Should the Sex Education Be Taught in Elementary School?

An affirmative stand
Written by Joseph Baring III

Thinking about the topic Sex Education invokes up all of those uncomfortable,
awkward, and uneasy flashes and moments as an adolescent when we had to sit at our
own chairs and listen to our Mapeh subject teacher talk about the things that we used to
joked about with my friends, I was so very rowdy, and very sanguine back then when I
was in my high school. But we never wanted to have a conversation about with adult
topics or talking about adulting 101, but things have changed a lot. As per my vision or
my perspective, there has been an escalation or increase in the quantity or number of
LGBT students who have come out while in high school, or from time to time even in the
middle school. Disclaimer I have no issue about the LGBT, I just want something to
point out, moving on, we are encircled or surrounded by illustrations and imaginations
that motivate discussion and conversation about the sex education and other images
created by fashion that often so much skin that there is nothing left to the envision.

Sex education should not concentrate and focus exclusively on the ways in which
bodies shifts or change during puberty and teenage years, nor simply on how to prevent
and avert pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STI) through the use of safer
sex aids. These substance maters comprises but a small part of comprehensive sex
educations, which should begin before middle or high school. I think there are
many articles that could explain and expound further rationalize why and how giving and
providing the young ones with accurate, precise information. Effective and efficient
sexual education does not make a mystery and a crime novel, game, or fun out of in the
least part or portion of human being’s anatomy. It gives and provide the young ones the
language to tell and dispatch somebody if they are being abused and mistreated. It
educates and teaches them concerning self-worth and the rights of others. In addition, it
creates a generation that recognizes and comprehends the concepts or theories of
courteous sexual interaction, supporting the prospect of a safer world for us all.

On my own perception I believe that the sex education should be a gradual process.
What I mean is for example, in elementary school, we would be taught the
fundamentals, essential and basic of the natural science regarding on biology of men
and women. I Don't Know, we would even tackle about fundamentals of reproduction
and adoption. That was accomplished to help out and develop some important and vital
thinking skills. If I am not mistaken maybe this gets launched or introduce during in forth
(4) grade or fifth (5), then in during the sixth (6) and seventh (7) grade, the student’s
study and learned a bit further regarding those things in detail. And in the later part in
junior high school, they get the full range of sex education, including safe sex, different
types or forms of STD’s, etc. In senior high, students can choose and decide in to get
secondary or inferior credit for a further progress or advance version of sex education,
that speak about gender character or identity and sex, as well as a chronicle and history
lesson in it and exactly how several parts of the world view it.
I feel that too many people grow up not knowing what sex is about. In today’s
generation, day and age, considering the absolute amount of ignorance coinciding sex,
rape, gender and rudimentary biology for pregnancy, we must some form of formed
method or system in which to unmask and exposed this to young ones and youth.
Clearly, it’s not being taught at home in most families, and this in itself causes a
continuance of problems. According to (Bandura 1963) states that learning every single
thing from personal experience is hard and could be potentially dangerous. He claims
that much of a person’s life is rooted in social experiences, thus observing others is
naturally advantageous to gaining knowledge and skills. Even if it was taught in some
families, some parents are teaching non-factual things, driven and motivated by religion
or other traditional values that do more harm than good. Young ones are very observant
especially the adolescents are clearly observing about these topics, and they do not
even know what the real meaning of it is.
They would actually do it what they see and observed in porn sites. Learning is a
surprisingly complex process that is affected and inspired by a wide variety of factors.
As most parents are probably very much aware, observation can play a critical role in
determining how and what the young ones learned. As the saying goes, young ones are
very much like sponges, soaking up the experiences they have each and every day.
Bandura (1977) states: “Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention
hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them
what to do. This is primarily about parents who aren’t doing their jobs and only trying to
boost their own private agenda onto their kids. When in reality, they ought to be doing
more for their kids’ well-being, even if they themselves do not hold on to it. It just makes
the sphere or world a little bit better, providing young ones the correct tools and devices
against such things like unwanted pregnancies, that the pull-out method is stupid, how
STD’s can be achieved and attained, forms of safe sex and overall attitudes towards
women and rape. Let our young ones know the only facts that could make our world
better. This is my statement on letting the sex education be taught in school.