0% found this document useful (0 votes)
384 views2 pages

Oral Presentation Evaluation Criteria and Checklist

This document provides an evaluation criteria and checklist for oral presentations. It contains 7 criteria for evaluating oral presentations: organization, content, confidence, speech, visual aids, timing/mode of delivery, and discussion management. Each criterion contains several items to score on a scale of excellent to needs work. The checklist is used to provide structured feedback to presenters on their performance.

Uploaded by

Leizel Mundo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
384 views2 pages

Oral Presentation Evaluation Criteria and Checklist

This document provides an evaluation criteria and checklist for oral presentations. It contains 7 criteria for evaluating oral presentations: organization, content, confidence, speech, visual aids, timing/mode of delivery, and discussion management. Each criterion contains several items to score on a scale of excellent to needs work. The checklist is used to provide structured feedback to presenters on their performance.

Uploaded by

Leizel Mundo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST

Presenter’s Name                                Paper number                       Evaluator’s Name                               

Excellent Good Fair Needs Work


CRITERIA
(10) (8) (6) (4)

(1) ORGANISATION        
talk was well-prepared        
topic clearly stated        
structure & scope of talk clearly stated in introduction        
topic was developed in order stated in introduction        
speaker summed up main points in conclusion        
speaker formulated conclusions and discussed        
implications

(2) CONTENT        
Speaker:        
was in control of subject matter        
covered what s/he intended to cover        
displayed knowledge of topic by referring to other        
sources

(3) CONFIDENCE        
Speaker:        
looked relaxed and confident        
controlled nervous hand movements        
used appropriate body language        
established good eye contact initially        
maintained eye contact throughout talk        
was aware of the audience response        
 (4) SPEECH        
pace was varied and not too rushed

volume was appropriate        


intonation varied & appropriate        
  pronunciation and articulation were clear        
grammar accurate        
(5) VISUAL AIDS        
equipment handled with confidence        
introduced at appropriate times        
were legible        
did not contain too much information        
showed appropriate use of diagrams        
(6) TIMING/MODE OF DELIVERY        
talk was well-timed        
time was divided appropriately        
speaker spoke from notes        
speaker read text in spoken style        
(7) DISCUSSION MANAGEMENT        
Speaker used appropriate strategies to:        
   initiate discussion
       
   control flow of questions and focus of discussion
       
respond confidently        
GENERAL COMMENTS

You might also like