank.com underlying material or its use. Readers are encouraged to base any (investment) decisions
on other material as well. Neither Swedbank nor its employees may be held responsible for
Legally responsible publisher
losses or damages, direct or indirect, owing to any errors or omissions in Swedbank’s
Cecilia Hermansson, +46-8-5859 7720.
monthly newsletter The Lithuanian Economy.
Nerijus Mačiulis, +370 5 2582237.
Lina Vrubliauskienė, +370 5 268 4275.
4 (4)